The UK Government has published Guidance Notes to help companies ensure they are in step with the new requirements ( the Guidance ).
|
|
- Adam Hall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com June 2011 Bribery Act 2010 The Bribery Act 2010 ( the Act ) comes into force on 1 st July While the Act concerns UK criminal offences for which prosecutions can only be brought in the UK, the Act has implications for international businesses and will impact the offshore world. Why has it been introduced? The UK has been criticised for a lack of effective anti corruption laws and the Act is the result. The Act provides a tough new anti corruption code. What does the Act do? The Act has three key features. First, it clarifies and places on a statutory footing the common law offences of bribery. Secondly, the Act introduces a number of novel corporate offences. Thirdly, it provides for long arm jurisdiction for offences committed abroad. It is this third, extra territorial, feature which makes the Act particularly relevant to the offshore world. The UK Government has published Guidance Notes to help companies ensure they are in step with the new requirements ( the Guidance ). Individual Bribery Offences There are three primary bribery offences for individuals: the offence of bribing another person ( Section 1 offence ); the offence of being bribed ( Section 2 offence ) and the offence of bribing a foreign public official ( Section 6 offence ). These place on a statutory footing the common law offences of bribery and can be considered a refinement of the current law.
2 A Section 1 offence is committed if a person offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another person intending to induce the improper performance of any business or governmental function. Improper performance means performance which is in breach of a relevant expectation, which expectation is determined according to what would be reasonably expected by UK standards. A Section 2 offence is the receipt of a bribe 1. A Section 6 offence is committed if a person offers, promises or gives any financial or other advantage to a foreign public official intending (1) to influence a public official and (2) to gain a business advantage. There is, however, no offence if the foreign official is required or permitted by written law to take the advantage on offer. Section 6 does not permit for exceptions such as facilitation payments 2, in contrast to the USA s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Corporate Offences A major innovation of the Act is the introduction of new corporate offences. At common law, in order to establish the commission of an offence by a company, prosecutors had to prove mens rea on the part of a high level employee/agent of the company what was often termed the controlling mind test. The Act makes prosecutions of companies far easier by introducing the new offence of failing to prevent bribery (the Section 7 offence ). A UK company, or a company doing business in the UK, commits a Section 7 offence if a person associated with it commits bribes or receives a bribe (anywhere in the world) intending to obtain an advantage for the company. A UK company, or a company doing business in the UK, will therefore be guilty of an offence if an act of bribery is committed by anyone associated with it whether or not the company asked that person to do so. The associated person does not need to be a controlling mind, nor an employee or agent. An associated person is anyone who performs services for or on behalf of the company a wide definition, which is not specifically delineated by the Act, or indeed the Guidance. The Guidance does provide some assistance by delineating who is not an associated person e.g., a subsidiary will not always be the associated person of its parent company (for example, if it merely remits dividends to its parent). It also explains that an organisation is only liable for the actions of its associated person if the bribe was intended (by such an associated person) to benefit the organisation directly. It 1 The Sections are exhibited in the schedule. 2 Payments made to facilitate routine governmental actions. Page 2 of 15
3 clarifies that a bribe paid by an employee of a subsidiary is normally intended to benefit the subsidiary and not the parent company, even though the parent may benefit indirectly. Thus a parent will not always be caught by bribes paid by or on behalf of a subsidiary. The Act offers a complete defence to Section 7 offence if the company can show that it had in place adequate anti bribery policies and procedures at the time. Sensible UK companies will therefore be putting in place such policies and procedures in time for the 1 July 2011 deadline. The Guidance provides a list of six governing principles, alongside case studies, for anti bribery policies and procedures and is required reading for all companies wishing to reduce their exposure to Section 7 prosecutions. Senior Officer Connivance A further innovation of the Act is the offence of connivance by a senior officer pursuant to Section 14. If a company commits any offence under Sections 1, 2 or 6, then a senior officer commits a separate offence if it is proved that (s)he consented to or connived in the company s actions, either actively or by his/her inaction to prevent bribery. This brings liability directly inside the board room. Importantly, there is no offence in conniving in or consenting to a failure by a company to prevent bribery by an associated person the company with which the senior officer is related must have actually bribed or been bribed. Penalties The penalties under the Bribery Act are up to ten years in jail (for individuals) and unlimited fines (for companies). In addition, the UK authorities have at their disposal the Proceeds of Crime Act which provides for additional fines and penalties calculated on the basis of the value of a contract which was obtained through bribery. The Bribery Act: Implications for offshore jurisdictions There has been a lot of press attention in the UK on the Bribery Act but little attention on its offshore implications. Page 3 of 15
4 Extra-Territorial Effect While UK criminal laws are generally domestic, the Bribery Act does not just apply to UK corporations and UK residents. The Act has broad extra territorial effect. There are two primary extra territorial features: (1) Connected persons can be prosecuted in the UK for offences committed anywhere in the world. (2) Companies which carry out part of their business in the UK can be prosecuted for Section 7 offences committed anywhere in the world. Personal liability Under the Act, an offence is committed if any act or omission forming part of the offence is committed in the UK, but Section 12 of the Act provides that an offence is also committed if a person does something abroad which would be an offence if committed in the UK and that person has a close connection with the UK. A close connection with the UK exists where a person (legal or natural) committing the acts, in the UK or in other jurisdictions, is domiciled or incorporated in the UK or is a UK citizen. This has implications for all British citizens, UK residents and for nationals of overseas territories such as Bermuda. Under the Act, Bermudians have close connections with the UK and, accordingly, can be prosecuted in the UK if they bribe, or accept bribes, anywhere in the world. The Act therefore impacts the offshore world. Many offshore centres are British overseas territories. The citizens or nationals of those overseas territories are caught by the Act. To give a concrete example, if a Bermudian director of an offshore company was himself/herself implicated in bribery, anywhere in the world for example by arranging payment of a bribe then the director could potentially be prosecuted. In practice, the Serious Fraud Office ( SFO ) and other UK prosecution authorities may not prioritise investigating or prosecuting minor cases of local bribery committed in overseas territories, leaving the policing and prosecution of these offences to local prosecutors and courts. The risks to the offshore world presented by the Act cannot, however, be dismissed. In jurisdictions where it is commonplace for offshore citizens to act as directors of Page 4 of 15
5 companies, there is a risk of prosecution in the UK if those offshore citizens carry out offences under the Bribery Act in the course of their directorships. An example may assist in terms of illustration. A Bermudian sits on the board of a construction company. The company is incorporated in Bermuda but its operations are in Azerbaijan, where corruption is endemic. The company needs to make a payment to secure a contract. The Bermudian arranges the payment to be made in Azerbaijan. The payment is a bribe. Under Bermuda law, since the payment was made in Azerbaijan, it is unlikely an offence has been committed in Bermuda. The Bermudian could, however, be prosecuted in the UK. Whether the Bermudian had the necessary knowledge, or mens rea, and should, for example, have known that the payment was a bribe will be a question for a UK jury. The Act may have another, more local, impact upon offshore centres. In cases involving alleged high level corruption in overseas territories, where local prosecutors are either unwilling or unable to act, the British authorities now have the power to prosecute or threaten prosecution. In summary, nationals of overseas territories and UK nationals who sit on the boards of offshore companies now have a direct interest under the Bribery Act in minimising the risks of those offshore companies engaging in bribery. Going forward, prudent directors of offshore companies will likely undertake additional due diligence when carrying out corporate acts. Corporate Liability Unless an offshore company commits a bribe, or receives a bribe, within the UK, or that company also carries on business in the UK, the offshore company does not itself have the required close connection. The UK authorities have no jurisdiction to prosecute under the core offences of Section 1, 2 and 6 of the Act where there is no close connection. Further, in terms of senior officer connivance, senior officers of offshore companies cannot be prosecuted for Section 14 offences unless their company commits an offence within the UK. Nevertheless, offshore companies do have exposure under the Act. This is because Section 7 applies to any company, wherever incorporated, which carries on business in the UK. The UK criminal courts, accordingly, have wide extra territorial jurisdiction over companies failures to prevent bribery. Any foreign company carrying on business or part of a business in the UK can be prosecuted for a failure to prevent bribery under Section 7. Page 5 of 15
6 Carrying on a business or part of a business has the potential for wide application. As a result, until the UK courts give guidance, foreign companies with any UK presence may wish to err on the side of caution and assume that they are caught within the ambit of the Act and, if any associated person pays a bribe, the company is liable to prosecution for failing to prevent it. The implications of Section 7 for offshore companies depend upon the relationship between the offshore company and the UK. It is helpful to consider such relationships under three broad headings: (1) Offshore companies with UK activities An offshore company, wherever located, which carries on operations in the UK (and these may be quite nominal in practice for example there is a debate as to whether a website pointed to the UK generating UK revenues would meet the criteria) should consider putting in place anti bribery procedures. Such a company can now be prosecuted under Section 7 if an associated person pays a bribe on its behalf anywhere in the world. Such companies may also want to consider altering their legal and operational structure to insulate the rest of the group from the UK operation. To minimise risk it may be advisable to incorporate a subsidiary and run UK operations through it, instead of using, say, a branch structure. (2) Offshore companies with subsidiaries in the UK Offshore holding companies which own UK operating companies may take comfort from the Guidance which stresses that having a UK subsidiary does not itself mean that the holding company will be itself carrying on business in the UK. However, they will need to keep in mind the following: (i) First, there may be additional factors to indicate that the holding company is carrying on business in the UK via its operating company. (ii) Secondly, the SFO appears to be sceptical that subsidiaries will demonstrate the necessary level of independence required for an affiliated company (e.g., the parent) to escape liability under the Act. Whether the SFO is right or wrong on this will ultimately be decided by the courts, but it does highlight that it will be critical to ensure that the UK operation is legally and operationally independent. Page 6 of 15
7 In many cases it may be prudent for the holding company, rather than perpetually scrutinising its relations with its UK subsidiary, to adopt anti bribery policies for itself. (3) Offshore companies with subsidiaries in the UK and subsidiaries in high risk territories Many offshore holding companies have subsidiaries in the UK and others in other jurisdictions, including high risk territories such as Azerbaijan or Russia. What would the position be if the Russian operating subsidiary committed a bribe? Could this be laid at the door of the offshore holding company under the Bribery Act? In most cases, the person paying the bribe in Russia will be doing so as part of providing a service to the Russian operating subsidiary and to benefit the Russian operating subsidiary. In the majority of cases, no service is being provided to the offshore holding company. In our view the holding company should, in most cases, be protected from prosecution under the Act by a properly set up group structure and using legally separate companies that are also operationally and financially independent 3. The offshore parent should, however, ensure that its group structure is set up to operate completely independently to successfully argue that the UK operation does not equate to the offshore company (or any of its affiliates) carrying on business in the UK. Introduction of anti bribery provisions is prudent precaution. The safest course will in most cases be for the holding company, at a minimum, to put in place an anti bribery policy (if only for itself) to minimise such risks. Some multi national companies will no doubt go further and put in place group wide anti bribery policies, despite the costs and difficulties of their implementation. The SFO have highlighted that they are interested in prosecuting overseas parent companies and testing the limits of the jurisdiction of the Bribery Act. The use of any structure to insulate a group from Bribery Act liability is at 3 There remains a US prosecution risk if the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is engaged. The US prosecutors, in the well publicised case of Mr Tesler, who pleaded guilty this year to paying bribes in Nigeria, did not appear interested about legal niceties of the corporate structure. Page 7 of 15
8 risk of being subjected to UK court scrutiny. Careful consideration will need to be given to it. Pending guidance from the UK courts, offshore holding companies with UK operating companies seeking to minimise risks under the Bribery Act should consider implementing protective measures such as: (1) Extending any anti bribery procedures to the holding company. (2) Ensuring that the holding company is run entirely independently from its operating subsidiaries. Ben Adamson Associate +1 (441) This article is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice or a legal opinion. It deals in broad terms only and is intended to merely provide a brief overview and give general information. About Conyers Dill & Pearman Conyers Dill & Pearman advises on the laws of Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Cyprus and Mauritius. Conyers lawyers specialise in company and commercial law, commercial litigation and private client matters. Conyers structure, culture and expertise enable responsive, timely and thorough service. Conyers provides clients with the highest quality legal advice from strategic global locations including offices in the world s leading financial centres in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America. Founded in 1928, Conyers comprises 600 staff including more than 150 lawyers. Affiliated companies (Codan) provide a range of trust, corporate secretarial, accounting and management services. For more information please contact: Naomi Little +1 (441) naomi.little@conyersdill.com Page 8 of 15
9 SCHEDULE Bribery Act 2010 Pertinent Sections 1 Offences of bribing another person (1) A person ( P ) is guilty of an offence if either of the following cases applies. (2) Case 1 is where (a) P offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another person, and (b) P intends the advantage (i) to induce a person to perform improperly a relevant function or activity, or (ii) to reward a person for the improper performance of such a function or activity. (3) Case 2 is where (a) P offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another person, and (b) P knows or believes that the acceptance of the advantage would itself constitute the improper performance of a relevant function or activity. (4) In case 1 it does not matter whether the person to whom the advantage is offered, promised or given is the same person as the person who is to perform, or has performed, the function or activity concerned. (5) In cases 1 and 2 it does not matter whether the advantage is offered, promised or given by P directly or through a third party. 2 Offences relating to being bribed (1) A person ( R ) is guilty of an offence if any of the following cases applies. (2) Case 3 is where R requests, agrees to receive or accepts a financial or other advantage intending that, in consequence, a relevant function or activity should be performed improperly (whether by R or another person). (3) Case 4 is where Page 9 of 15
10 (a) R requests, agrees to receive or accepts a financial or other advantage, and (b) the request, agreement or acceptance itself constitutes the improper performance by R of a relevant function or activity. (4) Case 5 is where R requests, agrees to receive or accepts a financial or other advantage as a reward for the improper performance (whether by R or another person) of a relevant function or activity. (5) Case 6 is where, in anticipation of or in consequence of R requesting, agreeing to receive or accepting a financial or other advantage, a relevant function or activity is performed improperly (a) by R, or (b) by another person at R s request or with R s assent or acquiescence. (6) In cases 3 to 6 it does not matter (a) whether R requests, agrees to receive or accepts (or is to request, agree to receive or accept) the advantage directly or through a third party, (b) whether the advantage is (or is to be) for the benefit of R or another person. (7) In cases 4 to 6 it does not matter whether R knows or believes that the performance of the function or activity is improper. (8) In case 6, where a person other than R is performing the function or activity, it also does not matter whether that person knows or believes that the performance of the function or activity is improper. 6 Bribery of foreign public officials (1) A person ( P ) who bribes a foreign public official ( F ) is guilty of an offence if P s intention is to influence F in F s capacity as a foreign public official. (2) P must also intend to obtain or retain (a) business, or (b) an advantage in the conduct of business. (3) P bribes F if, and only if Page 10 of 15
11 (a) directly or through a third party, P offers, promises or gives any financial or other advantage (i) to F, or (ii) to another person at F s request or with F s assent or acquiescence, and (b) F is neither permitted nor required by the written law applicable to F to be influenced in F s capacity as a foreign public official by the offer, promise or gift. (4) References in this section to influencing F in F s capacity as a foreign public official mean influencing F in the performance of F s functions as such an official, which includes (a) any omission to exercise those functions, and (b) any use of F s position as such an official, even if not within F s authority. (5) Foreign public official means an individual who (a) holds a legislative, administrative or judicial position of any kind, whether appointed or elected, of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom (or any subdivision of such a country or territory), (b) exercises a public function (i) for or on behalf of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom (or any subdivision of such a country or territory), or (ii) for any public agency or public enterprise of that country or territory (or subdivision), or (c) is an official or agent of a public international organisation. (6) Public international organisation means an organisation whose members are any of the following (a) countries or territories, (b) governments of countries or territories, (c) other public international organisations, (d) a mixture of any of the above. (7) For the purposes of subsection (3)(b), the written law applicable to F is (a) where the performance of the functions of F which P intends to influence would be subject to the law of any part of the United Kingdom, the law of that part of the United Kingdom, Page 11 of 15
12 (b) where paragraph (a) does not apply and F is an official or agent of a public international organisation, the applicable written rules of that organisation, (c) where paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply, the law of the country or territory in relation to which F is a foreign public official so far as that law is contained in (i) any written constitution, or provision made by or under legislation, applicable to the country or territory concerned, or (ii) any judicial decision which is so applicable and is evidenced in published written sources. (8) For the purposes of this section, a trade or profession is a business. 7 Failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery (1) A relevant commercial organisation ( C ) is guilty of an offence under this section if a person ( A ) associated with C bribes another person intending (a) to obtain or retain business for C, or (b) to obtain or retain an advantage in the conduct of business for C. (2) But it is a defence for C to prove that C had in place adequate procedures designed to prevent persons associated with C from undertaking such conduct. (3) For the purposes of this section, A bribes another person if, and only if, A (a) is, or would be, guilty of an offence under section 1 or 6 (whether or not A has been prosecuted for such an offence), or (b) would be guilty of such an offence if section 12(2)(c) and (4) were omitted. (4) See section 8 for the meaning of a person associated with C and see section 9 for a duty on the Secretary of State to publish guidance. (5) In this section partnership means (a) a partnership within the Partnership Act 1890, or (b) a limited partnership registered under the Limited Partnerships Act 1907, or a firm or entity of a similar character formed under the law of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom, relevant commercial organisation means Page 12 of 15
13 (a) a body which is incorporated under the law of any part of the United Kingdom and which carries on a business (whether there or elsewhere), (b) any other body corporate (wherever incorporated) which carries on a business, or part of a business, in any part of the United Kingdom, (c) a partnership which is formed under the law of any part of the United Kingdom and which carries on a business (whether there or elsewhere), or (d) any other partnership (wherever formed) which carries on a business, or part of a business, in any part of the United Kingdom, and, for the purposes of this section, a trade or profession is a business. 12 Offences under this Act: territorial application (1) An offence is committed under section 1, 2 or 6 in England and Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland if any act or omission which forms part of the offence takes place in that part of the United Kingdom. (2) Subsection (3) applies if (a) no act or omission which forms part of an offence under section 1, 2 or 6 takes place in the United Kingdom, (b) a person s acts or omissions done or made outside the United Kingdom would form part of such an offence if done or made in the United Kingdom, and (c) that person has a close connection with the United Kingdom. (3) In such a case (a) the acts or omissions form part of the offence referred to in subsection (2)(a), and (b) proceedings for the offence may be taken at any place in the United Kingdom. (4) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) a person has a close connection with the United Kingdom if, and only if, the person was one of the following at the time the acts or omissions concerned were done or made (a) a British citizen, (b) a British overseas territories citizen, (c) a British National (Overseas), (d) a British Overseas citizen, (e) a person who under the British Nationality Act 1981 was a British subject, Page 13 of 15
14 (f) a British protected person within the meaning of that Act, (g) an individual ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom, (h) a body incorporated under the law of any part of the United Kingdom, (i) a Scottish partnership. (5) An offence is committed under section 7 irrespective of whether the acts or omissions which form part of the offence take place in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. (6) Where no act or omission which forms part of an offence under section 7 takes place in the United Kingdom, proceedings for the offence may be taken at any place in the United Kingdom. (7) Subsection (8) applies if, by virtue of this section, proceedings for an offence are to be taken in Scotland against a person. (8) Such proceedings may be taken (a) in any sheriff court district in which the person is apprehended or in custody, or (b) in such sheriff court district as the Lord Advocate may determine. (9) In subsection (8) sheriff court district is to be read in accordance with section 307(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act Offences under sections 1, 2 and 6 by bodies corporate etc. (1) This section applies if an offence under section 1, 2 or 6 is committed by a body corporate or a Scottish partnership. (2) If the offence is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of (a) a senior officer of the body corporate or Scottish partnership, or (b) a person purporting to act in such a capacity, the senior officer or person (as well as the body corporate or partnership) is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. (3) But subsection (2) does not apply, in the case of an offence which is committed under section 1, 2 or 6 by virtue of section 12(2) to (4), to a senior officer Page 14 of 15
15 or person purporting to act in such a capacity unless the senior officer or person has a close connection with the United Kingdom (within the meaning given by section 12(4)). (4) In this section director, in relation to a body corporate whose affairs are managed by its members, means a member of the body corporate, senior officer means (a) in relation to a body corporate, a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body corporate, and (b) in relation to a Scottish partnership, a partner in the partnership. Page 15 of 15
A New Regulatory Regime in BVI: SIBA 2010
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com September 2010 A New Regulatory Regime in BVI: SIBA 2010 The Securities
More informationThe Bribery Act 2010:
The Bribery Act 2010: Overview Introduction The Bribery Act 2010 (the Act ) came into force on 1 July 2011. The main four offences under the Act are: 1. bribing another person (section 1); 2. being bribed
More informationBritish Virgin Islands Regulatory Update
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com June 2010 British Virgin Islands Regulatory Update Recent Regulatory Advances
More informationOverview on anti-corruption rules and regulations in the UNITED KINGDOM
Overview on anti-corruption rules and regulations in the UNITED KINGDOM Author: Chris Whalley I. What is the anti-corruption legal framework in your country (including brief overview on active / passive
More informationMauritius Foundations Act: Laying the foundation
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com July 2012 Mauritius Foundations Act: Laying the foundation The long-awaited
More informationTaking charge in Bermuda: some tips for cross border security arrangements
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com December 2010 Taking charge in Bermuda: some tips for cross border security
More informationGUIDANCE NOTE TO SCOTLAND S COLLEGES AND COLLEGE BOARDS OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BRIBERY ACT 2010
Guidance Note to Scotland s Colleges and College Boards of Management on The Bribery Act 2010 GUIDANCE NOTE TO SCOTLAND S COLLEGES AND COLLEGE BOARDS OF MANAGEMENT ON THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 1 Introduction
More informationThe Directors Registration and Licensing Law, 2014 now in force following publication of The Directors Registration
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS SINGAPORE conyersdill.com The Directors Registration and Licensing Law, 2014 now in force following publication of The Directors
More informationThe ripple effect: Offshore implications of the English Supreme Court decision in the Enviroco case
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com April 2011 The ripple effect: Offshore implications of the English Supreme
More informationThe Growing Popularity of Cayman Islands Trusts in the Middle East
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com March 2011 The Growing Popularity of Cayman Islands Trusts in the Middle
More informationConyers Dill & Pearman
BERMUDA SEGREGATED ACCOUNTS COMPANIES Conyers Dill & Pearman Barristers & Attorneys Clarendon House 2 Church Street PO Box HM 666 Hamilton HM 11 Bermuda email: bermuda@ Website: www. Bermuda British Virgin
More informationBRIBERY ACT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)
1. BACKGROUND BRIBERY ACT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) 1.1. What is the Bribery Act? Last updated on 19 April 2016 The Bribery Act 2010 is UK legislation that reforms the criminal law of bribery,
More informationA Trustee s top three part three
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com June 2011 A Trustee s top three part three In the first two parts of this
More informationPrivate Equity in Bermuda So Much More
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com August 2012 Private Equity in Bermuda So Much More Inspired by Bermudaʹs unofficial
More informationA Plethora of Case Law
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com May 2010 A Plethora of Case Law The offshore hedge fund industry has typically
More informationADVISORY White Collar
ADVISORY White Collar April 15, 2010 THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 - A BRAVE NEW WORLD FOR BUSINESS? Summary On 8 April 2010, the UK Bribery Bill received Royal Assent as the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act ). The Act,
More informationThe EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive the offshore angle
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com The EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive the offshore angle
More informationThe UK Bribery Act 2010: what you need to know. CMS Cameron McKenna
The UK Bribery Act 2010: what you need to know CMS Cameron McKenna May 2011 Contact us Omar Qureshi Partner, Dispute Resolution T +44 (0)20 7367 2573 E omar.qureshi@cms-cmck.com Joe Smith Senior Associate,
More informationBermuda: A Domicile of Choice for Shariah Compliant Structures Using Aircraft as an Asset Base
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com September 2010 Bermuda: A Domicile of Choice for Shariah Compliant Structures
More informationCase Study Overview and Analysis of the UK Bribery Act Professor Rob McCusker Transnational Crime Analyst
Case Study Overview and Analysis of the UK Bribery Act 2010 Professor Rob McCusker Transnational Crime Analyst Context UK signatory to Paris Convention of the OECD Under obligation to impose extra-territorial
More informationBermuda: Conversion of an exempted limited partnership with legal personality to an exempted company
Bermuda: Conversion of an exempted limited partnership with legal personality to an exempted company Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the conversion
More informationContinuing Requirements of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands
Continuing Requirements of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the operation of companies in the Cayman Islands
More informationConyers Dill & Pearman
CORPORATE RELOCATIONS: BERMUDA GROUP HOLDING COMPANIES Conyers Dill & Pearman Barristers & Attorneys Clarendon House 2 Church Street PO Box HM 666 Hamilton HM 11 Bermuda email: bermuda@ Website: www. Bermuda
More informationNEW UK CRIMINAL OFFENCES OF FAILURE TO PREVENT FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION
NEW UK CRIMINAL OFFENCES OF FAILURE TO PREVENT FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION 05 December 2016 London Legal Briefings In our October 2016 briefing, we reported on the publication of the Criminal Finances
More informationConyers Dill & Pearman
CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY OFFSHORE UPDATE 2009 Mark Forté, Partner & Head of Litigation, British Virgin Islands September 2009 Introduction At times such as these, we have seen the true nature of insolvencies
More informationConyers Dill & Pearman
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS INSURANCE COMPANIES Conyers Dill & Pearman Barristers & Attorneys Romasco Place, Wickhams Cay 1 PO Box 3140 Road Town, Tortola British Virgin Islands VG1110 email: bvi@ Website:
More informationThe new UK Bribery Act: why you need to be prepared
April 2011 The new UK Bribery Act: why you need to be prepared The UK government's new Bribery Act of 2010 will come into force on 1 July 2011 (the "Bribery Act"), and the Government on 30 March provided
More informationBritish Virgin Islands Business Companies
British Virgin Islands Business Companies Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of companies in the British Virgin Islands ( BVI ). It
More informationDoing business and the Bribery Act 2010
Doing business and the Bribery Act 2010 Elizabeth Higgs Ethics and Integrity Manager Bribery The UK History Anti-corruption Acts 1889 to 1916 Common law bribery offences UK ratified OECD Convention on
More informationBribery Act 2010: The Impact on U.K. Business
Bribery Act 2010: The Impact on U.K. Business 27 April 2010 The Bribery Act (the Act ) received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010. This legislation introduces a new offence that makes corporations operating
More informationJuly Administration
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com July 2012 The decision of the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal in ABC Limited
More informationAnti-Bribery Policy. Copyright Oceanscan All rights reserved 2012 Page 1 of 5
Anti-Bribery Policy Copyright Oceanscan All rights reserved 2012 Page 1 of 5 Contents Page Contents...2 1.0 Overview...3 2.0 Bribery What is the Law?...3 3.0 Enforcement...5 Copyright Oceanscan All rights
More informationSwiss American Chamber of Commerce The Bribery Act Zurich: 16 November 2011
Swiss American Chamber of Commerce The Bribery Act 2010 Zurich: 16 November 2011 Overview Part 1 In force 1 July 2011 (no implementation period) 4 new offences Bribing (section 1) Being bribed (section
More informationU.K. Bribery Act Implications for Companies Doing Business in the United Kingdom. Wednesday, 28 July 2010
U.K. Bribery Act Implications for Companies Doing Business in the United Kingdom Wednesday, 28 July 2010 Presenters Bob Hirth is the Executive Vice President and Global Managing Director of Internal Audit
More informationDirectors Registration and Licensing in the Cayman Islands
Directors Registration and Licensing in the Cayman Islands Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of proposed directors of Cayman Islands mutual funds and certain Cayman Islands
More informationCayman Islands Mergers and Consolidations
Cayman Islands Mergers and Consolidations Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering a merger or consolidation between Cayman Islands companies or between
More informationAnti-Bribery High Level Principles & Guidelines for Independent Producers
Anti-Bribery High Level Principles & Guidelines for Independent Producers Summary of Headings A. Introduction 1. Anti-Bribery Policy 2. Filming Programmes 3. Consequences 4. Reputation 5. Implementation,
More informationBermuda: Conversion of an exempted company to an exempted limited partnership
Bermuda: Conversion of an exempted company to an exempted limited partnership Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the conversion of a Bermuda exempted
More informationARNOLD PORTER (UK) LLP
Commitment Excellence Innovation ADVISORY MAY 2010 UK Bribery Act 2010: An In-depth Analysis INTRODUCTION The UK Bribery Act 2010 1 (Act) received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010. It has not yet come into
More informationECBA Conference - Antwerp
The Bribery Act 2010 ECBA Conference - Antwerp Neill Blundell Eversheds LLP 24 April 2010 Outline of Talk Timetable Key Offences Jurisdiction & Penalties Adequate procedures The Bribery Act - timetable
More informationUK Bribery Act 2010: Understanding and Meeting the Challenge. 13 October2010 Presented by Rose Parlane, Senior Associate, McGuireWoods London LLP
UK Bribery Act 2010: Understanding and Meeting the Challenge 13 October2010 Presented by Rose Parlane, Senior Associate, McGuireWoods London LLP Key Offences Offences of bribing another person (s.1) Offences
More informationThe UK s Bribery Act 2010 What Next?
slaughter and may article june 2011 With implementation of the Bribery Act 2010 on 1 July 2011 now imminent, Jonathan Cotton and Richard de Carle consider some of the remaining areas of uncertainty for
More informationCayman Islands Exempted Companies
Cayman Islands Exempted Companies Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of companies in the Cayman Islands ( Cayman ). It deals in broad
More informationBribery and Corruption
Bribery and Corruption The FCPA, UK Bribery Act, and Other Anti-Corruption Measures 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. Introduction The FCPA and the UK Bribery Act are the two premier
More informationThe UK Bribery Act 2010
The UK Bribery Act 2010 Jonathan Armstrong Duane Morris LLP Stockholm 15 May, 2012 2011 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris
More informationCorporate offences of failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion time to act!
27 February 2017 Corporate offences of failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion time to act! Summary Two new corporate criminal offences for failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
More informationThe Bribery Act 2010: what you need to know. CMS Cameron McKenna
The Bribery Act 2010: what you need to know CMS Cameron McKenna May 2010 Why was the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act ) created? The Act was created to replace the existing law (which still remains the law un
More informationMerger or Amalgamation of Companies into Bermuda
Merger or Amalgamation of Companies into Bermuda Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the merger or amalgamation of a foreign corporation with a Bermuda
More informationContinuing Requirements of the Companies Act of Bermuda
Continuing Requirements of the Companies Act of Bermuda Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the operation of companies in Bermuda. It deals in broad
More informationComparison of Laws in Bermuda, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands Relating to Offshore Companies
Comparison of Laws in Bermuda, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands Relating to Offshore Companies Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering
More informationThe Bribery Act A Brave New World for Business?
The Bribery Act 2010 - A Brave New World for Business? By John Rupp and Alexandra Melia (Covington & Burling LLP) Summary On April 8, 2010, the UK Bribery Bill received Royal Assent as the Bribery Act
More informationBermuda s Bribery Act 2016 What Your Organisation Should Be Doing to Comply
Bermuda s Bribery Act 2016 What Your Organisation Should Be Doing to Comply The Bermuda Government s new Bribery Act 2016 came into force on 1 September, 2017 (Bribery Act), drastically modernising Bermuda
More informationBritish Virgin Islands Segregated Portfolio Companies
British Virgin Islands Segregated Portfolio Companies Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of anyone who is considering establishing a segregated portfolio company in the British
More informationIntegrity. Bribery Act Procedures
Integrity Bribery Act Procedures The risk of criminal liability for your business The Bribery Act 2010 which comes into force on 1 July 2011 creates the most onerous anti-corruption regime in the world.
More informationProspectuses and Public Offers by Bermuda Companies
Prospectuses and Public Offers by Bermuda Companies Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the making of an offer by a Bermuda company of its shares
More informationObtaining Cypriot citizenship by investment
Citizenship by investment Cyprus Obtaining Cypriot citizenship by investment Cyprus offers one of the most attractive citizenship schemes with full rights as a European Citizen Cyprus is at the crossroads
More informationABF Anti-Bribery Policy
ABF Anti-Bribery Policy Introduction Associated British Foods plc (ABF) is committed to acting professionally, fairly and with integrity in all its business dealings. As part of its commitment to ethical
More informationTitle: Anti-Bribery Policy
Title: Anti-Bribery Policy Approved May 2012 Reviewed September 2016 1 1. Introduction The Bribery Act 2010 (the Act) introduces a new, clearer regime for tackling bribery that applies to all commercial
More informationData Protection Cayman Islands
Data Protection Cayman Islands Author: Martin S. Lane, Partner In June 2017, The Data Protection Law (the DP Law ) was published in the Cayman Islands Official Gazette. The DP Law will be brought into
More informationContinuance of Foreign Corporations in Bermuda
Continuance of Foreign Corporations in Bermuda Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the continuance of a foreign corporation into Bermuda as a Bermuda
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BATH Anti-Bribery Policy V2.1
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Policy The University of Bath is committed to ethical standards of business conduct, and adopts a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption in
More informationRegistration of Foreign Limited Partnerships in the Cayman Islands
Registration of Foreign Limited Partnerships in the Cayman Islands Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering registration of a foreign limited partnership
More informationANTI-BRIBERY POLICY AND ANTI-FRAUD POLICY AND RESPONSE PLAN
University for the Creative Arts Financial Regulations: Appendix K ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY AND ANTI-FRAUD POLICY AND RESPONSE PLAN INDEX 1. Introduction 2. Definitions 3. Culture 4. Responsibilities and Reporting
More informationABBOT GROUP LIMITED TO PAY 5.6 MILLION AFTER CORRUPTION REPORT
Nov. 23, 2012 Press Release Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Services Scotland (Retrieved from http://www.crownoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/2012/11/abbot-group- Limited-pay-%C2%A356-million-after-corruption-report)
More informationCorporate M&A APPLICATION OF THE UK BRIBERY ACT 2010 TO IRISH COMPANIES AND PARTNERSHIPS CARRYING ON BUSINESS IN THE UK
Corporate M&A APPLICATION OF THE UK BRIBERY ACT 2010 TO IRISH COMPANIES AND PARTNERSHIPS CARRYING ON BUSINESS IN THE UK Date: Wed 29 Jun 2011 APPLICATION OF THE UK BRIBERY ACT 2010 TO IRISH COMPANIES AND
More informationBermuda s National Pension Scheme
Bermuda s National Pension Scheme Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of anyone who is considering issues relating to pensions in Bermuda. It deals in broad terms with the requirements
More informationAnti-Money Laundering Measures in the British Virgin Islands
Anti-Money Laundering Measures in the British Virgin Islands Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the law of the British Virgin Islands ( BVI ) as
More informationBritish Virgin Islands Business Companies
British Virgin Islands Business Companies Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of companies in the British Virgin Islands ( BVI ). It
More informationFAILURE TO PREVENT THE FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION. Criminal Finances Act 2017 Simon Airey
FAILURE TO PREVENT THE FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION Criminal Finances Act 2017 Simon Airey OVERVIEW 2 the UK Criminal Finances Act 2017 introduces new criminal offences where a company fails to prevent
More informationAmalgamation of Bermuda Companies
Amalgamation of Bermuda Companies Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the amalgamation of Bermuda exempted companies. It deals in broad terms with
More informationMeeting the requirements of the UK Bribery Act A guide for South African companies
Meeting the requirements of the UK Bribery Act Background The Bribery Act in the United Kingdom (UK), commonly referred to as the UK Bribery Act (the Act), came into effect on 1 July 2011. Prior to this,
More informationThe Court s power to add powers to the terms of express trusts: two recent decisions of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com June 2010 The Court s power to add powers to the terms of express trusts:
More informationImpact of FATCA on Cayman Islands Entities
Impact of FATCA on Cayman Islands Entities This publication provides a brief overview of the expected impact on entities incorporated in the Cayman Islands of (a) the foreign account tax compliance provisions
More informationQuick Reference Guide to the Bribery Act Summery of the the Bribery Act 2010?
Local National International Quick Reference Guide to the Bribery Act 2010 Summery of the the Bribery Act 2010? This guide has been produced to address some of the most frequently asked questions raised
More informationContinuation of Companies into the British Virgin Islands
Continuation of Companies into the British Virgin Islands Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the continuation of companies into the British Virgin
More informationEstablishing Bermuda Residence
Establishing Bermuda Residence Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of anyone who is considering establishing residence in Bermuda. It deals in broad terms with the requirements
More informationSecurities Investment Business Law
Legal Guide Securities Investment Business Law The Securities Investment Business Law of the Cayman Islands (the SIB Law) regulates the conduct of certain securities investment activities, including dealing,
More informationCommissioners for Revenue and Customs Bill
Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Treasury, are published separately as HL Bill 21 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS The
More informationNew Corporate Offence for failing to prevent Tax Evasion: Are you prepared?
New Corporate Offence for failing to prevent Tax Evasion: Are you prepared? The UK Government s desire to extend further its reach in policing financial crime in the UK and beyond shows no sign of abating
More informationThe Cayman Islands and the Common Reporting Standard Issued by The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
The Cayman Islands and the Common Reporting Standard Issued by The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Preface This publication has been prepared to provide an overview of the common
More informationVoya Financial Anti-Corruption and Anti-Bribery Policy
Voya Financial Anti-Corruption and Anti-Bribery Policy Version 2.0 April 2014 Information Sheet ISSUED BY Voya Financial Compliance OWNED AND APPROVED BY Board of Voya Financial TARGET AUDIENCE All Voya
More informationUS, UK, EU: How does it all fit together?
US, UK, EU: How does it all fit together? NYSBA/Czech Bar Association Prague 9 th March, 2012 2011 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP.
More informationINSURANCE: Bermuda Issues Guidance Notes
INSURANCE: Bermuda Issues Guidance Notes David J. Doyle, Partner, July 2005 In 2003 the International Monetary Fund ("IMF") performed an in-depth on-site review of Bermuda's financial services legislation
More informationFATCA: Impact on Mauritius Entities
FATCA: Impact on Mauritius Entities Foreword This publication provides a brief overview of the expected impact on entities resident in the Republic of Mauritius ( Mauritius ) of the foreign account tax
More informationPrivate Equity in Bermuda The Bermuda Limited Partnership
Private Equity in Bermuda The Bermuda Limited Partnership Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of private equity vehicles in Bermuda.
More informationAnti-Bribery Policy. 1. Introduction and purpose
Anti-Bribery Policy 1. Introduction and purpose 8Safe UK Limited ("8Safe UK" or the Company ) is committed to adhering to the highest standards of business conduct; compliance with the law and regulatory
More informationKATOEN NATIE ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY
KATOEN NATIE ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY 1. PRINCIPLES 1.1 What do we mean by Ethical Business? As set out in our Corporate Sustainability policy, we are committed to high ethical standards and
More informationTaxation Convention Between Bermuda and the United States of America
Taxation Convention Between Bermuda and the United States of America Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who have established, or are considering the establishment of,
More informationBermuda and the Common Reporting Standard Issued by the Organisation for Economic Co- Operation and Development
Bermuda and the Common Reporting Standard Issued by the Organisation for Economic Co- Operation and Development Preface This publication has been prepared to provide an overview of the common reporting
More informationComparison of Bermuda, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and Mauritius Funds
Comparison of Bermuda, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and Mauritius Funds Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of a fund in an
More informationDuties of directors of Jersey companies
Duties of directors of Jersey companies Service area Corporate Location Jersey Date January 2013 This note summarises the duties of directors of Jersey companies, addresses directors indemnities, outlines
More informationThe British Virgin Islands and the Common Reporting Standard Issued by The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
The British Virgin Islands and the Common Reporting Standard Issued by The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Preface This publication has been prepared to provide an overview of the
More informationAnti-Bribery & Corruption Policy. OneMarket Limited ACN (Company)
Anti-Bribery & Corruption Policy OneMarket Limited ACN 623 247 549 (Company) Approved by the Board on 2 May 2018 Anti-Bribery & Corruption Policy Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Who does this
More informationBermuda Exempted and Limited Partnerships
Bermuda Exempted and Limited Partnerships Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of partnerships in Bermuda. It deals in broad terms with
More informationDe-Registration of Cayman Islands Companies being Continued in a Foreign Jurisdiction
De-Registration of Cayman Islands Companies being Continued in a Foreign Jurisdiction Preface This publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the process of de registering
More informationGifts and Hospitality Policy
Gifts and Hospitality Policy UNIQUE REFERENCE NUMBER: AC/XX/005/V1.2 DOCUMENT STATUS: Approved by Audit Committee 19 June 2013 DATE ISSUED: June 2013 DATE TO BE REVIEWED: July 2014 1 P age AMENDMENT HISTORY
More informationAbsolute Liability for a Failure to Prevent Foreign Bribery: Significant Change Ahead in Australia?
WHITE PAPER December 2017 Absolute Liability for a Failure to Prevent Foreign Bribery: Significant Change Ahead in Australia? Australia s Federal Government has tabled the Crimes Legislation Amendment
More informationPrivate Trust Companies: Comparison of Laws of Bermuda, Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands
Private Trust Companies: Comparison of Laws of Bermuda, Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands Preface This publication has been prepared to guide those professional advisors with clients who may be
More informationTudor Grange Academies Trust Financial Procedures Handbook Publication Date: June 2013 Version 01. Anti Bribery Policy. Page 1
Anti Bribery Policy Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document sets out the Tudor Grange Academy Trust s policy and advice to employees in dealing with bribery or suspected bribery. This policy details the
More informationAnti-Bribery and Corruption Policy
Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy Steadfast Group Limited ABN: 98 073 659 677 Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy 1 Contents Our commitment 2 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Summary of policy... 3 1.2 Who does this
More information