* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: 11 th November, % Judgment Pronounced on: November 29, 2010

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: 11 th November, % Judgment Pronounced on: November 29, 2010"

Transcription

1 * HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: 11 th November, 2010 % Judgment Pronounced on: November 29, LPA No. 726/2010 DR. MUNDHE KAILAS MAHARUDRA... Appellant Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar Gupta with Mr. Arvind S. Avhad, Advocates Versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS.... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes with Mr.Deepak Pathak, Advocates for Resp. 1 Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN 1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes DIPAK MISRA, CJ The present appeal is directed against the order dated 28 th September, 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP (C) No. 6436/ The facts which are requisite to be exposited are that the first respondent, namely, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (for short AIIMS ) while conducting admission for the post of Post-Graduate / Post Doctoral / MDS pursuant to entrance test held in May, 2010 did not consider the case of the appellant in the general category on the base and foundation that he belongs to OBC category. LPA No. 726/2010 Page 1 of 6

2 3. The learned Single Judge referred to his own order dated 19 th August, 2010 passed in WP (C) No. 4230/2010 (Dr. Jagveer Singh v. The Chairperson, Counselling Committee, Academic Section, AIIMS) and opined that the action taken by the AIIMS was unsustainable and issued directions to the said respondent to allow candidates belonging to the reserved category to compete in the general / unreserved category from the next academic session. 4. Be it noted, though the learned Single Judge came to hold that there was illegality in the process of admission and injustice had been caused to the petitioner, distinguished the decisions in Vijay Jaimni vs. Medical Council of India, (2005) 13 SCC 461, Harshali v. State of Maharashtra, (2005) 13 SCC 464 and Dr. Manish Patnecha v. Chairperson Counseling Committee AIIMS rendered on 10 th December, 2009 in LPA No. 622/2009 on the ground that in the first two decisions, the directions were given on consent and, therefore, were not precedents and as far as the decision in Dr. Manish Patnecha (supra) is concerned, he opined that it did not lay down any ratio. Eventually, the learned Single Judge expressed the view as follows: - The petitioner has also claimed damages from the respondents 1 & 2. Though the respondent no. 1 AIIMS is clearly found at fault, however considering its constitution and the work which it is doing in the field of medicine, I refrain from awarding any damages against it. However, it is made clear to the counsel for the respondent no.1 AIIMS that if respondent no.1 AIIMS continues to act in contravention of law, thereby depriving the meritorious LPA No. 726/2010 Page 2 of 6

3 candidates from admission, the Court in future may be compelled to award damages also against it. The writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. It is submitted by Mr. Nitin Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant that when learned Single Judge had expressed the view in categorical terms that the practice adopted by the AIIMS was defective, reliefs should not have been denied to him and he should have issued affirmative directions. It is also urged by him that in the case at hand, the AIIMS had delayed the declaration of marks from 25 th May, 2010 till 6 th September, 2010 to make the case of the appellant infructuous and hence, for no fault of his he should suffer. It is highlighted by him that the appellant had admittedly obtained more marks than the last selected candidate in the general category but he was not conferred the benefit of admission. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the seats are few and the appellant cannot be accommodated in the ensuing academic session. 7. This Court in LPA No.611/2010 (Tej Pal Yadav v. Union of India & Ors. decided on ) while dealing with a similar situation wherein a meritorious candidate was not given admission due to the fault of the authorities has held as follows: 21. In Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh v. Sanjay Gulati, AIR 1983 SC 580, the Apex Court has categorically held that the authority which makes admission by ignoring the LPA No. 726/2010 Page 3 of 6

4 rules of admission must pay for its own lapse and wrong caused and injustice meted to the deserving candidates. In the said case, their Lordships directed for increase of strength as a course of solution. It is worth noting that in the said case, a contention was propounded that the Medical Council of India would not sanction additional seats but the said proponement was repelled. We think it apt to reproduce the relevant paragraph from the said decision: It is strange that in all such cases, the authorities who make admissions by ignoring the rules of admission contend that the seats cannot correspondingly be increased, since the State Government cannot meet the additional expenditure which will be caused by increasing the number of seats or that the institution will not be able to cope up with the additional influx of students. An additional plea available in regard to medical colleges is that the Indian Medical Council will not sanction additional seats. We cannot entertain this submission. Those who infringe the rules must pay for their lapse and the wrong done to the deserving students who ought to have been admitted has to be rectified. The best solution under the circumstances is to ensure that the strength of seats is increased in proportion to the wrong admission made. 22. In Anil Kumar Gupta v. State of UP, (1995) 5 SCC 173, the Apex Court, after coming to hold that there were errors in the rule of reservation and its implementation, dwelled upon the relief to be granted when the admissions had already been finalized. In that context, their Lordships held thus: At the same time, we have to rectify the injustice done to the open competition candidates in the admissions in question, to the extent feasible. Accordingly, we direct that in the matter of admissions made pursuant to C.P.M.T. 1994, while the admissions already finalised shall not be disturbed, the Uttar Pradesh Government shall create thirty-four additional seats in the M.B.B.S. course and admit thirty-four students from the O.C. category against those seats. If any seats are vacant as on today, they shall also be filled from the O.C. category alone. LPA No. 726/2010 Page 4 of 6

5 23. In Dolly Chhanda v. Chairman, JEE & Ors., (2005) 9 SCC 779, while finding that the appellant was unjustly denied admission to an educational course, their Lordships ruled thus: 9. The appellant undoubtedly belonged to reserved MI category. She comes from a very humble background, her father was only a Naik in the armed forces. He may not have noticed the mistake which had been committed by the Zilla Sainik Board while issuing the first certificate dated But it does not mean that the appellant should be denied her due when she produced a correct certificate at the stage of second counselling. Those who secured rank lower than the appellant have already been admitted. The view taken by the authorities in denying admission to the appellant is wholly unjust and illegal. 10. The appellant had qualified in JEE-2003 but the said academic year is already over. But for this situation the fault lies with the respondents, who adopted a highly technical and rigid attitude, and not with the appellant. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the appellant should be given admission in MBBS course in any of the State medical colleges in the current academic year. 24. In Vijay Jaimni v. Medical Council of India & Ors., (2005) 13 SCC 461, while noticing the mistake in the determination of category, the Apex Court directed as follows: 5. Under these circumstances, we direct Respondent 5 college to give admission to the petitioner out of the said intake and under the category to which the petitioner was entitled as per the position in the last Academic Year The said college is further directed to charge from the petitioner the fee which would have been charged if admission had been granted in Academic Year The admission shall be granted before The petitioner shall comply with all the requirements. 8. At this stage, it is pertinent to refer to the case of Dr. Manish Patnecha (supra), wherein the Division Bench had directed as follows: - On the question of consequential relief that can be granted to the appellant we find that there is no denial by LPA No. 726/2010 Page 5 of 6

6 the respondent that the second session is to commence in January, 2010 and that admissions are to be made to the post graduate courses in that session. The appellant, having succeeded in showing that the denial of admission to him in Nuclear Medicine in OBC category is unjustified is in our view entitled to a direction to the respondent to admit him to the said course in the next session. This is held to be permissible by the Supreme Court in both Vijay Jaimni and Harshali. Accordingly we issue a direction to the respondent that the appellant will be granted admission to the post graduate course in Nuclear Medicine in one of the UR seats in the next session commencing in the year January, He will be permitted to participate in the counselling that is to take place tomorrow i.e. 11 th December, In view of the aforesaid decision, we are disposed to think that the appellant cannot be denied his right which was lawfully due to him and, therefore, we direct that he should be permitted to participate in the counselling for the purpose of subsequent examination i.e. the examination held after May 2005 and be allotted a seat in the Post-Graduate course in AIIMS. 10. Resultantly, the appeal is allowed and the order passed by the learned Single Judge is set aside. The directions issued by us be carried out forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE NOVEMBER 29, 2010 kapil MANMOHAN, J LPA No. 726/2010 Page 6 of 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013 R.K. JAIN Through: Mr. K.G. Mishra, Advocate. versus... Petitioner PUNJAB NATIONAL

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1990/2010 PREM KUMAR Judgment delivered on:08 th February, 2016 Represented by: Advocate. Versus... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Verma, CUSTOMS... Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on W.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on W.P. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on 13.03.2012 W.P.(C) 1227/2012 DELHI POLICE... Petitioner versus BALWANT SINGH Advocates

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 1254/2010 DATE OF DECISION :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 1254/2010 DATE OF DECISION : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 1254/2010 DATE OF DECISION : 04.02.2011 ST.LAWRENCE EDUCATIONAL SOCIEITY (REGD.)& ANOTHER... Petitioner Through Mr. V.P. Gupta and

More information

01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI.... Respondent Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate.

01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI.... Respondent Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. 01 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 39/2009 Date of Decision : 23 rd July, 2009 SAMRAT PRESS UOI versus Through : Through :... Appellant Mr. Shiv Khorana, Advocate.... Respondent Mr.

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 2nd February, 2011 WP(C) No.5774 of 1998

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 2nd February, 2011 WP(C) No.5774 of 1998 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 2nd February, 2011 WP(C) No.5774 of 1998 MAHINDER KUMAR...Petitioner Through: Mr.G.D. Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vishal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of decision : 26 th November, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through Mr.P.K.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of decision : 26 th November, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. Through Mr.P.K. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MEDICLAIM INSURANCE MATTER LPA 1335/2007 and CM Nos.16014/2007 and 16015/2007 (stay) (delay) Date of decision : 26 th November, 2007 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8113/2016 Date of Decision: 14 th September, 2017. RAJENDRA Through versus... PETITIONER Mr.Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Piyush Sharma, Adv.

More information

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017

Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi. OA No.571/2017 Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi OA No.571/2017 Hon ble Mr. K.N. Shrivastava, Member (A) Order Reserved on: 13.02.2018 Pronounced on:17.04.2018 G.C. Yadav, S/o late Kamal Singh

More information

$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, versus

$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, versus $~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7131/2015 % Judgment dated 29 th July, 2015 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through : versus Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Adv.... Petitioners U. RAI ARYA... Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ex F.A 7/2011. Reserved on : Date of Decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Ex F.A 7/2011. Reserved on : Date of Decision : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Ex F.A 7/2011 Reserved on : 11.02.2011 Date of Decision : 17.02.2011 SATNAM ANAND & ANR. Through: Mr. S.K. Duggal, Advocate....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 217 of 2002 Date of decision Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 217 of 2002 Date of decision Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana ITA 217 of 2002 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 217 of 2002 Date of decision 17.4.2012 Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana. Appellant Versus M/s Punjab Breweries

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2009 D. SAROJAKUMARI APPELLANT(S) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2009 D. SAROJAKUMARI APPELLANT(S) Versus 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8345-8346 OF 2009 D. SAROJAKUMARI APPELLANT(S) Versus R. HELEN THILAKOM & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T Deepak

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR BETWEEN C.S.T.A. NO.4/2015 THE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF Chennai Port Trust.Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF Chennai Port Trust.Appellant(s) VERSUS REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF 2010 Chennai Port Trust.Appellant(s) VERSUS The Chennai Port Trust Industrial Employees Canteen Workers Welfare

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: 7th March, LPA No. 741/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: 7th March, LPA No. 741/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Date of decision: 7th March, 2012 LPA No. 741/2011 BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate... Appellant Versus S.C.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Reserved on: 21st February, 2012 Pronounced on: 2nd July, 2012 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Reserved on: 21st February, 2012 Pronounced on: 2nd July, 2012 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Reserved on: 21st February, 2012 Pronounced on: 2nd July, 2012 MAC.APP. 10/2008 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.... Appellant Through: Mr.Pradeep

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009. % Date of Decision : Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009. % Date of Decision : Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C.) No.12711/2009 % Date of Decision :12.07.2010 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv.. Petitioners Versus SHANTI DEVI SHARMA Through Mr.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AHALYA A. SAMTANEY.APPELLANT. Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AHALYA A. SAMTANEY.APPELLANT. Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 8292_ of 2018 [Arising out of SLP(C) No.25448/2017] Non-Reportable AHALYA A. SAMTANEY.APPELLANT Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

More information

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr Ajay Verma, Adv. Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv with Mr Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Adv. AND LPA 709/2012.

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr Ajay Verma, Adv. Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv with Mr Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Adv. AND LPA 709/2012. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF LAND Judgment reserved on : 01.03.2013 Judgment pronounced on : 05.03.2013 LPA 670/2012 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr Ajay Verma,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO OF 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1347 OF 2016 1. Ashok s/o Munjappa Potphale, Age : 60 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Arunodya, Plot No. 54, Shivnerinagar, Airport

More information

+ LPA 330/2005 & CM No.1802/2005 (for stay) Versus J U D G M E N T

+ LPA 330/2005 & CM No.1802/2005 (for stay) Versus J U D G M E N T * THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 330/2005 & CM No.1802/2005 (for stay) Pronounced on: January 04, 2016 M/S THE CO-OPERATIVE CO. LTD.... Appellant Through: Ms. Rana Parveen Siddiqui, Adv. Versus

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 06.11.2009 + W.P.(C) 12965/2009 KRIMPEX SYNTHETICS LTD... Petitioner -versus- INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD AND ORS...

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1045 of 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1045 of 2014 -1- ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1045 of 2014 Col (Retd) Tejinder Singh Petitioner(s) Vs Union of India and others Respondent(s) -.- For the Petitioner (s) :

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C ) No /2009. Through: Mr. N. Safaya, Advocate. Versus. Hotel Corporation of India Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C ) No /2009. Through: Mr. N. Safaya, Advocate. Versus. Hotel Corporation of India Ltd. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C ) No. 11887/2009 Judgment reserved on : 22.01.2010 Judgment pronounced on : 19.04.2010 Sunit Kumar Singh...Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Safaya, Advocate Versus

More information

Indian Employees [ Judgment - 68 ] NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Indian Employees [ Judgment - 68 ] NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION VELAXAN KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS : Supreme Court - Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5636/2010. versus W.P.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5636/2010. versus W.P. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 Judgment delivered on: 23.01.2013 W.P.(C) 5636/2010 VISTAR CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS... Respondents

More information

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Decided on GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Versus AND. Versus

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Decided on GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Versus AND. Versus * THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 20.09.2011 +W.P.(C) No. 4408/2000 GROUP 4 SECURITAS GUARDING LTD. Petitioner Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh & Mr. Prattek Kohli, Advocate Versus EMPLOYEES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8429 of 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.19919 of 2018) Medical Council of India... Appellant

More information

ITA No. 140 of had been sold on , had been handed over to him. The assessee furnished the desired information and documents, including

ITA No. 140 of had been sold on , had been handed over to him. The assessee furnished the desired information and documents, including ITA No. 140 of 2000-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 140 of 2000 Date of Decision: 24.9.2010 Vinod Kumar Jain...Appellant. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and

More information

Decided on: 08 th October, 2010

Decided on: 08 th October, 2010 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) 398/2009 % Reserved on: 20 th September, 2010 Decided on: 08 th October, 2010 Shri L.C.Sharma Through:...Appellant Mr. Rakesh Kumar Garg, Advocate versus

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO (OS) No.74/2010 & C.M. No.1437/2010

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO (OS) No.74/2010 & C.M. No.1437/2010 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) No.74/2010 & C.M. No.1437/2010 Judgment reserved on: 08.03.2010 % Judgment delivered on: 16.03.2010 SREI VENTURE CAPITAL LIMITED & ANR.... Appellants

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR. TA No.1139 of 2010 (arising out of C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Versus

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR. TA No.1139 of 2010 (arising out of C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Versus 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR TA No.1139 of 2010 ( C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Kishan Singh Union of India & others For the petitioner For the Respondent(s) Versus : Mr.Arun

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 3 rd August, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 6 th August, W.P.(C) NO.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 3 rd August, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 6 th August, W.P.(C) NO. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On: 3 rd August, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 6 th August, 2010 + W.P.(C) NO.2698/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.... Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajesh

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos /2010. Date of Hearing: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT LPA No.101/2010 and LPA No.461/2010 & CM Appl. Nos.11988-11989/2010 Date of Hearing: 27.02.2012 Date of Decision: 07.03.2012 1) LPA

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3925 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 29160 of 2018) Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority & Anr.

More information

ITA No. 331 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 331 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: November 4, 2009

ITA No. 331 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 331 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: November 4, 2009 ITA No. 331 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 331 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: November 4, 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax-II...Appellant M/s Hero Cycles Ltd. Versus...Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 13th February, 2015 MAC.APP. 84/2014 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INS. CO. LTD... Appellant Through Mr. Navneet Kumar,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 13th February, 2014 MAC.APPEAL NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 13th February, 2014 MAC.APPEAL NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 13th February, 2014 MAC.APPEAL NO. 1020/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Represented by: Manu Shahalia,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3792 OF 2010 THE KERALA ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3792 OF 2010 THE KERALA ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3792 OF 2010 THE KERALA ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS ASSOCIATION..Appellant(s) :Versus: THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS....Respondent(s)

More information

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI * HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014 Decided on: 12 th January, 2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for the DDA.

More information

Whether employer /establishment can reduce the basic wages/salary for the purpose of deduction of provident

Whether employer /establishment can reduce the basic wages/salary for the purpose of deduction of provident $% $ % $! # $ $ % % %# &%!# ' %& $$ $%%&% # % 0 #8 $!#$# &# %! $!# ' %&$! "" ##$% & $ " $'$ "" (#$#( & $ " $$%'#$(()# & $ """ %) " ) *! +!,-!. Recently, the Hon ble Supreme Court has pronounced land-mark

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 2331/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 2331/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on:07.11.2012 W.P.(C) 2331/2011 SURAJ MAL... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.G.Mishra, Advocate with Petitioner in person. Versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6732/2015 T.T. LTD. Versus Through: Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016... Petitioner Ms.Shilpi Jain Sharma, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ANR... Respondents

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF Birla Institute of Technology.Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF Birla Institute of Technology.Appellant(s) VERSUS REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF 2012 Birla Institute of Technology.Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondent(s) J U D G

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, LPA No.399/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, LPA No.399/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Employees Provident Fund and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952 LPA No.399/2007 Date of Decision : 20th December, 2007 M/s L. N. Gadodia and Son Pvt. Ltd. and

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO._487 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) No.7181 of 2016)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO._487 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) No.7181 of 2016) 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO._487 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) No.7181 of 2016) NON-REPORTABLE Sunita Singh..Appellant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and

More information

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5566 OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO of 2006 Union of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5566 OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO of 2006 Union of India SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5566 OF 2008 @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12357 of 2006 Union of India and another...appellants Vs. SPS Vains (Retd.) and others.respondents

More information

Jaipur Court Case IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER. 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

Jaipur Court Case IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER. 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. Jaipur Court Case Court Case filed at Rajasthan High Court(Jaipur Bench) by Shri K M L Asthana and others REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER 1. S.B.

More information

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 35 OF Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 35 OF Versus BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2014 In the matter of 1. M/s Deepak Construction Co. Through Its Proprietor, Deepak Yadav, Village- Raghunathpura, Tehsil-

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out S.L.P. (C) NO OF 2007) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out S.L.P. (C) NO OF 2007) Versus Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6013 OF 2011 (Arising out S.L.P. (C) NO. 3777 OF 2007) Sheelkumar Jain... Appellant Versus The New India Assurance

More information

Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Punjab Chemical & Crop Protection Ltd

Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Punjab Chemical & Crop Protection Ltd Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Punjab Chemical & Crop Protection Ltd Judgement: 1. Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. - This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in

More information

Additional Pension on the basis of Contribution over and above Wage Limit of either Rs.5,000/- or Rs.6,500/- per Month.

Additional Pension on the basis of Contribution over and above Wage Limit of either Rs.5,000/- or Rs.6,500/- per Month. CIRCULAR No.02/2019 To All Members of the Association Off : 26613091 / 26607167 42103360 / 26761877 Email : kea@kea.co.in Web : www.kea.co.in KARNATAKA EMPLOYERS' ASSOCIATION NO.74, 2 nd FLOOR, SHANKARA

More information

VERSUS M/S. BHAGAT CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD... Respondent. VERSUS M/S. M.R.G. PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES AND ORS... Respondent

VERSUS M/S. BHAGAT CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD... Respondent. VERSUS M/S. M.R.G. PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES AND ORS... Respondent IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1169 OF 2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI... Appellant VERSUS M/S. BHAGAT CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.... Respondent WITH

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: $~68 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 01.05.2017 + W.P.(C) 2792/2017 SANJAY YOGI GOEL versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS... Petitioner... Respondents Advocates who appeared in

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO 276/2010 Reserved on: Decided on: versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO 276/2010 Reserved on: Decided on: versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 276/2010 RAJ KUMAR & ANR Through Reserved on: 20.10.2010 Decided on: 01.11.2010... Appellant Mr. Rajeshwar Tyagi, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. Through Nemo...

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 12 th November, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 19 th November, 2010

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Reserved On: 12 th November, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 19 th November, 2010 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On: 12 th November, 2010 Judgment Delivered On: 19 th November, 2010 + W.P.(C) 4901/2008 UOI & ANR.... Petitioners Through: Ms.Geetanjali Mohan,

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No. 87 of 2014

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A. No. 87 of 2014 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI O.A. No. 87 of 2014 Monday, the 09 th day of November, 2015 The Honourable Justice S.S.Satheesachandran (Member-Judicial) and The Honourable Lt Gen K Surendra

More information

it has been received or not. We have heard Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant herein. She has brought t

it has been received or not. We have heard Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant herein. She has brought t IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 CIVIL APPEAL NO.13053/2017 [@ SLP (C) No.751/2009] COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FARIDABAD COMMISSIONER Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHET RAM (HUF) Respondent(s)

More information

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO OF 2011

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO OF 2011 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1380 OF 2011 (Against the Order dated 18/03/2011 in Appeal No. 1569/2005 of the State Commission ) 1. JASBIR KAUR & ORS.

More information

K.J.S. Buttar Vs Union of India and Anr (Civil Appeal No of 2006) MARCH 31, 2011 [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ] SERVICE LAW: ARMED

K.J.S. Buttar Vs Union of India and Anr (Civil Appeal No of 2006) MARCH 31, 2011 [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ] SERVICE LAW: ARMED K.J.S. Buttar Vs Union of India and Anr (Civil Appeal No. 5591 of 2006) MARCH 31, 2011 [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ] SERVICE LAW: ARMED FORCES: Disability Pension and other consequential claims

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: RC.REV. 169/2012 & CM Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: RC.REV. 169/2012 & CM Nos. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment:23.04.2012. RC.REV. 169/2012 & CM Nos.7155-56/2012 SANT LAL Through RAJINDER KUMAR Through None. Mr. Amit Khemka,

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 969/2014

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 969/2014 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 969/2014 Judgment reserved on November 27, 2015 Judgment delivered on December 1, 2015 V.K. AGGARWAL & ORS... Petitioners Through: Mr.M.S.Saini, Adv.

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R %

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015 COPERION IDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ITA 357/2010. Reserved on : 16th December, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ITA 357/2010. Reserved on : 16th December, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ITA 357/2010 Reserved on : 16th December, 2010 Date of decision: 11th March, 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV Appellant Through:

More information

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: versus

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: versus $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON: 25.02.2015 + ITA 117/2015 JOINT INVESTMENTS PVT LTD... Appellant Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX...

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 24.07.2009 + ITA 596/2005 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED... Respondent Advocates who appeared

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001. Date of decision: 18th July, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001. Date of decision: 18th July, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 171/2001 Date of decision: 18th July, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Petitioner Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3314 OF 2004 wp-3314-2004.sxw M/s. Eskay K'n' IT (India) Ltd... Petitioner. V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income

More information

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5848 of 2010 TO SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5850 of 2010 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007. CORAM: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF 2007 Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007. RASEEL G. ANSAL... Appellant. Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER. Judgment delivered on: ITA 243/2008. versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER. Judgment delivered on: ITA 243/2008. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATER Judgment delivered on: 26.11.2008 ITA 243/2008 SUBODH KUMAR BHARGAVA... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX... Respondent Advocates

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No of 2018) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No of 2018) VERSUS 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No. 1463 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.23718 of 2018) The Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority.Appellant(s)

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WP(C)No.8902/2007 & CM No.16817/2007

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WP(C)No.8902/2007 & CM No.16817/2007 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C)No.8902/2007 & CM No.16817/2007 # JAL HOTELS CO. LTD.... Petitioner through! Mr. N. Venkatraman, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Achin Goel, Adv. versus $ ASSTT. DIR.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER ITA No-160/2005 Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 Judgment delivered on: 24th May, 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I, NEW DELHI...

More information

REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : December 06, 2010 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL

REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision : December 06, 2010 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL REPORTED * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. NO. 305/2009 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate. versus SMT. BIRBATI AND ORS. Through:...

More information

CWP No of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. versus

CWP No of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. versus CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.10.2011 Union of India & others... Petitioners versus Raj Pal & another...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013 SUNIL GUPTA Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv.... Appellant Versus HARISH

More information

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 12 th January, 2016 % Pronounced on : 22 nd January, MACA 217/2013

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 12 th January, 2016 % Pronounced on : 22 nd January, MACA 217/2013 $~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 12 th January, 2016 % Pronounced on : 22 nd January, 2016 + MACA 217/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani,

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Reserved On: Decided On: Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Reserved On: Decided On: Versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.253/2007 % Reserved On: 18.11.2010 Decided On:23.11.2010 M/S GODREJ HI CARE LTD.. Appellant Through: Mr.Rajiv Tyagi and Mr.Ram Manohar Singh, Advocates

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 25, RFA(OS) 50/2015. versus HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 25, RFA(OS) 50/2015. versus HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 25, 2015 + RFA(OS) 50/2015 SANDEEP KUMAR Represented by: versus HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR Represented by:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PP ACT Date of decision: 23rd March, 2012 LPA No.977/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PP ACT Date of decision: 23rd March, 2012 LPA No.977/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PP ACT Date of decision: 23rd March, 2012 LPA No.977/2011 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA Through: Mr. Mohinder Singh, Adv....Appellant Versus DAMYANTI

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD : PRESENT : THE HON BLE MR. VIKRAMAJIT SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD : PRESENT : THE HON BLE MR. VIKRAMAJIT SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012 : PRESENT : THE HON BLE MR. VIKRAMAJIT SEN, CHIEF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.

More information

Group 4 Securitas Guarding Ltd. vs The Regional Provident Fund... on 30 October, 2003

Group 4 Securitas Guarding Ltd. vs The Regional Provident Fund... on 30 October, 2003 Karnataka High Court Karnataka High Court Equivalent citations: 2004 (102) FLR 374, ILR 2004 KAR 2067 Author: V Shetty Bench: P V Shetty, A J Gunjal JUDGMENT Vishwanatha Shetty, J. 1. The appellant in

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 17975 of 2014] Management of the Barara Cooperative Marketing cum Processing

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018 1 RESERVED ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 537 of 2018 Friday, this the 16 th day of November, 2018 Hon ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon ble Air Marshal

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 421 of M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 421 of M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd. IN THE MATTER OF: NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI M/s. Manila Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus BAHL Paper Mills Ltd. & Ors. Present: For Appellant : Respondents Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Date of decision: 20th January, 2015 MAC. APP.386/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Date of decision: 20th January, 2015 MAC. APP.386/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Date of decision: 20th January, 2015 MAC. APP.386/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Thsrough: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate... Appellant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Date of decision : November 28, 2007 ITA 348/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Date of decision : November 28, 2007 ITA 348/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER Date of decision : November 28, 2007 ITA 348/2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... APPELLANT Through Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Advocate versus

More information

FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013

FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 FORM NO 21 (See Rule 102 (1) ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, KOLKATA APPLICATION NO: O.A. 10 OF 2011 THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 CORAM : Hon ble Mr. Justice Raghunath Ray, Member (Judicial) Hon

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 221 of Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 221 of Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018 1 Court No. 1 Reserved Judgment ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Original Application No. 221 of 2017 Tuesday, this the 23 rd day of January, 2018 Hon ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 29th November, 2012 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 29th November, 2012 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 29th November, 2012 MAC.APP. 244/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 09.01.2009 ITA 1130/2006 09.01.2009 M/S HINDUSTAN INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD Appellant Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008 Judgment delivered on : December 12, 2008 RFA No. 159/2003 IQBAL AHMED... Through:

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgments Reserved on: 08 th September, 2015 Judgments Delivered on: 13 th January, 2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgments Reserved on: 08 th September, 2015 Judgments Delivered on: 13 th January, 2016 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgments Reserved on: 08 th September, 2015 Judgments Delivered on: 13 th January, 2016 + WP(C) 7094/2014 M/S WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED...

More information

ASN 1/18 WP-2632.doc. vs. 1. The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) 11, having his office at Scindia House, Mumbai.

ASN 1/18 WP-2632.doc. vs. 1. The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) 11, having his office at Scindia House, Mumbai. ASN 1/18 WP-2632.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2632 OF 2012 Mahindra BT Investment Co. (Mauritius) Ltd. A company incorporated and

More information

A very simple but ticklish issue arises in this writ. petition. The issue is whether a person retiring from a higher grade

A very simple but ticklish issue arises in this writ. petition. The issue is whether a person retiring from a higher grade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10757 of 2010 =========================================================== M.M.P. Sinha, S/o Late Justice B.P. Sinha A Retired Railway

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VINOD VERMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 VINOD VERMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.14967 OF 2017 VINOD VERMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN,

More information

Public Interest Litigation Petitions filed by AIFTP & Associate Members

Public Interest Litigation Petitions filed by AIFTP & Associate Members Public Interest Litigation Petitions filed by AIFTP & Associate Members Sr. 1. All India Federation of Tax 1052 of (1994) 209 ITR Circular 681 946-TDS on Govt. amended the Law. Practitioners jointly with

More information

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR AFR Writ Petition (L) No.115 of 2014 Vandana Vidhut Limited, through its President (Commercial), Sirgitti Industrial Area, Sector-B, Bilaspur (CG) ---Petitioner Versus

More information