IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND"

Transcription

1 THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV BETWEEN RAVI NAGINA SUMATI BAKAY Claimants AND LARRY HAVEN SUSAN RAMLAL HAVEN Defendants Before The Hon. Madam Justice C. Gobin Appearances: Mr. M. Khan for the Claimant Mr. R. Rickhi instructed by Mr. Tacklalsingh for the Defendants REASONS The Issue 1. The factual issue which the Court had to resolve in this case was what were the arrangements between the parties under which Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay were put into possession of an HDC house which was owned and/or controlled by Larry and Susan Ramlal Haven. 2. I have noted that the appellants notice of appeal raises issues which were never raised in the statement of issues filed on their behalf on the 15 th May 2015, as to HDC Page 1 of 10

2 policy on applications for housing. These matters were never considered nor was any evidence led in relation to them. In any case I do not believe that I could have taken judicial notice of the matters now raised. The case for Mr. Nagina and the later Ms. Bakay 3. The respondents Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay alleged that (Mrs. Haven) offered to sell them the property for the sum of $325, to be paid by a deposit of $15, with the balance to be paid by monthly instalments of $2, until liquidation of the purchase price. Early in the day, Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay recognised the house was part of an HDC development scheme. They said they enquired of Mr. amd Mrs. Haven as to whether they were allowed to sell the property, and they were assured that the appellants had the permission of the HDC so to do. 4. There was no written agreement, but they paid the deposit of $15, in cash and a receipt was issued by Mrs. Haven. Upon payment they were given the keys to the property and they moved in. Further payments were made by them pursuant to the purchase agreement. Of the purchase price the sum of $139, was paid into a bank account (and this has not been denied by the appellants). 5. Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay alleged that in addition to the bank deposits, from time to time Mr. Haven required further cash payments and they obliged. He issued no receipts even when he was asked to do so. The cash payments allegedly amounted to $32, At some stage, and it was around the time they began to suspect that all was not well, Mr. Nagina. and Ms. Bakay received correspondence addressed to Mr. and Mrs. Page 2 of 10

3 Haven from the HDC. They opened it and found it was a notice of arrears. They subsequently, in or about May 2014, visited the HDC s offices. After this visit, and believing that this would secure their position in the property, they made some payments directly into Mr. and Mrs. Haven s HDC account. 7. On Saturday 16 th August 2013, Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay were evicted from the house. Mrs. Haven was present on the scene during the operation. She produced a notice of eviction dated 2 nd June 2016 which was addressed to the claimants as occupants of the property. The case of the Havens (Mr. and Mrs. Haven) 8. Mr. and Mrs. Haven at all times denied that they had entered into an agreement for the sale of the property. They claimed that Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay told them they were in need of housing accommodation for a period during which a property owned by Ms. Bakay was being renovated. The Haven s entered into the arrangement because Mrs. Haven s father was terminally ill and they had decided to take up residence with him. They denied any discussion or agreement to sell the house. They claimed they allowed Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay to occupy for a monthly fee. They specifically denied telling Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay that they had the permission of the HDC to sell. 9. They denied the sum of money allegedly paid by Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay but accepted that part of what was claimed was in fact paid into Mr. Haven s bank account. They denied payment of a $15, deposit and went so far as to deny that the signature on the receipt was Mrs. Haven s. Page 3 of 10

4 The Decision/finding of fact 10. I gave judgment for the claimants because I preferred the evidence of Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay as to how they came to be in occupation of the HDC house. I found that they had indeed entered into an agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Haven to purchase the house and that they were told at the time of the agreement that the owners had the permission of the HDC to sell. I found that the claimants paid the sum I found to be $140, pursuant to the agreement for sale and in reliance on the representation that the HDC property could be sold by Mr. and Mrs. Haven. 11. The case of Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay as to the nature of the arrangement was supported by the compelling evidence of Catherine Boodoo, a school teacher who was a friend Ms. Bakay and who, I accept, was well acquainted with the defendants. I found that she was indeed the person who put the parties in contact with each other when Mr. and Mrs. Haven told her they were looking to sell their property. She introduced them. I believe as she said, Mrs Haven had actually asked her, if she was interested in purchasing it herself. 12. When Mr. and Mrs. Haven became aware that Catherine Boodoo had filed a witness statement they sought and leave was granted to file a rebuttal evidence. Both claimed that Catherine Boodoo was a stranger to them. Through a dramatic development, this proved to be untrue. Page 4 of 10

5 13. During the course of Mrs. Boodoo s cross-examination, and in answer to questions from the Court on matters not raised in her evidence, the witness was consistently impressive. It turned out her relationship with Mrs. Haven was even closer than she had deposed. She knew the name of the Haven s son and the circumstances of them naming him Larsan, a combination of both their Christian names. She had been to Mrs. Haven s father s funeral and other family events. When I asked whether she had any photographs of them, she said she did not, but Mrs. Boodoo produced a package of about 10 postcards, Christmas and birthday cards which she said she received over the years from Mrs. Haven. They were aged and the earliest dated back to the year The writer signed as your best friend Susan Ramlal Mrs. Haven s maiden name. 14. I was satisfied that these cards were indeed sent by Mrs. Haven, although when she was confronted with them she continued to deny knowing Catherine, or having sent them. A casual comparison of Mrs. Haven s handwriting disclosed several similarities but such a comparison was not even essential. The production of the real evidence which she had just brought along on that morning convinced me that Catherine was an independent witness and a witness of truth. 15. That Mrs. Haven, even in the light of the production of the cards was prepared to continue denying not just her acquaintance with Ms. Boodoo but the extent of the friendship caused me to reject her and her husband s evidence on more material parts. 16. I rejected the Haven s case too, because what was glaring from the defence and indeed the witness statements, was that the monthly fee which they claimed they charged Page 5 of 10

6 to cover the monthly mortgage under their version of the arrangement, was never identified. 17. That figure would have been a fundamental feature of the arrangement. In its absence, Mr. and Mrs. Haven were hard pressed to explain the variation in the sums paid by Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay. On a balance of probabilities it was easier to accept that the moneys were in fact payments towards a purchase price. 18. Mr. and Mrs. Haven failed even to identify the monthly mortgage that they were paying to the HDC. The only document produced quite unintentionally, it seems to me, was a receipt which showed that what they were being charged by the HDC was the sum of $ and it was described as a license to occupy payment. This raised questions about what indeed was their status regarding the property with the HDC. 19. Further, Mr. and Mrs Haven in suggesting that I should reject the other side s case as to the purchase price of $325, under the alleged agreement, produced a letter from their alleged financiers, TTMF to the HDC. It showed that the couple could have conditionally qualified for financing to the tune of $408, This was hardly the best evidence to support a claim as to the purchase price or the value, but they introduced it to support an argument that given that figure, the case that the purchase price was $325, should be rejected. I was not impressed. 20. The defendants must have had an agreement with the HDC which clearly indicated what price they were to pay for the property at the time they took possession and what were the terms of that agreement. Their failure to disclose evidence on such an important issue Page 6 of 10

7 which, must have been available impressed me even less. Production of what might have been the figure available to them by way of a loan from a financier did not settle that question. 21. The defendants case that they entered into the arrangement because of the illness of Mrs. Haven s father, too, was not proved. The production of an MRI report dated 30 th September 2013 was of limited assistance. This was more than two years after Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay had entered into possession of the subject property. It gave no indication of the history of Mr. Ramlal s illness and when specifically, he fell seriously ill. On a balance of probabilities I found that their giving up possession of the property had less to do with his illness, than with their desire to sell, as Catherine Boodoo had been told by them. Damages/The issue 22. On the 26 th November 2015 at the close of the evidence, I indicated to the parties that I preferred the evidence of the claimants and invited submissions on the issue of damages. There was no dispute that under the arrangement, whatever it was, the claimants had paid the sum of $118, in respect of which amount there was independent or documentary proof of payment. 23. The defendants asked me to reject the claim for a further $22, Part of this sum was the alleged deposit of $15, Ms. Haven denied the signature on the receipt. Further they urged that I should reject the allegation of payment of the further sum of $7, in the absence of receipts. Page 7 of 10

8 24. The Havens reminded that in the defence they had indicated they disputed the receipt and signature and that they were prepared to submit to a forensic examination. In his closing submissions, Counsel has asked me to consider that, as a factor in determining the credibility Mrs. Haven in relation to the receipt. I was also asked to note that nothing on the face of the receipt for the alleged deposit refers to the alleged agreement for sale. I was asked to reject the claimants evidence that further cash was paid even after there were complaints about Mr. Haven s refusal to issue a receipt on a previous occasion. This according to the defendants, was less than credible. 25. I have already indicated my general assessment of the credibility of the respective parties in this case. I repeat I preferred the evidence of Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay. That Mr. and Mrs. Haven would deny a close friendship with someone I accept was in fact at some point a best friend of the wife, led me to believe they would not hesitate to deny a signature if it suited them. The signature on postcards received from Mrs. Haven by Catherine Boodoo was similarly denied. 26. I therefore accepted that the dispute sum of $22, was in fact paid. Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay may have been somewhat naïve in their dealings with the defendant but that does not affect their credibility on this issue. In my experience people foolishly part with money when they trust the people with whom they are dealing. In this case Catherine Boodoo whom I assess to be an honest, decent and loyal woman was a mutual friend. This connection may have influenced the level of trust that Mr. Nagina and Ms. Bakay reposed in the Haven s. Page 8 of 10

9 Assessments 27. As for the quantum of damages generally, having read the authorities I accepted the claimants submission that damages should be assessed applying the reliance interest measure. The claimants paid the sum of $140, to the defendants. They did so expecting to complete a purchase for what they thought was the defendant s property. They moved into occupation and enjoyed the benefit of a home for 40 months. Any award of damages had to take that factor into account. 28. How was the value of the benefit they got, to be assessed. The defendant suggested $ per month on the basis of the receipts which showed what monthly sums were paid to the HDC by the claimants but I reject this. My rejection follows too from the failure of the defendants to produce any document indicating what was their mortgage payment if there was indeed a concluded mortgage arrangement. The only reliable and independent evidence of what was a fair license fee for occupation is reflected on the HDC receipt date dated 4 th August 2014 in the sum of $ I therefore calculated the value of benefit by multiplying that occupation fee of 1300 x 40 months and deducted it from the sum which I found had been paid to Mr. and Mrs. H under the agreement for sale that is $140, $52, In the circumstances I made the order (a) Judgment for the claimants vs the defendants in the sum of $88, together with interest at the rate of 5% per annum from 25the August 2014 to 21 st January (b) The defendants to pay the claimants prescribed costs of the action. Page 9 of 10

10 (c) The defendants to pay the claimants costs of the injunction assessed in the sum of $5, Dated this 8 th day of April 2016 CAROL GOBIN JUDGE Page 10 of 10

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER. and IAC-AH-SAR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 27 th October 2015 On 6 th November 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL RS and SS (Exclusion of appellant from hearing) Pakistan [2008] UKAIT 00012 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Date of Hearing: 18 December 2007 Before: Mr C M G

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MONSON. Between MR MUNIR AHMED (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MONSON. Between MR MUNIR AHMED (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and IAC-AH-CO-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/05178/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 June 2015 On 8 July 2015 Before

More information

Tariq. The effect of S. 12 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act Ch. 48:51 The Act is agreed. That term is void as against third

Tariq. The effect of S. 12 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act Ch. 48:51 The Act is agreed. That term is void as against third REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA No. CV 2011-00701 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GULF INSURANCE LIMITED AND Claimant NASEEM ALI AND TARIQ ALI Defendants Before The Hon. Madam Justice C. Gobin

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L MURRAY

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L MURRAY Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06052/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA

IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA [2013] CCJ 3 (AJ) IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA CCJ Appeal No CV 005 of 2012 GY Civil Appeal No 31 of

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL KENNETH HARRIS. and SARAH GERALD

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL KENNETH HARRIS. and SARAH GERALD MONTSERRAT CIVIL APPEAL NO.3 OF 2003 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL KENNETH HARRIS and SARAH GERALD Before: The Hon. Mr. Brian Alleyne, SC The Hon. Mr. Michael Gordon, QC The Hon Madam Suzie d Auvergne

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 January 2018 On 11 January Before

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 January 2018 On 11 January Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 10 January 2018 On 11 January 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 BETWEEN: LAURIANO RAMIREZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 23 February 2015 On 18 March Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER. Between SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 23 February 2015 On 18 March Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER. Between SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT - Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: AA/06792/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Promulgated On 23 February 2015 On 18 March 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) EA/07000/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 May 2017

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) EA/07000/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 May 2017 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) EA/07000/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 May 2017 On 6 June 2017 Determination given orally

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/04305/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 16 June 2015 On 7 July 2015.

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/04305/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 16 June 2015 On 7 July 2015. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/04305/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 16 June 2015 On 7 July 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Winkelmann, Peters and Collins JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Winkelmann, Peters and Collins JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA508/2015 [2016] NZCA 138 BETWEEN AND MRINAL SARDANA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 8 March 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Winkelmann, Peters and Collins

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TOTAL IMAGE INCORPORATED LIMITED AND VENTURE CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED STEPHEN FULLERTON

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TOTAL IMAGE INCORPORATED LIMITED AND VENTURE CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED STEPHEN FULLERTON THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV. 2009-00296 H.C.A. No. 1903 of 2004 BETWEEN TOTAL IMAGE INCORPORATED LIMITED CLAIMANT AND VENTURE CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT DECISION AND REASONS

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT DECISION AND REASONS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/29910/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th June 2017 On 27 th June 2017 Before DEPUTY

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Heard at Field House ST (Corroboration Kasolo) Ethiopia [2004] UKIAT On 20 April 2004 Prepared 20 April 2004 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

Heard at Field House ST (Corroboration Kasolo) Ethiopia [2004] UKIAT On 20 April 2004 Prepared 20 April 2004 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL H-TW-V2 Heard at Field House ST (Corroboration Kasolo) Ethiopia [2004] UKIAT 00119 On 20 April 2004 Prepared 20 April 2004 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL notified: Date Determination 27 May 2004 Before :

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 23 rd March 2015 Prepared on 17 th March Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 23 rd March 2015 Prepared on 17 th March Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT IAC-FH-AR/V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/52919/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 23 rd March 2015

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D FROM THE INFERIOR COURT OF STANN CREEK JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D FROM THE INFERIOR COURT OF STANN CREEK JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2008 FROM THE INFERIOR COURT OF STANN CREEK JUDICIAL DISTRICT CIVIL SUIT CASE NO. 1 OF 2008 DELIA ANDREWS Appellant/Defendant AND KENT McKENZIE Respondent/Complainant

More information

NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985.

NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA82/2014 [2014] NZCA 304 BETWEEN AND TOESE

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016.

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016 Before DEPUTY

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06984/2012 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Date Sent On 11 June 2013 On 5 July 2013 Prepared 13 June 2013 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Mag. Appeal No. 13 of 2011 BETWEEN DAVENDRA OUJAR Appellant AND P.C. DANRAJ ROOPAN #15253 Respondent PANEL: P. WEEKES, J A R. NARINE, J A Appearances: Mr. Jagdeo

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jawad Raza Heard on: Thursday 7 and Friday 8 June 2018 Location: ACCA Head Offices,

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 08 May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL Between HAITHAM GHAZI FAISAL AL-ZIAYYIR (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 08 May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL Between HAITHAM GHAZI FAISAL AL-ZIAYYIR (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Heard at Manchester Piccadilly On 27 April 2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Decision Promulgated On 08 May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL Between

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08382/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08382/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08382/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at UT(IAC) Birmingham Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 18 July 2017 On 24 July 2017 Before UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) OA034192015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st July 2017 On 03 rd August 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between MS AYSHA BEGUM TAFADER (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between MS AYSHA BEGUM TAFADER (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and IAC-AH-KEW-V2 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/15233/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 19 th February 2015 On 15 th May 2015 Before

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 6 July 2015 On 22 July 2015 Prepared on 7 July Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JM HOLMES.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 6 July 2015 On 22 July 2015 Prepared on 7 July Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JM HOLMES. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at North Shields Determination Promulgated On 6 July 2015 On 22 July 2015 Prepared on 7 July 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Before : MR JUSTICE FANCOURT Between :

Before : MR JUSTICE FANCOURT Between : Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 48 (Ch) Case No: CH-2017-000105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES CHANCERY APPEALS (ChD) ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008 Judgment delivered on : December 12, 2008 RFA No. 159/2003 IQBAL AHMED... Through:

More information

Ombudsman s Determination

Ombudsman s Determination Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondents Mrs Y Armed Forces Pension Scheme (the Scheme) Veterans UK Outcome 1. I do not uphold Mrs Y s complaint and no further action is required by Veterans

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Court Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd July 2017 On 5 th July 2017 Before

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANBURY. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HANBURY. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/03806/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 22 December 2014 On 8 January 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

Ombudsman s Determination

Ombudsman s Determination Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondents Mr N Scottish Teachers' Superannuation Scheme (the Scheme) Dundee City Council (the Council) and Scottish Public Pensions Agency (the Agency) Outcome

More information

Indexed as: Atwal v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

Indexed as: Atwal v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Page 1 Indexed as: Atwal v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Harjinder Kaur Atwal, appellant, and Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, respondent [1999] I.A.D.D. No. 2576 No. V98-01144

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL CHANA. Between. MR NANTHA KUMAR AL SUPRAMANIAN (anonymity direction not made) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL CHANA. Between. MR NANTHA KUMAR AL SUPRAMANIAN (anonymity direction not made) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/37794/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House On: 31 October 2014 Decision and reasons Promulgated On: 19 January 2015 Before DEPUTY

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Not of interest to other judges Case no: JS171/2014 In the matter between: LYALL, MATHIESON MICHAEL Applicant And THE CITY OF JOHANNESBURG

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st April 2016 On 13 th July 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS Between

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BARBADOS MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY. and [1] MICHAEL PIGOTT [2] WEST MALL LIMITED

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BARBADOS MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY. and [1] MICHAEL PIGOTT [2] WEST MALL LIMITED ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO.12 OF 2004 BETWEEN: BARBADOS MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY and [1] MICHAEL PIGOTT [2] WEST MALL LIMITED Before: The Hon. Mr. Brian Alleyne, SC

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between MR SYED FAIZAN ALI NAQVI (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between MR SYED FAIZAN ALI NAQVI (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at HMCTS Employment Tribunals Decision & Reasons Liverpool Promulgated On 12 th September 2018 On 25 th October 2018 Before DEPUTY

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between NM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between NM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06052/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Newport Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 st March 2016 On 15 th April 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: File No: Registry: Vancouver. In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION)

Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: File No: Registry: Vancouver. In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION) Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: 20020307 File No: 2001-67384 Registry: Vancouver In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION) BETWEEN: MARY MERCIER CLAIMANT AND: TRANS-GLOBE TRAVEL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 4 th April 2018 On 17 th April Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 4 th April 2018 On 17 th April Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/18141/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 4 th April 2018 On 17 th April 2018 Before DEPUTY

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HUTCHINSON. Between MR UG (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HUTCHINSON. Between MR UG (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/03836/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 April 2018 On 24 April 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL. Between SALLAYMED KAIKAI (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE ) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL. Between SALLAYMED KAIKAI (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE ) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/03638/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 22 May 2014 On 2 nd June 2014 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Ms Hazima Naseem Akhtar Heard on: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Birmingham Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th July 2016 On 26 th July Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Birmingham Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th July 2016 On 26 th July Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/16164/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Birmingham Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th July 2016 On 26 th July 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 23 September 2015 On 24 September Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BLUM. Between KHADIJA ADAM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 23 September 2015 On 24 September Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BLUM. Between KHADIJA ADAM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) IAC-FH-CK-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/03436/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 23 September 2015 On 24 September 2015

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02086/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02086/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/02086/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 23 October 2017 On 25 October 2017 Before Deputy

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated on 7 December 2015 On 4 January Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated on 7 December 2015 On 4 January Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Glasgow Decision & Reasons Promulgated on 7 December 2015 On 4 January 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN Between REBECCA

More information

LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL

LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario Citation: Skyway Travel Inc. v. Registrar, Travel Industry Act, 2002, 2017 ONLAT- TIA 10690 Date: 2017-08-01 File Number:

More information

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. N M Dutch for Appellant I R Murray and R K Thomson for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. N M Dutch for Appellant I R Murray and R K Thomson for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PURSUANT TO S 200 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ESHUN. Between [H D] (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ESHUN. Between [H D] (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/08471/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 February 2018 On 1 March 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 3 February 2016 On 24 February Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RAMSHAW. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 3 February 2016 On 24 February Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RAMSHAW. Between IAC-AH-DN-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/30396/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 February 2016 On 24 February 2016

More information

IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL SG (Stateless Nepalese: Refugee Removal Directions) Bhutan [2005] UKIAT 00025 Between: IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Date of Hearing: 8 November 2004 Determination delivered orally at Hearing Date Determination

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Burhan Ahmad Khan Lodhi Heard on: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 25 July 2014 On 11 August 2014 Oral determination given following hearing. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 25 July 2014 On 11 August 2014 Oral determination given following hearing. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/30481/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 25 July 2014 On 11 August 2014 Oral determination given

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2006- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And, KAJI J.A. NYEKA KOU Vs. REPUBLIC (Appeal from the Decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Arusha)-

More information

JUDGMENT. Baptiste (Appellant) v Investment Managers Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)

JUDGMENT. Baptiste (Appellant) v Investment Managers Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) Easter Term [2018] UKPC 13 Privy Council Appeal No 0042 of 2017 JUDGMENT Baptiste (Appellant) v Investment Managers Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of

More information

Land Titles Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter L. 5., as amended

Land Titles Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter L. 5., as amended Notice: Personal information from this decision has been redacted for the purposes of making this decision available online. For additional information contact: Senior Legal and Technical Analyst at 416-325-4130.

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FRANCES. Between [S A] (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FRANCES. Between [S A] (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 24 th July 2017 On 17 th August 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FRANCES Between

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 25 November 2014 On 31 December 2014 Oral Judgment given.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 25 November 2014 On 31 December 2014 Oral Judgment given. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 25 November 2014 On 31 December 2014 Oral Judgment given Before THE HON. LORD

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Harmondsworth Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 January 2015 On 12 February 2015 Prepared 12 January 2015.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Harmondsworth Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 January 2015 On 12 February 2015 Prepared 12 January 2015. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Harmondsworth Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 January 2015 On 12 February 2015 Prepared 12 January 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 4 December 2017 On 22 January Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BLUM

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 4 December 2017 On 22 January Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BLUM Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/08943/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 4 December 2017 On 22 January 2018 Before UPPER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE AD. 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE AD. 2010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE AD. 2010 CLAIM NO. 773 of 2010 BETWEEN: HAVEN HOUSE CLAIMANT AND THADEUS LESLIE DEFENDANT Before: Justice Minnet Hafiz-Bertram Ms. Pricilla Banner of Courtenay Coye LLP for

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 13, 2003 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 13, 2003 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 13, 2003 Session BOBBY G. HELTON, ET AL. v. JAMES EARL CURETON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cocke County No. 01-010 Telford E. Forgety,

More information

HERMUS CYRUS CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE. 2011: June : February 7 JUDGMENT

HERMUS CYRUS CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE. 2011: June : February 7 JUDGMENT THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 232 OF 2008 BETWEEN: HERMUS CYRUS v CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE Claimant Defendant Appearances:

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Appellant and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Appellant and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Columbus House, Newport Determination Promulgated On 14 April 2015 On 17 April 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB Between

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN. ALAN DICK AND COMPANY LIMITED [Improperly sued as Alan Dick and Company] AND FAST FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN. ALAN DICK AND COMPANY LIMITED [Improperly sued as Alan Dick and Company] AND FAST FREIGHT FORWARDERS LIMITED AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL No. 214 of 2010 BETWEEN ALAN DICK AND COMPANY LIMITED [Improperly sued as Alan Dick and Company] APPELLANT AND FAST FREIGHT FORWARDERS

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 6 January 2015 On 15 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A LEWIS. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 6 January 2015 On 15 January Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A LEWIS. Between IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 6 January 2015 On 15 January 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCCLURE. Between NC (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCCLURE. Between NC (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/14028/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st March 2018 On 6 th April 2018 Before DEPUTY

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 th April 2018 On 14 th May Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 th April 2018 On 14 th May Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: EA/02223/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 th April 2018 On 14 th May 2018 Before DEPUTY

More information

LAURA JANE GEORGE Applicant. AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent. Ellen France, Randerson and French JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT

LAURA JANE GEORGE Applicant. AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent. Ellen France, Randerson and French JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA731/2013 [2014] NZCA 209 BETWEEN AND LAURA JANE GEORGE Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 12 May 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Ellen France, Randerson

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Taimoor Khan Heard on: Friday, 24 August 2018 Location: ACCA s Offices, The Adelphi,

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 2 September 2015 On 18 September Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 2 September 2015 On 18 September Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: AA/03525/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Columbus House, Decision & Reasons Promulgated Newport On 2 September 2015 On 18 September 2015

More information

Ombudsman s Determination

Ombudsman s Determination Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondent Mr L NHS Pension Scheme (the Scheme) NHS Pensions (as a service provided by NHS Business Services Authority (NHS BSA) Complaint Summary Mr L has complained

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 3 January 2007 On 23 April Before. Senior Immigration Judge Storey Immigration Judge Dawson. Between.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 3 January 2007 On 23 April Before. Senior Immigration Judge Storey Immigration Judge Dawson. Between. Asylum and Immigration Tribunal MM (Article 8 family life dependency) Zambia [2007] UKAIT 00040 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 3 January 2007 On 23 April 2007 Before

More information

BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY DECISION

BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY DECISION BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY In the Matter of Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs. DECISION Complaint No. 2010021621201 Dated: May 20, 2014 Michael

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Glasgow Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 November 2015 On 31 March Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Glasgow Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 November 2015 On 31 March Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DEANS. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/08210/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Glasgow Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 November 2015 On 31 March 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

DECISION. 1 The complainant, Ms JN, first made a complaint to the Tolling Customer Ombudsman (TCO) on 28 May 2012, as follows: 1

DECISION. 1 The complainant, Ms JN, first made a complaint to the Tolling Customer Ombudsman (TCO) on 28 May 2012, as follows: 1 DECISION Background 1 The complainant, Ms JN, first made a complaint to the Tolling Customer Ombudsman (TCO) on 28 May 2012, as follows: 1 My name is [JN] govia account ****170. I live in [Town, State].

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and. Appearances For the Claimant: Ms. A. Cadie-Bruney For the Defendant: Mr. K. Monplaisir QC and Ms. M.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and. Appearances For the Claimant: Ms. A. Cadie-Bruney For the Defendant: Mr. K. Monplaisir QC and Ms. M. SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 595 of 2001 BETWEEN NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION Claimant and ROCHAMEL CONSTRUCTION LIMITED GARVIN FRENCH GARRY LILYWHITE Defendants Appearances For

More information

ARBITRATION SUBJECT. Appeal of termination for violation of found property policy. ISSUES CHRONOLOGY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ARBITRATION SUBJECT. Appeal of termination for violation of found property policy. ISSUES CHRONOLOGY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Glendon #4 ARBITRATION EMPLOYER, INC. -and EMPLOYEE Termination Appeal SUBJECT Appeal of termination for violation of found property policy. ISSUES Was Employee terminated for just cause? CHRONOLOGY Termination:

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April Before IAC-AH-DP-V2 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

BERLINWASSER INTERNATIONAL AG MAURITIUS v BENYDIN L.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS. Berlinwasser International AG Mauritius

BERLINWASSER INTERNATIONAL AG MAURITIUS v BENYDIN L.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS. Berlinwasser International AG Mauritius BERLINWASSER INTERNATIONAL AG MAURITIUS v BENYDIN L.R 2017 SCJ 120 Record No. 6823 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- Berlinwasser International AG Mauritius Appellant v L.R. Benydin

More information

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. LCRO 30/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING BETWEEN a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] GN Applicant

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between MRS STEPHANIE LAURE FOYA (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JUSS. Between MRS STEPHANIE LAURE FOYA (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) and IAC-AH-DP-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st March 2016 On 25 th April 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before. Between. MR MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) Appellant. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before. Between. MR MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE (ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE) Appellant. and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/31161/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House On 5 September 2014 Determination Promulgated On 11 September 2014 Before DEPUTY JUDGE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 26 January 2018 On 21 February Before. UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE McWILLIAM. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 26 January 2018 On 21 February Before. UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE McWILLIAM. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 January 2018 On 21 February 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On: 2 May 2018 On: 8 May Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE. Between [G N] and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On: 2 May 2018 On: 8 May Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE. Between [G N] and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On: 2 May 2018 On: 8 May 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE Between [G N]

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/06395/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/06395/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/06395/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 23 March 2018 On 29 March 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd January 2018 On 22 nd February Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd January 2018 On 22 nd February Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/28692/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd January 2018 On 22 nd February 2018 Before

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 8 October 2015 On 12 October Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SAFFER. Between THN (ANONYMITY ORDER MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 8 October 2015 On 12 October Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SAFFER. Between THN (ANONYMITY ORDER MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/05252/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Taylor House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 October 2015 On 12 October 2015 Before DEPUTY

More information

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 10582-2010 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and DENISE ELAINE GAMMACK Respondent Before: Miss J Devonish

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. on: On 15 April 2015 On 28 April Before LORD BANNATYNE UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. on: On 15 April 2015 On 28 April Before LORD BANNATYNE UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/07021/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision sent to parties on: On 15 April 2015 On 28 April 2015 Before LORD BANNATYNE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th February 2018 On 2 nd March Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th February 2018 On 2 nd March Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/05613/2017 PA/05616/2017 PA/05618/2017 PA/05621/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 th February

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 117/12 Non Reportable In the matter between: NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Neutral citation: Seyisi v The State

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND PATRICK MANNING, PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO APPELLANTS AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND PATRICK MANNING, PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civ. App. No. 71 of 2007 BETWEEN PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND PATRICK MANNING, PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st September 2016 On 4 th October Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st September 2016 On 4 th October Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 21 st September 2016 On 4 th October 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information