FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/ :25 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2017 EXHIBIT C
|
|
- Merry Hodges
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/ :25 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2017 EXHIBIT C
2 September 22, 2016 In re Hestia B.V. Purchase and Sale Agreement Amended Section 5(d)(i) Earnout Dispute Notice of the Sellers Representative Pursuant to Section 5(d)(i) of the Agreement1 and as a result of Purchaser s failure to timely provide information requested by the Sellers Representative pursuant to Section 5(d)(ii),2 the Sellers Representative hereby amends his Section 5(d)(i) Earnout Dispute Notice dated August 31, 2016 to set forth his disagreement with the calculation of the Earnout Amounts contained in Purchaser s purported (a) Income Statement for the twelve month period ending January 31, 2016 and Earnout Statement for the twelve month period ending January 31, 2016 (collectively, the 2016 Earnout Statement ); and (b) Earnout Statements for each of the periods ending February 29, 2016, March 31, 2016, April 30, 2016 and May 31, 2016, respectively (collectively, the Four Extended Earnout Statements and with the 2016 Earnout Statement, the Five Earnout Statements ). The basis for the Sellers Representative s disagreements with Purchaser s calculations of the Earnout Amounts is set forth below, to the extent he is reasonably able to do so. I. DISAGREEMENT WITH PURCHASER S CALCULATION OF THE EARNOUT AMOUNTS SET FORTH IN THE FOUR EXTENDED EARNOUT STATEMENTS A. Calculation of Actual Gross Profit and the Earnout Amount for the Extended Earnout Period The Sellers Representative disagrees with Purchaser s calculation of Actual Gross Profit for the Extended Earnout Period as set forth in each of the Four Extended Earnout Statements. Purchaser appears to calculate Actual Gross Profit for each of the Four Extended Earnout Statements using a twelve month period ending on the last day of the month for each of the Four Earnout Statements -- i.e., a twelve month period ending February 29, 2016, March 31, 2016, April 30, 2016 and May 31, 2016, respectively. Purchaser s calculation violates the terms of the Agreement governing the calculation of Actual Gross Profit during the Extended Earnout Period. The Agreement directs that Actual Gross Profit for the First Earnout Period (including for the avoidance of doubt, any Extended Earnout Period) shall be calculated based on the twelve-month period ended on January 31, 2016 as automatically extended to the First Extended Earnout Date, which is defined as the earlier of (a) May 31, 2016 and (b) the last day of any month during the period commencing on February 1, 2016 until May 31, 2016 in which 1 Agreement refers to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among GardaWorld Consulting (UK) Limited, Hestia B.V., the Sellers, the Sellers Representative and Garda World Security Corporation (solely for purposes of sections 12.3 and 12.16), dated as of July 10, All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 2 Purchaser delayed until the evening of August 30, 2016 to respond to the Section 5(d)(ii) Requests of the Sellers Representative (Third Set), delivered on August 5, Purchaser s delay denied the Sellers Representative the opportunity to address the new disclosures in his initial Section 5(d)(i) Earnout Dispute Notice, which was due the next day, thereby necessitating this amended notice. Moreover, despite the additional information provided in the delayed production, Purchaser still has not fulfilled its disclosure obligations under Section 5(d)(ii) and, as set forth below, the Sellers Representative reserves all his rights in that regard.
3 the Actual Gross Profit for the First Earnout Period equals or exceeds. See Agreement 5(a)(i), 13.1 (defining terms Extended Earnout Period, First Earnout Period, and First Extended Earnout Date ). These provisions unambiguously direct that, during the First Earnout Period (including any Extended Earnout Period), Actual Gross Profit shall be calculated over a period of 12 through 16 months collectively -- i.e., over the twelve months ended January 31, 2016 extended though May 31, subject only to earlier termination if Actual Gross Profit equals or exceeds in any month during that extended First Earnout Period. Purchaser s failure to calculate Actual Gross Profit and the Earnout Amount for the Extended Earnout Period for the First Earnout Period consistent with the terms of the Agreement constitutes a breach of 5 of the Agreement. II. DISAGREEMENTS WITH PURCHASER S CALCULATION OF THE EARNOUT AMOUNTS SET FORTH IN THE FIVE EARNOUT STATEMENTS A. Basra Governorate The Sellers Representative disagrees with the reduction of from the calculation of Actual Gross Profit on the following grounds: a. The reduction of Actual Gross Profit is impermissible under the terms of 5 of the Agreement. Under the Agreement, Purchaser s. Accordingly, Purchaser s attempt to reduce Actual Gross Profit by constitutes a breach of 5 of the Agreement; b. In the alternative, the reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the is improper because it is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: i. Purchaser has failed to supply sufficient competent evidential matter to show that the. To the contrary, evidence supplied by the Purchaser showed that,. Moreover, pursuant to of the Agreement, Purchaser (and the Operating Companies) have a duty, which continued through and beyond May 31, 2016, to use good faith efforts to, which duty precluded Purchaser from. Accordingly, for both of these reasons, the proposed reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the amount of is improper; 2
4 ii. In the alternative, to, in whole or part, such amount should, consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries,. B. 3 Afghanistan Withholding Tax The Sellers Representative disagrees with the from the calculation of Actual Gross Profit Afghanistan Withholding Tax on the following grounds: of the so-called a. The Actual Gross Profit by the amount of the Afghanistan Withholding Tax is impermissible under the terms of 5 of the Agreement. Pursuant to the Agreement, the definition of Actual Gross Profit excludes any and all corporate or entity-level Taxes.... See Agreement 13.1(a)(definition of Actual Gross Profit, Taxes, and Taxing Authority ). Because Purchaser contends that the Afghanistan Withholding Tax and Purchaser s attempt to do so constitutes a breach of the Agreement; b. In the alternative, to the extent that the Afghanistan Withholding Tax the Afghanistan Withholding Tax is impermissible because it is premised on Purchaser s that was known or knowable, in whole or part, as of December 2, 2015, the date when Purchaser submitted its Closing Statement and Closing Date Working Capital., however, was not recorded by Purchaser on either the Closing Statement or the Closing Date Working Capital. Pursuant to 4(b) of the Agreement, Purchaser may not amend, adjust, supplement or modify the Closing Statement or the amount of the... Closing Date Working Capital.... Accordingly, Purchaser may not attempt, in violation of the contractual protections of 4(b) of the Agreement, pursuant to 5; c. In the alternative, the Afghanistan Withholding Tax is improper because it is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with the past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: i. Afghanistan Withholding Tax is improper 3 Each of the Earnout Amounts in the Five Earnout Statements reflect an increasing portion of the reducing Purchaser s calculation of Actual Gross Profit. For the reasons set forth above, the Sellers Representative disagrees with the recognition of any and all of the related to the so-called Afghanistan Withholding Tax. 3
5 . Accordingly, ; ii. In the alternative, the Afghanistan Withholding Tax could properly be recognized as of the last day of any of the Five Earnout Statements, : (a) that period prior to February 1, 2015, must be recognized as either (i) period prior to February 1, 2015 or alternatively (ii) on the Operating Companies consolidated income statement for periods after February 1, 2015 in a, so as to not violate applicable revenue matching principles and distort the reported profit margins of the Operating Companies; and (b) which accrued for any period after February 1, 2015 must be recorded in such a manner as to not violate applicable revenue matching principles and distort the reported profit margins of the Operating Companies. Accordingly, during the period after February 1, Because Purchaser has failed to supply sufficient competent evidential matter to show, despite repeated requests of the Sellers Representative, ; d. In the alternative, Afghanistan Withholding Tax the Afghanistan Withholding Tax is impermissible because it is premised, in whole or part, on Purchaser s and which, if Purchaser s assertions are proven, of the Agreement based on the including potentially those the Company contained in. Under the Agreement, Purchaser s recovery for is solely limited to the amounts identified in those provisions of of the Agreement governing. See. Accordingly, Purchaser s attempt to the Afghanistan Withholding Tax is contrary to the terms of the Agreement, would result in a windfall to Purchaser and should not be allowed. 4
6 C. Unbilled Accounts Receivable The Sellers Representative disagrees with the reduction of from the calculation of Actual Gross Profit arising from the, on the following grounds: a. The reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the amount of the is impermissible under the terms of 5 of the Agreement. recover. Under the Agreement, Purchaser s sole remedy for its inability to invoice or Purchaser s attempt to and thereby both the Agreement;. Accordingly, constitutes a breach of 5 of b. In the alternative, to the extent that the was, the reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the is impermissible because it is premised on Purchaser s recognition of a contingent liability that was known or knowable, in whole or part, as of December 2, 2015, the date when Purchaser submitted its Closing Statement and Closing Date Working Capital. Such a contingent liability, however, was not recorded by Purchaser on either the Closing Statement or the Closing Date Working Capital. Pursuant to 4(b) of the Agreement, Purchaser may not amend, adjust, supplement or modify the Closing Statement or the amount of the... Closing Date Working Capital.... Accordingly, Purchaser may not attempt, in violation of the contractual protections of 4(b) of the Agreement, to now record a liability which it failed to recognize as of the Closing Date for the sole purpose of expensing that liability and reducing the calculation of Actual Gross Profit pursuant to 5; c. In the alternative, the reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the is improper because it is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with the past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: i. Purchaser has failed, despite repeated requests of the Sellers Representative, to supply any competent evidential matter Accordingly, to the extent the was so accrued, Purchaser s 5
7 attempt to record a duplicative and recognize a related expense to reduce Actual Gross Profit would violate applicable accounting requirements and yield an unwarranted windfall to Purchaser; ii. In the alternative, to the extent the, Purchaser may not recognize such liability as an expense affecting Actual Gross Profit in the twelve month period ending January 31, 2016 or any periods ending thereafter, as such expense related to a which was known or knowable in its entirety prior to February 1, 2015 and accordingly should be recorded, if at all, as an expense either (a) to periods prior to February 1, or (b) if recorded in any period after February 1, 2015, then recorded as an extraordinary item on the Operating Companies consolidated income statement in such a manner that it does not affect Actual Gross Profit, so as to not violate applicable revenue matching principles and distort the reported profit margins of the Operating Companies; d. In the alternative, to the extent that the was, the reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the amount of the is impermissible because it is premised on Purchaser s recognition of a supposed undisclosed contingent liability that was purportedly known or knowable as of July 10, 2015 and which, if Purchaser s assertions are proven, might support a provisions of. Under the Agreement, Purchaser s recovery for is solely limited to the amounts identified in those. Accordingly, Purchaser s attempt to reduce Actual Gross Profit by 4 The Sellers Representative notes that, in its August 30, 2016 disclosures, Purchaser revealed that, in connection with the 2016 Earnout Statement, it expensed (thereby reducing Actual Gross Profit reported in the 2016 Earnout Statement) on the grounds that such an. The Sellers Representative believes that expense is included for the purported that is the subject of this disagreement, even though the brief explanations Purchaser has given for recognizing the separate expense amounts are entirely different. Because Purchaser has denied the Sellers Representative the ability to explore the basis for both the and the, however, the Sellers Representative has been unable to confirm his belief or explore the different rationales Purchaser has offered for recognizing the expenses. To preserve his rights, the Sellers Representative objects to the recognition of the based on either the reasons set forth in the text above or, to the extent Purchaser seeks to justify the expense on a different rationale, because Purchaser has offered. Consistent with his objections set forth below with respect to Purchaser s failure to comply with its disclosure obligations under Section 5(d)(ii) of the Agreement, the Sellers Representative reserves his right to amend, modify or supplement this disagreement, as appropriate. 6
8 contrary to the terms of the Agreement, would result in a windfall to Purchaser and should not be allowed. D. Unbilled Accounts Receivable The Sellers Representative disagrees with the reduction of from the calculation of Actual Gross Profit arising from the, on the following grounds: a. The reduction of Actual Gross Profit by of on the grounds that such amounts are is impermissible under the terms of 5 of the Agreement. The amount sought to be. Under the Agreement, Purchaser s sole remedy for its inability to invoice or recover the amount of any See. Accordingly, Purchaser s attempt to Actual Gross Profit by constitutes a breach of 5 of the Agreement; b. In the alternative, the reduction of Actual Gross Profit by is improper because it is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: i. Purchaser has failed, despite multiple requests by the Sellers Representative, to supply sufficient competent evidential matter to show that the. Moreover, pursuant to t, Purchaser (and the Operating Companies) have a duty, which continued through and beyond May 31, 2016, to which duty precluded Purchaser from discontinuing all reasonable efforts to. Accordingly, for both of these reasons, the proposed is improper; ii. In the alternative, to the extent that any, such portion should be on the Operating Companies consolidated income statement so that it does not affect Actual Gross Profit because the prior to February 1, 2015 and for the twelve month period ending January 31, 2016 or any period thereafter would be inconsistent with applicable revenue matching principles and would distort the reported profit margins of the Operating Companies. 7
9 E. Unbilled Accounts Receivable The Sellers Representative disagrees with the reduction of the calculation of Actual Gross Profit arising from the, on the following grounds: from a. The reduction of Actual Gross Profit by the recognition of a reserve of is impermissible under the terms of 5 of the Agreement. The amount sought to be would reduce the aggregate amount of the -- i.e., the. Under the Agreement, Purchaser s sole remedy for its, and. Accordingly, Purchaser s attempt to reduce Actual Gross Profit by recognizing a associated with the constitutes a breach of 5 of the Agreement; b. In the alternative, the reduction of Actual Gross Profit by recognition of a associated with the is improper because it is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: i. Purchaser has failed to show that a is appropriate because it has failed to supply sufficient competent evidential matter demonstrating that an, in full or part. Moreover, pursuant to, Purchaser (and the Operating Companies) have a duty, which continued through and beyond May 31, 2016, to which duty precluded Purchaser from concluding that. Accordingly, for both of these reasons, the proposed reduction of Actual Gross Profit by recognizing a is improper; ii. In the alternative, to the extent that any portion of the is appropriate, such portion should be on the Operating Companies consolidated income statement so that it does not affect Actual Gross Profit because the against which the relate to earned prior to February 1, 2015 and for the twelve month period ending January 31, 2016 or any period thereafter would be inconsistent with applicable revenue matching principles and would distort the reported profit margins of the Operating Companies. 8
10 F. Unbilled Accounts Receivable The Sellers Representative disagrees with the the calculation of Actual Gross Profit on the grounds that such a reduction is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. In particular, despite multiple requests by the Sellers Representative, Purchaser has failed to supply any competent evidential matter sufficient to show that the whole or part. To the contrary, Purchaser seeks to without reference to the Operating Companies experience and without considering the substantial improvements the Operating Companies made in their internal controls based on their, which should enable the Operating Companies to realize an even higher success rate for effort in attempting to, in than previously experienced. Moreover, Purchaser seeks to after having invested far less time and. Accordingly, because Purchaser has failed to supply any competent evidential matter to show that the based on a method inconsistent with past practices of the Company and its Subsidiaries, the proposed reduction to Actual Gross Profit is improper. G. Training WIP 5 The Sellers Representative disagrees with the reduction of the calculation of Actual Gross Profit arising from the WIP related to training costs on the grounds that such a reduction is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: a. Despite multiple requests by the Sellers Representative, Purchaser has failed to supply documents or other information sufficient to show that the. Among other things, Purchaser s explanations 5 Purchaser initially disclosed that it had Training WIP in calculating Actual Gross Profit for the 2016 Earnout Statement, which it later corrected to be. Purchaser contends that it for Training WIP when calculating Actual Gross Profit for the period ending February 29, Although Purchaser s response leaves uncertain the amounts relating to Training WIP for that were in the calculation of Actual Gross Profit in particular Earnout Statements, the Sellers Representative understands that the Training WIP has ultimately been over the course of the Five Earnout Statements and objects to Purchaser s calculation for the reasons set forth above. 9
11 for its proposed reduction to Actual Gross Profit are internally inconsistent, conclusory and lacking sufficient competent evidential matter to support management s supposed judgments that. Moreover, Purchaser has failed to show that, in, it employed a method consistent with past practices of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. Accordingly, the in Actual Gross Profit is improper. H. 6 Training WIP The Sellers Representative disagrees with the from the calculation of Actual Gross Profit arising from the recognition of a WIP training incurred in connection with on the grounds that such a is not in accordance with applicable accounting requirements nor consistent with past practice of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. That is because of the following: a. Purchaser has failed to show that a is appropriate because it has failed to supply any competent evidential matter demonstrating that an equivalent amount of the training WIP, in whole or part. Moreover, Purchaser has failed to show that, in, it employed a method consistent with past practices of the Company and its Subsidiaries, as required by Section 5(a) of the Agreement. Accordingly, the proposed in Actual Gross Profit is improper. I. The Sellers Representative disagrees with the reduction of from the calculation of Actual Gross Profit in connection with the on the grounds that Purchaser has failed, despite multiple requests by the Sellers Representative, to supply documents or other information sufficient to show that Purchaser has diligently and in good faith sought to obtain recovery of the, in full or part. III. OBJECTIONS TO PURCHASER S PERFORMANCE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER 5 AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS A. Purchaser Has Failed To Comply With 5(d)(ii) The Sellers Representative objects to Purchaser s failure to comply with its obligations under 5(d)(ii) of the Agreement. Among other things, Purchaser has failed to fully and timely produce documents and other information requested by the Sellers Representative concerning Purchaser s calculation of the Actual Gross Profit and Earnout 6 The Sellers Representative understands that the at issue was first recognized in the monthly period ending April 30, Accordingly, this disagreement only relates to Purchaser s calculation of the Earnout Amount in the Earnout Statements for each of the periods ending April 30, 2016 and May 31,
12 Amount in each of the Five Earnout Statements. Moreover, Purchaser has improperly limited or explicitly denied access by the Sellers Representative to personnel and the Representatives of Purchaser and its Affiliates (including their respective accountants) with knowledge relevant to Purchaser s calculation of the Actual Gross Profit and Earnout Amount in each of the Five Earnout Statements. Purchaser s conduct constitutes a breach of its duties under the Agreement that has substantially prejudiced the Sellers Representative s ability to review, evaluate and object to Purchaser s calculation of the Actual Gross Profit and Earnout Amount in each of the Five Earnout Statements. The Sellers Representative reserves the right to seek appropriate relief and/or remedies for Purchaser s violation of its contractual obligations in the appropriate forum. B. Reservation of Rights by the Sellers Representative Due to Purchaser s violation of its obligations under 5(d)(ii) of the Agreement, the Sellers Representative hereby reserves its right to amend, modify, supplement or add to the disagreements set forth in this Earnout Dispute Notice. 2. The Sellers Representative s statement of his disagreements with Purchaser s calculation of the Actual Gross Profit and Earnout Amounts in each of the Five Earnout Statements is set forth in the alternative. The assertion of one disagreement is without prejudice to the assertion of any other disagreement, whether on the same or a different topic. 3. The Sellers Representative, by stating his disagreements with Purchaser s calculation of the Actual Gross Profit and Earnout Amounts in each of the Five Earnout Statements, does not waive, but instead expressly preserves, his right to seek resolution of, and any appropriate relief in connection with, his disagreement with Purchaser s calculation and objection to Purchaser s conduct in such appropriate forums as are set forth in 5(d)(iv) of the Agreement. 11
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/03/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/03/2017 EXHIBIT B
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/03/2017 05:01 PM INDEX NO. 655726/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/03/2017 EXHIBIT B August 31, 2016 In re Hestia B.V. Purchase and Sale Agreement Section 5(d)(i)
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/04/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/04/2017 EXHIBIT 1
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/04/2017 04:21 PM INDEX NO. 655726/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/04/2017 EXHIBIT 1 Ú ÔÛÜæ ÒÛÉ ÇÑÎÕ ÝÑËÒÌÇ ÝÔÛÎÕ ðïñðíñîðïé ðëæðï ÐÓ ÒÇÍÝÛÚ ÜÑÝò ÒÑò îì ÒÜÛÈ
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ :37 PM
INDEX NO. 655726/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 12:37 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK JEFFREY PAUL ARNOLD DAY,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/29/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/29/2016 03:27 PM INDEX NO. 652301/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK AMBASE CORPORATION, 111 WEST
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/20/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------- x THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION,
More informationEXECUTION VERSION JULY 31, 2012 COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE I-95 HOV/HOT LANES PROJECT DATED AS OF JULY 31, 2012 BY AND BETWEEN
COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE I-95 HOV/HOT LANES PROJECT DATED AS OF BY AND BETWEEN VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia AND 95 EXPRESS LANES LLC,
More informationWHEN CAN YOU STOP WORK FOR NONPAYMENT?
WHEN CAN YOU STOP WORK FOR NONPAYMENT? PLANNING AHEAD When an owner or general contractor has not paid a roofing contractor the sums it is owed under the contract, the roofing contractor is faced with
More information2010 PA Super 144. Appeal from the Order Entered August 19, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, Civil Division, at No
2010 PA Super 144 ESB BANK, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : JAMES E. MCDADE A/K/A JAMES E. : MCDADE JR. AND JEANNE L. MCDADE, : : APPEAL OF: JEANNE L. MCDADE, : : Appellant
More informationCase Document 635 Filed in TXSB on 03/27/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 17-36709 Document 635 Filed in TXSB on 03/27/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/22/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/22/2016 04:31 PM INDEX NO. 151703/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/22/2016 EXHIBIT
More informationPost-Closing Earnouts in M&A Transactions: Avoiding Common Disputes
Post-Closing Earnouts in M&A Transactions: Avoiding Common Disputes Winter 2011 Kevin R. Shannon and Michael K. Reilly are partners in the Wilmington, Delaware law firm of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP.
More informationORDAT General Conditions of Contract
ORDAT Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2... 3 1 Remuneration, payment, service protection, and deadlines... 3 2 Collaboration, duties of cooperation, confidentiality... 4 3 Disruption
More informationISDA. International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. U.S. EMISSIONS ALLOWANCE TRANSACTION ANNEX. to the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. U.S. EMISSIONS ALLOWANCE TRANSACTION ANNEX to the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement dated as of... ( Effective Date ) between... and... (
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/11/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2016 0426 PM INDEX NO. 653624/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/11/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PHILIPPE BUHANNIC and PATRICK
More informationStandard Form of Agreement Between Contractor and Subcontractor
Standard Form of Agreement Between Contractor and Subcontractor GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARTICLE 1 THE SUBCONTRACT DOCUMENTS 1.1 The Subcontract Documents consist of (1) these General Terms and Conditions,
More informationCase3:09-cv MMC Document22 Filed09/08/09 Page1 of 8
Case:0-cv-0-MMC Document Filed0/0/0 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 United States District Court For the Northern District of California NICOLE GLAUS,
More informationISO Enforcement Protocol
FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF First Revised Sheet No. 858 FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Superseding Original Sheet No. 858 ISO Enforcement Protocol Issued on: May 20, 2004 FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF Substitute First
More informationCase 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204
Case 3:09-cv-01736-N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S OF LONDON
More informationCboe Global Markets Subscriber Agreement
Cboe Global Markets Subscriber Agreement Vendor may not modify or waive any term of this Agreement. Any attempt to modify this Agreement, except by Cboe Data Services, LLC ( CDS ) or its affiliates, is
More informationNTT Electronics AMERICA, INC. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
NTT Electronics AMERICA, INC. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE The following terms and conditions (hereinafter Terms and Conditions ) apply to all quotations, purchase orders, order acknowledgements
More informationPublic Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co NY Slip Op 30293(U) March 16, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
Public Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co. 2006 NY Slip Op 30293(U) March 16, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 0601202/2005 Judge: Louis B. York Republished
More informationSAMPLE FORMS - CONTRACTS Compression Services Agreement (Form 8100) (See Attached Form)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Revised CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO. 51176-G LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CANCELING Original CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO. 49858-G SAMPLE FORMS - CONTRACTS Compression Services Agreement (Form
More informationSTS RESEARCH CENTER PARTICIPANT USER FILE RESEARCH PROGRAM DATA USE AGREEMENT
MODEL FOR PUF RESEARCH STS RESEARCH CENTER PARTICIPANT USER FILE RESEARCH PROGRAM DATA USE AGREEMENT THIS DATA USE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into and made effective the day of, 20 (the Effective
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION DELTA AIR LINES, INC. *
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. * The name of the Corporation is Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the Corporation ). The original Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
More informationAPPLICATION FOR BUSINESS CREDIT
_. Return Completed Application to: Pike Industries, Inc. 3 Eastgate Park Road Belmont, NH 03220 Phone: 603.527.5100 Fax: 603.527.5101 Email: r1arremit@pikeindustries.com APPLICATION FOR BUSINESS CREDIT
More informationAgreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Customers
6101 03/10/2015 Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Customers This Agreement is entered into between Interactive Brokers ("IB") and the undersigned Advisor. WHEREAS, IB provides
More informationISDA. International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. U.S. EMISSIONS ALLOWANCE TRANSACTION ANNEX. to the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. U.S. EMISSIONS ALLOWANCE TRANSACTION ANNEX to the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement dated as of... ( Effective Date ) between... and... (
More informationFANDIS NORTH AMERICA CORP
FANDIS NORTH AMERICA CORP TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE February 4, 2017 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The terms and conditions contained herein (the Agreement ) apply to, are incorporated in, and form an integral
More informationThe Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Republic of Belarus, hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties,"
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United Mexican
More informationISDA. International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. AMENDED AND RESTATED INTEREST RATE 2002 MASTER AGREEMENT. dated as of August 1, 2014
Execution Version ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. AMENDED AND RESTATED INTEREST RATE 2002 MASTER AGREEMENT dated as of August 1, 2014 Royal Bank of Canada ( Party A ) and RBC
More informationINDIVIDUAL 401(k) RECORDKEEPING SERVICE AGREEMENT
INDIVIDUAL 401(k) RECORDKEEPING SERVICE AGREEMENT The Employer, on its own behalf and on behalf of the Plan Administrator, and the Recordkeeper hereby make the following agreement: 1. Definitions: In this
More informationFEDERAL RESOURCES SUPPLY COMPANY GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES
1. Applicability. FEDERAL RESOURCES SUPPLY COMPANY GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES These terms and conditions for services (these Terms ) are the only terms and conditions which
More informationApproved By: GR Auto Gallery, LLC
CUSTOMER DETAILS First Name: Email: Return Odometer Mileage: Purchase Date: Last Name: Phone: VIN: Return Date: CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I confirm that the vehicle has been returned by 5 p.m., within 3
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 56 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2015 EXHIBIT 30
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/28/2015 05:23 PM INDEX NO. 651841/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 56 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2015 EXHIBIT 30 STANDSTILL AGREEMENT THIS STANDSTILL AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is dated
More informationLEVERAGED INSTRUMENTS
To be retained by client TERMS AND CONDITIONS The following terms of trading, read together with the terms and conditions set out in the CONDITIONS GOVERNING PHILLIP SECURITIES TRADING ACCOUNTS, shall
More informationDELAWARE CORPORATE LAW BULLETIN
DELAWARE CORPORATE LAW BULLETIN Delaware Supreme Court Bars Buyer From Using Narrowly- Cabined Working Capital Adjustment To Attack Seller s Alleged Non- Compliance With GAAP Robert S. Reder Professor
More informationCONSTRUCTION CLAIMS DISCLOSURE (NRS )
CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS DISCLOSURE (NRS 113.135) This Construction Claims Disclosure is made as required by NRS 113.135 in contemplation of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement") which may be entered
More informationDOUBT, THE GERMAN VERSION SHALL BE TAKEN AS REFERENCE.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR EVENTS (VERSION: MARCH 2016) THE GERMAN VERSION OF OUR TERMS & CONDITIONS TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE ENGLISH VERSION. IN CASE OF DOUBT, THE GERMAN VERSION SHALL BE TAKEN
More informationANNEX A Standard Special Conditions For The Salvation Army
ANNEX A Standard Special Conditions For The Salvation Army TO BE ATTACHED TO AIA B101-2007 EDITION ABBREVIATED STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT 1. Contract Documents. This Annex supplements,
More informationAmendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Reinsurance contracts held underlying insurance contracts with direct participation features
STAFF PAPER IASB meeting January 2019 Project Paper topic Amendments to IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts Reinsurance contracts held underlying insurance contracts with CONTACTS Laura Kennedy lkennedy@ifrs.org
More informationARBITRATION RULES LJUBLJANA ARBITRATION RULES. Dispute Resolution Since 1928
ARBITRATION RULES Ljubljana Arbitration Centre AT the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia LJUBLJANA ARBITRATION RULES Dispute Resolution Since 1928 Ljubljana Arbitration Centre at the Chamber
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Appellant :
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Northeast Bradford School District, : : Appellant : : v. : No. 2007 C.D. 2016 : Argued: June 5, 2017 Northeast Bradford Education : Association, PSEA/NEA : BEFORE:
More informationKGS-Alpha Capital Markets, L.P.
KGS-Alpha Capital Markets, L.P. TERMS OF BUSINESS Last Updated: December 10, 2014 (Effective: December 11, 2014) By doing business with KGS-Alpha Capital Markets, L.P. ( KGS ), You, the Customer, accept
More informationNEBBIOLO STANDARD TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SALE
NEBBIOLO STANDARD TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. GENERAL These Terms and Conditions of Sale ("Terms and Conditions") and any attached exhibits [together with those terms and conditions appearing on the
More informationWentworth Distributors NZ Ltd Terms & Conditions of Trade Definitions Acceptance Electronic Transactions Act 2002 Change in Control
1. Definitions 1.1 WDNZL means Wentworth Distributors NZ Ltd, its successors and assigns or any person acting on behalf of and with the authority of Wentworth Distributors NZ Ltd. 1.2 Client means the
More informationEXHIBIT C - Contract for Residential Fire Sprinkler Demonstration Trailer
EXHIBIT C - Contract for Residential Fire Sprinkler Demonstration Trailer CONTRACTOR: 20 East Main Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 Telephone: 541/488-6002 Fax: 541/488-5311 DATE AGREEMENT PREPARED: BEGINNING
More informationREGULATED COMMERCE RETAILER ELECTRONIC SERVICES AGREEMENT
REGULATED COMMERCE RETAILER ELECTRONIC SERVICES AGREEMENT icontrol SERVICES icontrol Systems USA LLC ( icontrol or Company ) will provide electronic funds transfer (EFT) processing and electronic data
More informationUBS ASSET MANAGEMENT PRIVATE WEALTH SOLUTIONS SM PROGRAM CUSTODY AND EXECUTION AGREEMENT WITH UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
UBS ASSET MANAGEMENT PRIVATE WEALTH SOLUTIONS SM PROGRAM CUSTODY AND EXECUTION AGREEMENT WITH UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. THIS CUSTODY AND EXECUTION AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) describes the securities execution
More informationCase No (Fire Fighter Vincent DiBona's health insurance benefits) OPINION AND AWARD
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION In the Matter of the Arbitration X between PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION OF NASSAU COUNTY, LOCAL 1588, laff and VILLAGE OF GARDEN CITY Case No. 01-17-0005-1878
More informationCase 2:09-cv RK Document 55 Filed 04/18/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-06055-RK Document 55 Filed 04/18/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE : CIVIL ACTION COMPANY, : : Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K
Merrill Corporation 14-14493-1 Tue Jun 03 07:04:43 2014 (V 2.4m-2-P66747CBE) 8-K 107945 c:\jms\107945\14-14493-1\task6812922\14493-1-ba.pdf Chksum: 254396 Cycle 2.0 Doc 1 Page 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES
More informationINTERCONNECTION AND OPERATING AGREEMENT
INTERCONNECTION AND OPERATING AGREEMENT This Interconnection and Operating Agreement ( Agreement ) for the facility located at, in the City of, Michigan, is entered into this day of, 200 by and between
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2017-0277, Michael D. Roche & a. v. City of Manchester, the court on August 2, 2018, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and oral
More informationDC: AVNET, INC. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE PLAN
DC: 4069808-3 AVNET, INC. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE PLAN Avnet, Inc. Voluntary Employee Severance Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Eligibility... 2 Eligible Employees... 2 Circumstances Resulting
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 4:14-cv-00849 Document 118 Filed in TXSD on 09/03/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff,
More informationFebruary 21, Dear Employee,
EDWARD P. MANGANO COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE THEODORE ROOSEVELT EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BUILDING 1550 FRANKLIN AVENUE MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501-4895 516-571-3131 February 21, 2012
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG Reportable/Not Reportable Case no: JR538/14 In the matter between: ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED Applicant and NATIONAL UNION OF MINEWORKERS First Respondent
More informationDC 37, L. 375, 6 OCB2d 12 (BCB 2013) (IP) (Docket No. BCB )
DC 37, L. 375, 6 OCB2d 12 (BCB 2013) (IP) (Docket No. BCB-3042-12) Summary of Decision: The Union alleged that DDC violated NYCCBL 12-306(a)(1) and (4) by hiring outside consultants to perform work that
More information[Date] POLAR CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY TRUST PLC. - and - [name] DEED OF INDEMNITY
[Date] POLAR CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY TRUST PLC - and - [name] DEED OF INDEMNITY Herbert Smith LLP Exchange House Primrose Street London EC2A 2HS 1 THIS DEED is made on the [date] day of [year]. BETWEEN (1)
More informationDocument A401 TM. Standard Form of Agreement Between Contractor and Subcontractor
Document A401 TM 2017 Standard Form of Agreement Between Contractor and Subcontractor AGREEMENT made as of the day of in the year (In words, indicate day, month and year.) BETWEEN the Contractor: (Name,
More informationMETER PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
METER PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS These additional Terms shall govern UL s Meter Performance Certification ( MPC ) Services performed by UL and set out the responsibilities
More informationDate on which the purchase order has been revised.
For all Purchase Orders dated on or after 1 June 2014 : The following Terms & Conditions apply to all purchases made by Pfizer or any of its divisions and subsidiaries (including Wyeth). Pfizer Ltd Standard
More informationFROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Dennis J. Smith, Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether the interpretation of
Present: All the Justices GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION OPINION BY v. Record No. 032533 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. September 17, 2004 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationMASTER TRANSPORTATION BROKERAGE AGREEMENT
MASTER TRANSPORTATION BROKERAGE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the Agreement ), entered into on this day of, 20, between a motor contract carrier as per MC#, ( CARRIER ), and the following distinct corporate
More informationHOW TO EXECUTE THIS DPA:
DATA PROCESSING ADDENDUM (GDPR, and EU Standard Contractual Clauses) (Rev. April 20, 2018) This Data Processing Addendum ( DPA ) forms part of the Master Subscription Agreement or other written or electronic
More informationICE CLEAR US, INC. RULES
ICE CLEAR US, INC. RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 General Provisions... 1 Part 2 Clearing Membership... 9 Part 3 Guaranty Fund...21 Part 4 Clearing Mechanism...30 Part 5 Margins and Premiums...34 Part
More information1ZOOSPI.COM MOBILE SERVICE PROVIDER MSP TERMS OF USE
1ZOOSPI.COM MOBILE SERVICE PROVIDER MSP TERMS OF USE Introduction and Acceptance of Terms Zoospi.com provides a service to customers and building contractors ( Mobile Service Providers or MSPs ) by providing
More informationEvaluation of the Adequacy of the Indemnity for Electronically Created Items included in The Federal Reserve Board s 2013 Regulation CC Proposal
Evaluation of the Adequacy of the Indemnity for Electronically Created Items included in The Federal Reserve Board s 2013 Regulation CC Proposal In 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
More informationDATA PROCESSING ADDENDUM
DATA PROCESSING ADDENDUM This Data Processing Addendum ( DPA ) forms part of the Master Purchase Agreement, Customer Agreement, Channel Partner Agreement, End User License Agreement or other written agreement
More informationWorld Bank Administrative Tribunal. No Mario Fischel, Applicant. International Finance Corporation, Respondent
World Bank Administrative Tribunal 2009 No. 400 Mario Fischel, Applicant v. International Finance Corporation, Respondent World Bank Administrative Tribunal Office of the Executive Secretary Mario Fischel,
More informationDate. (Customer) (the Company ) Dear Sirs. Our Ref. MFA3-01. Master Forfaiting Agreement
Our Ref. MFA3-01 Date (Customer) (the Company ) Dear Sirs Master Forfaiting Agreement This Master Forfaiting Agreement (the Agreement ) sets forth the general terms and conditions that will apply to each
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-457 KENT SMITH, D.V.M., Individually and d/b/a PERRY VET SERVICES APPELLANT V. KIMBERLY V. FREEMAN and ARMISTEAD COUNCIL FREEMAN, JR. APPELLEES Opinion
More informationStandard Terms and Conditions of Sale and Delivery
These form an integral part of all quotations and contracts for all goods and services to be provided by us and shall apply to any current or future business relationships. In deviation from the preceding
More informationOLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 October 31, 2005 (Date of earliest
More informationTerms and Conditions
Terms and Conditions Acceptance of Terms The STEM Shoppe, LLC (collectively, The STEM Shoppe, we, or us ) is a Utah limited liability company with its principal place of business at 822 W Sheppard Lane,
More informationIT IS HEREBY AGREED Between IAAC and the Broker as follows:
IAAC, Inc. Broker s Agreement Agreement made this day of between IAAC, Inc., a New York Corporation with offices at 5784 Widewaters Parkway, 1 st Floor, Dewitt, New York 13214, representatives, successors
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Board of Education of the City of Chicago (the School Board ), by and through
Jeff J. Friedman Merritt A. Pardini KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 575 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022-2585 Telephone: (212) 940-8800 Facsimile: (212) 940-8776 Attorneys for the Board of Education
More informationSEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 96 13 OUTLINE SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCESS SEC. 2. SCOPE Suspension.02 Requests for Assistance.03 U.S. Competent Authority.04
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 106-cv-00606-SHR Document 23 Filed 06/22/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AEGIS SECURITY INSURANCE Civil No. 1CV-06-0606 COMPANY, JUDGE
More informationlocate a copy of the same until that time. HPA contends that this court order shows that COAH had no jurisdiction over the pricing of the units in que
IN RE MOTION TO DISMISS ) COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING COAH'S PROCEEDINGS REGARDING ) DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION OF PRICING ) OPINION ON CERTAIN AFFORDABLE UNITS ) IN BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP, ). SOMERSET COUNTY
More informationINMETRO MARK TESTING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES SERVICE TERMS
INMETRO MARK TESTING AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES SERVICE TERMS These Service Terms shall govern INMETRO Mark Testing and Certification Services performed by UL (as identified in the Quotation or Project
More informationICE TRUST U.S. LLC STANDARD TERMS ANNEX TO THE ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT
ICE TRUST U.S. LLC STANDARD TERMS ANNEX TO THE ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT WHEREAS, ICE Participant and Counterparty have previously entered into that certain ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of the date specified
More informationCONFLICT OF INTEREST FAQS (PART I- EXEMPTIONS)
CONFLICT OF INTEREST FAQS (PART I- EXEMPTIONS) U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration October 27, 2016 New Exemptions and Amendments to Existing Exemptions Under the Employee
More informationLOAN AGREEMENT. Recitals
LOAN AGREEMENT THIS LOAN AGREEMENT (this Loan Agreement ) is entered into and effective as of March 9, 2017 (the Effective Date ), by and between the Capitol Area Community Development Corporation, a California
More informationMETER PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES SERVICE TERMS
METER PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES SERVICE TERMS These Service Terms shall govern the Meter Performance Certification ( MPC ) Services performed by the UL Contracting Party (as identified in the
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF VMWARE, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF VMWARE, INC. VMWARE, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the Corporation ), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS:
More informationAPPENDIX B: Compression Services Agreement
APPENDIX B: Compression Services Agreement COMPRESSION SERVICES AGREEMENT This Compression Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of, 20 ("Effective Date") by and between Southern California
More informationExhibit T ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSES, PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES. Recitals:
Exhibit T ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSES, PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES This Assignment of Licenses. Permits and Certificates ( Assignment ) is made effective as of, 20 (the Effective Date ) by and between DESERT MOUNTAIN
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2013 INDEX NO. 654430/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2013 SUPRME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MF ACQUISITIONS, LLC., Index No.: Plaintiff,
More informationListing Council decisions provide guidance based on the rules in effect at the time of issuance. To view the current Listing Rules, please click
Listing Council decisions provide guidance based on the rules in effect at the time of issuance. To view the current Listing Rules, please click http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com. Listing Council Decision
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 17, 2014 518219 In the Matter of SUSAN M. KENT, as President of the NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION LEE AND MARY LINDA EDWARDS
Edwards et al v. GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company Doc. 99 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION LEE AND MARY LINDA EDWARDS VS. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2016 02:11 PM INDEX NO. 156376/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2016 EXHIBIT B FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/31/2014 10:27 AM INDEX NO. 653950/2014 NYSCEF
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/30/2016 08:01 PM INDEX NO. 655490/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SEATGEEK, INC. - against -
More informationStandard Terms and Conditions of Sale
1. Interpretation and Applicability Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale 1.1 The following terms and conditions are to be read in conjunction with the Long Term Supply Agreement, if any. In the event
More informationRepair Service Agreement
Repair Service Agreement This Agreement is between Quality Medical (the Seller ) and You (the Customer ) and is effective as of the date that Customer check s the Accept box on the website and otherwise
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Entered on Docket June 0, 0 EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA The following constitutes the order of the court. Signed June, 0 Stephen L. Johnson U.S. Bankruptcy
More informationDECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY. 7 March 2018
A-014-2016 1(11) DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY 7 March 2018 (Biocidal products Data sharing dispute Every effort Permission to refer Chemical similarity Contractual freedom)
More informationSECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure
Rev. Proc. 2002 52 SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF THE REVENUE PROCEDURE SECTION 2. SCOPE.01 In General.02 Requests for Assistance.03 Authority of the U.S. Competent Authority.04 General Process.05 Failure to Request
More informationOf... Annex C to the Living Green in Israel Competition documents Design of a demonstration structure for green construction
Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael - The Jewish National Fund Of... Annex C to the Living Green in Israel Competition documents Design of a demonstration structure for green construction Agreement with the designer
More information