Please be informed that Decision No ipD dated October 23, 2017 (copy
|
|
|
- Cynthia Booth
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES ALPARGATAS, S.A., Opposer, -versus- IPCNo Opposition to: Appln. Serial No Date Filed: 30 April 2013 TM: "SCOTT HAWAII" SCOTT SHOE CO., INC., Respondent- Applicant. NOTICE OF DECISION VERA LAW (DEL ROSARIO RABOCA GONZALES & GRASPARIL) Counsel for Opposer A & V Crystal Tower 105 Esteban Street, Legaspi Village Makati City POBLADOR BAUTISTA & REYES Counsel for Respondent-Applicant 5th Floor, SEDCCO I Building 120 Rada corner Legaspi Streets Legaspi Village, Makati City GREETINGS: Please be informed that Decision No ipD dated October 23, 2017 (copy enclosed) was promulgated in the above entitled case. Pursuant to Section 2, Rule 9 of the IPOPHL Memorandum Circular No series of 2016, any party may appeal the Decision to the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision together with the payment of applicable fees. Taguig City, October 24, MARILYN F.RETUTAL IPRS IV Bureau of Legal mail@ipophil.gov.ph tft q Intolloctual Property Cental»?8 Upper McKinlcy Road McKinley Hill lown Canter Fort Bonitacio, Taguig ',- / 16J4 Philippines
2 ia\ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES ALPARGATAS, S.A. Opposer, -versus- SCOTT SHOE CO., INC., Respondent-Applicant. IPC NO Opposition to: Appln. Serial No Date Filed: 30 April 2013 TM: SCOTT HAWAII Decision No DECISION ALPARGATAS S.A.,1 ("Opposer") filed an Opposition to Trademark Application Serial No The application, filed by SCOTT SHOE CO., INC.2 ("Respondent-Applicant") covers the mark SCOTT HAWAII for use on goods such as " sandals, footwear" under Class 25 of the International Classification of Goods.3 Opposer alleges that its mark HAVAIANAS is a well-known mark that must be afforded protection under prevailing laws and jurisprudence. Opposer also alleges that Respondent-Applicant's application should not be granted considering that the mark sought to be registered is confusingly similar, if not identical, to the well-known mark HAVAIANAS owned by it. According to Opposer, a comparison of the mark being applied for, more particularly, with the use of the word "HAWAII" and its well-known HAVAIANAS mark shows that they are confusingly similar with each other, hence, should not be registered. Opposer's evidence consist of the following: 1. Application details for the trademark SCOTT HAWAII; 2. Legalized and authenticated Special Power of Attorney/Secretary's Certificate; 3. Certified copy of the authenticated Affidavit Direct Testimony of Bruna Michele Pereira; 4. Certified copy of the Schedule of Registrations and Application for the mark HAVAIANAS as attached in the Affidavit Direct Testimony of Ms. Pereira; 5. Representative samples of print advertisement of HAVAIANAS products; 6. Copies of the printouts of relevant pages from the website 7. Copies of the printout of relevant pages of Havaianas website in the Philippines, and 8. Copies of samples of articles featuring Havaianas products. 1 A corporation organized and existing under the laws of Brazil with principal office at RuaFunchal, 160, Vila Olimpia Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2 A limited liability company with principal office at 1212 Kona Street, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A. 3The Nice Classification is a classification of goods and services for the purpose of registering trademark and service marks, based on the multilateral treaty administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization. The treaty is called the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purpose of the Registration of Marks concluded in Q mail@ipopriil.gov.pr> Q A A Intellectual Prop Brty Centa #?8 Upper McWmk/ Road McKinluy Hill lown Center Fori Bonitacio, Pnguicj City k;:)4 Philippines
3 - On 05 August 2014, this Bureau issued a Notice to Answer and served the same to Respondent- Applicant's counsel on 11 August After several motions for extension, Respondent-Applicant filed the Answer on 11 November On 21 November 2014, Opposer filed a Manifestation with Omnibus Motion praying that this Bureau expunged the Verified Answer for failure to attached proof of authority of the signatory in the verification. Respondent-Applicant filed its Counter-Manifestation with Opposition on 22 December On 10 February 2015, this Bureau directed the Respondent- Applicant to submit a Special Power of Attorney and/or Secretary's Certificate. On 25 February 2015, Respondent-Applicant filed a Motion for Extension of Time (to submit Special Power of Attorney and/or Secretary's Certificate). On 02 March 2015, Opposer filed a Motion to Declare Respondent- Applicant in Default. Another motion for extension of time was filed by Respondent-Applicant on 09 March Opposer filed its Comment on and/or Opposition and Reply to the Opposition to declare Respondent in default. On 07 April 2015, Respondent filed a Manifestation and Motion praying that the Secretary's Certificate dated 28 December 2012 be admitted as proof of authority of the signatory to sign the verification. An Opposition was filed on 06 May On 13 September 2017, this Bureau declared Respondent-Applicant in default for failure to complete the requirements under Section 10 of the Rules and Regulations on Inter Partes Proceedings. Should the Respondent-Applicant's mark SCOTT HAWAII be registered? Opposer anchors its opposition on Section (d) and (e) of Republic Act No. 8293, also known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines ("IP Code"), as amended, which provides: Section 123. Registrability A mark cannot be registered if it: xxx (d) Is identical with a registered mark belonging to a different proprietor or a mark with an earlier filing or priority date, in respect of: i. The same goods or services, or ii. Closely related goods or services, or iii. If it nearly resembles such a mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion; (e) Is identical with, or confusingly similar to, or constitutes a translation of a mark which is considered by the competent authority of the Philippines to be well-known internationally and in the Philippines, whether or not it is registered here, as being already the mark of a person other than the applicant for registration, and used for identical or similar goods or services: Provided, That in determining whether a mark is wellknown, account shall be taken of the knowledge of the relevant sector of the public, rather than of the public at large, including knowledge in the Philippines which has been obtained as a result of the promotion of the mark; Explicit from the afore-cited provision of the IP Code that whenever a mark subject of an application for registration resembles another mark which has been registered or has an earlier filing or priority date, or resembles a well-known mark, said mark cannot be registered. Records will show that at the time Respondent-Applicant filed its application for registration of the mark SCOTT HAWAII on 30 April 2013, Opposer already has an existing registration for the mark HAVAIANAS. As such, the certificate of registration in its name is a prima facie evidence of the validity of the registration, ownership of the mark and its exclusive right to use the mark in connection with the goods and/or services and those that are related thereto, pursuant to Section 138 of the IP Code.
4 But are the marks of the parties confusingly similar as to likely cause confusion, mistake or deception on the consumers? The marks of the parties are herein reproduced: scott Hawaii Opposer's Marks Respondent-Applicant's Mark A practical approach to the problem of similarity or dissimilarity is to go into the whole of the two trademark pictured in their manner of display. Inspection should be undertaken from the viewpoint of the prospective buyer. The trademark complained of should be compared and contrasted with the purchaser's memory (not in juxtaposition) of the trademark said to be infringed. Some such factors as "sound; appearance; form, style, shape, size or format; color; ideas connoted by marks; the meaning, spelling and pronunciation, of words used; and the setting in which the words appear" may be considered.4 Thus, confusion is likely between marks only if their overall presentation as to sound, appearance or meaning would make it possible for consumers to believe that the goods or products, to which the marks are attached, comes from the same source or are connected or associated with each other. In this case, a scrutiny of the marks of the parties would show that there is no similarity between the contending marks. Opposer's mark consists of the word HAVAIANAS written in stylized font. On the other hand, Respondent-Applicant's mark consists of the words SCOTT HAWAII written in plain uppercase letters. Clearly, there is no similar element that can be found in the two marks. Further, this Bureau does not agree with the Opposer that Respondent-Applicant's mark is confusingly similar with its HAVAIANAS mark because of the presence of the word HAWAII. HAWAII is not similar with HAVAIANAS. They have different connotations that one cannot be confused with the other. Further, it must be emphasized that the word "HAWAII" has also been disclaimed by Respondent-Applicant. Since it has been disclaimed, Respondent-Applicant does not claim exclusive appropriation of the word HAWAII, but only to the exclusive use of the word SCOTT and how the composite mark appears as a whole. Thus, considering that Respondent- Applicant's mark is not confusingly similar, visually, aurally and conceptually, to Opposer's mark, there is no bar to its registration. Aptly, the essence of trademark registration is to give protection to the owners of trademarks. The function of a trademark is to point out distinctly the origin or ownership of the goods to which it is affixed; to secure to him who has been instrumental in bringing into the market a superior article of merchandise, the fruit of his industry and skill; to assure the public that they are procuring the genuine article; to prevent fraud and imposition; and to protect the manufacturer against substitution and sale 4 EtephaA.G. v. Director of Patents, G.R. No. L-20635, 31 March 1966.
5 of an inferior and different article as his product. The mark of Respondent-Applicant meets this function. Accordingly, this Bureau finds that the Respondent-Applicant's trademark application is not prohibited by Sec (d) of the IP Code. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant opposition is hereby DISMISSED. Let the filewrapper of Trademark Application Serial No together with a copy of this Decision, be returned to the Bureau of Trademarks for information and appropriate action. SO ORDERED. 3 OCX 201? Taguig City, U/ VlARtlTA V. DAGSA adjudication Officer Bureau of Legal Affairs
Please be informed that Decision No >2> dated 09 March 2018(copy
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES SUYEN CORPORATION, Opposer, IPCNo. 14-2016-00435 Opposition to: -versus- Appln. Serial No. 1300612 Date Filed: 22 April 2016 BECCA, INC., Respondent-Applicant.
Please be informed that Decision No ipl dated 22 March 2018(copy
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHIUPPINES BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, } IPC No. 14-2016-00247 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2015-505953 -versus- } Date Filed: 14 October
} } } } } } } } } x x NOTICE OF DECISION
PEPSICO, INC., Opposer, -versus- NENITA D. TONGONAN, Respondent- Applicant. -------------------------------------------------- ----------- VI RGI LAW Virgilio M. Del Rosario & Partners Counsel for the
NOTICE OF DECISION. Please be informed that Decision No ?H dated December 23, 2016 (copy
IP PHL 3FFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES UNITED HOME PRODUCTS, INC., } IPC No. 14-2014-00362 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-008212 } Date Filed: 12 July 2013 -versus- } TM: "VITAMIN B1+ B6
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP PHL OF THE PHILIPPINES GLAXO GROUP LIMITED, } IPC No. 14-2014-00444 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. No. 4-2014-00007390 } Date Filed: 11 June 2014 -versus- } TM: "CORTUM" AMBICA INTERNATIONAL } TRADING
Please be informed that Decision No % dated 07 April 2017 (copy
INTELLECTUAL P OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES MEDICHEM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., } IPC No. 14-2014-00149 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-00014658 -versus- } Date Filed: 09 December 2013 CATHAY
HUGO BOSS TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG., EDISON CHENG, TM: BOSSY. IPC No Opposition to: } } } Opposer,
HUGO BOSS TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG., Opposer, -versus- EDISON CHENG, Respondent-Applicant. X--------------------------------------------------------------X IPC No. 14-2012-00084 Opposition to:
NOTICE OF DECISION. Please be informed that Decision No S Z dated 23 December 2016
IP PHL FFtCE OF THE PHILIPPINES L.R. IMPERIALS, INC., Opposer, IPCNo. 14-2013-00284 Opposition to: -versus- Appln. Serial No. 4-2012-00013694 Date Filed: 12 November 2012 CATHAY YSS DISTRIBUTORS CO. INC.
MAR~~ x: x: } } } } } } } } } } PFIZER PRODUCTS, INC., Opposer,
PFIZER PRODUCTS, INC., Opposer, -versus- PHARMAKON BIOTEC, INC., Respondent- Applicant. x:-------------------------------------------------------------------x: IPC No. 14-2014-00029 Opposition to: Application
PHL } } } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director: Atty. E;:icNiAN~ ~ Director Ill Bureau of Legal Affairs
IP@ PHL BATA BRANDS S.a.r.1., Opposer, -versus- HARTZELL CALIBJO-PRAOO, Respondent-Applicant. x-------------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2014-00018 Opposition to:
} } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
MERCK KgaA, Opposer, -versus- UNITED LABORATORIES, INC., Respondent- Applicant. )(-------------------------------------------------------------------)( BUCOY POBLADOR AND ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Opposer
OF THE PHILIPPINES INNOVATION VENTURES LLC and INTERNATIONAL} IPC No IP HOLDINGS LLC, } Opposer, j Opposition to:
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES INNOVATION VENTURES LLC and INTERNATIONAL} IPC No. 14-2015-00317 IP HOLDINGS LLC, } Opposer, j Opposition to: } } Appln. Serial No. 4-2015-00000800 versus-
MARl~~L. .34S- dated October 06, 2016 (copy. IPC No Opposition to : Appln. No Date Filed: 10 June 2014
BORER CHEMIE AG, -versus- Opposer, CHEMVALLEY RESOURCES, INC., Respondent-Applicant. x----------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2014-00552 Opposition to : Appln. No.
} } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
LF, LLC, Opposer, -versus- GEORGE T. ONG Respondent-Applicant. X------------------------------------------------------------------X IPC No. 14-2012-00351 Opposition to: App. Serial No. 4-2012-501016 Date
era. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP era. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES WORLD TRADE CENTERS ASSOCIATION, INC., } IPC No. 14-2013-00404 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2012-010944 -versus- } Date Filed:
x x
ON OPTIMUM NUTRITION LTD., Opposer, -versus- BAYANI LOSTE, Respondent-Applicant. x-----------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2010-00081 Opposition to: Application No.
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES LR. IMPERIALS, INC., Opposer, -versus- IPCNo. 14-2015-00495 Opposition to: Appln. Ser. No. 4-2015-001486 Date Filed: 11 February 2015 CATHAY YSS DISTRIBUTORS
UNITED AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., } IPC No Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No
IP PHL L PROPERTY )FFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES UNITED AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., } IPC No. 14-2015-00255 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2014-014751 -versus- } Date Filed: 28 November
PHL. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFtCE OF THE PHIUPPtNES } } } } } } } } } } } x x
IP PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFtCE OF THE PHIUPPtNES SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., Opposer, -versus- MEGA LIFESCIENCES PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, Respondent-Applicant. x-------------------------------------------------------------------x
} } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director: ~a. ~ Atty. EDWIN DANILO A. DAT~ Director 111 Bureau of Legal Affairs
INTERNATIONAL GAMING PROJECTS LIMITED, Opposer, -versus- XYLOMEN PARTICIPATIONS S.A.R.L., Respondent- Applicant. :x-----------------------------------------------------------------:x IPC No. 14-2015-00362
.-rll INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP.-rlL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, Opposer, -versus- HUAIMENG ZHENG, Respondent- Applicant. > ~x IPCNo. 14-2014-00248 Opposition to: Appln.
x x
L MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY, Opposer, -versus- WILSON DY GO, Respondent- Applicant. x--------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2012-00046 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No.
MEDICHEM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Opposer, } } -versus- } } } SUHIT AS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., } Respondent-Applicant. } IPC No.
MEDICHEM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Opposer, -versus- SUHIT AS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Respondent-Applicant. x------------------------------------------~----~~--------x IPC No. 14-2014-00166 Opposition to: Application
DECISION. a. Section of the Intellectual Property Code, which pertains to the exclusive rights of the owner of a registered trademark;
YAHOO! INC., IPC 14-2007-00091 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No. 4-2005-009220 (Filing Date: 16 Sept. 2005) ALASKA MILK CORPORATION, Respondent-Applicant TM: ALASKA YAMOO x-----------------------------------------------x
PHL } } } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION
IP PHL WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Opposer, -versus- ATTY AMBROSIO V. PADILLA Ill, Respondent-Applicant. x--------------------------------------- ------------------x IPC No. 14-2013-00355 Opposition
,. o )( )(
INTEUECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES FIRESTONE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO. LLC, IPC No. 14-2015-00535 Opposer, Opposition to: Application No. 4-2015-005215 Date Filed: 15 May 2015 TM: ULTRAPLY -versus
x x
Republic of the Philippines INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE lntollof""lt11nl DrA~A~~ ' r... il " n 11 _ ~ _ ~.,,. - UNITED LABORATORIES, INC., Opposer, -versus- EUROASIA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Respondent-Applicant.
} } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
NATRAPHARM, INC., Opposer, -versus- ZUNECA INCORPORATED, Respondent- Applicant. )(-----------------------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2010-00025 Opposition to: Appln. Serial
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Opposer, -versus- MERCK KGAA, Respondent- Applicant. x IPC No. 14-2015-00302 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2015-502259
-versus- )( )( NOTICE OF DECISION
Republic of the Philippines INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ' -" - " - -.. 1 n.. ~..._ 1 r""' i il nn ''-- l '-V~ - -. n-.-..j L 1.-..v:.-1,... 1 1:11 T- -,...,1 ~--1 "--!.l - -!- ABS-CBN PUBLISHING, INC.,
Please be informed that Decision No S^\ dated 23 December 2016
IP ERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES FELDA GLOBAL VENTURES HOLDINGS BERHAD } IPC No. 14-2013-00344 And DELIMA OIL PRODUCTS SDN, BHD, } Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-710048 -versus-
} } } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
SCHWAN-STABILO SCHWANHAUBER GMBH & CO. KG, Opposer, -versus- AMALGATED SPECIALTIES CORP., Respondent-Applicant. x-------------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2013-00168
e x x GINEBRA SAN MIGEUL, INC., } Opposers, } } } } }
.~ INTELLECTUALPROPERTY OFFICEOF THE PHILIPPINES x------------------------------------------------------------------x x------------------------------------------------------------------x x-----------------------------------------------------------------x
X X
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., Opposer, -versus- SAN MIGUEL PUREFOODS COMPANY INC., Respondent -Applicant. X-------------------------------------------------------------------X IPC No. 14-2012-00173
} } } } } } } } } } } x x NOTICE OF DECISION
LR. IMPERIAL, INC., Opposer, -versus- THE CATHAY YSS DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, INC., Respondent- Applicant. x---------------------------------------------------------------x OCHAVE & ESCALONA Counsel for the
-versus- NOTICE OF DECISION )( )( ~Q. ~ } } } } } } } } } } NOKIA CORPORATION, Opposer,
NOKIA CORPORATION, Opposer, -versus- SHENZHEN AINOUXING TECHNOLOGY CO. L TO., Respondent -Applicant. )(----------- - --------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2011-00299 Opposition
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES } } } } } } } } } } x x
IP PHL OF THE PHILIPPINES UNIVERSAL ROBINA CORPORATION, Petitioner, -versus- THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, Respondent-Registrant. x------------------------------------------------------------- -----x IPC No.
x x
JOLLIBEE FOODS CORPORATION, Opposer, -versus- HUHTAMAKI FINANCE B.V., Respondent-Applicant. x---------------------- -------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2013-00279 Opposition to: Application
Please be informed that Decision No &5" dated June 29, 2018 (copy
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES CROWN MELBOURNE LIMITED, Opposer, -versus- CORON SOLEIL GARDEN RESORTS, INC., Respondent- Applicant. x IPCNo. 14-2015-00126 Opposition to: Application No.
x x NOTICE OF DECISION
INTELLECTUAL PROPEllTY OFFICE OF THEPHILIPPINES OFFICIAL PILLOWTEX LLC., IPC No. 14-2017-00313 Opposer, Opposition to: Application No. 4-2017-0003394 Date Filed: 08 March 2017 TM: "CHARISMA" -versus AMRAPUR
IP~ PHL~ } } } } } } } } } x x NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director: ~a.
IP~ PHL~ L.R. IMPERIAL, INC., Opposer, -versus- ALDRTZ CORPORATION, Respondent:..Applica nt. x--------------------------- ---------------------------.-----------x IPC No. 14-2010-00181 Opposition to:.
DECISION. "1. The approval of Application Serial No is contrary to Section 4(d) of Republic Act No. 166, as amended.
WILFRO P. LUMINLUN, } INTER PARTES CASE NO. 3704 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Application Serial No. 70197 -versus- } Filed: November 29, 1989 } Trademark: "Bar Design (with the } Colors Blue, Red, } and
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES CHINA BANK SAVINGS, INC., Opposer, -versus- IPCNo. 14-2013-00152 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2012-013595 Date Filed: 08 November 2012 TM: "MADALING
} } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION
GRISI HNOS. S.A. de C.V., Opposer, -versus- TUPPERWARE PRODUCTS SA., Respondent-Applicant. x-~---~~~--~~-~~---~-~~--~---~---~~----~-~~~x IPC No. 14-2012-00377 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2012-001424
PHILIPPINES NEW BARBIZON FASHION INC., } IPC No Opposer, } Opposition to:
IP PHL PHILIPPINES NEW BARBIZON FASHION INC., } IPC No. 14-2014-00017 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-0500697 - versus- } Date Filed: 12 March 2013 THE ADF FAMILY TRUST AND THE CDF
x x Decision No DECISION
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A. IPC 14-2007-00061 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No. 4-2000-007717 (Filing Date: 12 September 2000) PT ARNOTTS INDONESIA, Respondent-Applicant. TM: GOLD
x x Decision No DECISION
TOTAL S.A., IPC 14-2007-00074 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No. 4-2004-003869 (Filing Date: 29 April 2004) COMET OIL PHILIPPINES, INC., Respondent-Applicant. TM: LUNAR x-----------------------------------------------x
NOTICE OF DECISION STICHTING BOO,
STICHTING BOO, Opposer, -versus- BANCO DE ORO UNIBANK, INC., Respondent-Applicant. )( ---- ----- - -- - )( IPC No. 14-2011-00190 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2010-010214 Date filed: 17 September
x x
T.C. PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., IPC No. 14-2010-00224 Opposition to: Opposer, Appln. Serial No. 4-2010-000228 Date filed: January 7, 2010 -versus- TM: "RED RAM & DEVICE" MR. VICHAI KULWUTHIVILAS,
Please be informed that Decision No Z I dated June 19, 2017 (copy
NOVARTISAG, } IPC No. 14-2015-00060 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2014-004232 } Date Filed: 04 April 2014 -versus- } TM: "TAMIN" CLARIS LIFESCIENCES } PHILIPPINES, INC., Respondent- Applicant.
DECISION. The grounds of the opposition are as follows:
DOW AGROSCIENCES L.L.C, } Inter Partes Case No. 14-2008-00194 Opposer, } Case Filed: 28 August 2008 } Opposition to: } -vs- } Appl n. Serial No. : 4-2007-012186 } Date Filed: 05 November 2007 } Trademark:
} } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director: ~, v. ! r(, 1/ ). :~~~ - U<A.. r:\., y ~ At}y.lVrARtiTA VAt~LESjRO-DAGSA
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV S.A., Opposer, -versus- ICONIC BEVERAGES INC., Respondent-Applicant. )(-----------------------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2009-00221 Opposition to: Appln.
DECISION. (f) Is identical with, or confusingly similar to, or constitutes a
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, } IPC No. 14-2005-00089 Opposer, } Opposition to: } -versus- } Serial No. 4-2001-003674 } Date Filed: 28 May 2001 PT EXELSO MULTI RASA, } Respondent-Applicant. } Trademark: FRAPPIO
} } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION
IP PHL 5FF1CE OF THE PHILIPPINES IROBOT CORPORATION, Opposer, -versus- CLAUDIA INDIG PAYUSAN, Respondent- Applicant-Assignee. ~x IPCNo. 14-2015-00372 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2012-013479 Date
} } } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION MAR~
f...... - - -1 -.:._ '. ~ ~ _.._ ~ ~ FACTON, LTD., Opposer, -versus- GENALIE RACAZA HONG, Respondent- Applicant. x-----------------------------x NOTICE OF DECISION IPC No. 14-2011-00206 Opposition to:
PHL OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DECISION
IP PHL OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL PRETTY DOOR INDUSTRIAL SALES CO., Opposer-Appellant, -versus - CHENG YU CHENG, Applicant-Appellee. "-----------------------------------------" Appeal No. 14-2010-0038
x x
SUMITUMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LIMITED, Opposer, -versus- PENG TEI LIU, Respondent-Applicant. x------------------------------------------------------- x IPC No. 14-2015-00153 Opposition to: Appln Serial No.
Atty.L~mbo Adjudication Officer Bureau of Legal Affairs. 2R'S dated August 16, 2016 (copy NOTICE OF DECISION
MISS ASIA PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL, LTD. ) Petitioner - versus - ELITE ASIA PACIFIC GROUP, INC, Respondent-Registrant. x------------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2014-00437
NOTICE OF DECISION. -versus- Atty. ~~A~"lo ~G Director Ill Bureau of Legal Affairs. CHANEL SARL, Opposer, } } } } } } } } }
CHANEL SARL, Opposer, -versus- BEE YOUNG GO, Respondent-Applicant. )( -------------------------------------------------- )( IPC No. 14-2010-00082 Opposition to: Ap.pln. Serial No. 4-2009-003319 Date Filed:
PHL IMTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
IP PHL IMTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC., Opposer, -versus- ) IPCNo. 14-2011-00115 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2009-02763
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DECISION
Republic of the Philippines INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL S. V. MORE PHARMA CORP., Appeal No. 14-2013-0023 Respondent-Appellant, IPC No. 14-2010-00198 -versus- Opposition
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES } } } } } } } } } } x x
IP PHL OF THE PHILIPPINES NEXT JEANS, INC., Opposer, -versus- ELWOOD KELLY B. LIAO, Respondent-Applicant. x-------------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2015-00182 Opposition
x x
WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Opposer, -versus- GRUPPO MEDICA, INC., Respondent-Applicant. x------------------------------------------x NOTICE OF DECISION IPC No. 14-2010-00100 Opposition to: Application
Please be informed that Decision No l4 dated 16 June 2017 (copy
IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES JOHNMUNRO, } IPCNo. 14-2016-00030 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2014-008579 -versus- } Date Filed: 09 July 2014 HILARIO F. CORTEZ and
} } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Opposer, -versus- BARGN FARMACEUTICI PHILS. CO., Respondent- Applicant. )(-------------------------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2009-00057 Opposition
} } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Opposer, -versus- GRUPPO MEDICA, INC., Respondent-Applicant. )(-------------------------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2013-00089 Opposition to:
MARKS AND SPENCER IPC 3639 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No (Filing Date: 26 February 1987) ODILIO MELON DECISION
MARKS AND SPENCER IPC 3639 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No. 4-1987-61045 (Filing Date: 26 February 1987) ODILIO MELON Respondent-Applicant. TM: MICHAEL x-----------------------------------------------x
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY IPC OF CANADA, Opposer, TM Application No (Filing Date: 13 November 2003)
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY IPC 14-2005-00123 OF CANADA, Opposer, -versus - P.T. KOTAMAS JAYARAYA Respondent-Applicant Opposition to: TM Application No. 4-2003-010459 (Filing Date: 13 November 2003) TM:
NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, PHILIPPINES, INC., ~ffi~ BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLC., Respondent- Applicant. X X BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, PHILIPPINES, INC., -versus- BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES LLC., Respondent- Applicant.
~ip. PHiliPPINES } } } } } } } }
~ip INTELLECTUAL PHiliPPINES PROPERTY ARVIN U. TING, Opposer, QUANTA PAPER CORPORATION, Respondent-Applicant x----------------------------------------------------x Inter Partes Case No. 14-2008-00261 Case
ril INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP ril INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES PHILIP MORRIS BRANDS SARL, } IPC No. 14-2014-00351 Opposer, } Opposition to: } } Appln. Serial No. 4-2014-00002280 -versus- } Date of Filed: 21 February
x x
INTEL CORPORATION, Complainant, -versus- COOLINTEL, INC. and the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondents. x------------------------------------------------------------x POBLADOR BAUTISTA & REYES
KILANG RANTAI S.A. S.D.N. B.H.D., } IPC No Petitioner, } Cancellation of: -versus- } Date of Reg.: 18 August 2011
IP PHL OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES KILANG RANTAI S.A. S.D.N. B.H.D., } IPC No. 14-2013-00162 Petitioner, } Cancellation of: } } Registration No. 4-2011 -990064 -versus- } Date of Reg.: 18 August 2011 } EASTON
} } } } } } } } } } DYNAMIC MUL Tl-PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent- Applicant. )( ~ )(
MAGNOLIA INCORPORATED, Opposer, -versus- DYNAMIC MUL Tl-PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent- Applicant. )(--------~-----------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2008-00241 Opposition to: Appln.
DECISION. The grounds for the present Opposition are as follows:
NBA PROPERTIES, INC., } Inter Partes Case No. 3693 Opposer, } Opposition to: } } Serial No. : 70791 -versus- } Date Filed : February 7, 1990 } Trademark : LAKERS } Goods : Men s briefs & t-shirts HERIBERTO
i'ril THLLECTUAL PROPERTY FFICE Of= THE HILIPPINES
IP i'ril THLLECTUAL PROPERTY FFICE Of= THE HILIPPINES MAMA SITA'S HOLDING CO., INC., Opposer, IPCNo. 14-2014-00510 Opposition to: -versus- Appln. Serial No. 4-2014-00008638 Date Filed: 10 July 2014 INVICTUS
DECISION. Opposer opposes the application on the following grounds:
COMPANIA COLOMBIANA DE } INTER PARTES CASE NO. 4298 TABACO S.A., } Opposition to: Opposer, } } Application Serial No. 95560 -versus- } Filed : 29 September 1994 } Mark : PIELROJA & Device } Goods : Cigarettes
. m dated June 29, 2018 (copy
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES DAEWON PHARMACEUTICAL CO., Opposer, LTD. IPCNo. 14-2016-00056 Opposition to: Appln. No. 1276429 Date Filed: 10 October 2015 TM: "ORAMIN-C" -versus- PACIFIC
NINTENDO COMPANY LIMITED IPC 3592 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No (Filing Date: 12 September 1987) CHONG KOH TENG,
NINTENDO COMPANY LIMITED IPC 3592 Opposer, - versus - Opposition to: TM Application No. 62765 (Filing Date: 12 September 1987) CHONG KOH TENG, Respondent-Applicant. TM: SUPER MARIOBROS x-----------------------------------------------x
THERAPHARMA, INC., } IPC No Opposer, } Opposition to: } Date Filed: 07 June versus- } TM: "ROGREL" NOTICE OF DECISION
IP PHL PHILIPPINES THERAPHARMA, INC., } IPC No. 14-2013-00384 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-006579 } Date Filed: 07 June 2013 -versus- } TM: "ROGREL" TABROS PHARMA PVT. LIMITED,
-versus- NOTICE OF DECISION. Atty. EDWIN DANILO A. DA I~ Director Ill Bureau of Legal Affairs. BENTA BIRADA NEW DAILY/ PHELAN A. TAYLARAN, Opposer,
BENTA BIRADA NEW DAILY/ PHELAN A. TAYLARAN, Opposer, -versus- IPC No. 14-2010-00294 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2010-740084 Date Filed: 16 July 2010 TM: "BIRADA" BRIGADA NEWS PHILIPPINES ELMERV.
x x
!e. THERAPHARMA, INC., Opposer, -versus- G & VTRADELINK, INC., Respondent-Applicant. x------------------- ------- ----------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2011-00071 Opposition to: Appln Serial No.
NOTICE OF DECISION. Affairs within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision together with the payment of
IP PHL 3FFICE OF Th PHILIPPINES MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, Opposer, IPCNo. 14-2013-00439 Opposition to: -versus- Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-500049 Date Filed: 07 January 2013 FUTURE ENTERPRISES PTE LTD., Respondent-Applicant.
x x
SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES, LTD., Opposer, -versus- HUAIMENG ZHENG, Respondent- Applicant. x-------------------------------------------------------------x FEDERIS & ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES Counsel for Opposer
2010 APAA TRADEMARK COMMITTEE
2010 APAA TRADEMARK COMMITTEE Special Topic: Trademark Protection Against Third Parties Bad Faith Trademark Filing, Registration & Importation Philippines: Country Report By: Enrique Manuel & Eduardo C.
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES RUSSEL G. WEINER, } IPC No. 14-2013-00457 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2013-00004164 } Date Filed: 12 April 2013 -versus- } TM:
x x
PHIL. ALLIANCE UMBRELLA, Opposer, -versus- HUI HUANG WANG, Respondent-Applicant. x------------------------------------------------------------------x IPC No. 14-2012-00441 Opposition to: Appln No. 4-2012-007437
} } } } } } } } } } NOTICE OF DECISION. For the Director:
PAKISUYO DELIVERY CENTER by Sole Proprietor Mr. Rosalino Rofule, Opposer, -versus- MARILOU MANGAHAS, Respondent- Applicant. )(-----------------------------------------------------------------)( IPC No.
DECISION. 3. The trademark McDOWELL S PREMIUM is unregistered as it clearly lacks distinctiveness.
THE SCOTCH WHISKY ASOCIATION, } Inter Partes Case No. 14-2005-00124 Opposer, } Opposition to: } } Appl n. Serial No. : 4-2000-007512 -versus- } Date Filed : 05 September 2000 } Trademark : MC DOWELL S
PHL LLECTUAL PROPERTY RICE OF THE I l_ I P P I N E S
IP PHL LLECTUAL PROPERTY RICE OF THE I l_ I P P I N E S UNILEVER N.V., Opposer, -versus- AMOREPACIFIC CORPORATION, Respondent- Applicant. x IPCNo. 14-2011-00450 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No. 4-2011-005726
Decision. The grounds upon which Opposer based its opposition were as follows:
CARLTON AND UNITED, IPC No. 14-2001-00012 BREWERIED, LTD., Opposition to: Opposer, Appl n. Serial No. : 85157 Date filed : March 23, 1993 -versus- Trademark : FOSTER S HOLLYWOOD BRENTFIELD INVESTMENTS,
PFIZER CARIBE LIMITED, PC Opposer, TM Application No (Filing Date: 15 August 2005) ELMER C. TENDERO Respondent-Applicant.
PFIZER CARIBE LIMITED, PC 14-2006-00125 Opposer, -versus - ELMER C. TENDERO Respondent-Applicant. Opposition to: TM Application No. 4-2005-008053 (Filing Date: 15 August 2005) TM: ZYTOX x-----------------------------------------------x
MAR~~AL. x x. e mil ophll.gov.ph. e +63:;'
INTELLECTUAl PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPIN E~ NOVARTIS AG, } IPC No. 14-2017-00236 Opposer, } Opposition to: } Appln. Serial No. 4-2017-002605 } Date Filed: 24 February 2017 } TM: TOBRADIN } -versus
PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES
IP PHL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE PHILIPPINES UNILEVER N.V., } IPC No. 14-2015-00425 Opposer, } Opposition to: } } Appln. Serial No. 4-2014-0014501 -versus- } Date Filed: 24 November 2014 VINCENT
-versus- )( )( NOTICE OF DECISION } } } } } } } } }
WILSON SPORTING GOOD CO., Opposer, -versus- RICHARD RYAN Ll, Respondent- Applicant. )(-------------------------------------------------------------------)( IPC No. 14-2012-00307 Opposition to: Appln. Serial
TRADEMARK MATTERS IN THAILAND. Trademark Act (No.3) B.E (Become into effect since July 28, 2016)
TRADEMARK MATTERS IN THAILAND LEGISLATION: Trademark Act (No.3) B.E. 2559 (Become into effect since July 28, 2016) Marks Eligible for Registration: Trademark is a distinctive sign used in distinguishing
x x
BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, Petitioner, -versus- DEESTONE LIMITED, Respondent-Registrant. x-------------------------------------------------------------------x NOTICE OF DECISION IPC No. 14-2010-00110 Cancellation
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DECISION
..,., OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ROSALINDA 0. BONIFACIO, Applicant-Appellant, -versus- McDONALD'S CORPORATION, Opposer -Appellee. X---------------------------------------------X Appeal No. 14-2010-0025
DECISION. The grounds for opposition are as follows:
MATTEL INC., } INTER PARTES CASE NO. 3898 Opposer, } Opposition to: } } Serial No. : 78543 -versus- } Date Filed : November 14, 1991 } Trademark : BARBIE } JIMMY A. UY, } Respondent-Applicant. } DECISION
IP(~ t ~A~,,-,, X X PHL~ -versus- NOTICE OF DECISION
IP(~ PHL~ GARAGE INTERNATIONAL LUX SARL, Opposer, -versus- MIRANI RISHI, Respondent-Applicant. X------- - ------------------------ --------------- X IPC No. 14-2011-00489 Opposition to: Appln. Serial No.