UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ( JUDGE KOSIK) UNITED STATES STATEMENT OF OFFENSE CONDUCT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ( JUDGE KOSIK) UNITED STATES STATEMENT OF OFFENSE CONDUCT"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CR. NO. v. ) ROBERT J. POWELL ) ) ) ( JUDGE KOSIK) ) ) Defendant ) ( ELECTRONICALLY FILED) UNITED STATES STATEMENT OF OFFENSE CONDUCT MARTIN C. CARLSON 1

2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHRISTIAN A. FISANICK CHIEF, CRIMINAL DIVISION GORDON A. D. ZUBROD WILLIAM S. HOUSER MICHAEL A. CONSIGLIO AMY PHILLIPS ASSISTANT U. S. ATTORNEYS FACTUAL PREDICATE MISPRISION OF A FELONY (18. U.S.C. 4) Judges for the Courts of Common Pleas are required to file financial disclosure reports annually with the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts, located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania and within the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Michael T. Conahan was a judge for the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Between January 2002 and January, 2007, Judge Conahan served as the President Judge for Luzerne 2

3 County. Mark A. Ciavarella was a judge for the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Beginning in about 1996 to June of 2008, Judge Ciavarella served as the head of the Juvenile Court for Luzerne County. In January, 2007, Judge Ciavarella was appointed President Judge for Luzerne County. As judges for the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas and as public officials in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Judge Conahan and Judge Ciavarella owed a duty of honest services to the public and were charged with serving the people of Luzerne County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in a fiduciary capacity, that is, the defendantsõ election to high public and judicial office carried with it the trust and confidence of the citizens of Pennsylvania that the defendants would exercise their judicial functions and duties for the benefit of the 3

4 people, with scrupulous good faith, impartiality, candor and without corruption and self- dealing. Robert J. Powell was an attorney whose principle office was in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. PowellÕ s firm, known as The Powell Law Group, P. C., specialized in plaintiffõ s tort litigation, among other areas. In about 2001, Robert Powell approached Judge Conahan and Judge Ciavarella to build a youth detention center in Luzerne County. Conahan and Ciavarella agreed to support the project, having concluded that the Luzerne County youth detention center was deteriorating. Ciavarella recommended that Powell use Mericle Construction for the project. Powell ultimately retained Mericle Construction to build the facility. Unbeknownst to Powell, Robert Mericle offered a finderõ s fee to 4

5 Conahan and Ciavarella for steering the new youth detention center to his company. Ciavarella directed Mericle to run the money through Powell, that is, to make it look as if the finderõ s fee had been paid to Powell. Powell was directed to let the money pass through his accounts and on to the judges. Powell felt that the judges had him over a barrel and acceded to the demand, ultimately allowing over $ 2 million in finderõ s fees to pass through his accounts to the judges. 1 On January 16, 2003, Powell was directed to sign a backdated brokerage agreement fee, dated February 19, 2002, with Mericle Construction, the builder of PA Child Care, for the payment, according to the terms of the agreement, to Powell of $ 997,600. PA Child Care was completed in 1 In addition to the Luzerne County facility, Mericle also built another facility for Powell and his partner in Western Pennsylvania and made upgrades to both facilities, each new construction project generating a new finder s fee. 5

6 February, On January 21, 2003, Mericle Construction wire transferred $ 610,000 of the brokerage agreement fee to an attorney in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. The remainder of the money of the brokerage agreement fee, $ 387,600, was wire transferred to Powell on or about January 24, The majority of the remainder of the money was subsequently transferred by Powell to Judge Conahan and Judge Ciavarella at their direction. In addition to the finderõ s fees paid by Mericle to the judges and run through PowellÕ s accounts, Judge Conahan and Judge Ciavarella also demanded kickbacks from Robert Powell in exchange for closing the Luzerne County youth detention center and sending the juvenile offenders to the private youth detention center, known as PA Child Care 6

7 in Luzerne County and Western PA Child Care in Butler County, both built by Mericle for Powell and his partner. In fact, Ciavarella told Powell that he ( Powell) was making a lot of money from the youth detention center and that he had to pay for the privilege. Implicit in the demand for kickbacks was the understanding that the payments were a quid pro quo for the judgesõ exercise of their judicial authority to send juveniles to PA Child Care and to Western PA Child Care and to take other discretionary acts. Powell played no role in nor was he aware of any impropriety by Judge Ciavarella in selecting juveniles for incarceration. On January 29, 2002, President Judge Michael T. Conahan signed a Placement Guarantee Agreement between Pennsylvania Child Care LLC and the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County to house juvenile offenders at PA Child Care. The Placement Guarantee 7

8 Agreement provided that the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County would pay PA Child Care the annual Rental Installment sum of $ 1,314,000 and stipulated that [ t] he obligation of the Court to make payment of the Rental Installments shall be absolute and unconditional. Robert Powell advised investigators that he that was made to understand that, had he stopped paying the judges, they would have retaliated against him and no more juveniles would have been sent to PA Child Care and to Western PA Child Care, which would have ruined Powell financially. Aware of the criminal activity, Robert Powell took no steps to notify authorities of the criminal activity until after the commencement of the federal investigation. The judges used straw parties and entities to transfer kickbacks from Powell to them. The judges engaged in the laundering of these 8

9 illegal kickbacks in order to make the transactions appear to be legitimate. All told, Powell paid the judges approximately of $ 772,500, often disguising the payments as rental fees relating to docking his boat at the judgesõ condominium in Jupiter, Florida. At other times, Powell paid the judges in cash. The payments were as follows: 1. On or about January 13, 2004, Robert Powell issued a check in the amount of $ 18,000 to the Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 2 On or about January 13, 2004, Robert Powell issued a check in the amount of $ 52,000 to the Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 3. On or about February 15, 2004, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. issued a check in the amount of $ 78,000 and identified on the face of the check as Reserving Lease to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 4. On or about February 15, 2004, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. issued a check in the amount of $ 75,000 and 9

10 identified on the face of the check as Rental Feb, Mar, Apr to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 5. On or about February 15, 2004, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. issued a check in the amount of $ 47,000 and identified on the face of the check as Slip Rental Fees to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 6. On or about April 30, 2004, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. issued a check in the amount of $ 75,000 and identified on the face of the check as Lease Expenses April, May, June to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 7. On or about April 30, 2004, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. issued a check in the amount of $ 25,000 and identified on the face of the check as Dock Expenses Related April, May, June to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 8. On or about July 12, 2004, in Luzerne County, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. wire transferred $ 120,000 to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 9. On or about September 23, 2004, in Luzerne County, Robert Powell, through Vision Holdings, Inc. wire transferred $ 100,000 to Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. 10

11 10. On or about August 16, 2006 Powell causes a series of checks for $ 42,000 to be cashed and gave the proceeds to the judges. 11. On or about October 13,2006 Powell causes a series of checks for $ 30,000 to be cashed and gave the proceeds to the judges. 12. On or about November 1, 2006 Powell causes a series of checks for $ 20,000 to be cashed and gave the proceeds to the judges. 13. On or about November 20, 2006 Powell causes a series of checks for $ 50,000 to be cashed and gave the proceeds to the judges. 14. On or about December 18, 2006 Powell causes a series of checks for $ 31,500 to be cashed and gave the proceeds to the judges. 15. On or about December 1, 2006, Robert Powell paid Judge Conahan $ 9,000 in cash from a check that was cashed as a referral fee for a case that was settled. 11

12 As Robert Powell made the demanded payments to the judges, Judge Ciavarella, being the juvenile court judge, commenced sending juveniles to PA Child Care and to Western PA Child Care. Unbeknownst to Powell, some of these juveniles had not been recommended for confinement by the Juvenile Probation Office. Nevertheless, they were sent to PA Child Care in order to keep all of the beds at PA Child Care occupied for the purpose of maximizing profits for PA Child Care. Even after the judges became aware of the federal grand jury investigation into their finances, they continued to demand payments from Powell for the privilege of doing business with Luzerne County. Ultimately, Powell commenced cooperating with federal investigators, met with the judges and recorded incriminating 12

13 conversations with them. These recorded conversations were instrumental in developing the case against the judges. Robert PowellÕs cooperation was a key factor in obtaining guilty pleas from Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella. ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT (18 USC... 3) Count Two of the Information alleges that Mr. Powell, by allowing MericleÕ s findersõ fee payments to Conahan and Ciavarella to be passed through his business accounts, by paying cash to the judges and by disguising payments by check to the judges as rental and leasing fees, acted as an accessory after the fact to the judgesõ conspiracy between themselves to file false tax returns. In other words, aware that the payments were being disguised as legitimate transactions, Robert Powell, as an attorney, was implicitly aware that the judges would of necessity 13

14 have intended ( a) to falsely characterize the nature of their income on their tax returns, and ( b) not to disclose the cash payments from Mr. Powell in their statement of income. For example, to conceal the payments to the judges, the judges directed that false entries be made in the books and records of Pinnacle Group of Jupiter, LLC. These false entries were made by the judges not only as part of the honest services fraud scheme but also to defraud the Internal Revenue Service by, for example, falsely characterizing some of the income as rental income in order to receive favorable tax treatment. The cash payments were not mentioned on their tax returns. Federal income tax returns relating to tax years 2003 through 2006 were filed with the Internal Revenue Service and signed by Judges Conahan and Ciavarella which were materially false to the extent that 14

15 they mischaracterized income the judges received from Robert Powell and Robert Mericle. For tax years 2003 through 2006, the tax loss to the government for Judge ConahanÕ s part in the scheme was in excess of $ 200,000. For tax years 2003 through 2006, the tax loss to the government for Judge CiavarellaÕ s part in the scheme was in excess of $200,000. THE PLEA AGREEMENT The plea agreement calls for Mr. Powell to waive indictment by a grand jury and to plead guilty to a two-count felony information which will be filed against the defendant by the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Count One of that information will charge the defendant with a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 4, misprision of a felony (wire fraud). The maximum penalty for that offense is imprisonment for a period of 3 years, a fine of $250,000, a maximum term of supervised release of up to 1 year, to be determined by the court, which shall be served at the conclusion of and in addition to any term of imprisonment, the costs of prosecution, denial of certain federal benefits as well as an assessment in the amount of $ Count Two of the information will charge the defendant with a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3, accessory after the fact 15

16 (conspiracy to file false tax returns). The maximum penalty for that offense is imprisonment for a period of 2.5 years, a fine of $250,000, a maximum term of supervised release of up to 1 year, and a special assessment in the amount of $ Mr. Powell further agrees to cooperate in the ongoing prosecution of others, to pay restituion as determined by the District Court and to forfeit the following assets: (a) a 2002 Ocean Yacht 56 Super Sport, HIN XYU05656D202S, named Reel Justice and owned by Fishin For a Good Time, LLC, 3852 Main Street, Tiverton, Rhode Island; (b) a 1981 Sabreliner 5, Serial Number , Registration N69WU with (2) Garrett TFE-731-3R-1D engines, Serial Nos. P93209 (left) and P83208 (right). The United States agrees that it will not bring any other criminal charges against the defendant directly arising out of the operative facts of the investigation into PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care and will further recommend that Mr. Powell receive a three-level departure for acceptance of responsibility. Should Mr. Powell provide substantial assistance in the prosecution of all other related parties, the United States will seek a downward departure from the applicable sentencing guideline range. 16

17 At time of sentencing, the United States will submit a memorandum to the District Court detailing the precise nature and extent of Mr. Powell s cooperation. MARTIN C. CARLSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHRISTIAN A. FISANICK CHIEF, CRIMINAL DIVISION GORDON A. D. ZUBROD WILLIAM S. HOUSER MICHAEL A. CONSIGLIO AMY PHILLIPS ASSISTANT U. S. ATTORNEYS

18

An appeal from an order of the Department of Management Services.

An appeal from an order of the Department of Management Services. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KENNETH C. JENNE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D09-2959

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO GOVERNMENT'S GUILTY PLEA MEMORANDUM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO GOVERNMENT'S GUILTY PLEA MEMORANDUM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CRIMINAL NO. 08-592-01 JOHN P. KAROLY JR. : GOVERNMENT'S GUILTY PLEA MEMORANDUM I. INTRODUCTION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No. [Cite as State v. Dorsey, 2010-Ohio-936.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Appellee Court of Appeals No. L-09-1016 Trial Court No. CR0200803208 v. Joseph

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EARL D. MILLS - July 5, 2005 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No.78215

More information

OKALOOSA SHERIFF PRAISES WORK OF NEW MORTGAGE FRAUD TASK FORCE

OKALOOSA SHERIFF PRAISES WORK OF NEW MORTGAGE FRAUD TASK FORCE September 30, 2011 OKALOOSA SHERIFF PRAISES WORK OF NEW MORTGAGE FRAUD TASK FORCE Okaloosa County Sheriff Larry Ashley today praised the work of the newly formed Northwest Florida Mortgage Fraud Task Force,

More information

- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF

- 1 - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF - 1-26 U.S.C. 7203 Sole Proprietorship or Partnership Employer's Quarterly Return Failure to File - Tabular Form Information Venue in District of Service Center 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

More information

v. MISDEMEANOR INFORMATION

v. MISDEMEANOR INFORMATION Case 3:13-cr-00154-JO Document 1 Filed 04/05/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 FILED 5 ~: '1315:jjj)DC-DRP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case ~o~l~3~c~~--_l_s_

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GARY D. WILLIAMS Appellant No. 2428 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOHN BRADLEY PETERS, SR., Appellant No. 645 WDA 2012 Appeal from

More information

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27 Case 3:17-cr-00083-HEH Document 12 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VICTOR M.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 24, 2008

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 24, 2008 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 24, 2008 BEN BLEVINS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hawkins County Nos. 07-CR-224, 07-CR-273,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. DATE FILED VIOLATIONS 18 U.S.C. 371 (conspiracy - 1 count) 18 U.S.C. 1014 (false statement

More information

FY16 Actual FY17 Budget FY18 Budget

FY16 Actual FY17 Budget FY18 Budget Department Judicial GENERAL FUND Percent Positions Change 2017-18 FY17 Budget FY18 Budget Circuit/County Court $194,022 $246,760 $234,890 (5)% 1 1 Legal Aid $1,072,725 $862,900 $941,500 9% Public Defender

More information

Casemaker - OH - Case Law - Search - Result. Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger, 2010-Ohio-1830, (OHSC)

Casemaker - OH - Case Law - Search - Result. Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger, 2010-Ohio-1830, (OHSC) Page 1 of 6 Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger, 2010-Ohio-1830, 2009-2290 (OHSC) 2010-Ohio-1830 Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger No. 2009-2290 Supreme Court of Ohio Submitted February 17, 2010. May 4,

More information

FY17 Actual FY18 Budget FY19 Budget

FY17 Actual FY18 Budget FY19 Budget Judicial Department Judicial GENERAL FUND Percent Positions Change 2018-19 FY18 Budget FY19 Budget Circuit/County Court $214,651 $234,890 $216,120 (8)% 1 1 Legal Aid $647,175 $941,500 $1,012,020 7% Public

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. ) v. ) Violations: Title 18, United ) States Code, Sections 2, 666, STUART LEVINE, ) 1341, 1343,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 18-10240 Document: 00514900211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff - Appellee JULISA TOLENTINO, Defendant

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES GODSPOWER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-67377 David Bragg,

More information

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0037n.06. Nos /2488 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0037n.06. Nos /2488 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0037n.06 Nos. 14-1693/2488 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD DEAN WOOLSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division Summary of Abusive Trust Schemes

Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division Summary of Abusive Trust Schemes Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division Summary of Abusive Trust Schemes April 2000 Introduction In the last few years the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (CI) has detected

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WILLIAM JOSEPH BOYLE, Appellant

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WILLIAM JOSEPH BOYLE, Appellant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16-4339 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM JOSEPH BOYLE, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

More information

Case Studies. COURSE X: MASTERING THE LOAN APPLICATION II Lesson 1: Mortgage Fraud. Case Study 1

Case Studies. COURSE X: MASTERING THE LOAN APPLICATION II Lesson 1: Mortgage Fraud. Case Study 1 Case Studies Case Study 1 TWO MORE CHARGED IN MASSIVE MORTGAGE FRAUD March 22, 2002 CONSPIRACY Susan W. Brooks, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, announced that RANDALL J. BOOKNIS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. LEE C. TEVIS THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C. 1349 INTRODUCTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JANELL ROBINSON : : : : : : : Hon. Criminal No. 18-18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C), 1341, 1346, 1349, 1951(a) and 2; and 28 U.S.C.

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. KAREEM GEORGE, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 465 MDA 2013 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:12-cr-00108-HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 FILED24 APR J 1312;18HSTIC ljrp IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES

More information

MORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE

MORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE MORTGAGE FRAUD UPDATE In the past, we have provided several articles discussing the then latest form of mortgage fraud and the ways to spot it and avoid it. Also, in the past we have commented on the lack

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. Plaintiff, COUNT ONE [Both Defendants] v. 18 U.S.C. 286 (Conspiracy to Defraud the

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0224 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. A. D.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TERRANCE GABRIEL CARTER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 2011-CR-44

More information

IRONSHORE INSURANCE INC. One State Street Plaza, 8 th Floor New York, NY Tel: Toll Free: (877) IRON-411

IRONSHORE INSURANCE INC. One State Street Plaza, 8 th Floor New York, NY Tel: Toll Free: (877) IRON-411 IRONSHORE INSURANCE INC. One State Street Plaza, 8 th Floor New York, NY 10004 Tel: 646-826-6600 Toll Free: (877) IRON-411 CONSULTANTS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE APPLICATION THE APPLICANT IS APPLYING

More information

Operator Of Unlawful Bitcoin Exchange Sentenced To More Than 5 Years In Prison For Leading Multimillion-Dollar Money Laundering And Fraud Scheme

Operator Of Unlawful Bitcoin Exchange Sentenced To More Than 5 Years In Prison For Leading Multimillion-Dollar Money Laundering And Fraud Scheme Search SEARCH HOME ABOUT U.S. ATTORNEY DIVISIONS NEWS PROGRAMS EMPLOYMENT CONTACT U.S. Attorneys» Southern District of New York» News» Press Releases Department of Justice U.S. Attorney s Office Southern

More information

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA : O P I N I O N -vs- 6/14/2004 :

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA : O P I N I O N -vs- 6/14/2004 : [Cite as State v. Philpot, 2004-Ohio-3006.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2003-05-103 : O P I N I O N -vs- 6/14/2004

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No MDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No MDA 2013 J-S40009-14 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LANCE PATRICK GREENAWALT, Appellant No. 1577 MDA

More information

[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT. CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ.

[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT. CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ. [J-144-2012] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, A.R., v. Appellee Appellant : No. 60 MAP

More information

U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302

U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302 U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Administrative Review Branch Alexandria, VA 22302 Ocean Live Poultry Market Appellant, v. Case Number: C0191192 Retailer Operations Division, Respondent.

More information

United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates Northern District of Georgia

United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates Northern District of Georgia United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates Northern District of Georgia FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Patrick Crosby 06/17/10 (404)581-6016 http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/ FAX (404)581-6160 Operation

More information

NOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

NOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS NOS. 12-17-00298-CR 12-17-00299-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DONALD RAY RUNNELS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEALS FROM THE 123RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2 JAMESY HAVENS 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C) DAVID FARNSWORTH 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(1)

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ROBERT WILLIAMS Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1631 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of

More information

*87166A01* Group Insurance. Preferential Beneficiary s Statement. Deceased s Information. Preferential Beneficiary s Statement

*87166A01* Group Insurance. Preferential Beneficiary s Statement. Deceased s Information. Preferential Beneficiary s Statement Preferential Beneficiary s ment Group Insurance Please send the completed form to: Deceased s Employer s Name Control Number Social Security Number Date of Death (mm dd yyyy) Preferential Beneficiary s

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AO 442 (Rev. 11/98) Warrant for Arrest UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -'- ~DlSTRICTOF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUAN CARLOS GUILLEN ZERPA V. WARRANT FOR ARREST DOCKET NUMBER: 3://mj 31(w/&) TO:

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Hoffner, 2010-Ohio-3128.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- JOHN LEWIS HOFFNER JUDGES Julie A. Edwards, P.J. William B.

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOHN EDWARD FLAMER, Appellant No. 2650 EDA 2018 Appeal from the

More information

2016 PA Super 262. Appellant No MDA 2015

2016 PA Super 262. Appellant No MDA 2015 2016 PA Super 262 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HENRY L. WILLIAMS, Appellant No. 2078 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 16, 2015 In

More information

SENATE, No. 685 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

SENATE, No. 685 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator RONALD L. RICE District (Essex) SYNOPSIS Makes residential mortgage fraud a separate crime.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) INFORMATION ) Plaintiff, ) (18 U.S.C. 371) ) (18 U.S.C. 1957) v. ) ) BRETT A. THIELEN, ) ) Defendant. ) THE UNITED STATES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) Case No. 09- I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) Case No. 09- I N D I C T M E N T COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City Docket) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) aka Bill Washington ) and ) EMMA JEAN HOLMES, ) ) Defendants. )

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. AKEEM JOHNSON Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 2880 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 1/25/2010 :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 1/25/2010 : [Cite as State v. Peterman, 2010-Ohio-211.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2009-06-149 : O P I N I O N - vs -

More information

PRIVATE COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM FORM

PRIVATE COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM FORM PRIVATE COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM FORM Name of Insurance Company to which application is made INSTRUCTIONS: This form is to be completed by an Applicant who has been involved in any claim or suit during

More information

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 109-cr-00349-RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Holding a Criminal Term Grand Jury Sworn in on November 16, 2009 UNITED STATES OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No. [Cite as State v. Robbins, 2012-Ohio-3862.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-11-012 Appellee Trial Court No. 10 CR 103 v. Barry

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. TODD ELVIS PUTMAN, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1380 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - MAHMOUD REZA BANKI, SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT SI 10 Cr. 08 (JFK) Defendant. - - X COUNT ONE CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MARSHA SCAGGS Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012 Appeal from the Order

More information

Berkley Insurance Company

Berkley Insurance Company ExecSuite Proposal Form for Employment Practices Liability CLAIMS MADE WARNING FOR APPLICATION: This Proposal Form is for a Claims Made and Reported Policy, relating to claims made against the Insureds

More information

FY 05 Actual FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget

FY 05 Actual FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget Judicial Department Judicial GENERAL FUND Percent Positions Change 2006-07 FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget Circuit/County Court $2,990,898 $2,318,360 $1,729,340 (25)% 1 1 Legal Aid $419,800 $419,800 $419,800

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee ANGEL PEREZ, v. Appellant No. 569 EDA 2012 Appeal from the Order

More information

Case 1:18-cr SHR Document 3 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Case 1:18-cr SHR Document 3 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case 1:18-cr-00251-SHR Document 3 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 28 DJF:JJT:nl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) RAYMOND OLIVER

More information

2017 PA Super 417 : : : : : : : : :

2017 PA Super 417 : : : : : : : : : 2017 PA Super 417 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PATRICK CLINE Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 641 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence August 22, 2016 In the Court of Common

More information

Case 2:13-cr KOB-TMP Document 1 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:13-cr KOB-TMP Document 1 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 Case 2:13-cr-00030-KOB-TMP Document 1 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 FILED 2013 Feb-01 PM 12:58 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA JWV/GAM: Feb. 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. RAYMOND C. DASILVA, JR., Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 206 MDA 2017 Appeal from

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BOB POPE, Appellant No. 786 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

Recent FCPA Enforcement Action

Recent FCPA Enforcement Action March 2009 Recent FCPA Enforcement Action BY TIMOTHY L. DICKINSON, WILLIAM F. PENDERGAST, JENNIFER D. RIDDLE AND PAULA R. KATZ February 11, 2009, KBR, Inc. ( KBR ) reached settlements resolving criminal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Clay O. Burris, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on November 19, 2013

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Clay O. Burris, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on November 19, 2013 [Cite as State v. Burris, 2013-Ohio-5108.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 13AP-238 v. : (C.P.C. No. 12CR-01-238) Clay O. Burris, : (REGULAR

More information

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION ;.I Case 3:13-cr-00332-KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PORTLAND DIVISION 0033~ Case No. 3:13-CR

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA GARY W. WILLIAMS, v. Appellant No. 1812 MDA 2012 Appeal from the

More information

2016 PA Super 238 OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 07, Robert J. Kearns ( Appellant ) appeals from the judgment of sentence

2016 PA Super 238 OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 07, Robert J. Kearns ( Appellant ) appeals from the judgment of sentence 2016 PA Super 238 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ROBERT J. KEARNS Appellant No. 192 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence December 11, 2015 In the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 1:07-cv-352-TJM-RFT ) ROBERT L. SCHULZ; ) WE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION

More information

STATE OF OHIO DARYL MCGINNIS

STATE OF OHIO DARYL MCGINNIS [Cite as State v. McGinnis, 2009-Ohio-6102.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92244 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DARYL MCGINNIS

More information

LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS INC. (A Stock Insurance Company, hereinafter the Company ) 55 Water Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10041

LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS INC. (A Stock Insurance Company, hereinafter the Company ) 55 Water Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10041 Toll-free number: 1-66-434-557 LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS INC. (A Stock Insurance Company, hereinafter the Company ) 55 Water Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10041 RENEWAL APPLICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT EFiled: Nov 19 2018 02:47PM EST Transaction ID 62681991 Case No. 2018-0838- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MATTHEW P. DENN, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, v. Plaintiff, BACKPAGE.COM,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Felder, 2009-Ohio-6124.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : No. 09AP-459 Plaintiff-Appellee, : (C.P.C. No. 00CR09-5692) No. 09AP-460 v. : (C.P.C.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 24, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EDWARD BUCK FRANKLIN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 15,981 15,986

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANDRE PACE, Appellant No. 932 WDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment

More information

Dear Claimant: If you have further questions about this claim, please call our toll-free Customer Service Center

Dear Claimant: If you have further questions about this claim, please call our toll-free Customer Service Center Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Group Life Claims P.O. Box 6100 Scranton, PA 18505-6100 1-800-638-6420 Dear Claimant: We at Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) are sorry for your loss. To

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. ADAM EUGENE PITTINGER Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 1638 MDA 2017 Appeal from

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff and Respondent, ) v. ) Defendant and Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff and Respondent, ) v. ) Defendant and Appellant. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JESSE JAMES, Defendant and Appellant. H012345 Santa Clara

More information

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE Southern District of New York

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE Southern District of New York UNITED STATES ATTORNEY S OFFICE Southern District of New York U.S. ATTORNEY PREET BHARARA FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, September 10, 2015 http://www.justice.gov/usao/nys CONTACT: U.S. ATTORNEY S OFFICE

More information

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. JAMES VAN DOREN (CRD No. 5048067), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. 20130367071 Hearing

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MJC/2008R00659 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : Criminal No. v. : : OTIS RAY HOPE, and : (Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud, RICHARD WAYNE HOPE,

More information

From the Office Suite to Cell Block C: Potential Criminal and Regulatory Implications of Pharma/Biotech/Device Products Liability Lawsuits

From the Office Suite to Cell Block C: Potential Criminal and Regulatory Implications of Pharma/Biotech/Device Products Liability Lawsuits From the Office Suite to Cell Block C: Potential Criminal and Regulatory Implications of Pharma/Biotech/Device Products Liability Lawsuits BUTLER SNOW 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

How to Apply for Long Term Disability Conversion Insurance

How to Apply for Long Term Disability Conversion Insurance How to Apply for Long Term Disability Conversion Insurance Please follow these steps to apply for Conversion: 1. Complete the LTD Conversion Application provided in this package. Please answer each question

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 09-318 Opinion Delivered March 17, 2011 LARRY DONNELL REED Appellant v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Appellee PRO SE APPEAL FROM PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CR 2006-1776, HON. BARRY

More information

TRUST COMPANIES Underwriting Questionnaire

TRUST COMPANIES Underwriting Questionnaire Harford Fire Insurance Company TRUST COMPANIES Underwriting Questionnaire Name of Applicant: 1. Is dual control exercised over all discretionary trust accounts (two employees, regardless of whether outside

More information

STATE OF OHIO MACK THOMAS, JR.

STATE OF OHIO MACK THOMAS, JR. [Cite as State v. Thomas, 2009-Ohio-1784.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91112 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. MACK THOMAS, JR.

More information

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:14-cr-00136-PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GREGORY A. DERUE,

More information

Your life insurance claim kit

Your life insurance claim kit U.S. Life Insurance Claims Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Your life insurance claim kit On behalf of MetLife, please accept our sincere condolences during this difficult time. Helping you submit your

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 16, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-09-00868-CR NO. 14-09-00869-CR ARRINGTON FLOYD BURLEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal

More information

[Cite as Willoughby v. Sapina, 2001-Ohio-8707.] COURT OF APPEALS LAKE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

[Cite as Willoughby v. Sapina, 2001-Ohio-8707.] COURT OF APPEALS LAKE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S [Cite as Willoughby v. Sapina, 2001-Ohio-8707.] COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S CITY OF WILLOUGHBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs DEJAN SAPINA, Defendant-Appellant. HON. WILLIAM

More information

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION. National Tax Liens Association

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION. National Tax Liens Association Presentation By The U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION To National Tax Liens Association February 26, 2015 DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this presentation are not purported to reflect those

More information

Dennis E. Boyle. Senior Counsel. Experience

Dennis E. Boyle. Senior Counsel. Experience 2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Dennis E. Boyle Senior Counsel 1800 M Street, NW Suite 450N Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202.659.6808 Fax: 202.327.6175 Email: dboyle@wtplaw.com Experience Dennis is

More information

Felony Insurance Fraud Offenses 2015 Annual Report

Felony Insurance Fraud Offenses 2015 Annual Report Criminal Justice Statistical Report Andrew M. Cuomo Governor Michael C. Green Executive Deputy Commissioner Legislative Report Series November 2016 Felony Insurance Fraud Offenses 2015 Annual Report Theresa

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division. Count 1: Count 2: CRIMINAL INFORMATION. FILED IN OPFM COURT ' % IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division.ALBaSbSFHSICQUHT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. l:10-cr- v. ANDREW B. SILVA,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2004 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2004 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. COREY HUDDLESTON Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County Nos. 6490, 6661, 6662,

More information

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 237 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 237 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 237 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 17-201-01 (ABJ) PAUL J. MANAFORT,

More information

Case 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

Case 1:06-cr Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA Case 1:06-cr-00029 Document 3 Filed 04/11/2006 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHERYL KYLES and DEREK HENRY Plaintiff,

More information

Kauffman Kilberg LLC. The Congress Center 1001 SW Fifth Avenue Suite 1414 Portland, OR 97204

Kauffman Kilberg LLC. The Congress Center 1001 SW Fifth Avenue Suite 1414 Portland, OR 97204 Jamie S. Kilberg Kauffman Kilberg LLC The Congress Center 1001 SW Fifth Avenue Suite 1414 Portland, OR 97204 P: 503.224.2595 F: 503.224.3203 jamie@kauffmankilberg.com Jamie S. Kilberg has well over a decade

More information

Justice Department s Focus on Individual Responsibility Requires Broadening of Excess Side-A Difference-in-Conditions D&O Insurance Policies

Justice Department s Focus on Individual Responsibility Requires Broadening of Excess Side-A Difference-in-Conditions D&O Insurance Policies Justice Department s Focus on Individual Responsibility Requires Broadening of Excess Side-A Difference-in-Conditions D&O Insurance Policies By Tim Burns The results of the recent national elections may

More information