Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India"

Transcription

1 Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India NEWS LETTER September-2018 Vol.-22 No. 09 CA. Abhay Sharma Chairman, Dear Colleagues, We are in the busiest month of the year in attending audits and tax returns in full swing. However, amid the busyness, the extension of dates for filing returns and tax audits which were due by 0th September to 15th October has provided unexpected respite from the hectic schedule. We may utilize this extension of time, as our interaction with the clients increases these days, to explain the benefits of the new provisions and advice the appropriate clients. We need to strike a balance between personal and professional life and ensure that extra pressure of work does not take toll on our health. From this month, we are having series of festivals like Ganesh Chartuthi, Id and Onam to be followed by so many in coming month. I wish you all to enjoy these festivities with full zeal and warmth. On the occasion of teachers' day, I take opportunity to pay gratitude for all teachers in life, in any form like seniors, friends or whatever, who have taught me in any manner. I welcome all the new members in last one year, and thank all for active participation in regular meetings. Professionally yours, Member : CA. Anand Jain, CA. Garjana Rathore CA. Vipul Padliya Ex. Officio Member : CA. Kemisha Soni, CA. Churchil Jain, CA. Nilesh Gupta

2 Reminding the Rights: Empowering the Assessee in Assessments The Tax Authorities in the Assessment Proceedings exercise their quasi judicial powers and in doing so it is expected that they must act fairly and not in a partisan manner. Indeed it is their duty to ensure that no tax which is legally due from Assessee remains unrecovered but at the same time they should not act in a manner as might indicate that scales are weighed against the Assessee. When the authorities administer their powers with an evil eye and unequal hand the Assessee should respond and defend with the rights provided to it by the Constitution, Legislation and Judiciary. This article is devoted to the noble cause of reminding the cardinal rights and thereby empowering the Assessee to face Assessments in a careful manner. Assessee's right to inspect the records and obtain copies of Proceedings Every Assessee has fullest right to inspect all documents, records, correspondences in respect of his case and any limitation to such right to inspect is infringement of his Rights under Article 14 of the Constitution. Sometimes the inspection of records proves very helpful in case for eg. From the Inspection of Assessment records in a Reopening case, it can be seen that whether the notice was issued after necessary approval or not, whether the reopening is based on any audit objection or not. Therefore it is advisable that wherever it is felt that inspection of records would be helpful, it should be applied for. Wherever it is denied by the Assessing Officer, the higher authorities should be approached since inspection of his records is basic right of an Assessee. Similarly it is a right of Assessee to obtain copies of Assessment records, proceedings, documents, etc. The records in the assessment file constitute public documents within the meaning of section 74 of Indian Evidence Act as forming the acts or records of the acts of a public officer or of an official body. Opportunity of being heard It is a principle of natural justice that every person has a right of being heard before any prejudice is caused to him by way of Assessment or addition or disallowance. The Assessing Officer is supposed to give a show cause notice before making any disallowance and provide sufficient opportunity of hearing in absence of which the order becomes illegal and void. Similarly very short time provided by the Officer to furnish explanation or details would also be considered as denial of sufficient opportunity of hearing. Private enquiries made by Department Tax authorities are open to conduct enquiries and to collect materials to facilitate assessment even by private enquiry. But if they desire to use the material so collected then the Assessee must be informed of the material and must be given an adequate opportunity of explaining it. Further the Assessee has a right to cross examine and without allowing the opportunity of cross examination, adverse inference cannot be drawn though the evidence may be so strong Use of Affidavits in Assessment Proceedings An affidavit is a written sworn statement of fact voluntarily made by the person under an oath or affirmation administered by a notary. It may be noted that facts stated on Affidavits cannot be rejected in law unless the person has either been cross-examined or called upon to produce documentary evidence in support of the affidavit sworn by him. Further the tax officers cannot accept the facts stated in affidavit partly i.e. accepting the part in favour of revenue and ignoring the part in favour of assessee and therefore an affidavit has to be read as a whole. Therefore the Affidavits can be used in appropriate cases to shift the burden on the other side to a great extent. However one should be very careful before filing an affidavit since suppression or stating wrong facts would amount to fraud and has severe consequences under Section 195 of Indian Penal Code. Onus on Department Vis-à-vis Onus on Assessee The fact that assessee has any unaccounted income or income outside books has to be proved by the department since it is not possible for the Assessee to prove negative that he does not have any income outside books. However where an expense or deduction has been claimed by the Assessee the onus shifts to the Assessee to prove that all the necessary conditions for allowability have been complied with and all the material facts have to be brought on record for substantiating the claim. Preponderance of probabilities Normal presumption is in favour of good faith and in favour of treating the apparent as real unless otherwise proved. Transactions in books have to be taken and considered as they are appearing and presumed to be real and genuine unless there is any specific reason and material which indicates that there is sham or bogusness. However the taxing authorities are entitled to look into the surrounding circumstances to find out the reality and the matter has to be considered by applying the test of human probabilities.additions or disallowances can be made by the Assessing Officer after applying the test of human probabilities and concluding whether the transaction is

3 genuine or not. Indeed probabilities are a determining factor for making additions however it is also clear that no penalty can be levied on additions made on preponderance of probabilities. Estimation of Income or Disallowances Wherever the Assessing Officer wishes to proceed in estimating the income it is imperative on the Assessing Officer to provide an opportunity to the Assessee to rebut the basis of his estimate and in absence of such opportunity the estimation is not well founded. Further the estimation has to be based on certain logical basis like comparison with data of similar businesses. Where the estimation is based on comparable cases then it is the duty of Assessing Officer to confront the Assessee with such comparable and afford an opportunity to rebut such cases, any deviation from this procedure would make the estimation illegal. If an estimate is based partly on irrelevant material and partly on relevant material, it is difficult to sustain the estimate because it cannot be said as to what extent and which part of the figure of estimate depends upon the irrelevant portion of the matter. Moreover where the additions have been made or are sustained on estimate basis, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied. No addition or books rejection for Lower or Inadequate Profits One normally comes across in Assessment to rebut the allegation of inadequacy or low profits. The Assessing Officer may even try to give show cause for rejection of books of accounts on the allegation of lesser profits. Here one needs to appreciate that low profits may be attributable to the fact that the assessee may be incompetent or his method of business may be uneconomic. Unless any specific defect is demonstrated by the Assessing Officer the books cannot be rejected and no addition can be made for profits. Variation of yield and other factors are dependent on several factors therefore no adverse inference can be made on the basis of these indicators subject to the proper maintenance of all records. Innocent or Trivial Mistakes in Accounts 'To err is human' and there may be small and innocent mistakes in accounts which may come to notice during the scrutiny of books in Assessment. If these mistakes and omissions are unintended and due to inadvertence the accounts can still be acceptable as genuine and substantially correct. The effect of these trivial mistakes may be limited to the extent of adjusting the income as per correct data. Here it is important to note that penalty is not leviable for additions or disallowance in respect of mistakes or errors noticed in accounts. Rule of Consistency It is true that each assessment year is different and the principle of res judicata or estoppel by record, does not strictly apply to income tax proceedings but it is also true that consistency should be maintained for the purpose of finality in all litigations. Stand accepted by department on an issue or earlier decisions on the same questions should not be reopened unless some fresh facts are found in the subsequent year. If there is no material change in facts or then the department must follow rule of consistency. The principles of natural justice also require that if there is prior determination by the Income-tax department, ordinarily there should be no variation from that decision unless there are fresh circumstances to warrant a deviation from the previous decision Decision of Tribunal Binding on Assessing Officers The Assessing Officer cannot ignore the decision taken by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee and take a contrary view. Though the revenue tribunal is not a court of record and its decisions are not precedents per se but the decisions of tribunals are held to be binding by Supreme Court on all revenue authorities functioning under the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Commercial Expediency Department cannot dictate the circumstances in which expenditure is to be incurred. It is not open to the department to prescribe what expenditure an assessee should incur and in what circumstances he should incur that expenditure. Every businessman knows his interest best. No question of reasonableness arises when it is found that expenditure has been incurred by the assessee wholly exclusively for the purpose of business. IT is also settled that wholly and exclusively does not mean 'necessarily' and any expense for the promotion of business is wholly and exclusively for the business. New Claim It is now settled that an Assessing Officer can only entertain a claim which was made in the return of income. Further there may be cases where a claim is first time lodged before the Appellate authorities. In such cases if the liability arises, then a claim can be made bona fide at any stage before any higher appellate authority, which is competent to grant relief. Whether a deduction was claimed or not before the ITO, is not of much importance. Method of Accounting Every Assessee is free to choose the method of accounting and the department cannot compel the Assessee to adopt the mercantile system of accounting. Moreover the assessee is free even to follow different methods of accounting for income from different sources. Also an Assessee An assessee can change the method of accounting in respect of a source of income without any requirement of approval from Tax Authorities. As regards method of valuation of closing stock, cost or at market value whichever is less is a generally accepted and established rule of commercial practice. The aforesaid are some basic principles which every member should know before representing the Assessee in Assessments. Awareness of Assessee's rights would help in combating the arbitrary actions and conclusion of a harmonious assessment.

4 MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2018 ACTIVITIES Sr. No. Date Programme Topic Faculty Guest Venue CPE Fees Mergers Demerger and unlocking Value from it CA. Surli Mehta CA. Chinmay Naik on Critical issues under capital gain CA. Kirti Joshi on GST Shri Pawan Sharma, IAS ( Commissioner SGSR ) CA. Navneet Garg Shri. Mukul Sharma Retd CTO CA. S Krishnan Session Chairman

5 Indore Branch of CIRC of ICAI Plot No.19-B, SchemeNo.78,Part-II, INDORE (M.P.)Tel.: , Registered with the Registrar of Newspaper for India under No. MPBIL 0121/12/1/2008-TC Printed & Published by CA. Abhay Sharma Chairman on behalf of the Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, Plot No.19-B, SchemeNo.78,Part-II, INDORE (M.P.)

NEWS LETTER. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. October-2018 Vol.-22 No.

NEWS LETTER. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. October-2018 Vol.-22 No. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India NEWS LETTER October-2018 Vol.-22 No. 10 Dear Professional Colleagues, CA. Abhay Sharma Chairman, We celebrate

More information

NEWS LETTER. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. August Vol.-22 No.

NEWS LETTER. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. August Vol.-22 No. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India NEWS LETTER August-2018 Vol.-22 No. 08 CA. Abhay Sharma Chairman, Dear Professional Colleagues, This year,

More information

NEWS LETTER. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. November-2018 Vol.-22 No.

NEWS LETTER. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. November-2018 Vol.-22 No. Indore Branch of Central India Regional Council of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India NEWS LETTER November-2018 Vol.-22 No. 11 Dear Esteemed Professional Colleagues, We encountered number

More information

Chapter IV Assessments, Payment, Recovery and Collection of Tax 24. Submission of return

Chapter IV Assessments, Payment, Recovery and Collection of Tax 24. Submission of return Chapter IV Assessments, Payment, Recovery and Collection of Tax 24. Submission of return (1) Every dealer liable to pay tax under this Act including a dealer from whom any amount of tax has been deducted

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER ITA No-160/2005 Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 Judgment delivered on: 24th May, 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I, NEW DELHI...

More information

Income Tax Authorities

Income Tax Authorities 20 Income Tax Authorities Question 1 Rajesh regularly files his return of income electronically. While he was trying to upload his return of income for assessment year 2014-15 on 31 st July, 2014, last

More information

25 Penalties Introduction Penalties

25 Penalties Introduction Penalties 25 Penalties 25.1 Introduction The Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for the imposition of a penalty on an assessee who wilfully commits any offence under the provisions of the Act. Penalty is levied over

More information

Short title, extent and commencement. Definitions.

Short title, extent and commencement. Definitions. PART I GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS, PUNJAB NOTIFICATION The 19th April, 2018 No.12-Leg./2018.-The following Act of the Legislature of the State of Punjab received the

More information

CA SHARAD A SHAH. 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC

CA SHARAD A SHAH. 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC CA SHARAD A SHAH 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC-2014 1 Relevant Part of Section 271 (1) If the Assessing Officer] or the [Commissioner (Appeals)][or the Commissioner] in the course of any proceedings under

More information

Offences and Penalty provisions under GST

Offences and Penalty provisions under GST Offences and Penalty provisions under GST DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this article are of the author(s). The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India may not necessarily subscribe to the views

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Judgment delivered on: ITA No.415/ Appellant.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Judgment delivered on: ITA No.415/ Appellant. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Judgment delivered on: 22.01.2013 ITA No.415/2012 CIT... Appellant versus MAK DATA LTD... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:

More information

ALL GUJARAT FEDERATION OF TAX CONSULTANTS

ALL GUJARAT FEDERATION OF TAX CONSULTANTS ALL GUJARAT FEDERATION OF TAX CONSULTANTS PRE-BUDGET MEMORANDUM FOR 2015-16 1. Section 2(22)(e) : Deemed Dividend As per the present provision, even if advance or loan is given to a share holder for one

More information

Advance Ruling. Chapter XV. FAQ s

Advance Ruling. Chapter XV. FAQ s FAQ s Chapter XV Advance Ruling Chapter-XVII of the CGST Act, 2017 (Section 95 to Section 106) read with Chapter XII - Advance Ruling of the CGST Rules, 2017 and Chapter-VII of the UGST Act, 2017(Section

More information

Disputing an assessment

Disputing an assessment IR776 June 2018 Disputing an assessment What to do if you dispute an assessment 2 DISPUTING AN ASSESSMENT Introduction While we make every effort to apply the tax laws fairly and correctly, there may be

More information

THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952

THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 Sec 2 The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 1 THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 Sec (ACT NO. 19 OF 1952) 1 (4 th March, 1952) An Act to

More information

April 2017 CA K Prasanna and ca Abhinaya Ramanujam

April 2017 CA K Prasanna and ca Abhinaya Ramanujam Assessment Procedure April 2017 CA K Prasanna and ca Abhinaya Ramanujam Topics Covered Return of Income Self-Assessment (S 140A) Enquiry before Assessment (S 142(1)) Summary Assessment (S 143(1)) Scrutiny

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21 ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR BETWEEN: ITA NOS.251/2016 & 390/2016

More information

PRESENTED BY CA VIKRAM D MEHTA

PRESENTED BY CA VIKRAM D MEHTA PRESENTED BY CA VIKRAM D MEHTA 1 IMPLICATION UNDER VAT DISALLOWANCE OF ITC SEC 48(5), HAWALA PURCHASES / MIS-MATCHES MATCHES etc. 2 The claims of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Maharashtra Value Added

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Ujagar Holdings Pvt. Ltd., 8-D,

More information

Commissioner of Income Tax 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr. Niraj Sheth i/b Atul Jasani for the respondent. DATED : 4 th JUNE, 2018.

Commissioner of Income Tax 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr. Niraj Sheth i/b Atul Jasani for the respondent. DATED : 4 th JUNE, 2018. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1363 OF 2015 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1358 OF 2015 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1359 OF 2015 Commissioner

More information

APPEALS & REVISIONS. PART I (For CAF-6 and ICMAP students)

APPEALS & REVISIONS. PART I (For CAF-6 and ICMAP students) Chapter 18 APPEALS & REVISIONS Section Rule Topic covered (Part - I for CAF-6 & ICMAP students) PART I 127 76 Appeal to the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals) 128 Procedure in appeal 129 Decision in

More information

THE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX ACT, 2015 A BRIEF ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION By PARAS KOCHAR, ADVOCATE 20/07/2015 With the objective to deal with the menace of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: ITA 232/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: ITA 232/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Date of decision: 22.11.2012 ITA 232/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel... Appellant

More information

LUNAWAT & CO. CA. PRAMOD JAIN. Chartered Accountants. 30 th January 2015 FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA

LUNAWAT & CO. CA. PRAMOD JAIN. Chartered Accountants. 30 th January 2015 FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA LUNAWAT & CO. Chartered Accountants 30 th January 2015 CA. PRAMOD JAIN FCA, FCS, FCMA, LL.B, MIMA, DISA Assessment Regular [143(3)] Best Judgment [144] Reopening [147] Block [158BC] PROCEDURE AFTER FILING

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 17.11.2016 Pronounced on: 03.07.2017 + ITA 240/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant Through : Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and

More information

WP(C) No of Versus- BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

WP(C) No of Versus- BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) No. 7363 of 2005 Shri Manik Gogoi, S/O Shri Jatiram Gogoi, R/O Eragaon, PO-Nakachari, District-Jorhat, Assam.

More information

PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT. -- By CA Mahendra Sanghvi

PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT. -- By CA Mahendra Sanghvi PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT -- By CA Mahendra Sanghvi RETURN OF INCOME & SELF ASSESSMENT 2 Procedure assessment covered of is by Chapter XIV of RETURN OF INCOME & SELF 3 ASSESSMENT Shall furnish, on or before

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer); and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 20 th January, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 20 th January, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 20 th January, 2010 + ITA 239/2008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Appellant Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal versus GOETZE (INDIA) LTD. Through:...

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI A. T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.1423 /Del/2013 Assessment year : 2008-09 Simran

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY OF JUNE 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR STRP 120/2013 & STRPs.229-250/2013 c/w STRP

More information

NETHERLANDS - ARBITRATION ACT DECEMBER 1986 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - BOOK IV: ARBITRATION TITLE ONE - ARBITRATION IN THE NETHERLANDS

NETHERLANDS - ARBITRATION ACT DECEMBER 1986 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - BOOK IV: ARBITRATION TITLE ONE - ARBITRATION IN THE NETHERLANDS NETHERLANDS - ARBITRATION ACT DECEMBER 1986 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - BOOK IV: ARBITRATION TITLE ONE - ARBITRATION IN THE NETHERLANDS SECTION ONE - ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR Article

More information

CHAPTER II And CHAPTER III INCIDENCE, LEVY AND RATE OF TAX, REGISTRATION

CHAPTER II And CHAPTER III INCIDENCE, LEVY AND RATE OF TAX, REGISTRATION CHAPTER II And CHAPTER III INCIDENCE, LEVY AND RATE OF TAX, REGISTRATION 3. Incidence and levy of tax (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, every dealer under sub-section (2), shall pay tax in the

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as Braden v. Sinar, 2007-Ohio-4527.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) CYNTHIA BRADEN C. A. No. 23656 Appellant v. DR. DAVID SINAR, DDS., et

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1580/Del/2010 Assessment Year : 2004-05 05 M/s

More information

Union Budget CA. Ashok Batra. (The author is a member of the Institute. He can be reached at )

Union Budget CA. Ashok Batra. (The author is a member of the Institute. He can be reached at ) 1449 Changes in the Finance Act, 1994 And Rules [Except Mega Exemption Notification, Negative List Changes And Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Changes] One of the striking features of the Finance Bill, 2015

More information

A legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section

A legitimate expenditure or relief not claimed in the return of income can be claimed ONLY by revising the return of income under section Fresh Claim Outside The Return of Income BY:- CA. (Dr.) Gurmeet S. Grewal B. Com (Hons.), FCA, PhD., CLA (IIAM) Grewal & Singh Chartered Accountants New Delhi, Chandigarh, Yamuna Nagar, Jammu Phones: 09811242856

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Income Tax Officer, TDS Rohtak (APPELLANT) PAN No. RTKPO1586E

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No of CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No of CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15566 of 2011 CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD - Petitioner(s) Versus ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX(OSD) & 1 - Respondent(s) Appearance :

More information

SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT

SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT SUMMARY OF THE 2014 MISSISSIPPI TAXPAYER FAIRNESS ACT This omnibus tax legislation, House Bill No. 799, was signed into law by Governor Phil Bryant on April 11, 2014, after passing the House of Representatives

More information

Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes

Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes I. Rationale for Residency Regulation The Council on Post-Secondary Education (CPE) has promulgated an administrative regulation

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW. ITA No.486/LKW/2016 Assessment Year:

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW. ITA No.486/LKW/2016 Assessment Year: IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY,JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.486/LKW/2016 Assessment Year:2012-13 Pankaj

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1999-2000 Bennett Coleman & Co.Ltd., The Times

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 09.01.2009 ITA 1130/2006 09.01.2009 M/S HINDUSTAN INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD Appellant Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... Respondent

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA. Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA. Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA C BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member), and Shri George Mathan (Judicial Member) I.T.A. No. 718/Kol. / 2014 Assessment year : 2011-2012

More information

BUDGET PROPOSALS 2009

BUDGET PROPOSALS 2009 BUDGET PROPOSALS 2009 Sales Tax & Federal Excise Adnan Mufti FCA Partner, Shekha & Mufti Income Tax Bar Association 25 April 2009 An independent member firm of MOORE STEPHENS INTRNATIONAL LIMITED members

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBE

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBE IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.195/LKW/2011 Assessment Year:2006-07 Income

More information

TAX CONTROVERSIES AND LITIGATION IN INDIA - AVOIDANCE AND THE SOLUTIONS. S.R. Wadhwa, Advocate 1

TAX CONTROVERSIES AND LITIGATION IN INDIA - AVOIDANCE AND THE SOLUTIONS. S.R. Wadhwa, Advocate 1 TAX CONTROVERSIES AND LITIGATION IN INDIA - AVOIDANCE AND THE SOLUTIONS S.R. Wadhwa, Advocate 1 BY: S.R. Wadhwa Ph. No. 9810414433 Email: wadhwasr@hotmail.com Website: wadhwataxconsultant.com S.R. Wadhwa,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Judgment delivered on : ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Judgment delivered on : ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Judgment delivered on : 06.03.2009 ITA Nos. 697/2007, 698/2007 & 699/2007 ESTER INDUSTRIES LIMITED... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA. ITA No.450/Ag/2015 Assessment Year:

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA. ITA No.450/Ag/2015 Assessment Year: 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. ANNAPURNA MEHROTRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.450/Ag/2015 Assessment Year:2009-2010 ITO (TDS),

More information

Penalty provisions under Income Tax Act Unlearning and relearning consequent to Finance bill 2016 By K.K.Chhaparia, FCA

Penalty provisions under Income Tax Act Unlearning and relearning consequent to Finance bill 2016 By K.K.Chhaparia, FCA Penalty provisions under Income Tax Act Unlearning and relearning consequent to Finance bill 2016 By K.K.Chhaparia, FCA As we know, penal provisions in any statute are intended to have deterrent effect

More information

PRIVATE VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACT

PRIVATE VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACT ss 1 2 CHAPTER 17:05 (updated to reflect amendments as at 1st September 2002) Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. Acts 63/1966, 6/1976, 30/1981, 6/1995, 6/2000 (s. 151 i ), 22/2001 (s. 4) ii ; R.G.N.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Decided on : ITA 195/2012, C.M. APPL.5434/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. Decided on : ITA 195/2012, C.M. APPL.5434/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Decided on : 27.07.2012 ITA 195/2012, C.M. APPL.5434/2012 ITA 196/2012, C.M. APPL. 5436/2012 ITA 197/2012, C.M. APPL.5437/2012 ITA 198/2012,

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1 ITA Nos. 6675 & 6676/Del/2015 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 6675/DEL/2015 ( A.Y 2013-14)

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09, 41-A, Film Center, 38, Tardeo

More information

CBDT Instruction No. 3/2016 : A game-changer for TP audits? - Part I

CBDT Instruction No. 3/2016 : A game-changer for TP audits? - Part I CBDT Instruction No. 3/2016 : A game-changer for TP audits? - Part I Date: Fri, 04/22/2016-15:02 Ajay Kering (Direct or, Grant Thornt on India LLP) Dinesh Ramnani (Manager, Grant Thornt on India LLP) This

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ASN 1/15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Nickunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Sir Joravar Bhavan. 93, Maharshi Karve Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 020. PA

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG,, JUDICIAL MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG,, JUDICIAL MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG,, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4281/Del/2010 Assessment Year : 2001-02 02 Income

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R %

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015. versus CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 14 + ITA 557/2015 COPERION IDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED... Appellant Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 22.01.2013 + ITA No.415/2012 CIT... Appellant versus MAK DATA LTD... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 217 of 2002 Date of decision Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 217 of 2002 Date of decision Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana ITA 217 of 2002 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 217 of 2002 Date of decision 17.4.2012 Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) Ludhiana. Appellant Versus M/s Punjab Breweries

More information

Concurrence in Trade mark usage- Concern, not for the Honest

Concurrence in Trade mark usage- Concern, not for the Honest 2014] F-35 Concurrence in Trade mark usage- Concern, not for the Honest Kanisshka Tyagi* and Isha Mehta** The article analyses the provisions relating to the concurrent use of one Trade mark by two or

More information

Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961

Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961 Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961 Special provision for computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis By: CA Sanjay Kumar Agarwal CA Sidharth Jain Assisted By : CA Neha khurana Applicability

More information

April 11, We will also prepare the organization's Federal and State information returns for the 2010 tax periods.

April 11, We will also prepare the organization's Federal and State information returns for the 2010 tax periods. April 11, 2011 Ms. Amy Dresser Held Executive Director Citizens of the World Charter School 1316 N. Bronson Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90028 Dear Amy, We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services

More information

KENSINGTON DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE Respondent. Randerson, Winkelmann and Keane JJ

KENSINGTON DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE Respondent. Randerson, Winkelmann and Keane JJ IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA64/2014 [2015] NZCA 60 BETWEEN AND KENSINGTON DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Appellant COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE Respondent Hearing: 16 February 2015

More information

IMPORTANT DATES DIRECT TAXES. TDS / TCS returns are to be filed Quarterly.

IMPORTANT DATES DIRECT TAXES. TDS / TCS returns are to be filed Quarterly. IMPORTANT DATES DIRECT TAXES TDS / TCS returns are to be filed Quarterly. QUARTER ENDING DUE DATE 30 TH JUNE 15 TH JULY 30 TH SEPTEMBER 15 TH OCTOBER 31 ST DECEMBER 15 TH JANUARY 31 ST MARCH 15 TH MAY

More information

thousand rupees of the total income but without being liable to tax], only for the purpose of charging income-tax in respect of the total income; and

thousand rupees of the total income but without being liable to tax], only for the purpose of charging income-tax in respect of the total income; and ACT FINANCE ACT *Finance Act, 2011 [8 OF 2011] An Act to give effect to the financial proposals of the Central Government for the financial year 2011-2012. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-second

More information

Section - 271, Income-tax Act,

Section - 271, Income-tax Act, 1 of 7 29-Feb-16 2:37 PM Section - 271, Income-tax Act, 1961-2015 35 [Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc. 36 271. 36a (1) If the 37 [Assessing] Officer or the 38

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 605/2012. CIT... Appellant. Through: Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 605/2012. CIT... Appellant. Through: Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 605/2012 CIT... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD... Respondent Through: Mr Rajat Navet

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: SWASTIK INDUSTRIAL POWERLINE LTD. versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: SWASTIK INDUSTRIAL POWERLINE LTD. versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.08.2015 + ST.APPL. 25/2013 SWASTIK INDUSTRIAL POWERLINE LTD versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES DELHI... Appellant... Respondent Advocates

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-409-000006 [2013] NZHC 2388 BETWEEN AND CIRCLE K LIMITED Appellant CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 11 September 2013 Appearances:

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15 2516 RONALD OLIVA, Plaintiff Appellant, v. BLATT, HASENMILLER, LEIBSKER & MOORE, LLC, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States

More information

M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. The Additional Commissioner of

M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. The Additional Commissioner of IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1060 OF 2014 M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd... Appellant v/s. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,

More information

1. Short title and commencement. (1) These rules may be called the Modaraba Companies and Modaraba Rules, 1981.

1. Short title and commencement. (1) These rules may be called the Modaraba Companies and Modaraba Rules, 1981. Modaraba Companies and Modaraba Rules 1981 ISLAMABAD, MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1981 PART II Statutory Notifications (S.R.O) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF FINANCE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY Islamabad the, 26

More information

Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc.

Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc. Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc. 271. (1) If the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner in the course

More information

Rajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an

Rajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an Rajen Hanumunthadu v The state and the independent commission against corruption. 2010 SCJ 288 Judgment delivered on 01 September 2010 This was an appeal from the Intermediate Court where the Appellant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY WRIT PETITION NO.2468 OF 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY WRIT PETITION NO.2468 OF 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2468 OF 2008 Cartini India Limited, ) (Formerly Godrej Appliances Ltd. ) Pirojshanagar, Vikhroli (East),

More information

ADMISSION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BY THE CIT(A)- BACK TO SQUARE ONE AT TRIBUNAL STAGE By Subash Agarwal, Advocate

ADMISSION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BY THE CIT(A)- BACK TO SQUARE ONE AT TRIBUNAL STAGE By Subash Agarwal, Advocate ADMISSION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE BY THE CIT(A)- BACK TO SQUARE ONE AT TRIBUNAL STAGE By Subash Agarwal, Advocate Introduction 1. The first appellate authority viz., CIT(A) enjoys wide powers under the

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT DAVID WALLACE ZIETSMAN MULTICHOICE AFRICA (PTY) SECOND RESPONDENT

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT DAVID WALLACE ZIETSMAN MULTICHOICE AFRICA (PTY) SECOND RESPONDENT THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 771/2010 In the matter between: DAVID WALLACE ZIETSMAN APPELLANT and ELECTRONIC MEDIA NETWORK LIMITED MULTICHOICE AFRICA (PTY) LIMITED FIRST

More information

CHAPTER 25. Penalties

CHAPTER 25. Penalties CHAPTER 25 Penalties Some Key Points : Recent Amendments (a) Higher penalty of ` 500 per day of continuing default for failure to furnish Annual Information Return in response to notice under section 285BA(5)

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2005-06 DCIT, Cir. 6(1), R.No.506, 5 th

More information

Salient features of Direct Tax Proposals of Union Budget 2011

Salient features of Direct Tax Proposals of Union Budget 2011 Salient features of Direct Tax Proposals of Union Budget 2011 RATES OF INCOME-TAX FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 o Tax slab rates have been changed for individuals and HUF, which is given by way of a

More information

Highlights of Easwar Committee s Draft Report on Income Tax Law Simplification in India

Highlights of Easwar Committee s Draft Report on Income Tax Law Simplification in India Highlights of Easwar Committee s Draft Report on Income Tax Law Simplification in India Executive Summary India is leaving no stone unturned to simplify the tax situation. Recently formed Easwar Committee,

More information

CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004

CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 516-527 OF 2004 Brij Lal & Ors.... Appellants versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar... Respondents with Civil

More information

New Reward Policy Approved vide Govt. Letter No. 19/118/2010-ET2(6)13762 Dated REWARD SCHEME

New Reward Policy Approved vide Govt. Letter No. 19/118/2010-ET2(6)13762 Dated REWARD SCHEME New Reward Policy Approved vide Govt. Letter No. 19/118/2010-ET2(6)13762 Dated 21.09.2010 INTRODUCTION REWARD SCHEME The Department of Excise & Taxation, in order to check tax evasion, has been conducting

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ASN 1/16 WP-3174-13.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3174 OF 2013 The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, Having his office

More information

Pravin Balubhai Zala v. ITO ()

Pravin Balubhai Zala v. ITO () (2010) 129 TTJ 0373 :(2010) 033 (II) ITCL 0318 :(2010) 036 DTR 0290 :ITAT Mumbai C Bench Pravin Balubhai Zala v. ITO () INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 --Assessment--ValidityNotice under section 142(1) by non-jurisdictional

More information

The Income Tax and GST Appeal Processes. D.P. Naban, Senior Partner 2 November 2016

The Income Tax and GST Appeal Processes. D.P. Naban, Senior Partner 2 November 2016 The Income Tax and GST Appeal Processes D.P. Naban, Senior Partner 2 November 2016 1 Agenda Income Tax Appeal Dispute Resolution Proceedings Special Commissioners of Income Tax High Court Judicial Review

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. (O&M) Date of decision: 4.8.2010 M/s V.K. Timber Pvt. Ltd. -----Appellant. Vs. Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) & another. -----Respondents CORAM:-

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961 And IN THE MATTER OF: Section 260A of the Income-tax Act,

More information

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND DEREGISTRATION: A CASE STUDY ON HOW THE GST LAW MAY HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED.

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND DEREGISTRATION: A CASE STUDY ON HOW THE GST LAW MAY HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED. Canberra Law Review (2011) Vol. 10, Issue 3 125 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND DEREGISTRATION: A CASE STUDY ON HOW THE GST LAW MAY HAVE BEEN MANIPULATED. JOHN MCLAREN

More information

Direct Tax (Article) Penalty for Concealment/Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars of Income

Direct Tax (Article) Penalty for Concealment/Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars of Income Direct Tax (Article) Penalty for Concealment/Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars of Income The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any

More information

SIGMA ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PVT LTD. ETHICS POLICY

SIGMA ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PVT LTD. ETHICS POLICY 1 SIGMA ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PVT LTD. ETHICS POLICY PURPOSE: At SIGMA, we are committed to winning business through honest competition in the marketplace. We abide by the letter and spirit

More information

BERMUDA LAND VALUATION AND TAX ACT : 227

BERMUDA LAND VALUATION AND TAX ACT : 227 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA LAND VALUATION AND TAX ACT 1967 1967 : 227 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Interpretation PART I PART II VALUATION LISTS

More information

Administrative Tribunal

Administrative Tribunal United Nations AT/DEC/1154 Administrative Tribunal Distr. Limited 30 January 2004 Original: English ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Judgement No. 1154 Case No. 1124: HUSSAIN Against: The Secretary-General of the

More information

Belgaum Branch of ICAI E-News Letter

Belgaum Branch of ICAI E-News Letter The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (Set up by an Act of Parliament) Pages 10 Belgaum Branch of ICAI E-News Letter Respected Professional Colleagues, Accept my greetings for a happy, prosperous

More information

COMPOUNDING UNDER FEMA BY CA.SUDHA G. BHUSHAN. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA 25 th July 2015

COMPOUNDING UNDER FEMA BY CA.SUDHA G. BHUSHAN. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA 25 th July 2015 COMPOUNDING UNDER FEMA BY CA.SUDHA G. BHUSHAN INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA 25 th July 2015 Scheme of Presentation Brief overview FEMA Enforcement under FEMA Adjudication and Appeal under

More information

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF B.L. Passi... Appellant(s)

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF B.L. Passi... Appellant(s) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3892 OF 2007 B.L. Passi... Appellant(s) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi... Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ORDER

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ORDER IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 100/Del/2015 Assessment Year: 2010-11 HARISH NARINDER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Decided on: ITA 31/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Decided on: ITA 31/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT Decided on: 13.02.2014 ITA 31/2013 ONASSIS AXLES PRIVATE LIMITED... Appellant Through: Sh. Salil Aggarwal and Sh. Prakash Kumar, Advocates.

More information