TEXAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK REPORT FY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT

Transcription

1 TEXAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK REPORT FY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TEXAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BANK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM DIVISION OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 1, 2014 TO AUGUST 31,

2 Overview The Texas Economic Development Bank (the Bank) operates within the Office of the Governor s (OOG) Economic Development and Tourism Division (EDT). It was created to oversee state economic development programs and to develop a comprehensive and coordinated approach to assist businesses and local communities. The Bank operates an economic development portfolio comprised of financial and business development programs to assist communities and businesses in developing and achieving economic success, as directed by Government Code Section Sec PROGRAMS, SERVICES, AND FUNDS UNDER BANK'S DIRECTION. Notwithstanding any other law, the bank shall perform the duties and functions of the office with respect to the following programs, services, and funds: (1) the Texas Small Business Industrial Development Corporation established under Chapter 503, Local Government Code; (2) the capital access program established under Section ; (3) the Texas leverage fund; (4) the linked deposit program established under Section ; (5) the enterprise zone program established under Chapter 2303; (6) the industrial revenue bond program; (7) the defense economic readjustment zone program established under Chapter 2310; (8) the Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community grant program established under Section ; and (9) the renewal community program. The Bank Texas Economic Development Bank (the Bank) provides numerous options and related assistance through finance and tax incentive programs. The programs target three key audiences: Texas businesses, communities, and other public and private financing contributors. In addition to helping growcultivate Texas home-grown economy, the Bank also provides incentives to businesses wishing to relocate or expand in Texas. The Bank s effectiveness is measured by the number of jobs created and retained and the total amount of non-state funds leveraged as a result of its efforts. The Bank was established for the statutory purposes of: Commented [AM1]: I wonder if we should have a short sentence somewhere that notes this report/division is separate from TEF??? Just a thought. Commented [LB2R1]: I don t think we should cross wires. Recommend no reference to TEF. 2

3 Providing globally competitive, cost-effective state incentives to expanding businesses operating in this state and businesses relocating to this state; and Ensuring that communities and businesses in this state have access to capital for economic development purposes. The Bank operates within the Office of the Governor s (OOG) Economic Development and Tourism Division (EDT). It was created to oversee state economic development programs and to develop a comprehensive and coordinated approach to assist businesses and local communities. The Bank operates an economic development portfolio comprised of financial and business development programs to assist communities and businesses in developing and achieving economic success, as directed by Government Code Section Sec PROGRAMS, SERVICES, AND FUNDS UNDER BANK'S DIRECTION. Notwithstanding any other law, the bank shall perform the duties and functions of the office with respect to the following programs, services, and funds: (1) the Texas Small Business Industrial Development Corporation established under Chapter 503, Local Government Code; (2) the capital access program established under Section ; (3) the Texas leverage fund; (4) the linked deposit program established under Section ; (5) the enterprise zone program established under Chapter 2303; (6) the industrial revenue bond program; (7) the defense economic readjustment zone program established under Chapter 2310; (8) the Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community grant program established under Section ; and (9) the renewal community program. The Public Finance programs provide financing to communities and businesses so they may in turn create additional employment opportunities and economic diversity and vitality. Public Finance Programs Industrial Revenue Bonds Texas Small Business Industrial Development Corporation 3 Commented [SL3]: We should remove references here since these programs were abolished, which is explained later in the report.

4 Product Development and Small Business Incubator Funds Texas Leverage Fund Linked Deposit Capital Access Program The Tax Incentive programs focus on job creation, retention, and capital investment in Texas. Tax Incentive Programs Enterprise Zone Program Defense Economic Readjustment Zone Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community Grant Program (federal authority has expired) Renewal Community Program (federal authority has expired) In Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, the Bank provided assistance through financing and tax incentive programs that generated 5,340 new jobs, helped retain 14,291 jobs, and aided in the development of 52 new projects that produced more than $9.01 billion in capital investment for the state. In addition, the Bank s finance programs made five new loans totaling $7,314,276. Reporting Requirements In 2003, the Texas Legislature authorized the Bank to administer the programs under Government Code Section As part of that charge, the Bank is required to submit an annual status report to the Texas Legislature and the Legislative Budget Board. This report is submitted in fulfillment of the statutory requirement under Government Code Sec which states that on or before January 1 of each year, the office shall submit to the legislature an annual status report on the activities of the bank. Industrial Revenue Bond Program The Texas Industrial Revenue Bond Program (IRB) provides tax-exempt or taxable long-term financing for projects as defined in Chapter 501 of the Texas Local 4

5 Government Code. The statute allows cities, counties, and conservation and reclamation districts to form non-profit Industrial Development Corporations (IDC) or authorities. An IDC issues tax-exempt and taxable bonds for eligible projects in its jurisdiction, and acts as a conduit through which bond proceeds are channeled. Generally, all debt service on the bonds is paid by the participating business under the terms of a lease, sale, or loan agreement. As such, it does not constitute a debt or obligation of the IDC, a governmental unit, or the State of Texas. In FY 2015, the Bank did not receive applications for or approve any new IRB bond issuances or refinancings. Texas Small Business Industrial Development Corporation On December 4, 2013, the last remaining program loan was paid off and all outstanding bonds were redeemed on January 2, The balance of $844, was deposited into the General Revenue account on September 3, In 2015, the 84th Texas Legislature abolished the TID program (HB 2667) effective September 1, Product Development Fund Small Business Incubator Fund The Product Development Fund and Small Business Incubator Funds (collectively PDSBI), are revolving loan programs established through the issuance of $45 million General Obligation (G.O.) bonds in FY The Product Development Fund accounts for $25 million, and the Small Business Incubator Fund has $20 million of General Obligation bond authority. The purpose of the Product Development Fund is to provide financing to aid in the development, production, and commercialization of new or improved products in the state, while the Small Business Incubator Fund provides financing to foster and stimulate the development of small businesses. In determining eligible projects and businesses, statutory special preference is given to products or businesses in the areas of semiconductors, nanotechnology, biotechnology, and biomedicine that have the greatest likelihood of commercial success, job creation, and job retention in the state. The programs are designed to be self-supporting with capital and administrative costs paid for by the loan participants repayments. Un-deployedAny bond proceeds that have not been loaned to program participants are held and invested in the state s treasury. 5

6 Two new loans totaling $2.3 million were funded during FY2015: PeopleFund, a non-profit micro lending institution with locations around the Sstate of Texas. This loan of $500,000 specifically went to PeopleFund s veteran lending program that provides capital and training to veteran entrepreneurs. Texas State Technical College Waco airport in support of their airport operations and to retain a large aerospace company which that occupies several hangars. This $1.8 million loan went to finance renovation costs associated with one of the largest hangars on the airport. Commented [AM4]: For consistency and just something this admin. is used to from OAG reporting. On June 17, 2015, a second tranche loan disbursement of $5.5 million was made to Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies Texas (FDBT) relating to its PDSBI loan for the construction of a live virus vaccine facility. There are two additional loan tranches totaling $7 million which that are expected to be made in FY2016 to FDBT. In FY2015, the PDSBI Board approved one a loan commitment amounting to $550,000. The Bank expects this loan commitment to close during the second quarter of FY2016. In addition, two loans were paid off during FY2015. AA Truck Sleeper, LLC paid off its $225,000 loan on September 18, S&S Industries paid off its $1.2 million loan on June 23, Texas Leverage Fund Program Introduced in 1992, the Texas Leverage Fund (TLF) provides an additional source of financing to communities that have adopted the Texas economic development sales tax (Type A/Type B). The program allows communities to leverage future sales tax revenues to expand economic development through business expansions, business recruitment, and exports. Loan terms are available for either long-term or interim financing with maturities of up to 15 years. Other advantages of this program are that communities can quickly access required capital, and there is no penalty for pre-payment of loans. Economic development sales tax revenues serve as collateral for loan repayment with required minimum debt service coverage ratios specified in the TLF Program guidelines. Chapter 501 of the Local Government Code allows Type A & B development corporations to use loan proceeds to pay for allowable project costs relating to land, buildings, equipment, facilities, expenditures and improvements. Chapter 505 of the Local Government code further allows Type B development corporations to use loan proceeds for projects relating to recreational or community facilities, recycling facilities, affordable housing and certain other programs. 6

7 At the end of FY 2015, there were 22 loans outstanding, with a combined balance of more than $18 million, including three new loans amounting to just over $5 million. Texas Leverage Fund Loans Funded FY 2015 COMMUNITY PROJECT LOAN AMOUNT CAPITAL INVESTMENT Port Isabel Roma Building purchase in order to establish Culinary Arts school in Port Isabel, TX. Purchase three properties in downtown area to renovate for small businesses. $2,484, $2,484, $1,454, $1,500,000 7

8 Mercedes Two land acquisitions, commercial property improvements, remodel EDC building. $1,075,000 $1,075,000 TOTALS $5,014, $5,059, Texas Leverage Fund Loans Paid in Full FY 2015 COMMUNITY PROJECT LOAN AMOUNT La Joya Edinburg #3 Build a motel and subsidy programs for affordable housing. Building to expand a new industrial park. $141,772 $1,500,000 Edinburg #4 Edinburg #5 Roanoke Fulshear Purchase real property for future use. Incentive for denim manufacturing company. Land acquisition and construction of a previous project Water & Sewer Treatment Plant Expansion $500,000 $3,837,000 $1,089,527 $450,000 TOTALS $7,518,299 The TLF is a successful and popular economic development financing tool that offers EDC s a cost-effective alternative to bond issuance. The TLF is limited by three factors: 1) maturities not to exceed 15 years (some assets being financed may have longer useful lives; 2) no more than $5 million in outstanding loans may be committed to an EDC; and 3) TLF loans may only be made to a community that has adopted a Type A and/or Type B sales tax. Linked Deposit Program Commented [AM5]: How did Edinburg get so much? (see table on previous page) I m sure it is fine, just begs the question. Commented [LB6R5]: Good point. Is there an exception? Were the loans not tied directly to an EDC? The Linked Deposit Program formerly provided low-interest loans to certain eligible businesses in economically distressed areas. There were no loans enrolled in the program in FY 2015 due to historically low interest rates, which made the terms of most commercial bank loans competitive with the interest rates available under the Linked Deposit Program. In 2015, the 84 th Texas Legislature abolished the Linked Deposit program (HB 2667) effective September 1,

9 Capital Access Program The Capital Access Program (CAP) is designed to increase the availability of financial loans for businesses and nonprofit organizations that face barriers in accessing capital or fall outside the guidelines of conventional financing. Loans may be used for working capital or the purchase, construction, or lease of capital assets, which include buildings and equipment. Construction or purchase of residential housing and simple real estate investments (excluding those occupied by the applicant's business) are ineligible uses of capital access proceeds. To be eligible, the borrower must be: A small or medium-sized business (499 employees or fewer) or a nonprofit organization; and Located in this state or having at least 51 percent of its employees located in this state. Participating lenders must set up reserve accounts to which contributions are made by the borrower, lender, and the State of Texas. All contributions from Capital Access Program loans are deposited into these reserve accounts, and in the event of a loan default, the lender can withdraw the defaulted amount and other fees to recoup any losses. Although CAP has been inactive since 2006, the program will be re-launched in the fall of All of the program criteria will remain the same. Commented [AM7]: Might want to indicate this was due to legislative interest/support (not just because we decided to). Texas Enterprise Zone Program The Texas Enterprise Zone Program (TEZ) encourages local communities to partner with the State of Texas in job creation efforts and capital investment, particularly in economically distressed areas of the state. Local communities must nominate a company as an Enterprise Project to be eligible to participate in the program. Legislation provides a maximum of 105 enterprise zone project designations per biennium. Local communities are limited by statute in the number of enterprise zone designations they may award. 9

10 Designated projects are eligible to apply for a refund of state sales and use taxes paid on expenditures at the qualified business site during the five-year designation period. The level and amount of refund are related to the capital investment and jobs created and/or retained at the qualified business site. In FY 2015, the Bank approved 47 Enterprise Project applications, totaling 52 designations. These 47 approved projects, once completed, will result in an estimated capital investment of $9.007 billion, 5,340 new jobs and 14,291 retained jobs for benefit. The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts reported $30.27 million in state sales and use tax refunded during FY Fiscal Year Approved Projects Project Designations Capital Investments New Jobs Retained Jobs Est. Refund of Sales & Use Taxes $9.007 billion 5,340 14,291 $30.27 million Reporting Requirements The Bank is required to submit an annual evaluation report to the Texas Legislature and the Legislative Budget Board which evaluates the program s effectiveness, describes the use of state and local incentives and the effect on revenue, and suggests legislation as appropriate (Government Code, Chapter Subchapter B, Section ) This report is submitted in fulfillment of the program s statutory requirements: Sec BANK REPORT REGARDING PROGRAM. The bank must include the following information regarding the enterprise zone program in the report required by Section : (1) an evaluation of the effectiveness of the program; (2) a description of the use of state and local incentives under this chapter and their effect on revenue; and (3) suggestions for legislation with regard to the program. Evaluation of Program Effectiveness The program was conceived as a tool to create new jobs in economically distressed areas. With sstatutory changes and the recent national economic recession, the program has evolved from its original intent to one more heavily weighted on retaining existing jobs. This trend can be seen in the graph below. The data should not be construed to indicate that new jobs are not being created in Texas, but rather that the Enterprise Zone Program is being more heavily utilized by businesses and communities intent on keeping their existing job base in Texas. While retained jobs isare still an Commented [LB8]: Reference SB 100 from the 84 th. Formatted: Highlight Commented [SL9]: Should be "retained jobs are " 10

11 important and integral part of the Enterprise Zone program, the Division Bank has made scoring changes giving more points to projects creating new jobs and this appears to be having the desired effect. Commented [AM10]: Is this a statutory desired effect Just want to make sure this is something we want to point out so strongly maybe we could say: While retaining jobs is still an important and integral part of the Enterprise Zone program, the Division has made scoring changes to also encourage the creation of new jobs, which appears successful thus far or something just a thought. For the FY biennium, there were 8,427 new jobs to be created, 33,168 jobs to be retained for benefit, and 41,595 total jobs to be created or retained for benefit based on the figures provided by each project at the time of application. For the FY 12 and 13 biennium, 93.82% of the jobs for benefit were retained jobs. Comparatively, the percentage of retained jobs for benefit for the FY 14 and 15 was 79.74%. However when calculated using the existing job baseline as the number of retained jobs for both FY 14 and 15, this percentage rises back up to 86.37%. Lastly, the number of new jobs for this latest biennium more than doubled the number that was previously accounted for in the FY 12- and 13 biennium. Use of State and Local Incentives and Effect on Revenue TEZ is an active and popular economic development incentive tool for businesses looking to bring capital investment and jobs to a community. Although the law limits enterprise project allocations per biennium, Texas is experiencing an increased interest in the TEZ. This is due, in large part, to the Texas Legislature s decision to allow projects to be located outside of an enterprise zone area if the project draws at least 35 percent of its employees from enterprise zone residents or economically disadvantaged individuals, as defined by the act. Forty-seven (47) percent of the designations awarded during FY 2015 were located outside of an enterprise zone area. 11

12 Each year, local enterprise zone administrators participate in a survey to determine the effectiveness of the program at the local level. TEZ administrators reported that, for FY 2015, participating communities received almost $644 million in total revenue (related taxes and fees) due to active enterprise zone projects. Of this amount, communities granted back to Enterprise Zone Projects approximately $130 million (19% of total revenue) for a net revenue collection of $514 million. Recommended Program Changes and Program Improvement Activities During tthe 84 th Legislatureive session,passed SB 100, which passed and became effective September 1, This bill changed numerous aspects of the program listed below: Introduction of "half designations," which allows smaller communities to use one half of an authorized designation for a project for a maximum of 250 jobs to be retained or created for benefit with a maximum refund of $125,000 each state fiscal year. The maximum rebate available for a half enterprise project is $625,000 The bill requires that an inter-local agreement be executed between a county and a local municipality if the county wants to nominate a project inside of a local municipality within the county. Only new jobs will be considered counted for per worker tax refund incentives for Double and Triple Jumbo awards. (i.e., larger projects with tax refunds in the range of $1.25 million to $3.75 million). Includes veterans as one an option for the types of workers that may satisfy thea new job hiring requirement for new jobs Limits the use of site designations so that no more than two active designations may occur at the same qualified business site at one time. Commented [AM11]: Just seemed awkward hope I didn t change meaning. The Office believes that these changes to the program will likely induce greater participation among eligible Texas communities, especially rural communities with the use of half projects, and will support the creation of new jobs in Texas. At this time staff do not recommend any further changes. Defense Economic Readjustment Zone Overview Commented [SL12]: Does this already include the other edits/changes that were made to the DERZ stand alone report? 12

13 The Defense Economic Readjustment Zone Program was created in 1997 by the 75th Texas Legislature as a tool for business recruitment and job creation in adversely impacted military communities. It is designed to provide assistance to Texas communities, businesses, and workers impacted by, or vulnerable to, the closure or realignment of military installations and the reduction of federal defense contracting expenditures. Since its inception, seven zones and four project applications have been approved by the Texas Economic Development Bank ( Bank ) in the Office of the Governor. Zones are designated for a period of seven years while projects are designated for a period of five years from the date of approval. Local communities must nominate a company as a Defense Economic Readjustment Zone (DERZ) Project to be eligible to participate in the program. Qualified businesses designated as DERZ projects are eligible for a state sales and use tax refund on expenditures of qualifying items. Under DERZ, the level and amount of the tax refund is related to the sales and use tax paid on expenditures of qualifying items and the number of jobs created/retained at the site. Local communities participating in the program may offer benefits to participants under the DERZ program as well, including local property tax abatement, tax increment financing, one-stop permitting, and other incentives. The most common local incentives available in the DERZ communities are tax abatement, infrastructure improvements, and training programs. In FY 2015, there were no applications received by the Bank for the DERZ program nor are there any active projects. Also, there are currently no active Defense Economic Readjustment Zones in the state. The last Zone designation (McGregor) expired in September Reporting Requirements In 2003, the Texas Legislature authorized the Economic Development Bank to administer the program. As part of that charge, the Bank is required to submit an annual evaluation report to the Texas Legislature and the Legislative Budget Board, which evaluates the program s effectiveness, describes the use of state and local incentives and the effect on revenue, and suggests legislation as appropriate (Government Code, Chapter Subchapter B, Section ). This report is submitted in fulfillment of the program s statutory requirements: Sec EVALUATION; REPORT. (a) The bank shall conduct a continuing evaluation of the programs of readjustment zones. (b) On or before December 1 of each year, the office shall submit to the governor, the legislature, and the Legislative Budget Board a report that: Commented [SL13]: There was a desparate DERZ stand alone report that was already reviewed and approved. I believe it has also already been submitted. 13

14 (1) evaluates the effectiveness of the readjustment zone program; (2) describes the use of state and local incentives under this chapter and their effect on revenue; and (3) suggests legislation, as appropriate. Evaluation of Program Effectiveness Section (b) (1) of the Government Code requires the Bank to evaluate the effectiveness of the readjustment zone program as part of its annual report to the Texas Legislature and Legislative Budget Board. The program as it currently exists is significantly underutilized by qualifying defense communities. Not only were there no zone or project applications in FY 2015, but there has been no program activity for the past seven years. There are a number of reasons for this. First, the process for DERZ designation is cumbersome and should be more streamlined. Currently, there must be a finding that the area to be designated is located in an adversely affected defense-dependent community and the zones must be created in accordance with the provisions found in Sec Next, if the Bank determines that a nominated area satisfies the criteria, then a designation agreement is negotiated in accordance with Sec It is only after the designation agreement is in place that projects can be nominated as Defense Enterprise Readjustment Projects. This procedure currently used for the creation of a DERZ is identical to the former procedure used in the Enterprise Zone program, which was amended by the 78th Texas Legislature to remove the cumbersome zone creation process. Under the updated procedure, enterprise zones are created statutorily thereby streamlining the process and increasing participation. Second, the statute has not been amended to reflect changes in the definition of Adversely Affected Defense-Dependent Community found in Sec Existing language does not allow the program to be used in areas to support our defense industries without first finding the area was adversely affected. This effectively eliminates the areas where defense growth and spending is driving economic activity. The original language envisioned a loss of military related economic activity and substituting it with other economic activity. Consideration should be given to using the program to capitalize on enhancements to the military related activities (i.e. Federal contracting possibilities, military base expansions, etc.). Finally, the program is limited in terms of the types of expenditures that qualify for incentive rebates. Unlike the Enterprise Zone, in which the rebate of state sales & use 14

15 tax is given for any sales & use tax liability paid, the rebates in the DERZ program are restricted to: (1) the purchase, lease, or rental of equipment or machinery for use in a readjustment zone; (2) the purchase of material for use in remodeling, rehabilitating, or constructing a structure in a readjustment zone; (3) labor for remodeling, rehabilitating, or constructing a structure in a readjustment zone; and (4) electricity and natural gas purchased and consumed in the normal course of business in the readjustment zone. Use of State and Local Incentives and Effect on Revenue Section (b) (2) of the Government Code requires the Bank to describe the use of state and local incentives under this chapter and their effect on revenue as part of its annual report. State legislation allows communities to offer a number of local incentives to DERZ projects including: (1) A refund of local sales & use taxes (2) Reduction or elimination of local fees or taxes (3) Tax increment financing and abatement (4) The issuance of development bonds (5) Other local incentives delineated in Since no project applications were received or awarded during the 2015 fiscal year, there were no local incentives granted to projects under the program. Recommendations to Improve Participation Section (b) (3) of the Government Code requires the Bank to suggest legislation as appropriate as part of its annual report. First, update the provisions in the act relating to the creation of the Zones. Defense Economic Readjustment Zones could be created by statute in the same manner as in the Texas Enterprise Zone Program. Second, the Legislature may wish to consider updating the definition and requirements for projects to be located in Adversely Affected Defense Dependent Communities. The primary requirement could restrict projects to Defense Economic Readjustment Zones identified in the statute. 15

16 Third, amend the statute to allow rebates on state sales & use tax for any state sales & use tax paid for eligible projects. Lastly, the Legislature could consider streamlining the reporting requirements for the program by amending the statue so that the DERZ report is incorporated within the annual Bank Report due on January 1 of every year instead of a stand-alone report due on December 1 of every year. 16