Exporting and profitability - evidence for different firm sizes
|
|
- Nathan Hubbard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exporting and profitability - evidence for different firm sizes PRELIMINARY VERSION - PLEASE DO NOT CITE Saara Tamminen Marcel van den Berg August 16, 2013 Abstract Compiling two parallel data sets covering Dutch firms over the years and Finnish firms over the years , we investigate the relationship between trade status, firm size and profitability, employing four different profit measures. Results from regression analysis suggest that internationalization of firm activities is not heavily correlated with profitability. We find largely insignificant or significantly negative trade premia of small magnitude, which aligns with earlier research. In addition, the negative trade premia seem to be tied mainly to exporting rather than to importing and particularly to micro and small firms. Results from propensity score matching analysis show little evidence supporting the hypothesis that exporting fosters profitability. Only for the Netherlands do we find some evidence suggesting that export starters in manufacturing sectors materialize higher profits in the longer run. The results indicate that new exporters seem to be willing to fully explore the possibilities that foreign markets provide even at the cost of (temporarily) materializing lower profits. Government Institute of Economic Research (VATT), Helsinki, Finland and Utrecht University School of Economics, Utrecht, the Netherlands, saara.tamminen@vatt.fi Utrecht University School of Economics, Utrecht, the Netherlands, m.r.vandenberg@uu.nl This study is funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. We are grateful to Statistics Netherlands for providing us with the data underlying the analysis. We thank Marjolijn Jaarsma for her invaluable support in our comprehension of the various data sets. We also thank Charles van Marrewijk, Peter van Bergeijk, Martin Luppes and participants at VATT Seminar for valuable feedback and comments. Any remaining errors are our own. 1
2 1 Introduction The assumption of profit maximization is at the heart of economic theory regarding firm behavior. While the notion that internationally competing firms are on average more productive than domestically competing firms is well-demonstrated (Wagner, 2011b), the evidence regarding the question whether this productive advantage translates into higher profitability is less conclusive (Wagner, 2011a). Theoretical models regarding the behavior of individual firms on international markets are generally developed from the notion that a firm starts exporting if expected profits derived from international markets at least equal the profits derived from only serving domestic markets (Clerides, Lach, and Tybout, 1998; Melitz, 2003; Helpman, Itskhoki, and Redding, 2010). However, the cost level of internationally competing firms is generally higher than that of firms focusing on domestic markets. In order to start exporting a firm faces additional fixed costs associated with e.g. market research, locating foreign trade partners or modifying products to comply with local regulations. In addition, internationally operating firms generally have a higher skilled and more productive workforce, which requires paying higher wages compared to domestically operating firms (ibid). The combination of higher revenues associated with access to a larger market and higher costs renders the net effect on firm-level profitability ambiguous. The lack of empirical studies of the relationship between profitability and internationalization of firm activities generally seems to stem from data limitations. However, the question on whether exporting affects firm level profitability is important. Financial analysts generally evaluate firm performance based on information provided in financial statements whereby profitability indicators play a particularly important role (Robinson, van Greuning, Henry, and Broihahn, 2012). This implies that information regarding firm profitability is crucial in the decision making process of investors and thus affects the availability of funds to the firm. Illustrative is the finding of Bridges and Guariglia (2008) that higher profitability has a significantly negative effect on the probability of bankruptcy. Productivity is correlated with profitability, but various other factors affect profitability as well. Therefore, we cannot unconditionally extend the findings of the huge empirical literature regarding the relationship between productivity and internationalization to include profitability. In this study we aim to add to the still small literature dealing with the relationship between profitability and internationalization. In doing so, we pay particular between differences between firms from different size classes and we distinguish between key sectors such as manufacturing, wholesale & retail trading and services. Most micro data based studies regarding firm 2
3 heterogeneity focus on manufacturing sectors, mainly motivated by a lack of data regarding trade in services. We contribute to the tiny literature dealing with firm heterogeneity and trade in services employing Finnish micro data. In addition, we employ four different profit measures to gain on understanding of the robustness of our findings to the choice for a particular profit measure. We employ gross profit margin, net profit margin, return on assets (ROA) and gross profits per employee as profitability measures. Furthermore, we add to the relatively small literature regarding profitability and exporting among micro-sized and small firms, which are frequently neglected in the heterogeneity literature, by separating for different firm size classes in our analysis. Finally, to be able to assess the consistency and the robustness of our findings we apply our empirical framework separately to firm level micro databases from two small, open Western-European economies, namely Finland and the Netherlands. We believe, as Hamermesh (2000, p. 376), puts it, that the credibility of a new finding that is based on carefully analyzing two data sets is far more than twice that of a result based only on one. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides a brief discussion of the existing empirical literature regarding the relationship between exporting and profitability. Section 3 introduces the Finnish and Dutch data sets employed in the analysis. In section 4 we discuss the measurement of profitability and the methodology adopted in the empirical analysis. In section 5 we present our empirical findings. Section 6 concludes and provides some directions for further research. 2 Literature In recent years a few empirical studies dealing with profitability and internationalization have been added to the firm heterogeneity literature. 1 The topic has been studied more intensively in the international business literature. However, the available evidence is rather diffuse and fragmented in terms of profit measures and research methodologies employed. Overall, the relationship between internationalization and profitability is still not wellestablished and contradictory results are not uncommon. Girma, Görg, and Strobl (2004), employing a series of Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, find no significant difference between domestic non-exporters and domestic exporters on the profit level per employee. Grazzi (2011) finds no significant relationship between exporting and profitability in Italy, just as do Temouri, Vogel, and Wagner (2013) for British service exporters and Wagner (2011a) for Germany. Illustrative for the lack of consensus, Temouri, Vogel, 1 see Wagner (2012) for a review. 3
4 and Wagner (2013) find a positive relationship between service exporting and profitability in France and a negative relationship in Germany. In addition, Fryges and Wagner (2010) document a small exporter premium on profit margins for German manufacturing firms. They show that being an exporter as such does not increase profits, and present evidence suggesting an inverted U-shaped correlation between the export share and profits. For firms with a sufficiently small share of exports in total sales they even find a negative export premium. Kox and Rojas-Romagosa (2010) present evidence for the Netherlands indicating that profitability in exporting firms is higher and that more profitable firms seem to self-select into exporting. 2 In the field of international business management the relationship between internationalization and firm performance has been heavily debated over the past decennia. For example, recent anecdotal evidence concerning 12 high-tech born global firms shows that the main reasons for these firms to internationalize immediately after start-up relate more to market characteristics and market structure, than to financial motivations or expected excess profits compared to starting locally (Kudina, Yip, and Barkema (2008)). However, Bausch and Krist (2007, p 320) summarize the current state of affairs in this field of research in a series of citations as: inconsistent, mixed, decidedly mixed, contradictory, inconsistent and contradictory, inconclusive and contradictory, and conflicting. Reviewing 43 empirical papers, Sousa (2004) corroborates this conclusion arguing that little consensus has been reached in the field, which has produced contradictory and fragmented findings thus far. Nonetheless, in their meta-analysis of 36 studies from 25 years of research, Bausch and Krist (2007) present empirical evidence suggesting that internationalization does indeed foster firm performance, albeit that this relationship is heavily moderated by various other firm characteristics, such as firm size and age. However, an important objection against the way in which the relationship between exporting and firm performance is generally analyzed in the field of international business management is that it does not relate the performance of exporters to that of domestically oriented firms. This makes it difficult to claim that exporting in itself does or does not foster firm performance, since a benchmark against which the performance of exporters is evaluated is lacking. Furthermore, many studies are based on relatively small samples, which, combined with employing myriads of methodologies and measures of internationalization and profitability, renders aggregating findings to the macro-economic level virtually impossible. 2 This paper does not mark an attempt to replicate the results presented by Kox and Rojas-Romagosa (2010) for the Netherlands, since the aim of our paper is different, our panel data set is compiled from alternative sources, the years covered by our panel data are largely non-overlapping and we employ different profit measures. 4
5 The main lesson we learn from the preceding discussion is that no consensus has been reached thus far regarding the question whether internationalization fosters firm performance. That is, neither in the field of economics and international trade, nor in the field of international business management has this question been decidedly answered. 3 Data For the empirical analysis we employ firm-level micro-data from Finland and the Netherlands. In order to gain an understanding of the consistency and robustness of our findings we run the analysis separately for both countries. The main aim of the data preparation process is to maximize the comparability of the Finnish and the Dutch data for the analysis, particularly regarding the profit concepts employed. 3.1 Finland For the Finnish analysis we use tax data that includes firms operating in all sectors. The database is described in detail in Tamminen and Chang (2012, 2013). This study analyzes Finnish data from 2005 until The data includes information regarding the export status of firms at each year and detailed financial accounts and balance sheet information. Firms are classified into four size categories according to the official EU-classification. 3 Micro-sized companies are included in the analysis, except for companies with less than 4 employees. In addition to the main database, value added tax (VAT) records are used for the identification of goods and services exporters and goods importers. The procedure for the identification of each firms exporting status is explained in detail in Tamminen and Chang (2012). The database also allows the identification of multinational firms. The firms are grouped into 70 sectors, which correspond roughly to a combination of NACE 2 and 3-digit classifications. Exporters identification is possible only in selected services sectors. Companies belonging to other services sectors are not included in the analysis. Since services and manufacturing exporters have typically significantly different types of production processes, manufacturing sectors and 3 Firms are classified into four groups: micro (less than 10 employees), small (10-49 employees), medium ( employees), and large (at least 250 employees) firms according to the definitions of European Union ( see 5
6 services sectors are considered separately. Multinational firms can be identified from the legal form of the firm and from the information on foreign subsidiaries. The analysis excludes self-employed and other firms with less than 4 employees. Finnish tax legislation provides an incentive for owners of small firms to artificially lower the pre-tax profits of the firm by withholding part of the profits in the form of their wage. This renders the profit information of small firms difficult to compare with larger firms. After merging of the two main databases, we obtain an unbalanced panel database of 122,621 observations (excluding outliers) from 34,941 firms for the period The Netherlands For the empirical analysis we merge data from three main Dutch data sources: (i) the General Business Register (GBR), (ii) the Baseline Database and (iii) the International Trade Database, all provided by Statistics Netherlands into a panel data set covering the years 2002 to The GBR is, in principle, exhaustive in the sense that it contains information about every firm in the Netherlands, including a set of basic firm characteristics such as the number of employees in fulltime equivalents and the sector in which the firm operates according to the internationally standardized ISIC Rev. 3.1 sector classification 5. We take from a separate but related database information concerning the ultimate controlling institution of the firm, indicating whether the ultimate controlling owner of the Dutch firm is located abroad. The Baseline database contains a wealth of financial information collected from both corporate tax declarations and income tax declarations of entrepreneurs, which is merged to the GBR. The Baseline database contains information about profits, gross output, value added and the value of capital, labor and intermediate inputs. Because of their fundamentally different nature, we separate the data into two main sectors, manufacturing, and wholesale & retail trading sectors. 6 4 We confine ourselves to discussing some key characteristics of each data source in this paper. For details regarding the merging procedure see Van den Berg (2013). 5 The ISIC Rev. 3.1 sector classification equals the SBI 93 2 digit classification employed by Statistics Netherlands 6 We focus the analysis of Dutch firms on manufacturing and wholesale & retail trading, thereby excluding service sectors, since data regarding trade in services are not yet sufficiently available for the Netherlands. We choose financial intermediation as the cutoff point for service sectors, which corresponds to ISIC Rev. 3.1 section J, division 65. Manufacturing sectors correspond in the analysis to ISIC Rev. 3.1 sections A through I, excluding G. Wholesale & retail traders correspond to ISIC Rev. 3.1 section G. The OECD and Eurostat recommend to define manufacturing as sections A through F and to include section G to Q in services. However, in terms of goods trade this division is 6
7 Trade data are taken from the International Trade database and includes information on all imports and exports of goods by Dutch firms. Extra- EU trade is recorded by the Customs Authority and intra-eu imports and exports are recorded by the Dutch Tax Authority. The trade data available at the firm level covers more than 80% of annual aggregate trade in terms of value in the Netherlands. 7 The merging procedure results in an unbalanced panel data set containing a total of 501,769 observations of 139,160 firms spanning a period of nine years ( ). 8 4 Methodology 4.1 Measuring profitability The definition of profit (π) per employee (E) is presented in equation 1 and shows that the profit level results from two factors: a scale effect (R, accounting for annual revenue) and a margin effect ( π ). The scale effect R refers to the level of revenue and the margin to the cost structure, i.e. to the margin of profits over revenues. Gross profit per employee is calculated according to the following equation, where the definition of gross profit is derived in equation 2: π G E = R ( πg R ) (1) E Investors typically employ indicators based on margins and returns from financial statements to assess the profitability and attractiveness of a firm as an investment (Robinson, van Greuning, Henry, and Broihahn, 2012). A few of the most common indicators for profitability in financial analysis based on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) include (but are not limited to): Gross profit margin, π G R = R V C R = 1 ( V C R ) (2) less sensible, since a considerable part of goods trade takes place in trade and transport sectors it is therefore more appropriate to separate these sections from typical (financial and public) service sectors. 7 The trade data are recorded on VAT-numbers. Connection to the firm identification key used by Statistics Netherlands leads to a merging loss of about 20% of annual trade values. 8 This is after eliminating four sectors with eight observations or less, micro firms (less than four fulltime equivalents) and implausible observations with zero or negative output or exports exceeding gross output. 7
8 Net profit margin, π N R = R V C F C F C X R and return on assets (ROA). = 1 ( V C R ) (F C R ) (F C X R ) (3) ROA = ( R V C F C F C X ) = ( R A A ) (V C A ) (F C A ) (F C X A ) (4) R accounts for annual revenue (or sales), VC accounts for variable costs (or costs of goods sold), FC are fixed costs of production that do not depend on the size of production in the short run, F C X represents the fixed cost of exporting (which is zero for companies operating only on the domestic market), and A represents total asset value. In addition, the operating margin (return on sales) and return on equity are well-established profitability indicators in financial analysis (Robinson, van Greuning, Henry, and Broihahn, 2012). Investors typically use indicators defined per dividend or per share, but most of the commonly available financial statements and balance sheets do not include that information. Therefore, we restrict our analysis to the four profitability indicators (equations 1, 2, 3 and 4) discussed above. 4.2 Empirical methodology We start the empirical analysis by investigating the correlation between export status and profitability with basic pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions and fixed effects panel regressions. The existing empirical evidence suggesting that highly productive firms self-select into exporting is compelling (Wagner, 2012). This implies that there is the threat of endogeneity arising in any OLS-regression of profitability on export status, due to a sample selection bias. The purpose of the regressions in the first stage is thus only to provide us an indication of the correlation between export status and the various profitability measures we employ. The pooled OLS-regressions are of the following form: π Xijt R ijt or π Xijt A ijt = α + Y ijtβ + Z ijtγ + ɛ ijt, (5) where π Xijt R ijt refers to profit margin π X of firm i I from sector j J in year t T relative to the mean profit margin over sales in sector j. Analogously, π Xijt A ijt represents the firms return on assets relative to the sector mean. Y ijt refers to a set of firm specific explanatory variables that include a set of dummy variables indicating the trade status of the firm and a set of control 8
9 variables. The control variables included are the export share in total sales, (the log of) firm size in terms of employment, a dummy variable indicating whether the firm is under foreign control and (the log of) labor productivity (defined as value added per employee). Non-trading firms mark the reference group, implying that α captures the general correlation of being a non-trader with the different profit measures. Albuquerque (2009) argues that size and industry specific groups provide the best view on the comparative performance of firms, since business cycles are mostly industry specific and firm size significantly affects the firms ability to respond to shocks. Therefore, a full set of industry and year specific dummy variables, represented by Z ijt, has been included in the regressions. Finally, the error term is denoted ɛ. Since firm specific factors, such as the quality of management, are expected to affect both the decision to export and profitability of the firm, we continue the analysis with fixed effect panel regressions, represented by the following empirical model: π Xijt R ijt or π Xijt A ijt = α + Y ijtβ + Z ijtγ + µ i + ɛ ijt, (6) Each variable is defined in the same way as in equation 5. In addition, µ i represents the firm specific fixed effect. Due to the expected sample selection bias, it is difficult to identify a fully exogenous instrument for export status. To deal with this problem, and in line with existing literature (Greenaway and Kneller, 2007), we employ propensity score matching (PSM) to investigate the causality between export status and the various profitability measures. The objective of this procedure is to construct the non-observed counterfactual by matching each export starter (a treated firm) to a firm from the control group (continuing nontrader, an untreated firm) based on similarity of firm characteristics before the treatment. In this particular application the treatment is the export start of the firm. This procedure enables us to evaluate whether export starters convert to a different profitability growth path compared to continuing nontraders. Matching is done based on the estimated probability of becoming an exporter. This probability is estimated by means of a probit-model of the export status on a set of firm characteristics prior to export start (equation 7). P r(exp = 1) = α + Y ijtβ + Z ijtγ + ɛ ijt, (7) The predicted values from this regression serve as the propensity score, based on which export starters and continuing non-exporters are paired up for the next step. The explanatory variables included in the probit-model are the import status, a dummy variable indicating whether the firm is under foreign 9
10 control, the relative net profit margin, (the log of) labor productivity, labor productivity growth, (the log of) assets per employee, (the log of) wages per employee and two sets of dummy variables representing size class and sector. All explanatory variables are lagged one year, in order to pair treated and untreated firms based on the similarity of their characteristics one year prior to treatment. Firms from the export-starting cohort are then matched to a peer from the continuingly non-exporting control group by minimizing the difference in individual propensity scores; this procedure is referred to as nearest neighbor propensity score matching. In addition, we force matching only to be allowed between firms from the same sector. The only additional condition that needs to be satisfied is that both treated and matched untreated firms continuously stay in business throughout the period under investigation. In the final step the profitability growth paths of the matched pairs of export starters and continuing non-exporters are compared. We define a firm as an export starter in case it reports exports larger than zero in year t and export values of zero in t-1 and t-2 (see table 22 in the appendix for the exact definition of the various cohorts that serve as input for the PSM-analysis). Firms that remain non-exporting for the full three years represent the control group. The proposed variable selection and methodology resemble the procedure presented by Ilmakunnas and Nurmi (2010) and Arnold and Hussinger (2005) who find that particularly firm size, productivity, labor quality, the price-cost margin and foreign ownership status affect the decision to export. As the data do not contain information on the skill level of the employees, we use the logarithm of the wage bill over employment as a proxy. Since an export start is expected to imply incurring additional export related fixed costs, the lagged net profit margin relative to the sector mean is included in the probit-regressions to account for differences in cost structures. The probit-regressions are run separately for each combined cohort of export starters and continuing non-exporters. 9 5 Empirical findings The results presented in this section are based on separate analysis of the compiled data sets concerning Finland and the Netherlands. Table 1 provides an insight in the panel size of both countries. The table shows that the available number of observations is larger for the Netherlands. This can be 9 The estimated propensities of becoming an exporter in Finland are remarkably similar to the findings of Ilmakunnas and Nurmi (2010) when we align our data set with theirs and limit the sample to firms with a minimum size of 20 employees. 10
11 explained by the relative size of both economies and the fact that the panel regarding the Netherlands includes three more years. The table also shows that exporting is more persistent among Finnish firms in every size class, which is partly explained by the fact that the Finnish data also includes services trade, whereas the Dutch data contains only goods trade. Table 1: Persistence of exporting firm size class micro small medium large all (fte) firms Finland: goods and service trade manufacturing no. of observations excluded 24,278 25,402 6,680 1,602 57,962 share exporting (%) excluded services no. of observations excluded 32,022 23,687 5,429 1,566 62,704 share exporting (%) excluded Netherlands: goods trade manufacturing no. of observations excluded 149, ,976 14,276 1, ,619 share exporting (%) excluded wholesale & retail trade no. of observations excluded 143,968 70,759 7, ,860 share exporting (%) excluded Regression results The pooled OLS-regressions are indicative for the degree of the correlation between exporting and profitability. Tables 14 through 21 in the appendix present the results of these regressions for both Finland and the Netherlands and each of the four profitability measures employed. The results indicate that the choice of profit measure does not heavily affect the findings. The pooled OLS regressions show persistently that productivity and firm size are the main determinants of profitability, with the former being positively associated with profits and the latter negatively. The results regarding the trade status dummy variables are mixed, although we only find insignificant or significantly negative coefficients, with the sole exception of two way traders generating higher gross profits per employee than non-traders in manufacturing sectors in the Netherlands and in Finland. In all other regressions for the Netherlands we find significant and negative trade premia with small magnitudes, both in manufacturing and in wholesale & retail trading sectors. The findings for Finland are less conclusive, with trade premia varying between not significantly different from zero to small but negative, both in manufacturing and services sectors. The higher persistence of exporting and significantly smaller sample sizes in Finland than in the Netherlands can also partially explain the insignificant results for Finland. Now that we have an indication of the direction of the relationship between trade status and profitability, we turn to the results of the fixed ef- 11
12 fects estimations, in order to be able to control for non-observed firm-specific heterogeneity. Tables 2 and 3 show the results from the fixed effects regressions on the relative gross profit margin as a measure for profitability. Finnish manufacturing and service sectors both consistently return insignificant trade premia, whereas the picture emerging for the Netherlands is more mixed. Manufacturing sectors show significantly negative premia for both sole importers, sole exporters and two-way traders, which is entirely on account of micro firms. In wholesale & retail trading we also find significantly negative premia, although the separate regressions for firm size classes show that the picture emerging is most pronounced for small firms and particularly persistent for two-way trading. While the results for Finland are all insignificant, especially for manufacturing sectors the coefficients are negative. The insignificance of the results can result also from the relatively small sample sizes. Similarly, the samples of medium sized and large firms for the Netherlands are relatively small and their results are consistently insignificant. Table 2: Relative gross profit margin premia (Finland, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors service sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-1.68) (-1.03) (-1.20) (-0.31). only imports (-1.00) (-0.57) (-0.46) (-1.52) (-0.29) (1.12) (-0.06) (1.23) (0.76) (0.24) two-way trader (-0.12) (-0.10) (-0.52) (0.35) (1.02) services exporter (0.41) (0.80) (-0.34) (0.26) (-0.26) control variables export share (2.20) (0.66) (1.95) (0.62) (1.35) (1.10) (1.00) (0.75) (1.68) (0.44) firm size (fte, log) (7.35) (5.70) (4.39) (1.70) (2.71) (4.42) (1.90) (2.42) (-0.49) (0.34) domestic firm reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference multinational (0.21) (-0.11) (0.96) (-1.13) (-0.85) (-0.13) (-0.13) (0.59) (-0.22) (0.27) labor productivity (log) (13.36) (6.90) (10.26) (3.18) (5.26) (8.73) (5.42) (3.61) (4.76) (1.90) No. of observations 57,787 24,180 25,319 6,686 1,602 62,261 31,769 23,549 5,388 1,555 R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < For manufacturing sectors both in Finland and in the Netherlands, and similar to the findings of Fryges and Wagner (2010) regarding Germany, we find a significant and positive coefficient for export share in total sales. This 12
13 indicates that exporting per se does not necessarily foster profitability rather than the extent to which foreign markets add to firm sales. This observation makes sense in the context of the fixed costs associated with exporting, which thus renders exporting profitable once a certain threshold share of exports in turnover is reached. In addition, contrary to the OLS-results, we find a consistently positive and significant correlation between firm size (within the size category) and profitability. This makes sense intuitively, since larger firms are for example more likely to be able to exploit economies of scale opportunities. 10 Furthermore, productivity remains an important indicator for profitability in the fixed effects regressions, considering the relatively large, positive and significant coefficients, which is an intuitively straightforward finding. Table 3: Relative gross profit margin premia (the Netherlands, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors wholesale and retail trading sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-3.12) (-3.42) (0.31) (-1.32) (-1.07) (-2.54) (-1.61) (-1.32) (0.42) (-1.11) only imports (-2.40) (-2.02) (-1.05) (-0.22) (-0.21) (-2.91) (-1.78) (-3.15) (1.35) (-0.55) two-way trader (-3.28) (-2.29) (-0.81) (-1.05) (-1.57) (-4.48) (-2.64) (-3.75) (1.30) (-0.40) control variables export share (4.24) (0.30) (2.75) (3.68) (1.54) (1.09) (-1.48) (3.02) (1.12) (-0.20) firm size (fte, log) (41.69) (30.30) (20.87) (5.64) (0.61) (38.10) (26.80) (17.96) (3.95) (-0.41) domestically controlled reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference foreign controlled (1.75) (1.96) (1.19) (0.89) (-0.38) (0.43) (-0.74) (0.88) (1.51) (-0.08) labor productivity (log) (64.05) (49.90) (33.61) (10.31) (3.31) (61.25) (49.94) (30.44) (8.15) (2.13) No. of observations 269, , ,596 13,810 1, , ,255 68,613 7, R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < Tables 4 and 5 present the results of the same fixed effects regression 10 Firm size is less likely to heavily affect access to capital and capital costs, since access to capital markets for SMEs is relatively easy in both Finland and the Netherlands. Specifically in developing countries capital market frictions tend to be larger, which is particularly problematic for smaller firms (Foellmi and Oechslin, 2010). Variation in results between firm size classes is therefore less likely to stem from differences in access to capital. 13
14 model, only with relative net profit margin as the dependent variable. The results regarding the relationship between internationalization and profitability align closely with the findings regarding the relative gross profit margin. Again we find insignificant premia for Finland and significantly negative but small premia mainly for smaller firms in the Netherlands. That is, except for only exporting or importing wholesale & retail traders, who show insignificant premia. In addition, the results regarding the control variables also resemble the findings regarding the gross profit margin closely. Table 4: Relative net profit margin premia (Finland, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors service sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-0.35) (-0.38) (-0.48) (-0.57). only imports (0.45) (-0.66) (0.71) (-1.79) (0.30) (0.89) (0.83) (0.75) (-0.50) (0.77) two-way trader (-0.90) (-0.45) (-0.13) (-1.26) (0.76) services exporter (0.79) (0.73) (-0.17) (-1.08) (-0.07) control variables export share (-1.04) (-0.16) (-0.96) (-2.07) (-2.10) (-0.36) (-0.50) (-1.22) (0.82) (-0.39) firm size (fte, log) (4.27) (6.70) (3.00) (0.41) (1.37) (2.46) (-0.64) (2.63) (0.50) (-0.01) domestic firm reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference multinational (-0.32) (-0.38) (0.98) (-0.42) (-0.64) (0.84) (0.80) (0.79) (0.88) (-0.29) labor productivity (log) (10.23) (14.56) (4.20) (5.90) (5.84) (4.49) (3.91) (7.41) (6.34) (1.48) No. of observations 57,962 24,278 25,402 6,680 1,602 62,704 32,022 23,687 5,429 1,566 R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p <
15 Table 5: Relative net profit margin premia (the Netherlands, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors wholesale and retail trading sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-3.20) (-3.18) (-0.17) (-1.03) (-1.41) (-1.08) (-0.27) (-0.61) (0.68) (-0.26) only imports (-2.11) (-1.72) (-1.12) (0.19) (-0.71) (-1.83) (-0.60) (-2.72) (1.24) (0.26) two-way trader (-3.70) (-3.06) (-1.26) (-0.13) (-1.75) (-2.79) (-1.04) (-2.97) (1.07) (0.44) control variables export share (2.77) (-0.20) (1.14) (3.08) (1.36) (1.23) (-0.47) (2.29) (0.06) (-0.75) firm size (fte, log) (47.78) (34.00) (25.96) (5.99) (1.02) (42.00) (30.82) (19.56) (4.50) (-0.41) domestically controlled reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference foreign controlled (1.88) (1.19) (1.43) (0.81) (-0.28) (-0.03) (-1.14) (1.09) (0.81) (-0.59) labor productivity (log) (71.82) (52.91) (41.44) (10.81) (2.96) (64.83) (52.86) (33.43) (7.65) (1.42) No. of observations 269, , ,727 13,830 1, , ,327 68,684 7, R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < The regressions with relative return on assets (ROA) as the profitability measure under investigation return consistent results as well (tables 6 and 7). Again, we find insignificant trade premia for Finnish firms and significantly negative trade premia in the Netherlands, in both manufacturing and wholesale & retail trading, mainly on account of smaller firms. The findings regarding the control variables are robust to the alternative profit measure employed, with firm size, productivity and, to a lesser extent, the export share in sales being positively associated with the return on assets. 15
16 Table 6: Relative return on assets premia (Finland, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors service sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-0.91) (-0.28) (-1.09) (-0.96). only imports (-0.75) (-0.09) (-0.50) (-0.55) (-0.04) (-0.84) (-0.57) (-0.24) (0.10) (-0.03) two-way trader (-1.51) (-1.12) (-0.05) (-0.96) (0.22) services exporter (1.52) (1.01) (-0.44) (0.45) (-0.15) control variables export share (0.06) (1.18) (0.26) (-0.36) (-1.12) (0.44) (0.90) (0.05) (0.40) (0.46) firm size (fte, log) (5.93) (3.24) (3.85) (2.26) (2.99) (8.11) (3.74) (3.58) (2.16) (2.60) domestic firm reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference multinational (-0.56) (-12.85) (0.78) (-0.74) (-0.70) (-1.62) (-0.97) (-0.47) (1.67) (-0.58) labor productivity (log) (20.67) (11.71) (12.88) (5.50) (3.71) (19.69) (12.15) (11.15) (4.57) (2.75) No. of observations 43,584 17,100 19,606 5,476 1,402 49,333 24,317 19,124 4,520 1,372 R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p <
17 Table 7: Relative return on assets premia (the Netherlands, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors wholesale and retail trading sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-3.96) (-2.24) (-1.15) (-1.55) (-1.79) (-3.15) (-1.78) (-2.45) (-0.69) (-0.91) only imports (-3.17) (-2.04) (-1.24) (-0.73) (-0.95) (-4.65) (-2.87) (-1.89) (-0.72) (-0.33) two-way trader (-3.93) (-1.97) (-1.53) (-2.35) (-1.63) (-6.80) (-5.05) (-3.59) (-0.28) (-0.30) control variables export share (4.33) (0.31) (3.32) (2.53) (1.61) (-1.39) (-0.88) (-0.12) (-0.31) (-0.47) firm size (fte, log) (25.04) (17.80) (9.67) (3.37) (0.31) (30.01) (20.39) (14.18) (5.52) (1.17) domestically controlled reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference foreign controlled (2.19) (1.92) (0.75) (1.67) (-0.14) (2.10) (0.48) (2.88) (1.61) (0.96) labor productivity (log) (59.49) (47.07) (33.14) (12.19) (3.78) (65.55) (54.25) (31.96) (12.07) (3.32) No. of observations 266, , ,301 13,812 1, , ,193 68,545 7, R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < The results regarding the relative gross profit margin per employee show both the scale effect of exporting and the margin effect (see section 4.1). Using the relative gross profit margin per employee as a measure of profitability, we find significant and negative trade premia for Dutch micro firms that solely export (tables 8 and 9). All other trade dummy variables return insignificant coefficients both for Finland and for the Netherlands in comparison to the negative margin effects especially in the Netherlands. A particularly striking finding is that the relationship between firm size and profitability turns negative and significant both in Finland and in the Netherlands except for Dutch wholesale & retail trading sectors. In addition, the export share returns mixed results, showing a significant and positive coefficient in Finnish manufacturing, a significant and negative coefficient in Dutch wholesale & retail trading and insignificant estimates otherwise. 17
18 Table 8: Relative gross profit per employee premia (Finland, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors service sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-0.54) (-0.28) (0.08) (-1.25). only imports (0.05) (1.97) (-0.02) (-0.27) (0.99) (1.50) (1.01) (0.33) (0.55) (-0.75) two-way trader (-1.40) (-0.41) (-0.49) (-1.48) (0.53) services exporter (-0.74) (-0.03) (-0.18) (0.12) (-1.23) control variables export share (3.46) (1.51) (1.79) (1.61) (0.59) (0.71) (0.70) (-0.39) (0.77) (0.78) firm size (fte, log) (-6.78) (-9.32) (-5.16) (-1.15) (1.16) (-4.21) (-4.63) (-1.52) (-0.11) (0.12) domestic firm reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference multinational (-0.66) (0.19) (2.40) (0.51) (-0.89) (0.38) (0.70) (-0.80) (1.03) (0.13) labor productivity (log) (7.16) (14.54) (9.14) (1.67) (3.18) (14.89) (9.06) (8.31) (4.43) (2.40) No. of observations 58,864 24,827 25,768 6,707 1,562 63,757 32,502 24,106 5,535 1,614 R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < Table 9: Relative gross profit per employee premia (the Netherlands, fixed effects panel regressions, ) trade dummies manufacturing sectors wholesale and retail trading sectors all micro small medium large all micro small medium large non-trader reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference only exports (-3.12) (-3.20) (-0.11) (-0.94) (-0.71) (-2.26) (-2.10) (-0.41) (-1.21) (-1.50) only imports (-1.54) (-1.69) (-0.15) (-0.73) (0.52) (-1.71) (-1.31) (-0.53) (-1.13) (-1.70) two-way trader (-1.09) (-0.28) (-0.16) (-1.85) (-1.76) (-1.51) (-0.23) (-1.68) (-0.79) (-1.38) control variables export share (1.07) (-0.54) (1.17) (1.57) (0.80) (-2.36) (-2.32) (-0.28) (0.80) (1.31) firm size (fte, log) (-6.37) (-6.88) (-3.84) (-1.57) (-1.69) (0.40) (-1.94) (0.20) (0.12) (-1.61) domestically controlled reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference foreign controlled (0.61) (0.83) (-0.59) (0.89) (0.64) (2.13) (2.08) (1.22) (1.43) (0.37) labor productivity (log) (66.01) (51.02) (37.47) (13.99) (3.35) (71.13) (59.38) (35.32) (12.90) (3.35) No. of observations 269, , ,289 13,685 1, , ,040 67,833 6, R 2 - within R 2 - between R 2 - overall Notes: All regressions include a full set of year-sector dummies and fixed effects at firm level. t statistics in parentheses. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < We draw a few preliminary conclusions from the regression results presented in this section: Internationalization does not seem to be heavily correlated with profitability, considering the largely insignificant or significantly negative 18
Is Publicly-Reported Firm-Level Trade Data Reliable? Evidence from the UK
Is Publicly-Reported Firm-Level Trade Data Reliable? Evidence from the UK Holger Breinlich, Patrick Nolen and Greg C. Wright February 3, 2017 Abstract In this paper we compare firms self-reported overseas
More informationCapital allocation in Indian business groups
Capital allocation in Indian business groups Remco van der Molen Department of Finance University of Groningen The Netherlands This version: June 2004 Abstract The within-group reallocation of capital
More informationThe impact of credit constraints on foreign direct investment: evidence from firm-level data Preliminary draft Please do not quote
The impact of credit constraints on foreign direct investment: evidence from firm-level data Preliminary draft Please do not quote David Aristei * Chiara Franco Abstract This paper explores the role of
More informationMeasuring Chinese Firms Performance Experiences with Chinese firm level data
RIETI/G COE Hi Stat International Workshop on Establishing Industrial Productivity Database for China (CIP), India (IIP), Japan (JIP) and Korea (KIP), October 22, 2010, Tokyo Measuring Chinese Firms Performance
More informationCash holdings determinants in the Portuguese economy 1
17 Cash holdings determinants in the Portuguese economy 1 Luísa Farinha Pedro Prego 2 Abstract The analysis of liquidity management decisions by firms has recently been used as a tool to investigate the
More informationFinancial liberalization and the relationship-specificity of exports *
Financial and the relationship-specificity of exports * Fabrice Defever Jens Suedekum a) University of Nottingham Center of Economic Performance (LSE) GEP and CESifo Mercator School of Management University
More informationThe impact of introducing an interest barrier - Evidence from the German corporation tax reform 2008
The impact of introducing an interest barrier - Evidence from the German corporation tax reform 2008 Hermann Buslei DIW Berlin Martin Simmler 1 DIW Berlin February 15, 2012 Abstract: In this study we investigate
More informationWhy Do Companies Choose to Go IPOs? New Results Using Data from Taiwan;
University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Department of Economics and Finance Working Papers, 1991-2006 Department of Economics and Finance 1-1-2006 Why Do Companies Choose to Go IPOs? New Results Using
More informationProductivity and the internationalization of firms: cross-border acquisitions versus greenfield investments.
Productivity and the internationalization of firms: cross-border acquisitions versus greenfield investments. Michaela Trax Preliminary draft please do not quote! January 2010 Abstract This paper extends
More informationOn exports stability: the role of product and geographical diversification
On exports stability: the role of product and geographical diversification Marco Grazzi 1 and Daniele Moschella 2 1 Department of Economics - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 2 LEM - Scuola Superiore
More informationOutward FDI and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Germany
Outward FDI and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Germany Outward investment substitutes foreign for domestic production, thereby reducing total output and thus employment in the home (outward investing)
More informationExchange Rates and Inflation in EMU Countries: Preliminary Empirical Evidence 1
Exchange Rates and Inflation in EMU Countries: Preliminary Empirical Evidence 1 Marco Moscianese Santori Fabio Sdogati Politecnico di Milano, piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy Abstract In
More informationExports and Profitability: First Evidence for German Manufacturing Firms
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 3798 Exports and Profitability: First Evidence for German Manufacturing Firms Helmut Fryges Joachim Wagner October 2008 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute
More informationAdvanced Topic 7: Exchange Rate Determination IV
Advanced Topic 7: Exchange Rate Determination IV John E. Floyd University of Toronto May 10, 2013 Our major task here is to look at the evidence regarding the effects of unanticipated money shocks on real
More informationWhat happens when firms invest? Investment events and firm performance
What happens when firms invest? Investment events and firm performance Michał Gradzewicz Narodowy Bank Polski, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie 15 June 2018 Motivation - the nature of investments At
More informationReal Estate Ownership by Non-Real Estate Firms: The Impact on Firm Returns
Real Estate Ownership by Non-Real Estate Firms: The Impact on Firm Returns Yongheng Deng and Joseph Gyourko 1 Zell/Lurie Real Estate Center at Wharton University of Pennsylvania Prepared for the Corporate
More informationPerhaps the most striking aspect of the current
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE, CROSS-BORDER MERGERS AND MERGER WAVES:INTER- NATIONAL ECONOMICS MEETS INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION STEVEN BRAKMAN* HARRY GARRETSEN** AND CHARLES VAN MARREWIJK*** Perhaps the most striking
More informationRole of Foreign Direct Investment in Knowledge Spillovers: Firm-Level Evidence from Korean Firms Patent and Patent Citations
THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ECONOMY, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Spring 2004), 47-67 Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Knowledge Spillovers: Firm-Level Evidence from Korean Firms Patent and Patent Citations Jaehwa
More informationIncome smoothing and foreign asset holdings
J Econ Finan (2010) 34:23 29 DOI 10.1007/s12197-008-9070-2 Income smoothing and foreign asset holdings Faruk Balli Rosmy J. Louis Mohammad Osman Published online: 24 December 2008 Springer Science + Business
More informationDetermination of manufacturing exports in the euro area countries using a supply-demand model
Determination of manufacturing exports in the euro area countries using a supply-demand model By Ana Buisán, Juan Carlos Caballero and Noelia Jiménez, Directorate General Economics, Statistics and Research
More informationLabor Market Protections and Unemployment: Does the IMF Have a Case? Dean Baker and John Schmitt 1. November 3, 2003
cepr Center for Economic and Policy Research Briefing Paper Labor Market Protections and Unemployment: Does the IMF Have a Case? Dean Baker and John Schmitt 1 November 3, 2003 CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY
More informationThe Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Export Performance: Empirical Evidence for Western Balkan Countries
Abstract The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Export Performance: Empirical Evidence for Western Balkan Countries Nasir Selimi, Kushtrim Reçi, Luljeta Sadiku Recently there are many authors that
More informationThe Labor Market Consequences of Adverse Financial Shocks
The Labor Market Consequences of Adverse Financial Shocks November 2012 Unemployment rate on the two sides of the Atlantic Credit to the private sector over GDP Credit to private sector as a percentage
More informationHow Markets React to Different Types of Mergers
How Markets React to Different Types of Mergers By Pranit Chowhan Bachelor of Business Administration, University of Mumbai, 2014 And Vishal Bane Bachelor of Commerce, University of Mumbai, 2006 PROJECT
More informationInternal Finance and Growth: Comparison Between Firms in Indonesia and Bangladesh
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues ISSN: 2146-4138 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2015, 5(4), 1038-1042. Internal
More informationDeviations from Optimal Corporate Cash Holdings and the Valuation from a Shareholder s Perspective
Deviations from Optimal Corporate Cash Holdings and the Valuation from a Shareholder s Perspective Zhenxu Tong * University of Exeter Abstract The tradeoff theory of corporate cash holdings predicts that
More informationInvestment and Taxation in Germany - Evidence from Firm-Level Panel Data Discussion
Investment and Taxation in Germany - Evidence from Firm-Level Panel Data Discussion Bronwyn H. Hall Nuffield College, Oxford University; University of California at Berkeley; and the National Bureau of
More informationDo Value-added Real Estate Investments Add Value? * September 1, Abstract
Do Value-added Real Estate Investments Add Value? * Liang Peng and Thomas G. Thibodeau September 1, 2013 Abstract Not really. This paper compares the unlevered returns on value added and core investments
More informationIndian Households Finance: An analysis of Stocks vs. Flows- Extended Abstract
Indian Households Finance: An analysis of Stocks vs. Flows- Extended Abstract Pawan Gopalakrishnan S. K. Ritadhi Shekhar Tomar September 15, 2018 Abstract How do households allocate their income across
More informationAccess to finance and foreign technology upgrading : Firm-level evidence from India
Access to finance and foreign technology upgrading : Firm-level evidence from India Maria Bas and Antoine Berthou CEPII ICRIER Seminar, 13th December 2010 Motivation : Import Patterns Globalization process
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF THE DEGREE OF DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE Zheng-Feng Guo, Vanderbilt University Lingyan Cao, University of Maryland
The International Journal of Business and Finance Research Volume 6 Number 2 2012 AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEGREE OF DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE Zheng-Feng Guo, Vanderbilt University Lingyan Cao, University
More informationEvaluating Trade Patterns in the CIS
Evaluating Trade Patterns in the CIS Paper prepared for the first World Congress of Comparative Economics Rome, Italy, June 26, 2015 Yugo Konno, Ph. D. 1 Senior Economist, Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.,
More informationLabor Market Institutions and their Effect on Labor Market Performance in OECD and European Countries
Labor Market Institutions and their Effect on Labor Market Performance in OECD and European Countries Kamila Fialová, June 2011 The aim of this technical note is to shed some light on relationship between
More informationHow do business groups evolve? Evidence from new project announcements.
How do business groups evolve? Evidence from new project announcements. Meghana Ayyagari, Radhakrishnan Gopalan, and Vijay Yerramilli June, 2009 Abstract Using a unique data set of investment projects
More informationInvestor Competence, Information and Investment Activity
Investor Competence, Information and Investment Activity Anders Karlsson and Lars Nordén 1 Department of Corporate Finance, School of Business, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract
More informationresearch paper series
research paper series China and the World Economy Research Paper 2008/04 The Effects of Foreign Acquisition on Domestic and Exports Markets Dynamics in China by Jun Du and Sourafel Girma The Centre acknowledges
More informationEmpirical appendix of Public Expenditure Distribution, Voting, and Growth
Empirical appendix of Public Expenditure Distribution, Voting, and Growth Lorenzo Burlon August 11, 2014 In this note we report the empirical exercises we conducted to motivate the theoretical insights
More informationContrarian Trades and Disposition Effect: Evidence from Online Trade Data. Abstract
Contrarian Trades and Disposition Effect: Evidence from Online Trade Data Hayato Komai a Ryota Koyano b Daisuke Miyakawa c Abstract Using online stock trading records in Japan for 461 individual investors
More informationExports, FDI and Productivity
Exports, FDI and Productivity Micro evidence from Norway Andreas Moxnes University of Oslo April 2007 (Institute) Exports, FDI and Productivity 04/07 1 / 23 Introduction Trade intensity 0.50 0.45 0.40
More informationThe Yield Curve as a Predictor of Economic Activity the Case of the EU- 15
The Yield Curve as a Predictor of Economic Activity the Case of the EU- 15 Jana Hvozdenska Masaryk University Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Finance Lipova 41a Brno, 602 00 Czech
More informationOnline Appendix to. The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts
Online Appendix to The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts This online appendix tabulates and discusses the results of robustness checks and supplementary analyses mentioned in the paper. A1. Estimating
More informationThe Role of Foreign Banks in Trade
The Role of Foreign Banks in Trade Stijn Claessens (Federal Reserve Board & CEPR) Omar Hassib (Maastricht University) Neeltje van Horen (De Nederlandsche Bank & CEPR) RIETI-MoFiR-Hitotsubashi-JFC International
More informationSwitching Monies: The Effect of the Euro on Trade between Belgium and Luxembourg* Volker Nitsch. ETH Zürich and Freie Universität Berlin
June 15, 2008 Switching Monies: The Effect of the Euro on Trade between Belgium and Luxembourg* Volker Nitsch ETH Zürich and Freie Universität Berlin Abstract The trade effect of the euro is typically
More informationPREZENTĀCIJAS NOSAUKUMS PROGRAMMES FOR FIRM PERFORMANCE*
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE EU REGIONAL SUPPORT PREZENTĀCIJAS NOSAUKUMS PROGRAMMES FOR FIRM PERFORMANCE* Konstantīns Beņkovskis (LB, SSE Riga), Oļegs Tkačevs (LB), Naomitsu Yashiro (OECD) First Annual Workshop
More informationIs There a Relationship between EBITDA and Investment Intensity? An Empirical Study of European Companies
2012 International Conference on Economics, Business Innovation IPEDR vol.38 (2012) (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore Is There a Relationship between EBITDA and Investment Intensity? An Empirical Study of
More informationGLOBALIZATION AND PROFITABILITY. THE CASE OF ECUATORIAN FIRMS
GLOBALIZATION AND PROFITABILITY. THE CASE OF ECUATORIAN FIRMS Francisco J. Guerra-Procel (Universidad Central del Ecuador) Joan Martín-Montaner (Universitat Jaume I de Castelló and Instituto de Economía
More informationDeregulation and Firm Investment
Policy Research Working Paper 7884 WPS7884 Deregulation and Firm Investment Evidence from the Dismantling of the License System in India Ivan T. andilov Aslı Leblebicioğlu Ruchita Manghnani Public Disclosure
More informationMAKING FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION MORE INCLUSIVE
MAKING FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION MORE INCLUSIVE Jonathan D. Ostry Research Department, IMF Prepared for the Session: Making Globalization More Inclusive AEA Meetings, Philadelphia, January 6, 8 This presentation
More informationPublic Employees as Politicians: Evidence from Close Elections
Public Employees as Politicians: Evidence from Close Elections Supporting information (For Online Publication Only) Ari Hyytinen University of Jyväskylä, School of Business and Economics (JSBE) Jaakko
More informationThe impact of introducing an interest barrier - Evidence from the German corporation tax reform 2008
The impact of introducing an interest barrier - Evidence from the German corporation tax reform 2008 Hermann Buslei DIW Berlin Martin Simmler 1 DIW Berlin February 29, 2012 Abstract: In this study we investigate
More informationThe Aggregate and Distributional Effects of Financial Globalization: Evidence from Macro and Sectoral Data
The Aggregate and Distributional Effects of Financial Globalization: Evidence from Macro and Sectoral Data Davide Furceri, Prakash Loungani and Jonathan D. Ostry International Monetary Fund IMF Annual
More informationElisabetta Basilico and Tommi Johnsen. Disentangling the Accruals Mispricing in Europe: Is It an Industry Effect? Working Paper n.
Elisabetta Basilico and Tommi Johnsen Disentangling the Accruals Mispricing in Europe: Is It an Industry Effect? Working Paper n. 5/2014 April 2014 ISSN: 2239-2734 This Working Paper is published under
More informationDo Domestic Chinese Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?
Do Domestic Chinese Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? Chang-Tai Hsieh, University of California Working Paper Series Vol. 2006-30 December 2006 The views expressed in this publication are those
More informationDemographics and Secular Stagnation Hypothesis in Europe
Demographics and Secular Stagnation Hypothesis in Europe Carlo Favero (Bocconi University, IGIER) Vincenzo Galasso (Bocconi University, IGIER, CEPR & CESIfo) Growth in Europe?, Marseille, September 2015
More informationLocal Government Spending and Economic Growth in Guangdong: The Key Role of Financial Development. Chi-Chuan LEE
2017 International Conference on Economics and Management Engineering (ICEME 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-451-6 Local Government Spending and Economic Growth in Guangdong: The Key Role of Financial Development
More informationDoes portfolio manager ownership affect fund performance? Finnish evidence
Does portfolio manager ownership affect fund performance? Finnish evidence April 21, 2009 Lia Kumlin a Vesa Puttonen b Abstract By using a unique dataset of Finnish mutual funds and fund managers, we investigate
More informationThe Labor Market Consequences of Adverse Financial Shocks
13TH JACQUES POLAK ANNUAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 8 9, 2012 The Labor Market Consequences of Adverse Financial Shocks Tito Boeri Bocconi University and frdb Pietro Garibaldi University of Torino and
More informationStock price synchronicity and the role of analyst: Do analysts generate firm-specific vs. market-wide information?
Stock price synchronicity and the role of analyst: Do analysts generate firm-specific vs. market-wide information? Yongsik Kim * Abstract This paper provides empirical evidence that analysts generate firm-specific
More informationKey Influences on Loan Pricing at Credit Unions and Banks
Key Influences on Loan Pricing at Credit Unions and Banks Robert M. Feinberg Professor of Economics American University With the assistance of: Ataur Rahman Ph.D. Student in Economics American University
More informationOUTPUT SPILLOVERS FROM FISCAL POLICY
OUTPUT SPILLOVERS FROM FISCAL POLICY Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko University of California, Berkeley January 2013 In this paper, we estimate the cross-country spillover effects of government
More informationPublic Expenditure on Capital Formation and Private Sector Productivity Growth: Evidence
ISSN 2029-4581. ORGANIZATIONS AND MARKETS IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2012, VOL. 3, No. 1(5) Public Expenditure on Capital Formation and Private Sector Productivity Growth: Evidence from and the Euro Area Jolanta
More informationDETERMINANTS OF BILATERAL TRADE BETWEEN CHINA AND YEMEN: EVIDENCE FROM VAR MODEL
International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom Vol. V, Issue 5, May 2017 http://ijecm.co.uk/ ISSN 2348 0386 DETERMINANTS OF BILATERAL TRADE BETWEEN CHINA AND YEMEN: EVIDENCE
More informationThe Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Firms by Pol Antràs, Teresa C. Fort and Felix Tintelnot
The Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Firms by Pol Antràs, Teresa C. Fort and Felix Tintelnot Online Theory Appendix Not for Publication) Equilibrium in the Complements-Pareto Case
More informationHedge Funds as International Liquidity Providers: Evidence from Convertible Bond Arbitrage in Canada
Hedge Funds as International Liquidity Providers: Evidence from Convertible Bond Arbitrage in Canada Evan Gatev Simon Fraser University Mingxin Li Simon Fraser University AUGUST 2012 Abstract We examine
More informationOnline Appendices for
Online Appendices for From Made in China to Innovated in China : Necessity, Prospect, and Challenges Shang-Jin Wei, Zhuan Xie, and Xiaobo Zhang Journal of Economic Perspectives, (31)1, Winter 2017 Online
More informationThe Determinants of Bank Mergers: A Revealed Preference Analysis
The Determinants of Bank Mergers: A Revealed Preference Analysis Oktay Akkus Department of Economics University of Chicago Ali Hortacsu Department of Economics University of Chicago VERY Preliminary Draft:
More informationBusiness cycle volatility and country zize :evidence for a sample of OECD countries. Abstract
Business cycle volatility and country zize :evidence for a sample of OECD countries Davide Furceri University of Palermo Georgios Karras Uniersity of Illinois at Chicago Abstract The main purpose of this
More informationFinancial constraints and exports: evidence from Portuguese. manufacturing firms
Financial constraints and exports: evidence from Portuguese manufacturing firms Author: Armando Silva CEFUP (Universidade do Porto) e Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Escola Superior de Estudos Industriais
More informationFirm Productivity and Exports in the Wholesale Sector: Evidence from Japan
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 13-E-007 Firm Productivity and Exports in the Wholesale Sector: Evidence from Japan TANAKA Ayumu RIETI The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/
More informationThe role of different types of firms in GVCs
The role of different types of firms in GVCs GGDC 25th Anniversary Conference Stephen Chong, Rutger Hoekstra, Oscar Lemmers, Ilke Van Beveren, Marcel van den Berg, Ron van der Wal, Piet Verbiest Overview
More informationThe Consistency between Analysts Earnings Forecast Errors and Recommendations
The Consistency between Analysts Earnings Forecast Errors and Recommendations by Lei Wang Applied Economics Bachelor, United International College (2013) and Yao Liu Bachelor of Business Administration,
More informationEffectiveness of macroprudential and capital flow measures in Asia and the Pacific 1
Effectiveness of macroprudential and capital flow measures in Asia and the Pacific 1 Valentina Bruno, Ilhyock Shim and Hyun Song Shin 2 Abstract We assess the effectiveness of macroprudential policies
More informationThe Effect of Corporate Governance on Quality of Information Disclosure:Evidence from Treasury Stock Announcement in Taiwan
The Effect of Corporate Governance on Quality of Information Disclosure:Evidence from Treasury Stock Announcement in Taiwan Yue-Fang Wen, Associate professor of National Ilan University, Taiwan ABSTRACT
More informationImport Penetration, Export Orientation and Plant Size in Indonesian Manufacturing
Chapter 6 Import Penetration, Export Orientation and Plant Size in Indonesian Manufacturing Sadayuki Takii Seinan Gakuin University May 2016 This chapter should be cited as Takii, S. (2014), Import Penetration,
More informationMethodologies to assess the overall effectiveness of EU cohesion policy: a critical appraisal
7th European Commission Evaluation Conference The Result Orientation: Cohesion Policy at Work Methodologies to assess the overall effectiveness of EU cohesion policy: a critical appraisal and (Sapienza,
More informationBank Capital, Profitability and Interest Rate Spreads MUJTABA ZIA * This draft version: March 01, 2017
Bank Capital, Profitability and Interest Rate Spreads MUJTABA ZIA * * Assistant Professor of Finance, Rankin College of Business, Southern Arkansas University, 100 E University St, Slot 27, Magnolia AR
More informationInput Tariffs, Speed of Contract Enforcement, and the Productivity of Firms in India
Input Tariffs, Speed of Contract Enforcement, and the Productivity of Firms in India Reshad N Ahsan University of Melbourne December, 2011 Reshad N Ahsan (University of Melbourne) December 2011 1 / 25
More informationCEM Benchmarking DEFINED BENEFIT THE WEEN. did not have.
Alexander D. Beath, PhD CEM Benchmarking Inc. 372 Bay Street, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON, M5H 2W9 www.cembenchmarking.com June 2014 ASSET ALLOCATION AND FUND PERFORMANCE OF DEFINED BENEFIT PENSIONN FUNDS IN
More informationTax Burden, Tax Mix and Economic Growth in OECD Countries
Tax Burden, Tax Mix and Economic Growth in OECD Countries PAOLA PROFETA RICCARDO PUGLISI SIMONA SCABROSETTI June 30, 2015 FIRST DRAFT, PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE WITHOUT THE AUTHORS PERMISSION Abstract Focusing
More informationConstruction Site Regulation and OSHA Decentralization
XI. BUILDING HEALTH AND SAFETY INTO EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY Construction Site Regulation and OSHA Decentralization Alison Morantz National Bureau of Economic Research Abstract
More informationMERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: THE ROLE OF GENDER IN EUROPE AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
) MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: THE ROLE OF GENDER IN EUROPE AND THE UNITED KINGDOM Ersin Güner 559370 Master Finance Supervisor: dr. P.C. (Peter) de Goeij December 2013 Abstract Evidence from the US shows
More informationSpillovers from FDI: What are the Transmission Channels?
Spillovers from FDI: What are the Transmission Channels? Henning Mühlen August 2012 (Preliminary draft: Please do not cite) Abstract Foreign direct investment (FDI) projects are assumed to be accompanied
More informationMergers & Acquisitions in Banking: The effect of the Economic Business Cycle
Mergers & Acquisitions in Banking: The effect of the Economic Business Cycle Student name: Lucy Hazen Master student Finance at Tilburg University Administration number: 507779 E-mail address: 1st Supervisor:
More informationThe Use of Accounting Information to Estimate Indicators of Customer and Supplier Payment Periods
The Use of Accounting Information to Estimate Indicators of Customer and Supplier Payment Periods Conference Uses of Central Balance Sheet Data Offices Information IFC / ECCBSO / CBRT Özdere-Izmir, September
More informationDebt Overhang, Rollover Risk, and Investment in Europe
Debt Overhang, Rollover Risk, and Investment in Europe Ṣebnem Kalemli-Özcan, University of Maryland, CEPR and NBER Luc Laeven, ECB and CEPR David Moreno, University of Maryland September 2015, EC Post
More informationDoes the Equity Market affect Economic Growth?
The Macalester Review Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 8-5-2012 Does the Equity Market affect Economic Growth? Kwame D. Fynn Macalester College, kwamefynn@gmail.com Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/macreview
More informationFOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND THE CZECH CORPORATE SECTOR: POTENTIAL RISKS TO FINANCIAL STABILITY
8 SECTOR: POTENTIAL RISKS TO FINANCIAL STABILITY Adam Geršl and Michal Hlaváček, CNB This article discusses the potential risks to price stability stemming from the influence of foreign direct investment
More informationPension fund investment: Impact of the liability structure on equity allocation
Pension fund investment: Impact of the liability structure on equity allocation Author: Tim Bücker University of Twente P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede The Netherlands t.bucker@student.utwente.nl In this
More informationImport Prices and Invoice Currency: Evidence from Chile
Import Prices and Invoice Currency: Evidence from Chile By Giuliano and Luttini Discussion by Joaquin Blaum (Brown) What They Do Interesting paper, with potentially important policy implications. What
More informationDoes Insider Ownership Matter for Financial Decisions and Firm Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan
Does Insider Ownership Matter for Financial Decisions and Firm Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan Haris Arshad & Attiya Yasmin Javid INTRODUCTION In an emerging economy like Pakistan,
More informationIs Ownership Really Endogenous?
Is Ownership Really Endogenous? Klaus Gugler * and Jürgen Weigand ** * (Corresponding author) University of Vienna, Department of Economics, Bruennerstrasse 72, 1210 Vienna, Austria; email: klaus.gugler@univie.ac.at;
More informationEconomic Growth and Convergence across the OIC Countries 1
Economic Growth and Convergence across the OIC Countries 1 Abstract: The main purpose of this study 2 is to analyze whether the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries show a regional economic
More informationDifferential Impact of Uncertainty on Exporting Decision in Risk-averse and Risk-taking Firms: Evidence from Korean Firms 1
Differential Impact of Uncertainty on Exporting Decision in Risk-averse and Risk-taking Firms: Evidence from Korean Firms 1 Haeng-Sun Kim Most existing literature examining the links between firm heterogeneity
More informationOnline Appendix to: The Composition Effects of Tax-Based Consolidations on Income Inequality. June 19, 2017
Online Appendix to: The Composition Effects of Tax-Based Consolidations on Income Inequality June 19, 2017 1 Table of contents 1 Robustness checks on baseline regression... 1 2 Robustness checks on composition
More informationDebt Financing and Survival of Firms in Malaysia
Debt Financing and Survival of Firms in Malaysia Sui-Jade Ho & Jiaming Soh Bank Negara Malaysia September 21, 2017 We thank Rubin Sivabalan, Chuah Kue-Peng, and Mohd Nozlan Khadri for their comments and
More informationRating Efficiency in the Indian Commercial Paper Market. Anand Srinivasan 1
Rating Efficiency in the Indian Commercial Paper Market Anand Srinivasan 1 Abstract: This memo examines the efficiency of the rating system for commercial paper (CP) issues in India, for issues rated A1+
More informationDo Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?
1 / 23 Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy? Journal of Finance, 2014 Mark T. Leary 1 and Michael R. Roberts 2 1 Olin Business School Washington University 2 The Wharton School University of
More informationDoes Growth make us Happier? A New Look at the Easterlin Paradox
Does Growth make us Happier? A New Look at the Easterlin Paradox Felix FitzRoy School of Economics and Finance University of St Andrews St Andrews, KY16 8QX, UK Michael Nolan* Centre for Economic Policy
More informationInvestment Platforms Market Study Interim Report: Annex 7 Fund Discounts and Promotions
MS17/1.2: Annex 7 Market Study Investment Platforms Market Study Interim Report: Annex 7 Fund Discounts and Promotions July 2018 Annex 7: Introduction 1. There are several ways in which investment platforms
More informationThe Competitive Effect of a Bank Megamerger on Credit Supply
The Competitive Effect of a Bank Megamerger on Credit Supply Henri Fraisse Johan Hombert Mathias Lé June 7, 2018 Abstract We study the effect of a merger between two large banks on credit market competition.
More information