Confirmations. 1. Introduction
|
|
- Roger Basil Eaton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Confirmations 1. Introduction 1.1. The British Bankers Association (BBA) recognises and supports the importance of a robust confirmation process, acknowledging the work that ISDA in particular has done in this area as it leads industry efforts to improve the overall processing environment for OTC Derivatives. This positive work has resulted extensive progress over recent years, as evidenced by industry meeting or exceeding successive ambitious targets as agreed with the OTC Derivatives Supervisors Group (ODSG) ESMA s publication of its draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) has introduced considerable uncertainty into this area however. Not only do the RTS lack the necessary definitional clarity regarding what the term confirmations means from an operational perspective (rather than what a confirm is), the BBA is also deeply concerned that ESMA s proposed implementation timetable for the confirmation timings between counterparties will prove both unrealistic and prohibitively costly to implement, especially in view of that fact that industry would fail to meet these obligations as they currently stand. This is especially so when considering its impact on small and medium counterparties, an industry demographic particularly vulnerable to unsuitable policy objectives While industry does favour phasing in more ambitious targets for confirmations and we do not disagree with the standards per we contend that in view of available evidence regarding current confirmations target, the implementation timetable set by ESMA should be reconsidered. 2. ESMA s Proposal 2.1. The Level 1 EMIR text requires financial counterparties and non-financial counterparties to have appropriate procedures and arrangements in place to measure, monitor and mitigate operational counterparty credit risk, including timely confirmation, where available, by electronic means, of the terms of non-cleared OTC derivatives, and mandates ESMA to specify these procedures and arrangements ESMA proposed RTS were 27 September 2012 and within it ESMA made a number of recommendations concerning these obligations. Delineating between OTC derivative contracts concluded between financial counterparties (FCs) and non-financial counterparties (NFCs) exceeding the clearing thresholds, and OTC derivative contracts concluded by NFCs below the clearing thresholds, ESMA proposed a timeframe for the confirmation ranging from the next business day following execution for the first category of counterparties to the second business day following execution for the second category of counterparties. The timing was extended by one business day when transactions are
2 executed after 4.00pm or with a counterparty located in a different time zone which did not allow confirmation by the set deadline When considering when to roll out these objectives, ESMA chose to adopt a staggered implementation schedule. Interim targets were established for periods ranging from the entry into force of the draft RTS, and progressively increasing in severity in August 2013, February 2014and finally August 2014, with ESMA asserting that these targets would allow interim enhancement of its timeframe before reaching its ultimate objective. This objective is the exchange of confirmations on the business day following execution for FCs and NFCs above the clearing threshold and the second business day following execution for NFCs below the clearing threshold The RTS appear to go beyond the Level 1 requirement for market participants to have procedures and arrangements in place for timely confirmation by mandating specific timeframes for counterparties for confirmation of non-cleared trades according to asset class and counterparty classification. We urge the Commission to move back from firm targets to a principles, policy-based requirement as envisaged under the Level 1. This would alleviate much concern amongst NFCs but still allow ESMA and national authorities to closely monitor industry progress in this area through the requirement to report confirmations outstanding over 5 business days. Figure 1: ESMA's confirmation implementation timeline 3. The Definition of Confirmation 3.1. During the RTS consultation, ESMA received significant industry feedback focusing on the need for greater definitional clarity over the meaning of the term confirmation 1. In particular, the BBA called on ESMA to explicitly exclude full legal execution as a possible meaning for confirmation, and to confirm that the dispatch of a document from one counterparty to another affirming the full terms of the contract (but not amounting to full legal execution) would satisfy its requirements. 1 ISDA-AFME-BBA-Assosim Response to ESMA Consultation Paper and Draft Technical Standards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and. Trade Repositories, 6 August 2012, pp.41
3 3.2. Unfortunately, ESMA s publication of the RTS in September provided only limited clarity on this issue. With confirmation currently defined in EMIR as the documentation of the agreement of the counterparties to all the terms of an OTC derivative contract, the possibility remains that confirmation could include full legal execution, or extend even wider, with ESMA itself stating that it would not recognise some existing market confirmation practices, such as the where the full legal contract is exchanged but not signed, but that it may accept other positive current market practises in certain asset classes, such as negative affirmation (where, following the counterparties exchanging the term sheet, the terms are considered correct if the other counterparty has not responded within a certain time period) Not only does this lack of clarity have considerable ramifications for the ability of users of OTC derivatives to meet ESMA s proposed confirmation deadlines, should the term confirmation include full legal execution, we are extremely concerned about the considerable market impact that such a requirement would have on counterparties, particularly end-users and those who engage in very bespoke transactions (of whom a significant portion are non-financial counterparties). Given the considerable complexities involved in meeting a confirmation obligation which includes full legal confirmation, it is not realistically achievable for counterparties particularly small and medium counterparties - to meet ESMA s implementation timelines without enormous cost. This is particularly true where the OTC derivatives trades in question are not eligible for electronic confirmation With the RTS now being considered by the European Commission ( the Commission ), the BBA would welcome explicit confirmation from the Commission that, in the event that the term confirmation does include full legal execution, it also includes other forms of confirmation currently accepted as standard market practice. 4. Date of application of confirmation rules 4.1. The date when ESMA s confirmation implementation timeline begins is 20 days following publication of the RTS in the Official Journal. This date expected to be on or about the 1st March contrasts with the date of implementation of other nonmargin bilateral risk mitigation rules, notably those on portfolio reconciliation, portfolio compression and dispute resolution, which are expected to begin in August, or at the latest, 1 September As highlighted below, there are a number of reasons why ESMA s proposed confirmation requirements place a considerable burden on small and medium-sized market participants and those who lack either the operational experience or appropriate infrastructure to effectively meet their obligations. When this is combined with the staggered implementation across the portfolio of risk mitigation measures required by the RTS, it is not apparent that there is any tangible benefit in this approach for either industry or regulators. The BBA recommends that the commencement date of the confirmation requirements occur concurrently with that of the remaining risk mitigation measures.
4 5. Implementation deadline 5.1. As acknowledged by ESMA, in recent years industry has made significant and welcome progress in shortening average confirmation periods. Nevertheless, despite these efforts, industry as whole, and particularly NFCs, do not currently meet ESMA s proposed timelines, a situation attributable to the heterogeneous nature of market participants, the complex features of their trades and the varied nature of their capabilities. These fundamental considerations are unlikely to be significantly addressed by the conclusion of ESMA s proposed phase-in period, with the likely result being that despite significant expenditure of crucial resources, both financial and nonfinancial counterparties will not be compliant with their RTS obligations One of the key impediments preventing industry from complying with the confirmations target is the contrasting capabilities of financial counterparties and nonfinancial counterparties. In the RTS s associated Impact Assessment, ESMA explicitly recognises that NFCs, particularly those below the clearing thresholds, do not have the same resources and sophisticated systems dedicated to handling the operational risks of their OTC transactions, as FCs, because the relatively low volumes of their activity would not justify the associated costs 2. ESMA also accepts that the low level of eligibility for electronic confirmation within some asset classes crucial if counterparties are to achieve ESMA s confirmation objectives is largely attributable to the difference in market practices between FCs and NFCs, and their activity in commodities markets The confirmation s picture is further coloured when considering the relative results between and within asset classes. While there has been a considerable success in reducing confirmation timeframes overall, there remain key differences among asset classes, with interest rate and credit derivatives showing the highest rate of T+0 confirmations, (above 70% of trades normally confirmed on a same-day basis) while the figures for Commodity and Equity derivatives remain at relatively low (47% and 21% respectively). Contrary to ESMA s assertion that industry performance outside credit and rates has made little progress only because focus has been on these areas, this divergence is due to other, more fundamental factors, such as market participant capability and asset complexity 3. Timing is also an issue for complex trades and structured trades (where it is not unusual to take 30 days to execute a trade). Also, these trades are not typically confirmed electronically (as they tend to be more bespoke) It is largely due to these complicating factors that across all asset classes, 100% issuance of electronic and non-electronic confirmations does not occur until at least five days after trade date. While industry does recognise and is pleased that issuance of a significant proportion of trades occurs within the first one or two days after trade date, we are concerned that the small portion that takes longer does so due to complexity of the trade and the varied capabilities of the respective counterparty, especially non-financial entities. Additionally, delays may also be attributable to the need for significant negotiation involving multiple parties or, in the case of smaller and less sophisticated market participants, the seeking of external council or advice. 2 Annex VIII of the Final report on draft Regulatory and Implementing Technical Standards on Regulation (EU) 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories, 27 September 2012, pp Annex VIII et al pp.31
5 6. While ESMA has acknowledged the differences between FC and NFC and those NFC below the threshold, their policy response creating staggered targets depending on the category but setting very ambitious timelines remains unachievable and, for many affected FCs and NFCs, beyond their capability. ESMA s believe that for NFCs above the threshold, it is likely that their level of activity and technological capacity would be close enough to those of FCs to justify the choice of having the same requirements is also unsupported by either analytical or qualitative analysis and ignores the considerable differences between sophisticated FCs and those NFCs for whom complex OTC derivative trading is an ancillary activity to their core business. Additionally, ESMA s belief that industry as a whole will be able to leverage what has been accomplished in the field of credit and interest rate derivatives does not pay due regarding the fundamental reasons why some confirmations remain outstanding beyond T Despite these complicating factors, as evidenced by the considerable effort expended by industry as it has worked with the ODSG to improve performance in this area, industry does support the intention of policy makers to advance confirmation performance. To that end, and leveraging off the considerable work already done in forwarding this agenda, we would encourage the Commission to adopt a more nuanced and flexible approach to implementation and one that affords due regard to the considerable difficulties counterparties will have as they attempt to meet ESMA s proposed confirmation obligation timeframes. We continue to encourage policy makers to work with industry in an effort to ensure that these obligations are effective, achievable and proportionate Regardless of the implementation timelines, we propose that for NFC which exceed the threshold, their more demanding confirmation obligations do not apply until at least a month after the NFC s status change. This will allow operations teams to adjust their procedures to the tighter timelines, lessening the regulatory burden for and compliance costs for NFCs. 7. The Commission s Q&A 7.1. In regards to the requirement that FCs report to the competent authority outstanding confirmations, this provision may be interpreted as capturing transactions that have not been confirmed within 5 business days of execution (rather than more than five business days after the relevant obligation deadline ). We would welcome the Commission addressing this question within its Q&A. Additionally, industry would benefit from guidance as to whether this report is a snapshot of every trade at month end that is still unconfirmed and aged more than 5 business days, or a monthly report showing all trades that were not confirmed within 5 business days during that month In Article 11(3) where an extension of time is allowed in circumstances where a transaction is concluded after 4:00 pm local time there is no provision for where counterparties are in different time zones. We would suggest that the reference to after local time should therefore be interpreted so that where either party is in a time zone where it is after when the transaction is executed, and then the extended
6 deadline will apply. Industry would welcome this point being clarified in the Q&A, however alternatively, the first part of the paragraph could be amended to refer to where a transaction... is concluded after local time in the time zone of at least one of the counterparties We would draw the Commission s attention to the absence of a definition for business day. In particular, when counterparties are dealing with different jurisdictions, counterparties need to be able to determine which jurisdiction determines whether something is a business day and which time zone determines the end of a business day. It would be helpful for the Q&A to clarify that the business day convention agreed by the parties in the contract would therefore apply, and that the business day convention of the location of the counterparties operations areas Should you have any questions on this or any other EMIR related manner, please contact Andrew Rogan, Policy Director, Capital Market s and Infrastructure, on Andrew.rogan@bba.org.uk, or on
ISDA Commentary on ESMA RTS on Confirmations (in European Commission Delegated Regulation C(2012) 9593 final (19 December 2012)) 29 January 2013
ISDA Commentary on ESMA RTS on Confirmations (in European Commission Delegated Regulation C(2012) 9593 final (19 December 2012)) 29 January 2013 A Introduction We welcome the opportunity to comment on
More informationCOUNTERPARTY CLEARING SYSTEM IN EUROPE
TR É S O R I S K C O N S E I L COUNTERPARTY CLEARING SYSTEM IN EUROPE IAFEI MANILA OCT 2014 NEW REQUIREMENTS GENERAL CONCEPT FOR ALL INSTITUTIONS The new regulation comes into force during 2013 and 2014.
More informationCP19/15: Contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law
Andrew Hoffman and Leanne Ingledew Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Cp19_15@bankofengland.co.uk 14 th August 2015 Dear Leanne and Andrew, CP19/15: Contractual stays in financial
More informationQuestions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)
Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) 5 August 2013 ESMA/1080 Date: 5 August 2013 ESMA/2013/1080
More informationNew EU Rules on Derivatives Trading. Introduction to EMIR for insurers
New EU Rules on Derivatives Trading Introduction to EMIR for insurers Barry King & Jack Parker OTC Derivatives & Post Trade Policy Financial Conduct Authority Material in this presentation is based on
More informationRe: Draft Technical Standards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories
05 August 2012 ESMA 103 rue de Grenelle 75007 Paris France Submitted via www.esma.europa.eu Re: Draft Technical Standards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories Dear Sir/Madam:
More informationFeedback Statement Consultation on the Clearing Obligation for Non-Deliverable Forwards
Feedback Statement Consultation on the Clearing Obligation for Non-Deliverable Forwards 4 February 2015 2015/ESMA/234 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 2 2 Background... 3 3 Results of the consultation...
More informationQuestions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)
Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) 11 November 2013 ESMA/1633 Date: 11 November 2013 ESMA/2013/1633
More informationQuestions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)
Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) 14 December 2017 ESMA70-1861941480-52 Date: 14 December
More informationOTC DERIVATIVES DRAFT RTS 4
Impact Assesment Annex VIII of the Final report on draft Regulatory and Implementing Technical Standards on Regulation (EU) 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories Date:
More informationQuestions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)
Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) 20 March 2013 ESMA/2013/324 Date: 20 March 2013 ESMA/2013/324
More informationEFET Approach Regarding Unresolved EMIR Implementation Issues 2 May 2013
Amstelveenseweg 998 1081 JS Amsterdam Phone: + 31 20 520 7970 Fax: + 31 346 283 258 Email: secretariat@efet.org Website: www.efet.org EFET Approach Regarding Unresolved EMIR Implementation Issues 2 May
More informationRe: Response to Consultation Paper Review of technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR 1 (the Consultation Paper) 2
(ESMA) CS 60747 103 rue de Grenelle 75345 Paris Cedex 07 France Re: Response to Consultation Paper Review of technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR 1 (the Consultation Paper) 2 1. Introduction
More informationQuestions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)
Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) 4 February ESMA/2016/242 Date: 4 February 2016 ESMA/2016/242
More informationExplanatory memorandum to the form of the ISDA EMIR Classification Letter
Explanatory memorandum to the form of the ISDA EMIR Classification Letter International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ( ISDA ) has prepared this explanatory memorandum to assist in your consideration
More informationFinal Report Draft regulatory technical standards on indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR
Final Report Draft regulatory technical standards on indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR 26 May 2016 ESMA/2016/725 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 3 2 Indirect clearing arrangements...
More information14 July Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities. Submitted online at
14 July 2014 Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities Submitted online at www.eba.europa.eu Re: JC/CP/2014/03 Consultation Paper on Risk Management Procedures for Non-Centrally Cleared OTC
More informationLSEG Response to European Commission consultation on the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
LSEG Response to European Commission consultation on the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories INTRODUCTION London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) is
More informationEMIR Reporting. Summary of Industry Issues and Challenges. 29 th October 2013
EMIR Reporting Summary of Industry Issues and s 29 th October 2013 Table of Contents Page No. 1. Representation of Underlyers.. 3 2. Product Identification.. 4 3. UTI Exchange.. 5 4. UTI for Cleared Trades..
More informationFinal Draft Regulatory Technical Standards
JC 2018 77 12 December 2018 Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 on risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivative contracts not cleared by a central counterparty
More informationEMIR FAQ 1. WHAT IS EMIR?
EMIR FAQ The following information has been compiled for the purposes of providing an overview of EMIR and is not legal advice. The information is only accurate at date of publication and is subject to
More informationQuestions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)
Questions and Answers Implementation of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) 20 March 2014 ESMA/297 Date: 20 March 2014 ESMA/2014/297
More informationEMIR Supervision by DNB
EMIR Supervision by DNB Points of interest and highlights Mieke Wennekes, 24 november 2015 1 Agenda Why EMIR EMIR Supervisory requirements Whom does this concern What can you expect from DNB What will
More informationFIA Europe response to ESMA Consultation paper Review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR
FIA Europe response to ESMA Consultation paper Review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR FIA Europe and its members welcome the publication of the consultation paper and the
More informationa central counterparty, the registration and supervision of trade repositories and the requirements for trade repositories
C 385/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.11.2017 OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 11 October 2017 on a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending
More informationcomments on Consultation Paper 26 Jul 2012
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken European Association of Co-operative Banks comments on Consultation
More informationRegulatory Briefing EMIR a refresher for investment managers: are you ready for 12 February 2014?
Page 1 Regulatory Briefing EMIR a refresher for investment managers: are you ready for 12 February 2014? February 2014 With effect from 12 February 2014, the trade reporting obligations in the European
More informationFinal Report. Amendments to the EMIR Clearing Obligation under the Securitisation Regulation. 12 December 2018 JC
Final Report Amendments to the EMIR Clearing Obligation under the Securitisation Regulation 12 December 2018 JC 2018 76 Date: 12 December 2018 JC 2018 76 Table of Contents Introduction 5 1. The clearing
More informationE.ON General Statement to Margin requirements for non-centrally-cleared derivatives
E.ON AG Avenue de Cortenbergh, 60 B-1000 Bruxelles www.eon.com Contact: Political Affairs and Corporate Communications E.ON General Statement to Margin requirements for non-centrally-cleared derivatives
More informationNext Steps for EMIR. November 2017
November 2017 Next Steps for EMIR For all the appropriate safeguards built into the derivatives regulatory framework after the financial crisis, certain aspects of the reforms impose unnecessary compliance
More informationConsultation Report ESMA s technical advice to the Commission on fees for securitisation Repositories under the Securitisation Regulation
Consultation Report ESMA s technical advice to the Commission on fees for securitisation Repositories under the Securitisation Regulation 23 March 2018 ESMA33-128-212 dd month yyyy ESMAXX-YY-ZZ Responding
More informationFinal Report. Clearing Obligation under EMIR (no. 6) 27 September 2018 ESMA
Final Report Clearing Obligation under EMIR (no. 6) 27 September 2018 ESMA70-151-1768 Table of Contents Introduction 5 1 Current temporary exemption 7 2 Proposed amendment 8 3 Further considerations 9
More informationInstructions for EBA data collection exercise on CVA
16 May 2014 Instructions for EBA data collection exercise on CVA Contents 1. Introduction 4 CVA Report CRR Article 456(2) 4 Review and RTS on the application of CVA charges to non-financial counterparties
More informationAugust Proposal for EMIR Reform targeted changes with important consequences for AIFs, AIFMs and UCITS Management Companies
August 2017 Proposal for EMIR Reform targeted changes with important consequences for AIFs, AIFMs and UCITS Management Companies Background to EMIR Reform On 4 May 2017, the European Commission (the Commission
More informationING response to the draft Technical Standards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories
ING response to the draft Technical Standards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories 3 August 2012 About ING Contact: Jeroen Groothuis Group Public & Government Affairs T +31
More informationOpinion Draft Regulatory Technical Standard on criteria for establishing when an activity is to be considered ancillary to the main business
Opinion Draft Regulatory Technical Standard on criteria for establishing when an activity is to be considered ancillary to the main business 30 May 2016 ESMA/2016/730 Table of Contents 1 Legal Basis...
More informationFinal Report ESMA Technical advice to EC on fees to TRs under SFTR and on certain amendments to fees to TRs under EMIR
Final Report ESMA Technical advice to EC on fees to TRs under SFTR and on certain amendments to fees to TRs under EMIR 20 April 2017 ESMA70-151-223 20 April 2017 ESMA70-151-223 ESMA CS 60747 103 rue de
More informationConsultation Paper. Draft Regulatory Technical Standards
JC 2018 15 04 May 2018 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 on risk-mitigation techniques for OTC-derivative contracts not cleared by a CCP
More informationFinal Draft Regulatory Technical Standards
ESAs 2016 23 08 03 2016 RESTRICTED Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk-mitigation techniques for OTC-derivative contracts not cleared by a CCP under Article 11(15) of Regulation (EU) No
More informationJune 26, Japanese Bankers Association
June 26, 2014 Comments on the Consultation Paper: Draft regulatory technical standards on risk-mitigation techniques for OTC-derivative contracts not cleared by a CCP under Article 11(15) of Regulation
More informationCESR Consultation on Transaction Reporting of OTC Derivatives and Extension of the Scope of Transaction Reporting Obligations
CESR Consultation on Transaction Reporting of OTC Derivatives and Extension of the Scope of Transaction Reporting Obligations (CESR/10 809) A response by: The British Bankers Association August 2010 2
More informationConsultation Paper. Amendments to the EMIR Clearing Obligation under the Securitisation Regulation. 04 May 2018 JC
Consultation Paper Amendments to the EMIR Clearing Obligation under the Securitisation Regulation 04 May 2018 JC 2018 14 Date: 04 May 2018 JC 2018 14 Responding to this paper The European Supervisory Authorities
More information- To promote transparency of derivative data for both regulators and market participants
5 August 2012 Broadgate West One Snowden Street London EC2A 2DQ United Kingdom European Securities and Markets Authority Via electronic submission DTCC Data Repository Limited responses to ESMA s Consultation
More informationRESPONSE. Elina Kirvelä 2 April 2012
Federation of Finnish Financial Services represents banks, insurers, finance houses, securities dealers, fund management companies and financial employers operating in Finland. Its membership includes
More informationESMA Consultation Paper on Review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR (10 November 2014 ESMA/2014/1352)
E u r e x C l e a r i n g R e s p o n s e t o ESMA Consultation Paper on Review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR (10 ) Frankfurt am Main, 09 February 2015 Acronyms Used CM
More informationMAJOR NEW DERIVATIVES REGULATION THE SCIENCE OF COMPLIANCE
Regulatory June 2013 MAJOR NEW DERIVATIVES REGULATION THE SCIENCE OF COMPLIANCE Around the world, new derivatives laws and regulations are being adopted and now implemented to give effect to a 2009 agreement
More informationDraft Frequently Asked Questions (Draft FAQs) and Draft Supplementary Reporting Instructions (Draft SRIs) Comments
Polly Lee Senior Manager, Market Development Division Monetary Management Department Hong Kong Monetary Authority 55/F Two International Finance Centre 8 Finance Street Central Hong Kong Email: pyklee@hkma.gov.hk
More informationApplications for intragroup exemptions from the margin requirements under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ( EMIR )
Margin IGT User Guide Applications for intragroup exemptions from the margin requirements under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ( EMIR ) Under some circumstances (set out in Article 11 of
More informationConsultation Paper. Clearing Obligation under EMIR (no. 6) 11 July 2018 ESMA
Consultation Paper Clearing Obligation under EMIR (no. 6) 11 July 2018 ESMA70-151-1530 Date: 11 July 2018 ESMA70-151-1530 Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites
More informationOpinion On the European Commission s proposed amendments to SFTR reporting standards
Opinion On the European Commission s proposed amendments to SFTR reporting standards 4 September 2018 ESMA70-151-1651 4 September 2018 ESMA70-151-1651 ESMA CS 60747 103 rue de Grenelle 75345 Paris Cedex
More informationRE: ASSOSIM response to ESMA Consultation Paper on the clearing obligation for financial counterparties with a limited volume of activity *****
Milano, 5 September 2016 Prot. n. 98/16 MFE/gc ESMA CS 60747 103 rue de Grenelle 75345 Paris Cedex 07 France RE: ASSOSIM response to ESMA Consultation Paper on the clearing obligation for financial counterparties
More information6 August EMIR Review. Simon Puleston Jones
6 August 2015 2015 EMIR Review Simon Puleston Jones EMIR Review - overview 21 May 2015: The European Commission launched a review of EMIR, publishing a questionnaire. Covers 4 main areas: Scope of the
More informationFocus - OTC Derivatives
Capital Markets and Financial Institutions - 23 July 2013 Focus - OTC Derivatives The trade with OTC derivatives will shortly change significantly when the effects of the new EMIR Regulation appear. Soon,
More informationFinancial Conduct Authority
Financial Conduct Authority Research Note August 2018 EMIR data and derivatives market policies How EMIR data help regulators better understand the impact of policies Anne-Laure Condat, Alessandro Puce
More informationEMIR and DODD-FRANK FAQs. January 2017
This FAQs document relates to: EMIR and DODD-FRANK FAQs January 2017 the European Market Infrastructure Regulation or EMIR, Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
More informationEACH response to the ESMA discussion paper Draft RTS and ITS under the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation
EACH response to the ESMA discussion paper Draft RTS and ITS under the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation April 2016 1. Introduction...3 2. Responses to specific questions...5 2 1. Introduction
More informationVia Electronic Service at comments.cftc.gov May 27, 2014
Via Electronic Service at comments.cftc.gov May 27, 2014 Melissa D. Jurgens Secretary of the Commission Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW Washington, DC 20581
More informationExecutive Summary. 5 August 2012
ISDA-AFME-BBA-Assosim Response to ESMA Consultation Paper and Draft Technical Standards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and. Trade Repositories. Executive Summary 5 August 2012 The Signatory
More informationDemystifying EMIR & CSDR s Implementation. Mr Nathan Fenech Analyst, Securities and Markets Supervision Unit, MFSA 16 th December, 2015
Demystifying EMIR & CSDR s Implementation Mr Nathan Fenech Analyst, Securities and Markets Supervision Unit, MFSA 16 th December, 2015 1 1 2 EMIR EMIR CSDR 2 3 Implementation in Malta 3 Stage Process:
More informationEMIR-Refit: Comments on the upcoming Trilogue Negotiations Retain the Hedging Exemption and provide substantial Burden Relief for Reporting
EMIR-Refit: Comments on the upcoming Trilogue Negotiations Retain the Hedging Exemption and provide substantial Burden Relief for Reporting Comments on the Proposal of the European Commission for a Regulation
More informationEMIR - What should Hedge Funds be doing?
www.pwc.co.uk EMIR - What should Hedge Funds be doing? Sept 2009 2008 credit crisis 2008: OTC market collapse Weaknesses revealed in crisis Collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehmans Heightened levels of counterparty
More informationConsultation Paper Indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR
Consultation Paper Indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR 5 November 2015 ESMA/2015/1628 Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites responses to
More informationConsultation Paper Review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR
Consultation Paper Review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR 10 November 2014 ESMA/2014/1352 Date: 10 November 2014 ESMA/2014/1352 Annex 1 Responding to this paper ESMA invites
More informationTHE IMPACT OF EMIR IS YOUR ORGANISATION READY?
THE IMPACT OF EMIR IS YOUR ORGANISATION READY? November 2013 Introduction to EMIR EMIR is part of the G20 commitments to prevent future financial crises Both the European Union and the United States have
More informationEMIR Review Report no.1 Review on the use of OTC derivatives by non-financial counterparties
EMIR Review Report no.1 Review on the use of OTC derivatives by non-financial counterparties 13 August 2015 ESMA/2015/1251 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 3 2 Introduction... 4 3 Identification
More informationCONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR THE REGULATION ON OTC DERIVATIVES, CCPS AND TRADE REPOSITORIES
Consultation response 1 (19) Federation of Finnish Financial Services represents banks, insurers, finance houses, securities dealers, fund management companies and financial employers operating in Finland.
More informationComments on the Consultation Paper: Non-centrally Cleared OTC Derivatives Transactions-Margin and Other Risk Mitigation Standards
January 15, 2016 Comments on the Consultation Paper: Non-centrally Cleared OTC Derivatives Transactions-Margin and Other Risk Mitigation Standards, issued by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority Japanese Bankers
More information11 th July Summary views
Record Currency Management Limited response to European Supervisory Authorities Consultation Paper Draft regulatory technical standards on risk-mitigation techniques for OTC-derivative contracts not cleared
More informationISDA/FIA Europe submission on the ESMA Clearing Obligation for Interest Rate Derivatives CP
18 August, 2014 ISDA/FIA Europe submission on the ESMA Clearing Obligation for Interest Rate Derivatives CP Introduction The International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") and FIA Europe welcome
More informationConsultation Paper Review of Article 26 of RTS No 153/2013 with respect to MPOR for client accounts
Consultation Paper Review of Article 26 of RTS No 153/2013 with respect to MPOR for client accounts 14 December 2015 ESMA/2015/1867 Date: 14 December 2015 ESMA/2015/1867 Responding to this paper The European
More informationCall for Evidence: AIFMD Passport and Third Country AIFMs
Via ESMA Website European Securities and Markets Authority 103 Rue de Grenelle 75007 Paris France Re: Call for Evidence: AIFMD Passport and Third Country AIFMs Dear Sir or Madam: Managed Funds Association
More informationBär & Karrer Briefing October 2015
Bär & Karrer Briefing October 2015 Derivative Trading under the FMIA After the Swiss parliament passed into law the Federal Act on Financial Market Infrastructures ("FMIA") on 19 June 2015, the Federal
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF EMIR MARGIN RULES for UNCLEARED OTC DERIVATIVES -
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMIR MARGIN RULES for UNCLEARED OTC DERIVATIVES - January 2017 update On 4 January 2017 new EU regulatory technical standards under EMIR 1 came into force that in the next two months
More informationEMIR 1.5. July (Regulation EU 648/2012) 2 See the Regulatory Technical Standards and the Annexes published on 4 th October 2016
EMIR 1.5 July 2017 Just as the dust had settled on implementation of the EMIR 1 margin requirements 2, the European Commission recently published a proposal for a new regulation with the aim of simplifying
More informationDraft regulatory technical standards
FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR RISK-MITIGATION TECHNIQUES FOR OTC-DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS NOT CLEARED BY A CCP WITH REGARD TO PHYSICALLY SETTLED FOREIGN EXCHANGE FORWARDS JC/2017/79 18/12/2017
More information40 Minute Briefing European and domestic reform: The day after tomorrow EMIR, CASS & MiFID
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, MINING AND COMMODITIES TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS AND LIFE SCIENCES 40 Minute Briefing European and domestic reform: The day after
More informationJoint Consultation Paper
3 July 2015 JC/CP/2015/003 Joint Consultation Paper Draft Joint Guidelines on the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings in the financial sector Content 1. Responding
More informationBär & Karrer Briefing March 2016
Bär & Karrer Briefing March 2016 Derivative Trading under the FMIA Impact on Cross-border Transactions On 1 January 2016, the Federal Act on Financial Market Infrastructures of 19 June 2015 ("FMIA") and
More informationISDA comments EU proposal on Structural Reform of the EU Banking Sector
2 July 2014 ISDA comments EU proposal on Structural Reform of the EU Banking Sector 1. Introduction ISDA 1 welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commission proposal for a Regulation on Structural
More informationESRB RESPONSE TO ESMA CONSULTATION PAPER ON MANDATORY CENTRAL CLEARING FOR FOREIGN-EXCHANGE NON-DELIVERABLE FORWARD OTC DERIVATIVES
6 November 2014 ESRB RESPONSE TO ESMA CONSULTATION PAPER ON MANDATORY CENTRAL CLEARING FOR FOREIGN-EXCHANGE NON-DELIVERABLE FORWARD OTC DERIVATIVES 1. Introduction Article 5(2) of the European Market Infrastructure
More informationD1387D-2012 Brussels, 24 August 2012
D1387D-2012 Brussels, 24 August 2012 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries.
More informationThe law of unintended consequences from current regulatory reform
15 October 2015 The law of unintended consequences from current regulatory reform Simon Puleston Jones Overview - The current wave of regulatory reform - Hedging issues - Capital Requirements reduced liquidity
More informationCONSULTATION PAPER ON DRAFT RTS ON TREATMENT OF CLEARING MEMBERS' EXPOSURES TO CLIENTS EBA/CP/2014/ February Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2014/01 28 February 2014 Consultation Paper Draft regulatory technical standards on the margin periods for risk used for the treatment of clearing members' exposures to clients under Article 304(5)
More informationEBF Response to the EBA Consultations on currencies with constrained availability of Liquid Assets
EBF_005646 Brussels, 13 December 2013 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries.
More informationISDA commentary on Presidency MiFID2/MiFIR compromise texts as published on
1 11 September 2012 ISDA commentary on Presidency MiFID2/MiFIR compromise texts as published on 31.08.2012 1 This paper has been produced by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) in
More informationPolicies and Procedures [Manual/Handbook]
Version 1 SAMPLE (27.2.2017) For EU Bank/Broker within a group (includes IM) [Name of Bank/Broker] Policies and Procedures [Manual/Handbook] for the margining of uncleared swaps under EMIR Contents No
More informationESMA consultation on the review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR
Amstelveenseweg 998 1081 JS Amsterdam Phone: + 31 20 520 7970 Email: secretariat@efet.org Website: www.efet.org ESMA consultation on the review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of
More informationMiFID II Retail Costs and Charges: Guideline Q&As
UK Finance Guidelines MiFID II Retail Costs and Charges: Guideline Q&As About UK Finance UK Finance represents nearly 300 of the leading firms providing finance, banking, markets and payments-related services
More informationEFAMA response to the ESMA consultation paper on the clearing obligation for financial counterparties with a limited volume of activity
EFAMA response to the ESMA consultation paper on the clearing obligation for financial counterparties with a limited volume of activity The European Fund and Asset Management Association 1, EFAMA, welcomes
More informationIn particular, we wish to highlight the following points, which we elaborate on in the body of our response:
ISDA response to FCA s second consultation on Brexit: Proposed changes to the Handbook and Binding Technical Standards CP18/36 The International Swaps and Derivatives Association ( ISDA ) welcome the opportunity
More informationConsultation response
Consultation response EBA Draft RTS on Assigning Risk Weights to Specialised Lending Exposures 11 August 2015 The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) welcomes the opportunity to provide
More informationDIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)
L 87/500 31.3.2017 DIRECTIVES COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE (EU) 2017/593 of 7 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to safeguarding of
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) / of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2017) XXX draft COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) / of XXX on the recognition of the legal, supervisory and enforcement arrangements of the United States of America
More informationDeutsche Bank s response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consultative document on the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book.
EU Transparency Register ID Number 271912611231-56 31 January 2014 Mr. Wayne Byres Secretary General Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements Centralbahnplatz 2 Basel Switzerland
More informationSCOPE OF SECTION C(10) CONTRACTS WHICH ARE "COMMODITY DERIVATIVES" FOR THE PURPOSES OF MIFID II
22 February 2017 SCOPE OF SECTION C(10) CONTRACTS WHICH ARE "COMMODITY DERIVATIVES" FOR THE PURPOSES OF MIFID II We write further to our letter of 22 September 2016 1 and the meeting between ESMA and our
More informationMaria-Teresa Fabregas, Head of Unit Financial Markets Infrastructure (C2) DG FISMA European Commission. 9 May Dear Mrs.
Maria-Teresa Fabregas, Head of Unit Financial Markets Infrastructure (C2) DG FISMA European Commission 9 May 2016 Dear Mrs. Fabregas, Variation Margin (VM) Timing Requirements for Counterparties Outside
More informationEuropean Commission consultation on EMIR revision
European Commission consultation on EMIR revision AMAFI s Answer Association française des marchés financiers (AMAFI) is the trade organisation working at national, European and international levels to
More informationPRA's proposal to "divide" the BTS into a PRA version and FCA version
20 December 2018 ISDA response to the PRA's Consultation Paper CP26/18 UK withdrawal from the EU: Changes to PRA Rulebook and onshored Binding Technical Standards The International Swaps and Derivatives
More informationOpinion. 1. Legal basis
Date: 22 May 2015 2015/ESMA/880 Opinion Impact of Regulation 648/2012 on Articles 50(1)(g) (iii) and 52 and of Directive 2009/65/EC for over-the-counter financial derivative transactions that are centrally
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union DG FISMA CONSULTATION DOCUMENT PROPORTIONALITY IN THE FUTURE MARKET RISK CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
More information