How Firms Score When They Take On The SEC Or FINRA
|
|
- Cornelius Carroll
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY Phone: Fax: How Firms Score When They Take On The SEC Or FINRA Law360, New York (July 10, 2014, 11:53 AM ET) -- Success is no accident. It is hard work, perseverance, learning, studying, sacrifice and most of all, love of what you are doing or learning to do. Edson Arantes do Nascimento, better known as Pele (regarded by many as the best soccer player of all time)[1] Every four years, the World Cup occupies the hearts and minds of soccer and football fans across the world. The team that ultimately wins will have played seven 90-minute games, in a progressively unforgiving format. The World Cup begins as a round-robin tournament and ends as an elimination round. The fate of each team depends on excellent performances during every minute of every game. Ultimately, there is little room for error. Litigating against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or Brian Rubin the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority is a more unforgiving format. Instead of a round-robin tournament, SEC and FINRA litigation begins as a single elimination round one loss in a litigated proceeding and a respondent or defendant could be eliminated from the securities industry. Just as soccer teams and fans study the plays of past winners, so too can broker-dealers (BDs), investment advisers (IAs), and their representatives review past wins and losses to make better informed decisions about whether to litigate against the regulators. One such statistic is that of all respondents in this study who chose to litigate before an SEC administrative law judge (ALJ) or a FINRA hearing panel, 46.7 percent achieved at least some success by getting charges dismissed or by receiving a sanction lower than that requested by the staff.[2] Of course, while statistics can provide guidance, they cannot predict outcomes. As they say in soccer (or perhaps should say), past performance does not guarantee future results. Recent, highly publicized losses by the SEC may have given respondents and defendants greater hope that they can score against the regulators. Notably, the SEC suffered setbacks in three insider trading cases in the course of a week earlier this year. On June 6, 2014, a jury found the former chief executive officer of a technology company not guilty of insider trading.[3] On June 4, 2014, the SEC dismissed its case of alleged insider trading against the former chairman and chief executive of a health care company.[4] And on May 30, 2014, a federal jury found that a hedge fund manager and his codefendants had not engaged in insider trading.[5] Rather than rely on anecdotal, one-off results, since 2005, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP has
2 conducted a study of litigated disciplinary proceedings that FINRA (formerly National Association Of Securities Dealers, or NASD) brought against firms, registered representatives and associated persons.[6] Since 2008, Sutherland has analyzed administrative proceedings the SEC brought against the same types of respondents. This year, Sutherland expanded the study to include SEC enforcement actions against IAs and their representatives. This study also includes potentially dispositive actions, trials or summary judgment decisions in litigated SEC enforcement actions against BDs, IAs, and their representatives in U.S. District Court. The current study analyzes the period from April 2012 through September 2013.[7] The Results of the Study 1. ALJ and Hearing Panel Findings of Violations A lot of football success is in the mind. You must believe you are the best and then make sure that you are. Bill Shankly (a Scottish footballer and manager, best known as manager of Liverpool)[8] When trying a case against the SEC and FINRA, while positive thinking is important, hard works that yields good facts and supporting law (in addition to a little luck) may be more critical. Many firms and their representatives fear litigating against the SEC or FINRA because the regulators have often spent years investigating the conduct. Respondents also perceive a 12th man on the field because the hearing site is the regulator s home field, and the hearing officers appear to be members of the same team. However, the statistics show that respondents are often successful convincing ALJs and hearing panels to dismiss certain charges or to sanction respondents less than the staff requested. a) SEC SEC administrative enforcement proceedings are conducted before an ALJ who issues an initial decision that includes findings of fact, legal conclusions and, where appropriate, a sanction.[9] In the current study, BD respondents (BD firms and their representatives) convinced SEC ALJs that the SEC staff did not prove 35.3 percent of the charges brought against them.[10] With regard to IA respondents, in fiscal year 2013, ALJs found that the SEC staff did not prove 43.5 percent of the charges.[11] In fiscal year 2012, ALJs found that the SEC did not prove 12.5 percent of the charges against IA respondents.[12] b) FINRA A FINRA disciplinary proceeding is tried before a hearing panel of two current or former industry members and one hearing officer, who is a FINRA employee.[13] In the current study, BD respondents were successful in convincing FINRA hearing panels that FINRA staff did not prove 16.2 percent of the charges brought against them.[14] 2. U.S. District Court Findings of Violations You have to show up in the World Cup, and in the World Cup anything can happen. Lionel Messi (an Argentinian who plays for Barcelona and for the Argentina national team and is currently one of the best players in the world)[15]
3 If you litigate, you have to show up with your best arguments and put your best foot forward (so to speak) to see what you can make happen. The study analyzed potentially dispositive actions in U.S. District Court trials or summary judgment decisions involving charges brought against BDs, IAs and their representatives. In fiscal year 2013, there were eight potentially dispositive actions in litigated enforcement actions against BDs and IAs in U.S. district court: one bench trial, one jury trial and six summary judgment decisions.[16] In its two trials, the SEC was successful on 56.3 percent of the charges.[17] The SEC was successful on 22.5 percent of the charges in summary judgment motions it brought.[18] Defendants were successful on 25.5 percent of the charges in summary judgment motions they brought.[19] In fiscal year 2012, there were two summary judgment decisions litigated in SEC enforcement actions against IAs in U.S. district court.[20] The SEC prevailed on 50 percent of the charges in those summary judgment motions.[21] 3. Sanctions Some people believe [soccer] is a matter of life and death. I m very disappointed with that attitude. I can assure you, it s much, much more important than that. Bill Shankly[22] In soccer, a red card or suspension (for biting a player, or otherwise) can change the outcome of a game or a tournament. Likewise, a suspension from the securities industry may permanently affect a career. As a part of its case, the staff generally will recommend what sanctions should be imposed on respondents for the alleged violations. The ALJ or hearing panel may follow or ignore the staff s request. This study demonstrates that firms and individuals should consider fighting the regulators if they believe a proposed sanction is not supported by the facts or law. a) SEC SEC BD respondents convinced ALJs to impose lower monetary sanctions 25 percent of the time in the current study.[23] The proposed sanctions were ordered against the other respondents.[24] Regarding industry or supervisory bars, ALJs granted enforcement s requests each time.[25] Enforcement did not request suspensions during the study period. In fiscal year 2013, ALJs imposed less-than-requested monetary sanctions for 100 percent of IA respondents.[26] By contrast, in fiscal year 2012, ALJs imposed higher-than-requested monetary sanctions for 66.6 percent of IA respondents[27] and same-as-requested for 33.3 percent of respondents.[28] In fiscal year 2013, ALJs imposed less-than-requested suspensions or bars for 16.7 percent of IA respondents,[29] and the requested sanction for the remainder. In fiscal year 2012, ALJs imposed lowerthan-requested suspensions or bars for 16.7 percent of IA respondents,[30] and the requested suspensions or bars for the remainder.[31] b) FINRA FINRA hearing panels imposed lower-than-requested monetary sanctions for 52.9 percent of respondents,[32] higher sanctions for 29.4 percent of respondents,[33] and the same sanctions for 17.7
4 percent of respondents.[34] Respondents were more successful in this study than during the previous study period, when hearing panels imposed lower monetary sanctions for one-third of respondents, higher sanctions for one-third, and the same sanctions for one-third.[35] FINRA hearing panels imposed less-than-requested suspensions for 55.6 percent of respondents,[36] higher-than-requested for 5.6 percent,[37] and the same-as-requested for 38.9 percent.[38] There were no requests for bars in the current study. 4. Appeals Player: What bloody game are you watching ref? Referee: The one where you ve had three shots and haven t hit the target. (Possibly apocryphal dialogue.)[39] When players don t like a call, they may appeal to the referee. Sometimes they are successful and sometimes not so much. The same thing happens in enforcement actions. The study finds that respondents and defendants who appeal must carefully weigh the risk of having a greater sanction imposed against the possibility that an appeal will result in reduced sanctions or a dismissal. a) SEC In SEC administrative proceedings, either party may appeal an ALJ s decision to the full commission.[40] Appeals are heard by the SEC chairman and the SEC commissioners. In the current study, only one BD respondent appealed. In that case, the commission affirmed the ALJ s findings, affirmed the bar, and increased the penalty. b) FINRA Either party may appeal a FINRA hearing panel decision to FINRA s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC), or the NAC may call the decision for review.[41] When FINRA respondents are unsuccessful before the NAC, they have the right to appeal to the SEC. In the current study, the NAC did not reverse any of the hearing panel s findings of violations.[42] In the two cases in which FINRA staff appealed a dismissal, the NAC affirmed the dismissals. The NAC imposed higher monetary sanctions against 53.3 percent of respondents,[43] lower monetary sanctions against 13.3 percent of respondents,[44] and did not modify the hearing panel s monetary sanctions decision for 33.3 percent of respondents.[45] The NAC imposed longer suspensions for 25 percent of respondents,[46] shorter suspensions for 18.8 percent of respondents,[47] and the same suspension for 56.3 percent of respondents.[48] In two cases, the NAC called the matter for review, where neither party appealed. Two respondents ended up with higher monetary sanctions, and one ended up with lower monetary sanctions. One respondent s suspension was affirmed; for the other respondent, the suspension was modified from a 12-month suspension in any principal capacity to a six-month suspension in all capacities.
5 In the current study, none of the seven respondents who appealed an NAC decision to the SEC had any success.[49] Conclusion The vision of a champion is someone who is bent over, drenched in sweat, at the point of exhaustion, when no one else is watching. Anson Dorrance (American college soccer coach)[50] While many securities professional envision themselves as champions to their clients, most would prefer to do without the sweat and possibly the exhaustion of litigating against the SEC or FINRA (although Thomas Edison, the great inventor who probably never played soccer, said, Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration ).[51] When assessing whether to do battle against the SEC and FINRA, parties must try to assess whether they will leave the arena as a champion or whether they will leave bent over, drenched in sweat, and at the point of exhaustion, after putting forth their best case, with nothing to show for their efforts. To make these assessments, parties will have to carefully review the evidence, the law, and the track record of the regulators. Of all respondents considered in this study who chose to litigate before an SEC ALJ or a FINRA hearing panel, 46.7 percent achieved some success by either getting charges dismissed or by receiving a sanction lower than that requested by the staff.[52] Similarly, among defendants in U.S. district court who moved for summary judgment against the SEC or took their case to trial, 60 percent succeeded in proving that the SEC did not establish some of its charges.[53] Thus, the statistics show that it can sometimes pay to take on the SEC or FINRA and that defendants and respondents can come away from the World Cup of enforcement litigation as champions. By Brian Rubin and Lauren Shor, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Brian Rubin is a partner in Sutherland Asbill's Washington, D.C., office. Lauren Shor is a summer associate at the firm. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. [1] [2] 42 of 90. [3] Jean Eaglesham, SEC Loses Second Insider-Trading Case in Seven Days, WALL ST. J. (June 6, 2014, 6:35 PM), available at [4] Rachel Abrams, SEC Drops Insider Trading Case Against Health Care Executive, N.Y. Times (June 4, 2014), available at
6 [5] Christopher M. Matthews, SEC Loses Insider-Trading Case, WALL ST. J. (May 30, 2014, 6:30 PM), available at Nelson Obus, Opinion, Refusing to Buckle to SEC Intimidation, WALL ST. J. (June 24, 2014, 7:37 PM), available at [6] Sutherland s first study, The House That the Regulators Built: An Analysis of Whether Respondents Should Litigate Against NASD, was published in BNA s May 2005 Securities Regulation & Litigation Report, 2005 WL (May 2, 2005), and won the 2006 Burton Award for Legal Achievement. [7] Sutherland s previous study analyzed SEC and FINRA actions against BDs and their representatives over the 18-month period from October 2010 through March See Brian L. Rubin & Jae C. Yoon, Stepping Into the Ring Against the SEC and FINRA: Sometimes It Pays to Duke It Out Against the Regulators, 2012 SEC. REG. L J. 485, available at trr9tobddev0zdp0!/fileupload.name=/srlj_rubin_yoon.pdf. [8] Bill Shankly, [9] See 17 C.F.R (i). [10] 6 of 17. [11] 10 of 23. [12] 4 of 32. [13] See FINRA Rule 9231(b). [14] FINRA Hearing Panels dismissed 27 of 167 charges from April 2012 through September [15] fifa-world-cup/. [16] Some of these motions for summary judgment were cross-motions in the same cases. For this study, cross-motions are counted separately because a defendant s successful summary judgment motion has a different effect on a case s outcome than the SEC s successful motion. [17] 18 of 32. [18] The SEC was successful in nine of 40 summary judgment motions brought by the SEC. [19] Defendants were successful in 12 of 47 summary judgment motions brought by defendants. [20] The SEC did not litigate to resolution claims against BDs in fiscal year [21] The SEC prevailed on six of 12 charges in summary judgment motions. [22]
7 [23] 1 of 4. [24] 3 of 4. [25] 5 of 5. [26] 8 of 8. [27] 2 of 3. [28] 1 of 3. [29] 1 of 6. [30] 1 of 6. [31] 5 of 6. [32] 9 of 17. [33] 5 of 17. [34] 3 of 17. [35] See Brian L. Rubin & Jae C. Yoon, Stepping Into the Ring Against the SEC and FINRA: Sometimes It Pays to Duke It Out Against the Regulators, 2012 SEC. REG. L J. 485, available at trr9tobddev0zdp0!/fileupload.name=/srlj_rubin_yoon.pdf. [36] 10 of 18. [37] 1 of 18. [38] 7 of 18. [39] [40] See 17 C.F.R (a). [41] See FINRA Rule 9312(a)(1). [42] 42 of 42. The only nominal success came where the respondent convinced the NAC to reverse the hearing panel s finding that the respondent had engaged in market manipulation. Instead, the NAC found that the respondent had violated a rule that enforcement had charged as an alternative to its market manipulation charge, which the hearing panel had not considered. [43] 8 of 15.
8 [44] 2 of 15. [45] 5 of 15. [46] 4 of 16. [47] 3 of 16. [48] 9 of 16. Sanctions are considered the same where the respondent s sanction was effectively the same after NAC review, for example, if the NAC affirmed the hearing panel s decision ordering a bar for one charge but then reduced a bar to a suspension for another charge. [49] In one appeal from the NAC, the SEC remanded to the NAC to reconsider a bar for one of the respondent s two violations. However, the SEC affirmed the NAC s bar for the respondent s second violation. [50] [51] [52] SEC ALJs and FINRA hearing panels dismissed charges or reduced sanctions in 42 of 90 cases. [53] U.S. district court judges determined the SEC did not establish some of its charges in six of 10 cases. All Content , Portfolio Media, Inc.
LEGAL ALERT. March 17, Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators
LEGAL ALERT March 17, 2011 Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators Whenever firms and individuals are faced with SEC and FINRA investigations and enforcement
More informationAlternative Investments: What Regulators Are After
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Alternative Investments: What Regulators Are After
More informationSECURITIES ENFORCEMENT
THE CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW ADVISOR THE CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW ADVISOR Volume 20 Number 12, December 2006 SECURITIES ENFORCEMENT How to Succeed at Settling SEC and NASD Enforcement Actions by Katherine
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 20150433627 01 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Laidlaw & Company
More informationPREPARING FOR ARBITRATION ARBITRATION BEFORE FINRA
PREPARING FOR ARBITRATION ARBITRATION BEFORE FINRA Introduction This paper is meant to be used as an informal supplement to the chapter on Preparing for Arbitration: A Plaintiff Lawyer s View, 1 and will
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2016049789602 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Alexander L. Martin,
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2010022518103 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Azim Nakhooda, Respondent
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2016051259501 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Kenneth S. Tyrrell,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PARTIAL PROPOSED BIOVAIL SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PARTIAL PROPOSED BIOVAIL SETTLEMENT If You Bought Wellbutrin XL or its Generic Equivalent, You May
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2013036836015 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Instinet, LLC, Respondent
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Penix v. Ohio Real Estate Appraiser Bd., 2011-Ohio-191.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TERESA PENIX -vs- Plaintiff-Appellee OHIO REAL ESTATE APPRAISER BOARD,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Dorsey, 2010-Ohio-936.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Appellee Court of Appeals No. L-09-1016 Trial Court No. CR0200803208 v. Joseph
More informationCan an Insurance Company Write a Reservation of Rights Letter that Actually Protects Their Right to Deny Coverage in Light of Advantage Buildings?
Can an Insurance Company Write a Reservation of Rights Letter that Actually Protects Their Right to Deny Coverage in Light of Advantage Buildings? By Kevin P. Schnurbusch Rynearson, Suess, Schnurbusch
More informationFINRA's Expanded Obligations For Broker-Dealers
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com FINRA's Expanded Obligations For Broker-Dealers Law360,
More informationNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO. 2017-04-00068 TO: RE: New York Stock Exchange LLC KFM Securities, Inc., Respondent CRD No. 142186 During the period from January
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO IF YOU PURCHASED PROCTER & GAMBLE S PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENT ALIGN IN CALIFORNIA, ILLINOIS, NORTH CAROLINA, FLORIDA OR NEW HAMPSHIRE, A CLASS
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2011026346204 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Neil Arne Evertsen,
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2009016627501 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Credit Suisse Securities
More informationTHE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF A WC
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF A WC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: Interactive Brokers LLC David M. Battan Executive Vice President & General Counsel One Pickwick Plaza 2"ct
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 20160518176 01 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Christopher M. Herrmann,
More informationYOUR GUIDE TO PRE- SETTLEMENT ADVANCES
YOUR GUIDE TO PRE- SETTLEMENT ADVANCES What is a pre-settlement advance? If you have hired an attorney to bring a lawsuit, and if you need cash now, you may be able to obtain a pre-settlement advance on
More informationTribes Need More Than Just The Sovereign Immunity Defense
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Tribes Need More Than Just The Sovereign
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Robbins, 2012-Ohio-3862.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-11-012 Appellee Trial Court No. 10 CR 103 v. Barry
More informationLegal Pitfalls Relating to Public Relations & Online Media and how it affects all Practitioners. Benjamin Brafman, Esq.
Legal Pitfalls Relating to Public Relations & Online Media and how it affects all Practitioners Benjamin Brafman, Esq. Introduction: Legal & Ethical Issues Regardless of whether you are dealing with high
More informationSecurePlus Provider universal life insurance policy SecurePlus Paragon universal life insurance policy. a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you were or are a California resident who purchased one or both of the following policies issued by Life Insurance Company of the Southwest
More informationHow to make changes to your annuity income
How to make changes to your annuity income What s inside Is it time to make a change? 2 Your annuity income 3 TIAA Traditional income 5 TIAA and CREF variable annuity income 7 How you can adjust your annuity
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN KNOX; NOE BAROCIO; SALVADOR BAROCIO; CINDY CONYBEAR, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Master
More informationChallenges and Considerations
Challenges and Considerations in Evaluating International Arbitration Venues Claudia T. Salomon Partner and Co-Chair, International Arbitration Practice Group DLA Piper LLP 1 [An Excerpt] Understanding
More informationACCEPTANCE AND CONSENT
THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2012031480718 TO: RE: The New York Stock Exchange LLC do Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA")
More informationThe analysis regarding securities law in this memorandum has been drafted by Clifford Kirsh of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP.
TO: Robert Wuelfing, Executive Director, The SPARK Institute FROM: Michael Hadley, Partner DATE: April 2, 2015 RE: You have asked us to provide views on the implications under the Employee Retirement Income
More informationLEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU OWNED A ST. LOUIS RAMS PERSONAL SEAT LICENSE, OR PSL, A PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
More informationWHITE COLLAR, SECURITIES ENFORCEMENT, AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS
WHITE COLLAR, SECURITIES ENFORCEMENT, AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS Clients hire the attorneys in Shulman Rogers White Collar, Securities Enforcement, and Government Investigations practice because of
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Regulation D Offerings and Private Placements
603 ALI-ABA Course of Study Regulation D Offerings and Private Placements Cosponsored by the Securities Law Committee of the Federal Bar Association March 17-19, 2011 Coronado, California Due Diligence
More informationCharles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Sherri T. Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GERALD YARBROUGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
More informationSchedule 1. the fact that if you lose, we will not earn anything;
Schedule 1 Success fee The success fee is set at 100% of our basic charges, where the claim concludes at trial; or 100% where the claim concludes before a trial has commenced. The success fee percentage
More informationLICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO
LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO Green Dolphin, Inc. ) Sam Menetti, President ) Licensee/Revocation ) for the premises located at ) 2200 North Ashland Avenue ) Case No. 11 LA 63 ) v. ) ) Department
More informationINVESTMENT AGREEMENT WVEST PARTNERS 20, LLC BASECANNA LLC LOAN ESCROW INVESTMENT
INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WVEST PARTNERS 20, LLC BASECANNA LLC LOAN ESCROW INVESTMENT You have indicated that you want to invest $ in Wvest Partners 20, LLC. We refer to your offer to invest as your subscription.
More informationConditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].
Disclaimer This model agreement is not a precedent for use with all clients and it will need to be adapted/modified depending on the individual clients circumstances and solicitors business models. In
More informationERISA. Representative Experience
ERISA RMKB s ERISA practice group has extensive experience representing insurance carriers, employers, plan administrators, claims administrators, and benefits plans against claims brought under the Employee
More informationSEC's Friendly Fire Against CCOs And How To Avoid It
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com SEC's Friendly Fire Against CCOs And How To Avoid
More informationStakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Stakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries Law360, New
More informationLesson 3: Failing to Get Medical. Treatment the Right Way
Lesson 3: Failing to Get Medical Treatment the Right Way Rule: The insurance company picks the medical provider. The injured worker can request a change in treatment. When you need a doctor, of course
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Glenn, 2009-Ohio-375.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Patricia
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 20140399376-01 TO: RE: Department of Market Regulation Financial industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") UBS Securities
More informationArbitration CAS 2007/A/1367 FC Metallurg v. Leo Lerinc, award of 14 May Panel: Mr Otto de Witt Wijnen (the Netherlands), Sole Arbitrator
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration FC Metallurg v. Leo Lerinc, Panel: Mr Otto de Witt Wijnen (the Netherlands), Sole Arbitrator Football Disciplinary sanction against
More informationTHE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF A WC
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF A WC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: FROM: Canaccord Genuity Inc. Mr. Howard Green Senior Managing Director 350 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017
More information3 District Court Decisions Highlight Limits To CFPB Claims
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 3 District Court Decisions Highlight Limits
More informationNYSE MKT LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
NYSEMKTLLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 20150441008 TO: RE: NYSE MKT LLC c/o Department of Market Regulation Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FTNRA") Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
More informationAnswers to Odd-Numbered Problems, 4th Edition of Games and Information, Rasmusen
ODD Answers to Odd-Numbered Problems, 4th Edition of Games and Information, Rasmusen Eric Rasmusen, Indiana University School of Business, Rm. 456, 1309 E 10th Street, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405-1701.
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE NASD REGULATION, INC. DECISION. District No. 7
BEFORE THE NATIONAL BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE NASD REGULATION, INC. In the Matter of District Business Conduct Committee For District No. 7, vs. Complainant, DECISION Complaint No. C07960091 District
More informationCase: , 01/04/2019, ID: , DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-56663, 01/04/2019, ID: 11141257, DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JAN 4 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
More informationOpus Bank. Insider Trading And Disclosure Policy. Board Approval Date: December 15, 2016
Opus Bank Insider Trading And Disclosure Policy Board Approval Date: December 15, 2016 BOD Approved: December 15, 2016 Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Application of Policy... 1 General Statement... 1 Insider
More informationAn individual risk assessment undertaken on your case at the outset together with in general:
Schedule 1 Success fee The success fee is set at 100% of our basic charges, where the claim concludes at trial; or 100% where the claim concludes before a trial has commenced. The success fee percentage
More informationDodd-Frank's Eye On Energy Cos. Use Of Derivatives
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Dodd-Frank's Eye On Energy Cos. Use Of Derivatives
More informationNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO. 2016-03-00052 TO: RE: New York Stock Exchange LLC KCG Americas LLC, Respondent CRD No. 149823 KCG Americas LLC violated NYSE Rule
More informationTCPA Exclusions Not Enough To Avoid Text Blasting Claims
Law360 Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com TCPA Exclusions Not Enough To Avoid Text Blasting
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. N
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. N0.2016050142601 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA")") Jonathan G. Sweeney,
More informationProcedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals
September 25, 1997 Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals By: Glenn Newman This new feature of the New York Law Journal will highlight cases involving New York State and City tax controversies
More informationBy: Mark A. Lies, II 1 and Craig B. Simonsen INTRODUCTION. One of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration s (OSHA s) most potent
131 South Dearborn Street Writer s direct phone (312) 460-5877 Writer s e-mail mlies@seyfarth.com Writer s direct fax (312) 460-7877 Suite 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 460-5000 fax (312) 460-7000
More informationGUIDE TO RETIREMENT PLANNING MAKING THE MOST OF THE NEW PENSION RULES TO ENJOY FREEDOM AND CHOICE IN YOUR RETIREMENT
GUIDE TO RETIREMENT PLANNING MAKING THE MOST OF THE NEW PENSION RULES TO ENJOY FREEDOM AND CHOICE IN YOUR RETIREMENT FINANCIAL GUIDE Green Financial Advice is authorised and regulated by the Financial
More informationDEBTS AND DISPUTES. Understanding Debt. What to do?
DEBTS AND DISPUTES If you ve ever been owed money, you know it s a frustrating situation to be in. Even when it s a small sum, debts not only leave a bad taste, but they can really affect your financial
More informationCash Collateral Orders Revisited Following ResCap
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Cash Collateral Orders Revisited Following ResCap
More informationNOS CR CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
NOS. 12-18-00174-CR 12-18-00175-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS EX PARTE: MATTHEW WILLIAMS APPEALS FROM THE 273RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SAN AUGUSTINE COUNTY,
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. Complainant, ANDREW LYMAN QUINN (CRD No. 2453320), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2013038136101
More informationTHE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF Awe
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF Awe Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: Archipelago Securities L.L.C. Mr. Paul D. Adcock Executive Principal 100 South Wacker Drive Suite 1800 Chicago,
More informationStakeholder Pension. The simple way to start a pension plan. Retirement Investments Insurance Health
Stakeholder Pension The simple way to start a pension plan Retirement Investments Insurance Health Introduction Any decision you make about investing for your future retirement needs careful consideration
More informationNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO. 2016-01-15-00001 TO: RE: New York Stock Exchange LLC Americas Executions, LLC, Respondent CRD No. 140345 During the period from
More informationForex Advantage Blueprint
Forex Advantage Blueprint Complimentary Report!! www.forexadvantageblueprint.com Copyright Protected www.forexadvantageblueprint.com - 1 - Limits of liability/disclaimer of Warranty The author and publishers
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY DECISION. Dated: October 7, 2010
BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY In the Matter of Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs. DECISION Complaint No. 2008012026601 Dated: October 7, 2010
More informationThe Final Round 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School or A Note about the Notes.
The Final Round 1 Everett Rutan Xavier High School everett.rutan@moodys.com or ejrutan3@acm.org Connecticut Debate Association Darien High School and Glastonbury High School March 8, 2008 Resolved: In
More informationExecutive Summary SRO Discussion Draft Investment Adviser Oversight Act of
I. Background Executive Summary SRO Discussion Draft Investment Adviser Oversight Act of 2011 1 a. Section 914 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd- Frank Act ), passed
More informationBACKGROUND NASDAQ BX, INC. LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
NASDAQ BX, INC. LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2012031480719 TO: RE: NASDAQ BX, Inc. do Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Simon Librati, Respondent
More informationSelf-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/12/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-08299, and on FDsys.gov 8011-01p SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More informationNOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT For Qualifying Owners of Property on Which Certain Fiber Cement Siding Manufactured by CertainTeed Corporation
More informationFrequently Asked Questions GLGI Class Action Donors4Donors.com
Why do we need a class action? By signing up, will I really make a difference? Yes. There is power in numbers. The more people who sign up the better. (Judges tend to look at it this way: the greater the
More informationPanel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), President; Mr Goetz Eilers (Germany); Mr Raymond Hack (South Africa)
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2654 Namibia Football Association v. Confédération Africaine de Football (CAF), (operative part of 10 January 2012) Panel:
More informationNASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. Complainant, MICHAEL FRANCIS O NEILL (CRD No. 352958), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. E102003130804 Hearing Officer Andrew H. Perkins
More informationNO THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT
THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 20150467692-02 TO: RE: New York Stock Exchange LLC do Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA")
More informationArbitration CAS 2012/A/2786 FC Spartak a.s v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 29 August 2012
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2786 FC Spartak a.s v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom),
More informationSUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE
Manwaring v. The Golden 1 Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING
More informationALI-ABA Conference on Life Insurance Company Products November 3-4, 2011 Washington, D.C.
775 ALI-ABA Conference on Life Insurance Company Products November 3-4, 2011 Washington, D.C. Redefining the Retail Relationship: The Emerging Regulatory Framework Governing Suitability, the Standard of
More information*Barcode39* - <<SequenceNo>>
MOORE V HCA C/O RUST CONSULTING INC 5114 PO BOX 2396 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* -
More informationHigh Court Ruling May Mean More Demand Response Scrutiny
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com High Court Ruling May Mean More Demand Response Scrutiny
More informationPursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( Act ), 1 and Rule
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/03/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-13616, and on FDsys.gov 8011-01P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More informationMEMORANDUM FIRST YEAR MOOT COURT COMPETITION PARTICIPANTS FIRST YEAR MOOT COURT COMPETITION DIRECTORS, AUSTIN EGAN AND LUCAS NOVAES
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRST YEAR MOOT COURT COMPETITION PARTICIPANTS FIRST YEAR MOOT COURT COMPETITION DIRECTORS, AUSTIN EGAN AND LUCAS NOVAES GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE 2017 ALVINA RECKMAN-MYERS
More information5 Biggest Mistakes Most Home Buyers Make
5 Biggest Mistakes Most Home Buyers Make And 3 Guaranteed Ways to Get Approved for a Home Loan This Complementary Special Report was prepared by: 2 5 Biggest Mistake Home Buyers Make Purchasing a home
More informationHayes Connor Solicitors
Hayes Connor Solicitors A jargon-free guide to: making a data breach group action claim with Hayes Connor Solicitors Why have we created this document? Making a data breach claim shouldn t be difficult.
More informationVictims Guide to the Defense Base Act: Your Next Steps
Introduction In many labor intensive industries, injuries on the job can be common and most often are handled with worker s compensation. However, working outside of the United States on a United States
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2010022518104 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Michael Perlmuter,
More informationCERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. ANONYMOUS CASE HISTORIES NUMBER 29926
CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. ANONYMOUS CASE HISTORIES NUMBER 29926 This is a summary of a decision issued following the October 2016 hearings of the Disciplinary and Ethics Commission
More informationTHE NASDAQ OPTIONS MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC
THE NASDAQ OPTIONS MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: FROM: Instinet, LLC Mr. Faron Webb General Counsel Worldwide Plaza 309 West 49th Street New York, NY 10019
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING NO HEARING OFFICER: MJD.
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS Department of Enforcement, Complainant, v. Robert Jay Eide (CRD No. 1015261), Respondent. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING NO. 2011026386002 HEARING
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court Nos. CR Appellant Decided: March 31, 2015 * * * * *
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Appellee Court of Appeals Nos. L-14-1265 Trial Court Nos. CR0201202162 v. Emmanuel Andre Wright DECISION AND JUDGMENT
More informationContribution Caution: Mitigating Risks From Pay-To-Play
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Contribution Caution: Mitigating Risks From Pay-To-Play
More informationParker has no relevant disciplinary history.
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2016050492101 TO: RE: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Walter Warren Parker,
More informationTHE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: FROM: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated Mr. Adam Inzirillo Managing Director One Bryant
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MCE [2015] QCA 4 PARTIES: R v MCE (appellant) FILE NO: CA No 186 of 2014 DC No 198 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against
More informationTHE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: FROM: Chardan Capital Markets LLC Mr. Steven Urbach Chief Executive Officer 17 State Street Suite 2130 New
More informationTHE NASDAQ OPTIONS MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC
THE NASDAQ OPTIONS MARKET LLC NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC Certified, Return Receipt Requested TO: FROM: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Mr. Alan Reifenberg Managing Director 11 Madison Avenue New York,
More informationAvoid Annuity Traps Page 1
Avoid Annuity Traps Page 1 Thinking About Purchasing An Annuity? Are you thinking about purchasing an annuity? Or maybe you already own one and are considering surrendering it? If so, then before you do
More information