Citation for published version (APA): Loc, T. D. (2006). Equitisation and stock-market development: the case of vietnam Groningen: s.n.

Transcription

1 University of Groningen Equitisation and stock-market development Loc, T.D. IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2006 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Loc, T. D. (2006). Equitisation and stock-market development: the case of vietnam Groningen: s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date:

2 Equitisation and Stock-Market Development The Case of Vietnam Truong Dong Loc ISBN

3

4 RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGEN Equitisation and Stock-Market Development The Case of Vietnam Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Economische Wetenschappen aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, dr. F. Zwarts, in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 6 juli 2006 om uur door Truong Dong Loc geboren op 13 december 1972 te Can Tho (Vietnam)

5 Promotor: Copromotor: Prof. Dr. B.W. Lensink Dr. G.J. Lanjouw Beoordelingscommissie: Prof. Dr. L.H. Hoogduin Prof. Dr.V. Murinde Prof. Dr. F.M. Tempelaar iv

6 Acknowledgements This dissertation has been completed with the great help of some organisations and many individuals. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge all of them. First of all, I would like to express my deep gratitude to NUFFIC and the Faculty of Economics of the University of Groningen for their financial support. Without their support the research could never have been completed. I would like to acknowledge my supervisors, Prof. Robert Lensink and Dr. Ger Lanjouw, for their invaluable feedback and support over the last four years. Moreover, Dr. Ger Lanjouw spent much time as an English editor for this book. My special thanks go to Prof. Frans Tempelaar, member of the reading committee, for giving me very useful comments, and Prof. Lex Hoogduin and Prof. Victor Murinde, the other members of the reading committee, for reading the manuscript. I would also like to thank two anonymous referees of The Economics of Transition for their valuable comments on a paper which is to be published in this journal and which is included in this book as Chapter 6. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to those people who created the necessary conditions for my Ph.D. study. I wish to thank Mr. Nguyen Tan Nhan, Dr. Mai Van Nam, Mrs. Nguyen Thanh Nguyet, Mr. Bui Van Trinh for providing me a chance to study at the University of Groningen. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Le Khuong Ninh and Dr. Luu Thanh Duc Hai for taking care of me during the first several weeks of my new life in Groningen. I greatly appreciate the assistance from many members of the Office for International Relations, especially Madeleine Gardeur-Veltman, Gonny Lakerveld, Anita Veltmaat, Wiebe Zijlstra and Erik Haarbrink. I would like to extend my profound gratitude to all staff members of the Centre for Development Studies for their hospitality, especially to Mr. Arthur de Boer for his arrangements during my entire study period in Groningen and the assistance in the layout of this book. I would like to thank Mrs. Vi Thi Nam Huong, Mrs. Nuyen Thi Hong, Mr. Nguyen Dinh Thong, Mr. Le Ngoc Khoi and Mr. Vuong Quoc Duy for assisting me in collecting the data. I also wish to acknowledge Mr. Nguyen Van Ngan and Mr. Le Long Hau for putting the data from the questionnaires into the computer.

7 My thanks also are due to Dr. Vo Thanh Danh and Dr. Vo Thi Thanh Loc for sharing useful knowledge and experiences related to statistics and economertrics. I would like to acknowledge my colleagues and friends in Groningen who made my life in Groningen easy and enjoyable. Finally, I would like to thank Mr. Le Nguyen Doan Khoi and Mr. Arthur de Boer who are my two paranimfen. Last but not least, I am greatly indebted to my parents and my mother-in-law for their constant love, support and encouragement. I would like to acknowledge my wife, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Diem, and my son, Truong Hoang Phuc, for their patience when I lived away from home. Their loving support has considerably contributed to the completion of the thesis. vi

8 Contents Acknowledgement Contents List of tables PART I: INTRODUCTION Page Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1. Introduction Aims of the study Outline of the dissertation 5 PART II: THE PROCESS OF EQUITISATION IN VIETNAM Chapter 2: An Overview of the Literature on Privatisation 2.1. Introduction Definitions of privatisation Methods of privatisation: pros and cons Restitution Sales to outsiders Management-employee buyouts (insider privatisation) Leasing and management contracts Voucher privatisation (mass privatisation) The efficiency of state versus private ownership: theoretical review The social view The agency view The impact of privatisation on firm performance: a survey of the 19 empirical literature Empirical studies comparing pre versus post-privatisation 20 performance Empirical studies comparing performance of privatised firms 20 with state-owned firms Empirical studies examining the effect of ownership structure 21 and corporate governance on firm performance 2.6. The macroeconomic effects of privatisation Conclusion 33

9 Chapter 3: Reforms of State-Owned Enterprises and the Equitisation Process in Vietnam 3.1. Introduction State-owned enterprises reform in the context of economic reforms Overview of the equitisation process in Vietnam Stages of equitisation Role of the National Steering Committee for Enterprise Reform 44 and Development (NSCERD) in implementing the equitisation process The equitisation procedure of SOEs in Vietnam Main features of the equitisation programme Conclusions 52 Chapter 4: The Impact of Equitisation and Stock Market Listing on Firm Performance in Vietnam: Case studies 4.1. Introduction Effect of equitisation on firm performance Cantho Foodstuff, Fruit & Vegetable Company Refrigeration Electrical Engineering Corporation (REE Corp.) A comparison of performance changes following equitisation 71 between the two cases 4.3. The effect of SML on firm performance: the case of REE Corp Conclusion 73 Appendix 4.1: Corporate governance in Vietnamese equitised companies 75 Chapter 5: An Overall Description of the Sample 5.1. Introduction Description of data collection A statistical description of the sample Structures of the samples Size of the samples Some aspects of the equitisation process: results from the survey Duration of the equitisation process Reasons for equitisation Main problems and constraints in equitised implementation Labour issue of the equitised firms following equitisation Ownership structure and corporate governance of the equitised firms Ownership structure Corporate governance Conclusion 94 viii

10 Chapter 6: The Impact of Equitisation on Firm Performance in Vietnam: An Empirical Study 6.1. Introduction Hypotheses and methodology Effect of equitisation on firm performance: Results from the pre-post 100 comparison method Results for the full sample Sub-sample results The sources of performance changes: Cross-sectional regression 115 results 6.5. Effect of equitisation on firm performance: Results from the DID 119 method 6.6. Summary and conclusions 121 PART III: THE VIETNAMESE STOCK MARKET Chapter 7: Overview of the Vietnamese Stock Market 7.1. Introduction Organisation and operation of the stock market The Vietnamese stock market index (VNINDEX) The performance of the Vietnamese Stock Market Comparison of performance between non-listed equitised firms and 141 listed equitised firms 7.6. Conclusion 142 Appendix 7.1: Securities companies in Vietnam 144 Appendix 7.2: An illustrated example of VN-Index calculation and 145 maintenance Appendix 7.3: Listed companies on the STC 147 Chapter 8: Testing the Weak-Form Efficiency for the Vietnamese Stock Market 8.1. Introduction The Theory of Efficient Market Hypothesis The Forms of EMH Review of empirical literature on the Weak Form efficiency in 153 emerging stock markets 8.5. Data description Methodology Empirical findings Autocorrelation tests 166 ix

11 Run tests Variance ratio tests Conclusions 174 Chapter 9: Testing Anomalies in Stock Returns for the Vietnamese Stock Market 9.1. Introduction Day-of-the-week effect on stock returns and stock volatility Empirical literature review Data and methodology Empirical results Testing for the short-term overreaction hypothesis Literature review Data and methodology Empirical results Conclusions 203 PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Chapter 10: Conclusions and Recommendations for Further Research Introduction Conclusions The process of equitisation in Vietnam The development of stock market in Vietnam Limitations of the dissertation and suggestions for further research 210 References 213 Questionnaires 223 Samenvatting 237 x

12 List of Tables Page Table 2.1: Summary of empirical studies comparing pre versus postprivatisation 23 performance of privatised firms Table 2.2: Summarised results from five empirical studies of the financial 27 and operating performance of newly privatised firms Table 2.3: Summary of empirical studies comparing performance of 30 privatised firms to state-owned enterprises Table 2.4: Summary of empirical studies examining the effect of 31 ownership structure and corporate governance on the privatised firm performance Table 3.1: Some economic performance indicators of Vietnam, Table 3.2: Shares of the state-owned and non-state sectors in GDP, Table 3.3: Capital and ownership structure of the first five equitised firms 43 in the pilot period Table 3.4: Ownership structure of privatised firms in Vietnam (2004) and 44 other transition countries Table 3.5: Number of SOEs to be annually equitised for the period Table 4.1: Performance of Cantho Foodstuff, Fruit & Vegetable Company 55 Table 4.2: Ownership structure of Cantho Foodstuff, Fruit & Vegetable 56 Company Table 4.3: The pre and post equitisation performance of Cantho 60 Foodstuff, Fruit & Vegetable Company Table 4.4: REE performance for the period of Table 4.5: Ownership structure of REE 64 Table 4.6: List of members of the Board of directors 65 Table 4.7: Members of the Board of supervisors 66 Table 4.8: Pre and post-equitisation performance of REE 69 Table 4.9: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation 74 between two cases Table 4.10: The pre and post-ipo performance of REE 75 Table 5.1: Firms classification by categories, sectors, and locations 82 Table 5.2: Sample structure of the surveyed SOEs by sectors and 83

13 locations Table 5.3: Charter capital of the surveyed firms 84 Table 5.4: Distribution of the sample of the surveyed firms by charter 84 capital Table 5.5: Duration of the equitisation process of the sample 85 Table 5.6: The ranking point of the reasons of equitisation 86 Table 5.7: The main constraints and problems in the equitisation process 87 Table 5.8: Pre and post-equitisation number of employees 88 Table 5.9: Ownership structure of equitised at the first shares issue 89 Table 5.10: The sample structure by the State s share 90 Table 5.11: New ownership structure of the firms 90 Table: 5.12: The composition of the board of directors 92 Table 5.13: Distribution of chairperson of the directors board by different 92 groups of shareholders Table 5.14: The composition of the board of supervisors 93 Table 5.15: Chairperson of the board of supervisors by different groups of 93 shareholders Table 5.16: Distribution of manager of surveyed firms by different groups 94 of shareholders Table 6.1: Performance measures: definitions and expected changes 98 Table 6.2: Summary of results from tests of predictions for the full sample 103 of all equitised firms Table 6.3: Comparison of post-equitisation performance changes for 106 larger and smaller firms Table 6.4: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation for 107 trade and services firms and manufacturing firms Table 6.5: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation for 108 firms with residual state ownership less than 30 percent and the other firms Table 6.6: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation for 111 FCBDRS and FCBDRP Table 6.7: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation for 112 listed firms and non-listed firms Table 6.8: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation for 113 firms located in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) and others firms Table 6.9: Comparison of performance changes following equitisation for 114 firms equitised before 1999 and other firms Table 6.10: Definitions of explanatory variables used and expected sign in 116 regression analyses Table 6.11: Cross-sectional regression results 120 Table 6.12: Summary of results from the DID test for the group of SOEs 123 xii

14 equitised in the year of 2000 Table 6.13: Summary of results from the DID test for the group of SOEs 124 equitised in the year of 2001 Table 7.1: Illustrated information of buying and selling orders of stock A 135 Table 7.2: Selling orders at the price of VND 20, Table 7.3: Key indicators for the STC over the period of Table 7.4: Comparison of performance between non-listed equitised firms 142 and listed equitised firms for the period of Table: 7.5: Trading information of the first some sessions on the STC 145 Table 8.1: Summary of empirical studies on the Weak Form efficiency in 156 emerging stock markets Table 8.2: Descriptive statistics for the VNINDEX and the individual 161 stocks returns Table 8.3: Results of autocorrelation tests for the daily observed returns 168 data Table 8.4: Results of autocorrelation tests for the daily corrected returns 169 data Table 8.5: Results of autocorrelation tests for the weekly observed returns 170 data Table 8.6: Results of autocorrelation tests for the weekly corrected returns 171 data Table 8.7: Results of the runs test for VNINDEX and selected individual 172 stocks Table 8.8: Variance ratio test results for the daily observed return data 176 Table 8.9: Variance ratio test results for the weekly observed return data 177 Table 8.10: Variance ratio test results for the daily corrected return data 178 Table 8.11: Variance ratio test results for the weekly corrected return data 179 Table 9.1: Summary of empirical studies on the day-of-the-week effect in 185 developed stock markets Table 9.2: Summary of empirical studies on the day-of-the-week effect in 189 emerging stock markets Table 9.3: Summary statistics on stock returns by day of the week 192 Table 9.4: Specifications of six employed models 194 Table 9.5: Day-of-the-week effect on the VNINDEX returns and 196 volatility Table 9.6: Number of stocks listed on the market over the time 200 Table 9.7: Differences in the mean abnormal returns between winner and 202 loser portfolios following the formation of the portfolios Table 9.8: The difference in mean cumulative abnormal returns between 203 the winner and loser portfolios xiii

15

16 List of Figures Page Figure 3.1: Organisation of the NSCERD 46 Figure 4.1: REE s ownership structure in Figure 4.2: REE s ownership structure in Figure 4.3: REE s ownership structure in Figure 4.4: Organizational structure of REE 67 Figure 7.1: Market capitalisation of the STC for the period from July 28 th, to December 31 st, 2005 Figure 7.2: VNINDEX changes over the period from July 28 th, 2000 to 141 December 31 st, 2005

17