IN THE MATTER' OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY-LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE -AND-

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE MATTER' OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY-LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE -AND-"

Transcription

1 ' IN THE MATTER' OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY-LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE -AND- DAVID LLOYD SANGSTER, RESPONDENT HEARING COMMITrEE: Stephen D. Gill, Chairman John McCoach, Member Lawrence H. McQuid, Member COUNSEL: Gordon R. Johnson, Appearing for the Exchange David L. Sangster, Appearing in person HEARING DATES: January 24, 1995 at Vancouver, British Columbia BACKGROUND: On December 23, 1994, the Exchange issued to David Lloyd Sangster ("Mr. Sangster") a Citation (the "Citation") which is Exhibit 1 in these proceedings and set 9:00 A.M., January 24, 1995, at the date and thne for the hearing. The alleged infractions in the Citation are as follows: "WHEREAS it is alleged that the Respondent David Lloyd Sangster CSangster") while a registered representative and assistant vice-president employed by Wood Gundy Inc. committed infractions as defined by Exchange By-Law 5.01 as follows: On or about November 26, 1993 Sangster received an Order from a client to sell 10,000 shares of Dueling Grounds Thoroughbred Racing Corp. ("Dueling Grounds") with a $7.00 limit (the "Order").

2 1-2- The posted bids for Dueling Grounds at the time the Order was received were as follows: 500 shares at the price of $7.75 per share 500 shares at the price of $7.75 per share 5,000 shares at the price of $7.50 per share 1,000 shares at the price of $6.50 per share 2,000 shares at the price of $4.25 per share Prior to entering the Order, Sangster contacted other traders to solicit their interest in purchasing the balance of the Order being 4,000 shares. Sangster's solicitation resulted in a further bid being posted by a trader for 4,000 shares at $7.00 and the Order being filled. Sangster also contacted the same trader when he sought to repurchase a share position in Dueling Grounds for a client later that same trading session. By providing other traders with advance informa_tion regarding the Order outside of the usual channels of the market, Sangster deprived other market pa(ticipants of any opportunity to bid for any portion of the Order. Sangster also deprived his client of any opportunity to have the balance of the Order Idled at a price exceeding $7.00 per share. Sangster thereby committed an infraction as defined in By-Law 5.01(19)." An Agreed Statement of Facts and documents between the V.S.E. and the Respondent Sangster was filed as Exhibit #2 in the proceedings. In addition the Committee received evidence from Mr. Lyle Davis, the Manager of Trading for the V.S.E., the Respondent Mr. Sangster gave evidence, Mr. Wayne Groom of Wood Gundy Inc. gave evidence as well as a Mr. Brown, a registered representative. On completion of the evidence, submissions were made on behalf of counsel for the Exchange, and on behalf of Mr. Sangster, and the Committee reserved its decision. From the Agreed Statement of Facts and documents, and the witnesses, we flnd the following facts. Mr. Sangster was born on June 10, 1956 and he became a registered

3 -3- representative at Yorkton Securities Inc. in May of In July of 1981 he became a registered representative of Wood Gundy Inc. and in January of 1988 was given the title of Assistant Vice-President. The events in issue occurred in the fall of 1993, at which time Mr. Sangster was a very experienced representative. At 6:38:00 on the morning of November 26, 1993, Mr. Sangster received an Order from the London, England office of Wood Gundy on behalf of a client to sell 10,000 shares of Dueling Grounds Thoroughbred Racing Corp. ("Dueling Grounds") with a $7.00 per share limit. According to the trading surveillance report, Dueling Grounds had been trading near or above $8.00 per share prior to November 26. Mr. Sangster agreed he had the prior trading information "at his fingertips". The posted bids for Dueling Grounds wereas follows: " at the time the Order was received by Mr. Sangster 500 shares at a price of $7.75 per share 500 shares at a price of $7.75 per share 5,000 shares at a price of $7.50 per share 1,000 shares at a price of $6.60 per share 2,000 shares at a price of $4.25 per share It would appear that Mr. Sangster could sell 6,000 shares to the posted bids and achieve a price of between $7.50 and $7.75 per share. It was acknowledged that Mr. Sangster would have had available to him the daily summary of activity in the stock and could have easily tracked the trades for November 22, 23, 24 and 25. During that period the high was $8.75 and the low was $7.88, and approximately 29,000 shares had traded.

4 -4- According to the Agreed Statement of Facts, Sangster stated that before entering the clients' Order he contacted three or four other traders, including his wife, Nancy Sangster, a trader at Majendie Securities Ltd. ('Majendie"). Sangster told Nancy Sangster that he had an order to sell shares in Dueling Grounds and asked if she wanted to buy 4,000 shares at a price of $7.00 per share. Nancy said that she would like to buy. Counsel for the Exchange alleged that the release of this information could hurt Sangster's client but could never help Sangster's client. Further, the only logical reason Sangster would call another trader in these circumstances would be to ensure that the other trader had an opportunity to buy the stock before anyone else. Counsel for the Exchange alleges that these facts confirm Sangster's knowledge that a $7.00 per share price for Dueling Grounds was below what could be obtained on the market. Counsel for the Exchange also alleged that Mr. Sangster had other options which may have produced a benefit to his client, such as he could have called his client to confirm his instructions, or, while he was phoning other traders, he could have entered his order to sell the Dueling Grounds shares at a price over $7.00 per share. Counsel for the Exchange alleges that the trading activity before and after Sangster entered his order shows that there clearly was a market for Dueling Grounds share. at a price above $7.00 per. According to the Agreed Statement of Facts, Nancy Sangster entered her order to buy 4,000 shares of Dueling Grounds at the price of $7.00 for an inventory account which she shared on an equal basis with Majendie. She entered the order at 6:38:45 on November 26, 1993 (Exhibit #1, Tab 1). Sangster entered his order to sell 10,000 shares of Dueling Grounds at 6:39:49 or approximately one minute after Nancy Sangster. Of course Nancy Sangster's bid would have been visible to all other traders on the system

5 5- -,L during this time frame, and any other trader interested in posting a better bid had the opportunity to have it entered into the system. According to Mr. Davis, the affect of the sell order by Sangster resulted in a temporary freez_ of the stock, which was released at approximately 6:40:19 where upon the first trade took place, and the stock was allowed to trade out. Mr. Davis stated that the freeze occurred because of the $7.00 per share price, which was out of the usual range. The order entered by Sangster was filled as follows: 500 shares at $7.75 per share 500 shares at $7.75 per share 5,000 shares at $7.50 per share 4,000 shares at $7.00 per share (to Nancy Sangster) Mr. Davis testified that there was absolutely no advantage to Sangster's client to disclose the $7.00 limit price, or before he put the offer in place. In fact, by disclosing the limit price of $7.00 he virtually guaranteed that no one would bid higher. In other words, the net result of the process by which Mr. Sangster arranged to sell the client's stock was to guarantee the minimum selling price stipulated by the client. According tothe Agreed Statement of Facts and documents, the trade at the price of $7.00 per share triggered a stop loss order which had been entered on November 15, 1993 by Sangster, to sell 4,000 shares of Dueling Grounds at a price of $7.25 per share on behalf of the Client. This order was filled in four separate trades on November 26, i993 between 6:40:49 and 6:41:05. Mr. Sangster testified that he did not know that the client who entered the order to sell 10,000 shares with the limit of $7.00 was the same client who had previously entered the stop loss order at $7.25.

6 -6- According to the Agreed Statement of Facts, Nancy Sangster immediately sold the shares of Dueling Grounds which she had purchased: at 6:42:30 she entered an order to sell 2000 shares at the price of $7.50 per share and at 6:42:53 she entered an order to sell the remaining 2000 shares at the price of $7.25 per share. That latter order was immediately filled pursuant to a buy order which had previously been entered. According to the Agreed Statement of Facts the saga does not end there. Subsequently, Sangster was told that Wood Gundy should have cancelled the previous stop loss orders for the client and Sangster was instructed to buy back 4,000 shares of Dueling Grounds at the market price. According to the Agreed Statement of Facts Sangster states that he then called Nancy Sangster by telephone and asked if he could cancel the trade in which he sold 4,000 shares. She replied that she had already sold 2,000 shares. Sangster informed Nancy Sangster that he would try to buy 4,000 shares back and at 6:56:25 Sangster entered an order to buy 4,000 shares of Dueling Grounds at the price of $7.375 per share. 6:56:29 Nancy Sangster changed her former sell order from a price of $7.50 per share At to a sell order at a price of $7.375 per share and the order was immediately filled from the buy order which Sangster had entered at 6:56:25. Counsel for the Exchange submitted that the trading activity, both before and after Sangster entered his order, shows that there was a market for Dueling Grounds at a price above $7.00 per share, and an experienced trader like Mr. Sangster would know that. Counsel for the Exchange alleged that the foregoing facts demonstrated a breach of By- Law 5.01(b), namely that there was conduct "unbecoming or inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade or detrimental to the interests of the Exchange or the public." In other words, Sangster breached the By-Law by complying with the client's instruction,

7 -7- albeit at the lowest price, but in fact arranging a trade, at below previous market prices, with his wife. Counsel for the V.S.E. submitted that the only inference to be drawn from the foregoing trades is that Sangster and his wife colluded, or that Sangster gave his wife preferential treatment. Mr. Davis stated that in his opinion the client's instructions could have been carried out, especially by an experienced trader, by "testing the waters", and he further stated that in his opinion there was evidence available to Mr. Sangster of a lot of buyers at $7.25 per share. However, also in his evidence he agreed that the next best / bid was $6.60 per share and that there was at that time equal opportunity for any other trader on the system to have entered a better bid between $6.60 and $7.50. He also testified that if Mr. Sangster missed $7.25 he would have to guarantee was confirmed by Mr. Groom. a "fill", which fact Mr. Davis also acknowledged, in cross-examination, that it is not common practice for a representatwe to phone around to other traders, in order to fill an order, but agreed that it is an option that is open to a trader. According to Mr. Davis there were a number of "options" open to a trader with instructions like those received by Mr. Sangster, without "prearranging" a trade at the lowest price. Mr. Sangster took the stand and gave evidence, and said thal_he had received the order from London office at 6:38:00, and he then made a number of calls, probably four in total, and that only his wife returned his interest. He testified that there was no interest at $7.00 by the other traders but that Nancy Sangster expressed interest at $7.00 and that he wanted $7.00 "or better". Later, Mr. Sangster indicated that he did not give a price to the other traders, but merely gave them information as to the size of the order he wished to sell. During cross-examination, Mr. Sangster admitted that he was interviewed on July 5, 1994 by representatives of the Exchange, and that he told Mr. Hurkett that he had called other

8 -8- traders and inquired if they wanted to purchase the stock at $7.00. He further admitted that his statement (to the Exchange) was true, although subsequently he attempted to resile from this admission and again stated that he did not mention the $7.00 price. Under further cross-examination, Mr. Sangster took the position that he did make the statement to Mr. Hurkett (that he called traders and wanted to know if they wanted stock at $7.00) but then testified, under oath, that in fact he did not give to the traders he contacted the $7.00 selling price. He attempted to explain this contradiction by stating that he had thought about the sequence of events subsequent to his interview with Mr. Hurkett. Under further cross-examination, Mr. Sangster stated that he had called a number of traders, and finally Nancy Sangster had told him that she would buy 4,000 shares at $7.00. Hetestified that Nancy Sangster had offered to purchase at $7.00, as opposed to his offering it at $7.00, and he testified that he alsoexpected she might sell the stock immediately for a profit. He also admitted that he knew, after his telephone conversation with Nancy Sangster, that she wasn't going to offer more than $7.00 per share. Under further cross-examination, Mr. Sangster was asked to carefully review paragraph 4 of the Agreed Statement of Facts (Exhibit #2) which states: "Sangster states that before entering the order he contacted three or four other traders, including his wife, Nancy Sangster, a trader at Majendie Securities Ltd. ("Majendie"). Sangster told Nancy Sangster that he had an order to sell shares in Dueling Grounds and asked if she wanted to buy 4,000 shares at a price of $7.00 per share. Nancy said that she would." He agreed that he and other members of his firm had reviewed the Agreed Statement of Facts very carefully, and that he had agreed to paragraph 4. Notwithstanding this, before us in the witness stand he still offered other explanations.

9 -9- Under further cross-examination, when confronted with the very short period of tune between his receipt of the order, and his sell order, and his alleged telephone activity, Mr. Sangster, for the first time, said that he had personally only made two calls, and that his assistant, John Glanville, had made the other two calls! This revelation unfolded for the first time Iduring the hearing; Mr. Sangster admitted that he had never told the investigator that anyone else was involved in his telephone calls; he provided no explanation for this new version of events. This testimony of Mr. Sangster on the witness stand, that he personally only made two calls, again conflicts with paragraph four of the Agreed Statement of Facts. Having had the opportunity to observe Mr. Sangster give his evidence, especially under cross-examination, and consider the whole of his testimony, the Hearing Committee has very serious doubts about Mr. Sangster's evidence in relation to his conduct after receiving the order. In all, we found Mr. Sangster to be a very unsatisfactory witness, and not credible. Counsel for the V.S.E. submitted that there were two issues: firstly, from the various options open to Mr. Sangster in order to fill his Client's order, did he have a duty to choose the option most beneficial to his client. Put another way, did he have a duty not to provide advance information to Nancy Sangster with respect to his instructions to sell at $7.00, but to "play the market" and attempt to obtain the highest price possible. The second issue, according to counsel for the V.S.E., is whether Sangster was entitled to favour some traders over others when he is about to enter an order at an attractive price into V.C.T.

10 - 10- Counsel for the V.S.E. submitted that there was a duty on Mr. Sangster to avoid favouring the interests of his wife over the interest of his client. While agreeing that Mr. Sangster had not breached any of the specific trading rules of the Exchange, counsel for the V.S.E. submitted that in all the circumstances of the case, Mr. Sangster's conduct was unbecoming or inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade, or detrimental to the interests of the Exchange or the public. He submitted that all transactions are to be conducted in an open fashion with equal access given to all market participants, and that on the evidence it was clear that this had not occurred. He submitted that Mr. Sangst'er did tell other traders that he was prepared to sell at $7.00, and this was of no assistance to his client. In his submission, the most egregious conduct by Mr. Sangster was in indicating the $7.00 selling price in advance. Counsel for the Exchange submitted that Mr. Sangster had a number of options which would have protected his client's interest, such as calling to confirm the instructions regarding the trade because $7.00 was far below market; call and seek instructions to work the market to effect the best possible price; fall the order with the 6,000 shares and then seek instructions, etc. Counsel agreed that selling 6,000, but then "working the market" would potentially put the member at risk with respect to the 4,000 remaining shares, and there was no way of knowing the average price would not drop. Counsel for the Exchange submitted that the one thing that was not open to Mr. Sangster was to sit on the order, leave his client vulnerable, and at the same time give an inside tip to Nancy Sangster at $7.00 and then put the 4,000 shares out. Counsel for the Exchange argued that Sangster's telephone call to Nancy Sangster guaranteed that his wife would get the 4,000 shares at $7.00, and suggested.that the only logical inference from this conduct was that he also realized she would make a quick profit. While agreeing that the effect on the client was the same whether the shares were purchased by Nancy Sangster or someone else, counsel for the Exchange pointed out that Nancy Sangster was

11 -11- not active in the market prior to this, and the only reason to call her was in effect to tip her on the price. In summary, counsel for the Exchange submitted that there was clear evidence the conduct of Sangster was inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade, and was also detrimental to the interests of the Exchange and the public. In this sense the "public" included Mr. Sangster's client. In support of his position with respect to the conduct of Mr. Sangster, counsel for the Exchange referred to the decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Hall in Delmas v. Vancouver Stock Exchange (1994) 119 D.L.R.(4th) the following: 136 at page 144 where the Court said "I think these matters have to be looked at from the perspective of what trade or profession is being regulated. It is, I suppose, always possible to point to some element of uncertainty in language in these regulatory statutes dealing with professional responsibilities or obligations. However, on reflection, -I am of the opinion that the language used here is adequate to provide a measure or standardthat is sufficiently clear to provide a meaningful framework of decision for those delegated to hear this sort of matter. I should also note that I have found helpful in my analysis herein the comments of my colleague Clancy J. in the Pearce case, supra. I lhink there is and was available sufficient material such as course material, by-laws and rules, policy statements and dec'tsions of tribunals and courts to enable persons in the securities industry including the petitioner and members of panels to allow them to be able to properly appreciate the relevant standards and to apply the provisions of By-Law 5.01(b) in a fair and orderly fashion." (emph. added) Mr. Wayne Groom, a Vice-President of Wood Gundy, responded on behalf of Mr. Sangster. In essence, he stated the Respondent did not understand the citation, or did not know how his conduct was alleged to have breached the rules. He submitted that Mr. Sangster was obliged to execute the client's instructions, as received, and that if he had

12 - 12- sold the 6,000 shares, and then put the 4,000 shares up, and then called around, there was no guarantee of a sale. Mr. Groom agreed that the principle issue was whether Mr. Sangster disclosed the $7.00 price in his telephone call to Nancy Sangster, and the other traders. Mr. Groom submitted that Mr. Sangster did carry out his role professionally, and there was no breach in Sangster contacting Nancy Sangster and ensuring that the order was Idled. Mr. Groom agreed, in response to a question from the panel, that Mr. Sangster could well have been criticized if he had not called other traders. It should also be noted that there is no evidence that the client of Mr. Sangster has made a complaint in relation to the manner in which Mr. Sangster carried out his instructions, but we have no evidence that the client was ever made aware of the true nature of the transaction. We note however', that the client previously had a stop loss in at $ and clearly the new sell order with a $7.00 limit demonstrates a conscious decision by the client to change the order. Considering the whole of the evidence before us, we find that Mr. Sangster did communicate to Nancy Sangster both the quantity of shares he had to sell (4,000) and the price of $7.00 per share that he was prepared to sell them for. It may have been, in the circumstances, that imparting this information to another trader in effect guaranteed that Mr. Sangster's client would not receive greater than $7.00 per share for the remaining 4,000 shares. However, on the other hand, it also guaranteed that the client's instructions were followed and the stock was sold in accordance with those instructions. The fact that in hindsight we know that Nancy Sangster was immediately able to resell the shares at a price greater than $7.00 is very troublesome, but as was acknowledged by counsel for the Exchange, Mr. Sangster could well have been criticized if he had not approached other traders in order to carry out the client's instructions.

13 - 13- In considering all the evidence of Mr. Sangster's conduct, we believe that upon reflection Mr. Sangster could have carried out the client's instructions without raising an appearance of impropriety. However, the duty of this Hearing Committee is to determine if Mr. Sangster's actions violated any V.S.E. bylaws or rules. Having considered all of the facts Of this case, we are not satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, that the Exchange has proven Mr. Sangster committed an infraction as defined in By-Law 5.01(b); the allegations contained in the Citation are dismissed. Lastly, there is a matter of general concern which this committee wishes to comment on, and that is the fact we believe the V.S.E. is aware that it is common practice for traders to seek a better market or the opposite side of an order. If the V.S.E. is of the view that the foregoing should not be a permitted activity, we suggest that the proper process should be for the matter to be referred to the appropriate Exchange standing committee for review, so that appropriate 'direction could be given in respect of what we understand is a common and accepted practice. DATED at Vancouver, B.C. this 3rd day of April, EKB:65896

IN THE MATTER OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY-LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE AND SCOTT MADDAUGH WILLIS, RESPONDENT

IN THE MATTER OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE EXCHANGE) BY-LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE AND SCOTT MADDAUGH WILLIS, RESPONDENT IN THE MATTER OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY-LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE AND SCOTT MADDAUGH WILLIS, RESPONDENT Hearing Committee: G.R. Schmitt, Q.C., Chairman David B. Elliott, Member John

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION. Jean P. Whittow, Q.C. Chilwin C.

IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION. Jean P. Whittow, Q.C. Chilwin C. IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF JASON FEDIUK DECISION Hearing Panel: Chair Industry Member Industry Member Counsel For Market Regulation Services: Counsel For

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY_'LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE AND TIBOR FRANCIS GAJDICSt RESPONDENT

IN THE MATTER OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE EXCHANGE) BY_'LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE AND TIBOR FRANCIS GAJDICSt RESPONDENT IN THE MATTER OF THE VANCOUVER STOCK EXCHANGE (THE "EXCHANGE") BY_'LAW 5 - DISCIPLINE AND TIBOR FRANCIS GAJDICSt RESPONDENT HEARING PANEL G.R. SCHMITT, Q.C., Chairman ROBERT H. BLADES, Member GWEN NEWTON,

More information

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the: INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION

More information

IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws

IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws IN THE MATIER OF Mr. Victor Herrera, a member of The Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario

More information

REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION

REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO John Van Dyk Respondent This document also

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L MURRAY

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L MURRAY Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06052/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

Re Smith. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

Re Smith. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) Re Smith IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Daniel Edward

More information

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The staff ( Staff ) of the Investment Dealers

More information

REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION

REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO JOHN VAN DYK Respondent This document also

More information

Gary Russell Vlug. Decision of the Hearing Panel on Facts and Determination

Gary Russell Vlug. Decision of the Hearing Panel on Facts and Determination 2011 LSBC 26 Report issued: August 31, 2011 Citation issued: March 5, 2009 The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning Gary Russell

More information

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT IN THE MATTER OF BLESSING RINGWEDE ODATUWA, solicitor (the Respondent)

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT IN THE MATTER OF BLESSING RINGWEDE ODATUWA, solicitor (the Respondent) No. 10323-2009 SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS ACT 1974 IN THE MATTER OF BLESSING RINGWEDE ODATUWA, solicitor (the Respondent) Upon the application of Peter Cadman on behalf of the Solicitors

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE CANADIAN VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. (formerly the Vancouver Stock Exchange Bylaw 5 - Discipline) AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE CANADIAN VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. (formerly the Vancouver Stock Exchange Bylaw 5 - Discipline) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CANADIAN VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. (formerly the Vancouver Stock Exchange Bylaw 5 - Discipline) AND JACOB JACKIE ALTER, (RESPONDENT) AND WOLVERTON SECURITIES INC. (RESPONDENT) HEARING

More information

Case Name: LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA v. MING J. FONG

Case Name: LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA v. MING J. FONG Case Name: LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA v. MING J. FONG IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF MING J. FONG, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA LAW SOCIETY HEARING FILE: HEARING COMMITTEE PANEL:

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jawad Raza Heard on: Thursday 7 and Friday 8 June 2018 Location: ACCA Head Offices,

More information

FD: ACN=3132 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 358 STY:Neukom v. Solaroli PANEL: Signoroni; Drennan (dissenting); Mason DDATE: ACT: 8(9) KEYW: Right to sue;

FD: ACN=3132 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 358 STY:Neukom v. Solaroli PANEL: Signoroni; Drennan (dissenting); Mason DDATE: ACT: 8(9) KEYW: Right to sue; FD: ACN=3132 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 358 STY:Neukom v. Solaroli PANEL: Signoroni; Drennan (dissenting); Mason DDATE: 231286 ACT: 8(9) KEYW: Right to sue; In the course of employment. SUM: The defendants in

More information

Case Name: Nanaimo Golf & Country Club (Re) Nanaimo Golf & Country Club (the "Employer"), and Unite Here, Local 40 (the "Union")

Case Name: Nanaimo Golf & Country Club (Re) Nanaimo Golf & Country Club (the Employer), and Unite Here, Local 40 (the Union) Page 1 Case Name: Nanaimo Golf & Country Club (Re) Nanaimo Golf & Country Club (the "Employer"), and Unite Here, Local 40 (the "Union") [2015] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 245 270 C.L.R.B.R. (2d) 199 BCLRB No. B245/2015

More information

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND IN THE MATTER OF A RESIGNATION APPLICATION BY MALCOLM LENNIE, QC A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA Resignation Committee: Darlene

More information

August 18, IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

August 18, IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Offer of Settlement August 18, 2003 2003-006 IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Staff of the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. (the

More information

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Citation: Re Bai, 2018 BCSECCOM 60 Date:

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Citation: Re Bai, 2018 BCSECCOM 60 Date: BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Citation: Re Bai, 2018 BCSECCOM 60 Date: 20180206 Roy Ping Bai, also known as Ping Bai, and RBP Consulting Panel Nigel P. Cave Vice

More information

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. June 13, 2018

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. June 13, 2018 FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. Complainant, ROBERT CHARLES McNAMARA (CRD No. 2265046), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2016049085401

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 23 rd March 2015 Prepared on 17 th March Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 23 rd March 2015 Prepared on 17 th March Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT IAC-FH-AR/V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/52919/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 23 rd March 2015

More information

2011 BCSECCOM 197. Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin. Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c.

2011 BCSECCOM 197. Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin. Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Hearing and Review Panel Brent W. Aitken Bradley Doney Don Rowlatt Vice Chair Commissioner

More information

IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws. IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of

IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws. IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of IN THE MATIER OF a Proceeding under The Certified General Accountants Act, 2010 and the Bylaws IN THE MATIER OF Bhavesh Patel, a member of The Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario BETWEEN:

More information

RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING

RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: Paul Joseph PALIOTTI NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT SACHS, WILTON-SIEGEL, MYERS JJ. ) ) ) Respondents )

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT SACHS, WILTON-SIEGEL, MYERS JJ. ) ) ) Respondents ) CITATION: Papp v. Stokes 2018 ONSC 1598 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: DC-17-0000047-00 DATE: 20180309 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT SACHS, WILTON-SIEGEL, MYERS JJ. BETWEEN: Adam Papp

More information

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS Contested Discipline Hearing held February 1 and 2, 2005 Hearing

More information

BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Appellant. THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY Respondent

BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Appellant. THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY Respondent FURTHER DRAFT BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision no: [2013] NZREADT 4 Ref No: NZREADT 115/11 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008

More information

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF THE Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of an Application by Richard Gariepy, a Member of the Law Society of Alberta to Resign

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN ANDERSON, LESLIE BROWN, DOUGLAS BROWN, DAVID SLOAN AND FLAT ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (a.k.a. F.E.D.I.)

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS In the matter of: Mr Karim Khan and Parker Lloyd Limited Heard on: 8, 9, 10 March 2016 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY

IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY Heard: May 1, 2006 Decision: May 10, 2006 Hearing Panel: Eric Spink, Chair Kathleen Jost William

More information

ADMISSIONS AND LICENSING COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

ADMISSIONS AND LICENSING COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS ADMISSIONS AND LICENSING COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Abdus Salam Heard on: Monday, 4 December 2017 Location: Committee: Legal

More information

CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO (THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO (THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO (THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO) CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 2010 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF: Allegations against JOE CLEMENT

More information

July 28, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF

July 28, IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF Settlement Agreement July 28, 2005 2005-006 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES AND IN THE MATTER OF IAN MACDONALD, EDWARD BOYD, PETER DENNIS AND DAVID SINGH OFFER OF SETTLEMENT A. INTRODUCTION

More information

Environmental Appeal Board

Environmental Appeal Board Environmental Appeal Board APPEAL NO. 92/23 WILDLIFE In the matter of appeal under s103 Wildlife Act, SBC Chap. 57 Index Chap. 433.1, 1982 BETWEEN Byron Dalziel APPELLANT AND Deputy Director of Wildlife

More information

ARBITRATION SUBJECT. Appeal of termination for violation of found property policy. ISSUES CHRONOLOGY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

ARBITRATION SUBJECT. Appeal of termination for violation of found property policy. ISSUES CHRONOLOGY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Glendon #4 ARBITRATION EMPLOYER, INC. -and EMPLOYEE Termination Appeal SUBJECT Appeal of termination for violation of found property policy. ISSUES Was Employee terminated for just cause? CHRONOLOGY Termination:

More information

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED 23 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO E.S.D. T.D. No. 52 OF 2006 IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT Between COMMUNICATION WORKERS - PARTY NO. 1 UNION And TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES - PARTY NO. 2 OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Martyn Mahe Heard on: 20 January 2015 Location: Committee: Legal Adviser: Persons

More information

Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: File No: Registry: Vancouver. In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION)

Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: File No: Registry: Vancouver. In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION) Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: 20020307 File No: 2001-67384 Registry: Vancouver In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION) BETWEEN: MARY MERCIER CLAIMANT AND: TRANS-GLOBE TRAVEL

More information

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. DIRK ALLEN TAYLOR (CRD No. 1008197), Complainant, Disciplinary Proceeding No. 20070094468 Hearing Officer

More information

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Citation: Re Malone, 2016 BCSECCOM 257 Date:

BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Citation: Re Malone, 2016 BCSECCOM 257 Date: BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Citation: Re Malone, 2016 BCSECCOM 257 Date: 20160803 William Raymond Malone Panel Nigel P. Cave Vice Chair George C. Glover, Jr.

More information

COMMUNITY CARE AND ASSISTED LIVING APPEAL BOARD. Community Care and Assisted Living Act, SBC 2002, c. 75

COMMUNITY CARE AND ASSISTED LIVING APPEAL BOARD. Community Care and Assisted Living Act, SBC 2002, c. 75 Citation: 2010 BCCCALAB 7 Date: 20100712 COMMUNITY CARE AND ASSISTED LIVING APPEAL BOARD Community Care and Assisted Living Act, SBC 2002, c. 75 APPELLANT: RESPONDENT: PANEL: APPEARANCES: TF (the Appellant)

More information

RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING

RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Quebec District Council RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that

More information

HOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD. In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD. And

HOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD. In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD. And HOSPITAL APPEAL BOARD In the matter of DR. IMRAN SAMAD And PROVINCIAL HEALTH SERVICES AUTHORITY and THE CHILDREN S AND WOMEN S HEALTH CENTRE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DECISION ON DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS On January

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Dilshad Hussain Heard on: Tuesday, 19 September 2017 Location: The Chartered Institute

More information

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the: INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA David E. Robbins, Petitioner v. No. 1860 C.D. 2009 Argued September 13, 2010 Insurance Department, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, President

More information

1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code

1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code APPEAL FORM (Form 1) This Appeal Form, along with the required attachments, must be delivered to the Employment Standards Tribunal within the appeal period. See Rule 18(3) of the Tribunal s Rules of Practice

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION

More information

NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS

NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS : DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT : : Disciplinary Proceeding Complainant, : No. C3A030024 : v. : Hearing Officer DMF : RICHARD S. JACOBSON : HEARING PANEL DECISION (CRD #2326286)

More information

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Unofficial English Translation INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA In the matter of: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION. Heard on: 23 October and 5 December 2014

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION. Heard on: 23 October and 5 December 2014 DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mrs Ajda D jelal Heard on: 23 October and 5 December 2014 Location: ACCA Offices, 29

More information

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Rakesh Maharjan Heard on: Monday, 9 October 2017 Location: ACCA Offices, The Adelphi,

More information

Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Province of British Columbia Order No October 3, 1994

Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Province of British Columbia Order No October 3, 1994 1 ISSN 1198-6182 Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Province of British Columbia Order No. 26-1994 October 3, 1994 INQUIRY RE: A Request for Access to a Record of the British Columbia Hydro

More information

(1) Misappropriated funds in the amount of $150,000 from the account of the N.B.O.

(1) Misappropriated funds in the amount of $150,000 from the account of the N.B.O. IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Re: JAMES DONALD BRUCE NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a hearing will be held before

More information

FILE,I) FIB 27 2fi5. CHMON QTA QUANTITATIVE TRADING ARTISTS LLC (NFA ld #424320), NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE HEARING PANEL

FILE,I) FIB 27 2fi5. CHMON QTA QUANTITATIVE TRADING ARTISTS LLC (NFA ld #424320), NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE HEARING PANEL NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE HEARING PANEL FILE,I) ln the Matter of: CHMON QTA QUANTITATIVE TRADING ARTISTS LLC (NFA ld #424320), and FIB 27 2fi5 NATIONAL FUTI I-R. ES ASS C CIATION LEGALDOCIGTII\JG

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A M MURRAY. Between MR NEEAJ KUMAR (ANONYMITY HAS NOT BEEN DIRECTED) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A M MURRAY. Between MR NEEAJ KUMAR (ANONYMITY HAS NOT BEEN DIRECTED) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 13 September 2018 On 9 November 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE I A M MURRAY

More information

Ombudsman s Determination

Ombudsman s Determination Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondent Mr A Rettig UK Pension Scheme (the Scheme) KPMG LLP (KPMG) Complaint Summary 1. Mr A has complained that when a pension sharing order on divorce was

More information

IN THE MATTER OF HENRY WERELABOPHIA ENDELEY, registered foreign lawyer AND DAVID JOHN STEVENSON AND INYANG PATRICIA ENDELEY, solicitors - AND -

IN THE MATTER OF HENRY WERELABOPHIA ENDELEY, registered foreign lawyer AND DAVID JOHN STEVENSON AND INYANG PATRICIA ENDELEY, solicitors - AND - No. 9380-2005 IN THE MATTER OF HENRY WERELABOPHIA ENDELEY, registered foreign lawyer AND DAVID JOHN STEVENSON AND INYANG PATRICIA ENDELEY, solicitors - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Mr

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 18 th July 2017 On 26 th July Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KING TD

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 18 th July 2017 On 26 th July Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KING TD Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/12563/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 18 th July 2017 On 26 th July 2017 Before UPPER

More information

IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before : Mr J Perkins (Vice President) Mrs G Greenwood Miss S E Singer. and ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER, LAGOS

IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before : Mr J Perkins (Vice President) Mrs G Greenwood Miss S E Singer. and ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER, LAGOS Heard at Field House On 13 October 2004 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL 00319 notified:... BY (A good reason to exclude) Nigeria [2004] UKIAT Date Determination...13/12/2004... Before : Mr J Perkins (Vice

More information

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF JACOBUS DAMEN, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

More information

Decision on Settlement Agreement

Decision on Settlement Agreement Unofficial English Translation Re Béland In the matter of: The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Alain

More information

- and - [HIGHGATE REHABILITATION LIMITED] (By Guarantee) Respondent AWARD. 1. This Arbitration concerns [Highgate Rehabilitation] ( [Highgate

- and - [HIGHGATE REHABILITATION LIMITED] (By Guarantee) Respondent AWARD. 1. This Arbitration concerns [Highgate Rehabilitation] ( [Highgate IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN:- [CHEVIOT HILLS LIMITED] Claimant - and - [HIGHGATE REHABILITATION LIMITED] (By Guarantee) Respondent AWARD 1. This

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK QUORUM : Justice Mohammed Bello, President Professor Maurice Glèlè Ahanhanzo, Vice President Justice Lombe Chibesakunda, Member Professor Christian

More information

2012 BCSECCOM 59. David Charles Greenway and Kjeld Werbes. Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Hearing

2012 BCSECCOM 59. David Charles Greenway and Kjeld Werbes. Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Hearing David Charles Greenway and Kjeld Werbes Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Hearing Panel Brent W. Aitken Vice Chair Kenneth G. Hanna Commissioner David J. Smith Commissioner Hearing date January 23, 2012

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MCE [2015] QCA 4 PARTIES: R v MCE (appellant) FILE NO: CA No 186 of 2014 DC No 198 of 2012 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of Appeal Appeal against

More information

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, March 18, Respondent.

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, March 18, Respondent. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. NOBLE B. TRENHAM (CRD No. 449157) Complainant, Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2007007377801 HEARING

More information

DECISION OF THE GENERAL MANAGER LIQUOR CONTROL AND LICENSING BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF. A hearing pursuant to Section 20 of

DECISION OF THE GENERAL MANAGER LIQUOR CONTROL AND LICENSING BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF. A hearing pursuant to Section 20 of DECISION OF THE GENERAL MANAGER LIQUOR CONTROL AND LICENSING BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF A hearing pursuant to Section 20 of The Liquor Control and Licensing Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 267 Licensee: Shu Guo dba

More information

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. ANONYMOUS CASE HISTORIES NUMBER 30547

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. ANONYMOUS CASE HISTORIES NUMBER 30547 CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. ANONYMOUS CASE HISTORIES NUMBER 30547 This is a summary of a decision issued following the June 2018 hearings of the Disciplinary and Ethics Commission

More information

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. (Held at Johannesburg) Case No: J118/98. In the matter between: COMPUTICKET. Applicant. and

IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. (Held at Johannesburg) Case No: J118/98. In the matter between: COMPUTICKET. Applicant. and IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Held at Johannesburg) Case No: J118/98 In the matter between: COMPUTICKET Applicant and MARCUS, M H, NO AND OTHERS Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Date of Hearing:

More information

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT S.N.B. 2004, c. S and - IN THE MATTER OF

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT S.N.B. 2004, c. S and - IN THE MATTER OF IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT S.N.B. 2004, c. S-5.5 - and - IN THE MATTER OF MI CAPITAL CORPORATION, ONE CAPITAL CORP. LIMITED, SEAN AYEARS and SCOTT PARKER (RESPONDENTS) REASONS FOR DECISION Date

More information

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. : DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, : : Disciplinary Proceeding

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. : DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, : : Disciplinary Proceeding NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS : DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, : : Disciplinary Proceeding Complainant, : No. C3A990050 : v. : : Hearing Officer - DMF JIM NEWCOMB : (CRD #1376482), : : HEARING

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record Chapter 3 Preparing the Record After filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant next needs to specify what items are to be in the record (the official account of what went on at the hearing or the trial

More information

Sponsorship Appeal [REDACTED] The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Le Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l Immigration

Sponsorship Appeal [REDACTED] The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Le Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l Immigration Appellant(s) Appelant(s) Respondent Date(s) and Place de of Hearing Date of Decision Panel Appellant s Counsel l appelant(s) Sponsorship Appeal [REDACTED] The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Le

More information

IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP DAVID DOUGLAS JOHN OSBORNE, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974

IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP DAVID DOUGLAS JOHN OSBORNE, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 No. 9390-2005 IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP DAVID DOUGLAS JOHN OSBORNE, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Mr J R C Clitheroe (in the chair) Mr J P Davies Mrs V Murray-Chandra Date of

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER. and IAC-AH-SAR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 27 th October 2015 On 6 th November 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr David Alan Budd Heard on: Thursday, 15 February 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11 John

More information

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 10582-2010 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and DENISE ELAINE GAMMACK Respondent Before: Miss J Devonish

More information

Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal

Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 NOTIFICATION OF THE TRIBUNAL S JUDGMENT This award, (subject to the right of appeal to the Royal Court, as set out in the Law)

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. Heard on: Wednesday, 29 August 2018

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. Heard on: Wednesday, 29 August 2018 DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jahangir Sadiq Heard on: Wednesday, 29 August 2018 Location: ACCA s Offices, The Adelphi,

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RECORD OF DECISION

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RECORD OF DECISION DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RECORD OF DECISION Mr Gerard Keith Rooney (a Member of the Insolvency Practitioners Association) A tribunal of the Disciplinary Committee made the decision recorded below having

More information

Re Clarke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada 2016 IIROC 12

Re Clarke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada 2016 IIROC 12 Re Clarke IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and Gary Clarke 2016 IIROC 12 Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Hearing

More information

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 10922-2012 On 28 June 2013, Mr Moseley appealed against the Tribunal s decision on sanction. The appeal was dismissed

More information

Re Pan. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

Re Pan. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) Re Pan IN THE MATTER OF: The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (IDA) and Sammy Shieh

More information

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND WILLIAM RICHARD BOOTH BELL WRIGHT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Enforcement

More information

VOLUNTARY LABOR ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE., Arbitrator Lee Hornberger Employer. DECISION AND AWARD

VOLUNTARY LABOR ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE., Arbitrator Lee Hornberger Employer. DECISION AND AWARD In the Matter of:, VOLUNTARY LABOR ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE Union, Class Action/Layoff-Recall and FMCS, Arbitrator Lee Hornberger Employer. For the City: 1. APPEARANCES

More information

Right to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work); In the course of employment (reasonably incidental activity test).

Right to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work); In the course of employment (reasonably incidental activity test). SUMMARY 766/91 DECISION NO. 766/91 Foley v. Bondy PANEL: B. Cook; Lebert; Preston DATE: 13/03/92 Right to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work); In the course of employment (reasonably

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 BETWEEN: LAURIANO RAMIREZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice

More information

FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL

FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 Website:

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND - Ontario Commission des 22nd Floor 22e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES

More information

IN THE MATTER OF LORRAINE ANNE MIERS, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974

IN THE MATTER OF LORRAINE ANNE MIERS, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 No. 9846-2007 IN THE MATTER OF LORRAINE ANNE MIERS, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Mr I R Woolfe (in the chair) Mr P Kempster Lady Maxwell-Hyslop Date of Hearing: 13th March

More information

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the: INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND THE DEALER

More information

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA AND SHAUN WAYNE HOWELL NOTICE OF HEARING TAKE NOTICE that

More information

In the Matter of. The FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT (RSBC 1996, c.141) (the "Act") and. The INSURANCE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ("Council") and

In the Matter of. The FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT (RSBC 1996, c.141) (the Act) and. The INSURANCE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Council) and In the Matter of The FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT (RSBC 1996, c.141) (the "Act") and The INSURANCE COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ("Council") and PATRICIA LOUISE SISSONS (the "Licensee") ORDER Pursuant to section

More information

Arbitration CAS 2005/A/940 Abel Xavier v. Hannover 96, award of 6 June 2006

Arbitration CAS 2005/A/940 Abel Xavier v. Hannover 96, award of 6 June 2006 Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2005/A/940 Panel: Mr Chris Georghiades (Cyprus), President; Mr Michele Bernasconi (Switzerland); Mr Raj Parker (United Kingdom)

More information