Recent 2013 Proxy Season Developments
|
|
- Mae Moore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ISS Publishes Proposed Updates to Its 2013 Proxy Voting Guidelines, Including Making Board Responsiveness Policy More Stringent and Revising Pay-for-Performance Test to Account for Company Peer Group and Realizable Compensation SEC Staff Issues Legal Bulletin on Shareholder Proposal Process SUMMARY As issuers and shareholders plan for the 2013 proxy season, they should take into account recent publications by Institutional Shareholder Services, proposing changes to its voting policies on director elections, management say-on-pay proposals and other matters, and by the SEC s Division of Corporation Finance, providing guidance under Rule 14a-8 on shareholder proposal process issues. ISS 2013 PROPOSED POLICY UPDATES ISS, the influential proxy advisory firm, published for public comment on October 16 the following proposed changes to its proxy voting guidelines for 2013: Recommending a vote against or withhold from directors who did not act to implement a shareholder proposal that received a majority of votes cast in the prior year. Under ISS s current policy, it would recommend such a vote only if the shareholder proposal had received a majority of votes outstanding in the prior year, or a majority of votes cast in the prior year and one of the two previous years; Modifying its executive compensation analysis for purposes of management say-on-pay proposals to align its peer group selection more closely with company-selected peer groups and to add realizable pay (as compared to grant date pay) and pledging of company shares by executives and directors as two new qualitative factors; Placing greater emphasis on all change-in-control arrangements (as compared to recent changes to those arrangements) in connection with say-on-golden-parachute votes now required under the Dodd-Frank Act; and New York Washington, D.C. Los Angeles Palo Alto London Paris Frankfurt Tokyo Hong Kong Beijing Melbourne Sydney
2 Changing its recommendation to vote case-by-case on shareholder proposals seeking sustainability metrics (as compared to its current recommendation of generally vote against ). The proposed change to the board responsiveness policy would not only increase the pressure on boards to implement precatory shareholder proposals but could also cause issuers to take steps to prevent such a proposal from coming to a vote and passing in the first place, such as by implementing or proposing a different form of the proposed action. Furthermore, ISS apparently contemplates that this proposed change may have retroactive effect, in that it may apply to vote recommendations in 2013 based on the outcome of a 2012 shareholder vote. The comment period for the policy changes ends on October 31, 2012, and the new policies would apply for annual meetings on or after February 1, All public companies are invited to comment on the proposal. SEC STAFF LEGAL BULLETIN NO. 14G RELATING TO RULE 14A-8 SEC Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14G, also issued on October 16, provides guidance on a number of technical issues relating to the Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposal process, including clarifications of the SEC staff s position on proof of share ownership by indirect owners, requirements for deficiency letters and the use of website references in proposals and supporting statements. ISS 2013 PROPOSED POLICY UPDATES On October 16, 2012, ISS released the 2013 draft updates to its proxy voting guidelines for comment by investors and issuers. 1 Issuers should consider the proposed updates, summarized below, including any impact they may have on the expected level of support for the directors or the company s other proposals. These policies would apply to shareholder meetings held on or after February 1, Comments on the proposed policy changes are due by October 31, BOARD RESPONSE TO MAJORITY-SUPPORTED SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS ISS is proposing a more stringent approach to its policy regarding implementation of shareholdersupported proposals from past years. Specifically, if the proposed policy is adopted, ISS would recommend a vote against or withhold from the entire board (except new nominees, for whom its recommendation would be case-by-case) if the board failed to implement a shareholder proposal that received the support of a majority of the votes cast in the previous year. Currently, ISS employs two less strict criteria, recommending a vote against or withhold if the board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received the majority support of either (1) the shares outstanding in the previous year or (2) the votes cast in the last year and one of the two previous years. 1 The proposed policy updates are available at -2-
3 The adoption by ISS of such a policy would change the current approach of many issuers, which is to allow shareholder proposals to come to a vote and then, taking the voting results, shareholder feedback and market trends into account, to determine whether and how to take responsive action without the threat of impending negative recommendations on directors. Instead, an issuer would be more likely to take action to prevent a precatory shareholder proposal from coming to a vote and passing in the first place for example, by implementing, or proposing to implement, changes that address the topics raised by a proposal in a different manner than that requested by the proposal. This policy change appears to contemplate retroactive application, in that ISS would recommend against or withhold votes in 2013 based on voting results in 2012, even though those voting results occurred prior to the adoption of the new policy. Retroactive application in this manner, however, would be unfair to companies that relied on ISS s existing policies and determined to allow a shareholder proposal to come to a vote in 2012, even though there was a risk that it would pass by a majority of votes cast. These companies may have done so because the directors justifiably expected to have time to take shareholder responses and market trends into consideration in deciding how to proceed without facing an immediate requirement to implement the specific proposal. An abrupt change in policy by ISS would be procedurally unfair. Recommending against or withhold votes in 2013 based on 2012 results would fail to give appropriate consideration to those directors good faith reliance on ISS s then-existing policies in deciding how to approach shareholder proposals in Sullivan & Cromwell and others have raised this concern with representatives of ISS, and our firm intends to submit a formal comment in this regard. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION EVALUATION POLICY ISS is proposing to change three inputs, both quantitative and qualitative, to the executive compensation evaluation policy that it adopted a year ago for purposes of formulating a recommendation on the company s advisory say-on-pay proposal: incorporating information about a company s self-selected peers into ISS s methodology for selecting peer groups as part of its quantitative pay-for-performance analysis; including a comparison of realizable pay to grant date pay as part of its qualitative pay-forperformance analysis at large cap companies; and adding pledging of shares as a negative qualitative factor in assessing executive compensation. Peer group methodology. In conducting its quantitative analysis of pay-for-performance, ISS assesses a relative alignment, comparing companies within groups of peers selected on the basis of market capitalization, revenue (or assets for financial firms), and GICS industry group ISS s construction of Global Industry Classification Standard, or GICS, is an industry taxonomy developed by Standard & Poor s and MSCI that categorizes companies based on two-digit sector codes, four-digit industry group codes within those sectors, six-digit industry codes and eight-digit sub-industry codes.
4 peer groups was a common subject of criticism by companies in the 2012 proxy season. 3 As ISS notes, its current focus on the subject company s GICS industry classification may not reflect multiple business lines in which the company operates, sometimes leading to the exclusion of a company s competitors from, or the inclusion of inappropriate comparisons in, the ISS peer group. ISS s draft revision would incorporate information about a company s self-selected peers to improve this relative comparison. The proposed change in methodology would draw peers from GICS classifications represented in the company s self-selected peer group, while maintaining the approximate proportions of these industries in the ISS peer group where possible. The methodology also would prioritize peers that maintain the company near the median of the peer group, that are in the subject company s peer group, and that have chosen the subject company as a peer. 4 Because many companies create peer groups based on multiple factors in addition to the GICS group, it is possible that ISS s focus on that factor may have unintended consequences. It may be useful for companies to review their current peer group from ISS s proposed perspective and evaluate the result. Realizable pay. If ISS s quantitative pay-for-performance analysis demonstrates weak alignment, then ISS conducts a further qualitative review to determine a final vote recommendation on management sayon-pay. This qualitative review takes into account a broad range of factors, including the use of performance-based awards, performance goals, peer group benchmarking, and financial performance. ISS is proposing adding realizable pay as compared to grant pay as one of these factors for large cap companies. Realizable pay would consist of the sum of relevant cash and equity-based grants and awards made during a specified performance period being measured, based on equity award values for actual earned awards, or target values for ongoing awards, calculated using the stock price at the end of the performance measurement period. In other words, it calculates performance-based pay by the final payouts made (or changes in value to ongoing awards) due to gains or losses in the company s stock price over the measurement period. In doing so, it attempts to show how executive pay has been affected by performance. ISS states that grant date pay, by contrast, shows the intent of the pay decisions of the compensation committee. Unfortunately, neither the SEC s current summary compensation table nor ISS s proposed realizable pay calculation is entirely consistent, with both including elements of both grant date pay and earned pay. Pledging of shares. ISS currently evaluates pay elements that are not based directly on performance on a case-by-case basis, but it maintains a list of problematic practices that carry significant weight in this overall consideration and may result in adverse vote recommendations. ISS is proposing adding 3 4 For a discussion of ISS s executive compensation methodology, including common criticisms thereof, see our publication, dated July 9, 2012, entitled 2012 Proxy Season Review. Additional proposed changes include focusing initially on an 8-digit GICS classification to identify comparable peers in terms of industry (as opposed to the current 2-digit GICS focus), using slightly relaxed size requirements (especially at very small and very large companies), and using revenues instead of assets for certain financial companies. -4-
5 pledging of company stock by executives or directors to this list of problematic practices. 5 In ISS s view, pledging stock for margin accounts or other loans may adversely affect shareholders or the company by, among other possibilities, forcing the executive or director to sell a significant amount of company stock to satisfy a margin call, which could impact the company s stock price or violate company insider trading policies, as well as allowing the executive or director to hedge economic exposure to the company s stock, even while maintaining voting rights. Although, as ISS notes, pledging policies are not tied to compensation, it believes say-on-pay proposals are a reasonable mechanism for shareholders to voice concern with companies pledging policies because most executives and directors receive a substantial portion of their company shares through compensation programs. Details not yet published. The proposed executive compensation policy changes generally omit significant details, especially as to the realizable pay and pledging of shares revisions. For example, ISS expressly seeks comments regarding the appropriate measurement period for realizable pay and how to define a significant level of pledging of company stock that causes concern for investors. Accordingly, it may be difficult for companies to assess how ISS will evaluate particular compensation decisions under the proposed policy changes. SAY-ON-GOLDEN-PARACHUTE PROPOSALS Under SEC rules adopted in January 2011 pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, companies are required to hold a separate advisory vote on potential severance and change-in-control payments when seeking shareholder approval for mergers and other similar transactions. ISS s proposed policy change regarding these so-called say-on-golden-parachute votes would continue to evaluate proposals on a case-by-case basis and take into account the factors set forth in ISS s existing policies, adopted by ISS a year ago, such as single-trigger acceleration of unvested equity awards, excessive severance payments, and a company s assertion that the proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote. The proposed 2013 policy, however, includes a focus on all existing change-incontrol arrangements with executive officers, rather than focusing only on new or extended arrangements as under the current policy. Thus, for example, where the current policy considers factors such as recently adopted or materially amended agreements that include modified single triggers or excise tax gross-up provisions, the proposed 2013 policy would consider factors such as, simply, Single- or modified-single-trigger cash severance and Excessive golden parachute payments (on an absolute basis or as a percentage of transaction equity value). It also offers a specific definition for excessive cash severance: greater than three times base salary and bonus. The proposal states that recent amendments that incorporate problematic features will tend to carry more weight on the overall analysis, but that the presence of multiple legacy problematic features also will be closely scrutinized. 5 Companies are required to disclose shares pledged by executive officers and directors in the proxy statement pursuant to Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. -5-
6 ISS indicated that these proposed policy changes will likely increase the number of ISS negative vote recommendations. ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE METRICS FOR COMPENSATION ISS is proposing to modify its general position on shareholder proposals urging the company to link executive compensation to environmental and social non-financial performance (often referred to as sustainability metrics ) from generally vote against to vote case-by-case. Additionally, the policy would delete the illustrative list of specific social and environmental criteria to which a shareholder proposal might seek to link compensation, 6 thus employing only the general term sustainability criteria, and would clarify that sustainability refers equally to environmental and social issues. Finally, in evaluating any particular proposal, ISS would change the existing factor of whether the company has significant and persistent controversies or violations regarding sustainability issues to whether the company has significant and/or persistent controversies or violations. These changes are intended to provide ISS with greater flexibility to incorporate developments in evolving environmental and social issues, particularly for certain industries such as the extractive industry sector or other sectors where companies have greater exposure to environmental issues. SEC STAFF LEGAL BULLETIN NO. 14G RELATING TO RULE 14A-8 Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14G ( SLB 14G ) 7 provides further guidance on a number of process issues that have caused significant confusion, and thus been the subject of past Staff Legal Bulletins and no-action requests, relating to Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposals. PROOF OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP Rule 14a-8(b) provides that, to be eligible to submit a shareholder proposal for inclusion in the company s proxy materials, a shareholder must provide documentation proving that the shareholder has continuously held at least $2,000 in market value or 1% of the company s securities entitled to vote at the shareholder meeting for at least one year as of the date the shareholder submits the proposal. If the shareholder is a beneficial owner of the securities, Rule 14a-8(b)(2)(i) provides that this documentation can be in the form of a written statement from the record holder of the securities. In October 2011, the SEC s Division of Corporation Finance published Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14F, which provided guidance on the definition of record holder for purposes of the proof of ownership requirement, 6 7 Under the existing policy, those specified criteria are corporate downsizings, customer or employee satisfaction, community involvement, human rights, environmental performance, or predatory lending. SLB 14G is available on the SEC website at -6-
7 stating that only securities intermediaries that are participants in The Depository Trust Company ( DTC ) system should be viewed as record holders of securities that are deposited at DTC. 8 This year, in SLB 14G, the Division noted that, during the 2012 proxy season, some companies questioned the sufficiency of proof of ownership letters from entities that were affiliates of DTC participants, but were not themselves DTC participants. The Division formalized the position it took in several no-action letter responses during the 2012 proxy season, stating that a proof of ownership letter from an affiliate of a DTC participant 9 will satisfy the requirement to provide proof of ownership for purposes of Rule 14a-8(b)(2)(i). The Division also indicated that it will require greater specificity from issuers in their deficiency letters to shareholders before allowing the exclusion of a proposal for failure to provide proof of ownership for the specific one-year period required. In submitting proof of ownership, shareholders must verify that they own the requisite amount of shares for the one-year period preceding and including the date on which the shareholder submits the proposal. If an ownership letter refers to a date before the proposal is submitted, or if it refers to a date after the proposal was submitted but covers a period of only one year, then the letter fails to provide proof of beneficial ownership over the full one-year period. In either case, under Rule 14a-8(f), the company may exclude the proposal only if the company notifies the shareholder of the defect and the shareholder fails to correct it. In SLB 14G, the Division takes the position that it will not allow a proposal to be excluded under Rules 14a-8(b) and 14a-8(f) unless the company s deficiency letter identifies the specific date on which the proposal was submitted and explains that the proponent must obtain a new proof of ownership letter covering the full one-year period to cure the defect. According to the Division, identifying the specific submission date in the deficiency letter will aid shareholders in instances when it is difficult for them to determine the submission date on their own, such as when the proposal is postmarked with a different date than when the shareholder placed it in the mail. Additionally, the Division states that companies should include copies of the postmark or evidence of electronic transmission with their no-action requests. USE OF WEBSITES IN PROPOSALS AND SUPPORTING STATEMENTS The Division also formalized its no-action position that shareholders may include references to websites within a proposal or supporting statement, and that the website will continue to count as only one word for purposes of the 500-word limitation, subject to the following three qualifications: 8 9 For a detailed discussion of SLB 14F, see our publication, dated October 28, 2011, entitled 2012 Proxy Season Developments. According to SLB 14G, an entity is an affiliate of a DTC participant if the entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the DTC participant. -7-
8 First, under Rule 14a-8(i)(3), a company may exclude a proposal as vague and indefinite if neither the shareholders voting on the proposal, nor the company in implementing it (if adopted), would be able to determine with reasonable certainty exactly what actions or measures the proposal requires. Where the shareholder proposal or supporting statement refers to a website, the Division takes the position that the proposal and supporting statements themselves nevertheless still must contain the information necessary to satisfy this definiteness requirement. That is, even if information available on the website supplements the proposal, shareholders and the company must be able to discern exactly what the proposal requires without reviewing the information provided on the website. Second, a proposal cannot be excluded solely because the referenced website is not yet operational. To benefit from this position, however, the shareholder must provide the company, at the time when the proposal is submitted, with the materials intended for publication on the website and a representation that the website will be operational when the company files its definitive proxy. Third, because a shareholder easily may change website content after submission of a proposal, the Division takes the position that a company may seek SEC staff approval to exclude a website reference if later revisions to the website render it excludable for any reason. Furthermore, although Rule 14a-8(j) requires a company to submit reasons for exclusion no later than 80 days before filing its definitive proxy materials, the Division indicated that we may concur that the changes to the referenced website constitute good cause for a company to request and receive a waiver of the 80-day deadline. * * * Copyright Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
9 ABOUT SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a global law firm that advises on major domestic and cross-border M&A, finance, corporate and real estate transactions, significant litigation and corporate investigations, and complex restructuring, regulatory, tax and estate planning matters. Founded in 1879, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has more than 800 lawyers on four continents, with four offices in the United States, including its headquarters in New York, three offices in Europe, two in Australia and three in Asia. CONTACTING SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP This publication is provided by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as a service to clients and colleagues. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Questions regarding the matters discussed in this publication may be directed to any of our lawyers listed below, or to any other Sullivan & Cromwell LLP lawyer with whom you have consulted in the past on similar matters. If you have not received this publication directly from us, you may obtain a copy of any past or future related publications from Jay Plum ( ; plumj@sullcrom.com) in our New York office. CONTACTS New York Robert Buckholz buckholzr@sullcrom.com Catherine M. Clarkin clarkinc@sullcrom.com Jay Clayton claytonwj@sullcrom.com Audra D. Cohen cohena@sullcrom.com H. Rodgin Cohen cohenhr@sullcrom.com Donald R. Crawshaw crawshawd@sullcrom.com Robert W. Downes downesr@sullcrom.com Matthew M. Friestedt friestedtm@sullcrom.com Joseph B. Frumkin frumkinj@sullcrom.com David B. Harms harmsd@sullcrom.com Alexandra D. Korry korrya@sullcrom.com Stephen M. Kotran kotrans@sullcrom.com John P. Mead meadj@sullcrom.com Scott D. Miller millersc@sullcrom.com James C. Morphy morphyj@sullcrom.com Robert W. Reeder III reederr@sullcrom.com Robert M. Schlein schleinr@sullcrom.com Glen T. Schleyer schleyerg@sullcrom.com Max J. Schwartz schwartzmax@sullcrom.com Andrew D. Soussloff soussloffa@sullcrom.com Marc Trevino trevinom@sullcrom.com -9-
10 Washington, D.C. Rebecca S. Coccaro Janet T. Geldzahler Eric J. Kadel, Jr Robert S. Risoleo Los Angeles Patrick S. Brown Eric M. Krautheimer Alison S. Ressler Palo Alto Sarah P. Payne John L. Savva London Nikolaos G. Andronikos Kathryn A. Campbell Richard C. Morrissey John O'Connor William A. Plapinger David Rockwell George H. White III Paris Krystian Czerniecki William D. Torchiana Frankfurt Krystian Czerniecki David Rockwell Melbourne Robert Chu Sydney Waldo D. Jones, Jr Tokyo Izumi Akai Hong Kong William Y. Chua Michael G. DeSombre Chun Wei John D. Young, Jr
11 Beijing Garth Bray SC1:
NYSE Notice Procedures
NYSE Proposes to Require Electronic Submission of Notices to NYSE Through Web-Based Communication System SUMMARY The SEC has published for public comment proposed changes to the New York Stock Exchange
More informationSEC Finalizes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence
SEC Finalizes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence Exchanges Still Responsible for Key Details, Including Definition of Independence, and Have 90 Days to Propose
More informationNasdaq Compensation Committee Independence Requirements
Nasdaq Compensation Committee Independence Requirements SEC Publishes Nasdaq Rule Change Removing Prohibition on Receipt of Compensatory Fees by Compensation Committee Members; Change Aligns Nasdaq Rule
More informationFinal Stock Exchange Rules for Compensation Committees and Advisers
Final Stock Exchange Rules for Compensation Committees and Advisers SEC Approves NYSE and Nasdaq Revised Listing Standards; Board Action Required by July 1, 2013 with Regard to Compensation Committee Authority
More informationTweets Allowed in Proxy Contests and Securities Offerings
Tweets Allowed in Proxy Contests and Securities Offerings New SEC Guidance Allows Use of Hyperlinks to Satisfy Legend Requirements in Social Media Communications with Character Limits and Limits Issuers
More informationSEC Proposes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence
SEC Proposes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence Exchanges Will Be Responsible for Details, Including Whether Significant Stock Ownership Will Impact Committee
More informationSEC Adopts CEO Pay Ratio Rule
New Rule Will Not Be Effective Until 2018 Proxy Season SUMMARY On Wednesday, the SEC published the text of its final rule, adopted that morning by a three-to-two vote, that U.S. public companies disclose:
More informationProxy Litigation SUMMARY. February 27, 2013
Court Enjoins Apple Shareholder Vote on a Charter Amendment Under SEC s Unbundling Rules but Refuses to Enjoin Say-on-Pay Vote Based on CD&A Disclosure SUMMARY On February 22, 2013, the United States District
More informationISS Proxy Voting Policy Updates
Updates for U.S. Companies in 2017 Include Negative Director Recommendations for Dual-Class IPO Companies and Implementation of Tougher Overboarding Restriction SUMMARY Yesterday, Institutional Shareholder
More informationSEC Staff Begins Taking Steps to Reform Shareholder Proposals
SEC Staff Begins Taking Steps to Reform Shareholder Proposals Guidance Contemplates New Board of Director Involvement in the Ordinary Business and Economic Relevance Exclusions and Suggests the Staff Would
More informationNYSE Corporate Governance Standards
SEC Publishes Proposed Changes to Update and Clarify NYSE Corporate Governance Standards SUMMARY The SEC has published for public comment proposed changes to the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance
More informationISS Releases 2018 Voting Policy Updates
Focus on Excessive Non-Employee Director Compensation, Board Diversity and Gender Pay Gap Continues While Poison Pills Return to the Spotlight SUMMARY Yesterday, Institutional Shareholder Services published
More informationEmergency SEC Orders Concerning Short Sales
Emergency SEC Orders Concerning Short Sales SEC Takes Temporary Action to Prohibit Most Short Sales in Publicly Traded Shares of Certain Financial Firms and to Require Certain Institutional Investment
More informationSEC Guidance on Reporting for U.S. Tax Reform
SEC Guidance on Reporting for U.S. Tax Reform SEC Staff Releases Guidance on Form 8-K Reporting for the Re-Measurement of Deferred Tax Assets and on Initial Income Tax Effects of New Tax Legislation SUMMARY
More informationISS Publishes Guidance on Pay-for- Performance Assessments and Updates to Governance Ratings System
ISS Publishes Guidance on Pay-for- Performance Assessments and Updates to Governance Ratings System Provides Additional Detail on Measuring Relative and Absolute Alignment Between CEO Pay and Total Shareholder
More informationSEC Approves New PCAOB Auditor Reporting Standard
SEC Approves New PCAOB Auditor Reporting Standard New Standard Expands the Scope of the Auditor s Report and Requires Auditors to Identify and Discuss Critical Audit Matters SUMMARY On October 23, 2017,
More informationSEC Approves New PCAOB Auditing Standard Relating to Communications Between Auditors and Audit Committees
January 2, 2013 SEC Approves New PCAOB Auditing Standard Relating to Communications Between Auditors and The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has approved Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications
More informationSEC Approves NYSE Proposal to Facilitate Listings of Companies Without a Trading History
SEC Approves NYSE Proposal to Facilitate Listings of Companies Without a Trading History SUMMARY On February 2, 2018, the SEC issued an order approving, on an accelerated basis, a proposed rule filed by
More informationForeign Private Issuer Exemption from SEC Registration
SEC Proposes to Amend the Rule 12g3-2(b) Exemption SUMMARY On February 25, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission published proposed amendments to Rule 12g3-2(b), which provides an exemption from
More informationFINRA Corporate Financing
FINRA Solicits Comments on Proposed Amendments to the Corporate Financing Rule (Underwriting Terms and Arrangements) SUMMARY FINRA is soliciting comments on proposed amendments to FINRA Rule 5110 the Corporate
More informationISS to Introduce QuickScore 3.0 on Friday
New Governance Factors Previewed; Details to be Published on October 31; Data Verification Period to Follow Through November 14 SUMMARY Institutional Shareholder Services, the proxy advisory firm, has
More informationNew SEC Staff Guidance on Shareholder Proposals
New SEC Staff Guidance on Shareholder Proposals Continues to Encourage Board of Director Involvement in the Ordinary Business and Economic Relevance Exclusions and Provides Examples of Useful Factors from
More informationLarge Trader Reporting System
SEC Proposes Creation of a Reporting and Information-Gathering System Applicable to Certain Large Market Participants and U.S. Registered Broker-Dealers SUMMARY The SEC has proposed a new Rule 13h-1 and
More informationPrivate Offering Reform
SEC Publishes Details of Proposed New Exemption Permitting Limited Publicity in Unregistered Offerings SUMMARY The Securities and Exchange Commission has published the text of proposed revisions to Regulation
More informationProperty Disclosure Rules for Mining Registrants
Property Disclosure Rules for Mining Registrants SEC s Proposal Would Align Its Disclosure Requirements With Current Industry and Global Regulatory Standards SUMMARY The SEC has proposed rules to modernize
More informationRegistered Offerings of Debt Securities
SEC Proposes Amendments to Simplify and Streamline Financial Disclosures About Issuers and Guarantors of Guaranteed Securities and Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize Registered Securities SUMMARY
More informationIn the Matter of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. Shareholder Litigation
In the Matter of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. Shareholder Litigation New York Court of Appeals Adopts MFW Business Judgment Standard of Review for Squeeze-Out Mergers In, 1 the New York Court of Appeals
More informationSEC Adopts Final Rules to Implement the Resource Payments Disclosure Requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act
SEC Adopts Final Rules to Implement the Resource Payments Disclosure Requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act Final Rules Require Filing a Separate Report Disclosing Payments Made to Governments for the Commercial
More informationSEC Proposes Rule Regarding Communications Involving Security- Based Swaps Entered Into Solely by Eligible Contract Participants
SEC Proposes Rule Regarding Communications Involving Security- Based Swaps Entered Into Solely by Eligible Contract Participants SUMMARY On September 8, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed
More informationSEC Adopts New Rules Affecting Public Company Reporting
SEC Adopts New Rules Affecting Public Company Reporting SEC Requires Use of Inline XBRL for Public Companies Including Funds, Eliminates XBRL Website Posting Requirement, Expands Companies Eligible for
More informationShareholder Proxy Access
SEC Proposes Two Mutually Exclusive Alternatives on Shareholder Access; Proposals Would Prohibit or Permit Binding Shareholder Proposals SUMMARY At its July 25, 2007 meeting, the SEC revisited the issue
More informationCompensation and Corporate Governance Disclosure and Proxy Solicitation
Compensation and Corporate Governance Disclosure and Proxy Solicitation SEC Publishes Proposed Rules to Expand Disclosure Regarding Compensation and Corporate Governance Matters and to Clarify Proxy Solicitation
More informationProxy System Modernization
SEC Issues Concept Release Seeking Comment on Perceived Deficiencies in the U.S. Proxy System and Potential Regulatory Responses SUMMARY On July 14, 2010, the SEC issued a concept release seeking public
More informationSULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP August 3, 2005 M EMORANDUM Re: Executive Summary: SEC Adopts Landmark Reforms to the Registered Securities Offering Process The SEC has unanimously adopted new rules and amendments
More informationIn re Micromet, Inc. Shareholders Litigation
Delaware Chancery Court Reaffirms Revlon Duties related to Pre- Signing Market Checks and Parameters of Fiduciary Duty of Disclosure SUMMARY In its recent Micromet 1 preliminary injunction decision, the
More informationSEC Provides Relief to Security-Based Swap Dealers From Business Conduct Rules
SEC Provides Relief to Security-Based Swap Dealers From Business Conduct Rules Relief From Certain Documentation Requirements Under the SEC s Business Conduct Rules Would Apply for Five Years After the
More informationBrexit: U.S. Agencies Facilitate Legacy Swap Transfers
Brexit: U.S. Agencies Facilitate Legacy Swap Transfers Under Interim Final Rule, Legacy Swaps Currently Exempt from the Swap Margin Rule Would Maintain Legacy Status If Transferred from U.K. Financial
More informationSEC Work Plan for Consideration of IFRS Adoption
SEC Work Plan for Consideration of IFRS Adoption SEC Publishes a Work Plan to Study Potential Adoption of IFRS for U.S. Issuers; Potential Transition to IFRS Delayed Until 2015-2016 SUMMARY The SEC has
More informationEuropean Commission Proposes Disclosure Requirements for Payments to Governments for the Development of Natural Resources
European Commission Proposes Disclosure Requirements f Payments to Governments f the Development of Natural Resources Summary Side-by-Side Comparison of and United States Proposals SUMMARY On October 25,
More informationJANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. CNET Networks, Inc.
JANA Master Fund, Ltd. v. CNET Networks, Inc. Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Company's Advance Notice Bylaw Applies Only to 14a-8 Proposals, and Not Independently Financed Proxy Solicitations SUMMARY
More informationSEC Reopens Comment Period on Proposed Rules Regarding Security-Based Swaps
SEC Reopens Comment Period on Proposed Rules Regarding Security-Based Swaps SEC Reopens Comment Period and Requests Additional Comment on Previously Proposed Rules Regarding Capital, Margin and Collateral
More informationProposed Roadmap For IFRS Adoption
SEC Proposes a Roadmap that Could Lead to Mandatory Use of IFRS by U.S. Issuers Beginning in 2014-2016; Also Proposes Rules Permitting Early Use of IFRS by Certain U.S. Issuers SUMMARY The SEC has published
More informationCompany Halts Initial Coin Offering After SEC Issues Cease-and-Desist Order; SEC Chairman Issues Statement on Blockchain- Based Offerings
Company Halts Initial Coin Offering After SEC Issues Cease-and-Desist Order; SEC Chairman Issues Statement on Blockchain- Based Offerings Without Alleging Fraud, SEC Order Finds That Company s Token Sale
More informationMore Clarity for Delaware Directors When Considering Restructuring Transactions
More Clarity for Delaware Directors When Considering Transactions SUMMARY In Quadrant Structured Products Co., Ltd. v. Vertin (May 4, 2015) ( Quadrant ), the Delaware Court of Chancery confirms again that
More informationOCC Issues Updated Policy for Determining the Impact of Discriminatory or Illegal Credit Practices on Community Reinvestment Act Ratings
OCC Issues Updated Policy for Determining the Impact of Discriminatory or Illegal Credit Practices on Community Reinvestment Act Ratings OCC Issues Policies and Procedures Manual Update Setting Forth a
More informationTax Reform Bill Proposes Significant Compensation Changes
Tax Reform Bill Proposes Significant Compensation Changes Tax Reform Proposal Would Eliminate Nonqualified Deferred Compensation, Limit Deductions for Payments to Highly Compensated Officers and Restrict
More informationAgencies Release New FAQ on CEO Certification Requirement, Setting March 31, 2016 Deadline for Initial Submissions
Agencies Release New FAQ on CEO Certification Requirement, Setting March 31, 2016 Deadline for Initial Submissions Earlier today, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve
More informationDelaware s Most Recent Thinking on the Preferred-Common Conflict: Hsu v. ODN Holding Corp. and In re Appraisal of GoodCents Holdings, Inc.
Delaware s Most Recent Thinking on the Preferred-Common Conflict: Hsu v. ODN Holding Corp. and In re Appraisal of GoodCents Holdings, Inc. Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses the Rights of Preferred Stockholders
More informationProposed Regulations Would Greatly Expand Reach of ERISA Fiduciary Exposure
Proposed Regulations Would Greatly Expand Reach of ERISA Fiduciary Exposure Adoption Would Extend ERISA s Prudence and Conflict of Interest Rules to Those Providing Investment Advice to Employee Benefit
More informationAdjusting to Shareholder Activism
Active Shareholders are the New Normal, Placing a Premium on Management Preparedness, Board Awareness and Ongoing Shareholder Engagement for Public Companies SUMMARY The results of the 2013 proxy season
More informationSEC and CFTC Adopt Product Definitions Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank
SEC and CFTC Adopt Product Definitions Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank The SEC and CFTC Voted to Further Define Swap, Security-Based Swap, and Security-Based Swap Agreement and Finalize Related Requirements;
More informationIn re Orchard Enterprises, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc. Stockholder Litigation Delaware Court of Chancery Provides Guidance on Squeeze-Out Mergers and Entire Fairness Review at Summary Judgment SUMMARY In a recent opinion analyzing
More informationFDIC Proposal on Compensation Programs
FDIC Authorizes Publication of Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Employee Compensation at Banking Organizations SUMMARY At the January 12, 2010 meeting, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit
More informationIRS Releases Initial Guidance on the 2017 Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code s Limitation on Deduction for Certain Executive Compensation
IRS Releases Initial Guidance on the 2017 Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code s Limitation on Deduction for Certain Executive Compensation Notice 2018-68 Provides Guidance on the Application of the
More informationBank Capital Plans and Stress Tests
FDIC and OCC Propose Amendments to Their Stress Testing Rules SUMMARY On December 18, the FDIC and the OCC issued proposed rules that would amend their respective stress testing rules that implement the
More informationIn re: Appraisal of Dell Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery Determines Fair Value Is 28% Higher Than Merger Price Following an Auctioned Arm s-length MBO SUMMARY In, 1 the Delaware Court of Chancery (Laster, V.C.) held in an appraisal
More informationBank Capital Plans and Stress Tests
January 26, 2016 Bank Capital Plans and Stress Tests Federal Reserve Finalizes Rule Revising FR Y-14 Forms to Include CFO Attestation Requirements for Certain Large Bank Holding Companies On January 21,
More informationFederal Reserve Supervision
Federal Reserve Updates Consolidated Supervision Framework for Large Financial Institutions SUMMARY On December 17, 2012, the staff of the Federal Reserve issued a Supervision and Regulation ( SR ) letter
More informationSEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank
SEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank SEC Issues Interim Final Rules and Order to Provide Relief from Certain Provisions That Would Be Effective on July 16,
More informationConflicts of Interest in Securitizations
SEC Proposes Rule under Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Act to Prohibit Securitization Participants from Engaging in Transactions Involving Material Conflicts of Interest with ABS Investors SUMMARY On September
More informationRegulators Explain Examination Approach for Compliance With FinCEN s Customer Due Diligence Rule
Regulators Explain Examination Approach for Compliance With FinCEN s Customer Due Diligence Rule FFIEC s New Examination Procedures Align with FinCEN s Rule and Existing Guidance; Impose No Lower Beneficial
More informationABS Shelf Eligibility Criteria
SEC Re-proposes Shelf Eligibility Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities SUMMARY On July 26, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission re-proposed eligibility criteria for shelf registration of asset-backed
More informationImplementation of Title VII of Dodd-Frank
SEC Issues Proposed Rules to Mitigate Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Operation of Security-Based Swap Clearing Agencies, Security- Based Swap Execution Facilities and Security-Based Swap Exchanges
More informationCOBRADesk Same Day Clearance
FINRA Announces Optional Procedure for Same Day Clearance of Shelf Filings under Rule 5110 SUMMARY The FINRA Corporate Financing Department has created a Same Day Clearance Option that allows issuers and
More informationClearing Exemption for Inter-Affiliate Swaps
CFTC Proposes Rule to Exempt Swaps between Certain Affiliated Entities from the Clearing Requirement under Dodd-Frank SUMMARY On August 16, 2012, the CFTC issued a proposed rule to exempt swaps between
More informationProposed Dodd-Frank Section 943 Rules
SEC Proposes Disclosure Requirements Regarding Representations and Warranties in Asset-Backed Securities Offerings SUMMARY On October 4, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules pursuant
More informationIn re Southern Peru Copper Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation
In re Southern Peru Copper Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation Delaware Chancery Court Finds Acquisition by Southern Peru Copper of a Subsidiary Owned by Its Controlling Shareholder Did Not Satisfy
More informationProposed Dodd-Frank Section 945 Rules
SEC Proposes Requirements Regarding Review of Assets Underlying Asset-Backed Securities Offerings and Disclosure of Findings and Conclusions SUMMARY On October 13, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationFinCEN Issues Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Customer Due Diligence Requirements
FinCEN Issues Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Customer Due Diligence Requirements Frequently Asked Questions Clarify Aspects of Beneficial Ownership Threshold, Identity Collection and Verification,
More informationProposed Rules Under the Investment Advisers Act
Proposed Rules Under the Investment Advisers Act SEC Proposes Rules to Implement Dodd-Frank Act Registration Requirements for Advisers to Private Funds; Registration Exemptions for Venture Capital Funds,
More informationRecovery Planning Guidelines for Certain Large Banks
Recovery Planning Guidelines for Certain Large Banks Proposed OCC Guidelines Would Require Recovery Planning for Large National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations and Insured Federal Branches
More informationFederal Reserve Issues Statement of Intent to Extend the Volcker Rule Conformance Period Through July 21, 2017 for CLOs
April 8, 2014 Federal Reserve Issues Statement of Intent to Extend the Conformance Period Through July 21, 2017 for CLOs Late yesterday afternoon, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
More informationTreasury Issues Comprehensive Report on Capital Markets Reform
Treasury Issues Comprehensive Report on Capital Markets Reform Trump Executive Order Required Fundamental Reassessment of Existing Rules; Treasury Submits the Second of Four Reports Examining the Regulatory
More informationCorporate Disclosure of Government Enforcement Developments
Corporate Disclosure of Government Enforcement Developments U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Holds No General Duty for Issuers to Disclose SEC Investigations or Receipt of SEC
More informationFederal Reserve Proposes New Rating System
Federal Reserve Proposes New Rating System Federal Reserve Proposes to Establish a New Rating System for the Supervision of Large Financial Institutions Designed to Align with the Supervisory Program for
More informationFederal Banking Agencies Release New Guidance on the Treatment of Foreign Excluded Funds Under the Volcker Rule
Federal Banking Agencies Release New Guidance on the Treatment of Foreign Excluded Funds Under the SUMMARY On Friday afternoon, the staffs of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal
More informationBank Capital Plans and Stress Tests
Federal Reserve Board Proposes Rule Revising FR Y-14 Forms to Include CFO Attestation Requirements for Certain Large Bank Holding Companies SUMMARY On September 16, 2015, the Board of Governors of the
More informationInternal Revenue Service Directive to Examiners on Equity Swaps
Internal Revenue Service Directive to Examiners on Equity Swaps The Internal Revenue Service Outlines its Approach for Examining Equity Swaps That May Have Been Executed to Avoid U.S. Withholding Tax SUMMARY
More informationAnother Vice Chancellor Considers Appraisal in Light of Dell and DFC and Another Appraisal Petitioner Gets Less than Deal Price
Another Vice Chancellor Considers Appraisal in Light of Dell and DFC and Another Appraisal Petitioner Gets Less than Deal Price However, This Time, the Court of Chancery Relies on DCF Analysis and Not
More informationOCC Lending Limit Rules
OCC Issues Interim Final Rules Applying the Lending Limit for National Banks and Savings Associations to the Credit Exposure to Derivatives and Securities Financing Transactions SUMMARY On June 20, the
More informationVolcker Rule. Agencies Release Limited Volcker Rule Guidance. June 10, 2014
June 10, 2014 Volcker Rule Agencies Release Limited Volcker Rule Guidance This afternoon, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve ), the Office of the Comptroller of the
More informationCorporate Expatriation Transactions
IRS and Treasury Issue Regulations on the Substantial Business Activities Exception and Finalize Regulations on Surrogate Foreign Corporations Under Section 7874 SUMMARY On June 7, 2012, the IRS and the
More informationNew Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty
July 9, 2015 New Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty Financial Institutions and Counterparties Must Retroactively Disclose Participation
More informationRisk-Based Bank Capital Guidelines
Federal Banking Agencies Seek Comment on Alternatives to Credit Ratings in Risk-Based Capital Guidelines SUMMARY On August 10, 2010, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors
More informationConcentration Limits on Large Financial Companies
Federal Reserve Approves Final Rule Implementing Dodd-Frank s Financial Sector Concentration Limit SUMMARY Last week, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve ) approved
More informationCFTC Chairman Releases White Paper on Cross-Border Swaps Regulation Version 2.0
CFTC Chairman Releases White Paper on Cross-Border Swaps Regulation Version 2.0 White Paper Proposes New Approach to Providing Exemptions and Other Relief from CFTC s Dodd-Frank Swaps Rules for Certain
More informationINSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES (ISS) AND GLASS LEWIS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE 2013 PROXY SEASON
January 29, 2013 INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES (ISS) AND GLASS LEWIS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE 2013 PROXY SEASON To Our Clients and Friends: Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationISS Issues Final 2013 Voting Policy Updates
CLIENT MEMORANDUM ISS Issues Final 2013 Voting Policy Updates November 20, 2012 On November 16, 2012, Institutional Shareholder Services issued its final updates to its proxy voting guidelines for the
More informationSpin-Off and Listing by Introduction of Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited
Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction of Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited Spin-Off by U.S.-Listed Companies via a Listing by Introduction on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange 1 SUMMARY China Natural Resources,
More informationBank Capital Plans and Stress Tests
Approves Final Rule Amending Certain Aspects of Existing Capital Plan and Stress Test Rules SUMMARY Last Friday, the Board of Governors of the System approved a final rule (the Final Rule ) amending certain
More informationBank Mergers & Acquisitions
Federal Reserve Board s Approval of Capital One's Acquisition of ING Direct Discusses Financial Stability Factor INTRODUCTION Late yesterday, the Federal Reserve Board ("FRB") issued an Order (the "Capital
More informationEmergency Economic Stabilization Act
Troubled Asset Relief Program and Related Measures Enacted into Law SUMMARY President Bush on Friday signed into law the of 2008 (the Act ). The Act seeks to restore stability and liquidity to the financial
More informationBank Capital Requirements
Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC Release Joint Proposal Regarding the Implementation of CECL and Their Regulatory Capital Rules SUMMARY On April 13 and 17, 2018, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC
More informationIn re MFW Shareholders Litigation
Controlling Stockholder s Upfront Commitment to Both Approval by Special Committee and Majority-of-the-Minority Vote Warrants Business Judgment Rule Standard of Review For Freeze-Out Mergers SUMMARY In
More informationMoney Market Mutual Funds
Financial Stability Oversight Council Proposes Recommendations for Money Market Mutual Fund Regulation SUMMARY On November 19, 2012, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the FSOC ) published for
More informationDelaware Supreme Court Rejects Bad Faith Claim Against Lyondell Board
Delaware Supreme Court Rejects Bad Faith Claim Against Lyondell Board The Court Rejects a Claim that a Truncated Sale Process Run by an Independent Board Violated the Directors Duty to Act in Good Faith
More informationDepositary Receipts Program Payments
IRS Releases Chief Counsel Memorandum Applying Withholding Tax to Payments Made to a Non-U.S. Corporate Issuer Participating in a Sponsored American Depositary Receipts Program SUMMARY On December 17,
More informationRegulated Investment Companies
IRS Extends Guidance on Stock Distributions to Publicly-Traded SUMMARY On January 7, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Procedure 2009-15 which extends to publicly-traded regulated investment
More informationMandatory CFIUS Filings for Foreign Investment in Specified Critical Technologies Companies
Mandatory CFIUS Filings for Foreign Investment in Specified Critical Technologies Companies New Pilot Program Pursuant to Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Will Require
More informationIRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities
IRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities SUMMARY On May 19, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations on
More information