Repo Instructions. Introduction. Summary of Pros and Cons
|
|
- Camron Powell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Repo Instructions Introduction Repo is a generic term which covers a diverse range of collateralized lending products and services which, across Europe, are cleared and settled according to different market practices. In an ideal situation there would be harmonization. However, harmonization is unlikely to occur within the current phase of T2S. Therefore, in the absence of harmonization, T2S must develop requirements based on a compromise solution which meets, as nearly as possible, the needs of different stakeholders in both domestic and cross border transactions. The following proposal is a technical way of processing instructions in the event of T2S adopting the compromise solution of allowing the use of both a single message as well as separate DVP/RVP instructions for Repo transactions. It allows T2S to reconcile different operating practices across Europe. The use of the single message could be restricted to "plain vanilla" fixed income financing transactions only but this solution may create some difficulties in those markets where it is in more general use. Therefore, a more generic way of operating is envisaged, which could be extended to non-plain vanilla transactions where the settlement details are known at the outset, based on business rules which will facilitate cross matching of different instruction types. These business rules also provide a basis for administering cancellations where market practice is divided between bi-lateral and unilateral cancellation for repo. Subject to market consultation, this solution could be extended to allow matching of the single message type with another single message type, or DVP/RVP, where not all settlement details are known at the outset for the far leg of a repo transaction. For convenience, this situation is referred to as a Temporary Instruction for the far leg. This proposal addresses only settlement related requirements and is not intended to provide a trade matching service or replace the value added role of CSDs and some trading platforms in arranging and/or administering repo transactions. Summary of Pros and Cons The following is a summary of the Pros and Cons of the compromise solution of allowing a single instruction for plain vanilla repo transactions only. It is included as a point of reference to understand the differences in the two methods of instructing and to highlight some issues using plain vanilla as a point of demarcation. Pros: Allows participants to choose which message type they submit according to current market practice (in domestic markets) and operational convenience. When required (according to market practice, legal jurisdiction) the single message provides a greater degree of certainty and control because it ensures a) matching (i.e. agreement) at outset to both legs of the repo transaction and b) prevents the far side settling before near the side settles. 1
2 Cons: No clear definition of plain vanilla. Cannot be mandatory as participants in international markets or domestic markets where two messages are currently in use will choose to continue to use separate RVP/RVP messages for plain vanilla. Counterparties in those markets currently using a single message will continue to use this instruction type for non plain vanilla if settlement details are known at the outset. Even where settlement details are not fully known at the outset the counterparties may prefer to match without completing all settlement fields until these are known nearer the settlement date for the far side. CSDs and trading platforms are able to calculate non-plain vanilla. Why restrict them from entering these instructions as a single instruction message? In cross border transactions one or other of the counterparties may need to compromise on which instruction type to use. Probable cause of failing to match and operational errors. The likelihood and cost of operational errors is especially high with repo transactions (short trade cycle, high value, complexity). Proposed solution Technically it is feasible to force participants to use one or the other instruction type and to only match within the same instruction type as per the Euroclear SSE. However, the business model for Euroclear differs from T2S. 1 From, the above summary of Pros and Cons it can be concluded that it is problematic to compartmentalize according to: Transactions: plain vanilla from non-plain vanilla Participants: those who habitually use a single message from those who use separate DVP/RVP. Markets or market practice: due to cross border settlement activity in T2S. Instruments: There are different types of fixed income instruments which could be considered under plain vanilla. Any solution must be generic in order to be able to handle collateralized transactions in any instrument (debt, equity etc.) Therefore, any compromise solution must find a way to effectively reconcile the use of either instruction type, by one or both of the counterparties to a transaction. In concept, it should be possible to accommodate the use of both a single message and two instructions (DVP/RVP) provided T2S has the functionality to recognize and cross-match the different instruction types and control their release for settlement. This functionality could be delivered using the following elements: 1 The situation in T2S differs from that in Euroclear because T2S allows individual CSDs to be Investor CSDs for all T2S eligible instruments and participants can choose which CSD to use irrespective of the domicile of the securities. However, Euroclear Domestic CSDs offering settlement in Central Bank Money can only be investor CSDs for their own domestic securities. Euroclear participants must open accounts at each domestic CSD or concentrate activity in the Full Service of Euroclear Bank. Therefore, in Euroclear, domestic repo business, using the single message, will probably continue as today within each CSD. On the other hand, the use of separate DVP/RVP instructions is likely to remain more prevalent in the ICSD, cross border business, of Euroclear Bank. Because T2S seeks to offer a more open architecture for cross border settlement, in order to open up competition between domestic markets, it is incumbent upon T2S to find a technical means of reconciling these two business models. 2
3 1. Use of a specific flag on DVP/RVP instructions to indicate that the instruction is a repo (as per current ISO standards). 2. Transaction linking for DVP/RVP. However, this functionality must be able to link both a delivery to a receipt as well as a receipt to a delivery so that it can be used by a counterparty irrespective of which side of the transaction the counterparty is undertaking (repo/reverse repo). 3. New matching business functionality for repo instructions to report specific status on cross matched instructions. Cross matched in this proposal means the matching of a single message type against linked DVP/RVP repo instructions. 4. New binding matching/cancellation business rules for repo instructions to cater for different market needs. In addition, the single message could be extended to non-plain vanilla where settlement details are known at the outset. Where settlement details are not known at the outset then T2S should consider the possible use of a Temporary instruction as a template for the far leg, subject to market consultation. Taking these elements together three scenarios can be identified: 1) Two single messages: Both counterparties submit a single message covering both the near side and far side of the transaction. This may be a plain vanilla repo or a nonplain vanilla repo. Note: In the case of Temporary Instructions, where not all settlement fields are known, T2S would match only the fields which had been input. However the fields input by either counterparty would be mandatory matching fields (i.e. if a settlement date is input on the far side then this must be matched but a countervalue may be left blank by both counterparties and this would be reported as matched). 2) Matched separate DVP/RVPs: Both counterparties can submit two instructions independently (DVP/RVP) with or without the repo flag. TG2 has already specified that the repo flag is a non-matching field. 3) One single message versus separate DVP/RVP: One counterparty enters a single message and the counterparty other enters two instructions (DVP/RVP). The first two scenarios are relatively standard. A compromise solution is required in the case of the third scenario to provide a bridge between participants in, for example, a cross border transaction who use different ways of instructing and managing a repo transaction. In the third scenario, it is proposed that T2S would try and match the DVP/RVP instructions against the single instruction if the following elements were present on both of the DVP/RVP instructions: 1) Both of the instructions had the repo flag. 2) The instructions were linked (i.e. they have a common reference and/or flag which allows them to be identified as linked for settlement purposes but which can also be used to link them for matching purposes). If a single message can be broken down into both a near side and far side DVP/RVP and matched on both sides with separate RVP/DVP instructions bearing the repo flag and which are linked, then T2S can report both the single message and the two separate RVP/DVP instructions as matched. 3
4 When a single instruction is matched in this way with separate DVP/RVP instructions then the matching should be binding as with matching of two single messages. Cancellation in this case should be only be by bi-lateral agreement because the counterparty entering the single message has done so in order to match for the purpose of agreeing to both legs of the repo contract at the outset in a way that is binding upon the counterparty. Because matching is binding in this case, then T2S will need to report that the DVP/RVP instructions have been matched under those conditions. It can reasonably be assumed that the counterparty entering the separate DVP/RVP instructions by implication agrees to matching being binding by both entering the repo flag and linking the instructions, knowing that his counterparty may/is likely to enter a single message owing to the nature of the transaction, domicile of the counterparty and/or known operational preferences. In the case where T2S tries to match eligible (repo flag + linked) DVP/RVP instructions against a single message and only the near side or far side match then this event could be reported as a distinct matching status (i.e. unmatched on near side only/unmatched on far side only). This will alert the counterparties to the precise nature of the problem and enable them to take action to rectify the problem leg of the transaction. Otherwise, the individual unmatched instructions would be reported as allegements, leaving it to the counterparties to identify the possible pairings on both legs and the leg where there is a matching problem. In order to allow for the business requirement to be able to execute unilateral cancellation of a repo instruction after matching it is proposed to allow unilateral cancellation where the repo flag is entered by both counterparties on separate DVP/RVPs only. The use of the repo flag distinguishes these DVP/RVP transactions from ordinary trade related instructions which would be subject to binding matching. Thus, where neither counterparty has entered the repo flag on a DVP/RVP or only one counterparty has entered the repo flag, then matching should be binding as per a normal DVP/RVP transaction. In this case, a counterparty who may wish to cancel the far leg of a repo transaction (i.e. in case of roll-over) would use the repo flag on a DVP/RVP instruction. However, both counterparties must use the flag for unilateral cancellation to be permitted in T2S. In the case of non-vanilla repo where the settlement details are not known, it should be possible for a counterparty to enter a Temporary instruction as a separate DVP/RVP for the far side and to match this against the far leg of a single instruction provided the repo flag is used together with transaction linking. In this case the Temporary instruction should be able to be amended (with settlement information) and re-matched prior to settlement of the far leg. In the case that the far leg of the transaction fails to be enriched with the required settlement information or fails to match on the enriched settlement information, then the original matching of the Temporary instruction should be deemed sufficient to evidence agreement on the far leg of the transaction as a basis for the counterparties to resolve any settlement differences. It is recognised that in providing the functionality to match Temporary instructions, T2S is not providing a full trade matching service because matching in T2S is restricted to a subset of the input needed for settlement purposes and would not be intended to cover other trade related details (i.e. reference information for rate fixing). Operational implications for participants 4
5 Any solution requires some changes to current operating practices. The proposal aims to minimise these for participants by T2S undertaking a process which will reconcile divergent market practices. Current users of the single message The proposal enables these participants to be able to continue to use their existing single message. However, further market consultation is required regarding the extent to which this instruction type could be extended to non-vanilla repo including transactions where the settlement details are not fully known at outset. These participants may be obliged to enter separate DVP/RVP when executing repo transactions in the cross border / international market. Today they face the same situation when instructing for settlement a) in a CSD where a single message is not currently used (i.e. CBF in the case of Germany) and b) in an ICSD. Current users of separate DVP/RVP instructions The proposal requires these participants to amend the way that they use separate DVP/RVP instructions as follows: Use of repo flag. This input field would be in accordance with ISO standards. In practice, participants would need to use the flag to ensure matching with counterparties who use the single message and to allow for unilateral cancellation in the case of counterparties who do not use the single message. This functionality may lead to the following situations: o A Participant using the repo flag wants to have the possibility of unilateral cancellation but matches with a counterparty using the single message. Matching therefore becomes binding. o A participant using the repo flag wants to have the possibility of unilateral cancellation but matches with a counterparty that uses separate DVP/RVP but without inputting the repo flag. Matching therefore becomes binding, as per normal trade matching. It is concluded that in both situations only one of the counterparties actually wanted the possibility of unilateral cancellation and that the proposed functionality imposes the standard of binding matching in this case, as with normal trade related instructions. If the counterparties want the possibility of unilateral cancellation then they must both enter separate DVPs/RVPs with the repo flag. A further situation is possible where a) the counterparties require binding matching and b) want to identify the transaction as a repo transaction (i.e. for income compensation purposes) but use separate DVP/RVP instructions. The proposed solution does not allow for both requirements if separate DVP/RVP instructions are used rather than the single message type. However, the use of separate RVP/RVP instruction types is most usual in those markets where matching is not binding. Therefore, it is assumed that participants using DVP/RVP would accept that matching would not be binding in this case, especially as they have a choice which instruction type to use. Use of transaction linking. Generally, this is a new element for repo transactions. Participants will be required to use it if they want to be able to match with participants who use the single message. It is considered that the use of the transaction linking field will, in addition, benefit the market in that it will avoid the possibility that the far side of a repo transaction can settle without the near side having settled. 5
6 New matching status on repo transactions matched or unmatched against single transaction type. This additional information requires different processing but is intended to assist participants to resolve matching problems. Note on URD updates required Apart from the specific requirements for repo transactions it should be noted that T2S has yet to fully elaborate the rules for: linking of instructions and for matching of Temporary instructions, although these are in scope. Note: Temporary instructions are known currently as Grey Market transactions in the context of the Primary Market but the functionality is generic to any instruction submitted for matching where not all of the settlement details are known at the outset and which can subsequently be converted to a settlement instruction. In the case of repo it is to be determined whether there is a requirement for process indicators (for example, indicators regarding the maturity conditions or conditions regarding interest calculation) to be matched in addition to matching fields used for settlement, without entering into a full trade matching service on T2S. Matching on process indicators may be a market requirement in the case of Temporary instructions where actual settlement data is incomplete but there is a requirement to agree on the basis of the transaction. The proposed solution avoids that T2S is required to calculate any data. T2S will not automatically calculate the return leg of the repo. The proposed solution must allow that a CSD, CCP, Stock Exchange or trading platform can submit already pre-matched instructions using either the single message or separate DVPs/RVPs. 6
Repo processing in T2S
Repo processing in T2S Background A number of CSDs currently support specific processing for Repo transactions. This allows participants to instruct both legs of a Repo transaction through one instruction.
More informationUSER REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER 5 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT AND MATCHING REQUIREMENTS
USER REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER 5 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT AND MATCHING REQUIREMENTS T2S project Team Reference: T2S-07-0355 Date: 15 November 2007 Version: 1 Status: Final TABLE OF CONTENT 5 Lifecycle Management
More informationDRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT ON TARGET2-SECURITIES THE FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE
DG PAYMENT SYSTEMS AND MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE 19 December 2006 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT ON TARGET2-SECURITIES THE FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE This draft working document on TARGET2-Securities (T2S) has been prepared
More informationT2S GUI Workshop Change Summary of GUI BFD V1.6 & Outstanding Issues
09.04.01/2011/000611 T2S GUI Workshop Change Summary of GUI BFD V1.6 & Outstanding Issues Frankfurt, 24th January 2011 T2S Project Team European Central Bank GUI BFD V1.6 Change Summary Business Object
More informationEACH response ESMA consultation paper Technical Standards under the CSD Regulation ESMA/2014/1563
19 th February 2015 EACH response ESMA consultation paper Technical Standards under the CSD Regulation ESMA/2014/1563 1. Introduction The European Association of CCP Clearing Houses (EACH) represents the
More informationEurobond XCSD settlement in T2S Joint presentation of Clearstream and Euroclear AMI Seco July 2017
Eurobond XCSD settlement in T2S Joint presentation of Clearstream and Euroclear AMI Seco July 2017 Making eligible assets available in T2S Eurosystem new collateral management system aims to mobilise marketable
More information3 August 2009 GENERAL COMMENTS
3 August 2009 Euroclear response to the public consultation by the European Commission on the future auctioning of emission allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System Euroclear is pleased to be given
More informationTARGET2 SECURITIES : INITIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND QUESTIONS : REPORT OF THE NATIONAL BANK OF BELGIUM ON THE OUTCOME OF THE MEETING WITH THE BELGIAN MARKET
Financial Markets Department Cashless Payments Monday, 11 September 2006 TARGET2 SECURITIES : INITIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND QUESTIONS : REPORT OF THE NATIONAL BANK OF BELGIUM ON THE OUTCOME OF THE MEETING WITH
More informationBank of Greece Securities Settlement System (BOGS)
February 2015 Bank of Greece Securities System () T2S - Community and Business Day testing 1. INTRODUCTION This document intends to provide all participants with the necessary information required, in
More informationConsultation Paper Indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR
Consultation Paper Indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR 5 November 2015 ESMA/2015/1628 Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites responses to
More informationIntegrated central bank collateral management services
Integrated central bank collateral management services Alessandro Bonara (ECB) Richard Derksen (CCBM2 Project) Amsterdam, 21 October 2010 Table of contents 1. The Eurosystem collateral framework II. Move
More informationGergely Koczan Potential benefits and challenges of taking collateral for Eurosystem credit operations in T2S
Gergely Koczan Potential benefits and challenges of taking collateral for Eurosystem credit operations in T2S AMI-SeCo Workshop on Eurosystem deliberations on taking collateral 11 May 2017, Madrid Rubric
More informationTARGET2 - SECURITIES: INITIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND QUESTIONS
PSSC/2006/352 FINAL 10 August 2006 TARGET2 - SECURITIES: INITIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND QUESTIONS Introduction TARGET2-Securities (T2S) is a possible new service of the Eurosystem with the aim to achieve efficient
More informationCost and pricing issues in T2S How will T2S pay off?
Cost and pricing issues in T2S How will T2S pay off? Conference at Narodowy Bank Polski 23 June 2009 Helmut Wacket T2S Project Team European Central Bank Economic feasibility of T2S 2 Methodology of the
More informationMARKET CLAIMS AND TRANSFORMATIONS IN T2S
T2S CORPORATE ACTIONS SUBGROUP 30 November 2016 01.03.05.04/2016/001711 MARKET CLAIMS AND TRANSFORMATIONS IN T2S Which CSD should identify them? 1. Introduction The purpose of this document is to clarify
More informationT2S features and functionalities
T2S features and functionalities Conference at Narodowy Bank Polski 23 June 2009 T2S Project Team European Central Bank 09.04.01/2009/005409 T2S settles CSD instructions Notary function Custody and assetservicing
More informationREGULATION (EU) 2015/1599 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
24.9.2015 L 248/45 REGULATION (EU) 2015/1599 OF THE EUROPEAN CTRAL BANK of 10 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1333/2014 concerning statistics on the money markets (ECB/2015/30) THE GOVERNING
More informationAsia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association
Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association Developing a Repo Best Practice Guide for Asian Markets Executive Summary 1 How Repo Markets Support the Real Economy Deepens primary and secondary
More informationCBF Release in April and June 2015: Advance announcement of changes
CBF Release in April and June 2015: Advance announcement of changes Clearstream Banking 1 informs customers in advance about some changes that will be implemented on Monday, 27 April 2015 and Monday, 22
More informationOBJECTIVES OF T2S STAKEHOLDERS
TARGET 2 SECURITIES PROJECT TEAM T2S-07-0247-rev Frankfurt, 4 September 2007 Introduction OBJECTIVES OF T2S STAKEHOLDERS This note presents an initial step in the future governance discussion of T2S. It
More informationCCBM2 and T2S Where do we stand?
CCBM2 and T2S Where do we stand? Fiona van Echelpoel Helmut Wacket Money Market Contact Group December 15, 2010 0 What s coming up CCBM2 - project status - a closer look into CCBM2 features T2S - project
More informationTARGET2-SECURITIES LEGAL FEASIBILITY
8 March 2007 TARGET2-SECURITIES LEGAL FEASIBILITY 1. Introduction On 6 July 2006 the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) decided to explore further the setting up of a new service for
More information2. Authorisation and ongoing supervision of CSDs. 4. Prudential rules and other requirements for CSDs
COMMENTS BY THE CNMV ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S CONSULTATION DATED 13 JANUARY 2011 REGARDING CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORIES (CSDS) AND ON THE HARMONISATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF SECURITIES
More informationComprehensive list of TFAX recommendations
Comprehensive list of TFAX recommendations Topic TFAX Recommendation HSG analysis Next steps 5 March 2013 09.04.01/2013/002221 Transmission and 1. The TFAX recommends not using T2S settlement messages
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.12.2018 C(2018) 7658 final COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of 13.12.2018 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format and frequency
More informationACI EXAM - 3I ACI Operations Certificate. Buy Full Product.
ACI EXAM - 3I0-013 ACI Operations Certificate Buy Full Product http://www.examskey.com/3i0-013.html Examskey ACI 3I0-013 exam demo product is here for you to test the quality of the product. This ACI 3I0-013
More informationIntegrated central bank collateral management services
Integrated central bank collateral management services Alessandro Bonara (ECB) Richard Derksen (DNB/CCBM2 Project) Cogesi, 22 November 2010 1 What s coming up Move towards integrated collateral management
More informationComments of the. Bundesverband der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken (BVR),
Comments of the Bundesverband der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken (BVR), for the cooperative banks, the Bundesverband deutscher Banken (BdB), for the private commercial banks and the Deutscher
More information3. In accordance with Article 14(5) of the Rules of procedure of the EBA, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion.
EBA BS 2012 266 21 December 2012 Opinion of the European Banking Authority on the European Commission s consultation on a possible framework for the recovery and resolution of financial institutions other
More informationBASEL III - Leverage Ratio 31 December 2017
BASEL III - Leverage Ratio 31 December 2017 Table 1 A. Summary comparison of accounting assets vs leverage ratio exposure measure Summary comparison of accounting assets versus leverage ratio exposure
More informationMaria-Teresa Fabregas, Head of Unit Financial Markets Infrastructure (C2) DG FISMA European Commission. 9 May Dear Mrs.
Maria-Teresa Fabregas, Head of Unit Financial Markets Infrastructure (C2) DG FISMA European Commission 9 May 2016 Dear Mrs. Fabregas, Variation Margin (VM) Timing Requirements for Counterparties Outside
More informationChange Requests 559 and 560 resulting from the CSG s Task Force (TF) on Insolvency Proceedings
Change Requests 559 and 560 resulting from the CSG s Task Force (TF) on Insolvency Proceedings CRG teleconference on 22 January 2016 T2S Programme Office European Central Bank 1 Change Requests resulting
More informationSFTR A harder version of EMIR? April Fabian Klar, Business Development Manager, REGIS-TR S.A.
SFTR A harder version of EMIR? April 2018 Fabian Klar, Business Development Manager, REGIS-TR S.A. About REGIS-TR REGIS-TR Your European Trade Repository of choice A European Trade Repository REGIS-TR
More informationRepurchase Agreement (REPO) Settlement Market Practice
Repurchase Agreement (REPO) Settlement Market Practice Status: Final/Approved Update date: 3/08/2019 Update. Impl. date: --- Author: SMPG - 1 - Contents I. OVERALL SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS:...4 II. SINGLE
More informationCommission proposal on improving securities settlement in the EU and on Central Securities Depositaries Frequently Asked Questions
MEMO/12/163 Brussels, 7 March 2012 Commission proposal on improving securities settlement in the EU and on Central Securities Depositaries Frequently Asked Questions 1. What does the proposed regulation
More informationReform of the registration, clearing and settlement system and its adaptation to Target 2 Securities.
Reform of the registration, clearing and settlement system and its adaptation to Target 2 Securities. AGENDA 1. CURRENT STATUS 2. PRINCIPLES OF THE REFORM 3. PRINCIPLES OF T2S 4. FINAL SETUP 5. TIMETABLE
More informationEACH response European Commission public consultation on Building a Capital Markets Union
12 th May 2015 EACH response European Commission public consultation on Building a Capital Markets Union 1. Introduction The European Association of CCP Clearing Houses (EACH) represents the interests
More informationTARGET2-Securities The Pre-project Phase
TARGET2-Securities The Pre-project Phase Jean-Michel Godeffroy ECB, Director General Payment Systems and Market Infrastructure Meeting with representatives of market participants and market infrastructures
More informationEACH response to the ESMA discussion paper Draft RTS and ITS under the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation
EACH response to the ESMA discussion paper Draft RTS and ITS under the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation April 2016 1. Introduction...3 2. Responses to specific questions...5 2 1. Introduction
More informationDRAFT - ECSDA SINGLE SETTLEMENT FAILS PENALTIES FRAMEWORK FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE HARMONISED APPLICATION OF THE CSDR SETTLEMENT DISCIPLINE REGIME
Last updated on 09/07/2018 DRAFT - ECSDA SINGLE SETTLEMENT FAILS PENALTIES FRAMEWORK FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE HARMONISED APPLICATION OF THE CSDR SETTLEMENT DISCIPLINE REGIME Contents Glossary... 4 Introduction...
More informationNew Hold/Release mechanism for securities settlement instructions. 23 November 2009
Announcement Connectivity A09076 29 May 2009 New Hold/Release mechanism for securities settlement instructions Key features Note: This revised version supersedes the versions published on 29 May 2009 and
More informationEnhancing DBV Functionality
Enhancing DBV functionality New Term DBV service 1 April 2011 Enhancing DBV Functionality New Term DBV Service Version 3.0 Enhancing DBV functionality New Term DBV service 2 Contents Preface 5 Glossary,
More informationIntesa Sanpaolo response to the European Commission
Intesa Sanpaolo response to the European Commission Consultation on a Possible Recovery and Resolution Framework for Financial Institutions other than Banks December 2012 REGISTERED ORGANIZATION N 24037141789-48
More informationT2S ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS
21 May 2008 T2S ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 1. EIA assumptions and scenarios 5 2. Average fee per settlement instruction 6 2.1 Estimated volume of settlement
More informationStatus Update of Change Requests from the CSG s Task Force (TF) on Insolvency Proceedings
Status Update of Change Requests from the CSG s Task Force (TF) on Insolvency Proceedings CRG meeting on 10 March 2016 T2S Programme Office European Central Bank 1 Background The CSG in the meeting on
More informationCCPs: A User s Perspective
CCPs: A User s Perspective DISCUSSION PAPER FOR THE JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO ON ISSUES RELATED TO CENTRAL COUNTERPARTY CLEARING April, 2006
More informationLeverage Ratio Disclosure Template A. Summary Comparison (Table 1)
A. Summary Comparison (Table 1) Summary comparison of accounting assets versus leverage ratio exposure measure Row Item In SR 000 s # 1 Total consolidated assets as per published financial statements 115,005,067
More informationKey highlights of settlement needs in T2S Trading-related settlements
T2S-07-0041 Key highlights of settlement needs in T2S Trading-related settlements TG3 1st meeting 18th June 2007 1 Agenda 1) General overview 2) Settlement prioritisation and recycling 3) Settlement optimisation
More informationLe banquier luxembourgeois dépositaire de titres
Le banquier luxembourgeois dépositaire de titres ALJB - Michel Barbancey Clearstream Banking Executive Director Relationship Management Europe ICSD s role The International Central Securities Depositories
More informationMembers wishing to engage in the response process should contact Andy Hill at ICMA.
CSDR Level 2: Settlement Discipline Overview and discussion notes January 14 th 2015 Introduction These notes are intended to provide a brief summary of the ESMA CSD Regulation Level 2 Consultation Papers
More informationFinal Report Guidelines on Internalised Settlement Reporting under Article 9 of CSDR
Final Report Guidelines on Internalised Settlement Reporting under Article 9 of CSDR 28 March 2018 ESMA70-151-1258 Table of Contents 1. Executive summary...3 2. Background and mandate 6 3. Feedback statement..7
More informationSETTLEMENT DAY IN T2S FOR SETTLEMENT IN NON-EURO
AMI-SeCo Harmonisation Steering Group 20 June 2017 SETTLEMENT DAY IN T2S FOR SETTLEMENT IN NON-EURO 1. Background The use of a single schedule for the T2S settlement day is established by the T2S User
More informationAnaCredit Reporting Manual. Part III Case studies
AnaCredit Reporting Manual Part III Case studies May / 0 Contents AnaCredit Reporting Manual Part III Contents of Part III Reverse repurchase agreements s under a multi-debtor/product structure Project
More informationAssessment of Securities Settlement in Sweden 2008
Reg.no. 2008 173 AFS Reg.no. 08 5262 of Securities Settlement in Sweden 2008 Financial markets have several important functions. They convert savings into investments, provide means for managing risks
More informationNBB-SSS on T2S. (Potential) Impact v5 Workshop 28/02/ Outcome
on T2S (Potential) Impact v5 Workshop 28/02/2011 - Outcome Structure 1. Context 2. Difficult to reproduce in T2S 3. To be investigated 4. To take into account 5. Open issues 6. Migration 7. What's next
More informationForeign Exchange Prime Brokerage Reverse Give-Up Relationships: Overview of Key Issues and Analysis of Legal Framework
Foreign Exchange Prime Brokerage Reverse Give-Up Relationships: Overview of Key Issues and Analysis of Legal Framework I. INTRODUCTION Foreign exchange prime brokerage allows clients to source liquidity
More informationThe Counterparty Gap. September 2016
The Counterparty Gap A study for the ICMA European Repo and Collateral Council on the trade registration models used by European central counterparties for repo transactions September 2016 1 This report
More informationAppendix A European Clearing and Settlement Matrix
Appendix A European Clearing and Settlement Matrix Note: The following matrix is an accumulation of cross-border and member state specific issues identified by market participants in relation to clearing
More informationESMA consultation on the review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR
Amstelveenseweg 998 1081 JS Amsterdam Phone: + 31 20 520 7970 Email: secretariat@efet.org Website: www.efet.org ESMA consultation on the review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of
More informationProposed Business Model
T+2 Settlement Cycle Proposed Business Model 9 th January 2017 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Definitions... 4 3. Structure... 6 4. Settlement Cycle... 8 5. Pre-order checks... 11 6. Custody Controls...
More informationJoint Working Group ETF Processing
Joint Working Group ETF Processing Sander van Nugteren 16 March 2017 20170314-123131-335422 Industry Growth has been strong. Europe ETP Assets & Number of ETPs by Year 1 Assets ($bn) # of ETPs 600 500
More informationRef.: D6.1/ Luxembourg, 11 September 2006 Re: TARGET2-Securities - Market Consultation
European Central Bank Mr. Jean-Michel Godeffroy By Cebamail Ref.: D6.1/06-0626 Luxembourg, 11 September 2006 Re: TARGET2-Securities - Market Consultation Dear Jean-Michel, In relation to the market consultation
More informationBOND ETP. Settlement Model. Date: 25 April 2018 Version 2.0 Author: JSE Post Trade Services
BOND ETP Settlement Model Date: 25 April 2018 Version 2.0 Author: JSE Post Trade Services Table of Contents Version control... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. The bond market ecosystem... 5 3. Settlement model
More informationAssessment of the ESES CSDs/SSSs against the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for FMIs
Assessment of the ESES CSDs/SSSs against the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for FMIs The ESES CSDs/SSSs (central securities depositories / securities settlement systems) comprise Euroclear Belgium (EBE), Euroclear
More informationAnnex 3 T2S Community - SETTLEMENT Test Plan
T2S Test Plan Annex 3 T2S Community - SETTLEMENT Test Plan 5th February 2015 Version 1.0 Index 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.0 TESTING PURPOSE 5 3.0 STAKEHOLDERS 5 4.0 TESTING GUIDELINES FOR PARTICIPANTS 6 5.0
More informationQuestions and Answers
Questions and Answers Transition to T+2 for the Swedish market 11 September 2014 Background The upcoming implementation of the Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR) mandates a T+2 settlement
More informationCENTRAL COUNTERPARTY GUARANTEE SYSTEM FOR THE REPO X-COM SECTION SERVICE MODEL
CENTRAL COUNTERPARTY GUARANTEE SYSTEM FOR THE REPO X-COM SECTION SERVICE MODEL Versione 4.9.2 Contents 1.0 GENERAL FEATURES 4 1.1 1.2 Subject of the Service 4 Membership of the Repo X-COM Section4 2.0
More informationClearing and CCP activities in T2S Further harmonization
Clearing and CCP activities in T2S Further harmonization Christophe Hemon 1 Agenda Introduction : Who we are, what is the range of our services Future and possible landscape at T2S horizon Harmonization
More information1. Market needs and developments for liquidity management at the end of day
FEDERATION BANCAIRE DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE BANKING FEDERATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BANKENVEREINIGUNG DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION (aisbl) EUROPEAN SAVINGS BANKS GROUP GROUPEMENT EUROPEEN DES CAISSES D EPARGNE
More informationAssessment of the ESES CSDs/SSSs against the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for FMIs
26/06/2015 Assessment of the ESES CSDs/SSSs against the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for FMIs The ESES CSDs/SSSs (Central Securities Depositories / Securities Settlement Systems) comprise Euroclear Belgium (EBE),
More informationT2S: Settling without borders in Europe
T2S: Settling without borders in Europe T2S DCP Infosession Paris, 11 October 2011 T2S Programme Office European Central Bank Table of Contents 1 Status Update 2 What is a DCP? 3 What are the implications
More informationT2S Special Series I Issue No 1 I April 2012 I T2S benefits: much more than fee reductions
T2S Special Series I Issue No 1 I April 2012 I T2S benefits: much more than fee reductions T2S Special Series Issue No 3 January 2014 Corporate actions in T2S Author: Rosen Ivanov, T2S Programme Office,
More informationCentral Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR) regulation: Where are we standing?
Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR) regulation: Where are we standing? Impact on (I)CSD client base and lessons to be learned for AECSD CSDs XIV International Conference of the Association
More informationUBS Group AG (consolidated) BIS Basel III leverage ratio information
UBS Group AG (consolidated) BIS Basel III leverage ratio information This document provides BIS Basel III leverage ratio information as of 30 June 2015, as required by the revised FINMA Circular 2008 /
More informationBELGIAN FINANCIAL SECTOR FEDERATION Financial Markets
BELGIAN FINANCIAL SECTOR FEDERATION Financial Markets CCBM2 DR12129.DOC Madame Daniela Russo European Central Bank Payment Systems and Market Infrastructure Postfach 16 03 19 D-60066 Frankfurt Germany
More informationConsultation Paper ESMA s Guidelines on position calculation under EMIR
Consultation Paper ESMA s Guidelines on position calculation under EMIR 17 November 2017 ESMA70-151-819 Date: 15 November 2017 ESMA70-151-819 Responding to this paper ESMA invites comments on all matters
More informationBANK OF GREECE SYSTEM FOR MONITORING TRANSACTIONS IN BOOK-ENTRY SECURITIES (BOGS) DISCLOSURE FRAMEWORK
BANK OF GREECE SYSTEM FOR MONITORING TRANSACTIONS IN BOOK-ENTRY SECURITIES (BOGS) DISCLOSURE FRAMEWORK Observance by BOGS of the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures Athens, October
More informationSignificant consolidation within the European
7 DOMESTICATING CROSS-BORDER SETTLEMENT Pierre Francotte Significant consolidation within the European settlement infrastructure has begun, both within certain domestic markets and on a transnational basis.
More informationThe Role of KDPW as CSD in the Polish Market
The Role of KDPW as CSD in the Polish Market Polish National Depository for Securities (KDPW) IX International AECSD Conference Kyiv, 6 September 2012 KDPW Introduction Responsibilities: Central securities
More informationNordax Group AB (publ) Combined financial statements 1 January 31 December 2012, 2013, 2014
Nordax Group AB (publ) Combined financial statements 1 January 31 December 2012, 2013, 2014 Contents Income statement...2 Statement of financial position...3 Cash flow statement...4 Statement of changes
More informationEUFTT: the tax that is dividing a union
EUFTT: the tax that is dividing a union The European Union Financial Transaction Tax (EUFTT) is one of the most talked about regulations in the last couple of years. Despite the controversy, it will likely
More informationDebt Instruments Solution (DIS) Project
Debt Instruments Solution (DIS) Project 14 March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction...3 2. Purpose of this document...3 3. Settlements...4 3.1 Settlement Cycles and Guiding Principles...4 3.2. Transaction Types...
More information- To promote transparency of derivative data for both regulators and market participants
5 August 2012 Broadgate West One Snowden Street London EC2A 2DQ United Kingdom European Securities and Markets Authority Via electronic submission DTCC Data Repository Limited responses to ESMA s Consultation
More informationSAUDI BRITISH BANK BASEL III - LEVERAGE RATIO DISCLOSURE AS AT
SAUDI BRITISH BANK BASEL III LEVERAGE RATIO DISCLOSURE AS AT 31st March 2015 PUBLIC Page 1 of 7 Table of Contents Page Leverage Ratio Exposures (Table 1)...... 3 Leverage Ratio Regulatory Elements (Table
More informationTHE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
GUIDELINE OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 20 February 2014 on domestic asset and liability management operations by the national central banks (ECB/2014/9) THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL
More informationASSESSMENT OF VP SECURITIES
ASSESSMENT OF VP SECURITIES SUMMARY The Danish system for safekeeping and settlement of securities is safe and efficient. That is the main conclusion of the assessment of VP Securities A/S, VP, performed
More informationDTCC SERVICES TARGET2-SECURITIES FOR CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY
DTCC SERVICES TARGET2-SECURITIES FOR CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY MAY 24, 2018 Copyright 2018 The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"). All rights reserved. This work (including, without limitation,
More informationIssues Paper: Impact of Multiple Trade Execution Platforms for ASX Listed Securities on ACH Clearing Participant Operations and Systems
Issues Paper: Impact of Multiple Trade Execution Platforms for ASX Listed Securities on ACH Clearing Participant Operations and Systems Broker Trades Message Specification 11 April 2008 (November 2007)
More informationNASDAQ CSD CORPORATE ACTION SERVICE DESCRIPTION. Nasdaq Central Securities Depository in Baltic
NASDAQ CSD CORPORATE ACTION SERVICE DESCRIPTION Nasdaq Central Securities Depository in Baltic v 1.4. September 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 6 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT... 6 1.2 TARGET
More informationResponse to the EC s Consultation on a possible recovery and resolution framework for financial institutions other than banks
Response to the EC s Consultation on a possible recovery and resolution framework for financial institutions other than banks 28 December 2012 Index Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This document is the London
More informationII-Annex 2: Resolution of Insurers
II-Annex 2: Resolution of Insurers II-Annex 2 Resolution of Insurers Excerpt from Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions The Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes
More informationCentral Bank of Ireland Discussion Paper Exchange Traded Fund
Central Bank of Ireland Discussion Paper Exchange Traded Fund Section I Questions ETF Dealing Ref CBI Question A. Is public disclosure of the identity of APs and OLPs of an ETF of benefit and should regulators
More informationCMI In Focus: Asset Segregation in CSDs
CMI In Focus: Asset Segregation in CSDs Concerns around Asset Safety have increased substantially during the global financial crisis as the full and ugly consequences of high-profile defaults (e.g. Lehman
More informationIntroductory comments
Introductory comments The (AFME) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the ESMA Discussion Paper on Guidelines on Internalised Settlement Reporting under Article 9 of CSDR. AFME s intention is to work
More informationSETTLEMENT DISCIPLINE REGIMES AND T2S
T2S PROGRAMME OFFICE 8 March 2010 09.04.01/2010/001895 ITEM 7.4 SETTLEMENT DISCIPLINE REGIMES AND T2S Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Definition 2 3 ECSDA report scope 3 4 Settlement discipline topics
More informationBOGS Feasibility Assessment towards T2S
BOGS Feasibility Assessment towards T2S v 1.0 Athens, April 2012 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 2. IMPACT ANALYSIS/ADAPTATION APPROACH... 3 2.1 LEGAL/REGULATORY... 4 2.1.1 Compliance with
More informationOverview of Collateral Management Harmonisation Activities (CMHAs) CMHA Title Workstream Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 0
Overview of Collateral Management Harmonisation Activities (CMHAs) CMHA Title Workstream Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 0 1 Triparty Collateral Management 1 11 7 16 2 Corporate Actions 2 16 5 1 3 Taxation
More informationGUIDELINES (2014/304/EU)
L 159/56 28.5.2014 GUIDELINES GUIDELINE OF THE EUROPEAN CTRAL BANK of 20 February 2014 on domestic asset and liability management operations by the national central banks (ECB/2014/9) (2014/304/EU) THE
More informationPublic CSD Rating Report
KAZAKHSTAN Public CSD Rating Report Central Securities Depository of the Republic of Kazakhstan Publication Date: September 2014 Thomas Murray CSD Public Rating for: Central Securities Depository of the
More informationIMPACT OF CSDR REGULATIONS
IMPACT OF CSDR REGULATIONS Sumit Ghosal & Neeraj Sinha This paper looks at the impact of shortening the settlement cycle from T+3 to T+2 as per the CSDR Regulations in Europe. It analyzes the impact on
More information