The U.S. Gender Earnings Gap: A State- Level Analysis
|
|
- Arnold Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The U.S. Gender Earnings Gap: A State- Level Analysis Christine L. Storrie November 2013 Abstract. Although the size of the earnings gap has decreased since women began entering the workforce in large numbers, the gender earnings gap is still of concern since in many U.S. households, women s wages constitute a major source of family income. I estimate a model using fixed effects to estimate earnings for men and women to determine if state of residency can be linked to any size differences in the ratio of men s to women s earnings by state. I find state variations in average earnings for both men and women exist with no pattern emerging for the variations of states size deviations from the national mean ratio when control variables are added. The relative size of the state s gender earnings ratio often varies significantly between the unadjusted model and the model that controls for individual worker characteristics. Keywords: Gender wage gap, fixed effects model JEL classification: J16 Corresponding author: Christine L. Storrie, Department of Economics, University of Delaware, 338 Purnell Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA, E- mail: storrie@udel.edu
2 1. Introduction The difference in pay between men and women is referred to as the gender earnings gap. In the United States today, women earn an average of 23% less than men earn (DeNavis-Walt, Proctor, and Smith 2012). The size of the overall earnings gap has decreased since 1960, when women earned only 60% of men s average pay. The narrowing of the gender earnings gap is due largely in part to women s increased education and workforce participation. Although the size of the earnings gap has decreased since women began entering the workforce in large numbers, the earnings gap is still of concern since in many U.S. households, women s wages constitute a major source of family income. Married women currently contribute over 36% of the total family income and in 34% of U.S. families, mothers are the sole wage earners (Hallman 2013). The gender earnings gap can be attributed mostly to an individual s choices as they pertain to education, career and lifestyle. Determining the causes of the earnings gap for men and women is challenging since many factors and varying individual characteristics, many of which are difficult to measure, attribute to one s educational and career path and ultimately one s salary. This makes identification of a clear-cut cause challenging. Existing studies on the gender earnings gap consider individual worker characteristics that potentially attribute to the overall gender earnings gap. Findings in recent literature indicate that earnings differences between men and women are impacted by gender differences in average number of hours worked per week, choice of occupation and number of career interruptions (Getz 2010; Goldin and Katz 2008; Hallman 2013). None of the prior studies of the gender earnings gap in the United States 2
3 however, have examined variations in the size of the earnings gap based on respondent s location, and particularly in relation to one s state of residence. In this paper, I use data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) March supplement to test for variation in the gender earnings gap across states in the United States. I attempt to determine if state of residency can be linked to any size differences in the ratio of men s to women s earnings. A report issued by the U.S. Census Bureau s American Community Survey (ACS) citing the average national gender earnings gap as well as the average size of the earnings gap for each state serves as motivation for this paper. The ACS report highlights differences in earnings between men and women at both the national and state levels. The report lists median earnings for men and women for all states as well as the national average and determines women s earnings as a percentage of men s earnings. This report does not, however, use any empirical tests to determine any significant state effects beyond presenting the median earnings values. The ACS reports annual earnings for men and women. The 2009 survey reports men s overall median earnings in 2008 for full-time, year round workers are $45,556. Women in the United States during the same period earned a median income of only $35,471 or only 77.9% of men s earnings. Additionally, women earned a lower salary than men on average in each of the 50 states (Semega 2009). Building upon the results presented in the ACS report, I test for any statistically significant differences in mean earnings for each gender by state. To determine the size of each 3
4 state s earnings gap, I measure the differences in earnings by estimating income in separate regressions for both men and women using three empirical specifications. Next, I determine if these differences in earnings can be attributed to a possible state effect. I compare the earnings differences based on state effects alone to those obtained when controlling for workplace and individual characteristics commonly used in labor economic studies for estimating earnings. The ratio of the differences in the state effects for men and women relative to the national mean gender earnings ratio (NGER) serves as the measure of the gender earnings gap for each state. I find state variations in average earnings for both men and women exist. Louisiana has the lowest gender earnings ratio (GER) in both estimated models. Maine and Massachusetts both have a gender earnings ratio that is 5.1% above the NGER when controlling for other variables. Many states display a GER that is similar to the NGER, but many states fall well below the NGER, meaning they have a larger earnings gap than the national average earnings gap. I find no pattern emerges for the variations of states size deviations from the national mean ratio when control variables are added to the unadjusted base model for state fixed effects. I find the relative size of the state s GER often varies significantly. 2. Review of Literature A report presented by the American Community Survey (ACS) highlights findings on men and women s earnings at the national and state levels based on data obtained from the 2009 ACS. Earnings are defined as the sum of an individual s wage and salary income plus any selfemployment income. The sample was restricted to include only full-time year-round workers 4
5 aged 16 years or older. A year-round worker is defined as an individual that worked 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months and included the individual s paid time off or sick time as weeks worked. They also consider full-time to mean 35 or more hours worked in a week (Getz 2010). i The ACS survey reports median earnings for both men and women. Overall, women s earnings as a percentage of men s for the United States were 77.9% (Semega 2009). Perhaps a more interesting result of this survey, however, was women s median earnings as a percentage of men s earnings varied substantially by state. Wyoming had the largest earnings gap among all states based on median earnings. According to the ACS report, women s earnings in Wyoming were only 64% of men s earnings, In Washington DC, women earned 88% of men s median income, the smallest earnings gap when measuring median earnings. These states represent the highest and lowest values for the gender earnings gap, but by no means are they outliers. The 2009 ACS report shows that women in Wyoming earn only 65.5% of a man s income and Utah women earn 66.4% of what men earn. In fact, four states show women s income as a percentage of men s to be under 70% while in nine states, women earn 80% of men s earnings or higher. Goldin and Katz (2008) discuss factors impacting earnings differences between men and women. Their results show the gender earnings gap and the correlation to some women s choices to have careers that fit with family-oriented goals as opposed to career goals. Examples of these choices could be choosing jobs that offer shorter workweeks or less travel and overall shorter time commitments. The tradeoff for these family-friendly benefits is typically a lowerpaying salary. They also found fewer men taking career interruptions than women do. A study of MBA s from the University of Chicago found three main causes of earnings differences of 5
6 men and women in corporate careers (Bertrand, Goldin, and Katz 2010). Women have slightly lower GPAs and took fewer finance courses than their male counterparts. They also found that women worked fewer hours compared to men. Women worked on average 52 hours per week in the first fifteen years of their careers compared to men who worked an average of 58 hours per week. Lastly, they found that only 10% of men in their study took a career interruption while 40% of the women went six months or more without working. Results obtained from prior studies reinforce the fact that there is in fact a gender earnings gap and seek to find sources of the gap. These studies do not however examine any geographical or state connection and a variance in the earnings gap. 3. Data Description To obtain a more robust sample size, I include data for two years. I use the Current Population Survey (CPS) March Supplement for the years 2008 and The original sample size of the CPS data set includes 138,018 observations with observations for all ages and employment categories. I use the Current Population Survey instead of the American Community Survey because the CPS provides measures of key explanatory variables that I use in my model to adjust for individual worker attributes. To test the comparability of the CPS data with the ACS, I replicate the results for median incomes as well as present mean incomes for men and women for each state for full-time year-round workers aged 16 and older. Table A1 of the appendix shows average earnings for each state for men and women measuring both median and mean. 6
7 The results for the median earnings of men and women for each state are comparable to the ACS s findings. In addition to median earnings, I also calculate the mean earnings for each state for both men and women. I use the means as the measure of averages for my analysis and all other estimates and comparisons in this paper use the mean as a measure of average earnings. I restrict the sample size to include only those full-time year round workers aged In addition, I further restrict the sample to include only individuals with one year of work experience or greater. These restrictions reduce the sample size to 136,268 observations for the fifty states as well as Washington DC. The number of observations per state varies, but each state has over 1,000 observations at a minimum, ensuring an adequate sample size from each state. 4. Empirical Methods I create dummy variables for education, marital status, race 1, Hispanic origin, metropolitan status and citizenship classification. In addition to the dummy variables, I use number of children under 18 in the household and years of work experience 2 as well as experience-squared. There are two common approaches for estimating fixed effects models. A within-groups method can be used to estimate the regression to net out the unobservable effects. A least squares 1 Race categories are white, black and Asian. Due to the low sample sizes of all other categories I treat all sub- categories of race as one group and together they act as the omitted variable. 2 I calculate experience by using age minus n minus 6. If the level of education was less than or equal to 10 th grade, n=10. For level of education equal to 11 th grade, n=11. If education=12 th grade n=12 regardless of whether they obtained a diploma or not. N=14 if there was some college and n=16 if they obtained a Bachelor s degree. For a Master s degree, n=18 and for a doctorate or professional degree, n=20. 7
8 dummy variable approach can also be used. This approach is done by creating dummy variables, which brings the unobserved effect explicitly into the model. Typically this method is not preferred over the within groups method since it adds extra variables to the regression equation and causes a loss in degrees of freedom. It is also common to have many fixed effect units with few observations per unit. The fixed effects may be of little interest or may be infeasible to recover. In my analysis however, the sample size is large, providing many observations for each state fixed effect. My goal was to capture and measure the state fixed effects since they can be interpreted as a measure of the differences in the average state earnings. I use fifty dummy variables to capture the state effects for the 50 states and DC 3. First, I examine any effect of the state of residence on earnings for each gender. I use OLS regression with fixed effects for state and year to test this (see equation (1) below). The state variable is a set of dummy variables for the individual state effects. Separate equations are estimated for men and women to capture the fixed effects for both genders for each state. Earnings i = α 0 + α 1 State ij + α 3 Year i + ε it (1) Next, I add variables to measure individual worker characteristics to the state effects model. Since the goal was to determine if state effects exist and not to determine the actual cause of the difference, I choose a parsimonious model adding variables commonly used in many labor economic studies. 3 In the regressions that only measure the fixed effects, the intercept can be interpreted as the mean for New Hampshire, which is the omitted variable for this study. 8
9 I re-estimate the model with these individual worker characteristic variables included. Equation (2) represents the regression equation for earnings based on state controlling for individual worker characteristics. The coefficient of interest is β 1, which is the coefficient on State j. This coefficient represents the estimates for the effect of state of residence of respondent on earnings controlling for education, race and ethnicity, marital and family status, citizenship, the two work experience measures as well as a dummy variable for year. Again, estimates are obtained for both men and women in separate OLS estimates. Earnings i = β 0 + β 1 State ij + β 2 Educ i + β 3 Race i + β 4 Marital i + β 5 Nund18 i + β 6 Hisp i + β 7 Metro i + β 8 Citizen i + β 9 Exper i + β 10 Exper 2 i + β 11 Year+ ε it (2) I also estimate an equation that does not include any state measure: Earnings i = γ 0 + γ 1Educ i + γ 2Race i + γ 3Marital i + γ 4Nund18 i + γ 5Hisp i + γ 6Metro i + γ 7Citizen i + γ 8 Exper i + γ 9Exper 2 i + γ 10 Year + ε it (3) Equation (3) represents earnings based on individual characteristics. This regression equation represents earnings estimated for the entire restricted sample controlling for personal attributes. Similarly, men and women s earnings based on these individual traits are estimated in separate regressions. 5. Empirical Results Summary statistics for the entire sample are found in Table 1. For the entire restricted sample, men on average, have more children in the home than women. More men are married than women and there are a higher percentage of white men than white women in the sample. Men also have higher percentages of those having only a high school diploma or less. Women on 9
10 the other hand, have a higher occurrence of US citizenship than men in the sample. Women also have a higher percentage of individuals who are black as well as those of Hispanic origin. The distribution of the sample for the other key variables tends to be fairly similar for men and women. Estimated coefficients for regression equations (1) and (2) are presented in Table 2. Estimates of the coefficients for the state fixed effects model are shown for men and women respectively. Columns (1) and (5) represent estimates the coefficient for the state dummy variable for equation (1). These columns represent results for the unadjusted model, which only estimates earnings using the state fixed effects with an added year fixed effect. The adjusted model, shown in Columns (3) and (7) of Table 2, represent the coefficient for the state dummy variables for equation (2) that include adjustments for individual worker traits. Since earnings are estimated using the natural log of earnings, the coefficients can be interpreted as percentage difference from the constant, which represents estimates for the mean log earnings for the omitted state New Hampshire. Most of the estimated coefficients are significantly different from zero at the 99% level of confidence and all were significant at the 90% confidence level. I use the results from the estimates from equations (2) and (3) to test the significance of state fixed effects on earnings 4. An F test concludes that the null hypothesis that the state effects are all equal to zero is rejected at all levels of significance indicating that state of residence impacts earnings. 4 Regression results for equation (3) in addition to the individual worker trait coefficients for equation (2) are presented in Table A2 in the appendix of this paper. 10
11 The raw regression results presented in Table 2 are estimates relative to the constant. For ease of interpretation, I re-scale the raw estimates as differences from the overall national mean. The overall average values are the mean of the states scaled mean earnings for each equation. I calculate the state effects for each sex. This value is used to determine the GER for each state. I compute the gender earnings ratio in state j as: GER = (!!!!") λ (4) (!!!!" ) where s equals the estimated state effect on earnings for men and women in state j (i.e. α 1 in equation 1 and β 1 in equation 2). NGER, as represented by λ in equation (4), equals the mean ratio for the average female to average male earnings. The national average gender earnings ratio is based on the mean earnings for men and women presented in Table 1. The results of the calculations are presented in Table 3. The GER columns are defined as the ratio of women s earnings to men s in each state relative to the overall mean ratio for women and men s earnings as determined from equation (4). Each state s GER for the unadjusted state effects only model is presented in columns (1) and (3). The state GER s for the adjusted model are found in columns (2) and (4). All states display an earnings gap based on gender. The overall size of the earnings gap decreases when controlling for individual and workplace characteristics. Additionally, the size of the earnings gaps does not remain constant when worker variables are added relative to the unadjusted model. The adjusted GER relative to the NGER tends to be smaller than the unadjusted GER in most states. Eight states have virtually no change in the size of their GER 11
12 relative to the NGER when comparing size of the adjusted GER to the unadjusted GER. Another 19 states only show a 1% decrease in the size relative to the national mean ratio between the models. This is not the case for all states however. The relative size decreases for most individual state earnings ratios, but the overall variation of the state effects remains for the adjusted model. Interestingly, the size of the GER for each state relative to the national GER does not remain constant between models. Figures 1 (a) and (b) illustrate some of the variations in size of the GER relative to the NGER for each model. I present the ten largest differences from the NGER for the unadjusted state fixed effect model in Figure 1(a). The composition of the states alters when adjustments for individual worker traits are included. The ten states with the largest deviation from the national mean ratio are presented in Figure 1(b). Only four states remain in the top ten largest deviations when adjusting for personal traits. Louisiana continues to have the largest deviation from the NGER for both models having only a slight decrease in size deviation for the adjusted model. For ease of presentation, only the largest deviations from the NGER are presented in Figure 1. The standard deviations for the state GER s are and for the unadjusted and adjusted models respectively. These results clearly show the presence of a state effect on the gender earnings gap. The ten largest differences between the unadjusted model and the adjusted model are presented in Figure 2. For example, Utah is 6.3% below the national mean ratio in the unadjusted model. Utah s GER relative to the NGER for the adjusted model, however, is insignificant. This implies that the variation in the state effect can be explained by individual 12
13 worker attributes for observations for that state. Minnesota, on the other hand, actually increases its positive difference from the national mean ratio in the adjusted model by approximately 4.5%. Still other states display a positive deviation from the NGER in the unadjusted model and find state GER s below the national mean ratio when adjusting for individual characteristics. 6. Conclusion This study tests for any significant differences in the size of the earnings gap based on state of residence. I find that the earnings gap as measured by the gender earnings ratio varies among states. I use regressions analysis using unadjusted and adjusted models and find GER variation among the states. The sizes of the earnings gaps vary by state when control variables are included, with no discernable patterns in the variations between the adjusted and unadjusted models. Due to the identification challenges of a generalized gender earnings gap, I hold individual worker characteristics constant for each state as well as assume that any possible omitted variables are held constant across all states since my goal is to determine the existence of a state varying gender earnings gap, not causes for the variations. The individual factors that vary across states could be a topic for future work. A possible pattern of mostly positive deviations from the national mean gender earnings ratio for the states in the northeast and mostly negative deviations for states in the south would suggest a possible connection between GER size and region of the country. Testing for a regional effect did not fall into the scope of this paper but could be subject of future research as well. 13
14 TABLE 1 Summary Statistics, Year- Round Full- time Workers Aged 18-65, Male Mean Std. Error of Mean Mean Earnings $61,098 $42,274 Female Std. Error of Mean Age Number of persons under age 18 - Household Metro status US Citizen Years of work experience Less than HS diploma HS Diploma Some College College Graduate Post- college education Married White Black Hispanic Asian Number of observations Data from CPS March supplement data obtained from DataFerrett. Means are calculated using restricted sample with observations from all states and Washington, D.C. The means for education, race, ethnicity as well as marital, metropolitan and citizenship statuses are calculated using dummy variables where the variable equals 1 if yes and 0 if no. 14
15 TABLE Men and Women s Earnings by State Results obtained from OLS regression estimates for equations (1) and (2) and depict raw results for the state dummy variables. Estimates are presented relative to New Hampshire. The Unadjusted columns represent estimates of log earnings from equation (1). Estimates for equation (2) are indicated in the Adjusted columns. State (1) Unadjusted (2) SE Men (3) Adjusted (4) SE (5) Unadjusted Women (6) SE (7) Adjusted Constant Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut DC Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi (8) SE 15
16 Men Women State (1) Unadjusted (2) SE (3) Adjusted (4) SE (5) Unadjusted (6) SE (7) Adjusted (8) SE Missouri Montana N. Carolina N. Dakota N. Mexico Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island S. Carolina S. Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia W. Virginia Washington Wisconsin Wyoming Dependent variable is log earnings for full- time year round workers aged with experience greater than zero. Sample period is and obtained from the CPS March supplement with a sample size of 136,268 observations. Standard Errors are reported. Adjusted R 2 for equation (1) was for the male regression and for the female regression. The adjusted R 2 for equation (2) is for men and for women. 16
17 TABLE 3 Measuring the Gender Earnings Gap by State Estimates for state s gender earnings ratio (GER) calculated using estimates obatined from equations (1) and (2) representing the unadjusted and adjusted models respectively. GER relative the the mean ratio indicate values above and below the national mean gender earnings ratio (NGER) for each state. Gender earnings ratio GER Relative to National Mean Ratio State (1) Unadjusted (2) Adjusted (3) Unadjusted (4) Adjusted Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut District of Columbia Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi
18 Gender earnings ratio GER Relative to National Mean Ratio State (1) Unadjusted (2) Adjusted (3) Unadjusted (4) Adjusted Missouri Montana N. Carolina N. Dakota N. Mexico Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island S. Carolina S. Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia W. Virginia Washington Wisconsin Wyoming
19 FIGURE 1 Variation in the Gender Earnings Ratio 10 largest deviations from national mean GER for the adjusted and unadjusted models ranked by absolute size differences. (a) Undjusted Model Louisiana District of Columbia Utah Wyoming Kansas N_Mexico Idaho California Alabama Vermont (b) Adjusted Model Louisiana Wyoming Mississippi Maine Massachusetts Alabama Minnesota Oregon Alaska District of Columbia
20 FIGURE 2 Unadjusted and Adjusted GER Size Variation by State States with the Largest Difference between the Unadjusted and Adjusted Models for the Gender Earnings Ratio for the State Relative to the National Mean Ratio Utah Idaho District of Columbia Minnesota Nevada Hawaii New_York Washington California Kansas Unadjusted Adjusted The Unadjusted figures represent the differences from the NGER using estimates obtained from equation (1). The Adjusted figures represent author calculations using values obtained using equation (2). Individual effects represent the differences in equation (2) for state effects controlling for individual worker characteristics. Figure is ranked based on the size of the difference between the unadjusted and adjusted models relative to the national mean GER. 20
21 Bibliography Bertrand, Marianne, Claudia Goldin, and Lawrence F. Katz "Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (2): DeNavis- Walt, Carmen, Bernadette D. Proctor, and Jessica C. Smith Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: Getz, David M Men s and Women s Earnings for States and Metropolitan Statistical Areas: 2009<br />: U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. Goldin, Claudia and Lawrence F. Katz "Transitions: Career and Family Life Cycles of the Educational Elite." American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 98 (2): Hallman, Linda D The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap. Semega, Jessica Men s and Women s Earnings by State: 2008 American Community Survey: U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 21
22 APPENDIX TABLE A1 Mean and Median Earnings By Gender and State Source: Author Calculations from CPS data for Full- Time Year- Round Workers Aged 16 and Older. ACS data replicated using data from 2008 ACS Survey results (Getz 2010, 1; Semega 2009, 1). 22
23 APPENDIX TABLE A2 Measuring the US Gender Earnings Gap Men Women State Fixed Standard Standard Standard Effects Yes No Yes No Error Error Error Included Constant Standard Error Metro Area US Citizen Self Employed Number of children Hispanic < HS Grad HS Grad College Grad Post College Married White Black Asian Experience Experience Year Estimates of log earnings obtained from OLS regression equation (2) and (3). Estimates for individual worker characteristic dummy variables for equation (2) for men and women respectively are presented in Columns (1) and (5). Columns 3 and 7 represent estimates for individual worker characteristic dummy variables for equation (3). The mean of the log earnings estimated for full- time year round workers aged with work experience greater than zero. Sample period is and obtained from the CPS March supplement. Adjusted R 2 for column (1) was and column (5) was Adjusted R 2 for column (5) is Adjusted R 2 for column (3) and (7) regressions are and respectively. All coefficients are significant at the 95% level of confidence. Number of observations is 136,268. i ACS Table 1 results were replicated and are included in the Appendix of this paper. 23
EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation
EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation UPDATED July 2014 This chapter looks at the percentage of American workers who work for an employer who sponsors
More informationMINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013
WEST INFORMATION OFFICE San Francisco, Calif. For release Wednesday, June 25, 2014 14-898-SAN Technical information: (415) 625-2282 BLSInfoSF@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ro9 Media contact: (415) 625-2270 MINIMUM
More informationState Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011
Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/s, 2011 Elderly Handicapped Blind Deaf Disabled FEDERAL Exemption $3,700 $7,400 $3,700 $7,400 $0 $3,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alabama Exemption $1,500 $3,000 $1,500 $3,000
More informationMINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016
For release: Thursday, May 4, 2017 17-488-DAL SOUTHWEST INFORMATION OFFICE: Dallas, Texas Contact Information: (972) 850-4800 BLSInfoDallas@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/southwest MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN
More informationForecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation
Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation January 2015 Equation The REMI government spending estimation assumes that the state and local government demand is driven by the regional
More informationUnion Members in New York and New Jersey 2018
For Release: Friday, March 29, 2019 19-528-NEW NEW YORK NEW JERSEY INFORMATION OFFICE: New York City, N.Y. Technical information: (646) 264-3600 BLSinfoNY@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/new-york-new-jersey
More informationIncome from U.S. Government Obligations
Baird s ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Enclosed is the 2017 Tax Form for your account with
More informationAnnual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care
2017 Cost of Care Home Health Care USA National $18,304 $47,934 $114,400 3% $18,304 $49,192 $125,748 3% Alaska $33,176 $59,488 $73,216 1% $36,608 $63,492 $73,216 2% Alabama $29,744 $38,553 $52,624 1% $29,744
More informationIncome Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies
Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies Daniel Schneider UC Berkeley Department of Sociology Orestes P. Hastings Colorado State University Department of Sociology Daniel Schneider (Corresponding
More informationKentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462
TABLE B MEMBERSHIP AND BENEFIT OPERATIONS OF STATE-ADMINISTERED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, LAST MONTH OF FISCAL YEAR: MARCH 2003 Beneficiaries receiving periodic benefit payments Periodic benefit payments
More informationUndocumented Immigrants are:
Immigrants are: Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants Appendix 1: Detailed State and Local Tax Contributions of Total Immigrant Population Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants
More informationCheckpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources
Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources Alabama Alaska Announcements Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Source Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ( FATCA ) Under Chapter 4 of the Code
More informationKey Facts: NATIONAL WOMEN S LAW CENTER FACT SHEET JAN 2018
NATIONAL WOMEN S LAW CENTER FACT SHEET JAN 2018 WORKPLACE JUSTICE PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS PROMOTE ECONOMIC SECURITY AND EQUALITY FOR WOMEN Kayla Patrick Public sector unions are crucial to the economic security
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Volunteering in the States: 2002 and 2003
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Youth Volunteering in the States: 2002 and 2003 By Sara E. Helms, Research Assistant 1 August 2004 Volunteer rates
More informationThe Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue
FISCAL April 2009 No. 166 FACT The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue By Patrick Fleenor Today the federal cigarette tax will rise from 39 cents to $1.01 per pack. The proceeds
More informationCENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH. Union Membership Byte 2018
CEPR CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH Union Membership Byte 2018 By Brian Dew* January 2018 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20009 tel: 202-293-5380
More informationThe table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *
State Minimum Wages The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. Summary: As of Jan. 1, 2014, 21 states and D.C. have minimum wages above the federal minimum
More informationThe Unions of the States
The Unions of the States John Schmitt February 2010 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 202-293-5380 www.cepr.net CEPR The Unions of the
More informationFigure 1a: Wage Distribution Density Estimates: Men, Minimum Minimum 0.60 Density
Figure 1a: Wage Distribution Density Estimates: Men, 1979-1989 0.90 0.80 1979 1989 1979 Minimum 0.70 1989 Minimum 0.60 Density 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00-1.75-1.50-1.25-1.00-0.75-0.50-0.25 0.00 0.25
More informationTermination Final Pay Requirements
State Involuntary Termination Voluntary Resignation Vacation Payout Requirement Alabama No specific regulations currently exist. No specific regulations currently exist. if the employer s policy provides
More informationQ Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010
Q1 2010 Homeowner Confidence Survey Results May 20, 2010 The Zillow Homeowner Confidence Survey is fielded quarterly to determine the confidence level of American homeowners when it comes to the value
More informationNation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016
Nation s Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 by Joan Alker and Olivia Pham The number of uninsured children nationwide dropped to another historic low in 2016 with approximately 250,000
More informationMotor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005
The following is a Motor Vehicle Sales/Use Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart which you may find helpful in determining the Sales/Use Tax liability of your customers who either purchase vehicles outside of
More informationThe Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro
The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees Robert J. Shapiro October 1, 2013 The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects
More informationState Income Tax Tables
ALABAMA 1 st $1,000... 2% Next 5,000... 4% Over 6,000... 5% ALASKA... 0% ARIZONA 1 1 st $10,000... 2.87% Next 15,000... 3.2% Next 25,000... 3.74% Next 100,000... 4.72% Over 150,000... 5.04% ARKANSAS 1
More informationPay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions
Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions State Pay Frequency Minimum Final Pay Resign Final Pay Terminated Alabama Bi-weekly or semi-monthly No Provision No Provision Alaska Semi-monthly or monthly Next
More informationState Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply
Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Nicholas W. Jenny and Donald J. Boyd The Rockefeller Institute Fiscal News: Vol. 1, No. 3 July 26, 2001 According to a report from the Congressional Budget
More informationAIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State
3600 Route 66, Mail Stop 4J, Neptune, NJ 07754 AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State As an industry leader in the group insurance benefits market, AIG is firmly
More informationResidual Income Requirements
Residual Income Requirements ytzhxrnmwlzh Ch. 4, 9-e: Item 44, Balance Available for Family Support (04/10/09) Enter the appropriate residual income amount from the following tables in the guideline box.
More informationOverview of Sales Tax Exemptions for Agricultural Producers in the United States
Overview of Sales Tax Exemptions for Agricultural Producers in the United States Dr. Wayne P. Miller Tyler R. Knapp November 2017 Draft Not for publication or quotation The University of Arkansas System
More informationBasic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State?
IWPR R590 October 2018 Basic Economic Security in the United States: How Much Income Do Working Adults Need in Each State? Economic security is a critical part of the overall health and well-being of women,
More informationTassistance program. In fiscal year 1998, it represented 18.2 percent of all food stamp
CHARACTERISTICS OF FOOD STAMP HOUSEHOLDS: FISCAL YEAR 1998 (Advance Report) United States Department of Agriculture Office of Analysis, Nutrition, and Evaluation Food and Nutrition Service July 1999 he
More informationSales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State
Thanks to R&M Consulting for assistance in putting this together Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Filing Thresholds
More informationQ209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009
NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Q209 Data as of June 30, 2009 2009 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are from
More informationDATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY Q3 2010 DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 2010 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are from a proprietary paid subscription
More informationMEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS
MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS Under federal law, states have the option of creating Medicaid buy-in programs that enable employed individuals with disabilities who make more than what is allowed under Section
More informationHealth Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S.,
Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Ricans in the U.S., 2010 2015 Research Brief Issued April 2017 By: Jennifer Hinojosa Centro RB2016-15 The recent debates and issues surrounding the 2010 Affordable
More informationQ309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009
NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Q309 Data as of September 30, 2009 2009 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are
More informationEstimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.
Background Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey August 2006 The Program Access Index (PAI) is one of
More informationImpacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables
THE UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL T H E F R A N K H A W K I N S K E N A N I N S T I T U T E DR. MICHAEL A. STEGMAN, DIRECTOR T 919-962-8201 OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CAPITALISM
More informationMapping the geography of retirement savings
of savings A comparative analysis of retirement savings data by state based on information gathered from over 60,000 individuals who have used the VoyaCompareMe online tool. Mapping the geography of retirement
More informationTotal state and local business taxes
Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2016 August 2017 Executive summary This study presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid
More informationWhite Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
White Paper STATE AND FEDERAL S White Paper STATE AND FEDERAL S The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for most employers in the private sector and
More informationFederal Rates and Limits
Federal s and Limits FICA Social Security (OASDI) Base $118,500 Medicare (HI) Base No Limit Social Security (OASDI) Percentage 6.20% Medicare (HI) Percentage Maximum Employee Social Security (OASDI) Withholding
More informationTassistance program. In fiscal year 1999, it 20.1 percent of all food stamp households. Over
CHARACTERISTICS OF FOOD STAMP HOUSEHOLDS: FISCAL YEAR 1999 (Advance Report) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OFFICE OF ANALYSIS, NUTRITION, AND EVALUATION FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE JULY 2000 he
More informationAbility-to-Repay Statutes
Ability-to-Repay Statutes FEDERAL ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA STATUTE Truth in Lending, Regulation Z Consumer Credit Secure and Fair Enforcement for Bankers, Brokers, and Loan Originators
More informationSTATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
2017 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for most employers in the private sector
More informationFederal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I
Federal Registry NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report 2012 Quarter I Updated June 6, 2012 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Federal
More informationTotal state and local business taxes
Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2017 November 2018 Executive summary This study presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid
More informationPAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS
PAY MENT 2017 PAY MENT Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia No generally applicable wage payment law for private employers. Rate
More informationSources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia
Sources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia 2007-2008 Tabulations of the March 2008 Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey and The 2008 Georgia Population Survey William
More informationATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities
Rates Effective August 8, 05 ATHE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities State Availability Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Product Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire California PE New Jersey
More information2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER
2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which applies to most employers, establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for the private
More informationTotal state and local business taxes
Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2014 October 2015 Executive summary This report presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid
More informationBy: Adelle Simmons and Laura Skopec ASPE
ASPE RESEARCH BRIEF 47 MILLION WOMEN WILL HAVE GUARANTEED ACCESS TO WOMEN S PREVENTIVE SERVICES WITH ZERO COST-SHARING UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT By: Adelle Simmons and Laura Skopec ASPE The Affordable
More informationHow Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Updated February 8, 2017 How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Cost in Fiscal Year?
More information2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes
2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes Dear Valued ADP Client, Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2012, you and your employees may notice changes in your paychecks due to updated 2012
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents
NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE CLEARING CORPORATION COMPENSATION DE PRODUITS DÉRIVÉS NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2002-013 January 28, 2002 Trading by U.S. Residents This is
More informationSTATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE
STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE The table below, created by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), reflects current state minimum wages in effect as of January 1, 2017, as
More informationCLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State
CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State Estimating the Annual Amounts of Unemployment Insurance Tax Collections From Individual States for Financing Adult Basic Education/ Job Training Programs
More informationPut in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed.
By:Erin Sollund The federal government Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed. Medicaid, The Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program, and Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
More informationMergers and Acquisitions and Top Income Shares
Mergers and Acquisitions and Top Income Shares Nicholas Short Harvard University December 15, 2017 Evolution of Top Income Shares 25 20 Top 1% Share 15 10 5 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
More informationMinimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006
1 of 15 Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006 Note: Where Federal and state law have different minimum wage rates, the higher standard applies. Wage and Overtime Standards Applicable to Nonsupervisory
More informationUnderstanding the Intersection of Medicaid and Work
Revised January 2018 Issue Brief Understanding the Intersection of Medicaid and Work Rachel Garfield, Robin Rudowitz and Anthony Damico Medicaid is the nation s public health insurance program for people
More informationPopulation in the U.S. Floodplains
D ATA B R I E F D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 7 Population in the U.S. Floodplains Population in the U.S. Floodplains As sea levels rise due to climate change, planners and policymakers in flood-prone areas must
More informationFinancial Burden of Medical Spending by State and the Implications of the 2014 Medicaid Expansions
ACA Implementation Monitoring and Tracking Financial Burden of Medical Spending by State and the Implications of the 2014 Medicaid Expansions April 2013 Kyle J. Caswell, Timothy Waidmann, and Linda J.
More informationAiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.
Aiming Higher Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance Edition Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L. Hayes December The COMMONWEALTH FUND overview On most of the indicators,
More informationImpact of Proposed Minimum-Wage Increase on Low-income Families
Impact of Proposed Minimum-Wage Increase on Low-income Families Heather Boushey and John Schmitt December 2005 We thank Ben Zipperer for helpful comments and assistance with the data. Center for Economic
More informationThe 2017 CHP Salary Survey
The 2017 CHP Salary Survey Gary Lauten, CHP, AAHP Niche Analyst Introduction The 2017 certified health physicist (CHP) survey data was collected by having CHPs submit their responses to survey questions
More informationRecourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO
Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO State Relevant Agency Contact Information Online Resources Online Filing Alabama Department
More informationTOP EMPLOYERS ARMY 12.2% NAVY 10.9% AIR FORCE 8.4% JUSTICE 5.9% AGRICULTURE 3.8% OTHER 18.3% CLERICAL
Federal Workforce 2019 The federal government employs about 2 million people who provide a wide array of critical services to the American public, from defending our national security to responding to
More informationFingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements
Updates to the State Specific Information Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic)
More information8, ADP,
2013 Tax Changes Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2013, employees may notice changes in their paychecks due to updated 2013 federal and state tax requirements. This document will
More informationRequired Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity
Completion Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California State Certification: must complete initial 16 hours (8 hrs of general LTC CE and 8 hrs of classroom-only CE specifically on the CA for LTC prior to
More informationMinnesota s Economics & Demographics Looking To 2030 & Beyond. Tom Stinson, State Economist Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer July 2008
Minnesota s Economics & Demographics Looking To 2030 & Beyond Tom Stinson, State Economist Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer July 2008 Minnesota Has Been Very Successful (Especially For A Cold Weather State
More informationFiscal Policy Project
Fiscal Policy Project How Raising and Indexing the Minimum Wage has Impacted State Economies Introduction July 2012 New Mexico is one of 18 states that require most of their employers to pay a higher wage
More informationMarch Karen Cunnyngham Amang Sukasih Laura Castner
Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in 2009-2011 for All Eligible People and the Working Poor March 2014 Karen Cunnyngham Amang Sukasih
More informationMetrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans. November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis
Metrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis Fiscal Sustainability Metrics Net Amortization Measures whether contributions are sufficient to reduce pension debt if plan
More informationTHE EFFECT OF SIMPLIFIED REPORTING ON FOOD STAMP PAYMENT ACCURACY
THE EFFECT OF SIMPLIFIED REPORTING ON FOOD STAMP PAYMENT ACCURACY Page 1 Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation October 2005 Summary One of the more widely adopted State options allowed by the 2002
More informationDFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018
DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018 Supplementary Tax Information 2017 The following supplementary information may be useful in
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL32598 TANF Cash Benefits as of January 1, 2004 Meridith Walters, Gene Balk, and Vee Burke, Domestic Social Policy Division
More informationFHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference
Credit Score/ Compensating Factor(s)* No Compensating Factor One Compensating Factor Two Compensating Factors No Discretionary Debt Maximum DTI 31% / 43% 37% / 47% 40% / 50% 40% / 40% *Acceptable compensating
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS20853 Updated February 22, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web State Estate and Gift Tax Revenue Steven Maguire Economic Analyst Government and Finance Division Summary
More informationFAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference
FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference FAPRI-UMC Report #04-02 April 11, 2002 Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute University of Missouri 101 South Fifth Street
More informationUnderstanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income
Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income Senate Interim Committee on Finance and Revenue January 12, 2018 2 Apportioning Corporate Income Apportionment is a method of dividing
More informationDeteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest
ACA Implementation Monitoring and Tracking Deteriorating Health Insurance Coverage from 2000 to 2010: Coverage Takes the Biggest Hit in the South and Midwest August 2012 Fredric Blavin, John Holahan, Genevieve
More informationSTATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
www.thinkhr.com 2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES s About ThinkHR ThinkHR provides brokers and their clients with easy and immediate access to expert HR advisors who will provide information and answers
More informationREPORT THE IMPACT OF THE OBAMA ECONOMIC PLAN FOR AMERICA S WORKING WOMEN
REPORT THE IMPACT OF THE OBAMA ECONOMIC PLAN FOR AMERICA S WORKING WOMEN REPORT: The Impact of the Obama Economic Plan for America s Working Women Over the past generation, women have made unparalleled
More informationProviding Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University
Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University FICO Scores: Identifying Subprime Consumers Category FICO Score Range Super-prime 740 and Higher
More informationUpdate: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis
Update: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis Executive Summary Research from the American Action Forum (AAF) finds regulations from the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
More informationFingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements
Updates to the State-Specific Information Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic) Alabama NAIC biographical affidavit
More informationWhat is your New Financing Statement Fee? What is your Amendment Fee (include termination fee if a different amount)?
Topic: UCC Filing Fee Information Question By: Tana Gormely Jurisdiction: Montana Date: 03 April 2012 Jurisdiction Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Question(s) What is your New Financing Statement
More informationDo you charge an expedite fee for online filings?
Topic: Expedite Fees and Online Filings Question by: Allison A. DeSantis : Ohio Date: March 14, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Yes. The expedite fee is $35. We currently offer
More informationTA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17
TA X FACTS 2O17 Northern Funds Tax Facts provides specific information about your Northern Funds investment income and capital gain distributions for 2017. If you have any questions about how to apply
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLAIMS INSTITUTE APRIL 3 5, 2019 CHICAGO, IL Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina (hours ethics
More informationConsultant Compensation Survey Results
Consultant Compensation Survey Results Tuesday, May 20 th, 2014 Executive Summary In April of 2014, GPA conducted a compensation survey of grant professionals who serve as consultants. The survey distributed
More information# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011
# of Credit Unions # of Credit Unins # of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011 8,600 8,400 8,200 8,000 8,478 8,215 7,800 7,909 7,600 7,400 7,651 7,442 7,200 7,000 6,800 # of Credit Unions -Trend By Asset-Based
More informationChild Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016
Policy solutions that work for low-income people Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016 i Background The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) is the primary federal funding
More informationFISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans
September 22, 2010 No. 246 FISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans By Gerald Prante Introduction One of biggest news stories
More informationMedia Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data
Contact Information Below Media Alert First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data First American CoreLogic, the first company to develop a national, state and city-level negative equity report,
More information