ALL RETIREMENT PLAN COVERAGE TABLES
|
|
|
- Randell Sullivan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ALL RETIREMENT PLAN COVERAGE TABLES 1. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage, Civilian, (%) 2. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage, Private-Sector, (%) 3. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage, State and Local Government, (%) 4. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage by Number of at Establishment, Private-Sector, March 2014 (%) 5. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage by Sector and Earnings Quartile, March 2014 (%) 6. Participation in Frozen and Open Defined Benefit Pension s by Sector, (%) 7. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage by Personal Characteristics, Full-Time Wage and Salary, 2009 (%)
2 Table 1. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage, Civilian, (%) Any Retirement Defined Benefit Pension Defined Contribution All Full-Time Part-Time Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics series, "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States" (March 2014, March 2013, March 2012, March 2011, March 2010, March 2009, March 2008).
3 Table 2. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage, Private-Sector, (%) Any Retirement Defined Benefit Pension Defined Contribution in in in All NA NA 20 NA NA 51 NA NA Full-Time NA NA 24 NA NA 60 NA NA Part-Time NA NA 8 NA NA 21 NA NA Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the following U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics series: "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States" (March 2014, March 2013, March 2012, March 2011, March 2010, March 2009, March 2008); "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States" (March 2007, March 2006, March 2005, March 2004, March 2003). Note: NA = "not available."
4 Table 3. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage, State and Local Government, (%) Any Retirement Defined Benefit Pension Defined Contribution in in in All Full-Time 1998 NA 98 NA NA 90 NA NA 14 NA Part-Time Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the following U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publications: "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States" (March 2014, March 2013, March 2012, March 2011, March 2010, March 2009, March 2008); "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in State and Local Governments in the United States, September 2007," and "Employee Benefits in State and Local Governments, 1998." Note: NA = "not available."
5 Table 4. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage by Number of at Establishment, Private-Sector, March 2014 (%) Number of Any Retirement Defined Benefit Pension Defined Contribution 1 to to to or more Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publication, "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2014."
6 Table 5. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage by Sector and Earnings Quartile, March 2014 (%) Any Retirement Defined Benefit Pension Defined Contribution Civilian Bottom Quartile Second Quartile Third Quartile Top Quartile Private-Sector Bottom Quartile Second Quartile Third Quartile Top Quartile State and Local Government Bottom Quartile Second Quartile Third Quartile Top Quartile Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publications, "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2014."
7 Table 6. Participation in Frozen and Open Defined Benefit Pension s by Sector, (%) Pct of Defined Benefit Participants in Frozen s Civilian Private- Sector State & Local Govt Pct of Participating in Open Defined Benefit Pension s Civilian Private- Sector State & Local Govt All NA 25 NA NA 13 NA 2013 NA 26 NA NA 12 NA Full-time NA 26 NA NA 15 NA 2013 NA 27 NA NA 14 NA Part-time NA 6 NA 2012 NA 15 NA NA 6 NA 2013 NA 19 NA NA 6 NA Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics series, "National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States" (March 2013, March 2012, March 2011, March 2010, March 2009). Note: Frozen plans are closed to new workers or have ceased accruing benefits for at least some participants. Open plans accept new participants. NA = "not available."
8 Table 7. Employer-Sponsored Retirement Coverage by Personal Characteristics, Full-Time Wage and Salary, 2009 (%) Any Retirement Defined Benefit Pension Defined Contribution Sex Men Women Age Education Not high school graduate High school graduate Some college Bachelor's degree or more Race and Hispanic origin Non-Hispanic white African American Hispanic Other Annual Earnings ($2010) Less than $25, $25,000 to $49, $50,000 to $99, $100,000 or more Source: Urban Institute Program on Retirement Policy estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Note: Estimates are restricted to wage and salary workers ages 25 to 64 employed at least 35 hours per week. Annual earnings are reported in constant 2010 dollars and estimated as four times quarterly earnings, as reported in SIPP. classified as having some college did not earn a Bachelor's degree.
Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, May U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS bls.gov
Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, May 2017 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS bls.gov Gig economy No official BLS definition of gig economy or gig workers Researchers use many different
Demographic and Other Statistics for Women and Men Aged 50 and Older,
Demographic and Other Statistics for Women and Men Aged 50 and Older, 1999-2001 Population in 2001 Proportion of Population Over Age 50 30.0 % 28.6 % 28.6 % 25.2 % Age Distribution: 50-61 41.9 49.6 45.5
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page
Northwest Census Data Aggregation
Northwest Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table
Riverview Census Data Aggregation
Riverview Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table
Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation
Zipe Code 66101 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5)
Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation
Zipe Code 66103 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5)
Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2008
Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2008 Patrick Purcell Specialist in Income Security October 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
Independence, MO Data Profile 2015
, MO Data Profile 2015 5 year American Community Survey (ACS) Jackson County, Missouri Data sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), 2011 2015 (released December 8, 2016), compared
Aging Seminar Series:
Aging Seminar Series: Income and Wealth of Older Americans Domestic Social Policy Division Congressional Research Service November 19, 2008 Introduction Aging Seminar Series Focus on important issues regarding
Program on Retirement Policy Number 1, February 2011
URBAN INSTITUTE Retirement Security Data Brief Program on Retirement Policy Number 1, February 2011 Poverty among Older Americans, 2009 Philip Issa and Sheila R. Zedlewski About one in three Americans
Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Summary of Recent Trends
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 9-11-2009 Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Summary of Recent Trends Patrick Purcell Congressional Research
Distribution of Family Wealth,
Distribution of Family Wealth, 1963 2016 1963 1983 2016 $12 million 99th percentile $10,400,000 $9 $6 $3 0 10th 50th 90th 10th 50th 90th $-19 $41,028 $238,860 $724 $82,746 $520,133 0 0 Source: Urban Institute
CRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL30122 CRS Report for Congress Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Summary of Recent Trends Updated September 6, 2007 Patrick Purcell Specialist in Income Security Domestic Social Policy
Are Today s Young Workers Better Able to Save for Retirement?
A chartbook from May 2018 Getty Images Are Today s Young Workers Better Able to Save for Retirement? Some but not all have seen improvements in retirement plan access and participation in past 14 years
Women in the Labor Force: A Databook
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 9-2007 Women in the Labor Force: A Databook Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow this and additional works at:
Do Older Americans Have More Income Than We Think?
Do Older Americans Have More Income Than We Think? Adam Bee and Josh Mitchell U.S. Census Bureau Presented at National Tax Association Meetings Philadelphia November 9, 2017 The views expressed in this
Women in the Labor Force: A Databook
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 2-2013 Women in the Labor Force: A Databook Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow this and additional works at:
$11.61 $17.60 $11.60 $17.60
Figure 1.1 Two Distributions of Hourly Earnings 20% $11.61 $17.60 5% $11.60 $17.60 Source: Authors figure. Figure 1.2 Working Adults Whose Hourly Wages Fall Below the Basic Standard, 2010 30 25 24% 20
Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Summary of Recent Trends
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 9-8-2008 Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Summary of Recent Trends Patrick Purcell Congressional Research
2018:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*
2018:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report* Department of Employment, Training & Rehabilitation Research and Analysis Bureau Dr. Tiffany Tyler-Garner, Director Dennis Perea, Deputy Director
EMPLOYEE TENURE IN 2014
For release 10:00 a.m. (EDT) Thursday, September 18, 2014 USDL-14-1714 Technical information: (202) 691-6378 cpsinfo@bls.gov www.bls.gov/cps Media contact: (202) 691-5902 PressOffice@bls.gov EMPLOYEE TENURE
Women in the Labor Force: A Databook
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 12-2011 Women in the Labor Force: A Databook Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow this and additional works at:
The Economy Today: What our measures tell us about the current labor market. Keith Hall Commissioner Bureau of Labor Statistics November 2010
The Economy Today: What our measures tell us about the current labor market Keith Hall Commissioner Bureau of Labor Statistics November 2010 2 B-19. Employment in government Over-the-month change, 2008-10
Women in the Labor Force: A Databook
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 12-2010 Women in the Labor Force: A Databook Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow this and additional works at:
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 This survey of 1,249 adults was conducted July 5 th through July 9 th, 2016 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded in
A Profile of the Working Poor, 2001
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 6-2003 A Profile of the Working Poor, 2001 Abraham Mosisa Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow this and additional
A Profile of the Working Poor, 2011
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 4-2013 A Profile of the Working Poor, 2011 Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow this and additional works at:
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 602894 Central Cities (CC) 227,818 Outside Central Cities 375,076 Percent of Entire MSA 37.79% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1187941 Central Cities (CC) 511,843 Outside Central Cities 676,098 Percent of Entire MSA 43.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 661645 Central Cities (CC) 247,057 Outside Central Cities 414,588 Percent of Entire MSA 37.34% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 583845 Central Cities (CC) 316,649 Outside Central Cities 267,196 Percent of Entire MSA 54.24% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1251509 Central Cities (CC) 540,423 Outside Central Cities 711,086 Percent of Entire MSA 43.18% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1135614 Central Cities (CC) 677,766 Outside Central Cities 457,848 Percent of Entire MSA 59.68% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 591932 Central Cities (CC) 260,970 Outside Central Cities 330,962 Percent of Entire MSA 44.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1100491 Central Cities (CC) 735,617 Outside Central Cities 364,874 Percent of Entire MSA 66.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 540258 Central Cities (CC) 198,915 Outside Central Cities 341,343 Percent of Entire MSA 36.82% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1249763 Central Cities (CC) 691,295 Outside Central Cities 558,468 Percent of Entire MSA 55.31% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1088514 Central Cities (CC) 272,953 Outside Central Cities 815,561 Percent of Entire MSA 25.08% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 922516 Central Cities (CC) 470,859 Outside Central Cities 451,657 Percent of Entire MSA 51.04% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 687249 Central Cities (CC) 198,500 Outside Central Cities 488,749 Percent of Entire MSA 28.88% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 542149 Central Cities (CC) 181870 Outside Central Cities 360279 Percent of Entire MSA 33.55% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1025598 Central Cities (CC) 293,834 Outside Central Cities 731,764 Percent of Entire MSA 28.65% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 875583 Central Cities (CC) 232,835 Outside Central Cities 642,748 Percent of Entire MSA 26.59% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 716998 Central Cities (CC) 448,275 Outside Central Cities 268,723 Percent of Entire MSA 62.52% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1333914 Central Cities (CC) 284,943 Outside Central Cities 1,048,971 Percent of Entire MSA 21.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 712738 Central Cities (CC) 448,607 Outside Central Cities 264,131 Percent of Entire MSA 62.94% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1169641 Central Cities (CC) 0 Outside Central Cities 1,169,641 Percent of Entire MSA 0% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999 to
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 3251876 Central Cities (CC) 2,078,750 Outside Central Cities 1,173,126 Percent of Entire MSA 63.92% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1592383 Central Cities (CC) 1,181,140 Outside Central Cities 411,243 Percent of Entire MSA 74.17% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1776062 Central Cities (CC) 716,793 Outside Central Cities 1,059,269 Percent of Entire MSA 40.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4112198 Central Cities (CC) 416,474 Outside Central Cities 3,695,724 Percent of Entire MSA 10.13% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 9519338 Central Cities (CC) 4408996 Outside Central Cities 5110342 Percent of Entire MSA 46.32% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1623018 Central Cities (CC) 152397 Outside Central Cities 1470621 Percent of Entire MSA 9.39% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1731183 Central Cities (CC) 776733 Outside Central Cities 954450 Percent of Entire MSA 44.87% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2968806 Central Cities (CC) 669,769 Outside Central Cities 2,299,037 Percent of Entire MSA 22.56% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2846289 Central Cities (CC) 809063 Outside Central Cities 2037226 Percent of Entire MSA 28.43% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4441551 Central Cities (CC) 1147720 Outside Central Cities 3293831 Percent of Entire MSA 25.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1500741 Central Cities (CC) 661799 Outside Central Cities 838942 Percent of Entire MSA 44.1% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2552994 Central Cities (CC) 686992 Outside Central Cities 1866002 Percent of Entire MSA 26.91% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2414616 Central Cities (CC) 764431 Outside Central Cities 1650185 Percent of Entire MSA 31.66% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
The Potential Effects of Cash Balance Plans on the Distribution of Pension Wealth At Midlife. Richard W. Johnson and Cori E. Uccello.
The Potential Effects of Cash Balance Plans on the Distribution of Pension Wealth At Midlife Richard W. Johnson and Cori E. Uccello August 2001 Final Report to the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,249 This survey of 1,249 adults was conducted July 22 nd through July 28 th, 2015 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded in
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL33387 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Topics in Aging: Income of Americans Age 65 and Older, 1969 to 2004 April 21, 2006 Patrick Purcell Specialist in Social Legislation
CRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL33116 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Retirement Plan Participation and Contributions: Trends from 1998 to 2003 October 12, 2005 Patrick Purcell Specialist in Social Legislation
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
Poverty in the United Way Service Area
Poverty in the United Way Service Area Year 4 Update - 2014 The Institute for Urban Policy Research At The University of Texas at Dallas Poverty in the United Way Service Area Year 4 Update - 2014 Introduction
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,205 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,205 This survey of 1,205 adults was conducted June 21 st through June 25 th, 2017 by The Marist Poll sponsored in collaboration
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,023 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,023 This survey of 1,023 adults was conducted January 10 th through January 13 th, 2019 by The Marist Poll sponsored in
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: HBO Real Sports/Marist Poll of 1,298 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: HBO Real Sports/Marist Poll of 1,298 This survey of 1,298 adults was conducted September 15 th through September 20 th, 2016 by The Marist Poll, sponsored
Do Older Americans Have More Income Than We Think?
Do Older Americans Have More Income Than We Think? Josh Mitchell and Adam Bee U.S. Census Bureau December 14, 2017 The views expressed in this research, including those related to statistical, methodological,
Opting out of the labor force and does the unemployment rate still matter?
Opting out of the labor force and does the unemployment rate still matter? Michael W. Horrigan, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics March 24, 2018 NAWB Pre-conference
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/Marist Poll of 949 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/Marist Poll of 949 This survey of 949 adults was conducted September 5th through September 9 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored in partnership
In 2012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, about. A Profile of the Working Poor, Highlights CONTENTS U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS M A R C H 2 0 1 4 R E P O R T 1 0 4 7 A Profile of the Working Poor, 2012 Highlights Following are additional highlights from the 2012 data: Full-time workers were considerably
Retirement Plan Coverage of Baby Boomers: Analysis of 1998 SIPP Data. Satyendra K. Verma
A Data and Chart Book by Satyendra K. Verma August 2005 Retirement Plan Coverage of Baby Boomers: Analysis of 1998 SIPP Data by Satyendra K. Verma August 2005 Components Retirement Plan Coverage in 1998:
Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2006
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents September 2007 Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2006 Patrick Purcell Congressional Research Service,
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,350 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,350 This survey of 1,350 adults was conducted January 8 th through January 10 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist National Poll of 1,197 Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist National Poll of 1,197 Adults This survey of 1,197 adults was conducted February 4 th through February 9 th, 2014 by The Marist Poll
FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates. Year
FIGURE I.1 / Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rates 40,000 12 Real GDP per Capita (Chained 2000 Dollars) 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Real GDP per Capita Unemployment
Digitized for FRASER Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Alexis M. Herman, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Katharine G. Abraham, Commissioner Employment & Earnings (ISSN 00136840; USPS 485010), is published monthly and prepared
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues January 2015
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues January 2015 South Carolina Offshore Drilling Presented by: Harris Poll Interviewing: January 13-15, 2015 Respondents: 604 Registered Voters Method: Telephone
MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)
MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP) Bob Carey, Public Consulting Group (PCG) An Overview of the in the State of Nevada
Women and Economic Security: Hard to Get, Hard to Keep
Women and Economic Security: Hard to Get, Hard to Keep Leslie Gabel-Brett, Ph.D. Executive Director Permanent Commission on the Making Women Visible Day February 16, 2006 Women and economic insecurity
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 807 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 807 This survey of 807 adults was conducted February 15 th through February 17 th, 2019 by The Marist Poll sponsored in
Topics in Aging: Income and Poverty Among Older Americans in 2005
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs Federal Publications September 2006 Topics in Aging: Income and Poverty Among Older Americans
Cross-Sectional Wealth and Financial Wealth
Technical Series Paper #00-02 Cross-Sectional Wealth and Financial Wealth Frank Stafford and Joe Lupton Survey Research Center - Institute for Social Research University of Michigan February 2000 This
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
Less than High school. high school graduate
Table S1.a Projections of future labor demand - New England states Distribution of employment by educational attainment for major occupation groups, 2009 and 2018. Southern New England "Low-Skill" "Middle-Skill"
U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics October Third quarter 2000 averages for household survey data
U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics October In this issue: Third quarter averages for household survey data U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Alexis M. Herman, Secretary BUREAU Ol" LABOR STATISTICS
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,075 This survey of 1,075 adults was conducted November 28 th through December 4 th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored
Economic Overview New York
Report created on October 20, 2015 Economic Overview Created using: Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,465 National Adults
How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: McClatchy-Marist Poll of 1,465 This survey of 1,465 adults was conducted October 29 th through November 4 th, 2015 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded
Health Status, Health Insurance, and Health Services Utilization: 2001
Health Status, Health Insurance, and Health Services Utilization: 2001 Household Economic Studies Issued February 2006 P70-106 This report presents health service utilization rates by economic and demographic
Economic Overview Long Island
Report created on October 20, 2015 Economic Overview Long Island Created using: Contact: Lisa.Montiel@suny.edu DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF
Changes in Economic Mobility
December 11 Changes in Economic Mobility Lin Xia SM 222 Prof. Shulamit Kahn Xia 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over years, income inequality has been one of the most continuously controversial topics. Most recent
Technical information: Household data: (202) USDL
2 Technical information: Household data: (202) 691-6378 http://www.bls.gov/cps/ Establishment data: 691-6555 http://www.bls.gov/ces/ Media contact: 691-5902 USDL 07-1015 Transmission of material in this
A Long Road Back to Work. The Realities of Unemployment since the Great Recession
1101 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 810 Washington, DC 20036 http://www.nul.org A Long Road Back to Work The Realities of Unemployment since the Great Recession June 2011 Valerie Rawlston Wilson, PhD National
Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018
Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX January 8, 2018 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 WAGE TRENDS...5 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7 OCCUPATION SNAPSHOT...9 INDUSTRY CLUSTERS...