CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Transformation Q4 2017

Transcription

1 CONSTRUCTION MONITOR Transformation Q4 2017

2

3 CIDB CONSTRUCTION MONITOR TRANSFORMATION; JANUARY Introduction 1 2. Transformation of the Construction Industry Background and Context A Strategy for the Transformation of the Construction Industry A Transformed Construction Industry 3 3. Transformation of the Built Environment Professions Sector Black-Ownership Black Management Control Employment Equity 5 4. Transformation of the Contracting Sector Black-Ownership Woman-Ownership B-BBEE Recognition Level Contracts Awarded 10 Appendix 1: Provincial Data: Number of cidb Registered Contractors 11 Appendix 2: Provincial Data: Black-Ownership 12 Appendix 3: Provincial Data: Woman-Ownership 13 Appendix 4: Provincial Data: B-BBEE Level 14

4

5 CIDB CONSTRUCTION MONITOR TRANSFORMATION; JANUARY Introduction The cidb Quarterly Monitors focus on individual themes each quarter, namely: Quarter 1: Supply & Demand; Quarter 2: Contractor Development; Quarter 3: Employment; and Quarter 4: Empowerment. This cidb Construction Monitor - Transformation covers empowerment issues in the construction industry. The Monitor presents an assessment of the state of transformation of the construction industry, with a focus on the consulting engineering (or professional service providers) and the contracting sectors. The Monitor draws largely on information obtained from the cidb Register of Contractors, the cidb Register of Projects and the Consulting Engineers South Africa (SA) Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey. 1

6 2. Transformation of the Construction Industry 2.1 Background and Context This cidb Construction Monitor Transformation draws primarily on information obtained from the cidb Register of Contractors, the cidb Register of Projects and the SA Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey. This assessment of the state of transformation of the consulting engineering and contracting sectors is given in Sections 3 and 4 respectively. Notwithstanding this, the following references dated 2012 to 2014 provide additional background and context to transformation in the construction industry: i) The Construction Industry Transformation Summit held on 23 November 2012, which was initiated by the Minister of Public Works and hosted by the cidb. ii) iii) A workshop on the Effectiveness of the Construction Sector Charter held on 10 March 2014, co-hosted by the cidb and the Construction Sector Charter Council (CSCC). The CSCC Baseline Report: State of Empowerment in the Construction Sector since the Gazette of the Construction Empowerment Code in which was released by the CSCC in April The above references deal primarily with the state of transformation of enterprises, whereas reference to the state of transformation of the built environment professionals can be found in: iv) The Council for the Built Environment (CBE) Baseline study on Transformation in the Built Environment, published in October A Strategy for the Transformation of the Construction Industry Drawing largely on the outcome of the Construction Industry Transformation Summit as well as the dti transformation strategy, the cidb has developed the following conceptual framework for transformation of the construction industry: i) Macro-economic / business conditions impact on the total work available to the construction sector and the underlying business conditions within which transformation must take place. An effective transformation strategy must therefore aim to increase the total government spend and the efficiency and rate of spend. ii) iii) iv) Access to work / participation: Within the construction economy, enhancing transformation is dependent on black-contractors, black-beps and black-materials manufacturers and suppliers accessing work and the participation of the black-sector. An effective transformation strategy must therefore increase the participation of the black-sector in public and private sector spend through regulation, development programmes and best practice. Business factors: Notwithstanding that access to work is fundamental to enhancing transformation, enhancing transformation requires support to enhance the capabilities of black-enterprise, availability of skills, access to finance, etc. An effective transformation strategy must therefore enhance the development and sustainability of the black-sector, and enhancing quality in the delivery of construction works. Good governance: Transformation must be associated with the highest standards of corporate governance of all participants. An effective transformation strategy must therefore encourage transparency and good governance in the delivery of construction works. 2

7 v) Commitment: Addressing transformation is not the responsibility of one entity or organization, and requires the commitment from the established construction industry to transform from within, and to support the transformation of the black construction sector. Amongst others, public sector clients have a key role to play in supporting the transformation of the construction sector through developmental support and procurement interventions. 2.3 A Transformed Construction Industry Targets for the transformation of the construction industry are, in effect, established and agreed to in the Construction Sector Codes (CSCs). Notwithstanding this, as a high level target, the cidb is using the following as a message for the cidb s vision of transformation: 90% or more of the capacity of the construction industry is 90% or more black-owned, and delivers 90% or more of construction contracts by value 3

8 3. Transformation of the Built Environment Professions Sector Information on the state of transformation of the built environment professions (BEPs) sector is drawn largely from the Consulting Engineers South Africa (SA) Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey taken from January to June 2017, together with other data available from SA. In this regard it should be noted that while SA represents a large proportion of consulting engineers, it does not represent all consulting engineers in South Africa 3.1 Black-Ownership An assessment of data obtained from SA membership data (as of end-june 2017) shows that the total number of companies with black ownership exceeding 50% has significantly increased from 17% to 32% since December A detailed breakdown of the number of companies by turnover with black ownership exceeding 50% is given below. Black-Ownership (50%+); June 2017 Size % Large (>R35m pa) 20% Medium (R11,5m to R35m pa 25% Small (<R11,5m pa) 35% Total 32% Large (>R35m pa) Medium (R11,5m to R35m pa) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Small (<R11,5m pa) Source: SA Membership Database, June Black Management Control An assessment of data obtained from SA membership data (as of end-june 2017) shows the black executives as a percentage of the total executives have increased from 30% in 2014Q2 to 37% in 2017Q2, but this shows a slight drop of 4% when compared to the same period last year. Even though this increase is encouraging, it is noted that the state of transformation is not representative of the demographics of South Africa. 50% Black Executive as % of Total Executive 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2014Q2 2014Q4 2015Q2 2015Q4 2016Q2 2017Q2 Source: SA Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey; 2012Q2 2017Q2 4

9 3.3 Employment Equity An assessment of employment equity obtained from SA membership data (as of end-june 2017) shows total black employees as a percentage of total employees have increased marginally from 44% in 2014Q2 to 49% in 2017Q2. Again, it is noted that the state of transformation is not representative of the demographics of South Africa. 60% Black Employees as % of Total Employees 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2014Q2 2014Q4 2015Q2 2015Q4 2016Q2 2016Q4 2017Q2 Source: SA Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey; 2014Q2 2017Q2 A breakdown of black employees as a percentage of total employees by job type is given below for 2017Q2. Professional black staff accounts for only 12% of total professional staff. Black Employees as % of Total Employees by Job Class Administration / Support staff Laboratory / Survey Assistants Draughtspersons Technical Assistants Unregistered technical staff: Other Unregistered technical staff: Technician Unregistered technical staff: Technologist Unregistered technical staff: Engineer Technicians PrTechni Technologists Pr TEchENg Professional Other Professional Quantity Surveyors Professional Architects Professional Engineer Pr.Eng 0% 50% 100% Source: SA Bi-Annual Economic and Capacity Survey; 2013Q2 2017Q2 5

10 4. Transformation of the Contracting Sector Information on the state of transformation of the contracting sector is drawn largely from the cidb Register of Contractors and the cidb Register of Projects. 4.1 Black-Ownership Details of black-ownership of cidb registered contractor enterprises (i.e. not registrations) is given below for South Africa for the following two ownership cases: i) ownership control of 51% or more; and ii) ownership control of 90% or more. The grade listed in the table below corresponds to the highest grade for an enterprise across all the registrations for the enterprise. From the assessment below, it is seen that the state of transformation decreases with increasing cidb Grade (and size of company). Specifically, for ownership of 51% and above, it is seen that less than 40% of cidb registered enterprises in Grade 9 are black-owned. (Note that the Grade 9 contractor enterprises in particular include public listed companies and wholly owned subsidiaries, for which black-ownership other than directors is excluded. The impact of excluding public listed and international companies on the transformation profile is however small.) Black-Ownership Grade Number Black (%) Woman-Ownership; 30%+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % 30% 7 & % 9 51% 5 & % 2 to % Total % 7 & 8 Woman-Ownership; 51% % 5 & 6 7 & % 5 & % 2 to % 2 to 4 Total % From the table above, it is also seen that there is little difference between black-ownership of 51% and above and 90% and above. The history profiles of black-ownership of 51% and above for contracting enterprises for the period 2015Q1 to 2017Q4 is shown in the following figures. Of concern is that while black-ownership representation as a percentage of the total number of registered enterprises shows improvement over time, overall, black-ownership representation has not increased significantly over the past three years in the higher level grades. 6

11 Black-Ownership; 51%+ 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 2 to 4 5 & 6 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 7 & (Note that the reason for the drop in Grade 9 contractors from 32% in 2015Q2 to 24% in 2016Q1 is not fully understood, and may be due to the merging of records during the redesign of cidb systems. This is being investigated further by the cidb.) Black-ownership by cidb Grade and by Class of Works for black-ownership levels of 51% and more is given below. It is seen that black ownership by Class of Works tends to be higher for General Building (), followed by Civil Engineering (). Black-Ownership; 51% + Grade EB EP ME SW 9 56% 40% 33% 34% 32% 35% 7 & 8 79% 75% 58% 63% 53% 57% 5 & 6 91% 88% 75% 80% 70% 79% 2 to 4 96% 96% 86% 87% 84% 91% As context, information on the number of cidb registered contractors by province for General Building and Civil Engineering is given in Appendix 1. Further information by province for General Building and Civil Engineering is given in Appendix Woman-Ownership Details of woman-ownership of cidb registered contractor enterprises (i.e. not registrations) is given below for South Africa for the following two ownership cases: iii) iv) ownership control of 30% or more; and ownership control of 51% or more. The grade listed in the table below corresponds to the highest grade for an enterprise across all the registrations for the enterprise. From the assessment below, it is seen that the state of transformation decreases with increasing cidb Grade (and size of company) but this change with Grade is not as pronounced as is observed for black-ownership. Specifically, for ownership of 51% and above, it is seen that woman-ownership amounts to around 30% of all contracting enterprises. 7

12 Woman-Ownership Grade Number Woman (%) Woman-Ownership; 30%+ 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% % 30% 7 & % 9 51% 5 & % 2 to % Total % 7 & 8 Woman-Ownership; 51% % 5 & 6 7 & % 5 & % 2 to % 2 to 4 Total % The history profiles of woman-ownership of 51% and above for contracting enterprises for the period 2015Q1 to 2017Q4 is shown in the following figures. It is seen that woman-ownership in Grades 2 to 6 is in fact decreasing over time, whereas woman ownership in Grades 7 to 9 is increasing. This is due in part to womanowned contractors upgrading to higher grades. Woman-Ownership; 51%+ 50% 2 to 4 5 & 6 50% 7 & % 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Woman-ownership by cidb Grade and by Class of Works for woman-ownership levels of 51% and more is given below. Further information by province for General Building and Civil Engineering is given in Appendix 3. No significant trends in woman-ownership by Class of Works can be seen. Woman-Ownership; 51% + Grade EB EP ME SW 9 32% 29% 33% 28% 24% 29% 7 & 8 28% 27% 29% 29% 27% 32% 5 & 6 34% 29% 30% 30% 23% 37% 2 to 4 33% 34% 27% 30% 26% 40% 4.3 B-BBEE Recognition Level For the period under review (2017Q4), the percentage of registered contracting enterprises with a minimum B- BBEE Levels is given below for contractors that have submitted B-BBEE Level information to the cidb.. 8

13 Grade % 36% 67% 86% 90% 96% 7 & 8 24% 48% 77% 89% 93% 96% 5 & 6 31% 45% 88% 97% 99% 99% 2 to 4 39% 41% 93% 100% 100% 100% It is seen that 36% of Grade 9 enterprises and 48% of Grade 7 and 8 enterprises have a minimum B-BBEE Level of 2 (i.e. a B-BBEE Level of 2 or 1). Similarly, only 4% of Grade 9 enterprises are B-BBEE Level 1 and 24% of Grade 7 and 8 enterprises have a minimum B-BBEE Level of 1. Furthermore, it is seen around 85% to 90% of Grade 7 to 9 contracting enterprises have a minimum B-BBEE Level Contributor of 4, which is regarded as being fully compliant with the Sector Codes. An assessment of the percentage of contractors with a minimum B-BBEE Levels by Class of Works is given below. Percentage Contractors by and Class of Works 9 6% 46% 77% 89% 94% 97% 9 4% 36% 72% 88% 94% 100% 7 & 8 28% 52% 81% 92% 95% 98% 7 & 8 23% 49% 79% 91% 95% 97% 5 & 6 32% 43% 92% 99% 100% 100% 5 & 6 30% 43% 90% 98% 99% 99% 2 to 4 38% 40% 96% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 39% 42% 95% 100% 100% 100% EP EB 9 0% 38% 69% 100% 100% 100% 9 0% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 22% 50% 72% 93% 96% 99% 7 & 8 21% 39% 58% 76% 79% 85% 5 & 6 31% 49% 87% 96% 98% 99% 5 & 6 36% 56% 85% 94% 98% 98% 2 to 4 35% 39% 88% 98% 100% 100% 2 to 4 34% 39% 85% 98% 99% 100% ME SW 9 0% 22% 72% 83% 83% 89% 9 0% 43% 86% 86% 93% 100% 7 & 8 14% 41% 73% 84% 90% 91% 7 & 8 18% 44% 74% 88% 94% 95% 5 & 6 27% 46% 76% 89% 95% 96% 5 & 6 31% 53% 88% 95% 97% 98% 2 to 4 29% 36% 83% 98% 99% 99% 2 to 4 37% 41% 92% 99% 100% 100% Key: 20% 80% 100% Note that the Preferential Procurement Regulations (2017) allows for pre-qualification criteria for the procurement of infrastructure, namely: 4.(1) If an organ of state decides to apply pre-qualifying criteria to advance certain designated groups, that organ of state must advertise the tender with a specific tendering condition that only one or more of the following tenderers may respond: (a) a tenderer having a stipulated minimum B-BBEE status level of contributor The above information can be used to guide the setting of B-BBEE Level eligibility levels. Note that the cidb endorses all actions to enhance transformation in the construction industry, and endorses the use of B-BBEE as an eligibility criteria for infrastructure procurement. However, it should be noted that using excessively restrictive B-BBEE Levels as eligibility criteria could excessively restrict the market, which can result in price increases and also result in non-responsive tenders and procurement delays. Further information by province for General Building and Civil Engineering is given in Appendix 4. 9

14 4.4 Contracts Awarded Estimates of the percentage by value of public sector contracts awarded to black-and woman-owned contractor enterprises during the three year period 2015Q1 to 2017Q4 are shown below. Public Sector Contracts Awarded Grade Black (%) Woman (%) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 9 25% 19% 7 & 8 70% 26% Black 5 & 6 87% 40% 9 Woman 2 to 4 92% 34% Total 54% 25% 7 & 8 5 & 6 2 to 4 Overall, it is seen that black-owned contractors (or 51% and more) are accessing in total around 54% of total public sector awards which is significantly lower than the cidb s vision of 90% of contract awards. Of particular concern is that the percentage of work accessed in Grade 9 (i.e. the higher value contract awards) is low. Similar conclusions can be drawn for women-owned contractors, who access around 25% of total public contract awards. It is noted however that the total number of women-owned enterprises (51% or more womanownership) is around 31% of total registered enterprises. 10

15 Appendix 1: Provincial Data: Number of cidb Registered Contractors Number of Contractors Grade Grade Eastern Cape Mpumalanga & & & & to to Free State North West & & & & to to Gauteng Northern Cape & & & & to to KwaZulu-Natal Western Cape & & & & to to Limpopo South Africa & & & & to to

16 Appendix 2: Provincial Data: Black-Ownership General Building () Civil Engineering () Eastern Cape 9 0% 0% 50% 50% 100% 9 0% 0% 33% 67% 100% 7 & 8 70% 74% 77% 79% 100% 7 & 8 53% 57% 66% 71% 100% 5 & 6 83% 85% 91% 93% 100% 5 & 6 85% 87% 90% 91% 100% 2 to 4 94% 94% 95% 95% 100% 2 to 4 94% 94% 96% 96% 100% Free State Free State 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 9 40% 40% 40% 40% 100% 7 & 8 65% 65% 77% 81% 100% 7 & 8 63% 66% 77% 83% 100% 5 & 6 78% 81% 83% 85% 100% 5 & 6 82% 85% 85% 87% 100% 2 to 4 97% 97% 97% 97% 100% 2 to 4 95% 96% 98% 98% 100% Gauteng Gauteng 9 49% 51% 56% 64% 100% 9 36% 38% 44% 51% 100% 7 & 8 78% 80% 82% 85% 100% 7 & 8 69% 72% 73% 78% 100% 5 & 6 88% 89% 91% 92% 100% 5 & 6 86% 87% 89% 91% 100% 2 to 4 95% 95% 95% 96% 100% 2 to 4 92% 92% 94% 95% 100% Kwa-Zulu Natal Kwa-Zulu Natal 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 33% 33% 33% 50% 100% 7 & 8 66% 71% 75% 82% 100% 7 & 8 70% 72% 78% 81% 100% 5 & 6 87% 88% 89% 91% 100% 5 & 6 85% 85% 87% 91% 100% 2 to 4 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% 2 to 4 98% 98% 98% 98% 100% Limpopo Limpopo 9 67% 67% 100% 100% 100% 9 25% 25% 50% 75% 100% 7 & 8 88% 90% 94% 96% 100% 7 & 8 87% 89% 91% 95% 100% 5 & 6 97% 97% 98% 98% 100% 5 & 6 93% 93% 95% 95% 100% 2 to 4 96% 96% 97% 97% 100% 2 to 4 96% 96% 97% 97% 100% Mpumalanga Mpumalanga 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 89% 89% 91% 91% 100% 7 & 8 90% 90% 96% 96% 100% 5 & 6 97% 98% 98% 98% 100% 5 & 6 92% 93% 96% 96% 100% 2 to 4 97% 98% 98% 99% 100% 2 to 4 97% 97% 98% 98% 100% North West North West & 8 73% 73% 83% 90% 100% 7 & 8 53% 53% 63% 73% 100% 5 & 6 91% 92% 92% 93% 100% 5 & 6 88% 88% 89% 93% 100% 2 to 4 95% 95% 96% 96% 100% 2 to 4 93% 93% 96% 96% 100% Northern Cape Northern Cape & 8 42% 42% 42% 50% 100% 7 & 8 47% 47% 60% 60% 100% 5 & 6 95% 95% 95% 95% 100% 5 & 6 78% 78% 78% 78% 100% 2 to 4 95% 95% 95% 95% 100% 2 to 4 90% 91% 94% 94% 100% Western Cape Western Cape 9 22% 22% 22% 33% 100% 9 11% 11% 11% 11% 100% 7 & 8 48% 50% 50% 58% 100% 7 & 8 27% 33% 35% 44% 100% 5 & 6 69% 69% 70% 75% 100% 5 & 6 40% 41% 50% 57% 100% 2 to 4 83% 84% 85% 87% 100% 2 to 4 73% 75% 78% 80% 100% South Africa South Africa 9 47% 49% 56% 63% 100% 9 32% 33% 40% 48% 100% 7 & 8 74% 76% 79% 83% 100% 7 & 8 68% 71% 75% 79% 100% 5 & 6 88% 89% 91% 92% 100% 5 & 6 85% 86% 88% 90% 100% 2 to 4 95% 95% 96% 96% 100% 2 to 4 95% 95% 96% 96% 100% Key: 50% 90% 100% Date: 2017 quarter 4 Eastern Cape 12

17 Appendix 3: Provincial Data: Woman-Ownership General Building () Civil Engineering () Eastern Cape Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 9 0% 0% 0% 33% 100% 7 & 8 17% 19% 26% 34% 100% 7 & 8 19% 24% 26% 35% 100% 5 & 6 22% 24% 29% 34% 100% 5 & 6 21% 23% 28% 34% 100% 2 to 4 23% 26% 28% 40% 100% 2 to 4 25% 28% 31% 41% 100% Free State Free State Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 9 40% 40% 40% 40% 100% 7 & 8 13% 13% 13% 35% 100% 7 & 8 6% 14% 17% 31% 100% 5 & 6 15% 20% 27% 32% 100% 5 & 6 17% 18% 21% 27% 100% 2 to 4 24% 25% 28% 34% 100% 2 to 4 22% 24% 29% 35% 100% Gauteng Gauteng Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 21% 26% 28% 49% 100% 9 23% 25% 33% 46% 100% 7 & 8 19% 20% 28% 37% 100% 7 & 8 20% 23% 27% 34% 100% 5 & 6 24% 27% 31% 40% 100% 5 & 6 24% 27% 31% 39% 100% 2 to 4 29% 31% 36% 46% 100% 2 to 4 24% 27% 32% 41% 100% Kwa-Zulu Natal Kwa-Zulu Natal Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 9 17% 17% 25% 33% 100% 7 & 8 18% 23% 26% 37% 100% 7 & 8 17% 22% 28% 46% 100% 5 & 6 31% 36% 39% 45% 100% 5 & 6 24% 27% 30% 37% 100% 2 to 4 30% 34% 36% 45% 100% 2 to 4 34% 37% 39% 46% 100% Limpopo Limpopo Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 0% 0% 33% 33% 100% 9 0% 0% 25% 25% 100% 7 & 8 29% 36% 40% 49% 100% 7 & 8 19% 26% 32% 47% 100% 5 & 6 31% 33% 37% 44% 100% 5 & 6 28% 30% 32% 42% 100% 2 to 4 28% 30% 32% 38% 100% 2 to 4 25% 28% 30% 36% 100% Mpumalanga Mpumalanga Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 28% 30% 37% 48% 100% 7 & 8 26% 30% 37% 47% 100% 5 & 6 32% 37% 43% 52% 100% 5 & 6 24% 26% 33% 45% 100% 2 to 4 28% 31% 36% 44% 100% 2 to 4 25% 29% 33% 43% 100% North West North West Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) & 8 13% 13% 20% 27% 100% 7 & 8 10% 10% 15% 25% 100% 5 & 6 33% 37% 38% 42% 100% 5 & 6 34% 36% 36% 45% 100% 2 to 4 21% 22% 23% 34% 100% 2 to 4 27% 29% 31% 38% 100% Northern Cape Northern Cape Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) & 8 0% 0% 8% 8% 100% 7 & 8 20% 20% 33% 33% 100% 5 & 6 14% 14% 14% 18% 100% 5 & 6 15% 15% 15% 22% 100% 2 to 4 15% 16% 18% 34% 100% 2 to 4 13% 16% 18% 27% 100% Western Cape Western Cape Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 22% 22% 22% 22% 100% 9 11% 11% 11% 11% 100% 7 & 8 15% 19% 23% 33% 100% 7 & 8 13% 13% 17% 25% 100% 5 & 6 26% 30% 33% 46% 100% 5 & 6 9% 12% 15% 29% 100% 2 to 4 27% 31% 34% 46% 100% 2 to 4 20% 22% 26% 44% 100% South Africa South Africa Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 9 22% 25% 32% 46% 100% 9 21% 22% 29% 40% 100% 7 & 8 19% 22% 28% 38% 100% 7 & 8 18% 22% 27% 38% 100% 5 & 6 27% 30% 34% 42% 100% 5 & 6 23% 26% 29% 38% 100% 2 to 4 27% 30% 33% 43% 100% 2 to 4 28% 31% 34% 42% 100% Key: 20% 50% 100% Date: 2017 quarter 4 Eastern Cape Minimum Woman-Ownership (%) 13

18 Appendix 4: Provincial Data: B-BBEE Level General Building () Civil Engineering () Eastern Cape Eastern Cape 9 0% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 9 0% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 23% 58% 74% 94% 97% 97% 7 & 8 21% 58% 79% 88% 91% 93% 5 & 6 28% 48% 94% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 29% 52% 91% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 37% 38% 95% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 33% 35% 93% 100% 100% 100% Free State Free State 9 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 0% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 21% 38% 75% 88% 92% 92% 7 & 8 17% 48% 74% 83% 91% 96% 5 & 6 32% 39% 92% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 42% 46% 88% 96% 96% 96% 2 to 4 50% 53% 94% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 39% 44% 94% 100% 100% 100% Gauteng Gauteng 9 5% 45% 90% 95% 100% 100% 9 0% 25% 71% 92% 96% 100% 7 & 8 25% 46% 78% 92% 96% 98% 7 & 8 21% 43% 75% 88% 94% 96% 5 & 6 22% 35% 88% 99% 99% 100% 5 & 6 22% 30% 88% 97% 99% 100% 2 to 4 25% 29% 94% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 29% 36% 94% 100% 100% 100% Kwa-Zulu Natal Kwa-Zulu Natal 9 0% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 9 0% 22% 44% 67% 78% 100% 7 & 8 31% 56% 77% 90% 96% 100% 7 & 8 26% 48% 79% 93% 95% 98% 5 & 6 36% 47% 94% 98% 99% 99% 5 & 6 36% 50% 91% 98% 99% 99% 2 to 4 38% 39% 96% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 44% 45% 96% 100% 100% 100% Limpopo Limpopo 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 31% 63% 94% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 24% 51% 90% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 28% 32% 97% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 21% 28% 96% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 19% 20% 97% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 19% 19% 95% 99% 100% 100% Mpumalanga Mpumalanga 9 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 53% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7 & 8 41% 53% 97% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 41% 50% 98% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 35% 43% 94% 98% 98% 98% 2 to 4 55% 57% 97% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 40% 45% 97% 100% 100% 100% North West North West & 8 22% 44% 89% 89% 89% 100% 7 & 8 21% 29% 57% 64% 86% 100% 5 & 6 16% 16% 81% 94% 100% 100% 5 & 6 35% 35% 94% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 32% 32% 97% 99% 99% 100% 2 to 4 28% 28% 99% 99% 100% 100% Northern Cape Northern Cape & 8 17% 17% 67% 83% 83% 100% 7 & 8 0% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 13% 63% 75% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 25% 31% 63% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 65% 65% 97% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 72% 74% 97% 100% 100% 100% Western Cape Western Cape 9 0% 38% 50% 88% 100% 100% 9 14% 43% 71% 86% 100% 100% 7 & 8 30% 54% 86% 92% 92% 95% 7 & 8 16% 65% 76% 92% 97% 97% 5 & 6 50% 67% 88% 100% 100% 100% 5 & 6 24% 63% 84% 94% 96% 98% 2 to 4 48% 53% 94% 99% 100% 100% 2 to 4 42% 51% 86% 98% 98% 100% South Africa South Africa 9 6% 46% 77% 89% 94% 97% 9 4% 36% 72% 88% 94% 100% 7 & 8 28% 52% 81% 92% 95% 98% 7 & 8 23% 49% 79% 91% 95% 97% 5 & 6 32% 43% 92% 99% 100% 100% 5 & 6 30% 43% 90% 98% 99% 99% 2 to 4 38% 40% 96% 100% 100% 100% 2 to 4 39% 42% 95% 100% 100% 100% Key: 20% 80% 100% Date: 2017 quarter 4 14

19

20 Gauteng Provincial Office Pretoria Western Cape Provincial Office Cape Town Eastern Cape Provincial Office Bisho Northern Cape Provincial Office Kimberley Free State Provincial Office Bloemfontein KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Office Durban Limpopo Provincial Office Polokwane Mpumalanga Provincial Office Nelspruit (Mbombela) North West Provincial Office Mahikeng cidb contact number: Anonymous Fraud Line: