EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044
|
|
- Reynard Lawson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OCA STATEMENT BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. United Water Pennsylvania, Inc. ) ) ) Docket No. R DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JENNIFER L. ROGERS ON BEHALF OF THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE April 17, 01 EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 00 Columbia, Maryland 10
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. QUALIFICATIONS... 1 II. PURPOSE AND CONCLUSION... III. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSE... IV. OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE... V. CUSTOMER CARE AND BILLING EXPENSE... 7 VI. OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENSE... 8 VII. TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE... 9 i
3 I. QUALIFICATIONS Q. WOULD YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS? A. My name is Jennifer L. Rogers. I am an Economist with Exeter Associates, Inc. (Exeter). My business address is 1080 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 00, Columbia, Maryland 10. Exeter is a firm of consulting economists specializing in public utility-related issues. Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE. A. I graduated from St. Mary s College of Maryland in St. Mary s City, Maryland, in 007 with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics and a minor in Environmental Studies. In 009, I received a Master of Arts Degree in Economics from Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. In May 009, I joined Exeter as an Economics Research Assistant. I was promoted to Economist in January 011. Since joining Exeter, my assignments have included evaluating and forecasting power supply requirements and costs, developing utility service assessments, providing bill and rate analysis, and assisting in the development of electric and natural gas sales forecasts. I have also provided assistance in reviewing policies and programs related to conservation and energy efficiency; and conducted analysis on renewable energy initiatives and cost allocation. In October 01, I attended the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) Utility Rate School. Q. HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY TESTIFIED IN REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS ON UTILITY RATES? A. No. I have not previously provided testimony in regulatory proceedings on utility rates. Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 1
4 Q. ON WHOSE BEHALF ARE YOU TESTIFYING IN THIS PROCEEDING? A. I am appearing on behalf of the Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate (PA OCA). II. PURPOSE AND CONCLUSION Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY? A. Exeter Associates, Inc. has been retained by the PA OCA to assist in the review of the reasonableness of the forecasted costs of United Water Pennsylvania, Inc. (UWPA or the Company) for its fully forecasted future test year (FFFTY or rate year) in its filing 9 under Docket No. R My review focuses on evaluating the Company s projected rate year expenses for materials and supplies, outside contractors, customer care and billing, outside professional services, and 1 transportation. My testimony presents the results of my review and my recommendations. My associate, Mr. Thomas S. Catlin, has incorporated my findings in his determination of UWPA s revenue requirements on behalf of the PA OCA. Q. HAVE YOU PREPARED SCHEDULES TO ACCOMPANY YOUR TESTIMONY? A. Yes, I have. Schedules JLR-1 through JLR- are attached to my testimony. These schedules present my findings and recommendations with respect to UWPA s rate year expenses for the materials and supplies, outside contractors, customer care and billing, outside professional services, and transportation categories. Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. A. As shown in Schedules JLR-1 through JLR-, I am recommending the following adjustments to the Company-proposed rate year expenses: A decrease in the materials and supplies expense of $99,1; Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page
5 A $0,76 reduction of the outside contractors expense; A $7,7 reduction of the customer care and billing expense; A decrease in the outside professional services expense of $,; and A decrease in the transportation expense of $19,07. In total, these proposed adjustments lower the Company s proposed rate year expenses by $170,966. Q. HOW IS THE REMAINDER OF YOUR TESTIMONY ORGANIZED? A. In the remainder of my testimony, I document and explain each of my adjustments to the following expenses: materials and supplies, outside contractors, customer care and 10 billing, outside professional services, and transportation. Discussion of these 11 1 adjustments is organized into sections corresponding to the relevant expense category. 1 III. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSE Q. HOW HAS UWPA DEVELOPED ITS MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSE ESTIMATE? A. To develop its materials and supplies expense estimate, UWPA computed a three-year average cost of historical data from calendar years 011, 01, and 01. It then applied a Future Test Year (FTY) inflation rate to the average, and an FFFTY inflation rate to the resulting FTY value. Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENTS ARE YOU PROPOSING TO MAKE TO UWPA S PROPOSED MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSE? A. I am proposing an adjustment to the materials and supplies expense such that it reflects the 01 materials and supplies expense provided in response to OCA II-, rather than a three-year average of calendar years 011, 01, and 01. I have Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page
6 modified the 01 value provided by UWPA to eliminate the reduction attributed to a 01 year-end accrual that was reversed out in January 01. My modification adds this value back into the 01 value. Further, I have updated the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the resulting value to reflect the updated inflation rate provided by witness Thomas S. Catlin. Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR ADJUSTMENT TO THE MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSE. A. In response to OCA VIII-10, UWPA indicated that the Company-provided 01 historical value incorporates a Capital/Expenditure Policy change, which impacted how UWPA accounts for meters. This policy change will continue to be applied in future years and, therefore, the 01 historical value is more representative of the materials and supplies expense going forward, rather than a three-year average of 1 prior years that do not incorporate this policy change. As noted above, I have increased the 01 per books amount provided by UWPA to eliminate the $,100 adjustment related the 01 year end accrual to provide a more complete value for the actual 01 materials and supplies expenses for the year that does not incorporate 01 adjustments. Q. HAVE YOU PREPARED A SCHEDULE SHOWING THE EFFECT OF THIS ADJUSTMENT ON MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES EXPENSES? A. Yes. Schedule JLR-1 presents the calculation of my adjustment. As shown there, I have calculated a materials and supplies expense for the rate year of $9,190, which is $99,1 lower than the value proposed by the Company in UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-11, Adjustment No. 10. Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page
7 IV. OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE Q. HOW HAS UWPA DEVELOPED ITS ESTIMATE OF OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE FOR THE FFFTY? A. To develop its outside contractors expense estimate, UWPA computed a three-year average cost of historical data from calendar years 011, 01, and 01. UWPA applied a normalizing adjustment to the 011 historical value prior to calculating the average to account for a cost that was no longer applicable. It then applied an FTY inflation rate to the average, and an FFFTY inflation rate to the resulting FTY value. These values were further adjusted to account for a contract between UWPA and Itron for Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) hosting fees in the UWPA Newberry and D1 system. UWPA applied the FFFTY inflation rate to these fees to reach the rate year adjustment value. Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENTS ARE YOU PROPOSING TO MAKE TO UWPA S PROPOSED OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE? A. I am proposing to update the outside contractors expense to reflect the three-year average of calendar years 01, 01, and 01, rather than a three-year average of calendar years 011, 01, and 01. For 01, I have adjusted the value provided in response to OCA II-0 to exclude the Newberry DBP Study costs detailed in response 19 to I&E-RE--D. I am further proposing to update the adjustment included to 0 1 account for the AMI hosting fees in the UWPA Newberry System, to $,97 per UWPA s response to I&E-RE-7. Finally, I have updated the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the resulting values to reflect Mr. Catlin s recommended inflation rates. Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE RATIONALE FOR YOUR ADJUSTMENT TO OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page
8 A. I am proposing to update the three-year average to reflect the average for the years 01 through 01. Utilizing 01 instead of 011 in the three-year average reflects more recent experience. In addition, 011 expenses include a period prior to the creation of Customer Care and Billing (CC&B) system that required adjustment by the Company to obtain more representative results. Using 01 eliminates the need to adjust the results to reflect the transition to the CC&B system. I am proposing to modify the 01 value, adjusting the value downward by $,069, to account for the Newberry DBP Study costs, as recovery of these costs has been sought separately by the Company. I would note that OCA witness Ashley Everette is recommending that the Newberry DBP costs be disallowed for reasons she explains. The modifications to the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the resulting values have been made to reflect the recommendations detailed by Mr. Catlin in his testimony. In response to I&E-RE-7, UWPA indicated that the AMI hosting fees in the UWPA Newberry System in the rate year will be higher than the amount included in the Company s filing. I have updated the amount included for these fees to reflect the increased amount provided in I&E-RE-7. Q. HAVE YOU PREPARED A SCHEDULE SHOWING THE EFFECT OF THIS ADJUSTMENT ON OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS EXPENSES? A. Yes. Schedule JLR- presents the calculation of my adjustment. As shown there, the net effect of my proposed adjustments is a decrease in the outside contractors expense for the rate year of $0,76. Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 6
9 V. CUSTOMER CARE AND BILLING EXPENSE Q. HOW HAS UWPA DEVELOPED ITS CC&B EXPENSE ESTIMATE? A. To develop its CC&B expense estimate, UWPA computed a two-year average cost of historical data from calendar years 01 and 01. It then applied an FTY inflation rate to the average, and an FFFTY inflation rate to the resulting FTY value. Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENTS ARE YOU PROPOSING TO MAKE TO UWPA S PROPOSED CC&B EXPENSE? A. I am proposing to adjust the CC&B expense to reflect the three-year average of calendar years 01, 01, and 01, using the 01 value provided in response to OCA II-, rather than a two-year average of calendar years 01 and 01. Further, I have updated the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the resulting values, per recommendations set forth by Mr. Catlin. Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR ADJUSTMENT TO THE CC&B EXPENSE. A. I am proposing a three-year average incorporating the 01 historical values to more closely reflect what future costs may be expected based on the most recently available 16 data. The modifications to the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the resulting values have been made per Mr. Catlin s recommendation. Q. HAVE YOU PREPARED A SCHEDULE SHOWING THE EFFECT OF THIS ADJUSTMENT ON CC&B EXPENSES? A. Yes. Schedule JLR- presents the calculation of my adjustment. As shown there, I have calculated a CC&B expense for the rate year of $7,07, which is $7,7 lower than the value proposed by the Company in UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-16, Adjustment No. 1. Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 7
10 VI. OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENSE Q. HOW HAS UWPA DEVELOPED ITS OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENSE ESTIMATE? A. To develop its outside professional services expense estimate, UWPA computed a three-year average cost of historical data for calendar years 011, 01, and 01. UWPA applied a normalizing adjustment to these historical values prior to taking the average, to account for a new Capital/Expenditure Policy implemented in 01. It then applied an FTY inflation rate to the average, and an FFFTY inflation rate to the resulting FTY value. The resulting FTY and FFFTY values were then adjusted further to incorporate a new contract that will have costs not included in the historical test years. The new contract is between UWPA and Irth Solutions, relating to the handling of UWPA One Call locates. UWPA applied the FFFTY inflation rate to these fees in the FTY to reach the rate year adjustment value. Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENTS ARE YOU PROPOSING TO MAKE TO UWPA S PROPOSED OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENSE? A. I am recommending an update to the three-year average used to determine the outside professional services expense, using calendar years 01, 01, and 01 rather than calendar years 011, 01, and 01. Further, I have updated the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the resulting values and to the FTY adjustment accounting for the Irth Solutions contract, per recommendations set forth by Mr. Catlin. Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY YOU UPDATED THE THREE YEAR AVERAGE USED TO ESTIMATE OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENSE FOR THE FFFTY. A. I am proposing a three-year average incorporating the 01 historical values to more closely reflect what future costs may be expected based on the most recently available Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 8
11 data. The 01 value not only reflects more recent information, it also reflects the first year in which the Capital/Expenditure Policy is fully reflected in the data. The modifications to the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates have been made to recognize the recommendations detailed by Mr. Catlin in his testimony. Q. HAVE YOU PREPARED A SCHEDULE SHOWING THE EFFECT OF 6 7 THIS ADJUSTMENT ON OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL EXPENSES? SERVICES A. Yes. Schedule JLR- presents the calculation of my adjustment. As shown there, the net effect of my proposed adjustments is a decrease in the outside professional services expense for the rate year of $,. 11 VII. TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE Q. HOW HAS UWPA DEVELOPED ITS TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE ESTIMATE? A. UWPA included the costs for leasing, car allowance, fuel, maintenance and repairs, payroll, insurance, depreciation, disposal of vehicles, and miscellaneous expenses in its transportation expense estimate. Total transportation costs were then reduced by the capitalized and billed-out portion, which was computed from a three-year average of historical capitalized/billed-out labor expenses from calendar years 011, 01, and 01. The FTY and FFFTY leasing expenses included in the Company s estimate reflect UWPA s current leasing agreements, as well as any expected new leases and expected vehicle replacements. Depreciation expenses were determined using the actual costs for the period, and the insurance values were provided by UWPA s Director of Insurance as representative of the Company s expected needs. To Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 9
12 develop its estimate of the other transportation expense components, UWPA computed a three-year average cost of historical data from calendar years 011, 01, and 01 for each remaining category. It then applied an FTY inflation rate to these averages, and an FFFTY inflation rate to the resulting FTY values for these remaining categories. Q. WHAT ADJUSTMENTS ARE YOU PROPOSING TO MAKE TO UWPA S PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE? A. I am proposing to update the projected rate year expenses for leases to reflect the updated information provided in response to OCA II-. Taking the difference of this update from the previous value, I am proposing to apply the 7.07 percent reflective of the percent charged to Operations and Maintenance (O&M) to determine the actual adjustment to lease expense. Further, I have updated the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied to the car allowance, fuel, maintenance and repair, payroll, disposal of vehicle, and other categories of transportation cost. Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR ADJUSTMENT TO THE TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE. A. I am proposing to update the leases expense per updated information provided by the Company to more closely reflect what future costs may be expected based on the most recently available data. The modifications to the FTY and FFFTY inflation rates applied have been made per the recommendations detailed by witness Mr. Catlin in his testimony. Q. HAVE YOU PREPARED A SCHEDULE SHOWING THE EFFECT OF THIS ADJUSTMENT ON TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES? Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 10
13 A. Yes. Schedule JLR- presents the calculation of my adjustment. As shown there, the net effect of my proposed adjustments is a decrease in the transportation services expense for the rate year of $19,07. Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY? A. Yes, it does. 08 Direct Testimony of Jennifer L. Rogers Page 11
14
15 Schedules
16 Docket No. R Schedule JLR-1 UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC Materials and Supplies Rate Year Ending October 1, 016 Amount Per Adjusted Company Filing Adjusted Fully Forecasted Fully Forecasted Future Test Future Test Description Future Test Year Year (1) Year () Materials and Supplies $ 8,60 $,7 $ 9,190 Proposed Adjustment $ (99,1) Inflation Rate: () Future Test Year 1.0% Fully Forecasted Future Test Year 1.77% Year Materials and Supplies 01 () $ 97,79 01 Year End Accrual Reversed Out of 01 () $,100 Modified 01 $ 9,89 Notes: (1) Applied the FTY inflation rate to the Modified 01 value. () Applied the FFFTY inflation rate to the OCA Adjusted FTY value. () Per OCA Witness Thomas S. Catlin's Direct Testimony. () Per UWPA Response to OCA - II-. () Per UWPA Response to OCA-VIII-10.
17 Docket No. R Schedule JLR- UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC Outside Contractors Rate Year Ending October 1, 016 Amount Per Adjusted Company Filing Adjusted Fully Forecasted Fully Forecasted Future Test Future Test Description Future Test Year Year (1) Year () Outside Contractor's $,106 $ 0,09 $ 09,8 Future Test Year Adjustment () 0,690 0,000,97 () Total Outside Contractor's $ 7,796 $,09 $,0 Proposed Adjustment $ (0,76) Year Outside Contractor's Expense () Adjustment (6) Adjusted Amount 01 $ 99,167 $ 99, ,87 9, ,9 (,069),80 Year Average $ 98,18 Inflation Rate: (7) Future Test Year 1.0% Fully Forecasted Future Test Year 1.77% Notes: (1) Applied the FTY inflation rate to updated year average of historical data before adjustment noted in (). () Applied the FFFTY inflation rate to adjusted FTY amount prior to adjustment noted in (). () Adjustment for new contract with Itron who will perform the AMI hosting fees in the UWPA Newberry System, per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-1, Adjustment No. 1. () Value updated in the adjusted FFFTY per UWPA's response to I&E-RE-7. () Values for 01 and 01 are per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-1, Adjustment No. 1; value for 01 is per UWPA's response to OCA - II-0. (6) Per UWPA response to I&E-RE--D. (7) Per OCA Witness Thomas S. Catlin's Direct Testimony.
18 Docket No. R JLR- UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC CC&B Rate Year Ending October 1, 016 Amount Per Adjusted Company Filing Adjusted Fully Forecasted Fully Forecasted Future Test Future Test Description Future Test Year Year (1) Year () Total CC&B Support Costs $,66 $ 1,00 $ 7,07 Proposed Adjustment $ (7,7) Year Outside Contractor's Expense () 01 $ 6,8 01,98 01,9 Year Average $ 7,60 Inflation Rate: () Future Test Year 1.0% Fully Forecasted Future Test Year 1.77% Notes: (1) Applied the FTY inflation rate to updated year average of historical data. () Applied the FFFTY inflation rate to adjusted FTY amount. () Values for 01 and 01 are per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-16, Adjustment No. 1; value for 01 is per UWPA's response to OCA - II-. () Per OCA Witness Thomas S. Catlin's Direct Testimony.
19 Docket No. R Schedule JLR- UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC Outside Professional Services Rate Year Ending October 1, 016 Amount Per Adjusted Company Filing Adjusted Fully Forecasted Fully Forecasted Future Test Future Test Description Future Test Year Year () Year () Outside Professional Services $,96 $ 1,809 $ 18,6 Future Test Year Adjustment (1) 17,67 17,17 17,77 Total Outside Professional Services $ 60,1 $ 1,981 $ 6,099 Proposed Adjustment $ (,) Year Outside Professional Services Expense () Adjustments () Adjusted Amount 01 $ 66,61 $ (71,) $ 19, ,16 (,0) 8, ,69 0,69 Year Average $ 1,60 Inflation Rate: (6) Future Test Year 1.0% Fully Forecasted Future Test Year 1.77% Notes: (1) Adjustment for new contract with Irth Solutions who will perform the service of handling the UWPA One Call locates, per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-17, Adjustment No. 16. () Applied the FTY inflation rate to updated year average of historical data. () Applied the FFFTY inflation rate to adjusted FTY amount. () Values for 01 and 01 are per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-17, Adjustment No. 16; value for 01 is per UWPA's response to OCA - II-. () Per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-17, Adjustment No. 16, adjustments reflect necessary deductions to normalize and comply with the new Cap/Ex Policy that was initiated in 01. (6) Per OCA Witness Thomas S. Catlin's Direct Testimony.
20 Docket No. R Schedule JLR- UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC Transportation Rate Year Ending October 1, 016 Amount Per Company Filing Adjusted Adjusted Fully Forecasted Future Test Fully Forecasted Description Future Test Year Year (1) Future Test Year () Leases $ 6,76 $ 0,1 $ 0,1 Transportation Categories Subject to Inflation () 1,99 0,71 10,10 Transportation Categories Not Subject to Inflation () 7,,990 7, Total Costs $ 86,81 $ 807,78 Less Cap and Billed Out (06,18) (06,18) Total Transportation Expense $ 60,68 $ 601,610 Proposed Adjustment $ (19,07) Updated Leases Value () $,16 Percent Charged to O&M (6) 7.07% Inflation Rate: (7) Future Test Year 1.0% Fully Forecasted Future Test Year 1.77% Total -Year averages of historical data for transportation categories subject to inflation (8) $ 01,69 Notes: (1) Leases adjustment determined per updated value referenced in (), with the percent charged to O&M referenced in (6) applied to the difference from the value provided in the Company filing; Values remaining categories are per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-0, Adjustment No. 19, with the updated FTY inflation rate applied to transportation categories subject to inflation. () Applied the FFFTY inflation rate to adjusted FTY amount. () Includes Car Allowance, Fuel, Maintenance & Repair, Payroll, Disposal of Vehicle, and 'Other'. () Includes Insurance and Depreciation. () Per UWPA's response to OCA - II-. (6) Per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-6. (7) Per OCA Witness Thomas S. Catlin's Direct Testimony. (8) Per UWPA Exhibit No. TGL-1, Schedule TGL-0, Adjustment No. 19; Includes Car Allowance, Fuel, Maintenance & Repair, Payroll, Disposal of Vehicle, and 'Other'.
Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn
Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR
More informationPENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC. Docket No. R Direct Testimony. Lisa A. Boyd
I&E Statement No. Witness: Lisa A. Boyd PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. UNITED WATER PENNSYLVANIA, INC. Docket No. R-01- Direct Testimony of Lisa A. Boyd Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. -R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY WITNESS: ALAN
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-1 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:
More informationEXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF RHODE ISLAND THE NARRAGANSETT BAY COMMISSION ) ) DOCKET NO. 4478 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THOMAS S. CATLIN ON BEHALF OF THE DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.
Penn Power Statement No. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R-2016-2537355 Direct Testimony of Richard A. D'Angelo List of Topics Addressed Accounting
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO
STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 1-- APPLICATION OF THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY DBA EVERSOURCE ENERGY TO AMEND ITS RATE SCHEDULES TESTIMONY OF NED W. ALLIS
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Application of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for ) Authority to Adjust Electric and Natural Gas Rates ) 0-UR- Direct Testimony of Rick J. Moras
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.
Met-Ed Statement No. 5 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-2016-2537349 Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L. Adams List of Topics Addressed Cash Working
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-0-000 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:
More informationNATIONAL GRID - ELECTRIC FY2015 REVENUE REQUIREMENT RECONCILIATION ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY PLAN RIPUC DOCKET NO.
NATIONAL GRID - ELECTRIC FY01 REVENUE REQUIREMENT RECONCILIATION ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY PLAN RIPUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TESTIMONY OF DAVID
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT
Application No.: A.08-09-023 Exhibit No.: SCG 7 Date: March 6, 2009 Witness: Michael W. Foster SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-1 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:
More informationNational Grid. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC TARIFF CHANGES. Testimony and Exhibits of:
National Grid Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC TARIFF CHANGES Testimony and Exhibits of: Revenue Requirements Panel Exhibits (RRP-), (RRP-), (RRP-)
More informationCHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application No: A.1--XXX Exhibit No.: Witness: P. Moersen Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 G) for Review of Costs Incurred in Executing Pipeline
More informationNiagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid PROCEEDING ON MOTION OF THE COMMISSION AS TO THE RATES, CHARGES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION FOR ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICE
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE LOW INCOME PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.
Penelec Statement No. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R-2016-2537352 Direct Testimony of Richard A. D'Angelo List of Topics Addressed Accounting
More informationStipulating Parties/100 Peng-Andrews-Jenks 1 Docket UM 1626 Stipulating Parties Exhibit 100 Peng, Andrews and Jenks BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON JOINT TESTIMONY OF MING PENG, ELIZABETH
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO EI
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 000-EI IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY S PETITION FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE RATES AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF EDSEL
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN THE MATTER OF THE ] PETITION OF SHORELANDS ] BPU Docket No. WR000 WATER COMPANY, INC. FOR ] AN INCREASE IN BASE
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DOCKET NO. DE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DOCKET NO. DE - 0 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RESTRUCTURING AND RATE STABILIZATION AGREEMENT JOINT DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PHILIP J.
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 0000--ER-1 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward September 01 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Q. Are you
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SEEKING A DECLARATORY ORDER FINDING ITS MUSTANG GENERATION PLANT MODERNIZATION PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION ) BPU Docket No. GR000 OF PIVOTAL UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. ) OAL Docket No. PUC-0-00N D/B/A
More informationBEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN
COMMISSIONERS DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF EPCOR WATER ARIZONA INC. FOR A DETERMINATION
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DE 17-
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Docket No. DE - Liberty Utilities (Granite State Electric) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities Reliability Enhancement Program and Vegetation Management
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Application No. A.1-0- Exhibit No.: Witness: Jonathan B. Atun Application of SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC ) COMPANY (U 0 E) For Approval of its ) Application No. 1-0- Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Pilot
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.
Penn Power Statement No. 3 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-016-537355 Direct Testimony of Kevin M. Siedt List of Topics Addressed Sales and Revenue
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationUNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD M. BOHAN. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission. Docket No. DE
UNITIL ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD M. BOHAN New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Docket No. DE -0 March, 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY... III. DISCUSSION
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.
Met-Ed/Penelec/Penn Power/West Penn Statement No. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY
More informationPUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF YANNICK GAGNE MAY 0, 0 0v. TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationNORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission
NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN- New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Docket No. DG -00 000 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... II. SUMMARY
More informationPENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. R PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.
Statement No. -SR Witness: Lisa A. Gumby PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. R-0- PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R-0- PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.
Page of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No. ER- -000 PREPARED TESTIMONY OF Deborah A. Blair XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC.
More informationAttachment 1- PECO's Petition
Attachment 1- PECO's Petition BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF THREE PROPOSALS DESIGNED TO INCREASE ACCESS TO NATURAL GAS SERVICE DOCKET
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF LIBERTY UTILITIES (PINE BLUFF WATER), ) INC. FOR GENERAL CHANGE OR ) MODIFICATION IN RATES, CHARGES, AND ) TARIFFS )
More informationRR1 - Page 181 of 518
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of JENNIFER S. PYTLIK on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.
Penelec Statement No. 3 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-2016-2537352 Direct Testimony of Kevin M. Siedt List of Topics Addressed Sales and Revenue
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO
STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. -0-0 APPLICATION OF YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY d/b/a EVERSOURCE ENERGY TO AMEND ITS RATE SCHEDULES TESTIMONY OF DOUGLAS P. HORTON
More informationTrailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079
Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP- -000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC ) ) ) Docket No. RP- -000 SUMMARY OF PREPARED
More informationSTATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD : : : : : : : : : : : : MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY S INITIAL BRIEF
STATE OF IOWA BEFORE THE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY Docket No. EAC-2016-0006 Docket No. EAC-2017-0006 MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY S INITIAL BRIEF Table of Contents I. PROCEDURAL
More informationPENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY. Pennsylvania Electric Company Statement of Reasons for Rate Changes
Page 1 of 6 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY FILING REQUIREMENT I-A-1: Provide a summary discussion of the rate change request, including specific reasons for each increase or decrease. Also provide a breakdown
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR APPROVAL OF INCREASED TARIFF RATES AND CHARGES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE, CHANGE IN DEPRECIATION RATES
More informationStephen P. St. Cyr & Associates 17 Sky Oaks Drive
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Sky Oaks Drive Biddeford, Me. 000 0--01 Direct Testimony of Stephen P. St. Cyr in DW 1- Q. Please state your name and address. A. Stephen P. St. Cyr of, 1 Sky Oaks Drive,
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES NSTAR Electric Company H.O. ) Petition of NSTAR Electric Company and ) each ) d/b/a Eversource Energy for Approval of an Increase ) in Base
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) PREFILED TESTIMONY OF LAUREN HAMMER ON BEHALF OF VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC.
STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Petition of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. for change in rates, and for use of the System Reliability and Expansion Fund in connection therewith ) ) ) ) PREFILED TESTIMONY
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated ) electric, steam,
More informationSOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A.17-10-008 Exhibit: SCG-48 SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT)
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationKEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014
KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02110-3113 TELECOPIERS: (617) 951-1354 (617) 951-1400 (617) 951-0586 March 17, 2014 Mark Marini, Secretary Department of Public
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R
Met-Ed/Penelec/Penn Power/West Penn Statement No. 7 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-2014-2428745 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-2014-2428743
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY for Authorization to (1 Obtain Long-term Debt Capital Not to Exceed the Equivalent of U.S $1,500,000,000; (2 Include Certain Features in Debt Securities or
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-1) Decoupling
Direct Testimony and Schedule Lisa R. Peterson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion to consider changes in the rates of all of the Michigan rate-regulated Case U- electric, steam,
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR ) DOCKET NO. 0-0-U APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN RATES ) AND TARIFFS ) DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2017 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES In The Matter of the Petition of Public Service Electric and Gas Company for Approval of an Increase in Electric and Gas Rates and For Changes In the Tariffs
More informationPacifiCorp d/b/a Pacific Power encloses for filing in this docket the following documents:
September 10, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Public Utility Commission of Oregon 201 High Street SE, Suite 100 Salem, OR 97301-3398 Attn: Filing Center RE: UE 344 Stipulation and Joint Testimony PacifiCorp
More informationCHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application No: A.1-0- Exhibit No.: Witness: K. Chan, R. Gonzales Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) for Approval To Extend the Mobilehome Park Utility Upgrade Program. Application
More informationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER II SUMMARY OF AMI BUSINESS CASE
Application No.: A.0-0-0 Exhibit No.: SCG Date: March, 00 Witness: Edward Fong SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER II SUMMARY OF AMI BUSINESS CASE Errata to Prepared
More informationTHIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) July 31, 2018
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 90 G) Proceeding: 019 General Rate Case Application: A.17-10-008 Exhibit: SCG-6-3R THIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY ) for authority to increase its rates for the ) Case No.
More informationSTATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED PETITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a VECTREN ENERGY DELIVERY OF IN DIANA, INC., FOR: ( AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT, OWN
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) MICHIGAN GAS UTILITIES CORPORATION ) for authority to increase retail natural gas rates )
More informationP.U.C. DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
P.U.C. DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF ROBERT K. ROBERTS ON
More informationBEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN 55401-2138 FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 121 7 th Place East, Suite 350 St Paul MN
More informationCHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS
Application No: Exhibit No: Witness: A.1-08-XXX Johnny M. Huleis Application of Southern California Gas Company (U90G) to establish a Combined Heat and Power and Distributed Energy Resources Tariff Application
More informationSECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) April 6, 2018
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 90 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A.17-10-008 Exhibit: SCG-6-2R SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE SITE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationBefore the Connecticut Department Of Public Utility Control. Application of the Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation For a Rate Increase
Before the Connecticut Department Of Public Utility Control Application of the Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation For a Rate Increase Direct Testimony of Timothy Woolf On Behalf of The Connecticut Office
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF SUEZ WATER NEW JERSEY INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE IN RATES FOR WATER/SEWER SERVICE AND OTHER TARIFF CHANGES BPU DOCKET
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PLAN DOCKET NO. M-0- TESTIMONY OF BRIAN J. FITZPATRICK
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Application of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for ) Authority to Adjust Electric and Natural Gas Rates ) 0-UR- Rebuttal Testimony of Rick J. Moras
More informationORIGINAL C~s~ ~o~z2~- ii_o~ g STATE OF NEW HAMPSH ~
ORIGINAL C~s~ ~o~z~- ii_o~ g STATE OF NEW HAMPSH ~ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ~~ DO NOT REMOVE FROM FILE DG -0 Northern Utilities, Inc. Direct Testimony of Robert J. Wyatt Utility Analyst IV
More informationCompany: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-46-R REVISED SOCALGAS
Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 90 G) Proceeding: 019 General Rate Case Application: A.1-10-00 Exhibit: SCG--R REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. DocketNo. DE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY STEVEN E. MULLEN AND HOWARDS.
.,- EXHIBIT Liberty U.. tiiities STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DocketNo. DE - Liberty Utilities (Granite State Electric) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities Distribution Service
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF. Denise Kay Parrish
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING Hearing Begins: June 18, 2012 Testimony Filed: May 25, 2012 IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATIONS AND AGREEMENTS On Behalf
More informationDate Filed: January 16, 20 19
FILED 1/16/2019 DOCUMENT NO. 00252-2019 FPSC - COMMISSION CLERK Docket No. 20180049-EI Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) Petition by FPL for Evaluation of Storm Restoration Costs Related to. Witness:
More informationRHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DOCKET NO PROVIDENCE WATER DEPARTMENT PREFILED TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER P.N. WOODCOCK ON BEHALF OF
0 0 RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DOCKET NO. PROVIDENCE WATER DEPARTMENT PREFILED TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER P.N. WOODCOCK ON BEHALF OF KENT COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 0 Q: Please state your name
More informationJOSEPH A. KEOUGH JR.* JEROME V. SWEENEY III* SEAN P. KEOUGH* STACI L. KOLB JEROME V. SWEENEY II OF COUNSEL
KEOUGH & SWEENEY, LTD. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 41 MENDON AVENUE PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND 02861 TELEPHONE (401) 724-3600 FACSIMILE (401) 724-9909 www.keoughsweeney.com RAYNHAM OFFICE: 90 NEW STATE
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. LANE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application of Southern California Gas Company for authority to update its gas revenue requirement and base rates effective on January 1, 01. (U0G) Application -1- Exhibit No.: (SCG-) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 2009 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LOAD MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ASSOCIATED
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING APPROVAL TO RETIRE AND ABANDON ITS PLANT X GENERATING STATION UNIT, PLANT
More informationSDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 M) Proceeding: 01 General Rate Case Application: A.1-- Exhibit: SDG&E- SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October, 01 BEFORE THE PUBLIC
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) FOR APPROVAL ) OF CHANGES IN RATES FOR RETAIL ) ELECTRIC SERVICE ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD G. GARNER, CDP SENIOR CAPITAL
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1910
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 0 In the Matter of PacifiCorp, Resource Value of Solar. OPENING TESTIMONY OF THE OREGON CITIZENS UTILITY BOARD March th, 0 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
More informationElectri Safety, Revised. Related. Submitted. by: Submitted to:
Electri ic Infrastructure, Safety, and Reliability Plan FY 2019 Proposal (Revised) Revised Revenue Requirement, Rate Design and Bill Impacts Related to Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 February 22, 2018 Docket
More informationA. My name is Lisa J. Gast. My business address is Integrys Energy Group, Inc.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Application of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation for ) Authority to Adjust Electric and Natural Gas Rates ) 0-UR- Revised Direct Testimony of Lisa J.
More informationDOCKET NO. 13A-0773EG DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF LEE E. GABLER
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT (DSM PLAN FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 0 AND TO CHANGE ITS ELECTRIC AND
More informationRR16 - Page 1 of
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of ARTHUR P. FREITAS on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationCHAPTER 13 AMI FINANCIAL MODELING. JULY 14, 2006, AMENDMENT Prepared Supplemental, Consolidating, Superseding and Replacement Testimony of SCOTT KYLE
Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U-0-E) for Adoption of an Advanced Metering Infrastructure Deployment Scenario and Associated Cost Recovery and Rate Design. Application 0-0-01 Exhibit
More informationGILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM STREET ALPENA, MICHIGAN May 12, 2015
ROGER C. BAUER JAMES L. MAZRUM JAMES D. FLORIP WILLIAM S. SMIGELSKI TIMOTHY M. GULDEN JOEL E. BAUER DANIEL J. FLORIP GILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI, & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2-R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS DEFAULT SERVICE PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 1, 2015 THROUGH
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO EI
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 000-EI IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY S PETITION FOR AN INCREASE IN BASE RATES AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBIT OF GORDON
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (RRS-1) Pension and Benefits Expense
Direct Testimony and Schedules Richard R. Schrubbe Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to
More information