May 10, Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC

Transcription

1 labor RELATIONS May 1, 213 Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 13 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC Certified Mail Tracking Number: Dear Cliff: As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Huntsville, Alabama Processing & Distribution Facility (P&DF) Area Mail Processing (AMP). In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 213, the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR. If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension Sincerely, ~()'/' Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU) Enclosures (CA )

2 REDACTED Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Facility Name & Type: Huntsville P&DF Street Address: 318 Wall Triana Highway City: Huntsville State: AL 5 Facility ZIP Code: District: Alabama Area: Southern Finance Number: 1425 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): Miles to Gaining Facility: 92.1 EXFC office: Yes Plant Manager: Charlie Harris Senior Plant Manager: Karlett Gilbert District Manager: Timothy R. Costello Facility Name & Type: Birmingham P&DC Street Address: th St. NW City: Birminghan State: AL 5 Facility ZIP Code: 3523 District: Alabama Area: Southern Finance Number: 1781 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): , 354, 355, 359, 362 EXFC office: Yes Plant Manager: Karlett Gilbert Senior Plant Manager: Karlett Gilbert District Manager: Timothy R. Costello Approval Date: July 1, 211 Implementation Date: Jan PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan-1-212: Jun Processing Days per Year: 31 Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,75 EAS Hours per Year: 1,825 Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/ New Facility Start-up Costs Update I------M_a_Y_ 2 _ 7 _ _ Date & Time this workbook was last saved: :36 Area Vice President: Vice President, Network Operations: Area AMP Coordinator: NAI Contact: Jo Ann Feindt David E. Williams Andrew Benefield/Steve Jackson Steve Martin/Barbara Brewington PIR Data Entry Page

3 Approval Signatures losing Facility Name and Type: Facility ZIP Code: Finance Number: Current SCF ZIP Code{s}: Type of Distribution Consolidated: Gaining Facility Name and Type: Facility ZIP Code: Finance Number: Current SCF ZIP Code(s): Implementation Date: Date Range of Data: PIRType: ACKNOWlEDGEMENT OF ACCOUNTASILITY l acknowledge that I am accountable!or respect'lng and supporting tha integrity of all official postal reporting systems. including financial reports and those relating to compllance WJ!h contract'lng. complement or simitar efforts involving the Investment and expenditure of lunds. as well as all systems to service to our customers. LOSING FACILITY: Plant Manager: Senior Plant Manager: Karlett Gilbert!:lrintadName District Manager: Timothy R Cq~!~ill;) J=.~~:=::::: ~~~~> ~~!:!rin!bd Nama 3-4 ~~ Date GAINING facfi,ity: Plant Manager: Karlett Gilbert Printed Name Senior Plant Manager: District Manager: ~ Date 3-'-i-t:J Date Area Vice President: Jo Arm Feindt Vice President, Network Operations: Com~~' PIR Approval Signatures

4 Executive Summary Last Saved February 21,213 Date Range of Data: PIR Type: 1st PIR Jan Jun Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address: City: State: Current SCF ZIP Code(s): Type of Distribution Consolidated: Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address: City: Huntsville P&DF 318 Wall Triana Highway Huntsville AL Originating Birmingham P&DC th St. NW Savings/Costs 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved Function 1 Workhour Savings Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint/Trans) PCES/EAS Workhour Savings Transportation Savings Maintenance Savings Space Savings from Workhour Costs Combined from Other Curr vs Prop from Other Curr vs Prop from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS from Maintenance from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Total Annual Savings Total One-Time Costs Total First Year Savings $ $331,635 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Staffing Craft Position Loss PCES/EAS Position Loss from Staffing-Craft from Staffing-PCESIEAS Service Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC /N) 96.82% 96.85% from Service Performance & CSM First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day) 94.45% 94.3% from Service Performance & CSM First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day) Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level 93.39% 94.41% 89.7% 86.61% from Service Performance & CSM from Service Performance & CSM from SetVice Performance & CSM 3 PIR Executive Summary

5 Calculation Befe[eoces Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Function 1 Workhour Costs $56,6,626 $54,268,154 $47,625,38 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Maintenance & Transportation) $1,118,846 $1,118,846 $1,347,267 PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $6,339,28 $6,339,28 $6,84,745 Transportation Costs $12,799,79 $12,9,131 $11,979,598 Maintenance Costs $15,519,94 $15,415,91 $14,56,853 Space Savings $ $ $ Total Annual Cost $91,838,41 $9,41,52 $81,597,771 Total One-Time Costs $ $331,635 $ Total First Year Costs $91,838,41 $9,373,137 $81,597,771 Staffing Craft Position Total On-Rolls PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP ja(!(!roved) AMP Approved AMP Function 1 Workhour Savings $8,435,318 $6,642,846 $1,792,472 ($228,421) ($228,421) ($) Non-Processlng Craft Work hour Savings (less Maint!Trans) PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $254,536 $254,536 $ Transportation Savings $82,111 $92,533 ($1,421) Maintenance Savings $959,87 $854,238 $14,849 Space Savings $ $ $ Total Annual Savings $1,24,631 $8,443,731 $1,796,9 Total One-Time Costs $ $331,635 ($331,635) Total First Year Savings $1,24,631 $8,775,366 $1,465,265 Staffing Craft Position Loss PCES/EAS Position Loss PIR Executive Summary

6 Summary Narrative Last Saved: February 21, 213 Losing Facility Name and Type: Huntsville P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Gaining Facility Name and Type: Birmingham P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): , 354, 355, 359, 362 Background: This is the 1st Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Huntsville AL P&DF Originating AMP into the Birmingham AL P&DC. The AMP study called for the consolidation of originating mail volumes due to the decline in originating volumes and to increase efficiencies. The Huntsville P&DF is approximately 92 miles from the Birmingham P&DC. Financial Summary: The First PIR baseline data was from the period January 1, 212 to June 3, 212. Prior to the full consolidation of originating mail from the Huntsville P&DF, a Saturday AMP had been implemented. The 1st PIR for the AMP shows an approximate annualized savings of $9,495,473. Total Annual Savings Total First Year Savings 1st PIR vs. Pre AMP $1,24,631 $1,24,631 1st PIR vs. Proposed $8,443,731 $8,775,366 Function 1 Savings were $8,435,318 versus the proposed $1,792,472. The Birmingham P&DC Function 1 Savings were $6,94,925 more than the proposed savings, while the Huntsville P&DF savings were $262,79 less than proposed. Customer & Service Impacts: There were upgrades to service standards for First-Class Mail by processing the originating Huntsville collection mail at the Birmingham P&DC. Tuscaloosa 354 and Anniston 362 were upgraded from 2-day to overnight from the Huntsville P&DF. losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF District: Alabama 'BeforeAMP After AMP Fiscal Quarter Q p~~;:~~:: 95 98% 95.61% 96921:: 96 42% 96 48% 96 82% :loa;; : Percentaae Percentaae 89.62% 92.36% 9112% 92 86% 92.27% 91.84% 9.12% 9.55% 93A5% 94.45% 93.39% PIR Summary Narrative 5

7 Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC District: Alabama Transportation: The First PIR shows an Annual Savings of $82,111, however $1,43,154 in savings is attributed to the elimination of HCR 67L 1 - Birmingham P&DC to Chicago STC on January 1, 212. In the AMP Study only the Huntsville stop on that trip was listed as proposed savings which was only $7,167. All routes listed in the HCR portion of the First PIR had increased Annual Costs/Mile due to fuel adjustments. HCR 35L5-Part A, Birmingham P&DC to Memphis STC had an increase of 39,769 annual miles versus proposed and a $32,664 increase in annual costs versus proposed. HCR 35L5-Part B, Birmingham P&DC to Memphis STC had an increase of 81,464 miles versus proposed and a $183,482 increase in annual costs versus proposed. Also 45,897 miles and $57,532 were added to HCR 3522 Birmingham to Florence ALto support the AMP collection profile. Staffing Impacts: Mail Processing staffing impacts for the 1st PIR resulted in 77 total craft position lost from the 1st PIR versus the Pre AMP and 5 total craft position lost from the 1st PIR versus the Proposed. EAS positions were down 4 versus the proposed, which are 4 vacant SDO positions at the two facilities. PIR Summary Narrative 6

8 1 Craft= FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals+PSE's <Craft= F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining All affected employees that were reassigned to other Postal facilities were subject to processes outlined in the National Labor Agreements. Pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), the USPS is complying with the National Labor Agreements in reassigning employees. Maintenance Impacts: The overall Maintenance Savings for the First PIR were $959,87, $864,238 more than proposed. There were $471,19 annual savings in Maintenance Stockroom, Supplies, and Utilities at the Huntsville P&DF, and $241,855 annual savings in the same category at the Birmingham P&DC. At the Birmingham P&DC, LDC 36 costs were $282,791 above the proposed costs. This was due to filling vacant authorized positions. There was also an increase in $94,373 in training costs due to filling the vacant positions. One Time Cost: In the Approved AMP Study, there was $162, allocated for employee relocation costs. During the 1' 1 PIR period there were no costs associated with employee relocation. Also in the AMP Study, $49,635 was approved to move an AFCS from Huntsville to Birmingham, and $12, was approved to expand the Birmingham 1 Loose Mail System to accommodate an additional AFCS. The additional AFSM was not added nor was the 1 Loose Mail System expanded. Space Impacts: Space gained at the Huntsville P&DF is being utilized for staging and to relieve congestion on the workroom floor. PIR Summary Narrative 7

9 >" H~->''''' ~ Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF District: Alabama Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: February 21,213 PIR Type: 1st PIR Implementation Date: 1/1/12 Oo Befo reamp ramp Fiscal Quarter i ~~~'-'~"~ ~,,, Overnight Percentage 9598% 95.61% 96.92% 96.42% 96.48% 96.82% 2oay 3 Day Percentage Percentage 89.62% I 92.36% 91.12% tl86% 92.27% 84% 9.12% 9.55% 95.42% 93.45% 94.45% 93.39%... o ooo O oo. Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC District: Alabama After AMP (15) Notes: CEMQ Customer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement '21. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in GEM. Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience) Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving) Satisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending) Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PO) Q16a Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact witt ;. ;::.1:.:9: ; ;:.;:.;..:;.;:.:.:.. ;_...:.::.:..:.;;:.:.:.,Likely to recommend the USPS 8 PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

10 [ --- -C~bined Facilities I Workhour Costs Combined Facilities Last Saved. February PIR Type :.;;'~:<,=~:<is;;;m;:;ati;edi;;fiisif>ir Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date Range of Data: ~ to Jun ~B_J_AUZED ~ PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

11 PIR Workhour Costs~ Combined Facl!ities

12 PJR Workhour Costs Combined Facilities

13 (27} NOTES' ""''1<12Q6 12 PIR Workhour Costs Combined F acuities

14 Losing Facility: ~.:!svihe P~~ ~ ~~~ Workhour Costs -Losing Facility Last Saved: February 21,213 PIR Type :.,;}o" 5!:.:,;:-:;~~:-ipm;R5Cc:::oiC:om::CoC:::sC::,.-:;a;;;oo"'oa"'li"'z "'d'-'fo"' F"''"'st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date Range of Data: Jan to Jun P!R Workhour Costs- Losing

15 PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

16 15 PIR Workhour Costs - Losing

17 Gaining Facility: Blrmi~~.~&OC Workhour Costs - Gaining Facility last Saved February 21, 213 PIR Type :.!E.!.i'~===;m;;;J""'fuif'iffit,PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date Range of Data: Jan to Jun..J-212 PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

18 P!R Workhour Costs- Galning

19 PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

20 (27)NOTES: PIR Workhour Costs* Gaining

21 ~~ ~ - Other Workhour Move Analysis I PIR Other Wori<hour Costs

22 21 PIR Other Workhour Costs

23 PIR Other Workhour Costs

24 23 PIR Other Workhour Costs

25 I Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs ~ 24 PI R Other Work hour Costs

26 25 PIR Other Workhour Costs

27 Staffing - Craft Last Saved: February 21,213 PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 9/1/12 Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF Finance#: 1425 Craft Positions Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC Finance#: 1781 Craft Positions, ~~ ,,. I (23) I (24) I! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP! 1st PIR vs Proposed! Total Craft Position Lossl 77 j :? J (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary) 26 PIR Staffing -Craft

28 Staffing - PCES/EAS Last Saved: February 21, 213 PIR Type: 1st PIR Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF Data Extraction Date 9/1/212 Finance# 14-'2-'-5 PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing On-Rolls Line (1) (2) (;l) Position Title Level 1AMP 1 MGR PROCESSING/DISTRIBUTION FCL TY EAS-24 1.,\' 2 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 e ' 6 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS SECRETARY (FLO) EAS-12 1 : 9 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLO) EAS ;.' I : 17.._ " _ : '. :.' 36 '; i ';.. 39 : ~ 45 ; : ; ' :. : Totals.1!>.. (4) 1st PJR {5) (6) (7) PreAMP Proposed 1stPIR. J"_ f 1 1 V:,' 1,; '; " ' ':':'.! : :'.. :.. ~.. I.... _... J :.. :..: > ;-;:.. I. ~ : >....: :... :. :...'::... :..._ \ : : :Z 11 ~ Variances Total On~Rolls (15) (16) Change 1st?IR vs 1st PIR vs Analysis PreAMP Proposed 27 Positions (1) (1) Percent ~8.3% -8.3% PIR Staffing P ES/EAS

29 Gaining Facility: Binningham P&DC Data Extraction Date: 9/1/212 Finance#..:;..:.1::..;7..:;;8..:.1 PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing On-Rolls (19) (2) f ' Pr! 2 (22) (24) (25)!P.>. p,f!~p 1 PLANT MANAGER (2) PCES r\ : MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS-25.: 1 1.: MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE (LEAD) EAS ; 1. ;. 1 5 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-21!> OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS-21 : 2 2.t :; MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINT ENGINEERING SUPPORT EAS MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS EAS-2. : OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS >_ MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST EAS MGR FIELD MAINT OPRNS (LEAD) EAS-19 : 1 1 o: 1 Line Position Title Level 1st PIR Proposed 1st PIR 14 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS : NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-18 1 : OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-18 1 : OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 4 *8 I~ 4 18 SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS SECRETARY (FLO) EAS / ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLO) EAS-12. : i'> >_ 29 < : 31 ; ::: ;; ; ; ;.. 4 " ; '; ; ;. :.. ; ,; ; 49 i.... I 5 I >'.. :q ; ~ t= 57!>.; Totals. 64 >. 55 >11. 1>1> 53 ~ Variances Total On~Rolls (33) (34) Change Analysis 1st PIR vs PreAMP 1st P1R vs Proposed 28 Positions (3) (3) Percent r - - _,,.,...,.,_.,_,_,_,_., 1,_,_._,,, ~5.4% -5.4% j Total PCES/EAS 1 ( 37 > 1 ( 38 > 1 j Position Lossj 4 j 4 j ~ ~ j ~ (Above numbers are carried fo!ward to the Executive Summary) PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

30 Transportation - PVS Last Saved: February 21,213 PIR Type: 1st PIR ~~~----- Date Range of Data: Jan to-- Jun Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF Finance Number: 1425 ~~~ (1) (2) ' PreAMP Proposed PVS Owned Equipment I _ Seven Ton Trucks Eleven Ton Trucks., Single Axle Tractors... Tandem Axle Tractors Spotters.... PVS Transportation... Number of Schedules.,. Total Annual Mileage I Total Mileage Costs. $ $ PVS Leases Total Vehicles Leased / ' Total Lease Costs I $ $ I /. PVS Workhour Costs I... LDC 31 (617, 679, 764). ' $ $ LDC 34 (765, 766) f$97,7!)5 $97,785 Total Workhour Costs.,.. $97,785 $97,785 I- (3) (4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st 1st PIR PIR vs Pre PIR vs AMP Prooosed $ $ $ $ $ $ $932,697 $24,912 $24,912 $932,697 $24,912 $24,912 Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC Finance Number:...:_1_.;..7;:..8.;..1 PVS Owned Eauioment Seven Ton Trucks Eleven Ton Trucks Single Axle Tractors I Tandem Axle Tractors.. ''' Spotters... PVS Transportation. ' Number of Schedules.._...._ Total Annual Mileage (6).. (7) (8) (9) (1) Variance 1st Variance 1st PreAMP Proposed PIR PIR vs Pre PIRvs AMP Prooosed ' Total Mileage Costs o $ $ $ I PVS Leases '. Total Vehicles Leased...> < Total Lease Costs $o $ $ $ $1... PVS Workhour Costs > '' - ' LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $13,458 $13,458 $232,493 $12,35 $12,35 LDC 34 (765, 766) $3;463,71 $3,463,71 $3,315,622 ($148,79) ($148,79) Total Workhour Costs,,!!:~5Q.-11<:a $3,594,159 $3,548,115 ($48,44) ($48,44)1. (11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: ($21,132) (This number added to the Executive Summary (12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: ($21,132) (This number added to the Executive Summary) (13) Notes= rev 1/8/2o8 29 PIR Transportation - PVS

31 Transportation - HCR Last Saved: February 21, 213 losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Data of HCR Data File: 7/1/12 CT for Outbound Dock: (1) (4) (9) (1) Route# 1st PIR Annual PreAMP 1st PIR Annual Cost 1st PIR 3 PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

32 Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP (1st PIR vs Proposed 31 PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

33 Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date of HCR Data File: 7/1/12 Transportation - HCR Last Saved: February 21, 213 CET for Inbound Dock: CET for Cancellations: PIR Type: Originating CETforOGP: CT for Outbound Dock: (3) (4) (7) (9) 1st PIR Annual Proposed Annual Cost I 1st PIR Annual Cost 1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

34 Change Analysis (11) (12) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed Gain in (13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities) (14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities) Total Transportation HCR PVS (15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary) (16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary) 33 PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

35 MPE Inventory Last Saved: February 21, 213 Data Extraction Date: 9/1/12 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan to-- Jun Losing Facility:...:.H.;..:u:;.;.n:.:.:ts;...;v.;.;.ill:.=e...:.P...:&:::D;...;F Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC I. ; (1) (2) (3) I (4)..... (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Proposed 1st PIR Variance in 1 PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR I PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Relocation Relocation Costs Equipment... Equipment Costs Costs AFCS.. AFCS r 7 6 $169,635 $ ($i69jl36) AFSM-ALL < 1 1 AFSM-ALL $ $ $ 2 APPS 1... APPS ;. $ $ 5 ClOSS. ClOSS ;; $ $ $ < CSBCS 6 CSBCS.. $ $ $ DBCS DBCS 2 26 $ $ $ i DBCS-OSS I :zo -:: / DBCS-OSS $ $ $ DIOSS DIOSS i 5 5 $ $ $ I FSS,. FSS $ $ $ SBPS SBPS.. : $ $ $ UFSM..():... UFSM... I $ $ $ FC I MICRO MARK. o. / FC I MICRO MARK I.... $ $ $ ROBOT GANTRY ROBOT GANTRY. > : $ $ $ HSTS IHSUS I< o..... HSTS/ HSUS $ $ $ LCTS I LCUS o.... LCTS I LCUS... :z. 2 1 $ $ $ LIPS.... LIPS.. <. $ $ $(J MLOCR-ISS I o. MLOCR-ISS. co.. $ $ $ MPBCS-OSS >. MPBCS-OSS... ). $ $ $ TABBER Q. TABBER o... $ $ $(J POWERED INDUSTRIAL (1) Notes: I I. POWERED. ;; INDUSTRIAL $ $ VEHICLE i VEHICLE.. LCREM LCREM -... } ; f.. 15,1_1: 13 '13 J Totals./.. ~ ~< $169,635 $ ($1 ~Q &:'tt::l ':::...:::: "':::... Carried to Space Evaluation and Other Costs <la PIR MPE Inventory

36 Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF Maintenance Last Saved February 21, 213 PIR Type*:,...,c_P_I_R Date Range of Data: Jan : Jun Gaining Facility: P&DC --~ Workhour Activity (1) PreAMP C!>sts (2) Proposed Costs (3) 1st PIR Costs (4) Variance 1st PIR to Pre AMP (5) Variance 1st PIR to Proposed (7) (8) (9) (1) Variance 1st Variance 1st Workhour ActivitY Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre PIR to Pre Costs Costs AMP Proposed LDC 36 Mail Processing $ Eauioment Building Equipment $ 1,733,51 $ ,13 $ 1,539,349 $ 295,13 $ 1,532,154 $ 351,523 $ I LDC 36 I LDC 37 Mail Processing $ EguiQment 5.426,Q4 $ 5,515,38 $ 5,798,98 $ 372,94 $ 282,791 Building Equipment $ 788,925 $ 788,925 $ 819,573 $ 3,648 3,648 Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning) --- $ ,779 $ --- 3,138,119 $ 899,461 $ 92,652 $ 3,19 $ 3,19 I LDC 38 $ 196,364 $ 214,23 $ 17,659 $ I LDC 39 13,779 $ 2,75 $ 6,926 $ 6, ,943,966 3,21,57 $ $ 77,9 Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning) Maintenance Operations $ SU(!(!Ort M~in+... "!!tn,.ft 2,622,283 $ 2,622,283 $ 1,885,632 $ $ 53,683 $ 641,68 $ 11,385 11,385 $ 47,128 $ 141,51 $ 94,373 $ 94, $ 9,54,326 $ 9,285,872 $ Parts and Supplies Parts and Supplies $ $ 583,291 $ 127,872 $ $ 2,383,57 $ 2,126,52 -- $ $ Grand Total 3,527,257 3,148,929 (11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings: (12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings: Grand Total $ 11,411,924 $ - (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary) (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary) (13) Notes: "Data in PIR columns is annualized for First PIR '(ff'i 11S/2$. 35 PIR Maintenance

37 Distribution Changes Last Saved: February 21, 213 Losing Facility : _H_u_n ts:...;v_il-=le_p_&:...;d=---f PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date Range of Data: Jan to-- Jun (1) Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. DMM L1 DMM L11 Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions. ( 2 l Oct 6-211, PB DMM L2 X DMM L21 DMM L3 DMM L4 DMM L5 DMM L6 DMM L7 DMM L8 DMM L9 DMM L61 DMM L62 DMM L63 DMM L64 DMM L65 DMM L66 DMM L67 Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP? < 3 l Yes DMM L1 DMM L81 (4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS Total No-Show Late Arrival Open Facility Name Month Losing/ Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % July '12 Losing Facility 357 Huntsville P&DF % %.% Aug '12 Losing Facility 357 Huntsville P&DF 1.%.%.% July '12 Gaining Facility 35 Birmingham P&DC % %.% Aug '12 Gaining Facility 35 Birmingham P&DC % %.% - Closed Count % % 1 1.% % % Unschd Count (5JNotes: ~========================== rev 1/ PIR Distribution Changes

38 Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF 5-Digit ZIP Code: Data Extraction Date: -:;:'=9::/1';;';:;/1c:: Customer Service Issues Last Saved February 21, Digit ZIP Code: Digit ZIP Code: 357 PreAMP PIR PreAMP PIR 1. Collection Points Mon;.-Frl. S.t. Mon. -Fri. Sat. Mon. Fri. Sat. Mon.~ Fri. Number picked up before 1 p.m i Number picked up between 1-5 p.m Number picked up after 5 p.m Total Number of Collection Points How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? I o J 3-Digit ZIP Code: 358 PreAMP PIR Sat..Mon>Fri. Sat. Mon.-Fri. Sat 58 3d < Digit ZIP Code:. PreAMP. PIR Mon.-Fri. S.t. Mon.~ Fri. Sat ,o How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? 4. Delivery Performance Report Quarter/FY 1st PIR Percent %Carriers returning before 5 p.m. I ~ -:.v _8% I 76.4% Q Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours I PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR stan End start End Start End Monda I -x a:il.. 17:.. 8:3 17: : Tuesda 1..,..a:3o. 17: 8:3 17: 83 17: Wednesda I Thursda I. 8:3 8:3 (... 17: 17: 8:3 8:3 17: 17: 8: : 17: Frida I Saturda I s:sci Closed 17: 8:3 Closed Closed 17: 83 Closed Closed 17 Closed PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Ef\d Start End Start End ; Start Monda y NIA.; NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A Tuesda 1 Wednesda y Thursda y Frida y Sa turd a I NIA C NIA NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA NfA NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA. 'i. NlA N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A 7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes 8. Notes: Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC 9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? I Birmingham AL 35 I 37 tev 1/9128 PIR Customer Service Issues

39 Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: February 21, 213 Date: -----'"'2;c;;/2'""'-/1'"'"3 1. Affected Facility Facility Name:""""'='::.;:,:""',::.:::.:-.,..,.-, Street Address:_;:;,;.=.:..;,;::;...;=====:~----=== City, State ZIP:~=="----~'--==' , 2. One-Time Costs 3. Savings Information Enter any one-time costs:...::;$::.. Space Savings ($): $;.; $ $ (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.) $ $ (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summaty) 4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain. Space was used for other mail processing activities 5. Notes: Employee Relocation Costs $162, $ Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE lnventoty) Facility Costs (from above) Total One-Time Costs $169,635 $ $331,635 ($ ) $ $ ($331,635) P!R costs carried forward to Executive Summary) Losing Facility: Huntsville P&DF Pre-AMP FY 211 Range of Report Gaining Facility: Birmingham P&DC PIR FY 212 YTD Product 1st PIR Associated REC 1st PIR Cost per 1, Images 38 PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs