Workshop 7 IRC Section 401(a)(26)
|
|
- Stanley Hines
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Workshop 7 IRC Section 401(a)(26) Kevin Donovan, MSPA, CPA Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Tucson, AZ Rick Block, ASA, MSPA, MAAA Block Consulting Actuaries, Inc. El Segundo, CA
2 Acknowledgement We thank Larry Deutsch for allowing us to use his presentation from the 2012 ASPPA Annual Conference
3 IRC Section 401(a)(26) This session will cover The 401(a)(26) test on an active plan Arrangements creating separate plans What happens if a plan is frozen Testing a former benefit structure Offset arrangements
4 What is the 401(a)(26) test 401(a)(26) tests that a plan benefits a sufficient number of employees 401(a)(26) does not test whether benefits, or coverage are non-discriminatory
5 What is the 401(a)(26) test Prior to 401(a)(26) it was common that a law firm would have one defined benefit plan covering each partner, known as an IDB or individual defined benefit plan, and then a plan covering the staff. While these arrangements met the nondiscrimination requirements. The concern was that the IDBs would become overfunded, while the staff plan was underfunded Similarly, the individual lawyers would have control over the investment of the assets in their individual plan (whether a DB or DC plan) while the staff did not
6 What is the 401(a)(26) test This potential disparity in funding and investing was viewed as inappropriate, and it was the intent of 401(a)(26) to eliminate this type of disparity To this end, 401(a)(26) requires that the plan benefit the lesser of 50 employees, or 40% of the non-excludable employees But, in no event, less than 2 employees, unless there is only one non-excludable employee
7 What plans are exempt from 401(a)(26) The 401(a)(26) regulations exempt from 401(a)(26) testing (or deem plans to satisfy 401(26)) if the plan meets either of 2 conditions No highly compensated employee benefits rule Certain underfunded frozen plans Multi-Employer plans Plans of Governmental entities Entities with Separate Lines of Business test each plan separately for each line of business Note the law was ultimately changed to exempt DC plans from 401(a)(26) but the regulations have not been updated
8 No highly compensated employee benefits rule Under this rule a plan is exempt from 401(a)(26) if: The plan is not top heavy The plan benefits no highly compensated employee or former highly compensated employee The plan is not aggregated with another plan in order to allow the other plan to satisfy 401(a)(4) (other than then the average benefit percentage test)
9 What plans are exempt from 401(a)(26) It is possible for an employer to maintain multiple plans, some of which are top heavy and some of which are not In particular, if a plan covers no key employees, and is not part of a top heavy aggregation group then the plan could be not top heavy, while another plan of the sponsor is top heavy
10 What plans are exempt from 401(a)(26) The 401(a)(26) regulations define an employee as benefitting if the employee is benefitting under the 410(b) rules, thus, generally, an employee is benefitting only if their accrued benefit increases during the plan year Thus, a highly compensated employee could have a benefit but not be benefitting
11 Underfunded frozen plan rule A plan is deemed to satisfy 401(a)(26) if The plan is covered under Title IV of ERISA The plan does not have sufficient assets to pay all benefits The plan is frozen (other than receiving Top Heavy minimums) Alternatively, a plan is deemed to satisfy 401(a)(26) if The plan is covered under Title I of ERISA The plan is not Top Heavy The plan does not have sufficient assets to pay all benefits The plan is frozen (other than receiving Top Heavy minimums) Note that the apparent conflict in Top Heavy has to do with effective date of rule changes
12 Who is a non-excludable employee The concept of which employees are counted (to take 40% of) is similar to the 410(b) concept of a non-excludable employee, but viewing the DB plan only Thus, a non-excludable employee for 401(a)(26) purposes is any employee who meets the age and service requirement of the DB plan
13 Who is a non-excludable employee A plan may be permissively disaggregated into those employees above and below the maximum minimum age and service requirements of 410(a)(1)(A) A plan may exclude terminated employees in a manner similar to the 410(b) rules
14 What is a meaningful benefit under 401(a)(26) The rules require that for an employee to be treated as benefitting in a DB plan, the benefits must be meaningful It is fairly well established (as a practice, but not a regulatory rule) that a participant has a meaningful benefit if their accrual rate is at least 0.5% of pay
15 What is a meaningful benefit under 401(a)(26) June 6, 2002 Paul Shultz Memo Internal memo to reviewers not subject normal vetting process 401(a)(26) becomes a non-discrimination test Compares the benefits of shareholders with nonshareholder not the benefits of HCEs vs. NHCEs Seems to preclude floor offset arrangements if the Service does not like the results Mandates ½% of pay as a minimum for 401(a)(26)
16
17
18
19
20 Determining the 401(a)(26) Accrual Rate For purposes of 401(a)(26), the accrual rate is determined in the same manner as an EBAR under 401(a)(4), with these exceptions The accrual rate only reflects the plan tested for 401(a)(26) purposes The testing age is the NRA (even if not uniform) Only the normal EBAR is used Permitted disparity may not be imputed No adjustment for normal forms of payment other than a life annuity
21 Determining the 401(a)(26) Accrual Rate So consider the following example Assume the following: Compensation of $120,000 (2011), $130,000 (2012) and $140,000 (2013) Entered the plan in 2011 Prior accrued benefit of $200 Current accrued benefit of $250
22 Determining the 401(a)(26) Accrual Rate The accrual rate on an annual basis is ($250 - $200) X 12 / $150,000 = 0.40% Alternatively, the accrual rate can be calculated using a 4 year average ($250 - $200) X 12 / $135,000 = 0.44% Therefore under either method, this example would generally not be considered to have a meaningful benefit on an annual basis
23 Determining the 401(a)(26) Accrual Rate The accrual rate may be determined on an accrued to date basis $250 X 12 / $140,000* / 4 = 0.53% Therefore this methodology shows the plan to provide meaningful benefit on an accrued to date basis *high 3 year average
24 401(a)(26) in a cash balance plan Consider the following: Interest crediting rate is 3% Actuarial equivalency is 5% (e) mortality table NRA is 65 Participant has pay of $50,000, has a pay credit of $1,250 (2½% of pay) and is 45 years old.
25 401(a)(26) in a cash balance plan The monthly benefit at NRA is $1,250 x 1.03^(65-45)/ = $15.51 The 401(a)(26) accrual rate is $15.51 x 12 / $50,000 = 0.37%
26 Arrangements creating separate plans 1.401(a)(26)-2(d) (iii) Defined benefit plans with other arrangements (A) In general. A defined benefit plan is treated as comprising separate plans if, under the facts and circumstances, there is an arrangement (either under or outside the plan) that has the effect of providing any employee with a greater interest in a portion of the assets of a plan in a way that has the effect of creating separate accounts.
27 Arrangements creating separate plans Separate plans are not created, however, merely because a partnership agreement provides for allocation among partners, in proportion to their partnership interests, of either the cost of funding the plan or surplus assets upon plan termination.
28 Arrangements creating separate plans Examples. The following examples illustrate certain situations in which other arrangements relating to a defined benefit plan are or are not treated as creating separate plans:
29 Arrangements creating separate plans Example 1. Employer A maintains a defined benefit plan under which each highly compensated employee can direct the investment of the portion of the plan s assets that represents the accumulated contributions with respect to that employee s plan benefits.
30 Arrangements creating separate plans In addition, by agreement outside the plan, if the product of the employee s investment direction exceeds the value needed to fund that employee s benefits, Employer A agrees to make a special payment to the participant.
31 Arrangements creating separate plans In this case, each separate portion of the pool of assets over which an employee has investment authority is a separate plan for the employee.
32 Arrangements creating separate plans The key point is the question of controlling the investments creating the effect of an IDB. This does not preclude different benefit levels for different employees
33 What happens if a plan is frozen If a plan is frozen, but does not meet the exceptions, then under the regulations the plan must satisfy testing under the prior benefit structure rules Under this rule testing may be done only on current employees or on the combination of current and former employees
34 What happens if a plan is frozen The requirement is restricted to testing current (or current and former) employees have a meaningful benefit (i.e. without regard to the fact that they have no current year accrual)
35 What happens if a plan is frozen The regulations have the further requirement at 1.401(a)(26)-3(c)(2) that A plan does not satisfy this paragraph (c) if it exists primarily to preserve accrued benefits for a small group of employees and thereby functions more as an individual plan for the small group of employees or for the employer.
36 What happens if a plan is frozen So consider a doctor plan that is frozen 95% of the value of plan benefits is for the doctor Benefit are frozen At what point is the primary purpose of the plan for the preservation of the previously accrued benefit for the doctor (and thereby not satisfy 401(a)(26))?
37 Testing a former benefit structure If the plan is testing the prior benefit structure then first the people included in the test must be determined Which ones of those people who have a meaningful benefit must be determined (i.e. have an EBAR (by definition, using accrued to date) of at least 0.5%)
38 Testing a former benefit structure If the test is based upon current employees, then the determination of who is included is done as described previously If the test includes former employees, then non-excludable former employees must be determined (1.401(a)(26)-6(c)
39 Testing a former benefit structure The test then requires that the plan satisfy the 50 employee or 40% test, or The plan benefits at least 5 former employees AND EITHER The plan benefits 95% of the former employees with a vested benefit, or At least 60% of the former employees who benefit under the plan are NHCEs
40 Testing a former benefit structure Under the regulations, all former employees must be included, except The plan may optionally exclude employees terminated Before January 1, 1984 prior to the 10 th calendar year prior to the calendar year in which the current plan year begins
41 Testing a former benefit structure Under the regulations, all former employees must be included, except The plan may optionally exclude employees who never met the plans age and service requirement
42 Testing a former benefit structure Under the regulations, normally when testing benefits for former employees, employees who were below the 411(c)(3)(ii) mandatory distribution limit (which under 411(c)(3)(ii) is determined at the time of termination) are excluded, but under 1.401(a)(26)-4(d)(2), if the participant was vested, then they are not excludable
43 Testing a former benefit structure In applying this rule, the first problem is the distinction between benefit and benefitting. While benefitting is a well defined term, benefit is not. It would seem that in the phrase a plan that is subject to this section must benefit means that the individual is owed a benefit (i.e. previously earned and not yet paid)
44 Testing a former benefit structure Logically, any individual who was not covered by the plan, has a benefit less than the 411(c)(3) limit (because it is zero), but are they vested? There are three possible interpretations, but only two seem to make sense
45 Testing a former benefit structure Under the first interpretation, vesting is determined independent of whether an individual was a participant, so an individual who was never a participant could only be excluded if they had insufficient service to vest. This seems to be wrong, because they still don t have a vested accrued benefit.
46 Testing a former benefit structure Under the second interpretation, 411(c)(3) only applies to participants, so an individual can only be excluded from being under the 411(c)(3) if they were actually in the plan. Of course, the entire exception precluding the use of 1.401(a)(26)-6(c)(4) is worded in a way that makes no sense, since it only applies if the person was not owed a benefit.
47 Testing a former benefit structure Under the third interpretation, since all nonparticipants have no accrued benefit, they are under the 411(c)(3) limit (and have no vested accrued benefit), and so are excludable. This makes no sense, in that it would render the rule for excluding people below the age and service limit moot.
48 Testing a former benefit structure Ultimately, it would appear that the process is like this First, assemble a list of all former employees Second, optionally eliminate those who terminated over 10 years prior to the current year Third, optionally eliminate those who never met the age and service requirement Fourth optionally eliminate those who had no vested accrued benefit (but, only those who were actually participants)
49 Testing a former benefit structure What is left is the non-excludable employees Within that group determine how many have an EBAR on an accrued to date basis, of at least.5% of average compensation Test the group with a meaningful benefit to see if an acceptable percentage or count
50 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets 1.401(a)(26)-5 tells us who benefits for purposes of passing IRC 401(a)(26) 1.401(a)(26)-5(a)(2) describes offset arrangements that will be taken into account for such purpose 1.401(a)(26)-5(a)(2)(i) provides that an employee is treated as benefiting if such employee would be benefiting if certain offsets or reductions were disregarded
51 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets 1.401(a)(26)-5(a)(2)(ii) describes offsets by sequential or grandfathered benefits An offset or reduction satisfies this requirement if the formula provides that an employee will not accrue additional benefits under the plan until the employee has accrued a benefit in excess of their benefit under one or more formulas (under same or other plan) in effect for prior years
52 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets Ex. of application of 1.401(a)(26)-5(a)(2)(ii) Dr X is a solo practitioner (no other ees) and has now-termed DB Plan A with accrued benefit of $9K. Dr. Y joins practice and wishes to accrue benefits under a DB plan at time when Dr X is not interested. Plan B is adopted that provides that benefits are offset by benefits under prior DB plan. Dr X is treated as benefiting under Plan B even if he is not entitled to benefits under the plan.
53 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets 1.401(a)(26)-5(a)(2)(iii) describes rules for concurrent offset arrangements Under such an arrangement the formula is offset by contributions or benefits under another plan the employer currently maintains Three conditions must be met
54 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets 3 conditions under 1.401(a)(26)-5(a)(2)(iii) (1) Contributions or benefits under plan used to offset benefits being tested actually accrue under such other plan (2) Employees who benefit under the plan being tested must benefit under the other plan on a reasonable and uniform basis (3) Contributions or benefits used to offset not used to offset benefits under any other plan May test gross benefit where all 3 conditions met
55 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets RR / IRS Phone forum 4/23/2013 DB plan must provide actuarial basis to be employed to determine benefit deemed provided by DC plan DB plan must specify time as of which such determination is made date ( determination date ) in manner which precludes employer discretion Offset to benefit otherwise payable from DB plan equal to amount deemed provided on determination date by vested portion of account balance DC plan
56 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets IRS Phone forum 4/23/2013 / Bad design Cash balance plan provides definition of principal credits as (a) (b) where: (a) = 10% of compensation (b) = the employer discretionary allocation in the Profit Sharing Plan for the same plan year This type of benefit offset is not allowed because per Rev Ruling , the offsetting accrued benefit has to be related to the (DC) account balance, NOT the annual allocation of the DC plan.
57 IRC 401(a)(26) and Offsets IRS Phone forum 4/23/2013 / Good design Cash balance plan provides the definition of principal credits as 10% of compensation However, the annuity benefit payable is defined as (a) (b) where: (a) = annuitized value of cash balance account (b) = the actuarial equivalent annuity based on the vested account balance of the profit sharing plan that is attributable to the discretionary employer contributions.
58 What is a meaningful benefit under 401(a)(26) July 7, 2007 Follow up memo to the Shultz Memo Another Internal memo to reviewers not subject normal vetting process Clarifies what is considered to be an allowable offset arrangement.
59
60
Cash Balance for Beginners. Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC
Cash Balance for Beginners Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC 1 Kevin Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin is a shareholder
More informationCash Balance for Beginners
Cash Balance for Beginners Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC 1 Kevin Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin is a shareholder
More information401(a)(26), Top Heavy, and Coverage Basics for Defined Benefit Plans
401(a)(26), Top Heavy, and Coverage Basics for Defined Benefit Plans Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA Owner and Actuary, Premier Actuarial Solutions Page 0 1 Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA Owner
More informationSession 5 Cash Balance Plans in 2014
Session 5 Cash Balance Plans in 2014 Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, MSPA Sara K. DeFilippo, EA, MSPA Actuarial Symposium, 8/15-8/16/2014 Cash Balance Plans in 2014 This session assumes a basic understanding of
More informationUsing the Power of Coverage Testing for Creative Plan Design. Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA, Managing Member Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC
Using the Power of Coverage Testing for Creative Plan Design Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA, Managing Member Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC 1 Introduction Discrimination testing encompasses a plan satisfying
More information9/23/2015. Combo Plan Design. Norman Levinrad, EA, FSPA, MAAA Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc.
Combo Plan Design Norman Levinrad, EA, FSPA, MAAA Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc. 2 1 Combo Plan Issues Deduction Limits Top Heavy coordination Testing 410b, 401(a)(4), DB/DC gateway, 401(a)(26),
More informationAdvanced Compliance Testing How to Put the Rules to Work for Plan Sponsors
Advanced Compliance Testing How to Put the Rules to Work for Plan Sponsors Kevin J Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC 1 Introduction Discrimination testing encompasses a plan satisfying
More informationWorkshop 10: Other Cash Balance Issues
1 Workshop 10: Other Cash Balance Issues Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Pinnacle Plan Design LLC Andrew W. Ferguson, FSA, EA, FCA, MSPA, MAAA Altman & Cronin Benefit Consultants, LLC 2 1. Background
More informationKevin J. Donovan, CPA, MSPA Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC. Compensation Uses
Compensation Concerns Monday, April 29, 2013 Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, MSPA Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Compensation Uses Determine HCE status Allocations or benefit accruals 415 limits Top Heavy minimums Non-discrimination
More informationLA Advanced Pension Conference WS 7: Cash Balance Update. Today s Agenda
LA Advanced Pension Conference WS 7: Cash Balance Update Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, ACA Pinnacle Plan Design LLC Andrew W. Ferguson, FSA, EA, MSPA Altman & Cronin Benefit Consultants, LLC 1 Today
More informationCash Balance. Lawrence Deutsch Larry Deutsch Enterprises. Mark Dunbar DB&Z, Inc. Advanced Actuarial Conference, 6/2-6/3/2014
Cash Balance Lawrence Deutsch Larry Deutsch Enterprises Mark Dunbar DB&Z, Inc. Advanced Actuarial Conference, 6/2-6/3/2014 Cash Balance Small Plan Topics to cover Simple Cash Balance Only Plan EBAR for
More informationWorkshop 45. Defined Benefit: Ask the Experts
ASPPA 2016 Annual Conference Workshop 45 Defined Benefit: Ask the Experts Tuesday, October 25, 2015 10:45 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Government Participants Linda Marshall, Senior Counsel, Chief Counsel, Qualified
More informationDefined Benefit Volume Submitter Plan Checklist DO NOT USE THIS CHECKLIST IN LIEU OF THE PLAN DOCUMENT. SAMPLE
Defined Benefit Volume Submitter Plan Checklist DO NOT USE THIS CHECKLIST IN LIEU OF THE PLAN DOCUMENT. 1. Adopting Employer: (Enter primary adopting Employer here. Enter other members of a controlled
More information2018 EA-2L Overheads Page Section Topic
1 INTRODUCTION 2 General Guidelines 3 New exam conditions 4 New exam conditions 4A New exam conditions 4B New exam conditions 5 Implied ranges 6 Recent exam summary 12/07/17 7 Detailed list of recent exam
More informationDB Plans Part I So What Am I Getting? Kevin J Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC
DB Plans Part I So What Am I Getting? Kevin J Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin J Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin
More informationThe Alert Guidelines are tools used by Employee Plans Specialists during their review of retirement plans and are available to plan sponsors to use
The Alert Guidelines are tools used by Employee Plans Specialists during their review of retirement plans and are available to plan sponsors to use before submitting determination letter applications to
More information7/28/2015. Correction Issues. Kevin Donovan Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC. Mark Dunbar DB&Z, Inc. ACOPA Actuarial Symposium, 8/7 8/8/2015
1 Correction Issues Kevin Donovan Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Mark Dunbar DB&Z, Inc. ACOPA Actuarial Symposium, 8/7 8/8/2015 2 1 Correction Issues Topics to cover NHCE who actually was an HCE Missing Employees
More informationCash Balance Plans Design and Testing Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Cash Balance Plans Design and Testing Wednesday, May 1, 2013 Norman Levinrad, FPSA, CPC Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc. First Steps Clearly understand the client s objectives. Determine what
More informationCash Balance Plans Design and Testing Wednesday, May 1, Norman Levinrad, FPSA, CPC Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc.
Cash Balance Plans Design and Testing Wednesday, May 1, 2013 Norman Levinrad, FPSA, CPC Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc. First Steps Clearly understand the client s objectives. Determine what
More informationActuarial 101 for Non-Actuaries. Mary Ann Rocco, EA, MSPA Huntington Beach, CA (714)
Actuarial 101 for Non-Actuaries Mary Ann Rocco, EA, MSPA Huntington Beach, CA (714) 393-8845 mar@roccoea.com Agenda Intro Traditional DB Plan Benefits Funding AFTAP PBGC AFN Cash Balance DB Plan Benefits
More informationSection 436 Rules for DB Plans Monday, April 29, 2013
Section 436 Rules for DB Plans Monday, April 29, 2013 David B. Farber, ASA, COPA, EA, MSPA IRC 436 Overview IRC 436 provides certain restrictions on single and multiple employer defined benefit plans that
More informationSolutions to EA-2(B) Examination Spring, 2005
Solutions to EA-2(B) Examination Spring, 2005 Question 1 The Notice of Intent to Terminate must be provided to all affected parties other than the PBGC. See ERISA regulation 4041.21(a)(1). Question 2 Plans
More information9/21/2015. Short Plan Year Issues 1. Disclaimer
Short Plan Year Issues 1 Disclaimer The information and opinions presented today are those of the presenter and do not necessarily represent the opinions or positions of ASPPA. Short Plan Year Issues 2
More informationCash Balance Interest Credits
Cash Balance Interest Credits Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin is a
More informationNon-Discrimination Tests Used
Including Gateway & Safe Harbor Contributions Chad Blech Jim Buchman Non-Discrimination Tests Used Tests involved 410(b) Average Benefits Percentage Test While not actually part of general testing, is
More informationMaximum Deductions and Compensation Issues For DB Plans. Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC
Maximum Deductions and Compensation Issues For DB Plans Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC 1 Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA Managing Member, Pinnacle
More information10/17/2016. Establishing a New Defined Benefit Plan: From A to Z. Norman Levinrad, EA, FSPA, MAAA Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc.
Establishing a New Defined Benefit Plan: From A to Z Norman Levinrad, EA, FSPA, MAAA Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc. 1 Assumptions We are designing a small DB plan. Large plan design is down
More informationSolving Cross-Testing Conundrums Tuesday, April 30, Norman Levinrad, FPSA, CPC Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc.
Solving Cross-Testing Conundrums Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Norman Levinrad, FPSA, CPC Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc. Major Issues to Discuss Accrued-to-date testing method Restructuring Benefits
More informationSole Props and Partnerships Issues for DB Plans
Sole Props and Partnerships Issues for DB Plans Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA Managing Member, Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Kevin
More informationDefined Benefit Takeover Issues
Workshop 5 Defined Benefit Takeover Issues Lynn M. Young, MSPA, EA Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Tucson, AZ Richard Kutikoff, MSPA, FSA, EA Pacific Benefit Services, Inc. Sherman Oaks, CA Defined Benefit Takeover
More informationWorkshop 35 Benefit Restrictions
Workshop 35 Benefit Restrictions Richard A. Block, ASA, FSPA, MAAA, Block Consulting Actuaries, Inc., El Segundo, CA Thomas J. Finnegan, MSPA, CPC, QPA, MAAA, FCA, Principal, The Savitz Organization, Philadelphia,
More informationIDP Defined Benefit 05/15/2017 Checklist
IDP Defined Benefit 05/15/2017 DOCUMENT REQUIRED a. Plan and Trust as one document b. Plan and Trust as separate documents c. Plan Only-No Trust Non-Trusteed (e.g. 412(i) fully insured) Plan (must select
More informationSECTION 401(a) SECTION 414(q) SECTION 414(s) Overview to Non-discrimination 401-1
SECTION 401(a) SECTION 414(q) SECTION 414(s) Overview to Non-discrimination 401-1 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE 401(a) 401(a) has a laundry list of items that are required for a plan to be qualified: 401(a)(3)
More informationIntersector Group Report to the American Academy of Actuaries 1 Pension Practice Council
Intersector Group Report to the American Academy of Actuaries 1 Pension Practice Council Meeting with the Treasury Department/Internal Revenue Service Please note: The Academy provides the meeting notes
More informationWorkshop 1: Variable Annuity Plans
1 Workshop 1: Variable Annuity Plans James E. Holland, ASA, FCA, EA, FSPA, MAAA Cheiron Andrew W. Ferguson, FSA, EA, FCA, MSPA, MAAA Altman & Cronin Benefit Consultants, LLC 2 1. Background Today s Agenda
More informationCash Balance 201. Notes. Curriculum: 4 Modules 10/5/2017. Kevin Palm, MSPA, MAAA. Cash Balance Coach Certificate
Cash Balance 201 Kevin Palm, MSPA, MAAA Retirement Plan Sales Consultant October 5, 2017 Curriculum: 4 Modules Cash Balance Coach Certificate 2 1 Outline Drilling deeper: 5 key design and compliance issues
More informationRECORD, Volume 25, No. 2 *
RECORD, Volume 25, No. 2 * Seattle Spring Meeting June 16 18, 1999 Session 112PD Maximum Benefit Limitations Track: Key Words: Moderator: Panelists: Recorder: Pension Pension Plans, Regulation VICTOR A.
More information10/9/2015. WS 66 Actuarial 101 for Non-Actuaries. Mary Ann Rocco, EA, MSPA Huntington Beach, CA (714)
WS 66 Actuarial 101 for Non-Actuaries Mary Ann Rocco, EA, MSPA Huntington Beach, CA (714) 393-8845 mar@roccoea.com 2 1 AGENDA Intro Traditional DB Plan AFTAP PBGC AFN Cash Balance DB Plan AFTAP 3 INTRO
More informationCompensation measurement period tax year not plan year
404 Deduction Rules for DB/DC Plans Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, MSPA Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC Defined Contribution Plans For defined contribution plans deduction limited to 25% of compensation
More informationDefined Benefit Plan Documents Issues
Defined Benefit Plan Documents Issues Michael Bain, MSPA, CMC Meredith J. Sesser, Esq., Brucker & Morra, A PC Plan Amendments DB/ DC Combination Plans Top Heavy What We ll Cover HCE Determination options
More informationWorkshop #53: Deduction Limits for Defined Benefit and Combo Plans
Workshop #53: Deduction Limits for Defined Benefit and Combo Plans Michael B. Preston, FSPA Preston Actuarial Services, Inc. Angela Barclay, EA Pension Benefits Unlimited, Inc. Overview of Presentation
More informationFebruary 28, CC:PA:LPD:PR Notice Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service POB 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044
The ERISA Industry Committee February 28, 2014 CC:PA:LPD:PR Notice 2014-5 Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service POB 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 RE: Notice 2014-5 - Nondiscrimination Relief
More informationLA Advanced Pension Conference WS 1: Benefit Restrictions Top 25 and IRC 436
LA Advanced Pension Conference WS 1: Benefit Restrictions Top 25 and IRC 436 Lawrence Deutsch, MSPA, MAAA, EA Larry Deutsch Penguin Consulting and Design Andrew W. Ferguson, FSA, EA, MSPA Altman & Cronin
More informationTHE LIFE OF A PLAN CASE STUDY Cash Balance Plan
THE LIFE OF A PLAN CASE STUDY Cash Balance Plan Charlie Steingas, EA, MSPA, MAAA President, Cash Balance Actuaries, LLC Charlie Steingas, EA, MSPA, MAAA President, Cash Balance Actuaries, LLC Charlie is
More informationWorkshop 9 Maximum Deductions
Workshop 9 Maximum Deductions Lauren Okum, MSPA Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, MSPA DC Plans Elective Deferrals PLR 201229012 an employee who is treated as benefitting (for 410(b) purposes) under a section 401(k)
More informationThe Basic Rules of Cross-Testing
The Basic Rules of Cross-Testing Karen Smith, President, Nova 401(k) Associates Karen Smith, President, Nova 401(k) Associates Karen Smith is the President of Nova 401(k) Associates in Houston. She has
More informationCompensation Quandary
Compensation Quandary Robert M. Richter, FIS Relius Avannesh K. Bhagat, IRS Robert M. Richter, FIS Relius Robert M. Richter, JD, LL.M. is a Vice President with FIS (formerly SunGard) in Jacksonville, Florida.
More informationDefined Benefit Terminations. Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA, Owner, Premier Actuarial Solutions
Defined Benefit Terminations Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA, Owner, Premier Actuarial Solutions Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA, Owner, Premier Actuarial Solutions Lauren is the founder of Premier
More informationThank you in advance for your consideration of these recommendations.
August 13, 2002 William Sweetnam, Esq. Benefits Tax Counsel Office of the Benefits Tax Counsel U.S. Department of the Treasury Room 1000 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20020 Dear Bill:
More informationPENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006
AN OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006 ON QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLANS Indiana Benefits Conference January 16, 2007 Indianapolis, Indiana E. Van Olson Introduction The Pension Protection
More informationFreezing and Terminating Plans
Freezing and Terminating Plans Presenters: Moderator: Richard Sirus,JD Greenberg Traurig, LLP David Strom, FSA, EA, MAAA - Segal Laura Mitchell, EA, MSPA, Actuarial Consultants, Inc. Freezing Plans 2 1
More informationPROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN & TRUST DOCUMENT No. 01
PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN & TRUST DOCUMENT No. 01 PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN DOCUMENT #01 ARTICLE I PURPOSE 1.01 Purpose: The Employer whose name and signature appear on the Adoption
More informationSubject: Aon Hewitt Comments on Temporary Nondiscrimination Relief for Closed Defined Benefit Plans (Notice )
Submitted via email to notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2014-5) Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Dear Sir or Madam, Subject:
More information2007 DEFINED BENEFIT INTERIM AMENDMENT FOR DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPES
2007 DEFINED BENEFIT INTERIM AMENDMENT FOR DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPES Section 1. General Rules 1.1. Adoption and Effective Date. The purpose of this Amendment is to incorporate required changes from
More informationComments on Proposed Additional Rules Regarding Hybrid Retirement Plans
Comments on Proposed Additional Rules Regarding Hybrid Retirement Plans January 12, 2011 Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [REG-132554-08] The American Society of Pension Professionals
More informationTYPES OF QUALIFIED PLANS
Chapter 2 by Richard A. Naegele, J.D., M.A. Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. 35765 Chester Road Avon, OH 44011-1262 Phone: (440) 695-8074 Email: RNaegele@WickensLaw.com Website: www.wickenslaw.com
More information1/13/2016. Basic Assumptions. Los Angeles Advanced Pension Conference Workshop 2. IRC Section 415 and Multiple Annuity Starting Dates
- 0 Los Angeles Advanced Pension Conference 2016 Workshop 2 IRC Section 415 and Multiple Annuity Starting Dates Richard A. Block, ASA, FSPA, MAAA Block Consulting Actuaries, Inc. Michael B. Preston, FSPA,
More informationRetirement Plan Solutions for High New Worth Business Owners
Retirement Plan Solutions for High New Worth Business Owners BILL SCHORIES, CIMA, AIF, CRPS VICE PRESIDENT, SENIOR RETIREMENT CONSULTANT MAY 17, 2017 Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value Not Bank Guaranteed
More informationPension Protection Act of 2006 And Other Recent Developments Provide Guidance on Hybrid Plans
Important Information Plan Design September 2006 Pension Protection Act of 2006 And Other Recent Developments Provide Guidance on Hybrid Plans This is the first of a series of Pension Analyst publications
More informationX-TREME CROSS-TESTING
X-TREME CROSS-TESTING Presented by: Charles Lockwood, J.D., LL.M. www.asc-net.com clockwood@asc-net.com Coverage and Nondiscrimination Limits extent to which plans can be designed in favor of HCEs = must
More information1/12/2016. Entity Issues
- Los Angeles Advanced Pension Conference 2016 Workshop 16 Small Plan Gotchas Richard A. Block, ASA, FSPA, MAAA Block Consulting Actuaries, Inc. Stephen R. Parks, MSPA Retirement Systems of California
More informationWHY YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASH BALANCE PLANS
WHY YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CASH BALANCE PLANS Presented by Steve J. Persons, MSPA, CPA Max E. Wyman, MSPA, CPC Creative Benefit Strategies, Inc. www.creben.com (800) 238-5490 Why should YOU care about Defined
More informationNotes from Intersector Meeting with IRS/Treasury Wednesday March 13, Proposed date for next meeting: September 11, 2013
Wednesday The Intersector Group is composed of two delegates from each of the following actuarial organizations: American Academy of Actuaries, Society of Actuaries, Conference of Consulting Actuaries,
More informationHybrid Plan Regulations Relax Market Rate of Return
Hybrid Plan Regulations Relax Market Rate of Return Final hybrid plan regulations from IRS fill in most gaps in previously finalized rules addressing the changes for these plans introduced by the Pension
More informationWorkshop 22: Defined Benefit Q&A
Workshop 22: Defined Benefit Q&A Kyle N. Brown, Special Counsel, IRS Chief Counsel TE/GE James E. Holland, Jr., Cheiron Inc. Judy Miller, ASPPA/ACOPA Question 1 Section 401(a)(4): Retroactive Plan Amendments
More informationADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR SUNGARD CORBEL LLC FUNDAMENTAL NON-STANDARDIZED PROFIT SHARING PLAN
ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR SUNGARD CORBEL LLC FUNDAMENTAL NON-STANDARDIZED PROFIT SHARING PLAN CAUTION: Failure to properly fill out this Adoption Agreement may result in disqualification of the Plan. EMPLOYER
More informationDefined Benefit Regulatory Update
Defined Benefit Regulatory Update Kyle N. Brown, Special Counsel, IRS Chief Counsel TE/GE Thomas J. Finnegan, MSPA, CPC, The Savitz Organization Judy Miller, MSPA, ASPPA/ACOPA Agenda IRS Reorganization
More informationSolutions to EA-2(B) Examination Spring, 2003
Solutions to EA-2(B) Examination Spring, 2003 Question 1 The PBGC Form 10 is used to notify the PBGC of a reportable event. A reportable event occurs if there is a failure to meet the minimum funding requirements
More informationPre-Approved Plans: Now Everyone Wants One
Pre-Approved Plans: Now Everyone Wants One Don Kieffer, Jr., Tax Law Specialist, Internal Revenue Service, TE/GE Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M., APM, Vice President, FIS (Relius) Why Have Pre-Approved
More informationADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE NON-STANDARDIZED CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN
ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE NON-STANDARDIZED CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN 01-031. ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE NON-STANDARDIZED CASH
More informationDB: Basics of Defined Benefit Plans 2017 Syllabus
Course DB: Basics of Defined Benefit Plans 2017 Syllabus This course builds on the material learned from the Retirement Plan Academy Retirement Plan Fundamentals courses (RPF-1 & RPF-2). Those courses
More informationPENSION EDUCATOR SERIES GLOSSARY
PENSION EDUCATOR SERIES GLOSSARY 2 1% Owner An employee who owns more than 1% of the outstanding stock or more than 1% of the total combined voting power of all stock in a corporation; or more than 1%
More informationWorkshop 4 Combination Design
Workshop 4 Combination Design Sara DeFilippo Dunbar, Bender & Zapf Inc. Karen Smith Nova 401(k) Associates Why? 1 Agenda Employer match PBGC premiums Mortality changes (time permitting) Not on Agenda Issues
More informationIDP Money Purchase/Target 05/15/2017 Checklist
DOCUMENT TYPE f. Money Purchase g. Target (complete Target questions: 120 134) DOCUMENT PACKAGE a. Volume Submitter Plan and Trust as one document b. Volume Submitter Plan and Trust as separate documents
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Pension, Profit-Sharing, Welfare, and Other Compensation Plans April 25-27, 2012 Chicago, Illinois
21 ALI-ABA Course of Study Pension, Profit-Sharing, Welfare, and Other Compensation Plans April 25-27, 2012 Chicago, Illinois ESOP: A Special Form of Retirement Plan By Gregory K. Brown Gary W. Howell
More informationThank You to Our Sponsors!
Thank You to Our Sponsors! Session 2 Plan Document Update: What You Need to Know in 2018 Kelsey N. H. Mayo, Esq. Partner Poyner Spruill LLP Robert M. Richter, Esq., APM Vice President FIS Wealth and Management
More informationENROLLED ACTUARIES PENSION EXAMINATION, SEGMENT B
SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PENSION ACTUARIES JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES ENROLLED ACTUARIES PENSION EXAMINATION, SEGMENT B MAY EA-2, SEGMENT B, EXAMINATION E2B-10-04 Printed
More informationWorkshop 17: 436 Restrictions
Workshop 17: 436 Restrictions James E. Holland, Jr. Lawrence Deutsch 436 Restrictions We should all know by now that under IRC 436, if the AFTAP is less than 80% certain restrictions apply to a plan, and
More informationApril 24, Filed electronically via to
April 24, 2012 Filed electronically via e-mail to Notice.Comments@irscounsel.treas.gov Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2012-25) Room 5203 P.O. Box 7603 Ben Franklin Station Washington,
More informationSAMPLE ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE NON-STANDARDIZED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN (NON-INTEGRATED)
ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE NON-STANDARDIZED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN (NON-INTEGRATED) 02-002. ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE NON-INTEGRATED
More informationFederal Register / Vol. 66, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2001 / Rules and Regulations
34535 Point Latitude Longitude 7... 24 29.20 N 81 17.30 W 8... 24 22.30 N 81 43.17 W 9... 24 28.00 N 81 43.17 W 10... 24 28.70 N 81 43.50 W 11... 24 29.80 N 81 43.17 W 12... 24 33.10 N 81 35.15 W 13...
More informationJoint Committee on Employee Benefits Q&A with the U.S. Treasury Dept. and Internal Revenue Service based on meeting with staff May 12, 2000
Joint Committee on Employee Benefits Q&A with the U.S. Treasury Dept. and Internal Revenue Service based on meeting with staff May 12, 2000 The following questions and answers are based on informal discussions
More informationVOLUME SUBMITTER PROFIT SHARING/401(k) PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT. Fax:
VOLUME SUBMITTER PROFIT SHARING/401(k) PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT By executing this Volume Submitter Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan Adoption Agreement (the "Agreement"), the undersigned Employer agrees to establish
More informationWorkshop 24: DB Plan Termination Gotchas
Workshop 24: DB Plan Termination Gotchas Workshop 24: DB Plan Termination Gotchas Steven J. Levine, EA, MSPA sjlevine@bestweb.net 914-232-5451 Mary Ann Rocco, EA, MSPA mar@roccoea.com 714-393-8845 1 INTRO
More informationADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE SHORT FORM NON-STANDARDIZED CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN
ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE SHORT FORM NON-STANDARDIZED CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN 01-041 ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR MASS-SUBMITTER PROTOTYPE SHORT FORM
More informationFIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED PROTOTYPE DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN
FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED PROTOTYPE DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ARTICLE II ADMINISTRATION 2.1 POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EMPLOYER... 16 2.2 DESIGNATION
More informationDB-A: Defined Benefit Administration
DB-A: Defined Benefit Administration Course This course builds on the material from ASPPA s Administrative Issues of Defined Benefit Plans (DB) exam. That exam deals with basic terms and definitions within
More informationCompensation Consternation S. Derrin Watson. Copyright 2010, SunGard, all rights reserved
Compensation Consternation S. Derrin Watson Copyright 2010, SunGard, all rights reserved Consider This: Safe harbor 401(k) plan 3% QNEC Cross-tested profit sharing contribution. Catch-ups OK Employees
More informationDistributions After Normal Retirement Age: Are You Prepared?
ACTUARIAL Distributions After Normal Retirement Age: Are You Prepared? By James E. Holland, Jr., MSPA, EA What happens when a participant in a DB plan wants to retire after normal retirement age? The answers
More informationCoverage and Nondiscrimination Testing with Related Employers S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM. Copyright 2017 S. Derrin Watson, all rights reserved
Coverage and Nondiscrimination Testing with Related Employers S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM Copyright 2017 S. Derrin Watson, all rights reserved 1 What we ll cover Basic principles Plan considerations and
More informationIRS Issues Final and Proposed Hybrid Plan Regulations
IRS Issues Final and Proposed Hybrid Plan Regulations October 2010 Background On October 18, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released final and proposed regulations regarding hybrid defined benefit
More informationIt is intended that this written material will meet the requirements necessary to qualify for Continuing Education Credits.
Larry Starr and Craig Hoffman met with James Holland, Manager, EP Technical, and Marty Pippins, Manager, EP Technical Guidance and Quality Assurance of the Internal Revenue Service. The meeting took place
More informationRichard A. Block, ASA, FSPA, MAAA Block Consulting Actuaries, Inc. Michael B. Preston, FSPA, MAAA Preston Actuarial Services, Inc.
Richard A. Block, ASA, FSPA, MAAA Block Consulting Actuaries, Inc. Michael B. Preston, FSPA, MAAA Preston Actuarial Services, Inc. 1 Unless otherwise noted: Basic Assumptions Actuarial equivalency is the
More informationIDP Profit Sharing 05/15/2017 Checklist
DOCUMENT PACKAGE a. Volume Submitter Plan and Trust as one document b. Volume Submitter Plan and Trust as separate documents c. Volume Submitter Plan Only-No Trust: (select one) Separate trust specifically
More informationCertified Pension Consultant (CPC) Proctored Exam 2017 Syllabus
Certified Pension Consultant (CPC) Proctored Exam 2017 Syllabus Course As the culminating designation for the nonactuary ASPPA member, the Certified Pension Consultant (CPC) credential is intended as an
More informationCorrecting 401(k) Testing and Errors The New EPCRS. Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Avaneesh Bhaget, Group Manager, IRS
Correcting 401(k) Testing and Errors The New EPCRS Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Avaneesh Bhaget, Group Manager, IRS 1 Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., and LL.M. (Taxation),
More informationSection 2 Plan Information 2-1 PLAN NAME: 2-2 PLAN NUMBER: SECTION 2 PLAN INFORMATION 2-3 TYPE OF PLAN: Profit Sharing (PS) Plan only PS and 401(k) Pl
[Name of Sponsor/Employer (as selected in checklist)] VOLUME SUBMITTER PROFIT SHARING/401(k) PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT By executing this Volume Submitter Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan Adoption Agreement (the
More informationBenefits, Rights and Features. Optional Forms of Benefits
Agenda What are benefits, rights and features (BRFs)? Protecting benefits, rights and features Nondiscrimination testing of benefits, rights and features Correcting failed nondiscrimination tests for benefits,
More informationCash Balance Plans Maximizing Retirement Assets and Minimizing Your Tax Burden
Cash Balance Plans Maximizing Retirement Assets and Minimizing Your Tax Burden September 18, 2013 Presented by: Jason Casey, Senior Vice President Larry Butcher, EA, Actuary Principal Agenda The Issue:
More informationCross-Testing Beyond The Basics. Karen Smith, President, Nova 401(k) Associates
Cross-Testing Beyond The Basics Karen Smith, President, Nova 401(k) Associates Audience Level Advanced Solid experience with coverage testing and 401(a)(4) testing Solid experience with cross testing Time
More information