ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC."

Transcription

1 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. January 25, 2013

2 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS CONTENTS 1. Report Highlights Basis of Valuation Actuarial certification...7 Appendix A: Disclosure Information Appendix B: Estimated Net Periodic Benefit Cost Information Appendix C: Plan Assets Appendix D: Actuarial Assumptions Appendix E: Actuarial Methods Appendix F: RPP Disclosure Information By Employer Appendix G: Employer Certification MERCER i \\caclg11fp04.mercer.com\clg_data\data\client\penvaln\enbridge\current\fas2012\reports\egd us gaap report 2012 final.doc

3 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS 1 Report Highlights Mercer has prepared this report for Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and it s subsidiary companies ( EGD ) to (i) present actuarial estimates of liabilities as at December 31, 2012 for the following plans: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates (the RPP ), Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates (the SERP ), Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. (the SSERP ) to incorporate, as EGD deems appropriate, in its financial statements under US accounting standards, and to (ii) provide an actuarial estimate of the net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year ending December 31, The RPP has a defined contribution component as well as a defined benefit component. The results presented in this report consider both components of the RPP. The RPP is funded by contributions from EGD unless it elects to use a funding excess to meet annual contribution requirements. Pension benefits payable from the defined benefit component are based on length of service and final average earnings and are partially indexed for inflation after retirement. The SERP and the SSERP are closed plans, funded by contributions from EGD as necessary. Pension benefits are based on length of service and final average earnings and are partially indexed for inflation after retirement. There are no longer any active members in the SSERP. All figures in this report are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. Section 3 of this report provides further explanation as to the purposes and limitations of this report. MERCER 1

4 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS Summary of Results Below are highlight of the results as at December 31, 2012 compared to the corresponding figures as at December 31, Fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 Fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 Net periodic benefit cost 40,509,200 20,743,800 Benefit obligation 902,891, ,983,800 Fair value of plan assets 779,499, ,822,600 Funded status (123,392,200) (108,161,200) Composite discount rate at year-end for all plans Composite expected rate of return on assets at year-end for all plans 4.30% 4.50% 6.64% 6.88% The net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 includes no charges/credits due to special events. The estimated net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 is $41,043,000. Please note that the actual net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 may be substantially different from the estimate and may be revised if assets and/or liabilities are remeasured during the year due to a significant event and/or cash flows are updated. We have not been notified by Enbridge nor are we aware of any events subsequent to December 31, 2012, which in our opinion would have a material impact on the results of the valuation. Changes In Plan Provisions There were no changes in plan provisions since the pevious reporting period. MERCER 2

5 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS Changes In Actuarial Assumptions The actuarial assumptions changed since the last actuarial valuation as at December 31, Details are shown in Appendix D. The approach used for setting the assumptions is similar to the prior year. Changes In Actuarial Methods There have been no changes to the actuarial methods or accounting policies since the prior valuation. To our knowledge there have been no other changes since the prior valuation that will affect the valuation results. Details of the disclosure information are shown in Appendix A. The estimated net periodic benefit cost information are shown in Appendix B. Details of plan assets are shown in Appendix C. Please refer to the remainder of the report for more information about these summary numbers. MERCER 3

6 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS 2 Basis of Valuation Plan Data To prepare this report Mercer has used and relied on financial data submitted as at the measurement date by the CIBC Mellon without further audit. Customarily, this information would not be verified by a plan s actuary. We have reviewed the information for internal consistency and we have no reason to doubt its substantial accuracy. Mercer has also used and relied on participant data as described in the statutory funding valuations as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011 as supplied by the Enbridge. The membership data is summarized in Appendix E of the following report effective December 31, 2011 (the Funding Report ) and Appendix of the following presentation: The Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2011 of the Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates; and The EGD RPP, SERP and SSERP Preliminary Valuation Results As Of December 31, 2011 dated April 4, 2012 Enbridge is responsible for ensuring that such participant data provides an accurate description of all persons who are participants under the terms of the plan or otherwise entitled to benefits that is sufficiently comprehensive and accurate for the purposes of this report. If the data supplied are not sufficiently comprehensive and accurate for the purposes of this report, the valuation results may differ significantly from the results that would be obtained with such data; this may require a later revision of this report. We have applied tests for internal consistency, as well as for consistency with the data used for the previous valuation. These tests were applied to membership reconciliation, basic information (date of birth, date of hire, date of membership, gender, etc.), pensionable earnings, credited service, contributions accumulated with interest and pensions to retirees and other members entitled to a deferred pension. Contributions, lump sum payments and pensions to retirees were compared with corresponding amounts reported in financial statements. The results of these tests were satisfactory. MERCER 4

7 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS Actuarial Assumptions To prepare the valuation report, assumptions are used in a forward looking financial and demographic model to present a single scenario from a wide range of possibilities; the results based on that single scenario are included in the valuation. The future is uncertain and the plan s actual experience will differ from those assumptions; these differences may be significant or material because these results are very sensitive to the assumptions made and, in some cases, to the interaction between the assumptions. Different assumptions or scenarios within the range of possibilities may also be reasonable and results based on those assumptions would be different. As a result of the uncertainty inherent in a forward looking projection over a very long period of time, no one projection is uniquely 'correct' and many alternative projections of the future could also be regarded as reasonable. Two different actuaries could, quite reasonably, arrive at different results based on the same data and different views of the future. A 'sensitivity analysis' shows the degree to which results would be different if you substitute alternative assumptions within the range of possibilities for those utilized in this report. We have not been engaged to perform such a sensitivity analysis and thus the results of such an analysis are not included in this report. At the client's request, Mercer is available to perform sensitivity or scenario analysis. Assumptions may also be changed from one valuation to the next because of changes in mandated requirements, plan experience, changes in expectations about the future and other factors. A change in assumptions is not an indication that prior assumptions were unreasonable when made. Actuarial Methods A valuation report is only a snapshot of a plan s estimated financial condition at a particular point in time; it does not predict the plan s future financial condition or its ability to pay benefits in the future and does not provide any guarantee of future financial soundness of the plan. Over time, a plan s total cost will depend on a number of factors, including the amount of benefits the plan pays, the number of people paid benefits, the period of time over which benefits are paid, plan expenses and the amount earned on any assets invested to pay benefits. These amounts and other variables are uncertain and unknowable at the valuation date. Because modelling all aspects of a situation is not possible or practical, we may use summary information, estimates, or simplifications of estimates to facilitate the modelling of future events in an efficient and cost-effective manner. We may also exclude factors or data that, if MERCER 5

8 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS used, in our judgment, would not have significantly affected our results. Use of such simplifying techniques does not, in our judgment, affect the reasonableness of valuation results for the plan. Valuations do not affect the ultimate cost of the plan, only the timing of when benefit costs are recognized. Cost recognition occurs over time. If the costs recognized over a period of years are lower or higher than necessary, for whatever reason, normal and expected practice is to adjust future expense levels with a view to recognizing the entire cost of the plan over time. As instructed, Mercer has prepared the accounting disclosures in this report based on Enbridge s accounting policies. A summary of the actuarial methods, accounting policies and valuation procedures is provided in Appendix E. Plan Provisions Mercer has used and relied on the plan documents, including amendments, and interpretations of plan provisions, supplied by Management as summarized in the Funding Report for the RPP and Appendix F of the following reports: The Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes of the Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates, effective December 31, 2010; and The Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes of the Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc., effective December 31, Enbridge is solely responsible for the validity, accuracy and comprehensiveness of this information. If any plan provisions supplied are not accurate and complete, the valuation results may differ significantly from the results that would be obtained with accurate and complete information. Moreover, plan documents may be subject to different interpretations, each of which could be reasonable, and the results under each of the different interpretations could vary. MERCER 6

9 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS 3 Actuarial Certification Mercer has prepared this report exclusively for Enbridge; subject to this limitation, Enbridge may direct that this report be provided to its auditors in connection with the audit of its financial statements. Mercer is not responsible for use of this report by any other party. The only purposes of this report are to present actuarial estimates of liabilities as at December 31, 2012 for the following plans: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge and Affiliates, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates, Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge for Enbridge to incorporate, as Enbridge deems appropriate, in its financial statements under US accounting standards, and to provide an actuarial estimate of the net periodic benefit cost for the fiscal year ending December 31, This report may not be used for any other purpose. Mercer is not responsible for the consequences of any unauthorized use. Its content may not be modified, incorporated into or used in other material, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity, without Mercer s permission. This report was prepared in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and procedures. The actuarial assumptions were selected by Enbridge. We express no opinion about the reasonableness of the assumptions used. All parts of this report, including any documents incorporated by reference, are integral to understanding and explaining its contents; no part may be taken out of context, used or relied upon without reference to the report as a whole. Decisions about benefit changes, granting new benefits, investment policy, funding policy, benefit security and/or benefit-related issues should not be made solely on the basis of this valuation, but only after careful consideration of alternative economic, financial, demographic and societal factors, including financial scenarios that assume future sustained investment losses. MERCER 7

10 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS Enbridge is ultimately responsible for selecting the plan s accounting policies, methods and assumptions. This information is referenced or described in section 2 of this report. Enbridge is solely responsible for communicating to Mercer any changes required to those policies, methods and assumptions. Enbridge is solely responsible for selecting the plan s investment policies, asset allocations and individual investments. The Mercer actuaries who prepared this report have not provided any investment advice to the Enbridge. This report is based on our understanding of applicable law and regulations as at the valuation date. Mercer is not an accountant or auditor and is not responsible for the interpretation of, or compliance with, accounting standards; citations to, and descriptions of accounting standards provided in this report are for reference purposes only. Mercer is not engaged in the practice of law. This report does not constitute and is not a substitute for legal advice. Enbridge should notify Mercer promptly after receipt of this valuation report if Enbridge disagrees with anything contained herein or is aware of any information that would affect the results of this report that has not been communicated to Mercer or incorporated therein. The valuation report will be deemed final and acceptable to Enbridge unless Enbridge promptly provides such notice to Mercer. MERCER 8

11 ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS Professional Qualifications I am available to answer any questions on the material contained in this report, or to provide explanations or further details as may be appropriate. I meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained in this report. I am not aware of any direct or material indirect financial interest or relationship, including investments or other services that could create a conflict of interest, that would impair the objectivity of this work. Danielle Neville FSA, EA January 25, 2013 Date Mercer 222-3rd Avenue SW, Suite 1200 Calgary, AB T2P 0B4 Phone: MERCER 9

12 APPENDIX A Disclosure Information Plan Name: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. All Plans Fiscal year ending on 12/31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/2011 A. Change in benefit obligation 1. Benefit obligation at beginning of year 827,074, ,638,500 15,068,700 13,033,200 5,840,600 5,909, ,983, ,580, Service cost 21,745,100 16,710, ,745,100 16,710, Interest cost 36,482,900 37,897, , , , ,000 37,390,700 38,937, Employee contributions 14, , Plan amendments Plan curtailments Plan settlements Special termination benefits a. Benefits paid from the plan (35,388,000) (31,546,800) (919,600) (909,600) (440,200) (493,100) (36,747,800) (32,949,500) b. Direct benefit payments Medicare subsidies received Expenses paid Taxes paid Premiums paid Net transfer in/(out) (including the effect of any business combinations/divestitures) Plan combinations Actuarial loss (gain) 32,603, ,374, ,700 2,226,700 (855,700) 103,700 32,505, ,704, Exchange rate changes Benefit obligation at end of year 882,532, ,074,500 15,563,700 15,068,700 4,795,600 5,840, ,891, ,983,800 B. Change in plan assets 1. Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 716,523, ,983,900 15,535,500 15,431,600 7,763,700 7,975, ,822, ,390, Actual return on plan assets 59,123,400 14,431, , , , ,500 59,855,100 15,158, a. Employer contributions to plan 15,808,300 (1,345,400) 746, , ,555,200 (777,600) b. Employer direct benefit payments Employee contributions 14, , Plan settlements a. Benefits paid from the plan (35,388,000) (31,546,800) (919,600) (909,600) (440,200) (493,100) (36,747,800) (32,949,500) b. Direct benefit payments Medicare subsidies received Expenses paid Taxes paid Premiums paid Acquisitions / divestitures Plan combinations Adjustments Exchange rate changes Fair value of plan assets at end of year 756,081, ,523,400 15,697,400 15,535,500 7,720,600 7,763, ,499, ,822,600

13 Plan Name: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Fiscal year ending on 12/31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/2011 C. Reconciliation of funded status 1. Fair value of plan assets 756,081, ,523,400 15,697,400 15,535,500 7,720,600 7,763, ,499, ,822, Benefit obligations 882,532, ,074,500 15,563,700 15,068,700 4,795,600 5,840, ,891, ,983, Funded status (plan assets less benefit obligations) (126,450,900) (110,551,100) 133, ,800 2,925,000 1,923,100 (123,392,200) (108,161,200) 4. Contributions and distributions made by company from measurement date to fiscal year end 5. Net amount [asset (obligation)] recognized in statement of financial position (126,450,900) (110,551,100) 133, ,800 2,925,000 1,923,100 (123,392,200) (108,161,200) All Plans D. Amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheet position consists of 1. Noncurrent assets , ,800 2,925,000 1,923,100 3,058,700 2,389, Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities (126,450,900) (110,551,100) (126,450,900) (110,551,100) 4. Net amount [asset (obligation)] recognized in statement of financial position (126,450,900) (110,551,100) 133, ,800 2,925,000 1,923,100 (123,392,200) (108,161,200) E. Reconciliation of amounts recognized in statement of financial position 1. Initial net asset(obligation) Prior service credit (cost) (1,212,900) (2,432,500) - (38,200) - - (1,212,900) (2,470,700) 3. Net gain (loss) (364,191,300) (369,407,200) (5,400,000) (5,366,700) (618,100) (1,693,600) (370,209,400) (376,467,500) 4. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (365,404,200) (371,839,700) (5,400,000) (5,404,900) (618,100) (1,693,600) (371,422,300) (378,938,200) 5. Accumulated contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost 238,953, ,288,600 5,533,700 5,871,700 3,543,100 3,616, ,030, ,777, Net amount [surplus (deficit)] recognized in statement of financial position (126,450,900) (110,551,100) 133, ,800 2,925,000 1,923,100 (123,392,200) (108,161,200) F. Components of net periodic benefit cost 1. Service cost - Defined Benefit 21,745,100 16,710, ,745,100 16,710, Service cost - Defined Contribution 1,207,100 1,345, ,207,100 1,345, Interest cost 36,482,900 37,897, , , , ,000 37,390,700 38,937, Expected return on plan assets (49,606,000) (52,091,000) (492,900) (556,100) (239,900) (279,500) (50,338,800) (52,926,600) 5. Amortization of initial net obligation (asset) Amortization of prior service cost 1,219,600 1,219,600 38,200 51, ,257,800 1,270, Amortization of net (gain) loss 28,302,000 14,886, , ,700 62,600 57,800 29,247,300 15,406, Curtailment (gain) / loss recognized Settlement (gain) / loss recognized Special termination benefit recognized Net periodic benefit cost 39,350,700 19,969,500 1,084, ,000 73,600 99,300 40,509,200 20,743,800 G. Changes recognized in other comprehensive income Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income 1. New prior service cost Net loss (gain) arising during the year 23,086, ,033, ,000 2,337,100 (1,012,900) 101,700 22,989, ,472, Effect of exchange rates on amounts included in AOCI Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost 4. Amortization, settlement or curtailment recognition of net transition asset (obligation) Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service credit (cost) (1,219,600) (1,219,600) (38,200) (51,000) - - (1,257,800) (1,270,600) 6. Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss) (28,302,000) (14,886,900) (882,700) (461,700) (62,600) (57,800) (29,247,300) (15,406,400) 7. Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income) (6,435,500) 144,927,000 (4,900) 1,824,400 (1,075,500) 43,900 (7,515,900) 146,795, Total recognized in net periodic benefit and other comprehensive loss (income) 31,708, ,551,100 1,080,000 2,499,400 (1,001,900) 143,200 31,786, ,193,700

14 Supplementary Senior Executive Plan Name: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates Distribution Inc. All Plans Fiscal year ending on 12/31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/2011 Estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income over the next fiscal year 9. Initial net asset (obligation) Prior service credit (cost) (1,212,900) - - (1,212,900) 11. Net gain (loss) (26,868,300) (778,500) - (27,646,800) (28,081,200) (778,500) - (28,859,700) H. Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligations 1. Discount rate 4.30% 4.50% 4.30% 4.50% 4.30% 4.50% 4.30% 4.50% 2. Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% Not applicable Not applicable 3.50% 3.50% 3. Measurement date 31-Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec-2011 I. Assumptions to determine net cost 1. Discount rate 4.50% 5.70% 4.50% 5.70% 4.50% 5.70% 4.50% 5.70% 2. Expected return on assets 7.00% 7.25% 3.20% 3.63% 3.20% 3.63% 6.64% 6.88% 3. Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% J. Additional year-end information Required information for all defined benefit plans 1. Accumulated benefit obligation 835,302, ,857,700 15,563,700 14,933,000 4,795,600 5,840, ,661, ,631,300 Sensitivity to key assumptions for pension plans 2. Sensitivity to key assumptions a. Half a percent decrease in expected return on assets i. Effect on pension expense 3,543,000 39,000 19,000 3,601,000 ii. Effect on year-end benefit obligation b. Half a percent decrease in discount rate i. Effect on pension expense 6,795, ,000 (1,000) 6,919,000 ii. Effect on year-end benefit obligation 62,450, , ,000 63,432,000 c. Half a percent decrease in rate of salary increase i. Effect on pension expense (888,000) (17,000) - (905,000) ii. Effect on year-end benefit obligation (8,428,000) (62,000) - (8,490,000) K. L. Additional year-end information for plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets 1. Projected benefit obligation 882,532, ,074, ,532, ,074, Accumulated benefit obligation 835,302, ,857, ,302, ,857, Fair value of plan assets 756,081, ,523, ,081, ,523,400 Additional year-end information for plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets 1. Projected benefit obligation 882,532, ,074, ,532, ,074, Fair value of plan assets 756,081, ,523, ,081, ,523,400

15 Plan Name: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Fiscal year ending on 12/31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/2011 M. Cash flows 1. Projected company contributions for FYE 31-Dec-2013 : 43,255, ,800-43,886, Dec-2014 : 43,875, ,900-44,062, Dec-2015 : 44,516, ,100-44,695, Dec-2016 : 45,180, ,100-45,359, Dec-2017 : 45,867, ,867, Dec-2018 : 21,033, ,033, Dec-2019 : 21,769, ,769, Dec-2020 : 22,531, ,531, Dec-2021 : 23,320, ,320, Dec-2022 : 24,136, ,136, Expected benefit payments for FYE 31-Dec-2013 : 36,346, , ,400 37,725, Dec-2014 : 38,499, , ,000 39,895, Dec-2015 : 40,495, , ,600 41,908, Dec-2016 : 42,432, , ,300 43,863, Dec-2017 : 44,383, , ,000 45,832,300 Next five years 250,765,400 5,088,800 2,428, ,282,400 All Plans N. Accumulated contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost 1. Amount as of beginning of year 261,288, ,258,100 5,871,700 5,978,900 3,616,700 3,716, ,777, ,953, Net periodic pension (cost) income for fiscal year (38,143,600) (18,624,100) (1,084,900) (675,000) (73,600) (99,300) (39,302,100) (19,398,400) 3. Employer contributions made in fiscal year (excludes contributions made between measurement year end and fiscal year end) 15,808,300 (1,345,400) 746, , ,555,200 (777,600) 4. Benefits paid directly by company in the fiscal year (excludes contributions made between measurement year end and fiscal year end) FAS 88 (expense) income Other gain / (loss) recognized Plan combinations Adjustment to match local books Exchange rate adjustment Preliminary amount as of end of year 238,953, ,288,600 5,533,700 5,871,700 3,543,100 3,616, ,030, ,777, Contributions and direct benefit payments made between measurement date and fiscal year end Amount as of end of year 238,953, ,288,600 5,533,700 5,871,700 3,543,100 3,616, ,030, ,777,000 O. Reconciliation of prior service cost (credit) 1. Amount as disclosed as of prior year end 2,432,500 3,652,100 38,200 89, ,470,700 3,741,300 Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost 2. Amortization (1,219,600) (1,219,600) (38,200) (51,000) - - (1,257,800) (1,270,600) 3. Effect of curtailment Total amount recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost (1,219,600) (1,219,600) (38,200) (51,000) - - (1,257,800) (1,270,600) Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income 5. Plan amendments Other changes (adjustment to accumulated comprehensive income, retained earnings) 6. Plan combinations Difference between prior year end and beginning of current year Total amount recognized as other change in accumulated other comprehensive income Exchange rate adjustment Amount at end of year 1,212,900 2,432,500-38, ,212,900 2,470,700

16 Plan Name: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Fiscal year ending on 12/31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/ /31/2011 P. Reconciliation of net (gain) loss 1. Amount as disclosed as of prior year end 369,407, ,260,600 5,366,700 3,491,300 1,693,600 1,649, ,467, ,401,600 Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost 2. Amortization (28,302,000) (14,886,900) (882,700) (461,700) (62,600) (57,800) (29,247,300) (15,406,400) 3. Effect of settlement Total amount recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost (28,302,000) (14,886,900) (882,700) (461,700) (62,600) (57,800) (29,247,300) (15,406,400) Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income 5. Liability experience 32,603, ,374, ,700 2,226,700 (855,700) 103,700 32,505, ,704, Asset experience (9,517,400) 37,659, , ,400 (157,200) (2,000) (9,516,300) 37,767, Effect of curtailment Extraordinary event that adjusts assets Total amount recognized as a change in plan assets and benefit obligations 23,086, ,033, ,000 2,337,100 (1,012,900) 101,700 22,989, ,472,300 Other changes (adjustment to accumulated comprehensive income, retained earnings) 10. Plan combinations Adjustment to match local books Difference between prior year end and beginning of current year Difference between calculated year-end gain/loss and amount using events that occurred during the year Total amount recognized as other change in accumulated other comprehensive income Exchange rate adjustment Amount at end of year 364,191, ,407,200 5,400,000 5,366, ,100 1,693, ,209, ,467,500 All Plans Q. Composition of asset balance for supplemental plans 1. Market value of RCA invested assets as per CIBC Mellon statement 8,213,900 7,951,500 5,150,700 5,257,300 13,364,600 13,208, Estimated value of Refundable Tax Account (RTA) 7,483,500 7,584,000 2,569,900 2,506,400 10,053,400 10,090, Market value of assets for disclosure 15,697,400 15,535,500 7,720,600 7,763,700 23,418,000 23,299,200

17 APPENDIX B Estimated Net Periodic Benefit Cost Information Plan Name: Pension Plan for Employees of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Affiliates Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Affiliates Supplementary Senior Executive Retirement Plan of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. DC Component of EGD RPP All Plans Fiscal year ending on 12/31/ /31/ /31/ /31/2013 A. Components of projected net periodic benefit cost 1. Service cost 24,926, ,249,300 26,176, Interest cost 37,167, , ,600-38,013, Expected return on plan assets (51,268,700) (497,500) (239,900) - (52,006,100) 4. Amortization of initial net obligation (asset) Amortization of prior service cost 1,212, ,212, Amortization of net (gain) loss 26,868, , ,646, Curtailment (gain) / loss recognized Settlement (gain) / loss recognized Special termination benefit recognized Net periodic benefit cost 38,906, ,200 (43,300) 1,249,300 41,043,000 E. Weighted-average assumptions to determine net cost 1. Discount rate 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% Not applicable 4.30% 2. Expected return on assets 6.75% 3.20% 3.20% Not applicable 6.60% 3. Salary scale 3.50% 3.50% Not applicable Not applicable 3.72%

18 APPENDIX C Plan Assets Plan assets have been taken at their fair value as provided by the Entity on January 17, Description of basis used to determine overall expected long-term rate of return assumption: To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, Enbridge considered the current level of expected returns on risk free investments (primarily government bonds), the historical level of the risk premium associated with the other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested and the expectations for future returns of each asset class. The expected return for each asset class was then weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption for the portfolio. This resulted in the selection of the 7.00%, 3.20% and 3.20% assumptions for the RPP, SERP and SSERP respectively. Method for determining market-related value of assets: The asset valuation method is the fair market value.

19 APPENDIX D Actuarial Assumptions We have used actuarial assumptions selected by Enbridge. The principal financial and demographic assumptions used at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are shown in the table below. The assumptions as at the reporting date are used to determine the present value of the benefit obligation at that date and the net periodic benefit cost for the following year. Discount rate 4.30% per year for year-end disclosure December 31, % per year for year-end disclosure Decmeber 31, 2011 and 2012 expense determination 5.70% for 2011 expense determination Expected long-term rate of return on assets 7.00% per year for the 2012 expense determination 7.25% per year for the 2011 expense determination Increases in pensionable earnings 3.50% per year Increases in the YMPE Increases in maximum pension permitted under the Income Tax Act Inflation Mortality Withdrawal Expenses Retirement age for active members Percentage with spouse at retirement Age difference 2.75% per year $2, in 2012 indexed from 2012 at 2.75% per year 2.25% per year UP-94 generational mortality table using scale AA See tables of sample rates Implicit in long-term rate of return on assets See table of sample rates 80% married A male is assumed to be 2 years older than his spouse

20 Sample rates from the age related tables are summarized below: Age Termination - Male Termination - Female Retirement % 9.5% 0.0% % 13.0% 0.0% % 11.0% 0.0% % 8.5% 0.0% % 4.0% 0.0% % 3.9% 0.0% % 2.8% 0.0% % 0.0% 5.0% % 0.0% 5.0% % 0.0% 7.5% % 0.0% 7.5% % 0.0% 10.0% % 0.0% 20.0% % 0.0% 20.0% % 0.0% 20.0% % 0.0% 20.0% % 0.0% 20.0% % 0.0% 100.0% A 20% retirement rate is assumed in lieu of the above rates in the year in which a member qualifies for early retirement with an unreduced pension and in each subsequent year until age 65. There have been no changes in actuarial assumptions since the prior valuation other than the changes to the principal assumptions shown in the table above.

21 APPENDIX E Actuarial Methods Benefit obligations are estimated using the Projected Unit Credit method. Under this method each participant s benefits under the plan are attributed to years of service, taking into consideration future salary increases and the plan s benefit allocation formula. Thus, the estimated total pension to which each participant is expected to become entitled at retirement is broken down into units, each associated with a year of past or future credited service. A description of the calculation follows: An individual s estimated attributed benefit for valuation purposes related to a particular separation date (e.g. expected date of retirement, leaving service or death) is the benefit described under the plan based on credited service as at the measurement date, but determined using the projected salary that would be used in the calculation estimate of the benefit on the expected separation date. The benefit attributed to an individual s service during a plan year is the excess of the attributed benefit for valuation purposes at the end of the plan year over the attributed benefit for valuation purposes at the beginning of the plan year. Both attributed benefits are estimated from the same projections to the various anticipated separation dates. An individual s estimated benefit obligation is the present value of the attributed benefit for valuation purposes at the beginning of the plan year, and the service cost is the present value of the benefit attributed to the year of service in the plan year. If multiple decrements are used, the benefit obligation and the service cost for an individual are the sum of the component benefit obligations and service costs associated with the various anticipated separation dates. Such benefit obligations and service costs reflect the estimated attributed benefits and the probability of the individual separating on those dates. The vested benefit obligation is based on the expected date of separation, and an individual s projected benefit obligation is constrained to be not less than his or her accumulated benefit obligation. In all cases, the benefit obligation is the total present value of the individuals attributed benefits for valuation purposes at the measurement date, and the service cost is the total present value of the individuals benefits attributable to service during the year. If multiple decrements are used, the present values take into account the probability of the individual leaving employment at the various anticipated separation dates.

22 Valuation Procedures The following approximations have been made in applying this method: Projection of obligations from valuation date to year-end measurement date: The benefit obligations at the year end December 31, 2012 have been based on a projection of the results of the statutory funding valuation of the plan as at December 31, This projection involves rolling forward the results at the earlier date allowing for interest on the liabilities, the accrual of further benefits by active members, the actual benefits payments paid out and actual actuarial assumptions as at December 31, We have assumed that all other experience during the projection, apart from investment returns, contributions, benefit payments, administration expenses and insurance premiums, has been in line with the assumptions made at the start of the year. Accounting Policies The accounting policies in cases where Enbridge has a choice of policy are set out below. There have been no changes to the actuarial methods or accounting policies since the prior valuation Materiality threshold: Enbridge has not instructed us to make any adjustments to the valuation procedures described in order to satisfy its materiality threshold. Net periodic benefit cost measurement: The net periodic benefit cost charged to profit or loss is budgeted for at the start of each reporting period using actuarial assumptions fixed at the start of the period, including assumptions about expected pensionable salaries, contributions and benefit payments that will be made during the period. It is only updated to allow for subsequent experience in the event of material changes. Interest on service cost: The current service cost includes all interest on the service cost during the reporting period. Discretionary benefits: No allowance is made in the benefit obligation for discretionary benefits on the grounds that there is no substantive commitment to provide such benefits. Therefore any benefit increases that are awarded on a discretionary basis are accounted for as a prior service cost. Significant events: No significant events have occurred during the reporting period that require accounting policy decisions. Amortization method and periods: The cumulative gains and losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the beginning of year benefit obligation or market related value of plan assets are amortized over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan.

23 APPENDIX F RPP Disclosure Information By Employer Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Inc. Gazifere Inc. Total A. Change in benefit obligation Benefit obligation at beginning of year 804,437,100 13,323,300 9,314, ,074,500 Service cost 20,419, , ,800 21,745,100 Interest cost 35,479, , ,600 36,482,900 Employee contributions 14, ,400 Special termination benefits Benefits paid from the plan (34,245,700) (426,600) (715,700) (35,388,000) Net transfer in/(out) (525,000) 555,200 (30,200) - Actuarial loss (gain) 30,858, , ,700 32,603,500 Benefit obligation at end of year 856,438,200 15,413,900 10,680, ,532,400 B. Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 700,367,600 10,354,200 5,801, ,523,400 Actual return on plan assets 57,728, , ,400 59,123,400 Employer contributions 14,892, , ,400 15,808,300 Employee contributions 14, ,400 Benefits paid (34,245,700) (426,600) (715,700) (35,388,000) DC contributions paid from DB surplus Net transfer in (out) (430,400) 450,500 (20,100) - Fair value of plan assets at end of year 738,326,800 11,680,100 6,074, ,081,500 C. Reconciliation of funded status Fair value of plan assets 738,326,800 11,680,100 6,074, ,081,500 Benefit obligations 856,438,200 15,413,900 10,680, ,532,400 Net amount [asset (obligation)] recognized in statement of financial position (118,111,400) (3,733,800) (4,605,700) (126,450,900) D. Amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheet position consists of Noncurrent assets Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities (118,111,400) (3,733,800) (4,605,700) (126,450,900) Net amount [asset (obligation)] recognized in statement of financial position (118,111,400) (3,733,800) (4,605,700) (126,450,900) E. Reconciliation of amounts recognized in statement of financial position Initial net asset(obligation) Prior service credit (cost) (1,195,700) (11,400) (5,800) (1,212,900) Net gain (loss) (355,008,500) (5,584,800) (3,598,000) (364,191,300) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (356,204,200) (5,596,200) (3,603,800) (365,404,200) Accumulated contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost 238,092,800 1,862,400 (1,001,900) 238,953,300 Net amount [surplus (deficit)] recognized in statement of financial position (118,111,400) (3,733,800) (4,605,700) (126,450,900)

24 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Inc. Gazifere Inc. Total F. Components of net periodic benefit cost Service cost 20,419, , ,800 21,745,100 Interest cost 35,479, , ,600 36,482,900 Expected return on plan assets (48,464,300) (726,800) (414,900) (49,606,000) Amortization of initial net obligation (asset) Amortization of prior service cost 1,202,200 11,500 5,900 1,219,600 Amortization of net (gain) loss 27,663, , ,200 28,302,000 Net periodic benefit cost 36,300, ,200 1,019,600 38,143,600 G. Changes recognized in other comprehensive income Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income New prior service cost Net loss (gain) arising during the year 21,594, , ,200 23,086,100 Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service credit (cost) (1,202,200) (11,500) (5,900) (1,219,600) Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss) (27,663,800) (409,000) (229,200) (28,302,000) Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income) (7,271,700) 235, ,100 (6,435,500) Total recognized in net periodic benefit and other comprehensive loss (income) 29,029,100 1,058,300 1,620,700 31,708,100 Estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income over the next fiscal year Initial net asset (obligation) Prior service credit (cost) (1,195,700) (11,400) (5,800) (1,212,900) Net gain (loss) (26,228,300) (393,700) (246,300) (26,868,300) H. Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligations Discount rate 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% Measurement date 31-Dec Dec Dec Dec-2012 I. Assumptions to determine net cost Discount rate 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% Expected return on assets 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% J. Additional year-end information Required information for all defined benefit plans Accumulated benefit obligation 813,325,000 13,314,700 8,662, ,302,000 Sensitivity to key assumptions for pension plans Sensitivity to key assumptions a. Half a percent decrease in expected return on assets i. Effect on pension expense 3,462,000 3,543,000 ii. Effect on year-end benefit obligation - - b. Half a percent decrease in discount rate i. Effect on pension expense 6,290,000 6,795,000 ii. Effect on year-end benefit obligation 60,114,000 62,450,000 c. Half a percent decrease in rate of salary increase i. Effect on pension expense (868,000) (888,000) ii. Effect on year-end benefit obligation (8,179,000) (8,428,000)

25 K. L. Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Gazifere Inc. Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Inc. Additional year-end information for plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets Projected benefit obligation 856,438,200 15,413,900 10,680, ,532,400 Accumulated benefit obligation 813,325,000 13,314,700 8,662, ,302,000 Fair value of plan assets 738,326,800 11,680,100 6,074, ,081,500 Additional year-end information for plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets Projected benefit obligation 856,438,200 15,413,900 10,680, ,532,400 Fair value of plan assets 738,326,800 11,680,100 6,074, ,081,500 Total M. Cash flows Projected company contributions for following fiscal year 31-Dec-2013 : 40,754,200 1,317,600 1,183,600 43,255, Dec-2014 : 41,336,800 1,339,400 1,199,000 43,875, Dec-2015 : 41,939,800 1,361,900 1,215,000 44,516, Dec-2016 : 42,563,900 1,385,300 1,231,600 45,180, Dec-2017 : 43,209,800 1,409,400 1,248,700 45,867, Dec-2018 : 19,769, , ,800 21,033, Dec-2019 : 20,461, , ,100 21,769, Dec-2020 : 21,177, , ,100 22,531, Dec-2021 : 21,919, , ,700 23,320, Dec-2022 : 22,686, , ,100 24,136,200 Expected benefit payments for FYE 31-Dec-2013 : 35,316, , ,000 36,346, Dec-2014 : 37,408, , ,400 38,499, Dec-2015 : 39,347, , ,000 40,495, Dec-2016 : 41,230, , ,000 42,432, Dec-2017 : 43,126, , ,100 44,383,500 Next five years 243,660,560 4,262,374 2,842, ,765,395 N. Accumulated contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost Amount as of beginning of year 259,406,400 2,392,000 (509,800) 261,288,600 Net periodic pension (cost) income for fiscal year (36,300,800) (823,200) (1,019,600) (38,143,600) Employer contributions made in fiscal year (excludes contributions made between measurement year end and fiscal year end) 14,892, , ,400 15,808,300 Benefits paid directly by company in the fiscal year (excludes contributions made between measurement year end and fiscal year end) FAS 88 (expense) income Business combinations 94,600 (104,700) 10,100 - Plan combinations Adjustment to match local books Exchange rate adjustment Contributions and direct benefit payments made between measurement date and fiscal year end Amount as of end of year 238,092,800 1,862,400 (1,001,900) 238,953,300 O. DC Current service cost 1,175,300 17,300 14,500 1,207,100

26 The following table presents the estimated pension expense for the fiscal period ending December 31, 2013: Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. Gazifere Inc. Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Inc. Components of net periodic benefit cost Current service cost (employer) 23,330, , ,500 24,926,900 Interest cost 36,067, , ,400 37,167,400 Expected return on plan assets (50,020,600) (807,500) (440,600) (51,268,700) Amortization of transitional obligation (asset) Amortization of past service costs 1,195,700 11,400 5,800 1,212,900 Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain) 26,228, , ,300 26,868,300 Net periodic benefit cost 36,801, ,400 1,203,400 38,906,800 DC current service cost 1,216,400 17,900 15,000 1,249,300 Assumptions to determine net cost Discount rate 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% 4.30% Expected return on assets 6.75% 6.75% 6.75% 6.75% Salary increase rate 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% Total

ESTIMATED ACCRUAL COSTS EGD PENSION PLANS JUNE 30, 2015

ESTIMATED ACCRUAL COSTS EGD PENSION PLANS JUNE 30, 2015 JUNE 30, 2015 Note to reader regarding actuarial valuations and projections: This report may not be relied upon for any purpose other than those explicitly noted in the Introduction, nor may it be relied

More information

Postretirement Benefit Valuation Report Under GASB 45 for Fiscal Year Ending October 31, 2010

Postretirement Benefit Valuation Report Under GASB 45 for Fiscal Year Ending October 31, 2010 December 14, 2010 Postretirement Benefit Valuation Report Under GASB 45 for Fiscal Year Ending October 31, 2010 New York State Housing Finance Agency State of New York Mortgage Agency New York State Affordable

More information

Correctional Employees Retirement Fund

Correctional Employees Retirement Fund December 2011 Correctional Employees Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2011 Contents Cover Letter Highlights... 1 Principal Valuation Results... 2 Important Notices... 4 Supplemental

More information

Anne Arundel County Employees Retirement Plan

Anne Arundel County Employees Retirement Plan Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2017 to Determine the County s Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 36 S. Charles Street, Suite 1000 Baltimore, MD 21201

More information

Anne Arundel County Fire Service Retirement Plan

Anne Arundel County Fire Service Retirement Plan Service Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2017 to Determine the County s Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 36 S. Charles Street, Suite 1000 Baltimore, MD 21201 Submitted

More information

THE ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY DETENTION OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015

THE ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY DETENTION OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015 THE ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY DETENTION OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015 Bolton Partners, Inc. 100 Light Street, 9th Floor Baltimore, MD 21202 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

CITY OF EASTPOINTE, MI RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN

CITY OF EASTPOINTE, MI RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2017 UNDER STATEMENT NOS. 74 and 75 CITY OF EASTPOINTE, MI RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN January 11, 2018 Prepared By: 6050 Oak Tree Blvd. S, Suite 500 Cleveland, OH

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Mayor Gavin Newsom Members of the Board of Supervisors. Report on Retiree (Postemployment) Medical Benefit Costs

M E M O R A N D U M. Mayor Gavin Newsom Members of the Board of Supervisors. Report on Retiree (Postemployment) Medical Benefit Costs CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER Ben Rosenfield Controller Monique Zmuda Deputy Controller M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mayor Gavin Newsom Members of the Board of Supervisors

More information

THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN

THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION RETIREE MEDICAL PLAN SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 VALUATION FUNDING AND COST ACCOUNTING FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 APRIL 2017 CONTENTS Executive Summary...

More information

Dear Trustees of the Local Government Correctional Service Retirement Plan:

Dear Trustees of the Local Government Correctional Service Retirement Plan: MINNESOTA LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORRECTIONAL SERVICE RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2012 November 2012 Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota Dear

More information

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORR E C T I O N A L S E R V I C E RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T

More information

December 19, St. Paul Teachers' Retirement Fund Association 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, Minnesota

December 19, St. Paul Teachers' Retirement Fund Association 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, Minnesota ST. PAUL TEACHERS' RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2016 December 19, 2016 St. Paul Teachers' Retirement Fund Association

More information

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp St. Paul Teachers Retirement

More information

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S E R V I C E R E T I R E M E N T P L A N A C T U A R

More information

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S E R V I C E R E T I R E M E N T P L A N G A S B S T

More information

Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio

Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio Prepared as of June 30, 2011 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication

More information

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey Information Required Under Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68 as of June 30,

More information

M I N N E S O T A S T A T E R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M J U D G E S R E T I R E M E N T F U N D

M I N N E S O T A S T A T E R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M J U D G E S R E T I R E M E N T F U N D M I N N E S O T A S T A T E R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M J U D G E S R E T I R E M E N T F U N D G A S B S T A T E M E N T S N O. 6 7 A N D N O. 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D F I N A N C I A L R E P

More information

November Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

November Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors: MINNESOTA STATE PATROL RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2012 November 2012 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors: The results of the July

More information

November Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

November Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota MINNESOTA GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2012 November 2012 Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Trustees of the : The

More information

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by: GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet As of January 1, 2016 Prepared by: Nina M. Lantz, FSA, EA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary William H. Clark-Shim,

More information

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION IS DETERMINED BY THIS VALUATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER

More information

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A GENERAL EMPLOYEES RET I R E M E N T P L A N ACTUARIAL V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T A S O F J U L Y 1, 2013

More information

Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2017

Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2017 Lutheran Church - Canada Pension Plan ASP Registration No. 00355610 CRA Registration No. 00355610 March, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Actuaries Opinion...

More information

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017 St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017 December 21, 2017 Ms. Jill E. Schurtz, Executive Director 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, MN 55104-6206 Dear

More information

CITY OF DEARBORN CHAPTER 22 RETIREMENT SYSTEM

CITY OF DEARBORN CHAPTER 22 RETIREMENT SYSTEM CITY OF DEARBORN CHAPTER 22 RETIREMENT SYSTEM 50 TH ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION JUNE 30, 2016 January 31, 2017 Board of Trustees City of Dearborn Chapter 22 Retirement System Dearborn, Michigan Re: City

More information

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp St. Paul Teachers Retirement

More information

El Paso County Retirement Plan

El Paso County Retirement Plan Conduent HR Consulting, LLC El Paso County Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report Prepared as of January 1, 2018 May 2018 May 24, 2018 Board of Retirement El Paso County Retirement Plan 105 E. Vermijo,

More information

Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017

Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017 Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017 November 13, 2017 Board of Trustees Arkansas State Police Retirement

More information

Gateway to Central Minnesota

Gateway to Central Minnesota Gateway to Central Minnesota January 1, 212 Actuarial Valuation of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) Under GASB Statement No. 45 Alternative Measurement Method For Fiscal Years Ending 212, 213 and 214

More information

METROPOLITAN TORONTO PENSION PLAN REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 APRIL 2017

METROPOLITAN TORONTO PENSION PLAN REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 APRIL 2017 GM21.6 Attachment 1 Attachment 1 REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 APRIL 2017 Financial Services Commission of Ontario Registration Number: 0351577 Canada Revenue

More information

City of Dover, Delaware General Employee Pension Plan. July 1, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report

City of Dover, Delaware General Employee Pension Plan. July 1, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report City of Dover, Delaware General Employee Pension Plan July 1, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report Table of Contents Actuarial Certification 3 Executive Summary 5 Summary Results 5 Changes Since Prior Valuation

More information

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Total Compensation Systems, Inc. Castroville Community Services District Actuarial Study of Retiree Health Liabilities Under GASB 74/75 Roll-forward Valuation Valuation Date: June 30, 2017 Measurement Date: June 30, 2018 Prepared by:

More information

ACTUARIAL PROJECTIONS FOR THE NATIONAL RELIGIOUS RETIREMENT OFFICE MAY 5, 2016

ACTUARIAL PROJECTIONS FOR THE NATIONAL RELIGIOUS RETIREMENT OFFICE MAY 5, 2016 ACTUARIAL PROJECTIONS FOR THE NATIONAL RELIGIOUS RETIREMENT OFFICE MAY 5, 2016 THE NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 2. Actuarial Assumptions... 4 3. Demographic Data and Projections...

More information

***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018

***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018 ***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018 The following are answers to questions received by potential proposers. 1.

More information

MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND

MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2015 December 14, 2015 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors:

More information

ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION

ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION AS OF J ULY 1, 2015 December 7, 2015 Ms. Jill E. Schurtz Executive Director 1619 Dayton Avenue, Room 309 St. Paul, MN 55104-6206 Dear

More information

ST. PAUL TEACHERS' RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION

ST. PAUL TEACHERS' RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION ST. PAUL TEACHERS' RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION GASB STATEMENTS NO. 67 AND NO. 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2014 February 17, 2015 St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association

More information

REPORT OF THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION AND GAIN/LOSS ANALYSIS

REPORT OF THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION AND GAIN/LOSS ANALYSIS A R K A N S A S S T A T E P O L I C E R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALU A T I O N A N D T H E GAIN/LOSS ANALYSIS O F E X P E R I E N C E JUNE 30, 2016 REPORT OF THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL

More information

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by: GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet As of January 1, 2014 Prepared by: Nina M. Lantz, ASA, EA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary William H. Clark-Shim,

More information

The Housing Authority of the City of Pharr Texas Texas County & District Retirement System GASB 75 Report

The Housing Authority of the City of Pharr Texas Texas County & District Retirement System GASB 75 Report Milliman GASB 75 Report GASB 75 Report For Measurement Date: December 31, 2017 Based on Actuarial Valuation Date: December 31, 2017 For Fiscal Year Ending: September 30, 2018 Prepared by: Mark Olleman

More information

A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S

A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D

More information

June 7, Dear Board Members:

June 7, Dear Board Members: CITY OF MANCHESTER EMPLOYEES' CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS DECEMBER 31, 2015 June 7, 2016 Board of Trustees City of Manchester

More information

OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF DEFINED BENEFIT ALLOWANCES TRADITIONAL, C OMBINED AND MEMBER DIRECTED PLANS DECEMBER 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pages Item 1-2 Cover

More information

Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018

Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018 Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018 November 16, 2018 Board of Trustees Arkansas State Police Retirement

More information

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title

More information

City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System

City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report Plan Year as of January 1, 2015 August 2016 Table of Contents Sections I Overview... 1 II Summary Of Principal Results... 3 III

More information

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund February 3, 2012 Experience Study 2007-2011 February 3, 2012 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, MN 55103 2007 to 2011 Experience Study Dear Dave: The results of the actuarial valuation are based

More information

Minnesota State Retirement System. State Patrol Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

Minnesota State Retirement System. State Patrol Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017 Minnesota State Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017 December 6, 2017 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors: The results of the July 1,

More information

City of Kalamazoo Postretirement Welfare Benefits Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2017

City of Kalamazoo Postretirement Welfare Benefits Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2017 City of Kalamazoo Postretirement Welfare Benefits Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2017 Section A Page Number -- 1-2 1 2 3 4-6 Table of Contents Cover Letter EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive

More information

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) May 19, 2017 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal Retirement System ( TMRS or the System ) Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the

More information

Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) Coalition on Pensions

Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) Coalition on Pensions Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) Coalition on Pensions Costing of Plan Changes for Local Authorities Pension Plan (LAPP) and Public Service Pension Plan (PSPP) December 20, 2013 Table of Contents Section

More information

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of This report has been prepared at the request of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

More information

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) May 22, 2015 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal Retirement System ( TMRS or the System ) Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the

More information

City of Sioux Falls Retirement Systems Assumption Study

City of Sioux Falls Retirement Systems Assumption Study City of Sioux Falls Retirement Systems Assumption Study February 6, 2013 Copyright 2013 GRS All rights reserved. City of Sioux Falls Retirement Systems Assumption Study Purpose Types of Assumptions Demographic

More information

Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio. Prepared as of June 30, 2009

Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio. Prepared as of June 30, 2009 Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio Prepared as of June 30, 2009 November 13, 2009 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience

More information

December 1, Minnesota State Retirement System Correctional Employees Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

December 1, Minnesota State Retirement System Correctional Employees Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors: MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM CORRECTIONAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2016 December 1, 2016 Minnesota State Retirement

More information

Maine Public Service Company Retiree Medical Plan

Maine Public Service Company Retiree Medical Plan Maine Public Service Company Retiree Medical Plan Postretirement Benefit Cost and Financial Disclosure for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017 and Preliminary Postretirement Benefit Cost for the Fiscal

More information

Actuarial Section ARLINGTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Arlington County Employees Retirement System

Actuarial Section ARLINGTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Arlington County Employees Retirement System ARLINGTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Arlington County Employees Retirement System 54 Arlington County Employees Retirement System Actuarial Section 55 Arlington County Employees Retirement System

More information

City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation and Report June 30, 2018

City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation and Report June 30, 2018 Actuarial Valuation and Report Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Actuarial Certification... 3 Summary of Report... 4 Comparative Summary of Membership Data... 5 Comparative Summary of Key Actuarial Valuation

More information

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting Public Employees Retirement System of New Jersey Information Required Under Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68 as of June 30,

More information

MERCER METROPOLITAN TORONTO POLICE BENEFIT FUND REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2014

MERCER METROPOLITAN TORONTO POLICE BENEFIT FUND REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2014 GM4.6 MERCER Attachment 1 TALENT HEALTH RETIREMENT INVESTMENTS METROPOLITAN TORONTO POLICE BENEFIT FUND REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2014 APRIL 2015 Financial

More information

Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) Coalition on Pensions

Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) Coalition on Pensions Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) Coalition on Pensions December 31, 2013 Projection of Financial Positions: Local Authorities Pension Plan (LAPP) and Public Service Pension Plan (PSPP) February 27, 2014

More information

December 4, Minnesota State Retirement System Legislators Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

December 4, Minnesota State Retirement System Legislators Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors: MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM LEGISLATORS RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2013 December 4, 2013 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors:

More information

1-3 Retiree Premium Rate Development. Active Members by Attained Age and Years of Service Retired Members by Attained Age Asset Information

1-3 Retiree Premium Rate Development. Active Members by Attained Age and Years of Service Retired Members by Attained Age Asset Information KENT COUNTY RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section Number -- Cover Letter EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-2 Executive Summary A VALUATION RESULTS 1 2 3

More information

City of Marine City Retirement

City of Marine City Retirement City of Marine City Retirement Shelby Township System Fire and Police Retirement System JUNE 30, 2017 ACTUARIAL VALUATION December 31, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report Actuarial Certification 3 Executive

More information

Key Benefit Concepts, LLC

Key Benefit Concepts, LLC Accounting and Sample Funding Report of Liabilities for Participants Post Employment Benefits as of July 1, 2012 Thru End of the Year June 30, 2013 May 2013 This report, its text, charts, content and formatting

More information

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015 ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS: Rate of Inflation (effective June 30, 2014) 3.00% per annum Rate of Crediting Interest on Contribution Balances (effective June 30, 2014) 3.75% per annum, compounded annually Rate

More information

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Total Compensation Systems, Inc. College of Marin Actuarial Study of Retiree Health Liabilities Under GASB 74/75 Roll-forward Valuation Valuation Date: June 30, 2017 Measurement Date: June 30, 2017 Prepared by: Date: November 30, 2017

More information

Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore

Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore as of June 30, 2015 Produced by Cheiron November 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Transmittal Letter... i Foreword...

More information

CONTENTS. 1-2 Summary of Benefit Provisions 3 Asset Information 4-6 Retired Life Data Active Member Data Inactive Vested Member Data

CONTENTS. 1-2 Summary of Benefit Provisions 3 Asset Information 4-6 Retired Life Data Active Member Data Inactive Vested Member Data CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 66TH ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT JUNE 30, 2015 CONTENTS Section Page 1 Introduction A Valuation Results 1 Funding Objective 2 Computed Contributions

More information

April Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund. Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2009

April Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund. Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2009 April 2010 Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes Contents 1. Summary of Results... 2 2. Introduction and Executive Summary... 4 3. Plan Assets...

More information

Simon Fraser University Pension Plan for Administrative/Union Staff

Simon Fraser University Pension Plan for Administrative/Union Staff Actuarial Report on the Simon Fraser University Pension Plan for Administrative/Union Staff as at 31 December 2010 Vancouver, B.C. September 13, 2011 Contents Highlights and Actuarial Opinion... 1 Appendix

More information

METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF CHICAGO OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017 INCLUDING:

METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF CHICAGO OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017 INCLUDING: METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF CHICAGO OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017 INCLUDING: GASB 45 DISCLOSURES FOR THE PLAN/FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER

More information

City of Hollywood Post-Retirement Medical Actuarial Valuation As Required by GASB 45

City of Hollywood Post-Retirement Medical Actuarial Valuation As Required by GASB 45 Post-Retirement Medical Actuarial Valuation As Required by GASB 45 Fiscal Date: October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 Date of Report: February 25, 2015 Prepared By:

More information

City of St. Clair Shores Employees Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018

City of St. Clair Shores Employees Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018 City of St. Clair Shores Employees Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018 September 19, 2018 Board of Trustees City of St. Clair Shores

More information

A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E

A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D

More information

MERCER Human Resource Consulting

MERCER Human Resource Consulting December 2003 THE CONTRIBUTORY PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF McMASTER UNIVERSITY INCLUDING McMASTER DIVINITY COLLEGE for Funding Purposes as at July 1, 2003 MERCER Human Resource Consulting ~arrh

More information

Public Service Shared Risk Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as at January 1, 2016

Public Service Shared Risk Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as at January 1, 2016 Public Service Shared Risk Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as at January 1, 2016 Registration number: Canada Revenue Agency: #0305839 NB Superintendent of Pensions: #0305839 Report prepared July 2016 Table

More information

City of Marine City Retirement

City of Marine City Retirement City of Marine City Retirement Shelby Township System Fire and Police Retirement System JUNE 30, 2018 ACTUARIAL VALUATION December 31, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report Actuarial Certification 3 Executive

More information

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2018

St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2018 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp St. Paul Teachers Retirement

More information

November 28, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

November 28, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Public Employees Retirement

More information

Firemen s Retirement System of St. Louis. Annual Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2017

Firemen s Retirement System of St. Louis. Annual Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2017 Firemen s Retirement System of St. Louis Annual Table of Contents Section Page 1-4 Introduction A Actuarial Valuation Results and Asset Information 1-6 Summary of Actuarial Valuation Results 7-8 Fund Balance

More information

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION IS DETERMINED BY THIS VALUATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,

More information

Postemployment Health Insurance -- Sensitivity Tests Sensitivity Analysis RETIREE PREMIUM RATE DEVELOPMENT

Postemployment Health Insurance -- Sensitivity Tests Sensitivity Analysis RETIREE PREMIUM RATE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TYLER RETIREE HEALTH CARE PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section A B C D E F G Page Number -- 1-2 1 2 3-4 5 6 1 2 1 2 1-2 1-4 1 2 Cover Letter EXECUTIVE

More information

West Virginia Teachers Retirement System

West Virginia Teachers Retirement System West Virginia Teachers Retirement System Actuarial Valuation As of July 1, 2013 Prepared by: for the West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board January 2014 January 15, 2014 West Virginia Consolidated

More information

Housing Trust Fund Corporation GASB 45 Valuation for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011

Housing Trust Fund Corporation GASB 45 Valuation for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011 Housing Trust Fund Corporation GASB 45 Valuation for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011 399 Alexander Street Rochester, NY 14607 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 SECTION II LIABILITY

More information

CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM GASB STATEMENTS NO. 67 AND NO. 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS DECEMBER 31, 2015 August 29, 2016 Board of Trustees Dear Board Members:

More information

Kent County Retiree Health Care Plan Actuarial Valuation Report December 31, 2017

Kent County Retiree Health Care Plan Actuarial Valuation Report December 31, 2017 Kent County Retiree Health Care Plan Actuarial Valuation Report December 31, 2017 Table of Contents Section Page Number -- Cover Letter Executive Summary 1-2 Executive Summary A Valuation Results 1 2 3

More information

Prepared by: Questar III - BOCES

Prepared by: Questar III - BOCES Huntington Union Free School District Actuarial Valuation Postretirement Benefits (GASB 45) as of July 1, 2012 With Disclosures for the Year Ended June 30, 2013 Prepared by: Questar III - BOCES TABLE OF

More information

THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA RETIREMENT PENSION PLAN REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT JANUARY 1, 2014

THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA RETIREMENT PENSION PLAN REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT JANUARY 1, 2014 REPORT ON THE ACTUARIAL VALUATION FOR FUNDING PURPOSES AS AT JANUARY 1, 2014 JUNE 2014 Financial Services Commission of Ontario Registration Number: 0310839 Canada Revenue Agency Registration Number: 0310839

More information

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JULY 1, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 ACTUARIAL CERTIFICATION... 4 ACCOUNTING

More information

Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System (Including District Judges) GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions

Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System (Including District Judges) GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System (Including District Judges) GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017 October 18, 2017 Board of Trustees Arkansas

More information

HEALTH SUPER DB FUND REPORT TO THE TRUSTEE ON THE ACTUARIAL INVESTIGATION AS AT 30 JUNE 2016 STATEMENT OF ADVICE

HEALTH SUPER DB FUND REPORT TO THE TRUSTEE ON THE ACTUARIAL INVESTIGATION AS AT 30 JUNE 2016 STATEMENT OF ADVICE 19 August 2016 HEALTH SUPER DB FUND (A SUB-FUND OF THE FIRST STATE SUPERANNUATION SCHEME) STATEMENT OF ADVICE REPORT TO THE TRUSTEE ON THE ACTUARIAL INVESTIGATION AS AT 30 JUNE 2016 Contents 1. Key results

More information

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan The Town of Middletown Pension Plan GASB 67 and 68 Information For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 November 2018 Buck 420 Lexington Ave. Suite 2220 New York, NY 10170 November 2018 Mr. Marc W. Tanguay

More information

Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore

Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018 Produced by Cheiron October 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Letter of Transmittal... i Foreword...

More information

DUKES COUNTY POOLED OPEB TRUST OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION

DUKES COUNTY POOLED OPEB TRUST OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION DUKES COUNTY POOLED OPEB TRUST OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION July 1, 2012 Prepared by: Linda L. Bournival, FSA, EA, MAAA KMS Actuaries, LLC Fellow, Society of Actuaries Enrolled

More information

City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions December

City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions December City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions December 31, 2017 May 10, 2018 Board of Trustees City of Manchester

More information

Key Benefit Concepts, LLC

Key Benefit Concepts, LLC Key Benefit Concepts, LLC Accounting and Sample Funding Report of Liabilities for Participants Post Employment Benefits as of July 1, 2013 Thru End of the Year June 30, 2014 April 2014 This report, its

More information

Contents. 1. Summary of Results ($000) Introduction...3 Report on the Actuarial Valuation as at July 1,

Contents. 1. Summary of Results ($000) Introduction...3 Report on the Actuarial Valuation as at July 1, Contents 1. Summary of Results ($000)...1 2. Introduction...3 as at July 1, 2003...3 3. Financial Position of the Plan...6 Valuation Results Going-Concern Basis...6 Valuation Results Solvency Basis...7

More information