IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA"

Transcription

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 0TH JUDICIL CIRCUIT IN ND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORID CSE NO. -C-0 BNK OF MERIC, N.., sbm BC Home Loans Servicing LP, Plaintiff, vs. SSET CUISITIONS & HOLDINGS TRUST DTED MY 0, d/b/a sset cquisitions & Holdings, et al., Defendant. / TRNSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Before the Honorable Thomas Reese, Judge of Said Court, at a trial of the above-styled action held at the Lee County Justice Center, 00 Monroe Street, Fort Myers, Florida, at 0: a.m. on September, 0. Presidential Court, Suite 00, Fort Myers, FL (Main Office) 0 Hendry Street, Suite 0, Fort Myers, FL 0 (Downtown) Panther Lane, Naples, FL FX..

2 P P E R N C E S On Behalf of Plaintiff: TORREY C. TYLOR, ES. ldridge Pite, LLP S. Congress venue, Suite 00 Delray Beach, Florida - On Behalf of Defendant: MICHELE S. BELMONT, ES. Law Offices of Michele S. Belmont, P.. 0 College Parkway, Suite 0 Fort Myers, Florida - 0 I N D E X WITNESS: Cliff Dunnan DE CE RD RC

3 ssets cquisitions, -C-0. That brings us to U.S. Bank vs. MR. TYLOR: Good morning, Your Honor. Torrey Taylor on behalf of plaintiff. (Proceedings interrupted off the record.) MR. TYLOR: nd good morning, once again, Your Honor, Torrey Taylor on behalf of plaintiff. 0 That brings us to U.S. Trust versus sset cquisitions, -C-0. Okay. Good morning, Your Honor. Michele Belmont for ssets cquisitions & Holdings Trust. MR. TYLOR: ll right. Let's go ahead. Thank you, Your Honor. I don't believe we need any opening statements from either side, unless Ms. Belmont wants to make one. No, I'm fine without them. Thank you. MR. TYLOR: Thank you. nd, Your Honor, I believe we stipulated to 0 several of the documents being entered into evidence. Documents stipulated to are the original note, original mortgage, original loan modification or note modification, the payment history, demand letter, and escrow balance. objecting to a couple of the other documents, nd I believe Ms. Belmont is

4 assignment of mortgage and the power of attorney. MR. TYLOR: nd as plaintiff's first witness, we'll be calling Cliff Dunnan. That's correct. Go ahead, please. Thereupon: CLIFF DUNNN, having been first duly sworn, upon his oath testifies and says as follows: 0 DIRECT EXMINTION BY MR. TYLOR: Could you please state your name. Cliff Dunnan. With whom are you employed? Caliber Home Loans. nd how is Caliber Home Loans related to the plaintiff in this matter? Caliber is the servicer. nd is there a document that reflects Caliber's 0 relationship with the plaintiff in this matter? Yes, and that would be the power of attorney. Does Caliber maintain records regarding mortgage notes and other related loan items? Do they keep these records within their

5 ordinary, normal course of business? Yes, they do. Is it part of their regularly conducted business to keep such records? Do they maintain a system of records to input this information into? Is the information transmitted into that system 0 of record created at or near the time each event of record occurs? Is the information input into that system of record by a person who has knowledge of that event of record? Have you had a chance to review the loan -- the subject loan that we're here on today prior to trial? Yes, I have. 0 nd is the testimony you're giving and about to give based on your own personal knowledge of that review? You previously stated that there was a power of attorney that authorized Caliber to service this loan on behalf of the plaintiff; is that correct?

6 That is correct. I'm handing you a document. Do you recognize this document? Yes, this is the power of attorney. nd is this document part of Caliber's business records? Yes, it is. Does the testimony that you previously gave 0 regarding Caliber's business records also apply to this document? MR. TYLOR: Your Honor, plaintiff would move to have Exhibit entered into evidence, the power of attorney. I would object to this document, Your Honor. recorded, was not an original. power of attorney, and also the witness hasn't testified that it's true and accurate based on his 0 review of the original. The document that I was shown was not It's a photocopy of a I would like an opportunity to voir dire the witness. Go ahead, please. Thank you, Your Honor.

7 VOIR DIRE EXMINTION BY Good morning, Mr. Dunnan. Can you tell me have you had the opportunity to review the original power of attorney? Yes, I have. Where is that document kept? That is kept at Caliber, at our headquarters with the custodian. 0 Which is where? Our custodiam is in Missouri. In Missouri. When did you review the documents, the original power of attorney? I'm sorry, the copy of the original, not the original-original. I have not reviewed it. Okay. Yes, ma'am. Have you ever seen the original power of Let me try again. attorney that that is a photocopy of? 0 No. Okay. So I'm sorry. Is this the most current power of attorney, the one that you have sitting before you? What is the date on that power of attorney, please?

8 This one is dated ugust th, 0. Okay. Not that I have reviewed, no. If I were to review the court records for powers nd so there's not one for 0 or 0? of attorney between U.S. Bank & Trust and your servicing company, might I find one from 0? Possibly. Okay. So there might be a more current version than the one that you're holding; is that right? 0 Possibly, yes. Okay. If you haven't seen the original of that document, then can you be certain that that is a true and accurate copy of it? It's within Caliber's business records and we rely upon them. It is part of Caliber's business records. How did you review the photocopy that you're holding in your hand today? from? Where did that photocopy come It came from our internal imaging system. 0 Your computer system? Okay. nd so you looked it up and saw on the your computer screen and hit print and out it came? that where the copy came from? No. Is It's within the loan, a copy is within the

9 loan when they -- well, when a document is created, it's imaged within that particular loan. There's other ways I can obtain this document as well. That's not the only other way. But when you say "this document," you're referring to a photocopy of the original, not the original itself? Correct. I have not seen the original. Your Honor, I would move to 0 exclude the power of attorney based upon the fact that the witness is unable to testify that it is a true and accurate copy of the original because he's never seen the original. MR. TYLOR: Counsel? Your Honor, this is a -- the witness has already testified this is a business record of Caliber Home Loans, and within the business record exception, it's a document relied upon to conduct the servicing business of Caliber, and, 0 therefore, it should be admissible into evidence based on that. If the court would like further testimony, there's additional evidence within this document that shows that it is part of Caliber's business records as well.

10 0 In addition to that, while this is not a recorded copy or a copy of a recorded power of attorney, the powers of attorney are recorded within the -- within the official records of the various counties. The reason we don't have that today is because it's obviously a burden for a large servicer that services loans, you know, thousands of loans. would create quite a burden for the servicer to It 0 provide a certified copy or the original for each one of these loans and, therefore, should be admissible in evidence. Objection sustained. Thank you, Your Honor. BY MR. TYLOR: Regarding this document you have identified as a power of attorney, is this a document that was prepared by Caliber? 0 nd as you previously stated regarding records being input into Caliber's system of records, does it also apply to this document that the person that would have input this document into Caliber's records reviewed the original?

11 nd would they have reviewed the original versus the copy for accuracy? MR. TYLOR: Your Honor, plaintiff would move to have Exhibit entered in evidence, the limited power of attorney. Ms. Belmont? I would have further questions for the witness then, Your Honor. 0 Go ahead. Thank you. VOIR DIRE EXMINTION BY Who is the person that put that document into the business records of Caliber, please? That is not listed here. Okay. Then how would you know that that person reviewed the original if you don't even know who the person is? 0 MR. TYLOR: Object, Your Honor. The witness has already testified that it's Caliber's policy to review. Objection is overruled. Go ahead with your question. Thank you, Your Honor.

12 BY How would you know for certain as you sit here today that the person who put that document into the system for Caliber reviewed the original if you don't know who the person who did it is? I don't. questions, Your Honor. this. 0 Thank you. I have no other I continue my objection to Objection sustained. BY MR. TYLOR: Is it part of Caliber's policies to train each individual within Caliber regarding their duties at Caliber? s part of the duties of the persons required to image documents into Caliber's system, do they also receive training upon their duties as far as imaging documents goes? 0 Objection as to form. Sustained. BY MR. TYLOR: What is the imaging platform that Caliber uses? Carbon Copy. nd which person or persons are responsible for

13 inputting or for imaging documents into Carbon Copy? Various departments. Is each department that has the authority to image documents into Carbon Copy -- does each person within each of those departments receive training on how to use Carbon Copy? 0 Objection as to form. Sustained. BY MR. TYLOR: What is the training involved regarding imaging documents into Carbon Copy? instructor. systems on a projector, and we follow along, and there's also reading material that goes along with it. It's a classroom setting training. They go through it. There's an It's their web-based nd is it a requirement of Caliber that each person employed by Caliber that has access to the imaging system to receive that training? 0 Would the person that imaged this document into Caliber's system also have received that same training? Objection, Your Honor. The witness has already testified that he doesn't know who imaged it in, so how would he know what kind of

14 training? Objection sustained. MR. TYLOR: Well, Your Honor -- Power of attorney isn't coming in, Counsel. have anything further, let's move on. I've sustained the objection now. MR. TYLOR: 0 I agree. further. If you I'm sorry? Let's move on if you have anything Power of attorney is not coming in evidence based on what you've presented today. MR. TYLOR: Your Honor, my witness has testified that it was a document prepared -- made my ruling. dismissed. Counsel, don't argue with me. I Now move on; otherwise, your case is MR. TYLOR: Yes, Your Honor. May we take a brief recess, Your Honor? ( short recess was taken.) 0 Sure. I'm sorry for the interruption, but would it be all right if I ask to have opposing counsel brought in to finish the rest of the trial? Is he on the phone? Do you know? He was when I went out about ten minutes ago, yeah.

15 Well, let's see if he's ready to go forward. Thank you, Your Honor. (Proceedings interrupted off the record.) MR. TYLOR: Yes, sir. Yes, Your Honor. Your Honor, I believe where we left off, the witness was testifying as to what has been identified as the power of attorney. We have moved for it to be entered into 0 evidence. The court has sustained objections thus far regarding the admissibility of the document. just wanted to clarify where we were. I BY MR. TYLOR: Mr. -- as far as the power of attorney that you previously identified as power of attorney -- Objection, Your Honor. Now he's going to have him testify as to a document that's not allowed in evidence. 0 It's not in evidence. BY MR. TYLOR: Regarding the document in front of you that you have identified as the power of attorney, Mr. Dutton -- or Dunnan, excuse me, you previously stated that this was a document prepared by Caliber. preparing this document by Caliber? What was the purpose of

16 It's to -- well, to allow Caliber to service the loan from U.S. Bank. Is this a contract produced by Caliber? Objection, Your Honor. I'm going to object to the whole line of questioning. court has already stated that the power of attorney is not coming in as evidence. 0 MR. TYLOR: The Your Honor, I believe the court has stated that based on the testimony thus far for the power of attorney. Well, how much farther do you think you can go to try to resurrect this thing? some basic flaws at the outset, they're not going to get better if he continues to talk about a document that's not in evidence. MR. TYLOR: You know, Yes, I understand that, Your Honor, but I'm not asking him to testify as to anything actually within the document yet. him what the purpose of the document is. 0 not in evidence. MR. TYLOR: I'm just asking What's the relevance of that? It's Relevance of that, Your Honor, is because I believe the testimony will show that this is a contract between two parties. client is not a party to this contract, but there is Ms. Belmont's

17 case law showing that a document can be entered into evidence regardless of whether it meets the business records exception or not if it's a contract between the two parties. nd I apologize, I don't have the case law yet, but it's being sent to me as we speak. The problem I have, Your Honor, is this is a photocopy of perhaps a contract that the witness has never seen an original of, so he can't 0 sit here today and tell us that this is a true and accurate copy of the contract. He said so himself. Here we are. Without the power of attorney, Your Honor, I would ask that the court grant an involuntary dismissal. only reason that the witness is permitted to testify, and he hasn't yet shown that he has that authority. 0 MR. TYLOR: The power of attorney is the nd, Your Honor, plaintiff would obviously object to that. Regardless of whether or not the power of attorney is deemed admissible by the court into evidence today, the witness has previously testified during preliminary questioning that Caliber Home Loans is the servicer for the plaintiff for this particular loan, and that was testified to without

18 objection by opposing counsel. So the court already has evidence through the testimony that Caliber is the servicer for this loan, Your Honor. But the witness is relying on the document that he can't get in as evidence to show that he has the authority to testify and, therefore, I would move to strike the witness's testimony completely because he has no authority to testify on 0 behalf of the plaintiff, who was substituted in by counsel. as trustee of the LSF Master Participation Trust. The new plaintiff is U.S. Bank and Trust, The witness works for Caliber, not the plaintiff; therefore, the witness shouldn't be testifying today. It's a defect that easily could have been remedied had a different approach to trial preparation been taken, perhaps, but your motion is granted. 0 MR. TYLOR: Thank you, Your Honor. Your Honor, I apologize, but I haven't finished making my responses to Ms. Belmont's motion. MR. TYLOR: ll right. Go ahead. If I may at least get them on the

19 record, if nothing else, Your Honor. That's fine. Go ahead, put them on the record. MR. TYLOR: Your Honor, the other evidence that's already been stipulated to, for one, Your Honor, was the payment history, as well as the escrow breakdowns. document that there have been -- that there has been activity on behalf of Caliber Home Loans in servicing 0 The payment history shows within the this loan. Under the Paquero (phonetic) case, and I can get the reference for that if the court would like. Under the Paquero case, it shows that there's additional evidence that can be shown regarding entities and their involvement regarding a case, such as having standing or whether or not they're the servicer of a particular loan based on their other activity. nd the court in that case determined that, as a 0 basis for that reasoning and for that ruling was because banks and servicers don't typically make payments on behalf of a property that they have no interest in. join into. That's an assumption that I cannot I'm sorry, that -- I wish that were true,

20 0 but we know facts to be contrary to that, not in this particular case, but... Ms. Belmont? I'm renewing my motion for involuntary dismissal, Your Honor. MR. TYLOR: nd, Your Honor, regardless of the power of attorney for the witness to testify here today, the evidence that's already been admitted into the record and stipulated to shows thus far that the 0 original plaintiff in this matter has standing based on the original note and the loan modification that has been stipulated to into evidence. Then we also have the demand letter and the payment histories, which show the damages for this matter, Your Honor. Oh, I agree. I agree. It's just you missed that one first step to show how Caliber can be here pursuing this case on behalf of U.S. Bank. 0 MR. TYLOR: Your Honor, based on the court's ruling today, that limits the witness's testimony here; however, based on the evidence already in, we're here showing that the plaintiff, U.S. Bank Trust, N.., does have standing to pursue this action based on the evidence already here today and the

21 payment history already reflects the amounts due and owing within our proposed final judgment. already met those -- those requirements. So we've If you have a witness from U.S. Bank Trust, bring him in. MR. TYLOR: Well, Your Honor -That's the problem, you don't, because you have not proven up your power of attorney giving Caliber the authority to be in court today on 0 behalf of U.S. Bank. Motion is granted. MR. TYLOR: motion. Your Honor, may -Counsel, I have just granted the Thank you. MR. TYLOR: Have a good day. Thank you, Your Honor. May I please just make -- for the record, may I make my statements regarding the cases that were being cited? They have just been sent to me. Do you need more time to do your 0 research to be prepared? give you an unlimited amount of time just to try to come up with case citations that you say. Counsel, I'm not going to You don't have any cases here for the court, case citations that you say support your position. I'm sorry, you're not ready today, and as such I'm

22 granting the motion for dismissal. MR. TYLOR: nd, Your Honor, as a last request then, I would just request that plaintiff be given five days to file a written response to the motion for involuntarily dismissal. No, no, I'm not -- no, not going to do that. You come to trial. You have got to be prepared. problem is you're missing one step here in going If you're not prepared -- and the only 0 forward, and without that step, it's not going anywhere, not that it couldn't had that step been accomplished in a timely manner. MR. TYLOR: the -- MR. TYLOR: nd, Your Honor, may I ask what No. I certainly don't mean disrespect to the court. No, no, no, no, you're not going to get me into a discussion so that you can pick it 0 apart later on and take it to the Court of ppeals and say, "Look, see, he made the decision for the wrong reason." No. I have dismissed the case. Have a good day, sir. MR. TYLOR: It is over. Thank you, Your Honor.

23 THE CLERK: for the record. MR. TYLOR: MR. TYLOR: Thank you, Your Honor. Mr. Taylor, I need those exhibits Yeah, exactly. They're not admitted. Then, Your Honor, may I also, as a proposed exhibit, submit the copy of the recorded assignment of mortgage? 0 MR. TYLOR: It's not admitted. Yeah, sure. nd I just want the record to reflect that the case was dismissed prior to plaintiff being able to -- No, Counsel, you cannot. You cannot build an issue for appeal that would be meritorious on something you have not presented up to this point. Now, please, pick your stuff up and withdraw from the court, sir. MR. TYLOR: Yes, sir. Thank you. 0 (Whereupon, the proceedings concluded at Have a good day. 0: p.m.)

24 CERTIFICTE STTE OF FLORID ) COUNTY OF LEE ) I, SUSN J. SIMONETTI, FPR, do hereby certify that the foregoing proceedings were taken by me at the time and place as stated in the caption hereto at Page hereof; that the foregoing computer-aided transcription, consisting of pages numbered through, inclusive, is a 0 true record of my stenographic notes taken at said proceedings. I further certify that I am neither of counsel nor solicitor to any of the parties involved nor interested in the event of the cause. Dated this rd day of September, 0, in the City of Fort Myers, County of Lee, State of Florida. Susan J. Simonetti, FPR 0 Court Reporter

25 [] - :, : 00 [] - : 0 [] - : 0: [] - : 0: [] - : [] - : -C-0 [] - :, :, : [] - : 00 [] - : 0 [] - : [] - :, : 00 [] - : 0 [] - : 0 [] - : 0 [] - :, : 0 [] - :, :, : 0 [] - : 0TH [] - : [] - : [] - :..00 [] :.. [] : rd [] - : [] - : - [] - : 0 [] - : [] - : - [] - :0 0 [] - : [] - : th [] - : [] - : 0 [] - : a.m [] - : able [] - : above-styled [] : access [] - : accomplished [] : accuracy [] - : accurate [] - :, :, :, : CUISITIONS [] : cquisitions [] - :, :, :, : action [] - :, 0: activity [] - :, : addition [] - 0: additional [] - :, : admissibility [] : admissible [] - :0, 0:, : admitted [] - 0:, :, : ago [] - : agree [] - :, 0: ahead [] - :, :, :, :0, :, :, : aided [] - : al [] - : ldridge [] - : allow [] - : allowed [] - : MERIC [] - : amount [] - : amounts [] - : ND [] - : apart [] - :0 apologize [] - :, : appeal [] - : ppeals [] - :0 apply [] - :, 0: approach [] - : argue [] - : SSET [] - : sset [] - :, : ssets [] - :, : assignment [] - :, : assumption [] : attorney [0] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, 0:, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, 0:, : ugust [] - : authority [] - :, :, :, :, : authorized [] - : venue [] - : B BC [] - : balance [] - : BNK [] - : Bank [] - :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, :, :0 banks [] - : based [] - :, :, :0, :, :, :0, :, :, 0:0, 0:0, 0:, 0: basic [] - : basis [] - :0 Beach [] - : behalf [] - :, :, :, :0, :, :, 0:, :0 Behalf [] - :, : BELMONT [] - :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, 0:, : Belmont [] - :, :, :, :, :, 0: Belmont's [] - :, : better [] - : between [] - :, :, : breakdowns [] - : brief [] - : bring [] - : brings [] - :, : brought [] - : build [] - : burden [] - 0:, 0: business [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : but.. [] - 0: BY [0] - :, :, 0:, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :0 C Caliber [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, : Caliber's [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, :, :, :, : cannot [] - :, : caption [] - : Carbon [] - :, :, :, :, : CSE [] - : case [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, :, :, :, : cases [] - :, : CE [] - : Center [] - : certain [] - :, : certainly [] - : CERTIFICTE [] : certified [] - 0:0 certify [] - :, : chance [] - : CIRCUIT [] - : citations [] - :, : cited [] - : City [] - : clarify [] - : classroom [] - : CLERK [] - : client [] - : Cliff [] - :, :, : CLIFF [] - : College [] - : coming [] - :, :, : company [] - : completely [] - : computer [] - :0, :, : computer-aided [] : concluded [] - :0 conduct [] - : conducted [] - : Congress [] - : consisting [] - : continue [] - : continues [] - : contract [] - :, :, :, :, :, : contrary [] - 0: Copy [] - :, :, :, :, : copy [] - :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:0, :, :, : correct [] - :, :, :, : Counsel [] - :, : counsel [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, : counties [] - 0: COUNTY [] - :, : County [] - :, : couple [] - : course [] - : COURT [] - :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :0, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :,

26 :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : court [] - :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0 Court [] - :, :, :0 court's [] - 0:0 create [] - 0: created [] - :0, : current [] - :, : custodiam [] - : custodian [] - : D d/b/a [] - : damages [] - 0: date [] - : Dated [] - : DTED [] - : dated [] - : days [] - : DE [] - : decision [] - : deemed [] - : defect [] - : Defendant [] - :, : Delray [] - : demand [] - :, 0: department [] - : departments [] :, : determined [] - : different [] - : dire [] - : DIRE [] - :, : DIRECT [] - :0 discussion [] - : dismissal [] - :, 0:, :, : dismissed [] - :, :, : disrespect [] - : document [] - :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, 0:, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : documents [] - :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : Downtown [] - : due [] - : duly [] - : Dunnan [] - :, :, :, :, : DUNNN [] - : during [] - : duties [] - :, :, : Dutton [] - : E easily [] - : either [] - : employed [] - :, : entered [] - :0, :, :, :, : entities [] - : escrow [] - :, : ES [] - :, : et [] - : event [] - :0, :, : evidence [] - :0, :, :0, :, 0:, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, 0:, 0: exactly [] - : EXMINTION [] :0, :, : exception [] - :, : exclude [] - :0 excuse [] - : Exhibit [] - :, : exhibit [] - : exhibits [] - : F fact [] - :0 facts [] - 0: far [] - :, :, :, :, 0: FX [] - : file [] - : final [] - : fine [] - :, : finish [] - : finished [] - : first [] - :, :, 0: five [] - : FL [] - :, :, : flaws [] - : FLORID [] - :, : Florida [] - :, :, :0, : follow [] - : follows [] - : FOR [] - : foregoing [] - :, : form [] - :0, : Fort [] - :, :, :, :0, : forward [] - :, :0 FPR [] - :, : front [] - : G given [] - : grant [] - : granted [] - :, :, : granting [] - : H hand [] - : handing [] - : headquarters [] - : held [] - : Hendry [] - : hereby [] - : hereof [] - : hereto [] - : himself [] - : histories [] - 0: history [] - :, :, :, : hit [] - : holding [] - :, : HOLDINGS [] - : Holdings [] - :, : Home [] - :, :, :, :, :, : Honor [0] - :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, 0:, 0:0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : Honorable [] - : I identified [] - 0:, :, :, : image [] - :, : imaged [] - :, :, : imaging [] - :, :, :, :, :, : IN [] - : INC [] - :0 inclusive [] - : individual [] - : information [] - :, :, : input [] - :, :, 0:, 0: inputting [] - : instructor [] - : interest [] - : interested [] - : internal [] - : interrupted [] - :, : interruption [] :0 involuntarily [] - : involuntary [] :, 0: involved [] - :, : involvement [] : issue [] - : items [] - : itself [] - : J join [] - : Judge [] - : judgment [] - : JUDICIL [] - : Justice [] - : K keep [] - :, : kept [] - :, : kind [] - : knowledge [] - :, : L Lane [] - : large [] - 0: last [] - : law [] - :, : Law [] - : least [] - : LEE [] - :, : Lee [] - :, : left [] - : letter [] - :, 0: limited [] - : limits [] - 0: line [] - : listed [] - : LLP [] - : loan [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, 0: Loans [] - :, :, :, :, :, : loans [] - 0:, 0: Look [] - : looked [] - : LP [] - : LSF [] - : M ma'am [] - : Main [] - : maintain [] - :, : manner [] - : Master [] - : material [] - : matter [] - :, :0,

27 0:0, 0: MY [] - : mean [] - : meets [] - : MERIT [] - :0 meritorious [] : met [] - : MICHELE [] - : Michele [] - :, :0 might [] - :, : minutes [] - : missed [] - 0: missing [] - : Missouri [] - :, : modification [] :, :, 0: Monroe [] - : morning [] - :, :, :0, : mortgage [] - :, :, :, : most [] - : motion [] - :, :, 0:, :, :, :, : move [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, : moved [] - : MR [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :0, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, : MS [] - :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, 0:, : Myers [] - :, :, :, :0, : N N. [] - :, 0: name [] - : Naples [] - : near [] - :0 need [] - :, :, : never [] - :, : new [] - : NO [] - : normal [] - : note [] - :, :, 0: notes [] - :, :0 nothing [] - : numbered [] - : O oath [] - : object [] - :, :0, :, : objecting [] - : objection [] - 0:, :, :, :0, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, : objections [] - :0 obtain [] - : obviously [] - 0:, : occurs [] - : OF [] - :, :, :, :, : Office [] - : Offices [] - : official [] - 0: once [] - : one [0] - :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:0, :, 0:, : opening [] - : opportunity [] - :, : opposing [] - :, : ordinary [] - : original [] - :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:0, 0:, :, :, :, :, 0:0, 0: original-original [] : otherwise [] - : outset [] - : overruled [] - : owing [] - : own [] - : P P. [] - : p.m [] - : Page [] - : pages [] - : Panther [] - : Paquero [] - :, : Parkway [] - : part [] - :, :, :, :, :, : Participation [] : particular [] - :, :, :, 0: parties [] - :, :, : party [] - : payment [] - :, :, :, 0:, : payments [] - : perhaps [] - :, : permitted [] - : person [] - :, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : personal [] - : persons [] - :, : phone [] - : phonetic [] - : photocopy [] - :, :, :, :, :, : pick [] - :, : Pite [] - : place [] - : Plaintiff [] - :, : plaintiff [] - :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, 0:0, 0:, :, : plaintiff's [] - : platform [] - : point [] - : policies [] - : policy [] - : position [] - : possibly [] - :, :0 Power [] - : power [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, 0:, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :0, 0:, : powers [] - :, 0: preliminary [] - : preparation [] : prepared [] - 0:, :, :, :0, : preparing [] - : presented [] - :0, : Presidential [] - : previously [] - :, :, 0:0, :, :, : print [] - : problem [] - :, :, : proceedings [] - :, :, :0, :, : PROCEEDINGS [] : produced [] - : projector [] - : property [] - : proposed [] - :, : proven [] - : provide [] - 0:0 purpose [] - :, : pursue [] - 0: pursuing [] - 0: put [] - :, :, : questioning [] - :, : questions [] - :, : quite [] - 0: R RC [] - : RD [] - : reading [] - : ready [] - :, : reason [] - 0:, :, : reasoning [] - :0 receive [] - :, :, : received [] - : recess [] - :, : recognize [] - : record [] - :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :0, :0 recorded [] - :, 0:, 0:, : records [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:0, 0:, 0:, :, : Reese [] - : reference [] - : referring [] - : reflect [] - : reflects [] - :, : regarding [] - :, :, 0:, 0:0, :, :, :, :, :, :, : regardless [] - :, :0, 0: regularly [] - : related [] - :, : relationship [] - :0 relevance [] - :0, : relied [] - : rely [] - : relying [] - : remedied [] - : renewing [] - 0: Reporter [] - :0 REPORTING [] - :0 request [] - :, : required [] - : requirement [] -

28 : requirements [] : research [] - :0 response [] - : responses [] - : responsible [] : rest [] - : resurrect [] - : review [] - :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, : reviewed [] - :, :, 0:, :, :, : ruling [] - :, :0, 0: S saw [] - : sbm [] - : screen [] - : see [] - :, : sent [] - :, : September [] - :, : service [] - :, : servicer [] - :, 0:, 0:, :, :, : servicers [] - : services [] - 0: Servicing [] - : servicing [] - :, :, : setting [] - : several [] - :0 short [] - : show [] - :, :, 0:, 0: showing [] - :, 0: shown [] - :, :, : shows [] - :, :, :, 0: side [] - : Simonetti [] - : SIMONETTI [] - : sit [] - :, :0 sitting [] - : solicitor [] - : sorry [] - :, :, :, :0, :, : standing [] - :, 0:0, 0: state [] - : STTE [] - : State [] - : statements [] - :, : stenographic [] :0 step [] - 0:, :, :0, : stipulated [] - :, :, :, 0:, 0: Street [] - :, : strike [] - : stuff [] - : styled [] - : subject [] - : submit [] - : substituted [] - :0 Suite [] - :, :, :, : support [] - : Susan [] - : SUSN [] - : sustained [] - 0:, :0, :, :, :0 Sustained [] - :, : sworn [] - : system [0] - :, :, :, :, :0, 0:, :, :, :, : systems [] - : T TYLOR [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :0, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, : Taylor [] - :, :, : ten [] - : testified [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, : testifies [] - : testify [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, 0: testifying [] - :, : testimony [] - :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0: THE [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :0, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, : therefore [] - :0, 0:, :, : Thereupon [] - : Thomas [] - : thousands [] - 0: timely [] - : today [] - :, :, 0:, :, :0, :0, :, :, 0:, 0:, 0:, :, : Torrey [] - :, : TORREY [] - : train [] - : training [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, : TRNSCRIPT [] : transcription [] : transmitted [] - : trial [] - :, :, :, :, : true [] - :, :, :, :0, :, :0 TRUST [] - : Trust [] - :, :, :, :, :, 0:, : trustee [] - : try [] - :, :, : two [] - :, : typically [] - : U U.S [] - :, :, :, :, :, 0:, 0:, :, :0 unable [] - : under [] - :, : unless [] - : unlimited [] - : up [] - :, :, :, :, : uses [] - : V various [] - 0:, : version [] - : versus [] - :, : voir [] - : VOIR [] - :, : vs [] - :, : W wants [] - : ways [] - : web [] - : web-based [] - : whole [] - : wish [] - : withdraw [] - : witness [] - :, :, :, :, :, :, :0, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, :, 0:, : WITNESS [] - : witness's [] - :, 0: works [] - : written [] - :

WIL S. WILCOX, OFFICIAL FEDERAL REPORTER

WIL S. WILCOX, OFFICIAL FEDERAL REPORTER 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 WESTERN DIVISION 4 THE HON. GEORGE H. WU, JUDGE PRESIDING 5 6 Margaret Carswell, ) ) 7 Plaintiff, ) ) 8 vs. ) No. CV-10-05152-GW ) 9

More information

UNITED STATES * 4:17-MC-1557 * Houston, Texas VS. * * 10:33 a.m. JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE * September 13, 2017

UNITED STATES * 4:17-MC-1557 * Houston, Texas VS. * * 10:33 a.m. JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE * September 13, 2017 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES * :-MC- * Houston, Texas VS. * * 0: a.m. JOHN PARKS TROWBRIDGE * September, 0 APPEARANCES: MISCELLANEOUS HEARING

More information

VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MEETING OF MAY 31, 2017

VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MEETING OF MAY 31, 2017 VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MEETING OF MAY, 0 AGENDA 0 STEPHEN P. CLARK CENTER COMMISSION CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM, ND FLOOR NW st Street Miami, Florida Wednesday May, 0 0:00 A.M.

More information

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * Timberline Four Seasons * WS-C * * * * * * * * *

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * Timberline Four Seasons * WS-C * * * * * * * * * PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * Robert And Janet Deal v. * Timberline Four Seasons * -0-WS-C Utilities, Inc. * * * * * * * * * * David And Jan Rosenau v. * Timberline

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. 13-CA TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. 13-CA TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIL CIRCUIT IN ND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORID CIVIL CTION JPMORGN CHSE BNK, NTIONL SSOCITION, et al, Plaintiff, vs. CSE NO. -C-0 PELER, BONNIE S., et al., Defendants.

More information

The False Lawsuit Claim That Our Refunds Were Made In Error

The False Lawsuit Claim That Our Refunds Were Made In Error The False Lawsuit Claim That Our Refunds Were Made In Error In the complaint in 2006 by which the bogus lawsuit was launched asking Judge Nancy Edmunds to order my wife, Doreen, and I to testify at the

More information

Excerpts From Kara Andrews Deposition Transcript February 24, 2017

Excerpts From Kara Andrews Deposition Transcript February 24, 2017 Case 6:-cv-048-CEM-KRS Document 1-73 Filed 11/30/ Page 1 of 8 PageID 87 Excerpts From Kara Deposition Transcript February, Case 6:-cv-048-CEM-KRS Document 1-73 Filed 11/30/ Page 2 of 8 PageID 88 Case 6:-cv-048-CEM-KRS

More information

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 2 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 2 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 2 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 4 CASE NO: 50 2008CA 020182XXXXMB Division: AW 5 HSBC BANK, USA, AS TRUSTEE

More information

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * *

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * * PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * KENTUCKY FUEL CORPORATION * --COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * * * HEARING TRANSCRIPT * * * * * * * * * BEFORE: MICHAEL A. ALBERT, Chairman

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Docket Nos. CA CA (RJL) : : : : : : : : : : LARRY E. KLAYMAN, ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Docket Nos. CA CA (RJL) : : : : : : : : : : LARRY E. KLAYMAN, ET AL. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY E. KLAYMAN, ET AL. v. Plaintiffs, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL. Defendants................. Docket Nos. CA- CA- (RJL) October, 0 p.m. TRANSCRIPT

More information

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record Chapter 3 Preparing the Record After filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant next needs to specify what items are to be in the record (the official account of what went on at the hearing or the trial

More information

CLERK OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 111 NW 1 Street, Commission Chambers Miami-Dade County, Florida Thursday, April 28, 3:30 p.m.

CLERK OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 111 NW 1 Street, Commission Chambers Miami-Dade County, Florida Thursday, April 28, 3:30 p.m. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NW Street, Commission Chambers Miami-Dade County, Florida Thursday, April, 0 @ :0 p.m. VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD MEETING 0 BOARD MEMBERS (Present) Commissioner Jose

More information

ESCRIBERS, LLC 700 West 192nd Street, Suite #607 New York, NY 10040

ESCRIBERS, LLC 700 West 192nd Street, Suite #607 New York, NY 10040 0 KNOX COUNTY, ss. CIVIL ACTION EDWARD HARSHMAN, Plaintiff, VS. SHEILA HARSHMAN, Defendant. STATE OF MAINE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT NO. VI DOCKET NO. ROCDC-FM-0-0 APPEAL NO. KNO--0 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

More information

Defendant(s). / DEPOSITION OF TINA BADO. Monday, April 5, :25 p.m. - 2:50 p.m.

Defendant(s). / DEPOSITION OF TINA BADO. Monday, April 5, :25 p.m. - 2:50 p.m. Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50-2008-CA-034979-XXXX-MB-AW BANKUNITED, FSB, Plaintiff, vs. IOSIF OSTROVSKY, a married man, if living

More information

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313)

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313) EXHIBIT 3 Trial transcript excerpt in which US attorney and prosecutor Melissa Siskind and presiding Judge Victoria Roberts misrepresent the content of 26 U.S.C. 6020(b) in open court during the trial

More information

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * BLUESTONE INDUSTRIES, INC. * COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * *

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * BLUESTONE INDUSTRIES, INC. * COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * * PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON * * * * * * * * * BLUESTONE INDUSTRIES, INC. * --COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * * CHESTNUT LAND HOLDINGS, LLC * --COAL-SC-GI * * * * * * * * * KENTUCKY

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI Honorable Rex M. Burlison, Judge. ) Cause No CR00642

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI Honorable Rex M. Burlison, Judge. ) Cause No CR00642 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI Honorable Rex M. Burlison, Judge STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ERIC GREITENS, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Cause No. -CR00 ) TRANSCRIPT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 30 2016 11:18:49 2015-CA-01772 Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BROOKS V. MONAGHAN VERSUS ROBERT AUTRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-01772 APPELLEE APPEAL

More information

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. V. Robert Tepper SC

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. V. Robert Tepper SC The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL ) TRUST COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) RENE CUENCA, ) ) Defendant. ) / CASE NO.:

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/05/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/05/2016 EXHIBIT J

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/05/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/05/2016 EXHIBIT J FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/05/2016 04:50 PM INDEX NO. 652528/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/05/2016 EXHIBIT J Page 1 1 2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 COUNTY OF NEW YORK 4

More information

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313)

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313) EXHIBIT 14 First, a trial transcript excerpt in which Robert Metcalfe admits that the Examination Report he presented as evidence supporting his Complaint in United States v. Peter and Doreen Hendrickson,

More information

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313)

JANICE COLEMAN, CSR 1095, RPR OFFICIAL FEDERAL COURT REPORTER (313) EXHIBIT 11 Trial transcript excerpt in which prosecutor Melissa Siskind misrepresents the content of 26 U.S.C. 6020(b) in open court during the second trial of Doreen Hendrickson. This is followed by the

More information

The Courts Are Closed

The Courts Are Closed The Courts Are Closed 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MR. SCHULZ: We expected for the next line and final line of inquiry that MR. Becraft would be here but he needed to leave to take MR. Benson to the airport. Let me just

More information

THE NEXT CASE ON THE COURT CALENDAR IS FLORIDA BAR V.BEHM. [INAUDIBLE] >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> GOOD MORNING. FIRST, MAY I PLEASE THE COURT, I WOULD

THE NEXT CASE ON THE COURT CALENDAR IS FLORIDA BAR V.BEHM. [INAUDIBLE] >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> GOOD MORNING. FIRST, MAY I PLEASE THE COURT, I WOULD THE NEXT CASE ON THE COURT CALENDAR IS FLORIDA BAR V.BEHM. [INAUDIBLE] >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> GOOD MORNING. FIRST, MAY I PLEASE THE COURT, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR AFFORDING ME THE PRIVILEGE OF APPEARING

More information

Case 2:09-cv DCB-JMR Document Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 16. which you s.eem to be maybe saying? I m sorry.

Case 2:09-cv DCB-JMR Document Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 16. which you s.eem to be maybe saying? I m sorry. Case 2:0-cv-0012-DCB-JMR Document -1 Filed 02/2/ Page 1 of 1 : \ 1 2 3 which you s.eem to be maybe saying? I m sorry. Were you going MR. HEMBREE: I'm trying to understand what you're saying. THE WITNESS:

More information

Real Estate Private Equity Case Study 3 Opportunistic Pre-Sold Apartment Development: Waterfall Returns Schedule, Part 1: Tier 1 IRRs and Cash Flows

Real Estate Private Equity Case Study 3 Opportunistic Pre-Sold Apartment Development: Waterfall Returns Schedule, Part 1: Tier 1 IRRs and Cash Flows Real Estate Private Equity Case Study 3 Opportunistic Pre-Sold Apartment Development: Waterfall Returns Schedule, Part 1: Tier 1 IRRs and Cash Flows Welcome to the next lesson in this Real Estate Private

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRADY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRADY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA Page 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRADY COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA ROGER W. HURLBERT d/b/a, ) SAGE INFORMATION SERVICES and ) ROGER W. HURLBERT, ) Individually, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- BARI FIRESTONE, ) GRADY

More information

>>> THE NEXT CASE IS MORALES VERSUS ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONORS. MY NAME IS TRACY GUN.

>>> THE NEXT CASE IS MORALES VERSUS ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONORS. MY NAME IS TRACY GUN. >>> THE NEXT CASE IS MORALES VERSUS ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONORS. MY NAME IS TRACY GUN. I REPRESENT THE APPELLANTS IN THIS CASE AND I HAVE RESERVED FIVE

More information

NORMAN HICKS - October 4, 2011 Cross-Examination by Mr. Barrow

NORMAN HICKS - October 4, 2011 Cross-Examination by Mr. Barrow NORMAN HICKS - October 4, 2011 Cross-Examination by Mr. Barrow 91 1 A. Not that I know of, no, sir. 2 Q. And I believe you testified that you could have 3 collected that charcoal lighter fluid and taken

More information

mg Doc Filed 05/10/18 Entered 05/17/18 11:47:19 Main Document Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

mg Doc Filed 05/10/18 Entered 05/17/18 11:47:19 Main Document Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 09-50026-mg IN RE:. Chapter 11. MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY,. (Jointly administered) et al., f/k/a GENERAL. MOTORS CORP.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. --o0o--

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. --o0o-- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA --o0o-- BERENICE THOREAU DE LA SALLE, ) Case No. :0-cv-00-MCE-KJM ) Plaintiff, ) Sacramento, California ) Wednesday, February, vs. ) :0 A.M.

More information

Valuation Public Comps and Precedent Transactions: Historical Metrics and Multiples for Public Comps

Valuation Public Comps and Precedent Transactions: Historical Metrics and Multiples for Public Comps Valuation Public Comps and Precedent Transactions: Historical Metrics and Multiples for Public Comps Welcome to our next lesson in this set of tutorials on comparable public companies and precedent transactions.

More information

Scenic Video Transcript Dividends, Closing Entries, and Record-Keeping and Reporting Map Topics. Entries: o Dividends entries- Declaring and paying

Scenic Video Transcript Dividends, Closing Entries, and Record-Keeping and Reporting Map Topics. Entries: o Dividends entries- Declaring and paying Income Statements» What s Behind?» Statements of Changes in Owners Equity» Scenic Video www.navigatingaccounting.com/video/scenic-dividends-closing-entries-and-record-keeping-and-reporting-map Scenic Video

More information

Case No. SCSL T THE PROSECUTOR OF THE SPECIAL COURT V. CHARLES GHANKAY TAYLOR FRIDAY, 27 FEBRUARY A.M. TRIAL TRIAL CHAMBER II

Case No. SCSL T THE PROSECUTOR OF THE SPECIAL COURT V. CHARLES GHANKAY TAYLOR FRIDAY, 27 FEBRUARY A.M. TRIAL TRIAL CHAMBER II Case No. SCSL-00-0-T THE PROSECUTOR OF THE SPECIAL COURT V. CHARLES GHANKAY TAYLOR FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 00.0 A.M. TRIAL TRIAL CHAMBER II Before the Judges: Justice Richard Lussick, Presiding Justice Teresa

More information

PRESIDING JUDGE FREMR: [9:32:20] Good morning, everybody. The situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in the case of The Prosecutor

PRESIDING JUDGE FREMR: [9:32:20] Good morning, everybody. The situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in the case of The Prosecutor ICC-0/0-0/0-T-0-Red-ENG CT WT 0--0 /0 SZ T Trial Hearing (Open Session) ICC-0/0-0/0 0 0 International Criminal Court Trial Chamber VI Situation: Democratic Republic of the Congo In the case of The Prosecutor

More information

Transcript - The Money Drill: Where and How to Invest for Your Biggest Goals in Life

Transcript - The Money Drill: Where and How to Invest for Your Biggest Goals in Life Transcript - The Money Drill: Where and How to Invest for Your Biggest Goals in Life J.J.: Hi, this is "The Money Drill," and I'm J.J. Montanaro. With the help of some great guest, I'll help you find your

More information

Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: File No: Registry: Vancouver. In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION)

Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: File No: Registry: Vancouver. In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION) Citation: Mercier v. Trans-Globe Date: 20020307 File No: 2001-67384 Registry: Vancouver In the Provincial Court of British Columbia (CIVIL DIVISION) BETWEEN: MARY MERCIER CLAIMANT AND: TRANS-GLOBE TRAVEL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NUMBER 09-CV KMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NUMBER 09-CV KMW 0 TRILOGY PROPERTIES, LLC, et al. vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NUMBER 0-CV-0-KMW Plaintiffs SB HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al. Defendants MOTION HEARING

More information

smb Doc Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 12:57:22 Exhibit 39 Pg 1 of 22 EXHIBIT 39

smb Doc Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 12:57:22 Exhibit 39 Pg 1 of 22 EXHIBIT 39 Pg 1 of 22 EXHIBIT 39 Pg 2 of 22 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 1 ---------------------------------x In Re: BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Debtor. ---------------------------------x

More information

PRESENTED BY: Naliko Markel Chapter 13 Trustee. FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT:

PRESENTED BY: Naliko Markel Chapter 13 Trustee. FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT: CHAPTER 13 THE THIRTEEN (13) MOST COMMON QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS PRESENTED BY: Naliko Markel Chapter 13 Trustee FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT: www.eugene13.com 1. I have something called a

More information

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212)

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------x 3 BEACON ASSOCIATES LLC I, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, 5 v. 14 Civ. 2294 AJP 6 BEACON ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT CORP.,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009 CA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009 CA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009 CA 005717 Page 201 JPMORGAN Chase BANK, N.A. as Successor in Interest to Washington Mutual BANK, VS Plaintiff,

More information

The Florida Bar v. Alan Ira Karten

The Florida Bar v. Alan Ira Karten The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

Level 3 Communications, LLC v. E. Leon Jacobs, Jr.

Level 3 Communications, LLC v. E. Leon Jacobs, Jr. The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

Small Claims Court Guide #7

Small Claims Court Guide #7 Getting Results Small Claims Court Guide #7 Some people think that when the trial is over and the judge's decision is made, the winner will be paid and that's the end of the case. Unfortunately, for some

More information

QUINLAN: Hughlene, let's start with a baseline question, why is accounting for income taxes so important?

QUINLAN: Hughlene, let's start with a baseline question, why is accounting for income taxes so important? September 2015 Segment 4 TRANSCRIPT 1. Challenges Related to Accounting for Income Taxes SURRAN: For many accountants, accounting for income taxes remains one of the most difficult subjects within the

More information

smb Doc Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 12:57:22 Exhibit 37 Pg 1 of 23 EXHIBIT 37

smb Doc Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 12:57:22 Exhibit 37 Pg 1 of 23 EXHIBIT 37 Pg 1 of 23 EXHIBIT 37 Pg 2 of 23 Pg 3 of 23 PE: Reichmuth Matterhorn was invested in two funds which were managed by Ezra Merkin. TRANSLATOR: Reichmuth Matterhorn had invested in two funds that were managed

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case Number ) v. ) :-cv--kmm ) Samsung Electronics CO., ) LTD., et al., ) ) Defendants.

More information

CPA Australia Podcast Transcript - Episode 36

CPA Australia Podcast Transcript - Episode 36 CPA Australia Podcast Transcript - Episode 36 Intro: Hello and welcome to the CPA Australia Podcast, your source for business, leadership, and public practise accounting information. Welcome to the CPA

More information

Interview With IRA Expert Ed Slott

Interview With IRA Expert Ed Slott Interview With IRA Expert Ed Slott By Robert Brokamp September 2, 2010 Motley Fool s Rule Your Retirement Certified public accountant Ed Slott, the author of five books, is considered one of America's

More information

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR 2 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO: 08-16913 CA 03 4 EMBRAER FINANCE LTD., 5 Plaintiff, 6 vs. 7 SERVICIOS AEREOS PROFESIONALES, S.A.,

More information

INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF WESTHAMPTON DUNES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. September 9, :00 a.m. Meeting held at

INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF WESTHAMPTON DUNES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. September 9, :00 a.m. Meeting held at INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF WESTHAMPTON DUNES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS September, 0 0:00 a.m. Meeting held at 0 Dune Road, Westhampton Dunes, New York 0 Application Ray Weber; SCTM#00-0-0-0; Dune Road West

More information

STRAUSS PAINTING, INC., Appellant-Respondent, MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant.

STRAUSS PAINTING, INC., Appellant-Respondent, MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- STRAUSS PAINTING, INC., Appellant-Respondent, -against- MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant. No. -------------------------------------

More information

>>>THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE FLORIDA BAR V. JOSE CARLOS MARRERO. COUNSEL? >> GOOD AFTERNOON, YOUR HONORS. IF IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS

>>>THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE FLORIDA BAR V. JOSE CARLOS MARRERO. COUNSEL? >> GOOD AFTERNOON, YOUR HONORS. IF IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS >>>THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE FLORIDA BAR V. JOSE CARLOS MARRERO. COUNSEL? >> GOOD AFTERNOON, YOUR HONORS. IF IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS JENNIFER FALCONE, I'M REPRESENTING THE FLORIDA BAR

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION 447, : on Behalf of Itself and All : Other Similarly Situated : Shareholders of inventiv : Health, Inc., : : Plaintiff, : : vs.

More information

COUNTY OF HUNTERDON NOTICE OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION Monday, November 4, :00 to 4:30

COUNTY OF HUNTERDON NOTICE OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION Monday, November 4, :00 to 4:30 COUNTY OF HUNTERDON NOTICE OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION Monday, November, 0 :00 to :0 IN RE: MARGARET PASQUA COUNTY TREASURER OF THE COUNTY OF HUNTERDON and KIMBERLY BROWNE, COUNTY DEPARTMENT HEAD, DEPARTMENT

More information

IB Interview Guide: Case Study Exercises Three-Statement Modeling Case (30 Minutes)

IB Interview Guide: Case Study Exercises Three-Statement Modeling Case (30 Minutes) IB Interview Guide: Case Study Exercises Three-Statement Modeling Case (30 Minutes) Hello, and welcome to our first sample case study. This is a three-statement modeling case study and we're using this

More information

Case JHW Doc 26 Filed 11/22/10 Entered 11/22/10 15:10:30 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 63

Case JHW Doc 26 Filed 11/22/10 Entered 11/22/10 15:10:30 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 63 Page of IN THE UNITED STTES BNKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: ) Bankruptcy No. 000 ) ) ) JOHN T. KEMP, ) ) Debtor. ) ) ) JOHN T. KEMP, ) dversary No. 00 ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COUNTRYWIDE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. :-mj-0000- ) v. ) ) January, 0 SHAWNA COX, ) ) Defendant. ) Portland,

More information

2 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

2 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1 1 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 2 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 3 4 June 24, 2010-10:39 a.m. Concord, New Hampshire 5 6 NHPUC J~JLO~ 10 ~ri1 1:21. RE: DE 10-096 7 GRANITE STATE ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a NATIONAL

More information

1 of 43 COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART 60 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, U.S. BANK USA, N.A., and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST

1 of 43 COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART 60 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, U.S. BANK USA, N.A., and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST â FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/26/2017 03:16 PM INDEX NO. 657387/2017 â 1 1 10 2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART 60 3 -X 4 In the matter of the application

More information

Before: DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE GOLD. -v- Counsel for the Claimant: Counsel for the Defendant: TRANSCRIPT OF EVIDENCE OF SOPHIE GRANVILLE

Before: DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE GOLD. -v- Counsel for the Claimant: Counsel for the Defendant: TRANSCRIPT OF EVIDENCE OF SOPHIE GRANVILLE T OUNTY OURT AT ASINSTOK laim No. 35YM369 The ourt ouse London Road asingstoke Wednesday, 19 th April 2017 efore: PUTY ISTRIT JU OL etween: IWAYS NLAN OMPANY LT laimant -v- ANIL UNSY efendant ounsel for

More information

[01:02] [02:07]

[01:02] [02:07] Real State Financial Modeling Introduction and Overview: 90-Minute Industrial Development Modeling Test, Part 3 Waterfall Returns and Case Study Answers Welcome to the final part of this 90-minute industrial

More information

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning Citation Authorized: June 8, 2017 Citation Issued: June 21, 2017 Citation Amended: February 19, 2018 THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9 and a

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA HAROLD PRATT PAVING & SEALING, INC., Petitioner, vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. DOR 05-2-FOF Case No. 04-1054 FINAL ORDER This cause

More information

Superior Court of New Jersey Essex Vicinage ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL FACT PATTERN. Mary Peabody v. Virgil Goodman

Superior Court of New Jersey Essex Vicinage ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL FACT PATTERN. Mary Peabody v. Virgil Goodman Superior Court of New Jersey Essex Vicinage ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL FACT PATTERN Mary Peabody v. Virgil Goodman Table of Contents Section Page Number(s) Law Day Fact Pattern 3 Instructions for Teachers

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EFiled Oct 19 2012 1136AM EDT Transaction ID 47152282 Case No. 7409 VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EORHB, INC., a Georgia corporation, and COBY G. BROOKS, EDWARD J. GREENE, JAMES

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Grimm, 2013-Ohio-3450.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Hon.

More information

VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM C. HULTMAN CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, (Pages 1 to 4)

VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM C. HULTMAN CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, (Pages 1 to 4) 1 (Pages 1 to 4) 1 1 CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA 2 3 DEBRA HENDERSON, : 4 Plaintiff, : 5 vs. : 6 MERSCORP, INC.; MORTGAGE : Case No. 7 ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, : CV 2008-900805 8

More information

2 COMMISSION OF INQUIRY - THE WITNESS HEARINGS 3 ST. THERESA'S CATHEDRAL HALL 4 LAFFAN STREET, HAMILTON, BERMUDA

2 COMMISSION OF INQUIRY - THE WITNESS HEARINGS 3 ST. THERESA'S CATHEDRAL HALL 4 LAFFAN STREET, HAMILTON, BERMUDA 1 2 COMMISSION OF INQUIRY - THE WITNESS HEARINGS 3 ST. THERESA'S CATHEDRAL HALL 4 LAFFAN STREET, HAMILTON, BERMUDA 5 MONDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2016 6 --o0o-- 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 AUDIO RECORDED TRANSCRIPTION

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CP-018S2 JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CP-018S2 JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-CP-018S2 FILED AUG 2 2 2014 \ DAVID H. VINCENT Vs. JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN APPELLANT APPELLEE ANSWER TO RESPONSE BRIEF OF

More information

Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Small Claims Court Goderich, Ontario. - and - Bill Steenstra

Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Small Claims Court Goderich, Ontario. - and - Bill Steenstra Court File No. 231/08 Ontario Superior Court of Justice Small Claims Court Goderich, Ontario Between: Hydro One Networks Inc. - and - Bill Steenstra Heard: April 21, June 4 and August 30, 2010 Judgment:

More information

WILLIAM BAMBECK MARY BETH BERGER

WILLIAM BAMBECK MARY BETH BERGER [Cite as Bambeck v. Berger, 2008-Ohio-3456.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89597 WILLIAM BAMBECK PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. MARY BETH

More information

Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SMITH MR ANTHONY SMITH. -v- EXCEL PARKING SERVICES LIMITED. Lay Representative for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent:

Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SMITH MR ANTHONY SMITH. -v- EXCEL PARKING SERVICES LIMITED. Lay Representative for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent: IN OUNTY OURT AT MANSTR laim No. 0P94/M17X062 Manchester ounty ourt and amily ourt earing entre 1 ridge Street West Manchester M60 9J Thursday, 8 th June 2017 efore: IS ONOUR JU SMIT etween: ANTONY SMIT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KINGS COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK DEFENDANTS MOTION REQUESTING PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INTERROGATORIES AND ADMISSIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KINGS COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK DEFENDANTS MOTION REQUESTING PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INTERROGATORIES AND ADMISSIONS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KINGS COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK ABC XYZ Plaintiff Vs. Index No: 12236/07 Defendants DEFENDANTS MOTION REQUESTING PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INTERROGATORIES AND ADMISSIONS COMES

More information

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION 3 CASE NO: CA 04 4 INS

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION 3 CASE NO: CA 04 4 INS 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION 3 CASE NO: 10-33653 CA 04 4 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SEGUROS, 5 Plaintiff, 6 vs. 7 HEMISPHERIC

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STEVE RUTH VS. LONDON SUZETTE BURCHFIELD APPELLANT NO. 2007-CA-02066 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH APPEAL

More information

THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES. Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired, Specially Assigned),

THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES. Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired, Specially Assigned), UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0230 September Term, 2015 MARVIN A. VAN DEN HEUVEL, ET AL. v. THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired,

More information

FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 0 0 FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES IN RE: AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE MEETING / COMMITTEE MEMBERS: NICOLE WASHINGTON, CHAIR TRUSTEE GARY MCCOY TRUSTEE ROBERT WOODY TRUSTEE CRAIG REED DATE:

More information

Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 12CA42 GEORGE ESPARZA, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 12CA42 GEORGE ESPARZA, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY [Cite as State v. Esparza, 2013-Ohio-2138.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 12CA42 vs. : GEORGE ESPARZA, : DECISION

More information

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD16-38895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2259 September Term, 2017 JEAN MEUS SR. v. LATASHA MEUS Reed, Friedman, Alpert,

More information

Grant Thornton Pensions Advisory podcasts

Grant Thornton Pensions Advisory podcasts Grant Thornton Pensions Advisory podcasts 3. Pensions schemes and transactions: transcript Welcome to this series of Grant Thornton's Pensions Advisory Podcasts. In this edition, we will be looking specifically

More information

THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS PRELIMINARY TRANSCRIPT. IVZ - Invesco Ltd. to Hold Analyst Call To Discuss The Acquisition Of Atlantic Trust By CIBC

THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS PRELIMINARY TRANSCRIPT. IVZ - Invesco Ltd. to Hold Analyst Call To Discuss The Acquisition Of Atlantic Trust By CIBC THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS PRELIMINARY TRANSCRIPT IVZ - Invesco Ltd. to Hold Analyst Call To Discuss The Acquisition Of Atlantic Trust EVENT DATE/TIME: APRIL 11, 2013 / 8:30PM GMT TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT

More information

CASE NO. 1D David P. Healy of Law Offices of David P. Healy, PLC, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

CASE NO. 1D David P. Healy of Law Offices of David P. Healy, PLC, Tallahassee, for Appellants. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT B. LINDSEY, JOSEPH D. ADAMS and MARK J. SWEE, Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 08A1096 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States INDIANA STATE POLICE PENSION TRUST, ET AL., Applicants, v. CHRYSLER LLC, ET AL., Respondents. RESPONSE TO APPLICANTS SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT Chrysler

More information

September 10, 1998 N.G.I.S.C. Biloxi Meeting. CHAIRMAN JAMES: With that, I'll open it up to. COMMISSIONER DOBSON: Mayor Short, you just mentioned

September 10, 1998 N.G.I.S.C. Biloxi Meeting. CHAIRMAN JAMES: With that, I'll open it up to. COMMISSIONER DOBSON: Mayor Short, you just mentioned September 0, N.G.I.S.C. Biloxi Meeting 0 CHAIRMAN JAMES: With that, I'll open it up to questions from commissioners. Commissioner Dobson? COMMISSIONER DOBSON: Mayor Short, you just mentioned the money

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 30 2015 11:00:44 2015-KA-00218-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOE M. GILLESPIE APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00218-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JUAN FIGUEROA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D14-4078

More information

ECO LECTURE TWENTY-FOUR 1 OKAY. WELL, WE WANT TO CONTINUE OUR DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD

ECO LECTURE TWENTY-FOUR 1 OKAY. WELL, WE WANT TO CONTINUE OUR DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD ECO 155 750 LECTURE TWENTY-FOUR 1 OKAY. WELL, WE WANT TO CONTINUE OUR DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD STARTED LAST TIME. WE SHOULD FINISH THAT UP TODAY. WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY'S LONG-RUN EQUILIBRIUM

More information

NOVEL. UNDER MY HYPO, THERE IS ONE ACCIDENT.

NOVEL. UNDER MY HYPO, THERE IS ONE ACCIDENT. The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET IN RE: CABINET AIDES MEETING /

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET IN RE: CABINET AIDES MEETING / 0 STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET IN RE: CABINET AIDES MEETING / CABINET AIDES: KRISTIN OLSON, CHAIR AMANDA CAREY ANDREW FAY ERIN SUMPTER ROBERT TORNILLO STEPHANIE LEEDS KIMBERLY RENSPIE

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00393-CR Merril Leroy Jessop, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCHLEICHER COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE GRAHAM C. MULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE OCTOBER 24, 2007

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE GRAHAM C. MULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE OCTOBER 24, 2007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 3:06-CV-531 ) vs. ) ) JOHN F. MANGAN, JR., and ) HUGH

More information

Can you handle the truth?

Can you handle the truth? 2 Can you handle the truth? Do you remember the first time you heard about self-directed IRAs? Chances are, the phrase, too good to be true was running through your head. Then, when you went to talk to

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D., 2004 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) APPEAL FROM THE INFERIOR COURT FOR THE BELZE JUDICIAL DISTRICT D E C I S I O N

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D., 2004 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) APPEAL FROM THE INFERIOR COURT FOR THE BELZE JUDICIAL DISTRICT D E C I S I O N IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D., 2004 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) APPEAL FROM THE INFERIOR COURT FOR THE BELZE JUDICIAL DISTRICT INFERIOR APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2004 BETWEEN: (ANTHONY WHITE ( ( ( AND ( ( (EDITH

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2010 MICHELLE PINDELL SHAWN PINDELL

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2010 MICHELLE PINDELL SHAWN PINDELL UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 699 September Term, 2010 MICHELLE PINDELL v. SHAWN PINDELL Watts, Berger, Alpert, Paul E., (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. Opinion by Berger,

More information

David Asman Isn't it beyond time at which the Fed should raise rates given its mandates.

David Asman Isn't it beyond time at which the Fed should raise rates given its mandates. Interviewee: Title: Portfolio Manager Company: USAA Interviewee2: Daniel Stecich, Athena Advisor Services Interviewee3:, Fort Pitt Capital Group Vice President Channel: Fox Business Network Date: February

More information