Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS"

Transcription

1 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ALEXANDER SHNERER, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JOSEPH C. LAWLER, STEVEN G. CRANE, and MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff Alexander Shnerer, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by his undersigned attorneys, alleges in this Class Action Complaint (the Complaint ) the following upon knowledge with respect to his own acts, and upon facts obtained through an investigation conducted by his counsel, which included, inter alia: (a) review and analysis of relevant filings made by ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. ( ModusLink or the Company ) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ); (b) review and analysis of Defendants public documents, conference calls and press releases; (c) review and analysis of securities analysts reports and advisories concerning the Company; and (d) information readily obtainable on the Internet. 2. Plaintiff believes that further substantial evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. Most of the facts supporting the allegations contained herein are known only to Defendants or are exclusively within their control.

2 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 2 of 84 I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 3. This is a federal securities class action on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants, who purchased the common stock of ModusLink between September 26, 2007 and through and including June 8, 2012 (the Class Period ), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants violations of federal securities laws (the Class ). II. BACKGROUND 4. The Company was founded in 1986 as CMG Information Services, Inc. ( CMGI ) and officially changed its name to ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. during the Class Period, on September 29, 2008, reflecting the Company s transformation from an Internet concern into a provider of global supply chain business process management solutions. 5. ModusLink currently provides supply chain management solutions to drive revenue growth and reduce cost for its clients. The Company offers factory supply, warehousing and fulfillment, postponement and configuration, returns management, repair and recovery, e- commerce, customer care, and digital rights management. 6. ModusLink has more than 3,500 employees and its common stock currently trades under the ticker MLNK on the NASDAQ. 7. On the morning of June 11, 2012, the Company disclosed through a press release that Company President and Chief Executive Officer Joseph C. Lawler would be stepping down and also relinquishing his seat on the Board of Directors, effective immediately. The press release also announced the departure of William R. McLennan ( McLennan ), President of Global Operations. The Company had not yet found replacements to fill these positions. 2

3 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 3 of The Press Release also revealed that, in response to an inquiry from the SEC regarding the Company s treatment of rebates associated with volume discounts provided by vendors, the Audit Committee of the Company s Board of Directors initiated an internal investigation, which determined that certain client contracts have not been aligned consistently with ModusLink s practice of retaining volume discounts. The Audit Committee also identified limited instances where vendor costs incurred were marked-up to clients in a manner not consistent with client contracts. 9. The press release further stated that the Company believes it is no longer able to conclude that amounts from such volume discounts and mark-ups, where now found to be inconsistent with client contracts, were correctly accounted for as revenue. Therefore, the Company expects to restate its audited financial statements from fiscal years 2009 through 2011, as well as the first two quarters of fiscal 2012 and its unaudited selected financial data for fiscal years 2007 and 2008, stating that the previously issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon. 10. According to the press release, as a result of the restatement, the Company expects to report downward adjustments to revenue of approximately $20 million to $30 million over a period in which aggregate reported revenue was $5.4 billion and aggregate reported net loss was $213 million, inclusive of $232 million of impairments related to goodwill and intangible assets. In addition, the Company expects that the restatement will negatively impact net income. 11. Finally, the press release disclosed that while the Company is continuing to assess the situation, it expects to conclude that the Company has a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. 3

4 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 4 of Due to the time required to review its current and historical financial data, ModusLink stated it was delaying the filing of its Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 ended April 30, 2012 and, as a result, the Company expects to receive a letter from NASDAQ that it is not in compliance with NASDAQ listing rules. 13. All of the press releases and Form 10-Ks and Form 10-Qs issued by the Company and the Individual Defendants during the Class Period were materially false and misleading because they did not accurately reflect the Company s treatment of rebates associated with volume discounts by vendors. 14. Specifically, the Company s scheme was to aggregate its business in order to acquire volume discounts from vendors, and then mark up the discounts to clients without their knowledge, inconsistent with their contracts. 15. The final phase of the scheme involved the Company incorrectly accounting for these discounts and mark-ups as revenue, thereby over-stating the Company s revenue and net income on its financial statements during the Class Period. 16. As a result of the unanticipated disclosures related in the Press Release, ModusLink common stock declined by $1.48 per share to close at $2.78 on June 11, 2012 a one-day decline of approximately 35% on unusually heavy trading volume. 17. In light of the foregoing background, Plaintiff alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants disseminated materially false and misleading information and failed to disclose material facts and, as a result, the market price for ModusLink s common stock was artificially inflated during the Class Period. Plaintiff and the other members of the Class acquired ModusLink common stock during the Class Period at artificially high prices and were damaged thereby. 4

5 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 5 of 84 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 18. The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78j(b) and 78t(a)) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R b-5). 19. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78aa) and 28 U.S.C Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78aa) and 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) as a substantial part of the conduct complained of herein occurred in this District. 21. In connection with the acts, conduct and other wrongs alleged herein, Defendants either directly or indirectly used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including but not limited to the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and the facilities of the national securities exchange. IV. PARTIES 22. Plaintiff Alexander Shnerer purchased ModusLink common stock during the Class Period and has suffered damages as a result as evidenced by his annexed certification. 23. Defendant ModusLink is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices located at 1601 Trapelo Road Waltham, Massachusetts. The Company s common stock was listed on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol CMGI from the beginning of the Class Period through September 29, 2008, and then under the ticker symbol MLNK from September 30, 2008 to date. 24. Defendant Joseph C. Lawler joined the Company in August of 2004 and served as the Company s President, CEO, and as a Director at all relevant times. 5

6 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 6 of Defendant Steven C. Crane ( Crane ) joined the Company in April of 2007 and served as the Company s Chief Financial Officer ( CFO ) at all relevant times. 26. Lawler and Crane are together referred to hereinafter as the Individual Defendants. 27. Each of the Individual Defendants: (a) was directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company at the highest levels; (b) was privy to confidential proprietary information concerning the Company and its business and operations; (c) was involved in drafting, producing, reviewing and/or disseminating the false and misleading statements and information alleged herein; (d) was aware of or recklessly disregarded the fact that the false and misleading statements were being issued concerning the Company; and (e) approved or ratified these statements in violation of the federal securities laws. 28. As officers, directors and controlling persons of a publicly-held company whose common stock is and was registered with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, and was traded on the NASDAQ and governed by the provisions of the federal securities laws, the Individual Defendants each had a duty to disseminate accurate and truthful information promptly with respect to the Company's financial condition and to correct any previously-issued statements that had become materially misleading or untrue to allow the market price of the Company's publicly-traded stock to reflect truthful and accurate information. 6

7 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 7 of ModusLink is liable for the acts of the Individual Defendants and its employees under the doctrine of respondeat superior and common law principles of agency as all of the wrongful acts complained of herein were carried out within the scope of their employment with authorization. 30. The scienter of the Individual Defendants and other employees and agents of the Company is similarly imputed to ModusLink under respondeat superior and agency principles. V. SUBSTANTIVE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD A. The Company Issued Materially False and Misleading Statements Concerning its Financial Results During the Class Period False and Misleading 2007 Statements 31. The Class Period begins on September 26, 2007, the day after the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading press release with the SEC, concerning its financial results for the 2007 fourth quarter and fiscal year, ended July 31, The September 25, 2007 press release (published after the market closed for trading that day) states, in pertinent part certain information concerning the Company s reported revenues and net income: Waltham, Mass. September 25, 2007 CMGI, Inc. (Nasdaq: CMGI) today reported financial results for its fiscal 2007 fourth quarter and full year ended July 31, Fourth Quarter Financial Summary Net revenue of $252.6 million, a decrease of 3.6% from the fourth quarter of the prior year Gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 12.1% from 10.7% last year Operating loss of $2.4 million compared with operating income of $1.7 million in the prior year 7

8 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 8 of 84 Net loss of $6.2 million or $0.01 per diluted share compared to net loss of $2.5 million or $0.01 per diluted share in the same period last year Non-GAAP operating income of $7.2 million compared with $7.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at July 31, 2007 increased to $282.3 million from $228.7 million at July 31, 2006 CMGI reported net revenue of $252.6 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, 3.6% lower than net revenue of $261.9 million reported for the same period one year ago. The decline in revenue primarily related to previously announced program changes for certain clients, partially offset by revenue growth from other client engagements. Gross margin was $30.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, an increase of 9.0% compared with $28.0 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal As a percentage of revenue, gross margin increased to 12.1% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 from 10.7% in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The improved gross margin percentage was attributed to revenue from engagements in target vertical markets, revenue from higher margin services and the continued realization of operating efficiencies. For the fourth quarter, we reported financial performance that was in line with our expectations, concluding a good fiscal year in which we made significant progress executing our strategic initiatives, said Joseph C. Lawler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CMGI. As anticipated, revenue for the fourth quarter was affected by specific client programs that were discontinued, but were partially offset by growth from other client engagements. Compared with the fourth quarter of last year, gross margin percentage increased to 12.1% of revenue compared with 10.7% as a result of the progress we are making with our strategies to increase revenue from targeted vertical markets and higher margin services, while improving efficiencies in our business. For the fourth quarter, CMGI reported a net loss of $6.2 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, compared to net loss of $2.5 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, for the same period in the prior fiscal year. The increase in net loss for the fourth quarter of 2007 was primarily due to the increase in restructuring and compensation expenses. The results for the fourth quarter of 2006 included a gain 8

9 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 9 of 84 of $4.6 million, related to the acquisition by a third party of Alibris, portfolio company. There were no material gains or losses attributed during in the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2007 Financial Summary Net revenue of $252.6 million, a decrease of 3.6% from the fourth quarter of the prior year Gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 12.1% from 10.7% last year Operating loss of $2.4 million compared with operating income of $1.7 million in the prior year Net loss of $6.2 million or $0.01 per diluted share compared net loss of $2.5 million or $0.01 per diluted share in the period last year to same Non-GAAP operating income of $7.2 million compared with $7.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at July 31, 2007 increased to $282.3 million from $228.7 million at July 31, 2006 ModusLink: Secured 118 new engagements, including multiple engagements for some clients, with 52 coming from new target markets of Storage, Communications and Consumer Electronics Achieved significant progress implementing a shared services model and investing in ERP system Strengthened footprint with the acquisition of remaining stake of joint venture in Japan Made key hires to the leadership team for the CFO, President of Sales and Marketing and CIO positions Created an executive position dedicated to reviewing and pursuing possible acquisition and strategic partnership opportunities Fiscal Year Consolidated Financial Results 9

10 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 10 of 84 During fiscal 2007, we continued to make significant change in our business to transform the company into a leader in supply chain services and I m pleased with the progress. During the year, we executed our strategy of increasing revenue from higher growth and higher margin target vertical markets. During fiscal 2007, 118 new engagements were secured, including multiple engagements for some clients, with 52 of those coming from our new markets of storage, communications and consumer electronics. In addition, we made progress strengthening our sales and marketing programs, implementing a shared services model and investing in our infrastructure with the implementation of an ERP platform, which is on track with our plans. Importantly, we have assembled a strong and highly experienced leadership team by making key hires for the President of Sales and Marketing, CFO and CIO positions, said Lawler. CMGI reported net revenue of $1.14 billion for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007, comparable to $1.15 billion reported for the 2006 fiscal year. Gross margin was $131.1 million or 11.5% of revenue for fiscal 2007, compared with $118.2 million, or 10.3% of revenue in fiscal As a percentage of revenue, gross margin improvement was attributed to revenue from engagements in target vertical markets and higher margin services, as well as the realization of operating efficiencies. Operating income for the fiscal year was $14.8 million compared to operating income of $0.6 million for the 2006 fiscal year. Compared with the prior year, operating results were positively affected by improved gross margin performance and a reduction in restructuring expenses. For the 2007 fiscal year, CMGI reported net income of $49.4 million or $0.10 per diluted share compared to net income of $14.9 million or $0.03 per diluted share for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net income for fiscal 2007 included $35.0 million of investment proceeds from liquidity events compared to proceeds of $27.3 million in fiscal The gains for fiscal 2007 included a gain of $28.7 million from the acquisition by a third party of Avamar, a company in portfolio, during the year. Excluding the effects of charges related to depreciation, amortization of intangibles, stock-based compensation and restructuring, CMGI reported non-gaap operating income of $44.4 million for the 2007 fiscal year compared with non-gaap operating income of $32.4 million for the prior fiscal year. 10

11 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 11 of 84 Outlook The company currently expects revenue of approximately $1.10 billion to $1.15 billion and operating income to be approximately 2.0% to 2.5% of revenue in fiscal 2008, before any restructuring. Restructuring for fiscal 2008 is expected to be $5 million to $8 million. 32. On October 15, 2007 the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC, for the 2007 fourth quarter and fiscal year, ended July 31, 2007, affirming its September 25, 2007 press release in greater detail. 33. The October 15, 2007 filing contained certifications pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Defendants Lawler and Crane. The signed certifications state, in pertinent part: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CMGI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known 11

12 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 12 of 84 to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant s internal control over financial reporting. 34. Also contained in the Company s October 15, 2007 filing were certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, signed by Defendants Lawler and Crane, which state, in pertinent part: In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CMGI, Inc. (the Company ) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 as 12

13 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 13 of 84 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), the undersigned, Joseph C. Lawler, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 35. Defendants Lawler and Crane each signed substantially similar Section 302 and Section 906 certifications for each Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the SEC, by the Company, during the Class Period (together Sarbanes-Oxley Certifications ). 36. On December 3, 2007, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading press release with the SEC, concerning its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended October 31, The press release states, in pertinent part: Waltham, Mass. December 3, 2007 CMGI, Inc. (Nasdaq: CMGI) today reported financial results for its first quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended October 31, Financial Summary Net revenue of $274.7, a decrease of 3.1% compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 Operating income of $9.1 million, an increase of 80.9% compared to operating income in the year ago period Income from continuing operations of $9.2 million, 5.1% lower than income from continuing operations in the same period last year Net income of $8.6 million, 16.6% lower than net income in the same period last year Non-GAAP operating income of $17.1 million, an increase of 66.4% from non-gaap operating income in the first quarter of the prior year 13

14 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 14 of 84 Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.19, compared to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.20 for the same period in the prior fiscal year (in each case, adjusted for the recent reverse stock split) Diluted earnings per share including discontinued operations of $0.18, compared to diluted earnings per share including discontinued operations of $0.21 for the same period in the prior fiscal year (in each case, adjusted for the recent reverse stock split) Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at October 31, 2007 increased to $261.2 million from $222.2 million at October 31, 2006 First Quarter Consolidated Financial Results We reported good financial results in the quarter with revenue and profitability in line with or better than our expectations, said Joseph C. Lawler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CMGI. Revenue was expectedly lower compared with last year due to two specific previously announced client programs that were discontinued, however we are very pleased with the growth we are seeing from other client engagements. Excluding those discontinued programs, revenue grew by approximately 15% compared to the year ago period. Gross margin performance was higher than expected, driven by work mix, continuous improvement initiatives and higher volumes for certain client programs. In addition, we continued to make operational progress this quarter, added Lawler. Our sales and marketing efforts are progressing, our shared services model is having an impact and the implementation of our IT platform is on track. We continued to make planned investments in our business that should enable us to reach our long-term objectives. CMGI reported net revenue of $274.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, a 3.1% decrease compared to net revenue of $283.6 million for the same period one year ago. Gross profit for the quarter increased 30.0% to $39.1 million from $30.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007, primarily due to favorable product mix especially within the company s Europe and Asia operations as well as efficiencies from continuous improvement initiatives and higher volumes for certain client programs. Gross margin increased to 14.2% in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, compared to 10.6% in the first quarter of fiscal Selling, General and 14

15 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 15 of 84 Administrative expense, including restructuring and amortization of stock compensation for the first quarter was $29.9 million compared to $25.0 million in the first quarter of the prior period. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to planned investment in the company s IT infrastructure and restructuring related expense of $1.6 million in the quarter associated with a restructuring action taken in North America. Operating income was $9.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to operating income of $5.1 million in the prior period, an improvement of 80.9%. The operating income improvement for the first quarter of 2008 was a result of improved gross margins during the quarter. For the first quarter, CMGI reported income from continuing operations of $9.2 million, or $0.19 diluted earnings per share, compared to income from continuing operations of $9.7 million, or $0.20 diluted earnings per share, for the same period in the prior fiscal year (in each case, adjusted for the recent reverse stock split). Including income (losses) from discontinued operations, CMGI reported net income of $8.6 million or $0.18 diluted earnings per share (after giving effect to the recent reverse stock split), compared to net income of $10.3 million or $0.21 diluted earnings per share (after giving effect to the recent reverse stock split) for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net income for the quarter reflects improved operating income performance primarily offset by an increase in income tax expense. Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2008 was $2.1 million. This compares to a tax benefit of $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2007, which was primarily a result of a reduction in valuation allowance for certain net operating losses in Europe. Outlook The Company continues to expect revenue of $1.10 billion to $1.15 billion and operating income to be approximately 2.0% to 2.5% of revenue in fiscal 2008, before any restructuring. Restructuring for fiscal 2008 is expected to be $5 million to $8 million. 37. On December 10, 2007 the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading Form 10-Q quarterly report with the SEC, for the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended October 15

16 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 16 of 84 31, 2007, containing Sarbanes-Oxley Certifications signed by Defendants Lawler and Crane, affirming its December 3, 2007 press release in greater detail. False and Misleading 2008 Statements 38. On March 10, 2008, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading press release with the SEC, concerning its financial results for the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended January 31, The press release states, in pertinent part: WALTHAM, Mass. March 10, 2008 CMGI, Inc. (NASDAQ: CMGI) today reported financial results for its second quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended January 31, Financial Summary Net revenue of $278.0 million, a decrease of 14.4% compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2007 Gross margins improved to 14.0% compared with 12.5% in the prior year period Operating income of $8.6 million, a decrease of 23.7% compared to operating income in the period one year ago, primarily due to higher SG&A costs associated with the Company s planned IT investments Net income of $27.8 million, or $0.58 per share, 22.5% lower than net income in the same period last year Non-GAAP operating income of $15.3 million, a decrease of 21.5% from non-gaap operating income of $19.5 million in the second quarter of the prior year Second Quarter Consolidated Financial Results We are pleased with the ongoing progress we are making transforming our company into a global supply chain services business, said Joseph C. Lawler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CMGI. Of particular note, we remain on track with our goal for completing our Enterprise Resource Planning project, which together with our shared services model will enable our company to run optimally and improve financial performance. 16

17 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 17 of 84 Revenue for the second quarter, adjusted for two discontinued programs, was approximately the same as one year ago, due to timing of new business start ups and the effects of the U.S. economy, added Lawler. Looking forward, we are cautiously optimistic about our revenue performance for the remainder of the year, as our sales and marketing efforts have resulted in the best pipeline of new business I ve seen at CMGI. The challenging economic environment requires lower cost supply chains, faster time to market and swifter response to promotions and liquidations to reduce excess inventory. These factors play to the strengths of our business model and are contributing to our growing sales pipeline. Based on the strength of that pipeline, we are maintaining our full year financial guidance. CMGI reported net revenue of $278.0 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2008, a 14.4% decrease compared to net revenue of $324.8 million for the same period one year ago. Adjusted for two previously announced discontinued programs, net revenue of $278.0 million would have compared with net revenue of $279.0 million in the prior year period on the same basis. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin improved to 14.0% for the second quarter of 2008, from 12.5% in the second quarter of fiscal The improvement in gross margin was attributed to work mix and continuous improvement initiatives. Operating income was $8.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2008, 23.7% lower than $11.3 million for the prior year period. Compared with the prior year period, the lower operating income for the second quarter of 2008 was primarily due to higher selling, general and administrative costs related to the implementation of the new ERP system. Net income for the second quarter of 2008 was $27.8 million, or $0.58 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $35.9 million, or $0.74 diluted earnings per share, for the same period in the prior fiscal year. The Company s per share data for prior year periods has been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the Company s common stock, effective October 31, Net income for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 includes an $18.5 million gain primarily from its venture capital This gain includes a $12.9 million gain from the acquisition of The Generations Network by a third party. Net income from the second quarter of 2007 included a gain of $28.7 million from the acquisition by a third party of Avamar Technologies, a company in held an investment. 17

18 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 18 of 84 Excluding net charges related to depreciation, restructuring and amortization of intangibles and stock-based compensation, non- GAAP operating income was $15.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2008, compared with non-gaap operating income of $19.5 million for the same period in fiscal Outlook The Company continues to expect revenue of $1.10 billion to $1.15 billion and operating income, before any restructuring expenses, to be approximately 2.0% to 2.5% of revenue in fiscal Restructuring expenses for fiscal 2008 are expected to be $5 million to $8 million. 39. On March 11, 2008, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading Form 10-Q quarterly report with the SEC, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended January 31, 2008, containing Sarbanes-Oxley Certifications signed by Defendants Lawler and Crane, affirming its March 10, 2008 press release in greater detail. 40. On June 9, 2008, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading press release with the SEC, concerning its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended April 30, The press release states, in pertinent part: WALTHAM, Mass. June 9, 2008 CMGI, Inc. (NASDAQ: CMGI) today reported financial results for its third quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended April 30, Financial Summary Net revenue of $239.2 million, a decrease of 15.2% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2007 Gross margins improved 230 basis points to 12.9% of revenue compared with 10.6% in the prior year period Operating income of $10 thousand compared to operating income of $877 thousand in the third quarter of 2007 Operating income of $9.1 million, an increase of 80.9% compared to operating income in the year ago period Income from continuing operations of $9.2 million, 5.1% lower than income from continuing operations in the same period last year 18

19 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 19 of 84 Non-GAAP operating income of $7.6 million, an increase of 1.5% from non-gaap operating income in the third quarter of the prior year Consolidated Financial Results During the third quarter, we continued to execute our strategy and position our business for growth, said Joseph C. Lawler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CMGI. We made very good progress with our sales and marketing initiatives, which are enabling us to introduce new solutions, secure new engagements and build our sales pipeline. In addition, we made progress with the implementation of our ERP platform and continued to execute our acquisition strategy. The recently announced acquisitions of Open Channel Solutions and PTS Electronics strengthen our market position and will also help improve the growth and profitability of our company. We expected revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 to be lower than the third quarter of fiscal 2007 due to two previously announced discontinued programs, continued Lawler. In addition, we experienced volume declines in some client programs and delays in the startup of some new engagements. As a percentage of revenue, gross margins improved by 230 basis points, which resulted in an increase in non-gaap operating income despite the lower revenue in the quarter. The continuous improvement we ve been showing in gross margins is the result of executing our long-term strategy, added Lawler. CMGI reported net revenue of $239.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2008, a 15.2% decrease compared to net revenue of $282.1 million for the same period one year ago. As a percentage of revenue, gross margins improved to 12.9% for the third quarter of fiscal 2008, from 10.6% in the third quarter of fiscal The improvement in gross margin was attributed to work and geography mix as well as continuous improvement initiatives. Net loss for the third quarter of 2008 was $2.6 million, or ($0.05) per share, compared to net income of $9.4 million, or $0.19 earnings per share, for the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net results include a change in other income (loss) from $7.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 to a loss of $70 thousand in the third quarter of fiscal This change was primarily due to a decline in interest income of approximately $1.1 million and a decline of $4.6 million related liquidity events. Net loss for the third quarter of 2008 also includes a tax expense of 19

20 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 20 of 84 $3.2 million, compared with a tax benefit of $900 thousand in the prior year period due to a shift in the geographic distribution of income, an increase in the tax rate in China and some discrete taxrelated items. Excluding net charges related to depreciation, restructuring and amortization of intangibles and stock-based compensation, non- GAAP operating income was $7.6 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2008, a 1.5% increase compared with non-gaap operating income of $7.5 million for the same period in fiscal As we enter the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we are encouraged with the amount of new engagements we have secured and the size and make-up of our sales pipeline. We do remain cognizant of the effects of the uncertain economic environment on our existing business and the expenses needed for the startup of the new business secured over the past few months. Based on these factors, we are revising our financial guidance ranges for fiscal 2008, concluded Crane. Outlook The Company now expects revenue of approximately $1.05 billion to $1.10 billion, compared with its previous range of $1.10 billion to $1.15 billion and operating income, before any restructuring expenses, to be at the low end of its previous guidance of 2.0% to 2.5% of revenue in fiscal Restructuring expenses for fiscal 2008 are expected to be $5 million to $8 million. 41. On June 9, 2008, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading Form 10-Q quarterly report with the SEC, for third quarter of fiscal year 2008, ended April 30, 2008, containing Sarbanes-Oxley Certifications signed by Defendants Lawler and Crane, affirming its June 9, 2008 press release in greater detail. 42. On September 29, 2008, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading press release with the SEC, concerning its financial results for the 2008 fourth quarter and fiscal year ended July 31, The press release states, in pertinent part: WALTHAM, Mass. September 29, 2008 ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as CMGI, Inc.) (NASDAQ: 20

21 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 21 of 84 CMGI) today reported preliminary financial results for its 2008 fourth quarter and fiscal year ended July 31, Results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year are preliminary based on the inclusion of an estimated non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $12 million related to its European segment. The amount of the non-cash charge will be finalized in conjunction with the completion of the Company s Form 10-K filing. As announced in a separate press release issued today, the Company has changed its name from CMGI, Inc. to ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. Its common stock will trade under the Nasdaq Global Select Market symbol MLNK effective at the opening of trading on September 30, Preliminary Fourth Quarter Financial Summary Net revenue of $276.3 million, an increase of 9.4% from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 Gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, of 10.4% compared with 12.1% in the same period during the prior year Selling, General and Administrative expense of $44.1 million. Excluding the estimated goodwill impairment charge, SG&A expense was $32.1 million or 11.6% of revenue, compared to SG&A expense of $33.0 million or 13.1% of revenue in the fourth quarter of the prior year Operating loss of $15.4 million, compared with an operating loss of $2.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 Net loss from continuing operations of $18.6 million or $0.39 per share, compared to a net loss from continuing operations of $6.2 million, or $0.13 per share, in the same period last year Net loss of $22.7 million, or $0.48 per share, compared to a net loss of $6.2 million, or $0.13 per share, in the same period last year Non-GAAP operating income of $6.3 million compared with $7.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 Preliminary Fourth Quarter Consolidated Financial Results During the fourth quarter, we grew our business and concluded a challenging but successful year in the transformation of our company, said Joseph C. Lawler, Chairman, President and Chief 21

22 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 22 of 84 Executive Officer of CMGI, now ModusLink Global Solutions. In the fourth quarter, we continued to build the Company s sales pipeline, driven by the introduction of new solutions, implementation of targeted lead generation programs and improved penetration of our targeted vertical markets. Despite the challenges of the current economic environment that resulted in lower volumes in some existing accounts, ModusLink Global Solutions is very well positioned for long-term growth as we continue to execute our strategy and fulfill the vision of the company. The Company reported net revenue of $276.3 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, an increase of 9.4% compared with net revenue of $252.6 million reported for the same period one year ago. The increase in revenue was attributed to organic growth, primarily driven by new client engagements, and contributions of $13.7 million from the recently acquired companies Open Channel Solutions and PTS Electronics. Adjusted for two previously announced discontinued programs, net revenue of $276.3 million would have compared with net revenue of $240.2 million in the prior year period. Gross margin was $28.7 million, or 10.4% of revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, compared with $30.5 million, or 12.1% of revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was due to increased start-up costs related to new business engagements and lower volumes from some existing clients. Selling, General and Administrative expense for the fourth quarter was $44.1 million. Excluding the goodwill impairment charge, SG&A expense was $32.1 million, or 11.6% of revenue, compared to $33.0 million, or 13.1% of revenue, in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The decrease in SG&A expenses excluding the goodwill impairment charge was primarily due to lower restructuring and lower compensation related costs, partially offset by increases attributable to the inclusion of the selling, general and administrative costs of the recently acquired companies. Net loss from continuing operations for the fourth quarter was $18.6 million, or $0.39 per share, compared to net loss from continuing operations of $6.2 million, or $0.13 per share, for the same period in fiscal Net loss for the fourth quarter of 2008 was $22.7 million or $0.48 per share, compared to net loss of $6.2 million or $0.13 per share for the same period in the prior year. 22

23 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 23 of 84 Fiscal 2008 fourth quarter results included a loss from discontinued operations of $4.2 million, or $0.09 per share, primarily due to updated sublease assumptions for a facility no longer being utilized for operations by the Company. Preliminary Fiscal Year 2008 Financial Summary Net revenue of $1,068 million, compared to net revenue of $1,143 million in fiscal 2007 Gross margin, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 12.9% from 11.5% in the previous year Selling, General and Administrative expense of $135.2 million. Excluding the estimated goodwill impairment charge, SG&A expense was $123.2 million, or 11.5% of revenue, compared to $116.3 million, or 10.2% of revenue, in fiscal 2007 Operating income of $2.4 million, compared to operating income of $14.8 million in the prior fiscal year Net income from continuing operations of $15.3 million, or $0.32 per diluted share, compared to net income from continuing operations of $49.1 million, or $1.00 per diluted share, in fiscal 2007 Net income was $11.1 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, compared to $49.4 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, in fiscal 2007 Non-GAAP operating income was $46.2 million compared with non-gaap operating income of $44.4 million for the prior fiscal year Preliminary Fiscal Year Consolidated Financial Results The Company reported net revenue of $1,068 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, compared to $1,143 million reported for the 2007 fiscal year. Adjusted for two previously announced discontinued programs, net revenue of $1,068 million would have compared with net revenue of $1,005 million in the prior year period on the same basis. Gross margin was $137.6 million, or 12.9% of revenue for fiscal 2008, compared with $131.1 million, or 11.5% of revenue for fiscal As a percentage of revenue, gross margin improvement was attributed to revenue from engagements in target 23

24 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 24 of 84 vertical markets and higher margin services, as well as the realization of operating efficiencies. Net income from continuing operations for fiscal 2008 was $15.3 million, or $0.32 per diluted share, compared to net income from continuing operations of $49.1 million, or $1.00 per diluted share, for fiscal Net income for fiscal 2008 was $11.1 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, compared to net income of $49.4 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, for the prior year. Fiscal 2008 results included a loss from discontinued operations of $4.2 million, or $0.09 per share, compared with income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, in fiscal Net income for fiscal 2008 included $19.1 million of investment gains from liquidity events compared with gains of $35.0 million in fiscal We are positioned for growth in fiscal 2009, continued Lawler. Our sales pipeline is the strongest we have seen at the company. However, we remain cognizant of the uncertain global economic condition and its impact on consumer demand in the technology markets we serve. As we enter the new fiscal year, we continue to be focused on revenue growth, expanding existing client relationships through the introduction of new solutions and improving operational efficiencies. We are optimistic that our strategy will create significant long-term value for our shareholders. Outlook Based on the strength of its sales pipeline and expectations for increasing demand for the Company s services, and given the uncertain economic environment, the Company currently expects revenue in fiscal 2009 to grow in the range of 10% to 12% over fiscal year 2008 revenue. The Company expects this revenue growth to be weighted toward the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal On October 14, 2008 the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading Form 10-K annual report with the SEC, for the 2008 fourth quarter and fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, containing Sarbanes-Oxley Certifications signed by Defendants Lawler and Crane, affirming its September 29, 2008 press release in greater detail. 24

25 Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/12 Page 25 of On December 4, 2008, the Company filed an intentionally false and misleading press release with the SEC, concerning its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, ended October 31, The press release states, in pertinent part: WALTHAM, Mass. December 4, 2008 ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLNK) today reported financial results for its first quarter of fiscal year 2009, ended October 31, Financial Summary Net revenue of $291.4 million, an increase of 6.1% from the first quarter of fiscal 2008 Gross margin as a percentage of revenue of 9.6% compared to 14.2% in the same period during the prior year; excluding the impact of $3.7 million of deferred revenue, gross margin as a percentage of revenue would have been 10.8% Operating loss of $10.8 million compared to operating income of $9.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 Net loss of $18.6 million, or ($0.41) per share, compared with net income of $8.6 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the same period last year Non-GAAP operating income of $3.3 million compared with $17.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 Consolidated Financial Results In the first quarter, we saw lower volumes in our existing engagements and delayed start of new engagements based on weak consumer spending in the Americas and Europe, said Joseph C. Lawler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ModusLink Global Solutions. Given the extreme sense of uncertainty regarding the economy, we have been aggressively taking action to reduce costs across the organization and restructure areas where we can gain efficiencies, while continuing to execute our overall business strategy. We expect the result of our actions will be more than $40 million of annualized cost reductions resulting in a leaner, more focused and efficient company as we move forward. 25

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:17-cv-03680-VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, DICK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, VASCO DATA SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC., T. KENDALL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION. Case No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., DAVID J. LANGEVIN, DAVID

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 1 1, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, THE CRYPTO COMPANY, MICHAEL ALCIDE POUTRE III,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA Plaintiff, WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, GEORGE M. AWAD, DENMAR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. Case 1:18-cv-00830-ELR Document 1 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 82 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA NORMAN MACPHEE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Case No: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EXTERRAN CORPORATION, ANDREW J. WAY, and JON

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division PLAINTIFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. TERRAFORM POWER, INC. 7550 Wisconsin Ave. 9th Floor Bethesda,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No. Case 2:15-cv-05427-MAK Document 1 Filed 10/01/15 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN P. MESSNER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, QUANTUM CORPORATION, FUAD AHMAD, JON W. GACEK, and ADALIO T. SANCHEZ,

More information

Plaintiff brings this securities fraud action individually on behalf of himself

Plaintiff brings this securities fraud action individually on behalf of himself UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, --against-- C. A.

More information

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2:15cw05146CA&JEM Document 1 fled 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 6 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on

More information

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case :-cv-00-dgc Document Filed 0// Page of SUSAN MARTIN (AZ#0) JENNIFER KROLL (AZ#0) MARTIN & BONNETT, P.L.L.C. 0 N. Central Ave. Suite Phoenix, Arizona 00 Telephone: (0) 0-00 smartin@martinbonnett.com

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 30

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 30 Case :-cv-000 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Richard M. Heimann (00) rheimann@lchb.com Katherine C. Lubin () kbenson@lchb.com LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Battery Street, th Floor San Francisco,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Battery Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 1 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 Local Counsel for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ROBERT STROUGO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS INC., MARK A. DIBLASI,

More information

Case 3:16-cv K Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 35 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv K Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 35 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Case 3:16-cv-00783-K Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 35 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CYNTHIA A. PARMELEE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. Plaintiff ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. Plaintiff ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (LR 5733) Phillip Kim, Esq. (PK 9384) 275 Madison Ave., 34th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 686-1060 Fax: (212) 202-3827 Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. Case 2:12-cv-05275-SDW-MCA Document 1 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 50 PageID: 1 COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP PETER S. PEARLMAN JEFFREY W. HERRMANN Park 80 West - Plaza One 250 Pehie Avenue, Suite

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:17-cv-02225 Document 1 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HANS E. ERDMANN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN ) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. South Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com [Proposed] Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:18-cv-05104 Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YONGQIU ZHAO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA BLOOMFIELD, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SYNTAX-BRILLIAN CORP., VINCENT SOLLITTO, JR., JAMES LI and

More information

CV 01,496 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ROGER DAVIDSON, on behalf of himself ' and all others similarly situated,

CV 01,496 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ROGER DAVIDSON, on behalf of himself ' and all others similarly situated, ROGER DAVIDSON, on behalf of himself ' and all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL ACTION No. CV 01,496 V. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR

More information

Case 1:17-cv LMB-TCB Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:17-cv LMB-TCB Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Case 1:17-cv-00696-LMB-TCB Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA JEREMY A. LANGLEY, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff. Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, SKY SOLAR HOLDINGS, LTD., WEILI SU, and JIANMIN WANG, Defendants.

More information

LIFE, C T-0Tr UNITED STATES DV T T SOUTHERN DISTRI 'ATE RK. Civil Action No.

LIFE, C T-0Tr UNITED STATES DV T T SOUTHERN DISTRI 'ATE RK. Civil Action No. UNITED STATES DV T T SOUTHERN DISTRI 'ATE RK NAOMI RAPHAEL, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, V. Plaintiff, MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE & EQUITY, LLC, MARK J. JOSEPH, MICHAEL L. FALCONE,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, B COMMUNICATIONS LTD, DORON TURGEMAN, ITZIK TADMOR, and EHUD YAHALOM,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : FEDERAL SECURITIES :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : FEDERAL SECURITIES : Case -cv-00-sjo-e Document 1 Filed 0/01/ Page 1 of Page ID #1 1 LIONEL Z. GLANCY (#0) MICHAEL GOLDBERG (#) ROBERT V. PRONGAY (#0) GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Century Park East, Suite 0 Los Angeles, California

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RYAN EDMUNDSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, THE FIRST MARBLEHEAD CORP., PETER B. TARR, JACK L. KOPNISKY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA :1-cv-0-CAS-RAO Document 1 Filed /0/1 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHINACACHE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD., SONG

More information

information concerning RYAM and the Individual Defendants.

information concerning RYAM and the Individual Defendants. By and through its undersigned counsel, Plaintiff alleges the following against Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. ("RYAM" or the "Company") and certain of the Company's executive officers and/or directors

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ; '

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ; ' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ; ' r-n U.S, Dic7: ARNOLD MAHLER, On Behalf Of ) Civil Action No. Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff,

More information

Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FARMLAND PARTNERS INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-00-JST Document Filed0// Page of 0 of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., SANG PARK, TAE YOUNG HWANG, and MARGARET SAKAI, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 4:15-cv-01862 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS and On Behalf Situated, of All Others Similarly v. Plaintiff, Case No. 4:15-cv-1862

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: DRAFT v. Plaintiff, FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS HEALTH

More information

Case 1:17-cv RA Document 1 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:17-cv RA Document 1 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 19 Case 1:17-cv-00916-RA Document 1 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 19 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Phillip Kim, Esq. (PK 9384) Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (LR 5733) 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, New York 10016

More information

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:17-cv-01375 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SUSAN DENENBERG, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:17-cv-13536-LVP-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 10/30/17 Pg 1 of 29 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN PAUL RUCKEL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA [PLAINTIFF], Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES

More information

Case 2:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 18

Case 2:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 18 Case 2:16-cv-00965-BCW Document 2 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 18 ZANE L CHRISTENSEN (USB 14614 STEVEN A. CHRISTENSEN (USB 5190 CHRISTENSEN YOUNG & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 9980 South 300 West, Ste 200 Sandy, UT 84070

More information

Case 3:17-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1

Case 3:17-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1 Case 3:17-cv-04908-MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. 609 W. South Orange Avenue, Suite 2P South Orange, NJ 07079 Tel: (973) 313-1887

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:17-cv-01954 Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KAYD CURRIER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, Case -cv-00-sjo-e Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID # LIONEL Z. GLANCY (#0) MICHAEL GOLDBERG (#) ROBERT V. PRONGAY (#0) GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Century Park East, Suite 0 Los Angeles, California

More information

Case 1:11-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2011 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2011 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:11-cv-22855-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2011 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA STANLEY WOLFE, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NIKKI BOLLINGER GRAE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DAMON T. HINIGER,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 1:14-cv-00952-UNA Document 1 Filed 07/17/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRADLEY M. FLETCHER, Individually ) and On Behalf of All Others Similarly ) Situated,

More information

Case 1:13-cv RA Document 1 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 1:13-cv RA Document 1 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, Defendants Case 1:13-cv-07409-RA Document 1 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SATISH DOSHI, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:14cv02368 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/15114 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SEAN CADY, Individually and on Behalf of ) All Other Persons

More information

Case3:13-cv SC Document1 Filed07/26/13 Page1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA V0. I

Case3:13-cv SC Document1 Filed07/26/13 Page1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA V0. I Case3:3-cv-03-SC Document Filed0/2/3 Page of 2 2 0 Uj U.. 2 3 8 2 2 2 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA V0. I 3 3 On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. ABEL M. BROWN, JR., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. ABEL M. BROWN, JR., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case 1:15-cv-24425-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2015 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ABEL M. BROWN, JR., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PLAINTIFF, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Civ. A. No. CLASS ACTION v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES

More information

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:17-cv-02368 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JOSEPH PRAUSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. : : Plaintiffs, : : vs.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. : : Plaintiffs, : : vs. Case 118-cv-02319 Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x GLENN EISENBERG, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PLAINTIFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, FIRST NBC BANK HOLDING COMPANY, ASHTON J. RYAN, JR. and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. Case:1-cv-00-EJD Document1 Filed0/0/1 Page1 of 1 1 1 1 Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) POMERANTZ LLP North Camden Drive Beverly Hills CA 0 Telephone: (, ) -0 E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com Jeremy A. Lieberman J. Alexander

More information

Case 2:15-cv JMA-AKT Document 1 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1. CASE No.: COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

Case 2:15-cv JMA-AKT Document 1 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1. CASE No.: COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Case 2:15-cv-01070-JMA-AKT Document 1 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (LR 5733) Phillip Kim, Esq. (PK 9384) Kevin Chan, Esq. (KC 0228) 275 Madison

More information

Case 1:12-cv PAC Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Case 1:12-cv PAC Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case 1:12-cv-04512-PAC Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JEFFREY GRODKO, Individually and On Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Case No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, V. AZZ, INC., THOMAS E. FERGUSON, and PAUL

More information

Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (Nadler v. Clarent Corp., et al., Case No. C BZ)

Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (Nadler v. Clarent Corp., et al., Case No. C BZ) Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (Nadler v. Clarent Corp., et al., Case No. C-01-3406-BZ Source: Milberg Weiss Date: 09/07/01 Time: 3:57 PM MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.: Case 1:15-cv-07214 Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANIEL LUNA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.:

More information

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:18-cv-03655-ER Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PEIFA XU, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case 314-cv-00755-AWT Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIAN PEREZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff(s),

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 28 PENSION FUND, Individually and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, THE FIRST MARBLEHEAD CORP.,

More information

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/15/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/15/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:14-cv-02368 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/15/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SEAN CADY, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons

More information

[Additional counsel appear on signature page.] Plaintiff,

[Additional counsel appear on signature page.] Plaintiff, 1 1 1 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.], Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION ROBERT GOSS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS,

More information

NATURE OF THE ACTION. 1. This is a securities class action on behalf of purchasers of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare

NATURE OF THE ACTION. 1. This is a securities class action on behalf of purchasers of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a securities class action on behalf of purchasers of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc.) ( Allscripts-Misys,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : : : : : : : : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES FINN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, DORAL FINANCIAL CORP., SALOMON LEVIS, RICHARD F. BONINI, RICARDO

More information

ORIGINAL. -l^ K CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 '7 L'I FEB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ORIGINAL. -l^ K CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 '7 L'I FEB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS j K- -l^ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ORIGINAL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, V. Plaintiff SWANK ENERGY INCOME ADVISERS, LP, SWANK CAPITAL, LLC, JERRY

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Lesley Elizabeth Weaver (0) BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP th Street, Suite 00 Oakland, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00 lweaver@bfalaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. Plaintiff ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. Plaintiff ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (LR 5733) Phillip Kim, Esq. (PK 9384) 275 Madison Ave., 34th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 686-1060 Fax: (212) 202-3827 Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. KAREN BARNWELL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. KAREN BARNWELL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case 1:14-cv-01243-KMT Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 24 Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO KAREN BARNWELL, Individually and on Behalf

More information

Case 2:17-cv LDW-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv LDW-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 Case 2:17-cv-04412-LDW-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:18-cv-01549 Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN V. FERRIS and JOANN M. FERRIS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY NATURE OF THE CLAIM 1. This is a securities class action brought on behalf of all purchasers

More information

Case 1:18-cv CMA-KLM Document 1 Filed 07/11/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv CMA-KLM Document 1 Filed 07/11/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:18-cv-01771-CMA-KLM Document 1 Filed 07/11/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. ALEXANDER KACHMAR, Individually and On Behalf

More information

Case 1:17-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:17-cv-04695-PGG Document 1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMARENDRA THUMMETI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Lionel Z. Glancy Michael Goldberg Robert V. Prongay Elaine Chang 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 201-9150 Facsimile: (310)

More information

Case 2:13-cv SVW-PLA Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 34 Page ID #:7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case 2:13-cv SVW-PLA Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 34 Page ID #:7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case :-cv-0-svw-pla Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: FILED I 0 0 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP LIONEL Z. GLANCY (0) MICHAEL GOLDBERG (#) ROBERT V. PRONGAY (#0) Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, PLAINITFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, FANHUA, INC, CHUNLIN WANG, and PENG GE, Defendants. CLASS

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:18-cv-00873 Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID LEE, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GARY W. HOLDEN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, TRIANGLE CAPITAL CORPORATION, E. ASHTON POOLE, STEVEN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE (NASHVILLE DIVISION)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE (NASHVILLE DIVISION) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE (NASHVILLE DIVISION) In re HCA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-00960 CLASS ACTION Judge

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.: Case 1:16-cv-10471-MPK Document 1 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MATTHEW CRANDALL, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

More information

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 104 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 66

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 104 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 66 Case :-cv-0-wha Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS () NADIM G. HEGAZI () Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff(s, LANNETT COMPANY, INC., ARTHUR P. BEDROSIAN, and MARTIN P. GALVAN,

More information

Case 1:14-cv JGK Document 2 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv JGK Document 2 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:14-cv-06046-JGK Document 2 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAY FRECHTER, Individually And On } Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Civil

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. 2 5 9 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, V. Plaintiff, 9 QUALCOMM, INC., STEVEN M. MOLLENKOPF, DEREK K. ABERLE,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 2:16-cv-04579-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Laurence Rosen, Esq. 609 W. South Orange Avenue, Suite 2P South Orange, NJ 07079 Tel: (973) 313-1887

More information

Case 1:18-cv NRB Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 25

Case 1:18-cv NRB Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 25 Case 1:18-cv-04993-NRB Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NICK SIMCO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICK A. CARPENTER and ROBERT J. KEN NED Y, on behal f of thems elves and all others simila rly situat ed, Civ. No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT JURY

More information

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:18-cv-04473 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ASHLEY PIERRELOUIS, Individually and on Behalf of All

More information

VIRTU FINANCIAL, INC. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES POLICY. (adopted by the Board of Directors on April 3, 2015)

VIRTU FINANCIAL, INC. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES POLICY. (adopted by the Board of Directors on April 3, 2015) VIRTU FINANCIAL, INC. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES POLICY (adopted by the Board of Directors on April 3, 2015) This document sets forth the policy of Virtu Financial, Inc. a Delaware corporation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------x Dr. Robert Gluck, On Behalf Of Himself And All Others

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TIM SCHULER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CENTRAL EUROPEAN DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, WILLIAM V. CAREY

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed /0/ Page of POMERANTZ LLP Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: () - E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com - additional counsel on signature page

More information

X : : : : X X : : : : : : X. below, upon information and belief, based upon, inter alia, the investigation of counsel, which

X : : : : X X : : : : : : X. below, upon information and belief, based upon, inter alia, the investigation of counsel, which UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION IN RE INFORMAX, INC. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION X : : : : X X : : : : :

More information