ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework
|
|
- Beatrix Grant
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 15 C O P Y R I G H T 2013 T R A N S P O W E R N E W Z E A L A N D L I M I T E D. A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D Preface This document has been prepared to outline the state of development and application of an Asset Health Framework for Grid assets, as at the date of the RCP2 submission in December Preface This document has been prepared to outline the state of development and application of an Asset Health Framework for Grid assets, as at the date of the RCP2 submission in December ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework.. Page 1 of 19
2 C O P Y R I G H T 2013 T R A N S P O W E R N E W Z E A L A N D L I M I T E D. A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D This document is protected by copyright vested in Transpower New Zealand Limited ( Transpower ). No part of the document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means including, without limitation, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Transpower. No information embodied in the documents which is not already in the public domain shall be communicated in any manner whatsoever to any third party without the prior written consent of Transpower. Any breach of the above obligations may be restrained by legal proceedings seeking remedies including injunctions, damages and costs. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework.
3 Table of Contents ASSET HEALTH... 1 ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION Purpose Risk Management ASSET HEALTH INDICES AHI MODELS AHI Categories APPLICATIONS Relationship to Service Performance FORECASTING ASSET HEALTH FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS Extensions to Other Fleets Refinements to Current Models... 5 APPENDIX A: AHI FORECAST SCENARIOS... 7 APPENDIX B: POWER TRANSFORMERS... 8 APPENDIX C: CIRCUIT BREAKERS APPENDIX D: TRANSMISSION LINES ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework.
4 Decreasing Asset Health BR02 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This document explains the development and application of an asset health framework as part of our overall asset risk management approach. It includes an overview of asset health and describes the different categories of asset health, how we use asset health indices (AHI), and future improvements. Details of our AHI models are set out in the appendices. 1.2 Risk Management Risk management is an important foundation for asset management. Its overall purpose is to understand the cause, effect and likelihood of adverse events and to optimally manage associated risks to an acceptable level. We do not yet have a fully quantified risk assessment framework that can be applied to the management of our assets. As an interim measure, we have sought to reflect the two main determinants (likelihood and consequence) of risk through an integrated framework by using asset health and asset criticality as simplified proxies. 1 We use a combination of asset health and criticality to reflect asset-related risk. This is used to support prioritisation within our planning processes. Our asset health and criticality frameworks have been designed to be used together. An illustration of the concept is shown below. Increasing Criticality Figure 1: Asset Risk Proxy: Asset Health and Criticality 2 ASSET HEALTH INDICES We have developed AHI as an asset management tool that supports the prioritisation of asset management interventions. It serves as a simplified proxy for the likelihood of asset failure. In our model, asset health is measured in years and reflects the remaining life of assets, where remaining life represents the estimated time before an intervention may be required in response to increasing asset risk. When remaining life is zero, it does not mean that failure is necessarily imminent, but does indicate that an intervention is likely to be required and should be investigated. 1 Asset health is used with asset criticality, which acts as a proxy for the consequences of failure (refer BR03 Asset Risk Management Criticality Framework). ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 1
5 To date AHI models have been developed for three core assets: Transmission lines 2 ; Power transformers; and Outdoor circuit breakers. The above asset classes were selected for AHI because they are discrete identifiable assets with reasonable asset data that will be subject to material expenditure during RCP2 and beyond. We are expanding AHI to cover additional fleets. Based on AHI forecasts we can estimate the required future volume of asset interventions. These are then used to inform our expenditure forecasts. The approach and methodology is still in development and is continuously being improved. 3 AHI MODELS As discussed above, asset health is expressed in terms of remaining life, reflecting the estimated time before an asset intervention is required. 3 The design of the AHI model is based on factors relevant to the particular asset fleet. The factors incorporated into the design of an AHI model may include: the condition of the asset condition degradation models or projections factors that affect the rate of degradation, such as the environment, or the frequency of operation failure and outage rate historic and projected known defects in certain assets or groups of assets issues that limit acceptable lifetime, such as compliance with safety or environmental regulations the age of the asset life expectancy for the asset class. 3.1 AHI Categories The derived remaining life is used to assign an AHI category as set out in Table 1. The basis for the categories is flexible and we have chosen them to align with our regulatory control periods. 2 3 Transmission lines, in this case, includes a number of associated fleets e.g. insulators, foundations, towers etc. Refer to Appendix B for more information. The need to upgrade assets to meet increased load or system fault levels is not considered in our AHI models. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 2
6 AHI Category (years) Implied Timing of Intervention Now Due RCP1 0 2 RCP1 2 7 RCP RCP3 12+ Beyond RCP3 Table 1: AHI Categories 4 APPLICATIONS The main applications of AHI include: forecasting the likelihood of failures in our asset fleets identifying assets that may be particularly at risk, and should be prioritised for intervention providing a consistent basis for monitoring asset fleets over time supporting decisions on prioritising investments within and between fleets testing and visualising the future effects of alternative fleet investment scenarios supporting capital investment decisions. 4.1 Relationship to Service Performance As set out in the Service Performance Measures paper 4, we have developed a set of customer-facing service performance measures and targets. To support the delivery of these targets we will monitor the likelihood of asset failure using AHI. This includes seeking health improvements to ensure assets remain available and to manage the likelihood of outages caused by asset failure. Given the ongoing refinement to these AHI models, and that our service performance measures are maturing, it is too early to directly link AHI to either service performance improvements or revenue. 5 FORECASTING ASSET HEALTH To date, AHI have been mainly used to inform replacement and refurbishment decisions. Figure 2 provides an example of how asset health has been used to demonstrate the impacts of an investment scenario for tower foundations refurbishments. The charts compare asset health in 2019/20, following the investment programme, with a do nothing scenario. 4 BR04 Service Performance Measures. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 3
7 FOUNDATIONS- ASSET HEALTH (19/20 - PLAN) 12+ YRS (91%) 7-12 YRS (5%) 2-7 YRS (4%) 0-2 YRS (0%) NOW DUE (0%) FOUNDATIONS- ASSET HEALTH (19/20 - DO NOTHING) 12+ YRS (79%) 7-12 YRS (5%) 2-7 YRS (4%) 0-2 YRS (2%) NOW DUE (10%) Figure 2: Example AHI comparison charts intervention versus no intervention When forecast remaining life is zero (indicated by Now Due ), it does not mean that an asset is about to fail. Instead, it indicates that an asset intervention is likely to be required and should be investigated. The relationships between AHI, intervention strategies and expenditure are set out in the relevant fleet strategies. An overview of the method used to develop these forecast scenarios is included in Appendix A. 6 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS The design of the AHI models is still at an early stage. We expect that these models will be continually refined as our asset management approach improves, and we obtain more consistent and higher-quality condition data to support the models. Additional improvements will include extending the use of AHI to other fleets and further embedding the models and their outputs into our planning and asset information systems. We may ultimately be able to make a formal linkage between AHI and service performance measures that have recently been developed. This would improve our ability to directly link investment scenarios with future service performance. The following sections provide further detail on our plans for the extension and improvement of our AHI models. 6.1 Extensions to Other Fleets We are working to extend the coverage of AHI to further fleets, including: Disconnectors and earth switches: we are currently reviewing our asset management approach for disconnectors and earth switches. The improvement plan will include updating our asset intervention criteria for these assets. This work may enable the development of an AHI model for this class of equipment. This work is planned for early Power cables: we are undertaking a pilot investigation into partial discharge mapping to assess the internal condition of a power cable. There is potential for this new condition information to be incorporated into an AHI model in Conductor asset health: the development of an AHI model for conductors is at a relatively early stage in its development, and is based on expected life for each conductor type by corrosion zone. We will continue to refine and develop this model throughout RCP2, using more detailed inspections such as close aerial inspections, Cormon testing and laboratory inspections of samples. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 4
8 6.2 Refinements to Current Models Transmission Lines AHI models We are planning the following improvements to our transmission line AHI models. Degradation curves: For tower steel, insulators, and attachment points, we plan to further enhance the degradation curves used as the basis for corrosion and the geographic zones in which structures are located. For grillages, we plan to ensure the modelling includes lessons learned from the refurbishment programme in relation to observed degradation in various soil types, moisture contents, land use, and so on. Asset data/knowledge: while good asset attribute and condition data is available for most sites, some fields (such as type test reports) may be incomplete. Data quality and completeness will be reviewed, cleansed and augmented as required to ensure a high-quality dataset is maintained. AC Stations AHI models We are planning the following improvements to our AC Stations AHI models: Condition assessment granularity: to improve the granularity of substation condition assessment, we are planning to adopt the scoring system (as used in transmission lines). This will enable a more accurate assessment of condition, enabling improved predictions of future condition and remaining life. Tools and training: improved tools and training for assessing condition will be considered for substation staff. It has also been recommended that testing regimes be refined. Testing regimes should be reviewed to include tests that most directly indicate asset deterioration. Results will record the condition before and after any work. This would test the effectiveness of maintenance intervals, and provide better estimates of expected long-term deterioration. Condition ageing : there can be long maintenance/inspection intervals for assets. If a condition score was within acceptable limits at the time recorded, it may now have deteriorated, perhaps significantly. It is therefore desirable to age the older condition score or test results to obtain a predicted/estimated condition or test score as of today or a future date. Increased granularity and condition degradation curves will be developed to allow systematic ageing of AC Stations condition assessment data. Data processes: data processes must be capable of ensuring that work done to change the condition of an asset (such as transformer rust removal) is recorded, together with the resulting change in condition assessment. Transformer through-faults: data about transient disturbances is not sufficient at present to determine how many through-faults a transformer has suffered and their magnitudes. New data sources are being investigated to enable this information to be collected in future. Transformer AHI: We are a member of the CIGRE power transformer committee, which is currently discussing guidelines for developing an asset health approach for power transformers. As part of this discussion, we will be disclosing information, along with peer utilities, on asset data, failure rates and performance issues to the CIGRE study group. Once the guidelines are completed, we will assess their applicability and may adopt them. CBRM Study: we plan to undertake a pilot investigation of a full Condition-Based Risk Management (CBRM) model, with an initial focus on outdoor circuit breakers. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 5
9 APPENDICES ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 6
10 APPENDIX A: AHI FORECAST SCENARIOS The asset health forecast is prepared by taking a snapshot of the current population for the asset fleet from asset databases, along with the investment programme as at the date of the snapshot. A remaining life is assigned to each asset in the current population based on the factors in the AHI model that are relevant to the particular fleet. The remaining life can be calculated for any point in time between the date of the extract and the end of RCP2 or other significant milestone. The model must be refreshed using updated condition assessment results, test data, and latest failure history each time a new snapshot is produced. If an annual update process is followed, each asset typically loses one year of remaining life every elapsed calendar year, unless it is replaced or refurbished in which case a revised remaining life year is assigned, based on the date of replacement plus the nominal expected life for the asset type. Forecasts of asset health can be prepared for various periods, and with various investment scenarios. A typical forecast will compare the asset health resulting from a do nothing scenario, with the asset health resulting from a defined investment scenario. Do nothing scenario Do nothing in this case means no investment in a defined planning period. For a base case scenario of do nothing in a defined period such as RCP2, the first step in forecasting asset health is to generate the population of assets expected to be in service at the start of the period. This forecast population is derived from the current extract, together with adjustments for the changes in the asset base that will result from investments planned to occur between the date of the extract and the start of RCP2. For the scenario of no investment in the RCP2 period, the expected population at the start of the period will then be retained and aged by calculating the remaining life for each asset at the start of RCP2, and decreasing this by one year for each year throughout RCP2. 5 Defined investment scenario Preparing the forecast of asset health for a defined investment scenario also commences with the predicted population of assets at the start of RCP2 period, as used in the no investment scenario. However, in this case, a number of the existing assets will be replaced or refurbished during the period, as set out in the proposed investment plan. For these assets, their remaining life will be reset based on the year of replacement and the nominal expected operating life for that asset type. All other assets are aged as in the no investment scenario. This can be repeated for a number of different investment scenarios. 5 Additional assets could be added to the model to reflect forecast changes in the fleet arising from system growth, such as from new Grid Exit Points (GXPs). However, in general, these would not have a material effect on the asset health forecast for the RCP2 period. At this stage, new assets forecast to be added for system growth have not been included in the model. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 7
11 APPENDIX B: POWER TRANSFORMERS Our power transformer population base is small and diverse compared to our international peers and this makes it difficult to confidently calculate AHI entirely using statistics (for example, industry standardised asset condition scores and forecast failure rates or hazard functions). We have therefore concentrated on factors that have affected the performance or led to major failures in our fleet, over the past 30 years of operating experience. For each of these characteristics, we have undertaken a simple statistical or engineering judgement approach to inform AHI. These characteristics and their corresponding remaining life adjustments and commentary are set out in Table 2. Factor Adjustment to remaining life Commentary Base life Major overhaul Winding design or manufacturing defects Transformer components Poor external condition Manufactured <1992 Base life of 60 years Manufactured >1992 Base life of 70 years Single phase units that have undergone major overhaul increase of 10 years Specific makes and models reduction of 15 years Mechanically ganged tap changers decrease of 10 years Tap changer generic design defects decrease of 10 years Bushing generic design defects decrease of 5 years Poor external condition decrease of 5 years We have improved our transformer design specification since We expect these transformers to have a longer base life than those manufactured before The base life of transformers manufactured before 1992 is established based on optimal replacement age (analysis detailed in the fleet strategy). We have completed a programme of major overhaul on most of our single phase transformer fleet. These overhauled transformers have not yet had a major failure or intervention and we expect them to have an extended life as a result. We experienced a high rate of failures of a particular type of 220 kv interconnecting transformer. The cause of these failures has been attributed to generic winding design defects. The remaining life adjustment is based on an engineering statistical analysis comparing the specific makes/models with the rest of the fleet. Components such as tap changers and bushings contribute to a significant portion of failures and unplanned outages. We have identified specific makes and models of these transformer components and have assigned the respective remaining life adjustments based on simplistic engineering analysis/judgement. Technically, poor external condition is not a driver for replacement; but it is a useful proxy for wholeof-life costs (such as increased maintenance cost or environmental oil leak costs). Poor internal condition High moisture content decrease of 10 years High DGA/Furans decrease of 10 years Table 2: AHI Categories Moisture content, DGA and Furans readings are an indication of failure risk. Other factors, characteristics and analysis that were considered but not included in the model were single-phase banks versus three-phase banks, winding design, and failure functions. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 8
12 Single-phase banks versus three-phase banks: the model already incorporates a number of the characteristics of our single-phase transformers that lead to poor asset health. We have not yet determined that a further adjustment factor is warranted that would specifically penalise single-phase transformers compared with three-phase transformers. Winding design: adjustments have only been applied to one type of transformer, as data on other makes/models was not conclusive. Failure functions: our population base is too small and we have too many unique/bespoke transformers to develop a statistically confident hazard or failure function for each characteristic. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 9
13 No of CB Operation counts BR02 APPENDIX C: CIRCUIT BREAKERS The AHI model for outdoor circuit breakers is mainly based on fleet wide performance issues we have encountered in the past. The model first takes into account the initial life expectancy of a circuit breaker depending on its interrupter type. The life expectancy has been based on our historic experience and analysis: SF 6 type 35 years bulk oil types 45 years other interrupter types 40 years. Most transmission circuit breakers undergo relatively few operations, and are unlikely to reach the limits of their mechanical endurance before they are replaced for another reason. However, some circuit breakers operate frequently, such as those switching capacitor banks. Circuit breakers that undergo a large number of operations will eventually deteriorate. To model this deterioration, we forecast the number of circuit breaker operations. If this exceeds the operation count limit before the expiry of the initial life expectancy (such as in the case of frequently operated circuit breakers), then the time to reach the operation count limit takes precedence (see Figure 3) Example of End of Life Calculation based on No of CB Operations Manufacturer recommended operation count limit Base Life Year End of Life Figure 3: Example of End of Life Calculation based on number of circuit breaker operations In addition, the following factors are applied when determining circuit breaker asset health: historical performance versus expectations leak-prone SF 6 models and whether these have been refurbished whether or not it is a minimum oil circuit breaker corrosion zones for bulk oil circuit breakers sites whether a model is orphan (less than 5 units of that model left in service). ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 10
14 CA CODE BR02 APPENDIX D: TRANSMISSION LINES Introduction This appendix sets out the current AHI models for our transmission lines assets, including: towers - tower steel - attachment points tower paint foundations grillages poles insulators dampers and spacers AHI Inputs Three sources of data are used to calculate transmission line AHI: MMS/MAXIMO: information used from our asset management information systems includes: - condition assessment data - environmental factors such as the corrosion zone - material/construction of asset - installation/commissioning date. Asset knowledge: typical asset knowledge includes expected asset life and intervention point (typically a condition assessment score at which we will intervene). Degradation path: typical degradation paths have been derived for specific assets. Example degradation curves for tower steel are shown in Figure 4. TOWER STEEL DEGRADATION RATE CURVES 100 EXTREME GALVANISING DEGRADING VERY SEVERE SEVERE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED AGE (YEARS) RUSTING STARTING TOWER CRUMBLING Figure 4: Example Degradation Curves for Tower Steel MODERATE LOW BENIGN ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 11
15 Calculations AHI for transmission lines uses the inputs described above and performs a series of calculations to estimate remaining life. In general the calculation evaluates the following two results: implied age at inspection, and implied age at present day Implied Age at Inspection: This uses a combination of CA data and degradation path to arrive at an implied age. This can be different to actual age and is arrived at by finding an implied age based on actual asset condition. Implied Age at Present Day: The Implied Age at Inspection is aged by adding the elapsed years since the last condition assessment. This value can then be converted to an Estimated CA at Present Day based on the degradation path. AHI Outputs The final calculation generally uses the following equation to arrive at a figure for AHI: AHI = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] A typical AHI calculation for transmission lines is shown in Figure 5. Inputs Calculation Output MMS / Maximo [Body Major Steel Cond], [Body Minor Steel Cond] Average of ([Body Major Steel Cond], [Body Minor Steel Cond]) KEY Data CA Score Calculation Degradation Curves Corrosion Zone Degradation Curve Data Derive [Implied Age (@ Inspection)] from degradation curve Result [Implied Age (@ Inspection)] [Years Since Inspection] [Implied Age (@ Inspection)] + [Years Since Inspection] [Implied Age (12/13)] Asset Knowledge [Expected Life] [Expected Life] [Implied Age (12/13)] Remaining Life AHI Figure 5: AHI Calculation for Tower Steel (example) ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 12
16 Transmission Line Fleets Table 3 summarises the key inputs, calculations, and inputs for the calculation of AHI for each transmission line fleet. Fleet Inputs Calculation Output Tower Tower Steel MMS/MAXIMO: Body Major Steel Condition score Body Minor Steel Condition score Date of Condition Assessment Corrosion Zone. Degradation Path (Figure 4) Asset Knowledge: Typical life expectancies for unpainted towers for the six corrosion zones. Condition Assessment score: Average of Body Major Steel Condition and Body Minor Steel Condition. This is done to provide a single value for tower steel condition. Implied Age at Inspection: Derived using the Condition Assessment score and the appropriate degradation curve. Implied Age at Present Day [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] Tower Attachment Points MMS/MAXIMO: Attach Condition score Date of Condition Assessment Corrosion Zone. Implied Age at Inspection: Derived using the CA Score and the appropriate degradation curve. Implied Age at Present Day [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] Degradation Path (identical to tower steel) Asset Knowledge: Typical life expectancies for attachment points for the six corrosion zones. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 13
17 Fleet Inputs Calculation Output Paint MMS/MAXIMO: Date of Condition Assessment Corrosion Zone Last Paint Date Tower Steel CA. Unpainted towers: Years to Optimal First Paint (from new) Implied Age at Present Day Painted towers: [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Years until first paint or repaint] Asset Knowledge: Repaint period for each corrosion zone Optimal condition code for tower painting. Years until repaint (based on last paint date) Foundation & Grillage MMS/MAXIMO: Condition score Grillages Non-grillages Date of Condition Assessment. Implied Age at Inspection: Derived using the CA Score and the appropriate degradation rate. Implied Age at Present Day [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] Degradation Path: Straight line based on historic degradation. Asset Knowledge: Expected asset life is allocated to each foundation based on observed life and typical condition degradation rates for each foundation type. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 14
18 Fleet Inputs Calculation Output Poles MMS/MAXIMO: Condition score Date of Condition Assessment. Degradation Path: Implied Age at Inspection: Derived using the CA Score and the appropriate degradation rate. Implied Age at Present Day [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] Straight line based on historic degradation. Asset Knowledge: Expected asset life is allocated to each pole based on observed life and typical condition degradation rates for each foundation type. Insulator MMS/MAXIMO: Insulator (insulator/hot/cold) Condition score and Date of condition Assessment Insulator Material and Type (Suspension/Strain) Corrosion Zone Year of Manufacture/Commissioned Date. Degradation Path Degradation curves (glass/porcelain) Straight line degradation (composite). Asset Knowledge: Condition Assessment score: Minimum of the three (insulator/hot end/cold end) Condition Assessment scores. Implied Age at Inspection: Glass/porcelain only: derived using the Condition Assessment score and the appropriate degradation rate. Implied Age at Present Day [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] Typical life expectancies for insulators for the six corrosion zones. ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 15
19 Fleet Inputs Calculation Output Dampers and spacers MMS/MAXIMO: Damper/spacer Condition score and Date of Condition Assessment. Corrosion Zone. Year of Manufacture/Commissioned Date. Degradation Path Degradation curves. Asset Knowledge: Typical life expectancies for dampers/spacers for the six corrosion zones. Table 3: Transmission Line AHI Inputs, Calculations, and Outputs Implied Age at Inspection: Derived using the Condition Assessment score and the appropriate degradation rate. Implied Age at Present Day [AHI (Remaining Life)] = [Expected Asset Life] - [Implied Age at Present Day] ASSET RISK MANAGEMENT Asset Health Framework 16
SP Energy Networks Business Plan
SP Energy Networks 2015 2023 Business Plan Updated March 2014 Annex 33kV Substation Plant Strategy SP Energy Networks 30 March 2014 March 2014 Issue Date Issue No. Document Owner Amendment Details 17th
More informationIndependent Review of Aurora Network summary of findings. Michael Van Doornik, Manager Advisory (VIC) 31 October 2018
Independent Review of Aurora Network summary of findings Michael Van Doornik, Manager Advisory (VIC) 31 October 2018 Agenda 1. Terms of reference 2. Limitations of the review 3. Our approach to undertaking
More informationTranspower Individual Price-Quality Path Determination 2015
ISBN 978-1-869456-27-6 Project no. 14.11/14120 Public version Transpower Individual Price-Quality Path Determination 2015 This consolidated version of the principal determination and amendment determinations
More informationExpenditure Forecast Methodology
Forecast Methodology Regulatory Control Period 2018-19 to 2022-23 Version 1.0 Security Classification: Public ElectraNet Corporate Headquarters 52-55 East Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 PO Box
More informationHORIZON ENERGY DISTRIBUTION LIMITED
HORIZON ENERGY DISTRIBUTION LIMITED THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT DATE, 31 MARCH 2010 Pursuant to the Commerce Act (Electricity Distribution Thresholds) Notice 2004 and Amendment Notice
More informationSPT.SHET_Network Risk Annex (NARA) ISSUE 18
SPT.SHET_Network Risk Annex (NARA) Asset ISSUE 18 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 8 1.1. Methodology Overview... 10 1.1.1. 1.1.2. 1.1.3. 1.1.4. Asset (A)... 11 Material Failure Mode (F)... 11 Probability
More informationBranch Name Commerce Commission Wellington NEW ZEALAND 27 June 2011 ISBN:
Draft decision Minor Capital Expenditure and Operating Expenditure Allowances, and Quality Standards to apply to Transpower for the Remainder Period of Regulatory Control Period 1 Branch Name Commerce
More informationTranspower Individual Price-Quality Path Determination NZCC XX
1 Project no. 14.11/14120 Public version Transpower Individual Price-Quality Path Determination NZCC XX The Commission: S Begg P Duignan Dr S Gale Summary of the determination: Pursuant to Part 4 of the
More informationUK Power Networks. Overall Cost Benefit Analysis
UK Power Networks Overall Cost Benefit Analysis Contents 1 Executive Summary 3 1.1 Analysis Conclusions 3 1.2 Summary Table 4 2 Introduction 5 2.1 Scope 5 2.2 Input Parameters 6 2.3 Asset Replacement/Refurbishment
More informationSubmitted by Western Power
Final Determination on the New Facilities Investment Test for a 66/11 kv Medical Centre Zone Substation Expansion and Voltage Conversion of the Distribution Network Submitted by Western Power 19 February
More informationDocument 15 Asset Category Modelling Overview EPN
Document 15 Asset Category Modelling Overview EPN Asset Stewardship Report 2014 Ian Butler Approved by Richard Wakelen / Barry Hatton Approved Date 03/03/2014 Document History Version Date Details Originator
More informationLIFECYCLE ASSET PORTFOLIO RENEWAL OPTIMISATION AT DRAKENSTEIN MUNICIPALITY
LIFECYCLE ASSET PORTFOLIO RENEWAL OPTIMISATION AT DRAKENSTEIN MUNICIPALITY By: Francois Joubert, Deon du Plessis, Dr Chris von Holdt, Abrie Fourie Senior Asset Management Consultant, Aurecon, Tel. 012
More informationASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT & ANALYSIS
Filed: August, 00 EB-00-0 Exhibit D Schedule Page of 0 0 0 ASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT & ANALYSIS.0 INTRODUCTION This Schedule summarizes Hydro One Distribution s Asset Condition Assessment (ACA) practices,
More informationMainPower New Zealand Limited. Asset Management Plan
MainPower New Zealand Limited. Asset Management Plan 2015 2025 MAINPOWER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2015-2025 MainPower New Zealand Limited Asset Management Plan Update 2015-2025
More informationCost Allocation Methodology
APPROVED COPYRIGHT TRANSEND NETWORKS PTY LTD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This document is protected by copyright vested in Transend Networks Pty Ltd. No part of the document may be reproduced or transmitted in
More informationPower Workers' Union (PWU) INTERROGATORY #1. Ref (a): Participant Information Package: Exhibit C1-2-1, Page 5 of 6, Table 2 (OM&A Expenditures)
Filed: 0-0- 0-0 Tx Rates Schedule Page of Power Workers' Union (PWU) INTERROGATORY # Ref (a): Participant Information Package: Exhibit C--, Page of, Table (OM&A Expenditures) Table : 0 Board Approved versus
More informationManaging the Sydney South Substation s Asset Risks. RIT-T Project Specification Consultation Report
Managing the Sydney South Substation s Asset Risks RIT-T Project Specification Consultation Report Region: Sydney South Date of issue: 3 September 2018 Disclaimer This suite of documents comprises TransGrid
More information2016 INTEGRATED TRANSMISSION PLAN COMPLIANCE REPORT
2016 INTEGRATED TRANSMISSION PLAN COMPLIANCE REPORT APPENDIX: ITP COMPLIANCE Introduction Our first integrated transmission plan (ITP), which we completed in 2013, was embedded within our regulatory proposal
More informationDocument 4 Asset Category G&P Transformers LPN
Document 4 Asset Category G&P LPN Asset Stewardship Report 2014 Andrew Stephen UK Power Networks (Operations) Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered No. 3870728. Registered Office: Newington
More informationElectricity Distribution (Information Disclosure) Requirements October 2008
Electricity Distribution (Information Disclosure) Requirements 2008 31 October 2008 ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION (INFORMATION DISCLOSURE) REQUIREMENTS 2008 1. Title, commencement, and application Contents
More informationBASE CAPEX PROPOSAL - QUALITATIVE INFORMATION
SCHEDULE F BASE CAPEX PROPOSAL - QUALITATIVE INFORMATION cl. 7.3.1, 9.1.1 F1 Qualitative information required in a base capex proposal For the purpose of clause 7.3.1 (1) a base capex proposal must, in
More informationAttachment C: How capital expenditure is proposed and approved under the capex IM
ISBN no. 978-1-869455-84-2 Project no. 14.09/16274 Public version Attachment C: How capital expenditure is proposed and approved under the capex IM Transpower capex input methodology review - Proposed
More informationElectricity Distribution Information Disclosure Determination 2012 (consolidated in 2015)
ISBN 978-1-869454-39-5 Project no. 14.09:15.01/14700:14699 Public version Electricity Distribution Information Disclosure Determination 2012 (consolidated in 2015) Date of consolidation: 24 March 2015
More informationNelson Electricity Ltd Asset Management Plan Update
Nelson Electricity Ltd Asset Management Plan Update April 2017 March 2027 April 2017 Nelson Electricity Ltd central Nelson city view In accordance with the Commerce Act Electricity Distribution Information
More informationFor Year Ended 31 March (In this Schedule, clause references are to the Electricity Distribution Information Disclosure Determination 2012)
Schedule 14 Company Name Vector For Year Ended 31 March 2014 Mandatory Explanatory Notes (In this Schedule, clause references are to the Electricity Distribution Information Disclosure Determination 2012)
More informationForecast Expenditure Summary Operating Costs
06.01.01 Forecast Expenditure Summary Operating Costs Contents 1 Introduction... 4 1.1 Operating expenditure forecast summary... 4 1.2 Ergon Energy s approach... 6 1.3 Operating expenditure forecasting
More informationOPERATIONAL INVESTMENTS
EB-0-0 Tab Schedule Page of OPERATIONAL INVESTMENTS REACTIVE CAPITAL Reactive capital investment includes funds for the replacement of failed distribution components and the restoration of system reliability.
More informationWanganui - Stratford Investment Proposal. Attachment B Costing report
Wanganui - Stratford Investment Proposal Attachment B Costing report September 2009 Document Revision Control Document Number/Version Description Date 001/ A Wanganui-Stratford Investment Proposal Attachment
More informationAUFLS information paper
AUFLS information paper Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 The under-frequency management challenge... 1 3 Overview of current arrangements... 3 3.1 The current AUFLS exemptions... 4 4 Initiatives to address
More informationDistributed Generation Connection Standard ST B Planning Engineer. Network Planning Manager. General Manager Network
Effective Date 1 May 2018 Issue Number 1.1 Page Number Page 1 of 26 Document Title Distributed Generation Connection Standard Document Number ST B1.1-001 Document Author Planning Engineer Document Reviewer
More informationTRANSPOWER MINOR CAPEX AND OPEX ALLOWANCES, AND QUALITY STANDARDS FOR RCP1 FINAL DECISIONS August 2011
TRANSPOWER MINOR CAPEX AND OPEX ALLOWANCES, AND QUALITY STANDARDS FOR RCP1 FINAL DECISIONS August 2011 Regulation Branch Commerce Commission Wellington NEW ZEALAND 12 August 2011 ISBN: 978-1-869451-62-2
More informationContents Introduction Chapter 1 - Security Policy... 6
Policy statement Contents Introduction... 5 PURPOSE... 5 SYSTEM OPERATOR POLICIES TO ACHIEVE THE PPOS and dispatch objective... 5 Avoid Cascade Failure... 5 Frequency... 6 Other Standards... 6 Restoration...
More informationAnnual Compliance Statement 30 May 2014
Electricity Distribution Services Default Price-Quality Path Determination 2012 Annual Compliance Statement 30 May 2014 Assessment as at 31 March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1. Background...
More informationSP Energy Networks Business Plan
Environmental Discretionary Reward Scheme 16 SP Energy Networks 2015 2023 Business Plan Updated March 2014 Annex Regulatory Reporting Pack Wooden Poles Guidance Document SP Energy Networks June 2013 Regulatory
More informationS atisfactory reliability and cost performance
Grid Reliability Spare Transformers and More Frequent Replacement Increase Reliability, Decrease Cost Charles D. Feinstein and Peter A. Morris S atisfactory reliability and cost performance of transmission
More informationConnection and Use of System Charge Methodology Statement ("Condition 25 Statement")
Connection and Use of System Charge Methodology Statement ("Condition 25 Statement") Revised Effective Date: 1 st January 2016 Approved by the Authority for Electricity Regulation, Oman Connection and
More informationHandbook for Optimised. Deprival Valuation of System Fixed Assets of. Electricity Lines Businesses
Handbook for Optimised Deprival Valuation of System Fixed Assets of Electricity Lines Businesses 30 August 2004 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HANDBOOK... 3 PREFACE... 5 PART ONE: INTRODUCTION...
More informationExplanatory notes to one-page performance summary of electricity distributors
ISBN no. 978-1-869455-88-0 Project no. 14.20/13107 Public version Explanatory notes to one-page performance summary of electricity distributors Date: 4 October 2017 CONTENTS 2 PURPOSE OF THIS EXPLANATORY
More informationInherent risk register guideline
Inherent risk register guideline Guidelines 16 May 2017 Market Performance Contents 1 Introduction 1 The purpose of the participant audit regime 1 The key goals of the participant audit regime 1 A risk-based
More informationWairakei Ring Investment Proposal. Project Reference: CTNI_TRAN-DEV-01. Attachment A GIT Results
Wairakei Ring Investment Proposal Project Reference: CTNI_TRAN-DEV-01 Attachment A GIT Results December 2008 Document Revision Control Document Number/Version 001/Rev A Description Wairakei Ring Investment
More informationA REPORT TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. Electrical. Mechanical. Civil. Protection&Control. Transmission & Distribution
A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Electrical f s TJ GARDINER ' \\ Mechanical Civil )j Protection&Control \, Dt Transmission & Distribution 2t Telecontrol System Planning 2012 WOOD
More informationCapital Expenditure Input Methodology draft decisions
Waikoukou 22 Boulcott Street PO Box 1021, Wellington New Zealand www.transpower.co.nz Catherine.jones@transpower.co.nz 04 590 8624 / 027 5646976 12 December 2017 Keston Ruxton Regulation Branch Commerce
More informationAsset Category Distribution Transformers LPN
Asset Category Distribution Transformers LPN Asset Stewardship Report 2013 Chino Atako 1 Approved by Richard Wakelen / Barry Hatton Approved date 05.06.2013 / 05.06.2013 Document Management and Governance
More information2018 General Rate Case
Application No.: A.16-09- Exhibit No.: SCE-0, Vol. 08 Witnesses: J. R. Goizueta M. Flores A (U 338-E) 018 General Rate Case Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume 8 - Infrastructure Replacement Before
More informationInherent risk register
Inherent risk register Guidelines 21 February 2017 Market Performance Contents 1 Introduction 1 The purpose of the participant audit regime 1 The key goals of the participant audit regime 1 A risk-based
More informationDNO COMMON NETWORK ASSET INDICES METHODOLOGY
DNO COMMON NETWORK ASSET INDICES METHODOLOGY 01/08/2016 Health & Criticality - A common framework of definitions, principles and calculation methodologies, adopted across all GB Distribution Network Operators,
More informationD.17 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INTENT 2018_19 SCI
D.17 18 19 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INTENT 2018_19 SCI Contents 1. Role and Objectives 2 1.1 Transpower s Role 2 1.2 Transpower s Objectives 2 2. Transpower s Strategy and Business Environment 3 2.1 Purpose
More informationElectricity Distribution Information Disclosure Amendments Determination 2017 [2017] NZCC 33
ISSN 1178-2560 Project no. 16104: 16275 Public version Electricity Distribution Information Disclosure Amendments Determination 2017 [2017] NZCC 33 The Commission: Sue Begg Dr Stephen Gale Dr Mark Berry
More informationWellington Electricity CPP assessment of 2010/21 capex
Commerce Commission P O Box 2351 Wellington 6140 For the Attention of: Kade Sheely 18th January 2018 Dear Kade Wellington Electricity CPP assessment of 2010/21 capex I am pleased to provide this briefing
More informationTranspower capex input methodology review
ISBN no. 978-1-869456-35-1 Project no. 14.09/16274 Public version Transpower capex input methodology review Decisions and reasons Date of publication: 29 March 2018 2 Associated documents Publication date
More informationD.17 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INTENT CONNECTING NEW ZEALAND SCI
D.17 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INTENT CONNECTING NEW ZEALAND SCI 20 15 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ROLE AND OBJECTIVES... 3 1.1 Transpower s Role... 3 1.2 Transpower s Objectives... 3 2. TRANSPOWER S STRATEGY
More informationCUSC Section 15 (CMP192) User Commitment Methodology
CUSC Section 15 (CMP192) User Commitment Methodology Guidance and Implementation Document 1 May 2012 Version 1 1 1. Summary... 3 2. Purpose of the document...3 3. Background... 4 4. Attributable and Wider
More informationTranspower New Zealand Investor update Full Year 2015
Transpower New Zealand Investor update Full Year 2015 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Full year results 3. Plan financial and capex forecasts 4. Regulatory update 5. Funding update 6. Other 2 1. Introduction
More information(Transpower) Reasons paper December 2010
Individual price-quality path (Transpower) Reasons paper December 2010 Regulation Branch Commerce Commission Wellington NEW ZEALAND 22 December 2010 ISBN: 978-1-869450-95-3 Commerce Commission i Table
More informationDECISION AND ORDER ON PHASE 1
Commission de l énergie de l Ontario DECISION AND ORDER ON PHASE 1 HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC. Leave to construct a new transmission line and facilities in the Windsor-Essex Region, Ontario. Before: Ken Quesnelle
More informationHVDC Inter-Island Link Upgrade Project. Investment Proposal. Part V Project Costs
HVDC Inter-Island Link Upgrade Project Investment Proposal Part V Project Costs Transpower New Zealand Limited 2005. All rights reserved 1 SUMMARY... 3 2 BACKGROUND... 4 3 APPROACH TO ESTIMATING COSTS...
More informationDocument 8 Asset Category HV Switchgear and LV Plant EPN
Document 8 Asset Category HV Switchgear and LV Plant EPN Asset Stewardship Report 2014 Zoe Cornish Approved by Richard Wakelen / Barry Hatton Approved Date 06/03/2014 Document History Version Date Details
More informationJemena Electricity Networks (Vic) Ltd
Jemena Electricity Networks (Vic) Ltd 2016-20 Electricity Distribution Price Review Regulatory Proposal Forecast capital expenditure report for the 2016 regulatory period Public 30 April 2015 TABLE OF
More informationRIIO T1 Business Plan. Section 5 Non-Load Related Expenditure
RIIO T1 Business Plan Section 5 Non-Load Related Expenditure Formal Issue: 28 July 2011 File Ref: 2011_SPT_Narrative_5 Non-Load Related Expenditure Non Load Narrative Page 1 of 151 Executive Summary The
More informationMANAGING THE RISKS ON TRANSFORMER ASSETS
MANAGING THE RISKS ON TRANSFORMER ASSETS by ARUN D YARGOLE & TONY McGRAIL DOBLE ENGINEERING COMPANY ayargole@doble.com What is an Asset? In commercial terms- It is an Entity that gives the owner the revenue
More informationEconomic Impacts on New Jersey of Upgrading PSE&G s Susquehanna-Roseland Transmission System
Economic Impacts on New Jersey of Upgrading PSE&G s Susquehanna-Roseland Transmission System Dr. Joseph J. Seneca Dr. Michael L. Lahr Dr. James W. Hughes Will Irving May 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE
More informationInformation Disclosure prepared according to subpart 3 of Part 4A of the Commerce Act 1986
Information Disclosure prepared according to subpart 3 of Part 4A of the Commerce Act 1986 For the Year Ended 31 March 2011 SUPPLEMENTARY UNAUDITED INFORMATION EXPLANATORY NOTE (UNAUDITED) This is an explanatory
More information2018 General Rate Case
Application No.: A.1-0- Exhibit No.: SCE-0, Vol. 1 (Appendix) Witnesses: R. Woods (U -E) 01 General Rate Case Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume 1 Appendix to Operational Overview and Risk-Informed
More informationSIMULTANEOUS TRIP OF SOUTH EAST No.1 AND No kv SVCs ON 31 JULY 2017 REVIEWABLE OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT UNDER THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY RULES
SIMULTANEOUS TRIP OF SOUTH EAST No.1 AND No.2 275 kv SVCs ON 31 JULY 2017 REVIEWABLE OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT UNDER THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY RULES Published: 20 September 2017 INCIDENT CLASSIFICATIONS
More informationOn the Development of Power Transformer Failure Models: an Australian Case Study
Number operating (n) Cumulative distribution (n) On the Development of Power Transformer Failure Models: an Australian Case Study D. Martin, J. Marks, T. Saha, O. Krause Power and Energy Systems The University
More informationAsset Category 132kV Switchgear LPN
Asset Category 132kV Switchgear LPN Asset Stewardship Report 2013 Richard Gould 1 Approved by Richard Wakelen / Barry Hatton Approved date 03.06.2013 / 17.06.2013 Document Management and Governance by
More informationStandard Development Timeline
PRC 012 2 Remedial Action Schemes Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective.
More informationThe Locomotive. Transformer Asset Management
Transformer Asset Management By William H. Bartley, P.E., The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company Introduction The deregulation of wholesale electricity supply has led to a number of
More informationHandbook for Optimised. Deprival Valuation of System Fixed Assets of. Electricity Lines Businesses
Handbook for Optimised Deprival Valuation of System Fixed Assets of Electricity Lines Businesses REVISED DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION 9 July 2004 Adjusted for Transpower Comments Deleted: 15 Deleted: 14 Inserted:
More informationXXXXX. Skookum Creek Power Project. Interconnection Facilities Study and Project Plan
XXXXX Skookum Creek Power Project Interconnection Facilities Study and Project Plan June 29, 2011 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority 2011. All rights
More informationNetwork Loss Factor Methodology
Network Loss Factor Methodology 2014-2015 Date: 12 th February 2014 T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s 1. I n t r oduction... 2 2. B a c k g r o u n d... 2 3. D e f i n i t i o n s a n d A b b r e v i a t i
More informationOsprey House, Tuesday 30 September 2014
Osprey House, Tuesday 30 September 2014 Cautionary statement This presentation contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements
More informationTRANSMISSION CHARGING STATEMENT
TRANSMISSION CHARGING STATEMENT 1 September 2016 1 September 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction... 1 2 General System Charges... 4 3 Site Specific Charges... 5 4 Connection Assets... 8 5 Least
More informationREGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT
REPORT TO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, JOBS, TRANSPORT AND RESOURCES 17 NOVEMBER 2015 REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT BUSHFIRE MITIGATION REGULATIONS AMENDMENT ACIL ALLEN CONSULTING PTY LTD ABN 68 102
More informationCUSC - SECTION 14 CHARGING METHODOLOGIES CONTENTS
CUSC - SECTION 14 CHARGING METHODOLOGIES CONTENTS 14.1 Introduction Part I -The Statement of the Connection Charging Methodology 14.2 Principles 14.3 The Calculation of the Basic Annual Connection Charge
More informationInformation Disclosure
Electricity Ashburton Limited trading as EA Networks Information Disclosure Prepared according to subpart 3 of the Part 4A Commerce Act 1986 Assessment Period: 1 April 2011 31 March 2012 Date: 11 December
More informationQuantitative Risk Modelling, Calibration and Continuous Improvement CK UMACHI RISK MANAGEMENT ENGINEER - TIMP PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
Quantitative Risk Modelling, Calibration and Continuous Improvement CK UMACHI RISK MANAGEMENT ENGINEER - TIMP PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC Agenda Relative vs Quantitative Risk Models PG&E s Risk Model History
More informationNew Mexico Public Regulation Commission P. O. Box Paseo de Peralta Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504
THE NEW MEXICO INTERCONNECTION MANUAL (To be Used in Conjunction with New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Rule 17.9.568 NMAC, Interconnection of Generating Facilities with a Rated Capacity Up to and
More informationThe Water Industry Commission for Scotland Scottish Water Scottish Water
The Water Industry Commission for Scotland Scottish Water Scottish Water Reporter s Report SR10 2 nd Draft Business Plan Appendix C Investment and Outputs Plan April 2009 SCOTTISH WATER REPORTER S REPORT
More informationAnnual Compliance Statement 29 May 2015
Electricity Distribution Services Default Price-Quality Path Determination 2012 Annual Compliance Statement 29 May 2015 Assessment as at 31 March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1. Background...
More informationRisk Considerations in Asset Management Decisions
Risk Considerations in Asset Management Decisions APIC Forum November 8, 2012 Presented by: C. Hughes R. Geddes P. Murthy 1 2 Overview 1. Risk Assessment and Asset Management 2. Overview of AE Risk Management
More informationCAP189 Standard Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) Ownership Boundaries
Stage 05: Draft CUSC Connection and Use of System Code (CUSC) CAP189 Standard Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) Ownership Boundaries This proposal seeks to modify the CUSC such that a User requesting a connection
More information2012 Budget. Customer Presentation October 10, Helping to keep the lights on, businesses running and communities strong
2012 Budget Customer Presentation October 10, 2011 Helping to keep the lights on, businesses running and communities strong Welcome & Overview Welcome! Introductions Tom Finco Budget Overview Kevin Szalacinski
More informationFor more on AWWA Membership, visit
AWWA is pleased to offer a complimentary copy of the Portland Water Bureau Asset Management case study to interested individuals. This offering is part of a collection of case studies in an AWWA Report
More informationTRIP OF MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION ELEMENTS IN THE SOUTHERN NSW AREA, 11 FEBRUARY 2017
TRIP OF MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION ELEMENTS IN THE SOUTHERN NSW AREA, 11 FEBRUARY 2017 REVIEWABLE OPERATING INCIDENT REPORT UNDER THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY RULES Published: 15 September 2017 INCIDENT CLASSIFICATIONS
More informationWELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL POLICY ON UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD CABLES
WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL POLICY ON UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD CABLES CONTENTS Foreword 3 Summary of Council Policy 3 Introduction 5 Definitions 5 Policy Objectives 5 Undergrounding Principles 5 Cost and
More informationTariff Review Application 2017/18. Submitted to LEWA Board of Directors. Corporate Planning 1/3/17 Lesotho Electricity Company
Tariff Review Application 2017/18 Submitted to LEWA Board of Directors Corporate Planning 1/3/17 Lesotho Electricity Company Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Achievements... 2 Challenges... 5 Way forward...
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL E. HAERING (CAPITAL PLAN)
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationGLOBAL CREDIT RATING CO. Rating Methodology. Structured Finance. Global Consumer ABS Rating Criteria Updated April 2014
GCR GLOBAL CREDIT RATING CO. Local Expertise Global Presence Rating Methodology Structured Finance Global Consumer ABS Rating Criteria Updated April 2014 Introduction GCR s Global Consumer ABS Rating Criteria
More informationLoss Evaluation Considerations for Utility Synchronous Condenser Applications. P.E. MARKEN, A.C. DEPOIAN GE Grid Solutions USA
21, rue d Artois, F-75008 PARIS CIGRE US National Committee http : //www.cigre.org 2016 Grid of the Future Symposium Loss Evaluation Considerations for Utility Synchronous Condenser Applications P.E. MARKEN,
More informationProject Assessment Conclusions Report
Powerlink Queensland Project Assessment Conclusions Report 27 August 2018 Addressing the secondary systems condition Disclaimer While care was taken in preparation of the information in this document,
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT: COST MINIMIZATION USING CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE. S Fretheim
RISK MANAGEMENT: COST MINIMIZATION USING CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE E Solvang, L Lundgaard, B Gustavsen, A O Eggen S Fretheim SINTEF Energy Research, Norway EBL Norwegian Electricity Association, Norway
More informationMicroFIT-Generation Connection Application For Connection of Micro-Generation Facilities of 10 kw
This application is applicable to individual or multiple generating units at the Applicant s facility with total nameplate rating of 10 kw or less. The applicant s generation facility must generate electricity
More informationEDB Information Disclosure Requirements Information Templates for Schedules 1 10
EDB Information Disclosure Requirements Information Templates for Schedules 1 10 Disclosure Date 31 August 2016 Disclosure Year (year ended) Templates for Schedules 1 10 excluding 5f 5g Template Version
More informationOtahuhu Sub-Station Conference. Graeme Everett 23 rd July 2007
Otahuhu Sub-Station Conference Graeme Everett 23 rd July 2007 The World of Norske Skog Europe - 100% Skogn Follum Union Saubrugs Parenco Walsum Steti Golbey Bruck Chongwon Hebei Chonju Pan Asia - 100%
More information2018 General Rate Case. Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume 3 R System Planning
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: A.1-0- A SCE-0, Vol. 0 R A E. Takayesu (U -E) 01 General Rate Case rd Errata ERRATA Transmission & Distribution (T&D) Volume R System Planning Before the Public
More informationICCP Infrastructure Provision Agreement between Transpower New Zealand Limited and <%#TradingName%>
ICCP Infrastructure Provision Agreement between Transpower New Zealand Limited and July 2013 ICCP Infrastructure Provision Agreement Transpower New Zealand Limited 2011. All
More informationDRAFT STCP 18-1 Issue 004 Connection and Modification Application
STCP 18-1 Connection and Modification Application Draft Issue 004 - June 2014 DRAFT STCP 18-1 Issue 004 Connection and Modification Application STC Procedure Document Authorisation Party Name of Party
More informationAs presented at the Institute of Municipal Engineering of South Africa (IMESA) conference 2013
Paper title: OUTCOMES FROM A SEWER MAINTENANCE BACKLOG INVESTIGATION As presented at the Institute of Municipal Engineering of South Africa (IMESA) conference 2013 Morné Pienaar a a Aurecon Port Elizabeth,
More informationRevisedAmended Pproposed revisions to the Access Arrangement for the Western Power Network
RevisedAmended Pproposed revisions to the Access Arrangement for the Western Power Network Formatted: Top: 2.5 cm Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 30 pt, Bold Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 30 pt,
More information