BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
|
|
- Maurice Johnston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 2009 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LOAD MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ASSOCIATED PROGRAMS AND ITS PROGRAM COST TARIFF RIDERS, SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE No UT DIRECT TESTIMONY of Ruth M. Sakya on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY October 31, 2008
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINED TERMS... iii TABLE OF ATTACHMENTS... iv I. INTRODUCTION AND QUALIFICATIONS... 1 II. ASSIGNMENT... 3 III. OVERVIEW OF SPS S APPLICATION... 4 IV. COST RECOVERY AND PROPOSED TARIFF RIDER A. Tariff Rider Costs B. Tariff Rider Calculation C Rider Bill Impacts V. INTERRUPTIBLE TARIFF TRANSITION VI. LOW-INCOME ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMMITMENT VII. CONCLUSION VERIFICATION ii
3 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINED TERMS Acronym/Defined Term Commission EUEA ICO Meaning New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Efficient Use of Energy Act Interruptible Credit Option 2009 Plan 2009 Energy Efficiency and Load Management Plan 2009 Rider 2009 Energy Efficiency and Load Management Tariff Rider Rule Commission s Energy Efficiency Rule, NMAC Saver s Switch SPS Tracker Xcel Energy XES Residential and business air conditioning and residential water heating cycling programs Southwestern Public Service Company Mechanism to track program costs and revenues Xcel Energy Inc. Xcel Energy Service Inc. iii
4 TABLE OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment Attachment RMS-1 Attachment RMS-2 Attachment RMS-3 Attachment RMS-4 Attachment RMS-5 Description 2009 Energy Efficiency and Load Management Plan 2009 Plan sections and sponsoring witness Energy efficiency accounting policies Calculation of Rider percentage Average customer impact study iv
5 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya I. INTRODUCTION AND QUALIFICATIONS Q. Please state your name and business address. A. My name is Ruth M. Sakya. My business address is 600 South Tyler St., Suite 2900, Amarillo, TX Q. On whose behalf are you testifying in this proceeding? A. I am filing testimony on behalf of Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. (Xcel Energy). Xcel Energy is a registered holding company that owns several electric and natural gas utility companies. 1 Q. By whom are you employed and in what position? A. I am employed by Xcel Energy Services Inc. (XES), the service company subsidiary of Xcel Energy, as a Manager, Regulatory Policy. Q. Please briefly outline your responsibilities as Manager, Regulatory Policy. A. My primary responsibilities include the direction and preparation of comments, testimony, and briefing materials on regulatory and legislative policy matters Xcel Energy is the parent company of four utility operating companies: Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation; Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation; Public Service Company of Colorado, a Colorado Corporation; and SPS, a New Mexico Corporation. 1
6 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. Please describe your educational background. A. I graduated from the University of Wyoming in 1998 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance. In 2001, I graduated from the University of Wyoming with a Master of Science degree in Finance, with an emphasis in Regulatory Economics. I am currently pursuing my PhD in Public Affairs at the University of Colorado at Denver. Q. Please describe your professional experience. A. I began my career in 2000, as a Senior Policy Analyst at the Public Utility Commission of Texas. In 2001, I accepted a position as Rate Analyst at a multijurisdictional electric and gas utility. In 2002, I accepted a position as a Senior Analyst with Energy & Resource Consulting, LLC, a consulting firm specializing in services to regulatory agencies and municipal entities. In 2004, I was promoted to Supervising Analyst. Later in 2004, I accepted a position of Senior Rate Analyst, Revenue Analysis in the Governmental and Regulatory Affairs department of XES. In 2007, I accepted my current position of Manager, Regulatory Policy. Q. Have you previously filed testimony at any regulatory commission? A. Yes. I have testified before the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Public Utility Commission of Texas, and New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (Commission). 2
7 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya 1 II. ASSIGNMENT Q. What is the purpose of your direct testimony? A. I provide an overview SPS s 2009 Energy Efficiency and Load Management Plan and associated programs (2009 Plan), support the requested variances from the Commission s Energy Efficiency Rule ( NMAC, Rule), and introduce the other SPS witnesses providing direct testimony in this proceeding. In addition, I discuss the costs to be recovered through the proposed 2009 Energy Efficiency and Load Management Tariff Rider (2009 Rider) and the mechanism to track program costs and revenues (Tracker), describe SPS s proposed rate design, and provide the bill impacts. I also explain how SPS will transition from its currently effective interruptible tariff to the new Interruptible Credit Option (ICO) tariff. Finally, I discuss SPS s commitment to spend $500,000 over a two-year period on low-income energy efficiency programs. Q. Are you sponsoring any sections of the 2009 Plan? A. Yes. The 2009 Plan is included as Attachment RMS-1 to my direct testimony. I sponsor the following sections of the 2009 Plan: II.D (Cost Recovery) and II.D.1 (Rate and Customer Bill Impacts). Although the 2009 Plan is attached to my direct testimony, it is supported by all of SPS s witnesses in this case. Attachment RMS-2 to my direct testimony lists each SPS witness and the section of the 2009 Plan they sponsor. 3
8 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya III. OVERVIEW OF SPS S APPLICATION Q. Please provide an overview of SPS s application. A. SPS is filing this application for approval of its 2009 Plan in accordance with the Efficient Use of Energy Act (EUEA), (Chapter 62, Article 17 NMSA 1978, as amended in 2008) and the Commission s Energy Efficiency Rule ( NMAC, Rule). Historically, SPS maintained an obligation to its customers and the environment by voluntarily offering conservation and load management programs in its service territories prior to this mandated Rule. In 2008, SPS began offering new programs designed to reach the goals established in the EUEA. SPS now seeks approval to continue offering its current programs as well as to implement new programs in SPS s proposed portfolio consists of 16 energy efficiency and load management programs, eight of which will continue from The 2009 Plan describes each of the proposed programs in detail, including the targeted customer segment and participation goals, energy and demand savings goals, proposed budgets, program administration, marketing and outreach plans, and measurement and verification plans. SPS s 2009 Plan presents cost-effective energy efficiency and load management programs which will provide system benefits and opportunities for participation across all customer sectors. 19 4
9 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. Did SPS review the EUEA and the current Rule? A. Yes. In 2008, the statutory requirement changed to require New Mexico utilities to acquire all cost-effective and achievable energy efficiency and load management, and achieve savings of no less than five percent of 2005 total retail kilowatt-hour sales to New Mexico customers in calendar year 2014 and ten percent in 2020 as a result of energy efficiency and load management programs implemented starting in SPS is committed to using its best efforts to meet these statutory offerings and believes that its 2009 Plan establishes programs that will help meet these goals. Q. Which customers are eligible to participate in these programs? A. All residential (including low-income), business, and industrial customers served by SPS in New Mexico are eligible to participate in one or more of SPS s proposed energy efficiency programs, except those who have applied and been accepted as exempt customers. Q. When will SPS begin implementing the proposed 2009 Plan and associated programs? A. SPS has eight programs from its 2008 Plan that will continue to be offered in 2009 without interruption. All of the new programs proposed in the 2009 Plan will be implemented within one month of approval of this application. 20 5
10 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. What approvals does SPS seek in this case? A. SPS requests that the Commission grant: (i) approval of SPS s proposed 2009 Plan that will be implemented in 2009; and (ii) approval of SPS s recovery of 2009 Plan costs through the proposed tariff rider and proposal to annually true up cost recovery under the 2009 Rider. Q. Does SPS seek any variances in the proceeding? A. Yes, SPS seeks a variance from: (i) K.4 NMAC, which requires all utilities to file a proposal to remove disincentives or barriers at the time of a program filing or be precluded from recovering costs to eliminate barriers or disincentives associated with its proposed program; (ii) D.5 NMAC, which requires that the proposed tariff rider not increase any customer s bill by more than the lower of one and one-half percent or $75,000 per year ( statutory tariff rider caps Z NMAC); and (iii) R NMAC, which defines a low income customer as one with an annual household income at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Q. Please discuss SPS s first variance request. A. SPS seeks a variance from K.4 NMAC, which provides: Failure to file a proposal to remove disincentives or barriers at the time of a program filing shall preclude the utility from recovering costs to eliminate barriers or disincentives associated with the proposed program. The utility may seek prospective recovery for costs of unforeseen barriers or disincentives, recognizing that 6
11 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya program approvals may need to be reconsidered in light of the revised information. Since the Rule was adopted, the statutory language regarding disincentives (and incentives) has been modified. The Commission is in the process of revising the Rule (Case No UT, In the Matter of a Rulemaking to Revise NMPRC Rule NMAC to Implement the Efficient Use of Energy Act). In this proceeding, interested parties are currently participating in a workshop process in the hope of submitting a consensus rule for Commission consideration by the end of the year (2008). SPS anticipates that a final Commission Rule will not be adopted until early As a result, SPS believes that it would be premature to file a proposal to remove disincentives and/or address incentives prior to adoption of the revised Rule. Rather, SPS asks the Commission to allow SPS to address the issues of disincentives and/or incentives resulting from the 2009 in its August 1, 2009 report filing (at which time SPS is also required to address disincentives from its 2008 Plan). Granting this variance will allow SPS to present a proposal to address the issues of disincentives and/or incentives resulting from the 2009 Plan, consistent with the recent changes to the EUEA that require any identified disincentives be removed in a manner that balances the public interest, consumers interests, and investors interests. 21 7
12 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. Please discuss SPS s second variance request. A D.5 NMAC provides: The tariff rider shall be designed to assure that it will not increase any customer s bill by more than the lower of one and one-half percent or $75,000 per year, unless needed consents from the attorney general or large customer(s) have been obtained as part of the utility s program approval. As described in the definition section of the Rule ( Z NMAC), the reference is to the statutory tariff rider caps ; however, the statute has been amended to eliminate the one and one-half percent cap. Thus, SPS believes that the one and one-half percent cap is inconsistent with the statute and requests the Commission grant SPS to exceed the one and one-half percent cap when calculating its Rider. Granting this variance will eliminate the inconsistency between the Rule and the statute. Q. Please discuss SPS s third variance request. A. SPS is requesting a variance from R NMAC that defines a low income customer as a customer that lives with an annual household income at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. To conform with the 150 percent federal poverty level thresholds applied by local community agencies in administering other low-income assistance programs in SPS s service territory, SPS requests a variance from the 200 percent poverty level threshold to a 150 percent poverty 8
13 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya level threshold. Granting this variance will broaden the number of eligible participants for the Low-Income Program in SPS s service territory. Q. Who are the other SPS direct witnesses in this case and what are their areas of testimony? A. Direct testimony supporting SPS s application and request for approval of the 2009 Plan will also be provided by the following witnesses: Peter J. Narog Donald E. Garretson Suzanne R. Doyle Craig L. Berg Mr. Narog describes and supports SPS s proposed 2009 energy efficiency programs. In addition, he describes SPS s plan to meet its $500,000 lowincome energy efficiency commitment from Case No UT. Mr. Garretson describes and supports SPS s three proposed load management programs a new interruptible tariff, the Interruptible Credit Option (ICO), and new residential and commercial air conditioning and residential water heating cycling programs, Saver s Switch. Ms. Doyle explains and supports the Total Resource Cost Test assumptions and calculations, the Planning and Research Segment, and the measurement and verification requirements. Mr. Berg supports the development of the systemlevel avoided costs, which are used by Mr. Garretson to develop the ceiling price applicable to SPS s proposed load management programs and by Ms. Doyle to determine the cost-effectiveness of the proposed energy efficiency programs. 9
14 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya IV. COST RECOVERY AND PROPOSED TARIFF RIDER A. Tariff Rider Costs Q. Is SPS allowed to recover the costs associated with implementing its proposed 2009 Plan and associated programs through an approved tariff rider? A. Yes. Both the EUEA ( (A)) and Rule ( A NMAC) allow a utility that undertakes cost-effective energy efficiency and load management programs the option to recover the costs of all the programs implemented through an approved tariff rider. Q. How does SPS decide which costs should be included in its requested rider? A. SPS identifies the costs that are specific to developing and implementing its New Mexico energy efficiency programs, including the direct costs of the programs themselves and the ongoing costs of running the programs. Generally speaking, these costs are related to: the programs (e.g., measures, materials, and equipment, rebates and bill credits), third-party provider payments, advertising and marketing expenses, independent evaluation payments, external legal counsel, consultants and contractors, labor and labor loadings directly related to providing or supporting New Mexico energy efficiency programs, and employee expenses directly related to providing or supporting New Mexico energy efficiency programs. I have provided a copy of the guidelines used by SPS to determine 10
15 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya which costs are properly included for collection through a tariff rider as Attachment RMS-3. Q. What are some examples of specific costs to be included in SPS s proposed Rider? A. The costs included in SPS s proposed Rider are those costs incurred by SPS that are solely related to the energy efficiency and load management programs identified in the 2009 Plan. Examples of specific costs that will be recovered through the 2009 Rider include: (1) the labor and benefits costs associated with an SPS Energy Efficiency Program Manager located in New Mexico, dedicated and assigned to assisting customers that participate in one or more of the proposed energy efficiency programs; (2) the cost of contractors hired to help develop the programs; and (3) the expenses associated with a third-party administrators. In addition, the Rider will include tangible program costs such as the switches installed for the Saver s Switch Program and customer rebates. Q. Have the costs identified in SPS s 2009 Plan and used as the basis of the proposed 2009 Rider been appropriately segregated from costs that would be included in a future rate case proceeding? A. Yes. In SPS s last energy efficiency case, Case No UT, the Commission approved SPS s proposal to use a Tracker to record costs and revenues associated with its energy efficiency and load management programs. 11
16 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Costs and revenues recorded to the Tracker are excluded from general rate case revenue requirements determinations. SPS believes that its Tracker will assist SPS and the Commission to ensure that program costs are recorded appropriately and facilitate year-to-year reconciliations of under- and over-recoveries. B. Tariff Rider Calculation Q. Does SPS currently have tariff rider in effect? A. Yes, SPS currently has a tariff rider that has been in effect since June 1, The current rider (2008 Rider) percentage, set at percent, is designed to recover 2007 and 2008 planning and program costs, as approved in Case No UT. Q. Please describe SPS s proposed 2009 Rider. A. SPS s proposed 2009 Rider is set to percent. The formula for calculating the 2009 Rider percentage is similar to that used by SPS to calculate the 2008 Rider percentage. That is, the annual projected costs are divided by total rate revenue and computed as a percentage of the customer s total bill. The resultant percentage is applied to the customer s service availability charges, energy charges, fuel and purchased power cost adjustment clause charge, and when applicable, demand charges and riders, exclusive of gross receipts taxes and franchise fees. Attachment RMS-4 shows the details of this calculation
17 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. Has SPS reconciled its 2008 costs and revenues in this proceeding? A. No. SPS did not launch its 2008 Plan or begin 2008 Rider collection until June As ordered by the Commission, SPS will provide a reconciliation its 2008 Plan costs and revenues with its August 1, 2009 Report. Q. How will SPS account for the 2009 Plan costs and revenues? A. Through its Tracker, SPS will record monthly expenditures and revenues collected through the 2009 Rider. Deviations between expenditures and revenues in any given month will be assessed carrying charges. As approved in Case No , SPS proposes to continue using the annual customer deposit interest rate set by the Commission under of the EUEA and B(2)(A) NMAC to assess symmetrical carrying charges. The 2008 rate is 3.28 percent, which SPS will use through the remainder of In 2009, SPS will use the new customer deposit interest rate set by the Commission. If SPS s expenditures exceed its revenues, then the carrying charges will be negative (SPS earns interest), whereas if the revenues exceed expenditures, the carrying charges will be positive (SPS pays interest). Q. When will the 2009 Rider be effective? A. SPS intends to replace the 2008 Rider percentage with the 2009 Rider percentage 30 days after Commission approval. The 2009 Rider will remain in place until the effective date of the next approved tariff rider. 13
18 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya C Rider Bill Impacts Q. To which tariff schedules is SPS s 2009 Rider applicable? A. The 2009 Rider is applicable to all of SPS s New Mexico retail rate schedules, subject to the statutory caps and exemptions described below. Q. What are the statutory caps? A. The EUEA limits customer bill impacts to $75,000 per year, per customer. As defined by the EUEA ( (D)), a customer means a utility customer at a single, contiguous field, location or facility, regardless of the number of meters at that field, location or facility. Q. How will SPS assure that customer bills do not exceed the statutory cap of $75,000 per year? A. SPS will use its billing system to track the $75,000 per year cap customer cap. Once the $75,000 cap amount is reached, the billing system will stop billing the customer under the 2009 Rider. Q. Is there an opportunity for large customers to apply for an exemption to SPS s Rider? A. Yes. Consistent with D NMAC, large customers may receive an exemption from paying 70 percent of the 2009 Rider if the customer demonstrates that it has exhausted all cost-effective energy efficiency opportunities in its facility (or group of facilities if facilities are aggregated in order to qualify). In 14
19 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya addition, consistent with F NMAC, credits for approved self-direct projects may be used to offset up to 70 percent of the 2009 Rider until the credit is exhausted. Any credit not fully utilized in the year it is received will carry over to subsequent years. Q. What impact would the 2009 Rider have on an average residential customer s monthly bill? A. For a residential customer using 500 kwh per month, the 2009 Rider percentage (set at percent) would add approximately $1.01 to an average monthly residential customer bill (for a total monthly bill of $47.62). Q. Has SPS developed an average customer impact study? A. Yes. Attachment RMS-5 shows how the proposed 2009 Rider will impact the average customer in each rate class. Below is a table that summarizes this information. Rate Schedule Residential Lighting (Schedule 500 kwh General Non Demand (Schedule 750 kwh General Service (Schedule 50 kw, 20,000 kwh Average Customer Impacts Avg. Monthly Bill* Avg. Monthly Bill Impact Total Bill $46.61 $1.01 $47.62 $69.49 $1.51 $71.00 $1, $31.28 $1, Large General Service (Schedule 50 kw, 20,000 kwh $83, $1, $84, * These monthly average bills exclude taxes and franchise fees; before 2009 Rider applied 15
20 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. Were any changes to the existing tariff? A. Yes. In addition to updating the tariff percentage, SPS has revised the tariff to: clarify the application of the 2009 Rider to all components of a customer s bill (excluding gross receipts taxes and franchise fees); more accurately describe the costs to be covered through the 2009 Rider; comport with the statutory definition of customer ; remove the one and one-half of one percent cap; and clarify the application of the symmetrical carrying charge on a monthly basis
21 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya V. INTERRUPTIBLE TARIFF TRANSITION Q. Earlier, you mentioned that SPS is proposing a new interruptible tariff, the ICO. How will SPS transition from its current interruptible tariff to the new ICO? A. Because SPS s application, including the proposed ICO tariff, will not likely be approved until May 2009, SPS proposes that its existing tariff remain effective through As described by Mr. Garretson, interruptible load provides SPS with a resource roughly equivalent to a supply-side resource. As such, it is appropriate that all customers take service under SPS s firm rates. For those customers participating in the interruptible program, they should receive a credit for the interruptible load provided to the SPS system (as opposed to a reduction in their demand charge). As SPS transitions to its proposed methodology, all interruptible customers will be transferred to a firm rate (beginning January 1, 2010). For those customers wishing to continue participation in the interruptible program, they will be given the option of signing up under the ICO tariff. The existing interruptible program will not be offered past December 31,
22 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya VI. LOW-INCOME ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMMITMENT Q. Please describe SPS s low-income energy commitment. A. In the settlement of Case No UT, approved by the Commission on August 26, 2008, SPS committed to spend $500,000 to supplement funding for its low-income energy efficiency programs (see Section IV, paragraph 4 of the Uncontested Stipulation). 2 Q. When does SPS intend to expend the funds necessary to meet this commitment? A. SPS intends to meets its commitment in 2009 and Q. What are SPS s plans in this regard? A. Although SPS is still finalizing its plans, SPS proposes a partnership with the New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority (MFA). SPS believes a partnership with the MFA will allow it to effectively leverage the funds and target lowincome customers within SPS s New Mexico service territory. Mr. Narog describes SPS s proposed plan for meeting this commitment in more detail Case No UT; In the Matter of Southwestern Public Service Company s Application for Approval of (1) Continued Use of its Fuel and Purchased Power Cost Adjustment Clause (FPPCAC) Using a Monthly Adjustment Factor Pursuant to NMPRC Rule 550, (2) the Existing Variance from Rule (A), and (3) the Report Regarding Collections Under the Previous Annual FPPCAC in Effect During the Period October 2001 through January 2002, and Collections Under the Existing Monthly FPPCAC for the Period February 2002 through May 2005; Unanimous Stipulation, at 8 (Dec. 4, 2007). 18
23 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya Q. Will SPS collect the funds expended for this commitment from any of its ratepayers? A. No. SPS is specifically tracking these funds such that they will not be recovered from SPS s ratepayers, either the annual rider or base rates. 5 19
24 Direct Testimony of Ruth M. Sakya VII. CONCLUSION Q. Please summarize your testimony. A. Through my testimony, I have provided a high-level overview of SPS s application and 2009 Plan as well as supported its requested variances. In addition, I discussed the nature of the costs to be recovered through the proposed 2009 Rider, the Tracker mechanism, the 2009 Rider rate design, and provided the bill impacts. I also described how SPS intends to transition between its current interruptible program and the proposed ICO tariff. Finally, I discussed SPS s commitment to spend $500,000 over a two-year period on low-income energy efficiency programs through a proposed partnership with New Mexico s MFA. Q. Were Attachments RMS-1 through RMS-5 and the sections of the 2009 Plan you sponsor prepared by you or under your direct supervision? A. Yes. A. Does this conclude your testimony? A. Yes. 20
25 VERIFICATION STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF POTTER ) Ruth M. Sakya being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states that she is the witness identified in the foregoing prepared testimony, that she has read the testimony and is familiar with its contents, and that the facts set forth are true to the best of her knowledge, information, and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of October, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 21
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176 Attachment RMS-2 Page 1 of 2 Southwestern Public Service Company 2009 Plan Sections and SPS Sponsors Section Description Witness I. Portfolio Characteristics A. Public Participation Narog B. System Benefits Berg C. Broad Participation within Classes Narog D. Estimated Energy and Demand Savings Narog E. Non-Energy Benefits Doyle F. Ease of Program Deployment Narog G. Product Development Process Doyle H. Risk of Technologies and Methods Narog I. Programs Studied and Rejected and Future Programs Narog 1 Electric Water Heater Rebates Narog 2 Future Programs Narog J. Goal Setting Narog K. General Marketing Narog L. Total Resource Cost Test and Avoided Costs Doyle 1 Avoided Costs Berg 2 Discount Rate/Cost of Capital Doyle 3 Net-to-Gross Doyle 4 Transmission Loss Factors Doyle II. Program Delivery and Administration A. General Marketing and Outreach Plan Narog 1 Residential & Low-Income Narog 2 Business & Large Customer Narog B. Roles and Responsibilities Doyle C. Reporting Process Doyle D. Cost Recovery Sakya 1 Rate Impact and Customer Bill Impact Sakya 2 Shared/Allocated Program Costs Doyle 3 Budget Categories Doyle III. Program Detail A. Residential Segment Narog 1 Air-Source Heat Pump Rebate Narog 2 Evaporative Cooling Rebates (New Program) Narog 3 Home Energy Services (New Program) Narog 4 Home Lighting & Recycling Narog 5 Refrigerator Recycling (New Program) Narog 6 School Education Kits Narog 7 Saver's Switch (New Program) Garretson
177 Attachment RMS-2 Page 2 of 2 Southwestern Public Service Company 2009 Plan Sections and SPS Sponsors Section Description Witness 8 Low-Income Program Narog B. Business Segment Narog 1 Cooling Efficiency Narog 2 Custom Efficiency Narog 3 Large Customer Efficiency Narog 4 Lighting Efficiency Narog 5 Motor & Drive Efficiency (New Program) Narog 6 Small Business Lighting Efficiency (New Program) Narog 7 Interruptible Credit Option (New Program) Garretson 8 Saver's Switch for Business (New Program) Garretson C. Planning and Research Segment Doyle 1 Overview Doyle 2 Consumer Education Doyle 3 Market Research Doyle 4 Product Development Doyle 5 Planning & Administration Doyle 6 Measurement and Verification Doyle
178 Attachment RMS-3 Page 1 of 1 Southwestern Public Service Company Guidelines for Recovery of NM EE and LM Costs Included Expense Type Included in Rider in Base Rates Measures, material, and equipment X Rebates and bill credits X Third party providers X Independent program evaluator X Carrying charges X Offsetting revenues (e.g., home energy audit) X Promotional & advertising expenses X Materials & Postage X External legal labor and expenses X Contractor and consultant labor and expenses X Internal labor and labor loadings: DSM planning & admin X Product portfolio management X Technical consultants X Market research related to EE and LM projects X Product development X Rebate processing X Risk analysis (Load Research) 1 X X Regulatory accounting (incremental labor responsible for EE and X X LM accounting only) Energy forecasting X IBM programming/rate change 2 X Account management X Revenue analysis X Regulatory administration X Internal legal X Employee expenses (follows employees labor charged to rider and X directly attributable to NM EE and LM programs) Sales rep incentives based on program attained goals and sales X 1 As an example, the impact study for the Saver s Switch program. 2 The exception would be large, special projects directly related to these programs.
179 Attachment RMS-4 Page 1 of 1 Southwestern Public Service Company Calculation of 2009 Rider Percentage Budgeted 2009 Costs Line No. Description Calculation Budget (Source: 2009 Plan) $ 5,000,802 2 Projected Revenues (Source: UT Compliance Filing Revenues) : 3 Residential Service Revenues $ 74,794,046 4 Small General Service Revenues $ 9,547,873 5 Municipal and Schools Revenues $ 8,557,939 6 Commercial and Industrial Revenues $ 172,093,115 7 Street and Area Lighting Revenues $ 3,844,003 8 Total Revenues (L3:L7) $ 268,836,976 9 Less: Billings not subject to 2009 Rider 1 $ (38,954,337) 10 Billings subject to 2009 Rider (L8 - L9) $ 229,882, Annual Energy Efficiency Percentage (L1/L10) % 1 Maximum billing is $75,000 per year, per customer.
180 Attachment RMS-5 Page 1 of 4 Southwestern Public Service Company Comparison of Monthly Bills at Present with 2009 Rider Present Proposed Proposed Bill Rider Total Bill % Residential - Tariff No kwh 100 $ $ 0.29 $ $ $ 0.56 $ $ $ 1.01 $ $ $ 1.47 $ ,000 $ $ 1.92 $ ,500 $ $ 2.82 $ ,000 $ $ 3.73 $ ,000 $ $ 5.54 $ Residential Heating Service - Tariff No kwh 100 $ $ 0.27 $ $ $ 0.51 $ $ $ 0.91 $ $ $ 1.31 $ ,000 $ $ 1.71 $ ,500 $ $ 2.51 $ ,000 $ $ 3.31 $ ,000 $ $ 4.91 $ Residential Electric Water Heating Service - Tariff No kwh 100 $ $ 0.28 $ $ $ 0.53 $ $ $ 0.96 $ $ $ 1.39 $ ,000 $ $ 1.81 $ ,500 $ $ 2.66 $ ,000 $ $ 3.51 $ ,000 $ $ 5.22 $
181 Attachment RMS-5 Page 2 of 4 Southwestern Public Service Company Comparison of Monthly Bills at Present with 2009 Rider Present Proposed Proposed Bill Rider Total Bill % Small General Service - Tariff No kwh 250 $ $ 0.63 $ $ $ 1.07 $ $ $ 1.51 $ ,000 $ $ 1.95 $ ,500 $ $ 2.83 $ ,000 $ $ 3.70 $ ,500 $ $ 4.58 $ ,000 $ $ 5.46 $ Secondary General Service - Tariff No kw kwh 10 2,000 $ $ 4.49 $ ,000 $ $ 6.52 $ ,000 $ $ 8.55 $ ,000 $ $ $ ,000 $ 1, $ $ 1, ,000 $ 1, $ $ 1, ,000 $ 1, $ $ 1, ,000 $ 2, $ $ 2, ,000 $ 3, $ $ 3, Secondary General Service, Low Load Factor - Tariff No kw kwh $ $ 1.54 $ $ $ 6.44 $ $ $ $
182 Attachment RMS-5 Page 3 of 4 Southwestern Public Service Company Comparison of Monthly Bills at Present with 2009 Rider Present Proposed Proposed Bill Rider Total Bill % Primary General Service - Tariff No kw kwh ,000 $ 3, $ $ 3, ,000 $ 5, $ $ 5, ,000 $ 7, $ $ 7, ,000 $ 9, $ $ 9, ,000 $ 13, $ $ 13, ,000 $ 18, $ $ 18, , ,000 $ 36, $ $ 36, , ,000 $ 54, $ 1, $ 55, ,000 1,200,000 $ 73, $ 1, $ 74, Primary General Service, Interruptible - Tariff No kw kwh ,000 $ 3, $ $ 3, ,000 $ 5, $ $ 5, ,000 $ 7, $ $ 7, ,000 $ 8, $ $ 8, ,000 $ 13, $ $ 13, ,000 $ 17, $ $ 18, , ,000 $ 33, $ $ 34, , ,000 $ 52, $ 1, $ 53, ,000 1,200,000 $ 70, $ 1, $ 72, Large General Service - Tariff No kw kwh 4, ,000 $ 59, $ 1, $ 60, ,000 1,600,000 $ 93, $ 2, $ 95, ,000 2,400,000 $ 128, $ 2, $ 131, ,000 1,600,000 $ 118, $ 2, $ 121, ,000 3,200,000 $ 187, $ 4, $ 191, ,000 4,800,000 $ 256, $ 5, $ 262, Large General Service, Interruptible - Tariff No kw kwh 4, ,000 $ 48, $ 1, $ 49, ,000 1,600,000 $ 83, $ 1, $ 84, ,000 2,400,000 $ 117, $ 2, $ 120, ,000 1,600,000 $ 97, $ 2, $ 99, ,000 3,200,000 $ 166, $ 3, $ 169, ,000 4,800,000 $ 235, $ 5, $ 240,333.97
183 Attachment RMS-5 Page 4 of 4 Southwestern Public Service Company Comparison of Monthly Bills at Present with 2009 Rider Present Proposed Proposed Bill Rider Total Bill % Small Municipal and School Service - Tariff No kwh 250 $ $ 0.55 $ $ $ 0.91 $ $ $ 1.27 $ ,000 $ $ 1.63 $ ,500 $ $ 2.35 $ ,000 $ $ 3.07 $ ,500 $ $ 3.78 $ ,000 $ $ 4.50 $ Large Municipal and School Service - Tariff No kwh 10 2,000 $ $ 3.74 $ ,000 $ $ 5.78 $ ,000 $ $ 7.83 $ ,000 $ $ $ ,000 $ 1, $ $ 1, ,000 $ 1, $ $ 1, ,000 $ 1, $ $ 1, ,000 $ 2, $ $ 2, ,000 $ 3, $ $ 3,528.48
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPLIANCE APPLICATION THAT REQUESTS AUTHORIZATION TO: () PER APPROVED VARIANCE,
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2017 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. on behalf of.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S INTERIM REPORT ON ITS PARTICIPATION IN THE SOUTHWEST POWER POOL REGIONAL TRANSMISSION ORGANIZATION,
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2017 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE TO SPS CUSTOMERS
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPLIANCE APPLICATION THAT REQUESTS AUTHORIZATION TO: (1 PER APPROVED VARIANCE,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.
Page of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No. ER- -000 PREPARED TESTIMONY OF Deborah A. Blair XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC.
More informationRR1 - Page 181 of 518
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of JENNIFER S. PYTLIK on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY JANNELL E. MARKS. on behalf of
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR REVISION OF ITS RETAIL RATES UNDER ADVICE NOTICE NO., SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: ( ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 0 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING APPROVAL TO RETIRE AND ABANDON ITS PLANT X GENERATING STATION UNIT, PLANT
More informationDOCKET NO. 13A-0773EG DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF LEE E. GABLER
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT (DSM PLAN FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 0 AND TO CHANGE ITS ELECTRIC AND
More informationRR9 - Page 356 of 510
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of JEFFREY C. KLEIN on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL TO RECOVER ITS REGULATORY DISINCENTIVES AND INCENTIVES ASSOCIATED WITH
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Proceeding No. A- E IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BLACK HILLS/COLORADO ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY, LP FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC DEMAND
More informationRR16 - Page 57 of
DOCKET NO. 43695 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of DEBORAH A. BLAIR on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY EVAN D. EVANS.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: () ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AUTHORIZING
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JEFFREY C.
Page of BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF ITS 0 0 RENEWABLE ENERGY COMPLIANCE PLAN *
More informationRR16 - Page 1 of
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of ARTHUR P. FREITAS on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationSUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CUSTOMER-OWNED RESOURCES.
25.181. Energy Efficiency Goal. (a) (b) (c) Purpose. The purposes of this section are to ensure that: (1) electric utilities administer energy savings incentive programs in a market-neutral, nondiscriminatory
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-1) Decoupling
Direct Testimony and Schedule Lisa R. Peterson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More informationAttachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn
Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. 2 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY FOR
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OP NEW MEXICO FOR APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS AND PROGRAM COST TARIFF RIDER
More information1 Q. What are the ratemaking consequences of the sale of the distribution assets?
Exhibit SPS-AXM 2-14(b)(1) Page 86 of 91 1 Q. What are the ratemaking consequences of the sale of the distribution assets? 2 A. There are two consequences. First, SPS expects to experience a gain on the
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING APPROVAL TO RETIRE AND ABANDON PLANT X GENERATING STATION UNIT, PLANT X
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RICHARD R. SCHRUBBE. on behalf of
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR REVISION OF ITS RETAIL RATES UNDER ADVICE NOTICE NO., SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE LETTER NO. 1672-ELECTRIC FILED BY PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO REVISE ITS COLORADO PUC NO.
More informationPUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF EMMANUEL J. LOPEZ ON BEHALF
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. -R BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY WITNESS: ALAN
More informationRIDER 783 ADJUSTMENT OF CHARGES FOR DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM
NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY First Revised Sheet No. 222 Original Volume No. 13 Original Sheet No. 222 TO WHOM AVAILABLE DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM This Rider shall be applicable
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF ZIA NATURAL ) GAS COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR ) REVISION OF ITS RATES, RULES, AND ) FORMS UNDER ADVICE NOTICE NO., ) ) CASE NO. - -UT ZIA
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE VERIFIED APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO CONDUCT A SECOND SHORT-TERM MEDICAL EXEMPTION
More informationDemand-Side Management Annual Status Report Electric and Natural Gas Public Service Company of Colorado
Demand-Side Management Annual Status Report Electric and Natural Gas Public Service Company of Colorado March 31, 2018 / Proceeding No. 16A-0512EG 2017 xcelenergy.com 2018 Xcel Energy Inc. Xcel Energy
More informationRR9 - Page 229 of 510
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of RICHARD R. SCHRUBBE on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.
Met-Ed/Penelec/Penn Power/West Penn Statement No. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY
More informationENERGY EFFICIENCY AND
2018 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN NMPRC CASE NO. 17-00 -UT APRIL 14, 2017 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 1.1 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN... 5 2 PROGRAM GOALS...
More information1
1 2 3 4 5 6 Attachment A TARIFF CONTROL NO. 41663 PETITION OF EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL TO REVISE MILITARY BASE DISCOUNT RECOVERY FACTOR TARIFF PURSUANT TO PURA 36.354 PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
More informationQ. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main
TESTIMONY OF, MANAGER RATES AND REGULATORY STRATEGY ON BEHALF OF DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC CAUSE NO. BEFORE THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 I. INTRODUCTION Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS
More informationMrs. Metts. Volume 1 Tab 9
Mrs. Metts Volume 1 Tab COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION Application of: KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY ) D/B/A OLD DOMINION POWER COMPANY ) ) For an Adjustment of Electric Base Rates
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION PLAN DOCKET NO. M-0- TESTIMONY OF BRIAN J. FITZPATRICK
More informationatlantic cit11 elect, c
Philip J. Passanante Assistant General Counsel 92DC42 PO Box 6066 Newark, DE 19714-6066 302.429.3105 - Telephone 302.429.3801 - Facsimile philip.passanante@pepcoholdings.com atlantic cit11 elect, c An
More informationColorado PUC E-Filings System
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Proceeding No. 15A 0424E IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BLACK HILLS/COLORADO ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY, LP FOR APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC
More informationResidential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: SCE-1 C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U -E) Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * VERIFIED APPLICATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR AUTHORIZATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVENUE DECOUPLING ADJUSTMENT
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.
Penn Power Statement No. 3 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-016-537355 Direct Testimony of Kevin M. Siedt List of Topics Addressed Sales and Revenue
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PETITION OF PECO ENERGY : COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS : ACT 129 PHASE III ENERGY : DOCKET NO. M-2015 EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION : PLAN : PETITION OF PECO
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: ( ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AUTHORIZING
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF EL PASO ELECTRIC ) COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR A ) CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND ) NECESSITY FOR A TWO-MW SOLAR ) Case No. 18-00099-UT
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE ) COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR: (1) ) AUTHORIZATION TO FORM A ) SUBSIDIARY; (2) AUTHORIZATION TO ) CONTRIBUTE CERTAIN TRANSMISSION
More informationAssembly Bill No. 428 Committee on Commerce and Labor
Assembly Bill No. 428 Committee on Commerce and Labor CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to energy; revising provisions relating to the Solar Energy Systems Incentive Program, the Wind Energy Systems Demonstration
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE LOW INCOME PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationPublic Service Commission. November 2,2015. Re: CASE NO E-P MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY and THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY
01 Brooks Street, P.0 Box 1 Charleston, West Virginla 33 Public Service Commission of West Virginia Phone (30) 300300 Fax (30) 3003 November,01 Ingrid Ferrell, Executive Secretary Public Service Commission
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: July 27, 2011 Docket No. 32,475 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. Appellant, NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION,
More informationSTATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION OUCC SETTLEMENT TESTIMONY OF ON BEHALF OF THE INDIANA OFFICE OF UTILITY CONSUMER COUNSELOR
STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PETITION OF NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC ) SERVICE COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF) CHANGES TO ITS ELECTRIC NET METERING ) TARIFF AND APPROVAL OF AN ELECTRIC )
More informationDOCKET NO DIRECT TESTIMONY of DAVID T. HUDSON. on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
DOCKET NO. 9 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR: A CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF WIND GENERATION AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES IN HALE
More informationDSM = P + LR (For each rate class) S
Indianapolis Power & Light Company I.U.R.C. No. E-17 5 th Revised No. 179.5 Indianapolis, Indiana 4 th Revised No. 179.5 STANDARD CONTRACT RIDER NO. 22 DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT (Applicable to
More informationPublic Service Commission CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
State of Florida Public Service Commission CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0850 -M-E-M-O-R-A-N-D-U-M- DATE: January 11, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: Office of Commission
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-0-1 DIRECT TESTIMONY WITNESS:
More informationSDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018
Company: San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902M) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A.17-10-007/-008 (cons.) Exhibit: SDG&E-246 SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES
More informationPublic Utilities Commission 2012 Report to the Colorado General Assembly on Demand Side Management (DSM) Pursuant to HB ( , C.R.S.
Public Utilities Commission 2012 Report to the Colorado General Assembly on Demand Side Management (DSM) Pursuant to HB 07-1037 ( 40-3.2-105, C.R.S.) Introduction In 2007 the General Assembly passed, and
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION
PECO ENERGY COMPANY STATEMENT NO. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION DOCKET NO. R-01-0001 DIRECT TESTIMONY
More informationFinal Version October 19, ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN TERM SHEET
CORE PRINCIPLES ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN TERM SHEET Energy efficiency is a cornerstone of the Commonwealth s long term energy policy. The Plan ( Plan ) reflects this key role and builds upon the high level
More informationI. INTRODUCTION. A. My name is Barry F. Blackwell and my business address is 1000 East Main Street, Q. BY WHOM ARE YOU EMPLOYED AND IN WHAT CAPACITY?
PETITIONER S EXHIBIT D PREFILED TESTIMONY OF, DIRECTOR OF RATES DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC ON BEHALF OF DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC. CAUSE NO. 01 BEFORE THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION I.
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter:
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Annual reestablishment of price increase or decrease index of major categories of operating costs incurred by water and wastewater utilities pursuant
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated ) electric, steam,
More informationBEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN 55401-2138 FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 121 7 th Place East, Suite 350 St Paul MN
More informationTelephone Fax
Kimberly A. Curry Assistant General Counsel BGE Legal Department 2 Center Plaza, 12 th Floor 110 West Fayette Street Baltimore, MD 21201 Telephone 410.470.1305 Fax 443.213.3206 www.bge.com kimberly.a.curry@bge.com
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE LETTER NO. 1-ELECTRIC FILED BY PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO REVISE ITS COLORADO PUC NO. -ELECTRIC
More informationTrailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079
Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP- -000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC ) ) ) Docket No. RP- -000 SUMMARY OF PREPARED
More informationOffice of the New York State Comptroller How to Apply for Exclusion of Sewer Debt from Municipal Debt Limits
Office of the New York State Comptroller How to Apply for Exclusion of Sewer Debt from Municipal Debt Limits (Pursuant to Section 124.10 of the Local Finance Law) July 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...2
More informationPublic Service Commission
State of Florida Public Service Commission CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD O AK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0850 DATE: TO: FROM: RE: November 30, 2017 Office of Commission Clerk (Stauffer)
More informationDIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL
BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules
More informationBefore the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-2) Decoupling and Sales True-Up
Rebuttal Testimony and Schedule Lisa R. Peterson Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW ) MEXICO FOR APPROVAL TO ABANDON ) SAN JUAN GENERATING STATION UNITS ) 2 AND 3, ISSUANCE
More informationP.U.C. DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
P.U.C. DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF ROBERT K. ROBERTS ON
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON UE 335 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Opening Testimony of George M. Waidelich.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON UE In the Matter of PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Request for a General Rate Revision. Opening Testimony of George M. Waidelich on behalf
More informationperformed 9. For provider complaints: MC-7
performed 3. For network management: a) Demonstration of adequacy of the network for services offered in relation to population to be served consistent with standards at N.J.A.C. 11:24B-3.5 b) Demonstration
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 18-035-01 Witness: Michael G. Wilding BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding March 2018 1
More informationINTERMOUNTAIN RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION RATES AND REGULATIONS
RATES AND REGULATIONS RATES AND REGULATIONS Table of Contents Part I: Part II: Part III: General Statement Definitions and Computation of Time Electric Rate Schedules Part IV: Electric Service Regulations
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Ellen Anderson. J. Dennis O Brien Commissioner
STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Ellen Anderson Chair David Boyd Commissioner J. Dennis O Brien Commissioner Phyllis Reha Commissioner Betsy Wergin Commissioner Review
More informationBEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES RILEY ON BEHALF OF NEVADA BELL
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the matter of ) ) Application of SBC Communications Inc., ) Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, ) and Southwestern Bell Communications
More informationEl Paso Electric Announces Fourth Quarter and Annual 2017 Financial Results
NEWS RELEASE El Paso Electric Announces Fourth Quarter and Annual 2017 Financial Results 2/27/2018 EL PASO, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- El Paso Electric Company (NYSE:EE): Overview For the fourth quarter
More informationFIVE YEAR PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY Executive Summary Prepared for: Holy Cross Energy Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1375 Walnut Street Suite 200 Boulder, CO 80302 303.728.2500 www.navigant.com July 15, 2011
More informationBefore the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota
Direct Testimony Glynda O. Rahn Before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota In the Matter of the Application of Black Hills Power, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY WILLIAM A. GRANT. on behalf of
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR REVISION OF ITS RETAIL RATES UNDER ADVICE NOTICE NO., SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the application of ) DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY ) for reconciliation of its Power Supply Cost ) Case No. U-009
More informationSTANDARD INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR QUALIFYING FACILITIES (QF) 10 KW OR LESS
STANDARD INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR QUALIFYING FACILITIES (QF) 10 KW OR LESS (Customer) and Roosevelt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Utility), referred to collectively as parties and individually
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 8 Proceedings held in the above-entitled. 9 matter before Suzanne D. Sonneborn, Administrative
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion, establishing the method and Case No. U- avoided cost calculation for Upper Peninsula Power
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE ) LETTER NO. 1672-ELECTRIC FILED BY ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) PROCEEDING NO. 14AL-0660E COLORADO
More informationNEW HAMPSHIRE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES NET METERING FOR CUSTOMER-OWNED RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION RESOURCES OF 1,000 KILOWATTS OR LESS
CHAPTER Puc 900 NET METERING FOR CUSTOMER-OWNED RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION RESOURCES OF 1,000 KILOWATTS OR LESS PART Puc 901 PURPOSE Puc 901.01 Purpose. The purpose of Puc 900, pursuant to the mandate
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * DIRECT TESTIMONY AND ATTACHMENTS OF LISA H.
Page of BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE LETTER NO. -ELECTRIC FILED BY PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO REVISE ITS PUC NO. -ELECTRIC
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationRR4-132 of 571. Attachment TSM-RR-B Page87of SPS Rate Case
RR4-132 of 571 Attachment TSM-RR-B Page87of 97 2008 SPS Rate Case Attachment TSM-RR-B Page 88 of 97 2008 SPS Rate Case I J Attachment TSM-RR-B Page 91 of 97 2008 SPS Rate Case Attachment TSM-RR-B Page92
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING APPROVAL TO RETIRE AND ABANDON ITS PLANT X GENERATING STATION UNIT, PLANT
More informationNiagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid PROCEEDING ON MOTION OF THE COMMISSION AS TO THE RATES, CHARGES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION FOR ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICE
More informationSTATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED PETITION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a VECTREN ENERGY DELIVERY OF IN DIANA, INC., FOR: ( AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT, OWN
More information