The Aboriginal Economic Benchmarking Report. Core Indicator 1: Employment. The National Aboriginal Economic Development Board June, 2013

Transcription

1 The Economic Benchmarking Report Core Indicator 1: Employment The National Economic Development Board June, 2013 The National Economic Development Board 10 Wellington St., 9th floor Gatineau, (Quebec) K1A 0H4 (819)

2 THE NATIONAL ABORIGINAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD Established in 1990, the National Economic Development Board is an Order-in-Council board mandated to provide policy and program advice to the federal government on economic development. Comprised of First Nations, Inuit and Métis community and business leaders from across Canada, the Board plays an important role in helping the federal government develop and implement policies and programs that respond to the unique needs and circumstances of Canadians. The Board also provides a vital link between policy makers, federal departments and and non- business and community leaders. The National Economic Development Board can be found online at: The Board's members are: Chair: Chief Clarence Louie, British Columbia Chief, Osoyoos Indian Band Vice-Chair: Dawn Madahbee, Ontario General Manager, Waubetek Business Development Corporation Member-At-Large: Pita Aatami, Quebec President, Air Inuit 3 Richard Francis, New Brunswick Past Director, Economic Development, Kingsclear First Nation John Michael Keyuk, Saskatchewan Vice President, G. Raymond Contracting Ltd. Matthew Mukash, Quebec Grand Chief, Grand Council of the Crees Chief Terrance Paul, Nova Scotia Chief, Community of Membertou James Ross, Northwest Territories President, AuraRoss Resources Limited Chief Sharon Stinson Henry, Ontario Chief, Chippewas of Rama First Nation 1 NCR# v9

3 Introduction In today s modern society, employment is the cornerstone for economic development and, in addition to being the main source of income for most individuals, is a basis for self respect and autonomy. However, the labour market situation is much worse than that of the non- population. This report seeks to provide additional information and to present an overview of the situation, not an in-depth analysis, of the Economic Benchmarking Report s Core Indicator #1: Employment. This indicator is based on three measures: Employment, Labour Force Participation and Unemployment. Despite progress since 1996, significant gaps remain between and non- Canadians for all three measures. success in the labour market should be of concern not only for leaders or government policy makers, but for all Canadians. Increasing employment will contribute to the Canadian economy while decreasing social spending. Furthermore, with greater labour shortages caused by an aging Canadian population, an increase of young entrants into the labour market will be vital to filling Canada s labour demand requirements over the next decade and beyond TARGET: EMPLOYMENT KEY MEASURES ABORIGINAL BENCHMARK 2022 TARGET Employment Rate 8.9 percentage points below the non- rate Labour Force Participation Rate 3.8 percentage points below the non- rate Unemployment Rate 8.5 percentage points above the non- rate The NAEDB target for Employment is employment, labour force participation, and unemployment rates comparable to those of Canada s non- population Labour market outcomes differ greatly between First Nations, Inuit and Métis and gains have not been shared equally among the three groups. For example, First Nations living on reserve have the lowest labour market outcomes of any group. Inuit have generally seen little improvement in employment measures over the period 1996 to On the other hand, in some areas such as employment and labour force participation, Métis have rates that are comparable to, or slightly exceed, those of non- Canadians. It is important to note that the measures of economic development that are used in our Economic Benchmarking Report do not capture the informal economy, which includes activities outside of the wage economy such as traditional hunting and fishing that are central to our way of life. That is because the NAEDB is setting targets for people to achieve comparable economic outcomes to non- Canadians, and not because we intend to diminish the value of our traditional economic activities. 2 NCR# v9

4 Employment Highlights by Heritage Group First Nations: In 2006, the First Nations employment rate was 48.3%, considerably below the non- rate of 62.7%. The First Nations employment rate off-reserve was 54.9%, above the on-reserve rate of 39.1%. In 2006, the First Nations unemployment rate was 18.0%, three times the non- rate of 6.3%. The First Nations unemployment rate on reserve was 23.0%, above the off-reserve rate of 14.0%. Inuit: In 2006, the Inuit employment rate was 48.9%, below the non population rate of 62.7%. The Inuit employment rate was 10 percentage points above that of the onreserve First Nations population. In 2006, the Inuit unemployment rate was 20.3%, compared to 6.3% for the non- population. Métis: In 2006, the Métis employment rate was 63.1%, slightly above the 62.7% rate for the non- population because of the younger age composition of the Métis population. In 2006, the Métis unemployment rate was 10.0%, compared to 6.3% for the non- population. 3 NCR# v9

5 Measure 1: Employment The employment rate showed a steady increase between 1996 and The gap between and non- people is declining in all regions of Canada; however, gains are not shared equally among the groups: Métis and off-reserve First Nations display higher employment rates than on-reserve First Nations and Inuit. Also, people in Canada tend to work in different sectors of the economy than other Canadians; in general, they are employed in greater numbers in industries that traditionally require less formal education, such as construction, primary industries, as well as accommodation and food services. Overall, employed First Nations and non- Canadians showed comparable full-time employment rates over the 1995 to 2005 period, whereas the Métis and Inuit gap was less comparable. a. Employment Rate In 2006, the employment rate for people was 53.8% compared with 62.7% for non- Canadians, a gap of 8.9 percentage points. This gap has steadily decreased since In 1996, the employment rate was 44.3% for people compared with 59.2% for non- Canadians a difference of 14.9 percentage points. These rates improved in 2001 to 49.7% and 61.8%, respectively narrowing the difference to 12.1 percentage points and improved again in 2006 (Chart 1). Employment Rate The employment rate measures the proportion of the population aged 15 or older that is employed. It is an important measure to assess economic progress, as a higher rate of employment increases purchasing power which contributes to a higher Gross Domestic Product. 65% Chart 1: Employment Rate in and non- Populations, Canada, % 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 59.2% 44.3% 61.8% 62.7% 49.7% 53.8% 30% Non- Source: Appendix Table 1 4 NCR# v9

6 In 2006, the employment rate varied by heritage group (Chart 2). Gaps remain significant between First Nations living on-reserve (23.6 percentage points), Inuit (13.8 percentage points) and non- people in Canada. On the other hand, the employment rate was higher for Métis than non- Canadians. Overall, the data suggests that there are more employment opportunities for those living off-reserve than on-reserve and in Inuit communities. Chart 2: Employment Rate Gap Between and Non- Populations, Canada, Source: Appendix Table 2 s First Nation On-reserve First Nations Off- Métis Inuit With regard to gender, the employment rate in 2006 for the population was 5.4 percentage points higher for men (56.5%), than for women (51.1%); while the gender gap for the non- population was 10.3 percentage points: men experienced an employment rate of 68.0 % while women were employed at a rate of 57.7%. The numbers suggest that, on a relative basis, men are not doing as well as their non- counterparts. Indeed, the employment rate for men is 11.5 percentage points lower than the one for non- men. In contrast, the gap between and non- women is 6.6 percentage points (Chart 3). Chart 3: Employment Rate in Canada by and Gender, % 70% 60% 68% 50% 40% 56.5% 51.1% 57.7% 30% 20% 10% 0% Men Women Non- Source: Appendix Table 3 5 NCR# v9

7 The and non- employment rate varies across provinces and territories. people in Alberta and in Prince Edward Island have the highest employment rates (61% and 59.3% respectively) higher than the national average of 53.8% (Summary Table 1). The lowest employment rates are found in Newfoundland and Labrador (42.5%), Saskatchewan (46.1%) and Nunavut (47.2%). Summary Table 1: Employment Rate in and non- Populations, Canada, 2006 Non s s Gap between s and non s (percentage points) Canada 62.7% 53.8% 8.9 Newfoundland and Labrador 48.2% 42.5% 5.7 Prince Edward Island 60.7% 59.3% 1.4 Nova Scotia 57.3% 53.2% 4.1 New Brunswick 57.5% 49.7% 7.8 Quebec 60.5% 51.3% 9.2 Ontario 62.9% 57.0% 5.9 Manitoba 65.6% 50.1% 15.5 Saskatchewan 67.1% 46.1% 21.0 Alberta 71.4% 61.0% 10.4 British Columbia 61.9% 55.3% 6.6 Yukon Territory 75.2% 55.3% 19.9 Northwest Territories 82.8% 52.2% 30.6 Nunavut 87.2% 47.2% 40.0 Source: Appendix Table 1 As Summary Table 1 demonstrates, in 2006, the gap between the and non- employment rate was widest in the Prairie Provinces (Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta) and in the Territories. A closer analysis indicates that First Nations living on-reserve have low employment rates across Canada, but in Saskatchewan (30.8%), Manitoba (31.3%) and Alberta (38.6%), they display the lowest employment rate of all Heritage groups (Appendix Table 1). Among Inuit, those living in Newfoundland and Labrador and in Nunavut display the lowest employment rates 41.6% and 46.8% respectively. Across Canada, the Métis employment rate is slightly lower than the non- employment rate in most provinces, except in British Columbia, Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia where it is higher for Métis than for non-s. With the exception of Newfoundland and Labrador, all provinces and territories saw significant gaps between on- and off-reserve employment rates. New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Saskatchewan, British Columbia and Northwest Territories had gaps of over 10 percentage points; while Manitoba and Alberta saw the greatest gaps. More recent data from the Labour Force Survey indicate that the employment rate for off-reserve people between 2009 and 2010 decreased more than it did for non- people (Statistics Canada 2011). In 2010, the average employment rate of people was 53.7%, compared to 61.8% for non- people, resulting in an 8.1 percentage point gap an increase from the 5.1 percentage point gap in The recession in 2009 had negative consequences for the employment level of the demographic: non- youth experienced an employment rate decline of 4.2 percentage points 6 NCR# v9

8 to 55.8%, while their off-reserve counterparts saw a 6.5 percentage point decrease to 46.0%. From 2009 to 2010, the employment rate of youth fell 1.0 percentage point to 45.0 %, while non- youth saw their employment rate decline 0.5 percentage points to 55.3%. Although the effects of the recession felt by the core age group (25-54) were less severe than those felt by persons aged 15-24, people aged saw more pronounced changes in employment rates than non- people over this period. The employment rate for people aged fell 3.0 percentage points, from 59.6 % in 2008 to 56.6% in 2009, followed by a second decline of 2.9 percentage points from 2009 to 2010 to 53.7%. Workers from the non- population of this age group, by comparison, saw their employment rate fall 1.9 percentage points from 63.6% in 2008 to 61.7% in 2009, followed by a 0.1 percentage point increase to 61.8% in b. Employment by Industry Overall, the employment structure of the population differs from that of the non- population. Chart 4 illustrates the gaps in the proportion of employment in each industry, classified according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The gap is calculated as the proportion of the population by industry for the identified population minus the non- proportion. A positive value indicates that a larger proportion of people is employed in that industry than the non- workforce; while a negative value indicates the proportion of the workforce is less than the non- workforce in that industry. The values are calculated as proportions of the experienced workforce, which includes employed and unemployed persons who have held a job in the previous year. Chart 4: Proportion of Experienced Labour Force by NAICS Industry: Proportion Minus non- Proportion, Canada, 2006, percentage points Manufacturing Professional, Scientific and Technical Services -4-4 Fiance and Insurance -2.5 Wholesale Trade -2 Information an Cultural Industries Retail Traide Real Estate and Rental Leasing Other Services Educational Services Transportation and Warehousing Utilities Arts, Entertainement and Recreation Administrative support Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Health Care and Social Assistance Mining and Oil and gas Extraction Accomodation and Food Services Construction 2.6 Public Administration 6 Source: Appendix Table 13 7 NCR# v9

9 people are less likely to work in traditionally well-paid areas geared to the well-educated, such as the finance and professional service industries. They are more likely to work in primary industries and construction. In addition, a substantial proportion of the population works in public administration: 23.7% of on-reserve First Nations and 20.7% of the Inuit workforce work in this area; approximately four times the proportion for the non- population. The off-reserve First Nations and Métis populations also work in public administration in slightly higher proportions than the non- population; therefore, the overall value for the population is 11.6%, more than double the non- value (Summary Table 2). Summary Table 2: Workers of and non- as Percentage of Total Workers by Industry (North American Industry Classification System - NAICS) in 2006 Industry (NAICS Classification) Non- Difference ( Population (%) Population (%) minus Non-) (%) Accommodation and Food Services Administrative and Support, Waste Management and Remediation Services Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Arts, Entertainment and Recreation Construction Educational Services Finance and Insurance Healthcare and Social Assistance Information and Cultural Industries Management of Companies and Enterprises Manufacturing Mining and Oil and Gas Extraction Other Services Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Public Administration Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Retail Trade Transportation and Warehousing Utilities Wholesale Trade Total Service Industries Good Industries Note: Workers refers to the experienced labour force; i.e. persons who worked between January of the year before and the census Source: Appendix Table 13 By dividing the workforce into two categories, goods-producing industries and service-producing industries, variations in the composition of the workforce over time between provinces and across groups can be evaluated. The goods-producing sector includes agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, mining, oil and gas extraction, utilities, construction and manufacturing. All other industries are classified as service-producing. With the exception of manufacturing, a higher proportion of the workforce in 2006 worked in each of the goods-producing industries; therefore, the gap in 8 NCR# v9

10 the goods-producing sector is positive (Summary Table 2). However, this is different from previous years. In 2001, the gap was considerably smaller, at 0.3%, and in 1996, at -0.5%, it was negative. This transformation was caused by a changing non- workforce, which shifted slightly away from the goods-producing sector, particularly manufacturing, while the workforce did not. At a more detailed industry level, further distinctions can be observed between the and non- populations. Within the goods-producing sector, the workforce is, like the non- workforce, primarily concentrated in the construction and manufacturing sectors. The most important goods-producing industry among the population is the construction industry, which accounts for roughly 40% of those employed in the goods-producing sector, followed by manufacturing, which represents slightly less than 30% of employment. In terms of composition, the agriculture, forestry, fishing sectors and the mining, oil and gas sectors are more important for the labour market than the non- labour market. Employment in the utilities sector is similar for both groups, accounting for less than 1% of total employment. Generally, employment between industries in the services-producing sector is not as clustered as in the goods-producing sector. In both and non- populations, the trade and health care and social assistance sectors represent the largest areas of employment in the services-producing sector. Trade represents approximately 15% of employment for both populations, while health care and social assistance accounts for just over 10% of employment in the non- population and slightly over 11% in the population. Beyond that, workers in the services-producing sector are more concentrated in the public administration sector than non- people are (12% versus 6%), as well as in the accommodation and food services sector (8% versus 6%). On the other hand, people are less concentrated in the finance, insurance, real estate and leasing sector, which represent 3% of employment for the population, and 6% for the non- population. workers are also less represented in the professional, scientific and technical services sector, which accounts for approximately 7% of non- employment, but less than 3% of employment. Employment in the remaining industries within the servicesproducing sector, which include educational services; transportation and warehousing; business, building and other support services; information, culture and recreation; and other services, represents a similar proportion of workers in both populations. c. Full-Time versus Part-Time Employment Generally speaking, full-time employment is an indicator of overall job quality. Furthermore, employed and non- people showed comparable proportions of individuals who worked primarily full-time jobs over the 1995 to 2005 period, while a slightly smaller proportion of Métis individuals did. The Inuit population not only has a smaller proportion of individuals working full-time than First Nations, Métis and non- people after 1995, but also showed a declining trend between 1995 and Summary Table 3: Proportion of Individuals Who Worked Mainly Full-Time, 1995, 2000, 2005, percent Non-s First Nations Métis Inuit Source: Appendix Table 16 9 NCR# v9

11 Measure 2: Labour Force Participation The labour force participation rate is lower than the non- rate. However, the gap closed considerably from 1996 to 2006, dropping from 7.3 to 3.8 percentage points (Chart 5). The rate increased from 58.3% to 63.1%, while the non- rate increased slightly from 65.6% to 66.9%. Labour Force Participation Rate The labour force participation rate measures the proportion of the population 15 years and over who are employed, or are unemployed but looking for a job. A strong labour force participation rate is a key contributor to long-term economic growth. 70% Chart 5: Labour Force Participation Rate in and non- Populations, Canada, 1996, 2001, % 60% 55% 65.6% 58.3% 66.5% 66.9% 61.4% 63.1% 50% 45% 40% Non- Source: Appendix Table 4 Among heritage groups, the less successful in terms of the labour force participation rate are on-reserve First Nations, which have a gap of 14.8 percentage points with the non- population. The Métis population, whose labour force participation rate (70.1%) is higher than the non- level of 66.9%. The labour force participation rates for First Nations off-reserve and Inuit are 3.2% and 5.6% below the non- rates, respectively (Chart 6, page 11). It is important to note the strong effects of age on labour force participation rates. For example, in 2006, Métis people had a labour force participation rate 3.2 percentage points higher than non- people. This was entirely due to their younger population 1. 1 Jean-Francois Arsenault, Andrew Sharpe, Investing in Education in Canada: An Economic Perspective, Canadian Policy Research Network, NCR# v9

12 Chart 6: Labour Force Participation Rate Gap between and Non- Populations, Canada, 2006, percentage points s Source: Appendix Table First Nations on The labour force participation rate of men in 2006 was 8.2 percentage points higher than that of women (Appendix Table 6). In that year, 67.4% of men participated in the labour force compared with 59.2% of women (Chart 7). This is in line with patterns seen in the general population where women s caregiving responsibilities limit their engagement in the labour force First Nations off 3.2 Métis -5.6 Inuit 80% Chart 7: Labour Force Participation Rate by and Gender, % 60% 50% 67.4% 72.5% 59.2% 61.7% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Men Women Source: Appendix Table 6 Non- This disparity is also observed in the non- population, although it is slightly higher, at 10.8% (the participation rate of men was 72.5%, and that of women was 61.7%). It is interesting to note that the gap between the and non- participation rate is slightly higher for men than for 11 NCR# v9

13 women. Non- men showed a participation rate 5.1 percentage points higher than their counterparts (Appendix Table 6). In comparison, non- women experienced a rate only 2.5 percentage points higher than the rate of women. The gap in male and female participation rates was also observed on reserve: The participation rate of men living on reserve was 55.8% in 2006 compared with 48.6% for women, resulting in a gap of 7.1 percentage points (Appendix Table 10). The labour force participation rate for and non- populations varies across provinces and territories. people in Prince Edward Island and Yukon have the highest labour force participation rate (71.7% and 70.8% respectively) (Summary Table 4). The lowest rates are in Saskatchewan (56.4%), Nunavut (59.1%), and Manitoba (59.2%). The widest gap between s and non-s can be found in the Territories, in Saskatchewan and in Manitoba. Summary Table 4: Labour Force Participation Rate in and non- Populations, Canada, 2006 Non s s Gap between s and non s (percentage points) Canada 66.9% 63.1% 3.8 Newfoundland and Labrador 58.8% 60.8% -2 Prince Edward Island 68.2% 71.7% -3.5 Nova Scotia 62.9% 63% -0.1 New Brunswick 63.7% 62.7% 1 Quebec 65% 60.8% 4.2 Ontario 67.1% 64.9% 2.2 Manitoba 68.5% 59.2% 9.3 Saskatchewan 70.1% 56.4% 13.7 Alberta 74.3% 68.5% 5.8 British Columbia 65.6% 65% 0.6 Yukon Territory 80.2% 70.8% 9.4 Northwest Territories 86.2% 65.3% 20.9 Nunavut 90.5% 59.1% 31.4 Source: Appendix Table 4 First Nations on reserve in Manitoba and Saskatchewan display the lowest labour force participation rates of all heritage groups, with rates of 43.9% and 43.4% respectively, well below the Canadian average of 52.1% for First Nations on reserve (Appendix Table 4). The Inuit of Newfoundland and Labrador (59.2%) and Nunavut (58.8%) display lower labour force participation rates than their counterparts in Quebec (63.2%) and the Northwest Territories (64.3%). The labour force participation rate gap between on- and off-reserve First Nations was 11.7 percentage points below the national average. The gaps in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and the Northwest Territories were over 10 percentage points; whereas Nova Scotia and Alberta saw larger discrepancies at 18.8 and 17 percentage points respectively. Manitoba and Saskatchewan also had the lowest on-reserve labour force participation rates in the country (43.9 and 43.4). In contrast, Newfoundland and Labrador and Prince Edward Island were the only two provinces with labour force participation rates greater for First Nations living on reserve than for First Nations living off reserve (Appendix Table 4). 12 NCR# v9

14 Measure 3: Unemployment While the unemployment rate for the population is higher than for the non- population (Chart 8); the gap narrowed considerably over the period, from 14.2 percentage points to 8.5 percentage points. However, people in Canada still experience an unemployment rate of 14.3% more than double the rate for the non- population. Unemployment Rate The unemployment rate is the proportion of those in the labour force who are not employed. Unemployment occurs when a person is both available to work and seeking work, but does not have a job. Typically, a lower unemployment rate suggests a stronger economy. 30% Chart 8: Unemployment Rate in and non- Populations, 1996, 2001, % 20% 24.0% 15% 10% 5% 9.8% 19.1% 7.1% 14.8% 6.3% 0% Non- Source: Appendix Table 7 The unemployment gap between and non- populations is likely to further narrow over time, in part because the non- unemployment rate is already low and unlikely to fall below 4%, as frictional unemployment (i.e. the transition period from one job to another) is inevitable. All heritage groups in Canada have higher unemployment rates than the non- population; however, there are substantial differences between these groups (Chart 9, page 14). In 2006, First Nations living on reserve experienced an unemployment rate of 25%, almost four times the non- rate. First Nations people living on reserve and Inuit have seen little improvement between 1996 and Compared to the rest of the population, the rate has not changed substantially since 1996, decreasing just 3.8 percentage points in contrast to the 9.2 percentage point decrease observed for all people. The Inuit unemployment rate has hardly changed, falling 1.4 percentage points from , revealing a gap between the Inuit and non- 13 NCR# v9

15 7.1% 6.3% 9.8% 10.0% 14.0% 14.0% 18.6% 20.2% 24.0% 21.7% 22.2% 20.3% 25.0% 28.9% 27.8% unemployment rate of 14.0 percentage points. Off-reserve First Nations and Métis not only have smaller unemployment rate gaps compared with the non- rate (7.7 and 3.7 percentage points respectively), but they have also shown substantial improvement, with unemployment rates dropping by more than 10 percentage points between 1996 and Consequently, unemployment rate gaps have fallen by approximately 7 percentage points. The improvements in the overall unemployment rate (Chart 8, page 13) are likely due to the lower rates for off-reserve First Nations and Métis populations. 35% 30% Chart 9: Unemployment rate in Canada by, 1996, 2001, % 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Non- First Nations on First Nations off Métis Inuit Source: Appendix Table 7 The unemployment rate for men in 2006 was 16.1%, 2.6 percentage points higher than the rate for women, at 13.4 % (Chart 10). This disparity is greater than the gap between non- men and women. Indeed, within the non- group, the unemployment rate for women was only slightly higher, at 6.4 %, compared with 6.2 % for men. Chart 10: Unemployment Rate by and Gender, % 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Source: Appendix Table % 13.4% 6.2% 6.4% Men Women Non- 14 NCR# v9

16 When comparing each group to their non- counterparts, these numbers indicate that men are in a less desirable unemployment situation than women. The gap between the unemployment rates for and non- men is 9.9 percentage points, compared with 7 percentage points for and non- women (Appendix Table 9). Measured by province and territory, the unemployment rates are consistently higher for the population (Summary Table 5). The territories and Saskatchewan have the largest gaps, while Prince Edward Island and Ontario have the smallest. These differences can be attributed in part to the composition of the population. The populations in the Territories are largely composed of Inuit or First Nations peoples with high unemployment rates, while the population in Ontario is largely off-reserve First Nations or Métis peoples, who have low unemployment rates (Appendix Table 7). In Saskatchewan however, all heritage groups display very high unemployment rates compared to the non-s. The highest unemployment rate for s can be found in Newfoundland and Labrador (30.1%), but since the non- unemployment was also very high (18%), the gap is not as wide as in the Territories (between 15.7 and 16.6 percentage points) or in Saskatchewan (14 percentage points). Summary Table 5: Unemployment Rate in and non- Populations, Canada, 2006 Non s s Gap between s and non s (percentage points) Canada 6.3% 14.8% 8.5 Newfoundland and Labrador 18% 30.1% 12.1 Prince Edward Island 11% 16.7% 5.7 Nova Scotia 9% 15.5% 6.5 New Brunswick 9.7% 20.8% 11.1 Quebec 6.9% 15.6% 8.7 Ontario 6.3% 12.2% 5.9 Manitoba 4.2% 15.4% 11.2 Saskatchewan 4.2% 18.2% 14 Alberta 3.9% 11% 7.1 British Columbia 5.6% 14.9% 9.3 Yukon Territory 6.2% 21.9% 15.7 Northwest Territories 4% 20.1% 16.1 Nunavut 3.5% 20.1% 16.6 Source: Appendix Table 7 The national gap for the on- and off-reserve unemployment rate (Appendix Table 7) was -11 percentage points. Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia had gaps over -10 percentage points; and New Brunswick saw the highest discrepancy at percentage points. Isolating the on-reserve unemployment rate, all regions in Canada had rates starting as high as 18.1 (Ontario) up to 39.3 (Newfoundland and Labrador). 15 NCR# v9

17 Conclusion Between 1996 and 2006, the economic development outcomes of people concerning employment, labour force participation and unemployment, improved. However, significant gaps still exist between and non- people in Canada, as well as between First Nations, Métis and Inuit populations. Most of the gains in labour market outcomes can be attributed to Métis and offreserve First Nations, since on-reserve First Nations and Inuit have seen little improvement between 1996 and Furthermore, on-reserve First Nations and Inuit have not been able to participate or benefit from economic growth to the same level as their Métis, off-reserve First Nations and non- counterparts. In addition, the data suggests that people are less likely to work in traditionally well-paid areas such as the manufacturing, finance and professional service industries. Focusing on future skills training in those areas could contribute to support economic development. Although this data report is descriptive rather than analytic, this closer examination of the three measures raises a number of observations. First, people display a high labour force participation rate compared to their unemployment rates. In other words, people keep trying to find jobs despite their high rates of unemployment; they are not discouraged from attempting to find work 2.This is positive news and suggests that employment programming and policy should not focus solely on incentive to work, but on the creation of employment opportunities and on skills training to allow people to access employment. Economic development initiatives and job creation programs focusing on-reserve and in Northern communities would greatly contribute to increasing the overall labour market outcomes and help close the gap with non- Canadians. The labour market results among the different identity and gender groups raise additional questions. women have a lower labour force participation rate and employment rate than their male counterparts. This is in line with patterns already observed in the general population where women s care giving responsibilities limit their engagement in the labour force. However, women display a lower unemployment rate than men and show a smaller gap in the employment and labour force participation rate with their non- counterparts than men do with non- men. More research on women employment patterns and on the way they experience labour market participation, including the impact of care giving on women s employment patterns, should be explored. Finally, Canada needs a continuing dialogue among organizations, governments of all levels, and private and public organizations about how people can achieve equity in our labour markets. Canada s population is growing at double the rate of the non- population, and it is projected that people will be the source of Canada s core population growth between 2011 and As the Canadian economy faces anticipated labour and skills shortages in the coming years, we cannot ignore the opportunity to tap into the valuable pool of young people who are eager to find work. 2 On this topic see Michael Mendelson, People in Canada s Labour Market: Work and Unemployment, Today and Tomorrow, Caledon Institute of Social Policy, NCR# v9 16

18 ANNEX A Supplementary Data Appendix Table 1a: Employment Rate: Persons with, 2006 Appendix Table 1b: Employment Rate: Persons with, 2001 Appendix Table 1c: Employment Rate: Persons with, 1996 Appendix Table 2a: Employment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2006 Appendix Table 2b: Employment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2001 Appendix Table 2c: Employment Rate: Gap with Non-, 1996 Appendix Table 3: Employment Rate by, Province and Gender, 2006 Appendix Table 4a: Labour Force Participation Rate: Persons with, 2006 Appendix Table 4b: Labour Force Participation Rate: Persons with, 2001 Appendix Table 4c: Labour Force Participation Rate: Persons with, 1996 Appendix Table 5a: Labour Force Participation Rate: Gap with Non-, 2006 Appendix Table 5b: Labour Force Participation Rate: Gap with Non-, 2001 Appendix Table 5c: Labour Force Participation Rate: Gap with Non-, 1996 Appendix Table 6: Labour Force Participation Rate by, Province and Gender, 2006 Appendix Table 7a: Unemployment Rate: Persons with, 2006 Appendix Table 1b: Unemployment Rate: Persons with, 2001 Appendix Table 1c: Unemployment Rate: Persons with, 1996 Appendix Table 8a: Unemployment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2006 Appendix Table 8b: Unemployment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2001 Appendix Table 8c: Unemployment Rate: Gap with Non-, 1996 Appendix Table 9: Unemployment Rate by, Province and Gender, 2006 Appendix Table 10a: Employment Measures: Persons with, Canada, 2006 Appendix Table 10b: Employment Measures: Persons with, Canada, 2001 Appendix Table 10c: Employment Measures: Men with, Canada, 2006 Appendix Table 10d: Employment Measures: Women with, Canada, 2006 Appendix Table 11a: Percentage of workers in goods-producing sectors: Persons with, 2006 Appendix Table 11b: Percentage of workers in goods-producing sectors: Persons with, 2001 Appendix Table 11c: Percentage of workers in goods-producing sectors: Persons with, 1996 Appendix Table 12a: Percentage of workers in Service-producing sectors: Persons with, 2006 Appendix Table 12b: Percentage of workers in Service-producing sectors: Persons with, NCR# v9

19 Appendix Table 12c: Percentage of workers in Service-producing sectors: Persons with, 1996 Appendix Table 13: Percentage of Workers by Industry (North American Industry Classification System): Persons with, Canada, 2006 Appendix Table 14: Distribution of Employment in Canada by Industry, Population and Gender, 2006 Appendix Table 15: Percentage of employment in Goods and Services Industries, by Gender, 2006 Appendix Table 16a: Percentage of employed that worked mainly full-time weeks in 2005 Appendix Table 16b: Percentage of employed that worked mainly full-time weeks in 2000 Appendix Table 16c: Percentage of employed that worked mainly full-time weeks in NCR# v9

20 Appendix Table 1a: Employment Rate: Persons with, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 47.2 n.a n.a Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

21 Appendix Table 1b: Employment Rate: Persons with, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 47.6 n.a n.a n.a n.a 90.6 Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

22 Appendix Table 1c: Employment Rate: Persons with, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Note: In 1996 persons who identified themselves as more than one aboriginal identity were listed under both those identities. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Multiple responses. In 1996 those who reported as being Registered or Treaty Indians or band members were listed as having that aboriginal identity. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Other. Note : In 1996 Nunavut was a part of the Northwest Territories Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 24

23 Appendix Table 2a: Employment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 40 n.a n.a Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

24 Appendix Table 2b: Employment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 43 n.a n.a n.a. n.a. Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

25 Appendix Table 2c: Employment Rate: Gap with Non-, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Note: In 1996 persons who identified themselves as more than one aboriginal identity were listed under both those identities. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Multiple responses. In 1996 those who reported as being Registered or Treaty Indians or band members were listed as having that aboriginal identity. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Other. Note : In 1996 Nunavut was a part of the Northwest Territories Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 27

26 Appendix Table 3: Employment Rate by, Province and Gender, 2006 Total Men Women Gap between Men and Women Non- Total Men Women Gap between Men and Women Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

27 Appendix Table 4a: Labour Force Participation Rate: Persons with, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 59.1 n.a n.a Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

28 Appendix Table 4b: Labour Force Participation Rate: Persons with, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 61.8 n.a n.a n.a. n.a Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

29 Appendix Table 4c: Labour Force Participation Rate: Persons with, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Note: In 1996 persons who identified themselves as more than one aboriginal identity were listed under both those identities. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Multiple responses. In 1996 those who reported as being Registered or Treaty Indians or band members were listed as having that aboriginal identity. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Other. Note : In 1996 Nunavut was a part of the Northwest Territories Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 31

30 Appendix Table 5a: Labour Force Participation Rate: Gap with Non-, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 31.4 n.a n.a Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

31 Appendix Table 5b: Labour Force Participation Rate: Gap with Non-, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 31.5 n.a n.a n.a. n.a. Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

32 Appendix Table 5c: Labour Force Participation Rate: Gap with Non-, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Note: In 1996 persons who identified themselves as more than one aboriginal identity were listed under both those identities. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Multiple responses. In 1996 those who reported as being Registered or Treaty Indians or band members were listed as having that aboriginal identity. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Other. Note : In 1996 Nunavut was a part of the Northwest Territories Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 34

33 Appendix Table 6: Labour Force Participation Rate by, Province and Gender, 2006 Total Men Women Gap between Men and Women Non- Total Men Women Gap between Men and Women Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

34 Appendix Table 7a: Unemployment Rate: Persons with, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a. n.a. 11 Nova Scotia n.a New Brunswick n.a. n.a Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 20.1 n.a n.a. n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. 3.5 Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

35 Appendix Table 7b: Unemployment Rate: Persons with, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador n.a Prince Edward Island n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut 22.9 n.a n.a. n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. 2.7 Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

36 Appendix Table 7c: Unemployment Rate: Persons with, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Note: In 1996 persons who identified themselves as more than one aboriginal identity were listed under both those identities. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Multiple responses. In 1996 those who reported as being Registered or Treaty Indians or band members were listed as having that aboriginal identity. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Other. Note : In 1996 Nunavut was a part of the Northwest Territories Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 38

37 Appendix Table 8a: Unemployment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island n.a. n.a. n.a. Nova Scotia n.a New Brunswick n.a. n.a. 1.1 Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut n.a n.a. n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

38 Appendix Table 8b: Unemployment Rate: Gap with Non-, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador n.a Prince Edward Island n.a Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut n.a n.a. n.a. n.a n.a. n.a. Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

39 Appendix Table 8c: Unemployment Rate: Gap with Non-, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Note: In 1996 persons who identified themselves as more than one aboriginal identity were listed under both those identities. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Multiple responses. In 1996 those who reported as being Registered or Treaty Indians or band members were listed as having that aboriginal identity. In 2001 and 2006 they were listed as Other. Note : In 1996 Nunavut was a part of the Northwest Territories Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 41

40 Appendix Table 9: Unemployment Rate by, Province and Gender, 2006 Total Men Women Gap between Men and Women Non- Total Men Women Gap between Men and Women Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory Northwest Territories Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

41 Appendix Table 10a: Employment Measures: Persons with, Canada, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Employment Rate Labour Force Participation Rate Unemployment Rate Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB Appendix Table 10b: Employment Measures: Persons with, Canada, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Employment Rate Labour Force participation Rate Unemployment Rate Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

42 Appendix Table 10c: Employment Measures: Men with, Canada, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Employment Rate Labour Force Participation Rate Unemployment Rate Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB Appendix Table 10d: Employment Measures: Women with, Canada, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Employment Rate Labour Force Participation Rate Unemployment Rate Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

43 Appendix Table 11a: Percentage of workers in goods-producing sectors: Persons with, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador na Prince Edward Island na na na 28.7 Nova Scotia na New Brunswick na na Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory na na na 13.7 Northwest Territories na na 13.8 Nunavut 14.0 na 14.0 na na n..a na 14.1 na na 7.4 Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

44 Appendix Table 11b: Percentage of workers in goods-producing sectors: Persons with, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador na Prince Edward Island na na na 31.4 Nova Scotia na New Brunswick na na Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory na na na 13.9 Northwest Territories na na 14.8 Nunavut 15.3 na 15.3 na na n..a na 15.1 na na 11.4 Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

45 Appendix Table 11c: Percentage of workers in goods-producing sectors: Persons with, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island 44.7 na na 43.5 na na 31.5 Nova Scotia na 23.6 New Brunswick na 27.2 Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan na 30.5 Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory na 17.6 Northwest Territories 16.1 na na Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 47

46 Appendix Table 12a: Percentage of workers in Service-producing sectors: Persons with, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador na Prince Edward Island na na na 71.3 Nova Scotia na New Brunswick na na Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory na na na 86.2 Northwest Territories na na 86.3 Nunavut 85.9 na 85.9 na na na na 85.9 na na 92.4 Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

47 Appendix Table 12b: Percentage of workers in Service-producing sectors: Persons with, 2001 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador na Prince Edward Island na na na 68.6 Nova Scotia na New Brunswick na na Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory na na na 86.1 Northwest Territories na na 85.2 Nunavut 84.8 na 84.8 na na na na 84.9 na na 88.7 Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

48 Appendix Table 12c: Percentage of workers in Service-producing sectors: Persons with, 1996 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island 51.8 na na 56.5 na na 68.5 Nova Scotia na 76.4 New Brunswick na 72.8 Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan na 69.5 Alberta British Columbia Yukon Territory na 82.4 Northwest Territories 84.0 na na Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 50

49 Appendix Table 13: Percentage of Workers by Industry (North American Industry Classification System): Persons with, Canada, 2006 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Mining and Oil and Gas Extraction Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation and Warehousing Information and Cultural Industries Finance and Insurance Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises

50 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Multiple Other Non- Population Total On Off Total On Off Total Total Total Total Total Administrative and Support, Waste Management and Remediation Services Educational Services Healthcare and Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment and Recreation Accommodation and Food Services Other Services Public Administration Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

51 Appendix Table 14: Distribution of Employment in Canada by Industry, Population and Gender, 2006 Population Non- Population Total Men Women Total Men Women Goods-Producing Industries Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Mining and oil and gas extraction Utilities Construction Manufacturing Services-Producing Industries Wholesale trade Retail trade Transportation and warehousing Information and cultural industries Finance and insurance Real estate and rental and leasing Professional, scientific and technical services Management of companies and enterprises

52 Population Non- Population Total Men Women Total Men Women Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services Educational services Healthcare and social assistance Arts, entertainment and recreation Accommodation and food services Other services (except public administration) Public administration TOTAL Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

53 Appendix Table 15: Percentage of employment in Goods and Services Industries, by Gender, 2006 Population Non- Population Total Men Women Total Men Women Goods Services Goods Services Goods Services Goods Services Goods Services Goods Services Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New-Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

54 Appendix Table 16a: Percentage of employed that worked mainly full-time weeks in 2005 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island na 80.4 Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan na 76.4 Alberta British Columbia Yukon, NWT, Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no XCB

55 Appendix Table 16b: Percentage of employed that worked mainly full-time weeks in 2000 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island na 80.8 Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon, NWT, Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 2001 Census of Population, Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97F0011XCB

56 Appendix Table 16c: Percentage of employed that worked mainly full-time weeks in 1995 Total North American Indian Métis Inuit Non- Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island na Nova Scotia na 75.6 New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Yukon, NWT, Nunavut Source: Statistics Canada, 1996 Census of Population, AANDC Tabulation 58

57 59