Inside Outside Information
|
|
- Nigel Booker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Inside Outside Information Daniel Quigley and Ansgar Walther Presentation by: Gunjita Gupta, Yijun Hao, Verena Wiedemann, Le Wu
2 Agenda Introduction Binary Model General Sender-Receiver Game Fragility of Information Better Outside Information can Reduce Total Information Disclosures and the Shape of Payoffs Applications Conclusion and Discussion
3 Introduction - Motivation Research question: Do better public signals crowd out the disclosure of inside information? Motivation: Study the impact of outside information and where these can create frictions Related literature and models: Communication with self-interested experts ÞContext of verifiable communication and unravelling equilibria
4 Introduction - Setting Inside information can be disclosed by self-interested insiders Uninformed agents also have access to outside information (e.g. online reviews and policy-maker announcements) Then insiders incentives to disclose information depends on availability and quality of outside information available Substantial cost of disclosure for Sender Uncertainty about whether Sender has information to disclose Sender discloses information before outside information is received
5 Introduction - Setting What is new? Disclosure costs and uncertainty favour opacity and lead to discontinuities in equilibrium play Outside information is first-order determinant of incentives to communicate Where does it matter? Political contests with several candidates as Senders, voters as Receivers and outside information through media coverage Financial panics with financial institutions are Senders, investors as Receivers and outside information by policy makers such as central banks
6 Binary Model - Setup Informed Agent: Sender offers an indivisible good at a market price p Uninformed Agent: Receiver take Binary Action (can either buy the good or not) Quality of good: θ with commonly known distribution and smooth density f(θ) Timing: ØSender privately observes θ, and send a message m {θ, } m = θ verifiable but with cost c + m = no information and costless ØReceiver observes m and an outside signal s = θ + kε, k measures noise andε [ 1,1]with smooth log-concave density g(ε) and cumulative distribution G(ε) ØReceiver decides whether or not to buy good
7 Binary Model - Setup Assumptions: E[θ] < p: without information, not worth buying good p > c: profits from sale cover the costs of disclosure High realizations of s are good news about θ: if a higher s is received, θ more likely to be high Payoffs: Receiver L s Payoff=θ p If receiver buys good, + Sender L s Payoff = p c 1 STU Receiver L s Payoff=0 If receiver does not buy good, + Sender L s Payoff = c 1 STU
8 Binary Model - Equilibrium Under full information, Receiver would buy good iff θ p For Bad Senders, θ < p, disclosing true θ never leads to a sale, but incurs cost c dominant strategy: stay quiet m = For Good Senders, θ p, find Transparent Equilibrium, i.e. all good types disclose ØIf sender quiet, receiver assume θ < p unless s proves opposite ØReceiver buys good only if s p + k ØSender discloses if θ p and M(θ) c, where θ p M θ p Pr s < p + k θ = p G 1 k M θ is the maximal punishment for staying quiet, M θ _ = c
9 Binary Model - Equilibrium If k is above a critical level k` Transparent Equilibrium exists M(θ) c for all θ p M θ _ = c k U bcd k` ecf gh i j If k is below a critical level k` Reverse Unraveling arises as follow If k < k`, a set of best types, θ (θ _, θ ], have dominant strategy to stay quiet No news is now ambiguous news Receiver values silence more favorably Silence is amplified
10 General Sender-Receiver Game - Setup Receiver needs to choose an action a A R The state of the world: θ Θ = {θ e,, θ q } R, θ q > θ qce > > θ e Sender s payoff: v(a) Receiver s payoff: u a, θ, a and θ are strategic complementarities, i.e. Receiver chooses higher a when optimistic about θ μ 0 (θ): prior distribution of θ π(s θ): conditional distribution of s given θ
11 General Sender-Receiver Game - Equilibrium In Perfect Bayesian Equilibria: Sender sets m to maximize v(a) and Receiver sets a to maximize u a, θ On equilibrium path, Receiver s posterior beliefs on θ follows Bayes law Off equilibrium path, Receiver places zero probability on type θ if she observes a signal such that π(s θ ) = 0 Receiver s Best Response if knows θ with certainty a (θ) = argmax y z u(a, θ) Receiver s Best response if sender stays quiet and outside information is s α(s) argmax E μ [u(a, θ) s, m = ] Receiver with skeptical beliefs assumes Sender to be the worst type given s, θ(s), if m =
12 General Sender-Receiver Game - Equilibrium Sender s payoff when he is taken to be type θ for certain V(θ) = v(a (θ)) Sender s payoff if stays quiet and faces a skeptical receiver who assumes that E[V(θ(s)) θ] Sender s net payoff fromverifiable disclosure N(θ) V(θ) E[v(α(s)) θ] Sender s maximal punishment for staying quiet M(θ) = V(θ) E[V(θ(s)) θ] Sender discloses if N(θ) c, i.e. net payoff from disclosure is more than cost Sender with type θ has a dominant strategy to stay quiet iff M(θ) < c Transparent equilibrium exists iff c S UƒU h M(θ) c 0
13 General Sender-Receiver Game - Benchmark Benchmark: No outside information Disclosure strategies monotone increasing qualitatively similar to transparent equilibrium All types valued equally if quiet high types gain most from disclosure Unraveling result if c is not prohibitively high We then consider the presence of outside information
14 Fragility of Information More Setup We consider how equilibrium disclosure changes as the distribution of s varies from pure noise to full information in a continuous fashion. π s θ; t : conditional distribution of s given θ as a function of t Π t = (π s θ; t )ˆ,U : stochastic matrix that defines t-dependent structure of s pure noise if π s θ; t is independent of θ Π t is + fully revealing if for each s, only one θ s. t. π s θ; t > 0
15 Fragility of Information Proposition 1 Proposition 1: For any payoffs {u, v} and any prior μ _, assume that c is sufficiently small to ensure that there is a transparent equilibrium when public signals are pure noise. Then there exists a continuous path of signal structures Π(t) for t [0, 1] with the following properties: Π(0) is pure noise, while Π(1) is fully revealing, and There exists a critical point t 0, 1 such that, when Receiver observes the signal induced by Π(t), there is a transparent equilibrium for t t, while full opacity is the unique equilibrium for t > t
16 Fragility of Information Binary Model B θ L : highest type of Sender who prefers to disclose when Receiver expects disclosures from θ (p, θ L ), increase in θ L due to Strategic complementarities Transparent Equilibrium Imprecise s Precise s Full Opacity
17 Fragility of Information Binary Model Transparent Equilibrium k = k` k = k` ε
18 Fragility of Information General Model
19 Fragility of Information Caveat Caveat: The sequence of signals that leads to a discontinuity does not have full support, that is, the set of possible signals is different for different types If full support is enforced, cannot construct a threshold t where M θ q while M θ q < M θ However, deviations from full support are empirically reasonable in many settings, e.g. very favorable news tend to rule out very bad outcomes and vice versa = c
20 Better Outside Information can Reduce Total Information Rank Information Blackwell (1953): Signal s L is more informative about θ than s if s is a garbled signal of s L Or put differently, Bayesian decision-maker always weakly prefers s L to s We need it to show (only using intuition here) that better outside signals can always decrease informativeness as long as there is some disclosure in equilibrium Before: Fully Revealing Equilibrium v.s. Fully Opaque Equilibrium Here: Generalization
21 Better Outside Information can Reduce Total Information Proposition 2 Proposition 2: Suppose that, when outside information is s, there is an equilibrium E in which Sender makes a disclosure m = θ with strictly positive probability. Then there exists an outside signal s L such that s L is more informative than s in the sense of Blackwell, and In the game where outside information is s L, there is an equilibrium E L in which Receiver is less informed than in E in the sense of Blackwell
22 Better Outside Information can Reduce Total Information - Intuition Another equilibrium E L exists where one Sender switches from full disclosure to not revealing any information and everyone else continues to play there equilibrium strategy Overall this means less information available to the Receiver as she does not learn about type who changed his behaviour
23 Better Outside Information can Reduce Total Information - Intuition How do they get there? In equilibrium E with outside information s the Sender strictly prefers to reveal his type. With probability close to 1, information bundle s L is drawn that perfectly reveals one sender s type. Therefore he expects a payoff close to full disclosure where he saves the cost of disclosure by not revealing any information. Everyone else continues to strictly prefer their equilibrium strategy fromequilibrium E.
24 Disclosures and the shape of payoffs More Setup A complementary analysis of prior results: Given a distribution of outside info, when does a sender have incentive to stay quiet in the equilibrium? Relate receiver s utility to some increasing function X(θ) (X ) = X θ e X(θ ) for the increment of receiver s action if receiver learns that sender s type increases from θ to the next-best type θ e
25 Disclosures and the shape of payoffs Concavity and Convexity Concavity = min ( ) ( h) Convexity = min ( h) ( ) When concavity > 1, payoffs are concave in the sense that marginal value of being perceived as a better type diminishes as sender s type imrpoves When convexity > 1, payoffs are convex in the sense that marginal value of being perceived as a better type increases as sender s type imrpoves
26 Disclosures and the shape of payoffs Downside and Upside Risk We can write payoff into an equation in which net payoff from disclosure is equal to the sum of two components: Downside risk : ce X Q Te qce ; Q =probability of sender s type<θ for j < i Upside risk : T X (1 Q )(Sender s type >θ for j > i) The sender discloses if the downside exceeds the upside more than c
27 Disclosures and the shape of payoffs Proposition 3 Proposition 3: If the concavity of payoffs is sufficiently large, then for any level of disclosure cost c > c _, all equilibria are non-monotonic or fully opaque. Conversely, if convexity is sufficiently large, then there are no non-monotonic equilibria. The strongest type of sender stay quiet in any equilibrium if the payoff is concave enough If payoffs are concave enough, incentives lie on the downside, but Q drops as type improves, incentive becomes weaker, leads to reverse unravelling, nonmonotone or fully opaque equilibrium Analogous in the context of convexity
28 Disclosures and the shape of payoffs Iterated deletion of dominated Define a procedure for iterated deletion of strictly dominated non-monotone disclosure (DNMD): Θ : the set of types staying quiet after n steps of iteration. Θ = {θ e, θ,, θ } and θ is the highest among these types. Θ ce Θ and this set converges to a set Θ Θ is non-empty b/c the worst type has the strictly dominant strategy to stay quiet
29 Disclosures and the shape of payoffs Proposition 4 Proposition 4: If no type θ Θ prefers to disclose when receiver expects the cutoff strategy Pr(m = θ θ) = 1( θ Θ ), then a monotone increasing equilibrium exists. Conversely, if some type θ Θ prefers to disclose when receiver expects the fully opaque strategy Pr(m = θ θ) = 1, then all equilibria are non-monotone A simple test for identifying whether monotone equilibria survive the introduction of outside info Generalize our intuition built up in the concavity argument in proposition 3
30 Applications Financial Panics Question: how much outside info should a policy maker release into a potentially panicked banking system? Key: Hirshleifer effect: opacity provides implicit insurance (the silence of strong strictly improves the utility of weak) Answer: Policy makers should ensure a minimum level of transparency as reducing noise of outside info enhances implicit insurance (efforts strong banks made to distinguish themselves are crowded out)
31 Applications Political Contest A game with two competing senders (candidates) and a mass of receivers (voters) Result: 1) Welfare is a convex function of voters expectation of θ, thus either releasing no info at all or eliminating all noise in the signal. 2) Inside disclosure happens only when θ is small, all landslide wins are associates with no inside info being revealed.
32 Applications Corporate Disclosure A firm wishing to raise funds from investors by issuing bonds or shares Bonds give investor a concave claim Shares give investors a convex claim Result: 1) Disclosure comes from high-quality firms mainly if they are selling shares 2) Disclosure comes from intermediate-quality firms mainly if they are selling bonds 3) Disclosure comes from firms with favorable subsequent realizations of outside info if selling shares 4) Disclosure comes from firms with intermediate signals like mediocre credit ratings if selling bonds
33 Conclusion and Discussion- Conclusion Existence of outside info alters insiders incentive to disclose Reverse unravelling Key result: 1) Fragility of information (amplification effect) 2) Improved outside info could generate discontinuous drop in inside disclosure 3) Tendency of disclosure depends on the shape of sender s disclosure function Key implication - Problem of selling information: Receiver who purchases outside info could end up with worse information overall in equilibrium
34 Conclusion and Discussion- Discussion Natural extension of topic: The role of information market for overall information and market efficiency Timing of model is very good for selected examples: Information by insiders will no longer be of any use of not be perceived very credible once public outside information has been received Various Best Responses by Receivers: There could be multiple Senders who value information differently, e.g. Trump voters who think the New York Times is too liberal and spreading lies anyways, or investors who think the local Central Bank is not independent or has a specific interest in keeping banks that are relevant to the system alive. Thus, not everyone will have same best-response function based on inside and outside information revealed
Inside and outside information
Inside and outside information Daniel Quigley University of Oxford daniel.quigley@economics.ox.ac.uk Ansgar Walther University of Warwick ansgar.walther@wbs.ac.uk This version: May 4, 2017 Abstract We
More informationCrowding out disclosure
Crowding out disclosure Daniel Quigley and Ansgar Walther February 2016 Abstract This paper introduces public information in a model of strategic disclosure to assess the impact of public signals such
More informationEvaluating Strategic Forecasters. Rahul Deb with Mallesh Pai (Rice) and Maher Said (NYU Stern) Becker Friedman Theory Conference III July 22, 2017
Evaluating Strategic Forecasters Rahul Deb with Mallesh Pai (Rice) and Maher Said (NYU Stern) Becker Friedman Theory Conference III July 22, 2017 Motivation Forecasters are sought after in a variety of
More informationSequential-move games with Nature s moves.
Econ 221 Fall, 2018 Li, Hao UBC CHAPTER 3. GAMES WITH SEQUENTIAL MOVES Game trees. Sequential-move games with finite number of decision notes. Sequential-move games with Nature s moves. 1 Strategies in
More informationMicroeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions
Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions 1. (45 points) Consider the following normal form game played by Bruce and Sheila: L Sheila R T 1, 0 3, 3 Bruce M 1, x 0, 0 B 0, 0 4, 1 (a) Suppose
More informationOut of equilibrium beliefs and Refinements of PBE
Refinements of PBE Out of equilibrium beliefs and Refinements of PBE Requirement 1 and 2 of the PBE say that no player s strategy can be strictly dominated beginning at any information set. The problem
More informationFinancial Fragility A Global-Games Approach Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Financial Fragility A Global-Games Approach Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Financial Fragility and Coordination Failures What makes financial systems fragile? What causes crises
More information1 x i c i if x 1 +x 2 > 0 u i (x 1,x 2 ) = 0 if x 1 +x 2 = 0
Game Theory - Midterm Examination, Date: ctober 14, 017 Total marks: 30 Duration: 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM Note: Answer all questions clearly using pen. Please avoid unnecessary discussions. In all questions,
More informationComparing Allocations under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem Revisited
Comparing Allocations under Asymmetric Information: Coase Theorem Revisited Shingo Ishiguro Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University 1-7 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan August 2002
More informationOptimal Disclosure and Fight for Attention
Optimal Disclosure and Fight for Attention January 28, 2018 Abstract In this paper, firm managers use their disclosure policy to direct speculators scarce attention towards their firm. More attention implies
More informationLecture Notes on Adverse Selection and Signaling
Lecture Notes on Adverse Selection and Signaling Debasis Mishra April 5, 2010 1 Introduction In general competitive equilibrium theory, it is assumed that the characteristics of the commodities are observable
More informationImpact of Imperfect Information on the Optimal Exercise Strategy for Warrants
Impact of Imperfect Information on the Optimal Exercise Strategy for Warrants April 2008 Abstract In this paper, we determine the optimal exercise strategy for corporate warrants if investors suffer from
More informationPractice Problems 2: Asymmetric Information
Practice Problems 2: Asymmetric Information November 25, 2013 1 Single-Agent Problems 1. Nonlinear Pricing with Two Types Suppose a seller of wine faces two types of customers, θ 1 and θ 2, where θ 2 >
More informationHW Consider the following game:
HW 1 1. Consider the following game: 2. HW 2 Suppose a parent and child play the following game, first analyzed by Becker (1974). First child takes the action, A 0, that produces income for the child,
More informationFinancial Economics Field Exam August 2011
Financial Economics Field Exam August 2011 There are two questions on the exam, representing Macroeconomic Finance (234A) and Corporate Finance (234C). Please answer both questions to the best of your
More information4. Beliefs at all info sets off the equilibrium path are determined by Bayes' Rule & the players' equilibrium strategies where possible.
A. Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium B. PBE Examples C. Signaling Examples Context: A. PBE for dynamic games of incomplete information (refines BE & SPE) *PBE requires strategies to be BE for the entire game
More informationFeedback Effect and Capital Structure
Feedback Effect and Capital Structure Minh Vo Metropolitan State University Abstract This paper develops a model of financing with informational feedback effect that jointly determines a firm s capital
More informationAnswers to Problem Set 4
Answers to Problem Set 4 Economics 703 Spring 016 1. a) The monopolist facing no threat of entry will pick the first cost function. To see this, calculate profits with each one. With the first cost function,
More informationFDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.
FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.) Hints for Problem Set 2 1. Consider a zero-sum game, where
More informationCredible Ratings. University of Toronto. From the SelectedWorks of hao li
University of Toronto From the SelectedWorks of hao li 2008 Credible Ratings ettore damiano, University of Toronto hao li, University of Toronto wing suen Available at: https://works.bepress.com/hao_li/15/
More informationAdverse Selection: The Market for Lemons
Andrew McLennan September 4, 2014 I. Introduction Economics 6030/8030 Microeconomics B Second Semester 2014 Lecture 6 Adverse Selection: The Market for Lemons A. One of the most famous and influential
More informationLYING FOR STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE: RATIONAL AND BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL MISREPRESENTATION OF INTENTIONS Vince Crawford, UCSD, October 2001
LYING FOR STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE: RATIONAL AND BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL MISREPRESENTATION OF INTENTIONS Vince Crawford, UCSD, October 21 "Lord, what fools these mortals be!" Puck, A Midsummer Night s Dream, Act
More informationWhen does strategic information disclosure lead to perfect consumer information?
When does strategic information disclosure lead to perfect consumer information? Frédéric Koessler Régis Renault April 7, 2010 (Preliminary) Abstract A firm chooses a price and how much information to
More informationBid-Ask Spreads and Volume: The Role of Trade Timing
Bid-Ask Spreads and Volume: The Role of Trade Timing Toronto, Northern Finance 2007 Andreas Park University of Toronto October 3, 2007 Andreas Park (UofT) The Timing of Trades October 3, 2007 1 / 25 Patterns
More informationGlobal Games and Illiquidity
Global Games and Illiquidity Stephen Morris December 2009 The Credit Crisis of 2008 Bad news and uncertainty triggered market freeze Real bank runs (Northern Rock, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers...) Run-like
More informationInformation and Evidence in Bargaining
Information and Evidence in Bargaining Péter Eső Department of Economics, University of Oxford peter.eso@economics.ox.ac.uk Chris Wallace Department of Economics, University of Leicester cw255@leicester.ac.uk
More informationWeb Appendix: Proofs and extensions.
B eb Appendix: Proofs and extensions. B.1 Proofs of results about block correlated markets. This subsection provides proofs for Propositions A1, A2, A3 and A4, and the proof of Lemma A1. Proof of Proposition
More informationGlobal Games and Illiquidity
Global Games and Illiquidity Stephen Morris December 2009 The Credit Crisis of 2008 Bad news and uncertainty triggered market freeze Real bank runs (Northern Rock, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers...) Run-like
More informationReputation and Signaling in Asset Sales: Internet Appendix
Reputation and Signaling in Asset Sales: Internet Appendix Barney Hartman-Glaser September 1, 2016 Appendix D. Non-Markov Perfect Equilibrium In this appendix, I consider the game when there is no honest-type
More informationMicroeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program
Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program August 2013 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.
More informationEconomics 385: Suggested Solutions 1
Economics 385: Suggested Solutions 1 19 January, 2007 Akerlof with Discrete Types Question 1 Suppose there is an equilibrium where both types trade. Then the buyers are willing to pay 7.5. But at this
More informationTwo-Dimensional Bayesian Persuasion
Two-Dimensional Bayesian Persuasion Davit Khantadze September 30, 017 Abstract We are interested in optimal signals for the sender when the decision maker (receiver) has to make two separate decisions.
More informationIntroduction to Political Economy Problem Set 3
Introduction to Political Economy 14.770 Problem Set 3 Due date: Question 1: Consider an alternative model of lobbying (compared to the Grossman and Helpman model with enforceable contracts), where lobbies
More informationResearch Article A Mathematical Model of Communication with Reputational Concerns
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 06, Article ID 650704, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/0.55/06/650704 Research Article A Mathematical Model of Communication with Reputational Concerns Ce Huang,
More informationMANAGEMENT SCIENCE doi /mnsc ec
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE doi 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1334ec e-companion ONLY AVAILABLE IN ELECTRONIC FORM informs 2011 INFORMS Electronic Companion Trust in Forecast Information Sharing by Özalp Özer, Yanchong Zheng,
More informationRoy Model of Self-Selection: General Case
V. J. Hotz Rev. May 6, 007 Roy Model of Self-Selection: General Case Results drawn on Heckman and Sedlacek JPE, 1985 and Heckman and Honoré, Econometrica, 1986. Two-sector model in which: Agents are income
More informationPersuasion in Global Games with Application to Stress Testing. Supplement
Persuasion in Global Games with Application to Stress Testing Supplement Nicolas Inostroza Northwestern University Alessandro Pavan Northwestern University and CEPR January 24, 208 Abstract This document
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics ECON5200 - Fall 2014 Introduction What you have done: - consumers maximize their utility subject to budget constraints and firms maximize their profits given technology and market
More informationStochastic Games and Bayesian Games
Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games CPSC 532l Lecture 10 Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games CPSC 532l Lecture 10, Slide 1 Lecture Overview 1 Recap 2 Stochastic Games 3 Bayesian Games 4 Analyzing Bayesian
More informationExtensive-Form Games with Imperfect Information
May 6, 2015 Example 2, 2 A 3, 3 C Player 1 Player 1 Up B Player 2 D 0, 0 1 0, 0 Down C Player 1 D 3, 3 Extensive-Form Games With Imperfect Information Finite No simultaneous moves: each node belongs to
More informationPractice Problems 1: Moral Hazard
Practice Problems 1: Moral Hazard December 5, 2012 Question 1 (Comparative Performance Evaluation) Consider the same normal linear model as in Question 1 of Homework 1. This time the principal employs
More informationCHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION
CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 1 / 65 Outline 1 An Introduction
More informationIntervention with Voluntary Participation in Global Games
Intervention with Voluntary Participation in Global Games Lin Shen Junyuan Zou June 14, 2017 Abstract We analyze a model with strategic complementarity in which coordination failure leads to welfare losses.
More informationAuction is a commonly used way of allocating indivisible
Econ 221 Fall, 2018 Li, Hao UBC CHAPTER 16. BIDDING STRATEGY AND AUCTION DESIGN Auction is a commonly used way of allocating indivisible goods among interested buyers. Used cameras, Salvator Mundi, and
More informationMATH 4321 Game Theory Solution to Homework Two
MATH 321 Game Theory Solution to Homework Two Course Instructor: Prof. Y.K. Kwok 1. (a) Suppose that an iterated dominance equilibrium s is not a Nash equilibrium, then there exists s i of some player
More informationNon-Exclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons
Non-Exclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons Andrea Attar Thomas Mariotti François Salanié October 2007 Abstract In order to check the impact of the exclusivity regime on equilibrium allocations,
More informationThe Irrelevance of Corporate Governance Structure
The Irrelevance of Corporate Governance Structure Zohar Goshen Columbia Law School Doron Levit Wharton October 1, 2017 First Draft: Please do not cite or circulate Abstract We develop a model analyzing
More informationGame Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India July 2012
Game Theory Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India July 2012 The Revenue Equivalence Theorem Note: This is a only a draft
More informationEcon 711 Homework 1 Solutions
Econ 711 Homework 1 s January 4, 014 1. 1 Symmetric, not complete, not transitive. Not a game tree. Asymmetric, not complete, transitive. Game tree. 1 Asymmetric, not complete, transitive. Not a game tree.
More informationOn Existence of Equilibria. Bayesian Allocation-Mechanisms
On Existence of Equilibria in Bayesian Allocation Mechanisms Northwestern University April 23, 2014 Bayesian Allocation Mechanisms In allocation mechanisms, agents choose messages. The messages determine
More informationAn optimal board system : supervisory board vs. management board
An optimal board system : supervisory board vs. management board Tomohiko Yano Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo January 10, 2006 Abstract We examine relative effectiveness of two kinds
More informationEconomics 171: Final Exam
Question 1: Basic Concepts (20 points) Economics 171: Final Exam 1. Is it true that every strategy is either strictly dominated or is a dominant strategy? Explain. (5) No, some strategies are neither dominated
More informationMicroeconomic Theory II Spring 2016 Final Exam Solutions
Microeconomic Theory II Spring 206 Final Exam Solutions Warning: Brief, incomplete, and quite possibly incorrect. Mikhael Shor Question. Consider the following game. First, nature (player 0) selects t
More informationInformation Aggregation in Dynamic Markets with Strategic Traders. Michael Ostrovsky
Information Aggregation in Dynamic Markets with Strategic Traders Michael Ostrovsky Setup n risk-neutral players, i = 1,..., n Finite set of states of the world Ω Random variable ( security ) X : Ω R Each
More informationDispersed Information, Monetary Policy and Central Bank Communication
Dispersed Information, Monetary Policy and Central Bank Communication George-Marios Angeletos MIT Central Bank Research Network Conference December 13-14, 2007 MOTIVATION The peculiar character of the
More informationExercises Solutions: Game Theory
Exercises Solutions: Game Theory Exercise. (U, R).. (U, L) and (D, R). 3. (D, R). 4. (U, L) and (D, R). 5. First, eliminate R as it is strictly dominated by M for player. Second, eliminate M as it is strictly
More informationMA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE
MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE Answers to Problem Set 2 [1] (a) This is standard (we have even done it in class). The one-shot Cournot outputs can be computed to be A/3, while the payoff to each firm can
More informationMicroeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems
Microeconomics II CIDE, MsC Economics List of Problems 1. There are three people, Amy (A), Bart (B) and Chris (C): A and B have hats. These three people are arranged in a room so that B can see everything
More informationBIASES OVER BIASED INFORMATION STRUCTURES:
BIASES OVER BIASED INFORMATION STRUCTURES: Confirmation, Contradiction and Certainty Seeking Behavior in the Laboratory Gary Charness Ryan Oprea Sevgi Yuksel UCSB - UCSB UCSB October 2017 MOTIVATION News
More informationS 2,2-1, x c C x r, 1 0,0
Problem Set 5 1. There are two players facing each other in the following random prisoners dilemma: S C S, -1, x c C x r, 1 0,0 With probability p, x c = y, and with probability 1 p, x c = 0. With probability
More informationGame Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Repeated Games
Game Theory Wolfgang Frimmel Repeated Games 1 / 41 Recap: SPNE The solution concept for dynamic games with complete information is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) Selten (1965): A strategy
More informationEcon 711 Final Solutions
Econ 711 Final Solutions April 24, 2015 1.1 For all periods, play Cc if history is Cc for all prior periods. If not, play Dd. Payoffs for 2 cooperating on the equilibrium path are optimal for and deviating
More informationStochastic Games and Bayesian Games
Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games CPSC 532L Lecture 10 Stochastic Games and Bayesian Games CPSC 532L Lecture 10, Slide 1 Lecture Overview 1 Recap 2 Stochastic Games 3 Bayesian Games Stochastic Games
More informationSequential Financial Market Trading: The Role of Endogenous Timing
Sequential Financial Market Trading: The Role of Endogenous Timing Andreas Park University of Toronto July 2004 Abstract The paper analyses a simplified version of a Glosten-Milgrom style specialist security
More informationAlmost essential MICROECONOMICS
Prerequisites Almost essential Games: Mixed Strategies GAMES: UNCERTAINTY MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell April 2018 1 Overview Games: Uncertainty Basic structure Introduction to the
More informationMarch 30, Why do economists (and increasingly, engineers and computer scientists) study auctions?
March 3, 215 Steven A. Matthews, A Technical Primer on Auction Theory I: Independent Private Values, Northwestern University CMSEMS Discussion Paper No. 196, May, 1995. This paper is posted on the course
More informationPROBLEM SET 6 ANSWERS
PROBLEM SET 6 ANSWERS 6 November 2006. Problems.,.4,.6, 3.... Is Lower Ability Better? Change Education I so that the two possible worker abilities are a {, 4}. (a) What are the equilibria of this game?
More informationEconomics 109 Practice Problems 1, Vincent Crawford, Spring 2002
Economics 109 Practice Problems 1, Vincent Crawford, Spring 2002 P1. Consider the following game. There are two piles of matches and two players. The game starts with Player 1 and thereafter the players
More informationPAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV. If any mistakes or typos are spotted, kindly communicate them to
GAME THEORY PROBLEM SET 1 WINTER 2018 PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV Introduction If any mistakes or typos are spotted, kindly communicate them to andrey.zhukov@aalto.fi. Materials from Osborne and Rubinstein
More informationVoluntary Disclosure and Strategic Stock Repurchases
Voluntary Disclosure and Strategic Stock Repurchases Praveen Kumar University of Houston pkumar@uh.edu Nisan Langberg University of Houston and TAU nlangberg@uh.edu K. Sivaramakrishnan Rice University
More informationNot 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.
Econ 400, Final Exam Name: There are three questions taken from the material covered so far in the course. ll questions are equally weighted. If you have a question, please raise your hand and I will come
More informationLiquidity saving mechanisms
Liquidity saving mechanisms Antoine Martin and James McAndrews Federal Reserve Bank of New York September 2006 Abstract We study the incentives of participants in a real-time gross settlement with and
More informationSupplementary Material for: Belief Updating in Sequential Games of Two-Sided Incomplete Information: An Experimental Study of a Crisis Bargaining
Supplementary Material for: Belief Updating in Sequential Games of Two-Sided Incomplete Information: An Experimental Study of a Crisis Bargaining Model September 30, 2010 1 Overview In these supplementary
More informationEconometrica Supplementary Material
Econometrica Supplementary Material PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE OFFERS: THE TWO-TYPE CASE TO SUPPLEMENT PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE OFFERS IN THE MARKET FOR LEMONS (Econometrica, Vol. 77, No. 1, January 2009, 29 69) BY
More informationCS 798: Homework Assignment 4 (Game Theory)
0 5 CS 798: Homework Assignment 4 (Game Theory) 1.0 Preferences Assigned: October 28, 2009 Suppose that you equally like a banana and a lottery that gives you an apple 30% of the time and a carrot 70%
More informationShills and Snipes. Subir Bose, University of Leicester, UK Arup Daripa, Birkbeck, University of London
Shills and Snipes Subir Bose, University of Leicester, UK Arup Daripa, Birkbeck, University of London Working Paper No. 14/12 September 2014 Shills and Snipes Subir Bose University of Leicester sb345@leicester.ac.uk
More informationLecture 3: Information in Sequential Screening
Lecture 3: Information in Sequential Screening NMI Workshop, ISI Delhi August 3, 2015 Motivation A seller wants to sell an object to a prospective buyer(s). Buyer has imperfect private information θ about
More informationInformation Processing and Limited Liability
Information Processing and Limited Liability Bartosz Maćkowiak European Central Bank and CEPR Mirko Wiederholt Northwestern University January 2012 Abstract Decision-makers often face limited liability
More informationA Theory of Asset Prices based on Heterogeneous Information and Limits to Arbitrage
A Theory of Asset Prices based on Heterogeneous Information and Limits to Arbitrage Elias Albagli USC Marhsall Christian Hellwig Toulouse School of Economics Aleh Tsyvinski Yale University September 20,
More informationLI Reunión Anual. Noviembre de Managing Strategic Buyers: Should a Seller Ban Resale? Beccuti, Juan Coleff, Joaquin
ANALES ASOCIACION ARGENTINA DE ECONOMIA POLITICA LI Reunión Anual Noviembre de 016 ISSN 185-00 ISBN 978-987-8590-4-6 Managing Strategic Buyers: Should a Seller Ban Resale? Beccuti, Juan Coleff, Joaquin
More informationECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HOMEWORK #7 ANSWER KEY
ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HOMEWORK #7 ANSWER KEY Exercise 3 Chapter 28 Watson (Checking the presence of separating and pooling equilibria) Consider the following game of incomplete information:
More informationEcon 101A Final Exam We May 9, 2012.
Econ 101A Final Exam We May 9, 2012. You have 3 hours to answer the questions in the final exam. We will collect the exams at 2.30 sharp. Show your work, and good luck! Problem 1. Utility Maximization.
More informationDARTMOUTH COLLEGE, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS ECONOMICS 21. Dartmouth College, Department of Economics: Economics 21, Summer 02. Topic 5: Information
Dartmouth College, Department of Economics: Economics 21, Summer 02 Topic 5: Information Economics 21, Summer 2002 Andreas Bentz Dartmouth College, Department of Economics: Economics 21, Summer 02 Introduction
More informationA Theory of Blind Trading
Cyril Monnet 1 and Erwan Quintin 2 1 University of Bern and Study Center Gerzensee 2 Wisconsin School of Business June 21, 2014 Motivation Opacity is ubiquitous in financial markets, often by design This
More informationTOO GOOD TO FIRE: NON-ASSORTATIVE MATCHING TO PLAY A DYNAMIC GAME
TOO GOOD TO FIRE: NON-ASSORTATIVE MATCHING TO PLAY A DYNAMIC GAME BENJAMIN SPERISEN AND THOMAS WISEMAN Abstract. We study stable outcomes in a two-sided, one-to-one matching market with firms and workers.
More informationFinite Memory and Imperfect Monitoring
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Finite Memory and Imperfect Monitoring Harold L. Cole and Narayana Kocherlakota Working Paper 604 September 2000 Cole: U.C.L.A. and Federal Reserve
More informationSolution Guide to Exercises for Chapter 4 Decision making under uncertainty
THE ECONOMICS OF FINANCIAL MARKETS R. E. BAILEY Solution Guide to Exercises for Chapter 4 Decision making under uncertainty 1. Consider an investor who makes decisions according to a mean-variance objective.
More informationSupplementary Appendix for Liquidity, Volume, and Price Behavior: The Impact of Order vs. Quote Based Trading not for publication
Supplementary Appendix for Liquidity, Volume, and Price Behavior: The Impact of Order vs. Quote Based Trading not for publication Katya Malinova University of Toronto Andreas Park University of Toronto
More informationBeliefs and Sequential Rationality
Beliefs and Sequential Rationality A system of beliefs µ in extensive form game Γ E is a specification of a probability µ(x) [0,1] for each decision node x in Γ E such that x H µ(x) = 1 for all information
More informationGame theory for. Leonardo Badia.
Game theory for information engineering Leonardo Badia leonardo.badia@gmail.com Zero-sum games A special class of games, easier to solve Zero-sum We speak of zero-sum game if u i (s) = -u -i (s). player
More informationECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2017
ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2017 These notes have been used and commented on before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please
More informationProblem Set 5 Answers
Problem Set 5 Answers ECON 66, Game Theory and Experiments March 8, 13 Directions: Answer each question completely. If you cannot determine the answer, explaining how you would arrive at the answer might
More informationWhere do securities come from
Where do securities come from We view it as natural to trade common stocks WHY? Coase s policemen Pricing Assumptions on market trading? Predictions? Partial Equilibrium or GE economies (risk spanning)
More informationDirected Search and the Futility of Cheap Talk
Directed Search and the Futility of Cheap Talk Kenneth Mirkin and Marek Pycia June 2015. Preliminary Draft. Abstract We study directed search in a frictional two-sided matching market in which each seller
More informationIndexing and Price Informativeness
Indexing and Price Informativeness Hong Liu Washington University in St. Louis Yajun Wang University of Maryland IFS SWUFE August 3, 2017 Liu and Wang Indexing and Price Informativeness 1/25 Motivation
More information(a) (5 points) Suppose p = 1. Calculate all the Nash Equilibria of the game. Do/es the equilibrium/a that you have found maximize social utility?
GAME THEORY EXAM (with SOLUTIONS) January 20 P P2 P3 P4 INSTRUCTIONS: Write your answers in the space provided immediately after each question. You may use the back of each page. The duration of this exam
More informationCommunication with Self-Interested Experts Part I: Introduction and Models of Verifiable Disclosure
Communication with Self-Interested Experts Part I: Introduction and Models of Verifiable Disclosure Margaret Meyer Nuffield College, Oxford 2017 Verifiable Disclosure Models 1 / 22 Setting: Decision-maker
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory
Introduction to Game Theory 3a. More on Normal-Form Games Dana Nau University of Maryland Nau: Game Theory 1 More Solution Concepts Last time, we talked about several solution concepts Pareto optimality
More informationShills and Snipes. June Abstract
Shills and Snipes Subir Bose University of Leicester sb345@leicester.ac.uk Arup Daripa Birkbeck College University of London a.daripa@bbk.ac.uk June 2011 Abstract Many online auctions with a fixed end-time
More informationAdvanced Micro 1 Lecture 14: Dynamic Games Equilibrium Concepts
Advanced Micro 1 Lecture 14: Dynamic Games quilibrium Concepts Nicolas Schutz Nicolas Schutz Dynamic Games: quilibrium Concepts 1 / 79 Plan 1 Nash equilibrium and the normal form 2 Subgame-perfect equilibrium
More information