New New Guidance Regarding Barrier Options
|
|
- Alexandra Floyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tax Alert December 2015 New New Guidance Regarding Barrier Options In a recently released Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (the CCA ), the Internal Revenue Service broadened its scrutiny of so-called barrier option transactions, which taxpayers have used to defer recognition of income and to convert ordinary income and short-term capital gain to long-term capital gain. 1 The government had previously announced that it would scrutinize these transactions in guidance released in 2010 and in July of this year. 2 The CCA is consistent with the previous guidance, and expands upon it in two ways: > It specifically targets a transaction that is a barrier option on a hedge fund interest. While the previous guidance acknowledged that this type of transaction could come under scrutiny, the previous guidance did not examine the potential for perceived abuse inherent in this kind of transaction; and, > It develops certain legal doctrines that the government may use to attack these transactions in more detail than the previous guidance. Because of this, the CCA should be of interest to banks which provide exposure to this kind of option, to hedge funds whose interests are referenced thereby, and to potential investors. 1) Facts A barrier option is a transaction whereby a party (the long party) pays money to another party (the short party) to gain price exposure to an asset (the underlier, or the referenced asset). Generally, the long party will pay an amount 1 CCA , Aug. 11, AM , Notice and Notice See, also GT Alert New Guidance Regarding Basket Derivatives, Jul. 15, 2015.
2 (the premium) to the short party equal to a portion of the referenced asset s value. Upon maturity, the long party will receive an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the underlier at maturity and an amount equal to the underlier s price at inception, less the premium, plus a financing charge (the strike price). If the fair market value of the underlier approaches the strike price prior to maturity, the contract is terminated. In certain cases, in order to further insulate the short party from risk, the long party is required to pay additional premium to the short party if the value of the referenced asset falls below a certain threshold. Example: On day one, the value of a referenced asset (say, an interest in a hedge fund) is $100. Long party pays short party $10 in order to enter into a contract that the parties call an option on the referenced asset. The contract obligates the short party to pay the long party the difference between the fair market value of the referenced asset and a strike price of $ This number will never be a negative value; the short party will never pay the long party upon termination. However, if the value of the referenced asset falls below $98, the long party is obligated to pay the short party an amount equal to the difference between $100 and the value of the referenced asset (with a corresponding decrease in the strike price). These payments may be clawed back if the value of the referenced asset subsequently rises above $100. If the value of the referenced asset decreases below $95, the contract is terminated. Absent an early termination, the contract has a maturity of two years. In order to hedge its position under the contract, the short party purchases the referenced assets. To finance this purchase, it uses the $10 premium received from the long party, and borrows $90 from a bank. Its cost of fund is three-month LIBOR (0.39 percent, at inception). If the referenced asset is illiquid, payments at maturity are deferred until the short party s position in the referenced asset can be sold or redeemed. This, along with the early termination provision and the requirement that the short party contribute more cash in the event of a decrease in the value of the referenced asset, insulate the short party from all foreseeable risk due to decreases in the value of the referenced asset. All exposure to potential losses and gains is borne by the long party. From the long party s perspective, the transaction is economically identical to a purchase of the referenced asset financed by a nonrecourse loan with an annual interest rate of 2.5 percent, compounded annually. From the short party s perspective, the transaction is identical to a transaction whereby the short party borrows $90 at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR and provides nonrecourse financing at an annual rate of 2.5 percent compounded annually to the buyer. So long as a barrier option is respected as an option for federal income tax purposes, it provides two benefits to the long party: > It defers recognition of gain. Gain or loss from the sale, termination, or lapse of an option is generally recognized in the year of sale, termination or lapse. By contrast, the owner of an actively traded portfolio of securities is required to recognize trading gain currently, and the owner of an interest in a partnership that has trading gain or ordinary income is required to recognize partnership income or gain currently on a passthrough basis. Therefore, an option on an actively-traded portfolio, or an option on a partnership interest - if respected as an option for tax purposes - allows deferral of recognition of taxable gain; and, > It helps re-characterize ordinary income and short-term capital gain as long-term capital gain. Gain or loss from the disposition, termination or lapse of an option on a capital asset is capital. To the extent that the option has been held for more than a year at the time of sale, termination or lapse, this capital gain or loss is long-term capital gain or loss. Therefore, any capital gain recognized with respect to an option on an actively-traded portfolio, or on a partnership interest - again, if the option is respected as such for tax purposes- will be long-term capital gain if the option has been held for more than one year. In the previous guidance, the Service took the position that income deferral and long-term capital gain treatment were not appropriate for barrier options on actively-traded portfolios, because barrier options are not true options
3 for United States federal income tax purposes. The CCA extended this position to barrier options on hedge fund interests, and further developed the legal support for these conclusions. 2) Previous Guidance The bulk of the legal analysis in the previous guidance is contained in AM In that notice, the taxpayer was a hedge fund that entered into a transaction that was labeled an option with a bank counterparty. The terms of the contract were materially identical to the facts of the example above, except the referenced asset was an actively traded portfolio of liquid, actively traded securities, instead of a single partnership interest. The taxpayer had the right to request that the portfolio be changed. Although the bank was not contractually obligated to comply with these requests, the requests were made frequently, and were always complied with. The Service held that the arrangement was, in fact, a custodial arrangement, whereby the bank provided margin financing to the taxpayer, rather than an option. Reasons for this conclusion included the following: > The transaction was not an option. An option is, generally, a contract that grants a party the right (but not the obligation) to buy or to sell a specified asset at a specified price on or before a specified date. By contrast, a contract that obligates a party to buy or to sell at a specified price is not an option. Because the terms of the contract ensured that the so-called option would always be in-the-money, the taxpayer would always be economically compelled to exercise its rights under the contract. This economic compulsion was not consistent with option status; and, > Under general tax law principles, the taxpayer was the beneficial owner of the underlying portfolio. In determining the owner of illiquid property, courts and the Service generally look to the party that bears economic exposure to the value of the underlier (the burdens and benefits test ). By contrast, in determining the owner of liquid, fungible property such as the securities in the underlying portfolio, courts and the Service look to the party that has the power to dispose of the property (the possession and control test ). Because the taxpayer had the right to vary the portfolio, it had the de facto right to dispose of the assets in the portfolio. Therefore, the taxpayer, rather than the bank, was the owner of the portfolio for United States federal income tax purposes. Notice and Notice (the Notices ) stated that certain contracts that resembled the contract described in AM would be treated as reportable transactions. 3 The Notices broadened the scope of government scrutiny to cover contracts that referenced baskets of securities, commodities, foreign currency or similar property, as well as interests in entities that trade instruments of this type (i.e., hedge fund interests). The Notices stated that, in scrutinizing relevant contracts, the Service may assert one or more of the following arguments to challenge the taxpayer s characterization of a contract, including: > That the contract is not an option for United States federal income tax purposes; > That the taxpayer is the tax owner of the referenced portfolio under general federal income tax purposes; > That a change to the portfolio prior to termination constitutes a modification of the contract that should result in a deemed taxable exchange of the unmodified contract for the modified contract under code section 1001; or, 3 Very briefly, taxpayers are required to disclose information about reportable transactions on their tax returns sua sponte. Absent adequate disclosure, understatements due to tax benefits afforded by reportable transactions are subject to penalties under Sections 6662A and In order to make adequate disclosure, every party that has participated in a reportable transaction is required to attach a disclosure statement about the transaction to its return for the applicable tax year. Treas. Reg (a).
4 > That the taxpayer actually owns separate contractual rights with respect to each asset in the reference basket, such that each change to the assets in the basket results in a taxable disposition of a contractual right. Significantly, the AM and the Notices only applied to contracts that referenced variable portfolios. They did not cover contracts on static baskets, or contracts on single assets that could not be changed. Therefore, at least on its face, the previous guidance did not apply to barrier options on static baskets of hedge fund interests, even if the hedge fund whose interests were referenced were engaged in an active trading business. 3) Current Guidance This appears to have changed with the current guidance. The taxpayer in the CCA entered into a series of contracts similar to the contract in the example above, each of which referenced a portfolio of hedge fund interests. 4 The Service held that the contracts should not confer the benefits of deferral and long-term capital gain treatment that would apply if they were respected as options. Reasons for this included, inter alia: > The contracts were not options. As in AM , the Service held that, since the long party was economically compelled to exercise its rights, the contracts did not constitute options. > The long party was the tax owner of the referenced assets. Although the conclusion here is similar to that in AM , the reasoning is slightly different. In discussing tax ownership law, the Service noted that, while courts look to all relevant facts and circumstances to determine tax ownership, the dispositive test regarding illiquid assets tends to be the identity of the party that has the burdens and benefits of ownership, rather than the party that has the right to dispose of the asset. Because the referenced assets in the CCA were illiquid hedge fund interests, the Service held that the party with economic exposure thereto (i.e., the taxpayer), rather than the party that held bare legal title, was the tax owner. 5 This is noteworthy because some advisors have taken the position that, since hedge fund interests are fungible with each other, the possession and control test, rather than the burdens and benefits test, should apply. The CCA indicates that, in determining tax ownership of hedge fund interests, the Service is more likely to apply the burdens and benefits test, rather than the possession and control test, even though hedge fund interests are, stricto sensu, fungible" property. 6 > Even if the bank, rather than the taxpayer, were the tax owner of the referenced assets, the taxpayer should not benefit from income deferral and re-characterization, because the transaction is a constructive ownership transaction, within the meaning of Code section By way of background Code section 1260 treats as ordinary income, and imposes an interest charge on, deemed late payment of gain received by holders of certain derivatives on interests in pass-thru entities to the extent that amounts attributable to this gain would have been treated as other than long-term capital gain had the taxpayer owned the interests directly. Derivatives that may constitute a constructive ownership transaction generally include so-called 4 The contracts granted the taxpayer the right to vary the components of the baskets; however, this does not appear to have been considered a dispositive fact by the Service. 5 The Service also noted that, since the taxpayer had the right to vary the components in the baskets, the taxpayer also had control over the disposition of the assets. Since this was consistent with the burdens and benefits test, this supported the conclusion that the taxpayer was the tax owner of the portfolio. 6 This is generally consistent with existing case law. The "possession and control" test grew out of cases regarding the treatment of short sales and securities loans. In these cases, because multiple parties may have long exposure, but only one party has the power to dispose of the underlier, only the party that has the power to dispose of the underlier is treated as the tax owner. However, these transactions only occur with respect to assets in which there is a deep, liquid market, making it possible for the short parties to buy back the underlier in order to satisfy their obligations to the long parties. The CCA interprets this to mean that it is the liquidity, rather than the fungibility, of the underliers, that make these transactions possible.
5 4) Next Steps delta one derivatives i.e., derivatives that provide full economic exposure to the risks and benefits of direct ownership of the underlier. Because the taxpayer was the party that bore the full risk of loss due to decreases in the value of the referenced asset, and the full opportunity for profit due to increases in the value of the referenced asset, the Service held that the contract constituted a constructive ownership transaction. Therefore, even if the contracts were respected as derivatives, the Service took the position that the rules of Code section 1260 would remove the benefit of derivative treatment. The net result of the foregoing is that the Service will scrutinize barrier options on hedge fund interests in the future - and has developed the legal doctrines that it may use to do so. Per the foregoing, the barrier option business is due for a make-over. Alternative methods for investors to gain exposure to hedge fund interests that are not vulnerable to attack under the CCA include the following. As indicated below, each of the proposed solutions has its merits, but none is perfect: > True Options. In order for a transaction to withstand scrutiny as a true option, the holder should be under no economic compulsion to exercise its rights thereunder; in order for that to be the case, there should be a reasonable possibility that the option could expire worthless. An option that is issued at or near the money, with no "knock-out" provision, and with no requirement that the holder contribute additional premium if it declines in value, would likely be respected as an option for these purposes. While these terms would provide the tax benefits of deferral and long-term capital treatment, they would also incur significant commercial costs, because they would require the short party to assume meaningful risk with respect to the underlier, and they would not allow the long party to obtain "delta one" exposure to the underlier; > Loans Instead of Derivatives. As discussed above, a barrier option is economically equivalent to a nonrecourse purchase-money loan. Instead of issuing a barrier option and holding the underlier as a hedge, the short party could simply lend money to the long party on a nonrecourse basis and hold the underlier as a custodian for the long party. While this would provide the short party with the same profit margin as a barrier option, it would not provide the long party the benefits of income deferral and re-characterization. > Offshore Long Parties. Foreign investors that are not engaged in a trade or business within the United States are generally indifferent to income deferral and long-term capital treatment; therefore, if a bank were to offer a barrier option to this type of investor, the Service would have little incentive to challenge the transaction. Note that, to the extent that the barrier option were to reference an interest in a hedge fund that was engaged in a United States trade or business, or that had so-called U.S.-source "FDAP" income subject to United States federal withholding tax, the Service would have reason to challenge the transaction. Further information is available upon request. This GT Alert was prepared by John Kaufmann. Questions about this information can be directed to: > John Kaufmann kaufmannj@gtlaw.com > Or your Greenberg Traurig attorney
6 Albany Delaware New York Silicon Valley Amsterdam Denver Northern Virginia Tallahassee Atlanta Fort Lauderdale Orange County Tampa Austin Houston Orlando Tel Aviv^ Berlin +49 (0) Las Vegas Philadelphia Tokyo +81 (0) Berlin-GT Restructuring +49 (0) London* +44 (0) Phoenix Warsaw~ Boca Raton Los Angeles Sacramento Washington, D.C Boston Mexico City San Francisco Westchester County Chicago Miami Seoul West Palm Beach Dallas New Jersey Shanghai Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) p romoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. This Greenberg Traurig Alert is issued for informational purposes only and is not intended to be construed or used as general legal advice nor as a solicitation of any type. Please contact the author(s) or your Greenberg Traurig contact if you have questions regarding the currency of this information. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision. Before you decide, ask for written information about the lawyer's legal qualifications and experience. Greenberg Traurig is a service mark and trade name of Greenberg Traurig, LLP and Greenberg Traurig, P.A. Greenberg Traurig s Berlin office is operated by Greenberg Traurig Germany, an affiliate of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and Greenberg Traurig, LLP. Berlin - GT Restructuring is operated by Köhler-Ma Geiser Partnerschaft Rechtsanwälte, Insolvenzverwalter. *Operates as Greenberg Traurig Maher LLP. **Greenberg Traurig is not responsible for any legal or other services rendered by attorneys employed by the strategic alliance firms. +Greenberg Traurig's Mexico City office is operated by Greenberg Traurig, S.C., an affiliate of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and Greenberg Traurig, LLP. Operates as Greenberg Traurig LLP Foreign Legal Consultant Office. ^Greenberg Traurig's Tel Aviv office is a branch of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Florida, USA. Greenberg Traurig Tokyo Law Offices are operated by GT Tokyo Horitsu Jimusho, an affiliate of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and Greenberg Traurig, LLP. ~Greenberg Traurig's Warsaw office is operated by Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp.k., an affiliate of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and Greenberg Traurig, LLP. Certain partners in Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp.k. are also shareholders in Greenberg Traurig, P.A. Images in this advertisement do not depict Greenberg Traurig attorneys, clients, staff or facilities. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.
Tax Hedging Policies for Insurance Companies How to Avoid an Expensive Foot Fault
Tax Alert Tax Hedging Policies for Insurance Companies How to Avoid an Expensive Foot Fault August 2015 Insurance companies are in the business of assuming risk for a fee. Fire, casualty, medical expenses,
More informationNew Proposed Regulations Provide Clarity and Rigidity to Tax-Free Spin- Off Rules
S! ta Tax Alert July 2016 New Proposed Regulations Provide Clarity and Rigidity to Tax-Free Spin- Off Rules If finalized, newly released proposed Treasury regulations may make spin-offs more difficult
More informationAlert Tax/Public Finance
Alert Tax/Public Finance April 2018 Revenue Procedure 2018-26: New Remedial Actions Revenue Procedure 2018-26, issued April 11, 2018, provides new or additional remedial actions to issuers of tax-advantaged
More informationNew York State Gaming Commission Proposes Rules on Gaming Facility Licensing
Gaming Alert July 2015 New York State Gaming Commission Proposes Rules on Gaming Facility Licensing In anticipation of the award of three casino licenses in the Empire State this fall, on July 6, 2015,
More informationSEC Adopts Regulation Crowdfunding to Facilitate Early Capital Raises
Corporate & Securities/Capital Markets GT Alert November 2015 SEC Adopts Regulation Crowdfunding to Facilitate Early Capital Raises On Oct. 30, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted
More informationInternational Tax Survival Guide: Countdown to Common Reporting Obligations for Global Individuals
Alert Tax September 2018 International Tax Survival Guide: Countdown to Common Reporting Obligations for Global Individuals The due date for filing 2017 U.S. federal income tax returns for individuals
More informationAlert American Indian Law
Alert American Indian Law October 2018 Competitive Advantages of Doing Business with Native American Tribes & Tribal Corporations In an expanding global economy, investors are looking for competitive advantages
More informationAlert Labor & Employment
Alert Labor & Employment Closing the Salary Gap & Practical Tips for Employers November 2017 Given the national spotlight on pay equity, in 2016 there was a radical change in the equal pay legal landscape,
More informationAlert Franchise & Distribution/ Cybersecurity, Privacy & Crisis Management
Alert Franchise & Distribution/ Cybersecurity, Privacy & Crisis Management EU General Data Protection Regulation: What Impact for Franchise Businesses? November 2017 One of the most important assets that
More informationGlobal Benefits & Compensation
Global Benefits & Compensation July 2007 ALBANY AMSTERDAM ATLANTA BOCA RATON BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DELAWARE DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE HOUSTON LAS VEGAS LOS ANGELES MIAMI NEW JERSEY NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY
More informationTax. IRS Provides Favorable Guidance on, and Parameters for, Convertible Bond Hedge Issuances
Tax October 2007 ALBANY AMSTERDAM ATLANTA BOCA RATON BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DELAWARE DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE HOUSTON LAS VEGAS LOS ANGELES MIAMI NEW JERSEY NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY ORLANDO PHILADELPHIA PHOENIX
More informationInvestment Climate Improving in The Netherlands
ALBANY AMSTERDAM ATLANTA BOCA RATON BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DELAWARE DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE HOUSTON LAS VEGAS LOS ANGELES MIAMI NEW JERSEY NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY ORLANDO PHILADELPHIA PHOENIX SACRAMENTO SILICON
More informationTax / Real Estate. Impact of Proposed FATCA Regulations on U.S. Real Estate Ventures With Non-U.S. Investors or Lenders
ALBANY AMSTERDAM ATLANTA AUSTIN BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DELAWARE DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE HOUSTON LAS VEGAS LONDON* LOS ANGELES MEXICO CITY+ MIAMI NEW JERSEY NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY ORLANDO PALM BEACH COUNTY
More informationADVISORY. Misclassification of Independent Contractors: A Challenge for Massachusetts Companies in the Delivery, Taxi, and Livery Sectors
ADVISORY Labor & Employment August 2014 Misclassification of Independent Contractors: A Challenge for Massachusetts Companies in the Delivery, Taxi, and Livery Sectors Summary In 2008, the Massachusetts
More informationMay 2015 Brings a Crop of FERC Loophole Manipulation Civil Penalty Assessments
May 2015 Brings a Crop of FERC Loophole Manipulation Civil Penalty Assessments In May, two loophole penalty orders were issued regarding recent fraud and manipulation investigations conducted by the Federal
More informationChina Initiates Value Added Tax (VAT) Reform in Shanghai 11/16/2011. A. VAT- taxable services and VAT rates
February 2012 / Issue No. 19 of Series ALBANY AMSTERDAM ATLANTA AUSTIN BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DELAWARE DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE HOUSTON LAS VEGAS LONDON* LOS ANGELES MIAMI MEXICO CITY+ NEW JERSEY NEW YORK
More informationZipRealty, Inc. Supplemental Data Reclassification of Consolidated Statement of Operations
Reclassification of Consolidated Statement of Operations Effective January 1, 2007, for income statement presentation purposes, we have reclassified sales support and marketing expenses from general and
More informationChina Newsletter. 1. Mergers & Acquisitions
April 2011 / Issue No. 16 of Series ALBANY AMSTERDAM ATLANTA AUSTIN BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DELAWARE DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE HOUSTON LAS VEGAS LONDON* LOS ANGELES MIAMI NEW JERSEY NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY ORLANDO
More informationNew Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty
July 9, 2015 New Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty Financial Institutions and Counterparties Must Retroactively Disclose Participation
More informationProposed Model for a Centralized RDDS System Managed by ICANN
Marc H. Trachtenberg Contact Information Redacted August 3, 2018 VIA E-MAIL Göran Marby Chief Executive Officer and President Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Contact Information Redacted
More informationClient Alert. IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations. Summary. Background
Number 1460 January 29, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations Summary The Regulations represent a significant step towards FATCA implementation, yet considerable
More information2012 TAXATION OF CARRIED INTERESTS CURRENT LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
2012 TAXATION OF CARRIED INTERESTS CURRENT LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS David A. Sussman 2014 2014 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris
More informationSEC Issues Risk Alert on Custody Rule, Reinforcing Its Message to Registered Investment Advisers in Its Examination Priorities for 2013
March 15, 2013 Practice Group: Private Equity Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments SEC Issues Risk Alert on Custody Rule, Reinforcing Its Message to Registered Investment Advisers
More informationM&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS
M&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS Daniel Nelson, Partner Casey August, Partner February 12, 2019 2019 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Introductory Notes Focus on domestic transactions Cross-border
More informationTAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS
MORGAN LEWIS 2018 M&A ACADEMY PRESENTS: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS Daniel Nelson, Partner Casey August, Partner March 6, 2018 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Introductory Notes Focus on domestic transactions
More informationIRS Moves Forward with Plan to Change the Determination Letter Process
July 14, 2016 Practice Group(s): Employee Benefits IRS Moves Forward with Plan to Change the Determination Letter Process By Karrie Johnson Diaz, Jennifer S. Addis, Alyssa M. Fritz In 2015, the Internal
More informationGT ALERT GREENBERG. February, NEW IRS GUIDANCE FOR TAXATION OF EQUITY SPLIT DOLLAR ARRANGEMENT
gtlaw.com gttechlaw.com gtabagados.com info@gtlaw.com GREENBERG ATTORNEYS AT LAW TRAURIG LLP GT ALERT NEW IRS GUIDANCE FOR TAXATION OF EQUITY SPLIT DOLLAR ARRANGEMENT ATLANTA BOCA RATON BOSTON CHICAGO
More informationChanges to Hedge Fund Disclosure and Reporting Obligations
22 January 2014 Practice Groups: Investment Management Changes to Hedge Fund Disclosure and Reporting Obligations By Jim Bulling, Daniel Knight and Julia Baldi In October 2013, the Australian Investment
More informationAkerAlert. The American Home Mortgage Case and Repurchase Agreements. Finance Law ADVERTISEMENT. march 21, 2008
AkerAlert Finance Law march 21, 2008 The American Home Mortgage Case and Repurchase Agreements By Jules Cohen, Esq. and Milton Vescovacci, Esq. In the field of mortgage warehouse lending, repurchase agreements
More informationSEC Issues Preliminary Denial Notices for Two Nontransparent Actively Managed ETF Applications
November 2014 Practice Group: Investment Management SEC Issues Preliminary Denial Notices for Two U.S. Investment Management Alert By Stacy L. Fuller, Mark D. Perlow, and Timothy A. Bekkers Summary In
More informationHIRE ACT S EFFECTS ON INVESTMENT FUNDS
CLIENT MEMORANDUM HIRE ACT S EFFECTS ON INVESTMENT FUNDS On March 18, 2010, the President signed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act ( HIRE Act or the Act ). The Act includes provisions that
More informationU.S. Investment Outlook
U.S. Investment Outlook Quarterly Investor Research update Q2 2015 U.S. Investment overview 37% 21% 15% 15% U.S. cities dominating global investment activity Top 20 Cities for Transactional Volumes H1
More informationDirectors and Officers Liabilities in Russia
Directors and Officers Liabilities in Russia Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the issues described in this note please contact a person mentioned below or the
More informationSEC Delays Municipal Advisor Registration and Record-Keeping Obligations
Updated January 16, 2014 Practice Group(s): Public Finance SEC Delays Municipal Advisor Registration and Record-Keeping Obligations By Scott A. McJannet, Erica R. Franklin, Laura D. McAloon and Cynthia
More informationAlert. February By Barbara T. Kaplan
Amsterdam Atlanta Boca Raton Boston Chicago Dallas Delaware Denver Fort Lauderdale Los Angeles Miami New Jersey New York Orange County Orlando Philadelphia Phoenix Tallahassee Tysons Corner Washington,
More informationTax Alert. China Issues New Tax Rules on Corporate Restructurings. I. Overview
June 2009 Authors: Clifford Ng clifford.ng@klgates.com + 852. 2230.3558 Shuang Peng shuang.peng@klgates.com + 852.2230.3590 K&L Gates is a global law firm with lawyers in 33 offices located in North America,
More informationA Practical Guide to U.S. Tax Compliance Issues for Hedge Fund of Funds
A Practical Guide to U.S. Tax Compliance Issues for Hedge Fund of Funds www.pepperlaw.com October 2008 This memorandum is intended to provide a quick reference guide to the key U.S. income tax issues that
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Derivatives: trade execution
MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 MiFID II Derivatives: trade execution December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points MiFID II requires certain standardised derivative contracts to be traded through a
More informationInvestment Management Alert
November 2010 Authors: George P. Attisano george.attisano@klgates.com +1.617.261.3240 Clair E. Pagnano clair.pagnano@klgates.com +1.617.261.3246 Joanne A. Skerrett joanne.skerrett@klgates.com +1.617.261.3263
More informationClient Alert. IRS Issues Final Regulations on Noncompensatory Partnership Options
Number 1471 February 19, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Issues Final Regulations on Noncompensatory Partnership Options On February 4, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released
More informationSummary SIDLEY UPDATE
DECEMBER 18, 2015 SIDLEY UPDATE Congress Passes REIT and FIRPTA Reforms: REIT Spinoffs Restricted, But Generally Beneficial for Existing REITs and Foreign Investors in U.S. Real Estate Markets On December
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 Affects Domestic Mergers and Acquisitions Tax Issues
Number 415 October 26, 2004 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department The Act makes certain significant reforms that relate to domestic mergers and acquisitions and will be of interest to U.S. taxpayers.
More informationAddendum to: The Community Reinvestment Act: A Welcome Anomaly in the Foreclosure Crisis
Addendum to: The Community Reinvestment Act: A Welcome Anomaly in the Foreclosure Crisis Relevant Figures Recalculated to Include CRA Bank Affiliate Lending January 14, 2008 Prepared by: Attorneys at Law
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Third country access
MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 MiFID II Third country access December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points MiFID II will allow third country (i.e. non-eu) firms to provide cross-border services in
More informationDM2/
The IRS Wants You! Are You in Compliance? prepared for Pennsylvania Association of Public Employees Retirement Systems - 12 th Annual Fall Workshop November 2018 presented by John A. Nixon, Partner 2010
More informationBlockchain Law and Supply Chain Management
AMCHAM MORNING BRIEFING BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY Ho Chi Minh City 26 October 2018 American Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam Blockchain Law and Supply Chain Management Brief Regulatory Overview and Outlook Manfred
More informationClient Alert December 20, 2017
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert December 20, 2017 Treasury Releases Important New Currency Regulations Regulations Resolve Many Currency Issues On December 18, 2017, the U.S. Treasury
More informationStruggling to Escape the Fallout of the Great Recession MARISA Di NATALE, MANAGING DIRECTOR
Struggling to Escape the Fallout of the Great Recession MARISA Di NATALE, MANAGING DIRECTOR FROM MOODY S ECONOMY.COM Broad-Based Slowing Across the Nation Total employment excluding federal government,
More informationUp We Go Again Financial Threshold Increases Effective 1 July 2016
June 2016 Practice Group: Labour, Employment and Workplace Safety Up We Go Again Financial Threshold Increases Effective 1 July 2016 By Michaela Moloney and Meg Aitken What Businesses Need to Know Before
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ann Marie Gorden/Robert Nihen
cutting through complexity News FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ann Marie Gorden/Robert Nihen June 24, 2014 KPMG LLP 201-505-6288/201-307-8296 agorden@kpmg.com / rnihen@kpmg.com CINCINNATI, CLEVELAND, ATLANTA
More informationREQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS July 1, 2015 Charles Horn, Partner Steve Stone, Partner Melissa Hall, Of Counsel Monique Botkin, Investment Adviser Association (Moderator)
More informationGood Oil Conference 2015 Shareholder activism. Clare Pope and Simon Rear
Good Oil Conference 2015 Shareholder activism Clare Pope and Simon Rear Overview of presentation The development of shareholder activism in Australia The objectives of shareholder activists Assessing whether
More informationBetter Late Than Never? The CFTC and the NFA Publish FAQs on CPO and CTA Reporting Forms
November 2015 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Derivatives & Structured Products Private Equity Global Government Solutions Better Late Than Never? The CFTC
More informationLatham & Watkins Tax Department
Number 584 April 4, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Cross-Border Financings: US Tax Authorities Target Structured Finance Arbitrage and Double Dip Losses There are three categories of
More informationEvolution of FATCA: How We Got Here and Where Are We Going?
Evolution of FATCA: How We Got Here and Where Are We Going? Mary Burke Baker Roger Wise Copyright 2011 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Introduction Welcome! Presenters Mary Baker, Government Affairs
More informationCredit Suisse. Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) Registration Statement No September 20, 2013
Pricing Supplement No. T246 To the Underlying Supplement dated July 29, 2013, Product Supplement No. T-I dated March 23, 2012, Prospectus Supplement dated March 23, 2012 and Prospectus dated March 23,
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 1260 November 22, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The Limits of Control: Private Funds and the Large Trader Rule... investment advisers to private funds should consider updating
More informationIntroducing the New Multi-Level Marketing Governing Act
March 2014 Practice Group(s): Corporate/M&A Public Policy and Law Introducing the New Multi-Level Marketing By Max Wang Background Taiwan had approximately 369 multi-level marketing (MLM) companies and
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Information to clients on costs and charges
MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 MiFID II Information to clients on costs and December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points All costs and associated investment/ancillary services and financial instruments
More informationInternational Issues 409A/457A
409A Basics A Webinar Series International Issues 409A/457A Presenters: Daniel L. Hogans Zaitun Poonja Heather C. Brookfield www.morganlewis.com June 6, 2012 International Application of Section 409A US
More informationHUMAN TRAFFICKING COMPLIANCE
HUMAN TRAFFICKING COMPLIANCE How Could This Possibly Apply to What Our Company Does? Presented by Walter T. Featherly SCCE Compliance & Ethics Conference, Anchorage, Alaska June 23, 2016 Copyright 2016
More informationClient Alert May 3, 2016
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert May 3, 2016 Treasury Issues Temporary Regulations on Inversions On April 4, 2016, the US Department of Treasury issued extensive temporary regulations
More informationTake Notice of This Change: Supreme Court Adopts Recommended Amendments to Bankruptcy Notice of Payment Change Rule
19 May 2016 Practice Groups: Restructuring & Insolvency Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Take Notice of This Change: Supreme Court Adopts Recommended Amendments to Bankruptcy Notice of Payment
More informationNAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:
NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM: WHAT BUSINESSES NEED TO KNOW Inbound Investment: Non-U.S. Taxpayers Investing Into the U.S. Market January 23, 2018 Presenters: Richard LaFalce, Partner Daniel Nelson, Partner
More informationSEC PROPOSES LIQUIDITY RISK- MANAGEMENT RULES. Christopher D. Menconi, Sean Graber, Beau Yanoshik, David W. Freese January 20, 2016
SEC PROPOSES LIQUIDITY RISK- MANAGEMENT RULES Christopher D. Menconi, Sean Graber, Beau Yanoshik, David W. Freese January 20, 2016 2015 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Overview Introduction Liquidity Risk
More informationCALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Pricing Supplement No. T392 To the Underlying Supplement dated July 29, 2013, Product Supplement No. T-I dated March 23, 2012, Prospectus Supplement dated March 23, 2012 and Prospectus dated March 23,
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II
MiFID II 31 December 2016 MiFID II Appropriateness December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points Appropriateness assessments will be applied to new types of complex investments. New record-keeping
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II
MiFID II 31 December 2016 MiFID II Information to clients about investment advice and financial instruments December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points Firms will be required to give additional
More informationFinal Regulations Adopt Most Proposed Regulations
Number 591 April 16, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department Final Regulations under Section 409A Important Issues for Stock Options and Other Stock Rights In general, the final regulations under
More informationMiFID II 31 December MiFID II
MiFID II 31 December 2016 MiFID II Underwriting and placing December 2016 MiFID II 31 December 2016 1 Key Points Firms must identify and prevent or manage conflicts of interest that may arise due to underwriting
More informationInternal Revenue Service Directive to Examiners on Equity Swaps
Internal Revenue Service Directive to Examiners on Equity Swaps The Internal Revenue Service Outlines its Approach for Examining Equity Swaps That May Have Been Executed to Avoid U.S. Withholding Tax SUMMARY
More informationInvestment Advisers and Funds New Treasury Report Form for Foreign Claims and Liabilities
February 2014 Practice Groups: Investment Management Hedge Funds and Venture Funds Investment Advisers and Funds New Treasury Report Form for Foreign Claims and Liabilities By Clifford J. Alexander and
More informationThird Party Rights / Licence. Binding Framework. Negotiating Framework
Structures for Group Procurement Operations This pack provides an overview of various structures which can be considered when establishing a group procurement operation It assumes that the operation may
More informationKey Energy-Related Tax Provisions in the 2013 Budget Proposal
Key Energy-Related Tax Provisions in the 2013 Budget Proposal February 17, 2012 Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County Paris Rome Silicon
More informationCALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Pricing Supplement No. T318 To the Underlying Supplement dated July 29, 2013, Product Supplement No. T-I dated March 23, 2012, Prospectus Supplement dated March 23, 2012 and Prospectus dated March 23,
More informationQ&A Addressing SEC Proposed New Rule Regulating Funds Use of Derivatives
FEBRUARY 1, 2016 SIDLEY UPDATE Q&A Addressing SEC Proposed New Rule Regulating Funds Use of Derivatives On December 11, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to propose Rule 18f-4 (Proposed
More informationSEC Approves Amendments to Rule 15c2-12
Number 1039 June 8, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department SEC Approves Amendments to Rule 15c2-12 For issuers or obligated parties with any currently outstanding municipal securities, including
More informationRELIABILITY. RELATIONSHIPS. RESULTS.
RELIABILITY. RELATIONSHIPS. RESULTS. DONE DEALS 2013 BEYOND NUMBERS. BEYOND BORDERS. BEYOND EXPECTATIONS. At PNC Business Credit, we have a longterm track record of reliability, with more than 600 done
More informationMiFID II Information to clients on costs and charges
MiFID II Information to clients on costs and Key Points associated /ancillary services and financial instruments should be disclosed to clients. This encompasses a wider range of costs than were previously
More informationNew IRS Notice Provides Employers with Ability to Correct Defects in Nonqualified Plan Documents
New IRS Notice Provides Employers with Ability to Correct Defects in Nonqualified Plan Documents January 28, 2010 Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York
More information2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES. Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016
2016 PLAN SPONSOR BASICS 401(k) ISSUES Presenters: Lisa Barton and Elizabeth Kennedy November 9, 2016 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP SECTION 01 WHAT WE WILL COVER Agenda Description of Correction Principles
More informationCALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Pricing Supplement No. T445 To the Underlying Supplement dated July 29, 2013, Product Supplement No. T-I dated March 23, 2012, Prospectus Supplement dated March 23, 2012 and Prospectus dated March 23,
More informationA Series of Fortunate Events
Number 973 18 January 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Changes in Regulation of Derivatives and Repo Transactions in Russia The Amendments almost by accident spawned a more general
More informationPLAN SPONSOR BASICS: RETIREMENT PLAN. Presenters: Lisa H. Barton and Mark J. Simons September 22, 2015
PLAN SPONSOR BASICS: RETIREMENT PLAN CORRECTION ISSUES Presenters: Lisa H. Barton and Mark J. Simons September 22, 2015 WHAT WE WILL COVER Available Correction Programs The IRS Employee Plans Compliance
More informationDerivatives: trade execution
2016 MiFID II Derivatives: trade execution Key Points MiFID II requires certain standardised derivative contracts to be traded through a trading venue This obligation only applies to those classes of derivatives
More informationHogan Lovells (Luxembourg) LLP. What do you know about us?
Hogan Lovells (Luxembourg) LLP What do you know about us? Who is Hogan Lovells? Who is Hogan Lovells? Change is happening faster than ever. To stay ahead, you need to anticipate what s next. Whether that
More informationTHE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES
THE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES Jennifer L. Klass and Eric L. Perelman Wharton Pension Research Counsel 2018 Symposium: The Disruptive Impact of FinTech on Retirement
More informationCOMPENSATION CLAWBACKS: TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR ISSUERS AND EXECUTIVES
COMPENSATION CLAWBACKS: TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR ISSUERS AND EXECUTIVES Rosina B. Barker Rosina.Barker@morganlewis.com 202.739.5210 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP What is a Clawback? Traditionally: Recoupment
More informationAustralian Insolvency Reforms Is the Harbour Safe Yet?
April 2017 Practice Group(s): Restructuring and Insolvency Australian Insolvency Reforms Is the Harbour Safe Yet? By Ian Dorey, Robert Honeywell, Zina Edwards and James Thompson On 28 March 2017, the Federal
More informationWhat Ship Finance Can Learn from Aircraft Finance
What Ship Finance Can Learn from Aircraft Finance Marine Money Ship Finance Forum NYC 2018 Richard Furey November 14, 2018 Financing Aircraft vs Financing Vesels Key Similarities» High asset value Capital
More informationPublicly Traded Partnerships
Publicly Traded Partnerships David A. Sussman December 2014 2014 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered service mark of Duane Morris LLP. Duane Morris Firm and Affiliate Offices
More informationCode of Conduct and Business Ethics*
SEMINAR WEBINAR Code of Conduct and Business Ethics* prepared for presented by Jonathan A. Segal, Esquire Follow me on Twitter @Jonathan_HR_Law *No statements made in this seminar or in the PowerPoint
More informationAdministering Your Group Health and Disability Plans in Compliance With the Department of Labor s Final Regulations on Claims Procedures and SPDs
Administering Your Group Health and Disability Plans in Compliance With the Department of Labor s Final Regulations on Claims Procedures and SPDs Background On November 21, 2000, the Department of Labor
More informationFreddie Mac Community Lender Presentation State of AAPI Housing August 23 rd, 2016
Freddie Mac Community Lender Presentation State of AAPI Housing August 23 rd, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction to AREAA a. Brief History b. Current membership c. Geographic Distribution d. Policy
More informationAPARTMENT TRENDS. U.S. Economic and Multi-Family Outlook. Special Client Webcast May 31, 2006
APARTMENT TRENDS U.S. Economic and Multi-Family Outlook Special Client Webcast May 31, 2006 U.S. Apartment Market Economic and Apartment Supply-Demand Overview and Outlook U.S. Economic Conditions Ideal
More informationHIPAA s New Rules: Expanding Scope, Clarifying Uncertainties, and Reinforcing Fundamentals
February 25, 2013 Practice Group: Health Care HIPAA s New Rules: Expanding Scope, Clarifying Uncertainties, and Reinforcing Fundamentals By Patricia C. Shea On January 25, 2013, the Secretary for the United
More informationControlled Foreign Corporations: Incentive to Reinvest Foreign Earnings in the United States
To maintain momentum StayCurrent. October 2004 The American Jobs Creation Act: International Tax Provisions By Douglas A. Schaaf Introduction The genesis of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the
More informationUncertain tax positions and FIN 48: practical recommendations
OCTOBER 31, 2006 Uncertain tax positions and FIN 48: practical recommendations The time for adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) is fast approaching
More informationAffordable Care Act Tasks:
Affordable Care Act Tasks: Shared Responsibility Reporting February 5, 2015 Presenters: Andy R. Anderson Kimberly J. Boggs www.morganlewis.com Today s Material Our assumptions for today: Calendar-year
More informationOECD 2008 DISCUSSION DRAFT: TRANSFER PRICING ASPECTS OF BUSINESS RESTRUCTURINGS
OECD 2008 DISCUSSION DRAFT: TRANSFER PRICING ASPECTS OF BUSINESS RESTRUCTURINGS Business Restructuring As A Taxable Event: Causing Realization OECD Consultation June 9-10, 2009 Steven P. Hannes McDermott
More information