Introducing the JPMorgan Cross Sectional Volatility Model & Report
|
|
- Alfred Lawson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Equity Derivatives Introducing the JPMorgan Cross Sectional Volatility Model & Report A multi-factor model for valuing implied volatility For more information, please contact Ben Graves or Wilson Er in Corporate Quantitative Research JPMorgan s European Equity Derivative Strategy Group uses a similar Cross Sectional Model. Please see Equity and Derivatives Markets Weekly Outlook 21 Nov 05 for details on the European model. We introduce our model for valuing implied volatility. It differs from time series models, which value current volatility based on past observations of one or more variables for a single stock, and instead utilizes current values for a group of stocks in an index or sector. The model considers several factors including Beta, market capitalization, realized volatility, and stock returns. It also incorporates CDS spreads, explicitly incorporating the link between these two markets. The model output is a ranking of rich/cheap single stock implied volatility. In practice, the model is not one but many. In total, 33 unique models are maintained for both the broad market (Market Model) and individual sectors (Sector Models), with each being run for 1M, 3M, and 6M implied volatility. The model backtests well. Both Market and Sector Models outperform a simple buy/sell volatility strategy, and produce best results when used together. In addition to buying or selling volatility, the model results are broadly applicable to call overwriting and optimizing single stock baskets for dispersion trades. In the US, JPMorgan has begun publishing the model results daily for a universe of 3 companies via our regular equity derivatives distribution. This note reviews how to read our daily report. Overview JPMorgan s Cross Sectional Model uses a snapshot of the relationship between current implied volatility and other independent variables for a broad group of companies to construct a multi-factor regression. In effect, the model calibrates how implied volatility across the market is impacted by various factors at the present time, and highlights when single stocks deviate from the broader pattern. The factors used in the model are: Beta Market capitalization Realized volatility (1 month & 12 month) CDS spread Stock price returns (1 month & 12 month) Exhibit 1 below shows a comparison between the model and actual implied volatility for the company universe that is liquid in both equity derivatives and CDS. Companies above the line have rich implied volatility vs. the model; companies below the line have cheap implied volatility vs. the model. 15
2 Exhibit 1: 3M Implied Volatility - model versus actual values* Actual (y-axis) Model (x-axis) R2 = 0.76 S BSX YHOO BSC *Note that several companies that are in the process of a leveraged buy-out have high model volatility relative to actual volatility, as the model does not explicitly consider LBOs. In these cases, the model should be overlaid with a sensibility check to incorporate other factors, such as LBOs, that impact volatility., data as of 3rd October 06 In practice, our Cross Sectional Report is not one model but many models. Implied volatility under each model may depend on some or all of the factors above and have differing sensitivity to each. We discuss the process to select relevant factors for each model in detail later on in this note. Market Model vs. Sector Model It is possible to build a cross sectional regression using any number of company universes. One approach is to build a model for the entire market (e.g. the S&P 0). This approach has the advantage of including many companies and hence a large number of observations across a broad range of company health and volatility. The disadvantage of this approach is that important factors in one sector may not matter in another (e.g., 1M stock returns have been significant for Energy but not for Technology). This generally leads to lower R-squared values for broad Market Models. In contrast, Sector Models are often good at determining rich/cheap volatility within a sector, but they can miss broader market context (e.g., KB Homes currently appears rich vs. its sector, but the sector overall looks cheap to the market). For this reason, we produce both a Market Model for the entire liquid universe and individual Sector Models (one each for the ten GICS sub-sectors). As discussed herein, we find that using both models together produces the best results. Notably, the Market Model is produced with and without CDS spreads as a factor. The Market Model (with CDS) has fewer companies. Due to the limited number of companies where CDS is liquid, we do not include CDS in the Sector Models, as it would too severely limit the number of model observations, in our view. Three different maturities The model is calculated for three different option maturities one month, three month, and six month for each for the Market and Sector Models. This allows for a discussion of relative value at different points along the volatility term structure, as well as the ability to account for differing sensitivities to each factor (e.g., 1M implied volatility may be more impacted by 1M realized, whereas 6M may be more impacted by 6M realized). LEH SEP HET GT TOL AMR FSL KBH AKS 16
3 Understanding the factors As noted above, we have included six factors in the model: Beta, Market Capitalization, Realized Volatility (1M & 12M), CDS Spread, Stock Return (1M and 12M) 1Y. These are among the strongest factors we have found among the many factors that are traditionally related to implied volatility. We discuss each for the liquid derivatives universe below. Realized volatility: Implied volatility is strongly related to both long term (12M) and short term (1M) realized volatility. Long term realized volatility gives investors a gauge of average volatility, whereas short term realized volatility reflects more recent trends and is generally more relevant for shorter term options. Exhibit 2: 6M Implied Volatility (y-axis) and 1M Realized Vol (x-axis) broad market liquid universe Market Capitalization: Companies with larger market capitalizations generally have lower volatility expectations (Exhibit 3). We observe, however, that the relationship between market capitalization and implied volatility becomes highly convex for small and distressed companies with low market capitalizations. We find that the LN (market cap) has a more linear fit with implied volatility (Exhibit 4), and use this value in the model. Exhibit 3: 6M Implied Volatility (y-axis) and Market Capitalization in bn (x-axis) broad market liquid universe 60 Exhibit4: 6M Implied Volatility (y-axis) and LN Market Capitalization (x-axis) broad market liquid universe Beta with S&P0: Beta measures stock price sensitivity to movements in the market. As such, higher volatility is often associated with higher betas. 17
4 Exhibit 5: 6M Implied Volatility (y-axis) and Stock Beta vs. S&P 0 (x-axis) broad market liquid universe Stock Price Return: Implied volatility is typically inversely related to stock price returns, with negative price returns generally being associated with higher implied volatility, all else equal. One reason for this phenomenon may be the leverage effect. This theory states that as the stock falls, the market value of the equity typically falls faster than the market value of the debt, causing the debt/equity ratio to rise and the risk of the stock to increase. Another reason is a slide down the equity skew, whereby higher implied volatility may be observed at lower prices, even absent a parallel shift in the volatility curve. Additionally, we note that higher implied volatility is also observed for large upside stock returns. This may be due to fears of a reversal, or simply because large past returns are indicative of a more volatile stock. Because large stock price movements both up and down can increase implied volatility, we use the absolute value of stock price returns in the model (Exhibit 6). Exhibit 6: 6M Implied Volatility (y-axis) and stock price return (x-axis) broad market liquid universe CDS Spread: CDS spread is a measure of credit risk. The higher the spread, the more premium a protection buyer is willing to pay for protection against a company's default, presumably due to a higher degree of risk that will also be reflected by implied volatility. We have chosen 5yr CDS as it is the most liquid of the tenures. We expect that increasing attention to cross-asset models that link CDS spreads to implied volatility may reinforce the theoretical correlation between the two markets. Among these models, the most straightforward and transparent include JPMorgan s Cross Asset Relative Performance Report, which publishes univariate regressions between the two markets daily. Other applications include Reduced-form models, which use the insight that both implied volatility for deep out-of-the-money options 18
5 and CDS spreads can be used to derive a probability of default. Finally, Structural models view corporate credit as the combination of a long risk-free security and short a put struck at the value of the firm s assets. As such, the credit value is contingent on asset volatility, which can be approximated using equity volatility. Exhibit 7: 6M Implied Volatility (y-axis) and 5 year CDS (x-axis) broad market liquid universe Principal component analysis and factor selection To determine the key factors, we perform a three step process for each Market and Sector model. The process, commonly known Principle Component Analysis, includes 1) Linear regression and R-Square filters 2) Correlation matrix filter and 3) Multiple regression P-Value filter. For illustrative purpose, we outline the process for the 3M Market Model (with CDS). Step 1: Individual Linear Regression Our goal is to select factors that have a strong correlation with implied volatility, and where the directionality of the impact (i.e. whether it increases or decreases volatility) is stable over time. To accomplish this, we run a cross sectional linear regression for each factor with respect to implied volatility over a period of one year. The rolling 1yr R-squared of these regressions for each factor are shown in Exhibit 8. We can use this process to identify whether each factor has a significant correlation with implied volatility. Our rule is that if the average R-Square over the last year is less than 0.15, the factor will be deemed insignificant and be rejected. For example, although it may seem that Stock Return 1M is decreasing in significance, the average R-Square is still larger than Exhibit 8 shows that all our factors were accepted after the first linear regression filter. 19
6 Exhibit 8: Cross Sectional Linear Regression R-Square for all factors 8A: R-Sq Hist_Vol_1M (Avg:0.58) 8B: R-Sq Hist_Vol_12M (0.78) 8C: R-Sq Beta (0.41) 8D: R-Sq Stock Return 1M (0.18) 8E: R-Sq Stock Return 12M (0.) 8F: R-Sq CDS Spread 5Y (0.44) 8G: R-Sq LN Market Cap (0.45), data as of 3rd October 06 In addition, we wish to determine whether the sign of each factor is the same over time. For example, if stock price returns were strongly correlated with implied volatility, but the direction of the impact changed over time (e.g. if high returns were sometimes associated with an increase in implied volatility and other times were associated with a decrease), this factor would not be especially helpful in predicting implied volatility, despite the high correlation. Exhibit 9 shows the t-statistic of each factor. The t-statistic measures the coefficient of the factor divided by its standard deviation. All of the t-statistics below are consistent with regard to sign, and are well above the threshold for determining statistical significance.
7 Exhibit 9: Cross Sectional t_stat for all factors 9A: T-Stat Hist_Vol_1M 9B: T-Stat Hist_Vol_12M 9C: T-Stat Beta 9D: T-Stat Stock Return 1M 9E: T-Stat Stock Return 12M 9F: T-Stat CDS Spread 5Y 9G: T-Stat LN Market Cap, data as of 3rd October 06 Step 2: Correlation Test Filter With the remaining factors, we implement a correlation matrix filter to avoid double counting similar or highly correlated data. We have defined a significant level of correlation between factors as having correlation of greater than Looking at the pair wise correlation matrix of the factors (Exhibit ), the 12M Hist Vol is eliminated as it is highly correlated with two other factors: 1M Hist Vol and Beta. This process is repeated till there is no high pair-wise correlation between the remaining factors. In this case, no further factors need to be eliminated. Exhibit : Absolute Correlation Matrix for remaining factors after Linear Regression filter Hist_Vol_1M Hist_Vol_12M Beta Market_Cap Stock_Return_1 M Stock_Return_12 M CDS_5Y Hist_Vol_1M Hist_Vol_12M Beta Market_Cap Stock_Return_1M Stock_Return_12M CDS_5Y 1.00, data as of 3rd October 06 21
8 Step 3: Multiple Regression Filter The third and last step is a Multiple Regression filter, which looks at the P-Value of each of the factors. In every regression filter, the factors with largest P-Value (and at least > 0.3) is eliminated. A factor with a high P-Value signifies little significance in the multiple-regression and does not compromise the goodness of fit of the reduced regression, even with its elimination. With six remaining factors, we perform a multiple-regression that, in this example, yields an R-Square of 0.80, and the following statistics for the respective factors (Exhibit 11). The one-month stock return factor has a P-Value of 0.324, and is eliminated. Exhibit 11: Coefficients statistic and P-Value of Multiple-Regression after Correlation filter (1Y Avg) Stdev of R-Sq=0.80 (1Y Avg) Coefficient Coefficient p-stat Constant Hist_Vol_1M Beta Market_Cap (1.) Stock_Return_1M Stock_Return_12M CDS_5Y , data as of 3rd October 06 Another multiple regression is then performed with the remaining five factors. This time none of the factors are eliminated based on the P-Value threshold of 0.. Resulting factor model for 3M implied volatility, Market Model The three step process ends with the elimination of three factors, with the remaining five factors as shown in Exhibit 12 below. Exhibit 12: Coefficient and P-statistics of multiple regression R-Sq=0.797 Coefficient p-stat Constant Hist_Vol_1M Beta Market_Cap Stock_Return_12M CDS_5Y , data as of 3rd October 06 This multi-step process for factor selection and coefficient designation is performed for each model on a quarterly basis. This rebalancing process allows the model to adjust for factors and factor weights that have become more or less important as the market changes. In between the rebalancing periods, the model is updated daily using close of business pricing. Reading the report The report is structured into three main sections Section 1: Summary A one page summary of the top 15 richest and cheapest implied volatility in the liquid equity derivatives universe ranked by the Sector Model z-score. Companies on this list must also have Market Model z-score that agrees with (is the same sign as) the Sector Model. Exhibit 13 shows an excerpt of the summary table for rich 3M implied volatility. 22
9 Exhibit 13: Summary of the richest 3M Implied volatility If the model volatility is lower than the actual volatility, actual volatility appears rich and the z-score will be positive. The Sector Model is telling us that the actual implied volatility is 2.22 standard deviations too high vs. the Consumer Cyclical model volatility of 34.2%. Additionally, the Market Model also calculates that RAD implied volatility is expensive, at 1.23 standard deviations too high versus the model implied volatility of 33.7%. Section 2: Sector Model and Market Model results This section has the look and feel of Exhibit 2 above, but includes separate pages with the results for all companies in each of the Sector Models and the Market Model. Sector Model results are ranked by the Sector Model z-score, and also show the results of the Market Model (no CDS). Market Model (with CDS) is shown separately and also include the results of the Market Model (no CDS). Section 3: Factors and coefficients A table describing the statistically significant factors and their coefficient for each model is located at the end of the daily report (Exhibit 9). This allows us to understand the sensitivities of implied volatility with respect to the individual variables for each member of the models. These tables will be updated each quarter. 23
10 Exhibit 14: List of critical factors and respective Coefficient, data as of 3rd October 06 How does the model perform? We performed a series of backtests to assess the performance of the model across the volatility term structure. Specifically, we compare the results across several Cross Sectional Models with the results of a simple model that buys or sells volatility based upon its relationship to historical volatility only. This simple model is used as a base case, and represents a process that is frequently considered by investors in buying and selling volatility, despite its lack of significance in backtests. The five models, and the rules for entering into a trade under each, are outlined below. Market Model (no CDS): Regression of all companies with liquid options. CDS is not used so the universe is larger but the model fit is slightly worse. Buy volatility when z-score > 2.0, sell volatility when z-score < Market Model (w/ CDS): Regression of all companies with both liquid options and liquid CDS. The inclusion of CDS reduces the number of companies in the universe. Buy volatility when z-score > 2.0, sell volatility when z-score < Sector Model: separate regressions, one for each GICS sector. CDS is not included. Buy volatility when z-score > 2.0, sell volatility when z-score < Sector Model + Market Model (no CDS): As above, but enter trade when z- score > 2.0 or < -2.0 for both the Sector Model and Market Model. Simple Model: Regression universe is the same as the Market Model. Buy volatility when implied volatility is less than realized volatility and sell volatility when implied volatility is greater than realized volatility. All illustrated trades are performed assuming interpolated at-the-money options, delta hedged using closing prices with no drift. Trades are entered each day over the last three years ending April 06, are held to maturity, and assume a bid offer 24
11 spread of one vol. The return percentages listed treat volatility as a security and simply observe its return (i.e. it is not a variance return). Returns are non-annualized. Exhibit 15: Buy and sell volatility: Backtest results for five different models Implied Vol Avg Ret Stdev Ret Info Ratio Ret Total Trades % Good Avg Vega Stdev Vega Info Ratio Vega Model 1M 0.3% 31.8% , % Simple 1M 12.6% 39.9% % Market (w/ CDS) 1M 12.2% 35.4% , % Market (no CDS) 1M 11.8% 31.7% ,4 68.6% Sector 1M 15.1% 33.7% , % Sector + Market (no CDS) 3M 0.4% 24.4% , % Simple 3M 6.7% 23.2% % Market (w/ CDS) 3M 13.3% 26.8% 0. 3, % Market (no CDS) 3M 11.0% 24.6% , % Sector 3M 14.3% 25.4% , % Sector + Market (no CDS) 6M 0.5% 22.7% , % Simple 6M 13.4% 21.4% , % Market (w/ CDS) 6M 9.7% 24.0% , % Market (no CDS) 6M 9.4% 21.1% , % Sector 6M.4% 21.8% , % Sector + Market (no CDS) We can reach several conclusions based on Exhibit 15: Both Market and Sector Models outperform the simple strategy. In terms of information ratio, the simple strategy significantly underperforms for both 1M and 3M trading strategies. The simple strategy does a bit better for 6M strategies, having the second highest information ratio, but also has the lowest average return. The Sector Model + Market Model outperforms the Sector Model alone. For all maturities, requiring a joint "signal" from both the Market Model and Sector Model to enter a trade increases average returns and increases the information ratio. This additional step does, however, reduce the number of trades over the period by about a third. Adding CDS to the Market Model is better for longer dated options. Relative to the Market Model, we find no clear benefit from including CDS for valuing shorter dated options, as average returns and information ratios are lower for both 1M and 3M strategies. 6M strategies, however, outperform in terms of both risk and return when CDS is used in the model. This makes sense to us given that 5yr CDS is used, which has a stronger theoretical link to longer dated options. Average returns for all models is positive. While this is clearly a good thing, it is difficult to draw any conclusions, as the absolute level of returns is driven by the market environment as well as the model output. For example, the backtest period experienced low volatility and selling volatility was generally profitable. We cannot ascertain from Exhibit 15 whether the profits we observe are due to judicious trade selection or a higher tendency to sell volatility. We also can make no claims about the ability of the model to identify buying versus selling opportunities. For this reason, we decompose the results into sell volatility (Exhibit 16) and buy volatility (Exhibit 17) below. 25
12 The Cross Sectional Models perform better for both selling and buying volatility. All models improve average returns versus the simple strategy for selling and buying volatility, and also improve the risk/return in most cases. In a market environment when selling volatility is generally profitable, we should bring our focus to the results to the relatively stronger performance of the model to the simple strategy, Exhibit 16: Sell volatility only: Backtest results for five different models Implied Vol Avg Ret Stdev Ret Sharpe Ret Total Trades % Good Avg Vega Stdev Vega Sharpe Vega Model 1M 3.61% 32.31% , % Simple 1M 16.0% 34.4% % Market (w CDS) 1M 14.5% 34.1% , % Market (no CDS) 1M 14.7%.9% ,9 74.9% Sector 1M 16.4% 32.6% 0. 2, % Sector + Market (no CDS) 3M 2.9% 23.8% , % Simple 3M 8.9%.5% % Market (w CDS) 3M 14.4% 24.4% , % Market (no CDS) 3M 13.3% 23.8% , % Sector 3M 14.9% 24.3% , % Sector + Market (no CDS) 6M 2.1% 22.7% ,3.9% Simple 6M 16.6% 19.6% , % Market (w CDS) 6M 8.8% 21.7% , % Market (no CDS) 6M 9.8%.3% , % Sector 6M.1%.8% , % Sector + Market (no CDS) Exhibit 17: Buy volatility only: Backtest results for five different models Implied Vol Avg Ret Stdev Ret Sharpe Ret Total Trades % Good Avg Vega Stdev Vega Sharpe Vega Model 1M -11.1% 32.3% (0.34) 62, % (0.0) 0.12 (0.29) Simple 1M 4.4% 49.7% % Market (w CDS) 1M -2.2% 39.5% (0.06) % Market (no CDS) 1M -5.9%.4% (0.19) 490.8% (0.2) (0.01) Sector 1M -7.2% 43.4% (0.16) 119.2% (0.8) (0.03) Sector + Market (no CDS) 3M -4.6% 24.8% (0.18) 58,725.5% (0.0) 0.09 (0.17) Simple 3M -0.6% 29.3% (0.02) % Market (w CDS) 3M 6.8% 37.7% % Market (no CDS) 3M -1.1% 25.3% (0.04) % Sector 3M 6.0% 36.6% % Sector + Market (no CDS) 6M -3.12% 22.06% (0.14) 60,268.8% (0.0) 0.08 (0.15) Simple 6M 2.2% 23.5% % Market (w CDS) 6M 15.9% 35.1% % Market (no CDS) 6M 7.0% 25.8% % Sector 6M 14.3% 32.4% % Sector + Market (no CDS) 26
13 Risks to Strategies Option Buyer. Options are a decaying asset, and investors risk losing 0% of the premium paid. Call Option Sale. Investors who sell uncovered call options have exposure on the upside that is theoretically unlimited. Investors who sell calls but also own the underlying stock will have limited losses should the stock rally. Put Sale. Investors who sell put options will own the underlying stock if the stock price falls below the strike price of the put option. Investors, therefore, will be exposed to any decline in the stock price below the strike potentially to zero, and they will not participate in any stock appreciation if the option expires unexercised. Call Overwrite or Buywrite. Investors who sell call options against a long position in the underlying stock give up any appreciation in the stock price above the strike price of the call option, and they remain exposed to the downside of the underlying stock in return for receipt of the option premium. 27
Trading Volatility: Theory and Practice. FPA of Illinois. Conference for Advanced Planning October 7, Presented by: Eric Metz, CFA
Trading Volatility: Theory and Practice Presented by: Eric Metz, CFA FPA of Illinois Conference for Advanced Planning October 7, 2014 Trading Volatility: Theory and Practice Institutional Use Only 1 Table
More informationSpotlight on: 130/30 strategies. Combining long positions with limited shorting. Exhibit 1: Expanding opportunity. Initial opportunity set
INVESTMENT INSIGHTS Spotlight on: 130/30 strategies Monetizing positive and negative stock views Managers of 130/30 portfolios seek to capture potential returns in two ways: Buying long to purchase a stock
More informationVIX ETPs, Inter-Relationships between Volatility Markets and Implications for Investors and Traders
Not a Product of Research / Not for Retail Distribution Citi Equities I U.S. Equity Trading Strategy VIX ETPs, Inter-Relationships between Volatility Markets and Implications for Investors and Traders
More informationVANGUARD HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF (VYM)
VANGUARD HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF (VYM) $87.98 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 2 - Buy Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Large Cap ETFs VANGUARD FTSE HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD INDEX VYM Sector Weights Date of Inception
More informationCalamos Phineus Long/Short Fund
Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund Performance Update SEPTEMBER 18 FOR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY Why Calamos Phineus Long/Short Equity-Like Returns with Superior Risk Profile Over Full Market Cycle
More informationin-depth Invesco Actively Managed Low Volatility Strategies The Case for
Invesco in-depth The Case for Actively Managed Low Volatility Strategies We believe that active LVPs offer the best opportunity to achieve a higher risk-adjusted return over the long term. Donna C. Wilson
More informationVANGUARD INFORMATION TECH ETF (VGT)
VANGUARD INFORMATION TECH ETF (VGT) $166.30 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 2 - Buy Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Technology ETFs VANGUARD MSCI US INVESTABLE MRKT INFO TECH 25/50 VGT Sector Weights Date
More informationExpected Return Methodologies in Morningstar Direct Asset Allocation
Expected Return Methodologies in Morningstar Direct Asset Allocation I. Introduction to expected return II. The short version III. Detailed methodologies 1. Building Blocks methodology i. Methodology ii.
More informationIncome-With-Growth Solution: Converting Future Dividend Growth Into Current Income
FEATURED STRATEGY September 2018 Income-With-Growth Solution: Converting Future Dividend Growth Into Current Income AUTHORS: Karan Sood Portfolio Manager Joanne Hill, Ph.D. Chief Advisor for Research &
More informationGyroscope Capital Management Group
Thursday, March 08, 2018 Quarterly Review and Commentary Earlier this year, we highlighted the rising popularity of quant strategies among asset managers. In our most recent commentary, we discussed factor
More informationStifel Advisory Account Performance Review Guide. Consulting Services Group
Stifel Advisory Account Performance Review Guide Consulting Services Group Table of Contents Quarterly Performance Reviews are provided to all Stifel advisory clients. Performance reviews help advisors
More informationOptions Markets: Introduction
17-2 Options Options Markets: Introduction Derivatives are securities that get their value from the price of other securities. Derivatives are contingent claims because their payoffs depend on the value
More informationThe Equity Imperative
The Equity Imperative Factor-based Investment Strategies 2015 Northern Trust Corporation Can You Define, or Better Yet, Decipher? 1 Spectrum of Equity Investing Techniques Alpha Beta Traditional Active
More informationPortfolio Management Philip Morris has issued bonds that pay coupons annually with the following characteristics:
Portfolio Management 010-011 1. a. Critically discuss the mean-variance approach of portfolio theory b. According to Markowitz portfolio theory, can we find a single risky optimal portfolio which is suitable
More informationManaged Futures managers look for intermediate involving the trading of futures contracts,
Managed Futures A thoughtful approach to portfolio diversification Capability A properly diversified portfolio will include a variety of investments. This piece highlights one of those investment categories
More informationVIX Hedging September 30, 2015 Pravit Chintawongvanich, Head of Risk Strategy
P R O V E N E X P E R T I S E. U N B I A S E D A D V I C E. F L E X I B L E S O L U T I O N S. VIX Hedging September 3, 215 Pravit Chintawongvanich, Head of Risk Strategy Hedging objectives What is the
More informationMarket Insights. The Benefits of Integrating Fundamental and Quantitative Research to Deliver Outcome-Oriented Equity Solutions.
Market Insights The Benefits of Integrating Fundamental and Quantitative Research to Deliver Outcome-Oriented Equity Solutions Vincent Costa, CFA Head of Global Equities Peg DiOrio, CFA Head of Global
More informationApril The Value Reversion
April 2016 The Value Reversion In the past two years, value stocks, along with cyclicals and higher-volatility equities, have underperformed broader markets while higher-momentum stocks have outperformed.
More informationDividend Growth as a Defensive Equity Strategy August 24, 2012
Dividend Growth as a Defensive Equity Strategy August 24, 2012 Introduction: The Case for Defensive Equity Strategies Most institutional investment committees meet three to four times per year to review
More informationDevelopments in Volatility-Related Indicators & Benchmarks
Developments in Volatility-Related Indicators & Benchmarks William Speth, Global Head of Research Cboe Multi-Asset Solutions Team September 12, 18 Volatility-related indicators unlock valuable information
More informationRisk Factors Citi Volatility Balanced Beta (VIBE) Equity US Gross Total Return Index
Risk Factors Citi Volatility Balanced Beta (VIBE) Equity US Gross Total Return Index The Methodology Does Not Mean That the Index Is Less Risky Than Any Other Equity Index, and the Index May Decline The
More informationTed Stover, Managing Director, Research and Analytics December FactOR Fiction?
Ted Stover, Managing Director, Research and Analytics December 2014 FactOR Fiction? Important Legal Information FTSE is not an investment firm and this presentation is not advice about any investment activity.
More informationMAI Managed Volatility Strategy Thesis and Process
MAI Managed Volatility Strategy Thesis and Process For additional disclosure information, please see the Important Disclosures in the back of this presentation. MAI s Thesis: We believe in: 1. Multiple
More informationThe enduring case for high-yield bonds
November 2016 The enduring case for high-yield bonds TIAA Investments Kevin Lorenz, CFA Managing Director High Yield Portfolio Manager Jean Lin, CFA Managing Director High Yield Portfolio Manager Mark
More informationTrend-following strategies for tail-risk hedging and alpha generation
Trend-following strategies for tail-risk hedging and alpha generation Artur Sepp FXCM Algo Summit 15 June 2018 Disclaimer I Trading forex/cfds on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable
More informationVANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK ETF (VT)
VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK ETF (VT) $71.53 USD Risk: Low Zacks ETF Rank 3 - Hold Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index World ETFs VANGUARD FTSE GLOBAL ALL CAP INDEX VT Sector Weights Date of Inception 06/24/2008
More informationISHARES GLOBAL 100 ETF (IOO)
ISHARES GLOBAL 100 ETF (IOO) $46.23 USD Risk: Low Zacks ETF Rank 3 - Hold Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index World ETFs BLACKROCK S&P GLOBAL 100 INDEX IOO Sector Weights Date of Inception 12/05/2000 AUM
More information1607 GROUP AT MORGAN STANLEY
W E A L T H M A N A G E M E N T I. Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS: II. 1607 Portfolio III. 1607 Income Growth Portfolio IV. Investment Team WEALTH MANAGEMENT WEALTH MANAGEMENT O V E R V I E W Our Business:
More informationGlossary of Investment Terms
Glossary of Investment Terms Performance Measures Alpha: Alpha measures the difference between a portfolio s actual returns and its expected returns given its risk level as measured by its beta. A higher
More informationBlack Box Trend Following Lifting the Veil
AlphaQuest CTA Research Series #1 The goal of this research series is to demystify specific black box CTA trend following strategies and to analyze their characteristics both as a stand-alone product as
More informationTechnical S&P500 Factor Model
February 27, 2015 Technical S&P500 Factor Model A single unified technical factor based model that has consistently outperformed the S&P Index By Manish Jalan The paper describes the objective, the methodology,
More informationMinimizing Timing Luck with Portfolio Tranching The Difference Between Hired and Fired
Minimizing Timing Luck with Portfolio Tranching The Difference Between Hired and Fired February 2015 Newfound Research LLC 425 Boylston Street 3 rd Floor Boston, MA 02116 www.thinknewfound.com info@thinknewfound.com
More informationEquity Volatility and Covered Call Writing
December 2017 Equity Volatility and Covered Call Writing Executive Summary Amid uncertainty in the markets and investor desire for lower volatility, investors may want to consider a covered call strategy
More informationManager Comparison Report June 28, Report Created on: July 25, 2013
Manager Comparison Report June 28, 213 Report Created on: July 25, 213 Page 1 of 14 Performance Evaluation Manager Performance Growth of $1 Cumulative Performance & Monthly s 3748 3578 348 3238 368 2898
More informationTradeOptionsWithMe.com
TradeOptionsWithMe.com 1 of 18 Option Trading Glossary This is the Glossary for important option trading terms. Some of these terms are rather easy and used extremely often, but some may even be new to
More informationSecurity Analysis: Performance
Security Analysis: Performance Independent Variable: 1 Yr. Mean ROR: 8.72% STD: 16.76% Time Horizon: 2/1993-6/2003 Holding Period: 12 months Risk-free ROR: 1.53% Ticker Name Beta Alpha Correlation Sharpe
More informationThe Optimal Transactions to Fill your Volatility Risk Bucket
The Optimal Transactions to Fill your Volatility Risk Bucket In December of last year, we published a RateLab analysis of the relative cheapness of Yield Curve Options. Last month we published a table
More informationValidation of Nasdaq Clearing Models
Model Validation Validation of Nasdaq Clearing Models Summary of findings swissquant Group Kuttelgasse 7 CH-8001 Zürich Classification: Public Distribution: swissquant Group, Nasdaq Clearing October 20,
More informationGUGGENHEIM S&P 500 PURE VALUE ETF (RPV)
GUGGENHEIM S&P 500 PURE VALUE ETF (RPV) $67.70 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 3 - Hold Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Large Cap ETFs GUGGENHEIM FUNDS S&P 500 PURE VALUE INDEX RPV Sector Weights Date of
More informationRegression Analysis and Quantitative Trading Strategies. χtrading Butterfly Spread Strategy
Regression Analysis and Quantitative Trading Strategies χtrading Butterfly Spread Strategy Michael Beven June 3, 2016 University of Chicago Financial Mathematics 1 / 25 Overview 1 Strategy 2 Construction
More informationUTILITIES SELECT SECTOR SPDR FUND (XLU)
UTILITIES SELECT SECTOR SPDR FUND (XLU) $53.06 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 5 - Strong Sell Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs STATE STREET GLOBAL ADVISORS UTILITIES SELECT
More informationComparison of U.S. Stock Indices
Magnus Erik Hvass Pedersen Hvass Laboratories Report HL-1503 First Edition September 30, 2015 Latest Revision www.hvass-labs.org/books Summary This paper compares stock indices for USA: Large-Cap stocks
More informationFIN 6160 Investment Theory. Lecture 7-10
FIN 6160 Investment Theory Lecture 7-10 Optimal Asset Allocation Minimum Variance Portfolio is the portfolio with lowest possible variance. To find the optimal asset allocation for the efficient frontier
More informationDebunking Five Myths about Cash-Secured PutWrite Strategies
Debunking Five Myths about Cash-Secured PutWrite Strategies A Cash-Secured PutWrite strategy sells a put option and fully collateralizes the option with cash or cash equivalents, i.e. the collateral balance
More informationJanus Hedged Equity ETFs SPXH: Janus Velocity Volatility Hedged Large Cap ETF TRSK: Janus Velocity Tail Risk Hedged Large Cap ETF
Janus Hedged Equity ETFs SPXH: Janus Velocity Volatility Hedged Large Cap ETF TRSK: Janus Velocity Tail Risk Hedged Large Cap ETF September 2014 The Janus Velocity Volatility Hedged Large Cap and Velocity
More informationPortfolio Rebalancing:
Portfolio Rebalancing: A Guide For Institutional Investors May 2012 PREPARED BY Nat Kellogg, CFA Associate Director of Research Eric Przybylinski, CAIA Senior Research Analyst Abstract Failure to rebalance
More informationMacroeconomic conditions and equity market volatility. Benn Eifert, PhD February 28, 2016
Macroeconomic conditions and equity market volatility Benn Eifert, PhD February 28, 2016 beifert@berkeley.edu Overview Much of the volatility of the last six months has been driven by concerns about the
More informationLearn To Trade Stock Options
Learn To Trade Stock Options Written by: Jason Ramus www.daytradingfearless.com Copyright: 2017 Table of contents: WHAT TO EXPECT FROM THIS MANUAL WHAT IS AN OPTION BASICS OF HOW AN OPTION WORKS RECOMMENDED
More informationVolatility Surface. Course Name: Analytical Finance I. Report date: Oct.18,2012. Supervisor:Jan R.M Röman. Authors: Wenqing Huang.
Course Name: Analytical Finance I Report date: Oct.18,2012 Supervisor:Jan R.M Röman Volatility Surface Authors: Wenqing Huang Zhiwen Zhang Yiqing Wang 1 Content 1. Implied Volatility...3 2.Volatility Smile...
More informationISHARES MORTGAGE REAL ESTATE ETF (REM)
ISHARES MORTGAGE REAL ESTATE ETF (REM) $43.14 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 3 - Hold Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Real Estate ETFs BLACKROCK FTSE NAREIT ALL MORTGAGE CAPPED INDEX REM Sector Weights
More informationArticle from: Risk Management. March 2015 Issue 32
Article from: Risk Management March 2015 Issue 32 VIX & Tails: Hedging With Volatility By Rocky Fishman 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 REGIME: SINGLE-DIGIT RV RARE Apr-04 Jan-05 Sep-05 Jun-06 Mar-07 Dec-07 Sep-08 Jun-09
More informationAn effective hedging tool for long-only equity holdings
BTAL An effective hedging tool for long-only equity holdings Since the 2008 Global Financial Crisis ( GFC ), when the term tail risk entered the general lexicon, investors embraced ways to insulate their
More informationQuality Value Momentum Strategy
Quality Value Momentum Strategy Ford Equity Research 11722 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite I San Diego, CA 92121 800.842.0207 (USA) 858.455.6316 Fax www.fordequity.com Background Can a low-turnover portfolio
More informationConsidering Covered Calls. LA Department of Water & Power Employees Retirement System
LA Department of Water & Power Employees Retirement System Pension Consulting Alliance, Inc. Client Name/Logo December 1 2010 G rowth of $100 Considering Covered Calls RATIONALE Growth of U.S. Equities?
More informationcovered warrants uncovered an explanation and the applications of covered warrants
covered warrants uncovered an explanation and the applications of covered warrants Disclaimer Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information comprising this brochure,
More informationVANGUARD DIVIDEND APPREC ETF (VIG)
VANGUARD DIVIDEND APPREC ETF (VIG) $112.45 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 3 - Hold Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Large Cap ETFs VANGUARD NASDAQ US DIVIDEND ACHIEVERS SELECT INDX VIG Sector Weights Date
More informationSensex Realized Volatility Index (REALVOL)
Sensex Realized Volatility Index (REALVOL) Introduction Volatility modelling has traditionally relied on complex econometric procedures in order to accommodate the inherent latent character of volatility.
More informationFactor Investing: Smart Beta Pursuing Alpha TM
In the spectrum of investing from passive (index based) to active management there are no shortage of considerations. Passive tends to be cheaper and should deliver returns very close to the index it tracks,
More informationQuantitative Measure. February Axioma Research Team
February 2018 How When It Comes to Momentum, Evaluate Don t Cramp My Style a Risk Model Quantitative Measure Risk model providers often commonly report the average value of the asset returns model. Some
More informationLending in the context of investing: another step toward Total Wealth advice
a b May 2017 For marketing purpose only This publication does not constitute UBS independent research as it has not been drafted in accordance with the statutory regulations regarding the independence
More informationNOTES ON THE BANK OF ENGLAND OPTION IMPLIED PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS
1 NOTES ON THE BANK OF ENGLAND OPTION IMPLIED PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS Options are contracts used to insure against or speculate/take a view on uncertainty about the future prices of a wide range
More informationInitiating Our Quantitative Stock Selection Models
Turkey / Quantitative Research / Equities 27 April 2016 Initiating Our Quantitative Stock Selection Models Ayhan Yüksel, PhD, CFA Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu, CFA Can Özçelik Okan Ertem, FRM +90 (212) 334 94 95
More informationCapital Idea: Expect More From the Core.
SM Capital Idea: Expect More From the Core. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. Core equity strategies, such
More informationLazard Insights. The Art and Science of Volatility Prediction. Introduction. Summary. Stephen Marra, CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst
Lazard Insights The Art and Science of Volatility Prediction Stephen Marra, CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Summary Statistical properties of volatility make this variable forecastable to some
More informationInvestment Insight. Are Risk Parity Managers Risk Parity (Continued) Summary Results of the Style Analysis
Investment Insight Are Risk Parity Managers Risk Parity (Continued) Edward Qian, PhD, CFA PanAgora Asset Management October 2013 In the November 2012 Investment Insight 1, I presented a style analysis
More informationAspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund RMEAX Q4 2018
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund Q4 2018 Investment Objective Description The Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund ( or the Fund ) seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation
More informationAlphaSolutions Multi-Sector Fixed Income Model
AlphaSolutions Multi-Sector Fixed Income Model A fixed income model based on trending and momentum strategies Portfolio Goals Primary: Seeks to invest in highranked sectors within the fixed income market
More informationMANAGING OPTIONS POSITIONS MARCH 2013
MANAGING OPTIONS POSITIONS MARCH 2013 AGENDA INTRODUCTION OPTION VALUATION & RISK MEASURES THE GREEKS PRE-TRADE RICH VS. CHEAP ANALYSIS SELECTING TERM STRUCTURE PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL RISK
More informationCovered Call Funds Resurrected
Covered Call Funds Resurrected QWAFAFEW Presentation Boston, MA 3/15/2005 Stuart J. Rosenthal, CFA 1 Disclaimer The views I express here today are my own and do not reflect the views of Credit Suisse First
More informationEXAMINATION II: Fixed Income Valuation and Analysis. Derivatives Valuation and Analysis. Portfolio Management
EXAMINATION II: Fixed Income Valuation and Analysis Derivatives Valuation and Analysis Portfolio Management Questions Final Examination March 2011 Question 1: Fixed Income Valuation and Analysis (43 points)
More informationTactical Income ETF. Investor Presentation N ORTHC OAST I NVESTMENT A DVISORY T EAM NORTHCOASTAM. COM
Tactical Income ETF Investor Presentation N ORTHC OAST I NVESTMENT A DVISORY T EAM 203.532.7000 INFO@ NORTHCOASTAM. COM NORTHCOAST ASSET MANAGEMENT An established leader in the field of tactical investment
More informationA Framework for Understanding Defensive Equity Investing
A Framework for Understanding Defensive Equity Investing Nick Alonso, CFA and Mark Barnes, Ph.D. December 2017 At a basketball game, you always hear the home crowd chanting 'DEFENSE! DEFENSE!' when the
More informationMutual Fund Research Process
Mutual Fund Research Process Identifying high-quality managers // Clearly defined process KEY TAKEAWAYS Raymond James believes that providing in-depth, unbiased research is an important tool for making
More informationEvolving Equity Investing: Delivering Long-Term Returns in Short-Tempered Markets
March 2012 Evolving Equity Investing: Delivering Long-Term Returns in Short-Tempered Markets Kent Hargis Portfolio Manager Low Volatility Equities Director of Quantitative Research Equities This information
More informationHow to be Factor Aware
How to be Factor Aware What factors are you exposed to & how to handle exposure Melissa Brown MD Applied Research, Axioma Omer Cedar CEO, Omega Point 1 Why are we here? Case Study To Dissect the Current
More informationVANGUARD REAL ESTATE ETF (VNQ)
VANGUARD REAL ESTATE ETF (VNQ) $81.68 USD Risk: Med Zacks ETF Rank 3 - Hold Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Real Estate ETFs VANGUARD MSCI US INVESTABLE MKT REAL EST 25/50 ID VNQ Sector Weights Date of
More informationQ Dividend Plus + Strategy beyond the covered call
Q3 2014 Dividend Plus + Strategy beyond the covered call MAI Firm Overview Our heritage dates back to 1973 Privately held, independent SEC registered investment advisor Manages more than $3.7 billion in
More informationVANECK VECTORS BIOTECH ETF (BBH)
VANECK VECTORS BIOTECH ETF (BBH) $132.32 USD Risk: High Zacks ETF Rank 1 - Strong Buy Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Health Care ETFs VAN ECK MVIS US LISTED BIOTECH 25 INDEX BBH Sector Weights Date of
More informationDIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BULL 3X SHARES (TNA)
DIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BULL 3X SHARES (T) $78.96 USD Risk: High Zacks ETF Rank Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Leveraged Equity ETFs DIREXION RUSSELL 2000 INDEX T Sector Weights Date of Inception 11/05/2008
More informationWisdomTree Research EMERGING MARKETS
WisdomTree Research EMERGING MARKETS Managing Risk in the Emerging Markets 2.0 [ Incorporating Emerging Market (EM) Corporate Bonds into EM Equity Allocations Has Been Shown to Reduce Volatility in Difficult
More informationPortfolio Management
Portfolio Management 010-011 1. Consider the following prices (calculated under the assumption of absence of arbitrage) corresponding to three sets of options on the Dow Jones index. Each point of the
More informationBrazil Risk and Alpha Factor Handbook
Brazil Risk and Alpha Factor Handbook In this report we discuss some of the basic theory and statistical techniques involved in a quantitative approach to alpha generation and risk management. Focusing
More informationSTRATEGY OVERVIEW. Long/Short Equity. Related Funds: 361 Domestic Long/Short Equity Fund (ADMZX) 361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund (AGAZX)
STRATEGY OVERVIEW Long/Short Equity Related Funds: 361 Domestic Long/Short Equity Fund (ADMZX) 361 Global Long/Short Equity Fund (AGAZX) Strategy Thesis The thesis driving 361 s Long/Short Equity strategies
More informationOPTIONS & GREEKS. Study notes. An option results in the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell an asset, at a predetermined
OPTIONS & GREEKS Study notes 1 Options 1.1 Basic information An option results in the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell an asset, at a predetermined price, and on or before a predetermined
More informationDIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BULL 3X SHARES (TNA)
DIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BULL 3X SHARES (T) $88.65 USD Risk: High Zacks ETF Rank Fund Type Issuer Benchmark Index Leveraged Equity ETFs DIREXION RUSSELL 2000 INDEX T Sector Weights Date of Inception 11/05/2008
More information1. What is Implied Volatility?
Numerical Methods FEQA MSc Lectures, Spring Term 2 Data Modelling Module Lecture 2 Implied Volatility Professor Carol Alexander Spring Term 2 1 1. What is Implied Volatility? Implied volatility is: the
More informationGetting Smart About Beta
Getting Smart About Beta December 1, 2015 by Sponsored Content from Invesco Due to its simplicity, market-cap weighting has long been a popular means of calculating the value of market indexes. But as
More informationFact Sheet User Guide
Fact Sheet User Guide The User Guide describes how each section of the Fact Sheet is relevant to your investment options research and offers some tips on ways to use these features to help you better analyze
More informationActive QQQ Covered Call Strategies. David P. Simon. Finance Department Bentley University Waltham, MA Tele: (781)
Active QQQ Covered Call Strategies David P. Simon Finance Department Bentley University Waltham, MA 02452 Dsimon@bentley.edu. Tele: (781) 891 2489 October 21, 2013 Abstract This study examines QQQ covered
More informationTRΛNSPΛRΣNCY ΛNΛLYTICS
TRΛNSPΛRΣNCY ΛNΛLYTICS RISK-AI, LLC PRESENTATION INTRODUCTION I. Transparency Analytics is a state-of-the-art risk management analysis and research platform for Investment Advisors, Funds of Funds, Family
More informationRisk: N/A Zacks ETF Rank N/A - BIB Sector Weights. Price Chart
November 24, 2016 PROSHARES ULTRA NASDAQ BIOTECHNOLOGY (BIB) $45.89 Risk: N/A Zacks ETF Rank N/A - Fund Type Issuer Healthcare - Biotech PROFUNDS GROUP BIB Sector Weights Benchmark Index NASDAQ BIOTECHNOLOGY
More informationHow to Trade Options Using VantagePoint and Trade Management
How to Trade Options Using VantagePoint and Trade Management Course 3.2 + 3.3 Copyright 2016 Market Technologies, LLC. 1 Option Basics Part I Agenda Option Basics and Lingo Call and Put Attributes Profit
More informationFUND OF HEDGE FUNDS DO THEY REALLY ADD VALUE?
FUND OF HEDGE FUNDS DO THEY REALLY ADD VALUE? Florian Albrecht, Jean-Francois Bacmann, Pierre Jeanneret & Stefan Scholz, RMF Investment Management Man Investments Hedge funds have attracted significant
More informationLazard Insights. Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta. Summary. What Is Smart Beta? Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst
Lazard Insights Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Summary Smart beta strategies have become increasingly popular over the past several
More informationChapter 3. Numerical Descriptive Measures. Copyright 2016 Pearson Education, Ltd. Chapter 3, Slide 1
Chapter 3 Numerical Descriptive Measures Copyright 2016 Pearson Education, Ltd. Chapter 3, Slide 1 Objectives In this chapter, you learn to: Describe the properties of central tendency, variation, and
More informationStatistically Speaking
Statistically Speaking August 2001 Alpha a Alpha is a measure of a investment instrument s risk-adjusted return. It can be used to directly measure the value added or subtracted by a fund s manager. It
More informationComparing the Performance of Annuities with Principal Guarantees: Accumulation Benefit on a VA Versus FIA
Comparing the Performance of Annuities with Principal Guarantees: Accumulation Benefit on a VA Versus FIA MARCH 2019 2019 CANNEX Financial Exchanges Limited. All rights reserved. Comparing the Performance
More informationWhere Vami 0 = 1000 and Where R N = Return for period N. Vami N = ( 1 + R N ) Vami N-1. Where R I = Return for period I. Average Return = ( S R I ) N
The following section provides a brief description of each statistic used in PerTrac and gives the formula used to calculate each. PerTrac computes annualized statistics based on monthly data, unless Quarterly
More informationDoes Relaxing the Long-Only Constraint Increase the Downside Risk of Portfolio Alphas? PETER XU
Does Relaxing the Long-Only Constraint Increase the Downside Risk of Portfolio Alphas? PETER XU Does Relaxing the Long-Only Constraint Increase the Downside Risk of Portfolio Alphas? PETER XU PETER XU
More informationLeveraging Minimum Variance to Enhance Portfolio Returns Ruben Falk, Capital IQ Quantitative Research December 2010
Leveraging Minimum Variance to Enhance Portfolio Returns Ruben Falk, Capital IQ Quantitative Research December 2010 1 Agenda Quick overview of the tools employed in constructing the Minimum Variance (MinVar)
More information