FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE MODULE 2
|
|
- Victor Bailey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MSc. Finance/CLEFIN 2017/2018 Edition FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE MODULE 2 Midterm Exam Solutions June 2018 Time Allowed: 1 hour and 15 minutes Please answer all the questions by writing your answers in the spaces provided. There are two optional questions (4 and 5). No additional papers will be collected and therefore they will not be marked. You always need to carefully justify your answers and show your work. The exam is closed book, closed notes. No calculators are useful or permitted. You can withdraw until 10 minutes before the due time. Question 1.A (10 points) Describe in detail, also with reference to the examples that have been provided in the lectures, the four stylized facts that have motivated the development of models of conditional heteroskedasticity. With reference to two independent Gaussian GARCH(1,1) models one estimated for US stock returns and the other for US Treasury note returns discuss whether and how these two models could fully account for the stylized facts that you have listed and discussed. 1
2 As for the Gaussian GARCH(1,1) case, as commented in the slides and lecture notes (see above), because it implies volatility clustering (by construction, as past squared shocks explain current conditional variance), this model automatically inflates the tails of the implied unconditional distribution of returns; moreover, because shocks enter raised to a power 2, so that small shocks are pushed towards zero while shocks larger than 1 are magnified, it is likely that a GARCH(1,1) model will also inflate the probability mass just around the (conditional) mean of the data, because of spells of time characterized by small shocks, small variance, small returns, small shocks, etc. When both the extreme tails and the center of the distribution are inflated vs. (say) a Gaussian benchmark, then we speak of leptokurtosis, i.e., the first stylized fact. However, by construction a GARCH(1,1) model is symmetric and cannot capture the third stylized fact. Moreover, without further extensions, a GARCH cannot even pick up time variation in all higher-order moments beyond the second. Finally, two independent GARCH processes, just because they are independent, have no hope to capture co-movements in volatility, either separately from time variation in covariances, or jointly with such covariances. Question 1.B (3 points) Mlado Vizov an analyst at Peeled & Head Ass. has just made a simple mathematical observation concerning a W-period rolling window variance estimator, σ W, namely that 2
3 σ W 1 W ε ε 1 W1 ε ε σ W 1. Therefore he claims that a rolling window variance estimator is just a special case of a RiskMetrics model, under the restriction that both the terms on the right-hand side are multiplied by a unit coefficient. Do you agree with his claim? Carefully explain your reasoning. As you know, a RiskMetrics model is simply written as σ 1λε λσ. However, note that the variance process on the left- and right-hand sides of the RiskMetrics are the same: on the right we just have one lag of the process on the left. In the case pointed out by Mlado, we have instead that the process on the left, a W-observation rolling window variance estimator σ W is structurally different from the process on the right, σ W 1, a (W -1)-observation rolling window variance estimator, which just uses less data. Therefore we can say that there is no restriction on RiskMetrics that can take us to a rolling window variance process and as a result Mlado is wrong. Question 1.C (4 points) Ms. Nanny Ogombo is due to give a presentation on the process followed by the conditional variance of the log-price returns on the 3-month futures on Natural Gas, traded on the NYMEX. The audience is composed of two types of customers: option pricers and risk managers. In the hurry to leave her home, Nanny has forgotten her most recent GARCH(1,1) estimates of the parameters of process. However, Nanny remembers for a fact that for the process she had estimated, α β Therefore she decides to roughly allocate the estimated persistence to α and β as follows: α 0.1 and β 0.88, because this will not count for very much, as only overall persistence matters. Knowing that in fact the true values of the estimates of α and β had been instead 0.04 and 0.94, do you agree with her decision? In particular, selecting α and β will distort and in what ways the volatility forecasts and decisions taken by option pricers vs. risk managers? Make sure to carefully justify your answer. Nanny is making a mistake because we know that for a given persistence index the exact values taken by α and β make a strong difference for the practical application of GARCH models, see also slides copied below. In particular, if one underestimates α and overestimates β, she obtains an implied conditional variance process that is rather (excessively) smooth but characterized by a less spiky dynamics and therefore because the unconditional variance is just determined by the implied persistence and such is determined independently of how a given estimated persistence is allocated between α and β by a higher general level of predicted variance. Therefore underestimating α to overestimate β generates a general, normal level of predicted variance that is higher than it should be and this may lead a risk manager to be overcautious, by setting aside amounts of cushion or regulatory capital that are most of the time excessive. Conversely, an option pricer will face a process in which using a simpler, constant variance model such as Black-Scholes is perceived to be generally not so bad and possibly leading to 3
4 acceptable errors, in spite of the time-varying variance implied by the process. In practice, such a selection may be then punished by the subsequent behavior of the underlying security price. Question 2.A (11 points) Discuss why and how would you proceed to specify an asymmetric GARCH model in which the standardized shocks are drawn from a t-student distribution. What types of potential asymmetric GARCH models would you consider and what are their pros and cons? How would you proceed to test that, given some selection of a framework, the resulting, estimated model for the conditional mean and conditional variance, say y μ σ z z IID t0, v is correctly specified? As discussed in general terms, the correct specification would be tested by checking that in fact the estimated, standardized residuals, z y μ /σ, are in fact IID t0, v. I have copied the corresponding slide just below. 4
5 5
6 6
7 Question 2.B (3 points) Giorgio Gutierro, an analyst at Black Eagler Inc., has just estimated two t-student GARCH-type models on de-meaned monthly Italian excess equity and 10-Treasury returns (denoted as x and x, respectively), obtaining (p-values are in parentheses): 7
8 x exp x z z Ez x, I..., x, lnσ., σ., z z z z IID t0, IID t0, ,. where the indicator variable I, has the same meaning seen in the lectures. Giorgio reports then that both Italian stock and bond excess returns contain evidence of leverage effects, i.e., that negative news increase predicted variance more than positive (non-negative) news do. Do you trust Giorgio s conclusions? Make sure to clearly justify your answer. You will need to recognize that the model estimated for excess stock returns is a EGARCH(1,1). Therefore, because when z 0, we have that the term in squared bracket under the square root is z z Ez (this follows from z z 0 when z 0), while when z 0, the same term becomes z z Ez... and the former exceeds the latter, Giorgio is correct: when shocks are negative, volatility increases more than when shocks are non-negative. In the case of bond returns, we are facing a threshold GARCH(1,1) model and we have that when shocks are negative, the model is x x..., σ., z while when they are non-negative, the model becomes x x, x, σ., z σ., and visibly, news increase variance more in the latter case than in the former: clearly, this is the opposite of leverage effects. Therefore on the second account Giorgio is incorrect. Question 2.C (3 points) Mr. Milenko Petic, and quant researcher at Toastercity & Ass., is comparing two alternative estimates of a GARCH-in mean model for Japanese stock returns, both obtained from an identical sample of data. The first set of parameter estimates has been obtained by assuming a t-student distribution for the standardized errors and by jointly maximizing the log-likelihood function with respect to all the 6 coefficients, and it is as follows: r σ ε ε σ. z z IID t0, The second set of parameter estimates has been obtained by assuming a t-student distribution for the standardized errors but in two steps: first the GARCH model has been estimated for the returns as r ε σ. z z IID t0, ;. z 8
9 next, given the estimated time series of predicted variances obtained from the GARCH model,, the conditional mean function is estimated by simple OLS as: σ r σ e ε σ e Milenko claims that the two estimators are equally valid, i.e., that their asymptotic properties are identical. Do you agree with his claim? What are the pros and cons of the two alternative estimation methods that have been described? Make sure to clearly justify your answer. Milenko is incorrect: the second estimator is obtained through a two-step process but it fails to assume normal standardized residuals and as such it cannot be rationalized as an instance of QMLE. As such, because estimation has been split in two steps, its statistical properties are simply unknown. The first estimator may instead be a MLE which, at least asymptotically, would be consistent, asymptotically normal, and the most efficient estimator, but such properties would require correct specification of everything in the model, i.e., conditional mean (the GARCH-in mean structure), conditional variance, as well as the t-student distribution for the shocks. In case any misspecification had occurred, then the estimator would lose all of the claimed asymptotic properties. As a result, the second estimator also appears to be risky. To hedge such risk, Milenko should subject the standardized residuals from the model to a carefully designed battery of diagnostic checks. Question 3.A (9 points) Describe the theoretical justifications as well as the practical implementations of tests of the forecasting validity of a conditional heteroscedasticity model based on the linear regression ε abσ e, where e is a white noise shock and σ are the one-step ahead conditional variance forecasts derived from a given model. How would you estimate this linear model? Under what circumstances the null that the model yields unbiased and efficient forecasts will be rejected? Discuss whether you would also use the regression R-square to assess the validity of the variance model. Make sure to clearly justify your answers. 9
10 Question 3.B (4.5 points) Mindy Kauskakas, an independent researcher, has estimated two models to predict the one-day ahead variance of US aggregate excess stock returns. For two models, call them A and B, Mindy has obtained the following results from a regression of squared residuals (from a MA(1) model that has been pre-specified using Box-Jenkins analysis) on variance predictions, σ, and (estimated standard errors are reported in parantheses): σ, ε σ, e R 0.029,.. ε σ, e R Scatter plots of the squared residuals vs. variance predictions with a regression line superimposed are as follows: 10
11 Which of the two models, if any, can be considered to be a valid prediction tool? Apart from the estimates of the two sets of regression coefficients, do the two plots reveal additional information to back up your judgement on the relative merits of the two models? Make sure to clearly justify your answers. Both models should be rejected because they provide biased and inefficient (i.e., not moving one-to-one with target values) forecasts. In particular, in the case of model A, we have: t reject null of a t reject null of b Clearly, in this case to test the joint null of a = 0 and b = 1 using an F-test will lead to a rejection. Moreover, with all its limitations, the R-square in this case is largely disappointing. The left panel of the picture also shows an interesting phenomenon: in a non-negligible fraction of the sample, recorded variance is large and exceeds 20 (careful, this is not a percentage!) but the model predicts a variance of almost zero, which is a reason for concern; in a few cases, we also record the opposite pattern: the recorded squared error is small and a below 1-2, but model A returns predictions that exceed 5 or even 10, see the green circles in the copy of the figures below. Of course, these regularities contribute to a rather small regression R-square. In the case of model B, we have: t reject null of a t reject null of b Clearly, in this case to test the joint null of a = 0 and b = 1 using an F-test will lead to a rejection. However, the R-square of this regression is not as low and disappointing as the one we have gotten for model B, and corresponds to almost the maximum one may hope to get with this type of data. This is qualitatively confirmed by the rightmost plot of the figure, in which high squared residuals are always matched by non-zero a substantial variance predictions: when variance will be high, the model will forecast that. However, remains visible and actually gets even stronger (see orange circle) the second type of bias: in a considerable fraction of the sample, the recorded squared error is small and a below 1-2, but model B returns predictions that exceed 5 or even 10, which implies that a fraction of the time, mode B predicts a high variance that fails to materialize in the data. 11
12 Question 3.C (2.5 points) In the case of model B, Mindy proceeds then to look for ways to improve the model and its predictive performance. She obtains the following evidence: 12
13 Keep in mind that model B has been estimated assuming that the standardized shocks are drawn from a t-student distribution, which justifies the selection of benchmark in the kernel density plot (third plot going clockwise). What is your advice to Mindy as to ways to improve the predictive power of model B? Make sure to clearly justify your answer. In fact, it all looks rather good apart from one piece of evidence: the kernel density comparison and especially the quantile-quantile plot reveal that the t-student inflates the tails of the predicted density excessively given the tail thickness expressed by the data (also because the estimated number of degrees of freedom, less than 8, appears to be really small). On the contrary there is no evidence that any residual ARCH structure is left in the data or of asymmetries that are not captured (see the kernel plot), even though further tests for asymmetries using the LM principles or news impact curves might be explored. Finally, note that one piece of evidence is rather redundant and unhelpful the histogram provides the background to test for normality, but there is no presumption here that the data may come from a Gaussian distribution. Question 4 (4 points) Consider the following QML estimates for a Gaussian GARCH(1,1)-DCC(1,1) with correlation targeting, applied to the bivariate vector time series of bitcoin and ripple cryptocurrency returns (p-values are in parentheses): r ε σ., z r ε q, z z z σ., q,., where ε r, estimated constant mean. Is the process for the auxiliary variable q stationary? Can you compute the implied, estimated value of the constant in the process for q,, given that correlation targeting has been applied? What guarantees that the implied DCC correlation ρ,, q q,, q always falls in the interval [-1, +1]? Finally, illustrate the difference between the two processes: σ, ε σ,..., , q. z. q Will they return identical values? What is the meaning of them being different and what does that imply? Yes, the process for the auxiliary variable q, is stationary because = < 1. Yes, it is easy to compute the implied, estimated value of the constant in the process for q,, given that correlation targeting has been applied: ω, What guarantees that the implied DCC correlation
14 ρ,, q q,, q falls in the interval [-1, +1] is the very functional form adopted, i.e., the fact that, , q, q. z. z q. q,.. This is in fact the meaning and interest in the auxiliary variable. See posted lecture notes for a proof of the reason. The two processes: σ, ε σ,..., , q. z. q are different and will not return identical values. This is clear from the fact that q, ε /σ, q,.. so that, even if we set q, =σ,, q, σ, σ, 0.104ε 0.872σ, will in general fail to equal σ, 0.848σ, 0.151ε These are different, and they must be kept so, to ensure that ρ, q, q,, q yields predicted correlations in [-1, +1]. As discussed in the lectures, this is the inconsistency of the DCC approach: it is as if two different notions of conditional variance are used by the same model contemporaneously. Moreover, in this specific case, note that while the two individual GARCH models have been estimated without imposing variance targeting, correlation targeting has appeared in the DCC model, and this generates additional inconsistencies. Question 5 (4 points) After having explained in what kind of reactions to the problem of structural instability in econometric relationships it is possible to classify Markov regime switching models, proceed to illustrate the structure and statistical features of a bivariate MSIH(2,0) model, i.e., a model with no VAR components but in which the covariance matrix is regime switching. Will a MSIH(2,0) induce unconditional skewness and kurtosis in the implied predictive density obtained from model estimates? The MSIH(2,0) model requested is a special case (with two regimes instead of three) of the 14
15 example discussed in the lectures: The comments on the statistical features may require that you provide some details along the following lines: 15
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (42 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Questions
More informationAmath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics
Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics Eric Zivot April 29, 2013 Lecture Outline The Leverage Effect Asymmetric GARCH Models Forecasts from Asymmetric GARCH Models GARCH Models with
More informationLecture 9: Markov and Regime
Lecture 9: Markov and Regime Switching Models Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2017 Overview Motivation Deterministic vs. Endogeneous, Stochastic Switching Dummy Regressiom Switching
More informationLecture 6: Non Normal Distributions
Lecture 6: Non Normal Distributions and their Uses in GARCH Modelling Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2015 Overview Non-normalities in (standardized) residuals from asset return
More informationLecture 8: Markov and Regime
Lecture 8: Markov and Regime Switching Models Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2016 Overview Motivation Deterministic vs. Endogeneous, Stochastic Switching Dummy Regressiom Switching
More informationThe University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (40 points) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Describe
More informationFinancial Times Series. Lecture 6
Financial Times Series Lecture 6 Extensions of the GARCH There are numerous extensions of the GARCH Among the more well known are EGARCH (Nelson 1991) and GJR (Glosten et al 1993) Both models allow for
More informationFinancial Econometrics
Financial Econometrics Volatility Gerald P. Dwyer Trinity College, Dublin January 2013 GPD (TCD) Volatility 01/13 1 / 37 Squared log returns for CRSP daily GPD (TCD) Volatility 01/13 2 / 37 Absolute value
More informationFinancial Econometrics Lecture 5: Modelling Volatility and Correlation
Financial Econometrics Lecture 5: Modelling Volatility and Correlation Dayong Zhang Research Institute of Economics and Management Autumn, 2011 Learning Outcomes Discuss the special features of financial
More informationThe University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (40 points) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Consider
More information12. Conditional heteroscedastic models (ARCH) MA6622, Ernesto Mordecki, CityU, HK, 2006.
12. Conditional heteroscedastic models (ARCH) MA6622, Ernesto Mordecki, CityU, HK, 2006. References for this Lecture: Robert F. Engle. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance
More informationBooth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Midterm Problem A: (30 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. Each question has
More informationFinancial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford
Financial Econometrics Notes Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford Monday 15 th January, 2018 2 This version: 22:52, Monday 15 th January, 2018 2018 Kevin Sheppard ii Contents 1 Probability, Random Variables
More informationThe Great Moderation Flattens Fat Tails: Disappearing Leptokurtosis
The Great Moderation Flattens Fat Tails: Disappearing Leptokurtosis WenShwo Fang Department of Economics Feng Chia University 100 WenHwa Road, Taichung, TAIWAN Stephen M. Miller* College of Business University
More informationResearch Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2009, Article ID 743685, 9 pages doi:10.1155/2009/743685 Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and
More informationThe University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 410, Spring Quarter 010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (4 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Questions 1
More informationVolatility Clustering of Fine Wine Prices assuming Different Distributions
Volatility Clustering of Fine Wine Prices assuming Different Distributions Cynthia Royal Tori, PhD Valdosta State University Langdale College of Business 1500 N. Patterson Street, Valdosta, GA USA 31698
More informationCross-Sectional Distribution of GARCH Coefficients across S&P 500 Constituents : Time-Variation over the Period
Cahier de recherche/working Paper 13-13 Cross-Sectional Distribution of GARCH Coefficients across S&P 500 Constituents : Time-Variation over the Period 2000-2012 David Ardia Lennart F. Hoogerheide Mai/May
More informationStatistical Analysis of Data from the Stock Markets. UiO-STK4510 Autumn 2015
Statistical Analysis of Data from the Stock Markets UiO-STK4510 Autumn 2015 Sampling Conventions We observe the price process S of some stock (or stock index) at times ft i g i=0,...,n, we denote it by
More informationGraduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam
Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (30 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Suppose that
More informationBooth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2014, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2014, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Midterm Problem A: (30 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. Each question has
More informationDownside Risk: Implications for Financial Management Robert Engle NYU Stern School of Business Carlos III, May 24,2004
Downside Risk: Implications for Financial Management Robert Engle NYU Stern School of Business Carlos III, May 24,2004 WHAT IS ARCH? Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Predictive (conditional)
More informationModel Construction & Forecast Based Portfolio Allocation:
QBUS6830 Financial Time Series and Forecasting Model Construction & Forecast Based Portfolio Allocation: Is Quantitative Method Worth It? Members: Bowei Li (303083) Wenjian Xu (308077237) Xiaoyun Lu (3295347)
More informationLecture 5a: ARCH Models
Lecture 5a: ARCH Models 1 2 Big Picture 1. We use ARMA model for the conditional mean 2. We use ARCH model for the conditional variance 3. ARMA and ARCH model can be used together to describe both conditional
More informationBooth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2016, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2016, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Midterm Problem A: (30 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. Each question has
More informationGARCH Models. Instructor: G. William Schwert
APS 425 Fall 2015 GARCH Models Instructor: G. William Schwert 585-275-2470 schwert@schwert.ssb.rochester.edu Autocorrelated Heteroskedasticity Suppose you have regression residuals Mean = 0, not autocorrelated
More informationBayesian Estimation of the Markov-Switching GARCH(1,1) Model with Student-t Innovations
Bayesian Estimation of the Markov-Switching GARCH(1,1) Model with Student-t Innovations Department of Quantitative Economics, Switzerland david.ardia@unifr.ch R/Rmetrics User and Developer Workshop, Meielisalp,
More informationLecture 5: Univariate Volatility
Lecture 5: Univariate Volatility Modellig, ARCH and GARCH Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2015 Overview Stepwise Distribution Modeling Approach Three Key Facts to Remember Volatility
More informationFINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE - MODULE 2 General Exam - June 2012
FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE - MODULE 2 General Exam - June 2012 Time Allowed: 105 Minutes Family Name (Surname). First Name. Student Number (Matr.) Please answer all the questions by choosing
More informationConditional Heteroscedasticity
1 Conditional Heteroscedasticity May 30, 2010 Junhui Qian 1 Introduction ARMA(p,q) models dictate that the conditional mean of a time series depends on past observations of the time series and the past
More informationAmath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models
Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models Eric Zivot April 24, 2013 Lecture Outline Conditional vs. Unconditional Risk Measures Empirical regularities of asset returns Engle s ARCH model Testing for ARCH
More informationForecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models
The Financial Review 37 (2002) 93--104 Forecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models Mohammad Najand Old Dominion University Abstract The study examines the relative ability
More informationLecture 1: The Econometrics of Financial Returns
Lecture 1: The Econometrics of Financial Returns Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Winter/Spring 2016 Overview General goals of the course and definition of risk(s) Predicting asset returns:
More informationThe University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2011, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam.
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2011, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (32 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Suppose
More informationARCH and GARCH models
ARCH and GARCH models Fulvio Corsi SNS Pisa 5 Dic 2011 Fulvio Corsi ARCH and () GARCH models SNS Pisa 5 Dic 2011 1 / 21 Asset prices S&P 500 index from 1982 to 2009 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200
More informationLecture Note 9 of Bus 41914, Spring Multivariate Volatility Models ChicagoBooth
Lecture Note 9 of Bus 41914, Spring 2017. Multivariate Volatility Models ChicagoBooth Reference: Chapter 7 of the textbook Estimation: use the MTS package with commands: EWMAvol, marchtest, BEKK11, dccpre,
More informationBooth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Midterm Problem A: (34 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. Each question has
More informationModeling the volatility of FTSE All Share Index Returns
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Modeling the volatility of FTSE All Share Index Returns Bayraci, Selcuk University of Exeter, Yeditepe University 27. April 2007 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28095/
More informationList of tables List of boxes List of screenshots Preface to the third edition Acknowledgements
Table of List of figures List of tables List of boxes List of screenshots Preface to the third edition Acknowledgements page xii xv xvii xix xxi xxv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is econometrics? 2 1.2 Is
More informationVolatility Models and Their Applications
HANDBOOK OF Volatility Models and Their Applications Edited by Luc BAUWENS CHRISTIAN HAFNER SEBASTIEN LAURENT WILEY A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication PREFACE CONTRIBUTORS XVII XIX [JQ VOLATILITY MODELS
More informationVolatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market
The Journal of Nepalese Business Studies Vol. V No. 1 Dec. 008 Volatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market Surya Bahadur G.C. Abstract Modeling and forecasting volatility of capital markets has been important
More informationAssicurazioni Generali: An Option Pricing Case with NAGARCH
Assicurazioni Generali: An Option Pricing Case with NAGARCH Assicurazioni Generali: Business Snapshot Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it Assicurazioni Generali SpA is an Italy-based insurance
More informationRandom Variables and Probability Distributions
Chapter 3 Random Variables and Probability Distributions Chapter Three Random Variables and Probability Distributions 3. Introduction An event is defined as the possible outcome of an experiment. In engineering
More informationFINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS PROF. MASSIMO GUIDOLIN
Massimo Guidolin Massimo.Guidolin@unibocconi.it Dept. of Finance FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS PROF. MASSIMO GUIDOLIN SECOND PART, LECTURE 1: VOLATILITY MODELS ARCH AND GARCH OVERVIEW 1) Stepwise Distribution
More informationVariance clustering. Two motivations, volatility clustering, and implied volatility
Variance modelling The simplest assumption for time series is that variance is constant. Unfortunately that assumption is often violated in actual data. In this lecture we look at the implications of time
More informationFinancial Times Series. Lecture 8
Financial Times Series Lecture 8 Nobel Prize Robert Engle got the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2003 for the ARCH model which he introduced in 1982 It turns out that in many applications there will be many
More informationFinancial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell. Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions. TA: B. B. Deng
Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions TA: B. B. Deng Unless otherwise stated, e t is iid N(0,s 2 ) 1. (12 points) Consider the three series y1, y2, y3, and y4. Match
More informationDependence Structure and Extreme Comovements in International Equity and Bond Markets
Dependence Structure and Extreme Comovements in International Equity and Bond Markets René Garcia Edhec Business School, Université de Montréal, CIRANO and CIREQ Georges Tsafack Suffolk University Measuring
More informationTHE DYNAMICS OF PRECIOUS METAL MARKETS VAR: A GARCH-TYPE APPROACH. Yue Liang Master of Science in Finance, Simon Fraser University, 2018.
THE DYNAMICS OF PRECIOUS METAL MARKETS VAR: A GARCH-TYPE APPROACH by Yue Liang Master of Science in Finance, Simon Fraser University, 2018 and Wenrui Huang Master of Science in Finance, Simon Fraser University,
More informationModeling Volatility of Price of Some Selected Agricultural Products in Ethiopia: ARIMA-GARCH Applications
Modeling Volatility of Price of Some Selected Agricultural Products in Ethiopia: ARIMA-GARCH Applications Background: Agricultural products market policies in Ethiopia have undergone dramatic changes over
More informationYafu Zhao Department of Economics East Carolina University M.S. Research Paper. Abstract
This version: July 16, 2 A Moving Window Analysis of the Granger Causal Relationship Between Money and Stock Returns Yafu Zhao Department of Economics East Carolina University M.S. Research Paper Abstract
More informationTime Invariant and Time Varying Inefficiency: Airlines Panel Data
Time Invariant and Time Varying Inefficiency: Airlines Panel Data These data are from the pre-deregulation days of the U.S. domestic airline industry. The data are an extension of Caves, Christensen, and
More informationInternet Appendix for Asymmetry in Stock Comovements: An Entropy Approach
Internet Appendix for Asymmetry in Stock Comovements: An Entropy Approach Lei Jiang Tsinghua University Ke Wu Renmin University of China Guofu Zhou Washington University in St. Louis August 2017 Jiang,
More informationProperties of the estimated five-factor model
Informationin(andnotin)thetermstructure Appendix. Additional results Greg Duffee Johns Hopkins This draft: October 8, Properties of the estimated five-factor model No stationary term structure model is
More informationFinancial Time Series Analysis (FTSA)
Financial Time Series Analysis (FTSA) Lecture 6: Conditional Heteroscedastic Models Few models are capable of generating the type of ARCH one sees in the data.... Most of these studies are best summarized
More informationOccasional Paper. Risk Measurement Illiquidity Distortions. Jiaqi Chen and Michael L. Tindall
DALLASFED Occasional Paper Risk Measurement Illiquidity Distortions Jiaqi Chen and Michael L. Tindall Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Financial Industry Studies Department Occasional Paper 12-2 December
More information1 Volatility Definition and Estimation
1 Volatility Definition and Estimation 1.1 WHAT IS VOLATILITY? It is useful to start with an explanation of what volatility is, at least for the purpose of clarifying the scope of this book. Volatility
More informationEquity Price Dynamics Before and After the Introduction of the Euro: A Note*
Equity Price Dynamics Before and After the Introduction of the Euro: A Note* Yin-Wong Cheung University of California, U.S.A. Frank Westermann University of Munich, Germany Daily data from the German and
More information20135 Theory of Finance Part I Professor Massimo Guidolin
MSc. Finance/CLEFIN 2014/2015 Edition 20135 Theory of Finance Part I Professor Massimo Guidolin A FEW SAMPLE QUESTIONS, WITH SOLUTIONS SET 2 WARNING: These are just sample questions. Please do not count
More informationKey Objectives. Module 2: The Logic of Statistical Inference. Z-scores. SGSB Workshop: Using Statistical Data to Make Decisions
SGSB Workshop: Using Statistical Data to Make Decisions Module 2: The Logic of Statistical Inference Dr. Tom Ilvento January 2006 Dr. Mugdim Pašić Key Objectives Understand the logic of statistical inference
More informationTHE INFORMATION CONTENT OF IMPLIED VOLATILITY IN AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY MARKETS. Pierre Giot 1
THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF IMPLIED VOLATILITY IN AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY MARKETS Pierre Giot 1 May 2002 Abstract In this paper we compare the incremental information content of lagged implied volatility
More informationLONG MEMORY IN VOLATILITY
LONG MEMORY IN VOLATILITY How persistent is volatility? In other words, how quickly do financial markets forget large volatility shocks? Figure 1.1, Shephard (attached) shows that daily squared returns
More informationMarket Risk Analysis Volume II. Practical Financial Econometrics
Market Risk Analysis Volume II Practical Financial Econometrics Carol Alexander John Wiley & Sons, Ltd List of Figures List of Tables List of Examples Foreword Preface to Volume II xiii xvii xx xxii xxvi
More informationAsymmetric Price Transmission: A Copula Approach
Asymmetric Price Transmission: A Copula Approach Feng Qiu University of Alberta Barry Goodwin North Carolina State University August, 212 Prepared for the AAEA meeting in Seattle Outline Asymmetric price
More informationAnalyzing Oil Futures with a Dynamic Nelson-Siegel Model
Analyzing Oil Futures with a Dynamic Nelson-Siegel Model NIELS STRANGE HANSEN & ASGER LUNDE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, AARHUS UNIVERSITY AND CENTER FOR RESEARCH
More informationA market risk model for asymmetric distributed series of return
University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong in Dubai - Papers University of Wollongong in Dubai 2012 A market risk model for asymmetric distributed series of return Kostas Giannopoulos
More informationFinancial Econometrics (FinMetrics04) Time-series Statistics Concepts Exploratory Data Analysis Testing for Normality Empirical VaR
Financial Econometrics (FinMetrics04) Time-series Statistics Concepts Exploratory Data Analysis Testing for Normality Empirical VaR Nelson Mark University of Notre Dame Fall 2017 September 11, 2017 Introduction
More informationModelling Stock Market Return Volatility: Evidence from India
Modelling Stock Market Return Volatility: Evidence from India Saurabh Singh Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Business,Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Indore 452001 (M.P.) India Dr. L.K Tripathi Dean,
More informationIntroductory Econometrics for Finance
Introductory Econometrics for Finance SECOND EDITION Chris Brooks The ICMA Centre, University of Reading CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS List of figures List of tables List of boxes List of screenshots Preface
More informationOil Price Effects on Exchange Rate and Price Level: The Case of South Korea
Oil Price Effects on Exchange Rate and Price Level: The Case of South Korea Mirzosaid SULTONOV 東北公益文科大学総合研究論集第 34 号抜刷 2018 年 7 月 30 日発行 研究論文 Oil Price Effects on Exchange Rate and Price Level: The Case
More informationChapter 4 Level of Volatility in the Indian Stock Market
Chapter 4 Level of Volatility in the Indian Stock Market Measurement of volatility is an important issue in financial econometrics. The main reason for the prominent role that volatility plays in financial
More informationSTA2601. Tutorial letter 105/2/2018. Applied Statistics II. Semester 2. Department of Statistics STA2601/105/2/2018 TRIAL EXAMINATION PAPER
STA2601/105/2/2018 Tutorial letter 105/2/2018 Applied Statistics II STA2601 Semester 2 Department of Statistics TRIAL EXAMINATION PAPER Define tomorrow. university of south africa Dear Student Congratulations
More informationThis homework assignment uses the material on pages ( A moving average ).
Module 2: Time series concepts HW Homework assignment: equally weighted moving average This homework assignment uses the material on pages 14-15 ( A moving average ). 2 Let Y t = 1/5 ( t + t-1 + t-2 +
More informationChapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis. () Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis 1 / 29
Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis () Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis 1 / 29 Time-Series Time-series is a sequence fx 1, x 2,..., x T g or fx t g, t = 1,..., T, where t is an index denoting
More informationBusiness Statistics 41000: Probability 3
Business Statistics 41000: Probability 3 Drew D. Creal University of Chicago, Booth School of Business February 7 and 8, 2014 1 Class information Drew D. Creal Email: dcreal@chicagobooth.edu Office: 404
More informationLecture 6: Univariate Volatility
Lecture 6: Univariate Volatility Modelling, ARCH and GARCH Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2017 Overview Stepwise Distribution Modeling Approach Three Key Facts to Remember Volatility
More informationThe Analysis of ICBC Stock Based on ARMA-GARCH Model
Volume 04 - Issue 08 August 2018 PP. 11-16 The Analysis of ICBC Stock Based on ARMA-GARCH Model Si-qin LIU 1 Hong-guo SUN 1* 1 (Department of Mathematics and Finance Hunan University of Humanities Science
More informationAsian Economic and Financial Review A REGRESSION BASED APPROACH TO CAPTURING THE LEVEL DEPENDENCE IN THE VOLATILITY OF STOCK RETURNS
Asian Economic and Financial Review ISSN(e): 2222-6737/ISSN(p): 2305-2147 URL: www.aessweb.com A REGRESSION BASED APPROACH TO CAPTURING THE LEVEL DEPENDENCE IN THE VOLATILITY OF STOCK RETURNS Lakshmi Padmakumari
More informationAn Implementation of Markov Regime Switching GARCH Models in Matlab
An Implementation of Markov Regime Switching GARCH Models in Matlab Thomas Chuffart Aix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), CNRS & EHESS Abstract MSGtool is a MATLAB toolbox which
More informationRisk Management and Time Series
IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management Spring 2016 c 2016 by Martin Haugh Risk Management and Time Series Time series models are often employed in risk management applications. They can be used to estimate
More informationI. Return Calculations (20 pts, 4 points each)
University of Washington Winter 015 Department of Economics Eric Zivot Econ 44 Midterm Exam Solutions This is a closed book and closed note exam. However, you are allowed one page of notes (8.5 by 11 or
More informationFORECASTING PERFORMANCE OF MARKOV-SWITCHING GARCH MODELS: A LARGE-SCALE EMPIRICAL STUDY
FORECASTING PERFORMANCE OF MARKOV-SWITCHING GARCH MODELS: A LARGE-SCALE EMPIRICAL STUDY Latest version available on SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2918413 Keven Bluteau Kris Boudt Leopoldo Catania R/Finance
More informationBeyond the Black-Scholes-Merton model
Econophysics Lecture Leiden, November 5, 2009 Overview 1 Limitations of the Black-Scholes model 2 3 4 Limitations of the Black-Scholes model Black-Scholes model Good news: it is a nice, well-behaved model
More informationAn Empirical Research on Chinese Stock Market Volatility Based. on Garch
Volume 04 - Issue 07 July 2018 PP. 15-23 An Empirical Research on Chinese Stock Market Volatility Based on Garch Ya Qian Zhu 1, Wen huili* 1 (Department of Mathematics and Finance, Hunan University of
More informationStatistical Inference and Methods
Department of Mathematics Imperial College London d.stephens@imperial.ac.uk http://stats.ma.ic.ac.uk/ das01/ 14th February 2006 Part VII Session 7: Volatility Modelling Session 7: Volatility Modelling
More informationTime series: Variance modelling
Time series: Variance modelling Bernt Arne Ødegaard 5 October 018 Contents 1 Motivation 1 1.1 Variance clustering.......................... 1 1. Relation to heteroskedasticity.................... 3 1.3
More informationMEASURING PORTFOLIO RISKS USING CONDITIONAL COPULA-AR-GARCH MODEL
MEASURING PORTFOLIO RISKS USING CONDITIONAL COPULA-AR-GARCH MODEL Isariya Suttakulpiboon MSc in Risk Management and Insurance Georgia State University, 30303 Atlanta, Georgia Email: suttakul.i@gmail.com,
More informationStudy on Dynamic Risk Measurement Based on ARMA-GJR-AL Model
Applied and Computational Mathematics 5; 4(3): 6- Published online April 3, 5 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/acm) doi:.648/j.acm.543.3 ISSN: 38-565 (Print); ISSN: 38-563 (Online) Study on Dynamic
More informationA Simplified Approach to the Conditional Estimation of Value at Risk (VAR)
A Simplified Approach to the Conditional Estimation of Value at Risk (VAR) by Giovanni Barone-Adesi(*) Faculty of Business University of Alberta and Center for Mathematical Trading and Finance, City University
More informationEstimating Bivariate GARCH-Jump Model Based on High Frequency Data : the case of revaluation of Chinese Yuan in July 2005
Estimating Bivariate GARCH-Jump Model Based on High Frequency Data : the case of revaluation of Chinese Yuan in July 2005 Xinhong Lu, Koichi Maekawa, Ken-ichi Kawai July 2006 Abstract This paper attempts
More informationIndian Institute of Management Calcutta. Working Paper Series. WPS No. 797 March Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta Working Paper Series WPS No. 797 March 2017 Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models Vivek Rajvanshi Assistant Professor, Indian Institute of Management
More informationA gentle introduction to the RM 2006 methodology
A gentle introduction to the RM 2006 methodology Gilles Zumbach RiskMetrics Group Av. des Morgines 12 1213 Petit-Lancy Geneva, Switzerland gilles.zumbach@riskmetrics.com Initial version: August 2006 This
More informationMarket Risk Management for Financial Institutions Based on GARCH Family Models
Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Spring 5-2017 Market Risk Management for Financial Institutions
More informationARCH Models and Financial Applications
Christian Gourieroux ARCH Models and Financial Applications With 26 Figures Springer Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Development of ARCH Models 1 1.2 Book Content 4 2 Linear and Nonlinear Processes 5
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET) ISSN 0976-6480 (Print) ISSN 0976-6499 (Online) Volume 5, Issue 3, March (204), pp. 73-82 IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijaret.asp
More informationCorresponding author: Gregory C Chow,
Co-movements of Shanghai and New York stock prices by time-varying regressions Gregory C Chow a, Changjiang Liu b, Linlin Niu b,c a Department of Economics, Fisher Hall Princeton University, Princeton,
More informationExample 1 of econometric analysis: the Market Model
Example 1 of econometric analysis: the Market Model IGIDR, Bombay 14 November, 2008 The Market Model Investors want an equation predicting the return from investing in alternative securities. Return is
More informationProperties of financail time series GARCH(p,q) models Risk premium and ARCH-M models Leverage effects and asymmetric GARCH models.
5 III Properties of financail time series GARCH(p,q) models Risk premium and ARCH-M models Leverage effects and asymmetric GARCH models 1 ARCH: Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Conditional
More informationHypothesis Tests: One Sample Mean Cal State Northridge Ψ320 Andrew Ainsworth PhD
Hypothesis Tests: One Sample Mean Cal State Northridge Ψ320 Andrew Ainsworth PhD MAJOR POINTS Sampling distribution of the mean revisited Testing hypotheses: sigma known An example Testing hypotheses:
More informationLinda Allen, Jacob Boudoukh and Anthony Saunders, Understanding Market, Credit and Operational Risk: The Value at Risk Approach
P1.T4. Valuation & Risk Models Linda Allen, Jacob Boudoukh and Anthony Saunders, Understanding Market, Credit and Operational Risk: The Value at Risk Approach Bionic Turtle FRM Study Notes Reading 26 By
More information