Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Risk Measures
|
|
- Elisabeth Thompson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Risk Measures Prof. Daniel P. Palomar The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) MAFS6010R- Portfolio Optimization with R MSc in Financial Mathematics Fall , HKUST, Hong Kong
2 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
3 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
4 Motivation The Markowitz portfolio has never been embraced by practitioners, among other reasons because 1 variance is not a good measure of risk in practice since it penalizes both the unwanted high losses and the desired low losses: the solution is to use alternative measures for risk, e.g., VaR and CVaR, 2 it is highly sensitive to parameter estimation errors (i.e., to the covariance matrix Σ and especially to the mean vector µ): solution is robust optimization, 3 it only considers the risk of the portfolio as a whole and ignores the risk diversification: solution is the risk-parity portfolio. We will here consider more meaningful measures for risk than the variance, like the downside risk (DR), Value-at-Risk (VaR), Conditional VaR (CVaR) or Expected Shortfall (ES), and drawdown (DD). D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 4 / 58
5 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
6 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
7 Returns Let us denote the log-returns of N assets at time t with the vector r t R N. The time index t can denote any arbitrary period such as days, weeks, months, 5-min intervals, etc. F t 1 denotes the previous historical data. Econometrics aims at modeling r t conditional on F t 1. r t is a multivariate stochastic process with conditional mean and covariance matrix denoted as 1 µ t E [r t F t 1 ] Σ t Cov [r t F t 1 ] = E [(r t µ t )(r t µ t ) T F t 1 ]. 1 Y. Feng and D. P. Palomar, A Signal Processing Perspective on Financial Engineering. Foundations and Trends in Signal Processing, Now Publishers, D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 7 / 58
8 I.I.D. Model For simplicity we will assume that r t follows an i.i.d. distribution (which is not very innacurate in general). That is, both the conditional mean and conditional covariance are constant µ t = µ, Σ t = Σ. Very simple model, however, it is one of the most fundamental assumptions for many important works, e.g., the Nobel prize-winning Markowitz portfolio theory 2. 2 H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Financ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp , D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 8 / 58
9 Parameter Estimation Consider the i.i.d. model: r t = µ + w t, where µ R N is the mean and w t R N is an i.i.d. process with zero mean and constant covariance matrix Σ. The mean vector µ and covariance matrix Σ have to be estimated in practice based on T observations. The simplest estimator is the sample estimator: sample mean estimator: ˆµ = 1 T T t=1 r t sample covariance matrix: ˆΣ = 1 T 1 T t=1 (r t ˆµ)(r t ˆµ) T. Many more sophisticated estimators exist, namely: shrinkage estimators, Black-Litterman estimators, etc. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 9 / 58
10 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
11 Portfolio Return Suppose the budget is B dollars. The portfolio w R N denotes the normalized weights of the assets such that 1 T w = 1 (then Bw denotes dollars invested in the assets). For each asset, the initial wealth is Bw i and the end wealth is Then the portfolio return is Bw i (p i,t /p i,t 1 ) = Bw i (R it + 1). R p t = Ni=1 Bw i (R it + 1) B B N N = w i R it w i r it = w T r t i=1 i=1 The portfolio expected return and variance are w T µ and w T Σw, respectively. 3 3 G. Cornuejols and R. Tütüncü, Optimization Methods in Finance. Cambridge University Press, D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 11 / 58
12 Performance Measures Expected return: w T µ Volatility: w T Σw Sharpe Ratio (SR): expected return per unit of risk SR = wt µ r f w T Σw where r f is the risk-free rate (e.g., interest rate on a three-month U.S. Treasury bill). Information Ratio (IR): IR = wt µ w T Σw Drawdown (DD): decline from a historical peak of the cumulative profit X(t): D(t) = max 1 τ t X(τ) X(t) (unnormalized) VaR (Value at Risk) ES (Expected Shortfall) or CVaR (Conditional Value at Risk) D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 12 / 58
13 Practical Constraints Capital budget constraint: w T 1 = 1. Long-only constraint: Market-neutral constraint: w 0. w T 1 = 0. Turnover constraint: w w 0 1 u where w 0 is the currently held portfolio. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 13 / 58
14 Practical Constraints Holding constraint: l w u where l R N and u R N are lower and upper bounds of the asset positions, respectively. Cardinality constraint: Leverage constraint: w 0 K. w 1 2. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 14 / 58
15 Risk Control In finance, the expected return w T µ is very relevant as it quantifies the average benefit. However, in practice, the average performance is not enough to characterize an investment and one needs to control the probability of going bankrupt. Risk measures control how risky an investment strategy is. The most basic measure of risk is given by the variance 4 : a higher variance means that there are large peaks in the distribution which may cause a big loss. There are more sophisticated risk measures such as downside risk, VaR, ES, drawdown, etc. 4 H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Financ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp , D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 15 / 58
16 Mean-Variance Tradeoff The mean return w T µ and the variance (risk) w T Σw constitute two important performance measures. Usually, the higher the mean return the higher the variance and vice-versa. Thus, we are faced with two objectives to be optimized: it is a multi-objective optimization problem. They define a fundamental mean-variance tradeoff curve (Pareto curve). The choice of a specific point in this tradeoff curve depends on how agressive or risk-averse the investor is. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 16 / 58
17 Markowitz mean-variance portfolio (1952) The idea of the Markowitz framework 5 is to find a trade-off between the expected return w T µ and the risk of the portfolio measured by the variance w T Σw: maximize w w T µ λw T Σw subject to 1 T w = 1 where w T 1 = 1 is the capital budget constraint and λ is a parameter that controls how risk-averse the investor is. This is a convex QP with only one linear constraint which admits a closed-form solution: w = 1 2λ Σ 1 (µ + ν 1), where ν is the optimal dual variable ν = 2λ 1T Σ 1 µ. 1 T Σ H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Financ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp , D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 17 / 58
18 Global Minimum Variance Portfolio (GMVP) The global minimum variance portfolio (GMVP) ignores the expected return and focuses on the risk only: minimize w w T Σw subject to 1 T w = 1. It is a simple convex QP with solution w GMVP = 1 1 T Σ 1 1 Σ 1 1. It is widely used in academic papers for simplicity of evaluation and comparison of different estimators of the covariance matrix Σ (while ignoring the estimation of µ). D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 18 / 58
19 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
20 Drawbacks of Markowitz s formulation The Markowitz portfolio has never been embraced by practitioners, among other reasons because 1 variance is not a good measure of risk in practice since it penalizes both the unwanted high losses and the desired low losses: the solution is to use alternative measures for risk, e.g., VaR and CVaR, 2 it is highly sensitive to parameter estimation errors (i.e., to the covariance matrix Σ and especially to the mean vector µ): solution is robust optimization, 3 it only considers the risk of the portfolio as a whole and ignores the risk diversification: solution is the risk-parity portfolio. We will here consider more meaningful measures for risk than the variance, like the downside risk (DR), Value-at-Risk (VaR), Conditional VaR (CVaR) or Expected Shortfall (ES), and drawdown (DD). D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 20 / 58
21 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
22 Variance as risk measure In finance, the mean return is very relevant as it quantifies the average benefit of the investment. However, in practice, the average performance is not good enough and one needs to control the probability of going bankrupt. Risk measures control how risky an investment strategy is. The most basic measure of risk is the variance as considered by Markowitz in 1952: 6 a higher variance means that there are large peaks in the risk distribution which may cause a big loss. However, Markowitz himself already recognized and stressed the limitations of the mean-variance analysis H. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Financ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp , H. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley, D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 22 / 58
23 Alternatives to variance as risk measure Variance is not a good measure of risk in practice since it penalizes both the unwanted high losses and the desired low losses (or gains). 8 Indeed, the mean-variance portfolio framework penalizes up-side and down-side risk equally, whereas most investors don t mind up-side risk. To overcome the limitations of the variance as risk measure, a number of alternative risk measures have been proposed, for example: Downside Risk (DR) Value-at-Risk (VaR) Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) Drawdown (DD): maximum DD average DD Conditional Drawdown at Risk (CDaR) 8 A. McNeil, R. Frey, and P. Embrechts, Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton University Press, D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 23 / 58
24 Downside Risk (DR) Let R be a random variable representing the return of an asset or portfolio (e.g., R = w T r where r denotes the vector of random returns of the assets). We are familiar with the mean return µ = E[R] and with the variance σ 2 = E[(R µ) 2 ]. The idea of downside risk is that the left-handside of the return distribution involves risk while the right-handside contains the better investment opportunities. Interest in downside risk arose in the early 1950s. One example is the semi-variance, already considered by Markowitz in The semi-variance measures the variability of the returns below the mean H. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley, D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 24 / 58
25 LPM and semivariance The semivariance is a special case of the more general lower partial moments (LPM): LPM = E [ ((τ R) + ) α ], where ( ) + = max(0, ). The parameter τ is termed the disaster level. The parameter α reflects the investor s feeling about the relative consequences of falling short of τ by various amounts: the value α = 1 (which suits a neutral investor) separates risk-seeking (0 < α < 1) from risk-averse (α > 1) behavior with regard to returns below the target τ. By changing the parameters α and τ most downside measures used in practice can be formed. In particular, setting α = 2 and τ = E[R] yields the semi-variance (or lower partial variance): SV = E [ ((E[R] R) + ) 2 ]. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 25 / 58
26 Value-at-Risk (VaR) To overcome the drawback of variance, another popular single side risk measurement is the Value-at-Risk (VaR) initially proposed by J.P. Morgan. VaR denotes the maximum loss with a specified confidence level (e.g., confidence level = 95%, period = 1 day). Let ξ be a random variable representing the loss from a portfolio over some period of time (e.g., ξ = w T r where r denotes the vector of random returns of the assets). The VaR is defined as VaR α = inf {ξ 0 : Pr (ξ ξ 0 ) α} with α the confidence level, say, α = However, this measure does not take into account losses exceeding VaR, is nonconvex, and is not subadditive. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 26 / 58
27 Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) The Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is also called Expected Shortfall (ES). The CVaR takes into account the shape of the losses exceeding the VaR through the average: CVaR α = E [ξ ξ VaR α ]. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 27 / 58
28 Drawdown The drawdown (DD) at time t is defined as the decline from a historical peak of the cumulative profit X(t). The unnormalized version is D(t) unnorm = max X(τ) X(t). 1 τ t But in practice, the normalized version is used: D(t) = HWM t X(t) HWM t where HWM t is the high water mark of X(t) defined as HWM t = max 1 τ t X(τ). D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 28 / 58
29 Drawdown S&P 500 Cumulative Return / Daily Return Drawdown Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Dec D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 29 / 58
30 Drawdown Then one can define the maximum DD (Max-DD) over a period t = 1,..., T as M(T) = max 1 t T D(t) Also the average DD (Ave-DD) over a period t = 1,..., T as A(T) = 1 T 1 t T D(t) Similarly to the CVaR, we can define the Conditional Drawdown at Risk (CDaR) as the mean of the worst 100(1 α)% drawdowns. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 30 / 58
31 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
32 Mean-downside risk portfolio Recall Markowitz mean-variance portfolio formulation: maximize w w T µ λw T Σw subject to 1 T w = 1, w 0. Instead of using the variance we can use a downside risk measure, obtaining the mean-downside risk formulation (introduced in 1977). For example, the LPM can be approximated as [ ((τ E R) + ) α ] 1 T T ( (τ Rt ) +) α where R t = w T r t. The mean-lpm portfolio formulation is the convex (depending on α) problem ( maximize w T µ λ 1 ( ) ) Tt=1 + α w T τ w T r t subject to 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 32 / 58 t=1
33 Mean-semivariance portfolio In particular, we can approximate the semivariance as [ ((E[R] E R) + ) 2 ] 1 T 1 T T ((E[R] R t ) +) 2 t=1 ( T 1 t=1 T ) + 2 T R t R t The mean-semivariance portfolio formulation is the convex QP problem t=1 ( maximize w T µ λ 1 ( ) ) Tt=1 + 2 w T w T µ w T r t subject to 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 33 / 58
34 Mean-LPM portfolio portfolio with different α s For less risk-averse investors, we can consider the mean-lpm portfolio formulation with α = 1, which is an LP: maximize w T µ λ 1 ) Tt=1 + w T (w T µ w T r t subject to 1 T w = 1, w 0. For more risk-averse investors, we can consider the mean-lpm convex portfolio formulation with α = 3: ( maximize w T µ λ 1 ( ) ) Tt=1 + 3 w T w T µ w T r t subject to 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 34 / 58
35 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
36 Mean-CVaR portfolio A portfolio formulation dealing directly with VaR and CVaR quantities is not tractable. Let f (w, r) be an arbitrary cost function, where w is the optimization variable (portfolio) and r denotes the random asset returns. Example: f (w, r) = w T r. Consider, for example, the maximization of the mean return subject to a CVaR risk constraint on the loss: maximize w subject to w T µ CVaR α (f (w, r)) c 1 T w = 1, w 0 where CVaR α (f (w, r)) = E [f (w, r) f (w, r) VaR α (f (w, r))]. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 36 / 58
37 CVaR portfolio Rockafellar and Uryasev 10 first proposed to minimize the CVaR of the portfolio loss as follows: ) minimize CVaR α (w T r w subject to 1 T w = 1, w 0 where ) ( )] CVaR α (w T r = E [w T r w T r VaR α w T r. 10 R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, J. Risk, vol. 2, pp , D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 37 / 58
38 CVaR in Convex Form Define the auxiliary convex function where [x] + = max (x, 0). F α (w, ζ) = ζ α E[ wt r ζ] +, Rockafellar and Uryasev show that 1 VaR α ( w T r) is a minimizer of F α (w, ζ) w.r.t. ζ: VaR α ( w T r) arg min F α (w, ζ). ζ 2 CVaR α ( w T r) equals minimum F α (w, ζ) w.r.t. ζ: CVaR α ( w T r) = min F α (w, ζ). ζ D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 38 / 58
39 Proof CVaR in Convex Form 1 The minimizer of F α (w, ζ) w.r.t. ζ satisfies: 0 ζ F α (w, ζ ). For example, we choose the following subgradient: 0 = s ζ F α (w, ζ ) = α { w T r>ζ }p(r)dr = 1 1 ( 1 α P w T r > ζ ), where 1 is the indicator function. Solving the above equation, we have ( P w T r > ζ ) = 1 α = ζ = VaR α ( w T r). D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 39 / 58
40 Proof CVaR in Convex Form 2 First, we have min ζ F α (w, ζ) = F α (w, ζ ) = ζ α E[ wt r ζ ] +. Recall that [ CVaR α ( w T r) = E w T r ] w T r > VaR α ( w T r) = 1 ( ) w T r p(r)dr 1 α w T r>var α( w T r) = 1 [ ] + w T r VaR α ( w T r) p(r)dr 1 α + VaR α ( w T r). D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 40 / 58
41 CVaR in Convex Form Corollary: ( ) min CVaR α w T r = min F α (w, ζ) w w,ζ In words, minimizing F α (w, ζ) simultaneously calculates the optimal CVaR and VaR. Corollary: Because w T r is convex in w for each r, then F α (w, ζ) is convex! Proof: F α (w, ζ) = ζ + 1 [ ] + w T r ζ p (r) dr. 1 α D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 41 / 58
42 Sample Average Approximation of CVaR Sample average approximation of F α (w, ζ): F α (w, ζ) = ζ α E[ wt r ζ] + ζ α T T [ w T r t ζ] +. t=1 D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 42 / 58
43 CVaR portfolio as an LP We first include the dummy variables z t : z t [ w T r t ζ] + = zt w T r t ζ, z t 0 CVaR portfolio problem can be approximated by an LP: minimize w,{z t},ζ ζ Tt=1 1 α T z t subject to 0 z t w T r t ζ, t = 1,..., T 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 43 / 58
44 Mean-CVaR portfolio as an LP We can also consider the maximization of the mean return subject to a CVaR constraint: maximize w,{z t},ζ w T µ subject to ζ + 1 Or a mean-cvar objective: maximize w,{z t},ζ 1 1 α Tt=1 T z t c 0 z t w T r t ζ, t = 1,..., T 1 T w = 1, w 0. ( w T µ λ ζ α T Tt=1 z t ) subject to 0 z t w T r t ζ, t = 1,..., T 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 44 / 58
45 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
46 Drawdown (DD) Let r(t) be the return vector of the N stocks at time t. Define the cumulative (uncompounded) return vector as r cum (t) = t r(τ) τ=1 (Note: the compounded return is t τ=1 (1 + r(τ)) 1.) The portfolio return is r p (t) = w T r(t) and cumulative return r cum p (t) = w T r cum (t) The drawdown (DD) at time t can be written as D(t) = max 1 τ t rcum p (τ) r cum (t) p D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 46 / 58
47 Max-DD, Ave-DD, and CDaR The maximum DD (Max-DD) over a period t = 1,..., T is M(T) = max 1 t T D(t) The average DD (Ave-DD) over a period t = 1,..., T is A(T) = 1 T 1 t T D(t) Similarly to the CVaR, we can define the Conditional Drawdown at Risk (CDaR) as the mean of the worst 100(1 α)% drawdowns: α (T) = 1 (1 α)t t Ω α D(t), where Ω α = {1 t T D(t) ξ α } with ξ α being the threshold such that exactly 100(1 α)% of drawdowns exceeds that limit. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 47 / 58
48 CDaR in Convex Form The CDaR can be conveniently expressed as 11 α (w) = min{ζ + 1 ζ 1 α 1 T T [D t (w) ζ] + } When α tends to 1, the CDaR tends to the maximum drawdown, i.e., t=1 1 (T) = M(T) When α tends to 0, the CDaR tends to the average drawdown, i.e., 0 (T) = A(T) 11 A. Chekhlov, S. Uryasev, and M. Zabarankin, Portfolio optimization with drawdown constraints, Research Report Available at SSRN: D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 48 / 58
49 Mean-Max-DD portfolio as an LP We can consider the maximization of the mean return subject to a Max-DD constraint: maximize w subject to w T µ max 1 t T {max 1 τ t w T r cum τ 1 T w = 1, w 0. w T r cum t } c Removing one maximum operator is trivial: maximize w subject to w T µ max 1 τ t w T r cum τ w T r cum t c, 1 t T 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 49 / 58
50 Mean-Max-DD portfolio as an LP To remove the other max operator, we need to introduce some additional variables: maximize w,{u t} subject to w T µ u t w T r cum t c, 1 t T u t w T r cum τ 1 t T, 1 τ t 1 T w = 1, w 0. We can reduce the large number of constraints by rewriting it as maximize w,{u t} subject to w T µ u t w T r cum t c, 1 t T u t w T r cum t u t u t 1 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 50 / 58
51 Mean-Max-DD portfolio as an LP We can finally write the maximization of the mean return subject to the Max-DD constraint as maximize w,{u t} subject to w T µ w T r cum t u t w T r cum t + c, 1 t T u t 1 u t 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 51 / 58
52 Mean-Ave-DD portfolio as an LP Similarly, we can consider the maximization of the mean return subject to an Ave-DD constraint: or, equivalently, maximize w,{u t} 1 subject to w T µ T Tt=1 (u t w T r cum t ) c u t w T r cum t u t 1 u t 1 T w = 1, w 0 maximize w T µ w,{u t} 1 subject to Tt=1 T u t T t=1 w T r cum t w T r cum t u t u t 1 u t 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 52 / 58 + c
53 Mean-CDaR portfolio as an LP Finally, we can consider the maximization of the mean return subject to a CDaR constraint: maximize w,ζ w T µ subject to ζ α T 1 T w = 1, w 0. Tt=1 [max 1 τ t w T r cum τ w T r cum t ζ] + c Similarly to the CVaR case, we can get rid of the [ ] + operator by introducing some additional variables: maximize w,{z t},ζ w T µ subject to ζ α Tt=1 T z t c 0 z t max 1 τ t w T r cum τ 1 T w = 1, w 0. w T r cum t ζ, t = 1,..., T D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 53 / 58
54 Mean-CDaR portfolio as an LP Similarly to the Max-DD and Ave-DD cases, we can get rid of the max operators by introducing additional variables: maximize w,{z t},ζ,{u t} w T µ subject to ζ Tt=1 1 α T z t c 0 z t u t w T r cum t ζ, t = 1,..., T w T r cum t u t u t 1 u t 1 T w = 1, w 0. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 54 / 58
55 Word of caution on DD The maximum drawdown is extremely sensitive to minute changes in the portfolio weights and to the specific time period examined. If returns are close to normally distributed, the distribution of drawdowns is just a function of the variance, so there s no need to include drawdowns explicitly in your portfolio construction objective. Minimizing variance is the same as minimizing expected drawdowns. On the other hand, if returns are very non-normal and you want to find a portfolio that minimizes the expected drawdowns, you still wouldn t choose weights that minimize historical drawdown. Why? Because minimizing historical drawdown is effectively the same as taking all your returns that weren t part of a drawdown, and hiding them from your optimizer, which will lead to portfolio weights that are a lot less accurately estimated than if you let your optimizer see all the data you have. Instead, you might just include terms in your optimization objective that penalize negative skew and penalize positive kurtosis. D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 55 / 58
56 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Warm-Up: Markowitz Portfolio Signal model Markowitz formulation Drawbacks of Markowitz portfolio 3 Alternative Measures of Risk: DR, VaR, CVaR, and DD 4 Mean-DR portfolio 5 Mean-CVaR portfolio 6 Mean-DD portfolio 7 Conclusions
57 Conclusions We have reviewed the Markowitz portfolio formulation and understood that it has many practical flaws that make it impractical. Indeed, it is not used by practitioners. We have learned about alternative measures of risk as opposed to variance: Downside risk (one particular example is the semi variance) VaR CVaR Drawdown We have formulated several portfolio designs based on downside risk, CVaR, and DD, all as LPs! D. Palomar (HKUST) CVaR Portfolio 57 / 58
58 Thanks For more information visit:
Portfolio Optimization. Prof. Daniel P. Palomar
Portfolio Optimization Prof. Daniel P. Palomar The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) MAFS6010R- Portfolio Optimization with R MSc in Financial Mathematics Fall 2018-19, HKUST, Hong
More informationIEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management
IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management Basic Concepts and Techniques of Risk Management Martin Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Email: martin.b.haugh@gmail.com
More informationQuantitative Risk Management
Quantitative Risk Management Asset Allocation and Risk Management Martin B. Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Outline Review of Mean-Variance Analysis
More informationLog-Robust Portfolio Management
Log-Robust Portfolio Management Dr. Aurélie Thiele Lehigh University Joint work with Elcin Cetinkaya and Ban Kawas Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant CMMI-0757983 Dr.
More informationPortfolio Management and Optimal Execution via Convex Optimization
Portfolio Management and Optimal Execution via Convex Optimization Enzo Busseti Stanford University April 9th, 2018 Problems portfolio management choose trades with optimization minimize risk, maximize
More informationOptimal Security Liquidation Algorithms
Optimal Security Liquidation Algorithms Sergiy Butenko Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3131, USA Alexander Golodnikov Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics,
More informationPortfolio Optimization using Conditional Sharpe Ratio
International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy Online: 2015-07-01 ISSN: 2299-3843, Vol. 53, pp 130-136 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilcpa.53.130 2015 SciPress Ltd., Switzerland Portfolio Optimization
More informationQuantitative Portfolio Theory & Performance Analysis
550.447 Quantitative ortfolio Theory & erformance Analysis Week February 18, 2013 Basic Elements of Modern ortfolio Theory Assignment For Week of February 18 th (This Week) Read: A&L, Chapter 3 (Basic
More informationMultistage risk-averse asset allocation with transaction costs
Multistage risk-averse asset allocation with transaction costs 1 Introduction Václav Kozmík 1 Abstract. This paper deals with asset allocation problems formulated as multistage stochastic programming models.
More informationRisk Reward Optimisation for Long-Run Investors: an Empirical Analysis
GoBack Risk Reward Optimisation for Long-Run Investors: an Empirical Analysis M. Gilli University of Geneva and Swiss Finance Institute E. Schumann University of Geneva AFIR / LIFE Colloquium 2009 München,
More informationCSCI 1951-G Optimization Methods in Finance Part 00: Course Logistics Introduction to Finance Optimization Problems
CSCI 1951-G Optimization Methods in Finance Part 00: Course Logistics Introduction to Finance Optimization Problems January 26, 2018 1 / 24 Basic information All information is available in the syllabus
More informationOptimization Models in Financial Mathematics
Optimization Models in Financial Mathematics John R. Birge Northwestern University www.iems.northwestern.edu/~jrbirge Illinois Section MAA, April 3, 2004 1 Introduction Trends in financial mathematics
More informationRobust Portfolio Optimization with Derivative Insurance Guarantees
Robust Portfolio Optimization with Derivative Insurance Guarantees Steve Zymler Berç Rustem Daniel Kuhn Department of Computing Imperial College London Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization Optimal Asset
More informationPortfolio Risk Management and Linear Factor Models
Chapter 9 Portfolio Risk Management and Linear Factor Models 9.1 Portfolio Risk Measures There are many quantities introduced over the years to measure the level of risk that a portfolio carries, and each
More informationEvaluation of proportional portfolio insurance strategies
Evaluation of proportional portfolio insurance strategies Prof. Dr. Antje Mahayni Department of Accounting and Finance, Mercator School of Management, University of Duisburg Essen 11th Scientific Day of
More informationThe Optimization Process: An example of portfolio optimization
ISyE 6669: Deterministic Optimization The Optimization Process: An example of portfolio optimization Shabbir Ahmed Fall 2002 1 Introduction Optimization can be roughly defined as a quantitative approach
More informationEE365: Risk Averse Control
EE365: Risk Averse Control Risk averse optimization Exponential risk aversion Risk averse control 1 Outline Risk averse optimization Exponential risk aversion Risk averse control Risk averse optimization
More informationPORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén
PORTFOLIO THEORY Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Portfolio Theory Investments 1 / 60 Outline 1 Modern Portfolio Theory Introduction Mean-Variance
More informationWhere Has All the Value Gone? Portfolio risk optimization using CVaR
Where Has All the Value Gone? Portfolio risk optimization using CVaR Jonathan Sterbanz April 27, 2005 1 Introduction Corporate securities are widely used as a means to boost the value of asset portfolios;
More informationMean Variance Analysis and CAPM
Mean Variance Analysis and CAPM Yan Zeng Version 1.0.2, last revised on 2012-05-30. Abstract A summary of mean variance analysis in portfolio management and capital asset pricing model. 1. Mean-Variance
More informationApplications of Linear Programming
Applications of Linear Programming lecturer: András London University of Szeged Institute of Informatics Department of Computational Optimization Lecture 8 The portfolio selection problem The portfolio
More informationTechniques for Calculating the Efficient Frontier
Techniques for Calculating the Efficient Frontier Weerachart Kilenthong RIPED, UTCC c Kilenthong 2017 Tee (Riped) Introduction 1 / 43 Two Fund Theorem The Two-Fund Theorem states that we can reach any
More informationMulti-period mean variance asset allocation: Is it bad to win the lottery?
Multi-period mean variance asset allocation: Is it bad to win the lottery? Peter Forsyth 1 D.M. Dang 1 1 Cheriton School of Computer Science University of Waterloo Guangzhou, July 28, 2014 1 / 29 The Basic
More informationMulti-Period Trading via Convex Optimization
Multi-Period Trading via Convex Optimization Stephen Boyd Enzo Busseti Steven Diamond Ronald Kahn Kwangmoo Koh Peter Nystrup Jan Speth Stanford University & Blackrock City University of Hong Kong September
More informationMean Variance Portfolio Theory
Chapter 1 Mean Variance Portfolio Theory This book is about portfolio construction and risk analysis in the real-world context where optimization is done with constraints and penalties specified by the
More informationWeek 2 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals
Week 2 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals Christopher Ting http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/christophert/ Christopher Ting : christopherting@smu.edu.sg :
More informationWorst-Case Value-at-Risk of Non-Linear Portfolios
Worst-Case Value-at-Risk of Non-Linear Portfolios Steve Zymler Daniel Kuhn Berç Rustem Department of Computing Imperial College London Portfolio Optimization Consider a market consisting of m assets. Optimal
More informationFinancial Giffen Goods: Examples and Counterexamples
Financial Giffen Goods: Examples and Counterexamples RolfPoulsen and Kourosh Marjani Rasmussen Abstract In the basic Markowitz and Merton models, a stock s weight in efficient portfolios goes up if its
More informationMinimum Risk vs. Capital and Risk Diversification strategies for portfolio construction
Minimum Risk vs. Capital and Risk Diversification strategies for portfolio construction F. Cesarone 1 S. Colucci 2 1 Università degli Studi Roma Tre francesco.cesarone@uniroma3.it 2 Symphonia Sgr - Torino
More informationVaR vs CVaR in Risk Management and Optimization
VaR vs CVaR in Risk Management and Optimization Stan Uryasev Joint presentation with Sergey Sarykalin, Gaia Serraino and Konstantin Kalinchenko Risk Management and Financial Engineering Lab, University
More informationThe mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations
The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20135 Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2014 Outline and objectives The backward, three-step solution
More informationLECTURE NOTES 10 ARIEL M. VIALE
LECTURE NOTES 10 ARIEL M VIALE 1 Behavioral Asset Pricing 11 Prospect theory based asset pricing model Barberis, Huang, and Santos (2001) assume a Lucas pure-exchange economy with three types of assets:
More informationMarkowitz portfolio theory
Markowitz portfolio theory Farhad Amu, Marcus Millegård February 9, 2009 1 Introduction Optimizing a portfolio is a major area in nance. The objective is to maximize the yield and simultaneously minimize
More informationCharacterization of the Optimum
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Notes for lectures 5. Portfolio Allocation with One Riskless, One Risky Asset Characterization of the Optimum Consider a risk-averse, expected-utility-maximizing
More informationOptimal Portfolio Inputs: Various Methods
Optimal Portfolio Inputs: Various Methods Prepared by Kevin Pei for The Fund @ Sprott Abstract: In this document, I will model and back test our portfolio with various proposed models. It goes without
More informationu (x) < 0. and if you believe in diminishing return of the wealth, then you would require
Chapter 8 Markowitz Portfolio Theory 8.7 Investor Utility Functions People are always asked the question: would more money make you happier? The answer is usually yes. The next question is how much more
More informationChapter 8. Markowitz Portfolio Theory. 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance
Chapter 8 Markowitz Portfolio Theory 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance The main question in portfolio theory is the following: Given an initial capital V (0), and opportunities (buy or sell) in N securities
More informationScenario-Based Value-at-Risk Optimization
Scenario-Based Value-at-Risk Optimization Oleksandr Romanko Quantitative Research Group, Algorithmics Incorporated, an IBM Company Joint work with Helmut Mausser Fields Industrial Optimization Seminar
More informationLecture 1: The Econometrics of Financial Returns
Lecture 1: The Econometrics of Financial Returns Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Winter/Spring 2016 Overview General goals of the course and definition of risk(s) Predicting asset returns:
More informationPORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION
Chapter 16 PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION Sebastian Ceria and Kartik Sivaramakrishnan a) INTRODUCTION Every portfolio manager faces the challenge of building portfolios that achieve an optimal tradeoff between
More informationMathematics in Finance
Mathematics in Finance Steven E. Shreve Department of Mathematical Sciences Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA shreve@andrew.cmu.edu A Talk in the Series Probability in Science and Industry
More informationMartingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models
IEOR E4707: Foundations of Financial Engineering c 206 by Martin Haugh Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models These notes develop the theory of martingale pricing in a discrete-time,
More informationLecture IV Portfolio management: Efficient portfolios. Introduction to Finance Mathematics Fall Financial mathematics
Lecture IV Portfolio management: Efficient portfolios. Introduction to Finance Mathematics Fall 2014 Reduce the risk, one asset Let us warm up by doing an exercise. We consider an investment with σ 1 =
More informationA Simple, Adjustably Robust, Dynamic Portfolio Policy under Expected Return Ambiguity
A Simple, Adjustably Robust, Dynamic Portfolio Policy under Expected Return Ambiguity Mustafa Ç. Pınar Department of Industrial Engineering Bilkent University 06800 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey March 16, 2012
More informationExtend the ideas of Kan and Zhou paper on Optimal Portfolio Construction under parameter uncertainty
Extend the ideas of Kan and Zhou paper on Optimal Portfolio Construction under parameter uncertainty George Photiou Lincoln College University of Oxford A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment for
More informationCHAPTER II LITERATURE STUDY
CHAPTER II LITERATURE STUDY 2.1. Risk Management Monetary crisis that strike Indonesia during 1998 and 1999 has caused bad impact to numerous government s and commercial s bank. Most of those banks eventually
More informationOptimal Portfolio Selection Under the Estimation Risk in Mean Return
Optimal Portfolio Selection Under the Estimation Risk in Mean Return by Lei Zhu A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics
More informationOPTIMIZATION METHODS IN FINANCE
OPTIMIZATION METHODS IN FINANCE GERARD CORNUEJOLS Carnegie Mellon University REHA TUTUNCU Goldman Sachs Asset Management CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Foreword page xi Introduction 1 1.1 Optimization problems
More informationNumerical Comparison of CVaR and CDaR Approaches: Application to Hedge Funds 1. Pavlo Krokhmal, Stanislav Uryasev, and Grigory Zrazhevsky
Numerical Comparison of CVaR and CDaR Approaches: Application to Hedge Funds 1 Pavlo Krokhmal, Stanislav Uryasev, and Grigory Zrazhevsky Risk Management and Financial Engineering Lab Department of Industrial
More informationFinancial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions, Modern Portfolio Theory
Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions, Modern Portfolio Theory Shuoxun Hellen Zhang WISE & SOE XIAMEN UNIVERSITY April, 2015 1 / 95 Outline Modern portfolio theory The backward induction,
More informationPORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION: ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION: ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES Keith Brown, Ph.D., CFA November 22 nd, 2007 Overview of the Portfolio Optimization Process The preceding analysis demonstrates that it is possible for investors
More informationChapter 15: Jump Processes and Incomplete Markets. 1 Jumps as One Explanation of Incomplete Markets
Chapter 5: Jump Processes and Incomplete Markets Jumps as One Explanation of Incomplete Markets It is easy to argue that Brownian motion paths cannot model actual stock price movements properly in reality,
More informationMeasuring Financial Risk using Extreme Value Theory: evidence from Pakistan
Measuring Financial Risk using Extreme Value Theory: evidence from Pakistan Dr. Abdul Qayyum and Faisal Nawaz Abstract The purpose of the paper is to show some methods of extreme value theory through analysis
More informationComparison of Estimation For Conditional Value at Risk
-1- University of Piraeus Department of Banking and Financial Management Postgraduate Program in Banking and Financial Management Comparison of Estimation For Conditional Value at Risk Georgantza Georgia
More informationAsset Allocation and Risk Management
IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management Fall 2016 c 2016 by Martin Haugh Asset Allocation and Risk Management These lecture notes provide an introduction to asset allocation and risk management. We begin
More informationOptimal Portfolio Liquidation and Macro Hedging
Bloomberg Quant Seminar, October 15, 2015 Optimal Portfolio Liquidation and Macro Hedging Marco Avellaneda Courant Institute, YU Joint work with Yilun Dong and Benjamin Valkai Liquidity Risk Measures Liquidity
More informationFinancial Mathematics III Theory summary
Financial Mathematics III Theory summary Table of Contents Lecture 1... 7 1. State the objective of modern portfolio theory... 7 2. Define the return of an asset... 7 3. How is expected return defined?...
More informationCalculating VaR. There are several approaches for calculating the Value at Risk figure. The most popular are the
VaR Pro and Contra Pro: Easy to calculate and to understand. It is a common language of communication within the organizations as well as outside (e.g. regulators, auditors, shareholders). It is not really
More informationDynamic Asset and Liability Management Models for Pension Systems
Dynamic Asset and Liability Management Models for Pension Systems The Comparison between Multi-period Stochastic Programming Model and Stochastic Control Model Muneki Kawaguchi and Norio Hibiki June 1,
More informationJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. The mean-absolute deviation portfolio selection problem with interval-valued returns
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 235 (2011) 4149 4157 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cam
More informationIntroduction Credit risk
A structural credit risk model with a reduced-form default trigger Applications to finance and insurance Mathieu Boudreault, M.Sc.,., F.S.A. Ph.D. Candidate, HEC Montréal Montréal, Québec Introduction
More informationOptimal Control of Batch Service Queues with Finite Service Capacity and General Holding Costs
Queueing Colloquium, CWI, Amsterdam, February 24, 1999 Optimal Control of Batch Service Queues with Finite Service Capacity and General Holding Costs Samuli Aalto EURANDOM Eindhoven 24-2-99 cwi.ppt 1 Background
More informationLecture 10: Performance measures
Lecture 10: Performance measures Prof. Dr. Svetlozar Rachev Institute for Statistics and Mathematical Economics University of Karlsruhe Portfolio and Asset Liability Management Summer Semester 2008 Prof.
More informationPortfolios that Contain Risky Assets Portfolio Models 3. Markowitz Portfolios
Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Portfolio Models 3. Markowitz Portfolios C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park Math 42: Mathematical Modeling March 2, 26 version c 26 Charles David
More informationWorst-Case Value-at-Risk of Derivative Portfolios
Worst-Case Value-at-Risk of Derivative Portfolios Steve Zymler Berç Rustem Daniel Kuhn Department of Computing Imperial College London Thalesians Seminar Series, November 2009 Risk Management is a Hot
More informationCan you do better than cap-weighted equity benchmarks?
R/Finance 2011 Can you do better than cap-weighted equity benchmarks? Guy Yollin Principal Consultant, r-programming.org Visiting Lecturer, University of Washington Krishna Kumar Financial Consultant Yollin/Kumar
More informationRisk Quadrangle and Applications in Day-Trading of Equity Indices
Risk Quadrangle and Applications in Day-Trading of Equity Indices Stan Uryasev Risk Management and Financial Engineering Lab University of Florida and American Optimal Decisions 1 Agenda Fundamental quadrangle
More informationMS-E2114 Investment Science Lecture 5: Mean-variance portfolio theory
MS-E2114 Investment Science Lecture 5: Mean-variance portfolio theory A. Salo, T. Seeve Systems Analysis Laboratory Department of System Analysis and Mathematics Aalto University, School of Science Overview
More informationProbability and Stochastics for finance-ii Prof. Joydeep Dutta Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Probability and Stochastics for finance-ii Prof. Joydeep Dutta Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture - 07 Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization (Part-II)
More informationStochastic Programming and Financial Analysis IE447. Midterm Review. Dr. Ted Ralphs
Stochastic Programming and Financial Analysis IE447 Midterm Review Dr. Ted Ralphs IE447 Midterm Review 1 Forming a Mathematical Programming Model The general form of a mathematical programming model is:
More information(High Dividend) Maximum Upside Volatility Indices. Financial Index Engineering for Structured Products
(High Dividend) Maximum Upside Volatility Indices Financial Index Engineering for Structured Products White Paper April 2018 Introduction This report provides a detailed and technical look under the hood
More informationIntroducing Expected Returns into Risk Parity Portfolios: A New Framework for Asset Allocation
Introducing Expected Returns into Risk Parity Portfolios: A New Framework for Asset Allocation Thierry Roncalli Research & Development Lyxor Asset Management, Paris thierry.roncalli@lyxor.com First Version:
More information1 Asset Pricing: Replicating portfolios
Alberto Bisin Corporate Finance: Lecture Notes Class 1: Valuation updated November 17th, 2002 1 Asset Pricing: Replicating portfolios Consider an economy with two states of nature {s 1, s 2 } and with
More informationAsset Allocation Model with Tail Risk Parity
Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference 2017 Asset Allocation Model with Tail Risk Parity Hirotaka Kato Graduate School of Science and Technology Keio University,
More informationCapital requirements and portfolio optimization under solvency constraints: a dynamical approach
Capital requirements and portfolio optimization under solvency constraints: a dynamical approach S. Asanga 1, A. Asimit 2, A. Badescu 1 S. Haberman 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University
More informationMULTISTAGE PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION AS A STOCHASTIC OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEM
K Y B E R N E T I K A M A N U S C R I P T P R E V I E W MULTISTAGE PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION AS A STOCHASTIC OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEM Martin Lauko Each portfolio optimization problem is a trade off between
More informationImplementing Momentum Strategy with Options: Dynamic Scaling and Optimization
Implementing Momentum Strategy with Options: Dynamic Scaling and Optimization Abstract: Momentum strategy and its option implementation are studied in this paper. Four basic strategies are constructed
More informationDynamic Replication of Non-Maturing Assets and Liabilities
Dynamic Replication of Non-Maturing Assets and Liabilities Michael Schürle Institute for Operations Research and Computational Finance, University of St. Gallen, Bodanstr. 6, CH-9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
More informationPortfolio selection with multiple risk measures
Portfolio selection with multiple risk measures Garud Iyengar Columbia University Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Joint work with Carlos Abad Outline Portfolio selection and risk measures
More informationMATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS
MATH307/37 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS School of Mathematics and Statistics Semester, 04 Tutorial problems should be used to test your mathematical skills and understanding of the lecture material.
More informationFinancial Economics Field Exam January 2008
Financial Economics Field Exam January 2008 There are two questions on the exam, representing Asset Pricing (236D = 234A) and Corporate Finance (234C). Please answer both questions to the best of your
More informationOptimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance with incomplete information
Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance with incomplete information Xiang Hu 1 Hailiang Yang 2 Lianzeng Zhang 3 1,3 Department of Risk Management and Insurance, Nankai University Weijin Road, Tianjin,
More informationFinancial Risk Forecasting Chapter 9 Extreme Value Theory
Financial Risk Forecasting Chapter 9 Extreme Value Theory Jon Danielsson 2017 London School of Economics To accompany Financial Risk Forecasting www.financialriskforecasting.com Published by Wiley 2011
More informationMean-Variance Analysis
Mean-Variance Analysis Mean-variance analysis 1/ 51 Introduction How does one optimally choose among multiple risky assets? Due to diversi cation, which depends on assets return covariances, the attractiveness
More informationConditional Value-at-Risk: Theory and Applications
The School of Mathematics Conditional Value-at-Risk: Theory and Applications by Jakob Kisiala s1301096 Dissertation Presented for the Degree of MSc in Operational Research August 2015 Supervised by Dr
More informationThe University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (40 points) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Describe
More informationFrom Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling
From Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling Prof. S. Jaimungal, Department of Statistics, University of Toronto 2004 Arrow-Debreu Securities 2004 Prof. S. Jaimungal 2 Consider a simple one-period economy
More informationThe Value of Stochastic Modeling in Two-Stage Stochastic Programs
The Value of Stochastic Modeling in Two-Stage Stochastic Programs Erick Delage, HEC Montréal Sharon Arroyo, The Boeing Cie. Yinyu Ye, Stanford University Tuesday, October 8 th, 2013 1 Delage et al. Value
More informationAn Application of Extreme Value Theory for Measuring Financial Risk in the Uruguayan Pension Fund 1
An Application of Extreme Value Theory for Measuring Financial Risk in the Uruguayan Pension Fund 1 Guillermo Magnou 23 January 2016 Abstract Traditional methods for financial risk measures adopts normal
More informationMASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS.
MASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS May/June 2006 Time allowed: 2 HOURS. Examiner: Dr N.P. Byott This is a CLOSED
More informationCHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION
CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 1 / 65 Outline 1 An Introduction
More informationMeasuring Efficiency of Exchange Traded Funds 1
Measuring Efficiency of Exchange Traded Funds 1 An Issue of Performance, Tracking Error and Liquidity Thierry Roncalli Evry University & Lyxor Asset Management, France Joint work with Marlène Hassine The
More informationModeling the extremes of temperature time series. Debbie J. Dupuis Department of Decision Sciences HEC Montréal
Modeling the extremes of temperature time series Debbie J. Dupuis Department of Decision Sciences HEC Montréal Outline Fig. 1: S&P 500. Daily negative returns (losses), Realized Variance (RV) and Jump
More informationMean-Variance Portfolio Theory
Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory Lakehead University Winter 2005 Outline Measures of Location Risk of a Single Asset Risk and Return of Financial Securities Risk of a Portfolio The Capital Asset Pricing
More informationIMPA Commodities Course : Forward Price Models
IMPA Commodities Course : Forward Price Models Sebastian Jaimungal sebastian.jaimungal@utoronto.ca Department of Statistics and Mathematical Finance Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada http://www.utstat.utoronto.ca/sjaimung
More informationOptimization in Finance
Research Reports on Mathematical and Computing Sciences Series B : Operations Research Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences Tokyo Institute of Technology 2-12-1 Oh-Okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo
More informationA Simple Utility Approach to Private Equity Sales
The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance Volume 8 Issue 1 Spring 2003 Article 7 12-2003 A Simple Utility Approach to Private Equity Sales Robert Dubil San Jose State University Follow this and additional
More informationPortfolios that Contain Risky Assets 3: Markowitz Portfolios
Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets 3: Markowitz Portfolios C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park, MD Math 42: Mathematical Modeling March 21, 218 version c 218 Charles David Levermore
More informationPricing Volatility Derivatives with General Risk Functions. Alejandro Balbás University Carlos III of Madrid
Pricing Volatility Derivatives with General Risk Functions Alejandro Balbás University Carlos III of Madrid alejandro.balbas@uc3m.es Content Introduction. Describing volatility derivatives. Pricing and
More informationMinimum Downside Volatility Indices
Minimum Downside Volatility Indices Timo Pfei er, Head of Research Lars Walter, Quantitative Research Analyst Daniel Wendelberger, Quantitative Research Analyst 18th July 2017 1 1 Introduction "Analyses
More information