2. Piecemeal Acquisitions

Transcription

1

2 CHAPTER 7 CONSOLIDATION 2. Piecemeal Acquisitions A Business Combination achieved in Stages (Piecemeal or Step Acquisition) An acquirer sometimes obtains control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest immediately before the acquisition date. For example, on 31 December 20X1, Entity A holds a 35 per cent non-controlling equity interest in Entity B. On that date, Entity A purchases an additional 40 per cent interest in Entity B, which gives it control of Entity B. This FRS refers to such a transaction as a business combination achieved in stages, sometimes also referred to as a step acquisition or piecemeal acquisition. In a business combination achieved in stages, the acquirer shall: remeasure its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at its acquisition-date fair value and recognise the resulting gain or loss, if any, in profit or loss. In prior reporting periods, the acquirer may have recognised changes in the value of its equity interest in the acquiree in other comprehensive income (for example, because the investment was classified as fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI) financial assets). If so, the amount that was recognised in other comprehensive income shall be recognised on the same basis as would be required if the acquirer had disposed directly of the previously held equity interest. Note: The adjustments (a), (b) and (c) will appear together in an exam question. They are NOT mutually exclusive! 364

3 CHAPTER 7 CONSOLIDATION a. Piecemeal Acquisition from: FVTOCI Financial Asset to Subsidiary or FVTOCI Financial Asset to Associate = reclassify previous OCE gain to RE Upon the FVTOCI Financial Asset becomes an Associate or Subsidiary, any previous gain or loss accumulated in the OCE must be reclassified to RE. Remember that Associates and Subsidiaries post-acquisition profits are already recorded in RE. In Parent s books: Dr OCE (to reduce previous gain in OCE) Cr RE (to reclassify to RE for Assc and Subsi) b. Associate to Subsidiary or FVTOCI Financial Asset to Associate or FVTOCI Financial Asset to Subsidiary = FV previous COI to RE In a business combination achieved in stages (piecemeal acquisition), the acquirer shall remeasure its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at its acquisitiondate fair value and recognise the resulting gain or loss, if any, in profit or loss (i.e. RE). In Parent s books: FV the previous COI Dr COI (from HC to FV at subsequent acquisition date) Cr RE c. Piecemeal Acquisition from: Subsidiary 70% to Subsidiary 80% 1. No change in goodwill and consolidated net assets in CSOFP. Therefore, goodwill must be calculated at the Original COI with 70% control. Remember, this step is to adjust the COI to our! 2. Decrease in NCI (which is also the increase in P s control) is treated as a Treasury Transaction i.e. movement within Equity (not in CSOPL and OCI): Dr Dr or Cr NCI OCE (balance) Cr COI (to adjust the COI to our ) NCI in CSOFP at year end FV of NCI at Acq $x Add: Post-Acq RE 30% $x NCI at year end $x Less: transfer to P 10% pro-rate 10% NCI at year end at 20% $x 365

4

5 CHAPTER 7 CONSOLIDATION Minny (Dec 2012 Q1) Minny is a company which operates in the service sector. Minny has business relationships with Bower and Heeny. All three entities are public limited companies. The draft statements of financial position of these entities are as follows at 30 November 2012: Assets: Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment Investments in subsidiaries Bower Heeny Investment in Puttin Intangible assets Current assets Total assets Minny $m , ,791 Bower $m ,130 Heeny $m Equity and liabilities: Share capital Other components of equity Retained earnings Total equity Non-current liabilities Current liabilities Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities , , , The following information is relevant to the preparation of the group financial statements: 1. On 1 December 2010, Minny acquired 70% of the equity interests of Bower. The purchase consideration comprised cash of $730 million. At acquisition, the fair value of the non-controlling interest in Bower was $295 million. On 1 December 2010, the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired was $835 million and retained earnings of Bower were $319 million and other components of equity were $27 million. The excess in fair value is due to nondepreciable land. 366

6 CHAPTER 7 CONSOLIDATION 2. On 1 December 2011, Bower acquired 80% of the equity interests of Heeny for a cash consideration of $320 million. The fair value of a 20% holding of the non-controlling interest was $72 million; a 30% holding was $108 million and a 44% holding was $161 million. At the date of acquisition, the identifiable net assets of Heeny had a fair value of $362 million, retained earnings were $106 million and other components of equity were $20 million. The excess in fair value is due to non-depreciable land. It is the group s policy to measure the non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition. 3. Both Bower and Heeny were impairment tested at 30 November The recoverable amounts of both cash generating units as stated in the individual financial statements at 30 November 2012 were Bower, $1,425 million, and Heeny, $604 million, respectively. The directors of Minny felt that any impairment of assets was due to the poor performance of the intangible assets. The recoverable amount has been determined without consideration of liabilities which all relate to the financing of operations. 4. Minny acquired a 14% interest in Puttin, a public limited company, on 1 December 2010 for a cash consideration of $18 million. The investment was accounted for under FRS 109 Financial Instruments and was designated as fair value through other comprehensive income. On 1 June 2012, Minny acquired an additional 16% interest in Puttin for a cash consideration of $27 million and achieved significant influence. The value of the original 14% investment on 1 June 2012 was $21 million. Puttin made profits after tax of $20 million and $30 million for the years to 30 November 2011 and 30 November 2012 respectively. On 30 November 2012, Minny received a dividend from Puttin of $2 million, which has been credited to other components of equity. 5. Minny purchased patents of $10 million to use in a project to develop new products on 1 December Minny has completed the investigative phase of the project, incurring an additional cost of $7 million, and has determined that the product can be developed profitably. An effective and working prototype was created at a cost of $4 million and in order to put the product into a condition for sale, a further $3 million was spent. Finally, marketing costs of $2 million were incurred. All of the above costs are included in the intangible assets of Minny. 6. Minny intends to dispose of a major line of the parent s business operations. At the date the held for sale criteria were met, the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities comprising the line of business were: $m Property, plant and equipment (PPE) 49 Inventory 18 Current liabilities 3 It is anticipated that Minny will realise $30 million for the business. No adjustments have been made in the financial statements in relation to the above decision. Required: (a) Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for the Minny Group as at 30 November (35 marks) 367

7 CHAPTER 7 CONSOLIDATION (b) Minny intends to dispose of a major line of business in the above scenario and the entity has stated that the held for sale criteria were met under FRS 105 Noncurrent Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. The criteria in FRS 105 are very strict and regulators have been known to question entities on the application of the standard. The two criteria which must be met before an asset or disposal group will be defined as recovered principally through sale are: that it must be available for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale must be highly probable. Required: Discuss what is meant in FRS 105 by available for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale must be highly probable, setting out briefly why regulators may question entities on the application of the standard. (7 marks) (c) Bower has a property which has a carrying value of $2 million at 30 November This property had been revalued at the year end and a revaluation surplus of $400,000 had been recorded in other components of equity. The directors were intending to sell the property to Minny for $1 million shortly after the year end. Bower previously used the historical cost basis for valuing property. Required: Without adjusting your answer to part (a), discuss the ethical and accounting implications of the above intended sale of assets to Minny by Bower. (8 marks) (50 marks) 368

8

9

10

11

12

13