August 20, Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
|
|
- Duane James
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 August 20, 2015 Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT File Reference No Dear Ms. Cosper: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Financial Accounting Standards Board s Proposed Account Standards Update Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities. I write to provide comments on behalf of Aeris (formerly known as CARS), an objective, nonprofit ratings institution that creates accountability, standardization, and transparency to help investors understand the risks, mitigants, and social/economic impact of community development financial institution (CDFI) loan funds. CDFI loan funds are mission-driven financial institutions (primarily nonprofits) that make targeted loans and investments to benefit underserved markets in the U.S. There are more than 500 CDFI loan funds in the United States with more than $10 billion in on-balance-sheet assets under management. During the course of its 11 year history, Aeris has issued 574 ratings opinions on 97 loan funds, which collectively manage approximately 60% of all CDFI loan fund on-balance-sheet assets. Aeris also aggregates highly accurate and timely GAAP-compliant financial and impact performance data on CDFIs. The nation s top philanthropic investors rely on Aeris due diligence and data to make informed CDFI investment decisions. Examples include foundations (e.g., the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation), financial institutions (e.g., Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, U.S. Bank), nonprofits (e.g., Calvert Foundation, NeighborWorks America), and others. From the investor perspective that we represent, Aeris believes the proposed changes help to clarify some critical issues with the presentation and consistency of nonprofit financials, but we have some concerns about the proposal as it is relates to financial statements in the CDFI industry, and appreciate the
2 opportunity to share our views. CDFIs that are structured as nonprofits must adhere to both FASB guidance and guidance related to financial institutions. We are especially concerned about the proposal s singular focus on the nonprofit sector and the potential consistency and comparability issues that may arise as a result. We believe some of the proposed changes increase the differences between not-forprofit financial reporting and for-profit financial reporting and therefore are counter-productive to improving comparability, understandability, and usefulness, as well as reducing complexities. CDFIs that are structured as nonprofit entities have fundamentally the same business model as CDFIs that are structured as for-profits, and we believe it is important to provide maximum flexibility to ensure the financial statements in the industry are comparable. We believe this issue is relevant for other nonprofit organizations that have business models that may mirror the for-profit sector. About CDFI Industry and CDFI Corporate Structures The U.S. Treasury Department operates a program, the CDFI Fund, which certifies organizations as CDFIs and provides grants and loans to support the CDFI industry. As of June 30, 2015, there are 958 CDFIs that are certified by the CDFI Fund. CDFIs must generally provide a GAAP-compliant audit that follows FASB standards to receive funding from the CDFI Fund and other investors. CDFIs are private, mission-driven, financial intermediaries that finance affordable housing, small business, community facilities, and individuals in the areas that need it most, and deliver positive changes for people and communities. CDFIs are committed to performance and being permanent institutions which provide capital and other services to transform lives in low-income, low-wealth, and other disadvantaged communities. The CDFI industry comprises different institution types. The four primary types of CDFIs are community development banks, community development credit unions, community development venture capital funds, and community development loan funds. Loan funds make up the largest portion of the CDFI industry, and are the CDFI type on which Aeris focuses. While all CDFIs are private mission-driven organizations, they are formed with different corporate structures and different institution types to deliver different products to best serve their communities. The industry includes both for-profit and nonprofit institutions. Banks are structured as for-profits, and credit unions are structured as nonprofit cooperatives; loan funds are primarily nonprofits, but a small percentage are for-profits; and venture capital funds are primarily structured as for-profit entities. Also, many CDFIs (particularly nonprofit loan funds) have for-profit subsidiaries to facilitate obtaining capital from different sources. For example, the U.S. Treasury s New Markets Tax Credit program requires that organizations form for-profit entities to utilize that program. Nonprofit CDFIs adhere to both FASB guidance that applies to nonprofits, as well as guidance related to financial institutions. This guidance supports a level of consistency and transparency in financial reporting across the CDFI industry. 2
3 About Performance Counts Aeris is a participant in an industry-led collaborative effort called Performance Counts, which seeks to develop CDFI industry standards and best practices around financial statements and financial management, and serves as an industry forum for sharing information, documents, and ideas on these topics. Aeris and Performance Counts share the goals with FASB of presenting clear, consistent, and accurate financial statements. Investors, funders, and other key stakeholders in the industry rely on the accuracy and consistency of financial statements to make credit, funding, and other programmatic decisions. Because it is critical that the CDFI industry and its supporters be able to rely on the financial information that CDFIs provide, we urge FASB to consider the following comments and recommendations on its recent proposal. We have used the "Questions for Respondents" contained in the exposure draft as a general guide for organizing our comments. We have responded to the questions that are most pertinent to the CDFI industry. In general, Aeris recommendations are in line with those of the Performance Counts group, with the exception of Question 4: Aeris is strongly in favor of a classified statement of financial position (current vs. noncurrent) as a more straight-forward alternative for financial statement users in understanding an organization's liquidity. Question 1: Do you agree that the disclosures about the nature of donor-imposed restrictions and their effects on liquidity in notes to financial statements would help ensure that necessary information is not lost by combining the temporarily and permanently restricted classes of net assets into one donor restricted category for purposes of presentation in the statement of financial position (balance sheet)? If not, please identify the information lost and why it is necessary. Aeris agrees with the proposed change to two classes of net assets and also supports the proposed terminology: with donor restrictions and without donor restrictions, as it is more practical and relevant compared to the current classifications. Aeris also believes that the proposed disclosures about the nature of donor-imposed restrictions in the notes will help ensure that necessary information is not lost by combining the temporarily and permanently restricted classes of net assets into one category on the face of the financial statements. Question 4: Do you agree that providing information in notes to financial statements about financial assets and liabilities and limits on the use of those assets is an effective way to clearly communicate information useful in assessing an NFP s liquidity and how it manages liquidity without imposing undue costs? If not, why, and what alternative(s) would you suggest? Aeris agrees that providing information in notes to financial statements about financial assets and liabilities and limits on the use of those assets is an effective way to clearly communicate information about liquidity. Such disclosures are critical to allow users of the financial statements to understand how 3
4 donor imposed restrictions may affect liquidity. Aeris feels the guidance should include minimum mandatory quantitative disclosure requirements that would allow for consistency in the presentation of financial statements. Aeris feels that this would make the financial statements more useful to users and help manage the costs of providing such information. Aeris is concerned about any proposed required qualitative disclosures about liquidity. This information is often very subjective and could create confusion and therefore may not be appropriate for the notes to the financial statements, which are subject to audit. These types of disclosures seem more appropriate in a management discussion of the financial statements. Aeris feels that presenting a classified statement of financial position (current vs. noncurrent) would be more straight-forward to financial statement users in understanding an organization's liquidity. Question 6: Do you agree that requiring intermediate measures of operations would provide users of NFP financial statements with more relevant and comparable information for purposes of (a) assessing whether the activities of a period have drawn upon, or have contributed to, past or future periods and (b) understanding the relationship of resources used in operations of a period to resource inflows available to fund those operations? Do you also agree that classifying and aggregating information in that way would not require major system changes? If not, why? Although we agree conceptually that reporting an intermediate measure of operations would enable users of NFP financial statements to better understand the entity's operations, we have a number of concerns with such a requirement. Not-for-profit entities are diverse in nature and users of not-for-profit entity financial statements vary greatly. Significant differences exist in operating activities between different not-for-profit entities. A not-for-profit entity should have the discretion to present the results of its operations in a manner that best suits the needs of its primary stakeholders within the industry in which it operates. A standardized operating measure applicable to all nonprofits would not necessarily provide useful information for the majority of stakeholders that use not-for-profit financial statements for resource allocation decisions. Question 7: Do you agree that intermediate measures of operations should include only those (a) resource inflows and outflows that are from or directed at carrying out an NFP s purpose for existence and (b) resources that are available for current-period operating activities before and after the effects of internal governing board appropriations, designations, and similar actions? If not, why? While Aeris feels an intermediate measure of operations based on activities that are from or directed at carrying out an organization s mission is reasonable, the proposed presentation seems confusing and overly complicated. We believe that not-for-profits should be able to have flexibility in determining the definition of their operations, similar to for-profit entities, and therefore what activities should be included or excluded from an intermediate measure of operations. 4
5 In addition, Aeris does not completely understand the rationale of taking into account the limits/designations imposed by the governing board of an NFP. Resources that are appropriated or designated by the governing body and do not have external limitations have the potential for use in the current period and therefore should be included. We are concerned that this could be abused and result in the manipulation of the intermediate measure. Question 8: Do you agree that all internal transfers (governing board appropriations, designations, and similar actions that make resources unavailable or available for operations of the current period) should be reflected on the statement of activities immediately after an intermediate measure of operations before transfers and immediately before an intermediate measure of operations after transfers? If not all internal transfers, on what basis would you distinguish between those transfers that should and should not be reflected and how would you make that distinction operable? Do you also agree that reflecting those internal decisions (or lack of them) on the face of the statement rather than in notes will help an NFP communicate how its operations are managed without adding undue complexities? Why or why not? Aeris does not support the presentation of internal transfers on the statement of activities. The group feels that presenting this information on the face of the financial statements would not provide adequate context and again is overly complicated and would be confusing to readers. In addition, we are concerned about the lack of comparability of this presentation in relation to for-profit business entities and specifically those operating in the CDFI industry. Question 12: Do you think the flexibility currently allowed by GAAP to present a statement of activities as either a single statement or two articulating statements and to use either a single-column or a multicolumn format should be retained or narrowed? If narrowed, why and in what ways? Aeris believes the flexibility currently allowed by GAAP should be retained. This provides organizations the ability to present the statement of activities in a more meaningful manner within each industry. Question 13: Do you agree that reporting operating expenses by both their function and nature together with an analysis of all expenses (other than netted investment expenses) provides relevant and useful information in assessing how an NFP uses its resources and, thus, should be required? Why or why not? Aeris agrees that reporting operating expenses by both their function and nature should be required since it does provide relevant and useful information to financial statement users. Question 14: Do you agree that requiring investment income to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expenses will increase comparability and avoid imposing undue costs to obtain information about all investment fees (for example, embedded fees of hedge funds, mutual funds, and funds of funds)? If not, why? 5
6 Aeris agrees with the proposed requirement that investment income be reported net of external and direct internal investment expenses will increase comparability and avoid imposing undue costs to obtain information about all investment fees. Question 15: Do you agree that the disclosure of the amount of all investment expenses is unnecessary but that disclosure of internal salaries and benefits that are netted against investment return is of sufficient relevance, not too costly to obtain, and thus should be required? Why or why not? Aeris agrees the disclosure of the amount of all investment expenses is unnecessary, but does not agree that disclosure of the amount of internal salaries and benefits that are netted against investment return should be required in all instances. Disclosure of this information should be encouraged where practicable, taking into account various factors including availability, cost, materiality, and significance of the activity to the organization s operations. Question 16: Do you agree that interest expense, whether incurred on short-term or long-term borrowing, and fees and related expenses incurred for access to lines of credit and similar cash management and treasury activities are not directed at carrying out an NFP s purposes and, thus, should not be classified as operating activities? If not, why? Aeris does not agree. The proposed treatment further widens the gap between not-for-profit and forprofit accounting. These items should be classified as operating activities. Borrowing on a short-or longterm basis is employed to facilitate operations and support the mission of the NFP. The cost of borrowing is as much a direct cost in carrying out the NFP s purpose as are bank account charges and office supplies. More importantly, interest income earned on loans made by CDFIs would be classified as operating activity since the loans are made for programmatic purposes. The proposed presentation would greatly distort a CDFI s operating measure. Question 18: Do you agree that the direct method of presenting operating cash flows is more understandable and useful than the indirect method? Do you also agree that the expected benefits of presenting operating cash flows in that way would justify the one-time and ongoing costs that may be incurred to implement that method of reporting? If not, please explain why and suggest an alternative that might increase the benefits or reduce any operational concerns or costs. Aeris feels that the statement of cash flows is often not well understood or considered very useful by financial statement users, regardless of which presentation method is used. The group is concerned that if the direct method is required, organizations will have to revise their chart of accounts resulting in increased time and cost. Additionally, the group is concerned about the lack of financial statement comparability to for-profit entities operating in the CDFI industry, since for-profit entities currently have the option of presenting the statement of cash flows using either method. Many CDFIs (particularly nonprofit loan funds) have for-profit subsidiaries that are included in their consolidated financial statements. Conversion of these financial statements to the direct method to accommodate the 6
7 consolidation would increase time and cost on an ongoing basis, and decrease comparability with other CDFIs and CDFI affiliates and subsidiaries. Accordingly, Aeris believes that not-for-profits, like for-profits, should have the flexibility of using the direct or indirect method for the cash flow statement. Question 19: Does the indirect method s reconciliation of cash flows from operations to the total change in net assets provide any particular type of necessary information that would be lost if, as proposed, that method is no longer required? If so, please identify the potentially omitted information and explain why it is useful and whether it should be provided through disclosure rather than requiring use of the indirect method. If you suggest that requiring the indirect method is necessary, would you require that the amount for cash flows from operations be reconciled to the amount of the (a) change in net assets, (b) change in net assets without donor restrictions, or (c) proposed intermediate measure of operations before or after transfers? Why? The indirect method provides an effective cross-check against the accuracy of the cash flows from operating activities, which in turn renders greater credibility to the amounts reported as cash flows from investing activities and financing activities. The indirect method enhances the integrity of the financial statements as one can tie the numbers across the statement of financial position and the statement of activities. This type of integrity check is best preserved via the indirect method of cash flows as opposed to additional note disclosures. Aeris would recommend that cash flows from operations be reconciled to the amount of the change in net assets. This option provides for an "overall" reconciliation of cash flows from operations to total change in net assets (as opposed to an intermediate measure) and would provide a straight-forward reconciliation more easily understood by financial statement users. Question 20: Do you agree that although operating activities is defined differently for the statement of cash flows than for the statement of activities, more closely aligning line items presented in the statement of cash flows with the proposed operating classification for the statement of activities will increase understandability even though that reporting would be somewhat different from current requirements for business entities? If you believe that operating items in the two financial statements would not be sufficiently aligned, please indicate how their alignment might be further improved. Aeris agrees that more closely aligning line items presented in the statement of cash flows with the proposed operating classification for the statement of activities will increase understandability of the financial statements. We do not believe, however, that these reporting changes should be limited to the NFP sector. Many for-profit entities also operate in the CDFI industry and the group is concerned about the comparability of financial information for financial statement users. To the maximum extent possible, we support a common reporting framework for both for-profit and not-for-profit enterprises. Question 21: Are there any particular proposed amendments in this Update that would require a longer period to implement than other amendments? If so, please explain. 7
8 The intermediate reporting levels and reporting of transfers may require system changes that would necessitate longer implementation time. The proposed retrospective application of this update will require more time for preparers to restate prior year financial statements. For areas such as the direct method of cash flows and the functional classification of expenses, organizations will have to analyze and reorganize data, which will increase the time/effort in accumulating financial information for comparative year presentations. Question 22: Are there reasons for any particular size or type of NFP to need a longer time frame to implement the proposed amendments in this Update? If so, please explain. Allowing additional time for larger NFP organizations to implement would be necessary, especially when more than one line of business or more than one legal entity is included in the reporting entity. Accounting systems will need to be modified in order to accommodate tracking certain new items across many different legal entities. We urge the Board to allow sufficient time for nonprofit organizations to adopt the proposed amendments. We feel that it could take some CDFIs a substantial amount of time to implement the changes outlined in the exposure draft due to limits on the scale and resources available to execute these changes. Aeris believes that the exposure draft is sufficiently complex that many nonprofit organizations will need significant time to retrain accounting staffs and would require significant system design and programming changes. We recommend that the effective date be established as no earlier than the first fiscal year that begins two years after the final issuance date of the ASU. Please direct any questions or comments on our position to Karen Seabury, Aeris Director of Ratings (kseabury@aerisinsight.com or (805) ). We would also appreciate the opportunity to discuss the CDFI industry and our comments with the appropriate people within FASB. Sincerely, Karen Seabury Director of Ratings Aeris 8
August 17, Via to
August 17, 2015 Via email to director@fasb.org Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: File Reference No. 2015-230
More informationRotary. 19 August Via to
Rotary 19 August 2015 Via email to director@fasb.org Ms. Susan M. Cosper, Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box5116 Norwalk CT o6856-5116 Re: File Reference No. -
More informationAugust 19, Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
August 19, 2015 Technical Director 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 FILE REFERENCE NO. 2015-230 Proposed Accounting Standards Update - Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care
More information8/28/ :06:46 AM
8/28/2015 11:06:46 AM Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for Profit Entities Record
More informationStatement of Financial Position and Liquidity
August 20, 2015 Via e mail to director@fasb.org 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856 5116 Re: File Reference No. 2015 230, Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Not for Profit Entities (Topic
More informationNot-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: April 22, 2015 Comments Due: August 20, 2015 Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954) Presentation of Financial Statements of
More informationAugust 20, Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
August 20, 2015 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No.: 2015-230 Re: Proposed ASU Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958)
More informationDALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY July 26, 2015 Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. 2015-230 Re: Comments on proposed ASU : Not-for-Profit
More informationSubject: Comment letter on FASB Not-For-Profit (NFP) Exposure Draft
August 20, 2015 Technical Director File Reference No. 2015-230 Financial Accounting Standards Board director@fasb.org Subject: Comment letter on FASB Not-For-Profit (NFP) Exposure Draft About is a family
More informationCommunity Foundation of Northwest Indiana, Inc.
0 Community Healthcare System Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana, Inc. Community Hospital St. Catherine Hospital St. Mary Medical Center 2015-230 August20,2015 Technical Director Financial Accounting
More informationNot-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
April 22, 2015 In Focus Proposed Accounting Standards Update Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) and Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities On
More informationAugust 11, Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
August 11, 2015 Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. 2015-230 Dear Ms. Cosper: The Financial Reporting
More informationAugust 20, Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Director, File Reference Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
August 20, 2015 Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Director, File Reference 2015-230 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Submitted by email to Director@fasb.org RE: Exposure Draft:
More informationMay 5, Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
May 5, 2017 Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: FASB January 10, 2017 Proposed Accounting Standards Update Debt (Topic 470) Simplifying the
More information99 High Street 30 th Floor Boston, MA 02110
99 High Street 30 th Floor Boston, MA 02110 March 29, 2016 Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merriott 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File F Dear Ms. Cosper,
More informationNonprofit Accounting and Auditing Update
Nonprofit Accounting and Auditing Update 2016 Today s Presenters Trent Foster, CPA Engagement Partner Weaver s Education & Nonprofit Leader Dallas Dugger, CPA Audit Manager Nonprofit Practice 1 NFP Accounting
More informationProposed Accounting Standards Update, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements (File Reference No )
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director File Reference No. 2018-200 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O.
More informationNovember 4, Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
November 4, 2016 Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 RE: File Reference No. 2016-310 Dear Ms. Cosper: PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationDeloitte & Touche LLP
695 East Main Street Stamford, CT 06901-2141 Tel: +1 203 708 4000 Fax: +1 203 708 4797 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box
More informationTIC has reviewed the ED and is providing the following comments for your consideration. GENERAL COMMENTS
December 9, 2015 Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856 5116 Re: September 24, 2015 Exposure Draft of a Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Notes
More informationFile Reference: No Selected Issues about Hedge Accounting (Including IASB Exposure Draft, Hedge Accounting)
Louis Rauchenberger Managing Director & Corporate Controller April 25, 2011 Susan M. Cosper Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference: No. 2011-175 Selected
More informationSeptember 27, Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
September 27, 2017 Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. Topic 2017-270: Dear Ms. Cosper: The Financial
More informationOctober 17, Susan M. Cosper, Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT Via to
October 17, 2016 Susan M. Cosper, Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Via Email to director@fasb.org Grant Thornton Tower 171 N. Clark Street, Suite 200 Chicago, IL
More informationJune 30, Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT Dear Ms.
June 30, 2014 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Dear Ms. Cosper On behalf of the American Academy of Actuaries 1 Financial Reporting
More informationFile Reference No I, Intra-Entity Asset Transfers, and File Reference No II, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis, Indiana 46285 U.S.A. May 27, 2015 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116
More informationMs. Susan Cosper Technical Director, Financial Accounting Standards Board Chairwoman, Emerging Issues Task Force
May 18, 2015 Mr. Russell Golden Chairman, Financial Accounting Standards Board Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director, Financial Accounting Standards Board Chairwoman, Emerging Issues Task Force 401 Merritt
More informationAccounting Standards Update (ASU) Summary of Changes
WE BUILD STRONGER NONPROFITS ONE ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT AT A TIME Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-14 Summary of Changes Introduction Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-14, Presentation of Financial
More informationMs. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 April 25, 2016 RE: File Reference No. 2016-200 Dear Ms. Cosper, PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationFile Reference No Re: Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Income Taxes
Deloitte & Touche LLP 695 East Main Street Stamford, CT 06901-2141 Tel: +1 203 708 4000 Fax: +1 203 708 4797 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board
More informationNonprofit Financial Statement Overhaul
Presenter Nonprofit Financial Statement Overhaul ASU 2015-230 Trent Foster Weaver Partner, Higher Education Largest overhaul of NFP financial statements in over 20 years. Proposal includes no changes to
More informationTIC has reviewed the ED and is providing the following comments from the nonpublic entity perspective for your consideration.
August 4, 2014 Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856 5116 Re: April 28, 2014 Exposure Draft of a Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Business
More informationOur responses to specific questions on which the Board are seeking comment are included in the Attachment to this letter.
Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: Proposed Accounting Standards Updated Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic
More informationFile Reference No Re: Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
Deloitte & Touche LLP 695 East Main Street Stamford, CT 06901-2141 Tel: +1 203 708 4000 Fax: +1 203 708 4797 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board
More informationThe collectability of accounts receivable, which is based on collection history with the donor/grantor.
50 Washington Street Westborough, MA 01581 508.366.9100 aafcpa.com To the Board of Directors and Management of : We have audited the financial statements of (PSW, Inc.) for the year ended June 30, 2017,
More informationStatement of cash flows
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Statement of cash flows Accounting Standards Codification 230 Updated as of August 2017 To our clients and other friends ASC 230, Statement of Cash
More informationACCOUNTING AND AUDITING SUPPLEMENT NO
Chapter 1 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 2015 INTRODUCTION This update includes the more significant accounting and auditing developments from October 2015 through December 2015. Included in
More informationMarch 9, Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
March 9, 2017 Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: FASB January 10, 2017 Proposed Accounting Standards Update Inventory (Topic 330): Disclosure
More informationOctober 5, File References: EITF-15D and EITF-15E Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
File References: EITF-15D and 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Dear Ms. Cosper: File References: EITF 15-D Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Effect of Derivative Contract Novations
More informationRe: Research Project, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
July 21, 2017 Russell G Golden, Chairman Susan M Cosper, Technical Director FASB 401 Meritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Grant Thornton Tower 171 N. Clark Street, Suite 200 Chicago, IL 60601-3370
More informationMajor Changes for Nonprofit Organizations Just Around the Corner
Major Changes for Nonprofit Organizations Just Around the Corner The Internal Accounting and Auditing Editorial Team at Thomson Reuters and Susan Weiss Budak SPECIAL REPORT Major Changes for Nonprofit
More informationNonprofit Implementation of FASB Financial Reporting Standards
Nonprofit Implementation of FASB Financial Reporting Standards Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor. Learning Objectives
More informationStatement of cash flows
Financial reporting developments A comprehensive guide Statement of cash flows Accounting Standards Codification 230 Updated as of November 2018 To our clients and other friends ASC 230, Statement of Cash
More informationNew Guidance for Recording Contributions, Grants and Contracts
New Guidance for Recording Contributions, Grants and Contracts Trevor W. Williams, CPA Nonprofit Audit Partner Gelman, Rosenberg & Freedman CPAs twilliams@grfcpa.com 301-951-9090 Why? Revenue is a key
More informationTel: ey.com
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director File Reference No. 2016-270 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O.
More informationMarch 9, Leslie F. Seidman, Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Importance: Gregg Nelson Director - FASB File Reference No. 2011-230, Proposed Accounting Standards Update (Revised): Revenue from Contracts with Customers Friday,
More informationRe: December 20, 2012 Exposure Draft of a Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Financial Instruments Credit Losses (Subtopic )
June 5, 2013 Susan M. Cosper, CPA Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: December 20, 2012 Exposure Draft of a Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Financial
More informationProposed Accounting Standards Update, Intra-Entity Asset Transfers (File Reference No )
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116
More informationFile Reference No. PCC-13-01B Re: Proposed Accounting Standards Update Accounting for Goodwill
Deloitte & Touche LLP Ten Westport Road P.O. Box 820 Wilton, CT 06897-0820 August 23, 2013 Tel: +1 203 761 3000 Fax: +1 203 834 2200 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting
More informationEITF 1116FN December 23, 2016 TO: MEMBERS OF THE FASB EMERGING ISSUES TASK FORCE
EITF 1116FN 2016 11 17 December 23, 2016 TO: MEMBERS OF THE FASB EMERGING ISSUES TASK FORCE Included are the final minutes of the November 17, 2016 meeting of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force and an
More informationApril 1, Mr. Russell Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
April 1, 2014 Mr. Russell Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-05116 Re: File Reference No. 2013-220: Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic
More informationFebruary 14, 2012 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
February 14, 2012 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. 2011-200 Dear Ms. Cosper: The Financial Reporting Executive
More informationFile Reference Number , Discussion Paper: Effective Dates and Transition Methods
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 360 Madison Avenue, 16th Floor New York, NY 10017 United States of America Telephone: 1 (212) 901-6000 Facsimile: 1 (212) 901-6001 email: isda@isda.org
More informationAugust 24, Mr. Russell Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
Shannon S. Warren Managing Director Corporate Accounting Policies August 24, 2009 Mr. Russell Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116
More informationr-\ Hydro ~ Québec February 22, 2016
r-\ Hydro ~ Québec February 22, 2016 Ms. Susan M. Cosper, CP A Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 U.S.A. Via Email to director@fasb.org
More informationRe: Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies
August 8, 2008 Mr. Robert Herz Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 Norwalk, CT 06856 Re: Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies
More informationTel: Fax:
Tel: 312-856-9100 Fax: 312-856-1379 www.bdo.com 330 North Wabash, Suite 3200 Chicago, IL 60611 August 23, 2013 Via email to director@fasb.org Susan M. Cosper Technical Director 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116
More informationTel: ey.com
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director File Reference No. 2017-220 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O.
More informationVia August 24, 2009
Via email: director@fasb.org August 24, 2009 Mr. Russell G. Golden Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: Proposed Statement of Financial
More informationNot-for-Profit Accounting Update
Not-for-Profit Accounting Update Robert Cordero, CPA Partner Independent School Practice Leader Not-for-Profit Services 914-341-7031 Joseph Ali, CPA Partner Private Foundation and Not-for-Profit Services
More informationIncome Statement Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: January 18, 2018 Comments Due: February 2, 2018 Income Statement Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated
More informationBoard Meeting Handout Accounting for Financial Instruments: Hedging March 8, 2017
Board Meeting Handout Accounting for Financial Instruments: Hedging March 8, 2017 PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING 1. The purpose of this decision-making Board meeting is to discuss the following issues for redeliberation:
More informationThe Appendix also contains our detailed responses to the Questions for Respondents in the proposed Update, and includes additional observations.
January 31, 2018 Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: File Reference No. 2018-210 Dear Ms. Cosper: PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationWe would like to offer the following general observations in connection with this proposed ASU.
February 14, 2012 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. 2011-210 Dear Ms. Cosper: The Financial Reporting Executive
More informationFebruary 15, Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
2011-200 Deloitte & Touche LLP 10 Westport Road P.O. Box 820 Wilton, CT 06897-0820 USA Tel: +1 203 761 3000 Fax: +1 203 834 2200 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting
More informationNot-for-Profit Financial Reporting Model - ASU June 9, 2017 Patrick F. Kerns
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting Model - ASU 2016-14 June 9, 2017 Patrick F. Kerns NFP Financial Reporting Model (Continued) This Accounting Standards Update (ASU) will be applicable for fiscal years
More informationJanuary 17, Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P O Box 5116 Norwalk Connecticut
January 17, 2012 Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P O Box 5116 Norwalk Connecticut 06856-5116 File Reference No: EITF-11A Dear Ms. Cosper, Citigroup
More informationKPMG LLP 757 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017
KPMG LLP 757 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone 212-909-5600 Fax 212-909-5699 Internet www.us.kpmg.com File Reference No. 1720-100 (FASB) 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, Connecticut 06856-5116
More informationExploring FASB s ASU ASU : The FASB's New NFP Standard. A collaborative toolkit brought to you by AICPA s:
Exploring FASB s ASU 2016-14 ASU 2016-14: The FASB's New NFP Standard A collaborative toolkit brought to you by AICPA s: Report October 19, 2016 Center for Plain English Accounting AICPA s National A&A
More informationTel: ey.com
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director File Reference No. 2016-370 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O.
More informationEliminating the Accounting for Basis Differences in Equity Method Investments
KPMG LLP Telephone +1 212 758 9700 345 Park Avenue Fax +1 212 758 9819 New York, N.Y. 10154-0102 Internet www.us.kpmg.com July 30, 2015 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt
More informationNovember 4, Susan M. Cosper Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT Via to
November 4, 2016 Susan M. Cosper Technical Director FASB 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Via Email to director@fasb.org Grant Thornton Tower 171 N. Clark Street, Suite 200 Chicago, IL
More information401 Merritt 7 First Floor
April 28, 2011 Financial Accounting Standards Board International Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 First Floor P.O. Box 5116 30 Cannon Street Norwalk, Connecticut 06856-5116 London EC4M 6XH U.S.A.
More informationJohn H. McCarthy, CPA 16 Maryknoll Drive Hingham, MA 02043
John H. McCarthy, CPA 16 Maryknoll Drive Hingham, MA 02043 Phone: 617-283-5330 Email: jhmcc@comcast.net August 18, 2015 Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Director, File Reference No. 2015-230
More information8 June Re: FEE Comments on IASB/FASB Phase B Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Financial Statement Presentation
8 June 2009 Sir David Tweedie Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom E-mail: commentletters@iasb.org Ref.: ACC/HvD/LF/SR Dear Sir David, Re: FEE
More informationFASB Nonprofit Financial Statement Project
FASB Nonprofit Financial Statement Project An Analysis of the Impact of Accounting Standards Update 2016-14, Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities ( ASU ) By: Smith & Howard Page
More informationNovember 27, Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
November 27, 2013 Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts File Reference No. 2013-290 The Financial Reporting Executive
More informationFile Reference No Re: Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Inventory
695 E. Main Street Stamford, CT 06901-2141 Tel: +1 203 708 4000 Fax: +1 203 708 4797 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merrit 7 P.O. Box 5116
More information9/11/2017. Agenda. What Drove the Change. Not-for-Profit Financial Statements: Changes are Coming!
Not-for-Profit Financial Statements: Changes are Coming! Presented by Tony Smith, CPA Beth Allen, CPA GreerWalker LLP Agenda Understanding what drove the change for an overhaul of not for profit financial
More informationMay 5, Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
May 5, 2017 Ms. Susan Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: File Reference No. 2017-200 Dear Ms. Cosper: PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationFebruary 29, Via Electronic Mail
February 29, 2016 Via Electronic Mail Mr. Russ Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-05116 Re: FASB File Reference No. 2015-350: Fair Value
More informationFASB Update: A View from the Top - The Latest Developments in Financial Accounting Standards
FASB Update: A View from the Top - The Latest Developments in Financial Accounting Standards Jenifer Wyss Project Manager, FASB MACPA 2014 CPA Innovation Summit June 16, 2014 The views expressed in this
More informationFASB Update: A View from the Top - The Latest Developments in Financial Accounting Standards
FASB Update: A View from the Top - The Latest Developments in Financial Accounting Standards Jenifer Wyss Project Manager, FASB MACPA 2014 CPA Innovation Summit June 16, 2014 The views expressed in this
More informationNot-for-Profit Conference A&A Update for NFPs
Not-for-Profit Conference A&A Update for NFPs James Schmutte July 24, 2014 This session focuses on recent and developing activities of the four standard setters (FASB, AICPA, OMB and GAO) that impact nonprofit
More informationThis document represents the views of COT and CCR and not necessarily the views of FEI or its members individually.
September 30, 2016 Russell G. Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Re: File Reference No. 2016-270 Dear Chairman Golden, Financial Executives
More informationRevenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: April 29, 2015 Comments Due: May 29, 2015 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Deferral of the Effective Date The Board issued this Exposure Draft
More informationNotes to Financial Statements (Topic 235)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: September 24, 2015 Comments Due: December 8, 2015 Notes to Financial Statements (Topic 235) Assessing Whether Disclosures Are Material The Board issued this
More informationSeptember 9, 2010 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 Norwalk, CT File Reference: No.
September 9, 2010 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference: No. 1830-100 Dear Mr. Golden: The Financial Reporting Executive Committee
More informationNonprofit Seminar: 2018 Accounting Standard Changes. Presented by: Adam Kellerhals, CPA
Nonprofit Seminar: 2018 Accounting Standard Changes Presented by: Adam Kellerhals, CPA Disclaimer Our firm provides the information for general guidance only, and does not constitute the provision of legal
More informationDecember 14, Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
December 14, 2016 Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 File Reference No. 2016-330 Dear Ms. Cosper: The Financial Reporting Executive
More informationRe: Proposed Accounting Standards Update on Government Assistance (Topic 832) Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance
Mr. Russ Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 301 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-05116 Re: Proposed Accounting Standards Update on Government Assistance (Topic 832) Disclosures
More informationDeloitte & Touche LLP
695 East Main Street Stamford, CT 06901-2141 Tel: + 1 203 708 4000 Fax: + 1 203 708 4797 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O.
More informationStatement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)
Proposed Accounting Standards Update Issued: April 17, 2012 Comments Due: July 16, 2012 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Not-for-Profit Entities: Classification of the Sale of Donated Securities in
More informationOctober 14, Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 Norwalk, CT
Deloitte & Touche LLP Ten Westport Road PO Box 820 Wilton, CT 06897-0820 Tel: +1 203 761 3000 www.deloitte.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7
More informationTel: ey.com
Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 773 3000 ey.com Ms. Susan M. Cosper Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116
More informationBoard Meeting Handout Disclosure Framework Fair Value Measurement March 4, 2015
Board Meeting Handout Disclosure Framework Fair Value Measurement March 4, 2015 PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING 1. The March 4, 2015, Board meeting is a decision-making meeting on fair value measurement disclosures
More informationNonprofit GAAP Accounting Update
Nonprofit GAAP Accounting Update June 21, 2014 1 Armanino LLP amllp.com Armanino LLP amllp.com About the Presenters Paul O Grady, CPA, Partner, Not-For-Profit Practice Leader Armanino LLP Paul heads up
More informationFinancial Guarantee Insurance
Board Meeting Handout Financial Guarantee Insurance January 9, 2008 At the January 9, 2008 Board meeting, the staff plans to continue redeliberations of the FASB Exposure Draft, Accounting for Financial
More informationApril 15, Russell G. Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT
Donna J. Fisher Senior Vice President Tax, Accounting & Financial Management (202) 663-5318 DFisher@aba.com April 15, 2016 Russell G. Golden Chairman Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7
More informationMorganStanley. Letter of Comment No: File Reference: FSPFAS133A. November 21, 2005
1 New York Plaza New York. NY 10004 'q MorganStanley '1 Letter of Comment No: File Reference: FSPFAS133A November 21, 2005 Suzanne Q. Bielstein Director-Major Projects and Technical Activities Mr. Lawrence
More informationNot-for-Profit: Presentation of financial statements
Not-for-Profit: Presentation of financial statements Issues In-Depth October 2016 US GAAP kpmg.com/us/frn Not-for-Profit: Presentation of financial statements b Contents Scaled-back changes, but still
More information