Infrastructure Doesn t Need to be Actively Managed to Outperform

Transcription

1 ETFS Trade idea ETF Securities The intelligent alternative May 2018 Infrastructure Doesn t Need to be Actively Managed to Outperform ETFS Global Core Infrastructure ETF (CORE) Many investors still invest in infrastructure via famous active fund managers In reality some ETFs outperform many of their active peers for significantly lower cost This note highlights CORE, which has produced strong relative returns since inception and outperformed many well-known active managers Investors looking for a cost-effective and dynamic infrastructure investment should consider evaluating CORE In this week s ETFS Trade idea, we look at how CORE, which was launched in September 2017, is performing in comparison to a collection of well-known active and passive global infrastructure funds. How does CORE compare to other infrastructure funds? Many investors believe that infrastructure is a complicated asset class and requires active management to provide real long-term outperformance. As the analysis below will illustrate, this is simply not the case. Just as with almost all asset classes, ETFs provide a strong alternative that investors should consider. Table 1 compares the total returns of CORE (and its benchmark Index) against a selection of six other unhedged global infrastructure funds available to investors in. Since its inception only one of those (Magellan Infrastructure Fund) has outperformed CORE. CORE Fund 3M Y TD 6M inception* ETFS Global Core Infrastructure ETF (CORE) 5.80% 1.92% 0.32% 4.24% AMP Capital Global Infra. Securities Fund - Unhedged 1.92% -2.29% -3.01% -1.49% CFS Wholesale Global Listed Infrastructure Securities Fund -2.16% -3.49% -4.21% -3.04% Macquarie International Infra. Securities Fund - Unhedged 3.60% 0.95% -0.65% 2.11% Magellan Infrastructure Fund - Unhedged 4.88% 2.28% 3.02% 6.79% RARE Infrastructure Income Fund -0.56% -3.08% -3.45% -5.18% Vanguard Global Infrastructure Fund - Unhedged 6.03% 1.49% 0.00% 3.60% Table 1: Comparison of returns of CORE against a selection of actively managed infrastructure funds *CORE inception date is 19-Sep For the purposes of Table 1, an inception date of 30-Sep-2017 is used to allow comparison against funds that publish net assets values only on a month-end basis. As CORE only launched in late-2017 we use the index to compare its longer-term performance in Table 2. During the bull market of 2017, as with low volatility strategies across the board, CORE would have underperformed, based on simulated index performance. However, it would have been amongst the top two performers in both 2015 and 2016.

2 2 Fund Solactive Global Core Infra. Low Volatility Index 5.29% 13.02% 7.68% AMP Capital Global Infra. Securities Fund - Unhedged 8.22% n/a n/a CFS Wholesale Global Listed Infrastructure Securities Fund 14.77% 15.48% 3.04% Macquarie International Infra. Securities Fund - Unhedged 10.52% 8.85% 0.17% Magellan Infrastructure Fund - Unhedged 14.13% 2.65% 15.69% RARE Infrastructure Income Fund 10.11% 15.63% -3.49% Vanguard Global Infrastructure Fund - Unhedged 6.70% 12.72% 0.10% Table 2: Comparison of returns of CORE s benchmark Index against a selection of actively managed infrastructure funds What else is there to know about CORE? CORE is the only infrastructure fund in that runs a smart-beta strategy to dynamically adjust its portfolio to reflect prevailing market conditions. It does so by tracking the Solactive Global Core Infrastructure Low Volatility Index (the Index ). The strategy of the Index aims to outperform the wider infrastructure market by investing in stocks with the lowest realised volatility. These stocks are likely to be the ones with the most desirable qualities for infrastructure investors; i.e. stable returns with lower correlation to the wider equity markets. Because CORE s investment strategy is pre-defined it has several potential advantages over active funds: its strategy is consistent, published and available for investors to evaluate and scrutinise its holdings are published in the public domain daily because it trades on exchange, unlike many active funds it is available for investors to trade intraday because the fund does not require a team of fund managers to continually evaluate its holdings, it can charge management fees more in-line with passive index trackers CORE s stocks allocations tend to be more dynamic than many other infrastructure funds due to the low volatility selection process it applies. This means that CORE will likely respond to changing market conditions differently to other funds To demonstrate the impact of the low volatility filter, in its most recent rebalance in mid-march the Index reduced its exposure to the U.S. while increasing exposure to China, Japan, Taiwan and Canada. Sector-wise the Index underweighted the volatile energy sector as oil prices were hitting new multi-year highs and increased exposure to industrials as well as slightly increasing exposure to utilities. Whilst energy prices have continued to rise CORE is still one of the top performing funds over the past 3 months. Figure 1: comparative performance of the Solactive Global Core Infrastructure Low Volatility Index against the benchmark FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index over 5 years to 30 April Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April 2018.

3 3 Figure 2: comparative 3-month volatility of the Solactive Global Core Infrastructure Low Volatility Index against the benchmark FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index over 5 years to 30 April Source: Bloomberg as at 30 April Figure 1, above, shows the comparative performance of the Index against the well-known FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. Figure 2, shows the relative volatility levels of the two indices. Over five years the Index outperformed by close to 1% per annum. Volatility was on average over 1% per annum lower, despite the fact that the Index contains only 75 names compared to over 230 names for the FTSE index. Furthermore, the Index was less correlated with global equity markets, as represented by the MSCI World Index over the same period. Low Cost Firstly, CORE s management fee compares favourably to the active funds. CORE charges a fee of 0.45% p.a. (plus up to 0.10% p.a. of additional cost recoveries), which is below all the active funds detailed in the Appendix and significantly below the average MER of 0.87% p.a. of the funds profiled. Note that many of the active funds also charge performance fees, which are not shown here. How CORE invests ETFS Global Core Infrastructure ETF (CORE) follows a rules-based strategy, tracking its benchmark Index, and has the following features: CORE captures the performance of a selection of the 75 lowest volatility companies from the global infrastructure universe and aims to provide stable returns with regular income. CORE is the only smart-beta fund focusing on infrastructure available in. CORE is rebalanced semi-annually in March and September. CORE is weighted inversely in proportion to the volatility of each constituent, meaning that the stocks with the lowest volatility receive the highest weightings. CORE applies market capitalisation and liquidity limits and ensures sector diversity by capping individual sectors at a maximum of 50% (or 40 stocks) and individual industries at a maximum of 35%. CORE has an MER of 0.45% p.a. with up to a maximum of 0.10% p.a. of additional costs. CORE has an Investment Grade rating by Lonsec. Summary Actively managed exposures are not the only way to invest in Infrastructure and the above illustrates how using an ETF like CORE can provide outperformance vs many actively managed peers at significantly lower costs. ETFS Global Core Infrastructure ETF factsheet

4 4 Appendix CORE vs 19 Other Infrastructure Strategies Total return (%) CORE inception* 2017 MER (%) 3M YTD 6M ETFS Global Core Infrastructure ETF (CORE) % 1.92% 0.32% 4.24% n/a n/a n/a Solactive Global Core Infra. Low Volatility Index n/a 5.29% 1.87% 0.23% 4.19% 5.29% 13.02% 7.68% 4 Dimensions Global Infrastructure Fund % 0.51% 1.10% 4.65% 22.10% n/a n/a AMP Capital Core Infrastructure Fund % -1.60% -0.11% 1.33% 9.58% 11.17% 15.29% AMP Capital Global Infra. Securities Fund - hedged % -4.99% -5.05% -4.47% 12.48% 8.05% -7.07% AMP Capital Global Infra. Securities Fund - Unhedged % -2.29% -3.01% -1.49% 8.22% n/a n/a Argo Global Listed Infrastructure Limited (LIC) n/a 1.60% -5.90% -0.94% 2.48% 15.40% -2.74% n/a CFS Wholesale Global Listed Infrastructure Securities Fund % -3.49% -4.21% -3.04% 14.77% 15.48% 3.04% Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Fund % -0.24% -0.55% 0.33% 23.96% 11.07% 12.67% Macquarie International Infra. Securities Fund - Hedged % -2.00% -2.67% -0.95% 14.27% 11.57% -3.38% Macquarie International Infra. Securities Fund - Unhedged % 0.95% -0.65% 2.11% 10.52% 8.85% 0.17% Magellan Infrastructure Fund - Hedged % -0.20% 1.02% 3.78% 17.43% 6.71% 10.63% Magellan Infrastructure Fund - Unhedged % 2.28% 3.02% 6.79% 14.13% 2.65% 15.69% Maple-Brown Abbot Global Listed Infra. Fund - Hedged % -3.80% -4.21% -4.59% 7.60% 18.22% n/a Maple-Brown Abbot Global Listed Infra. Fund - Unhedged % -0.40% -2.21% -1.01% 3.28% 17.67% 8.91% Mercer Passive Global Listed Infrastructrure Fund % -2.28% -2.69% -0.35% 14.19% 12.07% 2.40% RARE Infrastructure Income Fund % -3.08% -3.45% -5.18% 10.11% 15.63% -3.49% RARE Infrastructure Value Fund - Hedged % -3.85% -4.29% -4.90% 11.89% 8.00% -0.33% VanEck Vectors FTSE Global Infra. (Hedged) ETF % -2.37% -2.67% -0.32% 14.61% n/a n/a Vanngaurd Global Infrastructure Fund - Hedged % -1.69% -1.78% 0.23% 13.38% 13.61% -6.88% Vanngaurd Global Infrastructure Fund - Unhedged % 1.49% 0.00% 3.60% 6.70% 12.72% 0.10% Table 3: Comparison of management fees and returns against and a selection of passive and actively managed infrastructure funds *CORE inception date is 19-Sep For the purposes of Table 1, an inception date of 30-Sep-2017 is used to allow comparison against funds that publish net assets values only on a month-end basis. GET MORE INFORMATION To sign up for future ETFS Trade ideas, infoau@etfsecurities.com.au To find out more about ETF Securities products, visit CONTACT ETF Securities Sales and Trading Phone: infoau@etfsecurities.com.au Ganesh Balendran Chad Hitzeman Co-Head of Sales Phone: Phone: Mobile: Mobile: ganesh.balendran@etfsecurities.com.au chad.hitzeman@etfsecurities.com.au Kanish Chugh Gemma Weeks Co-Head of Sales Phone: Phone: Mobile: Mobile: kanish.chugh@etfsecurities.com.au gemma.weeks@etfsecurities.com.au Linda Cheng Nicola Culey Business Development Associate Phone: Phone: Mobile: Mobile: linda.cheng@etfsecurities.com.au nicola.culey@etfsecurities.com.au

5 5 DISCLAIMER This document is communicated by (n Financial Services Licence No: ) ( ETFS ). This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any recipient for any purpose. Under no circumstances is this document to be used or considered as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, investments or other financial instruments and any investments should only be made on the basis of the relevant product disclosure statement which should be considered by any potential investor including any risks identified therein. This document does not take into account your personal needs and financial circumstances. You should seek independent financial, legal, tax and other relevant advice having regard to your particular circumstances. Although we use reasonable efforts to obtain reliable, comprehensive information, we make no representation and give no warranty that it is accurate or complete. Investments in any product issued by ETFS are subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal invested. Neither ETFS, ETFS Capital Limited nor any other member of the ETFS Capital Group guarantees the performance of any products issued by ETFS or the repayment of capital or any particular rate of return therefrom. The value or return of an investment will fluctuate and investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.