ADOPTING THE AUGUST 2012 ISDA PROTOCOL FOR DODD FRANK SWAP REQUIREMENTS
|
|
- Samson Ellis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ADOPTING THE AUGUST 2012 ISDA PROTOCOL FOR DODD FRANK SWAP REQUIREMENTS Thompson & Knight Notes on the ISDA August 2012 DF Protocol (the Protocol ) I. Introduction 1 The Protocol is the first of a planned series of protocols intended to address the requirements of a series of rules adopted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC ) pursuant to the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd Frank ). These rules impose various reporting requirements on parties to over-the-counter swaps. Most of these requirements are intended either to give the CFTC more granular information about the swap market or to insure that swap dealers adequately know their customer. The CFTC rules do not generally require both parties to report the required information; there is generally a Reporting Counterparty and a Non-Reporting Counterparty. When swap participants are trading with swap dealers such as banks, the CFTC requires the swap dealer to be the Reporting Counterparty. Swap dealers need to obtain some of the required information from their swap participants, and there are certain tasks that these participants must perform themselves. The CFTC rules covered by the Protocol will become effective on May 1, After that date, swap participants that have not entered into either the Protocol or bilateral arrangements with their swap dealers to ensure compliance with CFTC rules will not be able to enter into new swap transactions or materially modify existing transactions. Some banks have developed form amendments to ISDA Master Agreements in order to deal with the requirements of the CFTC rules, and these amendments may be useful to customers that deal with only one or two banks. For market participants that deal with multiple counterparties (or, if participants prefer, even with a single counterparty), ISDA has developed the Protocol to allow the relevant information to be exchanged on a more general basis and to provide a process for amending all ISDA master agreements of a swap participant (each such ISDA master agreement is defined as a Protocol Covered Agreement ). We believe that most independent oil companies will prefer to use the Protocol. The Protocol involves the following documents, which are hyperlinked in this memorandum: ISDA s online introduction to the Protocol and accompanying FAQ (the Introduction ). The ISDA August 2012 DF Protocol Agreement (the Protocol Agreement ). 1 This memorandum has been prepared to provide background information for clients and friends of Thompson & Knight. It is not intended as legal advice or a legal opinion with respect to any specific circumstances or any specific client. 2 The effective date for these rules has been postponed twice, but market participants have been advised by the CFTC that there will be no further postponements. As of January 1, 2013 rules regarding anti-fraud, daily marks, communication-fair dealing, general suitability, and political contributions became effective.
2 The ISDA August 2012 DF Supplement (the DF Supplement ). The Adherence Letter to the Protocol (the Adherence Letter ). The ISDA August 2012 DF Protocol Questionnaire (the Questionnaire ). 3 The Questionnaire Answer Sheet (the Principal Answer Sheet ). Amended and Restated Addendum I to ISDA August 2012 DF Protocol Questionnaire (the Addendum ). The number of documents listed above makes the process of becoming a party to the Protocol seem complicated, but fundamentally it is relatively simple: Obtain a CICI number. Fill out online, print out, sign, scan as a pdf document, and return to ISDA an Adherence Letter, which will be posted on ISDA s web site. Answer the questions in the confidential Questionnaire (which are straightforward and are summarized below); elect, if desired, to have Schedule 3 of the DF Supplement (discussed below) apply; and deliver the Questionnaire to their swap counterparties, either directly or online. Two other actions may be necessary in some circumstances: If a swap participant elects to have Schedule 3 of the DF Supplement apply, it must adopt written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the persons evaluating swap recommendations and making trading decisions on behalf of the company (whether those persons are employees or outside advisors) are capable of doing so. Such policies could, for example, identify who is authorized to trade derivatives and what kind of board approval or oversight applies. More full-blown policies could also (i) refer to the requirements of the company s credit agreement or set out overall trading limits, such as those contained in a typical bank credit agreement; (ii) prohibit speculation, and require that hedges not be entered into never exceed anticipated actual production; (iii) describe internal reporting requirements for overall hedge positions; (iv) describe how a fall in production that results in hedges exceeding the overall trading limits are to be brought to the attention of senior management or the board; and (v) identify processes for temporarily waiving or permanently amending these policies. It is likely that most oil companies will want to elect to have Schedule 3 apply and therefore should adopt such policies and procedures. The board of directors of public companies should adopt a resolution that allows the company to enter into uncleared swap transactions. 4 These notes are a simplified summary of the Protocol Agreement and related documents. Among other things, we have assumed that participants in the Protocol are acting directly on their own behalf and 3 If asked for a User Name when going to the Questionnaire, select Cancel instead of inserting any name. 4 See 17 CFR 50.50(b)(iii)(D)(2), which requires a swap reporting entity to ask its counterparty: (2) Whether an appropriate committee of that counterparty s board of directors (or equivalent body) has reviewed and approved the decision to enter into swaps that are exempt from the requirements of sections 2(h)(1) and 2(h)(8) of the Act. 2
3 not through agents and that they are not Special Entities. (Special Entities are described below; independent oil companies, other than ERISA entities, would not be Special Entities). II. Obtaining a CICI Number. A CICI number can be obtained at the following linked web site: The cost is $200, and payment is made by credit card. III. Protocol Agreement and Adherence Letter. The Protocol Agreement is not intended to be modified. It contains basic representations and warranties (due organization, corporate power, no conflict with law or contract, enforceability, etc.) by the parties (the Protocol Participants ). It also permits the Protocol Participants, through their Questionnaires, to elect to make certain optional representations or enter into certain optional agreements. These are discussed below. Swap participants adhere to the Protocol by delivering an Adherence Letter to ISDA. The form of Adherence Letter is Exhibit 1 to the Protocol Agreement. Blanks in the Adherence Letter can be filled in online at ISDA s web site. The letter can then be printed out, signed, scanned as a pdf document, and uploaded for return to ISDA. Scanned Adherence Letters should be saved to your computer and then uploaded to ISDA s web site by clicking an upload button at the web site. (They are not sent by to an ISDA address.) It may take one or two days for ISDA to process and accept an Adherence Letter. Until it is accepted, you cannot proceed to fill out and deliver its Questionnaire. A $500 fee must be paid to ISDA in connection with submitting an Adherence Letter. Credit cards are accepted for payment. Adherence Letters will be posted publicly on ISDA s web site. An Adherence Letter will not be effective with respect to the Protocol Participants party to a Protocol Covered Agreement unless those Protocol Participants exchange Questionnaires. IV. Questionnaire and Principal Answer Sheet Protocol Participants supplement their Protocol Covered Agreements and make the Protocol effective by completing and delivering Questionnaires to each other. Questionnaires can be delivered directly in accordance with the notice provisions specified in the Protocol Participants Adherence Letters. Questionnaires can also be filled out and delivered online through ISDA Amend by Markit by going to the following web site: 3
4 Using ISDA Amend by Markit for filling in and delivering Questionnaires is free for buy-side Protocol Participants. Whether delivered directly or online, different Questionnaires can be given to different counterparties. Questionnaires are available only to other Protocol Participants to which they are delivered or that are authorized to receive them online. If a buy-side Protocol Participant delivers its Questionnaires online via ISDA Amend, the swap dealers that the buy-side Protocol Participant has authorized to receive those Questionnaires automatically will be deemed to have delivered their Questionnaires to it. The Questionnaire, if not completed online, includes both questions and a Principal Answer Sheet attached as Annex A to the Questionnaire. Applicable questions must be answered on the Principal Answer Sheet. The questions relevant to a swap participant that is not a swap dealer or Special Entity are summarized below. Basic questions are in Part II of the Questionnaire: (1) What is your CICI number? (2) What is your name and address? (3) What is your principal business? (4) Are any persons guaranteeing your swap obligations? If yes, what are their names and addresses? Note that this requirement appears to require listing each separate subsidiary guarantor, as well as all other guarantors. 5 (5) Is any person (other than an employee) exercising any control with respect to your swap positions? There appears to be no explanation of what control means in this context, so the client should answer based on a common sense interpretation of the question. (6) Do you want to designate any person as your Designated Evaluation Agent? A Designated Evaluation Agent is a person that is responsible for (i) evaluating investment risks with regard to swaps and trading strategies involving swaps as well as any swap recommendations provided by a swap dealer and (ii) makes trading decisions with respect to swaps on your behalf. If you designate a Designated Evaluation Agent, you must provide its name and contact information. (7-8) These questions are for Special Entities and are not relevant to most oil companies. 5 In adopting final rules adopted by the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2012, the CFTC stated that the term swaps includes swap guaranties. Swap guarantors must themselves, therefore, be Eligible Contract Participants (see the discussion below). If any guarantors are not Eligible Contract Participants, their guaranties are unenforceable and violate the rules. Most banks are inserting protective language into their guaranty forms to address this problem. 4
5 (9) This question is for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants and is not relevant to most oil companies. (10) Which address do you want your swap counterparty to use to send information and notices relating to the DF Supplement? (11) Do you want to receive oral disclosure of certain information relating to trades, with posttrade written confirmation? Market practice appears to be that much information in swap transactions is initially conveyed orally. Agreeing initially to receiving information orally obtained in a phone call, without waiting for written disclosures, appears to be the most practicable approach. Specific questions regarding the status of the Protocol Participant are in Part III of the Questionnaire: (1) Are you a commodity pool? Most oil companies would answer No. A commodity pool is any investment trust, syndicate, or similar form of enterprise operated for the purpose of trading in commodity interests. Oil companies that hedge their own production to reduce market risk would not be commodity pools. (2) Are you an Eligible Contract Participant? Most oil companies would answer Yes and would specify that they qualify under paragraph (b)(ix) of Question 2 as a corporation, partnership, or other entity that has total assets exceeding $10,000,000 or whose obligations are guaranteed by an entity that has such total assets. 6 If an oil company cannot confirm that it is an Eligible Contract Participant, it cannot generally enter into swap transactions. (3) Are you a Swap Dealer? Most oil companies would answer No. If they trade enough to be a swap dealer, they would know it. (4) Are you a Major Swap Participant? Most oil companies would answer No for the same reason as in question 3. The CFTC has said that this definition picks up only a relatively small number of companies, probably less than 25, that are major swap participants but are not swap dealers. (5) Are you a Financial Entity? Most oil companies would answer No. A financial entity for this purpose is a swap dealer, a major swap participant, a commodity pool, certain private funds, and persons predominantly engaged in banking. If your company is a private fund as defined in Section 202(a) of the Investment Advisors Act, or if your company is predominantly engaged in financial businesses, rather than in the active operation of oil and gas properties or other non-financial business assets, further analysis is needed with respect to this question. 6 If an oil company does not qualify under this paragraph, it may qualify under paragraph (b)(x) of Question 2, which provides that entities that have a net work exceeding $1,000,000 and enter into swaps in connection in connection with the conduct of their business or to manage risk associated with an asset or liability owned or incurred or reasonably likely to be owned or incurred by it in the conduct of its business also qualify as Eligible Contact Participants. 5
6 (6) Are you a Special Entity? Special Entities include federal agencies, states and any political subdivision or agency thereof, ERISA plans, public pension plans and endowments acting as such, and other employee benefit plans. Most oil companies would answer No. (7-8) These questions apply only to Special Entities and are not relevant to most oil companies. (9) Are you agreeing to incorporate Schedule 3 of the DF Supplement as part of your agreement? Schedule 3 is discussed below. Companies may want to discuss this with their swap dealers. (10) This question applies only if there is no signed ISDA Master Agreement. By exchanging Questionnaires, Protocol Participants also automatically incorporate Schedule 2 of the DF Supplement. The provisions of Schedule 2 are described below. If you have designated a Designated Evaluation Agent, that Designated Evaluation Agent will also have to execute the Questionnaire (or, if ISDA Amend is used, a signature page for it will have to be uploaded). V. DF Supplement The DF Supplement sets forth certain standardized representations, acknowledgments, notifications, and agreements relating to the CFTC rules. These are set forth in Schedules. The Protocol Covered Agreements between any two Protocol Participants that have delivered completed and executed Adherence Letters to ISDA and exchanged Questionnaires will be automatically deemed to have supplemented their Protocol Covered Agreements by DF Supplement Schedules 1 and 2. Those Protocol Participants can elect in their Questionnaires to incorporate the other Schedules that are applicable. Both parties must elect to incorporate one of those other Schedules for it to be incorporated. DF Schedule 1 contains defined terms used in the Protocol documents. Schedule 2 contains agreements between a Swap Dealer and any other party to a Protocol Covered Agreement. These are not elective. They are, however, intended to be neutral and not controversial. Certain sections of Schedule 2 are only applicable to certain types of Protocol Participants based on representations they have made to each other in their Questionnaires, and paragraphs (g) and (h) below address certain narrow categories of transactions. Paragraph (i), on the other hand, imposes continuing reporting requirements. Schedule 2 generally provides that: (a) (b) Each party agrees to give the other party the information the other party needs ( DF Supplement Information ) to comply with Dodd Frank. [Section 2.4] Each party represents that, as of the date on which each swap transaction is entered into, its DF Supplement Information (other than financial information) is true and has no material omissions and all financial information furnished pursuant to the DF Supplement has been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards. [Section 2.1] 6
7 (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Each party acknowledges that the other party is relying on the DF Supplement Information. The failure of DF Supplement Information to be true will not, however, cause an Event of Default or Termination Event under the ISDA Master. [Section 2.2] Each party agrees to update its DF Supplement Information to keep it true and to provide any information reasonably requested to comply with Title VII of Dodd Frank. [Section 2.3 & 2.4] Notwithstanding any confidentiality agreement between the parties, each party consents to the disclosure of information under applicable CFTC regulations. [Section 2.5] If the parties do not enter into a confidentiality agreement, CFTC regulations provide for the treatment of confidential information, and Schedule 2 modifies those regulations (which those regulations permit) to resolve certain omissions and ambiguities in the regulations regarding what is not material confidential information and permitted disclosures. [Section ] (The modifications to CFTC regulations made by Schedule 2 are not likely to be controversial. In some respects, the CFTC regulations confidential information provisions, as modified by Schedule 2, may be more protective than many confidentiality agreements currently in use.) Each party consents to the recording of conversations of its trading personnel. (This is required by CFTC regulations and is intended to eliminate any issue under the laws of some states regarding recording conversations.) [Section 2.6] Each party represents that, if it enters into any Commodity Trade Option under the Protocol Covered Agreement, that option contains a binding obligation that results in the sale and physical shipment of a commodity. Commodity Trade Option means a commodity option that is intended to be settled by physical delivery and shipment and involves a producer or consumer of the commodity or certain other industry participants. [Section 2.7 & 2.8] If a Non-Reporting Counterparty enters into an international swap with a Reporting Counterparty, it must provide certain information to the Reporting Counterparty. [Section 2.9] An international swap is a swap a swap required by U.S. law and the law of another jurisdiction to be reported both to a swap data repository and to a different trade repository registered with the other jurisdiction. Swap data repositories are entities created by Dodd-Frank in order to provide a central facility for swap data reporting and recordkeeping. Each Non-Reporting Counterparty also must notify the Reporting Counterparty of the occurrence of certain life cycle events that are related to a corporate event in respect of such Non-Reporting Counterparty. Notice must be provided by 10:00 am on the second business day after the occurrence of such event. [Section 2.10] (These notifications are required under CFTC regulations.) Although it is not entirely clear how the CFTC will interpret life cycle events, it appears that these events will, for commodity swaps, primarily be changes to the terms of the swap itself. The terms of equity swaps might, by contrast, be affected by corporate mergers or changes to the terms of the securities that underlie the equity swaps, and it appears that these are the kinds of corporate events required to be reported. 7
8 (j) Each entity that is a Hedging Entity ECP 7 represents, at the time of each swap transaction that it enters into, that each swap transaction entered into by it will be in connection with the conduct of its business or to manage risk associated with an asset or liability reasonably likely to be owned or incurred in the conduct of its business. [Section 2.2] Oil companies that are Eligible Contract Participants because they meet the total assets test described above are not Hedging Entity ECPs. (k) Each counterparty that is not a swap dealer or a major swap participant makes other representations and agreements, generally relating to how the swap dealer or major swap participant will provide certain required pricing information. Schedule 3 includes certain representations relating to Designated Evaluation Agents or by buyside Protocol Participants that do not use such agents. A Protocol Participant can elect in its Questionnaire whether or not to make the representations in Schedule 3. (a) A Protocol Participants that has specified in its Questionnaire that it has a Designated Evaluation Agent may elect to have it and its Designated Evaluation Agent make certain representations and covenants: It represents that it has complied in good faith with written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that its Designated Evaluation Agent is capable of evaluating swap recommendations of a swap dealer and making trading decisions on its behalf. The Designated Evaluation Agent represents that it is exercising independent judgment in evaluating swap recommendations. The Designated Evaluation Agent agrees to update information previously provide and representations previously made to maintain the accuracy thereof. It represents that it will exercise independent judgment in consultation with its Designated Evaluation Agent in evaluating swap recommendations of a swap dealer that are presented to it. (b) A Protocol Participant that has specified in its Questionnaire that it does not use a Designated Evaluation Agent may make elect to make the following representations: It has, and has complied with, written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the persons making trading decisions on behalf of [the company] are capable of doing so. The swap dealer is acting on its own behalf and not as an advisor as to the suitability of the swap. 7 A Hedging Entity ECP is an entity that represents that it is a corporation, partnership, or other entity with a net worth exceeding $1,000,000 and enters into swaps in connection with the conduct of its business or to manage risk but has not otherwise qualified as an eligible contract participant. 8
9 (c) (d) Note that the first representation described above in each of paragraphs (a) and (b) requires the preparation and adoption of specific policies and procedures by a company, if they are not already in place. These representations are intended to provide under CFTC rules a safe harbor for swap dealers. 8 If a buy-side Protocol Participant does not make these representations, a swap dealer that recommends a swap or trading strategy involving a swap must use reasonable diligence to determine and have a reasonable basis for determining the suitability of that swap or strategy. Diligence includes a client s investment profile, trading objectives, and ability to absorb losses. Whether a communication from a swap dealer is a recommendation will depend on the facts and circumstances. General marketing material probably would not be a recommendation; a customized pitch book probably would be. Protocol Participants should consider whether they are willing to make these representations or would prefer to have the CFTC rules apply to its relations with swap dealers. Swap dealers have expressed concern that doing reasonable diligence may require them to obtain information from their clients that clients will be unwilling to provide, and that doing such diligence may substantially interfere with ongoing relations with clients. While Schedule 3 does not seem particularly burdensome, there seem to be no strong reasons for an end-user to want to adopt it. Before electing Schedule 3, we think oil companies and other end-users may want to see whether their swap dealer counterparties will object if the end-users do not elect Schedule 3. Schedules 4, 5, and 6 only apply to Special Entities. Oil companies generally would not be Special Entities to which Schedule 4, 5, and 6 would be applicable and should focus on Schedule 3 only. VI. Amended and Restated Addendum I to ISDA August 2012 DF Protocol Questionnaire The Addendum updates the Questionnaire to reflect CFTC rules that became effective on December 12, It is not relevant to independent oil companies. A swap participant must represent whether it is an Active Fund, which is a private fund under the Investment under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that, among other things, on average executed more than 200 swaps per month in the 12 months preceding November 1, Most oil companies would not be Active Funds. 8 Certain swap dealer obligations are not affected by the safe harbor, including the obligation a reasonably sufficient time prior to entering into a swap to disclose material risks, material characteristics of the swap, material incentives or conflicts of interest, and the price and mid-market mark of the swap. Swap dealers also must notify their counterparties that they can request and consult on the design of a scenario analysis that includes a disclosure of material assumptions and methodologies (other than proprietary information). 9
10 The Addendum also addresses certain matters relating to commodity pools, which oil companies are unlikely to be, as discussed above. VII. Summary Oil companies that are end-users of commodity swaps and derivatives need to take certain steps in order to be able to trade in the over-the-counter derivatives markets, or to make material modifications to existing swap transactions, on and after May 1, They must obtain a CICI number and either enter into bilateral arrangements with swap dealers modifying existing ISDA Master Agreements or become a party to the Protocol by delivering an Adherence Letter and exchanging Questionnaires with their swap dealers. Two other actions also may need to be taken. If a swap participant elects to have Schedule 3 of the DF Supplement apply, it must adopt written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the persons making trading decisions on behalf of the company (whether they are Designated Evaluation Agents or company employees) are capable of doing so. The boards of public companies also should adopt a resolution that allows the company to enter into uncleared swap transactions Thompson & Knight LLP 10
MARCH 2014 KEY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. 1. Overview of FX Swap Regulatory Framework
Wsgr alert MARCH 2014 Fourth update: dodd-frank rules Impact end-users of ForeIgn exchange derivatives KEY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS This March 2014 update is a summary of certain recent developments under the
More informationISDA MARCH 2013 DF SUPPLEMENT 1
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA MARCH 2013 DF SUPPLEMENT 1 published on March 22, 2013, by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. [This document illustrates
More informationA Practical Guide to Lender Compliance with Eligible Contract Participant (ECP) Requirements
A Practical Guide to Lender Compliance with Eligible Contract Participant (ECP) Requirements Introduction Pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act (the CEA ), as modified by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act
More informationConsiderations for End-Users January 2014
2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Considerations for End-Users January 2014 Title VII for End-Users Title VII has as its objectives Reducing systemic risk posed by the swaps market
More informationInternational Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2018 BENCHMARKS SUPPLEMENT PROTOCOL
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2018 BENCHMARKS SUPPLEMENT PROTOCOL published on December 10, 2018 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. The International
More informationPRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF DERIVATIVES REFORM GORDON F. PEERY and STUART E. FROSS K&L GATES LLP Boston, MA September 21, 2010 1 Agenda Introduction Speakers Late-Breaking Developments: Developments in August
More information1 Although the FXC and the FMLG are sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the IISBP are not
To: Adherents to the ISDA Derivatives/FX PB Business Conduct Allocation Protocol From: Foreign Exchange Committee and Financial Markets Lawyers Group Date: July 29, 2014 Re: Intermediated FX Prime Brokerage
More informationISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol (ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol)
ISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol (ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol) ISDA has prepared this list of frequently asked questions to assist in your consideration of the ISDA U.S. STAY PROTOCOL. THESE FREQUENTLY
More informationWhat End-Users of Derivatives Need to Know About the Dodd-Frank Act
What End-Users of Derivatives Need to Know About the Dodd-Frank Act Prepared By: The Securities and Futures Regulation Group Many companies, both large and small, enter into over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
More informationKey Dodd-Frank Compliance Considerations for End-Users
August 31, 2012 Key Dodd-Frank Compliance Considerations for End-Users Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act ) requires the CFTC and SEC
More informationISDA/Markit Collaboration on Dodd- Frank Protocol and Relevance to Asia
ISDA Documentation Initiatives July 25, 2012 Hong Kong ISDA/Markit Collaboration on Dodd- Frank Protocol and Relevance to Asia Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Jeff Chen, Partner Jeff Robins, Partner
More informationDodd-Frank Title VII: Three Years Out, Still Buyer Beware
Dodd-Frank Title VII: Three Years Out, Still Buyer Beware July 11, 2013 Brought to you by Winston & Strawn s Derivatives Practice Group 2013 Winston & Strawn LLP Today s elunch Presenters Jennifer Genzler
More informationCadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA MARCH 2013 DF SUPPLEMENT 1 published on March [ ], 2013, by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 1 This March 2013 DF Supplement
More informationISDA 2018 Benchmarks Supplement Protocol (Protocol) FAQs
ISDA 2018 Benchmarks Supplement Protocol (Protocol) FAQs ISDA has prepared this list of frequently asked questions to assist in your consideration of the Protocol. Capitalized terms used in this FAQs have
More informationCOMMENTARY. Dodd-Frank Derivatives 101: What In-House. The Basics JONES DAY
November 2012 JONES DAY COMMENTARY Dodd-Frank Derivatives 101: What In-House Counsel Needs to Know Now So you are in-house counsel to a company that, either occasionally or on a regular basis, enters into
More informationThe University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company Derivative Investment Policy
Effective Date of Policy: August 25, 2016 Date Approved by U. T. System Board of Regents: August 25, 2016 Date Approved by UTIMCO Board: July 21, 2016 Supersedes: approved November 5, 2015 Purpose: The
More informationThe road to reform. Helping commercial end users of OTC derivatives comply with Dodd-Frank s Title VII
The road to reform Helping commercial end users of OTC derivatives comply with Dodd-Frank s Title VII Wide-ranging impact A survey conducted by the International Swaps & Derivatives Association (ISDA)
More informationCLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES
CLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES NEW YORK Byungkwon Lim +1 212 909 6571 blim@debevoise.com Emilie T. Hsu +1 212 909 6884 ehsu@debevoise.com
More informationDodd-Frank Act: Are You Ready? Mark. R. Haskell, Floyd L. Norton, IV, Michael M. Philipp, Levi McAllister
Dodd-Frank Act: Are You Ready? Mark. R. Haskell, Floyd L. Norton, IV, Michael M. Philipp, Levi McAllister www.morganlewis.com Dodd-Frank Act: Are You Ready The audio will remain quiet until we begin. We
More informationCOMMENTARY. Potential Impact of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act JONES DAY
March 2013 JONES DAY COMMENTARY Potential Impact of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act and Global OTC Derivatives Regulations In connection with any over-the-counter ( OTC ) derivatives transactions you execute with
More informationThe University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company Derivative Investment Policy
Effective Date of Policy: August 10, 2018 Date Approved by U. T. System Board of Regents: August 10, 2018 Date Approved by UTIMCO Board: July 26, 2018 Supersedes: approved July 21, 2016 Purpose: The purpose
More informationNEW YORK STATE HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. GUIDELINES FOR INTEREST RATE EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS, adopted September 12, 2013
NEW YORK STATE HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY GUIDELINES FOR INTEREST RATE EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS, adopted September 12, 2013 Authorization Subject to the provisions of Article 5-D of the State Finance Law ( Article
More informationUS OTC derivatives reforms Impact on UK and other non-us asset managers. Second update October 2013
US OTC derivatives reforms Impact on UK and other non-us asset managers Second update October 2013 Table of contents Important notes 1. Dodd Frank decision tree 2. What is regulated as a swap? 3. When
More informationPENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY AND PROCEDURE
PTC 502005539 (12/05) Policy Subject: 7.7 - Interest Rate Swap Management Policy PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY AND PROCEDURE This is a statement of official Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Policy
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act August 5, 2013 CFTC ISSUES FINAL INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE AND POLICY STATEMENT AND EXEMPTIVE ORDER REGARDING CROSS-BORDER APPLICATION OF DODD-FRANK ACT SWAP PROVISIONS On July 12,
More informationGFOA Advisory. Use of Debt-Related Derivatives Products
GFOA Advisory Use of Debt-Related Derivatives Products Background. A derivative or swap1 is a financial instrument created from or whose value depends upon (is derived from) the value of one or more separate
More informationProposed Rules for End-User Exception to Clearing of Swaps
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP Please feel free to contact us if we can provide further information on these matters. John W. White 212-474-1732 jwhite@cravath.com B. Robbins Kiessling 212-474-1500 bkiessling@cravath.com
More informationRe: Swap Trading Relationship Documentation Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants / 17 CFR Part 23 / RIN 3038 AC96
April 11, 2011 Mr. David A. Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21 st Street, NW Washington, DC 20581 Via agency website Re: Swap Trading Relationship Documentation
More informationGFOA Advisory. Use of Debt-Related Derivatives Products
GFOA Advisory Use of Debt-Related Derivatives Products GFOA Advisories identify specific policies and procedures necessary to minimize a governments exposure to potential loss in connection with its financial
More informationPeralta Community College District AP 6306
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 6306 INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT Interest rate risk management is incorporated into the framework through which the District undertakes bond financings. Interest rate swap agreements,
More informationFORM OF ADDENDUM CLEARED DERIVATIVES TRANSACTIONS
FORM OF ADDENDUM CLEARED DERIVATIVES TRANSACTIONS This Cleared Derivatives Addendum (the Cleared Derivatives Addendum ), which includes the schedule (the Schedule ), is dated as of the date specified in
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Regarding Registration with the Board. December 4, 2017
1666 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Office: (202) 207-9100 Fax: (202) 862-8430 www.pcaobus.org Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2017 The Mechanics of Registration 1. How can my firm apply for registration
More information[Date] IMPORTANT: ACTION REQUIRED
[Date] IMPORTANT: ACTION REQUIRED [2014] NOTIFICATION OF RIGHT TO SEGREGATION OF INITIAL MARGIN POSTED IN RESPECT OF UNCLEARED SWAPS PURSUANT TO CFTC RULE 23.701 Dear Sir or Madam: This notification (the
More informationRETIREMENT PLAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT TRINITY PORTFOLIO ADVISORS LLC
vs.4 RETIREMENT PLAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT TRINITY PORTFOLIO ADVISORS LLC Name of Plan: Name of Employer: Effective Date: This Retirement Plan Investment Management Agreement ( Agreement ) is
More informationPA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY
POLICY SUBJECT: PA TURNPIKE COMMISSION POLICY This is a statement of official Pennsylvania Turnpike Policy RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: NUMBER: 7.07 APPROVAL DATE: 05-07-2013 EFFECTIVE DATE: 05-07-2013 7.07
More informationOn July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank
S k a d d e n, A r p s, S l a t e, M e a g h e r & F l o m L L P & A f f i l i a t e s If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact the following attorneys
More informationSwap Clearinghouses and Markets
Capital Markets 1 Swap Clearinghouses and Markets An objective of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act is to create a structure and incentives to expand preand post-execution transparency for swaps and security-based
More informationDERIVATIVES. Westlaw Journal
Westlaw Journal DERIVATIVES Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 18, ISSUE 15 / JUNE 8, 2012 Expert Analysis CFTC and SEC Adopt New Rules Further Defining Major
More informationPractical guidance at Lexis Practice Advisor
Lexis Practice Advisor offers beginning-to-end practical guidance to support attorneys work in specific transactional practice areas. Grounded in the real-world experience of expert practitioner-authors,
More informationCFTC, SEC Propose to Delay the Applicability of Certain Swap Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act
June 17, 2011 CFTC, SEC Propose to Delay the Applicability of Certain Swap Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act The general effective date for most provisions under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
More informationDodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users
Dodd-Frank Title VII Update: Where Are We Today and Where Are We Going? Ten Important Issues Facing Derivatives Users Nov 07, 2011 Top Ten By James M. Cain This resource is sponsored by: Where Are We Today?
More informationISDA 2016 BAIL-IN ARTICLE 55 BRRD PROTOCOL (Dutch/French/German/Irish/Italian/Luxembourg/Spanish/UK entity-in-resolution version)
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2016 BAIL-IN ARTICLE 55 BRRD PROTOCOL (Dutch/French/German/Irish/Italian/Luxembourg/Spanish/UK entity-in-resolution version) published on 14 July,
More informationMemorandum. Independent Amount Segregation: Summary of ISDA s Sample Tri-Party IA Provisions
Memorandum Independent Amount Segregation: Summary of ISDA s Sample Tri-Party IA Provisions The International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc. ( ISDA ) has published the following documents in order
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act May 7, 2012 CFTC AND SEC JOINTLY ADOPT FINAL SWAP ENTITY DEFINITION RULES On April 18, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW FOR THE FUTURES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL SWAPS AND DERIVATIVES ASSOCIATION, INC.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW FOR THE FUTURES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL SWAPS AND DERIVATIVES ASSOCIATION, INC. Enforceability of the Liquidation, Setoff, Netting and Credit Support Provisions of
More informationThe CFTC Adopts Final Rules on the Recordkeeping and Reporting of Historical Swaps
The CFTC Adopts Final Rules on the Recordkeeping and Reporting of Historical Swaps June 20, 2012 The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC ) has adopted final rules governing the recordkeeping
More informationDERIVATIVES LAW SYLLABUS, FALL 2018
DERIVATIVES LAW SYLLABUS, FALL 2018 Gary E. Kalbaugh Classroom: [ ] 6:10 PM-8:00 PM Gary.E.Kalbaugh@hofstra.edu Purpose of the Course: The purpose of this course is to teach the current law and practice
More informationCadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ADDENDUM II 1 TO ISDA AUGUST 2012 DF PROTOCOL QUESTIONNAIRE published on [ ], 2013 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Instructions:
More informationAMENDMENT CREDIT SUPPORT ANNEX
Supplementary Exhibit NY-SUPP 2 NEW This Supplementary Exhibit to the ISDA 2016 Variation Margin Protocol is applicable if the Agreed Method is New CSA Method and the CSA Type is NY CSA. International
More informationRegulatory Practice Letter August 2014 RPL 14-11
Regulatory Practice Letter August 2014 RPL 14-11 SEC Adopts Cross-Border Security- Based Swap Rules and Guidance Executive Summary On June 25, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission)
More informationCFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank
CFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank CFTC and SEC Issue Final Rules and Guidance to Further Define the Terms Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant,
More informationU.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre st Street, NW, Washington, DC Telephone: (202)
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-5000 Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight Thomas J. Smith
More informationSecurity-Based Swaps: Capital, Margin and Segregation Requirements
Security-Based Swaps: Capital, Margin and Segregation Requirements SEC Proposes Rules Regarding Capital, Margin and Collateral Segregation Requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based
More informationChapter 9. 9:1 General Review of Systemic Risk and Regulatory Developments
Chapter 9 Current Developments 9:1 General Review of Systemic Risk and Regulatory Developments 9:2 Dodd-Frank Act and OTC Derivatives 9:2.1 Regulator 9:2.2 Key Dodd-Frank Swap Definition 9:2.3 Categorization
More informationDodd Frank and inter affiliate trading of derivatives
Financial Accounting Advisory Services Dodd Frank and inter affiliate trading of derivatives Impact of new derivatives regulations becomes clearer, but key questions remain New regulations in the US under
More informationDodd-frank implementation update: key differences between the CFTC and SEC final business conduct standards and related cross-border requirements
Dodd-frank implementation update: key differences between the CFTC and SEC final business conduct standards and related cross-border requirements Paul M. Architzel, Dan M. Berkovitz, Gail Bernstein, Seth
More informationMAJOR NEW DERIVATIVES REGULATION THE SCIENCE OF COMPLIANCE
Regulatory June 2013 MAJOR NEW DERIVATIVES REGULATION THE SCIENCE OF COMPLIANCE Around the world, new derivatives laws and regulations are being adopted and now implemented to give effect to a 2009 agreement
More informationImpact on End Users of Swaps
Dodd-Frank One-Year Anniversary: Impact on End Users of Swaps Presented by Daniel N. Budofsky Susan C. Ervin Gabriel D. Rosenberg (Moderator) July 28, 2011 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Presenters Daniel N.
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Swaps in Loan Transactions: Coordinating Loan Document Terms With the ISDA Master Agreement Documenting Covenants, Security, Voting and Control,
More informationHIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT BUSINESS ASSOCIATES AND SUBCONTRACTORS
HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT BUSINESS ASSOCIATES AND SUBCONTRACTORS This HIPAA Business Associate Agreement ( BAA ) is entered into on this day of, 20 ( Effective Date ), by and between Allscripts
More informationSHARTSIS FRIESE LLP One Maritime Plaza Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, California
SF SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP One Maritime Plaza Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3598 January 16, 2013 VIA E-MAIL To Our Investment Adviser Clients and Other Friends: This is our annual letter
More informationSEC Re-Proposes Rules Establishing a U.S. Personnel Test for Application of Dodd-Frank Security-Based Swap Requirements
June 15, 2015 clearygottlieb.com SEC Re-Proposes Rules Establishing a U.S. Personnel Test for Application of Dodd-Frank Security-Based Swap Requirements On April 29, 2015, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
More informationISDA. International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CDS PROTOCOL. published on April 9, 2009
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 2009 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CDS PROTOCOL published on April 9, 2009 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. The International
More informationCFTC Staff Issues Time-Limited No-Action Relief from Some Swap Data Reporting Requirements for Certain Counterparties
April 12, 2013 CFTC Staff Issues Time-Limited No-Action Relief from Some Swap Data Reporting Requirements for Certain Counterparties Key Takeaways: > Non-SD/MSP financial entities now have until May 29,
More informationSample Investment Management Agreement
FINAL June 2016 Sample Investment Management Agreement Updated and Approved by the PMAC Practices & Standards Committee and Borden Ladner Gervais LLP This sample investment management agreement ( IMA )
More informationANNEX MANUAL FOR THE USE OF RISK MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS
ANNEX MANUAL FOR THE USE OF RISK MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS January 2002 Guidelines for the Use of Risk Management Products 2/6 A. General comments 1. This Manual is designed to help clients apply for risk management
More informationClass Exemption for Principal Transactions in Certain Assets Between Investment Advice
Class Exemption for Principal Transactions in Certain Assets Between Investment Advice Fiduciaries and Employee Benefit Plans and IRAs (Principal Transactions Exemption) with Amended Applicability Dates
More informationINVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT For: John Sample Portfolio: Long-Term Growth Financial Advisor: Advisor Name Company Name 307-673-5675 July 1, 2015 201 North Connor Street, Suite 250, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801
More informationEDF TRADING A leader in the international wholesale energy market. 27 February 2012
EDF TRADING A leader in the international wholesale energy market 27 February 2012 The Dodd-Frank Act Overview The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) The Dodd-Frank Act What is it? What does
More informationDebt Management. Policy Statement and Purpose
Debt Management Policy Type: Board of Visitors Responsible Office: Vice President for Finance and Administration, Associate Vice President for Finance and Administration and Treasury Services Initial Policy
More informationInterest Rate Hedging for Real Estate Finance Transactions
Interest Rate Hedging for Real Estate Finance Transactions Meritas November 16, 2016 Presented by: Mark E. Heimendinger, Of Counsel Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. 2016 All rights reserved.
More informationTHE ELEMENTS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC SOLICITOR S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Pursuant to Rule 206(4)-3 of The Investment Adviser s Act of 1940
THE ELEMENTS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC SOLICITOR S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 206(4)-3 of The Investment Adviser s Act of 1940 ( Solicitor ) hereby proposes to introduce you to The Elements Financial
More informationISDA 2013 EMIR NFC Representation Protocol: Factors to consider in deciding whether to adhere
2nd April 2013 Practice Group(s): Finance Investment Management ISDA 2013 EMIR NFC Representation Protocol: Factors to consider in deciding whether to adhere By Stephen Moller On 8 March 2013, The International
More informationEmerald People's Utility District Power Risk Management Procedures Guide
Emerald People's Utility District Power Risk Management Procedures Guide Proposed by the Financial Risk Management Team (FRMT) Updated March 13, 2013 1 Financial Risk Management and Trading Guidelines
More informationMEMORANDUM December 13, 2018 Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of 9 Application of the U.S. QFC Stay Rules to Underwriting and Similar Agreements The new U.S. QFC Stay Rules 1 will soon require U.S. global systemically important banking organizations ( GSIBs
More informationInterest Rate Risk Management Refresher. April 27, Presented to: Section I. Basics of Interest Rate Hedging?
Interest Rate Risk Management Refresher April 27, 2012 Presented to: Section I Basics of Interest Rate Hedging? What Is An Interest Rate Hedge? Interest rate hedges are contracts between parties designed
More information[Insert Name of investment banking firm] MASTER SELECTED DEALERS AGREEMENT
Final adopted version dated June 10, 2011 January 4, 2019 [Insert Name of investment banking firm] MASTER SELECTED DEALERS AGREEMENT REGISTERED SEC OFFERINGS AND EXEMPT OFFERINGS (OTHER THAN OFFERINGS
More informationCFTC. Real-Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data AD08 / Real- Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data 1.
CFTC Real-Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data 7-8 Meta Data Item Value Date extracted from pdf July 7 th 0 Web page source URL Source page: Rule assets URL(s) http://www.cftc.gov/lawregulation/doddfrankact/rulema
More informationALERT. U.S. Banking Regulators Finalize Minimum Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps. Asset Management. January 8, 2016
Asset Management ALERT January 8, 2016 U.S. Banking Regulators Finalize Minimum Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps On October 22, 2015, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC ) and the
More informationCOMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. Amended Order Designating the Provider of Legal Entity Identifiers to be Used in
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/28/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-15477, and on FDsys.gov 6351-01-P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
More informationTHIRD AMENDMENT CREDIT AGREEMENT. Dated as of October 29, 2013 NEW SOURCE ENERGY PARTNERS L.P., BANK OF MONTREAL, ASSOCIATED BANK, N.A.
Exhibit 10.1 Execution Version THIRD AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT Dated as of October 29, 2013 AMONG NEW SOURCE ENERGY PARTNERS L.P., AS BORROWER, BANK OF MONTREAL, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ASSOCIATED
More informationCiti Supply Chain Finance Program
Treasury and Trade Solutions Citi Supply Chain Finance Program Introduction and Benefits The Solution Partnership between Macy s Merchandising Group (MMG) and Citi to allow MMG suppliers to sell their
More informationRegulatory Impact of. on the Energy Industry
Regulatory Impact of Dodd-Frank Act 2010 on the Energy Industry WSPP Committee Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana October 19, 2010 Anita Herrera Chief Compliance Officer 1 What is Nodal Exchange? Cash settled
More informationEMIR and DODD-FRANK FAQs. January 2017
This FAQs document relates to: EMIR and DODD-FRANK FAQs January 2017 the European Market Infrastructure Regulation or EMIR, Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
More informationAre you ready for the upcoming margin rules? ISDA Amend webcast August 11th 2016
Are you ready for the upcoming margin rules? ISDA Amend webcast August 11th 2016 1 Speakers Katherine Tew Darras, General Counsel, ISDA Douglas J. Donahue, Partner, Mayer Brown LLP Samantha Riley, Assistant
More informationDodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions
The University of Texas School of Law Presented: 10 th Annual Gas & Power Institute September 22-23, 2011 Houston, Texas Dodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions Craig R. Enochs Kevin M. Page
More informationDodd-Frank Act OTC Derivatives Reform
Dodd-Frank Act OTC Derivatives Reform Supporting Materials for Panel Discussion OTC Derivatives Reforms at MFA s Regulatory Compliance Conference Compliance 2011, November 30, The Princeton Club, New York
More informationGlobalNote October 2012
GlobalNote October 2012 Selected Exemption Provisions in the US Affecting Non-US Investment Advisers This memorandum addresses regulatory matters in the United States that most affect non-us investment
More informationBANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH ELECTRONIC TRADING TERMS AND CONDITIONS
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH ELECTRONIC TRADING TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. SCOPE 1.1 These Electronic Trading Terms and Conditions (the Terms) govern the electronic provision of prices by Bank of America,
More informationR.J. O BRIEN & ASSOCIATES, LLC DIRECT CLIENT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 2
In accordance with the provisions of Article 5(1) of the Indirect Clearing RTS, 1, this Direct Client Disclosure Statement is being made available to our clients that may be entitled to the protections
More informationBANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A., ( BBVA ) EMIR Article 39(7) CLEARING MEMBER DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
Version: February 2015 BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A., ( BBVA ) EMIR Article 39(7) CLEARING MEMBER DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT Introduction Throughout this document references to we, our and us are references
More informationCFTC Issues Final Rules on Cross- Border Uncleared Swap Margin Requirements
Client Alert Capital Markets CFTC Issues Final Rules on Cross- Border Uncleared Swap Margin Requirements August 2016 Authors: Ian Cuillerier, Rhys Bortignon The CFTC has combined an entity-level approach
More informationPublic Finance Client Alert
Public Finance Client Alert July 22, 2010 Regulation for the Short- and Long-Term: How Dodd-Frank Will Affect Municipal Securities The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd-Frank
More informationNorth American Power Credit Organization
North American Power Credit Organization Practical considerations associated with the Dodd-Frank Act (3:15pm 5:00pm) 2 May 2013 Agenda and contents Dodd-Frank overview and highlights 3-6 Industry snapshot
More informationDodd-Frank Title VII Considerations for End-Users March 5-6, 2013 Presented by David H. Kaufman and Chrys A. Carey
Dodd-Frank Title VII Considerations for End-Users March 5-6, 2013 Presented by David H. Kaufman and Chrys A. Carey 2013 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Preliminary Observations Program
More informationAugust 5, By
Robert dev. Frierson, Secretary Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20 th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20551 August 5, 2016 By email: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov
More informationClient Alert. CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective. Swap Entity Definition Guidance
Number 1425 November 6, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective Between October 10 and October
More informationSTROOCK SPECIAL BULLETIN
STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP STROOCK SPECIAL BULLETIN CFTC Cross-Border Margin Proposal July 20, 2015 On June 29, 2015, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) issued a proposed rule 1 (the
More informationEXHIBIT A: Subscription Documents
EXHIBIT A: Subscription Documents Subscription Agreement & Accredited Investor Questionnaire THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE
More informationFutures & Derivatives Law
REPORT Reprinted with permission from Futures and Derivatives Law Report, Volume 36, Issue 7, K2016 Thomson Reuters. Further reproduction without permission of the publisher is prohibited. For additional
More information