Professionally managed allocations and the dispersion of participant portfolios
|
|
- Myra Farmer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Professionally managed allocations and the dispersion of participant portfolios Vanguard research August 2013 The growing use of professionally managed allocations in defined contribution (DC) plans is reducing the dispersion in portfolio outcomes among participants. Target-date funds are the dominant type of professionally managed allocation, but the category also includes traditional balanced options and managed account advisory services. Authors: John A. Lamancusa Stephen P. Utkus Jean A. Young Dispersion of returns. From , a period encompassing the global financial crisis, the median Vanguard participant earned an average annual total return of 2.3%, equivalent to a cumulative return of just less than 12%. However, the average annual return ranged from 1.7% per year at the 5th percentile to 6.3% per year at the 95th percentile, a range of just more than 8 percentage points. Investments in target-date funds are subject to the risks of their underlying funds. The year in the fund name refers to the approximate year (the target date) when an investor in the fund would retire and leave the workforce. The fund will gradually shift its emphasis from more aggressive investments to more conservative ones based on its target date. An investment in target date funds is not guaranteed at any time, including on or after the target date. Connect with Vanguard > vanguard.com
2 Professional allocations and returns. The expanded use of professionally managed allocations is leading to reduced dispersion in participant outcomes. For participants in a single target-date fund during the period, realized average returns ranged from 1.7% per year at the 5th percentile to 3.7% per year at the 95th percentile, a range of 2 percentage points. For participants in a single balanced fund or in a managed account advisory service, the difference between the 5th and 95th percentiles was about 2 and 3 percentage points, respectively. Professional allocations and risk. Risk outcomes are also less dispersed for participants with professionally managed allocations. Risk levels among singletarget-date fund investors were less than half as variable as risk levels for participants making their own choices. Implications. The rapid growth in professionally managed allocations most notably, target-date funds, but also traditional balanced options and managed account advice services is contributing to a reduction in extreme risk and return outcomes for participants. It is also gradually mitigating concerns about the quality of portfolio decision-making within DC plans. Plan sponsors should consider greater adoption of these strategies to encourage better risk control and investment discipline in DC participant portfolios. Actions to consider include: offering target-date funds within the plan s investment menu, either on a voluntary or default basis; promoting their use in educational programs; introducing a managed account advisory service for participants seeking a customized portfolio strategy; and considering reenrollment into a plan s designated default option. 2
3 Background This paper continues our research on professionally managed allocations and their impact on participant portfolio construction in defined contribution (DC) plans. Professionally managed allocations are participant accounts where 10 of the balance is invested by a professional money manager. A single target-date fund is the most common type of professionally managed allocation, but the category also includes traditional balanced funds and a managed account advisory service. In effect, by choosing a professionally managed allocation (or by being defaulted into one), participants are delegating the complex task of portfolio construction to a third-party money manager selected by the plan sponsor. As of 2012, 36% of Vanguard participants were invested in professionally managed allocations, with a single target-date fund representing the largest part of that group at 27%. We estimate that more than half of participants will be in such allocations within five years, principally because of the growing use of target-date funds. 1 One reason for the growing interest in professionally managed allocations is their designation as qualified default investment alternatives under the 2006 Pension Protection Act. However, voluntary investment in these options by participants is also an important factor underlying their expansion. This paper examines DC participant portfolio outcomes for the five-year period ended December 31, We confirm two main findings from our prior papers on this topic. 2 First, in the period which includes the years of the global financial crisis the typical participant earned a small but positive investment return. (When contributions are also included, median account balances grew by double-digit rates. 3 ) However, returns were highly dispersed, with the difference between the 5th and 95th percentile spanning some 8 percentage points per year. Second, risk and return outcomes for participants in professionally managed allocations were substantially less dispersed than for participants making their own choices. We believe that this reduction in dispersion of outcomes is attractive to plan fiduciaries, as it demonstrates both improved investment discipline and risk control in participant portfolios. This result also is gradually mitigating concerns about the quality of investment choices being made by inexperienced plan participants. After a brief review of methodology and the market environment, the paper presents several measures of participant-realized returns and risk characteristics over various periods. Caveats As in our prior papers, there are several caveats to consider when reviewing our results. First, realized total returns reflect investment results for a specific period, and are conditional on the market and investment conditions prevailing during that time. The three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2012, were quite different in terms of the realized equity risk premium. 4 Second, total returns over the period reflect the effect of several portfolio characteristics, including asset allocation, sub-asset allocation, fund selection, rebalancing, and fees. Given the range of factors influencing portfolio outcomes, results across participants, and results across different strategies, should be expected to vary over future periods. 1 Vanguard, Utkus and Bapat, 2011; Utkus and Bapat, Vanguard, The equity risk premium here is defined as is the difference between the return on and the return on government or high-grade bonds. 3
4 Methodology Our data is drawn from Vanguard s recordkeeping systems encompassing more than 3 million DC plan participants. Total returns were calculated monthly for each participant account over the 60 months ended in December Total returns reflect investment performance only, and do not include the effect of ongoing contributions. Total returns are net of all fees and expenses including investment expenses of the fund options held by the participants, as well as any separate account-based recordkeeping charges (such as per capita recordkeeping fees). When presenting one-, three-, and five-year returns, we utilize a dataset of all participants with corresponding one-, three-, or five-year account histories. This data set includes 2.99 million participant accounts with a one-year history, 2.34 million participants with a three-year history, and 1.58 million participants with a five-year history. 6 Also, company stock as a portfolio holding creates a higher return volatility. The most extreme risk and return outcomes either negative or positive are typically associated with concentrated company stock positions. Just less than 1 of the five-year data set includes participants with a concentrated position in employer securities defined here as a position in company stock that exceeds 2 of the participant s account balance. Because participants with concentrated holdings are only a small portion of the sample, their results are included within the totals for all participants. Market environment During the period, global stock markets at first fell precipitously during the global financial crisis (Figure 1). Stock prices subsequently recovered, and by year-end 2012, stock investments were almost 12% higher than the level at year-end 2007 (as calculated on a total return basis, including reinvested dividends). International improved but remained more than 1 below their December 2007 level. Bond investments rose steadily due to both reinvested interest income and rising bond prices (due to falling interest rates during the period). As a result, average annual returns were quite different during the three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2012 (Figure 2). During the five-year period, returned 2.27% per year while bonds returned 5.99% a negative equity risk premium of 3.72% per year. During the three-year period, gained 11.34% compared with 6.26% for bonds, a positive equity risk premium of 5.08%. bonds offered the highest cumulative return during the five-year period, with a dollar at the beginning of the period growing to $1.34. A dollar invested in grew to only $1.12, while $1.00 invested in international fell to $0.86 during the period. Three-year cumulative returns for were much higher than for bonds. 5 Total returns are calculated for Vanguard participant portfolios from cash flow to cash flow, and then linked, in accordance with global investment performance standards. 6 One- and three-year returns are not materially different if they are presented only for the five-year panel of 1.58 million participants. Presenting returns for only the five-year panel leads to an inherent bias in the data, as it reports on results only for participants with five years or more of plan tenure. 4
5 Figure 1. Market performance, Cumulative total return for select market indexes 160 Index value Dec 07 Jun 08 Dec 08 Jun 09 Dec 09 Jun 10 Dec 10 Jun 11 Dec 11 Jun 12 Dec 12 Treasury bills bonds International Note: Indexes represented by the following benchmarks: Cash reserves Citigroup T-bill Index; bonds Barclays Aggregate Bond Index; MSCI Broad Market Index; and international MSCI All Country World Index ex-us Index. All values set at 100 as of month-end December Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index. Sources: Citigroup, Barclays, MSCI. Figure 2. Market returns and volatility For the period ended December 31, 2012 Annualized Cumulative Annualized total returns total returns volatility* Asset class Index year years years year years years months months Cash reserves Citigroup T-bill Index 0.09% 0.08% 0.44% 0.1% 0.3% 2.2% % bonds Barclays Aggregate Bond Index MSCI Broad Market Index International MSCI All Country World Index ex-us Index Note: Indexes represented by the following benchmarks: Cash reserves Citigroup T-bill Index; bonds Barclays Aggregate Bond Index; MSCI Broad Market Index; and international MSCI All Country World Index ex-us Index. * Standard deviation of monthly returns over the 36- or 60-month period ended December 31, Sources: Citigroup, Barclays, MSCI, Vanguard calculations. 5
6 Participant total returns The average Vanguard DC plan participant earned an average annual return of 2.3% and a cumulative return of 11.9% over the period (Figure 3). In effect, for the average participant, investment results alone boosted retirement wealth by just less than12%. Figure 3. Participant total returns Defined contribution plan participants, for the period ended December 31, % During the three-year period ended 2012, the average participant realized an average annual return of 7.8% and a cumulative three-year return of 25.1%, reflecting the sharp increase in stock prices over the period. On a one-year basis, the average participant earned 12.4% during % 12.4% 7.8% 11.9% Dispersion of returns One of the features of participant-constructed portfolios is the tendency of many participants to adopt unconventional or even extreme investment allocations. Some participants may invest their entire portfolio in equities, while others invest exclusively in low-risk assets, such as money market or stable value funds. Participant portfolios may also be concentrated in a single fund or management style, in a specialty asset class, or in company stock. As a result, participant total returns tend to be dispersed or distributed over a wide range. Over the five-year period, while the average participant gained 2.3% per year, a participant at the 5th percentile earned 1.7% per year, while a participant at the 95th percentile gained 6.3% per year a difference of 8 percentage points per year (Figure 4). On a cumulative basis, a $1.00 investment fell to $0.92 for a participant at the 5th percentile, but rose to $1.36 for a participant at the 95th percentile. Similarly, over a three-year period, the 5th percentile participant gained 1.6% per year, while the 95th percentile participant rose 11.5% per year. On a cumulative basis, the 5th percentile investor saw a $1.00 investment grow to $1.05, while the 95th percentile investor saw a $1.00 investment grow to $1.39. These statistics illustrate the wide variation in portfolio construction across participants. They also demonstrate that during the five- and three- year periods, very few participants had a negative return. In particular, we found that only 1 in 10 participants had a negative five-year return and only 1 in 100 had a negative 3-year return. Note: Includes 2,991,291 participants for the 1-year period; 2,337,819 participants for the 3-year period; and 1,583,839 participants for the 5-year period. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Source: Vanguard, Figure % Average annual total returns 1 year 3 years 5 years Average cumulative total returns Distribution of participant total returns Defined contribution plan participants for the period ended December 31, % 17.6% 15.6% 12.4% 9.2% 11.5% 9.2% 7.8% 6.8% 1.5% 1.6% 1 year 3 years 5 years 6.3% 3.3% 2.3% 1.2% -1.7% Reading a box-and-whisker graph: Top of line represents 95th percentile; top of box, 75th; diamond, average; bottom of box, 25th; and bottom of line, 5th. Note: Includes 2,991,291 participants for the 1-year period; 2,337,819 participants for the 3-year period; and 1,583,839 participants for the 5-year period. Source: Vanguard,
7 Effect of professionally managed allocations Participant portfolio strategies in DC plans are being reshaped by the growth of professionally managed allocations including target-date funds, traditional balanced funds, and managed account advisory services. Target-date funds are being offered within plans to streamline portfolio choice by participants; they are also a common default fund for automatic enrollment. Traditional balanced funds, whether offered on a stand-alone basis or as part of a riskbased series of life-cycle funds, play a similar role in a smaller fraction of plans. Managed account advisory services are also being increasingly offered within plans, typically on a voluntary choice basis. Managed accounts provide customized portfolio recommendations, typically for an additional fee, with a third-party advisor taking discretionary control over the participant s account. For each type of professionally managed allocation, we separately estimated portfolio return and risk characteristics over three- and five-year periods ended December 31, Under our approach, a participant in a particular strategy (i.e., in a singletarget-date or balanced fund or in the managed account service) had to maintain this strategy over the full three- or five-year period. Participants in these three types of allocations were compared with all other participants in essence, participants making their own portfolio construction decisions. 7 Examining returns over the five-year period, outcomes for single-target-date investors ranged from 1.7% per year for the 5th percentile to 3.7% for the 95th percentile, a difference of approximately 2 percentage points (Figure 5). For the single balanced fund and managed account participants, the 5th-to-95th percentile difference was approximately 2 and 3 percentage points. (Singlebalanced-fund investors also had generally higher returns over this period because of their larger fixed income exposure.) Figure 5. Distribution of five-year returns by strategy Defined contribution plan participants, five-year annualized total returns for the period ended December 31, Single target-date fund 3.7% 2.3% 2.2% 1.7% 1.7% Single balanced fund 4.3% 3.5% 3.3% 3.1% 2.3% Managed account 3.6% 2.4% 1.9% 1.2% 1.2% 0.2% All other participants 6.4% 3.3% 2.3% -1.9% Reading a box-and-whisker graph: Top of line represents 95th percentile; top of box, 75th; diamond, average; bottom of box, 25th; and bottom of line, 5th. Note: For the five-year period, includes 24,889 single target-date fund participants, 35,992 single balanced fund participants, 28,848 managed account participants, and 1,494,110 all other participants, for a total sample of 1,583,839 participants. Source: Vanguard, By comparison, among all other participants, those making choices on their own realized returns ranged from 1.9% per year for the 5th percentile to 6.4% for the 95th percentile, a difference of more than 8 percentage points. (Keep in mind that these differences would be wider in a period with strong equity returns.) 7 Over the three-year period, the sample size includes 90,171 single-target-date fund participants, 60,892 balanced fund participants, 66,822 managed account advisory service participants, and 2,119,934 all other participants. Over the five-year period, the sample size includes 24,889 single-target-date fund participants, 35,992 balanced fund participants, 28,848 managed account advisory service participants, and 1,494,110 all other participants. 7
8 Dispersion of outcomes over three years Differences among participant portfolios are particularly apparent when examining both return and risk outcomes in scatterplots. For ease in presentation, we created a random sample of approximately 1,000 participants for each group of investors. 8 During the period, which was characterized by a positive equity risk premium, outcomes for single-target-date investors were distributed among major market indexes (Figure 6, Panel A). These results are consistent with the fact that most of the target-date portfolios in our sample are a specific combination of indexed equities, international equities, and bonds. In the targetdate scatterplot (in Panel A), younger participants (represented by blue dots and in long-dated portfolios) are to the right of the chart; older participants (represented by purple dots and in near-dated portfolios) are to the left. The figure includes just less than 1,000 observations, although there appear to be far fewer. The reason is that while there are many observations in our sample, they are all 10 invested in a limited set of target-date portfolios, which means that portfolio outcomes are also limited. For example, if a plan offered 12 target-date options, then 1,000 participants invested solely in a single target-date fund would have 12 outcomes, not 1,000. The results for single balanced fund investors reflect the fact that most balanced funds have similar equity allocations, typically around 5 to 6 of assets (Figure 6, Panel B). Again, although there are nearly 1,000 participants in the scatterplot, their portfolios are confined to the investment results of the limited number of balanced funds offered by the plans in our data set. Managed account investors are more dispersed. A managed advice service varies asset allocation not only by age but also other factors such as risk tolerance and prior holdings (Figure 6, Panel C). We refer to this result as the cloud of customization. Managed account portfolios also include active manager risk and, in some cases, limited exposure to company stock, contributing to the cloud effect. Some participants may also incorporate their other assets in the service in which case the plan results shown here may be tailored to fit these other holdings. The managed account service may also consider other individual factors such as other benefit plans and plan contribution rates. Again, younger participants represented by blue dots cluster to the right of the cloud, and older participants represented by purple dots cluster to the left of the cloud. The greatest dispersion of risk and return outcomes is among all other participants (Figure 6, Panel D). Here age groups are scattered throughout the chart. Why do we see such dispersed portfolio results? One reason is differences in equity exposure. Outcomes on the far left are for portfolios invested exclusively in conservative options such as money market and stable value funds; outcomes on the far right represent all-equity portfolios. Other reasons for the dispersion of results include asset allocations overweighted to specific sub-asset classes; active manager risk exposure; concentrated positions in employer stock; trading and rebalancing activity (or a lack thereof) over time; and differences in recordkeeping and investment fees across plans and fund options. 8 Because certain types of recordkeeping processes contribute to erroneous and extreme returns, both positive and negative, we eliminated half a percentage point from the top and bottom of both the risk and return distributions i.e., a total tail reduction of 2% leaving 980 observations in each figure. 8
9 Figure 6. Risk and return characteristics, Defined contribution plan participants for the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 A. Single-target-date participants B. Single balanced fund participants 2 2 Three-year annualized total return bonds Non- Three-year annualized total return bonds Non- 5% Three-year annualized standard deviation 5% Three-year annualized standard deviation C. Managed account participants D. All other participants 2 2 Three-year annualized total return bonds Non- Three-year annualized total return bonds Non- 5% Three-year annualized standard deviation 5% Three-year annualized standard deviation Younger than 35 Ages 35 to 55 Older than 55 Note: Includes 1,000 random samples of participant accounts drawn from respective samples. Excludes 0.5% top and 0.5% bottom outliers for both risk and return, for a net sample of 980 observations. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Source: Vanguard,
10 Dispersion of outcomes over five years In contrast to the upward-sloping results for the three-year period, outcomes for the full five-year period, , are generally downward-sloping, reflecting the negative equity risk premium prevailing during that period. Even in this quite different market environment, similar patterns hold. Single-target-date fund holders (Figure 7, Panel A) span the risk/return spectrum, reflecting the age-based pattern of target-date investing. They are situated among major market indexes in a disciplined way. Single balanced fund investors (Figure 7, Panel B) are again clustered in a smaller group, reflecting the narrower range of allocations for those funds. The results for managed account advisory participants (Figure 7, Panel C) again demonstrate the cloud of customization. During this period, the data points at the extremes of the cloud represent the effects of customization of as well as sponsor fund selection. At the far left are accounts dominated by fixed income holdings, while at the far right are accounts with large positions in active international equities. Finally, the results for all other participants reflect yet again the greater dispersion in outcomes for participants making their own allocation choices (Figure 7, Panel D). Over time, the dispersion of all participant outcomes is declining as a result of the rapid growth in the use of target-date funds. Traditional balanced fund options and managed account advisory services are also expected to continue to grow, although at a slower pace. Yet for plan fiduciaries, these results underscore the wide dispersion in results that exists when participants make their own choices. An important question for fiduciaries to consider is to what extent such dispersion reasonably reflects participant desires for portfolio customization or reflects a lack of skill at portfolio construction. 10
11 Figure 7. Risk and return characteristics, Defined contribution plan participants for the five-year period ended December 31, 2012 A. Single-target-date participants 2 B. Single balanced fund participants 2 Five-year annualized total return bonds Non- Five-year annualized total return bonds Non- 5% Five-year annualized standard deviation 5% Five-year annualized standard deviation C. Managed account participants D. All other participants 2 2 bonds Five-year annualized total return bonds Non- Five-year annualized total return Non- 5% Five-year annualized standard deviation 5% Five-year annualized standard deviation Younger than 35 Ages 35 to 55 Older than 55 Note: Includes 1,000 random samples of participant accounts drawn from respective samples. Excludes 0.5% top and 0.5% bottom outliers for both risk and return, for a net sample of 980 observations. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Source: Vanguard,
12 Risk dispersion measures We also calculated a series of metrics examining participant risk exposures and the dispersion of those risk exposures across participants. The mean volatility level (Figure 8, Panel A) of participants in our different groups varies predictably. The average risk level for the single balanced fund options was lowest among the four groups, at 8% per year over three years and 11% per year over five years. Average risk levels were somewhat higher for managed account and all other participants, at 12% or 15% depending on the period. They were highest among single-target-date investors, at 13% or 16% depending on the period, because young investors with higher equity allocations dominate this group. How much do risk levels vary from participant to participant? The standard deviation of portfolio risk levels (Figure 8, Panel B) measures the dispersion of risk across participants in a given group. Among professionally managed allocations, the standard deviation in the value of risk levels was 2% or 3% over each period. However, among participants making choices on their own, the standard deviation was 6% three times as high as the professionally managed allocations. Figure 8. Risk and risk dispersion measures A. Mean portfolio risk Single target-date fund 13% 16% Balanced fund 8 11 Managed account advisory service All other participants B. Standard deviation of portfolio risk Single target-date fund 3% 3% Balanced fund 2 2 Managed account advisory service 2 2 All other participants 6 6 C. Coefficient of variation of portfolio risk* Single target-date fund 2 17% Balanced fund Managed account advisory service All other participants * The standard deviation of portfolio risk (Panel B) divided by its mean (Panel A). Source: Vanguard, The coefficient of variation (Figure 8, Panel C) scales the standard deviation across participants by the mean risk level and permits normalized comparisons across our groups of investors. Over the three- and five-year periods, the coefficient of variation for all other participants is nearly three times that of single-target-date investors. In other words, participants constructing portfolios on their own tend to choose risk levels that are three times as extreme as those selected by a target-date fund manager. These higher risk levels reflect the factors noted earlier in this report more extreme asset allocations, differences in sub-asset class and fund selection, concentrated fund or single stock risk, plus the effects of rebalancing, fees, and other factors. 12
13 Implications One of the distinctive characteristics of participant portfolios is the tendency for self-directed portfolios to be highly dispersed in terms of both risk and return. By comparison, professionally managed allocations result in a narrower range of investment outcomes, consistent with a more disciplined investment approach. Target-date funds are the dominant type of professionally managed allocations, but the category also includes traditional balanced funds and managed account advisory services. For plan fiduciaries, the question is whether such dispersed outcomes are an inevitable result of participants desires to customize their portfolios or whether participants appear to lack skill at portfolio construction. Sponsors concerned about the dispersion of portfolio outcomes will want to consider a number of strategies: offering target-date funds (or traditional balanced funds) on a default or voluntary basis within the plan investment menu; offering a managed account advisory service and promoting its use; and using the strategy of reenrollment into a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) as a way to make rapid changes to participant investment holdings. 9 More broadly, the growing use of target-date funds and other professionally managed allocations is changing the investment decision-making within DC plans. Participants are increasingly not making complex investment choices on their own, but are instead delegating this responsibility back to the employer and, in particular, to the employerdesignated money manager or third-party advice provider. Such a development is resulting in improved patterns of diversification in participant portfolios, and is gradually mitigating concerns about errors in decision-making by inexperienced plan participants. 9 See Vanguard, 2012b, and Mottola and Utkus,
14 References Utkus, Stephen P. and Shantanu Bapat, Participants during the financial crisis: Total returns Vanguard Center for Retirement Research, Malvern, PA. com/vgapp/iip/site/institutional/researchcommentary/ article/invresduringcrisis Utkus, Stephen P. and Shantanu Bapat, Target-date funds and the dispersion of participant portfolios. Vanguard Center for Retirement Research, Malvern, PA. pdf/dispp.pdf Utkus, Stephen P. and Gary R. Mottola, Reenrollment and target-date funds: A case study in portfolio reconstruction. Vanguard Center for Retirement Research, Malvern, PA. institutional.vanguard.com/vgapp/iip/site/institutional/ researchcommentary/article/retrestdf. Vanguard, Improving plan diversification through reenrollment in a QDIA. Vanguard Strategic Retirement Consulting, Malvern, PA. institutional.vanguard.com/vgapp/iip/site/institutional/ researchcommentary/article/invcomreenrollqdia. Vanguard, How America Saves 2013: A report on Vanguard 2012 defined contribution plan data. Vanguard Center for Retirement Research, Malvern, PA. HAS13.pdf. 14
15 Page intentionally left blank. 15
16 P.O. Box 2600 Valley Forge, PA Connect with Vanguard > institutional.vanguard.com Vanguard research > Vanguard Center for Retirement Research Vanguard Investment Strategy Group > An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although a money market fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in such a fund. All investments, including a portfolio s current and future holdings, are subject to risk. Bond funds are subject to the risk that an issuer will fail to make payments on time, and that bond prices will decline because of rising interest rates or negative perceptions of an issuer s ability to make payments. Investments in or bonds issued by non- companies are subject to risks including country/ regional risk and currency risk. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results The Vanguard Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. CRRDPPP
Participants during the financial crisis: Total returns
Participants during the financial crisis: Total returns 2005 2010 Vanguard research November 2011 Executive summary. For the 2005 2010 period, the typical defined contribution (DC) plan participant earned
More informationTDF adoption in Vanguard Research Note February Introduction
TDF adoption in 218 Vanguard Research Note February 219 In 218, 59% of Vanguard participants in defined contribution (DC) plans were invested in a professionally managed account option, including 52% who
More informationTarget-date fund adoption in 2014
Target-date fund adoption in 2014 IRA insights Vanguard research note March 2015 n In 2014, 45% of Vanguard participants were invested in a professionally managed account option, including 39% who were
More informationA powerful combination: Target-date funds and managed accounts
A powerful combination: Target-date funds and managed accounts Summer 2016 Executive summary Salt and pepper Rosemary and thyme Cinnamon and nutmeg Great chefs often rely on classic combinations to create
More informationTarget-date fund adoption in 2013
Research note Target-date fund adoption in 2013 Vanguard research March 2014 Author Jean A. Young 1 In 2013, 4 in 10 Vanguard participants were invested in a professionally managed account option and 3
More informationHow America Saves Small business edition Vanguard Retirement Plan Access TM supplement to How America Saves
How America Saves Small business edition 2015 Vanguard Retirement Plan Access TM supplement to How America Saves Introduction Defined contribution (DC) retirement plans are the centerpiece of the private-sector
More informationVanguard Research February 2016
The Reshaping buck stops participant here: Vanguard outcomes money through market funds reenrollment Vanguard Research February 2016 Cynthia A. Pagliaro, Stephen P. Utkus Executive summary. Reenrollment
More informationBehavioral effects and indexing in DC participant accounts
Behavioral effects and indexing in DC participant accounts 2004 2012 Vanguard research February 2014 Executive summary. The index exposure among participants in Vanguardadministered defined contribution
More informationSmall business edition
How America Saves 2017 Small business edition 2017 Vanguard Retirement Plan Access supplement to How America Saves Introduction Defined contribution (DC) retirement plans are the centerpiece of the private-sector
More informationSmall business edition
HOW AMERICA SAVES 2018 Small business edition 2018 Vanguard Retirement Plan Access supplement to How America Saves Introduction Defined contribution (DC) retirement plans are the centerpiece of the private-sector
More informationAchieving better diversification through reenrollment in a QDIA
Achieving better diversification through reenrollment in a QDIA Vanguard commentary December 2017 Appropriate diversification is key to successful retirement investing. However, in participant-directed
More informationVanguard research August 2015
The buck value stops of managed here: Vanguard account advice money market funds Vanguard research August 2015 Cynthia A. Pagliaro and Stephen P. Utkus Most participants adopting managed account advice
More informationHow America Saves A report on Vanguard 2012 defined contribution plan data
How America Saves 2013 A report on Vanguard 2012 defined contribution plan data June 2013 Chris McIsaac Managing Director Institutional Investor Group Defined contribution (DC) retirement plans are the
More informationAutomatic enrollment: The power of the default
Automatic enrollment: The power of the default Vanguard Research February 2018 Jeffrey W. Clark, Jean A. Young The default decisions made by defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors under automatic enrollment
More informationThe value of managed account advice
The value of managed account advice Vanguard Research September 2018 Cynthia A. Pagliaro According to our research, most participants who adopted managed account advice realized value in some form. For
More informationHOW AMERICA SAVES Vanguard 2017 defined contribution plan data
HOW AMERICA SAVES 2018 Vanguard 2017 defined contribution plan data June 2018 Defined contribution (DC) retirement plans are the centerpiece of the privatesector retirement system in the United States.
More informationHow America Saves Vanguard 2016 defined contribution plan data
How America Saves 2017 Vanguard 2016 defined contribution plan data 1 June 2017 Defined contribution (DC) retirement plans are the centerpiece of the privatesector retirement system in the United States.
More informationSix key survey findings:
Six key survey findings: Gauging attitudes about target-date funds from plan sponsors and consultants Fall 2011 Executive summary. In March and April 2011, Vanguard partnered with Greenwich Associates
More informationTechnology firms Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves
firms 2017 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with -recordkept, we are pleased
More informationLegal services firms Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves
firms 2017 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with -recordkept, we are pleased
More informationManufacturing firms Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves
firms 2017 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with -recordkept, we are pleased
More informationWelcome to Vanguard. How your money will move. June BorgWarner Retirement Savings Plan (099103)
Retirement Plan Conversion Welcome to Vanguard June 2016 How your money will move BorgWarner Retirement Savings Plan (099103) Unless you take action by 4 p.m., Eastern time, on July 22, 2016, your retirement
More informationVanguard s approach to target-date funds
Vanguard s approach to target-date funds Vanguard research November 2012 Executive summary. Target-date funds (TDFs) are designed to address a particular challenge facing many retirement investors: constructing
More informationArchitecture and engineering firms Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves
Architecture and engineering firms 2017 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare
More informationAmbulatory health care services Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves
Ambulatory health care services 2017 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with
More informationLower-cost investing coming soon
Lower-cost investing coming soon A valuable benefit keeps getting better The University of North Carolina (UNC) System retirement programs are one of the great benefits you have as an employee, giving
More informationVanguard Prime Money Market Fund Summary Prospectus
Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund Summary Prospectus December 22, 2017 Admiral Shares Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund Admiral Shares (VMRXX) The Fund s statutory Prospectus and Statement of Additional
More informationRisk-taking across generations
Risk-taking across generations Investor Insights June 2018 Thomas J. De Luca and Jean A. Young The typical millennial household takes substantial equity risk. However, one notable group, at least a quarter
More informationTechnology firms 2018
HOW AMERICA SAVES firms 2018 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with -recordkept,
More informationFramework for investment policy statement
Framework for investment policy statement Overview An investment policy statement (IPS) is a written document that provides plan fiduciaries with a framework for plan investment decisions. A well-defined
More informationFinance and insurance firms 2018
HOW AMERICA SAVES and insurance firms 2018 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare
More informationPHILLIPS 66 SAVINGS PLAN Plan Number Plan Information as of 08/11/2012
PHILLIPS 66 SAVINGS PLAN Plan Number 099066 Plan Information as of 08/11/2012 This notice includes important information to help you compare the investment options under your retirement plan. If you want
More informationLegal services firms 2018
HOW AMERICA SAVES firms 2018 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with -recordkept,
More informationVanguard Target Retirement Funds. Outwardly simple. Inwardly sophisticated.
Vanguard Funds Outwardly simple. Inwardly sophisticated. A Fund will hold more stocks the further it is from its target date, seeking stocks high potential growth. Stocks also have the highest risk of
More informationLow costs, exceptional service for your retirement plan. Vanguard Retirement Plan Access TM
Low costs, exceptional service for your retirement plan Vanguard Retirement Plan Access TM An effective retirement plan As a plan sponsor, you know how overwhelming the details and responsibilities of
More informationInformation firms 2018
HOW AMERICA SAVES firms 2018 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry s plans compare with -recordkept,
More informationTHE SAVINGS PLAN OF SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY Plan Number Plan Information as of 05/24/2017
THE SAVINGS PLAN OF SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY Plan Number 091353 Plan Information as of 05/24/2017 This legally required notice includes important information about the investment options under your retirement
More informationLearn about asset allocation. Investor education
Learn about asset allocation Investor education Building a strong foundation Asset allocation is one of the key ingredients of a successful investment strategy. Use this brief guide to gain a more complete
More informationCONOCOPHILLIPS SAVINGS PLAN Plan Number Plan Information as of 05/30/2018
CONOCOPHILLIPS SAVINGS PLAN Plan Number 092538 Plan Information as of 05/30/2018 This legally required notice includes important information about the investment options under your retirement plan. You
More informationAmbulatory health care services 2018
HOW AMERICA SAVES Ambulatory health care services 2018 Industry benchmark data supplement to How America Saves Introduction To help defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors understand how their industry
More informationUse of Target-Date Funds in 401(k) Plans, 2007
March 2009 No. 327 Date Funds in 401(k) Plans, 2007 By Craig Copeland, EBRI E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y WHAT THEY ARE: Target-date funds (also called life-cycle funds) are a type of mutual fund that
More informationSlicing and dicing retirement plan fees: Allocation consideration for plan sponsors
Slicing and dicing retirement plan fees: Allocation consideration for plan sponsors Vanguard commentary December 2018 Executive summary As a result of fee disclosure requirements and fee litigation trends,
More informationRisk-reduction strategies in fixed income portfolio construction
Risk-reduction strategies in fixed income portfolio construction Vanguard research March 2012 Executive summary. In this commentary, we expand upon previous research on the value of adding indexed holdings
More informationPension risk: How much are you really taking?
Pension risk: How much are you really taking? Vanguard research June 2013 Executive summary. In May 2012, Vanguard conducted the second of a planned series of surveys of corporate defined benefit (DB)
More informationMost Vanguard IRA investors shot par by staying the course:
Most Vanguard IRA investors shot par by staying the course: 28 212 Vanguard research May 213 Executive summary. In a recent study, Vanguard analyzed the personal performance of 8,168 self-directed Vanguard
More informationEmerging markets: Individual country or broad-market exposure?
Research note Emerging markets: Individual country or broad-market exposure? Vanguard research April 2011 Authors Christopher B. Philips, CFA Roger Aliaga-Díaz, Ph.D. Joseph H. Davis, Ph.D. Francis M.
More informationInvestment changes are coming to your retirement plan
Investment changes are coming to your retirement plan Table of contents Page 2 About the investment changes Page 4 Your closing funds Page 5 What the fund closures mean to you Page 6 About the Vanguard
More informationDUKE UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND STAFF RETIREMENT PLAN Plan Number Plan Information as of 03/26/2015
DUKE UNIVERSITY FACULTY AND STAFF RETIREMENT PLAN Plan Number 091156 Plan Information as of 03/26/2015 This legally required notice includes important information to help you compare the investment options
More informationInvestment changes coming to your retirement plan
P.O. Box 2900 Valley Forge, PA 19482-2900 www.vanguard.com Investment changes coming to your retirement plan This fall, the investment lineup of the Villanova University Retirement Savings Plans will change.
More informationYour Funds at a Glance
Your s at a Glance JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY 403(B)(7) PLAN (090078) The plan offers the following diversified lineup of investment options. For more information about each fund, including investment strategy,
More informationPrinceton University Retirement Plans
Princeton University Retirement Plans Contributions Made By Plan Number Eligibility Princeton University Retirement Plan (PURP) Princeton University TIAA 102861 (Main) 102865 (PPPL) Please see the eligibility
More informationInvestor comprehension and usage of target-date funds: 2010 survey
Investor comprehension and usage of target-date funds: 2010 survey Vanguard research January 2011 Executive summary. Vanguard conducted an online survey of target-date fund (TDF) investors in January 2010.
More informationSustainable Investment Solutions Personalized Investment Plan
Sustainable Investment Solutions Personalized Investment Plan Portfolio Recommendation and Investment Policy Statement Prepared for John Q. Sample and Mary R. Sample February 11, 2014 By First Affirmative
More informationStretching the match: Unintended effects on plan contributions
Stretching the match: Unintended effects on plan contributions Vanguard Research December 2018 Galina Young, Jean A. Young One strategy proposed to increase plan contributions, in plans not opting for
More informationICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE
ICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE 1401 H STREET, NW, SUITE 1200 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 202-326-5800 WWW.ICI.ORG APRIL 2018 VOL. 24, NO. 3 WHAT S INSIDE 2 Mutual Fund Expense Ratios Have Declined Substantially over
More informationUniversity of Maine System Investment Policy Statement Defined Contribution Retirement Plans
University of Maine System Investment Policy Statement Defined Contribution Retirement Plans As Updated at the December 8, 2016, Investment Committee Meeting Page 1 of 19 Table of Contents Section Statement
More informationIntroduction. Types of white-label funds. What are white-label funds? Single-manager. Single-asset class multimanager
V A N G U A R D C O M M E N T A R Y Considering custom for your DC plan May/June 2018 Authors: Michael Palazzi, CFA, CFP James Martielli, CFA John Croke, CFA Executive summary As defined contribution (DC)
More informationVanguard Variable Insurance Fund Money Market Portfolio Summary Prospectus
Vanguard Variable Insurance Fund Money Market Portfolio Summary Prospectus April 26, 2018 The Fund s statutory Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information dated April 26, 2018, as may be amended
More informationImportant information for Vanguard Personal Advisor Services clients
Important information for Vanguard Personal Advisor Services clients January 23, 2018 Vanguard Advisers, Inc. 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 800-416-8420 vanguard.com This notice provides information
More informationVanguard Research May 2014
The Retirement buck stops income here: among Vanguard wealthier retirees money market funds Vanguard Research May 2014 Anna Madamba, Ph.D., Stephen P. Utkus, John Ameriks, Ph.D. Based on a survey of wealthier,
More informationYour Investment Options at a Glance
Your Investment Options at a Glance UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA OPTIONAL RETIREMENT PLAN (091381) The plan offers the following diversified lineup of investment options. Diversification does not ensure a profit
More informationSupplement to the Prospectus Dated January 26, Prospectus Changes. All references to the Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index are deleted.
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund Vanguard Target Retirement 2015 Fund Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund Supplement to
More informationAnother Milestone on the Road to Policy Normalization
LEADERSHIP SERIES OCTOBER 2017 A feature article from our U.S. partners Another Milestone on the Road to Policy Normalization The twin tailwinds of strong earnings and easing financial conditions are unlikely
More informationNavigator Taxable Fixed Income
CCM-17-09-966 As of 9/30/2017 Navigator Taxable Fixed Navigate Fixed with Individual Bonds With yields hovering at historic lows, an active strategy focused on managing risk may deliver better client outcomes
More informationThe Growth of Workplace Managed Accounts
August 2013 The Growth of Workplace Managed Accounts An Effective Solution for Plan Sponsors and Participants Despite plan sponsors best efforts to line up appropriate investments, educate workers about
More informationFocus on investing for your future
Focus on investing for your future Read on to learn about important fund changes coming to the Drexel retirement plans. BBBBCZPJ 042011 First-Class U.S. Postage PAID Vanguard Participant Education P.O.
More informationThe Impact of the Default Investment Decision on Participant Deferral Rates: Managed Accounts vs Target-Date Funds
Retirement Industry Insights From Morningstar The Impact of the Default Investment Decision on Participant Deferral Rates: Managed Accounts vs Target-Date Funds David Blanchett, PhD, CFA, CFP Head of Retirement
More informationXXXX EMPLOYEE SAVINGS INVESTMENT PLAN Plan Number Plan Information as of - 05/16/2014
XXXX EMPLOYEE SAVINGS INVESTMENT PLAN Plan Number 099999 Plan Information as of - 05/16/2014 This legally required notice includes important information to help you compare the investment options under
More informationVanguard Funds. Supplement to the Prospectus. Frequent-Trading Limitations
Vanguard Funds Supplement to the Prospectus Effective February 15, 2018, the text under the heading Frequent-Trading Limitations within the Investing With Vanguard section is amended to read as follows:
More informationFactor Investing. Fundamentals for Investors. Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee
Factor Investing Fundamentals for Investors Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee As an investor, you have likely heard a lot about factors in recent years. But factor investing is not new.
More information4Q17 Global & International Equity GLOBAL EQUITY. 10+ Years of Providing High Income Through Global Dividends
4Q17 Global & International Equity GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME FUND 10+ Years of Providing High Income Through Global Dividends A: HFQAX C: HFQCX I: HFQIX N: HFQRX S: HFQSX T: HFQTX Overall Morningstar Rating
More informationData can inspire plan changes
REFERENCE POINT Data can inspire plan changes TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 3 Auto Solutions... 5 Contributions...15 Investments...29 Loan and Disbursement Behavior...40 Need more robust industry
More informationParticipant Disclosure of Plan and Investment Related Information
Participant Disclosure of Plan and Investment Related Information MidAmerican Energy Company Retirement Savings Plan Participating in the MidAmerican Energy Company Retirement Savings Plan can be one of
More informationNOTICE OF AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT AND INVESTMENT MACY S, INC. 401(k) RETIREMENT INVESTMENT PLAN
NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT AND INVESTMENT MACY S, INC. 401(k) RETIREMENT INVESTMENT PLAN This notice informs you of the automatic enrollment feature of the 401(k) Plan. Because you may have been subject
More informationAdvisor Briefing Why Alternatives?
Advisor Briefing Why Alternatives? Key Ideas Alternative strategies generally seek to provide positive returns with low correlation to traditional assets, such as stocks and bonds By incorporating alternative
More informationDebunking some misconceptions about indexing
Research note Debunking some misconceptions about indexing Vanguard research December 2010 Author Christopher B. Philips, CFA Although the indexing strategy has proven to be successful since its beginnings
More informationHow to choose investments for your retirement
How to choose investments for your retirement You have a lot of investment options in your retirement plan. Find out how to choose among them with this brochure. To put your financial plan into action,
More informationyour retirement savings
your retirement savings Why Investment Balance Matters 3 How Much Help Do You Want? 8 Ways You Can Get Help With Investment Balance 10 Click here for printer-friendly version At Kaiser Permanente, financial
More informationImprove your employees retirement readiness by mapping to target date funds.
DC Insights The Value of Mapping to Target Date Funds Improve your employees retirement readiness by mapping to target date funds. 1 Participant benefits Turn a Fresh Start for Your Plan Into a Head Start
More informationPlan Management Navigator
Plan Management Navigator Analytics for Health Plan Administration July 2016 Healthcare Analysts Douglas B. Sherlock, CFA sherlock@sherlockco.com Christopher E. de Garay cgaray@sherlockco.com Erin Ottolini
More informationA practical look at institutional investors exposure to different asset classes
A practical look at institutional investors exposure to different asset classes Vanguard research October 21 Executive summary. This analysis steps away from the theoretical aspects of asset allocation
More informationCustom Target Date Strategies: Considerations for Plan Sponsors
Custom Target Date Strategies: Considerations for Plan Sponsors May 2014 T. ROWE PRICE Investment Viewpoint EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Defined contribution plan sponsors that use target date portfolios can choose
More informationDeep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price
Deep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price troweprice.com/tdf Investment solutions designed for a multifaceted retirement landscape Today, defined contribution (DC)
More informationDeep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price
Deep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price troweprice.com/dcio Investment solutions designed for a multifaceted retirement landscape Today, defined contribution (DC)
More informationTARGET ALLOCATION PORTFOLIOS
TARGET ALLOCATION PORTFOLIOS A convenient single-solution approach to investing Life and work are so busy these days, it s no wonder that investment planning often falls to the bottom of the list. Your
More informationInvestment Advisor(s)
Vanguard Funds Supplement to the Prospectus At a special meeting held on November 15, 2017, shareholders of the Vanguard funds voted on several proposed changes to the funds. As a result, the following
More informationVanguard Funds. Supplement to the Prospectus. Important Information Regarding Wire Redemptions
Vanguard Funds Supplement to the Prospectus Important Information Regarding Wire Redemptions Effective February 15, 2018, Vanguard will impose a $10 wire fee on outgoing wire redemptions from retirement
More informationNavigator Fixed Income Total Return (ETF)
CCM-17-09-1 As of 9/30/2017 Navigator Fixed Income Total Return (ETF) Navigate Fixed Income with a Tactical Approach With yields hovering at historic lows, bond portfolios could decline if interest rates
More informations...... Fidelity Personalized Planning & Advice at Work Terms and Conditions Fidelity Personal and Workplace Advisors LLC Strategic Advisers LLC 245 Summer Street Boston, MA
More informationYour guide to upcoming changes to your 401(k) Plan Farm Credit Foundations Defined Contribution/401(k) Plan
Your guide to upcoming changes to your 401(k) Plan Farm Credit Foundations Defined Contribution/401(k) Plan John Hancock Retirement Plan Services, LLC and Farm Credit Foundations are not affiliated and
More informationAn Analysis of Public and Private Sector Earnings in Ireland
An Analysis of Public and Private Sector Earnings in Ireland 2008-2013 Prepared in collaboration with publicpolicy.ie by: Justin Doran, Nóirín McCarthy, Marie O Connor; School of Economics, University
More informationFor better pension liability matching, consider adding Treasuries
For better pension liability matching, consider adding Treasuries Vanguard research December 2012 Executive summary. When pension plan sponsors think about reducing risk, their first inclination is usually
More informationThe Looming Liability of Target Date Funds
The Looming Liability of Target Date Funds Proliferation of Target Date Funds (TDFs) One of the most widely used investment options in defined contribution (DC) plans 70% of total DC assets by 2020 1 TDF
More informationThe Digital Investor Patterns in digital adoption
The Digital Investor Patterns in digital adoption Vanguard Research July 2017 More than ever, the financial services industry is engaging clients through the digital realm. Entire suites of financial solutions,
More informationThe Earlier You Start Investing, the Easier It Is to Reach Your Goals Monthly savings needed to accumulate $1 million by age 65
The Earlier You Start Investing, the Easier It Is to Reach Your Goals Monthly savings needed to accumulate $1 million by age 65 $7,000 $1,000,000 $6,000 $5,846 $5,000 $750,000 $298,458 $701,542 $4,000
More informationDeep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price
Deep Experience. THOUGHTFUL INNOVATION. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price troweprice.com/tdf Investment solutions designed for a multifaceted retirement landscape Today, defined contribution (DC)
More informationInvesting in Municipal Bonds in a Rising Rate Environment
Investing in Municipal Bonds in a Rising Rate Environment February, 2015 The value of patience and active management to bond fund investors After 32 years of generally downward trending interest rates,
More informationFive key factors to help improve retirement outcomes for target date strategy investors
A feature article from our U.S. partners INSIGHTS AUGUST 2018 Five key factors to help improve retirement outcomes for target date strategy investors The variability of capital markets can lead to a range
More informationHigh-conviction strategies: Investing like you mean it
BMO Global Asset Management APRIL 2018 Asset Manager Insights High-conviction strategies: Investing like you mean it While the active/passive debate carries on across the asset management industry, it
More informationVanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Summary Prospectus
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Summary Prospectus February 13, 2018 Admiral TM Shares Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) The Fund s statutory Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information
More information