Consultation response Ferd Social Entrepreneurs
|
|
- Maryann Barnett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ferd Social Entrepreneurs Strandveien 50 P.O. Box 34 N Lysaker Norway Interest Representative Register ID: Ferd Social Entrepreneurs response to the European Commission s Consultation on promoting Social Investment Funds as part of the Social Business Initiative Ferd Social Entrepreneurs (FSE) highly appreciates the Commission s initiative towards promoting Social Investment Funds. We are following EU action in the area, including the work on the social economy and CSR, closely and with keen interest. FSE welcomes the European Commission s consultation on possible European measures to support social businesses through private investment funds, and is grateful for the opportunity to take part in this consultation. FSE is part of the Ferd Group, a privately owned Norwegian industrial and financial group. FSE invests in social entrepreneurs that reflect our vision to create enduring value and leave clear footprints. Within this field, FSE s principal objective is to help companies that enable children and young people to develop themselves and their potential. Our investment focus is social entrepreneurs, and our goal is to enable the recipient company to grow to a level where the company is financially viable without FSE s support. Normally, FSEs investment horizon is 3-7 years. We invest up to NOK 20 million ( 2.6m) per year on social entrepreneurs, and we currently support nine social businesses in Norway. We would like to comment on questions relating to the following 6 topics in the consultation; Box 1: Defining social business, Box 2: Funding challenge, Box 8: Asset valuation Financial assessment, Box 9: Asset valuation Social assessment and reporting, Box 11: Risk management and Box 17: Ensuring effective integration with social businesses and distributors. 1
2 Box 1: Defining social business I. Do you agree that the main features of social businesses are as outlined above? If you disagree, please outline the features that you think are important. FSE agrees with part of the European Commission s definition: that the primary objective of a social business should be social, ethical or environmental outcomes. We have chosen to further constrict investments to social outcomes. FSE defines a social business as any organization, project and individual who is working to help people, particularly children and young people, realize their goals and recognize the opportunities ahead of them. Moreover, we have opted for a further specification of what we regard as social entrepreneurship, in that there must be a clear social objective, supported by a sustainable business model that in the long run will ensure that the company has a healthy financial balance. According to our definitions, a social business should fulfil the following criteria to become part of our portfolio; 1. Have innovative solutions for social problems in society at large. 2. Build organizations or structures that address the tasks and challenges that neither the public sector nor the free market have so far identified or managed to solve. 3. Be primarily committed to achieving social results, supported by a sustainable business model that ensures the long- term sustainability of their operations We have also added a final criterion that focuses our investments on a particular group of social businesses; 4. A social business should help children and young people develop themselves and their potential. We believe that the first three criteria form a general definition of a social business, and thus could be useful for the Commission s work towards a common definition. The final criterion is our specification and as we comment below under point II, it should be up to the investor to make such further clarifications. II. To what extent do you think this initiative should focus solely on those social businesses that do not distribute profits to their investors? Or shall it also focus on those which distribute profits to their investors (e.g. at least to a limited extent)? If so, how might social businesses be distinguished from other businesses? FSE believes that what defines social companies is that their primary objective is achieving social outcomes. In our opinion, it is not a key variable how the company distributes their profit. FSE welcomes the discussion on whether social businesses include those who distribute dividends to their investors. This is a difficult debate, as there is a large industry of profitable companies on social arenas that are not automatically social businesses, as we understand the concept. Moreover, it can also be arbitrary to set a limit of profit distribution at a given percentage. 2
3 FSE seeks to invest in entrepreneurs and enable them to achieve their objectives while operating in an economically sustainable way. The companies we invest in have a clear social goal, and the financial part is only relevant for securing future operations. In our experience, a social entrepreneur s goal is thus not to use the company to secure a high personal profit. Few companies are in the situation of turning a profit, and if they would, most would be reinvested in the company. However, as an investor we want to emphasise the importance of a flexible definition. We believe that it should be a social business own decision whether the distribution of dividends will help them achieving their primary social objective. In our opinion, as social business is an emerging market, the EU should allow definitions to mature within the social business community, and avoid complex top- down definitions of a market that is in its early phase and thus constantly changing. Moreover, we believe that each investor should be able to choose a definition of social business that fits with their investment strategy. For instance, FSE has chosen to narrow our investment universe to social businesses that help children and young people. Definitions can thus be investor driven, whereby different investors, be it private investors, investment funds or public funding bodies, choose a definition that companies have to fulfil in order to receive funding. We believe it is important that any new framework for social investment does not undermine this flexibility. Box 2: The funding challenge I. What are the main difficulties social businesses faces, in your experience, in getting access to finance? Do different kinds of social businesses face different barriers? In FSE s experience, most of the social business ideas germinate among individuals with little business experience, but with a great engagement for a particular social outcome. Their main funding challenge is progressing from an initial business idea to a commercially viable business capable of attracting long- term investors. Moreover, in our experience, social business is an area with a lot of people in need of funding outside traditional funding sources, as traditional funds normally do not cover social businesses. Social businesses are a relatively new business area, and traditional investors are not familiar with the concept and therefore hesitant to invest. Social businesses are therefore first and foremost looking towards philanthropic funding or public start- up financing. Accordingly, one key barrier is access to public start- up funds. In our experience such funds are to a large extent focusing on traditional entrepreneurship, often involving technological development and innovation, thereby excluding more complex business models and service innovation. The consequence is that most social businesses and social innovations fall outside the criteria of public start- up funds. This points to the importance of reinforcing current start- up funding programmes to better accommodate the needs of social businesses, or create new programmes focusing on social entrepreneurs in particular. This applies both to national and European funding programmes. One possibility could be to improve the high growth and innovative SME facility under the Competitiveness and Innovation framework Programme (CIP), or to create a new EU- level programme focused on start- up funding of social businesses. 3
4 II. To what extent do you think barriers to access to finance are limiting the growth of social businesses across the EU? Do you agree that there is a need to tackle any such barriers at the EU level? FSE believes that, to a certain extent, barriers of access to finance limit the growth of social businesses. As explained above, access to long- term finance is important for social entrepreneurs. However, limited growth across the EU may not be due primarily to a lack of access to finance. In our experience the limited growth is as much related to non- financial factors such as (1) a lack of business management skills, and (2) a shortfall of available learning and network platforms. Knowledge about business strategy and management is key to make any business successful, including social enterprises. FSE believes that it is not enough to provide funding, if this is not accompanied by knowledge and expertise. The competence can be gained from investors, taking on other roles than portfolio management, but it can also be acquired through communication with other entrepreneurs, both social and traditional. Thus, one way of increasing competence sharing is the creation of networks and meeting places for companies and investors, which is more adapted to the particularities of social businesses. One example of a platform is the already existing Enterprise Europe Network, which could be adapted to social businesses. The newly established Social Innovation Europe website could also be used as a launch pad for such meeting places. Moreover, such platforms can also help stimulate cooperation across borders and thus spread best practice. Social business ideas rise locally, and are often restrained to locality. The projects of social businesses are therefore often small in scale and adapted to local particularities such as language and culture. This, however, should not restrict the possibilities of spreading successful social business ideas within the internal market. We believe there is a need to enable social enterprises to spread and work together across Europe. Spreading of best practice can also improve the access to funding, because the existence of an already successful social enterprise can show that professionalisation is possible, and thus provide an investment case for investors. One example from our experience is the Danish company Specialisterne, whose vision is to give individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder an opportunity to be seen as valuable and worthy members of society. FSE is currently investing in a Norwegian company, Unicus, which employs individuals with autism, and undertakes assignments for client companies in an area where its employees have particular skills as a result of their autism: testing IT systems. For Unicus the best- practice example of Specialisterne provides invaluable inspiration, and for us as an investor it shows that success and dissemination of good ideas is possible. III. Do you agree that there is a need to tackle any such barriers at the EU level? As mentioned above, the EU can help by adapting start- up funds to the needs and particularities of social businesses, or by creating new programmes focused on social entrepreneurs. Furthermore, the EU can play a role in lifting successful social business ideas beyond national borders through platforms for knowledge sharing and networking among entrepreneurs and investors. One example is Enterprise Europe Network, where one could establish a sector group for social enterprises. On this note, FSE believes that to separate social businesses into distinct platforms is not the solution. Networking between 4
5 social businesses and traditional businesses is as important as networking between social businesses, as traditional entrepreneurs often have the valuable knowledge of business development necessary for social entrepreneurs. Box 8: Asset valuation Financial assessment, Box 9: Asset valuation Social assessment and reporting I. Do you think that any non- social business assets that might be permitted should be subject to different valuation requirements? Might different kinds of assets require different approaches? II. How do you think 'social returns' might be best addressed and measured? III. How might this build on other existing work, for instance on non- financial company reporting, social accounting, socially responsible investing, etc.? IV. What information do you think needs to be disclosed to investors, and how might this best be presented? FSE takes the opportunity to reply to the asset valuation issues under one heading. On a general note, FSE agree with the Commission s description of the difficulties of financial assessment. We also agree that it is important to measure the social return of social businesses. FSE acknowledges the importance of developing result indicators for the social effects of the organisation s activities. Indicators are important in order to demonstrate the return of our investments on the double bottom line, financial and social, to the society FSE is a part of. However, as this is a complex issue, FSE want to emphasise three important aspects that we have found challenging in our asset valuation, which has led us to use a pragmatic and flexible measurement approach. Firstly, due to the great diversity among social businesses it is difficult to find a one- size- fits- all measurement model. The social objectives of various social entrepreneurs vary greatly. Although many objectives might be quantifiable using traditional metrics (such as the number of people helped back to work) some are not easily quantifiable, or not quantifiable at all, such as improved life quality or increased awareness. Different kinds of assets require different approaches, both in financial and social assessment. Secondly, as an investment market, social businesses to date represent a novel market. Various methods for measurement are being developed, tested and debated among investors, but a common agreement is yet to emerge. We believe this is closely related to the immaturity of markets. Thirdly, most social entrepreneurs are small enterprises who have limited resources to fulfil demands for information, such as information about company assets or assessment and documentation of company s results. If a social entrepreneur is required to provide detailed information and quantifiable documentation of results to investors, we see a risk of taking away capacity from achieving the social goals of the business. We therefore believe that avoiding excessive and time- consuming bureaucracy is crucial. 5
6 FSE s own asset valuation and reporting focuses on two aspects. First, we assess whether the company has a healthy financial basis. At this point, companies normally do not turn a profit. Instead, we consider the feasibility of achieving a balanced budget in the long run. Second, we currently do not impose common measurement requirements. Instead, we urge our social entrepreneurs to improve their own measurement over time, through the development of measurable metrics that fit the social objectives of the business, and that can quantify the social benefits generated by the projects. Given the abovementioned characteristics of the social investment market diversity, immaturity and resource scarcity we advise the Commission to be cautious in developing a single measurement model based on the lowest common denominator that social businesses are required to adhere to. The Commission should take into account the principle of subsidiarity and consider the extent to which a common EU definition at this point would aid the sector, as the market needs a flexible approach in its early development. Financial markets needs to be given time to build a new culture around assessing these new types of businesses. Box 11: Risk management I. What particular features of social investments might require specific risk management requirements? In our experience, it is difficult to identify, measure and manage all relevant risks when investing in social businesses. Social businesses, as mentioned, represent a novel market where risk management procedures are less developed. In particular, this holds true for investments in social entrepreneurs in an early phase. Moreover, managers of social businesses are not always competent business developers. These are two features that necessitate specific risk management. Another key area that requires specific risk management is the interaction of social business with the public sector. FSE believes that a key feature of social businesses is their targeting of markets that are not mature, and where people are not yet willing to pay the price for the services social businesses provide. Furthermore, social businesses often perform services within the realm of public services. For instance, social businesses often take part in public tenders. However, working with public sector and public procurement rules is often time- consuming, costly, unpredictable and high risk. Box 17: Ensuring effective integration with social businesses and distributors I. Do you think there are any possible actions at the European level that might ensure effective distribution of social investment funds? The Commission has identified the importance of making social businesses aware of the funding opportunities available for them and to have initiatives that can help them prepare for drawing on such funding opportunities. 6
7 FSE acknowledge the challenge for investors to make social businesses aware of funding opportunities available to them. On this point, FSE identified two challenges and formulated concrete solutions to improve our performance. Firstly, it is the overall need to communicate the funding opportunities to social businesses. Ferd has worked to improve our communication with social entrepreneurs and have seen an improvement through the use of two initiatives. 1. Outreach activities: FSE has tried to increase our visibility on different business forums and events by having our management team give a number of public talks and presentations on the topic. Our CEO has a high standing in the Norwegian business community, which provides him with a strong platform to present the idea of social entrepreneurship for the traditional industry. Another important communication channel is social media, which enables communication with a wide range of actors such as companies, citizens, politicians and media. FSE has actively pushed social media. Our FSE Facebook Group has some 600 members, and our CEO is also very active on twitter with 5,415 followers. 2. Create focused conferences and awards to attract attention: A focused conference with social entrepreneurs, investors and interested companies brings the parties together and enables formal and informal discussions that can bring knowledge about funding opportunities. FSE has developed a conference called velferd (on welfare) and the associated velferd Prize for Social Entrepreneur of the Year. This conference has been organized for the last two years and has succeeded in giving participants the opportunity to showcase success stories and by providing a meeting place for companies, investors and others engaged in social entrepreneurship. We have also created the international Ferd Award for Social Entrepreneurship, which aims to celebrate current or past participants of Junior Achievement - Young Enterprise Europe s entrepreneurship programmes (JA - YE Europe is supported by EU s lifelong learning programme), who through their enterprises have created a positive social impact in various fields of activities. A second challenge is to clearly communicate the criteria for investment to the social businesses in order to avoid applications by firms that do not comply with these criteria. The process of applying for funding is a time consuming task for social businesses, and it is thus important to avoid applications that are spurious. FSE receives a number of applications from very good projects that do not satisfy FSE s criteria. In particular, they do not correspond with the concept of social entrepreneurship, as FSE understands it. This might be because social entrepreneurship is still a new concept in Norway. However, it also indicates a need to communicate sufficiently clearly what the investor is looking for. FSE has worked to sharpen our presentation on our website and developed a simplified web- based application form launched in This form has made it easier for applicants to apply, and helped us to better organise applications through a common database. 7
8 General comments to the consultation II. Competent funding The importance of an active investment strategy As a horizontal comment, FSE would like to point out the importance of an active investment strategy when investing in social businesses. The Commission touches upon this in the consultation, for instance in section 3.5, when discussing the possibilities for a more active investor role and in section 4.1., where the Commission mentions other activities deployed to support the social businesses they target. Active investment strategies are increasingly spreading across social investment funds and investors, and in a possible framework for social investment fund this should be taken into account. Managers of social businesses may not be proficient in business economics and management. FSE focuses on providing the social businesses with capital, but also business skills. Being part of the industrial group Ferd, we have aligned FSE s social investment strategy closely with our company s field of expertise: traditional venture and private equity investment. Doing what we do best provides us with legitimacy as an investor. More particularly, FSE are assisting portfolio companies to (1) identify growth potential and exploit strategic opportunities in the market, (2) develop a competent and motivated management, and (3) ensure an experienced and competent board with capacity to lead the company forward. This is made possible through close and open cooperation with the management and board, sharing competence and network and using FSEs position on the company s board. In our experience, the social entrepreneurs appreciate the access to our network and our focus on developing the necessary expertise as much as, and sometimes more, than the financial investments themselves. On this note, we would like to emphasise the importance of the development of social investment funds that focus on an active investment strategy. One example is The Social Capital Fund 1, Denmark s first social venture fund, investing capital and competencies in social entrepreneurs to scale their social impact and economic performance. Their investment strategy secures that financial investments will be accompanied by intellectual capital investments from a pro bono network of leading business service companies competence partners to build capacity among the social entrepreneurs. This is a good example of how social investment funds can work together with other partners to deliver competent funding for social entrepreneurs. For the Commission s work going forward it is thus important to acknowledge that financing through social investment funds may not in itself be sufficient without the added dimension of skill- building and access to networks to allow investments to grow. One possibility is that public sector and EU funding can complement social investment funds in funding the necessary competence building, for instance through the establishment of informal network platforms. One example of such a platform is The Hub 2, created in London by social entrepreneurs and functions and sets out to create places that resemble a member's club, an innovation agency, a serviced office and a think- tank to create a very different kind of innovation environment. The Hub seeks to create these places all around the world, is currently in 26 cities, and 1 capital.dk/about- ipc 2 hub.net/ 8
9 recently opened in Bergen in the West of Norway. This initiative serves as a great example for other entrepreneurial networks. III. The business lifecycle A second horizontal issue is for any EU framework to take into account the lifecycle of social businesses that is, to allow for the difference in investment strategies when investing in companies who are in the entrepreneurial/start- up phase and companies already established as social enterprises. Asset valuations, investment strategy and risk management processes differ when investing in social entrepreneurs, and these differences must be taken into account in a new framework for social investment funds. We wish to thank the European Commission for allowing us to respond to this consultation, and remain at your disposal for any questions you might have. Katinka Greve Leiner, Director, Ferd Social Entrepreneurs Contact information: Strandveien 50 P.O. Box 34 N Lysaker Norway Phone: Fax: post@ferd.no 9
INTERREG IIIC West Zone. Programme Complement
INTERREG IIIC West Zone Table of Content 1. Description of Measures... 1 1.1 Operation Type (a) Regional Framework Operations (RFO)... 2 1.2 Operation Type (b) Individual Co-operation Project:... 3 1.3
More informationBelgium 2011 Developing effective ex ante social impact assessment with a focus on methodology, tools and data sources
Belgium 2011 Developing effective ex ante social impact assessment with a focus on methodology, tools and data sources Short Report Developing effective ex ante social impact assessment with a focus on
More informationDevelopment Impact Bond Working Group Summary Document: Consultation Draft
Development Impact Bond Working Group Summary Document: Consultation Draft FULL REPORT CONTENTS 2 Working Group Membership 4 Foreword 6 Summary 8 Development Impact Bond Working Group Recommendations 17
More informationOCR Economics A-level
OCR Economics A-level Macroeconomics Topic 4: The Global Context 4.5 Trade policies and negotiations Notes Different methods of protectionism Protectionism is the act of guarding a country s industries
More informationhttps://dm.eesc.europa.eu/eescdocumentsearch/pages/opinionsresults.aspx?k=eco%2f419
Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 October 2017 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2016/0336 (CNS) 2016/0337 (CNS) 12848/17 FISC 210 COVER NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council
More informationDRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2304(INI)
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Regional Development 2016/2304(INI) 2.3.2017 DRAFT REPORT on increasing engagement of partners and visibility in the performance of European Structural and Investment
More informationFrom cradle to grave - EIOPA s dynamic approach to restoring consumer confidence in the sale of general insurance products.
SPEECH Manuela Zweimueller Director of Regulations From cradle to grave - EIOPA s dynamic approach to restoring consumer confidence in the sale of general insurance products. FCA General Insurance Sector
More informationL 347/174 Official Journal of the European Union
L 347/174 Official Journal of the European Union 20.12.2013 REGULATION (EU) No 1292/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 December 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 establishing
More informationRE: Consultation on integrating sustainability risks and factors in MiFID II
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationRecommendations on what the EC can do to promote uptake of EFSI by the social services sector
Recommendations on what the EC can do to promote uptake of EFSI by the social services sector Commissioned, monitored and guided in 2015 by EASPD Researched and Written in 2015 by Diesis Coop and Sefea
More informationFollow-up by the European Commission to the EU-ACP JPA on the resolution on private sector development strategy, including innovation, for sustainable
Follow-up by the European Commission to the EU-ACP JPA on the resolution on private sector development strategy, including innovation, for sustainable Development. The European External Action Service
More informationResearch Note #3 SOCIAL IMPACT BONDS
Research Note #3 SOCIAL IMPACT BONDS Research Note #3 SOCIAL IMPACT BONDS 2014 1 This research note was written by António Miguel, from the Social Investment Lab, with the scientific supervision of Professor
More informationCARBON PRICING PRINCIPLES. Prepared by the ICC Commission on Environment and Energy
CARBON PRICING PRINCIPLES Prepared by the ICC Commission on Environment and Energy Document No. 213/121 ABH October 2016 Carbon Pricing Principles 1 The Paris Agreement accommodates and encourages a broad
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, COM(2010) 543/3 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Smart
More informationthinking: BRIEFING 21 Transnational EU Programmes RELEASE DATE: APRIL 2012 Please direct any questions or comments regarding this paper to:
thinking: BRIEFING 21 Transnational EU Programmes 2014-2020 RELEASE DATE: APRIL 2012 Please direct any questions or comments regarding this paper to: New Economy Tel: 0161 237 4031 E-mail: maria.gonzalez@neweconomymanchester.com
More informationSustainability. Status and measures carried out in 2017
1 Sustainability SpareBank 1 SR-Bank is a responsible social actor Social responsibility is not something we are given, it is something we take. Through our daily operations and in relation to our stakeholders,
More informationSTAKEHOLDER VIEWS on the next EU budget cycle
STAKEHOLDER VIEWS on the next EU budget cycle Introduction In 2015 the EU and its Member States signed up to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) framework. This is a new global framework which, if
More informationGrid Investments from a Nordic Perspective
Grid Investments from a Nordic Perspective NordREG recommendations 1 Background and task As one of the challenges for the further development of the Nordic electricity market has in the last few years
More informationECTRI INPUT Public consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market March 2018
ECTRI INPUT Public consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market The European Conference of Transport Research Institutes (ECTRI) is an international
More informationTHE SWEDISH OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP ACTION PLAN MORE EFFECTIVELY MANAGING PUBLIC RESOURCES IN DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION
THE SWEDISH OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP ACTION PLAN MORE EFFECTIVELY MANAGING PUBLIC RESOURCES IN DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION 1 Introduction By joining the Open Government Partnership, Sweden reaffirmed its
More informationFinancial Capability. For Europe s Youth And Pre-retirees: Financial Capability. For Europe s Youth And Pre-retirees:
Financial Capability For Europe s Youth And Pre-retirees: Improving The Provision Of Financial Education And Advice Citi Foundation The Citi Foundation is committed to the economic empowerment and financial
More information4th MEETING of the High Level Expert Group on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds Gold-plating
4th MEETING of the High Level Expert Group on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds Gold-plating 1. The members of the High Level Group agree that gold-plating practices are one of the
More informationBUSINESS PRIORITIES FOR EU COHESION POLICY
POSITION PAPER January 2011 BUSINESS PRIORITIES FOR EU COHESION POLICY RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE 5 TH ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND TERRITORIAL COHESION REPORT KEY RECOMMENDATIONS Concentrate
More informationThe Geneva Association: Setting Standards for 25 Years
The Geneva Association: Setting Standards for 25 Years by Drs. Jan Holsboer* The occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Geneva Association calls for a moment of reflection to look back on what has been
More informationSimplify the management and administrative processes of the programme; Mainstream / simplify the structure of the programme.
Plate forme européenne de la société civile pour l éducation tout au long de la vie European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning - EUCIS-LLL Brussels, January 2011 EUCIS- LLL POSITION ON THE FUTURE
More informationURBACT II PROGRAMME MANUAL. (Technical Working Document)
European Regional Development Fund 2007-2013 Objective 3: European Territorial Cooperation URBACT II PROGRAMME MANUAL (Technical Working Document) Approved by the Monitoring Committee on 21/11/2007 Modified
More information2017 APIC-ABAC/APFF Regional Pension Funds & Social Security Systems Summit 5 December 2017
2017 APIC-ABAC/APFF Regional Pension Funds & Social Security Systems Summit 5 December 2017 Special Address Pension Reform and the Development of the MPF System Dr David Wong Yau-kar Chairman Mandatory
More informationPublic consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility
Contribution ID: 9d8a55f8-5d8e-41d1-b1e9-bb155224c3a4 Date: 07/03/2018 15:16:10 Public consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility Fields marked with * are mandatory. Public consultation
More informationURBACT II PROGRAMME MANUAL
European Regional Development Fund 2007-2013 Objective 3: European Territorial Cooperation URBACT II PROGRAMME MANUAL (Technical Working Document) Approved by the Monitoring Committee on 21/11/2007 Modified
More informationEquity crowdfunding Sharia compliant
ABSTRACT The deep recession and the development of Web 2.0 technology, accounted the breeding ground for the birth of the Crowdfunding. The term, which literally indicates funding from the crowd, defines
More informationBilateral Guideline. EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms
Bilateral Guideline EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms 2014 2021 Adopted by the Financial Mechanism Committee on 9 February 2017 09 February 2017 Contents 1 Introduction... 4 1.1 Definition of strengthened
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. on the feasibility of a network of smaller credit rating agencies
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.5.2014 COM(2014) 248 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the feasibility of a network of smaller credit rating agencies {SWD(2014)
More informationSingle Euro Payments Area (SEPA): Frequently Asked Questions (See IP/08/98)
MEMO/08/51 Brussels, 28 January 2008 Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA): Frequently Asked Questions (See IP/08/98) What is the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA)? The Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) is the
More informationBrussels, XXX COM(2018) 114/2
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX COM(2018) 114/2 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE
More informationMETRICS FOR IMPLEMENTING COUNTRY OWNERSHIP
METRICS FOR IMPLEMENTING COUNTRY OWNERSHIP The 2014 policy paper of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN), The Way Forward, outlines two powerful and mutually reinforcing pillars of aid reform
More informationPlate forme européenne de la société civile pour l éducation tout au long de la vie European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning
Plate forme européenne de la société civile pour l éducation tout au long de la vie European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning Contact : EUCIS-LLL 40, rue d Arlon B-1000 Brussels Coordination
More informationAssociation of German Chambers of Industry and Commerce. Shaping the future of Europe
Brussels, November 2017 22.11.2017 Association of German Chambers of Industry and Commerce 2 Shaping the future of Europe I. Europe is facing major challenges This year in March, the European Union solemnly
More informationPublic consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market
Contribution ID: 2c3a841b-5e67-463a-bd59-3596b9ae1d63 Date: 20/02/2018 16:26:34 Public consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market Fields marked with
More informationEUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE. REPORT on EFTA participation in EC Programmes
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA 1 Annex 14 November 2000 Brussels JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE REPORT on EFTA participation in EC Programmes Co-rapporteurs: Ms. Siri Frost Sterri (Conservative, Norway) Mr. Toine
More informationPROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENTS
CEEP.2015 Orig. EN March 2015 PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENTS Regulation on the European Fund for Strategic Investments (COM(2015) 10 final) EUROPEAN CENTER FOR EMPLOYERS AND ENTREPRISES PROVIDING PUBLIC SERVICES
More informationPublic consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market
Public consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market Fields marked with * are mandatory. Public consultation on EU funds in the area of of investment,
More informationthe 12 th EMN Annual Conference Microfinance and banks: Are we the right partners?
July 2015 EMN POLICY NOTE on the 12 th EMN Annual Conference Microfinance and banks: Are we the right partners? With financial support from the European Union EMN POLICY NOTE The European Microfinance
More informationNational Energy Efficiency Action Plans as a policy tool. Core Theme Series Report CAESDII/CTSR/1.1. Gregor Thenius, Austrian Energy Agency, Austria
National Energy Efficiency Action Plans as a policy tool Core Theme Series Report CAESDII/CTSR/1.1 Gregor Thenius, Austrian Energy Agency, Austria Date: September 2012 Introduction and context According
More informationTO SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR PEOPLE IN ALL FORMS OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN PILLAR OF SOCIAL RIGHTS
RESPONSE FIRST PHASE CONSULTATION OF SOCIAL PARTNERS UNDER ARTICLE 154 TFEU ON A POSSIBLE ACTION ADDRESSING THE CHALLENGES OF ACCESS TO SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR PEOPLE IN ALL FORMS OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK
More informationCOHESION POLICY
COMMUNITY-LED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT COHESION POLICY 2014-2020 The European Commission adopted legislative proposals for cohesion policy for 2014-2020 in October 2011 This factsheet is one in a series highlighting
More informationQuestionnaire. On the patent system in Europe
EN PATSTRAT EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG Knowledge-based Economy Industrial property Brussels, 09/01/06 Questionnaire On the patent system in Europe EN EN INTRODUCTION The
More information7+(Ã52/(Ã2)Ã),1$1&,$/Ã,167,787,216Ã,1Ã$&+,(9,1*Ã6867$,1$%/(Ã'(9(/230(17 5( ((8523($1&200,66,21
7+(52/(2) ),1$1&,$/,167,787,216,1$&+,(9,1* 6867$,1$%/('(9(/230(17 5(3257 727+((8523($1&200,66,21 %< '(/3+,,17(51$7,21$//7',1$662&,$7,21:,7+(&2/2*,&*0%+ 129(0%(5 ([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\ (;(&87,9(6800$5
More information15. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the World Bank, the Council and the Commission.
C 188 E/42 Official Journal of the European Union 28.6.2012 10. Regrets that the World Bank mainly promotes a large-scale and export-oriented energy model rather than supporting small-scale decentralised
More informationSolidar EU Training Academy. Valentina Caimi Policy and Advocacy Adviser. European Semester Social Investment Social innovation
Solidar EU Training Academy Valentina Caimi Policy and Advocacy Adviser European Semester Social Investment Social innovation Who we are The largest platform of European rights and value-based NGOs working
More informationLondon Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) response to the European Commission consultation on non-financial reporting Guidelines
London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) response to the European Commission consultation on non-financial reporting Guidelines Executive Summary London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) welcomes the opportunity to
More informationScoping Paper for Access to Risk Finance Work-Programme
Scoping Paper for Access to Risk Finance Work-Programme 2018-2020 1. Context This scoping paper draws on the report 1 of the 'Access to Risk Finance' Advisory Group; discussions at the Latvian, Luxembourg
More informationORGALIME POSITION PAPER on the creation of a European Private Company Statute
ORGALIME POSITION PAPER on the creation of a European Private Company Statute Commission Communication COM (2003) 284 final Brussels, 3 August 2006 1. Introduction Orgalime represents the interests of
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.3.2018 COM(2018) 110 final 2018/0045 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on facilitating cross-border distribution of collective
More informationSummary of the Partnership Agreement for Hungary,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26 August 2014 Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Hungary, 2014-2020 Overall information The Partnership Agreement (PA) covers five funds: the European Regional Development
More informationWORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2009-2014 Committee on Budgetary Control 30.9.2013 WORKING DOCUMT on European Court of Auditors' Special Report 2/2013: 'Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the Seventh
More informationEvaluation questions are shown in blue and will be deleted once we upload the questionnaires
COSME Evaluation Survey questionnaire -----For internal use----- Code SO Target group SO10005 SO1 Other organisations Evaluation questions are shown in blue and will be deleted once we upload the questionnaires
More informationCASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY STRATEGIC PLAN
CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY STRATEGIC PLAN Adopted August 7, 2017 Contents 1 Overview... 1 2 10- to 30-Year Planning Horizon: Core Ideology... 2 3 Envisioned Future... 4 4 5- to 10-Year Planning Horizon:
More informationCross-cutting audit issues
6th MEETING of the High Level Expert Group on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds Cross-cutting audit issues 1. Although there have been some improvement in quality and professionalisation
More informationThe DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews
The DAC s main findings and recommendations Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews Luxembourg 2017 Luxembourg has strengthened its development co-operation programme The committee concluded
More information17. Communication, Dissemination and Exploitation
HORIZON 2020 WORK PROGRAMME 2014 2015 17. Important Notice on the First Horizon 2020 Work Programme This Work Programme covers 2014 and 2015. Due to the launching phase of Horizon 2020, parts of the Work
More informationAustrian Climate Change Workshop Summary Report The Way forward on Climate and Sustainable Finance
Austrian Climate Change Workshop 2018 - Summary Report The Way forward on Climate and Sustainable Finance In close cooperation with the Austrian Federal Ministry of Sustainability and Tourism, Kommunalkredit
More informationINTERIM SUMMARY FOR 2017
INTERIM SUMMARY FOR 2017 FURTHER GROWTH TO CREATE ENDURING VALUE AND LEAVE CLEAR FOOTPRINTS KEY FIGURES NOK bn 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Value-adjusted equity Value-adjusted equity 24,3 24,9 26,6 28,8 32,2
More informationCouncil conclusions on the review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Council conclusions on the review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region 325th GERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 5 November 20 The Council adopted
More informationPROPOSED COMMISSION PROGRAMME ON COMPETITIVENESS OF ENTERPRISE AND SMEs (COSME)
POSITION April 2012 PROPOSED COMMISSION PROGRAMME ON COMPETITIVENESS OF ENTERPRISE AND SMEs (COSME) KEY MESSAGES 1 2 3 BUSINESSEUROPE strongly supports the introduction of the Equity Facility for Growth
More informationAnnual report About the bank
About the bank 1 of 7 Statement by the Group CEO Equipping SpareBank 1 SMN for the future 2017 was a good year for SpareBank 1 SMN. 12,000 personal customers and 1,200 corporate customers joined us over
More informationCONSULTATION DOCUMENT CMU ACTION ON CROSS-BORDER DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS (UCITS, AIF, ELTIF, EUVECA AND EUSEF) ACROSS THE EU
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union FINANCIAL MARKETS Asset management CONSULTATION DOCUMENT CMU ACTION ON CROSS-BORDER DISTRIBUTION
More informationPATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN
PATSTRAT Error! Unknown document property name. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG Knowledge-based Economy Industrial property Brussels, 09/01/06 Questionnaire On the patent system in
More informationJob Description and Requirements Programme Manager State-building and Governance Job no in the EU Delegation to the Republic of Yemen
JOB PROFILE 17/08/2013 Job Description and Requirements Programme Manager State-building and Governance Job no. 127004 in the EU Delegation to the Republic of Yemen Job Type: Contract Agent Function Group
More informationHong Kong Trustees Association Conference Luncheon Keynote Speech 31 October 2017
Hong Kong Trustees Association Conference Luncheon Keynote Speech 31 October 2017 Reforming the MPF System to Improve Administration and Trustee Governance Dr David Wong Yau-kar Chairman Mandatory Provident
More information- ESF - EUR 14.5 million - Loan + training - SME - Lithuania. Entrepreneurship Promotion Fund (EPF) sustainable business.
- ESF - EUR 14.5 million - Loan + training - SME - Lithuania Entrepreneurship Promotion Fund (EPF) supporting entrepreneurs to develop a sustainable business DISCLAIMER This document has been produced
More informationSTRATEGY NORGES BANK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY 2017 2019 NORGES BANK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Our mission is to safeguard and build financial wealth for future generations. Contents Strategy 2017 2019 We are a large global investor and a long-term
More informationDG Enlargement. Support to civil society within the enlargement policy 2. should be focused on enabling and
DG Enlargement Guidelines for EU support to civil society in enlargement countries, 2014-2020 1. CIVIL SOCIETY AND PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY The Treaty on the European Union (Article 49) establishes that
More informationHow the Post-Cotonou Agreement can support EU investment and private sector development in ACP countries
27 April 2018 How the Post-Cotonou Agreement can support EU investment and private sector development in ACP countries Following the European Commission s recommendation for a Council Decision authorising
More informationOn behalf of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY
On behalf of the EUROPEAN PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL INDUSTRY 5 November 2012 To European Commission, Directorate-General Taxation and Customs Union, Unit D2 - Direct Tax Policy and Cooperation
More informationStrategic benefits Building bridges, shaping globalisation
Strategic benefits Building bridges, shaping globalisation An even closer relationship Taking a stand for open trade Working together to shape globalisation Strengthening our ties with Asia The EU-Singapore
More informationSUMMARY RESPONSES TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON CROWDFUNDING IN THE EU. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Internal Market and Services
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Internal Market and Services FINANCIAL MARKETS Securities markets SUMMARY RESPONSES TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON CROWDFUNDING IN THE EU March 2014 1 The European
More informationReview of the Shareholder Rights Directive
Review of the Shareholder Rights Directive Position of Better Finance for All (The European Federation of Financial Services Users) 27 October 2014 ID number in Transparency Register: 24633926420-79 Better
More informationThe approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg
The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme Guiding questions How is the third ESPON programme generation
More informationOverview of the Northern Ireland Ireland - Scotland VA Programme. Electric Vehicles Call Workshop
Overview of the Northern Ireland Ireland - Scotland VA Programme Electric Vehicles Call Workshop Welcome MARK FEENEY, MA DIRECTOR Introduction and Outline of Workshop Programme Priorities Policy Context
More informationInterregional cooperation
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Interregional cooperation State of play and perspectives PRE-WASTE final conference European Waste and Resource Days Brussels, 7/11/2012 Stefania Amorosi Finance Officer
More informationto ATAF Project: Support to the Establishment of the African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF)
Support to ATAF Project: Support to the Establishment of the African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) Background of ATAF Domestic resource mobilisation (DRM) has become one of the most prominent issues
More information1. General description of the extent to which and how the social impact of policy proposals is assessed in your country
Norway 1. General description of the extent to which and how the social impact of policy proposals is assessed in your country To what extent is the social impact of policy proposals in your country assessed?
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 13.10.2008 COM(2008) 640 final 2008/0194 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on cross-border payments
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION COHESION POLICY FOR PROGRAMMING PERIOD: EVOLUTIONS, DIFFICULTIES, POSITIVE FACTORS
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION COHESION POLICY FOR 2007-2013 PROGRAMMING PERIOD: EVOLUTIONS, DIFFICULTIES, POSITIVE FACTORS PhD Candidate Ana STĂNICĂ Abstract In an European Union that integrated
More informationInternational Sales, Franchising and Product Law Section Scholarship
International Bar Association Conference International Sales, Franchising and Product Law Section Scholarship The International Bar Association s Legal Practice Division s sections offer a fund from which
More informationQuestion 1: Are you sufficiently informed about upcoming calls for proposals in a timely manner? What improvements would you suggest?
The European League of Institutes of the Arts ELIA has experience with operational and project grants within the Culture Programme and the Lifelong Learning Programme, administered by the Executive Agency
More informationCONSULTATION DOCUMENT CAPITAL MARKETS UNION: ACTION ON A POTENTIAL EU PERSONAL PENSION FRAMEWORK
CONSULTATION DOCUMENT CAPITAL MARKETS UNION: ACTION ON A POTENTIAL EU PERSONAL PENSION FRAMEWORK A. INFORMATION ABOUT THE RESPONDENT (p8) 1. Are you replying as: an organisation or a company 2. First Name,
More informationA. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives
TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE LEAD DG RESPONSIBLE UNIT AP NUMBER LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE INDICATIVE PLANNING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Initiative for an EU Personal Pensions Framework
More informationCOHESION POLICY
ENSURING THE VISIBILITY OF COHESION POLICY: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION RULES 2014-2020 COHESION POLICY 2014-2020 The new rules and legislation governing the next round of EU Cohesion Policy investment
More informationEU Framework Programme 9
EU Framework Programme 9 1. Introduction The EU Framework Programme 9 (FP9), also called Horizon Europe, will be the EU s next research and innovation programme which is planned to start in January 2021
More informationLadies and gentlemen,
Achieving Thailand s True Growth Potentials: The Role of the Central Bank Speech by Dr. Prasarn Trairatvorakul, Governor Thailand Focus 2014: Reforming for Sustainable Growth August 27, 2014 At Grand Hyatt
More informationTerritorial Pacts: Making the Most of Europe 2020 through Partnership
EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Territorial Pacts: Making the Most of Europe 2020 through Partnership FAQs on the Committee of the Regions proposal for local, regional and national authorities
More information(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS
10.11.2017 Official Journal of the European Union L 293/1 I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2017/1991 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 October 2017 amending Regulation
More informationConsultation on revision of the EU Emission Trading System (EU ETS) Directive
Consultation on revision of the EU Emission Trading System (EU ETS) Directive Transparency register ID: 50679663522-75 EUROPEX Rue Montoyer 31 Bte 9 BE-1000 Brussels T. : +32 2 512 34 10 E.: secretariat@europex.org
More informationDelegations will find attached the abovementioned opinion. Please note that other language versions should be available at :
Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 November 2017 (OR. en) 13925/17 FISC 247 COVER NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations OPINION of the European Economic and Social
More informationDanube Transnational Programme
Summary Danube Transnational Programme 2014-2020 Summary of the Cooperation Programme Version 2.3, 20 th October 2014 Danube Transnational Programme 2014-2020 (INTERREG V-B DANUBE) Page 1 Mission of the
More informationProposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Year for Active Ageing (2012) (text with EEA relevance)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.9.2010 COM(2010) 462 final 2010/0242 (COD) C7-0253/10 Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Year for Active Ageing (2012)
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, COM(2011) 870 final
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.12.2011 COM(2011) 870 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, AND TO THE EUROPEAN AND SOCIAL
More information[REPORT ON THE FIFTH INVESTORS FORUM]
[English Translation] May 25, 2016 [REPORT ON THE FIFTH INVESTORS FORUM] Forum of Investors Japan Theme: Time: Venue: What kind of investor helps company to boost its value creation? April 22, 2016, 6:30
More information2012 European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations. Rachel Buchanan Policy Officer
1 2012 European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations Rachel Buchanan Policy Officer Why a European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations in 2012? 2 Marks 10th Anniversary
More information