Publication for private investors
|
|
- Diana Weaver
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MindScope Use of the right factors can contribute to the best stock selection for a portfolio. But which factors are the right ones to use? And how can we most efficiently reap their rewards in factor portfolios? Multi-Factor Equity Investing
2 Equity factor investing has become increasingly popular among a broad range of investors, including pension funds, mutual funds and sovereign wealth funds. Factor investing brings more transparency and lower costs, but the main driver of its rising popularity is that it can improve a portfolio s risk and return profile. It achieves this through the explicit allocation of risk in line with established drivers of return. Factors, in the context of stocks, are characteristics that explain the commonality in risks and returns. The most dominant factor is the equity market factor itself: all stocks tend to move in tandem with each other. In a single-factor model such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) 1, the market is the only factor driving the co-movement of stocks. The sensitivity of each stock is characterized by its market beta. All remaining risk and return expectations are idiosyncratic, or stock-specific, and can be diversified away by holding more stocks. Excess return can then only be added by superior skills, e.g. by selecting individual stocks that outperform the market after adjusting for beta. Numerous academic studies reveal that many factors other than the market drive risk and returns. The best-known and most established equity factors are value 2, momentum 3, low-vol 4 and quality 5. Use of the right factors can contribute to the best stock selection for a portfolio. Which factors are the right ones to use? And how can we most efficiently reap their rewards in factor portfolios? This Mindscope will answer these questions. Browsing through the factor jungle: factor selection The biggest pitfall in factor investing is selecting factors that are not true factors and do not carry a structural premium. A recent study shows that a large number of factors have been studied and are used in practice. Harvey, Liu and Zhu (2015) find no fewer than 316 factors documented in the academic literature, a number that is still growing! Figure 1 summarizes their results. Clearly we need some principles to guide us through this potential jungle of factors. Ultimately our assessment of a factor should be based on our expectation of its future efficacy, i.e. whether we think it will work in the future or not. We take several precautionary measures to make sure the factors we select and the way we construct them stand a good chance of delivering the anticipated benefits. First, we want stock selection factors to be supported by a clear and simple rationale. We should understand why the factor is expected to earn a premium. Otherwise it may be just a fluke that shows up in historical data and back-tests simply by chance. Given the massive increase of computational power available in the financial community, plus the fact that many studies are performed on similar data sets (typically US large cap stocks), this risk of data-mining is by no means an imaginary problem. But academic research and extensive in-house research guide us in the right direction. Second, we follow the evidence. The essence of factor investing is playing those strategies that have proven themselves and avoiding strategies that have not worked consistently over extended periods of time. Empirical and academic evidence supporting a factor must be very robust. This means that factors should work in multiple regions, sectors, periods and market environments. Obviously, no single factor will work everywhere all of the time. Individual factors generally have periods of underperformance. But in the long run (5+ years) factors tend to work. Moreover, a factor should not be subsumed by transaction costs. Figure 1: The number of documented factors has grown rapidly Dramatic growth in published factors in recent years Idiosyncratic ( Characteristic ) factors Generalised ( Common ) factors Source: Harvey, Liu and Zhu, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns, working paper version. Factors are from papers in finance, economics and accounting journals and SSRN working papers, collated by the authors. Third, factors should be resilient to reasonable changes in their definition. For example, 11-month momentum should not exhibit very different behaviour from 12-month momentum. Similarly, price-to-earnings and price-to-cash flow should provide broadly comparable results. In our view it is rather meaningless, for example, to try to define the best value or quality factor. Although in broad terms it is clear what such factor entails, arguments on the exact definition are similar to discussions on the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin. It is important that the concept of the factor can be reliably and robustly captured in a systematic manner. Value, momentum & quality All documented rewarding factors can be grouped into three comprehensive true factors. The three factors that we use to build a core multi-factor equity portfolio are value, momentum and quality. Each of these factors is well-established in its own right. They can also be efficiently combined together to construct a robust long-only equity portfolio. Value cheap stocks tend to have better performance 1 Capital Asset Pricing Model, Sharpe (1964) 2 Graham and Dodd (1923), Fama and French (1992) 3 Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) 4 Haugen and Heins (1972) 5 Novy-Marx (2013) Momentum Quality stocks that are doing well tend to continue to have better performance profitable companies tend to have better stock performance 2
3 Value The value factor relates to the old maxim of buy low, sell high : buy stocks when they are cheap, and sell stocks when they are expensive. There are several approaches to assess the cheapness of a stock. In general, valuation metrics boil down to comparing the market price of a stock to its fundamentals. The most frequently encountered fundamentals used to value a stock are book value, earnings, dividends, revenues and cash flows. When the valuation of a stock in is calculated using only one metric, for example dividend yield, the stock might appear to be selling at a steep discount. A look at several other valuation metrics, however, might reveal that the stock is rather expensive given its earnings and cash flow. The use of several value measures draws a more complete picture. For this reason, we combine multiple value characteristics to assess how attractive a stock is given the price at which it is trading and its historical and anticipated fundamentals. Momentum The momentum factor captures trends in the relative performance of stocks. This can be in terms of stock prices going up (winners outperforming losers, price momentum), but also in terms of earnings or positive changes in sell-side analyst estimates. A portfolio that every month buys stocks that had the best performance (or sells the worst performers) over the past 6 to 12 months outperforms market cap-weighted indexes. Behavioural finance experts explain this phenomenon by referring to the under-reaction of financial market participants to recent news. Similarly, stocks that experience upgrades in analysts consensus earnings estimates are more likely to outperform than recently downgraded stocks. Quality Unlike value and momentum, a quality factor has no generally accepted definition. The idea is that it is advantageous to buy stocks of a good or high-quality company, rather than those of a mediocre or lower-quality company. What distinguishes a highquality stock from a low-quality stock, however, is more subjective. A non-exhaustive list of characteristics that are often used as quality factors includes: high profitability, low accruals, low earnings and price volatility, stable dividend and earnings growth, high dividend coverage, low interest expense, high credit ratings, shareholder friendliness in the form of buybacks and low equity issuance, high workforce productivity and margin expansion. In order to systematically assess quality, we again look at a wide range of criteria that all link to certain facets of quality, such as profitability, financial robustness, productivity, earnings quality, growth at a reasonable price, and low-vol. The well-known low-vol factor is therefore subsumed in our quality factor. Ample academic and empirical evidence exists for the value, momentum and quality factors. We will further explore this evidence in the next section. Constructing portfolios with exposure to these factors makes intuitive sense, has a compelling investment rationale, and has demonstrated to add value in most market environments. We strongly believe in robust factor play. In defining a factor we combine several much more granular indicators. There are three reasons for doing so. First of all, the rationale for a factor typically does not imply a very narrow and specific definition. A single number does not tell the whole story. There are numerous ways to assess value, momentum and quality. The use of diverse methods to measure these attributes should result both in a more stable definition of the factor and a better translation of this factor into the portfolio. Selecting a specific metric (for example, price-to-book to assess value) is typically done in academic contexts to achieve exactness and reproducibility, and to avoid data-mining. In practice, though, it makes a lot more sense to refrain from a specific narrow definition, and instead use multiple equally valid definitions. Second, a broader definition has additional benefits when it comes to actual implementation. By construction, a diversified set of attributes will be more stable, and therefore warrant less turnover and transaction costs. Also there will be less overlap with other market participants, which could lead to everyone buying or selling the same stocks at the same time. Third, using a narrow definition is a bad idea because in certain sectors the use of a very specific factor is meaningless. For example, banks cannot be adequately compared using price-to-sales ratios as their business model is not driven by sales, but by interest rate margins. Price-to-book, on the other hand, is a good factor for banks but a poor metric for companies that have mostly intangible assets. The factor evidence Value, momentum and quality factors have delivered consistent returns and are expected to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns going forward. In order to investigate the added value of the factors, we investigate the performance of portfolios that differ by their factor exposures. Every month we rank all stocks based on how they score on a particular factor. We then split the universe of all stocks into five quintile portfolios. The first quintile (Q1) contains the top 2 and the last quintile (Q5) contains the bottom 2. The performance of all these portfolios is depicted in Figure 2. Figure 2: Average annualized performance of five quintile portfolios for the factors value, momentum and quality 14% 14% 14% 12% 12% 12% % 8% 8% 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Q5 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q5 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q5 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Source (and for all subsequent figures and tables): NN IP Quantitative Research & Strategy, sample period , Global Developed Markets. 3
4 For all factors we observe a monotonic behaviour: the higher the portfolio scores on a factor, the better its return has been over this period. This clearly demonstrates that the factors bear significant risk premiums and that exposure to these factors is structurally rewarded. Although in the long run we observe strong outperformance of each of the factors, there can be prolonged periods of cumulative underperformance for any individual factor. The portfolio with the higher exposure to a factor (Q1) does not always outperform the portfolio with the lower exposure (Q5). This is shown in Figure 3a, which illustrates the outperformance of the top versus the bottom quintile portfolios (that is, Q1 Q5) for each of the value, momentum and quality factors, as well as their cumulative drawdowns (see Figure 3b). Corresponding performance and risk numbers are presented in Table 1. Figure 3a: Cumulative relative performance (Q1-Q5) of the factors Table 1: Factor performance and risk statistics (based on Q1-Q5) Return (annualized) 7.2% % Volatility 11.6% 9.9% 8.6% Information ratio Max drawdown % Length (months) The graphs also clearly show that different factors perform at different times. This should come as no surprise given their different rationale and background. The performances of the factors show low correlations (see Table 2), so we can expect most benefits if we successfully combine multiple factors. The lowest historical correlation is between value and momentum factor returns, again a feature for which we can have a clear intuition: the momentum factor favours stocks that have recently outperformed, but it is exactly this gain in relative return that often tends to make these stocks less attractive from a relative value perspective. Clearly momentum and value are not each other s opposites, but this interaction effect goes a long way in explaining the dependence between these two factors. Table 2: Monthly correlations of the factors (based on Q1-Q5) Momentum 1 Value Quality Figure 3b: Cumulative relative drawdowns (Q1-Q5) of the factors -5% -1-15% Next to the low correlations, the drawdown numbers and graphs highlight another important reason why it is beneficial to combine these factors: the underperformance of one factor may be compensated by the performance of one or more of the other factors. Constructing a long-only factor portfolio After having identified the factors that we want to have exposure to, the next step is to determine how to best incorporate these factors into long-only equity portfolios. As we already saw in the previous paragraph, we can anticipate most benefits if we succeed in combining multiple factors % -3-35% To gain insight into the alternative ways of putting the factors together, we compare the performance of the factor portfolios. Figure 4 shows the performance of the value, momentum and quality factor portfolios. These portfolios are long-only, and contain only those stocks that score in the top 2 (Q1) on the respective factor. In addition we include the Average portfolio, which simply splits its allocation equally between these three factor portfolios. Also shown is the Multi-Factor portfolio, which contains the 2 stocks that score best on the combination of factors. For reference we also include the equal-weighted market portfolio consisting of all stocks, irrespective of their factor exposures. 4
5 Figure 4a: Cumulative performance of long-only factor portfolios and the market Average Multi-Factor Market As can be immediately inferred from Figure 4a, the market factor is the dominant driver of risk. This can also be seen in the volatility numbers in Table 3, but this follows even more strikingly from the drawdown graphs in Figure 4b: for all portfolios the largest drawdowns occur simultaneously during the global financial crisis. There is no escape from this in a long-only equity portfolio, but we do see differential performances of the individual factor portfolios and the combinations thereof. Figure 4b: Cumulative drawdowns of long-only factor portfolios and the market Average Multi-Factor Market Table 3: Performance and risk statistics of long-only factor portfolios and the market Average Multi- Market Factor Return (annualized) % 11.5% 14.3% 8.2% Volatility 15.4% 18.1% 12.5% 14.9% % Sharpe Max Drawdown % -42.4% -50.8% -50.2% -51.8% Length (months) There is substantial added performance compared to the market portfolio of all factor portfolios (and then naturally also for the Average), and in particular for the Multi-Factor portfolio. This should come as no surprise as the market portfolio is the sum of all stocks (so, the sum of Q1 through Q5) and we already established the additional performance of the top 2 factor portfolios (Q1) in Figure 2. The performance of the Average portfolio is basically the average performance of the three long-only factor portfolios, whereas the performance of the Multi-Factor portfolio is considerably higher. To facilitate a better comparison, we take a closer look at the relative performance of the different portfolios compared to the market portfolio, as shown in Figures 5a and 5b. The corresponding statistics are displayed in Table 4. Again we see strong outperformance of all factor portfolios, with the best performance for the Multi-Factor portfolio. In terms of relative risk or tracking error (TE) we clearly see the benefits of diversifying over multiple factors, with lower risk numbers for the Multi-Factor strategy compared to the single-factor portfolios, and an even lower tracking error for the Average singlefactor portfolio. Comparing information ratios (relative return per unit of relative risk, or outperformance divided by tracking error) the Average and Multi-Factor strategies show similar results, both considerably higher than the single-factor portfolios. Inspecting the relative drawdowns of the different strategies, we observe a much more benign behaviour of the Average and Multi- Factor strategy compared to the individual single-factor portfolios, both in terms of depth and length of drawdowns. This further strengthens the case for incorporating multiple factors in the portfolio. Figure 5a: Cumulative relative performance of long-only factor portfolios Average Multi-Factor 5
6 Figure 5b: Cumulative relative drawdowns of long-only factor portfolios -5% -1-15% -2-25% Average Multi-Factor Table 4: Relative performance and risk statistics of long-only factor portfolios Average Multi- Factor Outperformance (annualized) 3.5% 3.1% 2.5% 3.1% 5.7% Tracking error 5.6% 5.3% 3.6% 2.1% 3.9% Information ratio Max drawdown -19.8% -16.8% -7.6% -2.9% -6.5% Length (months) What is the best way to combine the factors? In the previous section we clearly established the diversification benefits of combining the factors, either in the Average strategy (which allocates equally across the three single-factor long-only portfolios) or in the Multi-Factor strategy (which allocates based on the score on the combined set of factors). We now further compare these two alternative approaches. The Average portfolio represents perhaps the simplest way to achieve this diversification: just split the portfolio three ways, and allocate a third of the portfolio to each of the factors. This simplicity is maybe why many asset owners employ this method, but it comes with a considerable cost. First of all, the exposure to the targeted factors can be substantially diluted: if we target three factors, on average only one-third of the portfolio will be used to gain exposure to any specific factor. Clearly this gets even worse when more factors are in scope. The combination of factors through the Multi-Factor strategy does a much better job than the Average strategy in providing strategic exposure to the factor premiums in a long-only setting. This means that we should expect a lower return of the Average single-factor portfolio compared to the Multi-Factor portfolio. Second, a specific single-factor portfolio can at times have negative exposure to the other factors. Adding up all single-factor portfolios may then even result in a negative exposure of the total portfolio to one of the individual factors! In the long run this effect more or less averages out, as can be deduced from the similar information ratios. In the short run, however, the Multi-Factor portfolio will be much better aligned with the objective of gaining diversified systematic exposures to all three factors. Finally, when one single-factor portfolio is buying a specific stock, another single-factor portfolio may well be selling the same stock (recall the example of value and momentum). At the overall portfolio level, nothing changes, and the transaction costs could be saved. We don t observe the impact of this effect in the above analysis, as we ignore transaction costs when we rebalance all portfolios. Clearly, though, the benefits of netting are present only in the Multi- Factor portfolio, and not in the Average single-factor portfolio. Within a Multi-Factor portfolio, the potential pitfalls described above can be avoided. The full portfolio can be used to gain exposure to all targeted factors simultaneously, and an outcome where the portfolio ends up with a negative exposure to any specific factor can simply be avoided. Also, when the portfolio is rebalanced, the contribution of each stock to the combination of factors is considered. The scenario described earlier will never occur, and a stock will only be bought or sold if its contribution to the total set of factors contributes or detracts significantly. The difference between the Average strategy and the Multi-Factor strategy is in essence driven by relative risk: the Multi-Factor strategy reaches a considerably higher active risk, with similar riskadjusted returns (information ratio) and drawdowns per unit of volatility. As a result it can provide a much more efficient exposure to the different factors. Also considerations about the optimal number of stocks to balance maximal exposure to the targeted factors with the amount of total or active risk can only be meaningfully addressed within the context of the full portfolio. Towards an actual portfolio: incorporating additional constraints The long-only portfolios that we considered so far do not obey any further constraints. In practice there are several considerations that warrant imposing constraints on the actual portfolio. The most high-impact constraints are related to risk. The factor portfolios considered so far could at times be skewed towards certain regions or sectors. As an example, if US stock markets have gone up compared to the rest of the world, the momentum factor portfolio is likely to have a large tilt towards the US. Using multiple factors reduces these biases somewhat, but in practice, additional risk limitations and constraints are often imposed to avoid such biases. Most often these risk constraints are applied versus a benchmark, either in terms of active risk or tracking error, but also in terms of limits on relative sector or regional exposures. Additional constraints can be motivated by actual implementation considerations. These typically scale with the size of the portfolio, and are imposed to mitigate market impact at times of rebalancing. 6
7 This can lead to thresholds on market capitalization of a company, position sizing or on minimal trading volumes. An important set of constraints is implemented to exclude investments in stocks with highly controversial profiles from an Environmental, Social or Governance (ESG) perspective. In addition it is straightforward in a Multi-Factor strategy to also add ESG inclusion through the use of an ESG factor or low-carbon factor if the asset owner desires such a profile. All of these constraints are more efficiently applied at the final stage of portfolio construction. This is yet another reason why the Multi- Factor approach is superior to the Average single-factor approach. Summary We have presented a factor-based approach to core equity portfolios that should achieve consistent outperformance over traditional core equity portfolios. Our approach hinges on three factors momentum, value and quality, which all have outperformed market indexes over the long-run. The explicit allocation of risk in line with these established drivers of return leads to an improved risk and return profile. Additional benefits of the systematic use of these factors to make investment decisions are increased transparency and low cost. Bas Peeters Head of Quantitative Research & Strategy Karim Bannouh Senior Quantitative Strategist For more information about NN IP s Equity Factor Investing capabilities and solutions, or about the role Equity Factor Investing can play in your portfolio, please contact: Karim Bannouh (Karim.Bannouh@nnip.com) or Bas Peeters (Bas.Peeters@nnip.com). Factor robustness of our momentum, value and quality factors is supported by a solid economic rationale and academic evidence. There is extensive and strong empirical evidence across various definitions, sample periods and the performance of these factors has been found to be strong in several market environments and investment universes. Diversification over multiple types of factors increases returns and reduces risk in the long term. There are several ways to combine individual factors into a Multi-Factor strategy. Constructing single-factor portfolios and equal-weighting these results in higher risk-adjusted returns and smaller drawdowns than investing only in one factor portfolio. A more efficient approach of combining factors can be implemented through favouring stocks that score well on a combination of targeted factors. This approach increases efficiency as it avoids selecting stocks that score well on one factor but poorly on one or more other factors. In addition, this Multi-Factor strategy provides a better platform for translating this approach into an actual long-only equity portfolio. 7
8 Disclaimer The elements contained in this document have been prepared solely for the purpose of information and do not constitute an offer, in particular a prospectus or any invitation to treat, buy or sell any security or to participate in any trading strategy. This document is intended only for MiFID professional investors. While particular attention has been paid to the contents of this document, no guarantee, warranty or representation, express or implied, is given to the accuracy, correctness or completeness thereof. Any information given in this document may be subject to change or update without notice. Neither NN Investment Partners Holdings B.V., NN Investment Partners Holdings N.V. nor any other company or unit belonging to the NN Group, nor any of its officers, directors or employees can be held direct or indirect liable or responsible with respect to the information and/or recommendations of any kind expressed herein. The information contained in this document cannot be understood as provision of investment services. If you wish to obtain investment services please contact our office for advice. Use of the information contained in this document is solely at your risk. Investment sustains risk. Please note that the value of your investment may rise or fall and also that past performance is not indicative of future results and shall in no event be deemed as such. This document and information contained herein must not be copied, reproduced, distributed or passed to any person at any time without our prior written consent. Any claims arising out of or in connection with the terms and conditions of this disclaimer are governed by Dutch law. This document is not intended and may not be used to solicit sales of investments or subscription of securities in countries where this is prohibited by the relevant authorities or legislation. 8
Factor Investing: Smart Beta Pursuing Alpha TM
In the spectrum of investing from passive (index based) to active management there are no shortage of considerations. Passive tends to be cheaper and should deliver returns very close to the index it tracks,
More informationResearch Factor Indexes and Factor Exposure Matching: Like-for-Like Comparisons
Research Factor Indexes and Factor Exposure Matching: Like-for-Like Comparisons October 218 ftserussell.com Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 The Mathematics of Exposure Matching... 4 3 Selection and Equal
More information+ = Smart Beta 2.0 Bringing clarity to equity smart beta. Drawbacks of Market Cap Indices. A Lesson from History
Benoit Autier Head of Product Management benoit.autier@etfsecurities.com Mike McGlone Head of Research (US) mike.mcglone@etfsecurities.com Alexander Channing Director of Quantitative Investment Strategies
More informationJanuary 2017 The materiality of ESG factors for equity investment decisions: academic evidence
The materiality of ESG factors for equity investment decisions: academic evidence www.nnip.com Content Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 3 Data description... 4 Main results... 4 Results based on
More informationLazard Insights. Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta. Summary. What Is Smart Beta? Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst
Lazard Insights Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Summary Smart beta strategies have become increasingly popular over the past several
More informationNasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index
Nasdaq Chaikin Power US Small Cap Index A Multi-Factor Approach to Small Cap Introduction Multi-factor investing has become very popular in recent years. The term smart beta has been coined to categorize
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO FACTOR INVESTING
WHITE PAPER AN INTRODUCTION TO FACTOR INVESTING THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. IT SHOULD NOT BE DISTRIBUTED TO, OR USED BY, INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS. OUR RESEARCH COMMITMENT As
More informationFactor investing: building balanced factor portfolios
Investment Insights Factor investing: building balanced factor portfolios Edward Leung, Ph.D. Quantitative Research Analyst, Invesco Quantitative Strategies Andrew Waisburd, Ph.D. Managing Director, Invesco
More informationCHAPTER 17 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT. by Alistair Byrne, PhD, CFA
CHAPTER 17 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT by Alistair Byrne, PhD, CFA LEARNING OUTCOMES After completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: a Describe systematic risk and specific risk; b Describe
More informationFactor Investing. Fundamentals for Investors. Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee
Factor Investing Fundamentals for Investors Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee As an investor, you have likely heard a lot about factors in recent years. But factor investing is not new.
More informationThe Merits and Methods of Multi-Factor Investing
The Merits and Methods of Multi-Factor Investing Andrew Innes S&P Dow Jones Indices The Risk of Choosing Between Single Factors Given the unique cycles across the returns of single-factor strategies, how
More informationGet active with Vanguard factor ETFs
Get active with Vanguard factor ETFs Factor investing has gained attention in recent years, in part because of the rise of alternatively weighted indexes and smart-beta products. Yet factor investing has
More informationFE670 Algorithmic Trading Strategies. Stevens Institute of Technology
FE670 Algorithmic Trading Strategies Lecture 4. Cross-Sectional Models and Trading Strategies Steve Yang Stevens Institute of Technology 09/26/2013 Outline 1 Cross-Sectional Methods for Evaluation of Factor
More informationMinimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk in a Single Strategy
White Paper Minimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk in a Single Strategy Matthew Van Der Weide Minimum Variance and Tracking Error: Combining Absolute and Relative Risk
More informationEFFICIENT FACTOR INVESTING STRATEGIES
EFFICIENT FACTOR INVESTING STRATEGIES WHITE PAPER For professional investors July 2014 David Blitz, PhD Joop Huij, PhD Simon Lansdorp, PhD Pim van Vliet, PhD Contents Introduction 3 The rise of factor
More informationCORESHARES SCIENTIFIC BETA MULTI-FACTOR STRATEGY HARVESTING PROVEN SOURCES OF RETURN AT LOW COST: AN ACTIVE REPLACEMENT STRATEGY
CORESHARES SCIENTIFIC BETA MULTI-FACTOR STRATEGY HARVESTING PROVEN SOURCES OF RETURN AT LOW COST: AN ACTIVE REPLACEMENT STRATEGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Smart beta investing has seen increased traction in the
More informationThe Case for Growth. Investment Research
Investment Research The Case for Growth Lazard Quantitative Equity Team Companies that generate meaningful earnings growth through their product mix and focus, business strategies, market opportunity,
More informationFactor Performance in Emerging Markets
Investment Research Factor Performance in Emerging Markets Taras Ivanenko, CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Alex Lai, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Factors can be defined
More informationComprehensive Factor Indexes
Methodology overview Comprehensive Factor Indexes Part of the FTSE Global Factor Index Series Overview The Comprehensive Factor Indexes are designed to capture a broad set of five recognized factors contributing
More informationDOES SECTOR ROTATION WORK?
DOES SECTOR ROTATION WORK? What goes around comes around. - Proverb 2 There is a general market wisdom that certain sectors perform well and other sectors perform poorly during different points in the
More informationIt is well known that equity returns are
DING LIU is an SVP and senior quantitative analyst at AllianceBernstein in New York, NY. ding.liu@bernstein.com Pure Quintile Portfolios DING LIU It is well known that equity returns are driven to a large
More information15 Week 5b Mutual Funds
15 Week 5b Mutual Funds 15.1 Background 1. It would be natural, and completely sensible, (and good marketing for MBA programs) if funds outperform darts! Pros outperform in any other field. 2. Except for...
More informationDynamic Smart Beta Investing Relative Risk Control and Tactical Bets, Making the Most of Smart Betas
Dynamic Smart Beta Investing Relative Risk Control and Tactical Bets, Making the Most of Smart Betas Koris International June 2014 Emilien Audeguil Research & Development ORIAS n 13000579 (www.orias.fr).
More informationLazard Insights. Growth: An Underappreciated Factor. What Is an Investment Factor? Summary. Does the Growth Factor Matter?
Lazard Insights : An Underappreciated Factor Jason Williams, CFA, Portfolio Manager/Analyst Summary Quantitative investment managers commonly employ value, sentiment, quality, and low risk factors to capture
More informationSmart Beta and Factor Investing Global Trends for Pension Investors
Smart Beta and Factor Investing Global Trends for Pension Investors Pascal Blanqué CIO Amundi Executive summary Risk factor investing: Seeing a strong momentum among long-term investors (pension funds,
More informationINSIGHTS. The Factor Landscape. August rocaton.com. 2017, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC
INSIGHTS The Factor Landscape August 2017 203.621.1700 2017, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Institutional investors have shown an increased interest in factor investing. Much of the
More informationBEYOND SMART BETA: WHAT IS GLOBAL MULTI-FACTOR INVESTING AND HOW DOES IT WORK?
INVESTING INSIGHTS BEYOND SMART BETA: WHAT IS GLOBAL MULTI-FACTOR INVESTING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? Multi-Factor investing works by identifying characteristics, or factors, of stocks or other securities
More informationIntroducing the Russell Multi-Factor Equity Portfolios
Introducing the Russell Multi-Factor Equity Portfolios A robust and flexible framework to combine equity factors within your strategic asset allocation FOR PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS ONLY Executive Summary Smart
More informationHidden Costs in Index Tracking
WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Research Brief January 2014 (revised July 2014) Hidden Costs in Index Tracking Introduction Buying an index tracker is seen as a cheap and easy way to get exposure to stock markets.
More informationPortfolio Rebalancing:
Portfolio Rebalancing: A Guide For Institutional Investors May 2012 PREPARED BY Nat Kellogg, CFA Associate Director of Research Eric Przybylinski, CAIA Senior Research Analyst Abstract Failure to rebalance
More informationMSCI LOW SIZE INDEXES
MSCI LOW SIZE INDEXES msci.com Size-based investing has been an integral part of the investment process for decades. More recently, transparent and rules-based factor indexes have become widely used tools
More informationMultifactor rules-based portfolios portfolios
JENNIFER BENDER is a managing director at State Street Global Advisors in Boston, MA. jennifer_bender@ssga.com TAIE WANG is a vice president at State Street Global Advisors in Hong Kong. taie_wang@ssga.com
More informationFOCUS: YIELD. Factor Investing. msci.com
FOCUS: YIELD Factor Investing msci.com FACTOR FOCUS: YIELD FACTOR FOCUS: YIELD IN THE REALM OF INVESTING, A FACTOR IS ANY CHARACTERISTIC THAT HELPS EXPLAIN THE LONG-TERM RISK AND RETURN PERFORMANCE OF
More informationDiversified or Concentrated Factors What are the Investment Beliefs Behind these two Smart Beta Approaches?
Diversified or Concentrated Factors What are the Investment Beliefs Behind these two Smart Beta Approaches? Noël Amenc, PhD Professor of Finance, EDHEC Risk Institute CEO, ERI Scientific Beta Eric Shirbini,
More informationNN First Class Return Fund - Passief
NN First Class Return Fund - Passief All Fund in Scope data as of end September 018 The NN First Class Selective Passive Return Fund gained.6% The global economy is still in a consolidation phase Equities
More informationHi, everyone. there. should be. We are an this for 28 Louie, our
TRANSCRIPT OF THE TD AMERITRADE WEBINAR January 22, 2015 Hi, everyone. We appreciate you taking time out of your day to join us. My name is Andrew Harris, and I head the national sales team to the advisors.
More informationSUSTAINABLE COMPANIES FOR A BETTER PORTFOLIO
SUSTAINABLE COMPANIES FOR A BETTER PORTFOLIO USING QUALITY AND ESG TO ENHANCE RETURNS By integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into their portfolios, investors are increasingly
More informationETF Research: Understanding Smart Beta KNOW Characteristics: Finding the Right Factors Research compiled by Michael Venuto, CIO
ETF Research: Understanding Smart Beta KNOW Characteristics: Finding the Right Factors Research compiled by Michael Venuto, CIO In this paper we will explore the evolution of smart beta investing through
More informationNN First Class Return Fund - Passief
NN First Class Return Fund - Passief All Fund in Scope data as of end December 018 The fund lost 8.6% in the fourth quarter The quarter was one of the worst for global equities in 45 years Performance
More informationAdvisor Briefing Why Alternatives?
Advisor Briefing Why Alternatives? Key Ideas Alternative strategies generally seek to provide positive returns with low correlation to traditional assets, such as stocks and bonds By incorporating alternative
More informationsmart money, crowded trades?
by Kristofer Kwait, Managing Director, Head of Research, and John Delano, Director, Hedge Fund Strategies Group, Commonfund smart money, crowded trades? For investors building multi-manager portfolios,
More informationMulti-factor investing, demystified: Part 2
Multi-factor investing, demystified: Part 2 November 20, 2018 by Sophie Gilbert of Russell Investments In the world of investing, there s always a buffet of options to choose from, but there s no such
More informationin-depth Invesco Actively Managed Low Volatility Strategies The Case for
Invesco in-depth The Case for Actively Managed Low Volatility Strategies We believe that active LVPs offer the best opportunity to achieve a higher risk-adjusted return over the long term. Donna C. Wilson
More informationFresh Momentum. Engin Kose. Washington University in St. Louis. First version: October 2009
Long Chen Washington University in St. Louis Fresh Momentum Engin Kose Washington University in St. Louis First version: October 2009 Ohad Kadan Washington University in St. Louis Abstract We demonstrate
More informationFACTOR ALLOCATION MODELS
FACTOR ALLOCATION MODELS Improving Factor Portfolio Efficiency January 2018 Summary: Factor timing and factor risk management are related concepts, but have different objectives Factors have unique characteristics
More informationActive vs. Passive Money Management
Active vs. Passive Money Management Exploring the costs and benefits of two alternative investment approaches By Baird s Advisory Services Research Synopsis Proponents of active and passive investment
More informationTHEORY & PRACTICE FOR FUND MANAGERS. SPRING 2011 Volume 20 Number 1 RISK. special section PARITY. The Voices of Influence iijournals.
T H E J O U R N A L O F THEORY & PRACTICE FOR FUND MANAGERS SPRING 0 Volume 0 Number RISK special section PARITY The Voices of Influence iijournals.com Risk Parity and Diversification EDWARD QIAN EDWARD
More informationThe benefits of core-satellite investing
The benefits of core-satellite investing Contents 1 Core-satellite: A powerful investment approach 3 The key benefits of indexing the portfolio s core 6 Core-satellite methodology Core-satellite: A powerful
More informationHow to evaluate factor-based investment strategies
A feature article from our U.S. partners INSIGHTS SEPTEMBER 2018 How to evaluate factor-based investment strategies Due diligence on smart beta strategies should be anything but passive Original publication
More informationWhat are Alternative UCITS and how to invest in them?
What are Alternative UCITS and how to invest in them? The purpose of this paper is to provide some insight in the European Alternative UCITS market. Alternative UCITS are collective investment funds that
More informationFactor Investing & Smart Beta
Factor Investing & Smart Beta Raina Oberoi VP, Index Applied Research MSCI 1 Outline What is Factor Investing? Minimum Volatility Index Methodology Historical Performance and Index Characteristics Risk
More informationBuilding Portfolios with Active, Strategic Beta and Passive Strategies
Building Portfolios with Active, Strategic Beta and Passive Strategies It s a Question of Beliefs Issues to think about on the Active/Passive spectrum: How important are fees to you? Do you believe markets
More informationINTRODUCING MSCI FACTOR INDEXES
INTRODUCING MSCI FACTOR INDEXES msci.com ELEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE TM Factors by MSCI Factors are the building blocks of many portfolios the elements capable of turning data points into actionable insights.
More informationThe CTA VAI TM (Value Added Index) Update to June 2015: original analysis to December 2013
AUSPICE The CTA VAI TM (Value Added Index) Update to June 215: original analysis to December 213 Tim Pickering - CIO and Founder Research support: Jason Ewasuik, Ken Corner Auspice Capital Advisors, Calgary
More informationIdentifying a defensive strategy
In our previous paper Defensive equity: A defensive strategy to Canadian equity investing, we discussed the merits of employing a defensive mandate within the Canadian equity portfolio for some institutional
More informationLazard Insights. Interpreting Active Share. Summary. Erianna Khusainova, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Analyst
Lazard Insights Interpreting Share Erianna Khusainova, CFA, Senior Vice President, Portfolio Analyst Summary While the value of active management has been called into question, the aggregate performance
More informationSTRATEGY OVERVIEW EMERGING MARKETS LOW VOLATILITY ACTIVE EQUITY STRATEGY
STRATEGY OVERVIEW EMERGING MARKETS LOW VOLATILITY ACTIVE EQUITY STRATEGY A COMPELLING OPPORTUNITY For many years, the favourable demographics and high economic growth in emerging markets (EM) have caught
More informationJACOBS LEVY CONCEPTS FOR PROFITABLE EQUITY INVESTING
JACOBS LEVY CONCEPTS FOR PROFITABLE EQUITY INVESTING Our investment philosophy is built upon over 30 years of groundbreaking equity research. Many of the concepts derived from that research have now become
More informationFACTOR INVESTING: Targeting your investment needs. Seek to enhance returns Manage risk Focused outcomes
FACTOR INVESTING: Targeting your investment needs Seek to enhance returns Manage risk Focused outcomes 1 Table of Contents Introduction What is factor investing? How to use factors in a portfolio Fidelity
More informationDisciplined Stock Selection
Disciplined Stock Selection Nicholas Clark March 4 th, 2010 04 March 2010 Designator author 1 4 th March 2010 2 Overview 1. Introduction 2. Using Valuation Dispersion to Determine Expected Stock Returns
More informationTAKE CONTROL OF YOUR INVESTMENT DESTINY Increasing control over your investments.
TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR INVESTMENT DESTINY Increasing control over your investments. To appreciate the power of Factors, consider this: Humankind is formed from just 23 Chromosome pairs CMINST-13427 2 1 Yet,
More informationFuture World Fund Q&A
For Professional Investors and their Financial Advisers Only. Not to be distributed to or intended for use by Retail Clients. Index Fund launch Future World Fund Q&A Investing for the world you want to
More informationEARNINGS MOMENTUM STRATEGIES. Michael Tan, Ph.D., CFA
EARNINGS MOMENTUM STRATEGIES Michael Tan, Ph.D., CFA DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE The material in this document is copyrighted by Michael Tan and Apothem Capital Management, LLC for which
More informationQuantitative Investment: From indexing to factor investing. For institutional use only. Not for distribution to retail investors.
Quantitative Investment: From indexing to factor investing For institutional use only. Not for distribution to retail investors. 1 What s the prudent portfolio mix? It depends Objective Investment approach
More informationSmart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing
Smart Beta and the Evolution of Factor-Based Investing September 2016 Donald J. Hohman Managing Director, Product Management Hitesh C. Patel, Ph.D Managing Director Structured Equity Douglas J. Roman,
More informationZero Beta (Managed Account Mutual Funds/ETFs)
2016 Strategy Review Zero Beta (Managed Account Mutual Funds/ETFs) December 31, 2016 The following report provides in-depth analysis into the successes and challenges of the NorthCoast Zero Beta investment
More informationWisdomTree International Multifactor Fund WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund DWMF/ EMMF THE CASE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND EMERGING MARKETS MULTIFACTOR FUNDS WisdomTree aspires to be at the forefront
More informationActive vs. Passive Money Management
Active vs. Passive Money Management Exploring the costs and benefits of two alternative investment approaches By Baird s Advisory Services Research Synopsis Proponents of active and passive investment
More informationWhy Use Smart Beta in DC?
Smart Beta for DC Smart Beta for DC Why Use Smart Beta in DC? Increasing numbers of our DC clients are looking to us to help them use smart beta solutions in their schemes. Offering improved risk-adjusted
More informationA Performance Analysis of Risk Parity
Investment Research A Performance Analysis of Do Asset Allocations Outperform and What Are the Return Sources of Portfolios? Stephen Marra, CFA, Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst¹ A risk parity model
More informationThe Rise of Factor Investing
Aon Retirement and Investment The Rise of Factor Investing Investing for DC savers Table of contents Key conclusions.... 3 Factor investing what is it?... 4 Where does factor investing fit in equity portfolios?....
More informationInitiating Our Quantitative Stock Selection Models
Turkey / Quantitative Research / Equities 27 April 2016 Initiating Our Quantitative Stock Selection Models Ayhan Yüksel, PhD, CFA Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu, CFA Can Özçelik Okan Ertem, FRM +90 (212) 334 94 95
More informationA Framework for Understanding Defensive Equity Investing
A Framework for Understanding Defensive Equity Investing Nick Alonso, CFA and Mark Barnes, Ph.D. December 2017 At a basketball game, you always hear the home crowd chanting 'DEFENSE! DEFENSE!' when the
More informationDiscussion of The Promises and Pitfalls of Factor Timing. Josephine Smith, PhD, Director, Factor-Based Strategies Group at BlackRock
Discussion of The Promises and Pitfalls of Factor Timing Josephine Smith, PhD, Director, Factor-Based Strategies Group at BlackRock Overview of Discussion This paper addresses a hot topic in factor investing:
More informationA Framework for Environmental Social and Governance Considerations in Portfolio Design
Jeffrey Dunn AQR Capital Management, LLC jeff.dunn@aqr.com WORKING PAPER JULY 2009 A Framework for Environmental Social and Governance Considerations in Portfolio Design From the eyes of a quant where
More informationNN First Class Return Fund - Passief
NN First Class Return Fund - Passief All Fund in Scope data as of end September 017 The NN First Class Selective Passive Return Fund gained 1.3% Global equities continued to move upward in the quarter
More informationThe A-Z of Quant. Building a Quant model, Macquarie style. Inside. Macquarie Research Report
27 August 2004 Building a Quant model, Macquarie style Quant: making the numbers work for you Stock prices change for a multitude of reasons and these reasons vary over time and economic conditions. This
More informationThe Equity Imperative
The Equity Imperative Factor-based Investment Strategies 2015 Northern Trust Corporation Can You Define, or Better Yet, Decipher? 1 Spectrum of Equity Investing Techniques Alpha Beta Traditional Active
More informationSpotlight on: 130/30 strategies. Combining long positions with limited shorting. Exhibit 1: Expanding opportunity. Initial opportunity set
INVESTMENT INSIGHTS Spotlight on: 130/30 strategies Monetizing positive and negative stock views Managers of 130/30 portfolios seek to capture potential returns in two ways: Buying long to purchase a stock
More informationSpecialist International Share Fund
Specialist International Share Fund Manager Profile January 2016 Adviser use only Specialist International Share Fund process process for this Fund is structured in the following steps: Step 1 Objectives:
More informationTAKE CONTROL OF YOUR INVESTMENT DESTINY Increasing control over your investments.
TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR INVESTMENT DESTINY Increasing control over your investments. Challenge for Investors Case for Factor-based Investing What Next? The Real World Economic and Market Outlooks are Constrained
More informationDiversified Growth Fund
Diversified Growth Fund A Sophisticated Approach to Multi-Asset Investing Introduction The Trustee of the NOW: Pensions Scheme has appointed NOW: Pensions Investment A/S Fondsmæglerselskab A/S as Investment
More informationChaikin Power Gauge Stock Rating System
Evaluation of the Chaikin Power Gauge Stock Rating System By Marc Gerstein Written: 3/30/11 Updated: 2/22/13 doc version 2.1 Executive Summary The Chaikin Power Gauge Rating is a quantitive model for the
More informationFall 2013 Volume 19 Number 3 The Voices of Influence iijournals.com
Fall 2013 Volume 19 Number 3 www.iijsf.com The Voices of Influence iijournals.com How to Value CLO Managers: Tell Me Who Your Manager Is, I ll Tell You How Your CLO Will Do SERHAN SECMEN AND BATUR BICER
More informationModest Style Bets, Modest Price
Reprinted by permission of Morningstar, Oct. 21, 2016 Modest Style Bets, Modest Price ETF SPECIALIST 10-21-16 by Alex Bryan, CFA Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) offers exposure
More informationInvited Editorial An examination of alternative portfolio rebalancing strategies applied to sector funds
Invited Editorial An examination of alternative portfolio rebalancing strategies applied to sector funds Journal of Asset Management (2007) 8, 1 8. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jam.2250055 Introduction It is a
More informationThe Liquidity Style of Mutual Funds
Thomas M. Idzorek Chief Investment Officer Ibbotson Associates, A Morningstar Company Email: tidzorek@ibbotson.com James X. Xiong Senior Research Consultant Ibbotson Associates, A Morningstar Company Email:
More informationResearch. Multifactor Indexes. The Power of Tilting
Research Multifactor Indexes The Power of Tilting ftserussell.com January 2016 Introduction It wasn t too long ago that the concept of factors in investing was the exclusive province of professors of finance
More informationFTSE Global Factor Index Series
Methodology overview FTSE Global Factor Index Series Overview The FTSE Global Factor Index Series is a family of benchmarks designed to represent the performance of specific factor characteristics. This
More informationInvestment manager research
Page 1 of 10 Investment manager research Due diligence and selection process Table of contents 2 Introduction 2 Disciplined search criteria 3 Comprehensive evaluation process 4 Firm and product 5 Investment
More informationTed Stover, Managing Director, Research and Analytics December FactOR Fiction?
Ted Stover, Managing Director, Research and Analytics December 2014 FactOR Fiction? Important Legal Information FTSE is not an investment firm and this presentation is not advice about any investment activity.
More informationINTRODUCING ESG INVESTING. msci.com
INTRODUCING ESG INVESTING msci.com ESG INVESTING IS THE CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE FACTORS ALONGSIDE FINANCIAL FACTORS IN THE INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING PROCESS. REMY BRIAND
More informationThe new asset allocation took effect on July 1, 2014 coinciding with the beginning of the 2015 fiscal year and involved the following changes:
This memo is intended to memorialize the decision made by the SDCERA Board of Trustees to change the SDCERA Policy Asset Allocation effective July 1, 2014. Beginning in 2009, the SDCERA Board of Trustees
More informationMarket Insights. The Benefits of Integrating Fundamental and Quantitative Research to Deliver Outcome-Oriented Equity Solutions.
Market Insights The Benefits of Integrating Fundamental and Quantitative Research to Deliver Outcome-Oriented Equity Solutions Vincent Costa, CFA Head of Global Equities Peg DiOrio, CFA Head of Global
More informationAmajority of institutional
JANUARY FEATURE IS IT TIME TO TILT? Exploring a Fundamental Question in Factor Investing By Andrew Ang, PhD, Ked Hogan, PhD, and Justin Peterson Amajority of institutional investors are now investing in
More informationFactor Investing: 2018 Landscape
Factor Investing: 2018 Landscape Growth expected to continue The factor investing landscape has proliferated in recent years. Today, the factor industry is $1.9 trillion in AUM and has grown organically
More informationPowerPoint. to accompany. Chapter 11. Systematic Risk and the Equity Risk Premium
PowerPoint to accompany Chapter 11 Systematic Risk and the Equity Risk Premium 11.1 The Expected Return of a Portfolio While for large portfolios investors should expect to experience higher returns for
More informationRISK PARITY SOLUTION BRIEF
ReSolve s Global Risk Parity strategy is built on the philosophy that nobody knows what s going to happen next. As such, it is designed to thrive in all economic regimes. This is accomplished through three
More informationHARNESSING THE POWER OF FACTOR MODELS
HARNESSING THE POWER OF FACTOR MODELS Enabling an Integrated View of Risk and Return Jean-Maurice Ladure, CFA Head of Equity Applied Research in EMEA, MSCI October 2017 2015 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved.
More informationSmart Beta: Index Investing, Evolved
Franklin LibertyShares TM Topic Paper November 2017 Smart Beta: Index Investing, Evolved Global investing literally and figuratively is foreign to many US investors. That s why some have taken a passive
More information