Ormat Technologies, Inc. December 2014

Transcription

1 Ormat Technologies, Inc. December 2014 McGinness Hills, Nevada, US Green energy you can rely on F66OTEC Q

2 Disclaimer Information provided during this presentation may contain statements relating to current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about future events that are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of These forward-looking statements generally relate to the company s plans, objectives and expectations for future operations, and are based on management s current estimates and projections of future results or trends. Actual future results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, please see risk factors as described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the securities and exchange commission on February 28, In addition, during this presentation, statements may be made that include a financial measure defined as non-gaap financial measures by the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA. These measures may be different from non-gaap financial measures used by other companies. The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. Management of Ormat Technologies believes that EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA may provide meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity measurement that both management and investors benefit from referring to this non-gaap financial measures in assessing Ormat Technologies liquidity, and when planning and forecasting future periods. This non- GAAP financial measures may also facilitate management s internal comparison to the company s historical liquidity. All Rights Reserved. This document contains information proprietary to Ormat Technologies, Inc. Reproduction in any form without prior written permission is strictly prohibited 1

3 Corporate Overview Market leader with proven track record in the geothermal energy sector Established Pure-Play Five decades of experience Vertically integrated with over 1,100 employees worldwide FY14 - expect over $550 million revenues Electricity Segment Owns & operates 626 MW in 18 geothermal & REG plants Sells base-load electricity to local utilities Fully contracted Product Segment Technology leader with over 77 U.S. patents Provides EPC services and supplies equipment to 3rd parties 1 Five years average ( ) 2

4 Investment Highlights Strong Fundamentals to Support Future Plans Industry Solid global demand for renewable energy Increasing demand for base-load with no integration cost Global regulatory support Market leader in geothermal Leader Financial Strength Responsible for approx. 40 % of 2013 geothermal industry growth 1 Approx. 90% of worldwide binary installed capacity uses Ormat equipment Strong Cash Flow & Balance Sheet Access to various sources of capital Substantial cash flow from operation 1 Based on Ormat Analysis 3

5 Geothermal Overview Geothermal delivers cost-effective, clean and reliable electricity 4

6 Same Technology- Different Applications Air-Cooled Binary Geothermal Power Plant Recovered Energy Generation (REG) System 5

7 Global Geothermal Potential (MW) Potential is over 10x the worldwide installed capacity of 12,000 MW 6,000 46,903 6, ,350 36,330 31,980 3,450 5, ,800 1,538 5,510 Areas with Potential Geothermal Resources Installed Capacity 2013 Hydrothermal Geothermal Resources Potential (139,555 MW) Source: Hydrothermal Geothermal Resources Potential, EMERGING ENERGY RESEARCH, LLC. Global Geothermal Markets and Strategies: , May "Geothermal Power Generation in the World Update Report" Ruggero Bertani Enel Green Power, via Dalmazia Roma (Italy) April Geothermal: International Market Overview Report, GEA September

8 Supportive Legislation Strong support is driving industry growth United States Creates Demand Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Cutting carbon emission (EPA) Nuclear and coal-fired power plants retirement CA- integration cost Supports Economics Tax incentives Internationally Power Africa Initiative The U.S. allocated up to $7 billion to increase access to power in sub-sahara Geothermal potential in Kenya, Ethiopia and Tanzania Asia-Pacific Comprehensive Partnership for Sustainable Energy The U.S. allocated up to $6 billion for green energy development 7

9 Business Overview Balanced business model Electricity Segment Product Segment Don A. Campbell, Nevada Approx. 67% of Revenues 1 In operation: 626 MW (net) 1 Five years average ( ) Ngatamariki, New Zealand Approx. 33% of Revenues 1 Backlog 2 of $363 million Supplied 1900 MW to 24 countries 2 The backlog is as of Nov. 1, 2014 (including revenues for the period between Oct.1 and Nov. 1, 2014) 8

10 Electricity Segment 2 nd largest geothermal owner in the U.S Own and operate 626 MW in 18 plants worldwide Diversified portfolio Fully contracted Contractual life duration - approx. 15 years. High availability ~90% in 2013 Annual Revenues ($million) United States 473 MW $242 $280 $312 $315 $330 $375-$380 Kenya 110 MW Guatemala 43 MW E 9

11 Electricity Segment Continuous improvement Annual Generation (GWh) All Inclusive OpEx 1 ($/MWh) 3,110 3,560 3,682 3,943 4, All Inclusive OpEx includes fixed O&M, variable O&M, field O&M, royalties, and related G&A figure excludes a non- recurring item in the amount of $ 3.3 million. 10

12 Geothermal Green Field Development Process Site Identification Lease agreement Permitting Exploration Initial field development & well testing PPA Plant design Completion field development & equipment manufacturing Plant permits Gathering system and plant construction Testing and start up Acceptance test Commercial operation 11

13 Short Term Growth New projects in development and construction 32 MW McGinness Hills Phase 2, Nevada Q MW Olkaria III, plant 4, Kenya H MW Platanares Phase 1, Honduras in MW Sarulla Phase 1, Indonesia 35 MW Menengai, Kenya 1 Total new investments to 150 MW by Ormat owns 51% stake in the project Company that will build own and operated the Menengai project 12

14 Long Term Prospects Strong land position 35 Prospects: U.S. - 28; Global - 7 U.S., 28 Guatemala, 2 OR, 8 NV, 12 Chile, 3 Indonesia, 1 CA, 2 UT, 1 NM, 1 NZ, 1 AK, 1 HI, 3 13

15 Product Overview Technology leadership in the geothermal industry Products & Services Customers Added Value Supplies Geothermal, REG and other power units Provides EPC services Provides O&M services Geothermal: Geothermal IPP s or local utilities REG: Natural gas pipeline/ processing plant owners Companies engages in energy-intensive industrial processes Local utilities Experience Track record Bankability Custom made design Increased efficiency Better control over timing and related costs 14

16 Product Segment Supplied more than 13% of the worldwide installed geothermal capacity Strong backlog 1 of $363 million, including: Supply contract signed for the 330 MW Sarulla project in Indonesia New contracts signed Annual Revenues from Third-party Sales ($million) $159 $187 $203 $175-$180 $81 $113 Approx. $150 million - 5 yr. Average E 1 The backlog is as of Nov. 1, 2014 (including revenues for the period between Oct.1 and Nov. 1, 2014) 15

17 Short Term Outlook New management and organization structure Streamline decision making process Reduce overhead Near term outlook Improving power plants efficiency Optimizing EBITDA Expanding global footprint Reassessing medium/long-term company's strategy 16

18 Financial Highlights Financial and technical capability to expand asset base Solid revenue stream Solid liquidity position Profitable operations Year over year growth 17

19 Financials - Total Revenues ($million) $401 $ $ $ $ $550- $ $402 $ E Electricity Product 9M M

20 Gross Margin by Segment 29% 29% 35% 33% 25% 25% 28% 29% 31% 29% 30% 36% 38% 17% M M 2014 Electricity Products 19

21 Financials - Adjusted EBITDA & EPS Adjusted EBITDA 1 ($million) $167 $164 $ $ $ $ $ M M 2014 Electricity Product Earnings (loss) per Share (Diluted) M M 2014 $1.51 $0.82 $(0.95) $(4.69) $0.91 $0.72 $ For reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA see the Appendix Net loss included $61.5 million non-cash-related valuation allowance; Net income excluding valuation allowance was $18.8 million Net loss was effected by a non- cash pre tax impairment charge of $236.4 million relating to the North Brawley and OREG IV power plants 20

22 Strong Balance Sheet As of September 30, 2014 ($ million) Total cash (Incl. $127 million restricted cash) $170 Principal payment (remainder of 2014) $ 31 Corporate debt $343 (33%) Project Finance debt $697 (67%) Property, plant and equipment, net and construction in process ($268 million) $1,728 Total assets $2,172 Total liabilities $1,388 Equity $784 Net debt $870 Net-Debt-to-Capital Ratio 53% Additional Capital sources Unused corporate lines of credit of $229.1 million 21

23 Investment Highlights Strong Fundamentals to Support Future Plans Industry Solid global demand for renewable energy Increasing demand for base-load with no integration cost Global regulatory support Market leader in geothermal Leader Financial Strength Responsible for approx. 40 % of 2013 geothermal industry growth 1 Approx. 90% of worldwide binary installed capacity uses Ormat equipment Strong Cash Flow & Balance Sheet Access to various sources of capital Substantial cash flow from operation 1 Based on Ormat Analysis 22

24 The Power of Experience Thank you For further information: 23

25 Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Additional Cash Flows Information Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Additional Cash Flows Information For the Nine and Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited) We calculate EBITDA as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We calculate Adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding impairment of long-lived assets and one-time termination fee. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not a measurement of financial performance or liquidity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net earnings as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented because we believe they are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of a company s ability to service and/or incur debt. However, other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do. The following tables reconcile net cash provided by operating activities and net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the nine and three-month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013: 24