Deal Protections and Remedies
|
|
- Everett Cook
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 (Actual image used will be more applicable to the webinar subject matter) Deal Protections and Remedies April 12, 2014 Presenter: Stephen M. Kotran, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
2 2
3 Study Overview Study of deal-protection measures and remedies governing the target company s conduct and fiduciary duties in public merger agreements. New this year: review of deal protections negotiated by buyers who require their own stockholder vote. Two purposes: To determine how frequently buyers in those transactions agree to symmetrical deal-protection measures. To determine how that negotiation dynamic affects the deal protections agreed to by the target company. Practical Law continues to publish its annual study of financing-risk allocation and remedies for buyer breach. This year s edition will be published online in early summer. 3
4 Study Overview First section: the post-signing market check No-shop covenants, go-shop rights, reduced-fee incentives for third-party bids Threshold for Acquisition Proposal to qualify for window-shop exception to noshop Window-shop fiduciary-determination requirement Waivers of standstills Second section: the change of recommendation The fiduciary out: superior proposal, intervening event, general satisfaction Mutual fiduciary outs for buyers Threshold for superior offer and knowledge for intervening event Matching rights, both initial and last look Third section: termination and break-up fee Right to terminate for superior offer, distinction between cash and stock deals Expense reimbursements for shareholder no-votes Break-up fees: triggers; mutual break-up fees; amounts overall and based on consideration and deal size 4
5 Study Overview 5
6 6
7 No-Shop Covenants The no-shop restricts the target company from soliciting competing bids, providing information to third-party bidders or negotiating a competing transaction. 149 out of 150 surveyed agreements contained a no-shop (deal without a no-shop was between affiliates, controlling stockholder delivered a written consent at signing). In mergers in which the buyer must obtain the approval of its own stockholders (whether for the merger itself or for the issuance of stock under the relevant stock exchange rules), the buyer frequently agrees to a reciprocal set of dealprotection measures. In this year s study sample, 45 of the 150 surveyed agreements required the approval of the buyer s own stockholders. 7
8 Mutual No-Shop Covenants Corresponding page 4 8
9 Go-Shop Rights and Reduced Break-Up Fees The common form of go-shop allows the target company to solicit any bidders for a given period of time and incentivizes bids with a two-tier break-up fee. Some agreements contain the two-tier fee structure for bids received shortly after signing, but do not authorize the target board to solicit bids. Fewer agreements allow solicitation of bids without adding a two-tier fee structure. Majority of agreements do not provide either incentive 126 out of 150 deals in this year s study sample. 20 deals with some type of incentive. 9
10 Go-Shop Rights and Reduced Break-Up Fees Corresponding page 5 10
11 Go-Shop Period Length Corresponding page 6 11
12 Excluded Parties in Deals with Go-Shops Some agreements with go-shops permit the target company to continue its negotiations with competing bidders identified during the go-shop period even after the go-shop s expiration. Some of them place a cap on the length of that follow-up period. Some agreements with a two-tier fee charge the lower fee only if a superior proposal is agreed to during the go-shop period. This is a stricter formulation of the go-shop break-up fee incentive. More common is to provide a grace period following the end of the go-shop for the target company to enter into the thirdparty agreement and capture the lower fee. 12
13 Excluded Parties in Deals with Go-Shops Corresponding page 6 13
14 Go-Shops and Reduced-Fee Incentives by Buyer and Financing Corresponding page 7 14
15 Go-Shops and Reduced-Fee Incentives by Buyer and Financing Six out of 131 strategic buyers agreed to a go-shop, compared to seven out of 19 financial buyers. Six of the seven agreements with post-signing break-up fee incentives (without an affirmative go-shop right) were reached with strategic buyers. Of those six, four were reached with buyers who raised debt to finance all-cash consideration. In total, eight of 60 strategic, debt-financed deals (13.3%) included either a go-shop or a reduced-fee incentive structure, compared to four of 71 deals (5.6%) with strategic buyers who did not rely on debt-financing. 15
16 Window-Shop Exception to No-Shop Covenant All 149 agreements with a no-shop covenant contained a window-shop exception that allows the target board to respond to unsolicited, qualifying offers. Of the 24 agreements with a buyer no-shop, 22 contained a window-shop exception. The other two were with foreign buyers different fiduciary-duty regimes than is typical for domestic US public targets. The window-shop exception generally requires that the thirdparty proposal pass some defined threshold of the amount of the target company s equity or assets before the board can provide information or discuss the bid. 16
17 Window-Shop: Acquisition-Proposal Threshold Corresponding page 9 17
18 Window-Shop: Fiduciary Determination First? Must the target board must make a fiduciary determination before exercising the window-shop exemption? This is separate from the common fiduciary out, in which the board concludes that its fiduciary duties compel it to change its recommendation for the merger. At the window-shop stage, the issue is whether the board must first make a determination that its fiduciary duties require it to investigate the third-party bid further. Potential advantage to buyer: if it quickly matches/exceeds the third-party bid before bidder begins due diligence, bidder would have to re-raise blindly. Compellent (2011) DE Chancery Court decision commented on restrictive vs. flexible formulations of the requirement. 18
19 Window-Shop: Fiduciary Determination First? Corresponding page 10 19
20 Window-Shop: Waive Existing Standstills? No single approach dominates, but most common approach is silence. Which may simply be the result of not having standstills to waive in the first place. Only four agreements flatly permitted waivers, with no qualifying language at all. A total of 53 agreements granted the target company a right to waive its standstill either after the board determines that its fiduciary duties require it to do so or for the limited purpose of allowing submission of bids, or a combination of those two limitations. 40 agreements with prohibitions against waivers:14 of them subject to the general window-shop exception, 26 totally prohibited. Six agreements mentioned Don t Ask, Don t Waive provisions by name, to allow waivers of those provisions. 20
21 Window-Shop: Waive Existing Standstills? Corresponding page 11 21
22 22
23 Fiduciary Out The core mechanism by which target boards preserve their ability to change their recommendation in favor of the signed merger agreement in order to satisfy their fiduciary duties. 149 of the 150 surveyed agreements included a fiduciary out in one form or another (deal without a fiduciary out was the same deal with no no-shop). Fiduciary outs can be drafted to include outs for: Superior proposals; Intervening events ( gold in the backyard and other similar metaphors); General compliance with fiduciary outs (referred to as backdoor fiduciary outs in the ABA deal-points study); Any combination of these. 23
24 Fiduciary Out: When Available? Corresponding page 13 24
25 Mutual Fiduciary Outs (Deals with Buyer Vote) Corresponding page 14 25
26 Fiduciary Out: Superior-Proposal Threshold Corresponding page 14 26
27 Fiduciary Out: What Is an Intervening Event? In both last year s and this year s study, 63% of the surveyed agreements permitted the target board to change its recommendation in response to an intervening event. In some agreements, the definition of intervening event is quite detailed, almost resembling a MAC definition, complete with carve-outs and exceptions to the carve-outs. Other agreements take a simpler approach and allow the board to change its recommendation if a material, reasonably unforeseeable event has occurred or become known to the board, without adding more detail to the definition. The various knowledge thresholds are categorized in the next table. 27
28 Fiduciary Out: What Is an Intervening Event? Corresponding page 15 28
29 Matching Rights All but one of the 149 agreements with a fiduciary out for a superior proposal granted the buyer a matching right. The only agreement to not include a matching right was the Cutrale Group/Safra Group topping bid for Chiquita Brands. The buyer also negotiates for a matching right when the target company has a fiduciary out for an intervening event or for general satisfaction of its fiduciary duties. In this case, the right is to make changes to the agreement so as to obviate the board s need to change its recommendation. The frequency of matching rights for the 93 intervening-event fiduciary outs (94, less one for the Chiquita Brands agreement) and 25 general-satisfaction fiduciary outs are shown on the next two slides. 29
30 Matching Rights: For Intervening Event? Corresponding page 16 30
31 Matching Rights: For General Fiduciary Out? Corresponding page 16 31
32 Matching Rights: Length of Initial Match of Superior Proposal The various periods of time for matching rights for superior proposals are shown on the next slide. Most common are three, four or five business days. In one agreement (Dawson Geophysical/TGC Industries), the buyer has no matching right if the third-party bidder makes an offer for 115% or more of the merger consideration. A similar provision was introduced in the 2010 Leonard Green/Prospect Medical Holdings agreement. Only one other time since then, in the 2013 Georgia-Pacific/Buckeye Technologies agreement. Intended to motivate third-party bidders to make their first offer their best, shorten any post-signing bidding war. Yet has not caught on widely. 32
33 Matching Rights: Length of Initial Match of Superior Proposal Corresponding page 17 33
34 Matching Rights: Last Look Most agreements allow the buyer a last look, or continuous matching right, whenever the third-party bidder materially changes its bid in response to the original buyer s improved offer. Usually, though not always, the last-look right is for a shorter period of time than the initial matching right period. Most matching rights for intervening events or generalsatisfaction fiduciary outs are not continuous. Whatever caused the target board to change its view of the merger ought to be obviated after one change by the buyer. 34
35 Matching Rights: Last Look for Intervening Event? Corresponding page 18 35
36 Matching Rights: Last Look for General- Satisfaction Fiduciary Out? Corresponding page 18 36
37 Matching Rights: Last Look for Superior Proposal 14 of the 148 agreements with a matching right for a superior proposal did not grant a last look. Most of the remaining 134 agreements shortened the amount of time the buyer had to rematch the topping bid after the first matching round. Market practice for last-look matching rights is much more diffuse than for the initial matching rights. Two agreements granted only one last look after the initial match; one agreement shortened the last-look period after the first raise. All agreements and details described in the study. 37
38 Matching Rights: Length of Last Look for Superior Proposal Corresponding page 18 38
39 39
40 Termination Rights Most public merger agreements provide for broadly similar sets of events that allow the target company to terminate the agreement. Therefore, most of the discussion concerning termination tends to focus on the remedy available to the buyer if it was prepared to close. The right to terminate the agreement in favor of a superior proposal is not universally accepted by buyers. 40
41 Termination to Accept a Superior Proposal Corresponding page 21 41
42 Deals with No Target Termination Right for Superior Proposal The absence of a termination right for superior offers is more common to stock deals. Perhaps because stock deals (mergers of equals, in particular) are structured to realize operational synergies that (in the buyer s view) offer more value on a long-term basis than a higher priced cash deal with different business prospects. Buyers in stock deals are therefore more likely to argue that the target company should not be entitled to terminate the agreement to enter into a superior proposal. Along related lines, buyers in stock deals can argue that the target company does not legally need the right to terminate for a superior offer, because the board does not have Revlon duties in stock deals. 42
43 Deals with No Target Termination Right for Superior Proposal Corresponding page 22 43
44 Break-Up Fees Out of the 150 agreements in the study sample, 146 contained a break-up fee or expense reimbursement payable in one circumstance or another. In most agreements, any expense reimbursement previously paid is credited against any break-up fee that ultimately becomes payable. In 17 agreements in this year s study sample, an expense reimbursement would be payable over and above the break-up fee. Most common trigger is a change or withdrawal of the board s recommendation. All 146 deals with a fee or expense reimbursement triggered the fee in this instance. 44
45 Mutual Fiduciary Break-Up Fees Thirty-one agreements were identified earlier (Figure J) that gave the buyer its own fiduciary out (22 for superior proposal, five for general satisfaction of fiduciary duties, four for intervening events). Those agreements would be expected to charge the buyer its own fiduciary break-up fee, presumably in the same amount as the target company s break-up fee. Separate from the buyer s reverse break-up fee for financing failure or regulatory failure or general failure to close those fees are expected to be larger. Next slide illustrates how often the buyer would pay same/larger/smaller fiduciary break-up fee, in connection with each type of fiduciary out. 45
46 Mutual Fiduciary Break-Up Fees Corresponding page 23 46
47 Break-Up Fee Triggers 139 out of 146 agreements with a break-up fee triggered payment on acceptance of a third-party bid. All seven agreements that did not charge the fee in this scenario did not allow the target company to terminate the agreement in favor of a superior proposal. (The break-up fee in those deals is triggered if the buyer terminates the agreement because of the target board s change of recommendation.) 138 out of 146 agreements with a break-up fee charged the fee when an acquisition proposal had been announced by termination and the target company then entered into an agreement for an acquisition proposal within a specified tail period. In most agreements, the event of termination can be any of: the passage of the outside date for closing; failure to obtain stockholder approval (not in front-end tender offers); and/or breach that caused a failure of a closing condition. The agreement sometimes uses a different trigger: change of recommendation (if the change itself would not trigger the fee); MAC; breach of the no-shop covenant; breach of the stockholder-meeting covenant. 47
48 Break-Up Fee Trigger: Tail-Period Deals Two related areas for negotiation for the tail-period trigger are: The length of the tail period. The event that must happen during the tail period to trigger payment. In a target-friendly formulation, the tail period is short and the company must enter into a definitive agreement for an acquisition proposal, if not actually close the competing deal, preferably with the same bidder who made the initial competing proposal before termination, by the end of the tail period. The buyer wants a long tail period during which even entry into a preliminary agreement (such as a letter of intent) with any third-party bidder (even if not the initial bidder) triggers payment of the fee. 48
49 Break-Up Fee Trigger: Tail-Period Deals Corresponding page 25 49
50 Break-Up Fee Trigger: Tail-Period Deals Only five out of 138 agreements provided that the third-party transaction must actually close during the tail period. The rest triggered payment on entry into the agreement. However, 30 agreements added that the third-party transaction must eventually close, even if not within the tail period. Six agreements only charged the fee if the agreement or closing is completed with the same bidder who had made the previously announced acquisition proposal. All the other agreements charged the fee regardless of whom the target company ultimately enters a deal with. Two agreements distinguished the tail-period trigger on the basis of the cause of termination of the merger agreement. 50
51 Break-Up Fee Trigger: Breach of No-Shop Corresponding page 26 51
52 Break-Up Fee Trigger: Breach of Stockholder- Meeting Covenant Corresponding page 27 52
53 Break-Up Fee Trigger: General Breach Some agreements charge a break-up fee or expense reimbursement for any breach of a representation, warranty or covenant that causes a failure to close. Thirty-eight agreements in the study sample included this trigger, to varying standards of willfulness or materiality and up to various negotiated amounts. Of these, seven charged a fee or expense reimbursement only if an acquisition proposal had previously been made, or on entry into a tail-period transaction (without a previously announced offer). The study identified at least a dozen different variations of the breach trigger all recorded in the study. 53
54 Expense Reimbursement for No-Vote Fifty agreements in this year s study sample provided for an expense reimbursement or fee in the event of the target company stockholders rejection of the merger. The payment is typically limited to the buyer s out-of-pocket expenses in order to avoid the appearance that the stockholders are being coerced into approving the merger. In ten agreements, an acquisition proposal had to already have been announced for the rejection to trigger an expense reimbursement. The various expense reimbursements are categorized on the next slide in half-percentage-point brackets, rendered as percentages of the transaction s equity value at announcement. 54
55 Expense Reimbursement for No-Vote Corresponding page 27 55
56 Sizes of Break-Up Fees Delaware courts: no bright-line test. Comverge (2014): a break-up fee of 5.55% might have had an unreasonably preclusive effect on potential bidders. Cogent (2010): the appropriate measure for a break-up fee is its percentage of the equity value of the transaction but in large, leveraged transactions, the debt component should also be considered. Topps (2007): smaller transactions can support a higher percentage, especially if much of the fee is attributable to reimbursement of the buyer s expenses. Phelps Dodge (1999): 6.3% break-up fee was allowed in a stock deal since Revlon duties were not implicated. 56
57 Break-Up Fees: Amounts Overall Corresponding page 28 57
58 Break-Up Fees: Amounts in Cash Deals Corresponding page 29 58
59 Break-Up Fees: Amounts in Stock Deals Corresponding page 29 59
60 Break-Up Fees: When Buyer Fee also Payable Stock deals are expected to charge higher break-up fees, but some contained relatively low fees. Explicable if the buyer must pay a fee of its own. If the parties are already agreeing to reciprocal deal protections, it is not surprising that the buyer would demand less onerous terms. Figure U identified 28 deals where the buyer must pay a break-up fee of its own for exercising its fiduciary out. Six of those deals involved mixed consideration where either half or more was payable in cash. The remaining 22 deals were either all-stock or majority-stock consideration deals. The study compared the fees in those 22 agreements against the 29 agreements for stock deals in which the buyer does not pay a break-up fee for exercising its fiduciary out. 60
61 Break-Up Fees: When Buyer Fee also Payable Corresponding page 30 61
62 Break-Up Fees: Amounts Based on Deal Size The Topps decision said a larger-percentage fee can be acceptable in smaller transactions, because the dollar amount of the fee necessarily takes up a greater percentage of the total deal value. The study divided the 146 transactions with break-up fees into two deal-size categories: those with equity values between $100 million and $1 billion, and those valued at $1 billion and up. The 146 deals divide evenly between those two categories, 73 agreements in each. Nineteen of the 20 agreements with break-up fees priced at 4% or higher were in deals valued below $1 billion. In each half-percentage-point break-up fee range below 4%, there are more deals with equity values above $1 billion than below. 62
63 Break-Up Fees: Amounts Based on Deal Size Corresponding page 31 63
64 Questions 64
By Alexander B. Johnson and Roberto Zapata 1
Optima is Optimal: Sidestepping Omnicare in Private Company M&A Transactions By Alexander B. Johnson and Roberto Zapata 1 The general controversy surrounding the Delaware Supreme Court s decision in Omnicare,
More informationMergers and Acquisitions in Canada
Mergers and Acquisitions in Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.... 1 PROCESS... 2 HOSTILE BIDS.... 3 ACQUISITIONS BY CONTROL PERSONS OR OTHER INSIDERS... 4 FAIRNESS OPINIONS...................................................................4
More informationASSET AND SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
ASSET AND SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTS Brian Ludmer, B.Comm., LLB., (416) 781-0334 brian@ludmerlaw.com Presentation to Insight Information Negotiating and Drafting Major Business Agreements Toronto, February
More informationKey Deal Terms in Public and Private Mergers & Acquisitions. Cam Rusaw Alex Moore
Key Deal Terms in Public and Private Mergers & Acquisitions Cam Rusaw Alex Moore April 30, 2014 Outline 1. Private M&A Deal Points Key Deal Points Indemnity Cap Basket/Deductible Survival Periods Sandbagging
More informationThe Section 203 Waiver - A New Delaware Hazard?
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Business Law Review 1-1-2002 The Section 203 Waiver - A New Delaware Hazard? Pat Vlahakis Follow this and additional works at:
More informationFIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THIRD-PARTY LEGAL OPINION CUSTOMARY PRACTICE IN FLORIDA REPORT
Working Draft of BLS Opinions Standard Committee: Please do not distribute outside of the BLS Committee FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THIRD-PARTY LEGAL OPINION CUSTOMARY PRACTICE IN FLORIDA REPORT I. CORPORATIONS
More informationTerm Sheet for Series A Round of Financing of XCorp
Term Sheet for Series A Round of Financing of XCorp mbbp.com Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, PC Waltham, MA Cambridge, MA mbbp.com CityPoint 230 Third Avenue, 4th Floor Waltham, MA 02451 781-622-5930
More informationStructuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers Avoiding Unintended Consequences
More informationAt this point you are conflicted you know this investment banker is supposed to be on your side and working for you and you certainly do not
Spring 2012 Negotiating Investment Banking M&A Engagement Letters: Keeping the Investment Bank Incentivized While Protecting Your Interests By Marshall Horowitz and Joshua Schneiderman Congratulations
More informationM&A Trends. The ABA Deal Points Study and Tales from the Front Lines. Paul Johnson, July 10, Partner
M&A Trends The ABA Deal Points Study and Tales from the Front Lines July 10, 2008 Paul Johnson, Partner Overview My text today: recent M&A experience and market data 5 recent deals ranging from $15-$50
More informationStructuring Deals. Raymond Gietz Weil, Gotshal & Manges Louis Goldberg Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Wilson Chu McDermott Will & Emery.
Structuring Deals Presented by Raymond Gietz Weil, Gotshal & Manges Louis Goldberg Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Wilson Chu McDermott Will & Emery March 8, 2017 DOING DEALS 2015 Acquisition Methods Broad Range
More informationNegotiating a Settlement with an Activist Investor
Ismagilov/Shutterstock.com Negotiating a Settlement with an Activist Investor In his regular column, Frank Aquila drafts a sample memo to a board explaining the issues to consider when negotiating a settlement
More informationM&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL
M&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL Agenda Overview of the Acquisition Process Basic Forms of Acquisitions Basic Issues To Consider In Structuring The Deal Select Public
More informationFIRST LIEN/SECOND LIEN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS AND RELATED ISSUES
FIRST LIEN/SECOND LIEN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS AND RELATED ISSUES An Introduction to the ABA Model Intercreditor Agreement Presented by: Michael S. Himmel, Chapman and Cutler LLP ABA Business Law Section
More informationMergers and Acquisitions in the Brewing Industry
715 Rollerton Road, Ste. 107 Charlotte, NC 28205 (704) 560-7119 Michael J. Denny Managing Partner Tel: (704) 560-7119 Email: michaeldenny@greenskylaw.com Bio: /attorneys Blog: www.beerlawmashing.com Twitter:
More informationA COMMUNITY BANKER S NUTS AND BOLTS APPROACH TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
A COMMUNITY BANKER S NUTS AND BOLTS APPROACH TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS By: Dave Muchnikoff, a partner at Silver Freedman & Taff, L. L.P., Washington, D.C., representing financial institutions and their
More informationtakeover bids in canada and tender offers in the united states
takeover bids in canada and tender offers in the united states Torys provides insight on steering takeover transactions through the regulatory regimes on both sides of the border. A Business Law Guide
More informationM&A Indemnification Deal Terms: 2017 Survey Results
Presenting a 60-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A M&A Indemnification Deal Terms: 2017 Survey Results What's Market for Negotiating and Drafting Private Target Company Indemnification Terms
More informationClient Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 711 June 10, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department On balance, the proposals are evolutionary and not revolutionary and, therefore, do not signal a major shift or fundamental new
More informationDrafting Shareholder Agreements for Private Equity M&A Deals
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Shareholder Agreements for Private Equity M&A Deals Structuring Provisions on Board Composition and Duties, Drag-Along, Tag-Along, Information
More informationAvoiding Post-Acquisition Disputes
Good Deals Gone Bad: Structuring Transactions to Reduce the Risk of Litigation Avoiding Post-Acquisition Disputes Philip O. Brandes Partner + 1 212 506 2558 pbrandes@mayerbrown.com Brian J. Massengill
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Elizabeth A. Gartland, Esq., Fenwick & West, San Francisco
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Management Carve-Out Plans for Privately Held Corporations: Mechanics, Tax Obstacles and Optimization Guidance for Employee Benefits
More informationFor personal use only
24 August 2017 FFT and MaxSec - a proposed merger to create a global security solutions capability. Future Fibre Technologies to acquire all shares in MaxSec Group Limited MaxSec Shareholders will be offered
More informationMortgage terminology.
Mortgage terminology. Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM). A mortgage on which the interest rate, after an initial period, can be changed by the lender. While ARMs in many countries abroad allow rate changes
More informationChapter VI. Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees
Chapter VI Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees American Bankruptcy Institute A. Should the Amount of the Credit Bid Be Included as Consideration Upon Which a Professional s Fee Is Calculated?
More informationIN RYAN V. LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE DELAWARE CHANCERY COURT REMINDS DIRECTORS THAT SALE OF CONTROL TRANSACTIONS REQUIRE ROBUST BOARD INVOLVEMENT
CLIENT MEMORANDUM IN RYAN V. LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE DELAWARE CHANCERY COURT REMINDS DIRECTORS THAT SALE OF CONTROL TRANSACTIONS REQUIRE ROBUST BOARD INVOLVEMENT On July 29, 2008, the Delaware Chancery
More informationMERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF IMPORTANCE Prepared by: Al Hudec Tel: (604) 661-9356 Fax: (604) 661-9349 E-mail: ahudec@farris.com Trevor Scott Tel: (604) 661-1732 Fax: (604) 661-9349 E-mail:
More informationBID PROCEDURES Determination of Qualified Bidder Status
BID PROCEDURES The following Bid Procedures shall govern the auction process for the sale of the property, located at 9440 S. Center Highway, Traverse City, MI, (collectively, the Real Property ) by Cherry
More informationMinority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Minority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions Protecting Minority Interests, Choice of
More informationATTORNEY ADVERTISING. PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME.
Corporate SEC Client Alert May 16, 2008 Securities and Exchange Commission Proposes Revisions to the Cross-Border Tender Offer, Exchange Offer, and Business Combination Rules by William L. Tolbert, Jr.
More informationLMA Webinar Overview of the LMA Leveraged Facilities Agreement Edward Aldred, Partner Linklaters LLP
LMA Webinar Overview of the LMA Leveraged Facilities Agreement Edward Aldred, Partner Linklaters LLP Overview Introduction: role of the LMA Assumptions A typical leveraged buy-out structure Overall anatomy
More informationReverse Takeovers. Consultation on Shareholder Approval Requirements for Listed Company Mergers
Consultation on Shareholder Approval Requirements for Listed Company Mergers CONSULTATION PAPER 10 NOVEMBER 2015 Invitation to comment ASX is seeking submissions on Reverse Takeovers - Shareholder Approval
More informationTERM SHEET FOR SERIES A ROUND OF FINANCING OF [your team name here] INC. your VC here ( Investor )
TERM SHEET FOR SERIES A ROUND OF FINANCING OF [your team name here] INC. Amount of Investment: $4,000,000 Investor: your VC here ( Investor ) Type of Security: Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Pre-Money
More informationAdvisory Council on Risk Oversight
Governance Challenges 2016: M&A Oversight Advisory Council on Risk Oversight A Publication of the Summary of Proceedings Heidrick & Struggles National Association of Corporate Directors and Its Strategic
More informationALTERNATIVE TO A TENDER OFFER A PERSPECTIVE FROM SHARESPOST
ALTERNATIVE TO A TENDER OFFER A PERSPECTIVE FROM SHARESPOST SharesPost Financial Corporation, Member FINRA/SIPC 2012 SharesPost, Inc. ALTERNATIVE TO A TENDER OFFER Introduction One of the key advantages
More informationannotated term sheet
annotated term sheet www.highway12ventures.com The following Annotated Term Sheet is for illustrative purposes only and does not indicate our position on any substantive issue or with respect to any specific
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Executive Compensation: Strategy, Design, and Implementation June 18-19, 2009 New York, New York
499 ALI-ABA Course of Study Executive Compensation: Strategy, Design, and Implementation June 18-19, 2009 New York, New York Executive Compensation Merger and Acquisition Issues By Joseph M. Yaffe James
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Thank You! 1 Merger Litigation Overview 2 Merger
More informationResearch Library. Treasury-Federal Reserve Study of the U. S. Government Securities Market
Treasury-Federal Reserve Study of the U. S. Government Securities Market INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND THE U. S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MARKET THE FEDERAL RESERVE RANK of SE LOUIS Research Library Staff study
More informationKey Trends In Midstream Oil And Gas Deals: Part 1
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Key Trends In Midstream Oil And Gas Deals:
More informationRepresentations and Warranties Insurance
Representations and Warranties Insurance Gaining Traction in the 2014 Marketplace April 2014 Lockton Companies Risk allocation lies at the heart of every transaction. Representations and Warranties Insurance
More informationCarve-Out Transactions
2018 Dechert LLP Carve-Out Transactions Practical Tips for Successfully Navigating the Key Pitfalls November 8, 2018 Abbi Cohen Ian Downes Adam Rosenthal Agenda Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Preparing
More informationA LOOK AT U.S. SPONSOR-BACKED GOING PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS. June Private Equity. Surveys WEIL:\ \5\US.NY
A LOOK AT U.S. SPONSOR-BACKED GOING PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS June 2018 2018 Private Equity Surveys WEIL:\96533818\5\US.NY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY... 2 KEY CONCLUSIONS... 3
More informationM&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL
M&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL October 24, 2017 John Utzschneider and Gitte Blanchet 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Agenda Overview of the Acquisition Process Basic
More informationVenture Capital Term Sheet (Long Form) The form is very pro-investor oriented.
Form: Venture Capital Term Sheet (Long Form) Description: This is a long form annotated Venture Capital Term Sheet, proposing deal terms for investment by a venture capitalist in an early stage company.
More informationDon t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill Agreements
2012-2013 DEVELOPMENTS IN BANKING LAW 265 IV. Don t Ask, Don t Waive Standstill Agreements A. Introduction For boards of directors trying to sell their company, Don t Ask, Don t Waive standstill agreements
More informationA LOOK AT U.S. SPONSOR-BACKED GOING PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS MAY Private Equity. Surveys WEIL:\ \5\US.NY
A LOOK AT U.S. SPONSOR-BACKED GOING PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS MAY 2017 2017 Private Equity Surveys WEIL:\95925608\5\US.NY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY... 2 KEY CONCLUSIONS... 3 HIGHLIGHTS
More informationNegotiating Commitment Letters For Traditional Bank Financing. An Article by Michael L. Messer and Jeremy M. Garlock SCHENCK, PRICE, SMITH & KING, LLP
Negotiating Commitment Letters For Traditional Bank Financing An Article by Michael L. Messer and Jeremy M. Garlock SCHENCK, PRICE, SMITH & KING, LLP Most businesses cannot finance their fixed asset needs
More informationSECURITIES INDUSTRY (TAKE-OVER) BY-LAWS, 2005 PART I PRELIMINARY PART III PART IV REQUIREMENTS FOR BIDS PART V BID CIRCULARS
By-law SECURITIES INDUSTRY (TAKE-OVER) BY-LAWS, 2005 Arrangement of By-laws PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Citation 2. Interpretation 3. Forms PART II EXEMPTIONS 4. Exempt take-over bids 5. Exempt issuer bids PART
More informationNew York May 22, SEC Release No (May 6, 2008) (the Release ). 2
SEC Proposes Revisions to the Cross-Border Tender Offer, Exchange Offer and Business Combination Rules and Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules for Certain Foreign Institutions New York May 22, 2008 On
More information1.1 What is the purpose of the policy?
CONSOLIDATED UP TO 13 August 2013 This consolidation is provided for your convenience and should not be relied on as authoritative NATIONAL POLICY 41-201 INCOME TRUSTS AND OTHER INDIRECT OFFERINGS Part
More information2009: A Turning Point in Change-in-Control Excise Tax Gross-Ups? Do Companies Need to Explore New Strategies?
2009: A Turning Point in Change-in-Control Excise Tax Gross-Ups? Do Companies Need to Explore New Strategies? by Marshall T. Scott * Watson Wyatt Worldwide Chicago, IL and Mark S. Weisberg, Esq. * Winston
More informationTop Ten Tips and Current Issues for Mergers and Acquisitions
Top Ten Tips and Current Issues for Mergers and Acquisitions David W. Healy, Co-Chair, M&A Group Fenwick & West LLP SVAGC Presentation February 17, 2006 Recent proposed change to SEC "best price" rule
More informationBy Matthew Friestedt and Gregory Grogan
LAWYER The M&A Reprinted with permission from The M&A Lawyer, Volume 20, Issue 8, K 2016 Thomson Reuters. Further reproduction without permission of the publisher is prohibited. For additional information
More information2011 Review of Selected U.S. Strategic M&A Transactions
paul, weiss, rifkind, wharton & garrison llp 2011 Review of Selected U.S. Strategic M&A Transactions new york beijing hong kong london tokyo toronto washington, d.c. wilmington Table of Contents Introduction
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS Section Heading Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Heading Page PART I KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER... 2 PART II INTRODUCTION TO TAKEOVERS IN THE UK... 3 1. THE TAKEOVER CODE AND THE PANEL... 3 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES... 3 3. PRELIMINARY
More informationBMC Software's Lessons For Expert Witnesses
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com BMC Software's Lessons For Expert Witnesses Law360,
More informationThe Board s Role in Merger and Acquisition Transactions
The Board s Role in Merger and Acquisition Transactions American Bankers Association Annual Convention Director Boot Camp Nashville, Tennessee October 16, 2016 John J. Gorman, Esq. Lawrence M. F. Spaccasi,
More informationGUIDE TO PUBLIC M&A IN CANADA
GUIDE TO PUBLIC M&A IN CANADA 2016 2 CONTENTS Introduction 6 Canadian Public M&A Frequently Asked Questions 7 Planning a Public M&A Transaction 7 Executing a Public M&A Transaction 10 Regulatory Approvals
More informationM&A Transaction Insurance: An Overview
November 2016 Follow @Paul_Hastings M&A Transaction Insurance: An Overview By Neil A. Torpey, Sean P. Murphy & Lu Wang As a result of falling costs, faster underwriting, and improving policy terms, M&A
More informationProposed Amendment to Delaware Law May Increase Pressure for Private Equity-Sponsors to Use Two-Step Merger Structures in Going- Private Transactions
Proposed Amendment to Delaware Law May Increase Pressure for Private Equity-Sponsors to Use Two-Step Merger Structures in Going- Private Transactions April 17, 2013 The Delaware State Bar Association has
More informationABC: Up to $5,000,000 XYZ: Up to $8,000,000 Others: between $2 and $4 million
NON-BINDING SUMMARY OF TERMS SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK FINANCING NewCo Biosciences, Inc. March 9, 2013 This Term Sheet summarizes the principal terms of the Series A Preferred Stock Financing of the Company.
More informationSections 13 and 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act )
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP CHECKPOINTS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF CROSSING VARIOUS OWNERSHIP THRESHOLDS WHEN INVESTING B. JEFFERY BELL * This memorandum outlines certain considerations associated with the acquisition
More informationJoint Ventures and Strategic Alliances: Key Considerations for Negotiation, Structuring & Drafting Terri Krivosha Maslon LLP
Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances: Key Considerations for Negotiation, Structuring & Drafting Terri Krivosha Maslon LLP 1. What is a Joint Venture or Strategic Alliance? a. A relationship between
More informationSEC Adopts Say-on-Pay Rules
News Bulletin January 31, 2011 SEC Adopts Say-on-Pay Rules On January 25, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) adopted rule changes to implement the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall
More informationIntercreditor Agreements (Pari Passu) 1:45pm - 3:15pm April 26, 2007
2007 ANNUAL SPRING INVESTMENT FORUM American College of Investment Counsel Chicago, Illinois Intercreditor Agreements (Pari Passu) 1:45pm - 3:15pm April 26, 2007 Chester L. Fisher, III Bingham McCutchen
More informationAcquisitions of Publicly Traded Corporations: A Cure for the Two-Step in Texas
Acquisitions of Publicly Traded Corporations: A Cure for the Two-Step in Texas By Whit Roberts and Nathan Crow of Locke Lord (Aug. 9, 2016) Delaware recently adopted amendments, effective August 1, 2016,
More informationThe Digital Media M&A Marketplace: Thinking about a company sale some perspectives from legal counsel
The Digital Media M&A Marketplace: Thinking about a company sale some perspectives from legal counsel Paul McDermott, DLA Piper US LLP MITX Program March 20, 2007 Copyright 2007 DLA Piper US LLP Overview
More informationCorporate Governance of the Largest US Public Companies General Governance Practices
Corporate Governance of the Largest US Public Companies General Governance Practices 2011 This Survey and our companion survey regarding director and executive compensation are available on the website
More information2013 amendments to the delaware general corporation law
2013 amendments to the delaware general corporation law John F. Grossbauer and Mark A. Morton 1 The Governor of Delaware has signed into law amendments to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
More informationDODGE & COX FUNDS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Revised February 15, 2018
DODGE & COX FUNDS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Revised February 15, 2018 The Dodge & Cox Funds have authorized Dodge & Cox to vote proxies on behalf of the Dodge & Cox Funds pursuant to the following
More informationDEAL LAWYERS. Materiality Scrapes Trending Upward in Private Deals
DEAL LAWYERS Vol. 8, No. 4 Materiality Scrapes Trending Upward in Private Deals By William Greason, Kevin Smith and Nicholas Scannavino of Chadbourne & Parke LLP 1 A materiality scrape (or materiality
More informationThe SEC s 'New' View On 13D Disclosure Requirements
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The SEC s 'New' View On 13D Disclosure Requirements
More informationTen Plus Pointers for Drafting Procurement Documents
TENDERING LAW 2014 UPDATE PAPER 2.2 Ten Plus Pointers for Drafting Procurement Documents These materials were prepared by David W. Little of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Vancouver, BC, for the Continuing
More informationCorporate Finance & Securities
Jon Feldman Michael Partridge Goodmans LLP Activist Investing in Canadian Companies Since 2007, Canada like other jurisdictions has seen a significant increase in shareholder activism. This increase can
More informationRepresentations & Warranties Insurance. Gallagher Management Liability Practice
Representations & Warranties Insurance Gallagher Management Liability Practice JULY 2017 Representations & Warranties (Reps & Warranties) insurance is designed to provide insurance coverage for breaches
More informationDrafting Asset Purchase Agreements: Reps, Warranties, Covenants, Conditions, Indemnity and Other Key Provisions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Asset Purchase Agreements: Reps, Warranties, Covenants, Conditions, Indemnity and Other Key Provisions TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationBest Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Best Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges Lessons From Case Law for Interpreting
More informationA Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A
presents Going Private: Legal and Strategic Considerations Structuring Transactions to Withstand Court and SEC Scrutiny A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A Today's panel features:
More informationDelaware Supreme Court Rejects Bad Faith Claim Against Lyondell Board
Delaware Supreme Court Rejects Bad Faith Claim Against Lyondell Board The Court Rejects a Claim that a Truncated Sale Process Run by an Independent Board Violated the Directors Duty to Act in Good Faith
More informationBidding Rules for the Auctions Under the Competitive Bidding Process of Ohio Power Company
Bidding Rules for the Auctions Under the Competitive Bidding Process of Ohio Power Company CBP Rules Contents Contents Contents... i ARTICLE I. Introduction...1 I.1. Background...1 I.2. Overview...1 ARTICLE
More informationC H A R A C T E R I S T I C S A N D R I S K S O F S T A N D A R D I Z E D O P T I O N S
C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S A N D R I S K S O F S T A N D A R D I Z E D O P T I O N S February 1994 1997 through 2005 Supplements included AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. 86 Trinity Place New York, New
More informationSummary of the SEC s Newly Adopted Amendments
September 2, 2008 The SEC Adopts Amendments to Foreign Private Issuer Registration and Disclosure Requirements, Including Those Relating to Cross-Border Mergers, Tender and Exchange Offers and Rights Offerings
More informationUS MERGER CONTROL MARCH 1, 2003
US MERGER CONTROL KENNETH R. LOGAN AND JACK D ANGELO SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP MARCH 1, 2003 Antitrust planning typically is a central part of every transaction and public takeover bids are no exception.
More informationRecent Developments in Private Company M&A
Recent Developments in Private Company M&A Jason (Jake) Bullen August 16, 2016 Cassels Academy of Continuing Professional Development AGENDA Introduction Recent Developments A. Legal Project Management
More informationThe Threshold Question: Negotiating Materiality Qualifiers and Standard of Effort Clauses in Credit Agreements
The Threshold Question: Negotiating Materiality Qualifiers and Standard of Effort Clauses in Credit Agreements American Bar Association Loan Documentation Subcommittee Meeting September 12, 2014 Don Waters
More informationJujitsu Techniques for Enforcing & Defending Contract Liability Claims
Jujitsu Techniques for Enforcing & Defending Contract Liability Claims January 19, 2017 Jeryl Bowers Sheppard Mullin Partner, Los Angeles T +310-229-3713 M +213-926-3800 jbowers@sheppardmullin.com Sheppard
More informationCayman Islands TRANSACTIONS. Chris Humphries, Simon Yard and James Smith. Stuarts Walker Hersant Humphries
Cayman Islands Chris Humphries, Simon Yard and James Smith 1 Types of private equity transactions What different types of private equity transactions occur in your jurisdiction? What structures are commonly
More informationFor personal use only
Tishman Speyer Australia Limited (ABN 43 106 909 871) Responsible Entity of Tishman Speyer Office Fund ARSN 108 809 534 Level 12, The Chifley Tower 2 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 www. tsof.com.au Ph:
More informationAsset & Share Purchase Agreements
Asset & Share Purchase Agreements By John R. Houghton October 4, 2007 This paper was presented at The Canadian Institute s Course Series on Negotiating & Drafting Key Business Agreements, held in Calgary,
More informationMaking Good Use of Special Committees
View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/3-502-5942 Making Good Use of Special Committees FRANK AQUILA AND SAMANTHA LIPTON, SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP, WITH PRACTICAL LAW CORPORATE & SECURITIES
More informationMergers & Acquisitions in a More Uncertain World: Using the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act
Mergers & Acquisitions in a More Uncertain World: Using the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act You are probably aware of the useful protective reconstruction provisions available to insolvent corporations
More informationHUTCHISON AND VODAFONE AGREE TO MERGE AUSTRALIAN TELECOM OPERATIONS TO FORM A 50:50 JOINT VENTURE
9 February 2009 HUTCHISON AND VODAFONE AGREE TO MERGE AUSTRALIAN TELECOM OPERATIONS TO FORM A 50:50 JOINT VENTURE Vodafone and Hutchison Telecommunications (Australia) Limited ( HTAL ), a listed subsidiary
More informationWarranty and Indemnity Insurance
Warranty and Indemnity Insurance Mrs. Ariane Brohez Partner ariane.brohez@loyensloeff.com Warranty and Indemnity Insurance Mrs. Bénédicte Deboeck Counsel benedicte.deboeck@loyensloeff.com Mr. Wim Vande
More informationMergers, Acquisitions and Divestures
Session 11 &12 Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestures Programme : Postgraduate Diploma in Business, Finance & Strategy (PGDBFS 2018) Course : Corporate Valuation (PGDBFS 203) Lecturer : Mr. Asanka Ranasinghe
More informationSpecial Statement for Uncovered Option Writers
Special Statement for Uncovered Option Writers If Account Approved for Other Option Transactions There are special risks associated with uncovered option writing which expose the investor to potentially
More informationPrivate Equity s Role in the Changing M&A and Corporate Finance Landscape Edouard C. LeFevre
Private Equity s Role in the Changing M&A and Corporate Finance Landscape Edouard C. LeFevre Edouard C. LeFevre is a partner with Foley & Lardner LLP. He is a member of the firm s Private Equity & Venture
More informationCALIFORNIA EMPLOYERS RETIREE BENEFIT TRUST PROGRAM ("CERBT") AGREEMENT AND ELECTION OF. Count of Siskiyou (NAME OF EMPLOYER)
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYERS RETIREE BENEFIT TRUST PROGRAM ("CERBT") AGREEMENT AND ELECTION OF Count of Siskiyou (NAME OF EMPLOYER) TO PREFUND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS THROUGH CalPERS WHEREAS (1) Government
More informationNegotiating Series A Term Sheets
Negotiating Series A Term Sheets Benjamin M. Hron Bhron@mccarter.com 617.449.6584 @HronEsq James F. Coffey jcoffey@mccarter.com 617.449.6533 @hopbos Twitter #mecic 11.20.13 Refresher: What is a Term Sheet
More informationStandard Form of Agreement Between OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Construction Manager At-Risk
CMAA Document CMAR-1 Standard Form of Agreement Between OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Construction Manager At-Risk 2004 EDITION This document is to be used in connection with CMAA Standard Form of Contract
More information