TRAVEL REPORT Stockholm Business Region. Issued by In collaboration with Via Egencia

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "TRAVEL REPORT Stockholm Business Region. Issued by In collaboration with Via Egencia"

Bridget Morgan
6 years ago
Views:

1 TRAVEL REPORT Stockholm Business Region Issued by In collaboration with Via Egencia

2 Climate Impact Report Stockholm Business Region's Air Travel Introduction Tricorona has calculated the climate impact from Stockholm Business Region's air travel during , based on data supplied by Via Egencia. Each flight has been calculated separately, using great circle s between the specific airports, to take full account of take-off and landing cycles. The calculations are based on NTM's calculation method and take account of all climate impact from the flight, including non-carbon. To achieve this result, the carbon at high altitude are multiplied by a factor of 2.7 to achieve a total figure expressed in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e). For full details of the calculation methodology please see: Summary Results The total from Stockholm Business Region's during the stated period are shown below. pkm means person kilometers, which is the total transported for all individuals. For carbon offsets the total are rounded up to nearest whole number, giving 335 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents. Category Value Unit 334,0 tonne CO 2 e Emissions/flight 582 kg CO 2 e/flight Emission/pkm 0,28 kg CO 2 e/pkm No. Flights pkm Carbon offsetting To carbon offset the total climate impact of the above travel, please contact your travel agency or Tricorona for further information. 2 of 6

3 Most commonly flown routes Table: Top 10 routes by no. Route No. Emissions/ flight (kg) (kg) (pkm) Emissions /pkm (kg/pkm) AMS-ARN % % % 0,28 ARN-LHR 49 9 % % % 0,27 ARN-CPH 43 7 % % % 0,30 ARN-MUC 28 5 % ,27 ARN-BRU ,28 ARN-HEL % % 0,32 ARN-LLA % % 0,29 ARN-FRA ,28 ARN-TXL % % 0,29 ARN-CDG % % 0,30 Other % % , % % % 0,28 Routes, sorted by no. Share of total trips, sorted by most often flown routes Other 46 % Other Top 10 routes 46 % ARN-CDG ARN-TXL AMS-ARN 10 % ARN-LHR 9 % ARN-LHR 9 % ARN-CPH 7 % ARN-MUC AMS-ARN5 % ARN-BRU 10 ARN-HEL % ARN-FRA ARN-LLA ARN-CPH 7 % ARN-MUC ARN-CDG 5 % ARN-BRU ARN-TXL ARN-HEL ARN-LLA ARN-FRA 3 of 6

4 Highest contribution to total Table: Top 10 routes by Route No. Emissions/ flight (kg) (kg) (pkm) Emissions /pkm (kg/pkm) DUS-LAX 8 1 % % % 0,28 ARN-LHR 49 9 % % % 0,27 AMS-ARN % % % 0,28 ARN-ORD 9 2 % % % 0,28 ARN-EWR 7 1 % ,28 ARN-MUC 28 5 % ,27 ARN-LAX 4 1 % ,28 ARN-BRU ,28 AMS-SEA 4 1 % ,28 LHR-YVR 4 1 % ,28 Other % % % 0, % % % 0,28 Routes, sorted by Share of, sorted by total per route ARN-ORD, 5 % ARN-EWR, Other, 60 % DUS-LAX AMS-ARN, 6 ARN-LHR % AMS-ARN 5 % 6 % Top 10 routes ARN-ORD 5 % ARN-MUC 5 % ARN-EWR Other ARN-BRU ARN-LAX 60 % ARN-LHR, 6 % LHR-YVR AMS-SEA DUS-LAX, 6 % ARN-MUC, ARN-LAX, ARN-BRU, AMS-SEA, LHR-YVR, 4 of 6

5 Distance category Table: Breakdown by category Category No. Emissions/ flight (kg) (kg) (pkm) Emissions /pkm (kg/pkm) Under 500 km 49 9 % % % 0, km to 1500 km % % % 0, km to 3000 km % ,30 Over 3000 km % % , % % % 0,28 Share of by category Routes, sorted by category Under 500 km 2 % Under 500 km 2500 % km to 1500 km Over 3000 Over km3000 km 32 % 52 % 52 % 1500 km to 3000 km 15 % 500 km to 1500 km 32 % 1500 km to 3000 km 15 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0 % Share of and, per pkm, by category Under 500 km 500 km to 1500 km 1500 km to 3000 km Over 3000 km 0,35 0,30 0,25 0,20 0,15 0,10 0,05 0,00 per km 5 of 6

6 Methodology The climate impact calculations have been performed using the methodology developed for Tricorona, based primarily on data and methods developed by NTM, the Scandinavian Network for Transport and the Environment. The NTM model calculates climate impact from direct carbon only, and Tricorona has therefore corrected the resulting figures to account for climate impact arising due to high altitude. This is achieved by multiplying the calculated figures for carbon by a factor of 2.7. The factor 2.7 is based on Tricorona s interpretation of IPCC research reports. The per-passenger are derived from the total flight and assumptions about the seating configuration (passenger capacity) and cabin factor (load factor). Full details of the calculation methodology are presented at Where the customer / travel agency data does not specify the aircraft used, Tricorona calculates based on the aircraft specified in the table below. Assumptions for cabin factor are also specified below. Table: Aircraft and cabin factor assumptions Category Distance Aircraft capacity Cabin factor Local Under 1500 km A % Regional 1500 km to 3000 km B % Continental 3000 km to 6000 km B % Intercontinental Over 6000 km B Belly % Carbon offsetting All projects offered by Tricorona for carbon offsetting are renewable energy or energy efficiency projects in developing countries. Tricorona offers two different categories of projects: - CDM projects: these projects are projects certified by the UN under the Kyoto Protocol. - Gold Standard CDM projects: these projects are, in addition to UN certification, also certified by the Gold Standard Foundation, an independent body backed by over 60 NGO's including WWF International and Greenpeace International. 6 of 6

A dynamic competitive assessment of the recent Lufthansa mergers

A dynamic competitive assessment of the recent Lufthansa mergers By Adél Németh Jacobs University & University of Applied Sciences, Bremen DIW Berlin, June 12, 2015 Introducing the aviation market in