Development Education Partnership Fair

Transcription

1 Development Education Partnership Fair Evaluation from Questionnaires Participants: Old Member States: part. New Member States: 9 part. Ro/Bg: 9 part. Resource persons: part. All together: 9 conference participants filled in their evaluation questionnaire.

2 To what extent did the DE partnership fair met your overall expectations?. Did I get what I needed to? =,% % % % % % % % 7% 8% 9% % p p p p p p p p p p p,%,%,%,%,%,% % % % % % % % 7% 8% 9% % : =,% : = 7,97% Ro/Bg: =,% With a relatively high average of,% the DE partnership fair met the overall expectations of the participants. Even more not one participant felt that none of his needs where treated (no answer beneath %). Even though the averages answer do not diverge, a higher contentedness with the fair of the participants of the new member states is observable.

3 . Did you find partners for your project? Yes No Maybe Too early to answer 7p 9p 9p 7p,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% Yes No Maybe Too early to answ er An average of,% of the participants of the DE partnership fair found an eligible partner and,8% found potential partners. It is remarkable that only,% of the participants could not find a partner. 7,9% of participants stated that this is too early to answer. Altogether a positive result. How well did the event met the following objectives/expected results? Please, use the following: = irrelevant, = inadequate, = insufficient, = fair, = good, = good, = excellent

4 . Participants were able to find partners and agree with them on specific projects to be carried out jointly and on the role of each partner irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good p p 8p 9p p p p excellent =,87,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =,7 : =,9 Ro/Bg: =, The ability to find partners and agree with them on specific projects and the role of each partner was estimated as good (average,87). Especially participants of the future (average,) and the new member countries (average,9) could achieve concrete partnerships.

5 . The partners started to built the logical framework of the joint projects - namely problems addressed, objectives, activities irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent p p p p p 8p 9p =,8,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =, : =,8 Ro/Bg: =, In a second phase partners could start to build the logical framework for joint projects, this part of the DE partnership was well received by the participants who estimated the progress as good (average of,8). On a closer examination the participants of the new (average,8) and future member states(average,) could intensively work on concrete objectives and activities of the logical frameworks for their joint projects.

6 . Participants got an overview of EC cofinancing requirements for Development Education and Awareness Raising irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent p p p 9p p 9p 8p =,,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =, The participants of the DE partnership fair appraise the overview of EC co financing requirements for development education and awareness raising as favourable (average,). Most notably the participants of the future member countries took high benefit from the overview of EC co financing requirements.

7 How would you rate and usefulness of each element of the programme? Please, use the following: =, =, = /use, = ing/useful, = ing/useful, = ing/useful, = extremely ing/useful Programme Elements. Opening Interesting =,7 Useful =,7 9p p p p 9p p p 9p p p p p 7p 9p Interesting % % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely 7

8 Useful % % % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely : =,7 : =, Ro/Bg: =,9 : =,8 : =,7 Ro/Bg: =,. Presentation of the Call for Proposals Interesting =, Useful =, 8

9 p p p p p p p p p 7p p p p p Interesting % % % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely Useful % % % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely 9

10 : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =, : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =,. Writing a successful co-financing application Interesting =,8 Useful =,9 p p 7p p p p 7p p p p p 7p p p Interesting % % % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely

11 Useful % % % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =, : =, : =,9 Ro/Bg: =,8. Presentation Open Space Interesting =,7 Useful =,8

12 p p 9p p p p p p p 8p p 7p p p Interesting % % % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely Useful % % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely

13 : =, : =,7 Ro/Bg: =, : =, : =,9 Ro/Bg: =,. Building partnership Interesting =,8 Useful =, p p p 9p p p p p p p 9p p p 7p Interesting % % % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely

14 Useful % % % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =, : =,9 : =, Ro/Bg: =,7. Raising funds from private and public sources Interesting =,9 Useful =,9

15 p 7p 7p p p p 7p p p 9p p p p p Interesting % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely Useful % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely

16 : =,8 : =, Ro/Bg: =, : =,7 : =,7 Ro/Bg: =,7.7 Working groups Interesting =, Useful =, p p p p 9p p 8p p p p p p 8p p Interesting % % % % % % % % % I don t fair ing extremely

17 Useful % % % % % % % % I don t fair useful extremely : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =, : =,9 : =, Ro/Bg: =,9. Comments/Suggestions: what could have made the programme even more effective? 7

18 Please rate the relevance and availability of the information / preparation materials provided during the event:. Please rate the relevance and availability of the information / preparation materials provided during the event irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent p p p 9p p p p =,9,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =,9. Comments 8

19 Please rate the venue - both the daytime facilities and the overnight accommodation.. Please rate the venue - both the daytime facilities and the overnight accommodation. =, irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent p p p 7p p p 7p,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =, : =, Ro/Bg: =,9. Comments 9

20 Please rate the technical and logistical support before and during the event.. Please rate the technical and logistical support before and during the event. =,8 irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent p p p p p p p,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =, : =,97 Ro/Bg: =,. Comments

21 7 To what extent would you recommend others to attend a Development Education Partnership Fair? 7. To what extent would you recommend others to attend a Development Education Partnership Fair? =, irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent p p p p p p p,%,%,%,%,%,%,%,% irrelevant inadequate insufficient fair good good excellent : =, : =,8 Ro/Bg: =, 7. Comments

22 8 Please give your opinion about the length of the event: 8. Please give your opinion about the length of the event Too long Just right Too short p 9p p 7,%,%,%,%,%,% too long just right too short,%,% 9 Any other comment

23 Which country are you from?. Which country are you from? 9p p p percentage,%,%,%,%,%,% percentage

24 partcipants percentage Austria,% Belgium,% France,7% Germany 9,77% Great Britain,% Greece,7% Ireland,% Italy 9,77% Netherlands,7% Portugal,% Cyprus,% Czech Republic 9,% Estonia 8,% Hungary 8,% Latvia 7,% Lithuania,% Poland 8,% Slovakia,7% Slovenia 8,7% Bulgaria 9,% Romania 9,%