The use of ICSID precedents by ICSID and ICSID tribunals Alejandro A. Escobar Latham & Watkins
|
|
- Bertram Reynolds
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The use of ICSID precedents by ICSID and ICSID tribunals Alejandro A. Escobar Latham & Watkins Investment treaty arbitration has presented ICSID and ICSID tribunals with significant new challenges. For the ICSID Secretariat, a particular challenge is posed in relation to its screening duties by what we have come to know as arbitration without privity : 1 consent to arbitration formulated not in relation to a specific party but rather to a category of investors defined in general and sometimes open-ended terms. For tribunals, the particular challenge seems to be ruling on multimillion dollar disputes on the basis of what in one case was described as a fairly terse agreement of limited length. 2 The reference is to the dilemma of applying an investment treaty in its relation both to the general corpus of international law and to the law of the disputing State, all of this in the light of Article 42 of the ICSID Convention regarding applicable law. The first case ever decided under an investment treaty (AAPL v Sri Lanka 3 ) did not have the benefit of the two-odd dozen jurisdictional decisions from ICSID tribunals and similar number of decisions on the merits (from ICSID and other tribunals) that exist today. Its rulings are marked not only by an involved consideration of the text of the treaty in combination with early 20 th century cases concerning the international law of State Responsibility, but also by an abundant reference to doctrine. We are reminded here of the subsidiary sources of international law envisaged in Article 38 of the ICJ Statute that are also relevant to ICSID arbitration. The situation was not much different at the time of the first ICSID investment treaty case against a Latin American country (Fedax N.V. v Venezuela 4 ). There, as regards jurisdiction, the tribunal dealt more closely with the ICSID Convention and related instruments, including the ICSID Additional Facility Rules and the instruments governing MIGA, ICSID s sister organizations within the World Bank Group. This analysis was aimed at giving meaning to the See J. Paulsson, Arbitration Without Privity, 10 ICSID Review FILJ 232 (1995 No. 2). Wena Hotels Ltd. v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4), Award dated 8 December 2000, paragraph 79, 41 ILM 896 (2002), at 910. Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. v. Republic of Sri Lanka (ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3), Award dated 27 June 1990, 6 ICSID Review FILJ 526 (1991 No. 2). Fedax N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction dated 11 July 1997, 37 ILM 1378 (1998); Award dated 9 March 1998, 37 ILM 1391 (1998). 1
2 central term investment in Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. The tribunal then went on to parse the terms of the relevant investment treaty in that context. This trend of deciding cases in the absence of case-law concerning investment treaties was continued in the first decision on the merits under the North America Free Trade Agreement (Azinian et al. v Mexico 5 ). The award was based almost entirely on first principles, with reliance on the writings of publicists. The factual background of the case may have assisted the tribunal. Be this as it may, the award starkly reminded us that throwing case-law at arbitrators will not be enough to win the day. Labelling is no substitute for analysis, said the tribunal. Certain terms may serve as a way to describe breaches [of contract] which are to be treated as extraordinary, and therefore as acts of expropriation, but they certainly do not indicate on what basis the critical distinction between expropriation and an ordinary breach of contract is to be made. The egregiousness of any breach is in the eye of the beholder and that is not satisfactory for present purposes. 6 In the light of the above decisions, the central question that this panel could consider is whether the users of ICSID arbitration may have any basis for reminding those who will decide future cases to abide by the Azinian tribunal s maxim when they rely on ICSID and other investment treaty decisions in their awards. To be sure, ICSID arbitration users may legitimately expect ICSID tribunals to consider previous cases in their decisions. Although those decision are not binding, this does not mean that they do not contain relevant discussion of applicable principles and standards. For a tribunal to decide an issue without demonstrating some awareness of other cases that deal with the same or cognate issues would be highly unusual. At the same time, the last year or so has witnessed an important qualification to the persuasive force of pre-existing case-law. While the inclination in many arbitration decisions is to consider the case at hand as unique in its factual circumstances, in SGS v Philippines 7 the tribunal focused Robert Azinian et al. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/2), Award dated 1 November 1999, 14 ICSID Review FILJ 535 (1999 No. 2). Azinian v. Mexico, Award, paragraph 90. Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction dated 29 January 2004, 2
3 on the uniqueness of the law. It said: [A]lthough different tribunals constituted under the ICSID system should in general seek to act consistently with each other, in the end it must be for each tribunal to exercise its competence in accordance with the applicable law, which will by definition be different for each BIT and each Respondent State. 8 One might be tempted to say that the SGS v Philippines tribunal added a corollary the Azinian maxim: because each tribunal is ultimately responsible for its own analysis of the facts and the law, consistency does not necessarily mean correctness. While the tribunal in SGS v Philippines alluded to the need to apply each investment treaty on its own terms, there are manifold other distinctions that may come to mind when considering the value of previous investment treaty cases. A decision under the ICSID Convention will not be the same as a decision under the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, particularly as regards jurisdictional requirements. Is a decision on a bilateral investment treaty less relevant to disputes under detailed free trade agreements, particularly when these are multilateral (and vice versa)? Is a decision with a dissenting opinion less valuable than one without a dissenting opinion? Does it depend on who is dissenting an why? Is an earlier decision, or one that is made largely on first principles, less relevant than a recent decision that recites a string of investment treaty cases? In all of this one must not forget the general context of investment treaty arbitration, which is a relatively new phenomenon the procedural and substantive law for which is still being developed. This general context may allow far greater flexibility to tribunals in deciding often unique cases than in a domestic law setting. It is probably understood, however, that expanded 8 SGS v. Philippines, Decision on Jurisdiction, paragraph 97. The Tribunal added: Moreover there is no doctrine of precedent in international law, if by precedent is meant a rule of the binding effect of a single decision. There is no hierarchy of international tribunals, and even if there were, there is no good reason for allowing the first tribunal in time to resolve issues for all later tribunals. It must be initially for the control mechanisms provided for under the BIT and the ICSID Convention, and in the longer term for the development of a common legal opinion or jurisprudence constante, to resolve the difficult legal questions discussed by the SGS v. Pakistan Tribunal and also in the present decision. (Footnote omitted.) 3
4 flexibility does not amount to a licence for tribunals simply to pick and choose among their favourite arbitral pronouncements to justify a decision they believe embodies the correct outcome of the case. In other words, labelling, even via the use of precedents, should be no substitute for analysis. There is a further dimension to the use of precedents in the case of ICSID arbitration, which is the role of the ICSID Secretariat itself. As we know, the ICSID Secretary-General must register a request for arbitration unless he finds, on the basis of the information contained in the request, that the dispute is manifestly outside the jurisdiction of the Centre. 9 In the case of an investment treaty dispute, one could rightly ask: what is manifest? ICSID has invariably required requests based on investment treaties to address each jurisdictional basis derived from the application of a treaty as the source of the parties consent. Claimants must fit, as it were, under two treaties : the ICSID Convention and the investment treaty in which the State s consent is expressed. The decisions of ICSID tribunals will have a role to play in this respect. Two examples may be mentioned. First, recent ICSID decisions are relevant to the registration of requests that rely on a most-favoured-nation clause with respect to procedural requirements for investment treaty arbitration. In the case of Maffezini v Spain, 10 the scrutiny of the request for arbitration was probably no less meticulous than in other novel situations. The ICSID Secretary-General, however, registered the request because he found that the dispute was not manifestly outside the Centre s jurisdiction. By comparison, today it is highly unlikely that the use of an MFN clause for the purpose of initiating arbitration could prevail without the request addressing, perhaps in some detail, the recent ruling of Plama v Bulgaria ICSID Convention, Article 36. Emilio Agustín Maffezini v. Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction dated 25 January 2005, 16 ICSID Review FILJ 212 (2001 No.1). Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction dated 8 February 2005, paragraphs , The Plama tribunal, while not disagreeing with the result reached by the Maffezini tribunal as regards the application of the MFN clause to procedural requirements, believed that result to be due to exceptional circumstances which should not be treated as a statement of general principle guiding future tribunals in other cases where exceptional circumstances are not present, Decision on jurisdiction, paragraph 224. The Plama tribunal thus reformulated the guiding principle, ibid., paragraph 223. For a discussion of the Plama decision and of the decisions relied on and distinguished therein, see S. Fietta, Most favoured nation treatment and dispute resolution under bilateral investment treaties: a turning point?, 2 TDM, Issue #03, June 2005, 4
5 A second example is the application of so-called fork-in-the-road provisions in investment treaties, which require investors to choose once and for all between submitting investment disputes to arbitration and submitting them to local courts. After a string of decisions that have rejected objections to jurisdiction based on this type of provisions, 12 investors who act advisedly are likely to be able to avoid triggering such provisions and thus avoid them becoming a significant obstacle to registration of a request for arbitration at ICSID. Finally, there is an important potential role for the ICSID Secretariat regarding the awareness of ICSID decisions that might be relevant for future cases. Under the proposed amendments to the Rule 48 of the ICSID Arbitration Rules, 13 ICSID shall publish excerpts of the legal conclusions of awards, even without the consent of the parties. 14 This could allow parties and tribunals to enrich their dialogue and, indirectly, contribute to the informed development of international investment law See, e.g., Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets L.P. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3), Decision on Jurisdiction dated 14 January 2004, paragraphs 95-98, See also, by the author, Argentina s deluge of investor-state arbitration proceedings, 1 TDM, Issue #03, July 2004, See ICSID, Suggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations: Working Paper of the ICSID Secretariat, 12 May 2005, page 9, The Paper notes that a corresponding change would be made to Article 53(3) of the ICSID Additional Facility Rules. This would go some way officially to meet the SGS v. Philippines tribunal s observation that there is no guarantee that ICSID decisions will be published, Decision on Jurisdiction, paragraph 97, footnote 30. 5
LITIGATION PRACTICE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
LITIGATION PRACTICE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION LAWG/J 885 08 Fall 2007 Prof. Mark Kantor Prof. Jean Kalicki Mondays 7:55 p.m. to 9.55 p.m. Room 156 This course blends mock litigation experiences with
More informationIn the Eyes of the Beholder: Host State s Refusal to Pay under a Contract as Breach of a BIT
In the Eyes of the Beholder: Host State s Refusal to Pay under a Contract as Breach of a BIT Kluwer Arbitration Blog May 7, 2013 Inna Uchkunova (International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))
More informationAn Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence in International Investment Law
An Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence in International Investment Law What Investment Treaty Tribunals Are Saying & Doing Jeffery P. Commission British Institute of International and Comparative Law
More informationJOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH [VOL 1 ISSUE 2 DEC 2015] Page 40 of 142
BALANCING THE MFN AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE UNDER INDIA S DRAFT MODEL BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATY, 2015 By Manas Pandey 91 1. INTRODUCTION Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) are the primary legal
More informationTreaty Claims vs. Contract Claims: Uncertainty is Certain
Treaty Claims vs. Contract Claims: Uncertainty is Certain Markiyan Kliuchkovskyi, Partner Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners, Ukraine Kyiv Arbitration Days 2012: Think Big - November 15-16, 2012 Egorov
More informationBreaking the Cemnet: Venezuela's Move to Nationalize Cemex Leads to Dispute Over Arbitral Jurisdiction
Arbitration Law Review Volume 3 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 34 7-1-2011 Breaking the Cemnet: Venezuela's Move to Nationalize Cemex Leads to Dispute Over Arbitral Jurisdiction Shari Manasseh
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: MESA POWER GROUP, LLC Claimant AND: GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent
More informationSouth Asian University Faculty of Law
South Asian University Faculty of Law Part I Course Title: International Investment Law Course Code: Course instructor: Dr Prabhash Ranjan Course Duration: One Semester Credit Units: 4 Medium of Instruction:
More informationTransnational Dispute Management transnational-dispute-management.com
Transnational Dispute Management transnational-dispute-management.com Issue : Provisional Published : November 2007 This article will be published in a future issue of TDM (2007). Check website for final
More informationCASES. LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp. and LG&E International Inc. 1 v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1) Introductory Note
CASES LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp. and LG&E International Inc. 1 v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1) Introductory Note The decisions on jurisdiction and liability in LG&E Energy Corp.,
More informationBolivia s Exit from ICSID:
Bolivia s Exit from ICSID: Legal and Practical Consequences of Denouncing the ICSID Convention The text and context of the Convention A presentation to the BIICL Investment Treaty Forum 20 June 2007 By
More informationMax Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law
Maffezini v Spain Case August Reinisch Table of Contents A. Introduction B. Factual Background C. Decision on Provisional Measures D. Decision on Jurisdiction E. Award on the Merits F. Rectification of
More informationILLEGALITY IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION. Sylvia T. Tonova
ILLEGALITY IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION Sylvia T. Tonova Warsaw, Poland 7 June 2013 Investor-State Arbitration System Instruments: Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) Multilateral treaties (e.g. Energy Charter
More informationLIST OF AUTHORITIES Claimant: International Treaties and Covenants: - Charter of United Nations. Treatises and Books:
LIST OF AUTHORITIES Claimant: International Treaties and Covenants: - Charter of United Nations Treatises and Books: - Dolzer, R., Schreuer, Ch. Principles of International Investment Law. 2008. Oxford
More informationProminent Issues in Latin American Arbitration: Annulment, Multi-party Arbitrations, Corruption and Fraud
Prominent Issues in Latin American Arbitration: Annulment, Multi-party Arbitrations, Corruption and Fraud Carolyn B. Lamm White & Case LLP April 12, 2012 Prominent Issues ANNULMENT MULTI-PARTY ARBITRATIONS
More informationInternational Commercial Arbitration Autumn 2013 Lecture II
Associate Professor Ivar Alvik International Commercial Arbitration Autumn 2013 Lecture II Investment Treaty Arbitration: Special Features Summary from last time Two procedural frameworks of investment
More informationAguas del Tunari SA v. The Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/2)
Aguas del Tunari SA v. The Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/2) Introductory Note The Decision on Jurisdiction reproduced hereunder was rendered on October 3, 2005, by a Tribunal comprised of
More informationICSID Case No ARB/10/5: Tidewater v Venezuela, Decision on Jurisdiction
ICSID Case No ARB/10/5: Tidewater v Venezuela, Decision on Jurisdiction ANIL YILMAZ I Introduction On 8 February 2013, an arbitration tribunal constituted under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment
More informationPolicy Papers on Transnational Economic Law
Policy Papers on Transnational Economic Law No. 5/2004 Having your Pie And Eating it with One Chopstick Most Favoured Nation Clauses and Procedural Rights Katja Scholz T RANSNATIONAL E CONOMIC LAW RESEARCH
More informationBACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). What is ICSID? ICSID is the leading institution for the resolution of international investment disputes.
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID) IN THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN. TECO GUATEMALA HOLDINGS, LLC Claimant and
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID) IN THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN TECO GUATEMALA HOLDINGS, LLC Claimant and THE REPUBLIC OF GUATEMALA Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/10/23 ================================================================
More informationWaste Management, Inc. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3)
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3) Introduction DECISION ON VENUE OF THE ARBITRATION 1. On 27 September
More informationPrevention & Management of ISDS
Investments Prevention & Management of ISDS Vee Vian Thien, Associate (Allen & Overy HK) 8 th Meeting of the Asia-Pacific FDI Network, 26 September 2018 Allen & Overy LLP 2018 Agenda 1 Introduction to
More informationDeutsche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/02, Award
Deutsche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/02, Award Summary: The Claimant created a specific derivative instrument allowing Sri Lanka s state-owned enterprise to hedge against oil price increases
More informationInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Washington, D.C. In the proceedings between. Telefónica S.A.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Washington, D.C. In the proceedings between Telefónica S.A. (Claimant) and The Argentine Republic (Respondent) Case No. ARB/03/20 DECISION OF
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID) INTRODUCTORY NOTE New Jurisdictional Hurdles, More on Investment Protection Standards and Novel Procedural Issues ICSID Arbitration in
More informationMihaly International Corporation v. Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/00/2)
Mihaly International Corporation v. Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/00/2) INDIVIDUAL CONCURRING OPINION BY MR. DAVID SURATGAR 1. Although in agreement with the findings of
More informationIntroducing ICSID. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. The global leader in international investment dispute settlement
Introducing ICSID International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes The global leader in international investment dispute settlement Contracting States to the ICSID Convention Signatory States
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON D.C. In the Proceeding Between: ELECTRABEL S.A.
THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON D.C. In the Proceeding Between: ELECTRABEL S.A. (Claimant) v. REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY (Respondent) (ICSID Case No ARB/07/19) DECISION
More informationBACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). What is ICSID? ICSID is the leading institution for the resolution of international investment disputes.
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. In the arbitration proceeding between. Claimant. and. Respondent. ICSID Case No.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES In the arbitration proceeding between UAB E ENERGIJA (LITHUANIA) Claimant and REPUBLIC OF LATVIA Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/12/33 DISSENTING
More informationInvestment Protection Agreement between Switzerland and China
Investment Protection Agreement between Switzerland and China A Swiss Investor s Perspective Anh HUYNH May 2010 www.eigerlaw.com Page - 2 I. Introduction On April 14, 2010 the Agreement between Switzerland
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Portuguese Republic and the United Mexican States, hereinafter referred
More informationTHE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )
THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE 03-) The ICSID Caseload Statistics (Issue 03-) This issue of the ICSID Caseload Statistics updates the profile of the ICSID caseload, historically and for the Centre
More informationMetalclad Corporation v. The United Mexican States. (ICSID Case No. ARB(AB)/97/1) Submission of the Government of the United States of America
Metalclad Corporation v. The United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AB)/97/1) Submission of the Government of the United States of America 1. Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128, the United States Government
More informationTHE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )
THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE 0-) The ICSID Caseload Statistics (Issue 0-) This issue of the ICSID Caseload Statistics updates the profile of the ICSID caseload, historically and for the calendar
More informationCONTRACTING WITH THE STATE COMMON PITFALLS
CONTRACTING WITH THE STATE COMMON PITFALLS Luminita Popa 43 Aviatorilor Blvd., 1 st District Code 011853, Bucharest, ROMANIA Website: www.musat.ro A. Political Risks and Adverse Treatment Generally determined
More informationPreamble The Contracting States Considering
Preamble The Contracting States Considering the need for international cooperation for economic development, and the role of private international investment therein; Bearing in mind the possibility that
More informationThe identification and consideration of concerns as regards investor to state dispute settlement
20 November 2017 The identification and consideration of concerns as regards investor to state dispute settlement 1. Introduction 1. This paper is intended as a contribution to the discussions in Working
More informationGlobal Financial Disruptions and Related Cases
Global Financial Disruptions and Related Cases Mexico (1994) Fireman s Fund v. Mexico Peru (2000) Renée Rose Levy de Levi v. Peru Czech Republic (1998-2000) Saluka Investments B.V. v. Czech Republic Argentina
More informationInvestment Treaty Protection and Arbitration: Key Things to Know
Investment Treaty Protection and Arbitration: Key Things to Know Dany Khayat Partner dkhayat@mayerbrown.com William Ahern Associate wahern@mayerbrown.com 11 April 2017 Mayer Brown is a global legal services
More informationInternational Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration Professor Loukas Mistelis School of International Arbitration Queen Mary University of London Issues Covered Introduction The course teacher students Subject Regulatory
More informationICSID I History, Overview and Jurisdiction - Consent
Seminar 3 ICSID I History, Overview and Jurisdiction Consent Learning objectives At the end of the session you should Appreciate the limited scope of jurisdiction of national courts in investment disputes
More informationIn the matter of an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. between
In the matter of an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules between 1. GRAMERCY FUNDS MANAGEMENT LLC 2. GRAMERCY PERU HOLDINGS LLC v. Claimants THE REPUBLIC OF PERU Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER
More informationTREATY-PROTECTED INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES AND PRIVITY OF CONTRACT
American University of Beirut From the SelectedWorks of Raul Henrique Pereira de Souza Fleury May 26, 2015 TREATY-PROTECTED INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES AND PRIVITY OF CONTRACT Raul Henrique
More informationInternational Investment Law LLM. Each two hour seminar will consist of an hour long lecture followed by an hour long tutorial discussion.
Instructor: David Collins Office: G304 Email: david.collins.1@city.ac.uk Tel: 0207 040 3215 International Investment Law LLM 2010 Each two hour seminar will consist of an hour long lecture followed by
More informationDESIRING to intensify the economic cooperation for the mutual benefit of the Contracting Parties;
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United
More informationThe issue of a foreign company wholly owned by national shareholders in the context of ICSID arbitration
Southern Methodist University/ Law Institute of the Americas From the SelectedWorks of Omar E Garcia-Bolivar Winter February 20, 2006 The issue of a foreign company wholly owned by national shareholders
More informationTHE ARBITRATION INSTITUTE OF THE STOCKHOLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE UNDER THE SCC RULES
THE ARBITRATION INSTITUTE OF THE STOCKHOLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE UNDER THE SCC RULES CALRISSIAN & CO., INC. CLAIMANT V. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF DAGOBAH RESPONDENT SKELETON BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE CLAIMANT 8 TH
More informationEudoro A. Olguín v. Republic of Paraguay. ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5. Decision on Jurisdiction. 8 August Award
Eudoro A. Olguín v. Republic of Paraguay ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5 Decision on Jurisdiction 8 August 2000 Award I. Introduction 1. On 27 October 1997, the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment
More informationThe Development of the Regulations and Rules. The International Centre for Settlement of Investment. Antonio R. Parra*
The Development of the Regulations and Rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Antonio R. Parra* I. Introduction The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes,
More informationICSID Case N ARB/02/6. SGS Société Générale de Surveillance v. Republic of the Philippines DECLARATION
DECLARATION The Decision on jurisdiction has been decided unanimously in respect of all issues except one, that is whether the Tribunal s jurisdiction under Articles VIII(2) or X(2) of the BIT is qualified
More informationTHE ROLE OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION IN DOING BUSINESS. Hugo Siblesz Secretary-General Permanent Court of Arbitration March 6,
THE ROLE OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION IN DOING BUSINESS Hugo Siblesz Secretary-General Permanent Court of Arbitration March 6, 2013 1 I have been asked to speak about the role of the Permanent
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE ICSID CONVENTION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE ICSID CONVENTION BETWEEN: MOBIL INVESTMENTS CANADA, INC. Claimant AND GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent
More informationSuggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations. Working Paper of the ICSID Secretariat. May 12, 2005
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. Telephone: (202) 458-1534 FAX: (202) 522-2615/2027 Website:www.worldbank.org/icsid Suggested
More informationMALAYSIAN HISTORICAL SALVORS SDN BHD, and THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10
IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN STATES AND NATIONALS OF OTHER STATES, AND THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE GOVERNMENT
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN CAMUZZI INTERNATIONAL S. A.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN CAMUZZI INTERNATIONAL S. A. (CLAIMANT) and THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (RESPONDENT) ICSID Case No. ARB/03/2)
More informationICSID: Jurisdiction ratione materiae and ratione personae
ICSID: Jurisdiction ratione materiae and ratione personae Professor Loukas Mistelis Any questions 2 ITIDS 202-203 - Slides Issues covered ICSID Jurisdiction ratione personae Personal jurisdiction (party
More informationInternational Arbitration: A Key Protection for Foreign Investments
Welcome to Our Fall 2006 Seminar Series: International Arbitration: A Key Protection for Foreign Investments October 10, 2006 1 Speakers: John J. Kerr, Jr. Peter C. Thomas Robert H. Smit Janet M. Whittaker
More informationEuro-Arab Conference on Investor-State Dispute Settlement, October 2012
Euro-Arab Conference on Investor-State Dispute Settlement, 10-11 October 2012 Hans Danelius, former Justice of the Supreme Court of Sweden: Enforcement of Awards in Investment Arbitrations A. Introduction
More informationGUIDE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE ICSID CONVENTION
Introduction GUIDE TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE ICSID CONVENTION The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is an intergovernmental organization established in 1966 by the Convention
More informationInvestment policies towards sustainable development and inclusive growth December 2013, Rabat, Morocco
Investment policies towards sustainable development and inclusive growth 10-13 December 2013, Rabat, Morocco Organized by the Secretariat of the UNCTAD, the Islamic Development Bank and the UN Economic
More informationArbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Draft for public consultation 26 April 2016 Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of
More informationLAWS477 International Investment Law Course Syllabus
LAWS477 International Investment Law Course Syllabus Second Semester, 2009 Dr Tracey Epps University of Otago, Faculty of Law International Investment Law LAWS477 Dr Tracey Epps Class time Wednesdays 11am
More informationThe Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Republic of Belarus, hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties,"
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United Mexican
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES CONCERNING THE PROMOTION AND
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES CONCERNING THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the Kingdom
More informationSelection and Appointment of Arbitrators
Overview 1. Appointing the Tribunal 2. Organization and Procedure Special focus: the UNCITRAL Rules 2010 and the Mauritius International Arbitration Act (MIAA) 2008 Appointing the Tribunal 1 Selection
More informationMODULE 2: CORE PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW
MODULE 2: CORE PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW African Institute of International Law Training Workshop on Bilateral Investment Treaties and Arbitration Laura Halonen Arusha, 17 February 2015
More informationTHE RELEVANCE OF MOST-FAVORED-NATION CLAUSES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE JURISDICTION OF INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS.
THE RELEVANCE OF MOST-FAVORED-NATION CLAUSES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE JURISDICTION OF INVESTMENT ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS By Olha Hrynkiv LL.M. SHORT THESIS COURSE: Investments and Investment Disputes
More informationArbitration Provisions in M&A Transaction Documents
Arbitration Provisions in M&A Transaction Documents September 22, 2015 Today s Speakers Joseph Tirado Co-Chair, International Arbitration Practice London +44 (0)20 7011 8784 jtirado@winston.com Alejandro
More informationARTICLEl Definitions
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS ') The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand
More informationHow Businesses Benefit from Foreign Investment Protection Agreements: Setting the Stage for the Canada-China FIPA
How Businesses Benefit from Foreign Investment Protection Agreements: Setting the Stage for the Canada-China FIPA Canada-China Investment Protection & Business Cooperation Forum John W. Boscariol McCarthy
More informationTHE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (SPECIAL FOCUS: SOUTH & EAST ASIA & THE PACIFIC)
THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (SPECIAL FOCUS: SOUTH & EAST ASIA & THE PACIFIC) The ICSID Caseload Statistics (Special Focus: South & East Asia & the Pacific Region) This issue of the ICSID Caseload Statistics
More informationINVESTMENT TREATY LAW AND ARBITRATION. Visiting Professor Anthea Roberts. Fall Term 2011
INVESTMENT TREATY LAW AND ARBITRATION Visiting Professor Anthea Roberts Fall Term 2011 Contact Details Office: Griswold 308 Assistant: Sandra Mays 617/496-3358 Email: aroberts@law.harvard.edu Course Details
More informationREQUEST FOR BIFURCATION OF RESPONDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN GLAMIS GOLD LTD., -and- Claimant/Investor, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Party.
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Claimant. Respondent. ICSID Case No. ARB/16/9
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES ITALBA CORPORATION Claimant v. THE ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/16/9 COMMENTS OF THE ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY
More informationFOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL MOOT COMPETITION 2009
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL MOOT COMPETITION 2009 MEMORIAL FOR CLAIMANT On Behalf of: MedBerg Co. [CLAIMANT] Against: The Government of The Republic of Bergonia [RESPONDENT] Team: MO i TABLE
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES ADEL A HAMADI AL TAMIMI V. SULTANATE OF OMAN (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/11/33) PROCEDURAL ORDER No. 5 RULINGS ON THE RESPONDENT S REQUESTS NOS. 3-11
More informationPOŠTOVÁ BANKA, A.S. AND ISTROKAPITAL SE v. THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC
POŠTOVÁ BANKA, A.S. AND ISTROKAPITAL SE v. THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC ICSID Case No. ARB/13/8 Award 9 April 2015 Claimants Poštová banka - a Slovak bank had acquired a total of 504 million in GGBs Istrokapital
More informationRole of the State on Protecting the System of Arbitration
1 Role of the State on Protecting the System of Arbitration Presentation by Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel at the CIArb Centenary Conference London 3 July 2015 When we consider the role states should play in protecting
More informationTHE LOEWEN GROUP, INC. and RAYMOND L. LOEWEN, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3
IN THE MATTER OF: THE LOEWEN GROUP, INC. and RAYMOND L. LOEWEN, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Claimants/Investors Respondent/Party ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3 SECOND SUBMISSION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF
More informationInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Washington, D.C. In the proceeding between. CMS Gas Transmission Company (Claimant) and
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Washington, D.C. In the proceeding between CMS Gas Transmission Company (Claimant) and The Republic of Argentina (Respondent) Case No. ARB/01/8
More informationInvestment Arbitration in India: An introduction to Concepts and Challenges in the White Industries Dispute
Investment Arbitration in India: An introduction to Concepts and Challenges in the White Industries Dispute By Raj Panchmatia and Meghna Rajadhyaksha Introduction Investment arbitration appears to have
More information(including the degree of openness to foreign capital) (3) Importance as a source of energy and/or mineral resources (4) Governance capacity of the gov
Section 2 Investment treaties Foreign direct investment has been growing rapidly worldwide since the 1980s, playing a major role in driving the growth of the global economy. In terms of the share of GDP
More informationAGREEMENT 1 ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTEC TION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES
1997 United Nations - Treaty Series Nations Unies - Recueil des Traites 171 [TRANSLATION- TRADUCTION] AGREEMENT 1 ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTEC TION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN
More informationThe Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Hellenic Republic, hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties",
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United Mexican
More informationDISSENTING OPINION. 1 Report of the Executive Directors, para. 9.
DISSENTING OPINION 1. The chairman of an arbitral tribunal dissenting from a decision drafted by his two colleagues: this is not a frequent occurrence. If I have decided to dissent, it is because the approach
More informationDISSENTING OPINION. 1 Report of the Executive Directors, para Op. cit., para Op. cit., para Op. cit., para. 13.
DISSENTING OPINION 1. The chairman of an arbitral tribunal dissenting from a decision drafted by his two colleagues: this is not a frequent occurrence. If I have decided to dissent, it is because the approach
More informationBENEFITING FROM EXPERIENCE: DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES MOST RECENT INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS
BENEFITING FROM EXPERIENCE: DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES MOST RECENT INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS Andrea J. Menaker * I. CLARIFICATION OF STANDARDS...122 II. TRANSPARENCY...124 III. IMPROVING EFFICIENCY
More informationInvestment Treaty Arbitration: An Option Not to Be Overlooked
15448_18_c15_p189-196.qxd 7/28/05 12:45 PM Page 189 CAPTER 15 Investment Treaty Arbitration: An Option Not to Be Overlooked BARTON LEGUM I have a huge mess in a really bad place, says eidi Warren, general
More informationTREATY PLANNING AND INSURANCE TO PROTECT ASSETS IN EMERGING MARKETS
PROTECT ASSETS IN EMERGING MARKETS By Kim R. Kodousek (Joy Global, Inc.) John M. Minor (Alliant Emerging Markets) Astrid Pieron (Mayer Brown International LLP) Timothy J. Tyler (Mayer Brown LLP) PROTECT
More informationForeign Investments in Emerging Markets
Foreign Investments in Emerging Markets Jose W. Fernandez Ronald Kirk Rahim Moloo February 11, 2015 Overview The rapid growth of emerging markets can provide investors with higher expected returns and
More informationSiemens A.G. v The Argentine Republic
This case summary was prepared in the course of research for S Ripinsky with K Williams, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, 2008) Case summary Siemens A.G. v The Argentine Republic Year of
More informationShifting Paradigms in Investor-State Arbitration: Innovations and Challenges for Multilateralizing the. Investment Tribunal System
Shifting Paradigms in Investor-State Arbitration: Innovations and Challenges for Multilateralizing the Investment Tribunal System in CETA & the EU-Vietnam FTA ELSA SARDINHA CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW
More informationArbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this contract, or the
More informationTHE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS SPECIAL FOCUS: SOUTH & EAST ASIA & THE PACIFIC (OCTOBER 2016)
THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS SPECIAL FOCUS: SOUTH & EAST ASIA & THE PACIFIC (OCTOBER 2016) The ICSID Caseload Statistics Special Focus: South & East Asia & the Pacific Region (October 2016) This issue
More informationJICLT. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol.9, No.4 (2014)
JICLT Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol.9, No.4 (2014) Variability of fair and equitable treatment standard according to the level of development, governance capacity and resources
More informationInternational Investment Law
Associate Professor Ivar Alvik International Investment Law Lecture 7 Contracts and contract claims Contracts and investment protection Practice the use of contracts as instruments to protect foreign investments
More informationFight against Corruption and International Investment Law
Kyoto Seminar on International Investment Law Fight against Corruption and International Investment Law Dai TAMADA Associate Professor of Public International Law Kobe University, Japan Introduction ICSID
More informationTHE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE )
THE ICSID CASELOAD STATISTICS (ISSUE 07-) The ICSID Caseload Statistics (Issue 07-) This issue of the ICSID Caseload Statistics updates the profile of the ICSID caseload, historically and for the Centre
More information