CLIENT ALERT. ISS Publishes Evaluating Pay for Performance Alignment White Paper
|
|
- Claud Cole
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 28, 2011 CLIENT ALERT Last week, ISS published a white paper detailing its new pay-for-performance methodology. As in the past, a significant misalignment between pay and company performance may cause ISS to vote against a company s Say on Pay vote. The new methodology is effective for Annual Meetings on or after February 1, We have summarized the key components of the new methodology below. The white paper can be found at As previously announced, ISS will use three measures of alignment between executive pay and company performance for its quantitative analysis. Two relative measures where a company s pay-for-performance alignment is evaluated in reference to a group of comparable companies, and one absolute measure, where alignment is evaluated independently of other companies performance. The new approach remains focused exclusively on CEO pay, and continues to rely upon TSR as the predominant indicator of company performance. Measures of Relative Alignment: Relative Degree of Alignment (RDA) Compares the percentile ranks of a company s CEO pay and TSR performance, relative to an industry-and-size derived comparison group, over one- and threeyear periods. (weighted 40%/60% so as to put more emphasis on the longer term).. Annualized TSR performance will be measured on the last day of the month closest to the fiscal year-end of the subject company.. RDA values may range from -100 to In ISS back-testing analysis, RDA measures were normally distributed across the sample. The median value was approximately zero, meaning that the percentile pay and performance ranks are nearly equal for the median company in the sample. 25% of companies have RDA measures of less than -28 (where lower values represent higher pay for lower performance), while 10% fall below -51. Approximately half of companies fell in the range between -28 and +30. Multiple of Median (MOM) The multiple of the CEO s total pay relative to median CEO pay at the ISS selected peer group.. Total Pay is defined as the sum of the compensation elements reflected in the Summary Compensation Table i.e., salary, bonus and/or non-equity incentive plan compensation, grant date value of stock and stock option awards, annual change in pension value/nonqualified deferred compensation earnings and all other compensation -- Note that the grant date value of equity is calculated using the ISS binomial option pricing model, not the value disclosed by companies in the Summary Compensation Table
2 The company s one-year CEO pay is divided by the median pay for the comparison group.. In ISS back-testing analysis, 25% of companies pay more than 1.5 times median and 10% pay more than 2.1 times the median. The highest observed value was approximately 25 times the peer group median Measures of Relative Alignment: ISS Peer Group Process The ISS peer group is generally comprised of companies that are selected using revenue (or assets for financial firms), market cap, and GICS industry group, via a process designed to select peers that are closest to the subject company, and where the subject company is close to median in revenue/asset size. Initially, ISS determines a potential comparison universe by choosing Russell 3000 companies in the same 2-digit GICS category (Sector) as the subject, between 0.45x and 2.1x the subject company s revenues (assets for financial companies), and with market capitalizations of between 0.2x and 5x the subject company Peer groups are constructed twice per year, based on data as of December 1 and June 1, as follows:.. Revenue Sum of most recent trailing 4 quarters revenues.. Total Assets Most recent quarter s total assets.. Market Capitalization 200 day average stock price multiplied by shares outstanding Then, ISS selects companies from the comparison universe that are in the subject company s 6-digit GICS category (Industry), first selecting the companies closest in size, while where possible alternating between companies larger and smaller than the subject company so as to maintain the subject at or near the median of the chosen comparison group. If the comparison group reaches the minimum 14 members, it is considered complete; up to 24 comparison companies can be selected from the 6-digit GICS category If 14 comparison group members are not selected from the companies in the universe that share the subject company s 6-digit GICS category, the process is repeated with companies in the comparison universe that share the company s 4-digit GICS category (Industry Group), maintaining the company at the median position where possible, until 14 comparison companies are selected If 14 comparison companies cannot be selected using the 4-digit GICS, then the process is repeated using the 2-digit GICS category, until 14 companies are selected Approximately 25 "Super-mega" non-financial companies (defined as over $50 billion in revenue, and at least $30 billion of market capitalization) have insufficient industry peers generated by the standard methodology because they are unique in being among the largest public companies and have very few industry peers close to their size. These firms will comprise a special peer group of "super-mega" companies for purposes of ISS quantitative analysis and - 2 -
3 will be compared to one another for the quantitative pay-for-performance evaluation. Industry specific performance will also be considered in any resulting qualitative review. For other subject companies with fewer than 14 generated peers, insufficient peer groups will be expanded by relaxing the revenue (but not market cap) parameters in the peer group selection process, while retaining peers selected under the basic methodology. Additional peer companies that are both larger and smaller will be added in order to maintain the subject company as close to the median size level as possible. Measure of Absolute Alignment: Pay-TSR Alignment (PTA) This absolute measure compares the trends of the CEO s annual pay and the value of an investment in the company over the prior five-year period. The measure is calculated as the difference between the slopes of weighted linear regressions for pay and for shareholder returns over a five-year period.. The PTA measure is equal to the TSR performance slope minus the CEO pay slope -- This difference indicates the degree to which CEO pay has changed more or less rapidly than shareholder returns over that period... Potential values for PTA are theoretically unbounded, but ISS states back-testing indicated that the range is from just over -100% to just over +100%, with a slightly negative median value Pay-for-Performance Measures and ISS Policy: The table below shows the levels, based on ISS initial testing analysis, where a company would be considered an outlier (triggering Medium concern) or a significant outlier (triggering High concern). High concern for any individual factor will result in an overall High concern level for the quantitative component of the pay-for-performance evaluation, and multiple Medium concern levels may also result in an overall High concern. Measure Relative Degree of Alignment Multiple of Median Pay-TSR Alignment Outlier: Triggers Medium concern/may trigger High concern if company is an outlier on more than one measure Significant Outlier: Triggers High concern by itself -30 ~25 th percentile -50 ~10 th percentile 2.33x ~92 nd percentile 3.33x ~97 th percentile) -30% ~10 th percentile -45% ~5 th percentile - 3 -
4 ISS also notes that each measure is assessed on a cumulative basis, so that a company with an RDA measure of -28 generates a stronger concern level than a company with RDA of -20, even though neither would trigger a Medium concern. Qualitative Assessment All cases where the quantitative analysis indicates the company is a significant outlier (High concern on one relative measure or Medium concern on multiple relative measures) will receive an in-depth qualitative assessment to determine either the likely cause or mitigating factors. This step in the analytic process may include consideration of some or all of the following: Strength of performance based compensation A review of the ratio of performance- to time-based equity awards as well as the overall ratio of performance-based compensation to total compensation, focusing particularly on the compensation committee's most recent decision-making.. Note that time-vested stock options with an exercise price of less than a 25% premium and restricted stock are not considered performance-based by ISS ISS will review both recent cash awards paid and the award opportunities (longterm incentive grants) intended to drive future performance, to evaluate their performance conditions Use of a single metric, or similar metrics, in either or both of the short- and longterm incentive programs may suggest inappropriate focus on one aspect of business results at the expense of others If a company uses non-gaap metrics, adjustments should be clearly disclosed (along with compelling rationale if such adjustments are nonstandard) Results of financial/operational metrics If disconnect is driven by cash pay, ISS considers the rigor of performance goals (if any) that generated the payouts Recent (GAAP) results on metrics such as return measures and growth in revenue, profit, cash flow, on both an absolute and relative basis may also be examined to assess the rigor of goals and whether the quantitative analysis may be anomalous (if other metrics suggest sustained superior performance).. ISS notes that company disclosure about metrics, goals, and adjustments to results, should be clear and fulsome The company s peer group benchmarking practices ISS will examine the disclosed benchmarking approach to determine whether that may be a contributing factor to a pay for performance disconnect - 4 -
5 .. Contributing factors cited include company-selected peers that are larger than the subject company and above median pay positioning Special circumstances Examples mentioned include a new CEO in the prior fiscal year and unusual equity grant practices (e.g. bi- or triennial awards), however these circumstances do not automatically exempt a company from receiving an against recommendation Next Steps: While ISS has indicated that they do not expect the new methodology to have a significant impact on the percentage of against Say on Pay votes ISS recommends, we strongly urge companies to begin testing their pay-for-performance results based on this new methodology. If you wish to discuss further, please don t hesitate to contact us
Australia. Pay-for-Performance Model. Frequently Asked Questions. Effective for Meetings on or after October 1, Published August 2017
Australia Pay-for-Performance Model Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after October 1, 2017 Published August 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2017 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationPay-for-Performance Mechanics
` Pay-for-Performance Mechanics ISS Quantitative and Qualitative Approach (U.S.) (Updated with regard to shareholder meetings held on or after Feb. 1, 2018) Published: December 2017 www.issgovernance.com
More informationU.S. Compensation Policies
U.S. Compensation Policies Frequently Asked Questions Updated December 14, 2017 New and materially updated questions are highlighted in yellow This FAQ is intended to provide general guidance regarding
More informationU.S. Compensation Policies
U.S. Compensation Policies Frequently Asked Questions Updated December 20, 2018 New and materially updated questions are highlighted in yellow This FAQ is intended to provide general guidance regarding
More informationTransparency. Inclusiveness. Global Expertise.
Frequently Asked Questions on U.S. Compensation Policies March 28, 2014 BE SURE TO CHECK OUR WEBSITE FOR THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. Copyright 2014 by ISS
More informationTHE ISS PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MODEL. By Stephen F. O Byrne, Shareholder Value Advisors, Inc.
THE ISS PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MODEL By Stephen F. O Byrne, Shareholder Value Advisors, Inc. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) announced a new approach to evaluating pay for performance in late 2011
More informationISS RELEASES FINAL FAQS FOR THE 2018 PROXY SEASON
NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO ATLANTA HOUSTON BOSTON ALERT December 19, 2017 ISS RELEASES FINAL FAQS FOR THE 2018 PROXY SEASON On December 14, ISS published (1) U.S. Compensation Policy Frequently
More informationInstitutional Shareholder Services (ISS)
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE HANDBOOK Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) The Basics According to its Website, ISS is the leading provider of corporate governance research, covering more than 40,000 shareholder
More informationISS RELEASES PRELIMINARY FAQS FOR 2018 PROXY SEASON
NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO ATLANTA HOUSTON BOSTON ALERT November 28, 2017 ISS RELEASES PRELIMINARY FAQS FOR 2018 PROXY SEASON On November 21, ISS published U.S. compensation policy preliminary
More informationFREDERIC W. COOK & CO., INC.
FREDERIC W. COOK & CO., INC. NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO ATLANTA HOUSTON BOSTON December 9, 2014 Proxy Advisory Firms Release 2015 Policy Updates In November, Institutional Shareholder Services
More information1. Evaluation of Executive Pay (Management Say-on-Pay)
November 7, 2011 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. 2099 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850-4045 policy@issgovernance.com Ladies and Gentlemen: Thank you for offering to Pearl Meyer & Partners ( PM&P
More informationUpdated ISS Policies for 2014: Compensation Voting Policy FAQs, Data Verification Dates in QuickScore 2.0 and New Burn Rates
Updated ISS Policies for 2014: Compensation Voting Policy FAQs, Data Verification Dates in QuickScore 2.0 and New Burn Rates Two new pieces of guidance have already emerged in 2014 from advisory firm Institutional
More informationEuropean Pay-for- Performance Methodology
European Pay-for- Performance Methodology Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2017 Last Updated: April 5, 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2017 ISS Institutional Shareholder
More informationExecutive Compensation Alert
Executive Compensation Alert Inside RiskMetrics Group 2010 Compensation Policy Updates Introduction Key Changes in Overall Evaluation Approach Executive Compensation Evaluation Policy Executive Compensation
More information2016 European Pay-for- Performance Methodology
2016 European Pay-for- Performance Methodology Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2016 www.issgovernance.com 2016 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services Table of
More informationINCENTIVE PLAN SERIES
INCENTIVE PLAN SERIES Long-Term Incentive Plans Michael Sherry, Managing Director Sandra Pace, Managing Director 650 Fifth Avenue, 33 rd Floor, New York, New York 10019 www.shallpartners.com (212) 488-5400
More informationNavigating ISS in 2013: Compensation Voting Policy Updates, QuickScore, and New Burn Rates
Navigating ISS in 2013: Compensation Voting Policy Updates, QuickScore, and New Burn Rates The beginning of the year yielded a flurry of news from advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS).
More informationEvaluating Pay for Performance Alignment
` Evaluating Pay for Performance Alignment Implementing a P4P model for Europe Authors: Roy Saliba & Robbert Gerritsen Published: November 2016 Updated Nov, 14, 2016 - Expansion of the European P4P coverage
More informationStockholder Engagement: Executive Compensation. May 2017
Stockholder Engagement: Executive Compensation May 2017 Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forwardlooking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated
More informationINSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES (ISS) AND GLASS LEWIS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE 2013 PROXY SEASON
January 29, 2013 INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES (ISS) AND GLASS LEWIS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE 2013 PROXY SEASON To Our Clients and Friends: Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationSay On Pay Best Practices For 2012
Say On Pay Best Practices For 2012 by John K. Wilson and Joshua A. Agen Most public U.S. corporations faced their first shareholder say on pay vote last proxy season, and the results were mixed. While
More informationU.S. Peer Group Selection Methodology and Issuer Submission Process
` U.S. Peer Group Selection Methodology and Issuer Submission Process Frequently Asked Questions Updated November 9, 2017 New and materially updated questions are highlighted in yellow www.issgovernance.com
More informationDispatches from the Proxy Front: A Preview of the 2013 Annual Meeting Season. Steven M. Pantina Managing Director January 18, 2013
Dispatches from the Proxy Front: A Preview of the 2013 Annual Meeting Season Steven M. Pantina Managing Director January 18, 2013 A Look Back at Say-on-Pay Votes in the 2012 Proxy Season Nearly 2,000 ballots
More informationPROXY ADVISORY FIRMS RELEASE 2017 POLICY UPDATES
NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO ATLANTA HOUSTON BOSTON ALERT November 28, 2016 PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS RELEASE 2017 POLICY UPDATES Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ( ISS ) and Glass, Lewis
More information2015 U.S. Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
` 2015 U.S. Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures Frequently Asked Questions on Peer Group Selection Methodology Published: June, 2015 BE SURE TO CHECK THE ISS WEBSITE FOR THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT
More informationREIT Executive Compensation Trends
REIT Executive Compensation Trends Compensation and Corporate Governance Report and Analysis August 2017 Index Page v Executive Summary Key Findings 3 v 2016 Compensation Adjustments 7 v Executive Compensation
More informationMeasureIT Benchmarking Report IT Budgeting Metrics
MeasureIT Benchmarking Report IT Budgeting Metrics Respondent Name: Sample Health Care Company Name: Info-Tech Email: healthcare@infotech.com Date Completed: Jun 12, 2012 Executive Summary The following
More informationCompensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies. HCM Health Care
Compensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies HCM Health Care CONTENTS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 DATA SAMPLE 6 MARKET DATA OVERVIEW 6 Compensation level 10 Compensation structure
More information2018 Corporate Governance & Incentive Design Survey Fall 2018
2018 Corporate Governance & Incentive Design Survey Fall 2018 Contents Executive Summary 2 Corporate Governance Practices 3 Proxy Disclosure 12 Company Policies 19 Annual Incentive Plan Design Practices
More informationISS Issues Final 2013 Voting Policy Updates
CLIENT MEMORANDUM ISS Issues Final 2013 Voting Policy Updates November 20, 2012 On November 16, 2012, Institutional Shareholder Services issued its final updates to its proxy voting guidelines for the
More informationISS Publishes Guidance on Pay-for- Performance Assessments and Updates to Governance Ratings System
ISS Publishes Guidance on Pay-for- Performance Assessments and Updates to Governance Ratings System Provides Additional Detail on Measuring Relative and Absolute Alignment Between CEO Pay and Total Shareholder
More informationTotal Shareholder Return How does it really add value?
Total Shareholder Return How does it really add value? Total Shareholder Return: How does it really add value? BY BRIAN HOLMEN & JELENA JOVIC An increasing number of companies are incorporating total shareholder
More informationThe Real Deal? Are Performance Awards Really Paying for Performance? October 24, 2013
The Real Deal? Are Performance Awards Really Paying for Performance? October 24, 2013 Dan Kapinos Associate Director, Global Technical Shared Services Team, Aon Hewitt Laura Smith Global Compensation &
More informationRespondent name: Sample Health Care Company name: Info-Tech Respondant Executive Summary
Respondent name: Sample Health Care Company name: Info-Tech Respondant Email: healthcare@infotech.com Executive Summary The following table identifies how your high level financial metrics compare those
More informationDirector Notes. Proxy Season 2012 The Year of Pay for Performance
Director Notes Proxy Season 2012 The Year of Pay for Performance by James D.C. Barrall, Alice M. Chung, and Julie D. Crisp As in 2011, executive compensation is the single most important corporate governance
More informationExecutive Compensation Trends. July 2018
Executive Compensation Trends July 2018 About The Index ERI s Executive Compensation Trends is a quarterly report that measures trends in executive compensation using analysis of the companies included
More informationEXEQUITY Independent Board and Management Advisors
How to Navigate with the Compass: ISS 2007 U.S. Voting Policy Updates NASPP Chicago January 17, 2007 EXEQUITY Independent Board and Management Advisors Contents 1. 1. Effective Dates of of New Policies
More informationBenchmark. Base salary 2012 Base salary 2013 Base salary 2014
Remuneration Annual Report 2014 57 s remuneration policy is prepared in accordance with the Dutch Corporate Governance Code and was adopted at the General Meeting of Shareholders on April 17, 2013. Remuneration
More informationTime to Invest Some Sweat Equity in your TSR Plan #NASPP26
Time to Invest Some Sweat Equity in your TSR Plan #NASPP26 Speakers Nathan O Connor Equity Methods nathan.oconnor@equitymethods.com David Bixby Pearl Meyer David.Bixby@pearlmeyer.com John Roe Institutional
More informationInvestor Say on Pay Discussion
Investor Say on Pay Discussion March 2012 2011 Strong Financial Results Proxy Advisor Outreach 2012 Plan Design Changes Continued Emphasis on Pay for Performance 2 Best Overall Financial Results in Nearly
More informationBuilding A Compensation Peer Group: A Step-by-Step Approach
Building A Compensation Peer Group: A Step-by-Step Approach Presentation for: Executive Compensation Webinar Series August 11, 2016 Presented by: Anthony J. Eppert 713.220.4276 AnthonyEppert@AndrewsKurth.com
More informationU.S. PROXY VOTING CONCISE GUIDELINES. Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2017
PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES U.S. PROXY VOTING CONCISE GUIDELINES Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2017 Vert Asset Management, LLC has delegated the authority to vote proxies for the portfolio
More informationAudio Webcast. May 14, :30 a.m. CT
Audio Webcast May 14, 2015 9:30 a.m. CT Before you cast your vote on Management Resolution Item 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation, please review the Executive Compensation Overview, as
More informationCanada. Equity Plan Scorecard. Frequently Asked Questions. Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2017
` Canada Equity Plan Scorecard Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2017 Published January 10, 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2017 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationThere are a number of
October 2015 Share Authorization Requestss in Canada: What s Required and What s Recommended There are a number of parties that have influence overr a company s share plan design as well as obtaining investor
More informationU.S. Compensation Policies
U.S. Compensation Policies Preliminary Frequently Asked Questions November 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2016 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services Table of Contents Introduction... 3 U.S. Quantitative Pay-for-Performance
More informationISS FAQ: Say-on-Pay Remuneration Changes France
ISS FAQ: Say-on-Pay Remuneration Changes France 2014 Report Author Eva Chauvet eva.chauvet@issgovernance.com Introduction This report provides information on the new recommendations in France relating
More informationCAP 100 Company Research
Industry Report // 2016-2017 CAP 100 Company Research The CAP 100 Company Research consists of 100 companies from 9 industries, selected to provide a broad representation of market practice among large
More informationSalesforce. Supplemental Proxy Materials. May NYSE: CRM San Francisco, CA
Salesforce Supplemental Proxy Materials May 2016 NYSE: CRM San Francisco, CA A Complete Platform for Customer Success Salesforce Success Services Success Community Success Ecosystem Customer Success Managers
More information2018 Executive Compensation Overview
218 Executive Compensation Overview Letter to Shareholders Fellow Shareholders, As you consider your vote on Management Resolution Item 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation, the members of
More information2013 French Equity Based Compensation FAQ
December 17, 2012 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. Copyright 2012 by ISS www.issgovernance.com ISS' 2013 French Equity Based Compensation Policy FAQ Effective for Meetings on or after Feb. 1, 2013
More informationCanada. Equity Plan Scorecard. Frequently Asked Questions. Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, Published January 4, 2016
Canada Equity Plan Scorecard Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2016 Published January 4, 2016 Updated January 20, 2016 www.issgovernance.com 2016 ISS Institutional
More informationUnited States. Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines. Benchmark Policy Recommendations. Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2018
United States Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines Benchmark Policy Recommendations Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2018 Published January 9, 2018 www.issgovernance.com 2018 ISS Institutional
More informationAs approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders on 3 May, 2013
As approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders on 3 May, 2013 Remuneration Policy for the Management Board of AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group N.V Amsterdam, the Netherlands 3 May, 2013 Introduction
More informationINSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES REBRANDS AND RELEASES UPDATED GOVERNANCE QUALITYSCORE MODEL
November 8, 2016 NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO ATLANTA HOUSTON BOSTON ALERT INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES REBRANDS AND RELEASES UPDATED GOVERNANCE QUALITYSCORE MODEL Institutional Shareholder
More informationInternational. Taft-Hartley Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates Policy Recommendations. Published January 25, 2017
International Taft-Hartley Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates 2017 Policy Recommendations Published January 25, 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2017 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services TABLE OF CONTENTS BOARD
More informationIn the early days of management-incentive plans, it. The Three Dimensions of Pay for Performance
Fourth Quarter 2013 The Three Dimensions of Pay for Performance In the early days of management-incentive plans, it was common to think of incentive plans as a partnership between managers and investors.
More informationExecutive Compensation Trends
Executive Compensation Trends December 2016 About This Report ERI s Executive Compensation Trends is a quarterly report that measures trends in executive compensation using analysis of the companies included
More informationSay on Pay Vote Results (S&P 500) LAST UPDATED: October 19, 2017
Say on Pay Vote Results (S&P 500) LAST UPDATED: October 19, 2017 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Phone: (212) 921-9350 Fax: (212) 921-9227 capartners.com Table of Contents Executive Summary...
More informationWestfield Capital Management Company, L.P. Proxy Voting Policy Revised March 2012
Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. Proxy Voting Policy Revised March 2012 Introduction Westfield Capital Management Company, L.P. ( Westfield ) will offer to vote proxies for all client accounts.
More informationEXECUTIVE REMUNERATION PERSPECTIVE
EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION PERSPECTIVE US ISSUE 99 JANUARY 2013 TEN TIPS FOR A TROUBLE-FREE 2013 PROXY SEASON This Perspective was adapted from a more in-depth article from Mercer Select. Mercer Select is
More informationDriving Performance - Linking Equity Compensation Design with FAS 123(R) Valuation, Jeff Bacher and Terry Adamson, Aon Consulting
Aon Consulting Executive Compensation + Employee Benefits Driving Performance - Linking Equity Compensation Design with FAS 123(R) Valuation, Jeff Bacher and Terry Adamson, Aon Consulting November 6, 2006
More informationRiskMetrics Issues Policy Updates for 2009 Proxy Season RiskMetrics Group, the East Coast-based
DECEMBER 9, 2008 compensia.com RiskMetrics Issues Policy Updates for 2009 Proxy Season RiskMetrics Group, the East Coast-based risk management and corporate governance services provider ( RMG ), recently
More informationInternational. Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates Sustainability Policy Recommendations. Published January 25, 2017
International Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates 2017 Sustainability Policy Recommendations Published January 25, 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2017 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services TABLE OF CONTENTS ELECTION
More informationWhat on earth just happened?
Where now for executive remuneration? After an unprecedented year for executive remuneration, what does the future hold? Peter Boreham, head of executive remuneration for Hay Group in the UK considers
More informationGlossary of Terms Sales Performance Management
Glossary of Terms Sales Performance Management Accelerator Account Account management Account Planning or Plan Accrual Adjustment Annual Bonus Annual Total Target Annual Wage Adjustment Award Base Salary
More informationReport of the OMERS Administration Corporation Board Human Resources Committee
Report of the OMERS Administration Corporation Board Human Resources Committee Members in 2016 Monty Baker (Chair) Bill Aziz David Beatty David Tsubouchi Sheila Vandenberk John Weatherup George Cooke (ex
More informationSAY ON PAY RESULTS RUSSELL 3000 APRIL 3
THIS REPORT CAN BE ACCESSED AT HTTP://WWW.SEMLERBROSSY.COM/SAYONPAY SEMLER BROSSY 2013 SAY ON PAY RESULTS RUSSELL 3000 APRIL 3 2013 VOTE RESULTS 100% 148 COMPANIES WITH REPORTED VOTES IN 2012 AND 2013
More information2015 French Equity- Based Compensation
2015 French Equity- Based Compensation Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2015 Published March 6, 2015 www.issgovernance.com 2015 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationFactors by Region. Appendix. Published October 23, ISS Institutional Shareholder Services
Factors by Region Appendi Published October 23, 2014 www.issgovernance.com 2014 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services Audit & Risk Oversight 1 2 3 Non-Audit fees represent what percentage of total fees?
More informationRelative Total Shareholder Return Plans: Valuation 103 How Design Decisions Impact the Cost of Relative Total Shareholder Return Awards
November 2016 Relative Total Shareholder Return Plans: Valuation 103 How Design Decisions Impact the Cost of Relative Total Shareholder Return Awards Long-term incentive plans based on Relative Total Shareholder
More informationCalifornia Bankers Association 126 th Annual Convention
California Bankers Association 126 th Annual Convention Compensation Strategies in an Evolving Environment May 4, 2017 Dan Wetzel Managing Director Pearl Meyer Bob Gotelli SVP, Director Human Resources
More informationPeer Group Development: Art or Science?
Peer Group Development: Art or Science? Bank Director: Bank Executive and Board Compensation Conference November 4, 2013 Kristine Oliver Vice President Pearl Meyer & Partners kristine.oliver@pearlmeyer.com
More informationInformation Memorandum About the Threeyear Cash Incentive Plan Based Also on Financial Instruments of the Parmalat Group
Information Memorandum About the 2013-2015 Threeyear Cash Incentive Plan Based Also on Financial Instruments of the Parmalat Group (prepared in accordance with Article 84-bis of the Issuers Regulations
More informationUnited States. Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines Benchmark Policy Recommendations. Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2015
United States Concise Proxy Voting Guidelines 2015 Benchmark Policy Recommendations Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2015 Published January 7, 2015 Updated February 26, 2015 www.issgovernance.com
More informationQuick Facts about the 2009 Equity Grant and Performance Shares
Quick Facts about the 2009 Equity Grant and Performance Shares 1. Performance Shares (PS) comprise approximately 25% of your target award grant value for 2009, with the other 75% consisting of restricted
More informationInterpreting the Information Ratio
Interpreting the Information Ratio Cameron Clement, CFA 11/10/09 The Information Ratio is a widely used and powerful tool for evaluating manager skill. In this paper, we attempt to foster a better understanding
More informationMorgan Stanley Compensation & Governance Practices. March 2014
Morgan Stanley & Governance Practices March 2014 Executive Summary Executive Summary Morgan Stanley s Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote: 1. FOR: Non-binding advisory vote
More informationTransparency. Inclusiveness. Global Expertise.
2014 U.S. Proxy Voting Concise Guidelines January 13, 2014 Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. Copyright 2013 by ISS www.issgovernance.com ISS' 2014 U.S. Proxy Voting Concise Guidelines Updated: Jan.
More information2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOMEBUILDERS ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES
OCTOBER 2016 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOMEBUILDERS ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES FOR EXECUTIVES AT THE TOP 20 HOMEBUILDERS CRITICAL THINKING
More informationAudio Webcast. May 14, :00 p.m. CT
Audio Webcast May 14, 2014 1:00 p.m. CT 1 EXXONMOBIL 2014 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERVIEW WEBINAR Before you cast your vote on Management Resolution Item 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation,
More informationCredit Performance Scorecard White Paper. (2016 Scorecard Updates, version 4.1) November Fannie Mae
Credit Performance Scorecard White Paper (2016 Scorecard Updates, version 4.1) November 2015 2011-2015 Fannie Mae Table of Contents About This Document... 3 STAR Introduction... 4 General Servicing Metric
More informationLong-Term Incentives Gone Wild?:
Long-Term Incentives Gone Wild?: Lessons Learned and Emerging Trends Jon Burg, Radford Brett Harsen, Radford May 14, 2010 Copyright 2010 Aon Corporation Any use of these Results by non-radford survey participants
More informationFMR Co. ( FMR ) Proxy Voting Guidelines
January 2017 I. General Principles A. Voting of shares will be conducted in a manner consistent with the best interests of clients. In other words, securities of a portfolio company will generally be voted
More informationMorgan Stanley Compensation & Governance Practices. March 2013
Morgan Stanley & Governance Practices March 2013 Notice The information provided herein may include certain non-gaap financial measures. The reconciliation of such measures to the comparable GAAP figures
More informationAMENDED PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
AMENDED PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Each of Midas Series Trust, on behalf of Midas Fund and Midas Magic, Dividend and Income Fund and Foxby Corp. (each, a Fund, and together, the Funds ) will
More informationFebruary 3, Intel Stockholders,
February 3, 2014 Intel Stockholders, Our goal is for executive compensation to be well aligned with stockholders interests, and the company is firm in its commitment to using executive compensation programs
More information4.3 Remuneration report
05 99 4.3 Remuneration report The following remuneration report from the Supervisory Board describes how the remuneration policy has been put into practice during the past financial year. The report includes
More informationTop 5 Compensation Cost, Holdings & Future Stock Returns. By Stephen F. O Byrne and S. David Young
Top 5 Compensation Cost, Holdings & Future Stock Returns By Stephen F. O Byrne and S. David Young In this article, we show that top 5 performance adjusted compensation cost and top 5 holdings predict future
More informationHOSPITALITY INDUSTRY ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES
DECEMBER 2017 2017 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES FOR EXECUTIVES IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY DECEMBER
More informationFY12 Performance Share Plan. February 9, :30-9:30 a.m. (EST)
FY12 Performance Share Plan February 9, 2012 8:30-9:30 a.m. (EST) FY12 Long-Term Incentive Plan As a senior leader at Tyco, you play a unique role in creating long-term value for our shareholders. Your
More information2015 Activist Investors and Executive Pay WHAT WE FOUND
flash NEWSLETTER ISSUE #78 FEBRUARY 1, 2016 2015 Activist Investors and Executive Pay By Shaun Bisman and Matt McLaughlin Shareholders can voice their support for, or concerns with, a s executive compensation
More informationResearch Findings Report on FTSE Small Cap Directors Remuneration
Research Findings Report on FTSE Small Cap Directors Remuneration 2009/10 Report on FTSE Small Cap Directors Remuneration 2009/10 Contents Review of 2008/09 and Likely Future Trends 3 7 Key Statistics
More informationCOPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Chapter 1 Comparable Companies Analysis. Chapter 1 Comparable Companies Analysis 1.
Chapter 1 Comparable Companies Analysis Chapter 1 Comparable Companies Analysis 1 COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Comparable Companies Analysis Steps Step I. Select the Universe of Comparable Companies Step II. Locate
More informationHYDRO ONE S PROPOSED NEW COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
HYDRO ONE S PROPOSED NEW COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK Prepared by: Hydro One Limited for public consultation Submitted for consideration and approval to the Province of Ontario Management Board of Cabinet in
More informationContinue. If you want to download a printable version of this Overview click here.
217 Executive Compensation Overview Before you cast your vote on Management Resolution Item 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation, please review the content of this Overview, as well as the
More informationU.S. Equity Compensation Plans
U.S. Equity Compensation Plans Frequently Asked Questions Updated December 16, 2016 New and materially updated questions are highlighted in yellow www.issgovernance.com 2016 ISS Institutional Shareholder
More informationAustralia and New Zealand Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates
2018-2019 Australia and New Zealand Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates Benchmark Policy Changes Effective for Meetings on or after October 1, 2018 Published September 28, 2018 www.issgovernance.com 2018 ISS
More informationSay on Pay: Is It Needed? Does It Work? By Stephen F. O Byrne, Shareholder Value Advisors
Say on Pay: Is It Needed? Does It Work? By Stephen F. O Byrne, Shareholder Value Advisors There is little need for shareholder oversight of executive pay if directors do a good job providing oversight
More informationU.S. Equity Compensation Plans
U.S. Equity Compensation Plans Frequently Asked Questions Updated December 19, 2018 New and materially updated questions are highlighted in yellow This FAQ is intended to provide general guidance regarding
More information