International Risk Management in Oilfield Services

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "International Risk Management in Oilfield Services"

Moris Nelson
5 years ago
Views:

1 International Risk Management in Oilfield Services Sashe Dimitroff, Haynes and Boone, LLP (713) (work) (713) (cell) William Cason, General Counsel, Gaither Petroleum (713) (work) (713) (cell) Francisco Rivero, Haynes and Boone, LLP (713) (work) (713) (cell) The course would be divided into three basic segments: Part 1: The first part of the course will set forth the background of international oilfield services contracts, including a review of the underlying treaties, statutes and regulations applicable to these contracts. This part will also include a series of discussions and reading assignments relating to enforcement, through litigation or arbitration, of international energy projects. Part 2: The second part of the course will involve analysis of a specific hypothetical drilling agreement. We will use a format that involves the client having negotiated the basic terms of the agreement, which must then be dealt with by the attorneys for the client. The class will assist in the initial evaluation of the deal to advise the client concerning the risks that the company has undertaken. Part 3: The third part of the course will involve an analysis of problems that arise under the hypothetical drilling agreement, including: counseling of the client as the drilling commences and problems begin to arise; counseling the client and assisting the client them in protecting the company s interests as the contract begins to slide towards dispute resolution; the conduct of the arbitration, with an emphasis on the strategic elements thereof. This will include multi-national mechanisms for the protection of assets. In each of the above stages, the students will be divided into groups and given a project in which they will draft relevant contract provisions based on the materials taught in the first part of the course. The work will be discussed in class, citing specific client issues and goals. The students will participate in teams and will then be asked to redraft the provisions to provide solutions. The students will be graded in two parts. First, there will be a 5-10 page paper in which they will be asked to analyze the model redraft provisions based on the legal issues and rules matters studied during the course. This portion of the course will count for 40% of the final grade. Second, 60 percent of the grade will be based on a final exam that will be comprehensive and will cover the entire course material. Page 1 of 6

2 Course Syllabus Article = Bishop, Dimitroff & Miles, Strategic Options Available When Catastrophe Strikes the International Energy Project will be used in class discussion Optional Material is purely informational. It may or may not be discussed in class and will not be part of the final exam. We have left three make up classes at the end of the semester in the event that we have to miss a class or if the discussion runs over from one week to the next. We will specify in each class what is due for the next session. DATE TOPIC ASSIGNMENT 1. Overview of Issues related to International Service McAndrew v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, 206 Fed 3 rd Agreements 1061 (2000) AUG. 26 A. Corruption Issues B. Model form of Contract Distribution of Hypothetical contract, with brief discussion. (Baker Hughes II) (Baker Hughes I) (Siemens case) SEPT What Claims Can Be Brought? A. Treaty Violations: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Energy Charter Treaty and NAFTA B. Breach of Contract Model Drilling Agreement (distributed electronically) 327 F.3 rd 173 (2000) (2003) The Saybolt case 28 Houston Journal of International Law 99 Pages 1-4 of Article American Manufacturing & Trading, Inc. v. Republic of Zaire, ICSID ARB/93/1, 36 I.L.M (1997). NAFTA Rules: Chapter 11, Chapter 20 - the Full NAFTA rules can be Page 2 of 6

3 C. Letter of Credit Litigation 1994 Energy Charter Treaty ( ECT ) Signatories: Nassar v. Florida Fleet Sales, Inc., 79 F. Supp. 2d 284,292 (S.D.N.Y. 1999); UCP art. 10(b). SEPT. 9 SEPT. 16 SEPT What Claims Can Be Brought? B. Breach of Contract C. Letter of Credit Litigation 1. What Claims Can Be Brought? C. Interim Measures to Freeze Assets or Preserve Evidence for Trial A. International Arbitration SRS Products Co., Inc. v. LG Engineering Co., 994 S.W.2d 380 (Tex. App.- Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.). UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: les2004/blackletter2004.pdf UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Article 6.2, 6.2.2: les2004/blackletter2004.pdf R. Doak Bishop, The Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith and the Enforceability of Short-Form Natural Gas Clauses in Production Sharing Agreements, which can be Pages of Article Rules 64 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure De Beers Consolidated Mines v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, (1945). Deckert v. Independence Shares Corporation, 31 1 U.S. 282 (1940). United States v. First National City Bank, 379 U.S. 378 (1965). Pages of Article National Oil Corp. v. Libyan Sun Oil Co., First Award of 31 May 1985,29 I.L.M. 565 (1990), Final Award of 23 February 1987,29 I.L.M. 601 (1990). Page 3 of 6 3 SCJILB 21

4 South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business A PRACTITIONER'S GUIDE: AN OVERVIEW OF THE MAJOR INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS Fall, 2006 (Approx. 45 pages) SEPT. 30 OCT. 7 A. International Arbitration B. International Courts and Tribunals ICSID Convention, Regulation and Rules can be ICSID International Facility Rules can be ICSID International Facility Rules can be ICC Arbitration Rules can be er/rules_arb_english.pdf Pages of Article 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) can be found at: Pages of Article ICJ Statute of the Court can be The Inter-American Court of Human Rights website contains links to decisions, judgments and general information and can be KEN= European Court of Human Rights: Historical background, organization, procedure, pending cases, reports and case law on the European Court of Human Rights can be found at: European Court of Justice: Links to the European Court of Page 4 of 6

5 OCT. 14 OCT. 21 OCT. 28 B. National Courts: Litigation in the United States B. National Courts: Litigation in the United States 2. What Parties Can Be Sued? A. Foreign Sovereigns & State Enterprises Justice, the Court of First Instance and Civil Service Tribunal judgments and opinions can be World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Panels:WTO Dispute Settlement Rules are : Website of the Office of Bilateral Trade Affairs is available at: Pages of Article Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 8 17 (1 976). Turner Entertainment Co. v. Degeto Film GmbH, 25 F.3d 1512 (11th Cir. 1994). Southwest Livestock & Trucking Co., Inc. v. Ramon, 169 F.3d 317 (5th Cir. 1999) Eastman Kodak Co. v. Kavlin, 978 F. Supp. 1078, 1081 (S.D. Fla. 1997). Wilwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 226 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, --- S. Ct. --- (March 26, 2001) Pages of Article Complaint of Sedco, 610 F. Supp 306 (S.D. Tex. 1982). Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1603 can be Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1604 can be Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1605 can be Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1608 can be Page 5 of 6

6 NOV. 4 NOV. 11 NOV. 18 DEC What Parties Can Be Sued? B. Bringing Claims Against Affiliates of Foreign Corporations 2. What Parties Can Be Sued? C. Non-Signatory Affiliates in an Arbitration D. Arbitration of Related Claims: Unified Contractual Scheme E. Political Risk Insurance: Overseas Private Investment Corporation/MIGA Workshop or Make- Up Classes Workshop or Make- Up Classes Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1609 can be Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1610 can be Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1611 can be Pages of Article Brunswick Corp. v. Waxman, 459 F.Supp. 1222,1230 (E.D.N.Y. 1978). DeWitt Truck Brokers v. W Ray Flemming Fruit Co., 540 F.2d 681, (4th Cir. 1976). Pages of Article Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc:, 10 F.3d 753, (1lth Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 190 (1994) JJ Ryan & Sons v. Rhone Poulenc Textile, S.A., 863 F.2d 315, (4th Cir. 1988) Carlin v. 3V, Inc., 928 S.W.2d 291, (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ). Deloitte Noraudit A/S. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, US., 9 F.3d 1060, 1064 (2d Cir. 1993). [ADD KROCK S CASE] Page 6 of 6

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/28/18 Page 1 of 10 : : : : : : : : PETITION TO ENFORCE ARBITRAL AWARD ALLEN & OVERY LLP

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/28/18 Page 1 of 10 : : : : : : : : PETITION TO ENFORCE ARBITRAL AWARD ALLEN & OVERY LLP Case 118-cv-02254 Document 1 Filed 09/28/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ------------------------------------------------------------x MASDAR SOLAR & WIND COOPERATIEF