Understanding The Regulations Impacting Physician Arrangements AVOIDING STARK, FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND ANTI-KICKBACK VIOLATIONS
|
|
- Emily Sparks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASCC Year In Review
2 Understanding The Regulations Impacting Physician Arrangements AVOIDING STARK, FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND ANTI-KICKBACK VIOLATIONS
3 Presentation Regulatory Complexity Medicare Financial Data Overview of the Fraud & Abuse Laws Governing Physician Relationships Recent Enforcement Trends Significant Court Rulings and DOJ Settlements Compliance Concerns and Practical Challenges
4 Understanding the Regulations There can be no doubt but that the statutes and provisions in question, involving the financing of Medicare and Medicaid, are among the most completely impenetrable texts within human experience. Indeed, one approaches them at the level of specificity herein demanded with dread, for not only are they dense reading of the most tortuous kind, but Congress also revisits the area frequently, generously cutting and pruning in the process and making any solid grasp of matters addressed merely a passing phase. Chief Judge Ervin, Rehabilitation Association of Virginia v. Kozlowski, 42 F. 3d 1444, 1450 (4 th Circuit 1994).
5 Medicare Financial Data Each working day Medicare pays over 4.4 million claims To 1.5 million providers Worth $1.1 billion Each month Medicare receives almost 19,000 provider enrollment applications Each year Medicare pays over $430 billion for more than 45 million beneficiaries Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data2014.html
6 The Cost of Health care Health care spending in 2020 is projected to reach $4.64 trillion, accounting for 19.8% of GDP. Lost to fraud: 3% - 10% ($69 billion - $230 billion).
7 Fraud and Abuse Defined Fraud: theft by deception Claiming payment for a service you did not deliver, delivered in reckless disregard, or delivered knowing it to be unnecessary Abuse: gaming the system Such as, unbundling necessary services and billing for the unbundled services as separate items.
8 Major Fraud and Abuse Laws Impacting Hospital/Physician Relationships False Claims Act (FCA) Federal Anti-kickback Statute (AKS) Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark)
9 False Claims Act FCA 31 U.S.C Civil War vintage (1863) known as informer s Act or Lincoln Laws Initially directed at procurement fraud and price gouging Became popular tool for combating fraud in 1986 when its scope greatly increased via statutory amendments (birth of health care compliance programs) Since 1986 over $24.2 Billion recovered in health care cases
10 The False Claims Act Prohibits The knowing (Intentional) submission of false claims or the use of a false record or statement for payment with government funds Covers claims presented to any health care program funded in whole or in part by federal funds Knowing includes actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance and reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the information Applies to individuals and corporate entities 60 day Rule
11 Example Hospital contracts with a neurosurgeon to provide medical director services for Neuro-Rehab Unit. The contract hourly rate of payment is above the 95 th percentile of FMV, hours of service are not closely tracked, audits reveal the time sheets are identical for 2 years. Contract expired 18 months ago and medical director payment continued. The OIG audits the physician s billing and financial arrangements and after review of the hospital contract and documentation, determines a Stark violation and a FCA violation has occurred. All Hospital claims billed pursuant to referrals of the surgeon are subject to the FCA and must be reimbursed to the Federal program because these claims were billed with a reckless disregard and a (possible) knowledge of an improper referral arrangement.
12 False Claims Act Sanctions Monetary penalties of between $5,500 and $11,000 per claim, plus 3 times the damages sustained by the government Possible exclusion of violators from participation in federal health care programs and from employment by entities receiving federal health care funds Professional license sanctions Loss of entity accreditation/certification
13 Qui Tam Qui Tam Suits: private entities (e.g., employees, patients, providers, competitors, etc.) may sue the hospital under False Claims Act on behalf of the government. Government may or may not intervene. Qui tam relator. Receives a percentage of any recovery. Recovers their costs and attorneys fees.
14 False Claims Act Case North Broward Hospital District, a 4 hospital system in Florida, has agreed to pay the federal government $69.5 million to settle allegations it violated the False Claims Act by engaging in improper financial relationships with physicians. The settlement resolves allegations that the hospital district provided compensation to nine employed physicians that exceeded the fair market value of their services.
15 Anti-Kickback Statute 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b) Prohibits purposeful payments to secure federal health care program business Criminal statute Based upon intent
16 Anti Kickback Statute AKS Cannot knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit or receive remuneration to induce referrals for items or services covered by government program unless transaction fits within a regulatory safe harbor. (42 USC 1320a-7b(b)) One purpose test Anti-Kickback Statute applies if one purpose of the remuneration is to induce referrals even if there are other legitimate purposes. (U.S. v.greber, 760 F.2d 68 (3d Cir. 1985)). Difficult to disprove Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
17 Examples of Kickbacks Applies to any form of remuneration to induce or reward referrals for federal program business. Money. Free or discounted items or services (e.g., perks, gifts, space, equipment, meals, insurance, trips, CME, etc.). Overpayments (e.g., not fair market value). Payments for items or services that are not provided. Payments for items or services that are not necessary. Professional courtesies. Waivers of copays or deductibles. Low interest loans or subsidies. Business opportunities that are not commercially reasonable. Anything else of value
18 DaVita Paid $350 Million in 2014 to Resolve Allegations of Illegal Kickbacks
19 Anti Kickback Statute Jail, criminal fines, or both Civil Monetary Penalties - $50,000 per kickback plus 3x the remuneration Exclusion False Claims Act liability
20 Analysis Financial arrangement or non-cash inducement between party that has referrals and party that wants them Example: Hospital wants surgical business from ophthalmologist, provides free office equipment, processes their billing and rents them space at less than FMV
21 Fair Market Value (FMV) Does Not Excuse a Kickback No de minimus safe harbor. No fair market value safe harbor. Fair market value payment does not legitimize a payment if there is an illegal purpose. (70 FR 4864) But fairly safe if remuneration represents fair market value for legitimate, needed services or items. Consider risk of federal program abuse. Due to nature of transaction. Incorporate safeguards to protect against abuse
22 Avoiding the Suggestion of AKS Violations Carefully craft physician relationships to avoid the suggestion of violating the AKS Hospitals should be aware that physician relationships are a prime source of AKS problems Strict control needed over contracting process for these relationships: Audits, Legal Review Policy governing how contracts between facilities and physicians must be processed Checklists for business purpose, FMV, etc.
23 Analysis of a Potential FCA or AKS Violation 1. Is there an economic benefit? 2. Is there a referral? 3. Is there a statutory exception? 4. Is there a safe harbor? 5. Is there a potential for abuse?
24 Physician Self-Referral Law: Stark General Prohibition:... If a physician (or an immediate family member of such physician) has a financial relationship with an entity..., then the physician may not make a referral to the entity for the furnishing of designated health services for which payment otherwise may be made under Medicare. Unless an exception exists. The prohibition seems clear but is subject to legal analysis and exceptions. Not always as you see it
25 Halifax Hospital Paid $85 M in 2014 to Settle Stark Allegations due to a Bonus Structure for Employed Oncologists of which one Factor was Ordering Expensive Tests and Medication
26 Halifax Case Halifax Medical Center (NFP) agreed to pay 85M to settle Stark and FCA violations. Hospital argued that the employment of the physicians was an exception to Stark and that the physicians did not make referrals, as intended by Stark, as the physician s personally performed the services they ordered.
27 Halifax The Court rejected each argument: 1. The employment exception requires FMV compensation-not based on referrals. The 6 MD s bonus structure was based on the operating margin of the oncology department, and this included all referrals made by the MDs. The Court also noted the MDs ordered many expensive tests and drugs. 2. The Court reasoned that a referral exists even if the MD personally performs the procedure or service. The Hospital benefits from the facility fee, and thus, this is a referral. As an additional note, Halifax is one of a handful of cases which extends the repayment of claims from referrals to Medicaid claims, thus opening the door to the OIG arguing that Stark applies to Medicare and Medicaid, as to any repayments.
28 What are Designated Health Services DHS Stark applies to referrals for designated health services ( DHS ) payable in whole or part by Medicare. Inpatient and outpatient hospital services Outpatient prescription drugs Clinical laboratory services Physical, occupational, or speech therapy Home health services Radiology and certain imaging services Radiation therapy and supplies Durable medical equipment and supplies Parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies Prosthetics and orthotics (42 CFR )
29 Stark: What it is and is not Applies to referrals (orders, requests, plan of care,) by physician for DHS performed by others. Other providers or facilities. Others in physician s own group. Other employees or contractors. Does not apply to services the physician personally performs. Physician may perform his own DHS. Beware ancillary, technical, facility fees-remember Halifax!. Does not apply to many services performed by radiologists or pathologists since they usually do not make referrals. (42 CFR )
30 Applies to referrals by a physician to entities with which the physician (or their family member) has a financial relationship Physician = MDs DOs Oral surgeons Dentists Podiatrists Optometrists Chiropractors (42 CFR ) Family member = Spouse Parent, child Sibling Stepparent, stepchild, stepsibling Grandparent, grandchild In-law
31 Stark Violation Penalty Penalties No payment for services provided per improper referral. Repayment of payments improperly received within 60 days of becoming aware. Civil penalties: $15,000 per claim submitted $100,000 per scheme (42 CFR , (a)(5), and (b)) May also constitute Anti-Kickback Statute violation May trigger False Claims Act
32 Stark Analysis 1. Is there a financial relationship between the DHS provider and the physician or their family member? Direct or indirect relationship? Ownership or investment interest? Compensation arrangement? 2. Does the physician make or has he/she made referrals to the entity for DHS payable by Medicare? 3. Does an exception apply? 4. Has the entity billed for items/services pursuant to improper referral?
33 Plain English The Stark Rule in Plain English: Start with assumption that we CANNOT pay or give anything of economic benefit (remuneration) to a physician referral source or his/her family member. If we do, we cannot bill Medicare for services ordered by that physician. Next: it might be ok if the arrangement falls into an EXCEPTION to the Stark law. There is NO guarantee that one is available. Lack of intent is not an excuse. Stark law violations result in strict liability.
34 Stark: Exceptions for Compensation Arrangements Bona fide employment relationships. Personal services contracts. Office space or equipment rental contracts. Physician recruitment contracts. Remuneration unrelated to DHS. Fair market value. Non-monetary compensation up to $398. Medical staff incidental benefits. Compliance training. Community-wide health information system. Professional courtesy. Certain payments by a physician for items or services at FMV. Others (42 CFR )
35 Personal Service Arrangement (PSA) Exception: Most Common Exception in Hospital/Physician Relationships Personal Service Arrangement Exception (Applies to Compensation Relationships) Remuneration paid under personal service arrangement is not a prohibited compensation arrangement if: Arrangement is set out in writing, signed by parties and specifies services covered by arrangement; Services reasonable and necessary; Compensation is FMV and not based on referrals; Arrangement covers all services to be provided by physician to entity; and, Term for at least one year.
36 Non-Monetary Compensation (NMC) Exception The Non-Monetary exception allows an entity that receives referrals (such as a hospital) to give a physician items or services that do NOT exceed a specific (total) dollar amount per calendar year. * This amount is adjusted annually by the government 2017 = $398 **This amount cannot be divided by the number of physicians e.g.: a $1000 advertisement for 5 physicians is still $1000 each.
37 Examples of NMC Off campus meal Education Event tickets Golf Office equipment & supplies Gift baskets Mugs, sweatshirts, water bottles, etc Use of services & employees Holiday gifts
38 NMC Penalty if in Excess of $398.00/Year Regulatory Penalties The entities cannot bill for services provided from the time NMC has been violated until corrected. Must correct within 180 days OR end of the calendar year Whichever comes first!
39 Employment Exception Employment is for identifiable services; Amount of compensation under employment is: Consistent with fair market value, reasonable and determined through arm s length negotiations; Not determined in manner which takes into account volume or value of referrals by referring physician; and, Compensation is provided pursuant to an agreement that would be commercially reasonable even if no referrals were made to employer.
40 What About Bonuses? Stark allows productivity bonuses for employed physicians, if based on services performed personally by the physician (i.e., worked RVUs) and not on net revenue. For example, services designated via the contract for which compensation is set in advance and calculated to meet fair market standards.
41 Can Referrals be Required in Employment Agreements? An employer can require an employee to refer to a particular provider, practitioner or supplier if: the compensation is set in advance the compensation is fair market value the referral requirement is in writing, signed by the parties is not required if the patient expresses a preference for a different provider does not require physician to refer if patients insurance does not cover services at required providers does not require physician to refer if the physician believes that the required referral is not in the patient s best medical interest
42 Basis of Referrals The required referrals relate solely to the physician s services covered by the scope of the employment and the referral requirement is reasonably necessary for the legitimate business purposes of the compensation arrangement between the employer and the employee
43 Can a Physician be More than 1 FTE? Carefully evaluate a physician arrangement which could call to question the need to audit time spent on duties. Example: Employed MD who is also a medical director and on several committees via different contracts. Are the time requirements reasonable in a week? Does each agreement require documentation of time before payment? A time sheet documenting time spent on each duty in a month is necessary for all personal service arrangements. No payment should be rendered without an approved time sheet.
44 FMV Exception Payments that are fair market value are permitted compensation arrangements if: In writing, covers all arrangements between parties, compensation is set in advance, commercially reasonable, and complies with all fraud and abuse requirements. FMV requires a reasonable and fair transaction, based upon confirmation of reimbursement being within established limits. For example, compensation above the 50 th percentile would require additional approval and analysis justifying the amount.
45
46 Real Estate and FMV
47
48 Per Use or Per Click Arrangements Per-click arrangements. CMS has repeatedly expressed concern over arrangements wherein physicians purchase equipment and then lease it to hospitals, with the hospital paying a rental fee for each use (or click ) of the equipment. This type of arrangement is not allowed.
49 Stark Regulatory Revisions Published on 11/16/15 Proceed with caution! Summary: Clarification of Writing Requirements. Interpreting the in writing component of the current exceptions for the rental of office space, the rental of equipment and personal service arrangements, CMS clarified that these and other compensation arrangements may be documented in a collection of writings rather than in a single contract. Clarification of Term Requirement. CMS also clarified that an explicit term provision within a formal contract or other document is generally not necessary to satisfy the one-year requirement under the Stark Law exceptions for the rental of office space, rental of equipment and personal service arrangements.
50 Stark Regulatory Revisions Broadening of Holdover Allowance. CMS has amended the six-month holdover provisions within the Stark Law exceptions for the rental of office space, rental of equipment and personal service arrangements, to permit extended holdovers. If the parties change the original terms and conditions of the arrangement, CMS would consider this a new arrangement that would need to satisfy an applicable exception. Expansion of Temporary Noncompliance with Signature Requirements Exception. CMS will now allow the rule regarding temporary noncompliance with signature requirements to extend up to 90 days for the obtaining of all required signatures, regardless of whether a late signature is advertent or inadvertent. New Recruitment Exception for Non-Physician Practitioners. The exception will apply only where the involved non-physician practitioner is a bona fide employee of the physician receiving the remuneration, and the purpose of such non-physician practitioner s employment is to provide primary care services to the physician s patients (i.e., general family practice, general internal medicine, pediatrics, geriatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology services). Note: Navicent has policies in place regarding physician contracts and requires written agreements, signed by both parties for at least a one year duration.
51 Landmark case: U.S. ex rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey Healthcare System On Oct. 3, 2013 a federal judge ordered Sumter, S.C.- based Tuomey Healthcare System to pay approximately $237 million in fines after a federal jury found the system violated Stark Law and the False Claims Act by submitting $39 million in false claims to Medicare from January 2005 through November The Federal Court of Appeals upheld this verdict in There are several lessons to consider from this case, which impact hospitals relationships with physicians.
52 Facts of Tuomey The compensation formula used to pay the physicians exceeded their expected professional collections by 31% (on average). The Government argued that this fact, by itself, demonstrated that the compensation formula was not commercially reasonable or consistent with fair market value. The hospital considered the value of the facility fee and referral when setting the salaries-a direct violation of Stark.
53 Facts of Tuomey Tuomey employed the physicians as a strategy to prevent them from performing their procedures in office or in an ambulatory surgery center. The strategy was purely defensive, and not in response to any particular community need. The physicians compensation spiked dramatically after the employment agreements were implemented, with the Government citing one ophthalmologist who saw his income soar from a little over $500,000 annually... to as much as $1 million per year after the contract.
54 Facts of Tuomey The employment agreements had a ten year term, and a covenant not to compete with a two year tail following termination, which locked in their referrals and prevented them from forming competing ambulatory surgery centers even after their employment terminated. Tuomey obtained an independent valuation to support the fair market value of the compensation formula, and also obtained outside legal assistance to review and draft the agreements. Tuomey believed they could rely on outside counsel advice and used this as a defense in the case. (Remember Stark is strict liability and they cannot have an excuse but FCA requires intent).
55 Facts of Tuomey Prior to Tuomey, most providers focused on whether the compensation rate payable to a physician falls within a fair market value range (typically between the 25th and 75th percentiles) based on independent compensation surveys. Valuation reports do not always clearly examine collections as a cap on total allowable compensation. (Indeed, Tuomey s compensation expert testified that payment in excess of collections was not uncommon.) This practice may change after Tuomey.
56 Facts of Tuomey One other issue of interest in the Tuomey decision is Tuomey s unsuccessful use of the advice of counsel defense. While the substantive violations were under the Stark law, the suit was brought under the FCA and thus, requires proof that the defendant knowingly submitted false claims (which can be satisfied by a showing of reckless disregard of the requirements of the Stark law). Tuomey argued that it did not possess the requisite intent to violate the FCA because it relied on counsel to design the agreements and analyze all contract negotiations. The court ruled that the jury reasonably could have found that Tuomey possessed the requisite intent to violate the FCA.
57 Facts of Toumey Court ruled: Clear Violations: Physician is paid a fixed amount or percentage for each ancillary service referred to the hospital. Physician is paid at the upper end of the compensation range recognizing that he/she is a high volume referral source. Physician is paid a percentage of the reimbursement received by hospital for every ancillary service referred by physician. To avoid the $237.4 million judgment, Tuomey entered into a settlement agreement with the federal government. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Tuomey will pay $72.4 million to settle the case and be sold to Columbia, S.C.-based Palmetto Health.
58 Legacy of Tuomey The Court: When a strategy doesn't smell correct, notwithstanding how many legal and valuation firms weigh in, leadership ought strongly consider not pursuing the strategy. If a system needs multiple legal and valuation firms to support or back up a program, that in and of itself may be reason for pause. Each of a hospitals' relationships with physicians does need legal and valuation support. But if you find yourself needing to seek multiple opinions for a relationship, that may be good reason for concern. The jury for the Tuomey case concluded that even though the health system relied upon an expert assessment of the fair market value of the employment agreement, when other factors were considered, the arrangements were in essence payment for referrals.
59 Recent False Claims Act case Altamonte Springs, Fla.-based Adventist Health System has agreed to pay $118.7 million to the federal government and to the states of Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas to settle allegations it violated the False Claims Act by maintaining improper compensation arrangements with referring physicians. The settlement resolves allegations that Adventist paid bonuses to employed physicians based on a formula that improperly took into account the value of the physicians' referrals to Adventist hospitals. Adventist submitted false claims to the Medicare and Medicaid programs for services rendered to patients by the physicians who received the improper bonuses, according to the lawsuit. The allegations against the health system were originally brought by three whistle-blowers who worked at an Adventist hospital in Hendersonville, N.C., and one whistle-blower who worked at the system's corporate office. The whistle-blowers brought the allegations under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act. The Adventist settlement is the largest healthcare fraud settlement ever made involving physician referrals to hospitals.
60 Self-Disclosure Protocol Voluntary process to disclose self-discovered evidence of potential Stark Law violations (63 Fed. Reg. 58,399) Provides detailed instructions for making a self-disclosure Requires internal investigation and damages calculation Requires full description of conduct Avoid costs and disruption of government directed investigation Lower settlement amounts
61 February 2011-June 2015 (Self-Disclosure)
62 February June 2015 Self-Disclosure Settlements
63 Resources Corporate Compliance Office: Chief Compliance Officer: Manager of Corporate Compliance: Corporate Compliance Reporting Line:
64 Education Attestation I certify that I have completed the training session titled, Physician Arrangements Training. I understand that I am obligated to follow compliance requirements that apply to my work, and to ask questions as needed to assure my understanding. I also understand that it is my obligation to report concerns about possible noncompliance, and that I may meet that obligation by discussing my concerns with my manager, another manager or supervisor, a member of the Audit Services and Corporate Compliance Leadership team, or by calling the Navicent Health Helpline at Click here to document that you have reviewed this module. You ll be prompted to supply your name, API# and the last four digits of your social security number and to PRINT a completion document for your records and to provide to your supervisor.
Fraud and Abuse Laws. Kim C. Stanger. Compliance Bootcamp (5/18)
Fraud and Abuse Laws Kim C. Stanger Compliance Bootcamp (5/18) This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The
Gifts to Referral Sources. Kim C. Stanger (11-17)
Gifts to Referral Sources Kim C. Stanger (11-17) Overview Some relevant laws Applying those laws to common situations Gifts to or from referral sources Gifts to physicians Gifts to or from patients Gifts
Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,
Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA 23255-2050, 804-967-9604, www.hancockdaniel.com 2018 Hancock, Daniel & Johnson P.C. hancockdaniel.com Fraud and Abuse Enforcement 1.Anti-kickback
Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.
Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute Ryan Meade, JD, CHRC, CHC F Director, Regulatory Compliance Studies Beazley Institute for Health Law and Policy Loyola University Chicago School of Law rmeade@luc.edu
UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS
26 th Annual National CLE Conference Law Education Institute January 3-7, 3 2009 UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS By JONELL B. WILLIAMSON January 5, 2009 1 Stark Prohibition
Building a Strategic Plan for Physician Employment and Practice Acquisition
Building Practice Acquisition and Physician Employment Strategies that Will Last the Test of Time In a Changing Regulatory Environment David Lewis Vice President/Associate General Counsel LifePoint Hospitals
Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance
Vol. 12, No. 9, September 2016 Happy Trials to You Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance By Payal Cramer Physician-investigators play a central role in clinical research. Through
Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith
Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith Overview 1972 - Enacted 1977 - Violation became a felony 1996 - Expanded to include all Federal Health Care Programs 2009 - Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement
Stark, AKS, FCA Primer
Stark, AKS, FCA Primer December 1, 2016 Christine Savage (csavage@choate.com, 617-248-4084) by any measure CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP choate.com Physician Self-Referral Prohibition (the Stark Law ): History
AHLA. U. Physician Relationship Audit Workshop: A Practical Guide to Auditing Physician Relationships and Addressing Identified Issues
AHLA U. Physician Relationship Audit Workshop: A Practical Guide to Auditing Physician Relationships and Addressing Identified Issues Bret S. Bissey Senior Vice President, Compliance Services MediTract,
Fraud and Abuse Laws: Understanding, Applying and Avoiding Liability
Fraud and Abuse Laws: Understanding, Applying and Avoiding Liability Kim C. Stanger (1/17) This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on
Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals
Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals HEALTHCON Business Expo April 2016 Presented by: Stacy Harper, JD, MHSA, CPC 1 Disclaimer This presentation is for general education purposes only. The information contained
Why Physicians and Physician Organizations Should be Concerned about Stark Compliance
Why Physicians and Physician Organizations Should be Concerned about Stark Compliance Steven W. Ortquist Partner, Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP 1 Introduction What do the Stark Statute and the
PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
Kean Miller Health Care Industry Business Group PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS April 28, 2004 Linda G. Rodrigue, Esq. and Clay J. Countryman, Esq. Kean,
Stark Update HCCA Hawaii Conference
Stark Update HCCA Hawaii Conference Steven W. Ortquist VP, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer Today s Agenda Review of healthcare Anti-Kickback statute and Stark law and regulations Discuss implications
Check Your Physician Contracts
Check Your Physician Contracts Publication 1/8/2014 Kim Stanger Partner 208.383.3913 Boise kcstanger@hollandhart.com Contracts and other financial arrangements with physicians and certain other healthcare
Auditing Physician Arrangements
Tuesday, October 24, 2017 1:00 P.M.- 2:30 P.M. Eastern Auditing Physician Arrangements Presented by: Allison Carty, JD, MBA Director Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting acarty@askphc.com Joseph N. Wolfe, Attorney/Shareholder
Physician s Guide to Stark Law Part I
Physician s Guide to Stark Law Part I Authored by W. Scott Keaty and Joshua G. McDiarmid Kantrow, Spaht, Weaver & Blitzer (APLC) Date: August 15, 2016 Physicians are under increasing scrutiny by federal
THE CHRIST HOSPITAL POLICY NO.: ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 9
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 9 POLICY TITLE: ORIGINATED BY: APPROVED BY: AGREEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS AND OTHER POTENTIAL REFERRAL SOURCES: GENERAL POLICY COMPLIANCE OFFICER COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE REVIEWED/REVISED:
Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space
Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space SCOTT R. GRUBMAN, ESQ. PARTNER CHILIVIS COCHRAN LARKINS & BEVER, LLP (ATLANTA GA) Fraud & Abuse Enforcement Landscape FBI CMS OCR MFCU DCIS DOJ HHS-OIG
Physician Lease Arrangements: New Rules
Physician Lease Arrangements: New Rules Presented by: Roger Clayton Peoria Office rclayton@heylroyster.com Greg Rastatter Peoria Office grastatter@heylroyster.com Tyler Robinson Springfield Office trobinson@heylroyster.com
Compensation Paid by Healthcare Providers
Compensation Paid by Healthcare Providers Physician compensation continues to be an especially important issue due to extensive integration of medical practices into larger healthcare systems and the severe
WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER
WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER January 24, 2017 Andrew N. Meyercord Gray Reed & McGraw 1601 Elm Street Suite 4600 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.954.4135 ameyercord@grayreed.com 129 attorneys Full-service,
Stark Prevention A Practical Approach to Physician Transactions. Paul Belton, VP Corporate Compliance Sharp Healthcare
Stark Prevention A Practical Approach to Physician Transactions. Paul Belton, VP Corporate Compliance Sharp Healthcare Dwight Claustre Health Care Compliance Professional 1 Objectives A practical non-attorney
N R a v e n s w o o d A v e, S t e C h i c a g o, I L w w w. a e g i s - c o m p l i a n c e.
Jorge Pérez-Casellas, JD, LLM, CHC jpcasellas@aegis-compliance.com Miglisa Capó-Suria, JD, LLM mcapo@metropaviahealth.com A Presentation for the 2017 HCCA San Juan Regional Conference May 19, 2017 / 8:30AM
LEGAL ISSUES FOR MEDICAL RESIDENTS
LEGAL ISSUES FOR MEDICAL RESIDENTS Presented by: www.thehealthlawfirm.com Copyright 2017. George F. Indest III. All rights reserved. George F. Indest III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M. Board Certified by the Florida
7/25/2018. Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space. The Statutes & Regulations. The Stark Law. The Stark Law.
Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space 2 SCOTT R. GRUBMAN, ESQ. The Statutes & Regulations 3 4 AKA the physician self-referral law The Rule: If physician (or immediate family member) has
Law Department Policy No. L-8. Title:
I. SCOPE: Title: Page: 1 of 13 This policy applies to (1) Tenet Healthcare Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates (each, an Affiliate ); (2) any other entity or organization in which
Certifying Employee Training Navicent Health s Corporate Integrity Agreement Year Two
Certifying Employee Training Navicent Health s Corporate Integrity Agreement Year Two Corporate Integrity Agreement Effective 4/23/2015 Term of five years Basic Requirement: Maintain a Compliance Program
Fraud and Abuse Laws. Overview. Kim C. Stanger Compliance Bootcamp
Fraud and Abuse Laws Compliance Bootcamp (5/16) This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made
Physician Relationship Compliance Issues
Physician Relationship Compliance Issues Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC Overview of Anti-Kickback Statute It is a federal crime to: Knowingly and willfully offer or pay/solicit or receive
Physician Relationship Compliance Issues. Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC
Physician Relationship Compliance Issues Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC Overview of Anti-Kickback Statute It is a federal crime to: Knowingly and willfully offer or pay/solicit or receive
Deciphering the Self-Disclosure Puzzle
Deciphering the Self-Disclosure Puzzle ABA Health Law Section Emerging Issues in Healthcare Law Bill Mathias 410.347.7667 wtmathias@ober.com Lisa Ohrin 410.786.8852 Lisa.Ohrin1@cms.hhs.gov February 28,
Conflicts of Interest 9/10/2017. Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute. May 2, 2017 Article from JAMA:
Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute Matthew Krueger Assistant United States Attorney E.D. of Wisconsin Stacy Gerber Ward von Briesen & Roper, S.C. Conflicts
This course is designed to provide Part B providers with an overview of the Medicare Fraud and Abuse program including:
This course is designed to provide Part B providers with an overview of the Medicare Fraud and Abuse program including: Medicare Trust Fund Defining Fraud & Abuse Examples of Fraud & Abuse Fraud & Abuse
Coding Partners in Patient Safety
Coding Partners in Patient Safety Senior Loss Prevention Attorney UF Self Insurance Programs Learning Objectives Understand federal fraud and abuse laws and the importance of coders in avoiding issues.
FRAUD AND ABUSE LAW IMPLICATED BY COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS. Lee Rosebush, PharmD, RPh, MBA, JD
FRAUD AND ABUSE LAW IMPLICATED BY COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS Lee Rosebush, PharmD, RPh, MBA, JD lrosebush@bakerlaw.com Real Quick Overview False Claims Act Any person who knowingly presents, or causes to
Telemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope
Telemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope Session 232, February 14, 2019 Douglas Grimm, Esq., Arent Fox LLP Hillary Stemple, Esq., Arent Fox LLP 1 Conflicts of Interest Douglas Grimm, Esq. Has
PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS
PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS Publication PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS
Repay Overpayments (18 USC 1347; 42 CFR et seq.)
Repay Overpayments (18 USC 1347; 42 CFR 401.301 et seq.) Repaying Overpayments If provider has received an overpayment, provider must: Return the overpayment to federal agency, state, intermediary, or
WORKING DRAFT 8/10/2016
DISCLAIMER PHYSICIAN PRACTICE LOSSES THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM HFMA Arkansas Chapter Summer Conference August 18, 2016 Herd Midkiff, CVA Partner Director of Consulting Services Haley Adams, CVA Senior Manager,
Medical Ethics. Paul W. Kim, JD, MPH O B E R K A L E R
Medical Ethics Paul W. Kim, JD, MPH O B E R K A L E R 410-347-7344 pwkim@ober.com 1 Agenda Federal Fraud & Abuse Laws Federal Privacy Laws Enrollment Audits Post-Payment Audits Pre-Payment Reviews 2 False
The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions
The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the situation in Florida? Florida-specific Issues For several years, FSA members have been contacting the society with reports of company
Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers. by William H. Hall Jr.
Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers by William H. Hall Jr. The anti-kickback statute prohibits arrangements that might be common in other industries. Health care is among
Improving Integrity in Nursing Centers
Improving Integrity in Nursing Centers Susan Edwards Reed Smith LLP AHCA/NCAL s General Counsel Goals of this webinar Introduce you to AHCA/NCAL s Fraud and Abuse Toolkit Provide you with a basic understanding
Managing Financial Interests: The Anti Kickback Statute (AKS)
Managing Financial Interests: The Anti Kickback Statute (AKS) Board of Commissioners Meeting February 15, 2012 Presented by: Mic Sager, Compliance Officer Context: Business Transactions o Health Care is
Stark Law Contracting Tips and Problem-Solving May 14, 2015
Stark Law Contracting Tips and Problem-Solving May 14, 2015 Presented by: Bill Hoffman Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP Presentation Agenda Overview of the Stark Law and Differences from the
MANAGING HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE REGULATORY RISK IN THE NEW HEALTH CARE ECONOMY
MANAGING HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE REGULATORY RISK IN THE NEW HEALTH CARE ECONOMY By: Thomas William Baker, Esq. Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (404) 221-6510 (Phone) (404) 238-9640 (Facsimile)
The Impact of Emerging Reimbursement Models on Physician Compensation
The Impact of Emerging Reimbursement Models on Physician Compensation By: Beth Connor Guest, Chief Counsel, Cigna HealthSpring and Patricia O. Powers, Office of General Counsel, Vanderbilt University.
Physician Contracting An Overview of Legal Policy No. 9
Physician Contracting An Overview of Legal Policy No. 9 Learning Objectives To Understand: CHI policy requirements for physician contracting Recent updates to Legal Policy No. 9 How to obtain review and
Anti Kickback Statute Update By Meredith Williams
Kickback and Stark Law Developments HCCA 20 th Annual Compliance Institute April 17 20, 2016 Meredith Williams Senior Counsel Office of Inspector General, DHHS Washington, DC Robert A. Wade Partner Krieg
ANCILLARY services: How to Stay Out of Trouble. The neurosurgical minefield Informed consent
ANCILLARY services: How to Stay Out of Trouble Richard N.W. Wohns, M.D. JD, MBA NeoSpine, Puget Sound Region, Washington The neurosurgical minefield 2013 Informed consent HIPAA ARRA and HITECH Anti-Kickback
Recent Developments In Voluntary Disclosure Stark Law
HCCA Compliance Institute 2010 Legal & Regulatory W6, Part1 April 21, 2010 Recent Developments In Voluntary Disclosure Stark Law Jeffrey Fitzgerald Faegre & Benson LLP jfitgerald@faegre.com 303.607.3740
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity of Federal Health Care Programs
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters April 2018 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity
Impact of Stark II, Phase II Regulations on Existing and Future Hospital/Physician Arrangements
Impact of Stark II, Phase II Regulations on Existing and Future Hospital/Physician Arrangements Health Care Provider Legal Issues Program WHA Annual Convention September 16, 2004 Michael Skindrud Godfrey
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WORK PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2006 MEDICARE HOSPITALS
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WORK PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2006 MEDICARE HOSPITALS GABRIEL L. IMPERATO, Esq. Broad & Cassel Fort Lauderdale, Fl. Medicare Hospitals Areas of Focus for OIG Work Plan 2006 Adjustments
Stark Law Making the Confusion Understandable
Stark Law Making the Confusion Understandable Robert A. Wade Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 4101 Edison Lakes Parkway, Suite 100 Mishawaka, IN 46545 Telephone: 574-485-2002 Email: bwade@kdlegal.com Learning
Agenda. Strategic Considerations in Resolving Voluntary Government Disclosures
Strategic Considerations in Resolving Voluntary Government Disclosures Health Care Compliance Association Annual Compliance Institute Patrick Garcia Hall, Render, Killian, Heath, & Lyman, P.C. Kenneth
2/24/2017. Agenda. Determine Potential Liability. Strategic Considerations in Resolving Voluntary Government Disclosures. Relevant legal authorities:
Strategic Considerations in Resolving Voluntary Government Disclosures Health Care Compliance Association Annual Compliance Institute Patrick Garcia Hall, Render, Killian, Heath, & Lyman, P.C. Kenneth
Stark Law Dos and Don ts: Best Practices for your Physician Contracts
Stark Law Dos and Don ts: Best Practices for your Physician Contracts Robert A. Wade, Esq. Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 4101 Edison Lakes Parkway, Ste. 100 Mishawaka IN 46545 574-485-2002 bwade@kdlegal.com
2012 Health Law Education Program: Anatomy of a Self- Disclosure Telling CMS About Your Stark Law Problems
2012 Health Law Education Program: Anatomy of a Self- Disclosure Telling CMS About Your Stark Law Problems October 24, 2012 12:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. Central Web Seminar Continuing Education Information We
Stark Self-Disclosure. Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC
Stark Self-Disclosure Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC A. Background 1. Stark Law The Physician Self-Referral Statute (or the Stark Law ) prohibits a physician from referring
PHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD. David E. Matyas. A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn)
PHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD David E. Matyas I. OVERVIEW OF THE STARK LAW A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn) The federal physician self-referral statute prohibits
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Stark Compliance Audits in Hospital-Physician Arrangements: Mitigating Provider Liability Implementing Monitoring Processes to Avoid Penalties,
Title: Corporate Compliance - Compensation and Business Courtesies - Policy
Document Owner: Jennifer May Content Expert: Jennifer May Last Approved Date: 08/09/2016 Printed copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy for the latest version. I. Policy Statement
Valuation of Health Care Entity Property or Services Transfers
Health Care Valuation Insights Valuation of Health Care Entity Property or Services Transfers Robert F. Reilly, CPA Health care providers comply with a myriad of professional regulations. Health care providers
4147 N Ravenswood Ave, Ste.200 Chicago, IL
Physician Arrangements Compliance Programs Steve Ortquist, Managing Director Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP 312-285-4850 sortquist@aegis-compliance.com Quick Test Test your Stark knowledge: Start
Physician Arrangements Compliance Programs
Physician Arrangements Compliance Programs Steve Ortquist, Managing Director Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP 312-285-4850 sortquist@aegis-compliance.com Quick Test Test your Stark knowledge: Start
2014 Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP
Legal Issues for Physician Owned Implant Manufacturer/Distribution Companies (PODs) October 24, 2014 Randal L. Schultz, Esq. 10851 Mastin Blvd, Building 82, Suite 1000 Overland Park, KS 66210-1669 913.451.5192
MARSHALL L. MATZ MARK L. ITZKOFF *PRACTICE WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS LIMITED TO MATTERS AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIES
PHILIP C. OLSSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW TISH E. PAHL RICHARD L. FRANK SUITE 400 ROBERT A. HAHN DAVID F. WEEDA (1948-2001) 1400 SIXTEENTH STREET, N.W. NAOMI J. L. HALPERN DENNIS R. JOHNSON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036-2220
Audit, Compliance, and Regulatory Guidelines
Audit, Compliance, and Regulatory Guidelines Presented by: Rae Jimenez, CPC, CPB, CPMA, CPPM, CPC-I, CCS Some set disclaimer thingy----- Federal Regulations Fraud and Abuse Regulations Some set disclaimer
Physician Care: Physician Compensation. Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA
Physician Care: Physician Compensation Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA Overview Compensation trends for employed physicians Regulatory risks of physician compensation
Provider and Provider Relationships. Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues
Provider and Provider Relationships Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues This document is intended to identify the primary healthcare fraud and abuse laws that may apply to contractual relationships between
PHYSICIAN ALIGNMENT: LEGAL AND FAIR MARKET VALUE COMPLIANCE
PHYSICIAN ALIGNMENT: LEGAL AND FAIR MARKET VALUE COMPLIANCE Health Care Compliance Association 17 th Annual Compliance Institute April 22, 2013 Donnessa Vessakosol Strategic Value Group, LLC Cheryl Camin
Audit Tools/Approach. Organization. Role and Contact Information Regional Director of Compliance x 5206
Audit Tools/Approach Organization Pediatrix Medical Group Neonatal physicians who provide services at more than 275 neonatal intensive care units Nation s largest provider of newborn hearing screens American
The Intersection of Valuation and Physician Productivity
The Intersection of Valuation and Physician Productivity McRae Sharpe, CMPE Shareholder August 11, 2015 Shannon W. Farr, CPA/ABV/CFF Director Objectives Define Fair Market Value (FMV) and Commercial Reasonableness
Federal Administrative Sanctions
FEDERAL AND STATE ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS HCCA COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE April 23, 2007 Chicago, IL Edgar D. Bueno Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP John W. O Brien Office of Counsel to the Inspector General
Industry Funding of Continuing Medical Education
Industry Funding of Continuing Medical Education June 25, 2010 Julie K. Taitsman, M.D., J.D. Chief Medical Officer, Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Financial Relationships
4/1/2014. Proof of Intent is Not Required
Robert A. Wade, Esq. Krieg DeVault LLP 4101 Edison Lakes Parkway, Ste. 100 Mishawaka, IN 46545 Phone: 574-485-2002 Email: bwade@kdlegal.com Kevin McAnaney, Esq. Law Office of Kevin G. McAnaney 1800 K Street,
Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Top 5 Things to Know for CE:
Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures Clay Stribling, Esq. Top 5 Things to Know for CE: 1. Make sure your BADGE IS SCANNED each time you
Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Clay Stribling, Esq.
Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures Clay Stribling, Esq. Top 5 Things to Know for CE: 1. Make sure your BADGE IS SCANNED each time you
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT AND FALSE CLAIMS POLICY INFORMATION FOR All NEW YORK WORKFORCE MEMBERS
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT AND FALSE CLAIMS POLICY INFORMATION FOR All NEW YORK WORKFORCE MEMBERS The Company is committed to preventing health care fraud, waste and abuse and complying with applicable state
COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS
COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS Daniel H. Melvin, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, in consultation with Daryl Johnson, Managing Partner, Health Care Appraisers, Inc.
Compliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration
Compliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration Winn W. Halverhout Husch Blackwell LLP Barbara A. Yosses Poudre Valley Health System Husch Blackwell LLP 1 Current Integration Structures
AHLA. A. Stark Law Primer. Troy A. Barsky Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC
AHLA A. Stark Law Primer Troy A. Barsky Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC Joan P. Dailey Office of the General Counsel US Department of Health and Human Services Washington, DC Fraud and Compliance Forum
FAST BREAK : STARK LESSONS FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS Albert Shay, Eric Knickrehm, and Jake Harper August 23, 2018
FAST BREAK : STARK LESSONS FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS Albert Shay, Eric Knickrehm, and Jake Harper August 23, 2018 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Agenda What is the Stark Law and what kind of
Self-Disclosure: Why, When, Where and How
American Bar Association Washington Health Law Summit Self-Disclosure: Why, When, Where and How December 8, 2015 Margaret Hutchinson U.S. Attorney s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Kaitlyn
The Anti-Kickback Statute. May 3, 2013 Tennessee Hospice Organization Compliance Forum
The Anti-Kickback Statute May 3, 2013 Tennessee Hospice Organization Compliance Forum 1 Overview The anti-kickback statute prohibits in the health care industry some practices that are common in other
Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings
Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings Implications under the Fraud and Abuse Laws March 1, 2011 Dennis S. Diaz Davis Wright Tremaine LLP dennisdiaz@dwt.com 213-633-6876
Stark Mitigating the Battle Scars. Objectives
Stark Mitigating the Battle Scars Dwight Claustre Director AEGIS Compliance & Ethics Center LLP 1 Objectives Who are the enemies and how do we make them allies? Identifying your mitigation weapons What
HOSPITAL COMPLIANCE POTENTIAL IMPLICATION OF FRAUD AND ABUSE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR HOSPITALS
HOSPITAL COMPLIANCE H C C A R E G I O N A L C O N F E R E N C E A P R I L 2 8, 2 0 1 6 S A N J U A N, P U E R T O R I C O S A N C H E Z B E T A N C E S, S I F R E & M U Ñ O Z N O Y A, C S P J A I M E S
Lessons Learned from Recent Enforcement Actions
Developing Compliant Physician Compensation Arrangements in the Current Enforcement Environment Anna M. Grizzle Bass, Berry & Sims PLC Lessons Learned from Recent Enforcement Actions 1 Physician Remuneration
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
Title: Fraud Waste and Abuse Laws in Health Care Policy # 1011 Sponsor: Corporate Compliance Approved by: Russell J. Matuszak, Interim Director, Corporate Compliance and Chief Privacy Officer Issued: Page:
Florida Health Law Traps -
and Gassman Law Associates, P.A. present Lester Perling lperling@broadandcassel.com Alan S. Gassman agassman@gassmanpa.com Florida Health Law Traps - 5 Hypotheticals and Discussion of Important Medical
Physician Rockstars Toolkit - Common Models and Legal Considerations for Securing the Services of Rockstar physicians. Item 3
(1) Employment Agreements Stark Exception Requirements 1 42 U.S.C. 1395nn(e)(2)/ 42 CFR 411.357(c) There is a bona fide employment relationship and the employment is for identifiable services. The amount
HCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010
Take a Second Look at Your Physician Relationships: Tips Based on Experience and Changes in the Law HCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010 Jana Kolarik Anderson, Attorney
Health Care Contracting
Health Care Contracting Best Practices Toolkit and Three Tenets of Defensibility Presented by Presented at The Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association Annual Conference September 27, 2017 Barbra
Recent Developments in Inducement Enforcement Stark, Antikickback and the False Claims Act
Recent Developments in Inducement Enforcement Stark, Antikickback and the False Claims Act Ben Durie Hooper Lundy & Bookman P.C. September 17 th HFMA Northern California Los Angeles San Francisco San Diego
Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Fraud, Waste and Abuse
Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: 2397820 Policy Scope: Date Of Origin: 06/2015 Last Approved: 07/2016 Last Revised: 07/2016 Next Review: 07/2018 Sponsor: Policy Area: Regulatory Tags: Applicability:
The Stark Law and Self-Disclosure:
The Stark Law and Self-Disclosure: What Should You Do After Discovering a Potential Stark Violation? Healthcare Horizons Webinar Series September 25, 2012 Husch Blackwell LLP Welcome Brian Bewley, Partner