Loss Prevention Standards

Transcription

1 Introduction Insurance companies paid out approximately 2.3m in Employers Liability claims every day in This inevitably puts pressure on those insurance companies to increase premiums in order to keep pace with claims inflation. Likewise, individual businesses experiencing an increase in claims frequency or cost are also likely to be facing an increase in premiums. Although the introduction of the Employers' Liability (EL)/Public Liability (PL) Claims Portal is anticipated to provide some benefit in terms of claimants fees, it has also highlighted the relatively higher fees available where claims are made that cannot be processed through it. Consequently there has been an increase in the number of disease type claims. The lesson being that, regardless of the effectiveness of the portal, claims are likely to continue to be made. All the time that injuries continue to happen in the workplace, those claims will often quite rightly result in compensation being paid. However, there is also a proportion of claims where the claimant has not followed an established system of work, has not carried out the task in the way they were trained to do so, or has otherwise contributed to their own injury. Unfortunately there are also a proportion of claims that are simply fraudulent. To ensure that questionable claims are not paid, companies must be able to provide the information with which to defend them this is commonly referred to as claims defensibility. Step 1 Preventing Claims from Occurring Having a safety management system in place will not only mean that an organisation will minimise the risk of an incident occurring, but, should an incident occur, all of the necessary information will be to hand, either to enable an early decision on liability or to robustly defend the claim if that is appropriate. Nobody wants to over-burden their business with unnecessary paperwork, but in terms of claims defensibility, the simple moto should be if it s done in the name of health and safety, write it down. A major frustration for employers is having to pay claims which they have good reason to believe are without merit, however, without the necessary documentation to prove the adequacy of the systems of work in place at the time of the incident, insurers will often be left with no option but to pay the claim. Adopting recognised health and safety management systems such as OHSAS or ISO will go a long way to preventing accidents from happening in the first instance and, should the worst occur, will ensure that the necessary records are in place. Where such systems are in place, employees are likely to feel the benefit of a more inclusive approach to health and safety and may be less inclined to claim, or if they are inclined to claim, will be more aware of the hurdles that they will need to overcome in order to prove negligence. Page 1 of 5

2 Step 2 Having the Correct Information Available In essence there are four main things that an employer needs to do in order to prevent injuries from occurring and therefore to prevent claims. Ensure that: the risks from a specific task are clearly understood (i.e. complete a risk assessment); the systems of work required to undertake these tasks safely are clearly identified (create method statements, safe systems of work, permits to work, etc. as necessary); employees are fully aware of both the risks from an activity and the controls in place (provide suitable tools and equipment and sufficient training to be able to follow the systems of work); the health and safety management system remains effective (undertake inspections, audits, etc. to ensure that the system is working and is being improved where necessary). The following are the sorts of documentation/records that may prove essential in evidencing the above: Health and safety policy Statements from all relevant witnesses, including negative statements Historic accident data and analysis Generic pre and post accident risk assessment Safe systems of work Near miss register Disciplinary proceedings records Internal workplace inspection and housekeeping records Company car/commercial vehicle driver handbooks Accident and accident investigation report form Photographs/video/CCTV RIDDOR report/f2508(a) Site/task specific risk assessment Training records Occupational health records Health and safety group or committee minutes Health and safety audit findings and response In order to be able to successfully defend a claim insurers are not only required to have the appropriate evidence, but also to make it available within given timescales; 1 working day to acknowledge the electronic Claim Notification Form (CNF) and 30 working days (for Employers Liability) and 40 working days (for Public Liability) to make a decision on liability. Keeping records safe and accessible is just as important as making sure they were completed in the first instance. It is frequently the case that a claim has to be paid because the relevant documentation could not be located or located in a reasonable timescale. For large, multi-site organisations it may be felt that a bespoke on-line health and safety management system is the answer to recording, disseminating and retrieving information. For smaller organisations local or paper-based systems may be adequate. Whatever the case, the documentation required to make a decision on liability must be available to insurers within the required timescales. Page 2 of 5

3 Probably the most important timescales at the initial stages of a claim are those imposed as a result of the Ministry of Justice Reforms. These are: 1 working day to acknowledge the electronic Claim Notification Form 30 working days (for EL) and 40 working days (for PL) to make a decision on liability It is also worth noting that an employer may be required to disclose the accident/incident report and any findings to a third party s solicitor during the investigation of the claim. It is therefore essential that those completing the reports/investigations are fully aware of the potential consequences of making unsupported claims about the causes of the incident or potential future remedies. Accident reporting/investigation training should not just focus on the mechanics of filling in the forms, but also on the type of information that should or should not be included. Those responsible for monitoring/analysing this information should also be on guard for any employees including personal thoughts or conjecture. Once such comments have been made they may be very difficult to undo in court. Step 3 How Well are we Doing? All companies need to remember that having a health and safety management system in place or receiving regular health and safety awards is not the same as having good claims defensibility. It is important that not only are the usual inspections/audits of the health and safety systems and procedures undertaken, but that these are occasionally reviewed against the recent claims history. The health and safety management team should be included in claims reviews and should have sight of regular updates on new or revised claims data. As well as any in-house reviews you may wish to undertake, Aviva routinely make members of their Claims and Risk Consulting teams available for tri-partite claims review meetings. When reviewing claims information, questions to be asked should include: Is our claims experience improving or deteriorating? Are there any common trends or themes in the claims arising? If we have been successful in denying liability was there anything particularly useful in defending the claim? If we have identified useful documents/policies/procedures, do we ensure that they are rolled out to all locations, and maintained? If we have had to admit liability, was this justified and are there any lessons to be learnt? If we have identified gaps in information, assessments, inspections, procedures etc. have we ensured that they are revised accordingly and that updated information is circulated to all locations? Are suitable sanctions in place for those failing to comply with the requirements of the management system and are they used where appropriate? To be able to demonstrate that they take health and safety seriously, an employer not only has to show that they have adequate procedures in place, but that they deal consistently with any non-compliance. If there is a suitable health and safety management system in place, then incidents should be prevented and if suitable arrangements have been made for the recovery of the appropriate information, where they do occur, an early admission of liability can be made or the claim successfully defended. Page 3 of 5

4 Step 4 Be Aware Although the idea of claims defensibility is to have the necessary systems of control in place to prevent accidents/incidents and to have a body of evidence to hand if they do occur, there are certain factors which may significantly increase the likelihood of claims arising. When these circumstances occur the employer will need to be particularly vigilant. The most likely cause of an increase of claims is uncertainty, if employees feel that their job security or income is at risk they may well feel that they have nothing to lose by making a claim and, potentially, everything to gain. The most common cause of this uncertainty is redundancy. This creates the additional difficulty that, at precisely the time when the employer needs to be most vigilant, those responsible for implementing and maintaining the relevant systems may also be distracted and that changes within the business may make the control of data more difficult. When businesses are bought or merged, although high level due diligence may well be a key factor, at the operational level (what do we do with the archive documentation?) this may well be overlooked. Likewise, there are things that can be done, even if an accident has occurred, that might minimise the risk of the injuries giving rise to a claim. Employees recovering at home can often feel isolated and abandoned. Having an effective rehabilitation process can increase the prospect and speed of their return to fitness, and ultimately their return to work. This can have a significant impact on the likelihood and value of any claim which might arise. As healthcare and rehabilitation experts, Aviva understand that the earlier your employee can get help and support, the faster they can recover. The Aviva Injury Management (AIM) service provides: Easy access service which fits your business needs: we ve designed our services so that they can dovetail seamlessly with any Occupational Health arrangements you may already have in place Early intervention: forms the basis of our approach. We believe that the earlier intervention can occur, the earlier an employee will recover and return to work Clinical assessment and advice: we ll talk your employee through the best practice injury management advice to ensure they feel fully supported from day one Access to effective treatments: includes Physiotherapy, Work Specific Strengthening, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Specialist Consultations and Investigations, and Workplace Assessments Dedicated in-house case management: injured employees are encouraged to talk to their case manager during their recovery period about potential adjustments that can be made to help them to stay at work or return to work sooner Page 4 of 5

5 Disease Related Claims Because a long time can pass between the initiation of the disease and the claim arising, they are worth a specific mention, not least because this significantly challenges the way in which historic records are archived in order to ensure safe retrieval. The Association of British Insurers published findings which confirmed that Noise Induced Hearing Loss claims alone increased by 189% between 2011 and In respect of disease claims, specific areas to be considered are the use of pre-placement, on-going/periodic and post employment medicals. These will not only confirm an individual s continued fitness to work, but will also show any deterioration in health over the working life. This information should be coupled with an appropriate absence process to ensure that anyone affected is quickly identified, and that suitable additional controls and/or rehabilitation can be introduced at the earliest possible time. In Summary With the current state of litigation in the UK, claims are not going to go away. However, by ensuring that there are well documented systems of control in place, that day to day health and safety activity (as well as events around incidents) is accurately recorded and that all those documents and records are readily available should they be required in the future, there is much that can be done to lessen the likelihood and impact of injuries occurring. Additional Information Further risk management information can be obtained from Aviva Risk Management Solutions Please Note This document contains general information and guidance and is not and should not be relied on as specific advice. The document may not cover every risk, exposure or hazard that may arise and Aviva recommend that you obtain specific advice relevant to the circumstances. AVIVA accepts no responsibility or liability towards any person who may rely upon this document. Page 5 of 5