Quoizel, Inc. v Hartford Fire Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32987(U) November 9, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge:
|
|
- Hilary Fitzgerald
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quoizel, Inc. v Hartford Fire Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32987(U) November 9, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Jeffrey K. Oing Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts ( for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
2 [* 1] ANNEDON SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY JEFFREY K. OlNG & PRESENT: J.S.C. PART Index Number : QUOIZEL vs. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE SEQUENCE NUMBER : 001 SUMMARY JUDGMENT - INDEX NO. MOTION DATE MOTION SEQ. NO. MOTION CAL. NO. this motion tolfor I Notice of Motion/ Order to Show Cause - Affidavits - Exhiblts... Answering Affidavits - Exhibits Replying Affidavits I Cross-Motion: Yes No Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that thia motion J. S. C. Check one: 0 FINAL DISPOSITION 4 NON-FINAL DISPOSITION Check if appropriate: c] DO NOT POST c] REFERENCE SUBMIT ORDER/ JUDG. SETTLE ORDER/ JUDG.
3 [* 2] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: IAS PART X QUOIZEL, INC., Plaintiff, -against- HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Indsx No.: /09 Mtn Seq. Nos. 001 & 002 DECISION AND ORDER JEFFREY K. OING, J.: Motion sequence numbers cp#n N@/d YORK CLERK'S OFFICE and 002 are consolidated for disposition. Plaintiff, Quoizel, Inc. ("Quoizel"), moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an order granting it summary judgment on its complaint. Defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company ("Hartford"), moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Background Quoizel is in the business of manufacturing lighting and home decor accessories such as bathroom lights, ceiling lights, chandeliers, pendant lights, wall scones, and outdoor light fixtures. Quoizel has a manufacturing facility in South Carolina. Manufacturing plants in China also produce for Quoizel component parts for these accessories, as well as being fabricators for these accessories.
4 [* 3] f Mtn Sarq. Nos. 001 & 002 Page 2 of 11 On November 9, 2007, Quoizel purchased from Hartford a commercial liability insurance policy which, inter alia, provided coverage for damage to Quoizel's building and business property, including stock, located at its South Carolina warehouse (the "South Carolina warehouse''), with a policy limit of approximately $43 million (the "policy"). The policy was in full force during the relevant period. On or about September 2, 2008, a sprinkler system leak damaged Quoizel's South Carolina warehouse, including its inventory. The damaged inventory consisted of three categories of lamps and lighting products: (1) parts, (2) boxed finished stock, and (3) unboxed finished stock (the "damaged inventory"). After submitting its claim to Hartford, Quoizel and Hartford reached an agreement with respect to the quantity of the damaged inventory and the valuation of loss. Regarding the latter, the loss was valued at replacement cost in the amount of $624,662.56, which is the amount it would cost Quoizel to re-manufacture the damaged inventory. Hartford paid and Quoizel accepted $624, as the calculation for the replacement cost of the damaged inventory. In that regard, Hartford did not calculate a portion of the damaged inventory at selling price because it took the position that those items were not manufactured by Quoizel, but, instead, by entities in China not related to Quoizel. Quoizel commenced this action against Hartford claiming additional amounts are owed to it under the policy. In that
5 [* 4] Index No, /09 Mtn Seq. Nos. 001 h 002 Page 3 of 11 regard, Quoizel claims entitlement to an additional $944,817.70, price value of damaged inventory of $1,529, and the amount paid of $624,662.56, which represented the replacement cost. Admittedly, the disputed damaged inventory was not manufactured in South Carolina, but in China (June 24, 2011 Tr. at p. 7). Quoizel, nonetheless, asserts that it is a manufacturer of the damaged inventory, and alleges that Hartford breached its contractual obligation by not using the selling price to calculate the damages sustained at the South Carolina warehouse. To support its position, Quoizel claims that the fifteen manufacturing plants in China contributed to manufacturing a component part of the damaged inventory, and that Quoizel has oversight and supervision over these facilities. In addition, of the fifteen manufacturing plants, Quoizel asserts that it has co-ownership interests in one of the factories, Design Emporium Company, Ltd. ("Lamplux") in Shenzhen, People's Republic of China. Hartford maintains that Quojzel is not a manufacturer of the damaged inventory produced in China, and that these items were properly valued at the replacement cost. In that regard, Hartford maintains that Quoizel has no bona fide ownership interest in the Chinese entities. As Such, the disputed damaged inventory were properly calculated at the replacement cost.
6 [* 5] Mtn Seq. Nos. 001 & 002 Page 4 of 11 Summary Judgment Standard The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting sufficient evidence to eliminate any material Medical Cent er, 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). If the moving party, however, fails to make a prima facie showing, the motion for summary judgment must be denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (a). But, where the movant has established a prima facie case, the opposing party has the burden to show by producing evidentiary proof that a genuine issue of material fact exists (Zuckerman v. Citv ~f New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). The Relevant Policy Provision The policy s relevant provision is as follows: E. LOSS PAYMENT AND VALUATION CONDITIONS Covered Property will be valued at either Replacement Cost or Actual Cash Value, as stated in the Property Choice Declarations and as described below except for the items listed below in item 3. Specific Property Valuations. We will not pay more than your financial interest in the lost or damaged property. *** 3. Speaific Property Valuations g. Stock
7 [* 6] Mtn Smq. Nos. 001 & 002 Page 5 of 11 (1) Manufactured Stock We will determine the value of Stock you have? manufactured at the selling price less discounts and expenses you otherwise would have incurred. This also applies to component parts manufactured by others that will become part of your finished product. (2) Mercantils Stock We will determine the value of Stock, which you have purchased for resale and have sold but not delivered, at the selling price less discounts and expense you otherwise would have had. This does not apply to Stock you have manufactured. (3) Stock in Proamas We will determine the value of Stock in process of manufacture at the replacement cost of the raw materials, plus labor expended and the proper proportion of overhead charges. (4) Commodity Stock For Stock that is bought and sold at an established market exchange, we will determine the value at: (a) The posted market price as of the time and place of loss; (b) Less discounts and expenses you otherwise would have had. (Dodd hff., Ex. A, Property of Choice Coverage Form, pp. 14 and 16). Of these four definitions for stock, only manufactured stock is implicated in this declaratory judgment action. The question to be resolved is whether Quoizel is deemed to be a manufacturer of the damaged inventory that was produced by the Chinese entities. Resolution of this issue will determine
8 [* 7] Mtn Ssq. N & 002 Page 6 of 11 whether the damaged inventory is to be calculated at selling price or replacement cost. Diacuesion The principle is well settled that the issue of whether an agreement is ambiguous is a question of law for the courts the Estat e of Stravinsky, 4 AD3d 75, 81 [13t Dept 20031). ( 1 re ~ Ambiguity is to be determined by looking within the four corners of the document and not to outside Sources (a). Extrinsic evidence of the parties intent may be considered only if the agreement is ambiguous (NFJ, Enterprises LTC v Comcast Cab le Comunications, LLC, 51 AD3d 52, 58 [13t Dept 20081) Here, the term manufacture os manufacturer is not defined in the relevant insurance policy, That term, however, has been defined as a reference to goods resulting from actual, physical work performed on raw materials (Biian Desiqner For Men, InG, v Fireman s Fund Ins. C 0., 264 AD2d 48, 52 [lst Dept 20001). Although the subject matter in Biian ostensibly addressed whether the policyholder was a manufacturer, the proposition for which it is oft cited is the elementary rule of contract construction, namely, that clauses of a contract should be read together contextually in order to give them meaning (HSBC Rank USA v b&lional Equity - Corp., 279 AD2d 251, 253 Dept 20011; (In re the Estate of Stravinskv, 4 AD3d 75, supra). Nonetheless, Biian is instructive. There, the policyholder argued that it must be considered a manufacturer because it is involved in the most
9 [* 8] Mtn Seq. Nos. 001 & 002 Page 7 of 11 important aspects of creating clothing, namely, that it designed the garments, selected the materials to be used, and provided specifications to factories (Biian, 264 AD2d at 53, supra). The First Department rejected that argument. It held that the level of importance of an activity is not what defines that activity, and viewed the policyholder as merely an "architect" of its clothing line rather than a manufacturer of the clothing (L). Quoizel argues that B i j m is distinguishable. Here, rather than being a mere "architect", Quoizel points to the fact that damaged inventory has the Underwriter Laboratories label ("UL"), and that only manufacturers receive such distinction. Contrary to its argument, however, the UL label is not determinative of Quoizel's status as a manufacturer. Absent from the record is an affidavit from a UL representative explaining the significance of such a label. Next, Quoizel argues that its tax filings list it as a manufacturer. That argument is also unavailing because Quoizel also recognized itself as an importer on its tax filings during the relevant time period. Other indicia, namely, that Quoizel's consolidated financial statements for , which identified Quoizel as a manufacturer, that the products from China are backed by a lifetime warranty honored by Quoizel, that Quoizel was the originator and owner of fifty-four active patents and fourteen active trademarks concerning design and manufacture of their products, do not conclusively demonstrate that Quoizel is a
10 [* 9] Mtn Seq. Noa. 001 & 002 Page 8 of 11 manufacturer, Such indicia could be deemed merely promotional or as standing by your product. Notwithstanding these deficiencies, Quoizel argues it has ownership interests in the China factories. The critical elements of ownership are control, supervision, and domination. On the issue of ownership, Quoizel argues it has such an interest with the Chinese entities because the damaged inventory produced in China was in accordance with Quoizel s organized plan and division of labor. Quoizel s vice president of operations, Timothy Hensch, states in two separate affidavits that Quoizel is intricately involved in the management and daily process of manufacturing at the factories in China. In that regard, Mr. Hensch points out that these relationships involve design of the items, and the sourcing of raw materials and component parts, a11 Of which become part of the finished product. In addition, Mr. Hensch states that Quoizel retains hands-on, involvement in the day-to-day process of manufacturing at the Chinese companies. He maintains that Quoizel s employees design specific items, remain On site at these factories on a daily basis for the purpose of supervising, overseeing, instructing, and managing the manufacturing process involved in producing its products. For further support, Quoizel proffers the following to demonstrate that it has an ownership interest and that, as such, it manufactured the damaged inventory: (1) it maintains an office in Dongguan, Guangdong Province, Peoples Republic of China, with
11 [* 10] Mtn Seq. Nos. 001 & 002 Page 9 of 11 a staff of approximately twenty-seven employees including designers, cad operators, and inspectors who work closely with the fifteen factories in China; (2) Quoizel has expended over $2 million for costs associated with its manufacturing activities in China; and (3) Quoizel has a quality control procedure in place that permits it to "stop production" in these Chinese factories. Clearly, under these circumstances, Quoizel has some relationship with the China factories. The question is whether these relationships are sufficient to support a finding that Quoizel has ownership interests for it to be.deemed a de facto manufacturer of the damaged inventory. The weakness in these purported indicia of ownership is the absence of an affidavit from a principal of any of these China factories corroborating these factual assertions. Indeed, in response to this Court's inquiry as to whether Quoizel has "anything in the documentation that establishes ownership of that factory", counsel responded, "[wle did not have anything about that and we established to counsel one could not be located" (June 24, 2001 Tr. at p. 9). Further, as for the $2 million expenditure, Quoizel failed to set forth an amount allocated for labor costs. Absent such evidentiary proof, Quoizel's claims are nothing more than selfserving statements. In fact, with respect to Quoizel's ability to stop production, which would be a persuasive indicator of ownership authority, counsel merely stated that that was his "understanding from my client'' (Id. at p. 27). Indeed, based on
12 [* 11] Mtn Ssq. Noe Page 10 of.11 this record, whether Quoizel could actually stop production is questionable given that these Chinese factories manufacture products for other entities, and could refuse to produce merchandise for Quoizel. Notwithstanding these factual issues, Hartford points to the fact that the damaged inventory is set forth in purchase orders, which it argues is conclusive proof that Quoizel is not a manufacturer. That argument is unavailing. Here, the record demonstrates that the purchase orders are a means by which Quoizel has the merchandise enter the United States. Indeed, as counsel explained: MR. CUMMINS: This whole issue of the purchase order, these are imported goods and there needs to be documentation in order to get them into the country. THE COURT: It is called tariffs. MR. CUMMINS: Yes, exactly. And the purchase order is an accounting device to memorialize transfer of the goods from China's factory into this country. June 24, 2011 Tr. at p. 28). With respect to Quoizel's ownership interest in Lamplux, although approximately 15% of Quoizel's annual production output came from Lamplux, Quoizel failed to proffer the joint venture agreement between it and Lamplux to establish such a relationship. Even if there were an ownership interest in that one factory, a factual issue would still remain. The thrust of Quoizel's argument is that a portion of the damaged inventory originated from Lamplux by way of purchase orders. That fact,
13 [* 12] Mtn Sarq. Nos. 001 & 002 Page 11 of 11 standing alone, is insufficient to warrant summary relief because and fabrication. Based on the foregoing, factual issues exist as to whether Quoizel can be deemed a manufacturer of the damaged inventory. Accordingly, it is denied; and it is further dismissing plaintiff's complaint is denied. Counsel are directed to telephone Part 48 at to schedule a status conference. This memorandum opinion constitutes the decision and order of the Court. NEW YORK COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
Lipton v Citibabes LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 32480(U) September 15, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Eileen A.
Lipton v Citibabes LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 32480(U) September 15, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 102961/2010 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationAGCS Mar. Ins. Co. v LP Ciminelli, Inc NY Slip Op 31533(U) August 11, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge:
AGCS Mar. Ins. Co. v LP Ciminelli, Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31533(U) August 11, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652086/15 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationPublic Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co NY Slip Op 30293(U) March 16, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
Public Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co. 2006 NY Slip Op 30293(U) March 16, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 0601202/2005 Judge: Louis B. York Republished
More informationCarbures Europe, S.A. v Emerging Mkts. Intrinsic Cayman Ltd NY Slip Op 33028(U) November 29, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Carbures Europe, S.A. v Emerging Mkts. Intrinsic Cayman Ltd. 2018 NY Slip Op 33028(U) November 29, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653892/2015 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with
More informationAspen Specialty Ins. Co. v Ironshore Indem. Inc NY Slip Op 31169(U) July 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013
Aspen Specialty Ins. Co. v Ironshore Indem. Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 31169(U) July 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160353/2013 Judge: Arthur F. Engoron Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationHRH Constr., LLC v QBE Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30331(U) March 9, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Cynthia S.
HRH Constr., LLC v QBE Ins. Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 30331(U) March 9, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157259/2014 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationSeneca Ins. Co. v Cimran Co., Inc NY Slip Op 33166(U) June 18, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Charles E.
Seneca Ins. Co. v Cimran Co., Inc. 2012 NY Slip Op 33166(U) June 18, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 601087/10 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationSirius XM Radio Inc. v XL Specialty Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32872(U) November 7, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: O.
Sirius XM Radio Inc. v XL Specialty Ins. Co. 2013 NY Slip Op 32872(U) November 7, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 650831/2013 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMarzan v Liberty Mutual Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32211(U) October 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Debra A.
Marzan v Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 216 NY Slip Op 32211( October 27, 216 Supreme Court, Ne York County Docket Number: 151184/213 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted ith a "3" identifier, i.e., 213 NY Slip
More informationNew York State Commr. of Taxation & Fin. v Wachovia Bank, N.A NY Slip Op 32122(U) August 3, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /05
New York State Commr. of Taxation & Fin. v Wachovia Bank, N.A. 2010 NY Slip Op 32122(U) August 3, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 401181/05 Judge: Judith J. Gische Republished from New York State
More informationCog-Net Bldg. Corp. v Travelers Indem. Co NY Slip Op 32497(U) August 27, 2010 Sup Ct, Richmond County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Joseph J.
Cog-Net Bldg. Corp. v Travelers Indem. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 32497(U) August 27, 2010 Sup Ct, Richmond County Docket Number: 100587/10 Judge: Joseph J. Maltese Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationRamanathan v Aharon 2010 NY Slip Op 32517(U) September 9, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 26744/2009 Judge: Timothy J.
Ramanathan v Aharon 2010 NY Slip Op 32517(U) September 9, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 26744/2009 Judge: Timothy J. Flaherty Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationNew York City Sch. Constr. Auth. v New S. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32867(U) November 7, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
New York City Sch. Constr. Auth. v New S. Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 32867(U) November 7, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 656691/2016 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationTransporation Ins. Co. v Main St. Am. Assur. Co NY Slip Op 30600(U) March 16, 2015 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /14 Judge: Carmen
Transporation Ins. Co. v Main St. Am. Assur. Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 30600(U) March 16, 2015 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 703128/14 Judge: Carmen R. Velasquez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationDevlin v Blaggards III Rest. Corp NY Slip Op 33730(U) November 22, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2007 Judge: Paul
Devlin v Blaggards III Rest. Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 33730(U) November 22, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 113986/2007 Judge: Paul Wooten Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationAmerican Home Assur. Co. v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J NY Slip Op 31468(U) June 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012
American Home Assur. Co. v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. 2014 NY Slip Op 31468(U) June 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651096/2012 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationGlenman Constr. Corp. v First Mercury Ins. Co NY Slip Op 34257(U) January 26, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10
Glenman Constr. Corp. v First Mercury Ins. Co. 2011 NY Slip Op 34257(U) January 26, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 111214/10 Judge: Joan M. Kenney Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMatter of Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v Helms 2015 NY Slip Op 32275(U) November 30, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge:
Matter of Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v Helms 2015 NY Slip Op 32275(U) November 30, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653267/15 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationTower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Artisan Silkscreen & Embroidery, Inc NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 9, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Artisan Silkscreen & Embroidery, Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 9, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157754/2015 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with
More informationCountry-Wide Ins. Co. v Excelsior Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32646(U) September 1, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013
Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excelsior Ins. Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 32646(U) September 1, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158326/2013 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationBovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. v Virginia Sur. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32591(U) September 16, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /07 Judge:
Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. v Virginia Sur. Ins. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 32591(U) September 16, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 107326/07 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York State Unified
More informationJ.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co NY Slip Op 31295(U) July 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge:
J.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co. 2016 NY Slip Op 31295(U) July 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 600979/09 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationDorchester, L.L.C. v Herzka Ins. Agency, Inc NY Slip Op 30177(U) January 25, 2019 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /16 Judge:
Dorchester, L.L.C. v Herzka Ins. Agency, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 30177(U) January 25, 2019 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 607478/16 Judge: Stephen A. Bucaria Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationJ.T. Magen & Co., Inc. v Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 31584(U) July 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015
J.T. Magen & Co., Inc. v Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 31584(U) July 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150761/2015 Judge: Jennifer G. Schecter Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationMerchant Cash & Capital, LLC v Yehowa Med. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 31590(U) July 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:
Merchant Cash & Capital, LLC v Yehowa Med. Servs., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31590(U) July 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 602039-16 Judge: Jerome C. Murphy Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationGlobex Intl., Inc. v Mago Foods LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30096(U) January 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:
Globex Intl., Inc. v Mago Foods LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30096(U) January 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653827/2013 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationValley Forge Ins. Co. v Arch Specialty Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32320(U) November 22, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v Arch Specialty Ins. Co. 2016 NY Slip Op 32320(U) November 22, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654217/2015 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationAsciutto v New York City Empls. Retirement Sys NY Slip Op 30093(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /2018
Asciutto v New York City Empls. Retirement Sys. 2019 NY Slip Op 30093(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 511644/2018 Judge: Paul Wooten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationEducap, Inc. v Tsekas 2013 NY Slip Op 31851(U) August 9, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Republished
Educap, Inc. v Tsekas 2013 NY Slip Op 31851(U) August 9, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 111355/10 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationKlenosky v David Lerner Assoc., Inc NY Slip Op 33112(U) October 28, 2010 Nassau County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Stephen A.
Klenosky v David Lerner Assoc., Inc. 2010 NY Slip Op 33112(U) October 28, 2010 Nassau County Docket Number: 007367/10 Judge: Stephen A. Bucaria Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationBig Apple Circus, Inc. v Chubb Insurance Group 2002 NY Slip Op 30054(U) April 19, 2002 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2000
Big Apple Circus, Inc. v Chubb Insurance Group 2002 NY Slip Op 30054(U) April 19, 2002 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 0601871/2000 Judge: Martin Schoenfeld Republished from New York State
More informationOld Republic Gen. Ins. Corp. v Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co NY Slip Op 31975(U) July 23, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Old Republic Gen. Ins. Corp. v Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 31975(U) July 23, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651797/2017 Judge: Anthony Cannataro Cases posted with
More informationMatter of American Home Assur. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30280(U) February 3, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
Matter of American Home Assur. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 30280(U) February 3, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109459/09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from
More informationMatter of Moore v City of N.Y NY Slip Op 30164(U) January 23, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Peter H.
Matter of Moore v City of N.Y. 2013 NY Slip Op 30164(U) January 23, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 102874/12 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationSerpa v Liberty Mut. Mid-Atlantic Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33438(U) November 23, 2018 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2016 Judge:
Serpa v Liberty Mut. Mid-Atlantic Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 33438(U) November 23, 2018 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 711913/2016 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationLexington Ins. Co. v Physician's Choice Ambulance Serv., Inc NY Slip Op 30164(U) January 20, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Lexington Ins. Co. v Physician's Choice Ambulance Serv., Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 30164(U) January 20, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157834/2014 Judge: Ellen M. Coin Cases posted with
More informationUtica Mut. Ins. Co. v Government Empls. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32428(U) September 13, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 23395/09
Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v Government Empls. Ins. Co. 2011 NY Slip Op 32428(U) September 13, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 23395/09 Judge: Thomas P. Phelan Republished from New York State
More informationAmedore Land Devs., LLC v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30359(U) February 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Albany County Docket Number:
Amedore Land Devs., LLC v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. 2012 NY Slip Op 30359(U) February 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Albany County Docket Number: 1494-10 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi Republished from New York
More informationJ.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33799(U) September 13, 2010 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Charles
J.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 33799(U) September 13, 2010 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 600979/09 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationOesterle v A.J. Clark Real Estate Corp NY Slip Op 31641(U) August 28, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Kelly
Oesterle v A.J. Clark Real Estate Corp. 2015 NY Slip Op 31641(U) August 28, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153081/13 Judge: Kelly A. O'Neill Levy Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMatter of th St. LLC v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 32216(U) October 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 803/17 Judge:
Matter of 24-60 47th St. LLC v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 32216(U) October 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 803/17 Judge: Howard G. Lane Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationLPL Holdings, Inc. v Pacific Life Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33802(U) March 3, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge:
LPL Holdings, Inc. v Pacific Life Ins. Co. 2011 NY Slip Op 33802(U) March 3, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 603652/09 Judge: Barbara R. Kapnick Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationState of N.Y. Mtge. Agency v Cliffcrest Hous. Dev. Fund Corp NY Slip Op 32575(U) December 4, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
State of N.Y. Mtge. Agency v 936-938 Cliffcrest Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. 2016 NY Slip Op 32575(U) December 4, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 850011/13 Judge: Joan A. Madden Cases posted
More informationMatter of Wentworth Originations, LLC v Ferrer 2012 NY Slip Op 31294(U) May 8, 2012 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 27269/11 Judge:
Matter of Wentworth Originations, LLC v Ferrer 2012 NY Slip Op 31294(U) May 8, 2012 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 27269/11 Judge: Howard G. Lane Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationGPH Partners LLC v Westchester Fire Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30582(U) March 18, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /08 Judge:
GPH Partners LLC v Westchester Fire Ins. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 30582(U) March 18, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 114983/08 Judge: Jane S. Solomon Republished from New York State Unified
More information3859 Tenth Ave. Corp. v United Natl. Specialty Ins. Co NY Slip Op 31414(U) June 27, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
3859 Tenth Ave. Corp. v United Natl. Specialty Ins. Co. 2013 NY Slip Op 31414(U) June 27, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 112898/10 Judge: Joan M. Kenney Republished from New York State
More informationGranirer v Bakery, Inc NY Slip Op 32624(U) September 20, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /06 Judge: Barbara R.
Granirer v Bakery, Inc. 2010 NY Slip Op 32624(U) September 20, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109915/06 Judge: Barbara R. Kapnick Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2015 08:23 PM INDEX NO. 651841/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x CAPITAL ONE TAXI MEDALLION
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE CO., Plaintiffs, vs. ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE CO.. Defendants. Case No.
More informationGreat Wall Realty Corp. v Wong 2014 NY Slip Op 31093(U) March 13, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Marguerite A.
Great Wall Realty Corp. v Wong 2014 NY Slip Op 31093(U) March 13, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 700536/2013 Judge: Marguerite A. Grays Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationKahn v Garg 2016 NY Slip Op 31516(U) August 10, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Jeffrey K.
Kahn v Garg 2016 NY Slip Op 31516(U) August 10, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652334/2013 Judge: Jeffrey K. Oing Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationU.S. Bank Natl. Assoc. v Yarbro 2013 NY Slip Op 30571(U) March 22, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5216/2009 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal
U.S. Bank Natl. Assoc. v Yarbro 2013 NY Slip Op 30571(U) March 22, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5216/2009 Judge: Bernice Daun Siegal Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationMatter of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc NY Slip Op 33205(U) April 30, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: O.
Matter of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 33205(U) April 30, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650607/2012 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationChelsea Piers L.P. v Colony Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33043(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge:
Chelsea Piers L.P. v Colony Ins. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 33043(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150402/2017 Judge: Gerald Lebovits Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationSenhert v New York City Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 32807(U) November 25, 2009 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /06 Judge: Harold B.
Senhert v New York City Tr. Auth. 2009 NY Slip Op 32807(U) November 25, 2009 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 117950/06 Judge: Harold B. Beeler Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationA KHODADADI RADIOLOGY P.C. a/a/o Helen Boddie Khan, Plaintiff, against. NYCTA - MaBSTOA, Defendant.
[*1] A Khodadadi Radiology P.C. v NYCTA 2006 NY Slip Op 50832(U) Decided on April 24, 2006 Civil Court, Kings County Baily-Schiffman, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
More informationTraditum Group, LLC v Sungard Kiodex LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30378(U) February 7, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge:
Traditum Group, LLC v Sungard Kiodex LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30378(U) February 7, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651485/13 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More information386 3rd Ave. Partners Ltd. Partnership v Alliance Brokerage Corp NY Slip Op 31484(U) July 11, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number:
386 3rd Ave. Partners Ltd. Partnership v Alliance Brokerage Corp. 2017 NY Slip Op 31484(U) July 11, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 500074114 Judge: Lawrence S. Knipel Cases posted with
More informationShareholder Representative Servs. LLC v NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc NY Slip Op 31266(U) July 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Shareholder Representative Servs. LLC v NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31266(U) July 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651145/2014 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a
More informationAdditional Insured - Bad Faith
NEW YORK Additional Insured - Bad Faith New York Trial Court Finds Coverage But Denies Bids for Attorney s Fees and Finding of Insurer Bad Faith 100 Church Fee Owner LLC v Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co.,
More informationMatter of J.G. Wentworth Originations, LLC v Rahman 2011 NY Slip Op 33363(U) December 14, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21636/2011
Matter of J.G. Wentworth Originations, LLC v Rahman 2011 NY Slip Op 33363(U) December 14, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21636/2011 Judge: David Elliot Republished from New York State
More information14902 Law Offices of Zachary R. Index /14 Greenhill P.C., et al., Plaintiff-Appellants,
Acosta, J.P., Saxe, Richter, Gische, JJ. 14902 Law Offices of Zachary R. Index 650414/14 Greenhill P.C., et al., Plaintiff-Appellants, -against- Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
More informationGS Plasticos Limitada v Bureau Veritas 2013 NY Slip Op 31904(U) July 23, 2013 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Joan A.
GS Plasticos Limitada v Bureau Veritas 2013 NY Slip Op 31904(U) July 23, 2013 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 650242/09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationNew York State Workers' Compensation Bd. v Classic Ins. Agency 2011 NY Slip Op 30424(U) February 17, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. v Classic Ins. Agency 2011 NY Slip Op 30424(U) February 17, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 601679/08 Judge: Debra A. James Republished from
More informationMatter of Lewis County 2012 NY Slip Op 33565(U) October 18, 2012 Supreme Court, Lewis County Docket Number: Judge: Charles C.
Matter of Lewis County 2012 NY Slip Op 33565(U) October 18, 2012 Supreme Court, Lewis County Docket Number: 2010-000556 Judge: Charles C. Merrell Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationNational Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v Compaction Sys. Corp. of N.J NY Slip Op 31461(U) June 28, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County
National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v Compaction Sys. Corp. of N.J. 2013 NY Slip Op 31461(U) June 28, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 107838/2009 Judge: Shlomo S. Hagler Republished
More informationMatter of Progressive, Cas. Ins. Co. v Milter 2017 NY Slip Op 32234(U) October 19, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16
Matter of Progressive, Cas. Ins. Co. v Milter 2017 NY Slip Op 32234(U) October 19, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654885/16 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationJacal Hacking Corp. v American Tr. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30031(U) January 6, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge:
Jacal Hacking Corp. v American Tr. Ins. Co. 2017 NY Slip Op 30031(U) January 6, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154248/12 Judge: Joan A. Madden Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More information: Ye s N o. Cross-Motion: YORK COUNTY SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW. PRESENT: Hon. ;. NON-FINAL DISPOSITION.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW PRESENT: Hon. p.gq$l! g g$$ & ; & 5.i ~u?j.~;::g i #MS&~ CL. _ Justice YORK COUNTY PART_a INDEX NO. MOTION DATE The following papers, numbered 1 to were read
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) Giuliani Associates, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Giuliani Associates, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 51672 ) Under Contract No. NAS5-96139 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Herman
More informationMargiotta v Suffolk County Police Department 2013 NY Slip Op 30017(U) January 3, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 17738/2012 Judge:
Margiotta v Suffolk County Police Department 2013 NY Slip Op 30017(U) January 3, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 17738/2012 Judge: John J.J. Jones Jr Republished from New York State Unified
More informationStoler v Herald Natl. Bank 2015 NY Slip Op 31361(U) July 22, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Anil C.
Stoler v Herald Natl. Bank 2015 NY Slip Op 31361(U) July 22, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650657/2010 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationKeyspan Gas E. Corp. v Munich Reins. Am., Inc NY Slip Op 30427(U) March 16, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /1997
Keyspan Gas E. Corp. v Munich Reins. Am., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 30427(U) March 16, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 604715/1997 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationTri State Dismantling Corp. v Robo Breaking Co., Inc NY Slip Op 30859(U) April 24, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /15
Tri State Dismantling Corp. v Robo Breaking Co., Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 30859(U) April 24, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 500183/15 Judge: Bernard J. Graham Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationUnitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC 2010 NY Slip Op 31936(U) February 5, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC 2010 NY Slip Op 31936(U) February 5, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 115586/07 Judge: Jane S. Solomon Republished from New
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/2014 INDEX NO. 653829/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP,
More informationCredit Agricole Corporate v BDC Fin., LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30135(U) January 20, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge:
Credit Agricole Corporate v BDC Fin., LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30135(U) January 20, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651989/10 Judge: Barbara Jaffe Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationPepper v GEICO Indem. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 31699(U) June 24, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 15893/09 Judge: Denise L.
Pepper v GEICO Indem. Ins. Co. 2010 NY Slip Op 31699(U) June 24, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 15893/09 Judge: Denise L. Sher Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationCushman & Wakefield, Inc. v JP Morgan Chase & Co NY Slip Op 34290(U) October 17, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /11
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v JP Morgan Chase & Co. 2011 NY Slip Op 34290(U) October 17, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104776/11 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationBasis PAC-Rim Opportunity Fund (Master) v TCW Asset Mgt. Co. Decided on March 2, Appellate Division, First Department. Kapnick, J.
Page 1 of 6 Basis PAC-Rim Opportunity Fund (Master) v TCW Asset Mgt. Co. 2017 NY Slip Op 01644 Decided on March 2, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Kapnick, J. Published by New York State Law
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 52109 ) Under Contract No. N68711-91-C-9509 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:
More informationNEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY. MAN CHOI CHIU and NORTHERN Action #1 BLVD.,LLC, Plaintiffs, Index No /07
Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY Present: HONORABLE ALLAN B. WEISS IA Part 2 Justice MAN CHOI CHIU and 42-52 NORTHERN Action #1 BLVD.,LLC, Plaintiffs, Index No. 21905/07 -against-
More informationStern Tannenbaum & Bell LLP, New York (Aegis J. Frumento of counsel), for respondent.
BGC Notes, LLC v Gordon 2016 NY Slip Op 05775 Decided on August 11, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law 431. This opinion
More informationSanabria v Aguero-Borges 2012 NY Slip Op 33606(U) August 2, 2012 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 19689/08 Judge: Gerald E.
Sanabria v Aguero-Borges 01 NY Slip Op 606(U) August, 01 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 19689/08 Judge: Gerald E. Loehr Cases posted with a "0000" identifier, i.e., 01 NY Slip Op 0001(U), are
More informationRyan et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al Doc. 53. Case 1:17-cv TWT Document 53 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 15
Ryan et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al Doc. 53 Case 1:17-cv-00817-TWT Document 53 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
More informationAFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT -against- : : ABEX CORPORATION, et al., : : Defendants. : : X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -------------------------------------------------------X : RAYMOND FINERTY and : MARY FINERTY, : INDEX NO. 190187/10 : Plaintiffs,
More informationForest Labs., Inc. v A rch Ins. Co.
Forest Labs., Inc. v A rch Ins. Co. 2012 NY Slip Op 22291 [38 Misc 3d 260] September 12, 2012 Schweitzer, J. Supreme Court, New York County Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA JOHN RANNIGAN, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) Case No. 1:08-CV-256 v. ) ) Chief Judge Curtis L. Collier LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE ) FOR
More informationArnone v Weill Med. Coll. of Cornell Univ NY Slip Op 30591(U) March 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:
Arnone v Weill Med. Coll. of Cornell Univ. 2017 NY Slip Op 30591(U) March 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156210/2013 Judge: Kelly A. O'Neill Levy Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 7, 2005 97121 NORMAN PEPPER et al., Respondents, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationNocella v Fort Dearborn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y NY Slip Op 31311(U) May 17, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge:
Nocella v Fort Dearborn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. 2010 NY Slip Op 31311(U) May 17, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 000437-08 Judge: Arthur M. Diamond Republished from New York State Unified
More informationOne William St. Capital Mgt., LP v Education Loan Trust IV 2015 NY Slip Op 31364(U) July 18, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
One William St. Capital Mgt., LP v Education Loan Trust IV 2015 NY Slip Op 31364(U) July 18, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652274/2012 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationBrands Cycles v Great Am. E&S Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30317(U) January 27, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Randy Sue
Brands Cycles v Great Am. E&S Ins. Co. 2011 NY Slip Op 30317(U) January 27, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 006546/09 Judge: Randy Sue Marber Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationBACM Carle Place Off., LLC v HLP Old Country TIC LLC 2012 NY Slip Op 33710(U) August 7, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number:
BACM 2005-6 Carle Place Off., LLC v HLP Old Country TIC LLC 2012 NY Slip Op 33710(U) August 7, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 600710-12 Judge: Timothy S. Driscoll Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationCase 9:16-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:16-cv-80987-BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 9 THE MARBELLA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, and NORMAN SLOANE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiffs,
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Target Natl. Bank v. Loncar, 2013-Ohio-3350.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT TARGET NATIONAL BANK, ) CASE NO. 12 MA 104 ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) VS. )
More informationCase 2:05-cv SRD-JCW Document Filed 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 18958 Filed 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CIVIL ACTION CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION No. 05-4182
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 59 Filed: 05/27/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:392
Case: 1:13-cv-03094 Document #: 59 Filed: 05/27/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:392 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ELENA FRIDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 13 C 03094
More informationNEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY Present: HONORABLE PATRICIA P. SATTERFIELD IA Part 19 Justice
[* 1 ] Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY Present: HONORABLE PATRICIA P. SATTERFIELD IA Part 19 Justice x Index TOWER RISK MANAGEMENT, etc., et al., Number 8413 2005 Plaintiff, Motion
More informationdoing business as Parking Systems. Pursuant to the agreement, the Village retained
SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK Present: HON. F. DANA WINSLOW, Justice TRIAL/IAS, PART 7 THE VILLAGE OF LAKE SUCCESS, NASSAU COUNTY Plaintiff, -against- MOTION DATE: 11/14/08 MOTION
More information