Bank Regulatory Practice
|
|
- Emerald Watkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bank Regulatory Practice SEPTEMBER 2016 Does the Federal Reserve Board have Authority to Set Incentive Compensation? Earlier this year, the Agencies 1 published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the Proposed Rule ) 2 on incentivebased compensation arrangements. The comment period expired July 22, 2016, and proposed final rules on this subject are still forthcoming. The Proposed Rule includes a vast new set of procedural, substantive and longer-term requirements over employees, officers and directors of financial institutions. In some instances, the Proposed Rule exceeds or conflicts with relatively new requirements that other federal agencies, such as the SEC, have adopted. This article explores whether the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FRB ) has authority to enforce the rules as proposed with respect to savings and loan holding companies ( SLHCs ) that are operating insurance companies. We conclude that there is a question with respect to the authority of the FRB over these institutions. Therefore, the FRB should reconsider the scope of its Proposed Rule and the inclusion of insurance SLHCs and their non-depository insurance company subsidiaries primarily because (1) the FRB lacks statutory authority to enforce such provisions, (2) inclusion would be contrary to the intent of Congress, and (3) at the very least, inclusion of SLHCs is premature prior to the FRB taking final action with regard to insurance SLHC capital requirements. 3 I. Background The Proposed Rule carries out Section 956 of the Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd-Frank ). 4 Section 956(b) requires the Agencies to jointly prescribe regulations or guidelines that prohibit any types of incentive-based payment arrangements, or any feature of any such arrangements, that the [Agencies] determine encourages inappropriate risks by covered financial institutions. 5 (emphasis added). The Agencies expressly cite Section 956 in the Proposed Rule as the statutory basis for the proposed rules on incentive compensation. 6 II. Does the FRB have a Statutory Mandate to Enforce Incentive Compensation Rules? Upon significant review, it is apparent that the FRB lacks a statutory mandate to enforce the incentive compensation rules as proposed because (A) the language of Section 956 of Dodd-Frank, along with its internally referenced statutes (1) excluded such power from OTS (defined below) authority, (2) specifically reserved such power to the State insurance regulators and (3) the FRB implicitly acknowledged the limitation in the Proposed Rule; (B) a contrary interpretation would be in conflict with the McCarran-Ferguson Act; (C) the OCC and FDIC specifically excluded persons providing insurance ; and (D) regulation by State insurance departments is consistent with the statute. 1 The FRB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC ), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC ), the National Credit Union Administration (the NCUA and in combination with the FRB, OCC, and FDIC, the Federal Prudential Banking Regulators ), the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ), and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (the FHFA ) (each an Agency and collectively, the Agencies ) F.R pub. avail. June 10, This article does not examine any potential constitutional issues associated with the Proposed Rule U.S.C U.S.C. 5641(b) Fed. Reg (Jun. 10, 2016). Attorney advertising materials 2016 Winston & Strawn LLP
2 A. Section 956 of Dodd-Frank and Section 505 of GLBA Of particular note is that the regulatory regime established by Section 956 of Dodd-Frank does not provide that the statute and any regulations issued thereunder shall be enforced by the Agencies that promulgated the regulations. Rather, Section 956(d) of Dodd-Frank expressly provides that Section 956 of Dodd-Frank and the regulations issued thereunder shall be enforced under section 505 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act [( GLBA )] and, for purposes of such section, a violation of this section or such regulations shall be treated as a violation of subtitle A of title V of such Act. 7 In turn, Section 505(a)(6) of GLBA 8 expressly provides that Subtitle A (Disclosure of Nonpublic Information) of Title V (Privacy) and regulations prescribed thereunder are to be enforced as to insurance companies by State insurance authorities, subject to Section 104 of the Act, and not by the Agencies. It provides: [t]his subtitle and the regulations prescribed thereunder shall be enforced by the Federal functional regulators, the State insurance authorities, and the Federal Trade Commission with respect to financial institutions and other persons subject to their jurisdictions under applicable law, as follows: (1) Under section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, in the case of -... (B) member banks of the Federal Reserve System (other than national banks), branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than Federal branches, Federal agencies, and insured State branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign banks, organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act, and bank holding companies [ BHCs ] and their nonbank subsidiaries (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies, and investment advisers) by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;... (D) savings associations the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and any subsidiaries of such savings associations (except brokers, dealers, persons providing insurance, investment companies, and investment advisers), by the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (6) Under State insurance law, in the case of any person engaged in providing insurance, by the applicable 7 12 U.S.C. 5461(d) U.S.C State insurance authority of the State in which the person is domiciled, subject to section 104 of this Act.... (emphasis added). Presumably the Agencies, including the FRB, recognized the need for an exception by including, in the proposed incentive compensation rule, Section.13, which expressly provides that [t]he provisions of this part shall be enforced under section 505 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and, for purposes of this section, a violation of this part shall be treated as a violation of subtitle A of title V of such Act. Thus, the Agencies have recognized that, for these institutions, they are not responsible for enforcement. i. Exclusion of FRB Authority over Insurance SLHCs Compensation There is a lack of any statutory basis for FRB enforcement authority in the area of insurance SLHC compensation. Section 505 of GLBA does not include any enforcement authority against SLHCs even in the provision providing enforcement authority to the Office of Thrift Supervision (the OTS ), the regulatory agency with responsibility for supervising SLHCs prior to such authority being transferred to the FRB following passage of Dodd-Frank. In fact, it is unclear that Congress was in any way concerned about the effect of incentive compensation on the financial soundness 9 of SLHCs as the conference report for Dodd- Frank does not address SLHCs at all, but instead targets BHCs in its language. 10 Since Section 505 of GLBA does not convey any enforcement authority over SLHCs, even to the OTS, the FRB cannot convincingly conclude that authority to enforce Section 505 of GLBA was transferred to it. Thus, authority to enforce Section 956 of Dodd-Frank and its implementing regulations as to insurance SLHCs would not rest with the FRB. 9 Financial soundness being a key determinant as it was the primary motivation for enactment of Dodd-Frank generally, and part of the express intent of Section 956 is to discourage incentivizing inappropriate risk-taking which could lead to material financial loss to the covered financial institution. 10 See Report of Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Conference, 111th Congress, Report 176 ( Section 956. Excessive compensation by holding companies of depository institutions. Section 956 amends Section 5 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to establish standards prohibiting as an unsafe and unsound practice any compensation plan of a BHC that provides an executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits; or could lead to material financial loss to the BHC. This applies regulatory authority currently applicable to banks to their holding companies. ) 2016 Winston & Strawn LLP 2
3 ii. Reservation of Enforcement Authority to the State Insurance Regulators Section 505 of GLBA explicitly places the authority to bring enforcement actions with the State insurance authority of the State where the company is domiciled, subject to Section 104. Thus, it would appear that only State insurance authorities may enforce Section 505 of GLBA as to insurers and, therefore, only State insurance authorities have the legal authority to enforce Section 956 of Dodd- Frank and any implementing regulations against insurers. Congress intent on the issue of enforcement authority has been extremely clear, as such enforcement language, which was originally a part of an earlier bill (the Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009, which was passed out of the House, but was never addressed in the Senate), was incorporated again when Dodd-Frank was introduced in the House, and although left out of the Senate version of the bill, 11 was deemed so crucial when the House and Senate met in conference that it was reinserted. Reservation of enforcement authority in State insurance commissioners the primary supervisors of insurance companies that are also SLHCs precludes the FRB from examining insurance SLHCs for compliance with any final incentive compensation regulation. Enforcement is a natural outgrowth of supervision. Examination is an inherent aspect of supervision and normally serves as the basis of enforcement action. If, as is the case, enforcement authority has been denied to the FRB with respect to insurance SLHCs, then similarly, the authority to examine insurance SLHCs for compliance with any incentive compensation rule would also rest exclusively with State insurance authorities and not with the FRB. The FRB lacks discretionary legal authority to examine or bring enforcement actions separate or apart from actions taken by state regulators. To the extent that the FRB disagrees with an action, or lack thereof, taken by the State insurance commissioners, discretionary authority has been delegated solely to the insurance departments, and the FRB does not have authority to supersede such actions. There is nothing inconsistent in authorizing the FRB to adopt regulations applicable to insurance SLHCs, but leaving the enforcement authority with State insurance 11 Although it should also be noted that the Senate version was significantly shorter, and the omission may have simply been one of oversight. departments. Such an arrangement that the FRB can make regulations but is not responsible for supervision and enforcement is consistent with current practice in which the FRB promulgates regulations and enforcement of such regulations is left by Congress to other agencies. For example, Federal Reserve Regulation T (Credit by Brokers and Dealers) imposes margin requirements and was adopted by the FRB, but is enforced by the SEC. iii. The FRB has Expressed Support for its Limited Authority The FRB expressly and publicly acknowledged in its July 22, 2011 notice of intent and request for comment 12 that Section 505 of GLBA does not apply to SLHCs or their non-depository institutions. Therefore, entirely apart from whether Section 956(d) limits enforcement and examination authority over insurance SLHCs, it may even be concluded that no agency has enforcement authority over any SLHC s compliance with any final incentive compensation rule. Consistent with the above interpretation of Section 956(d), FRB Governor Daniel K. Tarullo has recognized, in his address to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ( NAIC ) International Insurance Forum on May 20, 2016, that the FRB s oversight role complements the role that insurance regulators play, and while Dodd- Frank broadened the FRB s statutory mandate, it also preserved functional regulation. Tarullo added that the FRB has no role in regulating the manner in which insurance is provided as that is the province of State insurance regulators. B. Conflict with the McCarran-Ferguson Act The McCarran-Ferguson Act largely reserves regulation of the business of insurance to the States. It expressly provides that [n]o Act of Congress shall be construed to impair any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance. 13 Section 104(a) of GLBA, incorporated by reference by Section 505 of GLBA, affirms this position and provides in no uncertain terms that [the McCarran-Ferguson Act] remains the law of the United States. Section 956 of Dodd-Frank explicitly references Section 505 of GLBA, which has, in turn, deferred 12 Continued Application of Regulations to Savings and Loan Holding Companies. 76 F. R (July 22, 2011) U.S.C. 1012(b) Winston & Strawn LLP 3
4 enforcement in the case of persons engaged in providing insurance to state insurance regulators and further bolstered that deferral by referencing GLBA Section 104 s intent not to supersede state regulation of the insurance industry. Congress, in enacting Section 956, made a careful and deliberate decision to avoid creating any conflict between Section 956 (and regulations implementing Section 956) and any State law that regulates the business of insurance. C. Apparent Violation of the Requirement to Work Jointly with the Other Agencies Neither the OCC nor the FDIC propose to apply the requirements of the Proposal to persons providing insurance; only the FRB does so. Thus, the FRB s action is inconsistent with the statutory directive that the Agencies develop the rule jointly. 14 The OCC and the FDIC presumably excluded persons providing insurance because, under the terms of the GLBA, which governs enforcement of the rule, the Prudential Banking Regulators have no power over persons providing insurance. That power rests with state insurance regulators. D. Reserving Enforcement Authority to the States is Consistent with the Statute Reserving the regulation of operating insurance companies to State insurance departments is also consistent with ensuring financial soundness of the insurance industry. 15 A primary objective of state regulation of insurance companies is to regulate the industry in a way to monitor institutions and licensed individuals and to correct market failures that would otherwise cause insurers to incur an excessive risk of insolvency. 16 Significant state insurance department regulatory resources are employed to monitor market behaviors, compliance, and solvency. 17 Each state, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Territories are responsible for regulating the insurance business 14 See Section 956(b) ( the appropriate Federal regulators shall jointly prescribe regulations or guidelines that prohibit any types of incentive-based payment arrangement, or any feature of any such arrangement, that the regulators determine encourages inappropriate risks by covered financial institutions ) and Section 956(e)(2)(G) ( the term covered financial institution means any other financial institution that the appropriate Federal regulators, jointly, by rule, determine should be treated as a covered financial institution for purposes of this section. ) 15 As noted above, financial soundness is a primary element of Dodd-Frank generally, and is specifically highlighted in Section Report of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ( NAIC ) and the Federal Reserve System Joint Troubled Company Working Subgroup: A Comparison of the Insurance and Banking Regulatory Frameworks for Identifying and Supervising Companies in Weakened Financial Condition (April 19, 2005) at Ibid. within their own jurisdictions, and each maintains its own insurance department operating under the supervision of an elected or appointed commissioner, director or superintendent. Insurance companies are chartered by individual jurisdictions and receive a license (certificate of authority) to conduct business from each jurisdiction in which the company wishes to underwrite insurance. 18 Those licenses may be revoked if insurance commissioners determine that the companies are not operating in a safe and sound manner. Since 1792, insurance companies have been required by the States to limit their activities and investments and to file financial statements. 19 State insurance regulators monitor insurance company financial health by requiring extensive financial reporting based on conservative statutory accounting principles that do not permit the inclusion of certain assets in calculating an insurer s surplus. That reporting and many other information sources are used to screen for solvency, 20 as are on-site examinations. Using these tools, State insurance regulators historically have done an excellent job of limiting risk at insurance companies. Between 1980 and 2010, insurance companies had a lower failure rate (0.40%) than either banks (0.49%) or thrift institutions (2.07%). 21 III. Is Inclusion of Insurance SLHCs Contrary to Congressional Intent? In Dodd-Frank, Congress recognized that various exceptions were appropriate for the insurance industry. Insurance companies: (1) are inherently different from banks in their business operations and risk profiles; (2) are supervised and regulated in a different manner than banks; (3) have compensation methods that vary greatly from other types of financial services institutions; and (4) that are forced to apply incentive compensation restrictions as proposed in the Proposed Rule particularly the discrete insurance companies regulated as Covered Institutions would be disparately impacted and unfairly harmed in their ability to retain and attract high-quality employees. That disparate impact, over time, could potentially reduce the competitiveness, strength and success of the companies, particularly as compared to other insurance companies that are not covered by such a rule. Congress, quite possibly recognizing these factors, specifically exempted insurance 18 Ibid. 19 Ibid. at Ibid. at Comparative Failure Experience in the U.S. and Canadian Life Insurance and Banking Industries From 1980 To 2010 (March 2013) at Winston & Strawn LLP 4
5 companies. Thus, applying the proposed rule to insurance SLHCs runs contrary to both the enabling legislation and the intent of Congress. Congress intent to make exceptions for insurance companies was made explicit in other sections of Dodd-Frank notably Section 619 (the Volcker Rule ), which stated that one of the policy goals in implementing the Volcker Rule was to appropriately accommodate the business of insurance within an insurance company, subject to regulation in accordance with the relevant insurance company investment laws, while protecting the safety and soundness of any banking entity with which the insurance company is affiliated and of the United States financial system Therefore, the Volcker Rule sought to ensure that the normal operations of insurance companies would be excluded from inappropriate federal oversight and preserves the existing system of State regulation. IV. Is Inclusion of Insurance SLHCs Appropriate Prior to the FRB s Announcement of Final Capital Rules? It is difficult to see how it would be appropriate for the FRB to propose a rule on how to assess risk in compensation plans for employees in insurance companies based on the risk that such employees pose to the safety and soundness of the holding company or the underlying depository institution at a point in time when the FRB has not yet adopted final rules to set forth the basis on which it will assess risk for the SLHC insurance companies it regulates. On June 3, 2016, the FRB issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking ( ANPR ) regarding various potential approaches to regulatory capital requirements for depository institution holding companies significantly engaged in insurance activities. Comments were due on that ANPR on September 16, 2016, and eventually the FRB may propose a rule to reflect how it will consider the adequacy of capital of such firms. At some indefinite later date, the FRB may adopt a final rule and subsequently that rule may become effective, at which time it will become clear what capital levels the FRB will expect such insurance companies to maintain and, by extension, apply portions of the incentive-based compensation rule that rely on regulatory capital. 23 Therefore, it is, at the very least, premature to issue rules regulating the compensation of insurance company employees whose conduct theoretically could put the capital of the insurance company at risk. This is a developing issue and we expect the Agencies to release Final Rules or Proposed Final Rules in the future. Winston & Strawn is monitoring this situation and will provide additional client alerts as needed. If you have any questions about this issue, or any other banking regulatory matters, please contact your usual Winston & Strawn attorney or a member of the Bank Regulatory practice group listed on the next page U.S.C. 1851(b)(1)(F). 23 Such standards would be necessary, for example, should the final definition of significant risk -taker continue to integrate a capital exposure test Winston & Strawn LLP 5
6 Key Contacts Christine A. Edwards Chair, Bank Regulatory Practice Jerry Loeser Of Counsel Sears Sterling Associate, Chicago These materials have been prepared by Winston & Strawn LLP for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code. Receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. No reproduction or redistribution without written permission of Winston & Strawn LLP Winston & Strawn LLP 6
Table of Contents. August 2010 Arnold & Porter LLP
Rulemakings under the Dodd-Frank Act The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Act) requires the federal financial regulators to promulgate more than 180 new rules. The Act also permits
More informationM. Maureen Murphy Legislative Attorney. February 7, CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Titles III and VI, Regulation of Depository Institutions and Depository Institution Holding Companies M. Maureen Murphy Legislative Attorney
More informationFederal Financial Agencies Propose New Regulations on Executive Compensation: Here Is What You Need to Know
Federal Financial Agencies Propose New Regulations on Executive Compensation: Here Is What You Need to Know May 19, 2016 Winston & Strawn conducts an annual webinar series to assist Financial Institution
More informationGramm-Leach-Bliley Act 15 USC, Subchapter I, Sec Disclosure of Nonpublic Personal Information
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act 15 USC, Subchapter I, Sec. 6801-6809 Disclosure of Nonpublic Personal Information Sec. 6801. Protection of nonpublic personal information. (a) Privacy obligation policy. (b) Financial
More informationEvaluation of the FDIC s Economic Analysis of Three Rulemakings to Implement Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act
Office of Evaluations Report No. EVAL-11-003 Evaluation of the FDIC s Economic Analysis of Three Rulemakings to Implement Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act June 2011 Executive Summary Evaluation of the
More informationUS Federal Banking Agencies Recommend Changes to Permissible Banking Entity Activities and Investments
Legal Update September 21, 2016 US Federal Banking Agencies Recommend Changes to Permissible Banking Entity Activities and On September 8, 2016, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
More informationAGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) is repealing
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 216 [Docket No. R-1483] RIN 7100 AE13 Privacy of Consumer Information (Regulation P) AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY:
More informationMany Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act Become Effective on July 21, 2011 the One-Year Anniversary of Its Enactment
Many Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act Become Effective on July 21, 2011 the One-Year Anniversary of Its Enactment SUMMARY The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act
More informationFinancial Institutions Regulation Group Client Alert: Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire 1 : Enforcement of the Volcker Rule by the Five Agencies
July 21, 2015 CONTACT Douglas Landy Partner 212-530-5234 dlandy@milbank.com James Kong Associate 212-530-5244 jkong@milbank.com Grant R. Mainland Associate 212-530-5251 gmainland@milbank.com Financial
More informationUpdate on Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP): Select Regulatory and Legislative Activity
Update on Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP): Select Regulatory and Legislative Activity A presentation to the Financial Service Committee of the Association of Corporate Counsel By: John T.
More informationU.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know
U.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know U.S. Regulatory/Compliance Orientation Program Institute of International Bankers Derek M. Bush December 5, 2016 2015 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
More informationFederal Banking Agencies Issue Recommendations as Part of Their Section 620 Report to Solidify the Safety and Soundness of the U.S.
Client Alert September 9, 2016 Federal Banking Agencies Issue Recommendations as Part of Their Section 620 Report to Solidify the Safety and Soundness of the U.S. Financial System On September 8, 2016,
More informationAGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 251 Regulation XX; Docket No. R 1489 RIN 7100 AE 18 Concentration Limits on Large Financial Companies AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act July 21, 2010 REVISIONS TO BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT, OTHER BANKING REFORMS AND FEDERAL BANK REGULATORY AGENCY RESTRUCTURING On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the
More informationStatement of Policy Regarding Illiquid Fund Investments Under Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act
Statement of Policy Regarding Illiquid Fund Investments Under Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act On February 8, 2011, the Board issued its final rule to implement the provisions of section 619
More informationRegulatory Implementation Slides
Regulatory Implementation Slides Table of Contents 1. Nonbank Financial Companies: Path to Designation as Systemically Important 2. Systemic Oversight of Bank Holding Companies 3. Systemic Oversight of
More informationCUNA Short Summary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (H.R. 4173; Public Law Number ) August 2, 2010
CUNA Short Summary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (H.R. 4173; Public Law Number 111-203) August 2, 2010 Here is a short summary highlighting the provisions of the Dodd-Frank
More informationTable of Contents CLICK ANY TITLE TO GO DIRECTLY TO THAT SECTION. SUBTITLE A: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Venable CFPB monitor Please contact our attorneys in our CFPB Task Force if you have any questions regarding this information. Table of Contents CLICK ANY TITLE TO GO DIRECTLY TO THAT SECTION Last updated
More informationComments on Volcker Rule Proposed Regulations
Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson Secretary Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20551 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 250 E Street, SW.
More informationRemoval of References to Credit Ratings in Certain Regulations Governing the Federal Home Loan Banks
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/08/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-26775, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 8070-01-P FEDERAL HOUSING
More informationOn July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank
S k a d d e n, A r p s, S l a t e, M e a g h e r & F l o m L L P & A f f i l i a t e s If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact the following attorneys
More informationS T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 7, Opinion No.
S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 20207 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37202 April 7, 2004 Opinion No. 04-059 Effect of Federal Banking Rules on State Predatory Lending Laws QUESTIONS
More informationNovember Private Education Loan Ombudsman ( 1035) 4.2 Private Education Loans and Private Education Lenders
This is the fourth in a series of user guides that will be published by Morrison & Foerster. The user guides provide an in depth discussion on specific topics raised by the Dodd-Frank Act. For our Dodd-Frank
More informationTHE SECURITIES AND CAPITAL MARKETS IMPLICATIONS OF THE REFORM OF THE U.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY
P A U L, W E I S S, R I F K I N D, W H A R T O N & G A R R I S O N THE SECURITIES AND CAPITAL MARKETS IMPLICATIONS OF THE REFORM OF THE U.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY MARK S. BERGMAN - MIRIAM S. KLEPNER
More informationDodd-Frank Alert: Regulators Take Center Stage
Dodd-Frank Alert: Regulators Take Center Stage Y:\VPC\Molly Porter\07 July\1007-001010\DLA TEMPLATES\Marketing Department Styles Template.doc FINANCIAL SERVICES REGULATORY REFORM SIGNED INTO LAW NEXT,
More informationPresident Signs Dodd-Frank Reform Legislation
May 31, 2018 President Signs Dodd-Frank Reform Legislation On May 24, following passage in both the House and Senate earlier this year, President Trump signed into law a financial services reform bill
More informationMEMORANDUM. Background
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Governmental Pension Plans Ice Miller (Mary Beth Braitman and Tom Walsh) DATE: September 23, 2001 RE: Analysis of the Duties Imposed by Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act on Public
More informationClient Update Bipartisan Consensus Emerges on Bank Regulatory Relief
1 Client Update Bipartisan Consensus Emerges on Bank Regulatory Relief On November 13, 2017, a bipartisan group of Senators announced their agreement on proposed legislation, the Economic Growth, Regulatory
More informationDodd-Frank Act Section PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES. [As amended by Omnibus Spending Bill]
Dodd-Frank Act Section 716 -- PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES. [As amended by Omnibus Spending Bill] (a) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. Notwithstanding any other provision
More informationBank Regulatory Relief To Become Law, Focus Shifts to Agencies
Debevoise In Depth Bank Regulatory Relief To Become Law, Focus Shifts to Agencies May 22, 2018 Earlier today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer
More informationUNITED STATES CODE TITLE 15. COMMERCE AND TRADE CHAPTER 94--PRIVACY SUBCHAPTER I--DISCLOSURE OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION
Privacy (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) Privacy (GLBA); Standards Safeguarding Customer Information (FTC) 2/22/2007 4:43:07 PM UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 15. COMMERCE AND TRADE CHAPTER 94--PRIVACY SUBCHAPTER I--DISCLOSURE
More informationHome Mortgage Disclosure Act; Regulation C; Official Staff Interpretations; HMDA FAQs
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 12. BANKS AND BANKING CHAPTER 29--HOME MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE 1/2/2011 7:35:47 PM WKFS CompliSource January 2011 Page: 1 1/2/2011 7:35:47 PM HMDA 12 USC
More informationThe Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Affiliate Transaction and Insider Lending Restrictions
July 2010 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Affiliate Transaction and Insider Lending Restrictions BY KEVIN L. PETRASIC Introduction The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street
More informationRe: Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests In, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds
Via Internet: www.regulations.gov February 13, 2012 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 250 E Street, S.W., Mail Stop 2-3 Washington, D.C. 20219 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20th
More informationNew Federal Initiatives Project. Federal Agencies Propose Rules on Incentive-Based Compensation at Financial Institutions By Matthew Furman*
New Federal Initiatives Project Federal Agencies Propose Rules on Incentive-Based Compensation at Financial Institutions By Matthew Furman* August 9, 2011 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy
More informationVIII 6.1. VIII. Privacy FCRA. Fair Credit Reporting Act 1. Introduction. Structure and Overview of Examination Modules.
Fair Credit Reporting Act 1 Introduction The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) (15 USC 1681-1681u) became effective on April 25, 1971. The FCRA is a part of a group of acts contained in the Federal Consumer
More informationRegulatory review RR
Regulatory review RR2012-01 January 12, 2012 REGULATORY REVIEW Table of Contents Final Rule Community Reinvestment Act Regulations... 1 Mortgage Acts and Practices Advertising (CFPB Regulation N) and Mortgage
More informationWall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 Federal Preemption August 6, 2010 Presented By Oliver Ireland and Joseph Gabai 2010 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com
More informationFEDERAL RESERVE APPROVES MERGER OF TRAVELERS AND CITICORP
FEDERAL RESERVE APPROVES MERGER OF TRAVELERS AND CITICORP SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 On September 23, 1998, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board ) approved
More informationCFPB Supervision and Examination Process
Background Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Act) 1 established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and authorizes it to supervise certain
More information1. The following terms used in this CA will have the following meaning:
COOPERATION ARRANGEMENT CONCERNING THE RESOLUTION OF INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER FINANCIAL COMPANIES WITH CROSS-BORDER OPERATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EUROPEAN BANKING UNION
More informationAntipasti -- A Tasting Menu of Regulatory Morsels Financial Regulatory Changes Thursday, April 28, :00 a.m. - 11:15 a.m.
2011 ANNUAL SPRING INVESTMENT FORUM American College of Investment Counsel Chicago, IL Antipasti -- A Tasting Menu of Regulatory Morsels Financial Regulatory Changes Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:00 a.m.
More informationSummary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Summary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act October 12, 2010 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act ) was signed into law on July 21, 2010.
More informationOverview of Foreign Bank Supervision in the United States
Overview of Foreign Bank Supervision in the United States November 27, 2012 U.S. Regulatory/Compliance Orientation IIB & CSBS Kwayne Jennings Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation International
More informationFederal Reserve Board Issues Comprehensive Affiliate Rules Under Sections 23A and 23B of Federal Reserve Act
The Derivatives Report June 2001 Federal Reserve Board Issues Comprehensive Affiliate Rules Under Sections 23A and 23B of Federal Reserve Act By Greg Lyons Financial Services Practice Group, Goodwin Procter
More informationDecember 21, Dear Chairman McWilliams, Comptroller Otting, Vice Chairman Quarles, Chairman McWatters, and Chairman Tonsager:
December 21, 2018 The Honorable Jelena McWilliams The Honorable J. Mark McWatters Chairman Chairman Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation National Credit Union Administration 550 17 th Street, NW 1775
More informationFederal Reserve Interim Final Rule Adopts Regulations for Savings and Loan Holding Companies
CLIENT MEMORANDUM September 7, 2011 Federal Reserve Interim Final Rule Adopts Regulations for Savings and Loan Holding Companies On August 12, 2011, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
More informationJANUARY 26, 2012 JANUARY 30, Contact. Treatment of bridge financing under the Volcker rule. Proprietary trading restrictions in the Volcker rule
JANUARY 26, 2012 February 8, 2012 JANUARY 30, 2012 Treatment of bridge financing under the Volcker rule There has been widespread concern in the loan markets that the Volcker rule, as it would be implemented
More informationU.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know
U.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know U.S. Regulatory/Compliance Orientation for Head Office, Recently Arrived Officers of International Banks and Representatives Who Would Benefit from a
More informationSEC PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES.
SEC. 716. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES. (a) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), no Federal assistance
More informationCFPB Consumer Laws and Regulation
Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act 1 The Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 2 () was enacted on July 30, 2008, and mandates a nationwide licensing and registration
More informationDodd-Frank Act: Derivatives as Credit Extensions of Banks
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVISORY & FINANCIAL REGULATORY CLIENT PUBLICATION August 16, 2010... Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives as Credit Extensions of Banks... Overview The regulation of the over-the-counter
More informationRe: Request for Information on Small-Dollar Lending (Docket No. FDIC ; RIN ZA04)
January 22, 2019 Via Electronic Mail Mr. Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 550 17 th Street NW Washington, DC 20429 Re: Request for Information on Small-Dollar
More informationComparison of the Frank and Dodd Bills
March 19, 2010 Congressional Watch: Senator Dodd Introduces Financial Stability Bill Calling for SEC Proxy Access Authority and Other Governance and Executive Compensation Reforms On March 15, 2010, Senator
More informationDodd-Frank Title VII: Reforms for the Swaps Marketplace
Dodd-Frank Title VII: Reforms for the Swaps Marketplace August 13, 2010 On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act ( Act ), which institutes sweeping reforms across the financial
More informationPurpose and Structure: Banks and Regulatory Agencies. 2013, Cerfis Group, Inc.
Bank Operations Institute Dallas, Texas October 13, 2013 Purpose and Structure: Banks and Regulatory Agencies Financial Intermediaries Commercial banks (community) Thrifts Savings banks Savings and Loans
More informationSenate Bill No. 81 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy
Senate Bill No. 81 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to financial institutions; converting state-chartered savings and loan associations to savings banks; providing for
More informationVolcker Rule: Hedging, Market Making and Regulatory Oversight January 14, 2014 Presented By Julian E. Hammar
2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Volcker Rule: Hedging, Market Making and Regulatory Oversight January 14, 2014 Presented By Julian E. Hammar Background On December 10, 2013, the
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act July 21, 2010 SYSTEMIC RISK REGULATION AND ORDERLY LIQUIDATION OF SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FIRMS On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
More informationFinal Rules & Studies (by DFA Section) April 30, 2012
Final Rules & Studies (by DFA Section) April 30, 2012 Publication Date Effective Date Action Type Description Topics DFA Reference 7/26/2011 N/A FSOC Report FSOC 2011 Annual Report. 4/11/2012 5/11/2012
More informationA Fiduciary Duty for Broker-Dealers?
2010 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com NY2-675943 A Fiduciary Duty for Broker-Dealers? (The Dodd-Frank Act) August 2010 Disclaimer Regulatory reform legislation (the Dodd-Frank Act)
More informationAGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury (OCC), Board of Governors of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/23/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-25400, and on govinfo.gov BILLING CODE: 4810-33-P; 6210-01-P;
More informationHouse Approves Financial CHOICE Act
June 12, 2017 House Approves Financial CHOICE Act On June 8, the House of Representatives passed a revised version of the Financial CHOICE Act (the Act, available here) in a 233-186 vote. The Act would
More informationISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol (ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol)
ISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol (ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol) ISDA has prepared this list of frequently asked questions to assist in your consideration of the ISDA U.S. STAY PROTOCOL. THESE FREQUENTLY
More information2017 DERIVATIVES END-USER RELIEF ACT DISCUSSION DRAFT
2017 DERIVATIVES END-USER RELIEF ACT DISCUSSION DRAFT Despite the efforts of many in Congress to provide end-users with relief from some of the costliest regulations promulgated under Title VII of the
More informationChapter 2: Government Policies and Regulation Test Bank Solutions Principles of Bank Management 8th Edition by Koch Multiple Choice
Chapter 2: Government Policies and Regulation Test Bank Solutions Principles of Bank Management 8th Edition by Koch Multiple Choice 1. Historically, a commercial bank was defined as a firm that: a. accepted
More informationPrivacy of Consumer Financial Information; Conforming Amendments under. SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission" 01'
BILLING CODE: 6351-01-P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 17 CFR Part 160 RIN 3038-AD13 Privacy of Consumer Financial Information; Conforming Amendments under Dodd-Frank Aet AGENCY: Commodity Futures
More informationImplementing the Obligations of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act The NAIC Model for State Privacy Regulation
Implementing the Obligations of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act The NAIC Model for State Privacy Regulation This memorandum provides an analysis of the provisions of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
More informationDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Key Issues for Savings Associations
1 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Key Issues for Savings Associations Financial Institutions Team Kilpatrick Stockton LLP July 27, 2010 Joseph P. Daly Christina M. Gattuso Aaron
More informationChapter 2 Government Policies and Regulation
Chapter 2 Government Policies and Regulation Multiple Choice 1. Historically, a commercial bank was defined as a firm that: a. accepted NOW accounts and made consumer loans. b. accepted demand deposits
More informationSome New Developments in Bank Securities Regulation. Martin E. Lybecker Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Washington, D.C.
Some New Developments in Bank Securities Regulation Martin E. Lybecker Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP Washington, D.C. A. If It Walks like a Duck, and If It Quacks like a Duck, It is a Barift
More informationRe: Re-proposal of Rules on Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements
December 17, 2015 The Honorable Thomas J. Curry Comptroller of the Currency Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ( OCC ) 400 7 th Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20219 The Honorable Janet L. Yellen Chair
More informationThe Volcker Rule : Proposals to Limit Speculative Proprietary Trading by Banks
The Volcker Rule : Proposals to Limit Speculative Proprietary Trading by Banks David H. Carpenter Legislative Attorney M. Maureen Murphy Legislative Attorney June 30, 2010 Congressional Research Service
More informationFederal Reserve System
Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LV Federal Reserve System Semiannual Regulatory Agenda VerDate Aug2004 10:45 May 09, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 D:\UAPRESS\UA050455.TXT APPS10 PsN:
More informationSEC Proposes Securities Offering and Disclosure Reforms for Business Development Companies and Registered Closed-End Funds
SEC Proposes Securities Offering and Disclosure Reforms for Business Development Companies and Registered Closed-End SEC Proposes an Overhaul of the Registration, Offering and Communications Processes
More informationPRIVACY OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL INFORMATION NEW FINAL RULES. By Russell J. Bruemmer and Franca E. Harris *
PRIVACY OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL INFORMATION NEW FINAL RULES By Russell J. Bruemmer and Franca E. Harris * The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") published its rule on Privacy of Consumer Financial Information
More informationRoadmap to the Dodd Frank: Rulemakings, Studies, and Reports
Roadmap to the Dodd Frank: makings, Studies, and s TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE 1 FINANCIAL STABILITY... 5 Subtitle A Financial Stability Oversight Council... 5 Subtitle B Office of Financial Research... 7
More informationUS Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING CHAPTER 40 INTERNATIONAL LENDING SUPERVISION
US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 12 - BANKS AND BANKING CHAPTER 40 INTERNATIONAL LENDING SUPERVISION Please Note: This compilation of the US Code, current as
More informationFEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. 12 CFR Part 223. [Regulation W; Docket No. R-1103] Transactions between Member Banks and their Affiliates
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 223 [Regulation W; Docket No. R-1103] Transactions between Member Banks and their Affiliates AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Final rule.
More informationA Brief Overview of the CFPB
A Brief Overview of the CFPB May 2011 Tara Sugiyama Potashnik tspotashnik@venable.com 2008 Venable LLP 1 Overview How we ended up with the CFPB Who is covered by the CFPB How the CFPB is structured CFPB
More informationRe: Creditor-Placed Insurance Model Act Comments of the American Bankers Insurance Association Concerning the Entire Model Act
MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW MADISON OFFICE BUILDING 1155 15 TH STREET, N.W. SUITE 1101 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 TELEPHONE (202) 659-3900 FAX (202) 659-5763 WWW.MCINTYRELF.COM Commissioner
More information(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2011 %change 2010 %change 2009
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2011 %change 2010 %change 2009 Profitability Net interest income $ 156,897 9.9 $ 142,757 8.7 $ 131,304 Provision for loan losses 4,515
More informationFederal Banking Agencies Implement Collins Amendment by Establishing Risk-Based Capital Floor
CLIENT MEMORANDUM June 23, 2011 Federal Banking Agencies Implement Collins Amendment by Establishing Risk-Based Capital Floor Pursuant to the Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve
More informationStatement of. James C. Sivon. Partner Barnett Sivon & Natter, PC. Before the Committee on Financial Services. Of the U.S. House of Representatives
Statement of James C. Sivon Partner Barnett Sivon & Natter, PC Before the Committee on Financial Services Of the U.S. House of Representatives July 25, 2007 Chairman Frank, Ranking Member Bachus, and
More informationClient alert. Federal Reserve s two-track approach to regulatory capital for insurers. kpmg.com
Client alert Federal Reserve s two-track approach to regulatory capital for insurers kpmg.com Executive summary Towards the end of May, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB or Federal
More informationAlert Memo. Changed Supervision of Savings and Loan Holding Companies and Savings Associations
Alert Memo SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 Changed Supervision of Savings and Loan Holding Companies and Savings Associations The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd- Frank ), transferred
More informationLEGAL ALERT. June 23, Financial Regulatory Reform A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Supervision and Regulation
LEGAL ALERT June 23, 2009 Financial Regulatory Reform A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Supervision and Regulation Potential Implications for Banks, Thrifts and Their Holding Companies The Obama Administration
More informationFEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO. Research Department Financial Markets Group. 230 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois U.S.A.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO Research Department Financial Markets Group 230 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. Working Paper No. PDP 2016-1 * September 2016 Resolving central counterparties
More informationRKL Regulatory Compliance Report for Financial Institutions
RKL for Financial Institutions September 2018 RKL s quarterly compliance report identifies proposed and finalized, federally issued consumer compliance/regulatory items. JULY FINAL ISSUANCES Date July
More informationAugust 7, Via Electronic Submission. Mr. Brent J. Fields Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE Washington, DC 20549
August 7, 2018 Via Electronic Submission Mr. Brent J. Fields Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE Washington, DC 20549 Re: Form CRS Relationship Summary; Amendments to Form ADV;
More information[Insert Name of investment banking firm] MASTER SELECTED DEALERS AGREEMENT
Final adopted version dated June 10, 2011 January 4, 2019 [Insert Name of investment banking firm] MASTER SELECTED DEALERS AGREEMENT REGISTERED SEC OFFERINGS AND EXEMPT OFFERINGS (OTHER THAN OFFERINGS
More informationOTC Derivatives Markets Act of 2009
OTC Derivatives Markets Act of 2009 November 10, 2009 Glenn Sarno, Joyce Xu and Daniel Bae OTC DMA Overview Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets Act of 2009 Highlights Establishes framework for comprehensive
More informationPublic Finance Client Alert
Public Finance Client Alert July 22, 2010 Regulation for the Short- and Long-Term: How Dodd-Frank Will Affect Municipal Securities The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd-Frank
More informationTESTIMONY OF GEORGE E. BURNS COMMISSIONER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA S.B. 81. Savings & Loan Statute Modernization.
TESTIMONY OF GEORGE E. BURNS COMMISSIONER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA On S.B. 81 Savings & Loan Statute Modernization Before the NEVADA LEGISLATURE Page 2 of 5 INTRODUCTION Existing
More informationDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act Signed
JULY 23, 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act Signed By: Raymond J. Gustini, Lloyd H. Spencer, William E. Kelly, Keith L. Krasney, Paulette J. Morgan, Barry M. Rothchild, and
More informationSUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is prescribing this final
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/24/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-05894, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 8070-01-P FEDERAL HOUSING
More informationFair Credit Reporting Act
Fair Credit Reporting Act Compliance Bankers for Compliance School DEPOSITS 2016 This publication is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding
More informationModel #785: 11/09/18 Draft Considered for Adoption by Reinsurance (E) Task Force Attachment Five
CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE MODEL LAW Preface to Credit for Reinsurance Models The amendments to the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model Law (#785) & Regulation (#786) are part of a larger effort to modernize
More informationRegulatory Practice Letter December 2013 RPL 13-20
Regulatory Practice Letter December 2013 RPL 13-20 Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio Proposal of U.S. Bank Regulators Executive Summary The Federal Reserve Board (Federal Reserve), the Office of the Comptroller
More informationSUMMARY: The FDIC is adopting a final rule ( Final Rule ) that amends its deposit insurance
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/13/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-22340, and on FDsys.gov 6714-01-P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
More information